Modulation of striatal adenosine A1 and A2 receptors induces rotational behaviour in response to dopaminergic stimulation in intact rats

Drugs targeting adenosine signaling pathways: A current view

Adenosine is an endogenous nucleoside that regulates many physiological and pathological processes. It is derived from either the intracellular or extracellular dephosphorylation of adenosine triphosphate and interacts with cell-surface G-protein-coupled receptors. Adenosine plays a substantial role in protecting against cell damage in areas of increased tissue metabolism and preventing organ dysfunction in pathological states. Targeting adenosine metabolism and receptor signaling may be an effective therapeutic approach for human diseases, including cardiovascular and central nervous system disorders, rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, renal diseases, and cancer. Several lines of evidence have shown that many drugs exert their beneficial effects by modulating adenosine signaling pathways but this knowledge urgently needs to be summarized, and most importantly, actualized. The present review collects pharmaceuticals and pharmacological or diagnostic tools that target adenosine signaling in their primary or secondary mode of action. We overviewed FDA-approved drugs as well as those currently being studied in clinical trials. Among them are already used in clinic A2A adenosine receptor modulators like istradefylline or regadenoson, but also plenty of anti-platelet, anti-inflammatory, or immunosuppressive, and anti-cancer drugs. On the other hand, we investigated dozens of specific adenosine pathway regulators that are tested in clinical trials to treat human infectious and noninfectious diseases. In conclusion, targeting purinergic signaling represents a great therapeutic challenge. The actual knowledge of the involvement of adenosinergic signaling as part of the mechanism of action of old drugs has open a path not only for drug-repurposing but also for new therapeutic strategies.

G protein-coupled receptors in neurodegenerative diseases and psychiatric disorders

Neuropsychiatric disorders are multifactorial disorders with diverse aetiological factors. Identifying treatment targets is challenging because the diseases are resulting from heterogeneous biological, genetic, and environmental factors. Nevertheless, the increasing understanding of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) opens a new possibility in drug discovery. Harnessing our knowledge of molecular mechanisms and structural information of GPCRs will be advantageous for developing effective drugs. This review provides an overview of the role of GPCRs in various neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases. Besides, we highlight the emerging opportunities of novel GPCR targets and address recent progress in GPCR drug development.

Adenosine Receptors in Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Fine Regulators of Neurotransmission and Potential Therapeutic Targets

Adenosine exerts an important role in the modulation of central nervous system (CNS) activity. Through the interaction with four G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) subtypes, adenosine subtly regulates neurotransmission, interfering with the dopaminergic, glutamatergic, noradrenergic, serotoninergic, and endocannabinoid systems. The inhibitory and facilitating actions of adenosine on neurotransmission are mainly mediated by A₁ and A_2A adenosine receptors (ARs), respectively. Given their role in the CNS, ARs are promising therapeutic targets for neuropsychiatric disorders where altered neurotransmission represents the most likely etiological hypothesis. Activating or blocking ARs with specific pharmacological agents could therefore restore the balance of altered neurotransmitter systems, providing the rationale for the potential treatment of these highly debilitating conditions. In this review, we summarize and discuss the most relevant studies concerning AR modulation in psychotic and mood disorders such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorders, depression, and anxiety, as well as neurodevelopment disorders such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD), fragile X syndrome (FXS), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and neuropsychiatric aspects of neurodegenerative disorders.

Parkinson's disease in women: Mechanisms underlying sex differences

Parkinson's disease is a neurodegenerative disease which is associated with different motor, cognitive and mood-related problems. Though it has been established that Parkinson's disease is less prevalent in women in comparison to men, the differences tend to diminish with the advancing age. Different genetic, hormonal, neuroendocrinal and molecular players contribute towards the differences in the Parkinson's disease pathogenesis. Furthermore, data available with respect to the therapeutic management of Parkinson's disease in females is limited; women often tend to suffer more from the side effects of the currently available drugs. The present review highlights the sex-specific differences which play a role in the manifestation of these symptoms and side effects of the currently available therapeutic strategies. We have also discussed the current and upcoming therapeutic strategies which are in the clinical trials such as adenosine 2A (A2A) receptor antagonists, estrogen replacement therapy, α-synuclein targeting vaccines and antibodies, Botulinum toxin A, Fas-associated factor-1 (FAF-1) inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, 5-HT1_A receptor agonists, dopamine D1/D5 receptor agonists, Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogues and certain plant based principles for the treatment of Parkinson's disease in women.

Istradefylline to Treat Patients with Parkinson's Disease Experiencing "Off" Episodes: A Comprehensive Review

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder that leads to significant morbidity and disability. PD is caused by a loss of dopaminergic, cholinergic, serotonergic, and noradrenergic neurons in the central nervous system (CNS), and peripherally; the syndromic parkinsonism symptoms of movement disorder, gait disorder, rigidity and tremor are mostly driven by the loss of these neurons in the basal ganglia. Unfortunately, a significant proportion of patients taking levodopa, the standard of care treatment for PD, will begin to experience a decrease in effectiveness at varying times. These periods, referred to as “off episodes”, are characterized by increased symptoms and have a detrimental effect on quality of life and disability. Istradefylline, a novel adenosine A2A receptor antagonist, is indicated as a treatment addition to levodopa/carbidopa in patients experiencing “off episodes”. It promotes dopaminergic activity by antagonizing adenosine in the basal ganglia. This review will discuss istradefylline as a treatment for PD patients with off episodes.

Dopamine D4 receptor modulates inhibitory transmission in pallido-pallidal terminals and regulates motor behavior

Two major groups of terminals release GABA within the Globus pallidus; one group is constituted by projections from striatal neurons, while endings of the intranuclear collaterals form the other one. Each neurons' population expresses different subtypes of dopamine D2-like receptors: D₂ R subtype is expressed by encephalin-positive MSNs, while pallidal neurons express the D₄ R subtype. The D₂ R modulates the firing rate of striatal neurons and GABA release at their projection areas, while the D₄ R regulates Globus pallidus neurons excitability and GABA release at their projection areas. However, it is unknown if these receptors control GABA release at pallido-pallidal collaterals and regulate motor behavior. Here, we present neurochemical evidence of protein content and binding of D₄ R in pallidal synaptosomes, control of [³ H] GABA release in pallidal slices of rat, electrophysiological evidence of the presence of D₄ R on pallidal recurrent collaterals in mouse slices, and turning behavior induced by D₄ R antagonist microinjected in amphetamine challenged rats. As in projection areas of pallidal neurons, GABAergic transmission in pallido-pallidal recurrent synapses is under modulation of D₄ R, while the D₂ R subtype, as known, modulates striato-pallidal projections. Also, as in projection areas, D₄ R contributes to control the motor activity differently than D₂ R. This study could help to understand the organization of intra-pallidal circuitry.

Introduction to Purinergic Signalling in the Brain

ATP is a cotransmitter with glutamate, noradrenaline, GABA, acetylcholine and dopamine in the brain. There is a widespread presence of both adenosine (P1) and P2 nucleotide receptors in the brain on both neurons and glial cells. Adenosine receptors play a major role in presynaptic neuromodulation, while P2X ionotropic receptors are involved in fast synaptic transmission and synaptic plasticity. P2Y G protein-coupled receptors are largely involved in presynaptic activities, as well as mediating long-term (trophic) signalling in cell proliferation, differentiation and death during development and regeneration. Both P1 and P2 receptors participate in neuron-glial interactions. Purinergic signalling is involved in control of cerebral vascular tone and remodelling and has been implicated in learning and memory, locomotor and feeding behaviour and sleep. There is increasing interest in the involvement of purinergic signalling in the pathophysiology of the CNS, including trauma, ischaemia, epilepsy, neurodegenerative diseases, neuropsychiatric and mood disorders, and cancer, including gliomas.

The Role of Adenosine Receptors in Psychostimulant Addiction

Adenosine receptors (AR) are a family of G-protein coupled receptors, comprised of four members, named A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 receptors, found widely distributed in almost all human body tissues and organs. To date, they are known to participate in a large variety of physiopathological responses, which include vasodilation, pain, and inflammation. In particular, in the central nervous system (CNS), adenosine acts as a neuromodulator, exerting different functions depending on the type of AR and consequent cellular signaling involved. In terms of molecular pathways and second messengers involved, A1 and A3 receptors inhibit adenylyl cyclase (AC), through Gi/o proteins, while A2A and A2B receptors stimulate it through Gs proteins. In the CNS, A1 receptors are widely distributed in the cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum, A2A receptors are localized mainly in the striatum and olfactory bulb, while A2B and A3 receptors are found at low levels of expression. In addition, AR are able to form heteromers, both among themselves (e.g., A1/A2A), as well as with other subtypes (e.g., A2A/D2), opening a whole range of possibilities in the field of the pharmacology of AR. Nowadays, we know that adenosine, by acting on adenosine A1 and A2A receptors, is known to antagonistically modulate dopaminergic neurotransmission and therefore reward systems, being A1 receptors colocalized in heteromeric complexes with D1 receptors, and A2A receptors with D2 receptors. This review documents the present state of knowledge of the contribution of AR, particularly A1 and A2A, to psychostimulants-mediated effects, including locomotor activity, discrimination, seeking and reward, and discuss their therapeutic relevance to psychostimulant addiction. Studies presented in this review reinforce the potential of A1 agonists as an effective strategy to counteract psychostimulant-induced effects. Furthermore, different experimental data support the hypothesis that A2A/D2 heterodimers are partly responsible for the psychomotor and reinforcing effects of psychostimulant drugs, such as cocaine and amphetamine, and the stimulation of A2A receptor is proposed as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of drug addiction. The overall analysis of presented data provide evidence that excitatory modulation of A1 and A2A receptors constitute promising tools to counteract psychostimulants addiction.

Cannabinoid-induced depression of synaptic transmission is switched to stimulation when dopaminergic tone is increased in the globus pallidus of the rodent

Because activation of D2 receptors reverses the neurochemical effects of cannabinoids, we examined whether increasing dopaminergic tone in the globus pallidus (GPe) switches cannabinoid induced depression of synaptic transmission. GABAergic synaptic currents evoked in pallidal neurons by stimulation of striatal projections (IPSCs) were depressed by perfusion with the CB1R agonist ACEA. Coactivation of D2Rs with quinpirole converted the depression into stimulation. Pretreatment with pertussis toxin (PTX) to limit Gi/o protein coupling also switched the CB1R-induced depression of IPSCs. The stimulation of IPSCs was blocked by the selective PKA blocker H89. Changes in the paired pulse ratio during both inhibitory and stimulatory responses indicate that the effects are due to changes in transmitter release. Postsynaptic depolarization induces endocannabinoid release that inhibits transmitter release (DSI). When D2Rs were activated with quinpirole, depolarization increased transmission instead of depressing it. This increase was blocked by AM251. We also examined the effects of CB1R/D2R coactivation on cAMP accumulation in the GPe to further verify that the AC/PKA cascade is involved. CB1R/D2R coactivation converted the inhibition of cAMP seen when each receptor is stimulated alone into a stimulation. We also determined the effects on turning behavior of unilateral injection of ACEA into the GPe of awake animals and its modification by dopamine antagonists. Blockade of D2 family receptors with sulpiride antagonized the motor effects of ACEA. We show, for the first time, that cannabinoid-inhibition of synaptic transmission in the GPe becomes a stimulation after D2Rs or PTX treatment and that the switch is probably relevant for the control of motor behavior.

Adenosine receptor control of cognition in normal and disease

Adenosine and adenosine receptors (ARs) are increasingly recognized as important therapeutic targets for controlling cognition under normal and disease conditions for its dual roles of neuromodulation as well as of homeostatic function in the brain. This chapter first presents the unique ability of adenosine, by acting on the inhibitory A1 and facilitating A2A receptor, to integrate dopamine, glutamate, and BNDF signaling and to modulate synaptic plasticity (e.g., long-term potentiation and long-term depression) in brain regions relevant to learning and memory, providing the molecular and cellular bases for adenosine receptor (AR) control of cognition. This led to the demonstration of AR modulation of social recognition memory, working memory, reference memory, reversal learning, goal-directed behavior/habit formation, Pavlovian fear conditioning, and effort-related behavior. Furthermore, human and animal studies support that AR activity can also, through cognitive enhancement and neuroprotection, reverse cognitive impairments in animal models of Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), Huntington's disease, and schizophrenia. Lastly, epidemiological evidence indicates that regular human consumption of caffeine, the most widely used psychoactive drug and nonselective AR antagonists, is associated with the reduced cognitive decline in aging and AD patients, and with the reduced risk in developing PD. Thus, there is a convergence of the molecular studies revealing AR as molecular targets for integrating neurotransmitter signaling and controlling synaptic plasticity, with animal studies demonstrating the strong procognitive impact upon AR antagonism in normal and disease brains and with epidemiological and clinical evidences in support of caffeine and AR drugs for therapeutic modulation of cognition. Since some of adenosine A2A receptor antagonists are already in phase III clinical trials for motor benefits in PD patients with remarkable safety profiles, additional animal and human studies to better understand the mechanism underlying the AR-mediated control of cognition under normal and disease conditions will provide the required rationale to stimulate the necessary clinical investigation to rapidly translate adenosine and AR drug as a novel strategy to control memory impairment in neuropsychiatric disorders.

Superior working memory and behavioural habituation but diminished psychomotor coordination in mice lacking the ecto-5'-nucleotidase (CD73) gene

Adenosine is an important neuromodulator in the central nervous system involved in the regulation of wakefulness, sleep, learning and memory, fear and anxiety as well as motor functions. Extracellular adenosine is synthesized by the cell-surface ectoenzyme ecto-5'-nucleotidase (CD73) from 5'-adenosine monophosphate. While CD73 is widely expressed throughout the mammalian brain, its specific role for behaviour is poorly understood. We examined spatial working memory, emotional responses, motor coordination and motor learning as well as behavioural habituation in mice with a targeted deletion of CD73. CD73 knockout (CD73-/-) mice exhibit enhanced spatial working memory in the Y-maze and enhanced long-term behavioural habituation in the open field. Furthermore, impaired psychomotor coordination on the accelerating rotarod was found in CD73-/- mice. No changes in motor learning and/or anxiety-like behaviour were evident in CD73-/- mice. Our data provide evidence for a role of CD73 in the regulation of learning and memory and psychomotor coordination. Our results might be important for the evaluation of adenosine neuromodulators as possible treatments to ameliorate cognitive and motor deficits associated with neurodegenerative diseases.

Dopamine D4 receptor stimulation in GABAergic projections of the globus pallidus to the reticular thalamic nucleus and the substantia nigra reticulata of the rat decreases locomotor activity

Dopamine D4 receptors are localized in the GABAergic projections that globus pallidus (GP) neurons send to the reticular nucleus of the thalamus (RTN), the substantia nigra reticulata (SNr) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Deficient D4 function in this network could lead to hyperactivity and thus be important in generating some of the symptoms of ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder), a condition associated with polymorphisms of dopamine D4 receptors. It is then, unexpected that systemic injections of D4 ligands have no significant effects on the motor activity of normal rats. We further examined this issue by microinjecting D4 ligands and psychostimulant drugs in relevant structures. Interstitial dopamine overflow in the RTN was increased by reverse microdialysis of both methylphenidate and methamphetamine. Intranuclear injections in the RTN of methylphenidate, methamphetamine and the selective D4 agonist PD 168,077 reduced motor activity. Intraperitoneal injection of the D4 antagonist L 745,870 blocked the effects of these intranuclear injections. Similarly, intranuclear injections of PD 168,077 in the SNr inhibited motor activity, an effect that was also blocked by intraperitoneal L 745,870. In rats with 6-OHDA induced hemiparkinsonism, intraperitoneal PD 168,077 produced ipsilateral turning behavior that was blocked by L 745,870. Our results suggest that diminished D4 signaling in GP projections could lead to increased traffic through the relay nuclei of the thalamus and hyperactivity. Hence this basal-ganglia-thalamus network may be one of the targets of the beneficial effects that psychostimulant drugs have in disorders associated with D4 receptor abnormalities. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder'.

Purinergic signalling: from normal behaviour to pathological brain function

Purinergic neurotransmission, involving release of ATP as an efferent neurotransmitter was first proposed in 1972. Later, ATP was recognised as a cotransmitter in peripheral nerves and more recently as a cotransmitter with glutamate, noradrenaline, GABA, acetylcholine and dopamine in the CNS. Both ATP, together with some of its enzymatic breakdown products (ADP and adenosine) and uracil nucleotides are now recognised to act via P2X ion channels and P1 and P2Y G protein-coupled receptors, which are widely expressed in the brain. They mediate both fast signalling in neurotransmission and neuromodulation and long-term (trophic) signalling in cell proliferation, differentiation and death. Purinergic signalling is prominent in neurone-glial cell interactions. In this review we discuss first the evidence implicating purinergic signalling in normal behaviour, including learning and memory, sleep and arousal, locomotor activity and exploration, feeding behaviour and mood and motivation. Then we turn to the involvement of P1 and P2 receptors in pathological brain function; firstly in trauma, ischemia and stroke, then in neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and Huntington's, as well as multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Finally, the role of purinergic signalling in neuropsychiatric diseases (including schizophrenia), epilepsy, migraine, cognitive impairment and neuropathic pain will be considered.

Adenosine hypothesis of schizophrenia--opportunities for pharmacotherapy

Pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia based on the dopamine hypothesis remains unsatisfactory for the negative and cognitive symptoms of the disease. Enhancing N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDAR) function is expected to alleviate such persistent symptoms, but successful development of novel clinically effective compounds remains challenging. Adenosine is a homeostatic bioenergetic network modulator that is able to affect complex networks synergistically at different levels (receptor-dependent pathways, biochemistry, bioenergetics, and epigenetics). By affecting brain dopamine and glutamate activities, it represents a promising candidate for reversing the functional imbalance in these neurotransmitter systems believed to underlie the genesis of schizophrenia symptoms, as well as restoring homeostasis of bioenergetics. Suggestion of an adenosine hypothesis of schizophrenia further posits that adenosinergic dysfunction might contribute to the emergence of multiple neurotransmitter dysfunctions characteristic of schizophrenia via diverse mechanisms. Given the importance of adenosine in early brain development and regulation of brain immune response, it also bears direct relevance to the aetiology of schizophrenia. Here, we provide an overview of the rationale and evidence in support of the therapeutic potential of multiple adenosinergic targets, including the high-affinity adenosine receptors (A(1)R and A(2A)R), and the regulatory enzyme adenosine kinase (ADK). Key preliminary clinical data and preclinical findings are reviewed.

Blockade of adenosine A(1) receptors prevents methylphenidate-induced impairment of object recognition task in adult mice

Methylphenidate (MPH) is the preferred treatment used for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Recently, misuse for MPH due to its apparent cognitive enhancer properties has been reported. Adenosine is a neuromodulator known to exert influence on the dopaminergic neurotransmission, which is the main pharmacological target of MPH. We have reported that an overdosage of MPH up-regulates adenosine A(1) receptors in the frontal cortex, but this receptor was not involved in its anxiolytic effects. In this study, the role of adenosine A(1) receptor was investigated on MPH-induced effects on aversive and recognition memory in adult mice. Adult mice received acute and chronic (15 days) administration of methylphenidate (5mg/kg, i.p.), or an acute overdosage (50mg/kg, i.p) in order to model misuse. Memory was assessed in the inhibitory avoidance and object recognition task. Acute administration 5mg/kg improved whereas 50mg/kg disrupted recognition memory and decreased performance in the inhibitory avoidance task. Chronic administration did not cause any effect on memory, but decreased adenosine A(1) receptors immunocontent in the frontal cortex. The selective adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist, (DPCPX 1mg/kg, i.p.), prevented methylphenidate-triggered recognition memory impairment. Our findings showed that recognition memory rather than aversive memory was differently affected by acute administration at both doses. Memory recognition was fully impaired by the overdosage, suggesting that misuse can be harmful for cognitive functions. The adenosinergic system via A(1) receptors may play a role in the methylphenidate actions probably by interfering with dopamine-enhancing properties of this drug.

Adenosine receptors and brain diseases: neuroprotection and neurodegeneration

Adenosine acts in parallel as a neuromodulator and as a homeostatic modulator in the central nervous system. Its neuromodulatory role relies on a balanced activation of inhibitory A(1) receptors (A1R) and facilitatory A(2A) receptors (A2AR), mostly controlling excitatory glutamatergic synapses: A1R impose a tonic brake on excitatory transmission, whereas A2AR are selectively engaged to promote synaptic plasticity phenomena. This neuromodulatory role of adenosine is strikingly similar to the role of adenosine in the control of brain disorders; thus, A1R mostly act as a hurdle that needs to be overcame to begin neurodegeneration and, accordingly, A1R only effectively control neurodegeneration if activated in the temporal vicinity of brain insults; in contrast, the blockade of A2AR alleviates the long-term burden of brain disorders in different neurodegenerative conditions such as ischemia, epilepsy, Parkinson's or Alzheimer's disease and also seem to afford benefits in some psychiatric conditions. In spite of this qualitative agreement between neuromodulation and neuroprotection by A1R and A2AR, it is still unclear if the role of A1R and A2AR in the control of neuroprotection is mostly due to the control of glutamatergic transmission, or if it is instead due to the different homeostatic roles of these receptors related with the control of metabolism, of neuron-glia communication, of neuroinflammation, of neurogenesis or of the control of action of growth factors. In spite of this current mechanistic uncertainty, it seems evident that targeting adenosine receptors might indeed constitute a novel strategy to control the demise of different neurological and psychiatric disorders.

The adenosine A2A receptor is associated with methamphetamine dependence/psychosis in the Japanese population

BACKGROUND

Several lines of evidence suggest that the dopaminergic nervous system contributes to methamphetamine (METH) dependence, and there is increasing evidence of antagonistic interactions between dopamine and adenosine receptors. We therefore hypothesized that variations in the A2A adenosine receptor (ADORA2A) gene modify genetic susceptibility to METH dependence/psychosis.

METHODS

We first analyzed variations in the exons and exon-intron boundaries of the ADORA2A gene in METH dependent/psychotic patients. Then an association analysis between these single nucleotide polymorphisms and METH dependence/psychosis was performed using a total of 171 METH dependent/psychotic patients and 229 controls.

RESULTS

We found 6 variations, of which one single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) was novel. Significant associations were observed between the allelic and genotypic frequencies of the Exon2+751 (rs5751876) SNP and METH dependence/psychosis. These associations were observed especially in females. In the clinical feature analyses, significant associations were observed between the SNP and the patient subgroup using METH alone (i.e., without concomitant use of other substances of abuse).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the ADORA2A gene could be a vulnerability factor for METH dependence/psychosis, especially in females and/or in patients using only METH.

Adenosine A1 receptors are modified by acute treatment with methylphenidate in adult mice

In recent years misuse of methylphenidate (MPH) has been reported. The main pharmacological target of methylphenidate is the dopaminergic system. Adenosine is a neuromodulator that influences the dopaminergic neurotransmission, but studies on MPH and adenosine are still lacking. In this study, adult mice were acutely treated with MPH (5mg/kg, i.p.) and to model misuse, they received an acute overdosage (50mg/kg, i.p). The involvement of adenosine A(1) receptors in anxiety-related behavior and locomotor and exploratory activity was examined. The administration of methylphenidate (5 and 50mg/kg) 30 min before the exposure to open field arena did not modify locomotor activity. The anxiolytic-like behavior was observed with both doses of MPH as revealed by the increase on the number of entries and the time spent in the open arms in the elevated plus-maze. Pre treatment with selective adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist (DPCPX 1mg/kg, i.p.) did not prevent anxiolytic effect caused by MPH 50mg/kg. Immunoblotting of frontal cortex and hippocampal extracts revealed that MPH 50mg/kg increased 88% adenosine A(1) receptor density in the frontal cortex. Extracts from hippocampus did not reveal any differences in the adenosine A(1) receptor density. Our findings ruled out the participation of adenosine A(1) receptors on the MPH-triggered anxiolytic effects. However, the density of adenosine A(1) receptors increased in a brain area strictly involved in the MPH-mediated effects. Thus, the adenosinergic system may play a role in the methylphenidate actions in the central nervous system.

Adenosine A(2A) receptors in psychopharmacology: modulators of behavior, mood and cognition

The adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)R) is in the center of a neuromodulatory network affecting a wide range of neuropsychiatric functions by interacting with and integrating several neurotransmitter systems, especially dopaminergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission. These interactions and integrations occur at multiple levels, including (1) direct receptor- receptor cross-talk at the cell membrane, (2) intracellular second messenger systems, (3) trans-synaptic actions via striatal collaterals or interneurons in the striatum, (4) and interactions at the network level of the basal ganglia. Consequently, A(2A)Rs constitute a novel target to modulate various psychiatric conditions. In the present review we will first summarize the molecular interaction of adenosine receptors with other neurotransmitter systems and then discuss the potential applications of A(2A)R agonists and antagonists in physiological and pathophysiological conditions, such as psychostimulant action, drug addiction, anxiety, depression, schizophrenia and learning and memory.

Brain adenosine A2A receptor occupancy by a novel A1/A2A receptor antagonist, ASP5854, in rhesus monkeys: relationship to anticataleptic effect

The purpose of the present study was to measure adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)R) occupancy in the brain by a novel adenosine A(1)/A(2A) antagonist, 5-[5-amino-3-(4fluorophenyl)pyrazin-2-yl]-1-isopropylpyridine-2(1H)-one (ASP5854), and to determine the degree of receptor occupancy necessary to inhibit haloperidol-induced catalepsy in rhesus monkeys.

METHODS

A(2A)R occupancy by ASP5854 (0.001-0.1 mg/kg) was examined in the striatum using an A(2A)R-specific radiotracer, (11)C-SCH442416, and PET in conscious rhesus monkeys. A(2A)R occupancy was monitored after a single intravenous administration of ASP5854 in 3 animals, and a dynamic PET scan was performed at 1, 4, and 8 h after an intravenous bolus injection of the tracer for approximately 740 MBq. Catalepsy was induced by haloperidol (0.03 mg/kg, intramuscularly) and examined for incidence and duration.

RESULTS

ASP5854 dose-dependently increased A(2A)R occupancy in the striatum and showed long-lasting occupancy even after the reduction of plasma concentration. Haloperidol induced severe catalepsy at 40 min after intramuscular injection. The incidence and duration of cataleptic posture were dose-dependently reduced by ASP5854 at 1 h after oral administration, and the minimum ED(50) value was 0.1 mg/kg. Administration of a dose of 0.1 mg/kg yielded a plasma concentration of 97 +/- 16.3 ng/mL, which corresponded to 85%-90% of A(2A)R occupancy.

CONCLUSION

These results showed that ASP5854 antagonized A(2A)R in the striatum, and the dissociation from A(2A)R was relatively slow. In addition, more than 85% A(2A)R occupancy by ASP5854 resulted in an inhibition of haloperidol-induced catalepsy. Thus, such a pharmacodynamic study directly demonstrates both the kinetics of a drug in the brain and the relationship between dose-dependent receptor occupancy and plasma level.

Adenosine A2A receptors in ventral striatum, hypothalamus and nociceptive circuitry implications for drug addiction, sleep and pain

Adenosine A2A receptors localized in the dorsal striatum are considered as a new target for the development of antiparkinsonian drugs. Co-administration of A2A receptor antagonists has shown a significant improvement of the effects of l-DOPA. The present review emphasizes the possible application of A2A receptor antagonists in pathological conditions other than parkinsonism, including drug addiction, sleep disorders and pain. In addition to the dorsal striatum, the ventral striatum (nucleus accumbens) contains a high density of A2A receptors, which presynaptically and postsynaptically regulate glutamatergic transmission in the cortical glutamatergic projections to the nucleus accumbens. It is currently believed that molecular adaptations of the cortico-accumbens glutamatergic synapses are involved in compulsive drug seeking and relapse. Here we review recent experimental evidence suggesting that A2A antagonists could become new therapeutic agents for drug addiction. Morphological and functional studies have identified lower levels of A2A receptors in brain areas other than the striatum, such as the ventrolateral preoptic area of the hypothalamus, where adenosine plays an important role in sleep regulation. Although initially believed to be mostly dependent on A1 receptors, here we review recent studies that demonstrate that the somnogenic effects of adenosine are largely mediated by hypothalamic A2A receptors. A2A)receptor antagonists could therefore be considered as a possible treatment for narcolepsy and other sleep-related disorders. Finally, nociception is another adenosine-regulated neural function previously thought to mostly involve A1 receptors. Although there is some conflicting literature on the effects of agonists and antagonists, which may partly be due to the lack of selectivity of available drugs, the studies in A2A receptor knockout mice suggest that A2A receptor antagonists might have some therapeutic potential in pain states, in particular where high intensity stimuli are prevalent.

Novel ergopeptides as dual ligands for adenosine and dopamine receptors

Multivalent ligands are promising pharmacological tools that may be more efficacious for several diseases than highly selective single-target drugs. A combined therapy using dopaminergic agonists and adenosinergic antagonists is currently being evaluated for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. [(a) Kanda, T.; et al. Exp. Neurol. 2000, 162, 321-327. (b) Jenner, P. Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs 2005, 14, 729-738. (c) Kase, H.; et al. Neurology 2003, 61 (Suppl 6), S97-S100.] Here we prepared dual ligands acting on adenosine and dopamine receptors by applying a combinatorial approach based on the ergolene privileged structure. The potency and efficacy of these novel compounds were determined by radioligand binding studies and intracellular cAMP production assays in cells expressing adenosine and dopamine receptors. Selected compounds displayed dual dopamine agonist and adenosine antagonist activity. Molecules with this pharmacological profile are potentially useful for studying dopamine-adenosine cross-talk in the central nervous system and for testing the therapeutic potential of multivalent drugs for Parkinson's disease.

Physiology and pathophysiology of purinergic neurotransmission

This review is focused on purinergic neurotransmission, i.e., ATP released from nerves as a transmitter or cotransmitter to act as an extracellular signaling molecule on both pre- and postjunctional membranes at neuroeffector junctions and synapses, as well as acting as a trophic factor during development and regeneration. Emphasis is placed on the physiology and pathophysiology of ATP, but extracellular roles of its breakdown product, adenosine, are also considered because of their intimate interactions. The early history of the involvement of ATP in autonomic and skeletal neuromuscular transmission and in activities in the central nervous system and ganglia is reviewed. Brief background information is given about the identification of receptor subtypes for purines and pyrimidines and about ATP storage, release, and ectoenzymatic breakdown. Evidence that ATP is a cotransmitter in most, if not all, peripheral and central neurons is presented, as well as full accounts of neurotransmission and neuromodulation in autonomic and sensory ganglia and in the brain and spinal cord. There is coverage of neuron-glia interactions and of purinergic neuroeffector transmission to nonmuscular cells. To establish the primitive and widespread nature of purinergic neurotransmission, both the ontogeny and phylogeny of purinergic signaling are considered. Finally, the pathophysiology of purinergic neurotransmission in both peripheral and central nervous systems is reviewed, and speculations are made about future developments.

Involvement of adenosine in the neurobiology of schizophrenia and its therapeutic implications

Based on the neuromodulatory and homeostatic actions of adenosine, adenosine dysfunction may contribute to the neurobiological and clinical features of schizophrenia. The present model of adenosine dysfunction in schizophrenia takes into consideration the dopamine and glutamate hypotheses, since adenosine exerts neuromodulatory roles on these systems, and proposes that adenosine plays a role in the inhibitory deficit found in schizophrenia. Given the role of adenosine activation of adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) in mediating neurotoxicity in early stages of brain development, pre- and peri-natal complications leading to excessive adenosine release could induce primary brain changes (i.e., first hit). These events would lead to an adenosine inhibitory deficit through a partial loss of A1R that may emerge as reduced control of dopamine activity and increased vulnerability to excitotoxic glutamate action in the mature brain (i.e., second hit). Adenosine dysfunction is reasonably compatible with symptoms, gray and white matter abnormalities, progressive brain loss, pre- and peri-natal risk factors, age of onset, response to current treatments, impaired sensory gating and increased smoking in schizophrenia. Pharmacological treatments enhancing adenosine activity could be effective for symptom control and for alleviating deterioration in the course of the illness. Accordingly, allopurinol, which may indirectly increase adenosine, has been effective and well tolerated in the treatment of schizophrenia. Since much of the evidence for the adenosine hypothesis is preliminary and theoretical, further investigation in the field is warranted.

Adenosine A2a receptor/dopamine D2 receptor hetero-oligomerization: a hypothesis that may explain behavioral sensitization to psychostimulants and schizophrenia

The mechanisms underlying psychostimulant-induced behavioral sensitization and schizophrenia are yet to be fully elucidated. Evidence suggests that the dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) as well as other neurotransmitter system receptors may be involved in the two conditions, and previous reports have hypothesized that oligomerization of dopamine receptors and analogs from other neurotransmitter systems may underlie the mechanism responsible. This paper describes findings which show co-localization of DRD2 and the adenosine A2a receptor (A2aAR) in the striatum, interaction between the two receptors and A2aAR/DRD2 hetero-oligomerization in the neuronal cell. The possibility that A2aAR/DRD2 hetero-oligomerization may be involved in the development of psychostimulant-induced behavioral sensitization or the pathogenesis of schizophrenia is explored. A2aAR/DRD2 hetero-oligomerization can enhance dopaminergic function, resulting in an increased behavioral response to psychostimulants or the development of psychotic symptoms. Receptor oligomerization can affect receptor degradation, which may affect the persistence of behavioral sensitization or psychotic symptoms. The proposed A2aAR/DRD2 hetero-oligomerization model may suggest new directions in the understanding and treatment of schizophrenia.

Effects of adenosine A1, dopamine D1 and metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors-modulating agents on locomotion of the reserpinised rats

The pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease and l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (l-DOPA)-induced dyskinesia are characterised by an imbalance between activity of the direct and indirect pathways regulated by dopamine D1 and D2 receptors, respectively. In this study, we investigated the effects of treatments combining adenosine A(1) and metabotropic glutamate 5 (mGlu5) receptors modulators on locomotion induced by dopamine D1 receptor activation in the reserpine-treated rats. Administration of the adenosine A(1) receptor agonist and mGlu5 receptor antagonist resulted in the significant reduction of dopamine D1 receptor agonist-induced locomotion. The combination of adenosine A(1) receptor agonist with mGlu5 receptor antagonist had no greater effect than these compounds alone. However, the adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist attenuated the inhibitory effect of mGlu5 receptor antagonist. The data suggest that the effect of mGlu5 receptor blockade on locomotion elicited by dopamine D1 receptor stimulation involves activation of adenosine A(1) receptors. This interaction can improve our understanding of pathophysiology of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia.

Involvement of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors in the adenosinergic modulation of the discriminative-stimulus effects of cocaine and methamphetamine in rats

Adenosine, by acting on adenosine A1 and A2A receptors, is known to antagonistically modulate dopaminergic neurotransmission. We have recently reported that nonselective adenosine receptor antagonists (caffeine and 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine) can partially substitute for the discriminative-stimulus effects of methamphetamine. In the present study, by using more selective compounds, we investigated the involvement of A1 and A2A receptors in the adenosinergic modulation of the discriminative-stimulus effects of both cocaine and methamphetamine. The effects of the A1 receptor agonist N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA; 0.01-0.1 mg/kg) and antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dimethylxanthine (CPT; 1.3-23.7 mg/kg) and the A2A receptor agonist 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine hydrochloride (CGS 21680; 0.03-0.18 mg/kg) and antagonist 3-(3-hydroxypropyl)-8-(3-methoxystyryl)-7-methyl-1-propargylxanthin phosphate disodium salt (MSX-3; 1-56 mg/kg) were evaluated in rats trained to discriminate either 1 mg/kg methamphetamine or 10 mg/kg cocaine from saline under a fixed-ratio 10 schedule of food presentation. The A1 and A2A receptor antagonists (CPT and MSX-3) both produced high levels of drug-lever selection when substituted for either methamphetamine or cocaine and significantly shifted dose-response curves of both psychostimulants to the left. Unexpectedly, the A2A receptor agonist CGS 21680 also produced drug-appropriate responding (although at lower levels) when substituted for the cocaine-training stimulus, and both CGS 21680 and the A1 receptor agonist CPA significantly shifted the cocaine dose-response curve to the left. In contrast, both agonists did not produce significant levels of drug-lever selection when substituted for the methamphetamine-training stimulus and failed to shift the methamphetamine dose-response curve. Therefore, adenosine A1 and A2A receptors appear to play important but differential roles in the modulation of the discriminative-stimulus effects of methamphetamine and cocaine.

Molecular mechanisms and therapeutical implications of intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions among heptahelical receptors with examples from the striatopallidal GABA neurons

The molecular basis for the known intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions among G protein-coupled receptors was postulated to be heteromerization based on receptor subtype-specific interactions between different types of receptor homomers. The discovery of GABAB heterodimers started this field rapidly followed by the discovery of heteromerization among isoreceptors of several G protein-coupled receptors such as delta/kappa opioid receptors. Heteromerization was also discovered among distinct types of G protein-coupled receptors with the initial demonstration of somatostatin SSTR5/dopamine D2 and adenosine A1/dopamine D1 heteromeric receptor complexes. The functional meaning of these heteromeric complexes is to achieve direct or indirect (via adapter proteins) intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions in the complex. G protein-coupled receptors also form heteromeric complexes involving direct interactions with ion channel receptors, the best example being the GABAA/dopamine D5 receptor heteromerization, as well as with receptor tyrosine kinases and with receptor activity modulating proteins. As an example, adenosine, dopamine, and glutamate metabotropic receptor/receptor interactions in the striatopallidal GABA neurons are discussed as well as their relevance for Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, and drug dependence. The heterodimer is only one type of heteromeric complex, and the evidence is equally compatible with the existence of higher order heteromeric complexes, where also adapter proteins such as homer proteins and scaffolding proteins can exist. These complexes may assist in the process of linking G protein-coupled receptors and ion channel receptors together in a receptor mosaic that may have special integrative value and may constitute the molecular basis for some forms of learning and memory.

Adenosine A1 receptors control dopamine D1-dependent [(3)H]GABA release in slices of substantia nigra pars reticulata and motor behavior in the rat

Abnormalities in dopaminergic control of basal ganglia function play a key role in Parkinson's disease. Adenosine appears to modulate the dopaminergic control in striatum, where an inhibitory interaction between adenosine and dopamine receptors has been demonstrated. However the interaction has not been established in substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) where density of both receptors is high. Here we have explored the interaction between A1/D1 receptors in SNr. In SNr slices, SKF 38393, a selective D1 receptor agonist, produced a stimulation of depolarization-induced Ca(2+)-dependent [(3)H]GABA release that was inhibited by adenosine. The adenosine inhibition was abolished by 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), a selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist. DPCPX per se enhanced GABA release, indicating inhibition of the release by endogenous adenosine. When D1 receptors were blocked with SCH 23390 or the slices were depleted of dopamine, the effect of DPCPX was suppressed, showing that activation of dopamine receptors was necessary for the adenosine inhibition. In normal slices, 2-chloro-n(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA), a selective A1 agonist, inhibited GABA release, but the inhibition was prevented by the blockade of D1 receptors with SCH 23390. Superperfusion with 8-bromo-cAMP produced a stimulation of GABA release that was not blocked by CCPA: this finding indicates that the blockade of D1 effects caused by activation of A1 receptors is specific. To see if these actions on GABA release were correlated with changes in motor behavior we studied the effect of unilateral intranigral injections of modifiers of adenosine A1 and dopamine D1 receptors in rats challenged with systemic methamphetamine. Both the A1 agonist CCPA and the D1 antagonist SCH 23390 produced ipsilateral turning whereas the A1 antagonist DPCPX caused contralateral turning. These motor effects are consistent with the findings on GABA release. The results indicate the presence of an inhibitory A1/D1 receptor interaction in SNr. The inhibition exerted by A1 adenosine receptors on GABAergic striatonigral transmission would be due exclusively to blockade of the facilitation resulting from activation of D1 dopamine receptors. The data permit to better understand the action of adenosine antagonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Dopamine D1 receptors and adenosine A1 receptors in the rat nucleus accumbens regulate motor activity but not prepulse inhibition

Locomotor activity and sensorimotor gating (measured as prepulse inhibition of startle) are regulated by mesoaccumbal dopamine. Recent evidence indicated antagonistic interactions between adenosine A(1) receptors and dopamine D(1) receptors, as well as between adenosine A(2) receptors and dopamine D(2) receptors in the nucleus accumbens. Therefore, it is conceivable that accumbal dopamine and adenosine are both involved in the regulation of prepulse inhibition and locomotion. We tested whether accumbal adenosine A(1) and dopamine D(1) receptors control locomotor activity and prepulse inhibition using the following four treatments. (1) Injections of the selective adenosine A(1) receptor agonist N(6)-cyclopentanyladenosine (CPA 1.5 and 3 microg/microl per side) into the nucleus accumbens. (2) Stimulation of the ventral tegmental area by local infusion of the GABA(A) receptor antagonist picrotoxin (25-100 ng/0.5 microl bilaterally). (3) Picrotoxin injections into the ventral tegmental area (100 ng/0.5 microl) and simultaneous bilateral injections of CPA (3 microg/microl per side) into the nucleus accumbens. (4) Injections of the selective dopamine D(1) receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (3 microg/0.5 microl per side) into the nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area stimulation by picrotoxin. Intra-accumbal CPA infusion reduced locomotor activity but had no effect on prepulse inhibition. Picrotoxin stimulation of the ventral tegmental area increased locomotor activity which was antagonized by co-administration of CPA or SCH 23390 into the nucleus accumbens. An enhancement of prepulse inhibition was observed after stimulation of the ventral tegmental area and co-administration of SCH 23390 into the nucleus accumbens. These findings demonstrate that adenosine A(1) and dopamine D(1) receptors are involved in the regulation of locomotor activity mediated by the mesoaccumbal dopamine system. The finding that locomotor effects induced by stimulation of the mesoaccumbal dopamine system were not accompanied by a prepulse inhibition-deficit suggests a dissociation of the neuronal substrates involved in the control of locomotion and the regulation of sensorimotor gating.

Adenosine A(2a) receptor antagonists: potential therapeutic and neuroprotective effects in Parkinson's disease

The most effective treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) is, at present, the dopamine precursor L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), however a number of disadvantages such as a loss of drug efficacy and severe side-effects (psychoses, dyskinesias and on-off phenomena) limit long-term effective utilisation of this drug. Recent experimental studies in which selective antagonists of adenosine A(2A) receptors were used, have shown an improvement in motor disabilities in animal models of PD. The A(2A) antagonist [7-(2-phenylethyl)-5-amino-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo-(4,3-e)-1,2,4-triazolo(1,5-c) pyrimidine] (SCH 58261) potentiated the contralateral turning behavior induced by a threshold dose of L-DOPA or direct dopamine receptor agonists in unilaterally 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesioned rats, an effect accompanied by an increase in Fos-like-immunoreactivity in neurons of the lesioned striatum. Likewise, other A(2A) receptor antagonists such as (3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine) (DMPX), [E-8-(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)-1,3-dipropyl-7-methylxanthine] (KF 17837) and [E-1,3-diethyl-8(3,4-dimethoxystyryl-7-methyl-3,7-dihydro-1H-purine-2,6-dione] (KW 6002) antagonized catalepsy induced by haloperidol or reserpine in the rat, whereas in non-human primate models of PD, KW 6002 reduced the rigidity and improved the disability score of MPTP-treated marmosets and cynomolgus monkeys. Moreover, in contrast to L-DOPA, selective A(2A) receptor antagonists administered chronically did not produce dyskinesias and did not evoke tolerance in 6-OHDA and MPTP models of PD. An additional therapeutic potential of adenosine A(2A) antagonists emerged from studies showing neuroprotective properties of these compounds in animal models of cerebral ischemia and excitotoxicity, as well as in the MPTP model of PD. Adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists by reversing motor impairments in animal models of PD and by contrasting cell degeneration are some of the most promising compounds for the treatment of PD.

Effect of adenosine kinase, adenosine deaminase and transport inhibitors on striatal dopamine and stereotypy after methamphetamine administration

The effect of adenosine kinase (AKA), adenosine deaminase (ADA) and transport inhibitors on the release of dopamine (DA) induced by methamphetamine (MTH) in rat striatum was assessed using in vivo microdialysis in freely moving rats. MTH injected in a dose of 3 x 5 mg/kg i.p. at 2-hour intervals produced a massive release of DA. This excessive release of DA was inhibited by the ADA inhibitor 2'-deoxycoformycin (DCF), the AKA inhibitor 5'-iodotubercidin (IOT) and the adenosine uptake inhibitor dilazep (DIL), each of them given locally to the striatum via a microdialysis probe at a concentration of 100 microM. Perfusion with the same concentrations of erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl)adenine (EHNA) and 5'-amino-5'-deoxyadenosine (NH(2)dAD), ADA and AKA inhibitors, respectively, induced a considerably weaker effect on DA release. The non-selective antagonist of adenosine A(1)/A(2A) receptor caffeine (75 microM) significantly prevented the inhibitory effect of DCF, IOT and DIL on the MTH-induced DA release. Intrastriatal administration of DCF, IOT and DIL (5 nmol/microl before each injection of MTH) inhibited the stereotypy induced by MTH. The striatal content of DA and its metabolites 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA), decreased by MTH administration and measured 5 days after treatment with the toxin, was reversed by all the inhibitors at the order of potency as follows: IOT>DCF>DIL. Direct agonists of adenosine A(1) and A(1)/A(2A) receptors, N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) and 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA), respectively, given intrastriatally (5 nmol/microl) completely abolished the MTH-induced stereotypy and the fall in the striatal content of DA, DOPAC and HVA. The above results show that augmentation of endogenous adenosine in rat striatum by inhibition of its metabolism or uptake-despite the differences in the efficacy of various inhibitors-may provide neuroprotection against a toxic action of MTH.

Alteration of the behavioral effects of nicotine by chronic caffeine exposure

The prevalence of tobacco smoking and coffee drinking place nicotine and caffeine among the most used licit drugs in many societies and their consumption is often characterised by concurrent use. The pharmacological basis for any putative interaction between these drugs remains unclear. Some epidemiological reports support anecdotal evidence, which suggests that smokers consume caffeine to enhance the effects of nicotine. This paper reviews various aspects of the pharmacology of caffeine and nicotine, in humans and experimental animals, important for the understanding of the interactions between these drugs. In particular, recent experiments are reviewed in which chronic exposure to caffeine in the drinking water of rats facilitated acquisition of self-adminstration behavior, enhanced nicotine-induced increases in dopamine levels in the shell of the nucleus accumbens and altered the dopaminergic component of a nicotine discrimination. These studies provide evidence that the rewarding and subjective properties of nicotine can be changed by chronic caffeine exposure and indicate that caffeine exposure may be an important environmental factor in shaping and maintaining tobacco smoking.

Adenosine A1 and A2A receptor antagonists stimulate motor activity: evidence for an increased effectiveness in aged rats

The motor effects of selective adenosine A1 and A2A receptor antagonists were tested in young (2 months) and aged (24 months) Wistar rats. In young rats, both the selective A2A receptor antagonist 5-amino-7-(2-phenylethyl)-2-2(2-furyl)-pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazo++ + lo[1,5-c]pyrimidine (SCH 58261, minimal effective dose 2 mg/kg intraperitoneally (i.p.)) and the selective A1 receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dimethylxanthine (CPT, minimal effective dose 1.2 mg/kg i.p.) stimulated motor activity. In old rats, both compounds induced significant motor activation starting from doses lower than those required in young animals. Specifically, the minimal effective doses of SCH 58261 and CPT in aged rats were 1 and 0.6 mg/kg i.p, respectively. The results indicate that both adenosine A1 and A2A receptors play a functional role in the control of motor activity, and, therefore, the blockade of both receptor subtypes is involved in the motor stimulating properties of methylxanthines. Also the evidence indicates, for the first time, that in aged animals the motor inhibitory adenosinergic tone seems to be increased with respect to young animals.

Potential role of adenosine antagonist therapy in pathological tremor disorders

The continuing lack of effective long-term therapies for Parkinson's disease and other disorders in which a primary symptom is involuntary tremor is leading to a search for alternative pharmacological strategies. Adenosine is a major modulator of neuronal activity and neurotransmitter release in the central nervous system, with A1 receptors inhibiting transmitter release and A2 receptors generally enhancing release of several transmitter systems relevant to the control of movement. The A2a subtype of receptor is especially concentrated in the neostriatum and is co-localised with D2 receptors for dopamine, the affinity of which are reduced by activation of the A2a population. Antagonists of adenosine, such as theophylline, have been reported to improve the tremor in cases of Parkinson's disease and essential tremor, and the development of better and more selective A2a receptor antagonists may prove of value in these disabling disorders.

Adenosine-dopamine receptor-receptor interactions as an integrative mechanism in the basal ganglia

Increasing evidence suggests that antagonistic interactions between specific subtypes of adenosine and dopamine receptors in the basal ganglia are involved in the motor depressant effects of adenosine receptor agonists and the motor stimulant effects of adenosine receptor antagonists, such as caffeine. The GABAergic striatopallidal neurons are regulated by interacting adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors. On the other hand, the GABAergic striatonigral and striatoentopeduncular neurons seem to be regulated by interacting adenosine A1 and dopamine D1 receptors. Furthermore, behavioural studies have revealed interactions between adenosine A2A and dopamine D1 receptors that occur at the network level. These adenosine-dopamine receptor-receptor interactions might offer new therapeutic leads for basal ganglia disorders.

Adenosine A2A receptor antagonism potentiates L-DOPA-induced turning behaviour and c-fos expression in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats

In order to investigate the role of adenosine A2A receptor blockade on dopamine-mediated motor responses, contralateral turning behaviour and expression of the early-gene c-fos was evaluated in rats with a unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesion of the dopaminergic nigrostriatal pathway. SCH 58261, (7-(2-phenylethyl)-5-amino-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo-[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1 , 5-c]pyrimidine) a potent and selective antagonist of adenosine A2A receptors (5 mg/kg i.p.), induced a 70-fold increase in the contralateral turning behaviour induced by a low dose (2 mg/kg i.p.) of the dopamine precursor L-DOPA (L-3, 4-dihydroxyphenylalanine). Expression of c-fos as measured by Fos-like immunoreactivity after SCH 58261 plus L-DOPA was also potentiated as compared with L-DOPA alone, both in striatum and globus pallidus of the 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned side of the brain. SCH 58261 induced a less marked potentiation (7-fold) of turning behaviour induced by dopamine D2 receptor stimulation with quinpirole, while Fos-like immunoreactivity in the striatum and globus pallidus was not affected. Previous studies have shown that SCH 58261 strongly potentiated dopamine D1 receptor-mediated responses. The results of the present study therefore indicate that the positive interaction between SCH 58261 and L-DOPA, in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats, is mainly due to an interaction with dopamine D1 receptors. The data also suggest that adenosine A2A receptor antagonists might be useful for potentiating the effects of L-DOPA in Parkinson's disease.

Stimulation of adenosine A1 receptors prevents the EEG arousal due to dopamine D1 receptor activation in rabbits

The influence of adenosine A1 (N6-cyclopentyladenosine, CPA) and A2 (2-[4-(2-carboxylethyl)phenethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxamido -adenosine hydrochloride, CGS 21680) receptor agonists on SKF 38393-induced electroencephalographic (EEG) arousal was studied in rabbits. While CPA (0.1 mg/kg i.v.) significantly prevented the EEG effects of SKF 38393, CGS 21680 (0.2 mg/kg i.v.) did not affect them. These results demonstrate that adenosine A1 receptors can modulate dopamine D1 receptor-induced EEG arousal and show, for the first time, that adenosine-dopamine interactions are involved in brain functions other than motor activity.

Effects of selective adenosine A1 and A2a agonists on amphetamine-induced locomotion and c-Fos in striatum and nucleus accumbens

Low to moderate doses of amphetamine produce locomotion which is dependent on release of dopamine in the anteromedial striatum and nucleus accumbens. The effects of selective adenosine A1 and A2a receptor agonists on locomotion and c-Fos induction following a moderate dose of amphetamine was assessed in rats. Pretreatment with the adenosine A1 receptor agonist N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) or the adenosine A2a receptor agonist 2-[(2-aminoethylamino)carbonylethylphenylethylamino]-5'-N- ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (APEC) inhibited locomotion following an injection of amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg). This dose of amphetamine induced Fos-like immunoreactivity in an antero-dorsomedial distribution in the caudate-putamen and uniformly in the core and shell of the nucleus accumbens. Pretreatment with the adenosine A2a receptor agonist APEC, but not the adenosine A1 receptor agonist CHA, attenuated c-Fos induction in caudate-putamen and nucleus accumbens by amphetamine. These findings indicate that amphetamine-induced behavior is subject to modulation by adenosine receptors through mechanisms which are both related to and independent of c-Fos induction.

Adenosine A2A receptor stimulation enhances striatal extracellular glutamate levels in rats

The influence of CGS 21680, an adenosine A2A receptor agonist, on striatal glutamate extracellular levels was tested in a microdialysis study in rats. CGS 21680 (10 mu M), infused intrastriatally through the microdialysis probe, greatly enhanced glutamate extracellular levels. These results show that striatal adenosine A2A receptors are involved in the regulation of striatal glutamate extracellular levels. They also suggest that adenosine A2A receptor antagonists may possess neuroprotective effects in models of striatal excitotoxicity.

Dopamine-independent and adenosine-dependent mechanisms involved in the effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate on motor activity in mice

The involvement of dopamine and adenosine mechanisms in the motor effects of systemically administered N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) was studied in non-reserpinized and in reserpinized mice. In non-reserpinized mice NMDA induced motor depression (with 8, 25 and 75 mg/kg i.p.) during the first hour and motor activation (with 25 and 75 mg/kg i.p.) during the second hour after its administration. The non-selective adenosine antagonist, theophylline (3, 10 and 30 mg/kg i.p) induced motor activation during both 1-h periods of observation. NMDA-induced motor depression in non-reserpinized mice was antagonized by theophylline. Higher doses of theophylline were needed to counteract the motor depressant effect induced by higher doses of NMDA. The motor activation induced by NMDA and theophylline in non-reserpinized mice was not additive and theophylline did not enhance the motor activation induced by high doses of NMDA. Both NMDA (25 and 75 mg/kg i.p.) and theophylline (10 and 30 mg/kg) induced motor activation in reserpinized mice and, when coadministered, NMDA counteracted the effect of theophylline. NMDA (8 and 25 mg/kg i.p.) antagonized and theophylline (3, 10 and 30 mg/kg i.p.) potentiated the motor activation induced by the non-selective dopamine agonist, apomorphine (0.1 mg/kg s.c.), in reserpinized mice. In reserpinized mice, the non-selective dopamine antagonist, haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg s.c.) antagonized the motor activation induced by apomorphine (0.1 mg/kg s.c.) and the induced by theophylline (10 mg/kg i.p.) and did not modify NMDA-induced motor activation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)