1
|
Rick AM, Beigi R. Maternal Immunizations: Past, Present, and Future. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2024:00003081-990000000-00163. [PMID: 38899806 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Maternal vaccines during pregnancy offer crucial protection against infections for both the pregnant person and their newborn. Vaccines against influenza, pertussis, coronavirus disease 2019, and respiratory syncytial virus are routinely recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to safeguard pregnant women and their infants from potentially severe complications. Administering these vaccines during pregnancy helps transfer protective antibodies from the mother to the baby, enhancing immunity during the vulnerable early months of life. Extensive research supports the safety and efficacy of maternal vaccines, with numerous studies demonstrating their protective benefits for both pregnant people and newborns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Marie Rick
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Academic Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
| | - Richard Beigi
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
- UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Olson-Chen C, Swamy GK, Gonik B, Forsyth K, Heininger U, Hozbor D, von König CHW, Chitkara AJ, Top KA, Muloiwa R, van der Schyff M, Tan TQ. The current state of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy around the world, with recommendations for improved care: Consensus statements from the Global Pertussis Initiative. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2024; 165:860-869. [PMID: 38251722 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Bordetella pertussis, which causes a respiratory disease known as pertussis ("whooping cough") remains an important global challenge, with the incidence in pertussis cases increasing in recent years. Newborns and infants are at increased risk for severe morbidity and mortality from this bacterium. Vaccination in pregnancy has become an important strategy to both passively transfer immunity as well as prevent infection in pregnant persons, who are a major source of newborn infection, thus attempting to decrease the impact of this serious disease. It is considered safe for the pregnant person, the developing fetus, and the infant, and during the first 3 months of life it has been shown to be highly effective in preventing pertussis. There are a variety of strategies, recommendations, and adherence rates associated with pertussis vaccination in pregnancy around the world. We summarize the 2021 Global Pertussis Initiative Annual Meeting that reviewed the current global status of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy and remaining medical and scientific questions, with a focus on vaccination challenges and strategies for obstetric and gynecologic healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Olson-Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Geeta K Swamy
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bernard Gonik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Kevin Forsyth
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ulrich Heininger
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Basel Children's Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Daniela Hozbor
- Laboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, CONICET, La Plata, Argentina
| | | | - Amar J Chitkara
- Department of Pediatrics, Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Karina A Top
- Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Rudzani Muloiwa
- Department of Paediatrics and Child health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Malikah van der Schyff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Constantiaberg Mediclinic, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Tina Q Tan
- Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chokephaibulkit K, Puthanakit T, Chaithongwongwatthana S, Bhat N, Tang Y, Anugulruengkitt S, Chayachinda C, Anuwutnavin S, Lapphra K, Rungmaitree S, Tawan M, Andi-Lolo I, Holt R, Fortuna L, Kerdsomboon C, Yuwaree V, Mansouri S, Thai PH, Innis BL. Effective and safe transfer of maternal antibodies persisting two months postpartum following maternal immunization with different doses of recombinant pertussis-containing vaccines. Vaccine 2024; 42:383-395. [PMID: 38061956 PMCID: PMC10789266 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.11.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recombinant acellular pertussis (ap) vaccines containing genetically inactivated pertussis toxin (PTgen) and filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) with or without tetanus (TT) and diphtheria (DT) vaccines (Td) were found safe and immunogenic in non-pregnant and pregnant women. We report here maternal antibody transfer and safety data in mothers and neonates. METHODS This is the follow up of a phase 2 trial in 2019 among 400 pregnant women who randomly received one dose of recombinant pertussis-only vaccine containing 1 µg PTgen and 1 µg FHA (ap1gen), or Td combined with ap1gen (Tdap1gen), or with 2 µg PTgen and 5 µg FHA (Tdap2gen), or with 5 µg PTgen and 5 µg FHA (TdaP5gen, Boostagen®, BioNet, Thailand) or chemically-inactivated acellular pertussis comparator (Tdap8chem, Boostrix™, GSK, Belgium), either in the second or third trimester of gestation. IgG against PT, FHA, TT and DT were assessed by ELISA, PT-neutralizing antibodies (PTNA) by Chinese Hamster Ovary cell assay and safety outcomes at delivery in mothers and at birth. RESULTS Anti-PT and anti-FHA geometric mean concentration (GMC) ratio between infants at birth and mothers at delivery was above 1 in all groups. PT GMC in infants at birth were ≥30 IU/mL in all groups with the highest titers in infants found in TdaP5gen group at birth (118.8 [95% CI 93.9-150.4]). At 2 months, PT GMC ratio to Tdap8chem (98.75% CI) was significantly higher for TdaP5gen (2.6 [1.7-4.0]) and comparable for other recombinant vaccines. No difference in PTNA titers at birth was observed between all groups nor between time of vaccination. Adverse events were comparable in all vaccine groups. CONCLUSIONS BioNet licensed (TdaP5gen and Tdap2gen) and candidate vaccines (Tdap1gen and ap1gen) when given to pregnant women in the second or third trimester of gestation are safe and have induced passive pertussis immunity to infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kulkanya Chokephaibulkit
- Siriraj Institute of Clinical Research (SICRES) Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok 10700, Thailand; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Thanyawee Puthanakit
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Center of Excellence in Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Chulalongkorn University, Rama IV Road, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Surasith Chaithongwongwatthana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Rama IV Road, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Niranjan Bhat
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA
| | - Yuxiao Tang
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA
| | - Suvaporn Anugulruengkitt
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Center of Excellence in Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Chulalongkorn University, Rama IV Road, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Chenchit Chayachinda
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Sanitra Anuwutnavin
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Keswadee Lapphra
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Supattra Rungmaitree
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Monta Tawan
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Center of Excellence in Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Chulalongkorn University, Rama IV Road, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Indah Andi-Lolo
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA
| | - Renee Holt
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA
| | - Librada Fortuna
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand.
| | - Chawanee Kerdsomboon
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand
| | - Vilasinee Yuwaree
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand
| | - Souad Mansouri
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand
| | - Pham Hong Thai
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand
| | - Bruce L Innis
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pehlivan T, Dinleyici EC, Kara A, Kurugöl Z, Tezer H, Aksakal NB, Biri A, Azap A. The Present and Future Aspects of Life-Long Pertussis Prevention: Narrative Review with Regional Perspectives for Türkiye. Infect Dis Ther 2023; 12:2495-2512. [PMID: 37815753 PMCID: PMC10651609 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-023-00876-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Pertussis, caused by Bordetella pertussis, remains one of the most widespread, contagious, and vaccine-preventable diseases. It results in notable morbidity and mortality as well as severe medical, social, and economic burden. Despite high global vaccine coverage, pertussis continues to be a significant epidemiologic problem, with outbreak episodes every few years just as in the pre-vaccination era. In Türkiye, there is a lack of comprehensive data on the current burden of pertussis in different age and risk groups, leading to underdiagnosis and underreporting of the disease, especially in adults who are often not considered at risk. Available data from Türkiye also reveal inadequate levels of protective antibodies in preterm newborns, emphasizing the need for additional preventive measures. Authors stated that improving physician awareness of pertussis symptoms in patients with prolonged cough, increasing access to routine pertussis tests, and conducting surveillance studies would aid in accurate diagnosis and reporting in Türkiye. As the Turkish Ministry of Health Antenatal Care Management Guide suggests routine second and third pregnancy check-up visits at weeks 18-24 and 28-32 correspondingly, this period can be considered the ideal vaccination time for Türkiye. Introducing a booster dose of Tdap at around 10 years of age or during national military service would reduce transmission and protect susceptible individuals. Identifying individuals at high risk of severe pertussis and prioritizing them for a booster dose is also crucial in Türkiye. Enhancing surveillance systems, increasing healthcare professionals' awareness through training, and organizing catch-up visits for missed vaccinations during the COVID-19 pandemic are mentioned as additional strategies to improve pertussis prevention in Türkiye. This review focuses on the global and regional burden of pertussis and obstacles to effective prevention and evaluates existing strategies to achieve lifelong pertussis prevention. Literature and current strategies were also discussed from a Turkish national standpoint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamer Pehlivan
- Public Health, Remedium Consulting Group, Izmir, Türkiye.
| | - Ener Cagri Dinleyici
- Department of Pediatrics, Eskisehir Osmangazi University School of Medicine, Eskisehir, Türkiye
| | - Ateş Kara
- Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Zafer Kurugöl
- Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Türkiye
| | - Hasan Tezer
- Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Nur Baran Aksakal
- Department of Public Health, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Aydan Biri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Koru Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Alpay Azap
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Antoniou T, McCormack D, Fell DB, Kwong JC, Gomes T. Impact of national recommendations for routine pertussis vaccination during pregnancy on infant pertussis in Ontario, Canada: a population-based time-series study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:627. [PMID: 37653488 PMCID: PMC10469528 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05938-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In February 2018, Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) recommended antenatal tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) immunization in every pregnancy regardless of previous Tdap immunization history. We examined the impact of the NACI recommendation on rates of infant pertussis in Ontario, Canada. METHODS We conducted a population-based time-series study of all live births in Ontario between August 1, 2011 and February 28, 2020. We used interventional autoregressive integrated moving average models to examine the impact of the NACI recommendation on monthly rates of pertussis among infants ≤ 3 months of age. RESULTS We observed 675 incident cases of pertussis among 1,368,024 infants 3 months of age or less between August 2011 and February 2020. The average monthly percent change in infant pertussis during the period up to and including publication of the NACI guidance and the period following publication were 0.0% (95% CI: -0.4-0.3%) and - 0.8% (95% CI -2.3% to -0.1%), respectively. Following interventional ARIMA modelling, publication of the NACI guidance was not associated with a statistically significant decrease in the monthly pertussis incidence trend (-0.67 cases per 100,000 infants; p = 0.73). CONCLUSION Publication of national recommendations for antenatal Tdap immunization in every pregnancy did not significantly reduce infant pertussis rates. This may reflect the persistently low rate of antenatal vaccination following publication of the recommendations. Expanding the scope of practice of allied health care providers to include antenatal Tdap immunization and patient education regarding antenatal pertussis immunization should be considered to further optimize uptake of vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Antoniou
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | | | - Deshayne B Fell
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jeffrey C Kwong
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tara Gomes
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Calvert A, Amirthalingam G, Andrews N, Basude S, Coleman M, Cuthbertson H, England A, Greening V, Hallis B, Johnstone E, Jones CE, Karampatsas K, Khalil A, Le Doare K, Matheson M, Peregrine E, Snape MD, Vatish M, Heath PT. Optimising the timing of whooping cough immunisation in mums (OpTIMUM) through investigating pertussis vaccination in pregnancy: an open-label, equivalence, randomised controlled trial. THE LANCET. MICROBE 2023; 4:e300-e308. [PMID: 37080224 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-5247(22)00332-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pertussis vaccination in pregnancy is recommended in many countries to provide protection to young infants. The best timing for this vaccination is uncertain. In the UK, vaccination is recommended between 16 weeks and 32 weeks of gestation. In this trial we aimed to investigate the equivalence of three time periods for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy. METHODS In this open-label, equivalence, randomised controlled trial to investigate equivalence of different time windows for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy, participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1 ratio) to receive a pertussis-containing vaccine (Boostrix-inactivated poliovirus vaccine) in one of three gestational age groups, comprising group 1 (≤23 weeks + 6 days), group 2 (24-27 weeks + 6 days), and group 3 (28-31 weeks + 6 days) using a computer-generated randomisation list. The primary outcome was concentration of pertussis-specific antibodies in the infant born at term at birth. Maternal blood sampling was done before and 2 weeks after vaccination and at delivery, together with a cord sample, and an infant sample was collected at least 4 weeks after primary vaccination. Reactogenicity was assessed for 7 days after vaccination. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03908164). FINDINGS Between May 7, 2019, and Feb 13, 2020, of 1010 women assessed for eligibility, 364 women were recruited and 351 received the intervention (120 in group 1, 119 in group 2, and 112 in group 3). Equivalence of time periods was demonstrated for anti-pertussis toxin and anti-pertactin IgG concentrations. The cord blood geometric mean concentrations of anti-filamentous haemagglutinin IgG were higher with increasing gestational age at vaccination, such that for infants in group 1 (≤23 weeks + 6 days), equivalence to group 3 (28-31 weeks + 6 days) was not shown. Reported rates of fever were similar between study groups. INTERPRETATION Pertussis vaccination at three different time intervals in pregnancy resulted in equivalent concentrations of IgG antibodies in infants against two of the three pertussis antigens assessed. Overall, these findings support recommendations to vaccinate any time between 16 weeks and 32 weeks of gestation. FUNDING The Thrasher Research Fund and the National Immunisation Schedule Evaluation Consortium through the National Institute for Health and Care Research policy research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Calvert
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Gayatri Amirthalingam
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Nick Andrews
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Sneha Basude
- University Hospital Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Matthew Coleman
- NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Reproductive Health Research Team, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Anna England
- Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK
| | - Vanessa Greening
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bassam Hallis
- Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK
| | - Edward Johnstone
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Christine E Jones
- NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Konstantinos Karampatsas
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Asma Khalil
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kirsty Le Doare
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK; Medical Research Council and Ugandan Virus Research Institute and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Kampala, Uganda; Makerere University Johns Hopkins University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Mary Matheson
- Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK
| | | | - Matthew D Snape
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Manu Vatish
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Clinical Research Network, Thames Valley and South Midlands
| | - Paul T Heath
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Protecting the Offspring, the Gift of Maternal Immunization: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10111953. [DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10111953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Pregnancy is characterized by immunological alterations in pregnant women that permit the growth of a semi-allogenic fetus, resulting in greater susceptibility of childbearing women to infections. Furthermore, due to the immaturity of the immune system of neonates, a protection gap is present in early life, leaving neonates and infants vulnerable to infectious diseases with increased morbidity and mortality. Maternal immunization against influenza, pertussis, and, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 has been implemented in several countries, with beneficial effects on both the mother and the offspring. The main protective mechanism of vaccination during pregnancy is transplacental transfer of maternal antibodies. However, recent evidence has implied that the fetal immune system may be influenced beyond passive immunity. This review sheds light on the current status of the routinely administered vaccinations during pregnancy, focusing on the impact of maternal immunization on the priming of the fetal immune system and suggesting future perspectives for the optimization of vaccination strategies.
Collapse
|
8
|
Gomme J, Wanlapakorn N, Ha HTT, Leuridan E, Herzog SA, Maertens K. The Impact of Timing of Pertussis Vaccination During Pregnancy on Infant Antibody Levels at Birth: A Multi-Country Analysis. Front Immunol 2022; 13:913922. [PMID: 35837400 PMCID: PMC9273881 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.913922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pertussis vaccination during pregnancy is an effective strategy at reducing pertussis-related morbidity and mortality in infancy and is recommended across several countries. However, the optimal timepoint for vaccination in pregnancy to afford maximal protection to newborns is yet to be elucidated. This multi-country analysis aimed to model the impact of timing of vaccination during pregnancy on infant antibody titers at birth. Methods A multi-country analysis on a cohort of mother-infant pairs (n=698) vaccinated between 19.6-37.1 weeks gestation was conducted. Data taken from four parent studies on pertussis vaccination during pregnancy were modelled using natural cubic splines and linear mixed models to study the association of both gestational age at vaccination and the interval between vaccination and delivery with pertussis-specific cord blood antibody levels after pertussis vaccination during pregnancy. Results Term born infants on average achieve the highest antibody levels at birth if women are vaccinated before 31 weeks’ gestation. When considering both term and preterm deliveries, an interval of at least 7.5 weeks between vaccination and delivery is required to achieve the highest cord blood antibody levels. The models show that vaccinating earlier than these timeframes will also provide the infant with equally high antibody levels at birth. Conclusions Vaccinating in the second and early third trimester results in the highest antibody levels at birth. Vaccinating earlier within this window is needed to provide equal benefits to both term and preterm born infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Gomme
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Nasamon Wanlapakorn
- Department of Pediatrics, Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Bangkok, Thailand
- Division of Academic Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Elke Leuridan
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sereina Annik Herzog
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Kirsten Maertens, ; Sereina Annik Herzog,
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Kirsten Maertens, ; Sereina Annik Herzog,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lu-Culligan A, Tabachnikova A, Pérez-Then E, Tokuyama M, Lee HJ, Lucas C, Silva Monteiro V, Miric M, Brache V, Cochon L, Muenker MC, Mohanty S, Huang J, Kang I, Dela Cruz C, Farhadian S, Campbell M, Yildirim I, Shaw AC, Ma S, Vermund SH, Ko AI, Omer SB, Iwasaki A. No evidence of fetal defects or anti-syncytin-1 antibody induction following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. PLoS Biol 2022; 20:e3001506. [PMID: 35609110 PMCID: PMC9129011 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination on pregnancy and fertility has become a major topic of public interest. We investigated 2 of the most widely propagated claims to determine (1) whether COVID-19 mRNA vaccination of mice during early pregnancy is associated with an increased incidence of birth defects or growth abnormalities; and (2) whether COVID-19 mRNA-vaccinated human volunteers exhibit elevated levels of antibodies to the human placental protein syncytin-1. Using a mouse model, we found that intramuscular COVID-19 mRNA vaccination during early pregnancy at gestational age E7.5 did not lead to differences in fetal size by crown-rump length or weight at term, nor did we observe any gross birth defects. In contrast, injection of the TLR3 agonist and double-stranded RNA mimic polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid, or poly(I:C), impacted growth in utero leading to reduced fetal size. No overt maternal illness following either vaccination or poly(I:C) exposure was observed. We also found that term fetuses from these murine pregnancies vaccinated prior to the formation of the definitive placenta exhibit high circulating levels of anti-spike and anti-receptor-binding domain (anti-RBD) antibodies to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) consistent with maternal antibody status, indicating transplacental transfer in the later stages of pregnancy after early immunization. Finally, we did not detect increased levels of circulating anti-syncytin-1 antibodies in a cohort of COVID-19 vaccinated adults compared to unvaccinated adults by ELISA. Our findings contradict popular claims associating COVID-19 mRNA vaccination with infertility and adverse neonatal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Lu-Culligan
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Alexandra Tabachnikova
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | | | - Maria Tokuyama
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Hannah J. Lee
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Carolina Lucas
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Valter Silva Monteiro
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Marija Miric
- Two Oceans in Health, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Vivian Brache
- Biomedical Research Department, Profamilia, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Leila Cochon
- Biomedical Research Department, Profamilia, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - M. Catherine Muenker
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Subhasis Mohanty
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Jiefang Huang
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Insoo Kang
- Section of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Charles Dela Cruz
- Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Department of Microbial Pathogenesis, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Shelli Farhadian
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Melissa Campbell
- Section of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Inci Yildirim
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Section of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Yale Institute for Global Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Albert C. Shaw
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Shuangge Ma
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Sten H. Vermund
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Albert I. Ko
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Saad B. Omer
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Yale Institute for Global Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Akiko Iwasaki
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Etti M, Calvert A, Galiza E, Lim S, Khalil A, Le Doare K, Heath PT. Maternal vaccination: a review of current evidence and recommendations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:459-474. [PMID: 34774821 PMCID: PMC8582099 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.10.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Maternal vaccination is an effective means of protecting pregnant women, their fetuses, and infants from vaccine-preventable infections. Despite the availability of sufficient safety data to support the use of vaccines during pregnancy, maternal immunization remains an underutilized method of disease prevention, often because of concerns from both healthcare providers and pregnant women about vaccine safety. Such concerns have been reflected in the low uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine among pregnant women seen in many parts of the world. Here, we present an update of the current recommendations for the use of vaccines during pregnancy, including the evidence supporting the use of novel vaccine platforms. We also provide an overview of the data supporting the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy and an update of the status of vaccines that are currently under development for use in pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Etti
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Anna Calvert
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eva Galiza
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Suzy Lim
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Asma Khalil
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kirsty Le Doare
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul T Heath
- Vaccine Institute and Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Timing of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination during the third trimester of pregnancy and transplacental antibody transfer: a prospective cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2022; 28:419-425. [PMID: 34740773 PMCID: PMC8563509 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the impact of early versus late third-trimester maternal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination on transplacental transfer and neonatal levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. METHODS Maternal and cord blood sera were collected following term delivery after antenatal SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination, with the first vaccine dose administered between 27 and 36 weeks of gestation. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) and receptor-binding domain (RBD) -specific, IgG levels and neutralizing potency were evaluated in maternal and cord blood samples. RESULTS The study cohort consisted of 171 parturients-median age 31 years (interquartile range (IQR) 27-35 years); median gestational age 39+5 weeks (IQR 38+5-40+4 weeks)-83 (48.5%) were immunized in early thrird-trimester (first dose at 27-31 weeks) and 88 (51.5%) were immunized in late third trimester (first dose at 32-36 weeks). All mother-infant paired sera were positive for anti S- and anti-RBD-specific IgG. Anti-RBD-specific IgG concentrations in neonatal sera were higher following early versus late third-trimester vaccination (median 9620 AU/mL (IQR 5131-15332 AU/mL) versus 6697 AU/mL (IQR 3157-14731 AU/mL), p 0.02), and were positively correlated with increasing time since vaccination (r = 0.26; p 0.001). Median antibody placental transfer ratios were increased following early versus late third-trimester immunization (anti-S ratio: 1.3 (IQR 1.1-1.6) versus 0.9 (IQR 0.6-1.1); anti-RBD-specific ratio: 2.3 (IQR 1.7-3.0) versus 0.7 (IQR 0.5-1.2), p < 0.001). Neutralizing antibodies placental transfer ratio was greater following early versus late third-trimester immunization (median 1.9 (IQR 1.7-2.5) versus 0.8 (IQR 0.5-1.1), p < 0.001), and was positively associated with longer duration from vaccination (r = 0.77; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Early compared with late third-trimester maternal SARS-CoV-2 immunization enhanced transplacental antibody transfer and increased neonatal neutralizing antibody levels. Our findings highlight that vaccination of pregnant women early in the third trimester may enhance neonatal seroprotection.
Collapse
|
12
|
Rottenstreich A, Zarbiv G, Oiknine-Djian E, Vorontsov O, Zigron R, Kleinstern G, Wolf DG, Porat S. The effect of gestational age at BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination on maternal and neonatal SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels. Clin Infect Dis 2022; 75:e603-e610. [PMID: 35171998 PMCID: PMC8903394 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background COVID-19 during pregnancy and early infancy can result in severe disease. Evaluating the effect of gestational age at the time of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on maternal antibody levels and transplacental antibody transfer has important implications for maternal care and vaccination strategies. Methods Maternal and cord blood sera were collected from mother/newborn dyads (n=402), following term delivery after antenatal two-dose SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) and receptor binding domain (RBD)-specific IgG levels were evaluated in the samples collected. Results Median anti-S and anti-RBD-specific IgG levels in maternal sera at the time of delivery were lowest following 1 st trimester vaccination (n=90) (anti-S IgG: 76 AU/mL, anti-RBD-specific IgG: 478 AU/mL), intermediate in those vaccinated in the 2 nd trimester (n=124) (anti-S IgG: 126 AU/mL, anti-RBD-specific IgG: 1263 AU/mL), and highest after 3 rd trimester vaccination (n=188) (anti-S IgG: 240 AU/mL, anti-RBD-specific IgG: 5855 AU/mL). Antibody levels in neonatal sera followed a similar pattern and were lowest following antenatal vaccination in the 1 st trimester (anti-S IgG: 126 AU/mL, anti-RBD-specific IgG: 1140 AU/mL). In a subgroup of parturients vaccinated in the 1 st trimester (n=30), a third booster dose was associated with significantly higher maternal and neonatal antibody levels. Conclusions These results suggest a considerable antibody waning throughout pregnancy in those vaccinated at early gestation. The observed boosting effect of a third vaccine dose, hints to its potential benefit in those who completed the two-dose vaccine series at early pregnancy or prior to conception. The impact of antenatal immunization timing on SARS-CoV-2 transplacental antibody transfer may influence neonatal seroprotection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amihai Rottenstreich
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Gila Zarbiv
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Esther Oiknine-Djian
- Clinical virology unit, Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Olesya Vorontsov
- Clinical virology unit, Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Roy Zigron
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - Dana G Wolf
- Clinical virology unit, Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Shay Porat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
The optimal strategy for pertussis vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials and real-world data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:52-67.e10. [PMID: 34224687 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Severe pertussis infection has been reported in infants before receiving routine immunization series. This problem could be solved by vaccinating mothers during pregnancy or children at birth. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence to evaluate the optimal strategy for pertussis vaccination. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched until December 2020. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA RCTs, cohort studies, case-control studies, and case series were included if they investigated the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of acellular pertussis vaccine during pregnancy and at birth. METHODS Number of pertussis cases, severe adverse events (SAEs), and pertussis antibody concentration in infants before and after they receive routine vaccination series were extracted and random-effect model was used to pool the analyses. RESULTS Overall, 29 studies were included. Our meta-analysis revealed that pertussis immunization during pregnancy significantly increased the concentrations of 3 pertussis antibodies and reduced the incidence rates of infected infants below 3 months of age (odds ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.33). Similarly, infants vaccinated at birth had higher levels of pertussis antibody than those who were not. No significant difference in rates of severe adverse events was seen in all vaccination groups (during pregnancy [risk ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.82] and at birth [risk ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-1.54]). CONCLUSION Pertussis vaccination during pregnancy could protect infants against pertussis disease before the routine vaccination. Pertussis immunization at birth would be an alternative for infants whose mothers did not receive pertussis vaccines during pregnancy.
Collapse
|
14
|
Abu-Raya B, Madhi SA, Omer SB, Amirthalingam G, Giles ML, Flanagan KL, Zimmermann P, O’Ryan M, Safadi MA, Papaevangelou V, Maertens K, Wanlapakorn N, Diaz-Brito V, Tommelein E, Esposito S. Global Perspectives on Immunization Against SARS-CoV-2 During Pregnancy and Priorities for Future Research: An International Consensus Paper From the World Association of Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders. Front Immunol 2021; 12:808064. [PMID: 35003137 PMCID: PMC8733958 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.808064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in pregnancy is associated with a higher risk for severe morbidity and mortality when compared with infection in non-pregnant women of childbearing age. An increasing number of countries recommend immunization against SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant women. Recent studies provide preliminary and supportive evidence on safety, immunogenicity and effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in pregnant women; however, important knowledge gaps remain which warrant further studies. This collaborative consensus paper provides a review of the current literature on COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women, identifies knowledge gaps and outlines priorities for future research to optimize protection against SARS-CoV-2 in the pregnant women and their infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahaa Abu-Raya
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Shabir A. Madhi
- South African Medical Research Council, Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytics Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- African Leadership in Vaccinology Expertise, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Saad B. Omer
- Department of Internal Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Gayatri Amirthalingam
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michelle L. Giles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Katie L. Flanagan
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, Australia
- School of Health and Biomedical Science, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Tasmanian Vaccine Trial Centre, Clifford Craig Foundation, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, TAS, Australia
| | - Petra Zimmermann
- Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
- Department of Paediatrics, Fribourg Hospital HFR, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Miguel O’Ryan
- Microbiology and Mycology Program, Institute of Biomedical Sciences and Millennium Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Marco A. Safadi
- Department of Pediatrics, Santa Casa de Sao Paulo School of Medical Sciences, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Vassiliki Papaevangelou
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Third Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Attikon, Athens, Greece
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Nasamon Wanlapakorn
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Vicens Diaz-Brito
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu,, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eline Tommelein
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Susanna Esposito
- Pediatric Clinic, Pietro Barilla Children’s Hospital, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Anh Tuan T, Xoay TD, Thuy PTB, Ouellette Y. Cerebral spinal fluid positive pertussis encephalopathy in infants: Case reports. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 2021; 9:2050313X211052446. [PMID: 34676077 PMCID: PMC8524677 DOI: 10.1177/2050313x211052446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Pertussis has re-emerged in both developed and developing countries and is an ongoing
public health problem, even in countries with high rates of vaccination. Pertussis
encephalopathy is a known complication of the disease, but the pathophysiology of this
complication and the role of the pertussis bacteria have not been elucidated. We report
three confirmed cases of pertussis infant younger than 3 months of age with neurological
complications including lethargy, encephalopathy, and seizures. In each case, the
cerebrospinal fluid was positive for Bordetella pertussis as determined
by polymerase chain reaction. One patient did not survive and two were discharged with a
normal neurological exam on follow-up. The cases emphasize the importance of analyzing
cerebrospinal fluid in cases of pertussis-associated encephalopathy including polymerase
chain reaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ta Anh Tuan
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Vietnam National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Tran Dang Xoay
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Vietnam National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Phung Thi Bich Thuy
- Department of Biomolecular Research in Infectious Disease, Vietnam National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Yves Ouellette
- Department of Pediatrics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Godoy P, García-Cenoz M, Rius C, Muñoz-Almagro C, Carmona G, Alsedà M, Jané M, Vidal MJ, Rodríguez R, Álvarez J, Camps N, Minguell S, Carol M, Sala MR, Castilla J, Domínguez À. Effectiveness of maternal pertussis vaccination in protecting newborn: A matched case-control study. J Infect 2021; 83:554-558. [PMID: 34407422 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective was to estimate the effectiveness of maternal pertussis vaccination in protecting infants aged < 2 months. METHODS We performed a case-control study. Laboratory-confirmed cases aged <8 weeks at disease onset were identified and 2-4 matched-controls born within ± 15 days of the case were included. Information was obtained from healthcare providers and maternal interviews. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using multivariable conditional logistic regression. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was estimated as (1 - OR) × 100%. RESULTS 47 cases and 124 controls were studied. The mean age (in days) (39.8 ± 12.7 vs. 40.8 ± 13.2), weeks of gestation (38.8 vs. 39.1, p = 0.43) and mean birth weight (3.309 vs. 3.253 kg, p = 0.55) were comparable between cases and controls. Mothers of cases were less frequently vaccinated in the third trimester (59.6% vs. 83.9%, p <0.001). The VE of maternal vaccination in pregnancy was 88.0% (95%CI 53.8% -96.5%), and was slightly higher in those vaccinated before the 32nd week of gestation (88.5% vs 87.8%). CONCLUSION Pertussis vaccination in pregnancy is very effective in reducing pertussis in children aged < 2 months. Vaccination before and after the 32nd week of pregnancy are equally effective in reducing the risk of pertussis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pere Godoy
- Agència de Salut Pública de Catalunya. Barcelona, Spain; Ciber de Epidemiología y Salud Pública. CIBERESP. Madrid, Spain; Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida. IRBLleida. Lleida, Spain.
| | - Manuel García-Cenoz
- Ciber de Epidemiología y Salud Pública. CIBERESP. Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Salud Pública de Navarra - idiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Cristina Rius
- Ciber de Epidemiología y Salud Pública. CIBERESP. Madrid, Spain; Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona. Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Muñoz-Almagro
- Ciber de Epidemiología y Salud Pública. CIBERESP. Madrid, Spain; Institut de Recerca Pediàtrica, Hospital de Sant Joan de Dèu, Barcelona, Spain; Departament de Medicina, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
| | | | - Miquel Alsedà
- Agència de Salut Pública de Catalunya. Barcelona, Spain; Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida. IRBLleida. Lleida, Spain
| | - Mireia Jané
- Agència de Salut Pública de Catalunya. Barcelona, Spain; Ciber de Epidemiología y Salud Pública. CIBERESP. Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Josep Álvarez
- Agència de Salut Pública de Catalunya. Barcelona, Spain
| | - Neus Camps
- Agència de Salut Pública de Catalunya. Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Mónica Carol
- Agència de Salut Pública de Catalunya. Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jesús Castilla
- Ciber de Epidemiología y Salud Pública. CIBERESP. Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Salud Pública de Navarra - idiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Àngela Domínguez
- Ciber de Epidemiología y Salud Pública. CIBERESP. Madrid, Spain; Departament de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona. Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Garlasco J, Bordino V, Marengo N, Rainero E, Scacchi A, Ditommaso S, Giacomuzzi M, Bert F, Zotti CM. Pertussis immunisation during pregnancy: Antibody levels and the impact of booster vaccine. Vaccine 2021; 39:4957-4963. [PMID: 34330557 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.07.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Pertussis (whooping cough) is a highly infectious disease caused by Bordetella pertussis. Mothers lacking adequate immunity and contracting the disease represent the biggest risk of transmission to new-borns, for which the disease is often a threat. The aim of the study was to estimate the frequency of pertussis susceptibility among pregnant women, in order to point out the need for a vaccine recall during pregnancy, and to evaluate the antibody response in already vaccinated women. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the blood test centre of "St. Anna" Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital in Turin (Piedmont, Italy). Eligibility criteria included pregnant women coming to the centre for any blood test, aged 18 or above and with gestational age between 33 and 37 weeks at the moment of the blood draw. The data collection was carried out from May 2019 to January 2020 and the concentration of anti-Pertussis Toxin (anti-PT) IgG was measured through the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) technique. Two-hundred women (median age 35) were enrolled: 132 (66%) had received at least one dose of pertussis vaccine, 82 of which during pregnancy. Recently vaccinated women had significantly higher antibody titres (even 12-15 times as high) compared to those vaccinated more than 5 years before or never vaccinated at all (p < 0.0001). Moreover, 95.1% of recently vaccinated women had anti-PT IgG levels above 10 IU/ml, and 85.4% above 20 IU/ml, while the same proportions were as low as 37% and 21% (respectively) in the group of women not vaccinated in pregnancy. This study confirmed that the vaccination is greatly effective in ensuring high antibody titres in the first months after the booster vaccine, with considerable differences in anti-PT IgG compared to women vaccinated earlier or never vaccinated at all, and therefore vaccinating pregnant women against pertussis still represents a valuable strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Garlasco
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Turin, 5/bis, Via Santena, I-10126 Turin, Italy.
| | - Valerio Bordino
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Turin, 5/bis, Via Santena, I-10126 Turin, Italy.
| | - Noemi Marengo
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Turin, 5/bis, Via Santena, I-10126 Turin, Italy.
| | - Erika Rainero
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Turin, 5/bis, Via Santena, I-10126 Turin, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Scacchi
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Turin, 5/bis, Via Santena, I-10126 Turin, Italy.
| | - Savina Ditommaso
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Turin, 5/bis, Via Santena, I-10126 Turin, Italy.
| | - Monica Giacomuzzi
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Turin, 5/bis, Via Santena, I-10126 Turin, Italy.
| | - Fabrizio Bert
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Turin, 5/bis, Via Santena, I-10126 Turin, Italy.
| | - Carla Maria Zotti
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Turin, 5/bis, Via Santena, I-10126 Turin, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Calvert A, Karampatsas K, Andrews N, England A, Hallis B, Jones CE, Khalil A, Le Doare K, Matheson M, Snape MD, Heath PT. Optimising the Timing of whooping cough Immunisation in MUMs: a randomised controlled trial investigating the timing of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy (OpTIMUM): a protocol paper. Wellcome Open Res 2021. [DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16767.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Pertussis is a highly infectious respiratory illness caused by the bacteria Bordetella pertussis. A resurgence of pertussis, even in countries with good vaccine coverage, has led to an increase in infant deaths. In response to this, many countries have introduced pertussis vaccination in pregnancy. This strategy is effective at preventing infant disease, but there remains uncertainty about what gestational timing is best to ensure maximal protection of the infant. These uncertainties are the rationale for this randomised controlled trial and a sub-study investigating pertussis-specific antibody in breastmilk. Protocol: We will recruit 354 pregnant women and will randomise them to receive their pertussis vaccination in one of three gestational age windows: ≤23+6, 24-27+6 and 28-31+6 weeks of gestation. Vaccination will be with Boostrix-IPV® and participants will be asked to complete a symptom diary for seven days following vaccination. Blood sampling will be performed prior to vaccination, two weeks following vaccination and at the time of delivery. A cord blood sample will be collected at delivery and a blood sample collected from the infant 4-10 weeks after completion of the primary immunisations. Individuals participating in the breastmilk sub-study will provide a sample of colostrum within 48 hours of delivery and samples of breastmilk at two weeks and around five-six months. Blood samples will be analysed using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques for pertussis toxin, filamentous haemagglutinin and pertactin. A subset of serum samples will also be analysed using a functional assay. Colostrum and breastmilk samples will be analysed using functional assays. Discussion: Although pertussis vaccination has been shown to be safe and effective in pregnancy there remains debate about the optimal timing for the administration during pregnancy. This study will investigate antibody responses in serum and breastmilk when vaccination is performed in three different time periods. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT03908164 (09/04/2019)
Collapse
|
19
|
Esteghamati A, Sayyahfar S, Alimohamadi Y, Salahi S, Faramarzi M. Is it time to administer acellular pertussis vaccine to childbearing age/pregnant women in all areas using whole-cell pertussis vaccination schedule? Ther Adv Vaccines Immunother 2021; 9:25151355211015842. [PMID: 34104864 PMCID: PMC8161843 DOI: 10.1177/25151355211015842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccine administration is still advocated for children under 7 years of age in Iran. However, there is no recommendation for the administration of a dose of tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine to childbearing age/pregnant women in the Iranian vaccination program and it has increased the risk of infection through waning immunity during women’s childbearing age life. The study aimed to assess the levels of anti-Bordetella pertussis antibodies in childbearing age women of different ages in Iran. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a total number of 360 childbearing age women divided into six age groups, with 5-year intervals from 15 to 45 years old, in 2018–2019. Then, the levels of immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin M (IgM), and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against B. pertussis were evaluated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 16.0) (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis. Results: The mean age of the participants was 30.01 ± 8.35 years (range 14–45 years). All the cases were IgM negative, but two IgA-positive individuals (in the age groups of 14–19 and 30–34 years) were reported. Overall, 239 (66.4%) cases were IgG positive. The mean age of IgG-positive cases was 30.37 ± 8.37 years. The IgG-positive cases were mostly in the age groups of 30–34 and 35–39 years [43 (71.1%)]. The odds of IgG positivity were 1.97. The highest odds of IgG positivity were seen in 30–34 and 35–39 years groups (2.52) and the lowest odds were seen in the 20–24 and 25–29 years groups (1.60). Using the Jonckheere–Terpstra test, the increasing trend of IgG changes in different age groups was not statistically significant (Tπ=5.78, p = 0.09). Conclusion: The infants of women of childbearing age might be prone to pertussis in countries using the wP vaccination schedule. It is suggested to administer a dose of Tdap to women before or during pregnancy to increase the immunity of their infants against this disease during early infancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdoulreza Esteghamati
- Research Center of Pediatric Infectious diseases, Institute of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shirin Sayyahfar
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Ali Asghar Children Hospital, Vahid Dastgerdi Street, Shariati Street, Tehran 1919816766, Iran
| | - Yousef Alimohamadi
- Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, Institute of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sarvenaz Salahi
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahmood Faramarzi
- Research Center of Pediatric Infectious diseases, Institute of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Romanin V, Acosta AM, Juarez MDV, Briere E, Sanchez SM, Cordoba BL, Sevilla ME, Lucion MF, Urrutia A, Sagradini S, Skoff TH, Vizzotti C. Maternal Vaccination in Argentina: Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Effectiveness During Pregnancy in Preventing Pertussis in Infants <2 Months of Age. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 70:380-387. [PMID: 30877308 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2011, Argentina experienced its highest pertussis incidence and mortality rates of the last decade; 60% of deaths were among infants aged <2 months. In response, a dose of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine was recommended for all pregnant women at ≥20 weeks of gestation. Although recent studies suggest that maternal Tdap vaccination is effective at preventing infant disease, no data have come from low- or middle-income countries, nor from ones using whole-cell pertussis vaccines for primary immunization. METHODS We conducted a matched case-control evaluation to assess the effectiveness of maternal Tdap vaccination in preventing pertussis among infants aged <2 months in Argentina. Pertussis case patients identified from September 2012 to March 2016 at 6 hospital sites and confirmed by polymerase chain reaction testing were included. Five randomly selected controls were matched to each case patient by hospital site and mother's health district. We used multivariable conditional logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs). Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was estimated as (1 - OR) × 100%. RESULTS Seventy-one case patients and 300 controls were included in the analysis. Forty-nine percent of case patients and 78% of controls had mothers who were vaccinated during pregnancy. Overall Tdap VE was estimated at 80.7% (95% confidence interval, 52.1%-92.2%). We found similar VE whether Tdap was administered during the second or third trimester. CONCLUSIONS Tdap vaccination during pregnancy is effective in preventing pertussis in infants aged <2 months in Argentina, with similar effectiveness whether administered during the second or third trimester of pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viviana Romanin
- Dirección de Control de Enfermedades Inmunoprevenibles, Ministerio de Salud de la Nación, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Anna M Acosta
- Meningitis and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Maria Del Valle Juarez
- Dirección de Control de Enfermedades Inmunoprevenibles, Ministerio de Salud de la Nación, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Elizabeth Briere
- Meningitis and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sandra Sagradini
- Dirección de Control de Enfermedades Inmunoprevenibles, Ministerio de Salud de la Nación, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Tami H Skoff
- Meningitis and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Carla Vizzotti
- Dirección de Control de Enfermedades Inmunoprevenibles, Ministerio de Salud de la Nación, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abu-Raya B, Maertens K. Protection of the Newborn Through Vaccination in Pregnancy. Neoreviews 2021; 22:e25-e39. [PMID: 33386312 DOI: 10.1542/neo.22-1-e25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Newborns and infants are at risk for severe infections with some pathogens (eg, Bordetella pertussis, influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, group B Streptococcus) during early life. To decrease this window of high susceptibility to some infections during early life and protect young infants, vaccination in pregnancy against some vaccine-preventable diseases (eg, influenza, pertussis, tetanus) has been recommended in an increasing number of countries with notable success. In addition, recent advances have been made in developing vaccines for pregnant women with the aim of reducing the respiratory syncytial virus and group B Streptococcus burden in infancy. In this article, we review the vaccines currently recommended during pregnancy and their benefits to newborns and infants. We also discuss progress made in the development of other vaccines that are expected to be evaluated in pregnant women in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahaa Abu-Raya
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Vaccine Evaluation Center, British Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Saeed Z, Greer O, Shah NM. Is the Host Viral Response and the Immunogenicity of Vaccines Altered in Pregnancy? Antibodies (Basel) 2020; 9:E38. [PMID: 32759839 PMCID: PMC7551810 DOI: 10.3390/antib9030038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The intricacy of the maternal immune system arises from its ability to prevent a maternal immune response against a semi-allogenic fetus, while protecting the mother against harmful pathogens. However, these immunological adaptations may also make pregnant women vulnerable to developing adverse complications from respiratory viral infections. While the influenza and SARS pandemics support this theory, there is less certainty regarding the clinical impact of SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy. In the current COVID-19 pandemic, vaccine development is key to public preventative strategies. Whilst most viral vaccines are able to induce a seroprotective antibody response, in some high-risk individuals this may not correlate with clinical protection. Some studies have shown that factors such as age, gender, and chronic illnesses can reduce their effectiveness and in this review, we discuss how pregnancy may affect the efficacy and immunogenicity of vaccines. We present literature to support the hypothesis that pregnant women are more susceptible to respiratory viral infections and may not respond to vaccines as effectively. In particular, we focus on the clinical implications of important respiratory viral infections such as influenza during pregnancy, and the pregnancy induced alterations in important leukocytes such as TFH, cTFH and B cells, which play an important role in generating long-lasting and high-affinity antibodies. Finally, we review how this may affect the efficacy of vaccines against influenza in pregnancy and highlight areas that require further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Nishel Mohan Shah
- Academic Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Imperial College London, Level 3, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK; (Z.S.); (O.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Saso A, Kampmann B. Maternal Immunization: Nature Meets Nurture. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:1499. [PMID: 32849319 PMCID: PMC7396522 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccinating women in pregnancy (i.e., maternal immunization) has emerged as a promising tool to tackle infant morbidity and mortality worldwide. This approach nurtures a 'gift of nature,' whereby antibody is transferred from mother to fetus transplacentally during pregnancy, or postnatally in breast milk, thereby providing passive, antigen-specific protection against infections in the first few months of life, a period of increased immune vulnerability for the infant. In this review, we briefly summarize the rationale for maternal immunization programs and the landscape of vaccines currently in use or in the pipeline. We then direct the focus to the underlying biological phenomena, including the main mechanisms by which maternally derived antibody is transferred efficiently to the infant, at the placental interface or in breast milk; important research models and methodological approaches to interrogate these processes, particularly in the context of recent advances in systems vaccinology; the potential biological and clinical impact of high maternal antibody titres on neonatal ontogeny and subsequent infant vaccine responses; and key vaccine- and host-related factors influencing the maternal-infant dyad across different environments. Finally, we outline important gaps in knowledge and suggest future avenues of research on this topic, proposing potential strategies to ensure optimal testing, delivery and implementation of maternal vaccination programs worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Saso
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Vaccines and Immunity Theme, MRC Unit The Gambia at LSHTM, Banjul, Gambia
| | - Beate Kampmann
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Vaccines and Immunity Theme, MRC Unit The Gambia at LSHTM, Banjul, Gambia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abu-Raya B, Maertens K, Edwards KM, Omer SB, Englund JA, Flanagan KL, Snape MD, Amirthalingam G, Leuridan E, Damme PV, Papaevangelou V, Launay O, Dagan R, Campins M, Cavaliere AF, Frusca T, Guidi S, O'Ryan M, Heininger U, Tan T, Alsuwaidi AR, Safadi MA, Vilca LM, Wanlapakorn N, Madhi SA, Giles ML, Prymula R, Ladhani S, Martinón-Torres F, Tan L, Michelin L, Scambia G, Principi N, Esposito S. Global Perspectives on Immunization During Pregnancy and Priorities for Future Research and Development: An International Consensus Statement. Front Immunol 2020; 11:1282. [PMID: 32670282 PMCID: PMC7326941 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunization during pregnancy has been recommended in an increasing number of countries. The aim of this strategy is to protect pregnant women and infants from severe infectious disease, morbidity and mortality and is currently limited to tetanus, inactivated influenza, and pertussis-containing vaccines. There have been recent advancements in the development of vaccines designed primarily for use in pregnant women (respiratory syncytial virus and group B Streptococcus vaccines). Although there is increasing evidence to support vaccination in pregnancy, important gaps in knowledge still exist and need to be addressed by future studies. This collaborative consensus paper provides a review of the current literature on immunization during pregnancy and highlights the gaps in knowledge and a consensus of priorities for future research initiatives, in order to optimize protection for both the mother and the infant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahaa Abu-Raya
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kathryn M. Edwards
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Saad B. Omer
- Department of Internal Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Janet A. Englund
- Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Katie L. Flanagan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, Australia
- School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Matthew D. Snape
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Gayatri Amirthalingam
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elke Leuridan
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Pierre Van Damme
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vana Papaevangelou
- Third Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital ATTIKON, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Odile Launay
- Université de Paris, Inserm, CIC 1417, F-CRIN I REIVAC, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Ron Dagan
- The Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Magda Campins
- Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Franca Cavaliere
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Tiziana Frusca
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Sofia Guidi
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Miguel O'Ryan
- Microbiology and Mycology Program, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences and Associate Researcher, Millennium Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Ulrich Heininger
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Basel Children's Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tina Tan
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Ahmed R. Alsuwaidi
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Marco. A. Safadi
- Department of Pediatrics, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luz M. Vilca
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Buzzi Hospital - ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Nasamon Wanlapakorn
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Shabir A. Madhi
- Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Michelle L. Giles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Roman Prymula
- School of Medicine Hradec Kralove, Institute of Social Medicine, Charles University Prague, Prague, Czechia
| | - Shamez Ladhani
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Federico Martinón-Torres
- Translational Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, University of Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Litjen Tan
- Immunization Action Coalition, St. Paul, MN, United States
| | - Lessandra Michelin
- Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology Division, Health Sciences Post Graduation Program, University of Caxias Do Sul, Caxias Do Sul, Brazil
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Susanna Esposito
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Pediatric Clinic, Pietro Barilla Children's Hospital, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Post AL, Li SH, Berry M, Itell H, Martinez DR, Xie G, Permar SR, Swamy GK, Fouda GG. Efficiency of placental transfer of vaccine-elicited antibodies relative to prenatal Tdap vaccination status. Vaccine 2020; 38:4869-4876. [PMID: 32482459 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Administration of vaccines during pregnancy provides maternal protection against infectious diseases. This protection is extended to their infants during the first months of life, as pathogen-specific antibodies formed in response to maternal vaccination are transferred across the placenta to the fetus. Notably, Tdap (tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis) vaccination booster is routinely administered to pregnant women both to prevent neonatal tetanus and to ensure that infants have protective levels of pertussis antibodies until they are able to establish their own vaccine-induced levels. Whether infant protection through maternal immunization is merely due to an increase in maternal antibody levels or whether maternal immunization enhances the transfer of vaccine-specific antibodies is unclear. Moreover, the potential impact of prenatal vaccinations on the transplacental transfer of other antibodies, such as antibodies raised as a result of infections or other vaccines administered prior to pregnancy, has not been studied. The goal of this study was to define the impact of maternal vaccination on IgG transplacental transfer efficiency. We analyzed antigen-specific antibody populations and IgG subclass distribution in maternal and cord blood samples from 58 mother-infant pairs. All women received the seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine during pregnancy and 25 women received the Tdap vaccine during the second or third trimester of gestation. Prenatal Tdap vaccination did not impact the efficiency of IgG transplacental transfer; however, it was associated with higher maternal and infant vaccine-elicited Tdap-specific antibody levels, and with a higher proportion of infants with protective levels of antibodies, especially against diphtheria. There was also no difference in the IgG transplacental transfer rate of antibodies against non-Tdap vaccines between the two groups of women. Our results confirm previous reports demonstrating the benefits of prenatal Tdap immunization and indicate that this strategy does not impede the transplacental transfer of other antibodies that are also important for infant protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annalisa L Post
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Shuk Hang Li
- Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Madison Berry
- Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Hannah Itell
- Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David R Martinez
- Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Guanhua Xie
- Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sallie R Permar
- Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Geeta K Swamy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Genevieve G Fouda
- Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Albrecht M, Arck PC. Vertically Transferred Immunity in Neonates: Mothers, Mechanisms and Mediators. Front Immunol 2020; 11:555. [PMID: 32296443 PMCID: PMC7136470 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the last years, an increasing number of outbreaks of vaccine-preventable infectious diseases has been reported. Besides elderly and immunocompromised individuals, newborns and small infants are most susceptible to infections, as their immune system is still immature. This vulnerability during infancy can be mitigated by the transplacental transfer of pathogen-specific antibodies and other mediators of immunity from mother to the fetus during pregnancy, followed postnatally by breast milk-derived immunity. Since this largely antibody-mediated passive immunity can prevent the newborn from infections, neonatal immunity depends strongly on the maternal concentration of respective specific antibodies during pregnancy. If titers are low or wane rapidly after birth, the protection transferred to the child may not be sufficient to prevent disease. Moreover, emerging concepts propose that mothers may transfer active immunity to the newborns via vertical transfer of pathogen-specific T cells. Overall, a promising strategy to augment and prolong neonatal immunity is to vaccinate the mother before or during pregnancy in order to boost maternal antibody concentrations or availability of specific T cells. Hence, a large number of pre-and postconceptional vaccine trials have been carried out to test and confirm this concept. We here highlight novel insights arising from recent research endeavors on the influence of prenatal maternal vaccination against pathogens that can pose a threat for newborns, such as measles, pertussis, rubella and influenza A. We delineate pathways involved in the transfer of specific maternal antibodies. We also discuss the consequences for children's health and long-term immunity resulting from an adjustment of prenatal vaccination regimes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Albrecht
- Laboratory for Experimental Feto-Maternal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Petra Clara Arck
- Laboratory for Experimental Feto-Maternal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
McHugh L, Marshall HS, Perrett KP, Nolan T, Wood N, Lambert SB, Richmond P, Ware RS, Binks P, Binks MJ, Andrews RM. The Safety of Influenza and Pertussis Vaccination in Pregnancy in a Cohort of Australian Mother-Infant Pairs, 2012-2015: The FluMum Study. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 68:402-408. [PMID: 30475988 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) and pertussis vaccination are recommended in pregnancy. Limited safety data exist for women who received IIV vaccine during the first trimester of pregnancy or received both vaccines in pregnancy. We assessed adverse birth outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated pregnancies. Methods Among prospectively enrolled Australian "FluMum" participants (2012-2015), primary exposure was receipt and timing of IIV during pregnancy. Primary outcomes included preterm birth, low birthweight at term (LBWT), and small for gestational age (SGA). We compared birth outcomes for IIV in pregnancy with women unvaccinated in pregnancy using Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Adjusted HRs (aHRs) controlled for potential confounding variables. Sensitivity analyses were conducted in a subgroup of women who received pertussis vaccination during pregnancy to assess whether associations between IIV and adverse outcomes were maintained after adjusting for pertussis vaccination. Results Among 8827 participants in our study, women who received IIV in pregnancy did not have an elevated risk of an adverse birth outcome compared with unvaccinated pregnant women: preterm births (HR, 1.10 [95% CI, .92-1.31]; P = .28); LBWT (HR, 1.05 [95% CI, .76-1.44]; P = .77); or SGA (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, .86-1.15]; P = .94). Adjustment for pertussis vaccination during pregnancy yielded similar results: preterm births (aHR, 1.05 [95% CI, .82-1.34]; P = .69); LBWT (aHR, 0.81 [95% CI, .50-1.29]; P = .37); SGA (aHR, 0.92 [95% CI, .74-1.14]; P = .43). There was no evidence of elevated risk by trimester of IIV. Conclusions No significant associations were found between maternal IIV or pertussis vaccination in pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes, regardless of the trimester of pregnancy a vaccination was given compared to unvaccinated pregnancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa McHugh
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Tiwi, Northern Territory
| | - Helen S Marshall
- Women's and Children's Health Network, Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Kirsten P Perrett
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital and School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria
| | - Terry Nolan
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital and School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria
| | - Nicholas Wood
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales
| | - Stephen B Lambert
- Child Health Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane
| | - Peter Richmond
- University of Western Australia, Division of Paediatrics and Vaccine Trials Group, Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Western Australia
| | - Robert S Ware
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane
| | - Paula Binks
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Tiwi, Northern Territory
| | - Michael J Binks
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Tiwi, Northern Territory
| | - Ross M Andrews
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Tiwi, Northern Territory.,National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Brillo E, Tosto V, Giardina I, Buonomo E. Maternal tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) and influenza immunization: an overview. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019; 34:3415-3444. [PMID: 31645152 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1680633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternal tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) and influenza immunization for women during pregnancy (the so-called "maternal immunization") has been introduced in several countries, and recently also in Italy, to protect mother and fetus during pregnancy, infant in his first months of life and mother during postpartum period. However, very low vaccination coverage rates have been reached due to several variables. METHODS A literature search was conducted on PubMed and Embase, including any experimental or observational studies, to assesses existing evidence on the effectiveness, efficacy, safety and optimal timing of administration of Tdap and influenza immunization in pregnancy for mothers and their infants. The search was finalized in August 2019. RESULTS Reviewing the literature, we identified only a few studies that, among several maternal and infant outcomes, found sporadic significant associations with maternal influenza immunization and even less with Tdap immunization. Moreover, most of the authors of these studies explained these findings as a result of residual confounding effect. The effectiveness of maternal influenza immunization is more complicated to prove than the effectiveness of Tdap immunization because of several reasons. Not all nations recommend and offer vaccines in the same weeks of pregnancy and this one manifests the complexity in defining the best timing for Tdap or influenza immunization. CONCLUSIONS The safety of maternal Tdap or influenza immunization is supported by the evidence so far, however, regular surveillance should be maintained, especially with regard to the influenza vaccine that changes in formulation each year. There is a need to optimize the timing of vaccination in pregnancy and to have a national system of detection of maternal immunization in each country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Brillo
- Center for Research in Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.,Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Tosto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Irene Giardina
- Center for Research in Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Ersilia Buonomo
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abu-Raya B, Giles ML, Kollmann TR, Sadarangani M. The Effect of Timing of Tetanus-Diphtheria-Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Administration in Pregnancy on the Avidity of Pertussis Antibodies. Front Immunol 2019; 10:2423. [PMID: 31681310 PMCID: PMC6798090 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Optimal timing of gestational tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination is not well-defined. No well-established specific anti-pertussis antibody level correlates with protection, suggesting the importance of antibody quality such as avidity. We aimed to determine the effect of timing of vaccination with Tdap in pregnancy on the avidity of cord anti-pertussis toxin (PT) immunoglobulin G (IgG). Methods: Prospective study of newborns in a tertiary hospital (Melbourne, Australia) born to women vaccinated with Tdap in pregnancy. Ammonium thiocyanate was used as a bond-breaking agent to measure the avidity of anti-PT IgG using concentrations between 0.25 M (to measure low avidity antibodies) and 3 M (to measure very high avidity antibodies). Anti-PT IgG levels achieved at each ammonium thiocyanate concentration in cord samples of women vaccinated during 28–32 weeks gestation (WG) vs. 33–36 WG, and women vaccinated 5–12 vs. 1–4 weeks prior to delivery were compared using t-tests. Results: Newborns of women vaccinated with Tdap during 28–32 WG (n = 43) had statistically significant higher concentrations of medium and high avidity anti-PT IgG compared with newborns of women vaccinated during 33–36 WG (n = 47), 11.6 IU/ml (95% CI, 8.8–15.2) IU/ml vs. 6.7 IU/ml (95% CI, 5.2–8.6) and 10.1 IU/ml (95% CI, 7.4–13.8) vs. 5.7 (95% CI, 3.6–8.9) IU/ml (p = 0.007 and p = 0.035), respectively. Newborns of women vaccinated 5–12 weeks before delivery (n = 64) had statistically significant higher concentrations of high and very high avidity anti-PT IgG compared with newborns of women vaccinated within 4 weeks before delivery (n = 25), 10.3 IU/mL (95% CI, 7.9–13.4) vs. 3.3 IU/mL (95% CI, 1.7–6.4), 12.6 IU/mL (95% CI, 9.4–16.9) vs. 4.3 IU/mL (95% CI, 2.2–8.5) (all p < 0.03), respectively. Conclusions: Quantification of levels of anti-PT IgG with different avidities demonstrated that pertussis vaccination 5–12 weeks before delivery was associated with higher anti-PT IgG avidity compared with vaccination within 4 weeks before delivery. Pertussis vaccination during 28–32 WG was associated with higher anti-PT IgG avidity compared with vaccination during 33–36 WG, supporting vaccination at 28–32 over 33–36 WG for optimal protection against pertussis in infancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahaa Abu-Raya
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Michelle L Giles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Tobias R Kollmann
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Manish Sadarangani
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
McHugh L, Crooks K, Creighton A, Binks M, Andrews RM. Safety, equity and monitoring: a review of the gaps in maternal vaccination strategies for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2019; 16:371-376. [PMID: 31368832 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1649552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Influenza and pertussis infections are disproportionately higher among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and their infants compared to other Australians. These infections are potentially preventable through vaccination in pregnancy; however, there is a lack of systematic monitoring and therefore knowledge of vaccine uptake, safety and effectiveness in Australia, and specifically among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. The limited data available suggest there is a lower uptake of maternal vaccination among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women compared to non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women, and this review seeks to explore potential reasons and the knowledge gaps in this regard. Other key gaps include the equitable access to quality antenatal care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women; and pregnancy loss <20 weeks gestation. Furthermore, our review highlights the importance of addressing these gaps in maternal vaccination strategies in partnership with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa McHugh
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Tiwi, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Kristy Crooks
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Tiwi, Northern Territory, Australia.,Hunter New England Local Health District, Population Health, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amy Creighton
- Hunter New England Local Health District, Population Health, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Binks
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Tiwi, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Ross M Andrews
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Tiwi, Northern Territory, Australia.,Department of Population Health, National Centre for Epidemiology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Fernandes EG, Sato APS, Vaz-de-Lima LR, Rodrigues M, Leite D, de Brito CA, Luna EJ, Carvalhanas TRM, Ramos MLBN, Sato HK, de Castilho EA. The effectiveness of maternal pertussis vaccination in protecting newborn infants in Brazil: A case-control study. Vaccine 2019; 37:5481-5484. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.03.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Revised: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/21/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
32
|
Vaz-de-Lima LRA, Sato HK, Fernandes EG, Sato APS, Pawloski LC, Tondella ML, de Brito CA, Luna EJA, Carvalhanas TRMP, de Castilho EA. Association between the timing of maternal vaccination and newborns' anti-pertussis toxin antibody levels. Vaccine 2019; 37:5474-5480. [PMID: 31153689 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.04.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2018] [Revised: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pertussis remains an important global public health concern, despite the presence of extensive immunization programs. Incidence and severity of pertussis are typically higher in neonates and young infants. As a strategy to protect these young infants, maternal vaccination with Tdap (tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis) has been recommended in Brazil. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of Tdap vaccination during pregnancy on the anti-pertussis toxin (PT) IgG response in mothers and their infants at birth. MATERIAL AND METHODS Maternal and cord blood samples were collected from vaccinated (n = 243) and unvaccinated (n = 75) pregnant women, at the time of delivery, from July 2015 to August 2016 in São Paulo, Brazil. Anti-PT IgG antibodies were quantified by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and geometric mean concentrations (GMC) were calculated. Relationship between timing of vaccination and antibody concentrations were evaluated. RESULTS Maternal and cord blood GMCs among the vaccinated group were 5.4 and 5.6 fold higher [66.5 International Units (IU)/mL and 89.8 IU/mL] compared to the unvaccinated group (12.4 IU/mL and 16.1 IU/mL), respectively (p < 0.001). Higher anti-PT IgG GMCs were observed when vaccination occurred ≥60 days before delivery compared to <60 days, suggesting that vaccination early in the third trimester may be more effective than later in pregnancy. CONCLUSION Tdap maternal vaccination results in significantly higher anti-PT IgG in newborn infants and supports the current recommendation of the Brazilian Immunization Program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helena Keico Sato
- Divisão de Imunização, Centro de Vigilância Epidemiológica Prof. Alexandre Vranjac, Coordenadoria de Controle de Doenças da Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Eder Gatti Fernandes
- Divisão de Imunização, Centro de Vigilância Epidemiológica Prof. Alexandre Vranjac, Coordenadoria de Controle de Doenças da Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ana Paula Sayuri Sato
- Departamento de Epidemiologia, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Lucia C Pawloski
- Pertussis and Diphtheria Laboratory, Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States
| | - Maria Lucia Tondella
- Pertussis and Diphtheria Laboratory, Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States
| | | | | | - Telma Regina M P Carvalhanas
- Divisão de Doenças de Transmissão Respiratória, Centro de Vigilância Epidemiológica Prof. Alexandre Vranjac, Coordenadoria de Controle de Doenças da Secretaria de Estado da Saúde SP, Brazil
| | - Euclides A de Castilho
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Elertson KM, Schmitt CA. Ask them all: Self-report universal prenatal substance use screening in the United States. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/14659891.2019.1614233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
34
|
Acquisition of specific antibodies and their influence on cell-mediated immune response in neonatal cord blood after maternal pertussis vaccination during pregnancy. Vaccine 2019; 37:2569-2579. [PMID: 30955978 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.03.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Maternal immunization with pertussis acellular vaccine (Tdap) is an intervention that provides protection to newborns. However, it has been reported that high maternal antibody levels may adversely affect the immune response of infants after active immunization. In this study, we evaluated neonatal passive acquisition of pertussis-specific antibodies and their influence on the neonatal cell-mediated immune response. Pregnant women were either vaccinated with Tdap vaccine (case group, n = 66) or received no vaccine (control group, n = 101). Whole-cell Bordetella pertussis (Bp), pertussis toxin (PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) and pertactin (PRN)-specific serum IgG were quantified in paired maternal-cord sera, and Bp- and PT-specific IgA were evaluated in colostrum by ELISA. Ex vivo neonatal blood lymphocyte responsiveness after Bp stimulation was assessed in case (n = 17) and control (n = 15) groups using flow cytometry to detect proliferation, cytokine production and activation phenotype of lymphocytes in the context of high specific IgG acquired after maternal vaccination. Anti-Bp, PT, FHA and PRN IgG concentrations in maternal and cord sera from case group were higher than those in control group with positive correlation indexes in both groups for all pertussis antigens. The control group presented higher placental transfer ratios of specific antibodies and, in the case group, vaccination between 26 and 31 gestation weeks was associated with the best placental transfer ratios. Specific IgA concentrations in colostrum were not affected by vaccine status. Whole blood assays revealed that newborns responded to Bp stimulation with higher expression of CD40L, CD69 and CD4+ T cell proliferation compared to unstimulated cells, and a lower Th1 response, while a preserved Th2 response compared to adults, but there were no differences between the neonatal groups for any of the studied parameters. Our results indicate that higher pertussis-specific IgG levels in newborn sera after maternal vaccination do not affect the neonatal ex vivo cell-mediated immune response.
Collapse
|
35
|
Zhou F, Xu J, Black CL, Ding H, Cho BH, Lu PJ, Lindley MC. Trends in Tdap vaccination among privately insured pregnant women in the United States, 2009-2016. Vaccine 2019; 37:1972-1977. [PMID: 30826146 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2018] [Revised: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infants younger than 6 months are at increased risk of complications and mortality from pertussis infection. In October 2012, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices revised its recommendation to include a Tdap dose during each pregnancy, ideally between 27 and 36 weeks gestation. OBJECTIVE Assess trends in Tdap vaccination coverage among privately insured pregnant women from 2009 to 2016 including timing of Tdap vaccination (before, during, or after pregnancy), trimester of vaccination for women vaccinated during pregnancy, and missed vaccination opportunities for unvaccinated women. Identify factors associated with vaccination during the optimal period of 27-36 weeks gestation. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis of privately insured women 15-49 years who delivered live births during 2009-2016 conducted using 2009-2016 MarketScan data. Tdap vaccination coverage and the timing of Tdap vaccine administration were assessed for women continuously enrolled from 6 months before pregnancy to 1 month after delivery. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors independently associated with receipt of Tdap vaccine at 27-36 weeks gestation. RESULTS Tdap vaccination coverage during pregnancy increased from 0.4% in 2009 to 6.2% in 2012 and to 53.2% in 2016. The proportion of vaccinated women receiving Tdap at 27-36 weeks gestation increased from <10% in 2009 to nearly 90% in 2016, with most vaccination occurring at 27-32 weeks gestation. Women of older age, residing in a metropolitan statistical area, residing outside the South, and having a capitated health insurance plan were more likely to receive Tdap at 27-36 weeks gestation than their counterparts. Among women not vaccinated during pregnancy, 77.7% had a pregnancy-related medical claim between 27 and 36 weeks gestation. CONCLUSION Tdap vaccination coverage during pregnancy increased significantly from 2009 to 2016, with the greatest increase occurring after the revised Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendation. Most women who did not receive Tdap vaccine had a missed vaccination opportunity during pregnancy, indicating potential for much higher vaccination coverage and consequent infant protection against pertussis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangjun Zhou
- Immunization Service Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329, United States.
| | - Jing Xu
- Immunization Service Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329, United States
| | - Carla L Black
- Immunization Service Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329, United States
| | - Helen Ding
- Immunization Service Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329, United States; CFD Research Corporation, Huntsville, AL 35806, United States
| | - Bo-Hyun Cho
- Immunization Service Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329, United States
| | - Peng-Jun Lu
- Immunization Service Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329, United States
| | - Megan C Lindley
- Immunization Service Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329, United States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abu Raya B, Giles M. Timing of Prenatal Tdap Immunization and Protection Against Pertussis. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 64:821-822. [PMID: 28362952 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bahaa Abu Raya
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Michelle Giles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
The Fourth International Neonatal and Maternal Immunization Symposium (INMIS 2017): Toward Integrating Maternal and Infant Immunization Programs. mSphere 2018; 3:3/6/e00221-18. [PMID: 30404933 PMCID: PMC6222055 DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00221-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
This report provides an overview of the proceedings of the 4th International Maternal and Neonatal Immunization Symposium, where presentations focused on the state-of-the-art research on the development and implementation of vaccines given during pregnancy for the protection of mothers and infants. Prevention of serious infections in pregnant mothers, newborns, and young infants through immunization during pregnancy and in early life has the potential to further reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. In the past decade, research in this field has advanced substantially, from the understanding of the biology and immunology of pregnancy and early life, to the active development of several candidate vaccines, for which challenges and opportunities for global implementation are under consideration. Experts from academia, industry, regulatory and funding agencies, public health, and international organizations met in Brussels (Belgium) from 10 to 12 September 2017, at the 4th International Neonatal and Maternal Immunization Symposium (INMIS), to review the most relevant advances in maternal and neonatal immunization. The overarching focus of the conference was to identify the path forward to achieve integration of maternal and early life immunization strategies for the successful implementation of vaccines in antenatal care and pediatric programs for reduction of maternal and infant mortality worldwide. IMPORTANCE This report provides an overview of the proceedings of the 4th International Maternal and Neonatal Immunization Symposium, where presentations focused on the state-of-the-art research on the development and implementation of vaccines given during pregnancy for the protection of mothers and infants.
Collapse
|
38
|
Giles ML, Krishnaswamy S, Wallace EM. Maternal immunisation: What have been the gains? Where are the gaps? What does the future hold? F1000Res 2018; 7:F1000 Faculty Rev-1733. [PMID: 30443339 PMCID: PMC6213781 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.15475.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The vaccination of pregnant women has enormous potential to protect not only mothers from vaccine-preventable diseases but also their infants through the passive acquisition of protective antibodies before they are able to themselves acquire protection through active childhood immunisations. Maternal tetanus programmes have been in place since 1989, and as of March 2018, only 14 countries in the world were still to reach maternal neonatal tetanus elimination status. This has saved hundreds of thousands of lives. Building on this success, influenza- and pertussis-containing vaccines have been recommended for pregnant women and introduced into immunisation programmes, albeit predominantly in resource-rich settings. These have highlighted some important challenges when additional immunisations are introduced into the antenatal context. With new vaccine candidates, such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and group B streptococcus (GBS), on the horizon, it is important that we learn from these experiences, identify the information gaps, and close these to ensure safe and successful implementation of maternal vaccines in the future, particularly in low- and middle-income countries with a high burden of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle L. Giles
- Ritchie Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sushena Krishnaswamy
- Ritchie Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Monash Infectious Diseases, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Euan M. Wallace
- Ritchie Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Safer Care Victoria, Victorian Government, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Third-Trimester Maternal Vaccination Against Pertussis and Pertussis Antibody Concentrations. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131:364-369. [PMID: 29324612 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000002438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare pertussis antibody concentrations in maternal venous serum (at the time of delivery) and umbilical cord arterial serum among women vaccinated with the tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine from either 27-30 6/7 weeks of gestation or from 31-35 6/7 weeks of gestation. METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study of pregnant women divided into two groups based on when Tdap was administered: 27-30 6/7 weeks of gestation and 31-35 6/7 weeks of gestation. Paired maternal and umbilical cord samples were obtained at the time of delivery to determine immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentrations to pertussis toxin and pertactin. RESULTS Eighty-eight pregnant women were enrolled. Cord serum pertussis toxin IgG concentrations were approximately twice maternal serum pertussis toxin IgG concentrations (91.6 vs 48.6 enzyme-linked immunoassay [ELISA] units/mL, P<.01) and were significantly correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.85, P<.01). There was no significant difference in maternal serum pertussis toxin IgG concentrations (48.6 vs 48.6 ELISA units/mL, P=.99), cord serum pertussis toxin IgG concentrations (92.1 vs 90.7 ELISA units/mL, P=.95), and cord serum pertactin IgG concentrations (798 vs 730 international units/mL, P=.73) between the two groups. Furthermore, there was no correlation between time from vaccination to delivery and these three parameters. Cord serum pertussis toxin IgG concentrations were greater than 10 ELISA units/mL (ie, in the protective range) in 87% and 97% of those vaccinated from 27-30 6/7 weeks of gestation and from 31-35 6/7 weeks of gestation, respectively (P=.13). CONCLUSION Maternal vaccination against pertussis between 27 and 36 weeks of gestation was associated with a high percentage of newborns with antibody concentrations conferring protection and did not vary by gestational age at vaccination.
Collapse
|
40
|
Campbell H, Gupta S, Dolan GP, Kapadia SJ, Kumar Singh A, Andrews N, Amirthalingam G. Review of vaccination in pregnancy to prevent pertussis in early infancy. J Med Microbiol 2018; 67:1426-1456. [PMID: 30222536 DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.000829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Maternal pertussis vaccination has been introduced in several countries to protect infants from birth until routine infant vaccination takes place. This review assesses existing evidence on the effectiveness and safety of immunization in pregnancy. The search was finalized in April 2017 and was based on searches using several databases. The selection criteria included any experimental or observational study reporting on the immunogenicity, effectiveness or safety of vaccination with a pertussis-containing vaccine in pregnant women and their infants. Following de-duplication and exclusions, we identified 8395 studies, which were reduced to 46 for inclusion. The overall risk of bias was low, with the exception of some early studies and pharmacovigilance safety data. The evidence demonstrates efficient transplacental transfer of maternal antibodies in infants whose mothers were vaccinated with Tdap or Tdap/IPV in pregnancy, with good evidence that this protects against disease in young infants. Safety studies covering more than 150 000 women vaccinated mostly in the late second or third trimesters are generally consistent and provide reassurance of no significant increased risk of recognized maternal conditions or of adverse events (including congenital anomalies) in infants born to vaccinated women. The clinical significance of reduced seroconversion to pertussis following routine immunization is not yet clear, but no increased risk of pertussis in infants whose mothers were vaccinated in pregnancy was found following primary immunizations in North American and English studies. Most post-booster studies suggest that any blunting effect is short-lived and that longer-term protection in infants from active immunization is not compromised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Campbell
- 1Department of Immunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Saurabh Gupta
- 2Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ambition Health Private Limited, Gurgaon, India
- 3National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization Secretariat, National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, India
| | - Gayle P Dolan
- 4North East PHE Centre, Public Health England, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Smita J Kapadia
- 5Health Protection Team, Public Health England, East of England, Harlow, UK
| | - Awnish Kumar Singh
- 3National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization Secretariat, National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, India
| | - Nick Andrews
- 6Department of Statistics Modelling and Economics, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Gayatri Amirthalingam
- 1Department of Immunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety, Public Health England, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Loubet
- IAME, UMR 1137, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
- Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Olivia Anselem
- AP-HP, Maternité Port-Royal, Département de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Cochin Broca Hôtel-Dieu, Paris, France
- DHU Risk in pregnancy, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Odile Launay
- Inserm, F-CRIN, Innovative clinical research network in vaccinology (I-REIVAC), Paris, France
- Inserm, CIC 1417, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Département de maladies infectieuses, CIC Cochin Pasteur, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Liang JL, Tiwari T, Moro P, Messonnier NE, Reingold A, Sawyer M, Clark TA. Prevention of Pertussis, Tetanus, and Diphtheria with Vaccines in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2018; 67:1-44. [PMID: 29702631 PMCID: PMC5919600 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6702a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 213] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
This report compiles and summarizes all recommendations from CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) regarding prevention and control of tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis in the United States. As a comprehensive summary of previously published recommendations, this report does not contain any new recommendations and replaces all previously published reports and policy notes; it is intended for use by clinicians and public health providers as a resource. ACIP recommends routine vaccination for tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis. Infants and young children are recommended to receive a 5-dose series of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccines, with one adolescent booster dose of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine. Adults who have never received Tdap also are recommended to receive a booster dose of Tdap. Women are recommended to receive a dose of Tdap during each pregnancy, which should be administered from 27 through 36 weeks’ gestation, regardless of previous receipt of Tdap. After receipt of Tdap, adolescents and adults are recommended to receive a booster tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (Td) vaccine every 10 years to assure ongoing protection against tetanus and diphtheria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Liang
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC
| | - Tejpratap Tiwari
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC
| | - Pedro Moro
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC
| | - Nancy E Messonnier
- Office of the Director, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC
| | | | - Mark Sawyer
- University of California, San Diego; La Jolla, California
| | - Thomas A Clark
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
No 357 – Immunisation pendant la grossesse. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2018; 40:490-502. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
44
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the evidence and provide recommendations on immunization in pregnancy. OUTCOMES Outcomes evaluated include effectiveness of immunization and risks and benefits for mother and fetus. EVIDENCE The Medline and Cochrane databases were searched for articles published up to January 2017 on the topic of immunization in pregnancy. VALUES The evidence obtained was reviewed and evaluated by the Infectious Diseases Committee of the SOGC under the leadership of the principal authors, and recommendations were made according to guidelines developed by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1). BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS Implementation of the recommendations in this guideline should result in more appropriate immunization of pregnant and breastfeeding women, decreased risk of contraindicated immunization, and better disease prevention. RECOMMENDATIONS
Collapse
|
45
|
Fallo AA, Neyro SE, Manonelles GV, Lara C, Hozbor D, Zintgraff J, Mazzeo S, Davison HE, González S, Zapulla E, Canle O, Huespe M, Galas M, López EL. Prevalence of Pertussis Antibodies in Maternal Blood, Cord Serum, and Infants From Mothers With and Those Without Tdap Booster Vaccination During Pregnancy in Argentina. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2018; 7:11-17. [PMID: 28040688 DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piw069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2016] [Accepted: 10/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Morbidity and mortality rates for pertussis in infants are high because disease often occurs before the onset of routine immunization or in those who do not complete a primary immunization series. Pertussis immunization is recommended during pregnancy to achieve antibody levels sufficient to protect young infants. To our knowledge, no previous reports of maternal pertussis immunization results in Latin America exist in the literature. METHODS This study compared pertussis antibody levels in newborns from mothers who received or did not receive a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccination (TdapV) during pregnancy. Each mother's level of immunoglobulin G antibodies against pertussis toxin (IgG-PT) was measured with a validated, specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS Paired mother and cord serum samples were compared in 105 mothers with and 99 mothers without a TdapV. At birth, the mothers with and those without a TdapV had serum IgG-PT geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of 35.1 and 9.8 ELISA units (EU)/mL, respectively (P < .0001); cord blood GMCs were 51.3 and 11.6 EU/mL, respectively (P < .0003); and cord blood IgG-PT levels were <5 EU/mL in 2.9% and 16.1% of the cord blood samples, respectively (P < .001). The mothers received their TdapV at a mean (± standard deviation [SD]) of 24.7 ± 4.8 weeks' gestation. Vaccination timing did not affect the IgG-PT GMC at birth. Placental antibody transference efficiencies (measured as the ratio of the cord blood GMC to the maternal GMC) were 1.46 and 1.18 for mothers with and those without a TdapV, respectively. The IgG-PT GMCs were 17.7 EU/mL in 36 infants in their first month of life and 11.6 EU/mL in 32 infants in their second month of life. CONCLUSIONS Women who received a TdapV during pregnancy had significantly a higher serum/cord IgG-PT concentration at birth than mothers who did not receive a TdapV. Timing of the immunization was not correlated with antibody concentrations. Infants born to immunized mothers had significantly higher antibody levels during their first 2 months of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurelia A Fallo
- Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Hospital de Niños "Ricardo Gutiérrez," University of Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Silvina E Neyro
- Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Hospital de Niños "Ricardo Gutiérrez," University of Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Gabriela V Manonelles
- Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Hospital de Niños "Ricardo Gutiérrez," University of Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Claudia Lara
- National Reference Center, Anlis Instituto Nacional de Microbiología Dr. C. Malbran, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Daniela Hozbor
- Laboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular (IBBM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, CCT-CONICET, Argentina
| | - Jonathan Zintgraff
- National Reference Center, Anlis Instituto Nacional de Microbiología Dr. C. Malbran, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Silvina Mazzeo
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital D. F. Santojanni, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Héctor E Davison
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital D. F. Santojanni, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Susana González
- Pediatrics, Hospital D. F. Santojanni, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Estella Zapulla
- Pediatrics, Hospital D. F. Santojanni, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Oscar Canle
- Blood Center, Hospital de Niños "Ricardo Gutiérrez," Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Miguel Huespe
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital D. F. Santojanni, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Marcelo Galas
- National Reference Center, Anlis Instituto Nacional de Microbiología Dr. C. Malbran, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Eduardo L López
- Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Hospital de Niños "Ricardo Gutiérrez," University of Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Vaccination in pregnancy boosts maternal vaccine-specific antibody concentration and therefore increases transplacental transfer of antibody to optimize protection of the infant. The purpose of this review is to describe what is known about placental transfer of antibody in the context of vaccination in pregnancy, focussing on the recent literature and areas of debate, particularly about the timing of vaccination. RECENT FINDINGS There is a debate about the timing of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy with some studies reporting that vaccination in the third trimester results in higher pertussis antigen-specific IgG concentrations in cord blood and others finding that the concentration is higher following vaccination in the second trimester. The impact of timing of vaccination on antibody avidity in cord blood has also been investigated and one study suggests that avidity may be increased following vaccination at 27-30 gestational weeks compared with later vaccination. SUMMARY Understanding placental transfer of antibody is vital in informing maternal vaccination strategy. There has been recent research about the timing of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy that has implications for the timing of both current and future vaccines to be used in pregnancy.
Collapse
|
47
|
Pertussis epidemiology prior to the introduction of a maternal vaccination program, Queensland Australia. Epidemiol Infect 2017; 146:207-217. [DOI: 10.1017/s0950268817002722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
SUMMARYPertussis morbidity is highest in infants too young to be fully protected by routine vaccination schedules. Alternate vaccine strategies are required to maximise protection in this age-group. To understand baseline pertussis epidemiology prior to the introduction of the maternal pertussis vaccination program in 2014, we conducted a retrospective case series analyses of 53 901 notifications and temporal trends from 1997 to 2014. Notifications were highest in infants younger than 4 months of age and highest annual notification rates in infants younger than 1 month of age (308/100 000 per year). Amongst Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander infants aged younger than 1 month, this rate was 576/100 000 per year. Notification rates were 40% higher amongst women 15–44 years, 62·4/100 000 population compared with men (44·5/100 000) and 90% higher in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women of the same age (38·2/100 000) compared with men (19·7/100 000). Six infant deaths were identified, all younger than 2 months of age. Monitoring epidemiology in at-risk groups – infants too young to be vaccinated, women of childbearing age and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples – following implementation of the maternal pertussis vaccination program will be important to assess its impact and safety.
Collapse
|
48
|
Skoff TH, Blain AE, Watt J, Scherzinger K, McMahon M, Zansky SM, Kudish K, Cieslak PR, Lewis M, Shang N, Martin SW. Impact of the US Maternal Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccination Program on Preventing Pertussis in Infants <2 Months of Age: A Case-Control Evaluation. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 65:1977-1983. [PMID: 29028938 PMCID: PMC5754921 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Accepted: 08/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infants aged <1 year are at highest risk for pertussis-related morbidity and mortality. In 2012, Tdap (tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis) vaccine was recommended for women during each pregnancy to protect infants in the first months of life; data on effectiveness of this strategy are currently limited. METHODS We conducted a case-control evaluation among pertussis cases <2 months old with cough onset between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2014 from 6 US Emerging Infection Program Network states. Controls were hospital-matched and selected by birth certificate. Mothers were interviewed to collect information on demographics, household characteristics, and healthcare providers. Provider-verified immunization history was obtained on mothers and infants. Mothers were considered vaccinated during pregnancy if Tdap was received ≥14 days before delivery; trimester was calculated using Tdap date, infant's date of birth, and gestational age. Odds ratios were calculated using multivariable conditional logistic regression; vaccine effectiveness (VE) was estimated as (1 - odds ratio) × 100%. RESULTS A total of 240 cases and 535 controls were included; 17 (7.1%) case mothers and 90 (16.8%) control mothers received Tdap during the third trimester of pregnancy. The multivariable VE estimate for Tdap administered during the third trimester of pregnancy was 77.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48.3%-90.4%); VE increased to 90.5% (95% CI, 65.2%-97.4%) against hospitalized cases. CONCLUSIONS Vaccination during pregnancy is an effective way to protect infants during the early months of life. With a continuing resurgence in pertussis, efforts should focus on maximizing Tdap uptake among pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tami H. Skoff
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Amy E. Blain
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - James Watt
- California Emerging Infections Program, Oakland, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Kathy Kudish
- Connecticut Department of Public Health, Hartford, CT, USA
| | | | - Melissa Lewis
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Nong Shang
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Committee Opinion No. 718: Update on Immunization and Pregnancy: Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Pertussis Vaccination. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130:e153-e157. [PMID: 28832489 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000002301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The overwhelming majority of morbidity and mortality attributable to pertussis infection occurs in infants who are 3 months and younger. Infants do not begin their own vaccine series against pertussis until approximately 2 months of age. This leaves a window of significant vulnerability for newborns, many of whom contract serious pertussis infections from family members and caregivers, especially their mothers, or older siblings, or both. In 2013, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices published its updated recommendation that a dose of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) should be administered during each pregnancy, irrespective of the prior history of receiving Tdap. The recommended timing for maternal Tdap vaccination is between 27 weeks and 36 weeks of gestation. To maximize the maternal antibody response and passive antibody transfer and levels in the newborn, vaccination as early as possible in the 27-36-weeks-ofgestation window is recommended. However, the Tdap vaccine may be safely given at any time during pregnancy if needed for wound management, pertussis outbreaks, or other extenuating circumstances. There is no evidence of adverse fetal effects from vaccinating pregnant women with an inactivated virus or bacterial vaccine or toxoid, and a growing body of robust data demonstrate safety of such use. Adolescent and adult family members and caregivers who previously have not received the Tdap vaccine and who have or anticipate having close contact with an infant younger than 12 months should receive a single dose of Tdap to protect against pertussis. Given the rapid evolution of data surrounding this topic, immunization guidelines are likely to change over time, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists will continue to issue updates accordingly.
Collapse
|
50
|
Krishnaswamy S, Wallace EM, Cheng AC, Buttery J, Giles ML. Protecting newborns from pertussis: The role of partner vaccination in the era of maternal immunization. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017; 216:159-163. [PMID: 28772257 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2017] [Revised: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 07/24/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S) While antenatal vaccination is the most effective strategy to reduce newborn pertussis infection and its associated morbidity and mortality, uptake has consistently been reported to be suboptimal. "Cocooning" or vaccination of the close contacts of newborns therefore remains an important strategy for protecting newborns when maternal vaccination has not occurred or with insufficient time for antibody transfer. This study assesses the uptake of pertussis vaccination by parents and close contacts of newborns providing insight into the vulnerability of newborns to pertussis upon discharge from hospital to their primary carers. STUDY DESIGN The study was conducted at three public and two private hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. A survey was administered to 689 women and/or their partners admitted on maternity wards of participating hospitals after delivery of a healthy newborn between August and December 2016. The main outcomes measured were reported vaccination rates and factors associated with uptake of pertussis vaccination. Kappa statistic and logistic regression were used to determine factors associated with vaccination. RESULTS 70% of women and 66% of partners reported pertussis vaccination according to national recommendations. Significantly 22% of newborns were discharged to a household where neither parent reported vaccination. Compared to when maternal vaccination did occur, in families where it didn't there were low rates of vaccination of partners (83% vs 26%) and other carers, particularly carers usually resident overseas (76% vs 18.5%). CONCLUSION(S) While the majority of mothers and partners reported pertussis vaccination in accordance with recommended guidelines, concerningly nearly a quarter of newborns were discharged to a home where neither parent was vaccinated. When maternal vaccination did not occur, rates of vaccination of the other close contacts was poor. Educating women to encourage vaccination of partners and carers particularly those coming from overseas, prior to their arrival is an important consideration when maternal immunization does not occur. Cocooning remains an important approach to protect newborns of mothers vaccinated late or not vaccinated in pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sushena Krishnaswamy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Monash Infectious Diseases, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Euan M Wallace
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Monash Womens Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Allen C Cheng
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jim Buttery
- Infection and Immunity, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Pediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michelle L Giles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Monash Infectious Diseases, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Monash Womens Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|