Mimicking corticosterone's daily rhythm with specific receptor agonists: effects on food, water, and sodium intake

Actions of glucocorticoids at a seasonal baseline as compared to stress-related levels in the regulation of periodic life processes

For decades, demands associated with the predictable life-history cycle have been considered stressful and have not been distinguished from stress that occurs in association with unpredictable and life-threatening perturbations in the environment. The recent emergence of the concept of allostasis distinguishes behavioral and physiological responses to predictable routines as opposed to unpredictable perturbations, and allows for their comparison within one theoretical framework. Glucocorticosteroids (GCs) have been proposed as important mediators of allostasis, as they allow for rapid readjustment and support of behavior and physiology in response to predictable and unpredictable demands (allostatic load). Much work has already been done in defining GC action at the high concentrations that accompany life-threatening perturbations. However, less is known about the role of GCs in relation to daily and seasonal life processes. In this review, we summarize the known behavioral and physiological effects of GCs relating to the predictable life-history cycle, paying particular attention to feeding behavior, locomotor activity and energy metabolism. Although we utilize a comparative approach, emphasis is placed on birds. In addition, we briefly review effects of GCs at stress-related concentrations to test the hypothesis that different levels of GCs play specific and distinct roles in the regulation of life processes and, thus, participate in the promotion of different physiological states. We also examine the receptor types through which GC action may be mediated and suggest mechanisms whereby different GC concentrations may exert their actions. In conclusion, we argue that biological actions of GCs at "non-stress" seasonal concentrations play a critical role in the adjustment of responses that accompany predictable variability in the environment and demand more careful consideration in future studies.

Excretion of electrolytes in Brown Norway and Fischer 344 rats: effects of adrenalectomy and of mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptor ligands

Our previous studies showed that adrenalectomy (ADX) has surprisingly no effect on body weight and fluid intake in the Brown Norway rat strain, suggesting that mineralocorticoid receptor (MR)-mediated effects are present even in absence of corticosteroids in this strain. Moreover, glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-mediated mechanisms are more effective in Brown Norway than in Fischer 344 rats. Such functional differences in corticosteroid receptor pathways between Brown Norway and Fischer 344 rats led us to compare the effect of ADX and MR/GR-mediated actions on sodium and potassium excretion between these two rat strains. To this end, we first measured the effect of an acute high dose of aldosterone on the urinary Na+/K+ concentration ratio in intact and ADX Brown Norway and Fischer 344 rats. Second, to discriminate mineralocorticoid from glucocorticoid actions, we treated chronically ADX rats with increasing doses of aldosterone or RU28362, a pure GR agonist, in the drinking fluid. As sodium homeostasis involves salt appetite regulation, behaviour under mineralocorticoid control, we also measured saline preference in Brown Norway and Fischer 344 rats. Our data illustrate: (1) the very limited effect of ADX on body weight, food and fluid intake, diuresis, natriuresis, kaliuresis and salt appetite in Brown Norway rats, supporting the presence of MR signalling pathways in the absence of adrenal steroids in these rats; (2) the insensitivity of MR to aldosterone in intact Brown Norway rats, and the reduced sensitivity of MR to aldosterone in ADX Brown Norway rats compared with ADX Fischer 344 rats; and (3) the greater sensitivity of GR-related mechanisms to RU28362 in Brown Norway than in Fischer 344 rats in terms of body weight gain and electrolyte excretion. Considering that both MRs and GRs regulate hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis processes, such functional differences in corticosteroid receptors could be at the origin, at least partly, of the strain differences in corticotropic activity/reactivity to stress previously described.

Glucocorticoid regulation of vasopressin V1a receptors in rat forebrain

Vasopressin V1a receptors (V1aRs) are expressed in the septum of the rat brain where they are thought to mediate several of the physiologic and behavioral effects of this neuropeptide. We have investigated the effects of adrenal steroids on forebrain V1aRs. Rats were bilaterally adrenalectomized (ADX) and hormone replaced with either corticosterone (CORT), dexamethasone (DEX) or aldosterone (ALDO) at different concentrations. V1aR mRNA was evaluated using in situ hybridization, and V1aR binding site density was quantified using a specific iodinated V1aR antagonist [125I]d(CH2)5Sar7-AVP (125I-SAVP). V1aR density in the dorsolateral septum and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) decreased significantly with adrenalectomy, and 5 micrograms/100 g b.wt. of DEX was able to restore V1aR binding to levels comparable to those of sham operated controls in both regions. ALDO replacement also elevated V1aR binding in the BNST but not in the septum. In ADX animals given corticosterone in their drinking water, V1aR mRNA levels detected by in situ hybridization increased significantly over the ADX rats given saline. In order to understand the molecular basis of this effect, a putative genomic clone encoding the rat V1aR was isolated, and sequence analysis of the 5' flanking region has revealed the presence of several putative glucocorticoid response elements (GREs). Gel retardation assays were performed using these putative GREs, and two appear to be active in protein binding in glucocorticoid receptor containing nuclear extracts. The glucocorticoid effects on V1aR mRNA and binding, and the presence of putative active GREs in the promoter of the V1aR gene strongly implicate a role for adrenal steroids in the regulation of V1a receptor gene expression in glucocorticoid receptor and/or mineralocorticoid receptor expressing tissues.

The importance of calcium in the control of salt intake

There is no doubt that the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) can have a major influence on salt intake but the conditions used to demonstrate this are rare outside the laboratory. Changes in RAAS activity do not explain the voluntary intake of NaCl solution shown by non-deprived rats or the preference for salty foods shown by humans. As a first attempt to investigate an alternative mechanism, my colleagues and I are studying the effects of dietary calcium on salt appetite. Even though calcium-deprived rats have normal RAAS activity, they show a striking increase in NaCl intake, which can surpass the effects of the most severe manipulations of the RAAS. The physiological mechanism underlying this behavior is unknown but it probably involves an adrenal factor, perhaps corticosterone. Whatever the mechanism, the calcium-deprived rat and other low-renin models of salt intake provide a promising approach to help understand the physiological basis of excess salt consumption by humans.

Adrenal steroid receptors: interactions with brain neuropeptide systems in relation to nutrient intake and metabolism

The glucocorticoid, corticosterone (CORT), is believed to have an important function in modulating nutrient ingestion and metabolism. Recent evidence described in this review suggests that the effects of this adrenal hormone are mediated through two steroid receptor subtypes, the type I mineralocorticoid receptor and the type II glucocorticoid receptor. These receptors, which have different affinities for CORT, respond to different levels of circulating hormone. They mediate distinct effects of the steroid, which can be distinguished by the specific nutrient ingested and by the particular period of the circadian cycle. Under normal physiological conditions, the type I receptor is tonically activated, either by low basal levels of circulating CORT (0.5-2 microgram %) normally available across the circadian cycle or possibly by the mineralocorticoid aldosterone. This type I activation is required for the maintenance of fat ingestion and fat deposition that occurs during most meals of the feeding cycle. In contrast, the type II receptor is phasically activated by moderate levels of CORT (2-10 micrograms %) normally reached during the circadian peak. Activation of this receptor is required for the natural surge in carbohydrate ingestion and metabolism that is essential at the onset of the active feeding cycle when the body's glycogen stores are at their nadir, and gluconeogenesis is needed to maintain blood glucose levels. This receptor is also activated during periods of increased energy requirements, such as, after exercise and food restriction, when CORT levels rise further (> 10 micrograms %) and when its catabolic effects on fat and protein stores predominate to provide additional substrates for glucose homeostasis. These functions of CORT on fat and carbohydrate balance are mediated, in part, by type I and type II receptors located within the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus, which is known to have key functions in controlling nutrient intake and metabolism, as well as circulating CORT levels. Moreover, the type II receptors within this nucleus, in addition to the arcuate nucleus, may interact positively with the peptide, neuropeptide Y, and the catecholamine, norepinephrine, both of which act to enhance natural carbohydrate feeding and CORT release at the onset of the natural feeding cycle. Thus, under normal conditions, endogenous CORT has a primary function in controlling nutrient ingestion and metabolism over the natural circadian cycle, through the coordinated action of the type I and type II steroid receptor systems. Through this action, CORT has impact on total caloric intake and body weight gain over the long term.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Sensitivity of the circadian rhythm of kainic acid-induced convulsion susceptibility to manipulations of corticosterone levels and mineralocorticoid receptor binding

Increases in corticosterone levels have been associated with enhanced susceptibility and decreases in corticosterone levels have been associated with decreased susceptibility to convulsions in mice. The proconvulsant effects of corticosterone are believed to be mediated by central mineralocorticoid receptors (MR). Both convulsion susceptibility and plasma corticosteroid levels display circadian rhythmicity. When corticosterone levels are at their lowest, hippocampal MR binding is submaximal, whereas when corticosterone levels are at their circadian peak, hippocampal MR binding is maximal. In the present experiments the relationship between circadian rhythms of susceptibility to kainic acid-induced convulsions and plasma corticosterone levels was investigated. In addition, the effects of exogenously administered corticosterone and the MR antagonist spironolactone were examined at times of different convulsion susceptibility. In general, lower plasma corticosterone levels were associated with decreased convulsion susceptibility and higher plasma corticosterone levels were associated with greater convulsion susceptibility. Corticosterone, administered when endogenous levels were low, had a proconvulsant effect. Spironolactone, administered when corticosterone levels were higher and hippocampal MR were presumably maximally occupied, had an anticonvulsant effect. These results indicate that the circadian rhythm in susceptibility to kainic acid-induced convulsions is sensitive to manipulations of corticosterone levels and MR binding. Degree of central MR occupancy may, in part, mediate convulsion susceptibility in humans as well as laboratory animals.

Level of corticosterone replacement determines body weight gain in adrenalectomized rats with VMH lesions

Adrenalectomized female rats with lesions of the ventromedial hypothalamus or sham lesions were given SC implants of wax pellets or a fused mixture of corticosterone-cholesterol (40, 75, or 130% by weight). In animals with sham lesions, high dosages of corticosterone proved to be catabolic (r = -0.61 between plasma corticosterone and weight change). In marked contrast, animals with VMH lesions displayed substantial weight gains at all circulating levels of corticosterone, with a significant positive correlation (r = +0.48) between these two variables. It is concluded that: a) damage to the basomedial hypothalamus alters an organism's response to corticosterone at both ends of the dose-response curve, and b) both Type I and Type II corticosterone receptors in the brain play a role in hypothalamic obesity.

Exercise endurance in rats: roles of type I and II corticosteroid receptors

Intact and adrenalectomized (ADX) rats were mildly food deprived and administered dexamethasone (type II agonist), aldosterone (type I agonist), corticosterone (mixed agonist), or vehicle 24 and 2 h prior to forced exercise in a treadmill. The endurance of intact animals was unaffected by hormone treatments. Adrenalectomy greatly advanced the onset of fatigue, and aldosterone exacerbated the effect of adrenalectomy. Corticosterone improved endurance in ADX rats, and dexamethasone was even more potent in this respect. Aldosterone slowed deprivation-induced weight loss in ADXs, while corticosterone and especially dexamethasone accelerated loss. Thus, endurance was directly related to body weight loss, and presumably to the fuels released by such loss. The results extend the type I-type II functional dichotomy to the delivery of utilizable energy for metabolically active tissues.