Rhythm-related changes in pituitary-adrenal function in depression

Neuroendocrine pharmacology of stress

Exposure to hostile conditions initiates responses organized to enhance the probability of survival. These coordinated responses, known as stress responses, are composed of alterations in behavior, autonomic function and the secretion of multiple hormones. The activation of the renin-angiotensin system and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis plays a pivotal role in the stress response. Neuroendocrine components activated by stressors include the increased secretion of epinephrine and norepinephrine from the sympathetic nervous system and adrenal medulla, the release of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and vasopressin from parvicellular neurons into the portal circulation, and seconds later, the secretion of pituitary adrenocorticotropin (ACTH), leading to secretion of glucocorticoids by the adrenal gland. Corticotropin-releasing factor coordinates the endocrine, autonomic, behavioral and immune responses to stress and also acts as a neurotransmitter or neuromodulator in the amygdala, dorsal raphe nucleus, hippocampus and locus coeruleus, to integrate brain multi-system responses to stress. This review discussed the role of classical mediators of the stress response, such as corticotropin-releasing factor, vasopressin, serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine or 5-HT) and catecholamines. Also discussed are the roles of other neuropeptides/neuromodulators involved in the stress response that have previously received little attention, such as substance P, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, neuropeptide Y and cholecystokinin. Anxiolytic drugs of the benzodiazepine class and other drugs that affect catecholamine, GABA(A), histamine and serotonin receptors have been used to attenuate the neuroendocrine response to stressors. The neuroendocrine information for these drugs is still incomplete; however, they are a new class of potential antidepressant and anxiolytic drugs that offer new therapeutic approaches to treating anxiety disorders. The studies described in this review suggest that multiple brain mechanisms are responsible for the regulation of each hormone and that not all hormones are regulated by the same neural circuits. In particular, the renin-angiotensin system seems to be regulated by different brain mechanisms than the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system. This could be an important survival mechanism to ensure that dysfunction of one neurotransmitter system will not endanger the appropriate secretion of hormones during exposure to adverse conditions. The measurement of several hormones to examine the mechanisms underlying the stress response and the effects of drugs and lesions on these responses can provide insight into the nature and location of brain circuits and neurotransmitter receptors involved in anxiety and stress.

Evidence that 5-HT2A receptors in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus mediate neuroendocrine responses to (-)DOI

The present study determined whether the serotonin2A (5-HT2A) receptors in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus mediate the neuroendocrine responses to a peripheral injection of the 5-HT2A/2C receptor agonist (-)DOI [(-)1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane]. The 5-HT2A receptor antagonist MDL100,907 ((+/-)-alpha(2,3-dimethoxyphenyl)-1-[2-(4-fluorophenylethyl)]-4-piperidinemethanol), the 5-HT2C receptor antagonist SB-242084 (6-chloro-5-methyl-1-[[2-[(2-methyl-3-pyridyl)oxy]-5-pyridyl]carbamoyl]-indoline), or vehicle were microinjected bilaterally through a chronically implanted double-barreled cannula into the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus 15 min before a peripheral injection of (-)DOI in conscious rats. (-)DOI significantly elevated plasma levels of oxytocin, prolactin, ACTH, corticosterone, and renin. Neither the 5-HT2A receptor antagonist nor the 5-HT2C receptor antagonist, injected alone, altered the basal levels of these hormones. MDL100,907 (0.748, 7.48, and 18.7 nmol) dose dependently inhibited the (-)DOI-induced increase in all of the hormones except corticosterone. In contrast, SB-242084 (10 nmol) did not inhibit (-)DOI-increased hormone levels. To confirm the presence of 5-HT2A receptors in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus, 5-HT2A receptors were mapped using immunohistochemistry. Densely labeled magnocellular neurons were observed throughout the anterior and posterior magnocellular subdivisions of the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. Moderately to densely labeled cells were also observed in parvicellular regions. Thus, it is likely that 5-HT2A receptors are present on neuroendocrine cells in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. These data provide the first direct evidence that neuroendocrine responses to a peripheral injection of (-)DOI are predominantly mediated by activation of 5-HT2A receptors in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus.

Pulsatile adrenocorticotropic hormone: an overview

Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) is secreted by corticotrophic cells in pulsatile bursts. This paper reviews the extant literature on the phenomenon of pulsatile ACTH after addressing basic issues of hormone pulsatility in neuroendocrine systems. The following themes emerged from reviewing 51 studies measuring plasma ACTH at intervals of 20 min or less: marked inter-individual variability in the pattern of ACTH, the dependence of pulse identification on sampling frequency, the similarity in ACTH pulse amplitude and frequency across species, and the predominance of amplitude over frequency changes in ACTH pulses in altered physiological states. As the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis plays a critical role in orchestrating adaptation and survival, the ability to modulate the shape of ACTH signals may prove to be an important means of transmitting complex information to ACTH responsive cells. The clinical and neurobiological significance of temporal alterations in ACTH secretion represents an area for future investigation.

Diurnal variation of mood and the cortisol rhythm in depression and normal states of mind

A large scale chronobiological investigation was undertaken in 20 drug-free psychiatric inpatients displaying RDC major depression (endogenous subtype) in comparison to 10 healthy control subjects and 10 of the patients after clinical recovery. A series of measurements was taken 6 times a day and, in 8 of a total of 14 variables, also once a night over a period of 10 to 14 days. The following variables were assessed: mood (three different scales), performance (two tests), motor activity (three measures), salivary flow, urinary excretion of water, sodium, potassium, and free cortisol (UFC), and rectal temperature. A phase chart of the acrophases of the 8 variables with measurements taken during day and night revealed two clusters in the depressives and three in the non-depressed subjects. In the depressives, the acrophases of the mood scales clustered around the time of awakening in the morning, together with the acrophase of UFC, whereas all other acrophases clustered in the afternoon. In the non-depressed subjects, however, the mood scales reached their circadian maxima in the middle of the night around the time when sleep was interrupted to take measurements. All other acrophases corresponded roughly with those found in the depressives. The coincidence of the time course of depressed mood and cortisol excretion in the patients was interpreted as reflecting a temporal relationship between diurnal mood swings in depression and the cortisol rhythm. This interpretation was supported by the significant correlation between the acrophases of the two respective rhythms in patients showing a significant diurnal variation in mood. The mood curves of non-depressed subjects seemed unrelated to the cortisol rhythm. Probably, they mirror diurnal fluctuations of vigilance rather than fluctuations of mood. According to the literature, this rhythm is temporally related to the rhythm of melatonin secretion.

Function of the adrenal cortex in patients with major depression

Failure to suppress cortisol secretion after administration of dexamethasone occurs in up to 50% of depressed patients. To test whether this hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) overactivity is associated with adrenocortical hyperresponsiveness, we performed dexamethasone suppression tests (DSTs) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation tests in depressed subjects and subjects with other psychiatric disorders. Three groups were defined: depressed nonsuppressors, depressed suppressors, and other suppressors. While predexamethasone and postdexamethasone cortisol concentrations were greater in the depressed nonsuppressor group, ACTH concentrations did not differ among groups. After receiving alpha-ACTH[1-24] (4.2 micrograms/kg), depressed nonsuppressors had greater increases in stimulated cortisol secretion than the other groups. These results demonstrate that in a subgroup of depressed patients, HPA overactivity is associated with adrenocortical hyperresponsiveness.

Postdexamethasone plasma cortisol and beta-endorphin levels in depression: relationship to severity of illness

The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is dysregulated in many patients with depression, probably at all levels of the axis. To determine if HPA dysregulation is associated with severity of depression, we studied a group of 66 patients with major depressive disorder. Each patient underwent a pretreatment Dexamethasone Suppression Test, with plasma postdexamethasone cortisol determination at 8:00 AM, 4:00 PM, and 11:00 PM. All three postdexamethasone cortisol levels were significantly correlated with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) scores. We also examined the "profile" measures of mean, maximum, and minimum of the three cortisol values; again, all three were significantly correlated with HRSD scores. To evaluate associations between clinical severity and HPA dysregulation at the pituitary level, we studied a second group of 44 patients with major depressive disorder. Each had postdexamethasone cortisol determinations at 4:00 PM and 11:00 PM as well as pre- and postdexamethasone beta-endorphin determinations at 4:00 PM. The cortisol data from this group followed the same pattern as in the first sample, and there was a significant relationship between HRSD score and degree of beta-endorphin nonsuppression as well. These results suggest that severity of depression is one of the determinants of dysregulation at both adrenal and pituitary levels of the HPA axis, accounting for 10%-20% of the observed variance.

Multiple depressive episodes and plasma postdexamethasone cortisol levels

The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is dysregulated in many patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). To determine whether or not a past history of depressive episodes is associated with this dysregulation, we studied the relationships among number of past depressive episodes, number of previous hospitalizations for depression, and number of years since first depressive episode and biological markers of depression (postdexamethasone plasma cortisol levels and dexamethasone suppressor/nonsuppressor status). No significant relationships were detected.

Association of [3H]-imipramine and [3H]-paroxetine binding with the 5HT transporter in brain and platelets: relevance to studies in depression

[3H]-Imipramine and [3H]-paroxetine label with high affinity a site which is associated with the serotonergic transporter in brain and platelets. The pharmacological profile of inhibition by drugs of [3H]-imipramine and [3H]-paroxetine binding is highly correlated with the potency of the drugs to inhibit the uptake of 5HT. Denervation of serotonergic neurons by electrolytic lesions or with 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine produces marked decreases in the density of [3H]-imipramine as well as [3H]-paroxetine binding. Dissociation kinetic experiments support the view that the substrate recognition site for 5HT is different from the modulatory site which is labelled by [3H]-imipramine or [3H]-paroxetine. The existence of an endogenous ligand acting on the [3H]-imipramine recognition site to modulate the 5HT transporter was proposed by several laboratories. [3H]-Imipramine binding in platelets appears to be a biological marker in depression. Studies carried out in several laboratories report a significant decrease in the Bmax of platelet [3H]-imipramine binding without changes in Kd, when severely depressed untreated patients are compared with healthy volunteers matched for age and sex. The Bmax of platelet [3H]-imipramine binding appears to be a state-dependent biological marker in depression. It is tempting to speculate that the endocoid of the [3H]-imipramine recognition site may play a role in the pathogenesis of depression.

Lack of seasonal variation in platelet [3H]imipramine binding in humans

The Bmax of [3H]imipramine (IMI) binding has been reported to be reduced in platelets of depressed untreated patients as compared with normal controls. However, it has also been suggested that this difference could be related to the failure to take into account seasonal variations in the binding parameters for [3H]IMI recognition sites in platelets. For this reason, [3H]IMI binding was studied throughout 1 year in platelet membranes from 11 control volunteers, with blood samples collected once a month. The Bmax and Kd values of [3H]IMI binding showed no significant variation throughout the 12-month period of the study. These results indicate that in the control population, the platelet [3H]IMI binding parameters remain stable, and that the decrease in Bmax observed in depressed untreated patients reflects a genuine difference, which may be considered to be a biological marker in depression.