Underprediction of human skin erythema at low doses per fraction by the linear quadratic model

Normal tissue complication probability of acute eyelids erythema following radiotherapy of head and neck cancers and skull-base tumors

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy is broadly used as one of the main treatment methods for patients with head and neck cancers and skull base tumors. However, it can lead to normal tissue complications. Therefore, this study aimed to model normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of eyelid skin erythema after radiation therapy.

METHODS

The dataset of 45 patients with head and neck and skull base tumors was prospectively collected from their dose-volume histograms (DVHs). Grade 1 + eyelid skin erythema based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 4.0) was evaluated as the endpoint after a three-month follow-up. The Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) radiobiological model was developed based on generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD). Model parameters were calculated by maximum likelihood estimation. Model performance was evaluated by ROC-AUC, Brier score and Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

RESULTS

After three months of follow-up, 13.33% of patients experienced eyelids skin erythema grade 1 or more. The parameters of the LKB model were: TD50 = 30 Gy, m = 0.14, and n = 0.10. The model showed good predictive performance with ROC-AUC = 0.80 (CI:0.66-0.94) and a Brier score of 0.20.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, NTCP of eyelid skin erythema was modeled based on the LKB radiobiological model with good predictive performance.

Challenges in radiobiology - technology duality as a key for a risk-free α/β ratio

Since radiotherapy discovery, prediction of biological response to ionizing radiation remains a major challenge. Indeed, several radiobiological models appeared through radiotherapy history. Nominal single dose so popular in the 1970s, was tragically linked to the dark years in radiobiology by underestimating the late toxicity of the high-dose fractions. The actual prominent linear-quadratic model continues to prove to be an effective tool in radiobiology. Mainly with its pivotal α/β ratio, which gives a reliable estimate of tissues sensitivity to fractions. Despite these arguments, this model experiences limitations with substantial doubts of α/β ratio values. Interestingly, the story of radiobiology since X-ray discovery is truly instructive and teaches modern clinicians to refine fractionation schemes. Many fractionation schemes have been tested with successes or dramas. This review retraces radiobiological models' history, and confronts these models to new fractionation schemes, drawing a preventive message.

Prevention and treatment of radiotherapy-induced side effects

Radiotherapy remains a mainstay of cancer treatment, being used in roughly 50% of patients. The precision with which the radiation dose can be delivered is rapidly improving. This precision allows the more accurate targeting of radiation dose to the tumor and reduces the amount of surrounding normal tissue exposed. Although this often reduces the unwanted side effects of radiotherapy, we still need to further improve patients' quality of life and to escalate radiation doses to tumors when necessary. High-precision radiotherapy forces one to choose which organ or functional organ substructures should be spared. To be able to make such choices, we urgently need to better understand the molecular and physiological mechanisms of normal tissue responses to radiotherapy. Currently, oversimplified approaches using constraints on mean doses, and irradiated volumes of normal tissues are used to plan treatments with minimized risk of radiation side effects. In this review, we discuss the responses of three different normal tissues to radiotherapy: the salivary glands, cardiopulmonary system, and brain. We show that although they may share very similar local cellular processes, they respond very differently through organ-specific, nonlocal mechanisms. We also discuss how a better knowledge of these mechanisms can be used to treat or to prevent the effects of radiotherapy on normal tissue and to optimize radiotherapy delivery.

Prevention of Cutaneous Damages Induced by Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer: An Institutional Experience

Background and Aims

A minimal part of patients treated with radiotherapy on the entire breast may present an acute, subacute or chronic cutaneous damage of the healthy tissues involved in the radiation fields. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the most efficient topical hydrating treatment in the prevention of cutaneous radio-induced acute effects in breast cancer.

Material and Methods

From February 2009 to March 2010, 100 patients affected by breast cancer have been recruited, all of the female sex and with an average age of 47 years. The following topical treatments were compared: Pure vitamin E (Vea lipogel®), Omega-3,6,9 (Quinovit®), Betaglucan, sodium hyaluronate (Neoviderm®), Vitis vinifera A.s-I-M.t-O.dij, (Ixoderm®), natural triglycerides-fitosterols (Xderit®). All enrolled patients were subjected to breast conservative treatment (quadrantectomy with or without homolateral axillary dissection) and without prosthesis positioning, in combination or not with hormonal treatment. Evaluation of the cutaneous acute toxicity was defined according to the RTOG scale either during radiotherapy and during follow-up (3 months after radiation treatment).

Results

All patients completed the radiotherapy; 62% of patients presented G0-G1 cutaneous toxicity, 28% have developed G2 cutaneous toxicity, 10% have developed G3 toxicity; no patient presented G4 toxicity. Analysis of the data revealed a correlation between the topical treatment used and the incidence of cutaneous toxicity.

Conclusions

Of the patients who used the cutaneous hydrating creams – betaglucan, sodium hyaluronate (Neoviderm®) and Vitis vinifera A.s-I-M.t-O.dij (Ixoderm®) – during the radiation treatment, 80% developed G0-G1 toxicity and 20% G2 toxicity. The patients who used the other hydrating creams tested in the study manifested not only G1-G2 toxicity but also some G3 toxicity. Chemotherapeutic treatment with taxanes and/or anthracyclines did not result in an increased breast cutaneous toxicity induced by radiotherapy. The hormone therapy given to patients undergoing radiotherapy did not result in increased breast cutaneous toxicity. Further analysis on a larger number of patients is necessary for definitive results.

Extracting the normal lung dose-response curve from clinical DVH data: a possible role for low dose hyper-radiosensitivity, increased radioresistance

In conventionally fractionated radiation therapy for lung cancer, radiation pneumonitis' (RP) dependence on the normal lung dose-volume histogram (DVH) is not well understood. Complication models alternatively make RP a function of a summary statistic, such as mean lung dose (MLD). This work searches over damage profiles, which quantify sub-volume damage as a function of dose. Profiles that achieve best RP predictive accuracy on a clinical dataset are hypothesized to approximate DVH dependence.Step function damage rate profiles R(D) are generated, having discrete steps at several dose points. A range of profiles is sampled by varying the step heights and dose point locations. Normal lung damage is the integral of R(D) with the cumulative DVH. Each profile is used in conjunction with a damage cutoff to predict grade 2 plus (G2+) RP for DVHs from a University of Michigan clinical trial dataset consisting of 89 CFRT patients, of which 17 were diagnosed with G2+ RP.Optimal profiles achieve a modest increase in predictive accuracy--erroneous RP predictions are reduced from 11 (using MLD) to 8. A novel result is that optimal profiles have a similar distinctive shape: enhanced damage contribution from low doses (<20 Gy), a flat contribution from doses in the range ~20-40 Gy, then a further enhanced contribution from doses above 40 Gy. These features resemble the hyper-radiosensitivity / increased radioresistance (HRS/IRR) observed in some cell survival curves, which can be modeled using Joiner's induced repair model.A novel search strategy is employed, which has the potential to estimate RP dependence on the normal lung DVH. When applied to a clinical dataset, identified profiles share a characteristic shape, which resembles HRS/IRR. This suggests that normal lung may have enhanced sensitivity to low doses, and that this sensitivity can affect RP risk.

Exposure to low dose ionising radiation: molecular and clinical consequences

This review article provides a comprehensive overview of the experimental data detailing the incidence, mechanism and significance of low dose hyper-radiosensitivity (HRS). Important discoveries gained from past and present studies are mapped and highlighted to illustrate the pathway to our current understanding of HRS and the impact of HRS on the cellular response to radiation in mammalian cells. Particular attention is paid to the balance of evidence suggesting a role for DNA repair processes in the response, evidence suggesting a role for the cell cycle checkpoint processes, and evidence investigating the clinical implications/relevance of the effect.

Low-dose radiation hyper-radiosensitivity in multicellular tumour spheroids

OBJECTIVE

We propose and study a new model aimed at describing the low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity phenomenon appearing in the survival curves of different cell lines.

METHODS

The model uses the induced repair assumption, considering that the critical dose at which this mechanism begins to act varies from cell to cell in a given population. The model proposed is compared with the linear-quadratic model and the modified linear-quadratic model, which is commonly used in literature and in which the induced repair is taken into account in a heuristic way. The survival curve for the MCF-7 line of human breast cancer is measured at low absorbed doses and the uncertainties in these doses are estimated using thermoluminiscent dosemeters.

RESULTS

It is shown that these multicellular spheroids present low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity. The new model permits an accurate description of the data of two human cell lines (previously published) and of the multicellular spheroids of the MCF-7 line here measured.

CONCLUSION

The model shows enough flexibility to account for data with very different characteristics and considers in a faithful way the hypothesis of the repair induction.

Formulation of the multi-hit model with a non-Poisson distribution of hits

PURPOSE

We proposed a formulation of the multi-hit single-target model in which the Poisson distribution of hits was replaced by a combination of two distributions: one for the number of particles entering the target and one for the number of hits a particle entering the target produces. Such an approach reflects the fact that radiation damage is a result of two different random processes: particle emission by a radiation source and interaction of particles with matter inside the target.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Poisson distribution is well justified for the first of the two processes. The second distribution depends on how a hit is defined. To test our approach, we assumed that the second distribution was also a Poisson distribution. The two distributions combined resulted in a non-Poisson distribution. We tested the proposed model by comparing it with previously reported data for DNA single- and double-strand breaks induced by protons and electrons, for survival of a range of cell lines, and variation of the initial slopes of survival curves with radiation quality for heavy-ion beams.

RESULTS

Analysis of cell survival equations for this new model showed that they had realistic properties overall, such as the initial and high-dose slopes of survival curves, the shoulder, and relative biological effectiveness (RBE) In most cases tested, a better fit of survival curves was achieved with the new model than with the linear-quadratic model. The results also suggested that the proposed approach may extend the multi-hit model beyond its traditional role in analysis of survival curves to predicting effects of radiation quality and analysis of DNA strand breaks.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model, although conceptually simple, performed well in all tests. The model was able to consistently fit data for both cell survival and DNA single- and double-strand breaks. It correctly predicted the dependence of radiation effects on parameters of radiation quality.

Treatment modelling: the influence of micro-environmental conditions

The interest in theoretical modelling of radiation response has grown steadily from a fast method to estimate the gain of new treatment strategies to an individualisation tool that may be used as part of the treatment planning algorithms. While the advantages of biological optimisation of plans are obvious, accurate theoretical models and realistic information about the micro-environmental conditions in tissues are needed. This paper aimed to investigate the clinical implications of taking into consideration the details of the tumour microenvironmental conditions. The focus was on the availability of oxygen and other nutrients to tumour cells and the relationship between cellular energy reserves and DNA repair ability as this is thought to influence the response of the various hypoxic cells. The choice of the theoretical models for predicting the response (the linear quadratic model or the inducible repair model) was also addressed. The modelling performed in this project has shown that the postulated radiobiological differences between acute and chronic hypoxia have some important clinical implications which may help to understand the mechanism behind the current success rates of radiotherapy. The results also suggested that it is important to distinguish between the two types of hypoxia in predictive assays and other treatment simulations.

Dose-effect models for risk-relationship to cell survival parameters

There is an increased interest in estimating the induction of cancers following radiotherapy as the patients have nowadays a much longer life expectancy following the treatment. Clinical investigations have shown that the dose response relationship for cancer induction following radiotherapy has either of two main characteristics: an increase of the risk with dose to a maximum effect followed by a decrease or an increase followed by a levelling-off of the risk. While these behaviours have been described qualitatively, there is no mathematical model that can explain both of them on mechanistic terms. This paper investigates the relationship between the shape of the dose-effect curve and the cell survival parameters of a single risk model. Dose response relationships were described with a competition model which takes into account the probability to induce DNA mutations and the probability of cell survival after irradiation. The shape of the curves was analysed in relation to the parameters that have been used to obtain them. It was found that the two main appearances of clinical data for the induction of secondary cancer following radiotherapy could be the manifestations of the particular sets of parameters that describe the induction of mutations and cell kill for fractionated irradiations. Thus, the levelling off appearance of the dose response curve could be either a sign of moderate to high inducible repair effect in cell survival (but weak for DNA mutations) or the effect of heterogeneity, or both. The bell-shaped appearance encompasses all the other cases. The results also stress the importance of taking into account the details of the clinical delivery of dose in radiotherapy, mainly the fractionated character, as the findings of our study did not appear for single dose models. The results thus indicate that the shapes of clinically observed dose response curves for the induction of secondary cancers can be described by using one single competition model. It was also found that data for cancer induction may be linked to in vivo cell survival parameters that may be used for other modelling applications.

Radiobiology of systemic radiation therapy

Although systemic radionuclide therapy (SRT) is effective as a palliative therapy in patients with metastatic cancer, there has been limited success in expanding patterns of utilization and in bringing novel systemic radiotherapeutic agents to routine clinical use. Although there are many factors that contribute to this situation, we hypothesize that a better understanding of the radiobiology and mechanism of action of SRT will facilitate the development of future compounds and the future designs of prospective clinical trials. If these trials can be rationalized to the biological basis of the therapy, it is likely that the long-term outcome would be enhanced therapeutic efficacy. In this review, we provide perspectives of the current state of low-dose-rate (LDR) radiation research and offer linkages where appropriate with current clinical knowledge. These include the recently described phenomena of low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity-increased radioresistance (LDH-IRR), adaptive responses, and biological bystander effects. Each of these areas require a major reconsideration of existing models for radiation action and an understanding of how this knowledge will integrate into the evolution of clinical SRT practice. Validation of a role in vivo for both LDH-IRR and biological bystander effects in SRT would greatly impact the way we would assess therapeutic response to SRT, the design of clinical trials of novel SRT radiopharmaceuticals, and risk estimates for both therapeutic and diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals. We believe that the current state of research in LDR effects offers a major opportunity to the nuclear medicine community to address the basic science of clinical SRT practice, to use this new knowledge to expand the use and roles of SRT, and to facilitate the introduction of new therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals.

Low-Dose Radiation Response of Primary Keratinocytes and Fibroblasts from Patients with Cervix Cancer

The aim of the present study was to examine, using the micronucleus (MN) assay, the low-dose radiation response of normal skin cells from cancer patients and to determine whether the hyper-radiosensitivity (HRS)-like phenomenon occurs in cells of these patients. Primary skin fibroblasts and keratinocytes derived from 40 patients with cervix cancer were studied. After in vitro gamma irradiation with single doses ranging from 0.05 to 4 Gy, MN induction was assessed. For each patient, the linear-quadratic (LQ) model and the induced repair (IR) model were fitted over the whole data set. In fits of the IR model, an HRS-like response after low doses (seen as the deviation over the LQ curve) was demonstrated for the fibroblasts of two patients and for the keratinocytes of four other patients. The alpha(s)/alpha(r) ratio for the six patients ranged from 2.7 to 15.4, whereas the values of the parameter d(c) ranged from 0.13 to 0.36 Gy. No relationship was observed between chromosomal radiosensitivity of fibroblasts and keratinocytes derived from the same donor in the low-dose (0.1-0.25 Gy) region. In conclusion, the fact that low-dose chromosomal hypersensitivity was observed for cells of only six of the patients studied suggests that it is not a common finding in human normal cells and can represent an individual characteristic.

Ophthalmic and adnexal complications of radiotherapy

The role of radiotherapy in ophthalmic practice continues to grow. This growth has seen an expansion of indications for radiotherapy, a refinement of the modalities that can be used and a reduction in the ocular and adnexal complications that result from this form of therapy. The compendium of indications for radiotherapy in ophthalmology continues to grow and now includes many conditions such as the treatment of lid and adnexal disease, ocular surface disorders and both benign and malignant disease of the posterior segment and optic pathways. The radiotherapeutic modalities employed to manage these conditions are numerous and include both radioactive plaques (brachytherapy) and external beam radiation techniques. New techniques such as stereotactic radiosurgery are delivering benefits in the management of conditions such as optic nerve sheath meningioma, where the treatment of this blinding and occasionally life-threatening intracranial neoplasm now results in fewer adverse affects. The purpose of this review is to give a brief overview of the indications and treatment modalities, and a more in-depth discussion of the potential side-effects when radiotherapy is used for ocular and periorbital disease.

Correlation of dosimetric factors and radiation pneumonitis for non-small-cell lung cancer patients in a recently completed dose escalation study

PURPOSE

To determine dosimetric factors for lung, lung subregions, and heart that correlate with radiation pneumonitis (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 or more) in the 78 evaluable patients from a Phase I dose escalation study (1991-2003) of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) of non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

There were 10 > or = Grade 3 pneumonitis cases within 6 months after treatment. Dose-volume factors analyzed for univariate correlation with > or = Grade 3 pneumonitis were mean dose (MD), effective uniform dose (d(eff)), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), parallel model f(dam) and V(D) for 5 < or = D < or = 60 Gy for whole, ipsilateral, contralateral, upper and lower halves of the lungs and heart D05, and mean and maximum doses.

RESULTS

The most significant variables (0.005 < p < 0.006) were ipsilateral lung V(D) for D < 20 Gy. Also significant (p < 0.05) for ipsilateral lung were V(D) for D < 50 Gy, MD, f(dam) and d(eff); for total lung V(D) (D < 50 Gy), MD, f(dam), d(eff) and NTCP; for lower lung V(D) (D < 60 Gy), MD, f(dam) and d(eff). All variables for upper and contralateral lung were insignificant, as were heart variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Previously reported correlations between severe pneumonitis and whole lung V13 and with other dose-volume factors of total lung and lower lung are confirmed. The most significant correlations were for (V05-V13) in ipsilateral lung.

Low dose hyper-radiosensitivity in metastatic tumors

INTRODUCTION

The laboratory phenomenon of low dose hyper-radiosensitivity (LDHRS) describes excess cell kill at doses below 1 Gy relative to that predicted by the linear quadratic model. These data have stimulated the investigation of whether LDHRS can be exploited clinically.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic tumor nodules to skin were recruited. The nodules were measured in three dimensions, consecutively numbered according to volume, and randomized, in matched pairs, to receive either conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (1.5 Gy/day) or ultrafractionated radiotherapy (0.5 Gy TDS: 4-h gap). Both groups were treated for 12 days. Measurements were taken Days 0, 5, 8, 12, and 26 and monthly until regrowth occurred. Tumor volumes were normalized to those on Day 0 and plotted against time from the start of treatment. Time to regrowth to original volume was calculated and compared between groups using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

Eight patients with a total of 40 paired nodules were analyzed; 36 nodules have regrown and are therefore evaluable. Analysis of the whole data set demonstrates a two-tailed p-value of 0.14 in favor of the "ultrafractionated" treatment. Analysis of the tumors generally accepted as being radioresistant and known to show LDHRS in vitro demonstrates a two-tailed p value of 0.009.

CONCLUSIONS

LDHRS can be demonstrated in tumors clinically. An "ultrafractionated" radiotherapy regime produces significantly increased growth delay in radioresistant malignant tumors.

A Sense of Danger from Radiation1

Tissue damage caused by exposure to pathogens, chemicals and physical agents such as ionizing radiation triggers production of generic "danger" signals that mobilize the innate and acquired immune system to deal with the intrusion and effect tissue repair with the goal of maintaining the integrity of the tissue and the body. Ionizing radiation appears to do the same, but less is known about the role of "danger" signals in tissue responses to this agent. This review deals with the nature of putative "danger" signals that may be generated by exposure to ionizing radiation and their significance. There are a number of potential consequences of "danger" signaling in response to radiation exposure. "Danger" signals could mediate the pathogenesis of, or recovery from, radiation damage. They could alter intrinsic cellular radiosensitivity or initiate radioadaptive responses to subsequent exposure. They may spread outside the locally damaged site and mediate bystander or "out-of-field" radiation effects. Finally, an important aspect of classical "danger" signals is that they link initial nonspecific immune responses in a pathological site to the development of specific adaptive immunity. Interestingly, in the case of radiation, there is little evidence that "danger" signals efficiently translate radiation-induced tumor cell death into the generation of tumor-specific immunity or normal tissue damage into autoimmunity. The suggestion is that radiation-induced "danger" signals may be inadequate in this respect or that radiation interferes with the generation of specific immunity. There are many issues that need to be resolved regarding "danger" signaling after exposure to ionizing radiation. Evidence of their importance is, in some areas, scant, but the issues are worthy of consideration, if for no other reason than that manipulation of these pathways has the potential to improve the therapeutic benefit of radiation therapy. This article focuses on how normal tissues and tumors sense and respond to danger from ionizing radiation, on the nature of the signals that are sent, and on the impact on the eventual consequences of exposure.

The evaluation of low dose hyper-radiosensitivity in normal human skin

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The laboratory phenomenon of low dose hyper-radiosensitivity (LDHRS) describes an excess of cell kill at doses below 1Gy relative to that predicted by the linear quadratic model. These data have stimulated clinical investigation into LDHRS in vivo.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Skin was used as a model of normal human tissue. Two studies were initiated investigating the response to low doses of radiation. Study 1 compared once daily skin doses of approximately 0.5 and >1.0Gy in 24 patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy. Skin biopsies before and during radiotherapy were analysed histologically to assess the basal cell density (BCD). Study 2 compared two regimens of equal dose/time intensity--an ultrafractionated regimen (0.5Gy TDS x 12 days) with a conventional regimen (1.5Gy OD x 12 days). Skin biopsies taken during treatment assessed BCD and proliferative index. In both studies the changes in BCD were compared using non-linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Study 1. The results show a significantly greater reduction in BCD in the low dose group when BCD is plotted against dose. This effect is lost when BCD is plotted against time Study 2. The results demonstrate a significantly greater reduction in BCD in the higher dose/fraction arm. The proliferative response was similar in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that LDHRS does not occur in skin following doses of approximately 0.5Gy/fraction when regimens of equal dose/time intensity are compared. As only small volumes of normal tissue were irradiated it is difficult to predict the biological relevance of this with respect to larger field low dose per fraction irradiation regimens or risk of cancer induction. Equally we cannot extrapolate to effects resulting from exposure to doses <0.5Gy or to the effects of low doses on other endpoints.

Low-Dose Hyper-radiosensitivity: A Consequence of Ineffective Cell Cycle Arrest of Radiation-Damaged G2-Phase Cells

This review highlights the phenomenon of low-dose hyper- radiosensitivity (HRS), an effect in which cells die from excessive sensitivity to small single doses of ionizing radiation but become more resistant (per unit dose) to larger single doses. Established and new data pertaining to HRS are discussed with respect to its possible underlying molecular mechanisms. To explain HRS, a three-component model is proposed that consists of damage recognition, signal transduction and damage repair. The foundation of the model is a rapidly occurring dose-dependent pre-mitotic cell cycle checkpoint that is specific to cells irradiated in the G2phase. This checkpoint exhibits a dose expression profile that is identical to the cell survival pattern that characterizes HRS and is probably the key control element of low-dose radiosensitivity. This premise is strengthened by the recent observation coupling low- dose radiosensitivity of G2-phase cells directly to HRS. The putative role of known damage response factors such as ATM, PARP, H2AX, 53BP1 and HDAC4 is also included within the framework of the HRS model.

The relationship between factors that impair wound healing and the severity of acute radiation skin and mucosal toxicities in head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

To determine which wound-healing factors impact on the severity of radiation skin and oral mucosal reactions in head and neck cancer and to test modifications to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) acute toxicity scoring system.

METHODS

A consecutive sample of 53 head and neck cancer patients who were scheduled for curative or palliative radiation therapy. Therapy was planned using traditional computerized techniques. A new RTOG subscale for tongue reactions was developed. Information on potential predictors was collected during the first week of treatment. Reactions were observed and documented each week throughout treatment using the RTOG Acute Reaction Scoring System scores of acute oropharyngeal reactions and various personal factors.

RESULTS

Significant relationships were found between severe skin and oral reactions and age, commencing radiation within 2 months of surgery and smoking. Significant relationships for severe oral mucosal reactions were found with weight at the commencement of treatment, inadequate or poor diet, having had mucositis with previous chemotherapy, and the use of a custom-made Perspex tongue immobilizer.

CONCLUSIONS

Three conclusions can be derived from this study: (1) structures within the oral cavity should be considered separately for toxicity scoring, (2) the newly developed tongue RTOG subscale adds accuracy and specificity to the RTOG acute toxicity scoring system, and (3) wound healing factors are an important component of understanding risk for side effects in head and neck cancer treatment.

An association between the radiation-induced arrest of G2-phase cells and low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity: a plausible underlying mechanism?

The survival of asynchronous and highly enriched G1-, S- and G2-phase populations of Chinese hamster V79 cells was measured after irradiation with 60Co gamma rays (0.1-10 Gy) using a precise flow cytometry-based clonogenic survival assay. The high-dose survival responses demonstrated a conventional relationship, with G2-phase cells being the most radiosensitive and S-phase cells the most radioresistant. Below 1 Gy, distinct low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity (HRS) responses were observed for the asynchronous and G2-phase enriched cell populations, with no evidence of HRS in the G1- and S-phase populations. Modeling supports the conclusion that HRS in asynchronous V79 populations is explained entirely by the HRS response of G2-phase cells. An association was discovered between the occurrence of HRS and the induction of a novel G2-phase arrest checkpoint that is specific for cells that are in the G2 phase of the cell cycle at the time of irradiation. Human T98G cells and hamster V79 cells, which both exhibit HRS in asynchronous cultures, failed to arrest the entry into mitosis of damaged G2-phase cells at doses less than 30 cGy, as determined by the flow cytometric assessment of the phosphorylation of histone H3, an established indicator of mitosis. In contrast, human U373 cells that do not show HRS induced this G2-phase checkpoint in a dose-independent manner. These data suggest that HRS may be a consequence of radiation-damaged G2-phase cells prematurely entering mitosis.

Low-dose radiation hypersensitivity in human tumor cell lines: effects of cell-cell contact and nutritional deprivation

The hyper-radiosensitivity at low doses recently observed in vitro in a number of cell lines is thought to have important implications for improving tumor radiotherapy. However, cell-cell contact and the cellular environment influence cellular radiosensitivity at higher doses, and they may alter hyper-radiosensitivity in vivo. To confirm this supposition, we investigated the effects of cell density, multiplicity and nutritional deprivation on low-dose hypersensitivity in vitro. Cell survival in the low-dose range (3 cGy to 2 Gy) was studied in cells of two human glioma (BMG-1 and U-87) and two human oral squamous carcinoma (PECA-4451 and PECA-4197) lines using a conventional macrocolony assay. The effects of cell density, multiplicity and nutritional deprivation on hyper-radiosensitivity/induced radioresistance were studied in cells of the BMG-1 cell line, which showed prominent hypersensitivity and induced radioresistance. The induction of growth inhibition, cell cycle delay, micronuclei and apoptosis was also studied at the hyper-radiosensitivity-inducing low doses. Hyper-radiosensitivity/induced radioresistance was evident in the cells of all four cell lines to varying extents, with maximum sensitivity at 10-30 cGy, followed by an increase in survival up to 50 cGy-1 Gy. Both the glioma cell lines had more prominent hyper-radiosensitivity than the two squamous carcinoma cell lines. Low doses inducing maximum hyper-radiosensitivity did not cause significant growth inhibition, micronucleation or apoptosis in BMG-1 cells, but a transient G(1)/S-phase block was evident. Irradiating and incubating BMG-1 cells at high density for 0 or 4 h before plating, as well as irradiating cells as microcolonies, reduced hyper-radiosensitivity significantly, indicating the role of cell-cell contact-mediated processes. Liquid holding of BMG-1 cells in HBSS + 1% serum during and after irradiation for 4 h significantly reduced hyper-radiosensitivity, suggesting that hyper-radiosensitivity may be due partly to active damage fixation processes at low doses. Therefore, our findings suggest that the damage-induced signaling mechanisms influenced by (or mediated through) cell-cell contact or the cellular environment, as well as the lesion fixation processes, play an important role in hyper-radiosensitivity. Further studies are required to determine the exact nature of the damage that triggers these responses as well as for evaluating the potential of low-dose therapy.

The use of the linear quadratic model in radiotherapy: a review

To be able to predict the impact of any radiotherapy treatment the physics of radiation interactions and the expected biological effect for any radiotherapy treatment situation (dose, fractionation, modality) must be both understood and modelled. This review considers the current use and accuracy of the linear quadratic model which can be used to consider the variation in tissue response with fraction size. Cell kill following radiation damage results from damage to the DNA which can take a variety of forms. In many cases the linear quadratic model is used to estimate the relative impact for different situations especially clinical studies relating to fraction size. This is mainly undertaken using parameters derived from the linear quadratic model such as biological effective dose and standard effective dose. The model has also been adapted to consider the effect of overall treatment time, repair during treatment (as occurs for brachytherapy treatments) and other situations. There are some concerns over its use, mainly in the small dose ranges (both total low doses and low doses per fraction) where studies have shown its inaccuracy. In other situations however it does appear to provide a reasonable estimate of relative clinical effect. As with all models, however results should never be considered out of clinical context.

The impact of skin washing with water and soap during breast irradiation: a randomized study

BACKGROUND

The effect of washing the irradiated skin during radiotherapy for breast cancer is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of washing the breast skin with water and soap during radiotherapy on the intensity of acute skin toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-nine patients treated for breast cancer were prospectively randomized prior to receiving radiotherapy to the breast into two groups: (1), no washing was allowed during radiotherapy (49 patients); and (2), washing was allowed with water and soap (50 patients). Acute toxicity was recorded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) acute skin toxicity scale for each patient every week during radiotherapy and 1 month after the end of radiotherapy. Symptoms related to skin toxicity were scored by visual analogue scales at the same time intervals. Other data collected included sociodemographic data, characteristics related to the tumor and previous treatments, radiation technique, necessity for a second simulation due to loss of skin marks and treatment interruptions.

RESULTS

In the non-washing group, the following maximum acute toxicity scores were observed: grade 0, 2%; grade 1, 41%; grade 2, 57%; grades 3 and 4, 0%. For the washing group, the scores were: grade 0, 0%; grade 1, 64%; grade 2, 34%; grade 3, 2%; and grade 4, 0%. Moist desquamation was seen in 33% of non-washing patients, but in only 14% of washing patients. The median scores of pain, itching and burning of the treated skin were higher in the non-washing group, although this was not statistically significant. In a multivariate analysis using logistic regression, acute skin toxicity was associated with the patient's weight, concomitant radiochemotherapy and hot spots on dosimetry, and there was a trend toward more acute skin toxicity in the non-washing group.

CONCLUSION

Washing the irradiated skin during the course of radiotherapy for breast cancer is not associated with increased skin toxicity and should not be discouraged.

Skin damage probabilities using fixation materials in high-energy photon beams

INTRODUCTION

Patient fixation, such as thermoplastic masks, carbon-fibre support plates and polystyrene bead vacuum cradles, is used to reproduce patient positioning in radiotherapy. Consequently low-density materials may be introduced in high-energy photon beams. The aim of the this study was to measure the increase in skin dose when low-density materials are present and calculate the radiobiological consequences in terms of probabilities of early and late skin damage.

METHOD

An experimental thin-windowed plane-parallel ion chamber was used. Skin doses were measured using various overlaying low-density fixation materials. A fixed geometry of a 10x10 cm field, a SSD=100 cm and photon energies of 4, 6 and 10 MV on Varian Clinac 2100C accelerators were used for all measurements. Radiobiological consequences of introducing these materials into the high-energy photon beams were evaluated in terms of early and late damage of the skin based on the measured surface doses and the LQ-model.

RESULTS

The experimental ion chamber gave results consistent with other studies. A relationship between skin dose and material thickness in mg/cm(2) was established and used to calculate skin doses in scenarios assuming radiotherapy treatment with opposed fields.

CONCLUSION

Conventional radiotherapy may apply mid-point doses up to 60-66 Gy in daily 2-Gy fractions opposed fields. Using thermoplastic fixation and high-energy photons as low as 4 MV do increase the dose to the skin considerably. However, using thermoplastic materials with thickness less than 100 mg/cm(2) skin doses are comparable with those produced by variation in source to skin distance, field size or blocking trays within clinical treatment set-ups. The use of polystyrene cradles and carbon-fibre materials with thickness less than 100 mg/cm(2) should be avoided at 4 MV at doses above 54-60 Gy.

Inducible repair and intrinsic radiosensitivity: a complex but predictable relationship?

Two groups have proposed a simple linear relationship between inducible radioresistance in a variety of mammalian cells and their intrinsic radiosensitivity at 2 Gy (Lambin et al., Int.J. Radiat. Biol. 69, 279-290, 1996; Alsbeih and Raaphorst, unpublished results, 1997). The inducible repair response (IRR) is quantified as a ratio, alpha(S)/alpha(R), i.e. the slope in the hypersensitive low-dose region, alpha(S), relative to the alpha(R) term of the classical linear-quadratic formula. These proposals imply that the intrinsic radiosensitivity at clinically relevant doses is directly linked to the cell's ability to mount an adaptive response as a result of exposure to very low doses of radiation. We have re-examined this correlation and found that the more extensive data set now available in the literature does not support the contention of a simple linear relationship. The two parameters are correlated, but by a much more complex relationship. A more logical fit is obtained with a log-linear equation. A series of log-linear curves are needed to describe the correlation between IRR and SF2, because of the spectrum of alpha/beta ratios among the cell lines and hence the confounding effect of the beta term at a dose of 2 Gy. The degree of repair competence before irradiation starts could also be a major factor in the apparent magnitude of the amount of repair induced. There appears to be a systematic difference in the data sets from different series of cell lines that have been obtained using flow cytometry techniques in the laboratory in Vancouver and using dynamic microscope imaging at the Gray Laboratory. We suggest that the use of a brief exposure to a laser beam in flow cytometry before the cells are irradiated might itself partially induce a stress response and change the DNA repair capacity of the cells. The clinical consequences of the relationship for predicting the benefits of altered fractionation schedules are discussed. [ru5]

Radioresponsiveness at low doses: hyper-radiosensitivity and increased radioresistance in mammalian cells

The rationale for and importance of research on effects after radiation at "low doses" are outlined. Such basic radiobiological studies on induction of repair enzymes, protective mechanisms, priming, and hypersensitivity are certainly all relevant to treatment of cancer (see Section 1, Studies at low doses - relevance to cancer treatment). Included are examples from many groups, using various endpoints to address the possibility of an induced resistance, which has been compared to the adaptive response [M.C. Joiner, P. Lambin, E.P. Malaise, T. Robson, J.E. Arrand, K.A. Skov, B. Marples, Hypersensitivity to very low single radiation doses: its relationship to the adaptive response and induced radioresistance, Mutat. Res. 358 (1996) 171-183.]. This is not intended to be an exhaustive review--rather a re-introduction of concepts such as priming and a short survey of molecular approaches to understanding induced resistance. New data on the response of HT29 cells after treatment (priming) with co-cultured activated neutrophils are included, with protection against X-rays (S1). Analysis of previously published results in various cells lines in terms of increased radioresistance (IRR)/intrinsic sensitivity are presented which complement a study on human tumour lines [P. Lambin, E.P. Malaise, M.C. Joiner, Might intrinsic radioresistance of human tumour cells be induced by radiation?, Int. Radiat. Biol. 69 (1996) 279-290].It is not feasible to extrapolate to low doses from studies at high doses. The biological responses probably vary with dose, LET, and have variable time frames. The above approaches may lead to new types of treatment, or additional means to assess radioresponsiveness of tumours. Studies in many areas of biology would benefit from considerations of different dose regions, as the biological responses vary with dose. There may also be some implications in the fields of radiation protection and carcinogenesis, and the extensions of concepts of hyper-radiosensitivity (HRS)/IRR extended to radiation exposure are considered in Section 2, Possible relevance of IRR concepts to radiation exposure (space). More knowledge on inducible responses could open new approaches for protection and means to assess genetic predisposition. Many endpoints are used currently--clonogenic survival, mutagenesis, chromosome aberrations and more direct--proteins/genes/functions/repair/signals, as well as different biological systems. Because of scant knowledge of the relevant aspects at low doses, such as inducible/protective mechanisms, threshold, priming, dose-rate effects, LET within one system, it is still too early to draw conclusions in the area of radiation exposure. Technological advances may permit much needed studies at low doses in the areas of both treatment and protection.

Superfractionation as a potential hypoxic cell radiosensitizer: prediction of an optimum dose per fraction

PURPOSE

A dose "window of opportunity" has been identified in an earlier modeling study (1) if the inducible repair variant of the LQ model is adopted instead of the pure LQ model, and if all survival curve parameters are equally modified by the presence or absence of oxygen. In this paper we have extended the calculations to consider survival curve parameters from 15 sets of data obtained for cells tested at low doses using clonogenic assays.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A simple computer model has been used to simulate the response of each cell line to various doses per fraction in multifraction schedules, with oxic and hypoxic cells receiving the same fractional dose. We have then used pairs of simulated survival curves to estimate the effective hypoxic protection (OER') as a function of the dose per fraction.

RESULTS

The resistance of hypoxic cells is reduced by using smaller doses per fraction than 2 Gy in all these fractionated clinical simulations, whether using a simple LQ model, or the more complex LQ/IR model. If there is no inducible repair, the optimum dose is infinitely low. If there is inducible repair, there is an optimum dose per fraction at which hypoxic protection is minimized. This is usually around 0.5 Gy. It depends on the dose needed to induce repair being higher in hypoxia than in oxygen. The OER' may even go below unity, i.e. hypoxic cells may be more sensitive than oxic cells.

CONCLUSIONS

If oxic and hypoxic cells are repeatedly exposed to doses of the same magnitude, as occurs in clinical radiotherapy, the observed hypoxic protection varies with the fractional dose. The OER' is predicted to diminish at lower doses in all cell lines. The loss of hypoxic resistance with superfractionation is predicted to be proportional to the capacity of the cells to induce repair, i.e. their intrinsic radioresistance at a dose of 2 Gy.

Hyperfractionation as an effective way of overcoming radioresistance

PURPOSE

To model the influence of hypoxic radioprotection in fractionated treatments over a range of fraction sizes. To determine whether there is a "therapeutic window" of dose per fraction where hypoxic radioresistance could be reduced, and if so, where it occurs in different cell lines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A mathematical model has been used to simulate the response of cells to low doses of radiation, in the region of clinical interest. We have used the inducible repair variant of the linear quadratic (LQ) equation, with a hypersensitive region (alphaS) at low doses that gradually transforms to the accepted "resistance" in the shoulder region (alphaR). It contains two new parameters, the ratio alphaS/alphaR, and D(C). We have accepted that the "induction dose" D(C) is modified by anoxia to the same extent as the other parameters. We have initially modeled using theoretical parameters and then checked the conclusions with 14 sets of published experimental data for cell lines investigated for inducible repair.

RESULTS

We have computed the clinical hypoxic protection (OER') as a function of dose per fraction in simulations of clinical fractionated schedules. We have identified a therapeutic window in terms of dose per fraction at about 0.5 Gy, where the OER' is minimized, regardless of the precise cell survival curve parameters. The minimum OER' varies from one cell line to another, falling to about 1.0 if alphaS/alphaR = 6-10 and even far below 1.0 if alphaS/alphaR > or = 20.

DISCUSSION

Hyperfractionation using 0.5 Gy fractions may therefore be more effective than oxygen mimetic chemical sensitizers, since it could even make some tumor cells more sensitive than oxic normal tissues. The tumor lines that benefit most from this type of sensitization are those with the highest intrinsic oxic radioresistance, i.e. those with high SF2 values.

Do inflammatory processes contribute to radiation induced erythema observed in the skin of humans?

BACKGROUND

Two prospective trials were designed to determine whether there may be a role for inflammatory mediators in human skin erythema at both high and low doses per fraction and for 'out of field' effects.

METHODS

Trial 1. Effects of topical indomethacin (1%) and hydrocortisone (1%) applied before and during radiotherapy were compared for erythema induced by 20 Gy in four fractions (n = 26, 6 MV). Trial 2. Effects of topical hydrocortisone (1 %) applied before and during radiotherapy and no medication were compared for erythema induced by 1, 3, 5 and 7 Gy in five fractions (n = 21, 120 kV). Erythema was measured using reflectance spectrophotometry (RFS) and laser Doppler (LD) on a weekly basis.

RESULTS

Trial 1. A bi-phasic reaction time course was suggested in two-thirds of the cases. The first phase did not appear to be influenced by hydrocortisone cream but the second was significantly attenuated. Indomethacin had no effect on either reaction phase. Erythema measured several centimetres outside of the field was reduced by hydrocortisone but not by indomethacin. Trial 2. Trial 2 confirmed the presence of measurable erythema, invisible to the eye, that coincided in its time course to the first phase of erythema noted in trial 1. This reaction was more intense than predicted by the LQ formula and was non-significantly attenuated by topical hydrocortisone. RFS readings proved to be less subject to inter- and intra-patient variations than the LD unit used.

CONCLUSION

Inflammatory responses may play a role in the mediation of the erythematous response to radiation in human skin. Further studies are warranted.