Management paradigms for diabetic macular edema

Autonomous screening for laser photocoagulation in fundus images using deep learning

BACKGROUND

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness in adults worldwide. Artificial intelligence (AI) with autonomous deep learning algorithms has been increasingly used in retinal image analysis, particularly for the screening of referrable DR. An established treatment for proliferative DR is panretinal or focal laser photocoagulation. Training autonomous models to discern laser patterns can be important in disease management and follow-up.

METHODS

A deep learning model was trained for laser treatment detection using the EyePACs dataset. Data was randomly assigned, by participant, into development (n=18 945) and validation (n=2105) sets. Analysis was conducted at the single image, eye, and patient levels. The model was then used to filter input for three independent AI models for retinal indications; changes in model efficacy were measured using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and mean absolute error (MAE).

RESULTS

On the task of laser photocoagulation detection: AUCs of 0.981, 0.95, and 0.979 were achieved at the patient, image, and eye levels, respectively. When analysing independent models, efficacy was shown to improve across the board after filtering. Diabetic macular oedema detection on images with artefacts was AUC 0.932 vs AUC 0.955 on those without. Participant sex detection on images with artefacts was AUC 0.872 vs AUC 0.922 on those without. Participant age detection on images with artefacts was MAE 5.33 vs MAE 3.81 on those without.

CONCLUSION

The proposed model for laser treatment detection achieved high performance on all analysis metrics and has been demonstrated to positively affect the efficacy of different AI models, suggesting that laser detection can generally improve AI-powered applications for fundus images.

Clinical and optical coherence tomography biomarkers as prognostic factors in dexamethasone intravitreal implant for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

Aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone (DEX) 0.7 mg intravitreal implant in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) and serous retinal detachment (SRD), and to study the prognostic factors on a follow up of 12 months.

METHODS

Forty eyes of twenty- six patients with centre involving DME and SRD, who underwent DEX implant, were enrolled. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Swept source OCT imaging and intraocular pressure were evaluated. Central macular thickness (CMT), vitreomacular adhesion (VMA), disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRILs), hyperreflective dots (HRD), SRD and ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption were included in the analysis at baseline and 12 months after implant.

RESULTS

According to our parametric analysis, at 12 months, BVCA improvement from 48.6 ± 23.4 letters to 53.3 ± 24.5 letters was statistically significant (p = 0.04), CMT decreased from 460 ± 99.52 μm to 322.9 ± 117 μm. The presence at baseline of VMA (p = 0.01), EZ disruption (p = 0.03) and DRILs (p = 0.04), were associated with poor BCVA improvement at the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, OCT biomarkers can be considered significant prognostic factors for treatment outcome in patients with DME undergoing DEX intravitreal implant.

Diabetic Macular Edema Management: A Review of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Therapies

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of vision impairment in diabetic individuals, characterized by fluid accumulation in the macula due to a breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier (BRB). This review article explores the role of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies in the management of DME. Anti-VEGF treatments, including ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept, have revolutionized DME management by targeting VEGF, a key mediator in DME pathogenesis. We critically examined the efficacy of these therapies in reducing macular edema and improving visual acuity, assessed their safety and tolerability, and explored the variability in treatment response. The review highlights the latest advancements and future directions in anti-VEGF therapy, including novel drug delivery systems and emerging treatment paradigms. By providing a comprehensive overview of current anti-VEGF therapies, this review seeks to inform clinical practice, guide future research, and contribute to improved patient outcomes in DME management.

Individual and combined associations of sarcopenia, osteoporosis and obesity with frailty in a multi-ethnic asian older adult population

BACKGROUND

We explored the relationships between sarcopenia (SP), osteoporosis (OP), obesity (OB), (alone and in combination) with physical frailty (PF) in a multi-ethnic, population-based study of Asians aged ≥ 60 years.

METHODS

Participants were enrolled from the PopulatION HEalth and Eye Disease PRofile in Elderly Singaporeans Study (PIONEER) study. PF was defined using the modified Fried phenotype; SP using the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019; OP using bone mineral density scores; and OB using the fat mass index. Modified Poisson regression models investigated the associations between exposures and PF, and the relative excess rates of PF due to interactions (RERI) to determine synergistic or antagonistic interactions.

RESULTS

Of the 2643 participants, 54.8% was female; and 49.8%, 25.1%, 25.0% were Chinese, Indians, and Malays, respectively. 25%, 19.0% and 6.7% participants had OB only, SP only, and OP only, respectively. A total of 356 (17.5%), 151 (7.4%) and 97 (4.8%) had osteosarcopenia (OSP), sarcopenic obesity (SOB) and osteo-obesity (OOB), respectively; while 70 (3.5%) had all 3 morbid conditions (osteosarcopenic obesity, OSO). Both SP only and OB only were strongly associated with increased rates of PF (RR: 2.53, 95% CI: 1.95, 3.29; RR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.58, 2.66 respectively); but not OP. Those with OSP, OOB and SOB were also associated with high risks of PF (RR: 2.82, 95% CI: 2.16, 3.68; RR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.69, 3.23; and RR: 2.58, 95% CI: 1.95, 3.41, respectively) compared to robust individuals. Critically, individuals with OSO had the highest relative risk of having PF (RR: 3.06, CI: 2.28, 4.11). Only the sarcopenia-obesity interaction was significant, demonstrating negative synergism (antagonism). The concurrent presence of SP and OB was associated with a 100% lower rate of PF compared to the sum of the relatively rates of SP only and OB only.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of SP, OB and OP, alone and combined, is substantial in older Asians and their early identification is needed to mitigate the risk of frailty. OB may interact with SP in an antagonistic manner to moderate rates of frailty. Further longitudinal studies are needed to address causality and mechanistic underpinnings our findings.

Oxidative Stress and Its Regulation in Diabetic Retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy is the retinal disease associated with hyperglycemia in patients who suffer from type 1 or type 2 diabetes. It includes maculopathy, involving the central retina and characterized by ischemia and/or edema, and peripheral retinopathy that progresses to a proliferative stage with neovascularization. Approximately 10% of the global population is estimated to suffer from diabetes, and around one in 5 of these individuals have diabetic retinopathy. One of the major effects of hyperglycemia is oxidative stress, the pathological state in which elevated production of reactive oxygen species damages tissues, cells, and macromolecules. The retina is relatively prone to oxidative stress due to its high metabolic activity. This review provides a summary of the role of oxidative stress in diabetic retinopathy, including a description of the retinal cell players and the molecular mechanisms. It discusses pathological processes, including the formation and effects of advanced glycation end-products, the impact of metabolic memory, and involvements of non-coding RNA. The opportunities for the therapeutic blockade of oxidative stress in diabetic retinopathy are also considered.

Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers in Predicting Treatment Outcomes of Diabetic Macular Edema after Ranibizumab Injections

Background and Objectives: The identification of possible biomarkers that can predict treatment response among DME eyes is important for the individualization of treatment plans. We investigated optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based biomarkers that may predict the one-year real-life outcomes among diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes following treatment by intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) injections. Materials and Methods: A total of 65 eyes from 35 treatment-naïve patients with DME treated with ranibizumab injection were recruited. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), intraocular pressure (IOP), and OCT scans were retrospectively recorded at baseline before treatment and at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after treatment. The OCT scans were evaluated for biomarkers of interest, which included central retinal thickness (CRT), amount and locations of hyperreflective foci (HRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), intraretinal cysts (IRC), large outer nuclear layer cyst (LONLC), ellipsoid zone disruption (EZD), disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL), hard exudates (HE), epiretinal membrane (ERM), and vitreomacular interface (VMI). Correlations between these OCT biomarkers and outcome measures (visual and structural) were statistically analyzed. Results: A total of 65 eyes from 35 patients with DME were enrolled. The mean age was 64.2 ± 10.9 years old. Significant improvement in terms of mean BCVA (p < 0.005) and mean CRT was seen at final follow-up compared to baseline. The biomarkers of DRIL, LONLC, and SRF were found to be predictive for at least 50 μm CRT reduction after treatment (with odds ratio of 8.69, 8.5, and 17.58, respectively). The biomarkers of IRC, LONLC, and SRF were predictive for significant improvement in terms of BCVA and CRT after treatment. Finally, the number of HRF was predictive for both BCVA improvement and a CRT reduction of less than 100 μm after treatment. No serious complications were reported during the study. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated the utility of OCT biomarkers as therapeutic predictors of ranibizumab treatment among DME eyes.

Persistent diabetic macular edema: Definition, incidence, biomarkers, and treatment methods

Intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment has drastically improved the visual and anatomical outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME); however, success is not always guaranteed, and a proportion of these eyes demonstrate persistent DME (pDME) despite intensive treatment. While standardized criteria to define these treatment-resistant eyes have not yet been established, many studies refer to eyes with no clinical response or an unsatisfactory partial response as having pDME. A patient is considered to have pDME if the retinal thickness improves less than 10-25% after 6 months of treatment. A range of treatment options have been recommended for eyes with pDME, including switching anti-VEGF agents, using corticosteroids and/or antioxidant drugs in adjunct with anti-VEGF therapy, and vitrectomy. In addition, multimodal imaging of DME eyes may be advantageous in predicting the responsiveness to treatment; this is beneficial when initiating alternative therapies. We explore the literature on persistent DME regarding its defining criteria, incidence, the baseline biological markers that may be useful in anticipating the response to treatment, and the available treatment options.

Diabetic retinopathy in the pediatric population: Pathophysiology, screening, current and future treatments

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a sight threatening complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). The incidence of DR in the pediatric population has increased in the last two decades and it is expected to further rise in the future, following the increase in DM prevalence and obesity in youth. As early stages of the retinal disease are asymptomatic, screening programs are of extreme importance to guarantee a prompt diagnosis and avoid progression to more advanced, sight threatening stages. The management of DR comprises a wide range of actions starting from glycemic control, continuing with systemic and local medical treatments, up to para-surgical and surgical approaches to deal with the more aggressive complications. In this review we will describe the pathophysiology of DR trying to understand all the possible targets for currently available or future treatments. We will briefly consider the impact of screening techniques, screening strategies and their social and economic impact. Finally a large part of the review will be dedicated to medical and surgical treatments for DR including both currently available and under development therapies. Most of the available data in the literature on DR are focused on the adult population. The aim of our work is to provide clinicians and researchers with a comprehensive overview of the state of the art regarding DR in the pediatric population, considering the increasing numbers of this diseases in youth and the inevitable consequences that such a chronic disease could have if poorly managed in children.

Focal Photocoagulation as an Adjunctive Therapy to Reduce the Burden of Intravitreal Injections in Macula Edema Patients, the LyoMAC2 Study

AIM

To assess the efficacy of focal photocoagulation of capillary macroaneurysms (CMA) to reduce the burden of intravitreal injections (IVI) in patients with macular edema (ME).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective multicenter study in patients with diabetic ME or ME secondary to retinal vein occlusion (ME-RVO). CMA associated with ME were selectively photocoagulated. Patients were followed for one year after photocoagulation.

RESULTS

93 eyes of 76 patients were included in this study. At 6 months after the laser (n = 93), there was a significant decrease in mean macular thickness (from 354 µm to 314 µm, p < 0.001) and in mean IVI number (from 2.52 to 1.52 at 6 months, p < 0.001). The mean BCVA remained stable (0.32 and 0.31 logMAR at baseline and 6 months, p = 0.95). At 12 months (n = 81/93), there was a significant decrease in mean macular thickness (from 354 µm to 314 µm, p < 0.001) and in mean IVI number (from 4.44 to 2.95 at 12 months, p < 0.001), while the mean BCVA remained stable (0.32 and 0.30 logMAR at baseline and 12 months, p = 0.16).

CONCLUSION

Focal laser photocoagulation of CMA seems to be effective and safe for reducing the burden of IVI in patients with ME. Their screening during the follow-up should be considered closely.

Extracellular vesicles of human diabetic retinopathy retinal tissue and urine of diabetic retinopathy patients are enriched for the junction plakoglo bin protein

Introduction

Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is a potentially blinding retinal disorder that develops through the pathogenesis of diabetes. The lack of disease predictors implies a poor prognosis with frequent irreversible retinal damage and vision loss. Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) present a novel opportunity for pre-symptomatic disease diagnosis and prognosis, both severely limited in DR. All biological fluids contain EVs, which are currently being studied as disease biomarkers. EV proteins derived from urine have emerged as potential noninvasive biomarkers.

Methods

In this study, we isolated EVs from DR retinal tissue explants and from DR patients' urine, and characterized the vesicles, finding differences in particle number and size. Next, we performed proteomic analysis on human explanted DR retinal tissue conditioned media, DR retinal EVs and DR urinary EVs and compared to normal human retinal tissue, retinal EVs, and urinary EVs, respectively.

Results

Our system biology analysis of DR tissue and EV expression profiles revealed biological pathways related to cell-to-cell junctions, vesicle biology, and degranulation processes. Junction Plakoglobin (JUP), detected in DR tissue-derived EVs and DR urinary EVs, but not in controls, was revealed to be a central node in many identified pathogenic pathways. Proteomic results were validated by western blot. Urinary EVs obtained from healthy donors and diabetic patient without DR did not contain JUP.

Conclusion

The absence of JUP in healthy urinary EVs provide the basis for development of a novel Diabetic Retinopathy biomarker, potentially facilitating diagnosis.

Extracellular vesicles derived from different sources play various roles in diabetic retinopathy

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are present in almost all biological fluids and secreted by almost all cell types. A growing number of studies have revealed the potential roles of EVs in the diagnosis and treatment of the diabetic retinopathy (DR). Changes in the quantity and content of EVs may serve as biomarkers of cause or consequence of pathological status of DR, such as inflammation, neovascularization and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. In addition, as natural, safe and efficient drug carrier, EVs have been reported to play important roles in intercellular communication by acting for essential cell-specific information to target cells. In this review, we summarize the roles of EVs, secreted by various types of cells and participated in various biological processes, in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of DR.

Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy Using Extracted 3D Features from OCT Images

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major health problem that can lead to vision loss if not treated early. In this study, a three-step system for DR detection utilizing optical coherence tomography (OCT) is presented. First, the proposed system segments the retinal layers from the input OCT images. Second, 3D features are extracted from each retinal layer that include the first-order reflectivity and the 3D thickness of the individual OCT layers. Finally, backpropagation neural networks are used to classify OCT images. Experimental studies on 188 cases confirm the advantages of the proposed system over related methods, achieving an accuracy of 96.81%, using the leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) cross-validation. These outcomes show the potential of the suggested method for DR detection using OCT images.

Visual outcomes of observation, macular laser and anti-VEGF in diabetic macular edema in type 1 diabetes: a real-world study

Background

The treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) has revolutionized during the last 15 years after the introduction of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the real-world visual outcomes of diabetic macular edema (DME) treatment in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in long-term follow-up.

Methods

A real-world, descriptive, population-based cohort and follow-up of all patients with T1D and DME in 2006-2020 in 34 communities of the Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District. The main outcome measures included age, gender, duration of T1D at the onset of DME, stage of retinopathy, treatment of DME (observation, laser, intravitreal treatments, combination), and visual outcomes.

Results

A total of 304 eyes of 206 T1D patients with DME were included. 75% (n=155) had non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy during the onset of DME. 15% of the cases were observed, 33% had macular laser, 41% intravitreal anti-VEGF and 12% combination of laser and intravitreal injections. Patients in anti-VEGF and in combination groups gained 4.9 and 5.5 ETDRS letters after the initial DME episode (p<0.001 and p<0.001), and the long-term visual improvements were 4.1 and 5.1 ETDRS letters (p<0.001 and p<0.001), respectively. In observation and laser groups the initial gain of 0.1 (p>0.90) and loss of 0.4 ETDRS letter (p=0.61), respectively, was noted. After the follow-up, a 3.7 ETDRS letter decrease was documented in the observation group (p>0.90) and a 1.1 (p=0.14) ETDRS letter decline in the laser group of patients. At the beginning of treatment, eyes subjected to anti-VEGF alone or in combination with laser had lower visual acuity compared to eyes subjected to observation or macular laser. The average of a 6.1±4.8 anti-VEGF injections were needed to dry DME. Visual impairment due to DME decreased from 2.4% to 1.0% during the 15-year period.

Conclusions

Anti-VEGF alone or in combination with macular laser seems to be beneficial in terms of visual outcomes and treatment stability in T1D patients with central DME.

Moreover, satisfying long-term visual outcomes were achieved with anti-VEGF treatment in a real-world setting.

Ellipsoid Zone Integrity and Visual Acuity Changes during Diabetic Macular Edema Therapy: A Longitudinal Study

PURPOSE

Ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity is identified as a potential biomarker for therapy surveillance and outcome prediction of visual acuity (VA). However, only a few studies report long-term results of over 1 year of clinical and anatomical changes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). This study is aimed at describing the long-term VA and anatomical outcomes in spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) (relative ellipsoid zone reflectivity ratio, central macular thickness, and volume) in patients with DME treated with antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. Furthermore, we studied the correlation between EZ integrity and changes in visual acuity.

METHODS

71 eyes of 71 patients were included in this retrospective study. Clinical characteristics were reviewed yearly. OCT data were assessed at baseline and after 1, 3, and 5 years. EZ parameters were quantified automatically. OCT parameters and visual outcome were correlated and analyzed in multivariable regression models.

RESULTS

EZ reflectivity ratio correlated with functional outcome in DME patients from baseline to fifth year at all time points (for all p < 0.05). EZ reflectivity improved the most in the first year of treatment (0.68 to 0.75; p < 0.05) and declined gradually until year 5 of therapy (0.71; compared to baseline p > 0.05). Similarly, best VA was achieved after 1 year (0.40 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) to 0.28 logMAR; p < 0.001) and declined gradually until year 5. Final VA in year 5 was comparable to baseline (0.45 logMAR, compared to baseline p > 0.05). Together with baseline VA, baseline EZ parameters did predict VA outcome after 1 year (p < 0.05). Concordantly, VA and EZ parameters from year 1 were associated with VA outcome in year 2.

CONCLUSION

This study described the long-term course of EZ changes during anti-VEGF treatment in DME patients. In addition, our results underlined the potential of EZ parameters as novel OCT biomarkers for prediction of VA outcomes during therapy.

Vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema and the relevance of external limiting membrane

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relevance of external limiting membrane (ELM) on the visual and morphological results in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) that underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling.

METHODS

Medical records of patients with DME who underwent PPV at our unit between January 2017 and December 2019 were reviewed. We assessed preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) using spectral domain OCT (optical coherence tomography). Exclusion criteria were previous PPV; incomplete data; concomitant diseases including retinal vein occlusion, age-related macular degeneration, uveitis; and a follow-up of less than 12 months. The surgeries were performed using 23- or 27-gauge vitrectomy. The ELM was graded depending on its configuration (grade 0 = intact, grade 1 to 3: disruption of varying extent).

RESULTS

Ninety-nine eyes were enrolled. The postoperative follow up averaged 23.7 months. The preoperative and final BCVA averaged 0.71 ± 0.28 and 0.52 ± 0.3 logMAR, respectively (p = 0.002). The CMT averaged 515.2 ± 209.1 μm preoperatively and 327 ± 66.1 μm postoperatively (p = 0.001). Eyes with intact ELM (n = 8) had a significantly better BCVA compared to those with ELM disruption (0.28 ± 0.14 vs. 0.7 ± 0.25 logMAR, p = 0.01). The final CMT was similar among the groups (intact ELM: 317 ± 54.6 μm; ELM disruption: 334 ± 75.2, p = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

PPV with ERM and ILM peeling is an effective treatment of DME. Eyes with intact ELM preoperatively had a significantly better final visual outcome. To maximize the benefit for patients with DME we recommend early PPV as long as ELM is intact.

Systematic review of diabetic eye disease practice guidelines: more applicability, transparency and development rigor are needed

OBJECTIVES

To assess the quality of diabetic eye disease clinical practice guidelines.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

A systematic search of diabetic eye disease guidelines was conducted on six online databases and guideline repositories. Four reviewers independently rated quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. Aggregate scores (%) for six domains and overall quality assessment were calculated. A "good quality" guideline was one with ≥60% score for "rigor of development" and in at least two other domains.

RESULTS

Eighteen guidelines met the inclusion criteria, of which 13 were evidence-based guidelines (involved systematic search and grading of evidence). The median scores (interquartile range (IQR)) for "scope and purpose," "stakeholder involvement," "rigor of development," "clarity of presentation," "applicability" and "editorial independence" were 73.6% (54.2%-80.6%), 48.6% (29.2%-71.5%), 60.2% (30.9%-78.1%), 86.6% (76.7%-94.4%), 28.6% (18.0%-37.8%) and 60.2% (30.9%-78.1%), respectively. The median overall score (out of 7) of all guidelines was 5.1 (IQR: 3.7-5.8). Evidence-based guidelines scored significantly higher compared to expert-consensus guidelines. Half (n = 9) of the guidelines (all evidence-based) were of "good quality."

CONCLUSION

A wide variation in methodological quality exists among diabetic eyecare guidelines, with nine demonstrating "good quality." Future iterations of guidelines could improve by appropriately engaging stakeholders, following a rigorous development process, including support for application in clinical practice and ensuring editorial transparency.

Discontinuation and loss to follow-up rates in clinical trials of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections

PURPOSE

Clinical trials are often designed to include homogenous, highly specific patient populations with many resources to reduce patient dropout. Results may not translate to real-world settings. We evaluated discontinuation and loss to follow-up (LTFU) rates in clinical trials of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections for diabetic macular edema (DME), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

METHODS

Retrospective meta-epidemiological study. The authors queried ClinicalTrials.gov for all completed trials of anti-VEGF injections for DME, AMD, or RVO. Of 658 trials identified, 582 were excluded for being non-interventional, <100 patients, terminating early, or missing study results. The remaining 76 trials of 27,823 patients were analyzed for discontinuation and LTFU rates.

RESULTS

Mean discontinuation rate was 12.44% (SD 8.12%, range 0-54.12%), with higher rates among control (18.87%) than treatment arms (10.78%, p = .006). Mean LTFU rate was 1.84% (SD 1.78%, range 0-7.76%), with no differences by disease, treatment type, or treatment frequency.

CONCLUSION

Discontinuation rates of major intravitreal anti-VEGF clinical trials were highly variable, suggesting even trials struggle with overall patient retention. Though trial LTFU rates were low, real-world outcomes may differ due to higher reported LTFU rates, which should be considered when extrapolating trial results to clinical practice.

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF TOPICAL INTERFERON α2b AS A COMPLEMENTARY TREATMENT OF MACULAR EDEMA OF PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC RETINOPATHY: A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial Study

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of the topical interferon α2b (IFNα2b) as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of diabetic macular edema.

METHOD

This was a randomized controlled clinical trial performed on patients with diabetic macular edema. Fifty eyes of 50 patients (one eye/patient) who were receiving treatment for diabetic macular edema were randomly assigned to get topical IFNα2b 1 MU/mL or artificial tear eye drop as an adjunctive therapy. The primary measure outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness; the secondary goals were to assess the effect of topical IFNα2b on the intraocular pressure and its potential side effects.

RESULTS

Baseline demographic data of the two groups were similar. The improvement in visual acuity of patients on IFN was more than the patients on artificial tear by the end of the fourth week (6.85 and 1.45 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, respectively, P = 0.001) and the eighth week (6.75 and 1.05 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, respectively, P = 0.005). The central macular thickness was also decreased correspondingly by the end of fourth week (53.1 ± 153 µm for patients on IFN and 26.6 ± 119.1 µm for patients on artificial tear, P = 0.497) and eighth week (27.9 ± 67.7 for patients on IFN and 29.2 ± 98 µm for patients on artificial tear, P = 0.957), but it was not statistically significant. Intraocular pressure was decreased on the fourth week in IFN group for 1.7 mmHg ±3 and increased for 0.1 mmHg ±2.3 in the artificial tear group (P = 0.018). No significant side effect was detected with topical IFN drop.

CONCLUSION

This study evaluated the short-term effects of topical IFNα2b 1 MU/mL. The drug was well tolerated and may have an effect on improvement of best-corrected visual acuity in patients with diabetic macular edema. It also had an intraocular pressure lowering effect on the studied eyes. However, further studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Factors Affecting a Short-Term Response to Anti-VEGF Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common cause of visual impairment in patients with diabetes. Although intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections were efficacious in clinical trials, several patients exhibited a poor response. This study aimed to compare clinical features between patients who were susceptible to intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for DME and those who were not. A single-center, retrospective study of 102 such patients was conducted (123 eyes; mean ± standard deviation age, 63.4 ± 10.8 years; 57.8% males). Systemic and ocular data, assessed at baseline and after a month, were compared between good (>20% decrease in central macular thickness (CMT)) and poor (≤20% decrease in CMT) responders using the Mann-Whitney U test/Fisher's exact test. Eighty-one eyes (65.9%) were good responders. The glycosylated hemoglobin level was higher (p = 0.011) in poor (7.5% ± 0.94%) than in good (7.04% ± 1.19%) responders. The foveal avascular zone was larger (p = 0.0003) in poor (0.67 ± 0.33 μm²) than in good (0.47 ± 0.23 μm²) responders. The number of microaneurysms in the pericapillary network was higher (p = 0.0007) in poor (2.7 ± 2.2) than in good (1.4 ± 2.0) responders. Baseline glycemic control and macular ischemia may be associated with the short-term response to intravitreal anti-VEGF injections.

Increasing Incidence and Prevalence of Common Retinal Diseases in Retina Practices Across the United States

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To provide an updated estimate of incidence and prevalence of the foremost retinal diseases in the U.S.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of the Vestrum Health Database evaluating eyes with diagnoses of wet or dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), diabetic retinopathy (DR), branch or central retinal vein occlusion (BRVO; CRVO) from January 2014 to December 2019 across 58 retina practices.

RESULTS

Of the 3,086,791 eyes examined, 490,881 (15.9%) had dry AMD, 294,041 (9.5%) wet AMD, 270,703 (8.8%) DME, 254,690 (8.3%) DR without DME, 73,617 (2.4%) BRVO, and 50,670 (1.6%) CRVO. Dry AMD had the highest incidence. These diseases comprised 61.0% of total prevalence and 54.3% of incidence among patients at the retina practices analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a diverse database, these diseases comprised the majority of U.S. retina practice cases, with increasing annual incidences. AMD is the most common diagnosis, then diabetic eye disease. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:29-36.].

Association between the patterns of diabetic macular edema and photoreceptors' response after intravitreal ranibizumab treatment: a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography study

PURPOSE

To analyze photoreceptors' condition after intravitreal ranibizumab treatment according to the pattern of diabetic macular edema (DME) on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).

METHODS

Retrospective study includes 58 treatment naïve patients with DME, treated with intravitreal ranibizumab injections and followed up for at least 12 months. Patients were classified based on DME morphology on SD-OCT into: diffuse macular edema, cystoid macular edema (CME) and serous retinal detachment with CME (SRD/CME). The DME morphology was analyzed, while quantitative measurement of ellipsoid zone (EZ) defect, as well as qualitative assessment of the condition of external limiting membrane (ELM) and interdigitation zone (IZ) at foveal area, was taken before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Before treatment, patients with CME presented worse ELM and IZ condition and greater EZ defect than patients with diffuse macular edema or SRD/CME. After treatment, the restoration of EZ defect and IZ was more evident in patients with CME than in diffuse macular edema or SRD/CME.

CONCLUSION

Patients with DME presented significant photoreceptors' restoration after intravitreal ranibizumab injections at the 12-month follow-up. The improvement in EZ defect size and IZ was dependent on the pattern of DME on SD-OCT.

Real-world management of treatment-naïve diabetic macular oedema: 2-year visual outcome focusing on the starting year of intervention from STREAT-DMO study

Background/aims

To investigate the yearly change of real-world outcomes for best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after 2-year clinical intervention for treatment-naïve diabetic macular oedema (DMO).

Methods

Retrospective analysis of aggregated, longitudinal medical records obtained from 27 retina specialised institutions in Japan from Survey of Treatment for DMO database. A total of 2049 treatment-naïve centre involving DMO eyes of which the initial intervention started between 2010 and 2015, and had been followed for 2 years, were eligible. As interventions, antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents, local corticosteroids, macular photocoagulation and vitrectomy were defined. In each eye, baseline and final BCVA, the number of each intervention for 2 years was extracted. Each eye was classified by starting year of interventional treatment.

Results

Although baseline BCVA did not change by year, 2-year improvement of BCVA had been increased, and reached to +6.5 letters in the latest term. There is little difference among starting year about proportions of eyes which BCVA gained >15 letters, in contrast to those which lost >15 letters were decreased by year. The proportion of eyes receiving anti-VEGF therapy was dramatically increased, while those receiving the other therapies were gradually decreased. The proportion of eyes which maintained socially good vision of BCVA>20/40 has been increased and reached to 59.0% in the latest term.

Conclusion

For recent years, treatment patterns for DMO have been gradually but certainly changed; as a result, better visual gain, suppression of worsened eyes and better final BCVA have been obtained. Anti-VEGF therapy has become the first-line therapy and its injection frequency has been increasing.

Incidence and treatment outcomes of secondary epiretinal membrane following intravitreal injection for diabetic macular edema

The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of secondary epiretinal membrane (ERM) after intravitreal injection and the effect of ERM on visual acuity and central macular thickness (CMT) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). We included 147 eyes of 95 patients over 18 years old who were diagnosed with DME from 2012 to 2016, treated with intravitreal injection, and followed-up more than 24 months. Mean CMT in the ERM group was significantly thicker than in the non-ERM group after 9, 12, 18, and 24 months. Secondary ERM developed in 9.5% of patients during follow-up. Compared to other agents, the incidence of secondary ERM was significantly higher after intravitreal injection of dexamethasone implant. Among patients in the ERM group, the mean decrease of CMT between pre-injection and 2 weeks post-injection was significantly less after secondary ERM formation than before ERM formation. Secondary ERM formation was significantly associated with the number of intravitreal injections and the use of dexamethasone implant. Therefore, secondary ERM develops more frequently as the number of intravitreal injections increases and after intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection. The therapeutic effects of intravitreal injections for DME patients decrease after secondary ERM formation.

Effects of Intravitreal Bevacizumab Therapy in Patients with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus (DM) stands out as one of the chronic diseases with the highest morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. Among the many complications of DM, diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the causes of blindness in patients aged between 20 and 64 years. At least 90% of the new cases showed to have the retinal structure and function restored when proper treatment was provided.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of the antiangiogenic bevacizumab in the treatment of DR according not only to the clinical laboratory parameters for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) and capillary glycemia but also to the ophthalmological parameters for optical coherence tomography (OCT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 11 individuals were included and followed up for 12 months after 3 administrations of bevacizumab.

RESULTS

Upon associating the ophthalmological and laboratory variables throughout the treatment, no significant alterations could be seen regarding the analyzed variables. However, it was observed that HbA1c values and the total leukocyte count negatively interfered with the treatment response.

CONCLUSION

The current study showed that HbA1c values and the amount of leukocytes negatively interfere with the therapeutic response. Therefore, laboratory analyses of these parameters are recommended for diabetic patients undergoing the above-mentioned treatment.

Optical coherence tomography analysis of patients with untreated diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of vision loss. Diabetes patients with mild macular edema and good visual acuity are often observed carefully so that treatment can be instituted when central vision is threatened. Optimal frequency of monitoring of these patients is unknown. Our study aimed to gather more information to determine a safe interval for monitoring of patients with eyes that were not undergoing active treatment for DME and to correlate outcomes with clinical risk factors.

METHODS

Study population: Ninety-seven eyes with optical coherence tomography (OCT) evidence of DME of 97 patients with diabetes. Study procedures: Retrospective review of medical records and macular OCT scans at a 6-12-month interval. Primary outcomes: Change in visual acuity and change in central subfield thickness (CSFT) between the initial and follow-up OCT scans.

RESULTS

There was no significant change from median baseline visual acuity 6/9 (inter-quartile range 6/6-6/12) or from median baseline CSFT (290 μm, inter-quartile range 270-312 μm) over a median duration of 8 months (inter-quartile range 7-10 months). The numbers of eyes where CSFT had increased ≥ 25 μm, reduced ≥ 25 μm, or remained unchanged were 16 (16%), 6 (6%), and 74 (76%), respectively. Patients with hemoglobin A1c ≥ 8.5% were 5.7 times more likely to develop central subfield thickening (95% CI 1.1-30.1, P = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Majority of eyes with DME on OCT had stable CSFT without treatment over a median duration of 8 months. Hemoglobin A1c may be useful for risk stratification.

Cytokine and Chemokine Profile Changes in Patients After Intravitreal Conbercept Injection for Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the concentrations of cytokines and chemokines in diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes before and during therapy with the intravitreal injection of conbercept (IVC) and to identify associations with disease activity.

Methods

The Bio-Plex^® 200 System and the Bio-PlexTM Human Cytokine Standard 27-Plex, Group I (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA) were used to detect cytokine levels in aqueous humour. Experimental aqueous humour samples were collected from 18 patients with DME at the same time that IVC was performed at baseline and at 1 month. Control aqueous humour samples were collected from 16 patients undergoing cataract surgery.

Results

Significantly higher concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-8, eotaxin, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), interferon gamma-induced protein 10 (IP-10), and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) were found in the aqueous humour of DME patients than cataract patients. One month after IVC, the intraocular concentrations of VEGF were significantly lower in the eyes of DME patients than at baseline. No other cytokines were significantly altered by conbercept therapy. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) slightly improved following IVC compared with that at baseline, although this difference was not significant, and central macular thickness (CMT) significantly decreased 1 month after IVC treatment.

Conclusion

Angiogenic, inflammatory and growth factors are involved in the development of DME. With the exception of VEGF, IVC did not cause significant differences in any inflammatory cytokines or growth factors in DME patients. CMT is related to VEGF levels in aqueous humour.

Ranibizumab treatment improves diabetic macular oedema without influencing retinal oximetry parameters

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of ranibizumab on retinal oximetry in eyes with diabetic macular oedema (DME).

METHODS

In this prospective interventional study, 30 eyes (30 patients) with DME were treated with three-monthly intravitreal ranibizumab injections, followed by pro re nata administration for 12 months. Retinal oximetry was performed using an Oxymap T1.

RESULTS

The mean number of injections was 6.6 ± 2.5. No adverse event was observed throughout the study period. Ranibizumab treatments for 12 months improved the macular oedema (p = 0.002) and achieved a recovery of visual acuity (VA; p = 0.011). However, oxygen saturation levels in the major retinal blood vessels, either the arteries or the veins, remained unchanged during the observational period. Arterial oxygen saturation was 100.3 ± 9.4% before treatment and 100.9 ± 10.7% (p = 0.698) at 6 months. Venous oxygen saturation was 56.4 ± 8.9% before treatment and 55.6 ± 8.6% (p = 0.529) at 6 months. In addition, there were no significant changes in diameters of the major retinal arteries and veins. Greater improvement of VA at 12 months was correlated with a smaller number of ranibizumab injections (r = 0.459, p = 0.011). The number of ranibizumab injections during these 12 months correlated with an increased baseline central retinal thickness (r = 0.385, p = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Ranibizumab treatments for DME improved the macular oedema and achieved VA recovery, but no changes were noted in the retinal oxygen saturation.

Healthcare resource use and costs of diabetic macular oedema for patients with antivascular endothelial growth factor versus a dexamethasone intravitreal implant in Korea: a population-based study

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the costs and healthcare resources of patients with diabetic macular oedema (DME) who received intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents or a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX-implant) in Korea.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

The Korean National Health Insurance claim data from 1 January 2015 to 30 June 2017 were retrieved from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients with DME who were diagnosed with diabetic retinopathy or DME and received ranibizumab, aflibercept or a DEX-implant in conjunction with intravitreal injection were included. Patients whose primary diagnoses were age-related macular degeneration or retinal vein occlusion were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Healthcare resource utilisation and costs related to DME in the 12-month postindex period.

RESULTS

During the study period, 182 patients and 414 patients were identified in the anti-VEGF and DEX-implant groups, respectively, and there was no significant difference in the demographic characteristics between the two groups. The outpatient eye care-related medical costs were US$3002.33 for the anti-VEGF group vs US$2250.35 for the DEX-implant group (p<0.0001). After adjusting the relevant covariates based on the generalised linear model, the estimated outpatient eye care-related medical costs were 33% higher in the anti-VEGF group than in the DEX-implant group (p<0.0001, 95% CI 22% to 45%). The utilisation pattern of the two groups showed no significant difference except for the number of intravitreal injections, which was higher in the anti-VEGF group (2.69±2.29) than in the DEX-implant group (2.09±1.37, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The average annual eye-related medical cost of the DEX-implant group was significantly lower than that of the anti-VEGF group during the study period, which was mainly due to decreased utilisation of eye care-related injections. Further long-term studies are needed.

Platelet distribution width, platelet count, and plateletcrit in diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of PRISMA guidelines

BACKGROUND

Screening and diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy (DR) mainly depends on fundus examination, which is not an intuitive and simple screening or diagnostic method. Recently, the relationship between platelet parameters and DR has become a hot topic. Whether platelet parameters have clinical value in DR is controversial.

METHODS

Literature was retrieved by formal search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Scopus, and CNKI) and by hand searching of reference lists of related articles from the beginning of building database to December 2017. Review manager 5.3 was utilized to deal with statistical data. This study was registered at International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (number: CRD42018093773).

RESULTS

This study included 1720 DR patients, 1477 type 2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM) without DR patients and 1456 health controls in 21 eligible studies. We found there was significant increase of platelet distribution width (PDW) level in the comparison of DR versus Control group (standard mean difference [SMD] [95% confidence interval [CI]] = 1.04 [0.68, 1.40]) and DR versus T2DM without DR group (SMD [95% CI] = 0.68 [0.40, 0.95]). For platelet count (PLT), it showed obvious decrease in the comparison of DR versus T2DM without DR group (SMD [95% CI] = -0.26 [-0.49, -0.03]) and no difference in comparison of DR versus Control (SMD [95% CI] = -0.26 [-0.51, -0.00]). Subgroup analysis showed that significant result of PDW level appeared in China and Turkey in all comparisons, while similar results of PLT only in China. In addition, PDW level was different in various DR-subtypes, obvious high level in proliferation DR.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that the guiding significance of PDW and PLT in diagnosis and monitor of DR, and especially, application of PDW to PDR management may have potential sense.

Determinants in Initial Treatment Choice for Diabetic Macular Edema

PURPOSE

To assess how patient choices (out-of-pocket costs, insurance plan, geographic region) impact initiation of therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using administrative medical claims data from a large, national insurer.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients newly diagnosed with DME from 2013 through 2016 were observed for 90 days after diagnosis or until first treatment was received.

METHODS

Multivariate logistic regression was used to create odds ratios comparing different baseline demographic and patient-related factors.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the odds of receiving the different possible initial treatments for DME (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF], focal laser treatment, steroids, or observation), no treatment, and not following up.

RESULTS

Of the 6220 newly diagnosed DME patients, 3010 (48.4%) underwent a follow-up examination within 90 days of diagnosis, and of those, 1453 patients (48.3%) received treatment in the observation window, including 614 (20.4%) with bevacizumab, 191 (6.3%) with ranibizumab or aflibercept, 560 (18.6%) with focal laser, 38 (1.3%) with steroid injection, and 50 (1.7%) with an injection of an unspecified drug. Having a copay (vs. $0) lowered the odds of receiving any treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.71; P < 0.001) and of receiving each treatment individually (anti-VEGF treatment: OR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88; bevacizumab: OR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59-0.91; ranibizumab or aflibercept: OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49-0.99; focal laser: OR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.35-0.55; P < 0.001). Contrary to having a copay, having a high deductible and type of insurance plan were not associated with initiating treatment (P > 0.41 for all comparisons). Patients in the Northeast showed lower odds of initiating anti-VEGF treatment (OR = 0.60; 95%CI, 0.44-0.82; P < 0.001) and specifically bevacizumab (OR = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.33-0.67; P < 0.001). Furthermore, Northeast patients who were treated with anti-VEGF showed a higher odds of receiving ranibizumab or aflibercept compared with bevacizumab (OR = 2.39; 95% CI, 1.31-4.37; P < 0.001). Southern Midwest patients showed a higher odds of treatment (anti-VEGF: OR = 1.35; 95%CI, 1.02-1.77; P < 0.001; bevacizumab: OR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.04-1.87; focal laser: OR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01-1.89; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient choices such as copays and where they live are important factors in determining the initial choice of treatment for DME.

The impact of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents on visual impairment/blindness prevention in patients with diabetic macular edema and on associated patient and caregiver burden in Japan

AIMS

To estimate the impact of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents on visual impairment and blindness avoided in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) and on associated patient and caregiver productivity loss in Japan.

METHODS

This study compared the impact of current care (estimated at 53.8% utilization of anti-VEGF agents using current data) with that of hypothetical care (characterized by a higher utilization of anti-VEGF agents [80.0%], as estimated by an expert panel) of DME patients. A population-based Markov model (two-eye approach) simulated visual acuity (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters) transitions over 5 years with DME treatments (intravitreal aflibercept, ranibizumab, and triamcinolone acetonide, and grid/focal laser) in patients with DME. Patient and caregiver productivity loss was determined using the human capital method.

RESULTS

In total, 570,000 DME patients were included in the model over 5 years. Increased utilization of anti-VEGF agents resulted in 6,659 fewer cases of severe visual impairment (SVI; 26-35 ETDRS letters) or blindness (0-25 ETDRS letters) compared with the current care approach (26,023 vs 32,682 cases; 20.38% reduction) over this period. Increased utilization of anti-VEGF agents also contributed to productivity loss savings of ¥12.58 billion (US $115.64 million) (i.e., 17.01%) at the end of year 5. The total overall saving over 5 years was ¥45.83 billion (US $421.27 million) (13.45%).

LIMITATIONS

Few Japanese data were available, and assumptions were made for some inputs. Vision changes dependent on the function of both eyes were not studied. Only intravitreal (not sub-Tenon's) injections of triamcinolone were considered in this model. Direct costs were not considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased utilization of anti-VEGF agents can reduce SVI and legal blindness in patients with DME in Japan. This would also be associated with substantial savings in patient and caregiver productivity loss.

Guidelines on Diabetic Eye Care: The International Council of Ophthalmology Recommendations for Screening, Follow-up, Referral, and Treatment Based on Resource Settings

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a global epidemic and affects populations in both developing and developed countries, with differing health care and resource levels. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major complication of DM and a leading cause of vision loss in working middle-aged adults. Vision loss from DR can be prevented with broad-level public health strategies, but these need to be tailored to a country's and population's resource setting. Designing DR screening programs, with appropriate and timely referral to facilities with trained eye care professionals, and using cost-effective treatment for vision-threatening levels of DR can prevent vision loss. The International Council of Ophthalmology Guidelines for Diabetic Eye Care 2017 summarize and offer a comprehensive guide for DR screening, referral and follow-up schedules for DR, and appropriate management of vision-threatening DR, including diabetic macular edema (DME) and proliferative DR, for countries with high- and low- or intermediate-resource settings. The guidelines include updated evidence on screening and referral criteria, the minimum requirements for a screening vision and retinal examination, follow-up care, and management of DR and DME, including laser photocoagulation and appropriate use of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors and, in specific situations, intravitreal corticosteroids. Recommendations for management of DR in patients during pregnancy and with concomitant cataract also are included. The guidelines offer suggestions for monitoring outcomes and indicators of success at a population level.

Influence of serous retinal detachment on the outcome of ranibizumab treatment in diabetic macular oedema

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of serous retinal detachment (SRD) on the outcome of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) therapy in diabetic macular oedema (DME).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-one eyes with cystoid macular oedema (CME) and SRD (study group) and 57 eyes with only CME (control group) that received pro re nata (PRN) IVR injections during a 6-month period were retrospectively evaluated. The outcome measures included changes in the central macular thickness (CMT) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and injection numbers.

RESULTS

The mean initial CMT in the study and control groups was 467 ± 101 and 440 ± 89 µm, respectively. The mean BCVA in the study and control groups was 0.75 ± 0.38 and 0.59 ± 0.36 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (LogMAR), respectively (p = 0.010). The study group received a mean of 2.2 ± 0.92 injections, whereas the control group received a mean of 2.54 ± 0.9 injections. The decrease in CMT was greater, but not significantly greater, in the study group than in the control group.

CONCLUSION

The presence of SRD resulted in a less favourable visual acuity (VA) outcome with IVR. Disruption of the ellipsoid zone and abnormality of the foveal avascular zone at the baseline examination were correlated with a lower VA. Both of the pathologies occurred more frequently in the SRD group.

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OUTCOMES OF INTRAVITREAL AFLIBERCEPT FOCUSING ON PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA FROM JAPAN

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) in Japanese patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

VIVID-DME was a Phase 3 study comprising patients with DME randomized 1:1:1 to IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks until Week 16 then 8-week dosing (2q8), and laser. A total of 403 patients (76 Japanese) were included in this study. VIVID-Japan (72; all Japanese patients) was a nonrandomized, open-label study comprising Japanese patients with DME receiving IAI 2q4 until Week 16, then 2q8. Primary efficacy endpoint (Week 52) of VIVID-DME was mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity; VIVID-Japan evaluated safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (letters) for 2q4, 2q8, and laser groups was +10.6, +10.9, and +1.2 and +9.8, +9.5, and +1.1 in the non-Japanese and Japanese populations of VIVID-DME, respectively. In VIVID-Japan, it was +9.3 for IAI 2q8. Intravitreal aflibercept injection also provided consistently greater benefits for anatomical outcomes versus laser. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of IAI.

CONCLUSION

In Japanese patients with DME, IAI treatment was superior to laser for visual and anatomical outcomes and resulted in efficacy and safety outcomes similar to those in a non-Japanese patient population.

Current Advances in Pharmacotherapy and Technology for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Systematic Review

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is classically defined by its vascular lesions and damage in the neurons of the retina. The cellular and clinical elements of DR have many features of chronic inflammation. Understanding the individual cell-specific inflammatory changes in the retina may lead to novel therapeutic approaches to prevent vision loss. The systematic use of available pharmacotherapy has been reported as a useful adjunct tool to laser photocoagulation, a gold standard therapy for DR. Direct injections or intravitreal anti-inflammatory and antiangiogenesis agents are widely used pharmacotherapy to effectively treat DR and diabetic macular edema (DME). However, their effectiveness is short term, and the delivery system is often associated with adverse effects, such as cataract and increased intraocular pressure. Further, systemic agents (particularly hypoglycemic, hypolipidemic, and antihypertensive agents) and plants-based drugs have also provided promising treatment in the progression of DR. Recently, advancements in pluripotent stem cells technology enable restoration of retinal functionalities after transplantation of these cells into animals with retinal degeneration. This review paper summarizes the developments in the current and potential pharmacotherapy and therapeutic technology of DR. Literature search was done on online databases, PubMed, Google Scholar, clinitrials.gov, and browsing through individual ophthalmology journals and leading pharmaceutical company websites.

[Anti-VEGF therapy for diabetic macular edema. From theory to clinical practice]

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical effectiveness of aflibercept therapy for patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) - both naïve to the drug and unresponsive to previous anti-VEGF treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 127 patients (127 eyes) divided into two groups. The first group consisted of 100 primary DME patients (100 eyes) with mean age of 68.48±2.56 years and average disease duration of 12.50±7.85 years. The second group comprised 27 patients (27 eyes) with resistant macular edema who had received three or more 0.5 mg ranibizumab loading injections. Their average age was 66±4.12 and the mean number of previous anti-VEGF injections before changing therapy was 4.56±1.21. The evaluation parameters included Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) and Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) that were assessed initially and after each 2 mg aflibercept injection (at 1-month intervals during the 6 months of DME therapy).

RESULTS

The average number of aflibercept injections in the first group was 4.34±1.22. BCVA improved in 100% of patients of that group after the 3^rd injection with resulting mean value of 0.32±0.15. Maximum BCVA improvement was seen after the 6^th injection amounting to 0.46±0.2. CRT decreased in 100% of patients of that group after the 1^st injection. One month after the therapy start, CRT decreased in average by 17.96% - to 370.89±50.55 µm; at 3 months, CRT was 344.65±48.56 µm; after 6 month - 283.40±49.76 µm. All patients of the second group had retinal morphology restored, visual function improved in 55% of patients. Mean CRT decrease was 180±44 µm, BCVA improvement - 0.13±0.08, mean number of aflibercept injections - 4.86±0.9.

CONCLUSION

Aflibercept can be used as first-choice drug for treatment of DME patients (both therapy-naïve and unresponsive to previous ranibizumab therapy) to improve anatomical parameters and visual function.

Management of diabetic macular edema in Japan: a review and expert opinion

Diabetic retinopathy is a frequent cause of visual impairment in working-age adults (≥ 30 years) and in Japan is most commonly observed in those aged 50-69 years. Diabetic macular edema (DME) is one of the main causes of vision disturbance in diabetic retinopathy, which is a clinically significant microvascular complication of diabetes. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is becoming the mainstay of treatment for DME. However, to achieve sustained long-term improvement in visual acuity, conventional laser photocoagulation, vitrectomy and steroid therapy are also expected to play a role in the treatment of DME. This review summarizes the epidemiology and pathology of diabetic retinopathy and DME, evaluates the findings regarding the diagnosis and treatment of DME, and underscores the importance of systemic management of the disease in the context of the current health care situation in Japan. Finally, the unmet needs of patients with DME and prospects for research are discussed. The weight of evidence suggests that it is important to establish a multipronged treatment strategy centered on anti-VEGF therapy.

Experience of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for treatment of diabetic macular edema among Omani population

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of intravitreal (IVT) triamcinolone in diabetic macular edema (DME).

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

A retrospective study of 42 eyes diagnosed clinically and supported with optical coherence tomography (OCT), with DME of more than 300 μm in thickness. All eyes were injected with a single IVT injection of preservative free triamcinolone acetonide (TA) with dose of 4 mg. Patients were subjected to visual acuity (VA) and OCT on each follow-up visit which was continued for 6 months. The total number of IVT injections given was 48. Six eyes had a repeat injection. None of the eyes had any other IVT injection within 6 weeks of TA. Twenty-one eyes were pseudophakic.

RESULTS:

Mean age of the patients was 58.8 years. The mean central subfield thickness (CST) at baseline was 504.6 μm. At 6 weeks, the mean CST dropped by 183.6 μm (P < 0.00001). At 6-month follow-up, the mean CST had increased by 74.6 μm from 6 weeks level; however, the 6-month mean CST was 109 μ less than mean baseline thickness (P < 0.0005). The mean baseline VA was 0.80 LogMAR units. At 6 weeks, the mean VA dropped by 0.01 LogMAR. At 6 months, VA improved by 0.02 LogMAR units from baseline. Overall, VA improved in 47% eyes, dropped from baseline in 35% eyes, and remained unchanged in 18% eyes.

CONCLUSION:

Triamcinolone acetonide is a safe, effective, and promising therapy in DME.

Correlation between Deep Capillary Plexus Perfusion and Long-Term Photoreceptor Recovery after Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment

PURPOSE

To determine the association between baseline deep capillary plexus (DCP) integrity and long-term photoreceptor recovery as well as visual outcome after treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

DESIGN

Retrospective, interventional case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-seven eyes with DME that resolved successfully with initial treatment (baseline) and that remained edema free for 12 months after the initial DME resolution.

METHODS

Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spectral-domain (SD) OCT, and OCT angiography findings were collected at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after baseline. Correlations were analyzed between DCP integrity parameters (vascular flow density [VD] and area of the foveal avascular zone [FAZ]) and photoreceptor integrity parameters (ellipsoid zone [EZ] and external limiting membrane [ELM] integrity). Multivariate linear regression analysis was conducted to identify the baseline predictors for photoreceptor recovery and visual improvement.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The association between baseline DCP integrity and recovery of photoreceptor integrity over 12 months.

RESULTS

At baseline, the mean central retinal thickness was 306.1±51.8 μm. The mean baseline DCP VD and FAZ were 14.4±5.2% and 0.71±0.36 mm², and the mean baseline EZ and ELM integrity were 57.2±26.1% and 76.4±19.8%, respectively. Ellipsoid zone and ELM integrity recovered significantly at 12 months from baseline (both P < 0.001). The degree of EZ and ELM integrity recovery was well correlated with the baseline DCP VD (P = 0.004 and P = 0.009, respectively) and DCP FAZ (P = 0.007 and P = 0.009, respectively). Moreover, the mean change in BCVA from baseline to 12 months was significantly greater with higher baseline DCP VD (P = 0.003) and smaller DCP FAZ (P = 0.042). Compared with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) nonresponders, anti-VEGF responders had higher baseline DCP integrity and a significantly greater degree of photoreceptor recovery at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of DCP preservation at the time of initial DME resolution is correlated closely with long-term recovery of photoreceptor integrity and visual outcome in patients with resolved DME.

Diabetic macular edema in proliferative stage treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent and triamcinolone acetonide by laser-based strategies

AIM

To appraise the effect of treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) in proliferative stage with sufficient panrentinal photocoagulation (PRP) therapy and intravitreal injections (IV) Conbercept and posterior subtenon's triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) sequential therapy.

METHODS

This prospective clinical randomized controlled trial of cross-over design was conducted in three phases. The participants included cases of DME in proliferative stage. They were divided into two groups and treated with PRP before enrollment. Group A were treated with IV-Conbercept 0.5 mg for one month in the 1^st phase. Group B were treated with STTA 40 mg (twice per two weeks). The interventions were exchanged in the second phase (2mo) between the two groups. In the third phase (3-6mo) no other treatment was given. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) measured by OCT and complications were compared.

RESULTS

After phase I: in Group A, BCVA improved from 0.201±0.17 to 0.37±0.24 (F=5.88, P=0.004). CMT changed from 449±155.10 to 304.1±84.70 µm (F=14.9, P<0.01). In Group B, BCVA changed from 0.195±0.19 to 0.26±0.20 (F=0.76, P=0.41) while CMT changed from 463.82±152.92 to 366.00±115.40 µm (F=3.70, P<0.03). The improvement of BCVA was better in Group A (P<0.05). After phase II: in Group A, BCVA raised to 0.47±0.27 (F=0.26, P<0.01), CMT reduced to 260.67±62.97 µm (F=-188.3, P<0.01); in Group B, BCVA raised to 0.51±0.26 (F=0.31, P<0.01), CMT reduced to 261.93±50.15 µm (F=-201.9, P<0.01). But there were no difference between two groups (P>0.05). After phase III: in Group A, BCVA maintained 0.42±0.25 (F=0.22, P=0.001), CMT maintained 267.8±58.34 µm, (F=-0.27, P<0.01); in Group B, BCVA was 0.47±0.25 (F=-0.27, P<0.01), CMT was 272.71±49.16 µm (F=-191.1, P<0.01). No serious complications happened in all phases.

CONCLUSION

PRP+Conbercept is better than PRP+STTA in DME with proliferative stage but PRP+Conbercept+STTA sequential therapy may be a wiser choice for persistent effectiveness on anatomical as well as functional status.

Intravitreal Aflibercept for Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema Refractory to Bevacizumab or Ranibizumab: Analysis of Response to Aflibercept

PURPOSE

To investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept in a case series of patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) refractory to ranibizumab or bevacizumab.

DESIGN

A retrospective chart review.

METHODS

From September 2013 to March 2016, we identified patients with DME who developed resistance to bevacizumab or ranibizumab. Three monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections were administered in refractory cases. Nonresponse to aflibercept was defined as a paradoxical increase in central foveal thickness (CFT) and gain in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of less than 1 line at 1 month after treatment compared with before aflibercept administration.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 72 eyes in 72 refractory patients, 42 eyes (58.3%) responded to aflibercept injections. The BCVA and CFT were 0.65 ± 0.32 logMAR and 438.5 ± 80.1 μm, respectively, before aflibercept treatment and significantly improved to 0.31 ± 0.17 logMAR (P = 0.0008) and 297.9 ± 19.1 μm (P = 0.0004), respectively, 1 month after 3 aflibercept injections in responders. No differences in baseline characteristics, including age, sex, glycosylated hemoglobin, serum creatinine, total cholesterol, lens status, grades of diabetic retinopathy, and CFT/BCVA before aflibercept management (P > 0.05), were observed between responders and nonresponders. There were 17 vitrectomized eyes in 30 nonresponders (56.7%), a significantly higher rate than among the 42 responders (0%; P = 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Three monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections had benefit in nearly two thirds of cases with DME resistant to bevacizumab or ranibizumab over short-term follow-up. Vitrectomized eyes responded poorly to aflibercept treatment.

Effect of intravitreal aflibercept on recalcitrant diabetic macular edema

Background

Despite anti-VEGF therapy, some patients develop chronic diabetic macular edema. The objective of this study was to evaluate anatomic and visual outcomes of switching patients with chronic DME from intravitreal bevacizumab or ranibizumab to intravitreal aflibercept injection.

Methods

In this retrospective observational case series, 11 eyes with recalcitrant diabetic macular edema (DME) were evaluated 6 months prior to and 6 months following initial intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI). Recalcitrant DME was defined as having a thickened retina (≥350 μm) on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) with persistent cystic changes (less than a 15% reduction in central retinal thickness) over 6 months prior to intravitreal aflibercept switch despite aggressive treatment for DME during this time.

Results

One hundred and forty-seven patients in total were treated with IAI during this time, and of these, 31 patients were treated with IAI for DME. 18 eyes had less than 4 treatments within the 6 months prior to switch to IAI, 6 patients had a central retinal thickness (CRT) on SD-OCT of less than 350 μm at time of switch to IAI, and 2 patients had a greater than 15% decline in CRT on SD-OCT over the 6 months prior to switch to IAI. A total of 11 patients were included in the study. Over the 6 months prior to switch, the mean change in central retinal thickness was +18.6% and over the 6 months following switch to aflibercept the mean change in central retinal thickness was −27.1%. Switching to a regimen of at least 3 intravitreal aflibercept injections over 6 months resulted in some anatomic improvement and improvement or stabilization of Snellen visual acuity in all eligible patients.

Conclusions

In patients with recalcitrant diabetic macular edema, switching to intravitreal aflibercept resulted in improved a 25% or more decrease in central retinal thickness in 81% (9/11) patients at 6-month follow-up. Sixty-three percent (7/11) had improvement in Snellen visual acuity after switching to intravitreal aflibercept injection, suggesting some reversibility of functional damage.

Clinical utility of intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide (Iluvien®) implant in the management of patients with chronic diabetic macular edema: a review of the current literature

The first-line therapy for patients with center-involving diabetic macular edema (DME) is with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents, with or without adjunctive macular laser treatment. However, a significant proportion of patients have persistent and recurrent edema despite repeated anti-VEGF injections. The fluocinolone acetonide (FA) 190 μg intravitreal implant has been shown in pivotal clinical trials to be efficacious for the treatment of DME and has been approved in many countries for use in patients who have not responded to first-line therapy. In this report, we have collated the latest data from the increasing number of studies to illustrate the pattern of usage of the Iluvien FA implant for DME during the current anti-VEGF era. We have shown that there is now a wealth of published evidence from real-world studies to support the clinical utility of the FA implant in achieving further resolution of edema and improving visual acuity outcomes in this challenging group of patients.

Diabetic macular oedema

Diabetic macular oedema, characterised by exudative fluid accumulation in the macula, is the most common form of sight-threatening retinopathy in people with diabetes. It affects one in 15 people with diabetes resulting in more than 20 million cases worldwide. Few epidemiological studies have been done to specifically investigate risk factors for diabetic macular oedema, although poor glycaemic and blood pressure control are associated with the presence and development of the disorder. The pathophysiological processes begin with chronic hyperglycaemia, and interplay between vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and inflammatory mediators. Non-invasive imaging using optical coherence tomography has allowed clinicians to detect mild levels of diabetic macular oedema in order to monitor progress and guide treatment. Although focal or grid laser photocoagulation was the traditional mode of treatment, intraocular pharmacotherapy with anti-VEGF agents is now the standard of care. However, these therapies are expensive and resource intensive. Emerging therapeutic strategies include improving efficacy and duration of VEGF suppression, targeting alternative pathways such as inflammation, the kallikrein-kinin system, the angiopoietin-Tie2 system, and neurodegeneration, and using subthreshold and targeted laser therapy. Ongoing research should lead to improvements in screening, diagnosis, and management of diabetic macular oedema.