Vision Outcomes Following Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema in Clinical Practice

Port Delivery System With Ranibizumab vs Monitoring in Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Without Macular Edema: The Pavilion Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Frequent prophylactic intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections can reduce risk of progression to vision-threatening complications in nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). A refillable drug delivery system for continuous intraocular ranibizumab release could offer less frequent treatment regimens.

Objective

To evaluate the Port Delivery System (PDS) with ranibizumab, 100 mg/mL, with refill-exchange procedures every 36 weeks (PDS Q36W), vs no PDS (control) in moderately severe to severe NPDR without center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME), monitoring both groups every 4 weeks.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a randomized clinical trial at 50 US investigational sites. Participants aged 18 years or older with moderately severe or severe NPDR (Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale [DRSS] level 47 or 53) secondary to type 1 or 2 diabetes were eligible. Data analysis was performed from August 10, 2020, to October 3, 2022.

Intervention

Participants were randomized (unmasked) 5:3 to PDS Q36W vs control. Both groups could receive intravitreal ranibizumab injections if CI-DME, proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), or anterior segment neovascularization (ASNV) developed.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Proportion of participants with an improvement of at least 2 levels in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study DRSS from baseline at week 52.

Results

A total of 174 participants (mean [SD] age, 53.9 [11.7] years; 74 [42.5%] female) were randomized to PDS Q36W (n = 106) or control (n = 68). At week 52, 80.1% of those receiving PDS Q36W vs 9.0% of control participants had at least a 2-step DRSS improvement from baseline (difference, 71.1% [95% CI, 61.0% to 81.2%]; P < .001). Secondary outcomes included rate of development of CI-DME, PDR, or ASNV through week 52 (PDS Q36W, 7.1%; control, 47.0%; hazard ratio, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.05 to 0.28]; P < .001) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline to week 52 (+1.4 letters [95% CI, -0.5 to 3.3 letters] for those receiving PDS Q36W vs -2.6 letters [95% CI, -5.0 to -0.1 letters] for control participants; difference, 4.0 letters [95% CI, 0.9 to 7.1 letters]; P = .01). The PDS Q36W group had a transient BCVA decrease of 7.4 letters (95% CI, -10.3 to -4.5 letters) at 4 weeks after implantation, resolving 8 weeks later. Ocular adverse events of special interest occurred in 17 of 105 participants (16.2%) receiving PDS Q36W (cataract, 7 participants [6.7%]; vitreous hemorrhage, 6 participants [5.7%]; conjunctival bleb, conjunctival retraction, and hyphema, each 2 participants [1.9%]; conjunctival erosion and retinal detachment, each 1 participant [1.0%]), with no endophthalmitis reported through week 52.

Conclusions and Relevance

At 1 year, PDS Q36W resulted in substantially more participants achieving at least a 2-step DRSS improvement and a reduced risk of developing CI-DME, PDR, or ASNV compared with control participants, with safety outcomes consistent with previous reports. These findings should be balanced with the transient, postoperative decrease in BCVA 4 through 12 weeks after implantation and the need for longer-term BCVA and safety outcomes.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04503551.

Switching to faricimab from the current anti-VEGF therapy: evidence-based expert recommendations

Dual inhibition of the angiopoietin (Ang)/Tie and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signalling pathways in patients with retinal diseases, such as neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular oedema (DME), may induce greater vascular stability and contribute to increased treatment efficacy and durability compared with treatments that only target the VEGF pathway. Faricimab, a bispecific intravitreal agent that inhibits both VEGF and Ang-2, is the first injectable ophthalmic drug to achieve treatment intervals of up to 16 weeks in Phase 3 studies for nAMD and DME while exhibiting improvements in visual acuity and retinal thickness. Data from real-world studies have supported the safety, visual and anatomic benefits and durability of faricimab, even in patients who were previously treated with other intravitreal agents. These evidence-based expert recommendations from a panel of retina specialists consolidate current evidence with clinical experience for the optimal use of faricimab in patients with nAMD or DME, with a focus on switching from an anti-VEGF agent to faricimab.

Visual Acuity Outcomes and Influencing Factors in a Cohort of UK Real-World Diabetic Macular Oedema Patients During the First Two Years of Anti-VEGF Treatment

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The visual acuity (VA) outcomes after the first and second years of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment in patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO) were evaluated, and the factors associated with treatment success were investigated.

METHODS

Using Medisoft electronic medical records (UK), this retrospective cohort study analysed VA outcomes, changes, and determinants in DMO patients at year 1 and year 2 after initial anti-VEGF injection. Descriptive analysis examined baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, while regression models were used to assess associations between these factors and changes in VA.

RESULTS

728 DMO patients (1035 eyes) treated with anti-VEGFs (ranibizumab, aflibercept, or bevacizumab) at the Northern Ireland Mater Macular Clinic from 2008 to 2021 were evaluated. The mean age was 64.5 (SD 12.8) years, and 59.6% were male. In the first year, the median annual injection number and interval were 6.0 (IQR 5.0-8.0) and 6.1 weeks (IQR 5.4-7.8), respectively, and in the second year, they were 3.0 (IQR 2.0-5.0) and 10.0 weeks (IQR 6.5-20.1). In the first two treatment years, 83.4% and 79.8% of eyes had improved/stable VA (ISVA) respectively. The injection number, interval, baseline VA, age, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) significantly impacted VA outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms the effectiveness of anti-VEGF treatments in improving or maintaining vision for DMO patients, consistent with previous real-world clinical data. An elder age, a better baseline VA, low annual injection numbers (<5), and less frequent injection intervals (≥12 weeks) were negatively associated with ISVA success in the first two years. These findings have implications for managing patient expectations, allocating resources, and understanding DMO clinical management.

Factors Influencing Treatment Preference in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema: A Study Using Conjoint Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Despite the wide range of treatment options available for diabetic macular edema (DME), adherence to treatment remains a barrier. Therefore, this study used conjoint analysis to examine the factors that patients with DME prioritize when choosing a course of treatment and investigated differences in quality of life and levels of disease self-management in patients with or without experience of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted through an online survey in Japan between May 31, 2022, and June 30, 2022. Questionnaires were sent to 27,236 individuals registered in the diabetes panels, with experience of treatment for DME within the last 10 years. Conjoint analysis was employed to calculate the relative importance, i.e., degree of influence on patients' treatment choices, considering the trade-offs among five factors: cost per treatment, frequency of visits, anticipated post-treatment visual acuity, physician's explanation about disease and treatment, and frequency of treatment-related side effects.

RESULTS

A total of 237 responses were used to assess the relative importance of cost per treatment, frequency of visits, anticipated post-treatment visual acuity, physician's explanation about the disease, treatment, and frequency of treatment-related side effects using conjoint analysis. The importance of each factor was anticipated post-treatment visual acuity at 30.0, frequency of treatment-related side effects at 25.5, treatment frequency at 17.7, cost per treatment at 16.5, and physician explanation about the disease and treatment at 10.4. The average EuroQoL 5 dimension 5 level index value in patients with and without anti-VEGF treatment experience was 0.785 and 0.825, respectively, with no major difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticipated post-treatment visual acuity was identified as the most important factor in selecting a treatment regardless of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment experience demonstrating when patients with DME make treatment choices, anticipated post-treatment visual acuity is prioritized over treatment frequency and cost.

[Aflibercept in the clinical routine: the AURIGA study : The 24-month results of the German cohort of treatment-naïve patients with diabetic macular edema receiving intravitreal aflibercept]

BACKGROUND

AURIGA is the largest prospective real-world study to evaluate intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) and macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. This article presents 24-month data from the German cohort of treatment-naïve patients with DME.

METHODS

Treatment-naïve patients (≥ 18 years) with DME were treated with IVT-AFL at the discretion of the physician in clinical practice. The primary endpoint was mean change in visual acuity (early treatment diabetic retinopathy, ETDRS, letters) at month 12 compared to baseline. Statistical analyses were descriptive.

RESULTS

The analysis included data from 150 DME patients (54.7% male). At months 6, 12 and 24, mean (95% confidence interval) visual acuity gains of 4.6 (2.6; 6.5), 4.0 (2.1; 6.5) and 5.0 (3.0; 6.9) letters from baseline (mean ±SD: 65.0 ± 15.3 letters) and reductions in retinal thickness of 86µm (109; 64µm), 70µm (94; 43µm) and 75µm (103; 47µm) from baseline (mean ±SD: 391 ± 132 µm), respectively, were achieved. At month 24, 54% of patients gained ≥ 5 letters and 22% ≥ 15 letters. Patients received a mean number of 5.0 ± 1.6 injections until month 6, 7.1 ± 3.2 until month 12 and 9.0 ± 5.3 until month 24, 68% of patients received ≥ 5 injections until month 6 and 56% ≥ 7 injections within the first year. The safety profile was consistent with previous studies.

DISCUSSION

In the German AURIGA cohort, treatment-naïve DME patients achieved a clinically relevant gain in visual acuity as well as reduction in central retinal thickness following IVT-AFL treatment in clinical practice. From month 6 onwards, improvements were maintained despite a low injection frequency over 24 months. In comparison with previous real-world studies, care of DME patients in clinical practice seems to have improved; however, there is still room for further improvement.

Long-term Treatment Patterns for Diabetic Macular Edema: Up to 6-Year Follow-up in the IRIS® Registry

OBJECTIVE

To characterize anti-VEGF intravitreal therapy (IVT) patterns and long-term visual outcomes among patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in routine clinical practice in the United States.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of the American Academy of Ophthalmology's IRIS® (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry.

PARTICIPANTS

Treatment-naïve patients with DME (no previous IVT in the past 12 months) initiating anti-VEGF IVT from January 1, 2015, to March 31, 2021.

METHODS

Baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and long-term visual acuity (VA) outcomes were reported for up to 6 years of follow-up.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes included the annualized number of injections, change in VA, and anti-VEGF agents.

RESULTS

A total of 190 345 eyes met the inclusion criteria. After 1 year of anti-VEGF IVT initiation, eyes received a mean of 3.9 (±2.8) injections and gained +3.2 (±16.4) letters of vision. Of the 1236 eyes with year 6 data, eyes received a mean of 2.9 (±2.1) injections in year 6 and gained +0.5 (±19.7) letters from baseline. The number of injections decreased, and injection intervals increased year over year up to 6 years regardless of baseline VA initiation. The average injection interval was 10 weeks in year 1 and increased to 13.2 weeks in year 2 before plateauing in years 3 to 6 (12.6, 12.3, 12.2, and 12.3 weeks, respectively). Improvements in VA from baseline were greatest in eyes that received 5 or more injections each year. At the end of follow-up, eyes with good baseline vision (>20/25) lost vision, whereas those with worse baseline vision (<20/25) gained vision. Although 51.7% of patients with DME discontinued IVT after a mean of 6 months, 32.8% reinitiated anti-VEGF IVT. Worse VA outcomes were associated with patients of Hispanic ethnicity (-1.08; 95% confidence interval: -1.34, -0.83] compared with non-Hispanic), Medicaid insurance (-1.15; 95% confidence interval: -1.48, -0.81 compared with commercial), and older age (-0.06; 95% confidence interval: -0.07, -0.05] each additional year).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with DME in routine clinical settings receive fewer injections than those in clinical trials and fewer than recommended per the label of US Food and Drug Administration-approved anti-VEGF IVT.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

[Anatomical and functional outcomes of the "3+PRN" therapeutic protocol in the treatment of diabetic macular edema]

PURPOSE

To evaluate the anatomical and functional results of the "3+PRN" protocol in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME), determine the predictive factors for good final visual acuity, and compare it to other protocols.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, descriptive, comparative, cross-sectional study of patients with DME, which we dubbed HTSM. All patients were treated with three monthly initial intravitreal injections (IVT) of 1.25mg bevacizumab and followed according to the pro re nata (PRN) protocol for a period of 3years. The protocol was based on a monthly monitoring schedule for the first 3months, then increasingly spaced out over time. "On-demand" treatment was indicated with resumption of bevacizumab IVT in the event of worsening of DME.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients were included. The mean age was 65years. Type 2 was the most frequently observed type of diabetes. The mean duration of the PRN protocol was 6months, and the mean number of injections was 6. The mean visual acuity (VA), initially 1/10, improved to 3/10 by the conclusion of the 3+PRN protocol, with an improvement of more than 5 letters in 77.6% of cases. The mean initial central macular thickness (CMT) was 451.5μm. The final mean EMC decreased to 298.5μm, which corresponds to a reduction of 153μm compared to the initial value. The mean subfoveal choroidal thickness, initially 304.2μm, decreased to a mean of 284.5μm at completion. Comparative analysis of the results before and after the PRN protocol confirmed the existence of a statistically significant correlation between VA and CMT (P<0.05). No correlation was observed between age and visual acuity or between initial and final VA. The analysis of the various tomographic parameters and VA revealed a significantly better visual improvement in the group in whom the external limiting membrane (MLE) and ellipsoid zone (ZE) were intact (P=0.04), as well as in the group in whom serous retinal detachment (SRD) was absent (P<0.001). Posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) was the most frequently observed vitreomacular anomaly. The final VA was similar in the groups with and without PVD (P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

The 3+PRN protocol is effective both functionally and tomographically in the treatment of DME. Various tomographic parameters might influence therapeutic efficacy. However, further in-depth studies are needed to better investigate these parameters.

Association Between Tobacco Smoking and the Development of Diabetic Macular Edema

Introduction: To explore the effect of cigarette smoking on the risk for developing diabetic macular edema (DME) among patients with diabetes. Methods: This retrospective exactly-matched cohort study used claims data for patients from all 50 states in the United States from 2010 through 2020. Patients with an initial diagnosis of diabetes were stratified into 3 cohorts as follows: active smokers, never smokers, and former smokers. After exact matching based on demographics and comorbidities, Kaplan-Meier survival functions for the 3 cohorts were compared using pairwise log-rank tests. Results: After matching, there were 42 298 patients in each cohort. Over 6 years of follow-up, the cumulative risk for DME was significantly higher among never smokers (1.18%) than among active smokers (0.88%) and former smokers (0.90%) (both P < .001). Conclusions: Among patients with diabetes, smoking may decrease the risk for developing DME. Although the harms of smoking far outweigh any potential protective benefits, further investigation into the mechanisms behind these findings has potential to uncover new therapeutic targets.

ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR TREATMENT IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: RESULTS FROM A LARGE SINGLE-CENTER COHORT WITH BEVACIZUMAB AS FIRST-LINE THERAPY

PURPOSE

To explore visual acuity (VA) outcomes of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal injections in treatment-naive eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME), with bevacizumab as first-line treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center cohort study over a three-year follow-up. Overall, 1765 eyes from 1179 patients treated with intravitreal injections were evaluated. The cohort was divided according to the treatment given: (1) bevacizumab monotherapy, (2) eyes switched to a second-line agent, and (3) eyes switched to a third-line agent.

RESULTS

In total, 644 eyes of 444 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age at presentation was 64.0 ± 11.1 years. The mean follow-up period was 24.6 ± 12.4 months. Furthermore, 67.1% of eyes were treated with bevacizumab monotherapy, 25.45% switched to a second-line agent, and 7.45% were switched to a third-line agent. The mean number of injections decreased significantly during each treatment year in the total cohort and within each treatment group ( P < 0.001). Mean VA for the total cohort and within each treatment group improved significantly throughout follow-up ( P < 0.001). No significant difference in VA was found between the groups ( P = 0.373).

CONCLUSION

This real-world study demonstrates robust and consistent VA gains over long-term follow-up in eyes with DME treated with either bevacizumab monotherapy or switching to alternative anti-VEGF agents in cases of suboptimal response.

Real-world effects of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection frequency on visual outcomes in patients with diabetic macular oedema

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections are often administered less frequently in real-world treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) than what was studied in clinical trials. This study aims to characterise real-world DMO treatment patterns and the effect of treatment intervals on patient outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN/PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 291 patients with DMO treated with anti-VEGF therapy. 12- and 24-month best visual acuity (BVA) and central subfield thickness (CST) were compared between injection interval groups, which were determined by averaging the two most recent injection intervals. Multiple linear regressions were performed to identify factors associated with injection interval, BVA, and CST.

RESULTS

48.8% of patients received injections less than or equal to every 8 weeks (≤ q8w), 27.5% between every 8 to 12 weeks (q8-12w), and 23.7% greater than every 12 weeks (> q12w). Baseline CST was similar (p = 0.32), but BVA differed significantly in q8-12w patients (p = 0.0095). BVA and CST at 12 months were similar, but q8-12w patients experienced greater 12-month BVA improvement (7.36 ± 12.4 letters) than > q12w patients (1.26 ± 12.3 letters; p = 0.0056). 24-month BVA and CST changes were similar between groups (p = 0.30 and 0.87). Baseline BVA, HbA1c, and sex were associated with 12-month BVA, and baseline BVA and CST were associated with 12-month CST.

CONCLUSION

Many patients experienced improvements in BVA and CST over 12 months of treatment despite receiving less frequent anti-VEGF therapy than recommended in the pivotal trials. The present study showed that extended treatment intervals with bevacizumab were effective in preserving vision of many individuals with high baseline BVA.

Effect of Race and Insurance Status on Treatment and Outcomes in Diabetic Retinopathy: Analysis of 43 274 Eyes Using the IRIS Registry

Purpose: To examine disparities in visual acuity (VA) outcomes 1 year and 2 years after initiation of diabetic retinopathy (DR) or diabetic macular edema (DME) treatment in patients based on race/ethnicity and insurance status, accounting for disease severity. Methods: This retrospective analysis used the IRIS Registry and included DR patients older than 18 years with documented antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment and VA data for at least 2 years. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes were used to determine the severity of DR and DME presence. VA outcomes were assessed using multivariable linear regressions and anti-VEGF drug use by multivariable logistic regressions, with race and insurance status as independent variables. Main outcome measures comprised the mean VA change at 1 year and 2 years and percentage of patients treated with bevacizumab. Results: The study included 43 274 eyes. White patients presented with a higher mean VA and lower mean DR severity than Black patients and Hispanic patients. Multivariable logistic regression showed Hispanic patients were significantly more likely to be treated with bevacizumab than White patients across all insurance types, controlling for disease severity and VA. After 1 year, the letter improvement was 1.73, 1.33, and 1.13 in White patients, Black patients, and Hispanic patients, respectively. Multivariable linear regression suggested that across races, Medicaid-insured patients had significantly smaller gains in VA than privately insured patients. Conclusions: Race-based and insurance-based differences in 1-year and 2-year outcomes after anti-VEGF treatment for DR and anti-VEGF treatment patterns suggest a need to ensure earlier and more effective treatment of minority and underserved patients in the United States.

The Treatment of Diabetic Retinal Edema with Intravitreal Steroids: How and When

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common complication of diabetes mellitus and a leading cause of visual impairment worldwide. It is defined as the diabetes-related accumulation of fluid, proteins, and lipids, with retinal thickening, within the macular area. DME affects a significant proportion of individuals with diabetes, with the prevalence increasing with disease duration and severity. It is estimated that approximately 25-30% of diabetic patients will develop DME during their lifetime. Poor glycemic control, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes duration, and genetic predisposition are recognized as risk factors for the development and progression of DME. Although the exact pathophysiology is still not completely understood, it has been demonstrated that chronic hyperglycemia triggers a cascade of biochemical processes, including increased oxidative stress, inflammation, activation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), cellular dysfunction, and apoptosis, with breakdown of the blood-retinal barriers and fluid accumulation within the macular area. Early diagnosis and appropriate management of DME are crucial for improving visual outcomes. Although the control of systemic risk factors still remains the most important strategy in DME treatment, intravitreal pharmacotherapy with anti-VEGF molecules or steroids is currently considered the first-line approach in DME patients, whereas macular laser photocoagulation and pars plana vitrectomy may be useful in selected cases. Available intravitreal steroids, including triamcinolone acetonide injections and dexamethasone and fluocinolone acetonide implants, exert their therapeutic effect by reducing inflammation, inhibiting VEGF expression, stabilizing the blood-retinal barrier and thus reducing vascular permeability. They have been demonstrated to be effective in reducing macular edema and improving visual outcomes in DME patients but are associated with a high risk of intraocular pressure elevation and cataract development, so their use requires an accurate patient selection. This manuscript aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pathology, epidemiology, risk factors, physiopathology, clinical features, treatment mechanisms of actions, treatment options, prognosis, and ongoing clinical studies related to the treatment of DME, with particular consideration of intravitreal steroids therapy.

Biomarkers determining treatment interval of diabetic macular edema after initial resolution by anti-vascular endothelial growth factor

PURPOSE

To identify predictive factors that help determine the interval of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection after the initial resolution of diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study enrolled treatment-naïve DME patients who had achieved DME resolution after intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. Patients were classified into the recurrence and no-recurrence groups, depending on the development of recurrent DME after deferring intravitreal anti-VEGF injection. The demographics and clinical features, including optical coherence tomography findings, were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

We enrolled 105 eyes. Sixty eyes (57.1%) belonged to the no-recurrence group, and 45 (42.9%), belonged to the recurrence group. The severity of diabetic retinopathy at baseline was related to early DME recurrence (P = 0.009). At the treatment deferring point, the non-recurrence group had both thinner central subfield thickness (289.5 ± 27.2 μm vs. 307.0 ± 38.2 μm, P = 0.011) and thinner central retinal thickness (214.9 ± 41.4 μm vs. 231.8 ± 41.2 μm, P = 0.043) compared to the recurrence group. Intraretinal cyst was observed in 34 eyes (56.7%) in the no-recurrence group and 42 eyes (93.3%) in the recurrence group at the deferring point (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A low risk of early DME recurrence is anticipated in the eyes with foveal thinning and no intraretinal cyst when anti-VEGF injection is deferred. These predictive biomarkers can be useful for patient monitoring and determining treatment strategies for DME patients.

From randomised controlled trials to real-world data: Clinical evidence to guide management of diabetic macular oedema

Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are generally considered the gold-standard for providing scientific evidence for treatments' effectiveness and safety but their findings may not always be generalisable to the broader population treated in routine clinical practice. RCTs include highly selected patient populations that fit specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Although they may have a lower level of certainty than RCTs on the evidence hierarchy, real-world data (RWD), such as observational studies, registries and databases, provide real-world evidence (RWE) that can complement RCTs. For example, RWE may help satisfy requirements for a new indication of an already approved drug and help us better understand long-term treatment effectiveness, safety and patterns of use in clinical practice. Many countries have set up registries, observational studies and databases containing information on patients with retinal diseases, such as diabetic macular oedema (DMO). These DMO RWD have produced significant clinical evidence in the past decade that has changed the management of DMO. RWD and medico-administrative databases are a useful resource to identify low frequency safety signals. They often have long-term follow-up with a large number of patients and minimal exclusion criteria. We will discuss improvements in healthcare information exchange technologies, such as blockchain technology and FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources), which will connect and extend databases already available. These registries can be linked with existing or emerging retinal imaging modalities using artificial intelligence to aid diagnosis, treatment decisions and provide prognostic information. The results of RCTs and RWE are combined to provide evidence-based guidelines.

The Role of Laser Photocoagulation in Treating Diabetic Macular Edema in the Era of Intravitreal Drug Administration: A Descriptive Review

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to elucidate the role of laser photocoagulation therapy in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) as an alternative to, or in conjunction with, the first-line treatment, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search to identify studies that evaluated the efficacy of laser photocoagulation therapy in the management of DME was performed. The relevant findings of the efficacy of focal/grid laser therapy from data in randomized, controlled trials were synthesized, and the potential of new laser technologies, such as navigated laser systems, pattern scan lasers, and subthreshold lasers, was explored. The usefulness of multimodal imaging-guided laser therapy was also evaluated, with a focus on the potential contribution to anti-VEGF therapy. Results: Focal laser photocoagulation targeting microaneurysms remains an effective therapeutic approach to chronic refractory edema, despite the widespread use of anti-VEGF therapy. To achieve the best possible treatment outcomes, precise identification of microaneurysms is essential. This requires the use of multimodal imaging-guided, highly accurate, minimally invasive coagulation techniques. Subthreshold laser therapy can also reduce the frequency of anti-VEGF injections and minimize treatment burden. Conclusions: Further studies are needed to determine the optimal timing and settings for laser photocoagulation therapy and the potential of new laser technologies in the management of DME. Nevertheless, laser photocoagulation therapy plays an important role in the management of DME, in conjunction with anti-VEGF therapy.

Pro re nata Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with Cycles of Three Injections of Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to report the visual and anatomic results at 12 and 24 months using the protocol of 3 monthly pro re nata (PRN) injections for diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of 97 eyes with DME treated with a protocol of cycles consisting of 3 monthly injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs on a PRN basis. Change in visual acuity was the main outcome measure. Macular thickness, number of injections, cycles, and visits in years 1 and 2 of follow-up were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients with a mean age of 60.9 ± 9.96 years were followed for a mean of 22.17 ± 12.30 months. Ninety-two (95.9%), 3 (3%), and 1 (1%) patients were started on bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept, respectively. Of bevacizumab patients, 17 (18.2%) were eventually switched to aflibercept. The mean 12-month improvement (standard deviation [SD]) was + 3.3 (17.4) letters (95% confidence interval [CI] = +0.36-+7.05, P < 0.001) after an average (SD) of 5.97 (2.98) injections over a mean (SD) of 1.7 (1.0) three-injection cycles. The mean 24-month improvement (SD) was + 5.6 (13.0) letters (95% CI: -0.28-11.05, P = 0.0186) after an average (SD) of 8.72 (6.31) injections over a mean (SD) of 2.9 (2.1) three-injection cycles. The mean central macular thickness (SD) at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months was 374 ± 120, 322 ± 88, and 305 ± 70 µm. Optical coherence tomography was fluid free at 12 and 24 months in 27.6% and 46% of eyes, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Comparable to real-world studies, this protocol can stabilize or improve vision in more than 85% of DME patients over 24 months. The most important factor in improvement of vision is increasing number of injections and visits.

Real-World Outcomes of Anti-VEGF Therapy in Diabetic Macular Oedema: Barriers to Treatment Success and Implications for Low/Lower-Middle-Income Countries

Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is the leading cause of vision loss associated with diabetic eye disease. The exponential increase in the diabetic population and thus, of DMO is an impetus for optimizing the management of DMO. One major challenge in DMO management is the discrepancy between treatment outcomes seen in clinical trials and the real world. Contrary to the homogeneity, better patient motivation and shorter study durations seen in randomised control trials, routine clinical practice is fraught with more diverse populations, undertreatment and variable compliance with long-term therapy. Under both circumstances, this review aims to compare efficacy outcomes and adverse events of DMO therapies within the scope of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medications, specifically the commonly used ones-bevacizumab, ranibizumab and aflibercept. Impediments and methods to achieve better treatment outcomes in the real world will be addressed to achieve better outcomes. Low- to lower-middle-income countries are faced with even more barriers which range from paucity of data on epidemiology and treatment response to scarce human and financial resources to poorer national level attention and then basic issues like transportation. Additionally, to address the lack of a global consensus in DMO treatment, this review generates and recommends, for clinical and research purposes, an up-to-date consensus algorithm for DMO management universally. Underpinned by results from clinical trials and recent guidelines, this therapeutic flowchart can be utilised in various resource settings including low- and lower-middle-income countries where affordability is a major deterrent to treatment access.

Topical treatment of diabetic macular edema using dexamethasone ophthalmic suspension: A randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled study

PURPOSE

To evaluate topical dexamethasone ophthalmic suspension OCS-01 (Oculis SA, Lausanne, Switzerland) in diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

This was a multicenter, double-masked, parallel-group, randomized, Phase 2 study. Patients aged 18-85 years with DME of <3 years duration, ETDRS central subfield thickness ≥ 310 μm by SD-OCT, and ETDRS letter score ≤ 73 and ≥ 24 in the study eye were randomized 2:1 to OCS-01 or matching vehicle, 1 drop 3 times/day for 12 weeks. Efficacy was evaluated as change from baseline to Week 12 of ETDRS letter score and central macular thickness (CMT). The primary analysis used a linear model with baseline ETDRS letters as a covariate, and missing data imputed using multiple imputation pattern mixture model techniques. Active treatment was considered superior to vehicle if the one-sided p-value was <0.15 and the difference in mean change from baseline in ETDRS letters was >0.

RESULTS

Mean CMT showed a greater decrease from baseline with OCS-01 (N = 99) than vehicle (N = 45) at Week 12 (-53.6 vs -16.8 μm, p = 0.0115), with significant differences favouring OCS-01 from Weeks 2 to 12. OCS-01 was well-tolerated, and increased intraocular pressure was the most common adverse event. Mean change in ETDRS letter score from baseline to Week 12 met the p was +2.6 letters with topical OCS-01 and 1 letter with vehicle (p = 0.125). In a post-hoc analysis, there was a greater difference in patients with baseline BCVA ≤65 letters, the OCS-01 group improved 3.8 letters compared with 0.9 letters with vehicle.

CONCLUSION

Topical OCS-01 was significantly more effective than vehicle in improving central macular thickness in patients with DME. Visual improvement was better in eyes with lower baseline vision.

Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in treatment-naïve diabetic macular oedema: findings from the prospective, multicentre, AUSSIEDEX study

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg (DEX; Ozurdex) monotherapy in the patient subgroup of the AUSSIEDEX study with treatment-naïve diabetic macular oedema (DME).

METHODS

The open-label, prospective, phase 4, real-world study included pseudophakic eyes and phakic eyes scheduled for cataract surgery that were treatment-naïve or non-responsive to antivascular endothelial growth factors. No eyes were excluded based on baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) or central subfield retinal thickness (CRT). After the initial DEX injection at the baseline visit, reinjection was permitted at ≥16-week intervals. Week-16 and week-52 visits were mandatory. Primary endpoints were changes in mean BCVA and CRT from baseline to 52 weeks.

RESULTS

Of 200 eyes enrolled in the AUSSIEDEX study, 57 were treatment-naïve. Baseline mean BCVA was 58.8 letters and baseline mean CRT was 418.6 µm; changes in mean BCVA and CRT from baseline to 52 weeks in this subgroup were 3.4 letters (p=0.042) and -89.6 µm (p<0.001), respectively, with a mean 2.5 injections. The change in mean CRT from baseline was -55.8 µm at week 16 (p<0.001). The most common adverse event was increased intraocular pressure (IOP), with 20.0% of eyes requiring IOP-lowering medication. One patient was discontinued due to increased IOP. No eyes required filtration surgery. No serious, treatment-related ocular adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

In this largest prospective, real-world study of DEX monotherapy for DME to date, DEX significantly improved CRT and BCVA at 52 weeks in treatment-naïve eyes, without new safety concerns, supporting DEX use in treatment-naïve DME.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02731911.

Treatment results of diabetic macular edema with different choroidal thickness with intravitreal anti vascular endothelial growth factor

PURPOSE

To compare the results of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) with different choroidal thicknesses.

METHODS

The files of patients diagnosed with DME and treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF were reviewed retrospectively. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), choroidal thickness (CT), and macular thickness (MT) measurements were recorded before and after treatment. All patients included in the study were divided into 3 groups according to the initial subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT). Group 1 included 35 patients with SFCT ≤ 220, group 2 included 27 patients with SFCT > 220 ≤ 270, and group 3 included 30 patients with SFCT > 270. The total number of anti-VEGF administered during the follow-up at the last examination, baseline and post-treatment CT, MT, and BCVA measurements were statistically compared in all 3 groups.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 61.9 ± 10.2 in group 1, 58.7 ± 8.7 in group 2, and 57.0 ± 6.5 in group 3. The mean anti-VEGF count in group 1 was significantly lower than group 2 and group 3 (p = 0.004, p = 0.006). In Group 1, BCVA improved significantly after treatment compared to baseline (p = 0.001). In Groups 2 and 3, BCVA did not change significantly after treatment compared to baseline (p = 0.320, p = 0.104). After treatment, central macular thickness decreased significantly in group 1 compared to baseline, while central macular thickness did not show a significant change from baseline in group 2 and group 3 after treatment (p = 0.003, p = 0.059, p = 0.590).

CONCLUSION

In our study, we observed that the treatment needs of our DME patients with different choroidal thicknesses were different. In patients with DME, the initial choroidal thickness may help determine the need for follow-up and treatment.

Social Determinants of Health and Impact on Screening, Prevalence, and Management of Diabetic Retinopathy in Adults: A Narrative Review

Diabetic retinal disease (DRD) is the leading cause of blindness among working-aged individuals with diabetes. In the United States, underserved and minority populations are disproportionately affected by diabetic retinopathy and other diabetes-related health outcomes. In this narrative review, we describe racial disparities in the prevalence and screening of diabetic retinopathy, as well as the wide-range of disparities associated with social determinants of health (SDOH), which include socioeconomic status, geography, health-care access, and education.

Suprachoroidal delivery enables targeting, localization and durability of small molecule suspensions

Drug delivery to the suprachoroidal space (SCS®) has become a clinical reality after the 2021 FDA approval of CLS-TA, a triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension for suprachoroidal use (XIPERE®), administered via a microneedle-based device, the SCS Microinjector®. Suprachoroidal (SC) delivery facilitates targeting, compartmentalization, and durability of small molecule suspensions, thereby potentially addressing some of the efficacy, safety, and treatment burden limitations of current retinal therapies. Herein, the design features of the SCS Microinjector are reviewed, along with the biomechanics of SC drug delivery. Also presented are preclinical evaluations of SC small molecule suspensions from 4 different therapeutic classes (plasma kallikrein inhibitor, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, corticosteroid, complement factor D inhibitor), highlighting their potential for durability, targeted compartmentalization, and acceptable safety profiles following microinjector-based SC delivery. The clinical evaluations of the safety, tolerability and efficacy of SC delivered triamcinolone further supports potential of SC small molecule suspensions as a clinically viable strategy for the treatment of chorioretinal diseases. Also highlighted are current limitations, key pharmacological considerations, and future opportunities to optimize the SC microinjector platform for safe, effective, and potentially long-acting drug delivery for the treatment of chorioretinal disorders.

Treatment of diabetic macular edema in real-world clinical practice: The effect of aging

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

In older patients, the management of diabetic macular edema (DME) can be complicated by comorbidities, geriatric syndrome, and socioeconomic status. This study aims to evaluate the effects of aging on the management of DME.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a real-world clinical study including 1,552 patients with treatment-naïve center-involved DME. The patients were categorized into 4 categories by age at baseline (C1, <55; C2, 55-64; C3, 65-74; and C4, ≥75 years). The outcomes were the change in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT), and the number of treatments from baseline to 2 years.

RESULTS

From baseline to 2 years, the mean changes in logMAR BCVA from baseline to 2 years were -0.01 in C1, -0.06 in C2, -0.07 in C3, and 0.01 in C4 (P = 0.016), and the mean changes in CRT were -136.2 μm in C1, -108.8 μm in C2, -100.6 μm in C3, and -89.5 μm in C4 (P = 0.008). Treatments applied in the 2 year period exhibited decreasing trends with increasing age category on the number of intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents (P = 0.06), selecting local corticosteroid injection (P = 0.031), vitrectomy (P < 0.001), and laser photocoagulation outside the great vascular arcade (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with younger patients with DME, patients with DME aged ≥75 years showed less frequent treatment, a lower BCVA gain, and a smaller CRT decrease. The management and visual outcome in older patients with DME would be unsatisfactory in real-world clinical practice.

Changes in 12-month outcomes over time for age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular oedema and retinal vein occlusion

Objectives

To identify whether the outcomes of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in routine clinical practice have changed over time.

Methods

We analysed 12-month outcomes in treatment-naïve eyes that started aflibercept or ranibizumab for nAMD (3802 eyes), DMO (975 eyes), Branch RVO (BRVO, 357 eyes), Central RVO (CRVO, 371 eyes) and Hemi-RVO (HRVO, 54 eyes) from 2015 and 2019 tracked in the prospectively designed observational Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry.

Results

The mean VA change at 12-month for each year between 2015 and 2019 remained stable or otherwise showed no discernible trends over time in eyes with nAMD (+3.3 to +6 letters), DMO (+3.6 to +6.7 letters) and RVO (+10.3 to +11.7 letters for BRVO, +5.9 to +17.7 letters for CRVO and 10.2 to 20.7 letters for HRVO). The median number of VEGF-inhibitor injections in eyes that completed 12-month follow-up also remained stable at 8–9 for nAMD, 6–7 for DMO, 7–9 for RVO. Fewer eyes (<one-fourth) that started treatment between 2015 and 2018 and more eyes starting in 2019 did not complete 12-month’s follow-up visit. The mean VA in non-completers at their last visit was higher than that of their baseline visit.

Conclusions

Treatment patterns and outcomes for nAMD, DMO and RVO in routine clinical practice have stabilised over the past 5 years at levels inferior to those reported by the pivotal phase 3 studies. A conscious effort to treat these conditions more intensively, or with longer lasting agents, would likely improve outcomes further in our patients.

Initial observation or treatment for diabetic macular oedema with good visual acuity: two-year outcomes comparison in routine clinical practice: data from the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry

Purpose

To compare visual acuity (VA) change at 24 months in eyes with clinically significant DME (CSDME) and good VA initially treated versus initially observed in routine clinical practice.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of treatment‐naïve eyes with CSDME and good VA (baseline VA ≥ 79 letters), with at least 24 months of follow‐up and initially managed with treatment (intravitreal treatment and/or macular laser) or observation with possible treatment after 4 months that were tracked in a prospectively designed observational registry.

Results

We identified 150 eligible eyes (98 initially observed, 52 initially treated) of 130 patients. The proportion of eyes with at least a 5‐letter VA loss at 24 months was not significantly different between the groups: 65% with initial observation and 42% with initial treatment (p = 0.39). However, initially observed eyes were more likely to have a 10‐letter VA loss at 24 months (OR = 4.6, p = 0.022). Most of eyes in the initial observation group received at least one treatment (an intravitreal injection in 66% and macular laser in 20%) during the 24‐month period.

Conclusions

The risk of 5 letters loss was similar between both management groups. However, initially observed eyes were more at risk of developing moderate visual loss and more than 80% of them required treatment over 24 months.

Frequency of Eye Diseases in Residents of Nursing Homes - 1-Year Results of a Novel Telemedicine Service in Switzerland

PURPOSE

For the elderly in nursery homes, a visit to the ophthalmologist is a burden, which might lead to undertreatment. We have recently started offering a novel ophthalmological service combining onsite examination and telemedical interpretation for patients with limited access to ophthalmological care. This study summarises the frequency of findings of treatable eye diseases after the first year of operation in participants who dropped out from regular ophthalmological control.

METHODS

Participants' clinical characteristics, frequency of service utilisation, and findings were extracted from the system and analysed.

RESULTS

Of 1946 residents approached, 540 (27.7%; 1080 eyes) signed up for the service. A complete examination was possible in 412 persons (813 eyes) and partially possible in the remaining 128. The mean age of the examined participants mean age was 83.9 years (SD 9.7), and they were predominantly female (69.8%). The majority had a diagnosis of dementia (54.5%) and 20.2% had diabetes mellitus requiring treatment. The median care level (ranging from 0 - 12) was 7 (interquartile range 6 - 9), corresponding to a care need of 121 - 140 min/d. The mean best-corrected decimal visual acuity was 0.55 (SD 0.24). For 164 eyes (15.2%), the current spectacle correction was insufficient. An untreated cataract was present in 145 eyes (13.4%), 89 eyes (8.2%) were receiving glaucoma treatment, and 7 eyes had a decompensated glaucoma. Dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) appeared in 276 eyes (25.6%), 12 eyes (1.1%) had wet AMD, and 24 eyes (11.0%) among patients with diabetes showed signs of diabetic retinopathy. Other pathologies were uncommon.

CONCLUSION

Residents of nursery homes, who are unable to attend regular ophthalmological control, show various treatable ophthalmological conditions, including cataracts, glaucoma, and retinal pathologies. Screening with a novel telemedicine service allows for the identification of treatable conditions and careful planning and referral of patients to appropriate clinics having the necessary infrastructure for this particular population.

Identifying Genetic Biomarkers Predicting Response to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections in Diabetic Macular Edema

Intraocular anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies are the front-line treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME); however, treatment response varies widely. This study aimed to identify genetic determinants associated with anti-VEGF treatment response in DME. We performed a genome-wide association study on 220 Australian patients with DME treated with anti-VEGF therapy, genotyped on the Illumina Global Screening Array, and imputed to the Haplotype Reference Consortium panel. The primary outcome measures were changes in central macular thickness (CMT in microns) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA in ETDRS letters) after 12 months. Association between single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes and DME outcomes were evaluated by linear regression, adjusting for the first three principal components, age, baseline CMT/BCVA, duration of diabetic retinopathy, and HbA1c. Two loci reached genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10−8) for association with increased CMT: a single SNP on chromosome 6 near CASC15 (rs78466540, p = 1.16 × 10−9) and a locus on chromosome 12 near RP11-116D17.1 (top SNP rs11614480, p = 2.69 × 10−8). Four loci were significantly associated with reduction in BCVA: two loci on chromosome 11, downstream of NTM (top SNP rs148980760, p = 5.30 × 10−9) and intronic in RP11-744N12.3 (top SNP rs57801753, p = 1.71 × 10−8); one near PGAM1P1 on chromosome 5 (rs187876551, p = 1.52 × 10−8); and one near TBC1D32 on chromosome 6 (rs118074968, p = 4.94 × 10−8). In silico investigations of each locus identified multiple expression quantitative trait loci and potentially relevant candidate genes warranting further analysis. Thus, we identified multiple genetic loci predicting treatment outcomes for anti-VEGF therapies in DME. This work may potentially lead to managing DME using personalized treatment approaches.

Assessment of Anti-VEGFs in Treating Diabetic Macular Edema in Alfaisal Eye Center, Khartoum, Sudan, 2019

Background

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medicines have revolutionized DME and DR treatment. Despite the worldwide use of anti-VEGFs, their use remains limited in Sudan. This study aimed to assess the impact of anti-VEGF (ranibizumab and bevacizumab) injections in patients with diabetic macular oedema in Khartoum, Sudan.

Methods

An analytical comparative cross-sectional study was implemented in Alfaisal referral eye centre. A Standard questionnaire was used to collect the variables related to the research objectives. Thirty-four patients were recruited; 16 patients under ranibizumab (Lucentis) and 18 under bevacizumab (Avastin). Data were analyzed through SPSS 23, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) measurements were considered as main outcomes to evaluate the treatment effectiveness.

Results

Among the 34 participants, 64.7% were males and 35.3% were females, with an average age of 62 years and 13 years of long standing diabetes. A total of 54 eyes received an average of 2.3 injections in an average of 7 months’ period. The mean BCVA before and after treatment for both drugs respectively 0.19 min and 0.21 min was statistically correlated (p = 0.000). For patients under Lucentis, the mean BCVA before and after medication was 0.20 min–0.24 min and 0.19–0.19 min for those who used Avastin. The mean central retinal thickness (CRT), before and after treatment for both drugs, was 492.22µm–422.89µm, respectively, with a significant correlation (p = 0.003). For patients under Lucentis, the mean CRT decreased from 536.30 µm to 425.19 µm; it dropped from 453.16µm to 421.18µm for patients under Avastin. About 79.4% (27/34) of the participants reported that injections were not affordable and 14.7% (5/34) complained from shortage of one dose, regardless of which type of treatment. Glycaemia control, duration of treatment, type and frequency of injections used were found to be the most contributing factors to the effectiveness of anti-VEGF medications.

Conclusion

Both anti-VEGF medications are effective in treating DME, Lucentis showed better improvements in BCVA and macular thickness than Avastin. Policymakers in Sudan require urgent alternative strategies to increase access to these medications.

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

https://youtu.be/6c64zldJJWY

YOSEMITE and RHINE

Purpose

Faricimab is a novel anti–angiopoietin-2 and anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) bispecific antibody with high affinities and specificities for both VEGF and angiopoietin-2. It is postulated that targeting angiogenic factors and inflammatory pathways in addition to the VEGF pathway will increase treatment durability and improve outcomes. The phase 3 YOSEMITE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03622580) and RHINE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03622593) trials are designed to assess efficacy, safety, and durability of faricimab compared with aflibercept in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). The trials evaluate a personalized treatment interval (PTI) approach to address heterogeneity in treatment response among patients with DME.

Design

Two identically designed, global, double-masked, randomized, controlled phase 3 trials (YOSEMITE and RHINE).

Participants

Adults with center-involving DME secondary to type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods

These studies were designed to evaluate 3 treatment groups: faricimab 6.0 mg dosed either at fixed dosing every 8 weeks after initial treatment with 6 intravitreal doses at 4-week intervals, or faricimab 6.0 mg dosed according to PTI after initial treatment with 4 every-4-week doses, compared with aflibercept 2.0 mg dosed every 8 weeks after 5 initial every-4-week doses. The primary end point of the studies was change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity at 1 year, averaged over weeks 48, 52, and 56. Secondary end points included anatomic, durability, and patient-reported outcomes. Safety outcomes included incidence and severity of ocular and nonocular adverse events. The PTI is a protocol-defined flexible regimen based on the treat-and-extend concept, which allowed up to every-16-week adjustable dosing based on objective and standardized criteria. The PTI design aimed to maximize therapeutic results while minimizing treatment burden.

Main Outcome Measures

We describe the rationale for the study design and the novel PTI (up to every-16-week adjustable dosing) approach for treatment with faricimab.

Results

YOSEMITE and RHINE enrolled 940 and 951 patients, respectively. Results from each study will be reported separately.

Conclusions

YOSEMITE and RHINE were the first registrational trials in retinal disease to incorporate an objective PTI regimen, allowing for up to every-16-week adjustable dosing with a dual angiopoietin-2 and VEGF-A inhibitor, faricimab 6.0 mg, for treatment of DME.

Bevacizumab for diabetic macular oedema: one-year treatment outcomes from the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the 1-year treatment outcomes of bevacizumab for diabetic macular oedema (DMO) in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 298 eyes of 220 patients with DMO that received intra-vitreal bevacizumab between 1 September 2013 and 31 August 2018 that were tracked by a prospectively designed, web-based observational registry-the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry.

RESULTS

The mean visual acuity (95% confidence interval [CI]) at 1-year was 3 (2, 5) letters better than a mean (SD) of 68 (15) letters at study entry. Nearly a quarter of eyes achieved ≥20/40. Eyes presenting with better vision (≥20/40) tended to maintain that vision during the period of observation, whereas those presenting with worse vision (<20/40) gained a mean (95% CI) of 9 (5, 13) letters. A mean reduction in the macular thickness was observed over the study period with the central subfield improving by 29 µm (95% CI 17, 40) from a mean (SD) of 402 (109) µm at study entry. Eyes that completed 1 year of follow-up received a median (Q1, Q3) of 7 (4, 9) bevacizumab injections. Sixty-two eyes, ~20%, that started with bevacizumab changed to either another VEGF inhibitor or steroid (triamcinolone) during the period of observation. This did not lead to functional improvement for eyes changed to either ranibizumab or aflibercept despite a further reduction in macular thickness. An improvement in vision and reduction in macular thickness was noted in the 13 eyes that subsequently received triamcinolone. Approximately 10% of eyes dropped out over 12 months, even though their mean visual acuity had improved by seven letters from the initial visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab is an effective treatment for DMO in unselected populations.

TITLE: THREE-YEAR TREATMENT OUTCOMES OF AFLIBERCEPT VERSUS RANIBIZUMAB FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: DATA FROM THE FIGHT RETINAL BLINDNESS! REGISTRY

PURPOSE

Compare the three-year outcomes of ranibizumab versus aflibercept in eyes with DME in daily practice.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of naive DME eyes starting intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (0.5mg) or aflibercept (2mg) from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2017 that were collected in the Fight Retinal Blindness! registry.

RESULTS

We identified 534 eyes (ranibizumab - 267, aflibercept - 267) of 402 patients. The adjusted mean (95% CI) VA change of +1.3 (-0.1, 4.2) letters in the ranibizumab group and +2.4 (-0.2, 5.1) letters (P = 0.001) in the aflibercept group at 3 years was not clinically different. However, the adjusted mean CST change appeared to remain significantly different throughout the three-year period with higher reductions in favor of aflibercept (-87.8 [-108.3, -67.4] µm for ranibizumab vs. -114.4 [-134.4, -94.3] for aflibercept; P < 0.01). When baseline visual impairment was moderate (VA ≤68 ETDRS letters), we found a faster improvement in VA in eyes treated with aflibercept up until 18 months of treatment than eyes treated with ranibizumab, which then stayed similar until 36 months of treatment, while there was no apparent difference when baseline visual impairment was mild (VA ≥69 ETDRS letters). The rate of serious adverse events was low.

CONCLUSIONS

Aflibercept and ranibizumab were both effective and safe for DME over 3 years.

Treat-and-Extend vs. Pro Re Nata Regimen of Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema—A Two-Year Matched Comparative Study

Purpose

To compare 2-year treatment outcomes of ranibizumab using treat-and-extend (T&E) or pro re nata (PRN) regimens for diabetic macular edema (DME) in clinical settings.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 34 patients (34 eyes) with DME treated with ranibizumab using the T&E regimen, and 34 patients (34 eyes) treated with ranibizumab using the PRN regimen and matched to cases in the treat-and-extend group by baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT). BCVA and CFT changes, number of injections and recurrence of macular edema over 2 years were compared between the groups.

Results

The average BCVA gain in the T&E and PRN groups was 16.2 and 7.6 ETDRS letters at 2 years (p = 0.011), respectively. The mean CFT reduction was 145.5 ± 127.3 and 97.3 ± 152.5 μm in the T&E and PRN groups at 2 years (p = 0.035), respectively. The T&E group had a higher proportion of patients with BCVA gain ≥ 15 letters at months 18 (p = 0.015) and 24 (p = 0.029) than the PRN group. During the 2-year treatment periods, the T&E group received more injections than the PRN group (11.0 ± 3.2 vs. 6.2 ± 2.0; p < 0.001), while the PRN group had more recurrence of macular edema than the T&E group (71 vs. 41%; p = 0.015).

Conclusions

After 2-year ranibizumab treatment for DME, better visual and anatomical improvement and less recurrence of macular edema were achieved in the T&E group, with more injections administered.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic's first wave on the care and treatment situation of intravitreal injections in a German metropolitan region

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate the impact of the first coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) wave in 2020 on patients scheduled for intravitreal injections (IVI) in a German metropolitan region.

Methods

We performed a multicentre prospective survey and retrospective analysis of the records of patients treated with intravitreal injections during the 20-week period from March to July 2020 in all four hospital eye departments in the city of Hamburg using a questionnaire (on treatment adherence, SarsCoV2-related personal, familial and social data) and treatment data.

Results

A total of 1038 patients (2472 IVI, 1231 eyes) and 818 questionnaires were evaluated. Longer duration of therapy, lower visual acuity (VA) of the treated and higher VA of the fellow untreated eye was were associated with a higher probability of visit cancellation. Every additional year of life posed a 2.6% lower risk of noncompliance. A COVID-19 infection in the family environment displayed a 5.5-fold chance of visit cancellation. Patients treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) had a 36% reduced risk of visit cancellation compared to patients with diabetic macular oedema (DME).

Conclusion

A long preceding treatment period, low VA of the treated eye, high VA of the untreated eye, COVID-19 in the family and DME were identified as risk factors for IVI visit cancellations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Compliance to treatment might be improved in the future by taking these risk factors into account when scheduling patients for IVI during the exceptional circumstances of a pandemic.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00417-021-05521-5.

Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Patients with Center-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema in the Asia-Pacific Region

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg (DEX) compared with laser photocoagulation in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

Patients and Methods

This Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, efficacy evaluator–masked, parallel-group, 12-month clinical study enrolled adults in China and the Philippines with reduced visual acuity secondary to fovea-involved DME in the study eye. Participants were randomized 1:1 to study eye treatment with laser photocoagulation every 3 months as needed (n = 139) or DEX every 5 months (n = 145). The main efficacy measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and leakage area. The primary endpoint was the average change in BCVA from baseline over 12 months (area-under-the-curve method). Preplanned subgroup analyses evaluated outcomes in Chinese patients.

Results

Mean average change in BCVA from baseline during the study (letters) was 4.3 with DEX (n = 145) versus 1.4 with laser (n = 127) overall (P = 0.001) and 4.6 with DEX (n = 129) versus 0.6 with laser (n = 113) in Chinese patients (P < 0.001). At Month 12, mean change in CRT from baseline was −209.5 μm with DEX versus −120.3 μm with laser (P < 0.001) and mean change in total leakage area from baseline was −8.367 mm² with DEX versus −0.637 mm² with laser (P < 0.001). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events in the DEX group were increased intraocular pressure and cataract.

Conclusion

DEX administered every 5 months provided significantly greater improvement in BCVA, CRT, and total leakage area compared with laser treatment. DEX demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, consistent with an intraocular corticosteroid, and similar to that reported in completed global registration studies.

Impact on visual acuity and psychological outcomes of ranibizumab and subsequent treatment for diabetic macular oedema in Japan (MERCURY)

PURPOSE

The MERCURY study aimed to evaluate the effects on visual acuity and psychological symptoms, and safety, of ranibizumab and subsequent treatment in patients with diabetic macular oedema (DME) and impaired visual acuity (VA). We report data from the prespecified 12-month interim analysis.

METHODS

This was a 24-month, phase 4, open-label, single-arm, prospective, observational study conducted at 20 specialised retinal centres in Japan. Participants were 209 patients with DME and impaired VA, not previously treated with either intravitreal or systemic anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents, who initiated ranibizumab 0.5 mg per investigator discretion. Following ranibizumab administration, patients were treated per routine clinical practice. Other treatments were allowed. The main outcome measure was the mean change in best-corrected VA (BCVA) in logarithmic minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) from baseline to month 12. An exploratory objective was to assess patients' psychological status using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation BCVA at baseline was 0.43 ± 0.39 logMAR. The mean number of injections of ranibizumab and anti-VEGF agents from baseline to month 11 was 3.2 ± 2.0 and 3.6 ± 2.4, respectively. The BCVA change from baseline to 12 months was - 0.08 ± 0.34 logMAR (p = 0.011), showing a significant improvement; the HADS-anxiety score also decreased significantly (p = 0.001) and the depression score decreased numerically (p = 0.080).

CONCLUSION

MERCURY study data confirm the effectiveness of real-world treatment initiated with ranibizumab in Japanese patients with DME. In addition, treatment was able to positively influence anxiety via VA improvement.

Hyperreflective foci in predicting the treatment outcomes of diabetic macular oedema after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy

This retrospective study evaluated the association of hyperreflective foci (HRF) with treatment response in diabetic macular oedema (DME) after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. The medical records, including of ophthalmologic examinations and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, of 106 patients with DME treated with either intravitreal ranibizumab or aflibercept were reviewed. The correlations between best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes and HRF along with other OCT biomarkers were analysed. The mean logMAR BCVA improved from 0.696 to 0.461 after an average of 6.2 injections in 1 year under real-world conditions. Greater visual-acuity gain was noted in patients with a greater number of HRF in the outer retina at baseline (p = 0.037), along with other factors such as poor baseline vision (p < 0.001), absence of epiretinal membrane (p = 0.048), and presence of subretinal fluid at baseline (p = 0.001). The number of HRF after treatment was correlated with the presence of hard exudate (p < 0.001) and baseline haemoglobin A1C (p = 0.001). Patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy had greater HRF reduction after treatment (p = 0.018). The number of HRF in the outer retina, in addition to other baseline OCT biomarkers, could be used to predict the treatment response in DME after anti-VEGF treatment.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and diabetic retinopathy: insights into preservation of sight and looking beyond

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 Inhibitors (SGLT2i) were initially developed as therapeutic options for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Recently, randomized clinical trials have investigated their effects in cardiorenal protection through major adverse cardiovascular event reduction and reductions in diabetic nephropathy. While multiple mechanisms are proposed for this protection, microvascular protection is the primary component of their efficacy. While not primarily emphasized in clinical trials, evidence in other studies suggests that SGLT2i may confer retinoprotective effects via some of the same mechanisms in the aforementioned cardiorenal trials. Diabetic patients are susceptible to vision loss with chronic hyperglycemia promoting inflammation, edema, and retinal pathological changes. Targeting these pathways via SGLT2i may represent opportunities for providers to decrease retinopathy in high-risk T2DM patients, reduce disease progression, and lower drug burden in diabetic retinopathy patients. Further comprehensive clinical trials investigating these associations are needed to establish the potential retinoprotective effects of SGLT2i.

Treatment outcomes of retinal vein occlusion in clinical practice in Nepal

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the treatment outcomes of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in a routine clinical practice in Nepal.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of observational data of patients with RVO who attended the retina clinic of the Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology from 1 November 2017 to 31 October 2018. The main outcome was the mean change in visual acuity (VA) at 12 months from the start of treatment. Other outcomes of interest were the mean change in central subfield thickness (CST) and the number of treatments over 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 99 eyes (of 99 patients) with RVO (60 - branch RVO [BRVO] and 39 - central RVO [CRVO] were available for the analysis. Eyes with CRVO had worse VA and CST at baseline. Eyes in both groups were similar for age, associated factors for RVO, duration of vision loss and the presence of ischemia at baseline. The mean (95% Confidence Interval [CI]) VA change at 12 months for BRVO was - 0.35 (- 0.46, - 0.23) logMAR (p < 0.001) from a mean (SD) of 0.75 (0.42) logMAR at baseline with 63% achieving VA < 0.3 logMAR while for CRVO it was - 0.35 (- 0.46, - 0.23) logMAR (p = 0.19) from 1.13 (0.61) logMAR at baseline and VA < 0.3 logMAR in 36%. The mean (95% CI) change in CST over 12 months was - 114 (- 189, - 40) μm (p = 0.003) from a mean (SD) of 423 (151) μm at baseline for BRVO and - 184(- 276, - 91) μm (p < 0.001) from 519 (213) μm for CRVO. Patients in both groups received a median of 2 bevacizumab injections over 12 months. Around 37% eyes were lost before 12 months' observation. The mean VA and CST trajectory in these eyes at their last visit was similar to those that completed 12 months.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of RVO over the 12 months were inferior and the number of treatments fewer than those of the clinical trials and other reports from routine clinical practice. Future studies to identify the treatment barriers are warranted to improve the treatment outcomes in our patients.

Short-Term Effects of COVID-19-Related Deferral of Intravitreal Injection Visits

PURPOSE

To determine secondary effects of the mandated COVID-19 pandemic closure period for elective treatment on non-elective, injection-based retina care and outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional, retrospective analysis of a single-provider outpatient clinic across multiple satellites, consecutive patients returning for intravitreal injections (IVIs) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor or corticosteroids were identified as "delayed" or "undelayed" during a six-week study interval during the COVID-19 pandemic that closely following a mandated period of prohibited elective encounters. A "delayed" encounter was defined as having a follow-up interval exceeding 33% of the recommended cycle. Patients seen for IVIs during the corresponding six-week interval a year previously were identified for study as pre-COVID-19 controls. Main outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessment based on findings of intraretinal or subretinal fluid consistent with new or recurrent neovascular events.

RESULTS

The study included 183 eyes of 144 patients who underwent IVI-based care from June 18, 2020, through August 7, 2020, compared to 193 eyes of 154 patients injected during the corresponding interval 1 year before. There were 62 eyes of 46 patients seen in the study period later than scheduled (among 144 patients of 183 eyes in total), which represented a larger proportion of delayed patients compared to the previous year (31.9% vs. 14.9%, p<0.0005). Considering the patterns from the control group, the attributed delay due to COVID-19 was 15.0% of patients. The delayed return eyes had a greater decline in BCVA (3 letters), higher rates of worsened OCT results (48%), and prompted reduction in previously prescribed injection intervals (p<0.02).

CONCLUSION

The unintended consequence of delayed care of patients on established care regimens should be anticipated, and mitigate strategies considered if similar restrictions are mandated in the future.

ASSOCIATION OF SERUM VASOGENIC AND PROINFLAMMATORY FACTORS WITH CLINICAL RESPONSE TO ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

PURPOSE

To study the role of serum biomarkers as prognostic factors for qualitative and quantitative response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections for diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

Sixty-seven eyes with DME were treated with intravitreal bevacizumab during a 12-month follow-up period. All cases underwent a baseline workup consisting of 12 inflammatory, metabolic and prothrombotic factors. The following outcomes were evaluated at 3-month intervals until 1 year of follow-up: visual acuity, central subfield thickness (CST), macular volume (MV), % of change from baseline in CST, occurrence of a CST change < 10%, a CST change >20%, and a CST <330 µm, achieving an improvement ≥2 lines of visual acuity, achieving visual acuity ≥20/40.

RESULTS

A significant improvement in CST and visual acuity was seen from third month onwards. Twenty-eight (48.1%) cases were classified as "early responders," 24 (35.8%) as "late responders", and 15 (22.4%) as "poor responders." Serum vascular endothelial growth factor-A levels were significantly lower in "poor responders" (P = 0.006). C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was associated with a limited anatomic response (<10% CST change) (P = 0.002, OR = 1.845, cutoff value of hsCRP = 1.84 mg/L). hsCRP was also negatively associated with obtaining a final CST <330 µm (P = 0.04, r2 = 0.112, OR = 0.643). Baseline visual acuity was significantly associated with 12th month visual acuity (P < 0.001, r2 = 0.602) and also with an improvement ≥2 visual acuity lines (P = 0.009, OR = 20.54).

CONCLUSION

Increased high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was associated with limited anatomic response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment and persistent DME. Poor responders had significantly lower values of serum vascular endothelial growth factor-A, suggesting an alternative pathogenic pathway for persisting DME.

Managing Diabetic Macular Edema in Clinical Practice: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Strategies and Treatment Options

Purpose

This meta-analysis aims to summarize 12-month best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) outcomes in response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy and dexamethasone implant for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) and to identify factors affecting treatment response using evidence generated from meta-regression.

Methods

A systematic review of electronic databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-life/observational studies that reported 12-month changes in BCVA in patients with DME on anti-VEGF or dexamethasone implant treatment in monotherapy. Study factors that were analyzed are baseline patient characteristics, study type, drug employed, number of injections and 12-month change in BCVA. Data were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis with BCVA change as the main outcome. Meta-regression was conducted to assess the impact of multiple covariates.

Results

One-hundred-five heterogeneous study populations (45,032 eyes) were identified and included in the analysis. The use of anti-VEGFs and dexamethasone implant induced an overall increase of +8.13 ETDRS letters in BCVA at 12 months of follow-up. Meta-regression provided evidence that mean BCVA change using anti-VEGFs was not statistically higher for RCTs (p=0.35) compared to observational studies. Dexamethasone implant showed a trend for better results in observational studies over RCTs. Populations following a fixed aflibercept regimen performed better than those following a reactive treatment regimen. Mean BCVA gain was higher in younger populations (p<0.001), with lower baseline BCVA (p<0.0001) and longer diabetes duration (p<0.0001), receiving a higher number of injections (p<0.0001).

Conclusion

Intravitreal therapy with anti-VEGFs or dexamethasone implant produces a significant improvement in BCVA at 12 months in patients with DME. Meta-regression identified the modifiable covariates that can be targeted in order to maximize functional results.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Vision Outcomes with Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose

To assess injection patterns and vision outcomes in patients receiving intravitreal ranibizumab injections for diabetic macular edema in a real-world clinical setting.

Methods

Retrospective chart review involving 74 eyes of 62 patients who started ranibizumab treatment for diabetic macular edema at the Hospital of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos. Data collected included follow-up visits, injections administered, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

Results

Median follow-up duration was 652.5 days (min 365; max 914). Over the first year, eyes received a median of 4 injections (min 1; max 10). Among eyes with 2-year follow-up and injections during the second year, there was a median of 3 injections (min 1; max 6) over the second year. The BCVA improved by a median of 5 letters 365 ± 60 days and 730 ± 60 days after baseline. At the first visit ≥365 days after baseline, 13.5% of eyes gained ≥15 letters from baseline while 6.8% of eyes lost ≥15 letters. For 74.3% of eyes, BCVA improved (gain of ≥5 letters) or remained stable (gain/loss of ≤4 letters).

Conclusion

Intravitreal ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema was effective in a real-world clinical setting, with most eyes gaining or maintaining vision. Compared with randomized prospective clinical trials, patients received less frequent injections and achieved lower vision gains.

Real-World Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Treated Long Term with Ranibizumab (VISION Study)

Aim

Evaluate long-term real-world treatment patterns and associated effectiveness and safety outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated ≥36 months with 0.5mg ranibizumab.

Methods

Open-label observational effectiveness study in 9 Belgian clinics. Included were primary treated eyes of 55 DME patients between August 2014 and March 2015 and followed for 3.5±1.8 years. Eyes were 21.8% treatment (TX)-naïve, 9.1% non-naïve with exclusive prior anti-VEGF treatment (PRIOR-anti-VEGF), and 63.6% non-naïve with other prior treatments (PRIOR-other). Intravitreal injections with ranibizumab were administered per ophthalmologists’ best clinical judgment. Trend testing of changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) over time occurred using mixed regression analysis.

Results

The mean±SD number of treatments in the first year was 5.1±3.0 (TX-naïve), 4.5±2.7 (PRIOR-anti-VEGF) and 5.6±3.1 (PRIOR-other). At 12 months, BCVA increased by 8.9±16.4 letters from 59.7±9.3 at baseline in TX-naïve (p<0.0001), by 11.8±9.9 from 61.6±8.5 in PRIOR-anti-VEGF (p=0.03), and by 4.2±10.6 from 58.2±14.6 in PRIOR-other groups (p=0.0002). BCVA remained stable for the remainder of follow-up in all groups. CRT decreased over the first 2 months by monthly rates of −43.8µm in TX-naïve (p=0.04), −75.7µm in PRIOR-anti-VEGF (p=0.02), and −65.8µm in PRIOR-other eyes (p=0.0003), showing stability afterwards. No unknown adverse events were recorded; a painful eye following injection was registered with a possible relationship to the treatment.

Conclusion

This real-world study confirms the effectiveness of ranibizumab in preventing a decline in BCVA and demonstrated initial improvement and subsequent retention of BCVA in DME patients ≥36 months. Ranibizumab initially reduced and then maintained CRT. However, these data reveal that treatment intensity and BCVA and CRT outcomes are lower than those found in early efficacy trials. Under-treatment likely accounts for this efficacy-effectiveness gap. Yet, intravitreal ranibizumab is an effective and safe long-term treatment for DME under conditions of significant heterogeneity in patients and treatment patterns.

Development of a 1-year risk-prediction nomogram for good functional response with anti-VEGF agents in naive diabetic macular oedema

PURPOSE

To develop a risk-prediction nomogram based on baseline variables for good functional response during the 1st year of treatment with anti-VEGF agents in naive diabetic macular oedema (DME).

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients presenting naive-DME treated with anti-VEGF therapy at Dijon University Hospital (France) between 1 February 2012 and 31 March 2015 (derivation cohort). We studied baseline variables that had significant associations with a good functional response to anti-VEGF agents during the 1st year of treatment. We used a program to generate a nomogram based on a binary logistic regression predictive model. Then, this nomogram was tested on data from a separate cohort of naive-DME patients from a multicenter study involving 20 French ophthalmologic centres between January 2014 and June 2015 (validation cohort).

RESULTS

Age, baseline BCVA and ellipsoid zone integrity on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) are functional prognostic factors and were used to build a nomogram. The nomogram showed excellent discrimination for good functional responders (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.906, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = [0.849-0.964], p = 0.004). The discriminative power of this nomogram was tested on the validation cohort data, demonstrating good discrimination of good functional responders (AUC = 0.942, 95% CI = [0.898-0.986], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This nomogram provides a useful estimation of a good functional response in naive-DME patients treated with anti-VEGF agents.

Development of a Patient-Oriented Organizational Management System for Intravitreal Injection Therapy in a Standardized "Treat-and-Extend" Regime at a University Eye Clinic

BACKGROUND

The treatment of macular edema with intravitreal injections has revolutionized the treatment of associated diseases in ophthalmology. However, with a few exceptions, this is a chronic treatment where patients require many injections and usually need to stay in treatment for years. Patient adherence and control of patient flow are critical to treatment success. In this manuscript, we describe the development of a patient-oriented organization management for intravitreal injections in a university hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 2015, the intravitreal treatment in our clinic was switched to the treat-and-extend regime. At the same time, the optimization of the previous organizational processes in perioperative management was evaluated. For the period 2015 to 2018, we analyzed and gradually optimized the procedures of our intravitreal injection therapy in a survey with a specialized service provider.

RESULTS

Through the analysis of the original processes, the patient appointment was optimized, work processes were summarized, spatially reorganized and there was only a slight increase in the number of staff involved compared with the significant increase in the number of injections. Through these measures, the total in-hospital-time of the patients could be drastically reduced and at the same time the number of patients on one operation day could be multiplied.

CONCLUSION

In the context of chronic treatment with intravitreal injections, the care of an increased number of patients is a logistical challenge. By optimizing processes, existing resources can be better used to meet the increased demands. An optimized system offers the patient greater adherence and a better visual outcome largely independent of the medication used.

Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema in Clinical Practice of Single Center: Three-Year Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to explore visual and anatomical outcomes in patients who underwent intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection for visual impairment from center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) in clinical practice.

METHODS

Medical records of consecutive CI-DME patients who initiated treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab injection between January 2012 and December 2016 and were followed for at least 12 months were retrospectively reviewed. Visual and anatomical changes after treatment over a 36-month period were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 286 patients (423 eyes) with a mean (standard deviation, SD) age of 56.8 (8.5) years included in this study. One hundred and forty-six (51%) patients were female, and 137 (47.9%) patients received bilateral eye treatment. Mean (SD) presenting visual acuity (VA) of overall eyes was 50.2 (19.6) letter scores. Stratified by baseline vision, eyes with initial VA worse than 20/40 achieved a statistically significant VA improvement, compared to baseline, by +8.4, +6.9, and +5.4 letters at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively, with all p values <0.001. However, when initial VA was 20/40 and better, a non-statistically significant change in mean VA by +2.0, -3.5, and -3.6 letters were noted at the same time point (p value between 0.078 and 0.273). Unlike visual changes, a statistically significant decline in central subfield thickness compared to baseline was noted at the end of months 12, 24, and 36 in both initial VA subgroups (all p values <0.001). Nevertheless, even though the median number of given injections considerably decreased from 6 in the first 12 months to 2 in the second 12-month period and 1 in the final 12-month interval, required ophthalmic clinic visits decreased in frequency with median numbers of 10, 7, and 6 appointments in each consecutive 12-month duration.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the benefits of practical intravitreal anti-VEGF utilization to manage CI-DME in real-world settings. The improvement of vision in eyes presenting with poor baseline VA and maintenance of vision in eyes with better baseline VA were demonstrated through the 3-year review of each case. However, the burden of frequent monitoring warrants further evaluation of long-term compliance and efficacy.