The Tromsø Study: frequency and predicting factors of analgesic drug use in a free-living population (12-56 years)

Abuse of Non-opioid Analgesics in Germany: Prevalence and Associations Among Self-Medicated Users

BACKGROUND

Abuse of non-opioid analgesics (NOA) is associated with serious health consequences. However, due to inconsistent definitions of NOA abuse, prevalence estimates for the German population are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to estimate the 12-month prevalence of NOA abuse among self-medicated users of these drugs in the general German population and to identify risk factors.

METHODS

Data are from the 2015 Epidemiological Survey of Substance Abuse, a nationally representative sample with 9,204 individuals aged 18-64 years. Classification of NOA abuse was based on self-reported information according to the definition of the ICD-10-GM diagnosis F55.2 abuse of non-dependence producing substances. Multiple logistic regression was performed to examine associations between NOA abuse and sociodemographic, behavioral, and health-related variables.

RESULTS

The weighted 12-month prevalence of NOA abuse was 14.6% (95%-CI [13.2- 16.0]) among self-medicated users of these drugs. Extrapolation of the proportion of individuals abusing NOA to the German population aged 18 to 64 is 3,243,396 individuals or 6.4% (95%-CI [5.7- 7.1]). Inexplicable physical pain, being underweight, depression, hazardous alcohol use, daily smoking, illegal drug use, and frequent use of NOA (one or more times per week and daily use) were associated with an increased probability of NOA abuse. The use of cannabis was associated with a lower probability of NOA abuse.

CONCLUSION

Abuse of NOA is highly prevalent in the German population. Against the background of increasing self-medication of NOA, healthcare providers need to be aware of potential risk factors of abuse to better identify and prevent this problem.

Ibuprofen Arginate for Rapid-Onset Pain Relief in Daily Practice: A Review of Its Use in Different Pain Conditions

Ibuprofen is one of the most frequently used analgesics. One of the concerns related with the oral administration of conventional ibuprofen is the relatively slow absorption, which is clinically a relative inconvenience when rapid-onset analgesic effect is required in patients suffering from acute moderate/severe pain. A new oral dosage formulation of ibuprofen containing the L-arginine salt of ibuprofen (ibuprofen arginate) has been commercialized for more than two decades, but data reported in the literature are relatively scarce. This article presents salient findings on pharmacokinetics, pharmacological activity, clinical efficacy and tolerability of ibuprofen arginate, with the purpose to provide clinicians with a summary overview of some frequent acute pain conditions, such as dental pain, dysmenorrhea, headache or postoperative pain in which ibuprofen arginate may be considered the drug of choice in individual patients.

Gender Disparities in Preoperative Resource Use for Wrist Arthroscopy

BACKGROUND

Although national efforts to minimize gender biases exist, gender differences in surgery persist. This study aims to investigate gender differences in preoperative resource use of patients undergoing wrist arthroscopy for nontraumatic wrist pain.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a wrist arthroscopy for nontraumatic pain from 2009 to 2015 were selected from the Truven MarketScan databases. Demographic and preoperative resource use data were recorded. Multivariable regression models were performed to examine the relationship between gender and preoperative resource use and to investigate the cost of these services.

RESULTS

A total of 8792 patients, 3805 men and 4987 women, met our inclusion criteria. Women were less likely to use imaging modalities preoperatively (OR, 0.08; 95 percent CI, 0.07 to 1.00; p = 0.02). However, women used more occupational therapy (OR, 1.2; 95 percent CI, 1.1 to 1.3; p = 0.002), nonnarcotic analgesia (OR, 1.2; 95 percent CI, 1.1 to 1.3; p = 0.001), and narcotic analgesia (OR, 1.6; 95 percent CI, 1.5 to 1.8; p < 0.001). Preoperative costs during the 12 months before surgery were similar between genders ($1308 versus $1367, respectively; p = 0.07). However, women accrued more costs from occupational therapy ($130 versus $93; p = 0.003), and nonnarcotic ($65 versus $46; p < 0.001) and narcotic medications ($568 versus $197; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant gender differences exist in the preoperative care for patients undergoing wrist arthroscopy. Men use more imaging, implying more intense preoperative investigation for wrist pain, whereas women use more conservative measures, highlighting possible implicit provider biases in preoperative management and potential gender differences in disease presentation.

Use of acetaminophen and risk of endometrial cancer: evidence from observational studies

Previous meta-analyses suggested that aspirin was associated with reduced risk of endometrial cancer. However, there has been no study comprehensively summarize the evidence of acetaminophen use and risk of endometrial cancer from observational studies. We systematically searched electronic databases (PubMed , EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) for relevant cohort or case-control studies up to February 28, 2017. Two independent authors performed the eligibility evaluation and data extraction. All differences were resolved by discussion. A random-effects model was applied to estimate summary relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. All statistical tests were two-sided. Seven observational studies including four prospective cohort studies and three case-control studies with 3874 endometrial cancer cases were included for final analysis. Compared with never use acetaminophen, ever use this drug was not associated with risk of endometrial cancer (summarized RR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.93-1.13, I2 = 0%). Similar null association was also observed when compared the highest category of frequency/duration with never use acetaminophen (summarized RR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.70-1.11, I2 = 15.2%). Additionally, the finding was robust in the subgroup analyses stratified by study characteristics and adjustment for potential confounders and risk factors. There was no evidence of publication bias by a visual inspection of a funnel plot and formal statistical tests. In summary, the present meta-analysis reveals no association between acetaminophen use and risk of endometrial cancer. More large scale prospective cohort studies are warranted to confirm our findings and carry out the dose-response analysis of aforementioned association.

Need for Analgesics/drugs of Abuse: A Comparison Between Headache Patients and Addicts by the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ)

Our aim was to compare the need for analgesics/drugs of abuse between headache patients—chronic and episodic headache sufferers—and addicts, by the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ). This is a self-completion 10-item instrument to measure dependence upon a variety of substances. We administered the LDQ questionnaire to 122 chronic daily headache (CDH) sufferers who had been taking one dose of analgesic drug every day for at least 1 year; 71 subjects suffering from episodic headache (EH) using analgesics only occasionally; 115 consecutive drug addicts (DA) with a diagnosis of substance dependence. The mean LDQ total score was similar in the CDH (11.58 ± 6.35) and DA (10.37 ± 6.51) groups, and for both it was significantly higher than the score in the EH (5.61 ± 3.00) group ( P < 0.001). The CDH group had the highest scores, and higher scores than the DA group (Z = −8.18, P < 0.001) in item 8, assessing the primacy of effect over the kind of analgesic used, and in item 10 (Z = −5.03, P < 0.001), asking if it is difficult to live without the analgesic; the DA group had the highest scores, and higher scores than the CDH group, in item 9 (Z = −5.07, P < 0.001) addressing the need for the continued administration of the drug to maintain well-being, and in item 3 (Z =−2.39, P < 0.05), exploring compulsion to start the use of the drug. The EH group had lower scores in all items ( P < 0.05) except for item 9, where there was no difference from CDH group; the EH group had also lower scores ( P < 0.001) than the DA group, except for item 8, where, instead, the score was higher than in the DA group (Z = −5.33, P < 0.001). A strong link develops between chronic headache patients and the analgesics they use. This sort of ‘dependence’ appears to be a consequence of headache, originating from the necessity for the analgesic to cope with everyday life.

Persistent analgesic use and the association with chronic pain and other risk factors in the population-a longitudinal study from the Tromsø Study and the Norwegian Prescription Database

PURPOSE

Analgesics are commonly used drugs. The long-term effectiveness is mostly unproven, while the risk of several serious adverse effects is well established. We aimed to estimate the prevalence and incidence of persistent analgesic use and the association with chronic pain and sociodemographic and comorbid risk factors.

METHODS

The Tromsø Study is an epidemiological, prospective study of health and diseases. We linked the sixth wave (Tromsø 6, 2007-08, n = 12,981) with the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD, 2004-13). Persistent analgesic use was defined as the use of analgesics, i.e., either non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids or paracetamol, for ≥90 days with proportion-of-days-covered ≥40 %. The study design provided both cross-sectional and longitudinal data; a cohort of 11,905 persons was followed for 4.5 years.

RESULTS

The prevalence of persistent analgesic use was 4 % in general and 10 % among those reporting chronic pain. The incidence rate of persistent analgesic use was 21 per 1000 person-years in general. Baseline chronic pain doubled the risk of incident persistent analgesic use (HR = 2.05, 95 % CI 1.80-2.33). The risk increased with increasing chronic pain severity, as measured by chronic pain duration, frequency, intensity, and number of body locations. Sociodemographic risk factors were older age, female sex, lower education, and most likely lower physical activity. Psychological distress was not a statistical significant risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed a relatively low prevalence of persistent analgesic use and that the majority of persons reporting chronic pain do not use analgesics persistently.

Analgesic use in a Norwegian general population: change over time and high-risk use--The Tromsø Study

Background

Increased use of analgesics in the population is a cause for concern in terms of drug safety. There is a paucity of population-based studies monitoring the change in use over time of both non-prescription (OTC) analgesics and prescription (Rx) analgesics. Although much is known about the risks associated with analgesic use, we are lacking knowledge on high-risk use at a population level. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of non-prescription and prescription analgesic use, change over time and the prevalence in the presence of potential contraindications and drug interactions in a general population.

Methods

A repeated cross-sectional study with data from participants (30–89 years) of the Tromsø Study in 2001–02 (Tromsø 5; N = 8039) and in 2007–08 (Tromsø 6; N = 12,981). Participants reported use of OTC and Rx analgesics and regular use of all drugs in the preceding four weeks. Change over the time period was analyzed with generalized estimating equations. The prevalence of regular analgesic use in persons with or without a clinically significant contraindication or drug interaction was determined in the Tromsø 6 population, and differences were tested with logistic regression.

Results

Analgesic use increased from 54 to 60 % in women (OR = 1.24, 95 % CI 1.15–1.32) and from 29 to 37 % in men (OR = 1.39, 95 % CI 1.27–1.52) in the time period; the increase was due to sporadic use of OTC analgesics. There was substantial regular use of analgesics in several of the contraindication categories examined; the prevalence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was more than eight per cent among persons with chronic kidney disease, gastrointestinal ulcers, or high primary cardiovascular risk. About four per cent of the study population demonstrated at least one potential drug interaction with an analgesic drug.

Conclusions

The use of analgesics increased in the time period due to an increase in the use of OTC analgesics. Analgesic exposure in the presence of contraindications or drug interactions may put patients at risk. Public and prescriber awareness about clinically relevant contraindications and drug interactions with analgesics need to be increased.

Effects of over-the-counter analgesic use on reproductive hormones and ovulation in healthy, premenopausal women

STUDY QUESTION

Does use of commonly used over-the-counter (OTC) pain medication affect reproductive hormones and ovulatory function in premenopausal women?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Few associations were found between analgesic medication use and reproductive hormones, but use during the follicular phase was associated with decreased odds of sporadic anovulation after adjusting for potential confounders.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Analgesic medications are the most commonly used OTC drugs among women, but their potential effects on reproductive function are unclear.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

The BioCycle Study was a prospective, observational cohort study (2005-2007) which followed 259 women for one (n = 9) or two (n = 250) menstrual cycles.

PARTICIPANTS, SETTING, METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-nine healthy, premenopausal women not using hormonal contraception and living in western New York state. Study visits took place at the University at Buffalo.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

During study participation, 68% (n = 175) of women indicated OTC analgesic use. Among users, 45% used ibuprofen, 33% acetaminophen, 10% aspirin and 10% naproxen. Analgesic use during the follicular phase was associated with decreased odds of sporadic anovulation after adjusting for age, race, body mass index, perceived stress level and alcohol consumption (OR 0.36 [0.17, 0.75]). Results remained unchanged after controlling for potential confounding by indication by adjusting for 'healthy' cycle indicators such as amount of blood loss and menstrual pain during the preceding menstruation. Moreover, luteal progesterone was higher (% difference = 14.0, -1.6-32.1, P = 0.08 adjusted) in cycles with follicular phase analgesic use, but no associations were observed with estradiol, LH or FSH.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Self-report daily diaries are not validated measures of medication usage, which could lead to some classification error of medication use. We were also limited in our evaluation of aspirin and naproxen which were used by few women.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The observed associations between follicular phase analgesic use and higher progesterone and a lower probability of sporadic anovulation indicate that OTC pain medication use is likely not harmful to reproduction function, and certain medications possibly improve ovulatory function.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health (contract # HHSN275200403394C). The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Prevalence of use of non-prescription analgesics in the Norwegian HUNT3 population: Impact of gender, age, exercise and prescription of opioids

Background

There are concerns about potential increasing use of over-the-counter (OTC) analgesics. The aims of this study were to examine 1) the prevalence of self-reported use of OTC analgesics; 2) the prevalence of combining prescription analgesics drugs with OTC analgesics and 3) whether lifestyle factors such as physical activity were associated with prevalence of daily OTC analgesic use.

Methods

Questionnaire data from the Nord–Trøndelag health study (HUNT3, 2006–08), which includes data from 40,000 adult respondents. The questionnaire included questions on use of OTC analgesics, socioeconomic conditions, health related behaviour, symptoms and diseases. Data were linked to individual data from the Norwegian Prescription Database. A logistic regression was used to investigate the association between different factors and daily use of paracetamol and/or non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients with and without chronic pain.

Results

The prevalence of using OTC analgesics at least once per week in the last month was 47%. Prevalence of paracetamol use was almost 40%, compared to 19% and 8% for NSAIDs and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), respectively. While the use of NSAIDs decreased and the use of ASA increased with age, paracetamol consumption was unaffected by age. Overall more women used OTC analgesics. About 3-5% of subjects using OTC analgesics appeared to combine these with the same analgesic on prescription. Among subjects reporting chronic pain the prevalence of OTC analgesic use was almost twice as high as among subjects without chronic pain. Subjects with little physical activity had 1.5-4 times greater risk of daily use of OTC compared to physically active subjects.

Conclusions

Use of OTC analgesics is prevalent, related to chronic pain, female gender and physical inactivity.

Medication-overuse headache: a review

Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is a worldwide health problem with a prevalence of 1%–2%. It is a severe form of headache where the patients often have a long history of headache and of unsuccessful treatments. MOH is characterized by chronic headache and overuse of different headache medications. Through the years, withdrawal of the overused medication has been recognized as the treatment of choice. However, currently, there is no clear consensus regarding the optimal strategy for management of MOH. Treatment approaches are based on expert opinion rather than scientific evidence. This review focuses on aspects of epidemiology, diagnosis, pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment of MOH. We suggest that information and education about the risk of MOH is important since the condition is preventable. Most patients experience reduction of headache days and intensity after successful treatment. The first step in the treatment of MOH should be carried out in primary care and focus primarily on withdrawal, leaving prophylactic medication to those who do not manage primary detoxification. For most patients, a general practitioner can perform the follow-up after detoxification. More complicated cases should be referred to neurologists and headache clinics. Patients suffering with MOH have much to gain by an earlier treatment-focused approach, since the condition is both preventable and treatable.

Medication-overuse headache: epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment

Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is one of the most common chronic headache disorders and a public health problem with a worldwide prevalence of 1-2%. It is a condition characterized by chronic headache and overuse of different headache medications, and withdrawal of the overused medication is recognised as the treatment of choice. However, the strategy for achieving withdrawal is, at present, based on expert opinion rather than scientific evidence, partly due to the lack of randomised controlled studies. This narrative review investigates different aspects of epidemiology, diagnosis, risk factors and pathogenesis as well as management for MOH. We suggest that the first step in the treatment of MOH should be carried out in general practice and should focus primarily on detoxification. For most patients, both prevention and follow up after detoxification can also be performed in general practice, thus freeing resources for referral of more complicated cases to headache clinics and neurologists. These suffering patients have much to gain by an earlier treatment-focused approach lower down on the treatment ladder.

Management of medication-overuse headache

Medication-overuse headache (MOH) has developed into the third most common type of headache after tension-type headache and migraine. The prevalence reaches approximately 1% of the world's population and shows an increasing trend. Many important studies on MOH have been published in the last year, some of which investigated the pathophysiology of headache chronicity, with others focusing on the evaluation of risk factors. The International Headache Society revised its classification criteria on MOH. Several large population-based longitudinal studies clearly demonstrated that overuse of any kind of acute headache medication is the main risk factor leading to the development of chronic headache. Management of MOH remains difficult; the only effective treatment concept is consequent withdrawal therapy.

Study protocol: brief intervention for medication overuse headache--a double-blinded cluster randomised parallel controlled trial in primary care

Background

Chronic headache (headache ≥ 15 days/month for at least 3 months) affects 2–5% of the general population. Medication overuse contributes to the problem. Medication-overuse headache (MOH) can be identified by using the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS). A “brief intervention” scheme (BI) has previously been used for detoxification from drug and alcohol overuse in other settings. Short, unstructured, individualised simple information may also be enough to detoxify a large portion of those with MOH. We have adapted the structured (BI) scheme to be used for MOH in primary care.

Methods/Design

A double-blinded cluster randomised parallel controlled trial (RCT) of BI vs. business as usual. Intervention will be performed in primary care by GPs trained in BI. Patients with MOH will be identified through a simple screening questionnaire sent to patients on the GPs lists. The BI method involves an approach for identifying patients with high likelihood of MOH using simple questions about headache frequency and the SDS score. Feedback is given to the individual patient on his/her score and consequences this might have regarding the individual risk of medication overuse contributing to their headache. Finally, advice is given regarding measures to be taken, how the patient should proceed and the possible gains for the patient. The participating patients complete a headache diary and receive a clinical interview and neurological examination by a GP experienced in headache diagnostics three months after the intervention. Primary outcomes are number of headache days and number of medication days per month at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include proportions with 25 and 50% improvement at 3 months and maintenance of improvement and quality of life after 12 months.

Discussion

There is a need for evidence-based and cost-effective strategies for treatment of MOH but so far no consensus has been reached regarding an optimal medication withdrawal method. To our knowledge this is the first RCT of structured non-pharmacological MOH treatment in primary care. Results may hold the potential of offering an instrument for treating MOH patients in the general population by GPs.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01314768

Is smoking associated with alcohol-drug dependence in patients with pain and chronic pain patients? An evidence-based structured review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine if there is consistent evidence for smoking to be considered a red flag for development of opioid dependence during opioid exposure in patients with pain and chronic pain patients (CPPs).

METHODS

Six hundred and twenty-three references were found that addressed the areas of smoking, pain, and drug-alcohol dependence. Fifteen studies remained after exclusion criteria were applied and sorted into four groupings addressing four hypotheses: patients with pain and CPPs who smoke are more likely than their nonsmoking counterparts to use opioids, require higher opioid doses, be drug-alcohol dependent, and demonstrate aberrant drug-taking behaviors (ADTBs). Each study was characterized by the type of study it represented according to the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) guidelines and independently rated by two raters according to 13 quality criteria to generate a quality score. The percentage of studies in each grouping supporting/not supporting each hypothesis was calculated. The strength and consistency of the evidence in each grouping was rated by the AHCPR guidelines.

RESULTS

In each grouping, 100% of the studies supported the hypothesis for that grouping. The strength and consistency of the evidence was rated as A (consistent multiple studies) for the first hypothesis and as B (generally consistent) for the other.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited consistent indirect evidence that smoking status in patients with pain and CPPs is associated with alcohol-drug and opioid dependence. Smoking status could be a red flag for opioid-dependence development on opioid exposure.

A comparison of self-reported analgesic use and detection of urinary ibuprofen and acetaminophen metabolites by means of metabonomics: the INTERMAP Study

Information on dietary supplements, medications, and other xenobiotics in epidemiologic surveys is usually obtained from questionnaires and is subject to recall and reporting biases. The authors used metabolite data obtained from hydrogen-1 (or proton) nuclear magnetic resonance ((1)H NMR) analysis of human urine specimens from the International Study of Macro-/Micro-Nutrients and Blood Pressure (INTERMAP Study) to validate self-reported analgesic use. Metabolic profiling of two 24-hour urine specimens per individual was carried out for 4,630 participants aged 40-59 years from 17 population samples in Japan, China, the United Kingdom, and the United States (data collection, 1996-1999). (1)H NMR-detected acetaminophen and ibuprofen use was low (∼4%) among East Asian population samples and higher (>16%) in Western population samples. In a comparison of self-reported acetaminophen and ibuprofen use with (1)H NMR-detected acetaminophen and ibuprofen metabolites among 496 participants from Chicago, Illinois, and Belfast, Northern Ireland, the overall rate of concordance was 81%-84%; the rate of underreporting was 15%-17%; and the rate of underdetection was approximately 1%. Comparison of self-reported unspecified analgesic use with (1)H NMR-detected acetaminophen and ibuprofen metabolites among 2,660 Western INTERMAP participants revealed similar levels of concordance and underreporting. Screening for urinary metabolites of acetaminophen and ibuprofen improved the accuracy of exposure information. This approach has the potential to reduce recall bias and other biases in epidemiologic studies for a range of substances, including pharmaceuticals, dietary supplements, and foods.

Gender Role in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Comparison of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Module (ROME III) Between Male and Female Patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a widespread chronic health condition which is significantly more prevalent in women. We conducted a gender difference analysis by comparing findings of men and women to determine whether any significant differences exist or not.

METHODS

This single-center study was conducted in Tehran, Iran during 2009-2010. IBS was diagnosed on the basis of Rome III criteria. A simple "10 point" objective questionnaire was used.

RESULTS

A total number of 144 IBS patients including 44 (30.6%) males and 100 (69.4%) females with the mean age of 37.50 ± 11.50 years, were assessed. The only differently observed symptom was nausea which was significantly more prevalent in females (49% vs 18.2%, P < 0.001). The commonest subtype of IBS in male patients was diarrhea predominant IBS (38.6%); while, constipation predominant IBS was the most frequent type among females (38%). Moreover, the frequency of loose, mushy or watery stools within the last 3 months was significantly higher among males (2.11 ± 1.67 vs 1.37 ± 1.50, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

We report that gender is important in IBS. Although qualitative comparison of different subtypes of IBS between male and female failed to meet the statistically significant level, the answers to the corresponding questions of ROME III IBS module suggest the higher prevalence of bowel movements and looser stool in males. Moreover, nausea was reported more often by females.

Sex differences in neuropeptide content and release from rat dental pulp

INTRODUCTION

Studies to examine sex differences in response to pain have suggested that females exhibit lower threshold responses to painful stimuli and that threshold response varies greatly at different stages of the menstrual cycle. Additional studies suggest that sex differences may be caused by societal sex roles or differences in anxiety responses by men and women.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate biologically evident sex differences in male and female rats chronically treated with a systemic algogen, the nerve growth factor (NGF), by measuring neuropeptides (calcitonin gene-related peptide) content and release from isolated dental pulp.

METHODS

Rats were injected subcutaneously every other day with either murine NGF (1 mg/kg) or vehicle for 7 or 13 days. Isolated incisor pulp tissue was evaluated from these male and female rats (n = 96). Capsaicin-evoked neurosecretion of CGRP and tissue content were measured using a previously validated radioimmunoassay.

RESULTS

Dental pulp from female rats at 7 days showed significantly increased capsaicin-evoked immunoreactive CGRP release (>50% increase) compared with tissue from male rats. After 13 days, this release was significantly increased only in NGF-treated female rats (3-fold increase) when compared with control females or both male groups. The CGRP content in tissue from both female groups was also significantly increased after 7 days of treatment (>3 fold), but after 13 days this content was only significantly increased in tissue from NGF-treated female rats (P = .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that sex differences affect the role of NGF in the modulation of inflammation through the regulation of peripheral neuropeptide release and content.

Dispensing of prescribed analgesics in Norway among young people with foreign-or Norwegian-born parents

Purpose To examine and compare dispensing of prescribed analgesics between young people with parents from countries with a Muslim majority and those with parents born in Norway. Methods Our study-population constituted 11,542 adolescents from the Norwegian Youth Health Surveys conducted in 2000-2003. Users and non-users of prescribed analgesics at baseline were analysed separately. Self-reported information on their parents' birth country was used to classify them into one of the three predefined groups: Norway, countries with a Muslim majority or others. To study and compare dispensing of prescribed analgesics, data from the youth surveys were linked to the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) 2004-2007. Dispensed analgesics studied were antiinflammatory and antirheumatic products (non-steroid), opioids and other analgesics and antipyretics. Results Among non-users of prescribed analgesics at baseline, 34% of all males with parents born in Norway received prescribed analgesics at least once during 2004-2007, compared to 36% in the group with parents from countries with a Muslim majority. The proportions of females receiving prescribed analgesics were about 44% in both of the two previously mentioned groups. Among users of prescribed analgesics at baseline, the proportion of individuals who were dispensed prescribed analgesics in 2004-2007 was generally higher than for those that were non-users at baseline. Both males and females with parents from countries with a Muslim majority reported more pain compared to those with parents born in Norway. No statistical differences were detected between participants with parents from countries with a Muslim majority compared to those with parents born in Norway in terms of prescribed analgesics dispensed or total amount of analgesics dispensed in 2004-2007. For the dispensing of all analgesics in 2004-2007 the adjusted OR for having parents from countries with a Muslim majority compared to parents born in Norway was 1.02 (0.87-1.21) among non-users of prescribed analgesics at baseline and 0.82 (0.57-1.16) among users. Conclusions There were no differences in the dispensing of prescribed analgesics between young people with parents born in countries with a Muslim majority and those with parents born in Norway. Nor did the amount of prescribed analgesics differ between these groups.

Use of medicines by persons with disabilities in São Paulo state areas, Southeastern Brazil

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the use of medicines and the main therapeutic groups consumed by persons with physical, hearing and visual disabilities.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed, where data from the 2002 Inquérito Multicêntrico de Saúde no Estado de São Paulo (ISA-SP - São Paulo State Multicenter Health Survey), as well as the 2003 Inquérito de Saúde no Município de São Paulo (ISA-Capital - City of São Paulo Health Survey), Southeastern Brazil, were analyzed. Respondents who reported having disabilities were studied, according to variables that comprise the database: geographic area, gender, income, age group, ethnic group, use of medicines and types of drugs consumed.

RESULTS

The percentage of use of drugs by persons with disabilities was 62.8% among the visually impaired; 60.2% among the hearing impaired; and 70.1% among the persons with physical disabilities. Individuals with physical disabilities consumed 20% more medications than non-disabled ones. Among persons with visual disabilities, the most frequently consumed drugs were diuretics, agents of the renin-angiotensin system and analgesics. Persons with hearing disabilities used more analgesics and agents of the renin-angiotensin system. Among those with physical disabilities, analgesics, antithrombotics and agents of the renin-angiotensin system were the most frequently consumed medicines.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a greater use of medicines among persons with disabilities than non-disabled ones. Persons with physical disabilities were those who most consumed medicines, followed by the visually impaired and the hearing impaired.

Appropriate use of non-prescription ibuprofen: a survey of patients' perceptions and understanding

Objectives

The aim was to investigate patients' perceptions and understanding on the appropriate use of non-prescription ibuprofen.

Methods

In this pilot study, a self-administered anonymous survey was completed by 183 patients presenting at one of the eight selected community pharmacy premises in South Australia and the Northern Territory during the study. The questionnaire comprised items on: demographics (age, gender), current medications, frequency of ibuprofen use, medical consultations, reading manufacturer's printed dosage/warning instructions, sources from which drug information was gathered and understanding of common indications for ibuprofen.

Key findings

Sixty per cent of patients (n= 110/183), predominantly females, were currently on other medications and 64.5% of patients (n= 118/183) did not seek medical advice before using non-prescription ibuprofen. Seventy-one per cent (n= 130) of these patients had used ibuprofen for more than a year. The majority of patients did not provide precise answers for the common indications of ibuprofen. Sixty-six per cent of patients (n= 110) reported rarely or never reading manufacturer's printed warning instructions on the potential drug interactions or adverse effects associated with the use of the product.

Conclusions

Many patients are unaware that non-presciption analgesics such as ibuprofen can cause potentially serious adverse effects when used in combination with other common medications.

Factors associated with a continuous regular analgesic use - a population-based study of more than 45,000 Danish women and men 18-45 years of age

PURPOSE

Widespread use of and serious adverse effects associated with use of analgesics accentuates the need to consider factors related to analgesic use. The objective of this study was to describe continuous regular analgesics use and examine factors associated with a continuous regular analgesic use.

METHODS

The study was based on data from two surveys and included a random sample of women and men aged 18-45 years from the general Danish population. Information on analgesics use, self-rated health, demographic and lifestyle factors was collected using a self-administered questionnaire. A total of 28,000 women and 33 000 men were invited to participate and 22,199 women (response-rate 81.4%) and 23,080 men (response-rate 71.0%), respectively, were included in the study. Data were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

We found that 27% of the women and 18% of the men reported a regular monthly use of at least seven analgesic tablets during the last year (continuous regular analgesics use). Besides poor self-rated health we found in both sexes that increasing age, poor self-rated fitness, and smoking were related to a continuous regular analgesics use. Nulliparity, low level of education, overweight/obesity, binge drinking, and abstinence were associated with a continuous regular analgesics use for women, while underweight and marital/cohabiting status were associated with a continuous regular analgesics use only for men.

CONCLUSIONS

Regular monthly analgesic use during the last year was generally prevalent. Besides self-rated health, several socio-demographic and lifestyle factors were associated with a continuous regular analgesic use, although with some gender differences.

Sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia

It is a clinical reality that women make up the large majority of chronic pain patients, and there is now consensus from laboratory experiments that when differences are seen, women are more sensitive to pain than men. Research in this field has now begun to concentrate on finding explanations for this sex difference. Although sex differences in sociocultural, psychological, and experiential factors likely play important roles, evidence largely from animal studies has revealed surprisingly robust and often qualitative sex differences at low levels of the neuraxis. Although not yet able to affect clinical practice, the continued study of sex differences in pain may have important implications for the development of new analgesic strategies.

Use of analgesics in adults with pain complaints: prevalence and associated factors, Turkey

OBJECTIVE

Use of analgesics has been increasingly recognized as a major public health issue with important consequences in Turkey. The objective of the study was to determine the prevalence and patterns of analgesics usage and associated factors in adults with pain complaints.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in 15 cities selected from five demographic regions in Turkey. The study sample population comprised 1.909 adults 18-65 age groups suffering from pain. The sampling method was multi-step stratified weighted quota-adjusted sampling. Data were collected by face-to-face interviews using a semi-structured survey questionnaire consisting of 28 questions. Odds ratios were produced by logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

The prevalence of analgesic use was 73.1%, and it was higher in females (75.7%; p<0.05), in subjects 45-54 years (81.4%; p<0.05), in subjects in rural areas (74.6%; p<0.05), in subjects in northern region (84.3%; p<0.05), in illiterate subjects (79.1%; p>0.05), and in subjects of lower socioeconomic status (74.1%; p>0.05). One in ten of the participants used non-prescription analgesics. Non-prescription analgesics were more prevalent among the 55-65 age groups (18.1%; p<0.05), among female (11.6%; p>0.05), among the urban population (10.7%; p>0.05), and in subjects of lower middle socioeconomic status (13.2%; p<0.05). Logistic regression showed statistically significant ORs only for age groups, duration of education, socioeconomic status, and demographic regions (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that the prevalence of analgesic use and prescription analgesic use is high in Turkey, and their use is related to sociodemographic characteristics.

Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings

Sex-related influences on pain and analgesia have become a topic of tremendous scientific and clinical interest, especially in the last 10 to 15 years. Members of our research group published reviews of this literature more than a decade ago, and the intervening time period has witnessed robust growth in research regarding sex, gender, and pain. Therefore, it seems timely to revisit this literature. Abundant evidence from recent epidemiologic studies clearly demonstrates that women are at substantially greater risk for many clinical pain conditions, and there is some suggestion that postoperative and procedural pain may be more severe among women than men. Consistent with our previous reviews, current human findings regarding sex differences in experimental pain indicate greater pain sensitivity among females compared with males for most pain modalities, including more recently implemented clinically relevant pain models such as temporal summation of pain and intramuscular injection of algesic substances. The evidence regarding sex differences in laboratory measures of endogenous pain modulation is mixed, as are findings from studies using functional brain imaging to ascertain sex differences in pain-related cerebral activation. Also inconsistent are findings regarding sex differences in responses to pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic pain treatments. The article concludes with a discussion of potential biopsychosocial mechanisms that may underlie sex differences in pain, and considerations for future research are discussed.

PERSPECTIVE

This article reviews the recent literature regarding sex, gender, and pain. The growing body of evidence that has accumulated in the past 10 to 15 years continues to indicate substantial sex differences in clinical and experimental pain responses, and some evidence suggests that pain treatment responses may differ for women versus men.

Pain and depression in gynecology patients

BACKGROUND

The prevalence and consequences of comorbid pain and depression in gynecology patients are understudied.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence of pain, depression, and their co-occurrence among gynecology patients, and to examine how pain and depression are associated with additional comorbid mental disorders.

METHOD

Self-reported pain, depressive symptoms, other mental-disorder symptoms, functional status, interpersonal distress, and abuse were assessed in 1,647 gynecology patients by use of the Patient Health Questionnaire and the Medical Outcomes Study (SF-20).

RESULTS

Moderate-to-severe pain was reported by 29% of patients; depression, by 21%; with both present in 10.3%. Comorbid pain and depression was associated with anxiety, suicidal or death ideation, functional impairment, interpersonal distress, and physical or sexual abuse.

DISCUSSION

Innovative approaches are needed to assess and treat gynecology patients with comorbid pain and depression, given the degree of overlap between them.

The Link Between Pain Patient and Analgesic Medication is Greater in Migraine than in Rheumatic Disease Patients

Our aim was to measure and compare the link between pain patients and the different kinds of analgesic medications they use by the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ). This is a self-completion 10-item instrument to measure the severity of dependence upon a variety of substances. LDQ was administered to 200 episodic migraine patients (EM group), 77 chronic migraine patients (CM group) overusing acute medications, and 114 patients suffering from rheumatic disease (RD group), consecutively attending the Headache Centre or the Rheumatology Clinic of the University Hospital of Modena in the course of the first semester of 2007. The link with analgesics was greater in migraine patients than in patients with rheumatic disease, since the LDQ total score was significantly higher in the EM (6.65 ± 0.32, P < 0.005) and CM groups (9.61 ± 0.59, P < 0.0001) than in the RD group (5.17 ± 0.37) (Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U-tests). Migraine patients were significantly more linked to triptans and to combined medications than to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The strength of the link between migraine patients and the analgesic medications they take could represent a factor of vulnerability: overusing these medications could develop medication overuse headache.

A comparison of three questionnaire-based measures of analgesic use over 11 years in adult males: a retrospective analysis of data from a prospective, population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Few data are available on whether 3 commonly used, yet slightly different, questionnaire-based measures assessing the use of analgesics provide congruent and comparable results.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare 3 different measures of analgesic use in 1 study population over an 11-year period.

METHODS

Data for this study were gathered from a prospective, population-based cohort study in which 3 different measures were applied simultaneously for measuring use of analgesics at baseline, 4 years, and 11 years. The first measure was "weekly analgesic use in general," the second measure "analgesic use for pain symptoms within the past week," and the third measure "giving the name of any analgesic used within the past week." The subjects were Finnish men who completed 11 years of follow-up in the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor (KIHD) Study, conducted at the Research Institute of Public Health, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland. Agreement between the 3 different measures was determined by Kappa statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 829 men completed 11 years of follow-up (mean [SD] age, 51.4 [6.7] years at baseline; 62.4 [6.5] at study end). At baseline, the prevalence of weekly analgesic use varied from 12.3% to 17.4% and at 11 years from 16.5% to 25.9%, depending on which measure was being used. The third measure yielded the highest prevalence at all 3 points of time and the lowest was obtained using the first measure. The Kappa agreement between the 3 measures at the 3 time points varied from moderate (0.37) to good (0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that the measure being used influences the obtained prevalence of analgesic use. All 3 measures tested consistently throughout the course of the study. The best results, with regard to determining prevalence, were obtained by asking the respondents to name the medicines they had been using during the previous week.

Anxiety, stress, depression, and patients' responses to periodontal treatment: periodontists' knowledge and professional behavior

BACKGROUND

Anxiety, stress, and depression affect the use of health care services, treatment decision-making, and responses to periodontal treatment. This study explored periodontists' confidence in detecting patient anxiety, stress, or depression, as well as their knowledge concerning the relationships between these factors and patients' pain, use of pain medication, and wound healing after periodontal treatment. In addition, this research surveyed if (and which) special accommodations were offered when treating patients with high levels of anxiety, stress, or depression.

METHODS

Data were collected from 171 members of the American Academy of Periodontology (response rate = 34.41%). Most respondents were male (82.2%), white (88.2%), and practiced in solo practices (60.9%).

RESULTS

The respondents were more knowledgeable about the effects of anxiety and stress on pain, the use of pain medication, and wound healing than about the impact of depression on these outcomes. They agreed more strongly with statements that they were more confident in their ability to perceive when patients were anxious and stressed than when they were depressed. They also offered more special accommodations for patients with anxiety and stress than for patients with depression.

CONCLUSIONS

The respondents were significantly less knowledgeable about the impact of depression on patients' responses to periodontal treatment than about the effect of anxiety and stress. Given the evidence concerning the relationships among depression, pain, pain medication use, and wound healing, it is important to educate periodontists about the role of anxiety and stress and the significance of depression on their patients' responses to periodontal therapy.

Surgical Versus Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment: Psychosocial Factors and Treatment Outcomes

BACKGROUND

This research explored how patients with surgical versus non-surgical periodontal treatment differ in trait anxiety, depression, perceived stress, and well-being on the day of surgery and in their reported pain and use of pain medication 2 and 4 weeks after treatment. In addition, it was investigated how psychosocial factors affected reported pain, use of pain medication, and wound healing.

METHODS

Data were collected from 70 dental patients (34 males and 36 females; average age: 54.79 years; SD=13.206) on the day of their periodontal treatment and 2 and 4 weeks after this treatment. The psychosocial factors (i.e., trait anxiety, depression, perceived stress, and well-being) were measured with standardized scales. The patients' providers assessed their wound healing 2 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

On the day of treatment, non-surgical patients had higher anxiety, depression, and stress, and poorer well-being than surgical patients. However, surgical patients reported a higher level of pain during the second week, and greater consumption of analgesics during the second and fourth week. Anxiety, depression, stress, and well-being correlated with the reported level of pain, the use of pain medication, and wound healing after periodontal treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychosocial factors (i.e., anxiety, depression, stress, and well-being) can affect the patients' quality of life on the day of periodontal treatment and the pain experience and medications used after surgical and non-surgical periodontal therapy (4-week period). Patient-provider communication should address the role of these factors in the treatment process.

Pain and Depressive Symptoms among Financially Disadvantaged Women's Health Patients

OBJECTIVES

Women are at greater risk than men for both pain and depression, yet little is known about the frequency and implications of comorbid pain and depression among women in women's health settings. This study aimed to determine the frequency of comorbid depressive symptoms and pain among a sample of gynecology outpatients and to evaluate the associations of comorbid pain and depressive symptoms with physical, emotional, and social functioning and abuse experiences.

METHODS

A total of 242 low-income, primarily African American women presenting at an urban women's health clinic for routine gynecological care consented to participate. Subjects completed the Beck Depression Inventory, Brief Symptom Inventory, Graded Chronic Pain Scale, SF-36, Physical and Sexual Abuse Questionnaire, and Duke Social Support Index. Multivariate analyses were used to test pain and depressive symptoms in their associations with emotional, physical, and social functioning and abuse experience. Age, race, income, and education were controlled in all analyses.

RESULTS

Nearly 20% of participants reported comorbid high depressive symptoms and pain. Both depressive symptoms and pain were independently associated with emotional, physical, and social functioning domains. Depressive symptoms, but not pain, were associated with increased likelihood of history of abuse.

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbid depressive symptoms and pain are a substantial problem, with pervasive implications among financially disadvantaged women seeking routine gynecological care. Subsequent research will determine if psychosocial treatment can be adapted effectively to the needs of this patient population.

Medication overuse headache

Medication overuse headache (MOH) has developed into the third most common type of headache after tension-type headache and migraine. The prevalence of MOH is approximately 1% of the world's population and it shows an increasing trend as recent studies reveal a common involvement throughout the ages, even starting in childhood. All antiheadache drugs, such as triptans, analgesics, ergots and opioids, along with the common combination substances currently on the pharmacological market are capable of inducing MOH. New data on specific clinical features and mean critical monthly dosages and mean critical monthly intake frequencies are now available. The only effective treatment concept is consequent withdrawal therapy. Data of prospective studies on relapse rates and predictors of relapse after successful withdrawal therapy are presented.

Medication-overuse headache

Medication-overuse headache (MOH) can be caused by almost all anti-headache drugs including analgesics, ergots, triptans, and combined preparations The prevalence of chronic daily headache (CDH) appears to be between 2% and 4% in the general population. Current epidemiologic studies suggest that MOH accounts for approximately 50% of these cases. The pathophysiology of MOH remains unclear. The only therapy is withdrawal from the overused substances. Prednisone decreases the duration of headache in the first days of withdrawal therapy. The only strategy to reduce the prevalence of MOH is to prevent the development of MOH in the first place by restriction of anti-headache drugs and constant education of patients.

Prevalência e fatores associados ao uso de antiinflamatórios não-esteróides por pacientes submetidos a endoscopia digestiva alta, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 2000

OBJETIVO: Determinar a prevalência e os fatores associados ao uso de AINE por pacientes submetidos a endoscopia digestiva alta no Hospital das Clínicas da UFMG. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal de uma amostra de 533 pacientes com idade igual ou superior a 17 anos, com endoscopia previamente marcada na Seção de Endoscopia do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Os dados foram coletados por meio de entrevistas. Foram considerados quatro grupos de variáveis exploratórias: sociodemográficas, relacionadas aos hábitos de vida, relacionadas à história de morbidades e relacionadas ao uso de medicamentos. Os dados foram submetidos às análises estatísticas bivariada e multivariada. RESULTADOS E CONCLUSÕES: Entre os entrevistados, 34,1% relataram algum uso de AINE no período de 1 mês anterior à realização da endoscopia. Os AINE mais utilizados foram o ácido acetilsalicílico e o diclofenaco. Os fatores associados ao uso de AINE foram: sexo feminino (OR = 2,07; IC 95% = 1,28-3,34), renda igual ou superior a 3 salários mínimos (OR = 3,20; IC 95% = 1,74-5,90), uso de álcool (OR = 2,43; IC 95% = 1,39-4,24), presença de sintomas gastrintestinais (OR = 1,82; IC 95% = 1,18-2,80), uso regular de 4 ou mais medicamentos (OR = 4,33; IC 95% = 2,49-7,54) e história prévia de úlcera e/ou hemorragia digestiva (OR = 0,40; IC 95% = 0,22-0,75). Estes resultados mostram semelhanças aos observados em países desenvolvidos. Além disso, alertam para a necessidade de maior atenção por profissionais de saúde para com os subgrupos de uso evidenciados.

Medication overuse headache in patients with primary headache disorders: epidemiology, management and pathogenesis

Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a common medical condition that is associated with considerable long-term morbidity and disability. Patients experiencing MOH have primary headache disorders (migraine, tension-type headache [TTH] or the combination of migraine and TTH) that change to a pattern of daily or near-daily headaches over a period of years or decades following the overuse of symptomatic headache medications. Overused drugs include analgesics, ergot alkaloids, serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists ('triptans') and medications containing barbiturates, codeine, caffeine, tranquillisers and mixed analgesics. Affected patients usually have a long history of primary headache, overuse of medications and MOH before they consult a physician for care. Patients with MOH are usually managed in specialist centres by withdrawal of the overused drugs and treatment of withdrawal symptoms (on an inpatient or outpatient basis), headache prophylaxis and limited use of symptomatic acute medications. Most patients respond to this therapy, although the prognosis is not always good and >or=50% may lapse over an initial 5-year follow-up period. The best practical strategy at present is to prevent the overuse of drugs in the first place by patient education and formal management approaches conducted in primary care to treat the primary headache before it changes to MOH. The quality of the clinical evidence on MOH is suboptimal and further biological and clinical research is urgently required to help facilitate the management of these patients more effectively in the future.

Frequent analgesic use at population level: Prevalence and patterns of use

Statistics and prescription database studies show that analgesics are widely utilized, but do not tell anything about either the factors behind analgesic use or how over-the-counter (OTC) analgesics are being used. We aimed to study the prevalence of frequent use of prescribed and OTC analgesics. We also investigated the background factors related to frequent analgesic use and assessed rationality of analgesic usage patterns. We addressed a postal survey to a random stratified population sample of 6500 Finnish people aged 15-74 years. The response rate was 71% (n=4542) after exclusion of unobtainable addressees (n=68). Individuals reporting analgesic use 'daily' or 'a few times a week' were categorized as frequent users. After adjusting for age and sex, the overall prevalence of daily analgesic use was 8.5%, and the prevalence of analgesic use a few times a week 13.6%. The adjusted prevalence of using exclusively prescribed analgesics daily or a few times a week was 8.7%, and that of utilizing purely OTC analgesics 8.8%. The overall prevalence of concomitant frequent use of both prescribed and OTC analgesics was 4.6%. Multinominal logistic regression analyses showed that frequent analgesic use was related especially to daily or continuous pain and high pain intensity. Low mood and not being employed also increased the probability for daily analgesic use. Frequent analgesic use seems to be common at population level. Concomitant use of both prescribed and OTC analgesics can be considered irrational, as it increases the risk of adverse events.

Gender differences in chronic pain--findings from a population-based study of Norwegian adults

The purpose of this study was to evaluate for gender differences in the experience of chronic pain and the impact of chronic pain on quality of life (QOL). A total of 1,912 out of 4,000 Norwegian citizens returned a mailed questionnaire, and 24.4% reported chronic pain. More women than men reported chronic pain, and women reported significantly higher pain intensity scores than men did. Although the duration of chronic pain was similar in women and men, women more often received treatment for their chronic pain. Men in chronic pain reported a poorer QOL than women did. Although specific variables that predicted present pain intensity in women and men differed, the variables that explained the largest percentage of the variance in pain for both genders were the disease and the pain location variables. These findings support previously published studies that document gender differences in chronic pain and extend the work to the impact of chronic pain on QOL.

How do people ease their pain? A population-based study

We investigated how a general population treat their pain and determined factors affecting use of different pain management strategies. From the respondents of a cross-sectional postal survey we selected those who had experienced pain during the past 7 days (n = 3641) and analyzed how they had tried to manage their pain during the past 6 months. The most common pain management strategies were use of over-the-counter medicines (53% of 3641 respondents), physical exercise (52%), prescription medicines (35%), and visiting a physician (33%). The location of pain was related to which pain management strategy was chosen. Use of multiple (>4) treatments was related to prolonged pain, having several (>3) painful locations, high intensity and frequency of pain.

PERSPECTIVE

This study indicates that people with pain are active in trying different treatments. Self-care strategies, especially over-the-counter medicines and physical exercise, are common ways to manage pain at the population level.

Perceptions of analgesic use and side effects: what the public values in pain management

In this population-based telephone survey, we evaluated the attitudes of 302 adults toward analgesic use and related side effects. Over half (68%) reported prior experience with 2 or more side effects. Vomiting (34%), confusion (32%), and nausea (17%) were ranked as the worst side effects. Exploratory cluster analysis grouped responses to 6 questions about willingness to use analgesics into two categories. Participants in Cluster I (n=106), "Conservatives," were less willing to take analgesics for pain as compared to those in Cluster II (n=153), "Liberals." Univariate analysis found Hispanics, women, those less affluent or educated, and those with prior side-effect experience were more likely to be Conservative. Experience with side effects (OR=1.3) and being female (OR=2.1) were the strongest predictors of conservative cluster membership. To achieve better pain outcomes, clinicians and patients must identify factors that contribute to conservative decision-making about analgesic use and side effect management.

Medication overuse headache

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current literature on medication overuse headache will be reviewed with regard to clinical presentation, pathophysiology, therapy and prognosis in the light of the new headache classification.

RECENT FINDINGS

Medication overuse headache is a widely unrecognized medical condition, which according to recent epidemiological studies has evolved to the third most frequent form of headache after tension-type headache and migraine. The first classification of headache disorders from 1988 defined medication overuse headache (formerly called 'drug-induced headache') on the bases of drugs that were available in the 1980s. For the most important anti-headache drugs, including triptans, new data on specific clinical features and more important mean critical monthly dosages and mean critical monthly intake frequencies are now available. Furthermore, recent prospectively conducted studies have revealed rates and predictors of relapse after successful withdrawal.

SUMMARY

The newly available data on medication overuse headache may provide the basis for future consensus guidelines for the management of this condition.

Sex differences in temporal summation of pain and aftersensations following repetitive noxious mechanical stimulation

Several studies demonstrate that women are more sensitive to experimental pain than men. In addition, women exhibit greater temporal summation of heat and mechanically evoked pain. Since temporal summation of pain is centrally mediated, its greater expression in women suggests a central nociceptive hyperexcitability relative to men. The purpose of this study was to pursue this theory, by further assessing sex differences in (1) temporal summation of mechanically evoked pain, and (2) aftersensations following repetitive noxious stimulation. Sixteen series of 10 repetitive, mildly noxious, mechanical stimuli were applied to the fingers of 25 women and 25 age-matched men. The subjects rated the pain intensity and unpleasantness caused by the first, fifth and tenth stimulus in the series, as well as their aftersensations 15 s and 1 min following the end of stimulation. Data were analyzed by three-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. Pain and unpleasantness ratings increased with repetition of stimulation (P<0.0001). Temporal summation of pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings were more pronounced in women than men (P<0.0001). In addition, significant temporal summation occurred only with 2 s interstimulus interval for men (P<0.0005) but with 2 and 5 s interstimulus interval for women (P<0.0001). Moreover, women provided greater ratings for the intensity and the unpleasantness of aftersensations (P<0.0005) and reported painful aftersensations at greater frequency (P<0.05) Greater temporal summation of pain and aftersensations in women suggests that their central processing of nociceptive input may be more easily upregulated into pathological hyperexcitability, possibly accounting for the higher prevalence of various chronic pain conditions among women.