Aortic valve morphology: an important in vitro determinant of proximal regurgitant jet width by Doppler color flow mapping

Prediction of severity of isolated aortic regurgitation by echocardiography: an aortic regurgitation index study

BACKGROUND

No single precise qualitative method is recommended for evaluating the severity of aortic regurgitation (AR). Quantitative methods for AR assessment are, typically, cumbersome and time-consuming. The purpose of this study was to develop a more comprehensive method for predicting the severity of AR.

METHODS

In all, 79 patients with normal left ventricular systolic function and at least mild AR were included in this prospective study. The standard references for evaluating AR severity were quantitative methods. The AR index consisted of 5 echocardiographic parameters: jet width ratio, vena contracta width, pressure half-time, jet density, and diastolic flow reversal in the descending aorta. Each parameter was scored on a 3-point scale from 1 to 3. The AR index was calculated as the sum of each score divided by the number of parameters. Thus, an increasing AR index score from 1 to 3 was indicative of increasing regurgitation.

RESULT

The study demonstrated that the numeric value of AR index increased proportionately to the quantitative grading of AR severity, and proved to be an accurate predictor for AR severity. A 1.8 threshold for the AR index offered a high level of sensitivity and negative predictive value for severe AR. The possibility of missing severe AR was low with AR index less than 1.8. A 2.6 threshold for the AR index provided high specificity and positive predictive value for severe AR. The possibility of diagnosing severe AR was extremely high with AR index of 2.6 or more.

CONCLUSION

AR index provided a more comprehensive method for predicting the degree of AR severity in this study. We suggest that the AR index should be considered for any evaluation of the severity of AR.

Valvular Heart Disease

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is characterized by diastolic reflux of blood from the aorta into the left ventricle (LV). Acute AR typically causes severe pulmonary edema and hypotension and is a surgical emergency. Chronic severe AR causes combined LV volume and pressure overload. It is accompanied by systolic hypertension and wide pulse pressure, which account for peripheral physical findings, such as bounding pulses. The afterload excess caused by systolic hypertension leads to progressive LV dilation and systolic dysfunction. The most important diagnostic test for AR is echocardiography. It provides the ability to determine the cause of AR and to assess the severity of AR and its effect on LV size, function, and hemodynamics. Many patients with chronic severe AR may remain clinically compensated for years with normal LV function and no symptoms. These patients do not require surgery but can be followed carefully for the onset of symptoms or LV dilation/dysfunction. Surgery should be considered before the LV ejection fraction falls below 55% or the LV end-diastolic dimension reaches 55 mm. Symptomatic patients should undergo surgery unless there are excessive comorbidities or other contraindications. The primary role of medical therapy with vasodilators is to delay the need for surgery in asymptomatic patients with normal LV function or to treat patients in whom surgery is not an option. The goal of vasodilator therapy is to achieve a significant decrease in systolic arterial pressure. Future therapies may focus on molecular mechanisms to prevent adverse LV remodeling and fibrosis.

Changes in size of ascending aorta and aortic valve function with time in patients with congenitally bicuspid aortic valves

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is associated with premature valve dysfunction and abnormalities of the ascending aorta. Limited data exist regarding serial changes of aortic dilation in patients with BAV. We studied paired transthoracic echocardiograms of 68 patients with BAV (mean age 44 years) and with at least 2 examinations >12 months apart (mean follow-up 47 months) to characterize the progression of aortic dilation and the natural history of valve function. We measured aortic root and ascending aortic diameters at baseline and follow-up. We measured aortic gradients and severity of aortic regurgitation (AR). During follow-up, aortic diameters increased at the sinuses of Valsalva by 1.9 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3 to 2.5), at the sinotubular junction by 1.6 mm (95% CI 0.8 to 2.3), and at the proximal ascending aorta by 2.7 mm (95% CI 1.9 to 3.6). Mean rate of diameter progression was 0.5 mm/year at the sinuses of Valsalva (95% CI 0.3 to 0.7), 0.5 mm/year at the sinotubular junction (95% CI 0.3 to 0.7), and 0.9 mm/year at the proximal ascending aorta (95% CI 0.6 to 1.2). Progression was observed regardless of hemodynamic function at baseline. Mean aortic valve gradient increased significantly from baseline to follow-up (17.6 mm Hg vs 25.7 mm Hg, p <0.001). The degree of AR increased during follow-up in 17 patients (25%). In addition, progression of aortic diameter dilation occurred irrespective of baseline valve function in adult patients with BAV. We also observed considerable progression of aortic gradients and AR over time.

New index for grading the severity of aortic regurgitation based on the cross-sectional area of vena contracta measured by color Doppler flow mapping

This study was designed to examine whether the cross-sectional area of vena contracta measured by color Doppler flow mapping (CFM) could be used for assessing aortic regurgitation (AR) and developing an index for grading AR. The 75 study patients with AR were classified into quadrant grades according to New York Heart Association functional class, regurgitant fraction, left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic dimension and LV end-systolic dimension. Using CFM, the cross-sectional area of the vena contracta was measured and it could distinguish all grades without significant overlap. An area of less than 0.10 cm(2) corresponded to Grade 1, 0.10-0.19 cm(2) corresponded to Grade 2, 0.20-0.29 cm(2) corresponded to Grade 3 and an area of more than 0.30 cm(2) corresponded to Grade 4. An area of vena contracta of more than 0.30 cm(2) identified high-scoring AR (Grade 4) in 11 of 11 (sensitivity 100%) and correctly predicted the absence of high-scoring AR in 60 of 64 (specificity 94%). Conversely, there was considerable overlap between the jet distances with the clinical grades. The cross-sectional area of the vena contracta measured by CFM can provide a simple quantitative assessment of AR that correlates well with the clinical grade of AR.

Vena contracta width measurement: theoretic basis and usefulness in the assessment of valvular regurgitation severity

In patients with valvular regurgitation, the regurgitation jet can be observed by Doppler color flow imaging. Vena contracta is defined as the narrowest part of the jet, just distal to the regurgitant orifice. Vena contracta dimensions reflect the severity of regurgitation. Vena contracta diameter, usually easy to measure in clinical practice, is well correlated with the effective regurgitant orifice area and the regurgitant volume. Cutoff values have been determined to identify severe regurgitation for mitral, aortic, and tricuspid valves. In clinical practice, determination of vena contracta diameter is a useful and simple method for assessment of valvular regurgitation. In the future, assessment of complex jet regurgitations will probably benefit from the contribution of three-dimensional Doppler flow imaging, which should improve the performances of the method.

Measurement of aortic valve anatomic regurgitant area using transesophageal echocardiography: implications for the quantitation of aortic regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Various echocardiographic methods for the assessment of the severity of the aortic regurgitation (AR) by have been described with no general consensus.

AIM

To assess the feasibility and reproducibility of direct planimetric measurement of the end-diastolic gap between aortic cusps on the transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) images in patients with AR. We also analyzed the correlation of this anatomic aortic regurgitanty area with angiographic AR severity.

METHODS

Ninety patients (38 males, 52 females, mean age 41 +/- 24 years) with AR who underwent TEE and contrast aortography in a single institution. The AR was graded angiographically as mild (n = 45), moderate (n = 31), and severe (n = 14). The anatomic regurgitant area was measured on the end-diastolic short-axis TEE images of the aortic valve by planimetering the central gap bordered by the commisural edges of the aortic cusps.

RESULTS

The intraobserver and interobserver variability for the measurement of aortic anatomic regurgitant area were small (mean absolute differences 0.01 +/- 0.01 cm(2), and 0.015 +/- 0.013 cm(2), respectively). The average values of anatomic regurgitant area for angiographically mild, moderate, and severe AR were 0.15 +/- 0.05 cm(2), 0.30 +/- 0.08 cm(2), and 0.68 +/- 0.33 cm(2), respectively (P <.001). When the anatomic regurgitant area was graded as small (> 0.2 cm(2)), moderate (> 0.2 and > 0.4 cm(2)) and large (> 0.4 cm(2)), the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and the diagnostic accuracy for predicting the angiographically mild AR were 85%, 97%, 97%, 87%, and 91%, respectively. For the moderate angiographic AR the same values were 84%, 92%, 81%, 93%, and 90%, and for the severe angiographic AR they were 98%, 93%, 93%, 98% and 97%.

CONCLUSION

The planimetric measurement of aortic anatomic regurgitant area by TEE is feasible and reproducible for the assessment of the severity of AR.

Hemielliptic proximal isovelocity surface area method modified for clinical application: more accurate quantification of mitral regurgitation in Doppler echocardiography

The proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method is one of the various methods used for quantitatively estimating mitral regurgitation. The PISA shape is hemielliptic rather than hemispheric on a slit-like orifice, and the hemielliptic method is more accurate than the hemispheric method for in vitro studies. Nevertheless, the hemispheric method is used clinically because of its simplicity, whereas the hemielliptic method is difficult to approach from 3 orthogonal directions. The present study tries to establish a modified hemielliptic method for use in clinical applications. A closed-circuit, constant flow system was designed to simulate PISA, and various types of slit-like orifices were selected. Three orthogonal PISA radii were measured and flow rates were calculated using the original hemielliptic formula from the 3 orthogonal radii. Flow rates were also calculated indirectly using a linear regression formula, and PISA radii from a bird's eye approach and lateral approaches (modified hemielliptic method) were compared. Flow rates that were determined using the original hemielliptic method correlated significantly with actual flow rates (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001; y = 1.1x - 13; SEE = 13.63 ml/s). Similarly, flow rates calculated using the modified hemielliptic method correlated significantly with actual flow rates (r = 0.90, p < 0.001; y = 0.94x - 0.78; SEE = 14.13 ml/s). The study's results imply that the modified hemielliptic method can be used to accurately quantify mitral regurgitation and could be applied for clinical examinations.

Assessment of aortic regurgitation by transesophageal color Doppler imaging of the vena contracta: validation against an intraoperative aortic flow probe

OBJECTIVES

This study was performed to validate the accuracy of color flow vena contracta (VC) measurements of aortic regurgitation (AR) severity by comparing them to simultaneous intraoperative flow probe measurements of regurgitant fraction (RgF) and regurgitant volume (RgV).

BACKGROUND

Color Doppler imaging of the vena contracta has emerged as a simple and reliable measure of the severity of valvular regurgitation. This study evaluated the accuracy of VC imaging of AR by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).

METHODS

A transit-time flow probe was placed on the ascending aorta during cardiac surgery in 24 patients with AR. The flow probe was used to measure RgF and RgV simultaneously during VC imaging by TEE. Flow probe and VC imaging were interpreted separately and in blinded fashion.

RESULTS

A good correlation was found between VC width and RgF (r = 0.85) and RgV (r = 0.79). All six patients with VC width >6 mm had a RgF >0.50. All 18 patients with VC width <5 mm had a RgF <0.50. Vena contracta area also correlated well with both RgF (r = 0.81) and RgV (r = 0.84). All six patients with VC area >7.5 mm2 had a RgF >0.50, and all 18 patients with a VC area <7.5 mm2 had a RgF <0.50. In a subset of nine patients who underwent afterload manipulation to increase diastolic blood pressure, RgV increased significantly (34 +/- 26 ml to 41 +/- 27 ml, p = 0.042) while VC width remained unchanged (5.4 +/- 2.8 mm to 5.4 +/- 2.8 mm, p = 0.41).

CONCLUSIONS

Vena contracta imaging by TEE color flow mapping is an accurate marker of AR severity. Vena contracta width and VC area correlate well with RgF and RgV obtained by intraoperative flow probe. Vena contracta width appears to be less afterload-dependent than RgV.

Assessment of severity of aortic regurgitation using the width of the vena contracta: A clinical color Doppler imaging study

BACKGROUND

The width of the vena contracta (VC-W), the smallest area of regurgitant flow, reflects the degree of valvular regurgitation and is measurable by color Doppler imaging, but this method has not been validated in aortic regurgitation (AR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively examined 79 patients with isolated AR and 80 patients without regurgitation. The VC-W was measured from the long-axis parasternal view and compared with 2 simultaneous reference methods (quantitative Doppler and 2D echocardiography). In patients without regurgitation, the agreement between methods was excellent. In patients with AR, good correlations (all P<0.0001) were obtained between VC-W and effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) area and regurgitant volume recorded by quantitative Doppler (r=0.89 and 0.90, respectively) and 2D echocardiographic (r=0.90 and 0.89, respectively) methods. These correlations were similar with eccentric or central jets (all P>0.60). The other methods used showed good correlations of VC-W with aortographic grading of AR (n=8, r=0.82, P=0.01), with the proximal flow convergence method (n=53, r=0.85, P<0.0001), and with left ventricular end-diastolic volume (r=0.81, P<0.0001). Sensitivity and specificity of VC-W >/=6 mm for diagnosing severe AR (ERO >/=30 mm(2)) were 95% and 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For assessment of the degree of AR, VC-W shows good correlations with simultaneous quantitative measures (regardless of jet direction), shows good correlations with other methods of assessment of AR, and provides a high diagnostic value for severe AR. VC-W is a simple, reliable method that can be used clinically as part of comprehensive Doppler echocardiographic assessment of AR.

Quantification of tricuspid regurgitation by measuring the width of the vena contracta with Doppler color flow imaging: a clinical study

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the vena contracta width (VCW) measured using color Doppler as an index of severity of tricuspid regurgitation (TR).

BACKGROUND

The VCW is a reliable measure of mitral and aortic regurgitation, but its value in measuring TR is uncertain.

METHODS

In 71 consecutive patients with TR, the VCW was prospectively measured using color Doppler and compared with the results of the flow convergence method and hepatic venous flow, and its diagnostic value for severe TR was assessed.

RESULTS

The VCW was 6.1+/-3.4 mm and was significantly higher in patients with, than those without, severe TR (9.6+/-2.9 vs. 4.2 +/- 1.6 mm, p<0.0001). The VCW correlated well with the effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) by the flow convergence method (r = 0.90, SEE = 0.17 cm2, p<0.0001), even when restricted to patients with eccentric jets (r = 0.93, p < 0.0001). The VCW also showed significant correlations with hepatic venous flow (r = 0.79, p < 0.0001), regurgitant volume (r = 0.77, p<0.0001) and right atrial area (r = 0.46, p< 0.0001). A VCW > or =6.5 mm identified severe TR with 88.5% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity. In comparison with jet area or jet/right atrial area ratio, the VCW showed better correlations with ERO (both p<0.01) and a larger area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.98 vs. 0.88 and 0.85, both p<0.02) for the diagnosis of severe TR.

CONCLUSIONS

The VCW measured by color Doppler correlates closely with severity of TR. This quantitative method is simple, provides a high diagnostic value (superior to that of jet size) for severe TR and represents a useful tool for comprehensive, noninvasive quantitation of TR.

Fluid mechanics of regurgitant jets and calculation of the effective regurgitant orifice in free or complex configurations

The velocity fields of turbulent jets can be described using a single formula which includes two empirical constants: k(core) determining the length of the central core and k(turb) the jet widening. Flow models simulating jet adhesion, confinement and noncircular orifices were studied using laser Doppler anemometer and the modifications of the constants were derived from series of velocity profiles. In circular free jets, k(core) was found equal to 4.1 with a variability of 1.4%. In complex configurations, its variability was equal to 15.2%. For k(turb), the value for free circular jets was of 45.2 with a variability of 6.0% and this variability in complex configurations was significantly higher (30. 1%, p=0.025). The correlation between the actual orifice size and the jet extension was poor (r=0.52). However, the almost constant value of k(core) allowed to define a new algorithm calculating the regurgitant orifice diameter with the use of outlines of the jet image (r=0.89). In conclusion, the fluid mechanics of regurgitant jets is modified in complex configurations but, due to the relative independency of the central core, velocity fields could be used to evaluate the dimensions of the effective regurgitant orifice.

Strategy for optimal aortic regurgitation quantification by Doppler echocardiography: agreement among different methods

BACKGROUND

Although different Doppler methods have been validated for aortic regurgitation quantification, the benefit of combining information from different methods has not been defined.

METHODS

Our study included 2 phases. In the initial phase (60 patients), Doppler parameters (jet width, short-axis jet area, apical jet area, regurgitant fraction from pulmonary and mitral flow, and deceleration slope) were correlated with angiography; range values for each severity grade were defined and intraobserver and interobserver and intermachine variability were studied. In the validation phase (158 patients), defined value ranges were prospectively tested and a strategy based on considering as the definitive severity grade that in which the two best methods agreed was tested.

RESULTS

Jet width had the best correlation with angiography (r = 0.91), and its ratio with the left ventricular outflow diameter did not improve the correlation (r = 0.85) and decreased reproducibility. Apical jet area and regurgitant fraction from pulmonary flow permitted acceptable quantification (r = 0.87 and 0.86, respectively) but with worse reproducibility. The other methods were not assessable in 20% to 30% of studies. Concordance with angiography decreased in jet width when the jet was eccentric (90% vs 77%, P <.01), in apical jet area when mitral valve disease was present (84% vs 65%, P <.02), and in short-axis jet area and regurgitant fraction from pulmonary flow with concomitant aortic stenosis (77% vs 44%, P <.002 and 77% vs 53%, P <.02, respectively). Agreement with angiography was very high (94 [95%] of 99) when severity grade coincided in both jet width and apical jet area. In 59 cases without concordance, regurgitant fraction from pulmonary flow was used as a third method. Overall, this strategy permitted concordance with angiography in 146 patients (92%).

CONCLUSIONS

Jet width is the best predictor in aortic regurgitation quantification by Doppler echocardiography. However, better results were obtained when a strategy based on concordance between jet width and another Doppler method was established, particularly when the jet was eccentric.

Aortic regurgitation: quantitative methods by echocardiography

Quantification of aortic regurgitation (AR) is a common and difficult clinical problem. The severity of regurgitation has traditionally been estimated with the use of contrast aortography, which is impractical as a screening tool or for serial examinations. In the past two decades, Doppler echocardiography has emerged as an important tool in the quantification of AR. Pulsed Doppler mapping of the depth of the regurgitant jet into the left ventricle was one of the initial echocardiographic methods used for this purpose. The slope and pressure (or velocity) half-time of continuous-wave Doppler profiles of regurgitant jets are also useful. These Doppler techniques may be used to determine the regurgitant volume or regurgitant fraction in patients with AR. The use of color Doppler to measure the height (or cross-sectional area) of the regurgitant jet relative to the height (cross-sectional area) of the left ventricular outflow tract is both sensitive and specific in the quantification of AR. More recently, the continuity principle has been used to determine the effective aortic regurgitant orifice area, which increases as AR becomes more severe. Although this is a promising tool, calculation of this value is not yet common practice in most echocardiography laboratories. Although no single echocardiographic technique is without limitations, all have some validity, and it is reasonable to use a combination of them to obtain a composite estimate of the severity of AR.

Three-dimensional reconstruction of the color Doppler-imaged vena contracta for quantifying aortic regurgitation: studies in a chronic animal model

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of color Doppler flow maps to image and extract the vena contracta cross-sectional area to determine the severity of aortic regurgitation (AR) in an animal model. Evaluation of the vena contracta with 2-dimensional imaging systems may not be sufficiently robust to fully characterize this region, which may be asymmetrically shaped.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 6 sheep with surgically induced chronic AR, 18 hemodynamically different states were studied. Instantaneous regurgitant flow rates were obtained by aortic and pulmonary electromagnetic flowmeters (EMFs) as reference standards, and aortic regurgitant effective orifice areas (EOAs) were determined from EMF regurgitant flow rates divided by continuous-wave (CW) Doppler velocities. Composite video data for color Doppler imaging of the aortic regurgitant flows were transferred into a TomTec computer after computer-controlled 180 degrees rotational acquisition. After the 3D data transverse to the flow jet were sectioned, the smallest proximal jet cross section was identified for direct measurement of the vena contracta area. Peak regurgitant flow rates and regurgitant stroke volumes were calculated as the product of these areas and the CW Doppler peak velocities and velocity-time integrals, respectively. There was an excellent correlation between the 3D-derived vena contracta areas and reference EOAs (r=0.99, SEE=0.01 cm2) and between 3D and reference peak regurgitant flow rates and regurgitant stroke volumes (r=0.99, difference=0.11 L/min; r=0.99, difference=1.5 mL/beat, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

3D-based determination of the vena contracta cross-sectional area can provide accurate quantification of the severity of AR.

[The measurement of jet width at its origin in assessing mitral prosthetic regurgitation. The effect of the spatial disposition of the jet]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The study was performed to test the influence of the jet spatial disposition on the correlation degree between the measurement of the jet width at its origin and the severity of mitral prosthetic regurgitation by transesophageal Doppler color flow imaging.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 165 patients with mitral valve prosthesis which were submitted for transesophageal echocardiography examination due to suspected prosthetic dysfunction, we studied 126 with pathological mitral regurgitation. On these patients, studies of jet spatial disposition, maximum width in its origin and severity quantification by means of maximum regurgitation area were performed.

RESULTS

For the free jet group of patients (90), jet width at its origin correlated with maximal regurgitation area (r = 0.75); whereas for the wall jet group (36), the correlation degree was 0.59. We observed a relationship (p < 0.05) between severe mitral regurgitation assessed by maximal regurgitant jet size and jet width > or = 5 mm in both groups: the sensitivity and specificity of 72.7% and 95% respectively for free jets, and 70.7% and 64.4% for wall jets.

CONCLUSIONS

The correlation between the area measurement and the width in its origin is better for free jets than for wall jets. A statistically significant relationship between the presence of severe mitral regurgitation and width in its origin > or = 5 mm could be observed, independently of the jet spatial disposition.

An integrated approach to the quantification of aortic regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Although different Doppler methods have been proposed for the quantification of aortic regurgitation, no study has prospectively compared these methods with each other and their correlation with angiography. The aim of this study was to prospectively analyze the usefulness of different Doppler echocardiography parameters by testing all such parameters in each patient.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients with aortic regurgitation underwent 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic studies and catheterization. The following Doppler indexes were analyzed and compared with aortography. Color Doppler: (1) jet color height/left ventricular outflow tract height in parasternal long-axis view, and (2) jet color area/left ventricular outflow tract area in short-axis view. Continuous Doppler: (3) regurgitant flow pressure half-time, (4) regurgitant flow time velocity integral (in centimeters), and (5) regurgitant flow time velocity integral (in centimeters)/diastolic period (in milliseconds). Pulsed Doppler in thoracic and abdominal aorta: (6) time velocity integral of diastolic reverse flow (in centimeters), (7) time velocity integral of systolic anterograde flow/integral of diastolic reverse flow, (8) (time velocity integral of diastolic reverse flow/diastolic period) x 100, and (9) diastolic reverse flow duration/diastolic period (as a percentage). We compared these parameters with severity of regurgitation measured by angiography and classified as mild, moderate, or severe.

RESULTS

The most useful parameters were (1) jet color height/left ventricular outflow tract height (correctly classified 42 of 49 patients), (2) (time velocity integral of diastolic reverse flow/diastolic period) x 100 in the thoracic aorta (correctly classified 41 of 46 patients), and (3) (time velocity integral of diastolic reverse flow/diastolic period) x 100 in the abdominal aorta (correctly classified 42 of 49 patients). Sequential integration of these 3 parameters correctly classified 96% of patients (44 of 46 patients) and was achieved in 90% of cases.

CONCLUSION

An integrated combination of several Doppler parameters can quickly and accurately classify the degree of aortic regurgitation as determined by angiography.

Quantification of mitral regurgitation with MR phase-velocity mapping using a control volume method

Reliable diagnosis and quantification of mitral regurgitation are important for patient management and for optimizing the time for surgery. Previous methods have often provided suboptimal results. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate MR phase-velocity mapping in quantifying the mitral regurgitant volume (MRV) using a control volume (CV) method. A number of contiguous slices were acquired with all three velocity components measured. A CV was then selected, encompassing the regurgitant orifice. Mass conservation dictates that the net inflow into the CV should be equal to the regurgitant flow. Results showed that a CV, the boundary voxels of which excluded the region of flow acceleration and aliasing at the orifice, provided accurate measurements of the regurgitant flow. A smaller CV provided erroneous results because of flow acceleration and velocity aliasing close to the orifice. A large CV generally provided inaccurate results because of reduced velocity sensitivity far from the orifice. Aortic outflow, orifice shape, and valve geometry did not affect the accuracy of the CV measurements. The CV method is a promising approach to the problem of quantification of the MRV.

Progressive enlargement of the regurgitant orifice in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation

The severity of aortic regurgitation is dependent on the size of the regurgitant orifice, the left ventricular response to volume overload, and the diastolic pressure difference across the aortic valve. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the aortic regurgitant orifice increases over time in patients with audible chronic aortic regurgitation. To assess serial changes in aortic regurgitant severity by the use of two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography, 59 patients (29 men and 30 women) with audible chronic aortic regurgitation were prospectively identified and evaluated annually with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiograms. Patients were followed for a median of 38 months. We measured two separate indicators of the size of the regurgitant orifice: the color Doppler regurgitant jet width and the Doppler-derived regurgitant orifice area. Jet width increased with time (0.5 +/- 0.4 cm at baseline, 0.04 +/- 0.01 cm/year slope, p < 0.001). The regurgitant orifice area also increased (0.12 +/- 0.14 cm2 at baseline, 0.01 +/- 0.01 cm2/year, p = 0.05). Changes in regurgitant orifice area were related to changes in left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (p < 0.001). There were no significant changes in left ventricular chamber dimensions, volumes, and regurgitant volume over time in this cohort. Increases in jet width and orifice area occurred in patients with all degrees of baseline disease severity, with bicuspid or tricuspid leaflet morphology, and with male or female sex. In this prospective study of chronic aortic regurgitation, both jet width and Doppler-derived regurgitant orifice area increased over time. These findings suggest that one factor in the progression of chronic aortic regurgitation is enlargement of the orifice.

Comparison of vena contracta width by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography with quantitative Doppler assessment of mitral regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) severity is routinely assessed by Doppler color flow mapping, which is subject to technical and hemodynamic variables. Vena contracta width may be less influenced by hemodynamic variables and has previously been shown to correlate with angiographic estimates of MR severity. This study was performed to compare mitral vena contracta width by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with simultaneous quantitative Doppler echocardiography in 35 patients with MR. The vena contracta width was measured at the narrowest portion of the MR jet as it emerged through the coaptation of the leaflets; it was identified in 97% of the patients. Vena contracta width correlated well with regurgitant volume (R2 = 0.81) and regurgitant orifice area (R2 = 0.81) by quantitative Doppler technique. A vena contracta width > or = 0.5 cm always predicted a regurgitant volume >60 ml and an effective regurgitant orifice area > or = 0.4 cm2 in all patients. A vena contracta width < or = 0.3 cm always predicted a regurgitant volume <45 ml and a regurgitant orifice area < or = 0.35 cm2. Thus, vena contracta width by multiplane TEE correlates well with mitral regurgitant volume and regurgitant orifice area by quantitative Doppler echocardiography and provides a simple method for the identification of patients with severe MR.

Quantifying aortic regurgitation by using the color Doppler-imaged vena contracta: a chronic animal model study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of determining aortic effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) and aortic regurgitant volume by using the color Doppler-imaged vena contracta (CDVC).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-nine hemodynamically different states were obtained pharmacologically in eight sheep with surgically induced aortic regurgitation. Instantaneous regurgitant flow rates (RFRs) were obtained with aortic and pulmonary electromagnetic flowmeters (EFMs), and aortic EROAs were determined from EFM RFRs divided by continuous wave Doppler velocities. Color Doppler-derived EROAs were estimated by measuring the maximal diameters of the CDVC. Peak and mean RFRs and regurgitant volumes per beat were calculated from vena contracta area continuous wave diastolic Doppler velocity curves. Peak EFM-derived RFRs varied from 1.8 to 13.6 (6.3+/-3.2) L/min (range [mean+/-SD]), mean RFRs varied from 0.7 to 4.9 (2.7+/-1.3) L/min, regurgitant volumes per beat varied from 7.0 to 48.0 (26.9+/-12.2) mL/beat, and the regurgitant fractions varied from 23% to 78% (55+/-16%). EROAs determined by using CDVC measurements correlated well with reference EROAs obtained by using the EFM method (r=.91, SEE=0.07 cm2). Excellent correlations and agreements between peak and mean RFR and regurgitant volumes per beat as determined by Doppler echocardiography and EFM were also demonstrated (r=.95 to .96).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that the CDVC method can be used to quantify both aortic EROAs and regurgitant flow rates.

Doppler echocardiographic assessment of progression of aortic regurgitation

The rate of progression of the degree of chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) is unknown. Furthermore, although left ventricular (LV) dilation has been studied in patients with severe AR, its rate and determining factors, and specifically, its relation to the degree of regurgitation remain to be established and have not previously been studied for mild and moderate AR. The purpose of this study was to explore the progression of chronic AR by 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography, and the relation of LV dilation to the fundamental regurgitant lesion and its progression in patients with a full spectrum of initial AR severity. We studied 127 patients with AR by 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography (69 men; 59 +/- 21 years; 67 with mild, 45 with moderate, 15 with severe AR). AR increased in 38 patients (30%) (25% of mild, 44% of moderate, and 50% of moderate to severe lesions; p <0.006). The ratio of proximal AR jet height to LV outflow tract height also increased (30.3 +/- 17.5% vs 35.2 +/- 19.7%; p <0.0001). Initial LV volumes and mass were larger in patients with more severe AR and increased significantly during follow-up (138 +/- 53 to 164 +/- 70 ml; 59 +/- 32 to 71.7 +/- 42 ml; 203 +/- 89 to 241 +/- 114 g; p <0.0001). LV volumes and mass increased faster in patients with more severe AR, and in those in whom the degree of AR progressed more rapidly. Finally, patients with bicuspid aortic valve (n = 21) had a higher prevalence of severe AR than patients with tricuspid aortic valves (52% vs 4%; p <0.001). In conclusion, AR is a progressive disease not only in patients with severe AR but also in those with mild and moderate regurgitation. Patients with more severe AR have larger left ventricles that also dilate more rapidly.

The importance of slice location on the accuracy of aortic regurgitation measurements with magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping

Although several methods have been used clinically to evaluate the severity of aortic regurgitation, there is no purely quantitative approach for aortic regurgitant volume (ARV) measurements. Magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping can be used to quantify the ARV, with a single imaging slice in the ascending aorta, from through-slice velocity measurements. To investigate the accuracy of this technique, in vitro experiments were performed with a compliant model of the ascending aorta. Our goals were to study the effects of slice location on the reliability of the ARV measurements and to determine the location that provides the most accurate results. It was found that when the slice was placed between the aortic valve and the coronary ostia, the measurements were most accurate. Beyond the coronary ostia, aortic compliance and coronary flow negatively affected the accuracy of the measurements, introducing significant errors. This study shows that slice location is important in quantifying the ARV accurately. The higher accuracy achieved with the slice placed between the aortic valve and the coronary ostia suggests that this slice location should be considered and thoroughly examined as the preferred measurement site clinically.

Slice location dependence of aortic regurgitation measurements with MR phase velocity mapping

Although several methods have been used clinically to assess aortic regurgitation (AR), there is no "gold standard" for regurgitant volume measurement. Magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping (PVM) can be used for noninvasive blood flow measurements. To evaluate the accuracy of PVM in quantifying AR with a single imaging slice in the ascending aorta, in vitro experiments were performed by using a compliant aortic model. Attention was focused on determining the slice location that provided the best results. The most accurate measurements were taken between the aortic valve annulus and the coronary ostia where the measured (Y) and actual (X) flow rate had close agreement (Y = 0.954 x + 0.126, r2 = 0.995, standard deviation of error = 0.139 L/min). Beyond the coronary ostia, coronary flow and aortic compliance negatively affected the accuracy of the measurements. In vivo measurements taken on patients with AR showed the same tendency with the in vitro results. In making decisions regarding patient treatment, diagnostic accuracy is very important. The results from this study suggest that higher accuracy is achieved by placing the slice between the aortic valve and the coronary ostia and that this is the region where attention should be focused for further clinical investigation.

Evaluation of eccentric aortic regurgitation by color Doppler jet and color Doppler-imaged vena contracta measurements: an animal study of quantified aortic regurgitation

To evaluate the utility of measurements of the color Doppler jet area, jet length, and width of the color Doppler-imaged vena contracta (the smallest flow diameter in any part of the flow acceleration field) as methods for quantifying aortic regurgitation (AR), eight sheep with surgically induced AR were studied. AR was quantified as peak and mean regurgitant flow rates, regurgitant stroke volumes, and regurgitant fractions as determined with pulmonary and aortic electromagnetic flow probes and flowmeters balanced against each other. Simple linear regression analysis between the maximal color jet areas, jet length, and flowmeter data showed only moderately good correlation (jet area: 0.42 < or = r < or = 0.57, SEE = 2.85 cm2; jet length: 0.42 < or = r < or = 0.59, SEE = 1.23 cm). In contrast, the width of color Doppler-imaged vena contracta was a better indicator of the severity of AR on the basis of the electromagnetic flowmeter methods (0.73 < or = r < or = 0.90, SEE = 0.15 cm). Therefore the color Doppler jet length and jet area methods have limited use for determining AR, whereas the width of the color Doppler-imaged vena contracta can be used for quantifying the severity of AR.

Colour doppler valvar and subvalvar flow diameter imaging versus echo score in mitral stenosis: comparison with type of surgery

OBJECTIVE

To compare the value of echo score with that of Doppler subvalvar flow broadening in deciding the type of mitral stenosis surgery.

PATIENTS

30 patients, mean age 47 years, with severe stenosis undergoing surgery were divided into two groups according to type of surgery: open heart commissurotomy (group 1, n = 12), or prosthesis (group 2, n = 18). A control group of 10 patients with prosthesis served as reference, representing mild stenosis without subvalvar connection.

METHODS

For echo, the score proposed by Wilkins for cross sectional imaging was used. For Doppler, the flow diameters were measured in cm by an independent examiner from the long axis view in early diastole at two levels: (1) at the level of the stenosis (origin flow diameter), and (2) 1.5 cm downstream from the stenosis in the left ventricle (subvalvar flow diameter) with calculation of a Doppler ratio relating these two measurements, expressed as a percentage of broadening. Diagnostic value was compared for both procedures.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in age, mitral valve areas, or haemodynamics for the two groups. Mean values (SD) were: echo score: group 1, 9.83 (1.26) v group 2, 10.8 (8.1), NS; Doppler ratio %: group 1, 44 (24) v group 2, 12 (21) (P < 0.001); control group: 69 (15). The per cent diagnostic value for an open heart commissurotomy of respective cut off points was: Doppler ratio > 25% (range 71% to 87%); echo score < 10 (range 50% to 75%).

CONCLUSIONS

The new Doppler ratio diagnostic value agreed better with surgical management, repair or prosthesis, in this study. Thus, it appears to better reflect the subvalvar involvement and changes in kinetics than the echo score alone. This easy Doppler method might become a routine examination for follow up of patients with open heart commissurotomy, to avoid performing repeated transoesophageal echocardiography.

Assessment of aortic regurgitation by color flow and continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography

This study describes a Doppler echocardiographic method for assessing the severity of aortic regurgitation based on the product of the velocity time integral and cross-sectional area of the aortic regurgitation jet. This method was found to be highly productive of the angiographic grade of aortic regurgitation with minimal overlap between grades.

Evaluation of aortic regurgitation with digitally determined color Doppler-imaged flow convergence acceleration: a quantitative study in sheep

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to validate a digital color Doppler-based centerline velocity/distance acceleration profile method for evaluating the severity of aortic regurgitation.

BACKGROUND

Clinical and in vivo experimental applications of the flow convergence axial centerline velocity/distance profile method have recently been used to estimate regurgitant flow rates and regurgitant volumes in the presence of mitral regurgitation.

METHODS

In six sheep, a total of 19 hemodynamic states were obtained pharmacologically 14 weeks after the original operation in which a portion of the aortic noncoronary (n = 3) or right coronary (n = 3) leaflet was excised to produce aortic regurgitation. Echocardiographic studies were performed to obtain complete proximal axial flow acceleration velocity/distance profiles during the time of peak regurgitant flow (usually early in diastole) for each hemodynamic state. For each steady state, the severity of aortic regurgitation was assessed by measurement of the magnitude of the regurgitant flow volume/beat, regurgitant fraction and instantaneous regurgitant flow rates determined by using both aortic and pulmonary artery electromagnetic flow probes.

RESULTS

Grade I regurgitation (regurgitant volume/beat < 15 ml, six conditions), grade II regurgitation (regurgitant volume/beat between 16 ml and 30 ml, five conditions) and grade III-IV regurgitation (regurgitant volume/beat > 30 ml, eight conditions) were clearly separated by using the color Doppler centerline velocity/distance profile domain technique. Additionally, an equation for correlating "a" (the coefficient from the multiplicative curve fit for the velocity/distance relation) with the peak regurgitant flow rates (Q [liters/min]) was derived showing a high correlation between calculated peak flow rates by the color Doppler method and the actual peak flow rates (Q = 13a + 1.0, r = 0.95, p < 0.0001, SEE = 0.76 liters/min).

CONCLUSIONS

This study, using quantified aortic regurgitation, demonstrates that the flow convergence axial centerline velocity/distance acceleration profile method can be used to evaluate the severity of aortic regurgitation.

Proximal jet size by Doppler color flow mapping predicts severity of mitral regurgitation. Clinical studies

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown that many instrument and physiological factors limit the ability of color Doppler total jet area within the receiving chamber to predict the severity of valvular regurgitation. In contrast, the proximal or initial dimensions of the jet as it emerges from the orifice have been shown to increase directly with orifice size and to correlate well with the severity of aortic insufficiency. Only limited data, however, are available regarding the value of proximal jet size in mitral regurgitation, and it has not been examined in short-axis or transthoracic views. The purpose of the present study, therefore, was to evaluate the relation between proximal jet size and other measures of the severity of mitral regurgitation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 49 patients, the anteroposterior height of the proximal jet as it emerges from the mitral valve was measured in the parasternal long-axis view; proximal jet width and area were measured in the short-axis view at the same level. Results were compared with regurgitant volume and fraction by pulsed Doppler subtraction of aortic and mitral flows in 47 patients without more than trace aortic insufficiency; with angiographic grade determined within 24 hours in 33 catheterized patients; and with angiographic regurgitant fraction in 13 patients who were in normal sinus rhythm and had no significant aortic and tricuspid insufficiency. Proximal jet height, width, and area correlated well with Doppler regurgitant volume and fraction (r = .86 to .95; SEE = 7.7 to 9.0 mL; 5.9% to 7.3%). Proximal jet size could also be used to distinguish angiographic grades of mitral regurgitation with minimal overlap (P < .0001) and correlated well with angiographic regurgitant fraction (r = .85 to .91; SEE = 4.1% to 5.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal jet size correlates well with established measures of the severity of mitral regurgitation. It is conveniently available with transthoracic clinical scanning and should be useful in the routine evaluation of patients with mitral regurgitation.

Multiplane transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of mitral regurgitation by Doppler color flow mapping of the vena contracta

Assessment of the severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) by Doppler color flow mapping is limited by dependence of jet area on hemodynamic and technical variables. The width of the MR jet at its origin may be less dependent on hemodynamic variables, and thus should more accurately reflect the severity of MR. Doppler color flow mapping was performed in 80 subjects by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) within 48 hours of catheterization. Width of the MR jet at its vena contracta was measured by both single plane and multiplane TEE and compared with the angiographic grade of MR and regurgitant volume. The width of the MR jet correlated closely with angiographic grade by both methods. A jet width > or = 6 mm identified angiographically severe MR with a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 83% by single-plane TEE, and 95% and 98% by multiplane TEE. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting a regurgitant volume > or = 80 ml was 93% and 76% for single-plane TEE, and 86% and 95% for multiplane TEE. Thus, the width of the MR jet at its vena contracta by Doppler color flow mapping is an accurate marker of the severity of MR. By virtue of its ability to obtain orthogonal views specifically oriented to mitral leaflet coaptation, multiplane TEE is superior to single-plane TEE in assessing MR jet width.

Consequence of diseases in aorta on evaluation of aortic regurgitation by aortic flow velocity profiles

The aim of the study was to investigate whether flow velocity profiles of the aorta are related to the severity of aortic valve regurgitation (AR) in patients with diseases of the aorta. Aortic root angiography, abdominal aortic flow velocity measurements by pulsed Doppler method, and regurgitant jet measurements by color Doppler echocardiography were performed in 62 patients with various etiologies of AR and 13 patients without AR. The regurgitant fraction of abdominal aortic flow velocity profiles was related to the angiographic severity of AR except for the patients with Takayasu's arteritis and those after thoracic aorta grafting who showed large regurgitant fraction regardless of AR. Color Doppler evaluation was also correlated well with angiographic findings, but it was not possible in 13 of 62 patients with AR because of the inadequate color Doppler images. Although the observation of abdominal aortic flow profiles is clinically of value in noninvasive evaluation of AR, it could not be applied in patients with Takayasu's arteritis and those after graft surgery.

New method for quantitatively determining aortic regurgitant volume using Doppler color flow imaging: experimental validation study

We have developed a method to provide the two-dimensional distribution of blood flow velocity and the blood flow volume rate in the ascending aorta from the cross-sectional Doppler color flow image. Regional blood flow velocities were determined by converting color intensities of the cross-sectional Doppler color flow image into the corresponding flow velocities with the correction with the spatial ultrasound beam incident angle. The spatial ultrasound beam incident angle was estimated from the geometric characteristics of the color flow image contour. The method was validated in a steady flow model circuit comparing the calculated flow volume rates by the method with those simultaneously measured by an electromagnetic flowmeter. We performed an open chest dog experiment and calculated the blood flow volume rate at the ascending aorta before and after the aortic regurgitation was made. The calculated ejection flow volume rate and regurgitant volume were validated by the comparison with those simultaneously measured by an electromagnetic flowmeter. Based on these data, we can conclude that the current method provides accurate measurements of regurgitant volume as well as ejection flow volume rate in the ascending aorta.

Color-coded Doppler imaging of the vena contracta as a basis for quantification of pure mitral regurgitation

The narrowest central flow region of a jet is defined as the vena contracta. This term is applied also to the contracted zone of the Doppler color flow image of a jet at its passage through an incompetent mitral valve. The clinical applicability of measuring the size of the vena contracta by transthoracic color-coded Doppler echocardiography for estimating the severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) was evaluated. In 78 of 82 patients with angiographically proved MR, a coherent flow image across the valve was visualized. The maximal diameter in the apical long-axis view was considered as a representative value for the size of the vena contracta. In comparison with the maximal left atrial velocity pixel area, this parameter revealed higher correlations to the angiographic degree of MR and to the regurgitant volume (r = 0.94 vs 0.72, and 0.83 vs 0.71, respectively). The highest positive and negative predictive accuracies for differentiating mild-to-moderate from severe MR were determined for a diameter of 6.5 mm (88 and 96%, respectively). Because the vena contracta is directly related to the severity of MR, it is concluded that it is helpful to use this parameter instead of the maximal velocity pixel area for semiquantitative grading.

Relationships between contour and/or contour/area ratio at Doppler and left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with significant aortic stenosis

Planimetry of the stenotic flow areas using Doppler imaging of jet origin was performed, together with the measurement of their contour and a calculated contour/area (C/A) Doppler ratio, on 38 adult patients with significant aortic stenosis (0.27 to 0.85 cm2). Echo measurements of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) were also performed to study the differences in LVH according to the areas, even in case of smaller areas. This led to lower mean values of LVH (p < 0.001) in this group, and to a correlation coefficient at 0.18. The smallest areas were generally rounded and had a high C/A ratio. Contour was regular in half of areas over 0.5 cm2. It increased less rapidly than areas increased, leading to a decreased C/A. The other half, of a similar range of sizes, had a markedly increased irregular contour, entailing a C/A > 0.8. The highest mean value in LVH was found in this subgroup. Correlation coefficients vs. LVH were 0.43 for contour, and 0.32 for C/A ratio. Diagnostic reliability of a C/A > 0.8 for an LVH > 150 g/m2 BSA ranged from 55 to 70%. In conclusion, the study suggests that contour length weighs on LVH development when stenoses are significant, and should be coupled with area measurements. Figures also suggest that other factors intervene, requiring further study.

A new Doppler imaging measurement in aortic stenosis: the contour length of the jet origin flow area. Relationships between both, with usual Doppler data and left ventricular hypertrophy

Planimetry of stenotic aortic jet origin flow areas was performed using transthoracic Doppler imaging, with measurement of the contour length of flow areas and calculation of a contour/area (C/A) Doppler ratio on a group of 75 patients with aortic stenosis ranging from 0.27 to 2.44 cm2. The purpose was to study correlations of these data with the usual Doppler data and with left ventricular hypertrophy. The "r" coefficient between planimetered flow areas and those calculated by the continuity equation method was 0.89. Mean values (SD) of data were: areas: (planimetry) 1.00 +/- 0.53 cm2, (continuity equation) 0.91 +/- 0.42 cm2, contours: 5.6 +/- 1.6 cm, C/A: 0.66 +/- 0.25, maximal and mean pressure gradients: 68 +/- 34 and 37 +/- 21 mmHg, left ventricular hypertrophy: 138 +/- 30 g/m2 BSA (vs. 100 +/- 18 in normals). All values except age, gender and BSA, differed significantly (p < 0.001) between areas below or over 0.85 cm2. Other correlations between parameters were significant (p < 0.01 to 0.001), but with lower "r" coefficients due to widely scattered individual values. Contours increased much less rapidly than areas did, and were correlated with left ventricular hypertrophy only when coupled in the C/A ratio, with a higher "r" coefficient (0.62) than areas alone (0.52). Study of both areas and contours helps to approach the geometry of the orifice. This suggests that the individual geometry of the stenosis might weigh on the left ventricular mass growth, as an associated factor for a given decrease in stenotic area.

Influence of jet impingement on color Doppler parameters of aortic regurgitation

In vitro studies have demonstrated that the characteristics of a color Doppler jet are influenced by a number of factors including jet eccentricity and jet impingement. To explore the relationship of a jet impingement and aortic regurgitant color Doppler jet parameters, jet area, width, and length were measured from apical echocardiographic views of 84 patients 4 +/- 11 days prior to catheterization and compared to angiographic grade. An impinging color jet contacted the interventricular septum or mitral valve beneath the aortic valve in the imaging plane and a nonimpinging jet did not contact the septum or mitral valve in the imaging plane. As expected, the percentage of patients with impinging jets increased with aortic regurgitation angiographic grade. Neither left ventricular chamber dimensions nor the presence of an aortic prosthesis significantly influenced the color Doppler variables. For a given angiographic grade of aortic regurgitation, impinging jets were associated with larger color Doppler jet widths (P less than 0.05) and areas (P = 0.001) than nonimpinging jets. The color Doppler area and length increased significantly with angiographic grade for nonimpinging jets (P less than 0.05) but not for impinging jets. Impinging jets are associated with larger color Doppler widths and areas than nonimpinging jets for a given grade of aortic regurgitation, possibly because of the effect of jet deflection toward an adjacent wall. Jet impinging should be considered when using color Doppler techniques to evaluate aortic regurgitation.

Relation between Doppler color flow variables and invasively determined jet variables in patients with aortic regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that invasively derived jet variables including regurgitant orifice area and momentum determine the characteristics of Doppler color flow jets in patients with aortic regurgitation.

BACKGROUND

In vitro studies have demonstrated that the velocity distribution of a regurgitant jet is best characterized by the momentum of the jet, which incorporates orifice area and velocity of flow through the orifice.

METHODS

Peak jet momentum, peak flow rate and regurgitant orifice area were determined with intraaortic Doppler catheter and cardiac catheterization techniques in 22 patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. These invasively derived variables were compared with apical and parasternal long-axis Doppler color echocardiographic variables obtained in the catheterization laboratory.

RESULTS

Jet momentum increased significantly with the angiographic grade of regurgitation. The apical color jet area of aortic regurgitation increased linearly with jet momentum and regurgitant orifice area in vivo, but the correlations were only moderately good (r = 0.63 and 0.65, respectively). Color jet length also increased linearly with jet momentum and with regurgitant orifice area. There was only a trend for Doppler color jet width to increase with all invasively derived jet variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Whereas jet area by Doppler color flow imaging is directly related to both orifice area and jet momentum in vivo, Doppler color variables measured in planes normal to the orifice do not correlate well enough with either jet momentum or regurgitant orifice area to predict jet flow variables in patients with aortic regurgitation. It is likely that the important influence of adjacent boundaries will limit the use of the velocity distribution of aortic regurgitant jets for determining the severity of disease.

Assessment of severity of mitral regurgitation by measuring regurgitant jet width at its origin with transesophageal Doppler color flow imaging

BACKGROUND

The ability of transesophageal color Doppler echocardiography to provide high-resolution images of both cardiac structure and blood flow in real time is advantageous for many clinical purposes. This study was performed to determine the utility of the regurgitant jet width at its origin measured by transesophageal Doppler color flow imaging in the assessment of severity of mitral regurgitation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty-three consecutive patients with mitral regurgitation underwent transesophageal color Doppler examination, and the diameter of regurgitant jet at its origin was measured. Both right and left cardiac catheterizations were performed within 24 hours of Doppler studies, and angiographic grading of mitral regurgitation and regurgitant stroke volume were evaluated. There was a close relation between the jet diameter at its origin measured by transesophageal Doppler color flow imaging and the angiographic grade of mitral regurgitation (r = 0.86, p less than 0.001). A jet diameter of 5.5 mm or more identified severe mitral regurgitation (grade III or IV) with a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 92%, and positive and negative predictive values of 88% and 95%, respectively. In 31 patients with isolated mitral regurgitation, the jet diameter correlated well with the regurgitant stroke volume determined by a combined hemodynamic-angiographic method (r = 0.85, p less than 0.001). A jet diameter of 5.5 mm or more identified a regurgitant stroke volume of 60 ml or more with a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 93%, and positive and negative predictive values of 94% and 87%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The regurgitant jet width at its origin measured by transesophageal Doppler color flow imaging provides a simple and useful method of measuring the severity of mitral regurgitation, and it may allow differentiation between mild and severe mitral regurgitation.

Quantitative assessment of aortic regurgitation by combined two-dimensional, continuous-wave and colour flow Doppler measurements

The width of the regurgitant jet at the aortic valve plane, i.e. the core flow diameter, the ratio of the jet width to the left ventricular outflow diameter, the regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction were determined using two-dimensional, continuous wave and colour flow Doppler echocardiography. The relationship between the non-invasive measurements and semiquantitative angiographic grading of the regurgitant flow (1 + to 4+) was examined in a primary group of 20 patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Cut-off points for the non-invasive measurements were selected so as to separate patients with mild or moderate regurgitation (1+ or 2+) from patients with moderately severe or severe regurgitation (3+ or 4+). These cut-off points were prospectively applied in a new group of 35 patients with aortic regurgitation to predict the angiographic grading. Jet width correctly predicted the angiographic grading in 86% of cases, the ratio of the jet width to the outflow diameter in 83% of cases, the regurgitant volume in 86% of cases and the regurgitant fraction in 91% of cases. We conclude that the severity of aortic regurgitation as determined by angiographic grading can be estimated with reasonable accuracy by non-invasive techniques based on colour flow imaging.