Amphetamine discrimination: effects of dopamine receptor agonists

Dopamine and serotonin antagonists fail to alter the discriminative stimulus properties of ±methylenedioxymethamphetamine

Most studies on discriminative stimulus effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) have been conducted using a relatively low dose (1.5 mg/kg), and those studies have invariably implicated serotonergic mechanisms. In contrast, dopaminergic mechanisms mediate the discriminative stimulus effects of amphetamine (AMPH). Some studies have suggested that the discriminative stimulus effects of a higher (3.0 mg/kg) dose of MDMA might rely on both serotonergic and dopaminergic mechanisms. This study aimed to determine effects of selective dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5HT) antagonists on the discriminative stimulus properties of AMPH (0.5 mg/kg) and MDMA (3.0 mg/kg). Separate groups of rats were trained to discriminate AMPH (0.5 mg/kg) or MDMA (3.0 mg/kg) from saline using a food-reinforced drug-discrimination procedure. Effects of DA (SCH 23390: 0.003-0.03 mg/kg and eticlopride: 0.03-0.3 mg/kg) or 5HT (ritanserin: 1.0-10.0 mg/kg, WAY-100635: 0.3-1.0 mg/kg and GR129375: 1.0-3.0 mg/kg) antagonists on the discriminative stimulus effects of both drugs were determined. Both DA antagonists dose-dependently decreased the AMPH but not the MDMA discrimination. None of the 5HT antagonists altered the discriminative stimulus effects of either drug. The MDMA (3.0 mg/kg) stimulus comprises both a DAergic and 5HTergic response, and the results suggest that either one is sufficient, but not required, to maintain the stimulus effects.

Dopamine D1 receptor stimulation modulates the formation and retrieval of novel object recognition memory: Role of the prelimbic cortex

Previous studies have shown that dopamine D1 receptor antagonists impair novel object recognition memory but the effects of dopamine D1 receptor stimulation remain to be determined. This study investigated the effects of the selective dopamine D1 receptor agonist SKF81297 on acquisition and retrieval in the novel object recognition task in male Wistar rats. SKF81297 (0.4 and 0.8 mg/kg s.c.) given 15 min before the sampling phase impaired novel object recognition evaluated 10 min or 24 h later. The same treatments also reduced novel object recognition memory tested 24 h after the sampling phase and when given 15 min before the choice session. These data indicate that D1 receptor stimulation modulates both the encoding and retrieval of object recognition memory. Microinfusion of SKF81297 (0.025 or 0.05 μg/side) into the prelimbic sub-region of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in this case 10 min before the sampling phase also impaired novel object recognition memory, suggesting that the mPFC is one important site mediating the effects of D1 receptor stimulation on visual recognition memory.

Differential substitution for the discriminative stimulus effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and methylphenidate in rats

Previous studies have demonstrated that methylphenidate, MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine), and other psychostimulants exert stimulant-like subjective effects in humans. Furthermore, MDMA and methylphenidate substitute for the discriminative stimulus effects of psychostimulants, such as amphetamine and cocaine, in animals, which suggests that MDMA and methylphenidate may produce similar discriminative stimulus effects in rats. However, there is no evidence regarding the similarities between the discriminative stimulus effects of MDMA and methylphenidate. To explore this issue, cross-substitution, substitution, and combination tests were conducted in rats that had been trained to discriminate between MDMA (2.5 mg/kg) or methylphenidate (5.0 mg/kg) and saline. In the cross-substitution tests, MDMA and methylphenidate did not cross-substitute for each other. In the substitution test, methamphetamine substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of methylphenidate, but not for those of MDMA. Furthermore, ephedrine and bupropion, which activate dopaminergic and noradrenergic systems, substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of methylphenidate. On the other hand, serotonin (5-HT) receptor agonists 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 fully substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of MDMA. These results suggest that activation of the noradrenergic and dopaminergic systems is important for the discriminative stimulus effects of methylphenidate, whereas activation of the serotonergic system is crucial for the discriminative stimulus effects of MDMA. Even though MDMA, like psychostimulants, exerts stimulant-like effects, our findings clearly indicate that the discriminative stimulus effects of MDMA are distinctly different from those of other psychostimulants in rats.

The role of dopaminergic transmission through D1-like and D2-like receptors in amphetamine-induced rat ultrasonic vocalizations

RATIONALE

Systemic amphetamine (AMPH) administration increases the rate of 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) in adult rats and preferentially enhances the 'trill' subtype; these effects of AMPH critically depend on noradrenergic transmission, but the possible contributions of dopamine are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the role of dopamine in 50-kHz USVs emitted drug-free and following systemic AMPH administration.

METHODS

Adult male Long-Evans rats pre-selected for high AMPH-induced calling rates were tested with AMPH (1 mg/kg, intraperitoneal (IP)) and saline following pretreatment with the following dopamine receptor antagonists: SCH 23390 (0.005-0.02 mg/kg, subcutaneous (SC)), SCH 39166 (0.03-0.3 mg/kg, SC), haloperidol (0.1, 0.2 mg/kg, IP), sulpiride (20-80 mg/kg, SC), raclopride (0.1-0.5 mg/kg, SC), clozapine (4 mg/kg, SC), risperidone (0.5 mg/kg, SC), and pimozide (1 mg/kg, IP). The dopamine and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (GBR 12909 and nisoxetine, respectively) were also tested, alone and in combination.

RESULTS

SCH 23390, SCH 39166, haloperidol, and raclopride dose-dependently inhibited vocalizations under AMPH and suppressed the proportion of trill calls. Sulpiride, however, had no discernable effect on call rate or profile, even at a high dose that reduced locomotor activity. Single doses of clozapine, risperidone, and pimozide all markedly decreased calling under saline and AMPH. Finally, GBR 12909 and nisoxetine failed to promote 50-kHz USVs detectably or alter the subtype profile, when tested alone or in combination.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of 50-kHz USVs and the call subtype profile following systemic AMPH administration depends on dopaminergic neurotransmission through D1-like and D2-like receptors. However, inhibiting dopamine and/or noradrenaline reuptake appears insufficient to induce calling.

Role of dopamine D2 and D3 receptors in mediating the U-50,488H discriminative cue: comparison with methamphetamine and cocaine

Substitutions of the dopamine D(2) or D(3) receptor agonists for the discriminative stimulus effect induced by U-50,488H, methamphetamine (METH) and cocaine in rats were examined. The D(2) receptor agonist R-propylnorapomorphine [(-)-NPA] failed to substitute for U-50,488H cue, while the D(3) receptor-preferred agonist (+/-)-7-hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin hydrobromide (7-OH-DPAT) produced dose-related increases in drug-appropriate responding up to 0.03 mg/kg, which fully substituted. At doses greater than 0.03 mg/kg of 7-OH-DPAT, there was a dose-dependent decrease in the percentage of responses on the U-50,488H-appropriate lever. Furthermore (-)-NPA and 7-OH-DPAT at high doses substituted for the discriminative stimulus effect induced by both METH and cocaine, indicating that 7-OH-DPAT at high doses may interact with D(2) receptors. These results suggest that the stimulation of D(2) receptor may be critical for the production of the discriminative stimulus effect induced by METH and cocaine, whereas the stimulation of D(3) receptor may contribute to the production of the U-50,488H cue.

Aripiprazole attenuates the discriminative-stimulus and subject-rated effects of D-amphetamine in humans

The results of animal research suggest that the use of partial agonists at dopamine (DA) D2 receptors may be an effective strategy for the treatment of stimulant dependence. Aripiprazole is an atypical antipsychotic that has partial agonist activity at D2 receptors. In this experiment, seven human participants with a history of nontherapeutic stimulant use learned to discriminate 15 mg oral D-amphetamine. After acquiring the discrimination (ie > or =80% correct responding on four consecutive sessions), the effects of a range of doses of D-amphetamine (0, 2.5, 5, 10, and 15 mg), alone and in combination with aripiprazole (0 and 20 mg), were assessed. D-Amphetamine alone functioned as a discriminative stimulus, produced prototypical subject-rated drug effects (eg increased ratings of Active, Alert, Energetic) and elevated cardiovascular indices. These effects were generally a function of dose. Aripiprazole alone did not occasion D-amphetamine-appropriate responding or produce subject-rated effects, but modestly impaired performance. Administration of aripiprazole significantly attenuated the discriminative-stimulus and cardiovascular effects of D-amphetamine, as well as some of the subject-rated drug effects. These data are consistent with previous preclinical findings and suggest that DA partial agonists deserve further evaluation as potential pharmacotherapies in the management of stimulant dependence. Future studies should investigate the ability of aripiprazole or related compounds to attenuate the behavioral effects of stimulants associated with a greater degree of dependence, such as methamphetamine or cocaine, in dependent individuals.

Effects of dopamine D1 ligands on eye blinking in monkeys: efficacy, antagonism, and D1/D2 interactions

Dopamine D1 ligands have been classified and ordered according to efficacy in both in vitro and in vivo studies. In the present experiments, dopamine D1 ligands reported to differ in in vitro efficacy were evaluated for efficacy-related effects on eye blinking in squirrel monkeys. Additional comparisons were made with the effects of D2 receptor agonists and indirect dopamine agonists. The results show that D1 agonists increased eye blinking in an efficacy-related manner, whereas the D1 receptor blocker SCH 39166 [(-)-trans-6,7,7alpha,8,9,13beta-hexahydro-3-chloro-2-hydroxy-N-methyl-5H-benzo[d]naphtho[2,1-b]azepine] only decreased rates of eye blinking. D1 high-efficacy agonists induced rates of eye blinking that were 2- to 3-fold greater than observed with dopamine D2 agonists and indirect agonists. In drug combination experiments, increases in eye blinking induced by the D1 high-efficacy agonist R-(+)-6-Br-APB [R-(+)-6-bromo-7,8-dihydroxy-3-allyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrobromide] were antagonized by both the D1 antagonist SCH 39166 and the lower efficacy agonist SKF 83959 [6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-3-methyl-1-(3-methylphenyl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrobromide], consistent with dopamine D1 receptor mediation of these behavioral effects. The dopamine D2 agonist (+)-PHNO [(+)-N-propyl-hydroxynaphthoxazine], which selectively activates dopamine D2 receptors, also attenuated D1 agonist-induced increase in eye blinking, suggesting that D2 receptor actions may inhibit D1-mediated increases in eye blinking. Overall, eye blink rate appears to be a robust behavioral measure that can be used to measure changes in dopaminergic D1 signaling and as a functional assay of agonist efficacy at dopamine D1 receptors.

Modulation of the stimulus effects of (+)amphetamine by the 5-HT6 antagonist MS-245

5-HT(6) serotonin receptors are distributed within some dopamine terminal regions in the brain leading to suggestions that they might influence dopaminergic function. In the present study, the 5-HT(6) antagonist 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyl-N(1)-benzenesulfonyltryptamine (MS-245) was without effect when administered (3.0-7.5 mg/kg) to rats trained to discriminate (+)amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg) from saline vehicle in a two-lever drug discrimination task. Administered in combination, 0.3 mg/kg (i.e., the ED(50) dose) of (+)amphetamine plus 5.0 mg/kg of MS-245 elicited 95% amphetamine-appropriate responding. Similar studies were conducted using rats trained to discriminate cocaine (8.0 mg/kg) from saline vehicle, but a combination of 2.0 mg/kg (i.e., the ED(50) dose) of cocaine together with relatively low doses of MS-245 resulted in the percent response (approximately 50%) expected from administration of this dose of cocaine or in disruption of the animals' behavior. The present results confirm findings from other laboratories that 5-HT(6) antagonists can modulate amphetamine-induced behavioral actions, and further extend these findings to an example of a different structural class of 5-HT(6) antagonists and to a different behavioral paradigm. Taken together, the data suggest that 5-HT(6) serotonin agents (or at least MS-245) could have potential clinical application in therapies that involve modulation of dopamine neurotransmission.

Selectivity of (3)H-MADAM binding to 5-hydroxytryptamine transporters in vitro and in vivo in mice; correlation with behavioural effects

1. Binding of the novel radioligand (3)H-2-(2-dimethylaminomethyl-phenylsulphanyl)-5-methyl-phenylamine ((3)H-MADAM) to the serotonin transporter (SERT) was used to characterise a range of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in vitro and in vivo. 2. (3)H-MADAM bound with high affinity in a saturable manner to both human SERT expressed in CHO cells (K(d)=0.20 nm (pK(d)=9.74+/-0.12), B(max)=35+/-4 fmol mg(-1) protein) and mouse cerebral cortex membranes (K(d)=0.21 nm (pK(d)=9.66+/-0.10), B(max)=50+/-24 fmol mg(-1) protein). 3. Binding of (3)H-MADAM was highly selective for SERT in vitro as demonstrated by the in vitro profile of MADAM tested at 75 different receptors, ion channels and transporters. This was further substantiated by the pharmacological profile of the binding. Hence, the binding of (3)H-MADAM was potently inhibited by SSRIs but not by selective inhibitors of noradrenaline transport and dopamine transport. Likewise, a 5-HT(2A/2C) receptor antagonist did not inhibit (3)H-MADAM binding. 4. (3)H-MADAM binding in vivo was inhibited only by compounds which also inhibited the binding of (3)H-MADAM in vitro (the SSRIs, mixed SERT/noradrenaline transport inhibitors and clomipramine), confirming the selectivity of (3)H-MADAM for SERT also in vivo. Moreover, compounds effective in inhibiting (3)H-MADAM binding were the only ones found to be active in the mouse 5-HTP potentiation test confirming the model as a behavioural correlate to in vivo 5-HT uptake. 5. Finally, it was found that a SERT occupancy of 85-95% was necessary to produce 50% of the maximum behavioural response (ED(50)).

Amphetamine reinstates polydipsia induced by chronic exposure to quinpirole, a dopaminergic D2 agonist, in rats

The hypothesis that the combined activation of D1 and D2 dopaminergic receptors is instrumental in inducing amphetamine (AMPH)-mediated hyperdipsia was tested in rats. The D1 agonist SKF-38393 (SKF) and the D2 agonist quinpirole (QNP) were i.p. injected, alone or in combination, to male rats for 10 days. After 2 days of wash-out, a single dose of AMPH (3 mg/kg) was administered. Intake of water and food and diuresis were daily measured at 2, 5 and 24 h. In two further experiments the higher dose of QNP (0.56 mg/kg) was given with two different doses of the D1 antagonist SCH-23390 (SCH), or, respectively, of the peripheral D2 antagonist domperidone (DMP). In a fourth experiment, the possibility that QNP, given alone or in combination with SKF, produces an AMPH-like internal state was evaluated by using a drug-discrimination paradigm. Results show that chronic administration of QNP produced a significant increase of 24 h water intake that was reinstated by AMPH. This QNP effect was only partially prevented by DMP, suggesting a main central mechanism of action. By itself D1 receptor manipulation did not affect water intake, but influenced QNP polydipsia that, accordingly, was enhanced by the lower dose of SKF (0.3 mg/kg) and inhibited by the lower dose of SCH (0.01 mg/kg). In rats trained to discriminate AMPH from solvent, QNP partially generalized for the AMPH stimulus, an effect that was potentiated by SKF. In conclusion, a D1-modulated sensitization of D2 dopaminergic mechanisms is probably involved in AMPH-induced hyperdipsia.

Investigations into the nature of a 7-OH-DPAT discriminative cue: comparison with D-amphetamine

In the present study, separate squads of rats were trained to discriminate either the dopamine D3 receptor preferring ligand 7-hydroxy-2-(di-N-propylamino)-tetralin (7-OH-DPAT) (0.03 mg/kg) from saline, or D-amphetamine (0.3 mg/kg) from saline using a standard operant schedule (FR10 schedule reinforcement). Following stable acquisition of responding, tests of generalisation and antagonism were conducted. A number of dopamine agonists having high dopamine D2-like receptor (D2, D3 or D4) affinity generalised to the 7-OH-DPAT, but not amphetamine, cue. The dopamine D2/3 receptor agonist SKF38393 showed no generalisation to either drug cue. Subsequent correlational analysis suggested that this effect was most likely mediated through the dopamine D3 receptor. The dopamine D2/3 receptor antagonist raclopride significantly attenuated both cues. The failure of these drugs to generalise to amphetamine, suggest that there is little involvement of the dopamine D3 receptor subtype in mediating its discriminative stimulus properties.

Dopamine receptors: molecular biology, biochemistry and behavioural aspects

The description of new dopamine (DA) receptor subtypes, D1-(D1 and D5) and D2-like (D2A, D2B, D3, D4), has given an impetus to DA research. While selective agonists and antagonists are not generally available yet, the receptor distribution in the brain suggests that they could be new targets for drug development. Binding characteristics and second messenger coupling has been explored in cell lines expressing the new cloned receptors. The absence of selective ligands has meant that in vivo studies have lagged behind. However, progress has been made in understanding the function of DA-containing discrete brain nuclei and the functional consequence of the DA's interaction with other neurotransmitters. This review explores some of the latest advances in these various areas.

Effects of methamphetamine, dopamine and noradrenaline administered into the nucleus accumbens of rats discriminating subcutaneous methamphetamine

Since the nucleus accumbens has been hypothesized to centrally mediate the discriminative effects of psychomotor stimulants, the discriminative effects of methamphetamine (MA) as well as dopamine (DA) and noradrenaline (NA) were observed by intracerebral administration of these drugs into the nucleus accumbens in rats discriminating subcutaneous MA from saline. These rats were trained and maintained to discriminate between MA at 0.5 mg/kg, s.c. and saline under a fixed ratio 10 schedule for food reinforcement in a 2-lever operant chamber situation. Guide cannulae were implanted bilaterally into the nucleus accumbens. In the substitution tests, the drug was administered into the nucleus accumbens. MA at 10 micrograms per rat substituted for subcutaneous MA in 4 out of 5 rats but neither DA at 10-40 micrograms per rat (n = 7) nor NA at 10-40 micrograms per rat (n = 4) substituted for subcutaneous MA. On the other hand, the same drugs administered into the nucleus accumbens induced increased spontaneous motor activity as also observed in six other untrained rats. MA, DA or NA alone each at 10 micrograms per rat increased spontaneous motor activity. The discriminative effects of MA are considered to be mediated in the nucleus accumbens of rats. Although DA or NA alone administered into the nucleus accumbens showed similar increasing motor activity effects as those of MA, the discriminative effects of exogenous DA or NA alone administered into the same brain area were different from those of MA in the present experimental condition.

D-amphetamine-like stimulus properties are produced by morphine injections into the ventral tegmental area but not into the nucleus accumbens

We investigated whether injections of morphine into the ventral tegmental area (VTA) or the nucleus accumbens (NAS) could produce amphetamine-like stimulus properties and locomotor stimulant effects. Rats were trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg D-amphetamine from saline using both VI-30 and FR-16 reinforcement schedules and they were then tested following bilateral injections of morphine sulfate (2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 micrograms/side) either into the VTA or the NAS. Intra-VTA injections of morphine produced significant increases in amphetamine-lever responding that were comparable to increases observed following intra-NAS D-amphetamine (2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 micrograms/side). Such increases were not observed, however, following intra-NAS injections of morphine. Tests for the effects of intracerebral morphine and D-amphetamine on locomotor activity produced a similar pattern of results. Locomotor activity was increased following intra-VTA morphine and intra-NAS D-amphetamine injections, but not after intra-NAS morphine injections. Together, these findings indicate that activation of opioid receptors within the VTA, but not the NAS, can produce a behavioral state which mimics to some degree the state produced by systemic and intra-NAS injections of D-amphetamine.

Effects of the dopamine release inhibitor, CGS 10746B, on the locomotor stimulant and discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and methamphetamine

CGS 10746B or 5-(4-methyl-1 piperazinyl)-imadazo[2,1-b]1,3,5]benzothiadiazepine maleate is a clozapine analog that, unlike clozapine, produces decreases in neostriatal dopamine release without changing dopamine metabolism or occupying D2 receptors. CGS 10746B also blocks neuronal impulse flow. The ability of this atypical antipsychotic candidate to alter the discriminative stimulus effects induced by cocaine or methamphetamine in rats or the stimulation of locomotor activity in mice was evaluated. A range of doses of CGS 10746B was tested against maximally effective doses of the psychomotor stimulants. Although CGS 10746B completely blocked the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine and methamphetamine, it also decreased spontaneous activity in mice over the same dose range. Rats were trained to discriminate 10 mg/kg cocaine or 1 mg/kg methamphetamine from saline. The discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine or methamphetamine were not blocked by CGS 10746B. Thus, in contrast to other potential atypical antipsychotic compounds (e.g., D1 receptor antagonists), CGS 10746B does not appear to produce selective blockade of these behavioral effects of psychomotor stimulant compounds.

Mediation of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the effects of GBR 12909 on latent learning and locomotor activity in mice

We investigated the involvement of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor subtypes in the effects of GBR 12909, a selective dopamine uptake inhibitor, on latent learning in the performance of a water-finding task and on locomotor activity in mice. GBR 12909 (10 and 20 mg/kg) impaired latent learning, and this effect was counteracted by the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, (-)-sulpiride (20 and 40 mg/kg), but not by the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, SCH 23390 (0.025 and 0.05 mg/kg). The dopamine D2 receptor agonist, quinpirole (0.5 and 1 mg/kg) and the dopamine D1 receptor agonist, SKF 38393 (20 mg/kg) impaired latent learning, but both effects were less than that of GBR-12909. The effect of quinpirole, but not of GBR 12909, on latent learning was potentiated by combination with SKF 38393. In contrast to its effect on learning, SCH 23390 (0.025 and 0.05 mg/kg) was more effective to suppress the stimulant effect of GBR 12909 on locomotor activity than was (-)-sulpiride (40 and 80 mg/kg). These findings suggest that both dopamine D1 and D2 receptors play an important role in the action of endogenously released dopamine in latent learning and locomotor activity, and that while the dopamine D2 receptor is involved predominantly in latent learning, both dopamine D1 and D2 receptors play a critical role in locomotor activity.

Repeated stimulation of D1 dopamine receptors causes time-dependent alterations in the sensitivity of both D1 and D2 dopamine receptors within the rat striatum

Recent evidence suggests that repeated stimulation of D1 dopamine receptors within the rat striatum leads to an enhancement of both D1 and D2 dopamine receptor-mediated responses. The present study used both behavioral observations and extracellular single unit recording techniques to investigate this phenomenon following repeated administration of selective D1 dopamine receptor agonists. Groups of rats received twice daily administration of either saline or the partial D1 dopamine receptor agonist SKF 38393 (8 mg/kg, s.c.) for three weeks. Rats were tolerant to the ability of SKF 38393 to enhance grooming behavior when tested immediately following the last of the 42 treatment injections. However, the ability of this last SKF 38393 injection to potentiate oral stereotyped behavior following administration of the D2 DA agonist quinpirole was still evident. Following a one-day withdrawal, grooming responses to SKF 38393 had returned to normal. At this time, administration of quinpirole, without concomitant SKF 38393, failed to significantly promote oral stereotypies, as is typical of normal rats. Following a one-week withdrawal period, SKF 38393-induced grooming behavior was significantly enhanced and quinpirole, administered without SKF 38393, produced pronounced oral stereotyped behavior in 10 of 12 rats tested. Following a one-month withdrawal, these sensitized responses were no longer evident. Single-cell recordings from rat lateral striatal neurons revealed similar time-dependent alterations in the effects of iontophoretically administered SKF 38393 and quinpirole. Current-response curves revealed that, without a withdrawal period, striatal neurons were subsensitive to the inhibitory effects of SKF 38393 but not quinpirole. The decreased inhibitory responses of striatal neurons to SKF 38393 returned to normal levels after a one-day withdrawal. Following a one-week withdrawal, the effects of both agonists were significantly greater than that in saline-treated controls. Normosensitivity was evident following a one-month withdrawal. Repeated administration of the full D1 DA agonist SKF 81297 (0.5 mg/kg, s.c., twice daily) also resulted in sensitized responses of striatal neurons following a one-week withdrawal, demonstrating that the sensitization to SKF 38393 was not due to its partial agonist character. The present findings provide both behavioral and electrophysiological evidence that repeated stimulation of D1 dopamine receptors results in a brief subsensitivity, followed by transient sensitization of the D1 receptors. The enhanced effects of D2 dopamine agonists might be due to an enhanced synergism (enabling) produced by endogenous dopamine stimulating supersensitive D1 receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Dopamine receptor occupancy in vivo: behavioral correlates using NNC-112, NNC-687 and NNC-756, new selective dopamine D1 receptor antagonists

The ability of dopamine D2, mixed D1/D2 and selective D1 receptor antagonists, including NNC-112, NNC-687, NNC-756, to inhibit the in vivo binding of [3H]SCH 23390 or [3H]raclopride to dopamine receptors was studied in mice and rats. Furthermore, the dopamine-antagonistic effects of these drugs were also studied in various behavioral models. Significant levels of in vivo receptor blockade were required for antagonism of typical dopamine agonist-mediated behaviors. However, fewer D1 than D2 receptors had to be blocked to produce similar antagonistic effects. Thus, there may be a greater receptor reserve for D2 receptors than for D1 receptors.

Partial and full dopamine D1 receptor agonists in mice and rats: relation between behavioural effects and stimulation of adenylate cyclase activity in vitro

The dopamine (DA) D1 agonists, SK&F 83959, SK&F 75670, SK&F 38993, SK&F 81297 and SK&F 80723, had variable abilities to stimulate adenylate cyclase activity in rat striatal homogenates. Their efficacies, in relation to the effect of 100 microM DA were 0, 33, 69, 68 and 81%, respectively. In rats, all compounds induced (1) contralateral circling behaviour after unilateral 6-hydroxy-DA lesions, (2) ipsilateral circling behaviour after midbrain hemitransection after cotreatment with the D2 agonist quinpirole and (3) oral stereotypies after their combination with quinpirole. Maximum effects and rank order of potencies were similar in the three test models. In mice SK&F 83959, SK&F 75670 and SK&F 38393 inhibited methylphenidate-induced gnawing behaviour and induced no or only weak hypermotility. SK&F 81297 induced marked hypermotility which was partially inhibited by SK&F 83959 and SK&F 75670 and was completely blocked by the D1 antagonist, SCH 23390. It is concluded that no relation could be demonstrated between the efficacy to stimulate adenylate cyclase and to induce circling behaviours and stereotypies in rats. In contrast, a relation between biochemical and behavioural efficacies was found in the mouse models. The results suggest that different subtypes of D1 receptors mediate the behavioural effects reported in this study.

Effects of dopamine receptor agonists on passive avoidance learning in mice: interaction of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors

The present study examined the effects of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor agonists on the acquisition stage of passive avoidance learning and on locomotor activity in mice. The D2 agonist, RU 24213 (1-10 mg/kg s.c.), and the non-selective agonist, apomorphine (0.3-3 mg/kg s.c.), but not the D1 agonist, SKF 38393 (1-10 mg/kg s.c.), impaired learning and activated locomotion. RU 24213 (1 mg/kg s.c.) was more effective in impairing learning than in activating locomotion. The concurrent administration of SKF 38393 (10 mg/kg i.p.) and RU 24213 (1 and 3 mg/kg s.c.) produced a synergistic effect in both behavioral situations. The D1 antagonist, SCH 23390 (0.025 mg/kg i.p.), slightly inhibited the effects of apomorphine and of the combination of SKF 38393 and RU 24213 on learning but not on locomotion. The D2 antagonist, (-)-sulpiride (40 mg/kg i.p.), completely blocked these effects in both situations. These results suggest that dopamine receptor agonists impair passive avoidance learning through the D2 receptor, and that D1 and D2 receptors act synergistically in this impairment, as they do in their effects on locomotion. The involvement of D1 and D2 receptors is qualitatively similar in each of these behaviors, although some small differences may exist.

Role of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in mediating the d-amphetamine discriminative cue

The role of D1 and D2 dopamine (DA) receptors in mediating the discriminative cue produced by d-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg) in rats has been assessed by using compounds which exert strong selectivity for each of these DA receptor subtypes. The D2 agonists quinpirole and RU 24213 substituted completely for d-amphetamine, while the D1 agonists SKF 38393 and SKF 81297 failed to exert such effects. On the other hand, the D2 antagonists raclopride and YM 09151-2, and D1 antagonists SCH 23390 and SKF 83566, all completely blocked d-amphetamine discrimination. The D2 antagonists produced more pronounced inhibitory effects on response rate than did D1 antagonists. Quinpirole substitution for d-amphetamine was blocked by YM 09151-2, but not by SCH 23390, while the locomotor stimulatory effect of quinpirole was inhibited by both drugs. The present findings confirm that D2 receptors play a primary role in the d-amphetamine discriminative cue, while the precise role of D1 receptors remains to be disclosed.

Relationship between D1 dopamine receptors, adenylate cyclase, and the electrophysiological responses of rat nucleus accumbens neurons

The electrophysiological effects of three selective D1 dopamine (DA) receptor agonists, which exhibit different potencies and efficacies for stimulation of adenylate cyclase, were compared in the rat nucleus accumbens (NAc) using single unit recording and microiontophoretic techniques. The partial agonists SKF75670 and SKF38393, and the full agonist SKF81297 produced nearly identical current-response curves for the inhibition of firing of NAc neurons. In rats acutely depleted of DA by alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine (AMPT) pretreatment, all three D1 agonists enabled the inhibition of firing produced by the selective D2 receptor agonist quinpirole, with SKF38393 exerting the greatest efficacy, followed by SKF81297 and SKF75670. Thus, no apparent relationship was found between the previously reported ability of these compounds to stimulate cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production and their ability either to inhibit the firing of NAc neurons or to enable quinpirole-mediated inhibition of firing in DA-depleted rats. In addition, the membrane-permeable cAMP analog 8-bromo-cAMP also caused a current-dependent inhibition of the firing of NAc neurons, but failed to enable quinpirole-mediated inhibition in AMPT-pretreated animals. These results suggest either that only a small percentage of D1 receptors need to be stimulated to produce these electrophysiological effects, or that D1 receptors exist within the rat NAc which are linked to transduction mechanisms other than, or in addition to, adenylate cyclase.

Characterization of tiagabine (NO-328), a new potent and selective GABA uptake inhibitor

Tiagabine (NO-328) (R(-)-N-[4,4-bis(3-methylthien-2-yl)but-3-enyl]nipecotic acid, hydrochloride) is a new centrally acting GABA uptake inhibitor. The anticonvulsant activity of tiagabine was evaluated against seizures induced by methyl 6,7-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate (DMCM), pentylenetetrazol, bicuculline, maximal electrostimulation (MES), or high intensity sound. The sedative actions of tiagabine were evaluated in tests for traction, rotarod performance and exploratory behavior. Finally, interoceptive properties of tiagabine were assessed using diazepam-, CGS 9896-, pentylenetetrazol-, or amphetamine-discriminating rats. Tiagabine was an effective anticonvulsant in doses which did not produce sedation or motor debilitation, although it was not potent against MES. In a manner similar to other anti-epileptic drugs, tiagabine potentiated dopaminergic function (methylphenidate-induced gnawing in mice) although it did not substitute for amphetamine in amphetamine-trained animals. Furthermore, although tiagabine antagonized DMCM-induced convulsions, it exhibited neither CGS 9896 or diazepam-like interoceptive effects, nor did it block (or potentiate) pentylenetetrazol-discrimination. Thus, GABA uptake inhibition represents a novel rationale for a valproate-like anticonvulsant drug therapy.

Evidence that dopamine in the nucleus accumbens is involved in the ability of rats to switch to cue-directed behaviours

Recently we have reported that injections of d-amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens enhanced the number of switches to cue-directed behaviours without an effect on the number of switches to non-cue-directed behaviours in a swimming test. In the present study we investigated to what extent this effect is mediated via the dopaminergic system in the nucleus accumbens. For that purpose drugs selective for D1- and D2-receptors were studied in this swimming test. It was found that the selective D2-agonist LY 171 555 (50 ng/0.5 microliters) enhanced the number of different cue-directed behaviours. The selective D2-antagonist raclopride (50 ng/0.5 microliters) decreased it. Furthermore an ineffective dose of raclopride attenuated the effect of LY 171 555. Both the selective D1-antagonist SCH 23390 (400 ng/0.5 microliters) and the selective D1-agonist SKF 38393 (50-400 ng/0.5 microliters) decreased the number of different cue-directed behaviours. The effect induced by SCH 23390 could not be blocked by SKF 38393. Similarly the effect induced by SKF could not be attenuated by SCH 23390. These data point to a role for dopamine D2-receptors in the ability to switch to cue-directed behaviours. The present findings do not yet allow the conclusion that D1-receptors are involved.

Dopamine D1 and D2 mediation of the discriminative stimulus properties of d-amphetamine and cocaine

Evidence suggests that stimulants such as d-amphetamine and cocaine act presynaptically by increasing the amount of dopamine (DA) available to stimulate postsynaptic DA receptors. Since two subpopulations of DA receptors (D1 and D2) exist, we investigated the role of both of these receptor subtypes in mediating the internal "state" produced by these stimulants. Two groups of rats (N = 8/group) were trained to discriminate intraperitoneal (IP) injections of either d-amphetamine (1 mg/kg) or cocaine (10 mg/kg) from saline in a two-lever, water-reinforced, drug discrimination task. After stable performance was established (i.e., more than 85% correct under each training condition), substitution and combination tests were conducted with selective D1 and D2 agonists and antagonists. The D2 agonist quinpirole (0.0313-0.125 mg/kg) mimicked both stimulant cues while the D1 agonist SKF 38393 (5-20 mg/kg) substituted partially for cocaine but not d-amphetamine. Combination tests with DA antagonists indicated that both the D1 antagonist SCH 23390 (0.0063-0.25 mg/kg) and the D2 antagonist haloperidol (0.125-0.5 mg/kg) attenuated the effects of both stimulants; in addition, the substitution of cocaine (20 mg/kg) for d-amphetamine was blocked by both DA antagonists. The ability of both D1 and D2 antagonists to attenuate the stimulus effects of d-amphetamine and cocaine raises the possibility that a synergistic ("enabling") interaction between D1 and D2 receptors may modulate stimulant cues.

Dopamine receptor agonists: selectivity and dopamine D1 receptor efficacy

Dopamine receptor selectivity was investigated for a number of dopamine receptor agonists. In vitro, the benzazepine derivatives, e.g., SKF 38393 and SKF 75670 as well as the isoquinoline derivatives, SKF 89626 and SKF 89615, were D1 receptor-selective. All other compounds like apomorphine, CY 208-243, 6,7-ADTN and 3-PPP were either D2-selective or did not discriminate between subtypes. In general, the same receptor profile seen in vitro was observed in vivo. The exceptions to this pattern were: compounds which did not cross the blood-brain barrier, like 6,7-ADTN and SKF 89626, and compounds which appeared nonselective in vitro but demonstrated D2 selectivity in vivo like apomorphine, CI 201-678 and CY 208-243. A number of compounds were characterized in detail with respect to a GTP-induced affinity shift in inhibition of [3H]SCH 23390 binding, and potency and efficacy in stimulating adenylate cyclase from rat striatum. Inhibition of specific [3H]SCH 23390 binding by these agonists in the absence of GTP occurred with Hill slopes below unity and could best be explained by a two-site model with a high (KH)- and low-affinity (KL) component. Inhibition of [3H]SCH 23390 binding in the presence of 15 microM GTP occurred with Hill slopes of unity. The KI values obtained in the presence of 15 microM GTP were similar to the KL values, the low-affinity component observed in the absence of GTP. The capability of the agonists to stimulate the adenylate cyclase was analyzed in relation to dopamine (efficacy = 100%). The efficacy of the benzazepine derivatives varied from 24 (SKF 75670) to 100% (SKF 83189), dependent on the substituents on the benzazepine core. The isoquinolines, SKF 89626 and SKF 89615 had full efficacy, whereas most other agonists tested appeared to have only partial efficacy. In summary, the present paper presents data on dopamine receptor selectivity and efficacy in stimulating adenylate cyclase for a number of dopaminergic agonists. These data may create a basis for selection of agonists in future characterizations of dopaminergic-mediated events.

Dopamine D-2 agonists with high and low efficacies: differentiation by behavioural techniques

The effects of the dopamine (DA) D-2 antagonist YM 09151-2 and the DA D-2 agonists terguride, preclamol, EMD 23448, B-HT 920, quinpirole and (-)-NPA were studied in a battery of behavioural tests in order to evaluate their relative efficacies. Furthermore, their affinities for DA D-2 receptors labelled by 3H-N-0437 were measured in vitro. All agonists reduced spontaneous locomotor activity and induced marked contralateral circling behaviour in 6-hydroxy-DA-lesioned rats. Quinpirole and (-)-NPA increased motor activity after high doses. YM 09151-2 did not induce circling. In hemitransected rats quinpirole and (-)-NPA had weak effects when given alone, whereas the other agonists were ineffective. After combination with DA D-1 agonist SK&F 38393, B-HT 920 became effective, and the effects of quinpirole and (-)-NPA were facilitated. EMD 23448, preclamol and terguride were not active. In contrast, the two latter compounds fully inhibited the response to apomorphine. In stereotypy experiments a similar activity pattern was observed. Finally, drug discrimination studies showed that quinpirole, (-)-NPA and B-HT 920 substituted for the stimulus effects induced by d-amphetamine or (-)-NPA in different groups of rats. EMD 23448 induced intermediate effects, whereas preclamol and terguride had weak effects. None of the partial agonists inhibited the response of d-amphetamine. YM 09151-2 potently inhibited the effect of d-amphetamine. The results suggest that DA D-2 agonists can be ranked according to gradually increasing agonist efficacies rather than classified into autoreceptor-selective versus nonselective D-2 agonists. Implications of this hypothesis are discussed.

The effects of dopamine D-1 and D-2 receptor agonists on body temperature in male mice

The effect of dopamine D-1 and D-2 receptor stimulation on body temperature has been investigated in male mice. The selective D-2 receptor agonists, quinpirole and LY 163502, and the mixed D-1/D-2 agonist, apomorphine, induced a dose-dependent hypothermia, whereas the selective D-1 receptor agonists, SK&F 81297, SK&F 38393 and SK&F 75670, induced hyperthermia. The hyperthermic responses of these agents were of a similar magnitude although the relative efficacies determined in vitro with the adenylate cyclase assay were different. The peripherally acting D-1 agonist, fenoldopam, did not influence body temperature, indicating that the hyperthermia is mediated, centrally. Studies with combinations of quinpirole and SK&F 38393 showed that the effect of one of the substances could be counteracted by the other. Furthermore, antagonist studies showed that the hypothermia induced by quinpirole could be inhibited by the D-2-selective antagonist, YM 09151-2, and by the mixed D-1/D-2 antagonist, cis(Z)-flupentixol, but not by the D-1-selective antagonist, SCH 23390. Similar results were found for apomorphine-induced hypothermia. SK&F 38393-induced hyperthermia could be antagonized by all three antagonists. These results suggest that the two receptor subtypes act differentially on body temperature, and that they influence a common out-put system, but in opposite directions. These findings are opposite to those of behavioural studies, where a synergistic function of D-1 and D-2 receptors has been demonstrated in the regulation of motor function.