1
|
Hoadley A, Fleisher L, Kenny C, Kelly PJ, Ma X, Wu J, Guerra C, Leader AE, Alhajji M, D'Avanzo P, Landau Z, Bass SB. Exploring Racial Disparities in Awareness and Perceptions of Oncology Clinical Trials: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Baseline Data From the mychoice Study. JMIR Cancer 2024; 10:e56048. [PMID: 39348891 DOI: 10.2196/56048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 04/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 10/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black/African American adults are underrepresented in oncology clinical trials in the United States, despite efforts at narrowing this disparity. OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore differences in how Black/African American oncology patients perceive clinical trials to improve support for the clinical trial participation decision-making process. METHODS As part of a larger randomized controlled trial, a total of 244 adult oncology patients receiving active treatment or follow-up care completed a cross-sectional baseline survey on sociodemographic characteristics, clinical trial knowledge, health literacy, perceptions of cancer clinical trials, patient activation, patient advocacy, health care self-efficacy, decisional conflict, and clinical trial intentions. Self-reported race was dichotomized into Black/African American and non-Black/African American. As appropriate, 2-tailed t tests and chi-square tests of independence were used to examine differences between groups. RESULTS Black/African American participants had lower clinical trial knowledge (P=.006), lower health literacy (P<.001), and more medical mistrust (all P values <.05) than non-Black/African American participants. While intentions to participate in a clinical trial, if offered, did not vary between Black/African American and non-Black/African American participants, Black/African American participants indicated lower awareness of clinical trials, fewer benefits of clinical trials, and more uncertainty around clinical trial decision-making (all P values <.05). There were no differences for other variables. CONCLUSIONS Despite no significant differences in intent to participate in a clinical trial if offered and high overall trust in individual health care providers among both groups, beliefs persist about barriers to and benefits of clinical trial participation among Black/African American patients. Findings highlight specific ways that education and resources about clinical trials could be tailored to better suit the informational and decision-making needs and preferences of Black/African American oncology patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel Hoadley
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Linda Fleisher
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Cassidy Kenny
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Patrick Ja Kelly
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Xinrui Ma
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Jingwei Wu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Carmen Guerra
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Amy E Leader
- Division of Population Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Mohammed Alhajji
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Paul D'Avanzo
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Zoe Landau
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Sarah Bauerle Bass
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Leader AE, Rebbeck TR, Oh WK, Patel AV, Winer EP, Bailey LO, Gomella LG, Lumpkins CY, Garraway IP, Aiello LB, Baskin ML, Cheng HH, Cooney KA, Ganzak A, George DJ, Halabi S, Hathaway F, Healy C, Kim JW, Leapman MS, Loeb S, Maxwell KN, McNair C, Morgan TM, Prindeville B, Soule HR, Steward WL, Suttiratana SC, Taplin ME, Yamoah K, Fortune T, Bennett K, Blanding-Godbolt J, Gross L, Giri VN. Adaptation of the socioecological model to address disparities in engagement of Black men in prostate cancer genetic testing. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:2533. [PMID: 39289635 PMCID: PMC11409532 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20008-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 09/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black men consistently have higher rates of prostate cancer (PCA)- related mortality. Advances in PCA treatment, screening, and hereditary cancer assessment center around germline testing (GT). Of concern is the significant under-engagement of Black males in PCA GT, limiting the benefit of precision therapy and tailored cancer screening despite longstanding awareness of these disparities. To address these critical disparities, the Socioecological Model (SEM) was employed to develop comprehensive recommendations to overcome barriers and implement equitable strategies to engage Black males in PCA GT. METHODS Clinical/research experts, national organization leaders, and community stakeholders spanning multiple regions in US and Africa participated in developing a framework for equity in PCA GT grounded in the SEM. A novel mixed-methods approach was employed to generate key areas to be addressed and informed statements for consensus consideration utilizing the modified Delphi model. Statements achieving strong consensus (> =75% agreement) were included in final equity frameworks addressing clinical/community engagement and research engagement. RESULTS All societal levels of the SEM (interpersonal, institutional, community, and policy/advocacy) must deliver information about PCA GT to Black males that address benefits/limitations, clinical impact, hereditary cancer implications, with acknowledgment of mistrust (mean scores [MS] 4.57-5.00). Interpersonal strategies for information delivery included engagement of family/friends/peers/Black role models to improve education/awareness and overcome mistrust (MS 4.65-5.00). Institutional strategies included diversifying clinical, research, and educational programs and integrating community liaisons into healthcare institutions (MS 4.57-5.00). Community strategies included partnerships with healthcare institutions and visibility of healthcare providers/researchers at community events (MS 4.65-4.91). Policy/advocacy included improving partnerships between advocacy and healthcare/community organizations while protecting patient benefits (MS 4.57-5.00). Media strategies were endorsed for the first time at every level (MS 4.56-5.00). CONCLUSION The SEM-based equity frameworks proposed provide the first multidisciplinary strategies dedicated to increase engagement of Black males in PCA GT, which are critical to reduce disparities in PCA-mortality through informing tailored screening, targeted therapy, and cascade testing in families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy E Leader
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William K Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alpa V Patel
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Department of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, WWW214A, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - LeeAnn O Bailey
- National Cancer Institute/Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Crystal Y Lumpkins
- Department of Communication, Population Sciences Division, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Isla P Garraway
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lisa B Aiello
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Monica L Baskin
- Department of Medicine, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Heather H Cheng
- Department of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kathleen A Cooney
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Amanda Ganzak
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Daniel J George
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Feighanne Hathaway
- Department of Medicine, High-Risk and Advanced Prostate Cancer Clinic, University of Chicago Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Claire Healy
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joseph W Kim
- Department of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, WWW214A, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | | | - Stacy Loeb
- Department of Urology and Population Health, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kara N Maxwell
- Department of Medicine-Hematology/Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christopher McNair
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Breanne Prindeville
- Neaman Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA
| | | | - Whitney L Steward
- National Cancer Institute/Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Sakinah C Suttiratana
- Department of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, WWW214A, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Departmetnt of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Thierry Fortune
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Joshua Blanding-Godbolt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Laura Gross
- Department of Medicine, Yale University and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Veda N Giri
- Department of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, WWW214A, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bilen MA, Khilfeh I, Rossi C, Muser E, Morrison L, Hilts A, Diaz L, Lefebvre P, Pilon D, George DJ. Homologous Recombination Repair Testing Patterns and Outcomes in mCRPC by Alteration Status and Race. CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 16:657-674. [PMID: 39257456 PMCID: PMC11385689 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s468680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Alterations in DNA damage repair genes in advanced prostate cancer (PC) may impact responses to therapy and clinical outcomes. This study described homologous recombination repair (HRR) testing patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) by HRR alteration status and race in the United States (US). Methods Clinical data in the nationwide (US-based) Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine, Inc. (FMI) Metastatic PC Clinico-Genomic Database were evaluated (01/01/2011-12/31/2022). Patients initiating first-line (1L) mCRPC therapy on or after mCRPC diagnosis were included. Testing patterns, time-to-next treatment, overall survival (OS), and time-to-prostate specific antigen response were described. Results Of the 1367 patients with mCRPC and at least one HRR panel test prior to or on the date of 1L mCRPC therapy initiation, 332 (24.3%) were HRR positive (White patients: n = 219 [66.0%]; Black patients: n = 37 [11.1%]) and 1035 (75.7%) were HRR negative (White patients: n = 702 [67.8%]; Black patients: n = 84 [8.1%]). The mean time between first positive test and 1L mCRPC therapy initiation date was 588 days (White patients: 589 days; Black patients: 639 days). Among HRR positive relative to negative patients, trends for faster progression (respective 12-month rate overall: 71.1% and 63.7%; White patients: 72.5% and 64.0%; Black patients: 65.4% and 56.4%), shorter OS (respective 24-month rate overall: 46.8% and 51.9%; White patients: 48.6% and 46.2%; Black patients: 52.8% and 54.1%), and decreased treatment response (respective 12-month rate overall: 24.3% and 37.9%; White patients: 24.5% and 35.2%; Black patients: 17.0% and 43.9%) were observed. Conclusion Patients with mCRPC positive for HRR alterations tended to exhibit poorer treatment responses and clinical outcomes than those with a negative status. These findings highlight the importance of timely genetic testing in mCRPC, particularly among Black patients, and the need for improved 1L targeted therapies to address the unmet need in HRR positive mCRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Asim Bilen
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | - Erik Muser
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Daniel J George
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Cancer Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lopez A, Bailey JT, Galloway D, Woods-Burnham L, Montgomery SB, Kittles R, Teteh-Brooks DK. Evidence-based Prostate Cancer Screening Interventions for Black Men: A Systematic Review. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2024:10.1007/s40615-024-02085-y. [PMID: 38987514 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-024-02085-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of death for men in the U.S. and Black men are twice as likely to die from the disease. However, prostate cancer, if diagnosed at an earlier stage, is curable. The purpose of this review is to identify prostate cancer screening clinical trials that evaluate screening decision-making processes of Black men. METHODS The databases PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, and PsychInfo were utilized to examine peer-reviewed publications between 2017 and 2023. Data extracted included implementation plans, outcome measures, intervention details, and results of the study. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme was used to assess the quality of the evidence presented. RESULTS Of the 206 full-text articles assessed, three were included in this review. Educational interventions about prostate cancer knowledge with shared and informed decision-making (IDM) features, as well as counseling, treatment options, and healthcare navigation information, may increase prostate cancer screening participation among Black men. Additionally, health partner educational interventions may not improve IDM related to screening participation. The quality of the evidence presented in each article was valid and potentially impactful to the community. DISCUSSION Black men face various social determinants of health barriers related to racism, discrimination, cost of health services, time away from work, and lack of trust in the healthcare system when making health-related decisions, including prostate cancer screening participation. A multifactorial intervention approach is required to address these inequities faced by Black men especially as prostate cancer is curable when diagnosed at an earlier stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail Lopez
- Department of Health Sciences, Crean College of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University, One University Drive, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Jared T Bailey
- Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Rick Kittles
- Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Dede K Teteh-Brooks
- Department of Health Sciences, Crean College of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University, One University Drive, Orange, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hage Chehade C, Jo Y, Gebrael G, Tripathi N, Sayegh N, Chigarira B, Mathew Thomas V, Galarza Fortuna G, Narang A, Campbell P, Gupta S, Maughan BL, Roy S, Agarwal N, Swami U. Trends and Disparities in Next-Generation Sequencing in Metastatic Prostate and Urothelial Cancers. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2423186. [PMID: 39023888 PMCID: PMC11258596 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.23186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Targeted therapies based on underlying tumor genomic susceptible alterations have been approved for patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) and advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). Objective To assess trends and disparities in next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing among patients with mPC and aUC. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used an electronic health record-derived database to extract deidentified data of patients receiving care from US physician practices, hospital-affiliated clinics, and academic practices. Patients diagnosed with mPC or aUC between March 1, 2015, and December 31, 2022, were included. Exposures Social determinants of health evaluated by race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), region, insurance type, and sex (for aUC). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were (1) NGS testing rate by year of mPC and aUC diagnosis using Clopper-Pearson 2-sided 95% CIs and (2) time to NGS testing, which considered death as a competing risk. Cumulative incidence functions were estimated for time to NGS testing. Disparities in subdistributional incidence of NGS testing were assessed by race and ethnicity, SES, region, insurance type, and sex (for aUC) using the Fine-Gray modified Cox proportional hazards model, assuming different subdistribution baseline hazards by year of mPC and aUC diagnosis. Results A total of 11 927 male patients with mPC (167 Asian [1.6%], 1236 Black [11.6%], 687 Hispanic or Latino [6.4%], 7037 White [66.0%], and 1535 other [14.4%] among 10 662 with known race and ethnicity) and 6490 patients with aUC (4765 male [73.4%]; 80 Asian [1.4%], 283 Black [4.8%], 257 Hispanic or Latino [4.4%], 4376 White [74.9%], and 845 other [14.5%] among 5841 with known race and ethnicity) were eligible and included. Both cohorts had a median age of 73 years (IQR, 66-80 years), and most underwent NGS testing before first-line treatment in the mPC cohort (1502 [43.0%]) and before second-line treatment in the aUC cohort (1067 [51.3%]). In the mPC cohort, the rates of NGS testing increased from 19.0% in 2015 to 27.1% in 2022, but Black patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67-0.84) and Hispanic or Latino patients (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.82) were less likely to undergo NGS testing. Patients with mPC who had low SES (quintile 1: HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.66-0.83]; quintile 2: HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.80-0.99]), had Medicaid (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.38-0.74) or Medicare or other government insurance (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98), or lived in the West (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.94) also were less likely to undergo testing. In the aUC cohort, the NGS rate increased from 14.1% in 2015 to 46.6% in 2022, but Black patients (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61-0.96) and those with low SES (quintile 1: HR 0.77 [95% CI, 0.66-0.89]; quintile 2: HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.76-1.00]) or Medicaid (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53-0.97) or Medicare or other government insurance (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99) were less likely to undergo NGS testing. Patients with aUC living in the South were more likely to undergo testing (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.12-1.49). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that although NGS tumor testing rates improved over time, the majority of patients still did not undergo testing. These data may help with understanding current disparities associated with NGS testing and improving access to standard-of-care health care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chadi Hage Chehade
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Yeonjung Jo
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
- Cancer Biostatistics, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Georges Gebrael
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Nishita Tripathi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Nicolas Sayegh
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Beverly Chigarira
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Vinay Mathew Thomas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Gliceida Galarza Fortuna
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Arshit Narang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Patrick Campbell
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Sumati Gupta
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Benjamin L. Maughan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Soumyajit Roy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Umang Swami
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Weaver SJ, Breslau ES, Russell LE, Zhang A, Sharma R, Bass EB, Marsteller JA, Snyder C. Health-care organization characteristics in cancer care delivery: an integrated conceptual framework with content validation. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:800-811. [PMID: 38419574 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Context can influence cancer-related outcomes. For example, health-care organization characteristics, including ownership, leadership, and culture, can affect care access, communication, and patient outcomes. Health-care organization characteristics and other contextual factors can also influence whether and how clinical discoveries reduce cancer incidence, morbidity, and mortality. Importantly, policy, market, and technology changes are transforming health-care organization design, culture, and operations across the cancer continuum. Consequently, research is essential to examine when, for whom, and how organizational characteristics influence person-level, organization-level, and population-level cancer outcomes. Understanding organizational characteristics-the structures, processes, and other features of entities involved in health care delivery-and their dynamics is an important yet understudied area of care delivery research across the cancer continuum. Research incorporating organizational characteristics is critical to address health inequities, test care delivery models, adapt interventions, and strengthen implementation. The field lacks conceptual grounding, however, to help researchers identify germane organizational characteristics. We propose a framework identifying organizational characteristics relevant for cancer care delivery research based on conceptual work in health services, organizational behavior, and management science and refined using a systematic review and key informant input. The proposed framework is a tool for organizing existing research and enhancing future cancer care delivery research. Following a 2012 Journal of the National Cancer Institute monograph, this work complements National Cancer Institute efforts to stimulate research addressing the relationship between cancer outcomes and contextual factors at the patient, provider, team, delivery organization, community, and health policy levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sallie J Weaver
- Health Systems and Interventions Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Erica S Breslau
- Health Systems and Interventions Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Lauren E Russell
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Allen Zhang
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ritu Sharma
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Eric B Bass
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jill A Marsteller
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Claire Snyder
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Albers P, Bashir S, Mookerji N, Broomfield S, Martín AM, Ghosh S, Kinnaird A. Prostate Cancer Among Black Men in Canada. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2418475. [PMID: 38916889 PMCID: PMC11200144 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Prostate cancer is a prevalent disease among men worldwide, exhibiting substantial heterogeneity in presentation and outcomes influenced by various factors, including race and ethnicity. Disparities in incidence, stage at diagnosis, and survival rates have been observed between Black men and those of other races and ethnicities. Objective To compare prostate cancer outcomes between Black men and men with other race (Asian, Hispanic, Indigenous, Middle Eastern, White, Multiracial, and Other) in a universal health care system, with race and ethnicity self-reported. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a prospective, observational cohort study of men diagnosed with prostate cancer between June 1, 2014, and August 28, 2023, who self-identified race and ethnicity. Participants included men who had been prospectively enrolled in the Alberta Prostate Cancer Research Initiative from the 2 major urology referral centers in Alberta (University of Alberta and University of Calgary). All men with prostate cancer enrolled in the initiative were included. Exposure Race and ethnicity. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the stage and grade of prostate cancer at diagnosis. Further outcomes included age and prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis, initial treatment modality, time from diagnosis to initial treatment, and prostate cancer-specific, metastasis-free, and overall survivals. Results A total of 6534 men were included; 177 (2.7%) were Black, and 6357 (97.3%) had another race or ethnicity. Men who identified as Black were diagnosed with prostate cancer at an earlier age (mean [SD], 62.0 [8.2] compared with 64.6 [7.7] years; P < .001) and had a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index rating (14% compared with 7% ≤ 1; P < .001) compared with men of other races. Men who identified as Black had similar prostate-specific antigen levels at diagnosis, TNM category (74% vs 74% with T1-T2; P = .83) and Gleason Grade Group (34% compared with 35% Gleason Grade Group 1; P = .63). Black men had similar rates of prostate cancer-specific (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% CI, 0.41-2.97; P = .85), metastasis-free (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.42-1.46; P = .44), and overall (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.25-1.24; P = .15) survival. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cohort study suggest that Black men, despite being diagnosed at a younger age, experience comparable prostate cancer outcomes compared with men of other races.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Albers
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Safaa Bashir
- Black Medical Students Association, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nikhile Mookerji
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Stacey Broomfield
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Sunita Ghosh
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Adam Kinnaird
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Prostate Cancer Research Initiative, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Cancer Research Institute of Northern Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Centre for Urologic Research and Excellence, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Murphy A, Cottrell-Daniels CC, Awasthi S, Katende E, Park JY, Denis J, Green BL, Yamoah K. Understanding and Addressing Prostate Cancer Disparities in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes Among Black Men. Cancer Control 2024; 31:10732748241275389. [PMID: 39149902 PMCID: PMC11329981 DOI: 10.1177/10732748241275389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 07/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite advances in screening, diagnosis, and treatment for prostate cancer (PCa), Black men tend to be diagnosed at younger ages, have higher mortality rates, and are at increased risk of recurrence or metastasis compared to their White counterparts. PCa disparities among Black men are caused by a complex interaction of social, behavioral, and biological factors across the public policy, community, organizational, interpersonal, and individual levels. Key contributing factors include mistrust in the health care system, poor communication between patients and providers, low awareness of screening guidelines, and high medical costs. These disparities are further exacerbated by the low representation of Black men in clinical trials, which limits access to high-quality cancer care and generalizability for PCa treatments. In this narrative review of the existing literature, we examined the epidemiology and identified contributing factors, and propose multi-level strategies to address and mitigate disparities among Black men with PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Murphy
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Shivanshu Awasthi
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Esther Katende
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jong Y. Park
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Justin Denis
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - B. Lee Green
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Basin MF, Crane K, Basnet A, Chandrasekar T, Shapiro O, Jacob JM, Bratslavsky G, Goldberg H. Disparities Associated with Shared Decision-making in Prostate Cancer Screening. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:1008-1015. [PMID: 37198068 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Revised: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer screening guidelines recommend shared decision-making (SDM) regarding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. However, it is unclear who undergoes SDM and whether any disparities exist. OBJECTIVE To examine sociodemographic differences in participation of SDM and its association with PSA testing in prostate cancer screening. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among men aged 45-75 yr undergoing PSA screening, using the 2018 National Health Interview Survey database. The evaluated sociodemographic features included age, race, marital status, sexual orientation, smoking status, working status, financial difficulty, US geographic regions, and cancer history. Questions regarding self-reported PSA testing and whether respondents discussed its advantages and disadvantages with their healthcare provider were analyzed. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Our primary outcome was to evaluate the possible associations between various sociodemographic factors and undergoing PSA screening and SDM. We used multivariable logistic regression analyses to detect potential associations. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 59596 men were identified, of whom 5605 answered the question regarding PSA testing, with 2288 (40.6%) undergoing PSA testing. Of these men, 39.5% (n = 2226) discussed the advantages and 25.6% (n = 1434) discussed the disadvantages of PSA testing. On a multivariable analysis, older (odds ratio [OR] 1.092; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.081-1.103, p < 0.001) and married (OR 1.488; 95% CI 1.287-1.720, p < 0.001) men were more likely to undergo PSA testing. Although Black men were more likely to discuss PSA advantages (OR 1.421; 95% CI 1.150-1.756, p = 0.001) and disadvantages (OR 1.554; 95% CI 1.240-1.947, p < 0.001) than White men, this did not correlate with higher rates of PSA screening (OR 1.086; 95% CI 0.865-1.364, p = 0.477). The lack of important clinical data remains a limitation. CONCLUSIONS Overall, SDM rates were low. Older and married men had an increased likelihood of SDM and PSA testing. Despite higher rates of SDM, Black men had similar rates of PSA testing to White men. PATIENT SUMMARY We evaluated sociodemographic differences in shared decision-making (SDM) in prostate cancer screening using a large national database. We found that SDM had varying results in different sociodemographic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael F Basin
- Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Kelly Crane
- Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Alina Basnet
- Department of Medical Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | | | - Oleg Shapiro
- Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Joseph M Jacob
- Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | | | - Hanan Goldberg
- Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dickey L, Gronowski B, Jones K, Rinaldi JB, Emery K, Clemens J, Gordon O, Vartanian K. Participation in genetic screening: testing different outreach methods across a diverse hospital system based patient population. Front Genet 2023; 14:1272931. [PMID: 37900185 PMCID: PMC10602775 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1272931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Genomics has the potential to transform medicine by identifying genetic risk factors that predispose people to certain illnesses. Use of genetic screening is rapidly expanding and shifting towards screening all patients regardless of known risk factors, but research is limited on the success of broad population-level outreach for genetic testing and the effectiveness of different outreach methods across diverse populations. In this study, we tested the effectiveness of Digital Only (emailing and texting) and Brochure Plus Digital (mailed brochure, emailing, and texting) outreach to encourage a diverse patient population to participate in a large hospital system's whole genome sequencing program. Methods: Disproportionate stratified sampling was used to create a study population more demographically diverse than the eligible population and response rates were analyzed overall and by demographics to understand the effectiveness of different outreach strategies. Results: 7.5% of all eligible patients enrolled in the program. While approximately 70% of patients invited to complete genetic testing identified in their EHR as being Hispanic, Black or African America, Asian, or another non-White race, these patients generally enrolled at lower rates than the overall population. Other underrepresented groups had higher enrollment rates including people with Medicaid coverage (8.7%) and those residing in rural areas (10.6%). We found no significant difference in enrollment rates between our Digital-Only and our Brochure Plus Digital outreach approaches in the overall population, but enrollment rates were significantly higher for Asian patients and patients who resided in rural areas in the Brochure Plus Digital group. Across both outreach approaches, links provided in emails were most commonly used for enrollment. Discussion: Our study reveals expected enrollment rates for proactive outreach by a hospital system for genetic testing in a diverse population. As more hospital systems are adopting population-scale genetic testing, these findings can inform future outreach efforts to recruit patients for genetic testing including those patients traditionally underrepresented in genomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Dickey
- Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Ben Gronowski
- Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Kyle Jones
- Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Portland, OR, United States
| | - J. B. Rinaldi
- Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Kate Emery
- Center for Clinical Genetics and Genomics for Providence Southern California, Burbank, CA, United States
| | - Jon Clemens
- Center for Clinical Genetics and Genomics for Providence Southern California, Burbank, CA, United States
| | - Ora Gordon
- Center for Clinical Genetics and Genomics for Providence Southern California, Burbank, CA, United States
| | - Keri Vartanian
- Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Portland, OR, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hwang C, Henderson NC, Chu SC, Holland B, Cackowski FC, Pilling A, Jang A, Rothstein S, Labriola M, Park JJ, Ghose A, Bilen MA, Mustafa S, Kilari D, Pierro MJ, Thapa B, Tripathi A, Garje R, Ravindra A, Koshkin VS, Hernandez E, Schweizer MT, Armstrong AJ, McKay RR, Dorff TB, Alva AS, Barata PC. Biomarker-Directed Therapy in Black and White Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2334208. [PMID: 37721753 PMCID: PMC10507489 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.34208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Black men have higher incidence and mortality from prostate cancer. Whether precision oncology disparities affect Black men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is unknown. Objective To compare precision medicine data and outcomes between Black and White men with mCRPC. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used data collected by the Prostate Cancer Precision Medicine Multi-Institutional Collaborative Effort (PROMISE) consortium, a multi-institutional registry with linked clinicogenomic data, from April 2020 to December 2021. Participants included Black and White patients with mCRPC with molecular data. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to May 2023. Exposures Database-reported race and ethnicity. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the frequency of actionable molecular data, defined as the presence of mismatch repair deficiency (MMRD) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H), homologous recombination repair deficiency, or tumor mutational burden of 10 mutations per megabase or greater. Secondary outcomes included the frequency of other alterations, the type and timing of genomic testing performed, and use of targeted therapy. Efficacy outcomes were prostate-specific antigen response rate, site-reported radiographic response, and overall survival. Results A total of 962 eligible patients with mCRPC were identified, including 204 Black patients (21.2%; median [IQR] age at diagnosis, 61 [55-67] years; 131 patients [64.2%] with Gleason scores 8-10; 92 patients [45.1%] with de novo metastatic disease) and 758 White patients (78.8%; median [IQR] age, 63 [57-69] years; 445 patients [58.7%] with Gleason scores 8-10; 310 patients [40.9%] with de novo metastatic disease). Median (IQR) follow-up from mCRPC was 26.6 (14.2-44.7) months. Blood-based molecular testing was more common in Black men (111 men [48.7%]) than White men (317 men [36.4%]; P < .001). Rates of actionable alterations were similar between groups (65 Black men [32.8%]; 215 White men [29.1%]; P = .35), but MMRD or MSI-H was more common in Black men (18 men [9.1]) than White men (36 men [4.9%]; P = .04). PTEN alterations were less frequent in Black men than White men (31 men [15.7%] vs 194 men [26.3%]; P = .003), as were TMPRSS alterations (14 men [7.1%] vs 155 men [21.0%]; P < .001). No other differences were seen in the 15 most frequently altered genes, including TP53, AR, CDK12, RB1, and PIK3CA. Matched targeted therapy was given less frequently in Black men than White men (22 men [33.5%] vs 115 men [53.5%]; P = .008). There were no differences in response to targeted therapy or survival between the two cohorts. Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study of men with mCRPC found higher frequency of MMRD or MSI-H and lower frequency of PTEN and TMPRSS alterations in Black men compared with White men. Although Black men received targeted therapy less frequently than White men, no differences were observed in clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Brandon Holland
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Frank C. Cackowski
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | | | | | - Shoshana Rothstein
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Matthew Labriola
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancer, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Bicky Thapa
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | | | | | - Vadim S. Koshkin
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Erik Hernandez
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Andrew J. Armstrong
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancer, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Rana R. McKay
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | | | | | - Pedro C. Barata
- Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Janopaul‐Naylor JR, Corriher TJ, Switchenko J, Hanasoge S, Esdaille A, Mahal BA, Filson CP, Patel SA. Disparities in time to prostate cancer treatment initiation before and after the Affordable Care Act. Cancer Med 2023; 12:18258-18268. [PMID: 37537835 PMCID: PMC10523962 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delayed access to care may contribute to disparities in prostate cancer (PCa). The Affordable Care Act (ACA) aimed at increasing access and reducing healthcare disparities, but its impact on timely treatment initiation for PCa men is unknown. METHODS Men with intermediate- and high-risk PCa diagnosed 2010-2016 and treated with curative surgery or radiotherapy were identified in the National Cancer Database. Multivariable logistic regression modeled the effect of race and insurance type on treatment delay >180 days after diagnosis. Cochran-Armitage test measured annual trends in delays, and joinpoint regression assessed if 2014, the year the ACA became fully operationalized, was significant for inflection in crude rates of major delays. RESULTS Of 422,506 eligible men, 18,720 (4.4%) experienced >180-day delay in treatment initiation. Compared to White patients, Black (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.72-1.87, p < 0.001) and Hispanic (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.28-1.48, p < 0.001) patients had higher odds of delay. Compared to uninsured, those with Medicaid had no difference in odds of delay (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.84-1.06, p = 0.31), while those with private insurance (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.52-0.63, p < 0.001) or Medicare (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.58-0.70, p < 0.001) had lower odds of delay. Mean time to treatment significantly increased from 2010 to 2016 across all racial/ethnic groups (trend p < 0.001); 2014 was associated with a significant inflection for increase in rates of major delays. CONCLUSIONS Non-White and Medicaid-insured men with localized PCa are at risk of treatment delays in the United States. Treatment delays have been consistently rising, particularly after implementation of the ACA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R. Janopaul‐Naylor
- Department of Radiation OncologyWinship Cancer Institute at Emory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
- Department of Radiation OncologyMemorial Sloan Kettering CancerNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Taylor J. Corriher
- Department of Radiation OncologyWinship Cancer Institute at Emory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Jeffrey Switchenko
- Department of Biostatistics and BioinformaticsRollins School of Public HealthAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Sheela Hanasoge
- Department of Radiation OncologyWinship Cancer Institute at Emory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Ashanda Esdaille
- Department of UrologyEmory University School of MedicineAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Brandon A. Mahal
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiFloridaUSA
| | | | - Sagar A. Patel
- Department of Radiation OncologyWinship Cancer Institute at Emory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Canter DJ, Branch C, Shelnutt J, Foreman AJ, Lehman AM, Sama V, Edwards DK, Abran J. The 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score Assay Is Prognostic for Biochemical Failure in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer After Radiation Therapy at a Community Cancer Center. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101193. [PMID: 37152483 PMCID: PMC10157115 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The objective of this study was to assess the association between the Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) assay and long-term outcomes in men with localized prostate cancer (PCa) after radiation therapy (RT). We hypothesized that the GPS assay is prognostic for biochemical failure (BCF), along with distant metastasis (DM) and PCa-specific mortality in patients with PCa receiving RT. Methods and Materials We retrospectively studied men with localized PCa treated with definitive RT at Georgia Urology from 2010 to 2016. The primary objective was to assess the association between GPS results and time to BCF per the Phoenix criteria; we also assessed time to DM and PCa-specific mortality. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models for all analyses, with clinicopathologic covariates determined a priori for multivariable modeling. Results A total of 450 patients (median age, 65 years; 35% Black) met eligibility criteria. There was a strong univariable association between GPS result and time to BCF (hazard ratio [HR] per 20-unit increase = 3.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.11-4.46; P < .001), which persisted after adjusting for clinicopathologic characteristics in multivariable analyses. We also observed this association for time to DM (HR = 5.19; 95% CI, 3.06-8.77; P < .001) and PCa-specific mortality (HR = 13.07; 95% CI, 4.42-49.39; P < .001). Race was not a predictor of time to BCF or DM, and the GPS assay was strongly prognostic for all endpoints in Black and White patients. Conclusions In a community-based cohort, the GPS assay was strongly prognostic for time to BCF as well as long-term outcomes in men treated with RT for localized PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Amy M. Lehman
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Redwood City, California
| | - Varun Sama
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Redwood City, California
| | | | - John Abran
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Redwood City, California
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Burnett AL, Nyame YA, Mitchell E. Disparities in prostate cancer. J Natl Med Assoc 2023; 115:S38-S45. [PMID: 37202002 DOI: 10.1016/j.jnma.2023.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Despite substantial advances in early detection/prevention and treatments, and improved outcomes in recent decades, prostate cancer continues to disproportionately affect Black men and is the secondleading cause of cancer death in this subgroup. Black men are substantially more likely to develop prostate cancer and are twice as likely to die from the disease compared with White men. In addition, Black men are younger at diagnosis and face a higher risk of aggressive disease relative to White men. Striking racial disparities endure along the continuum of prostate cancer care, including screening, genomic testing, diagnostic procedures, and treatment modalities. The underlying causes of these inequalities are complex and multifactorial and involve biological factors, structural determinants of equity (i.e., public policy, structural and systemic racism, economic policy), social determinants of health (including income, education, and insurance status, neighborhood/physical environment, community/social context, and geography), and health care factors. The objective of this article is to review the sources of racial disparities in prostate cancer and to propose actionable recommendations to help address these inequities and narrow the racial gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yaw A Nyame
- Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Urology, University of Washington, United States
| | - Edith Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer at Jefferson, 925 Chestnut Street, Suite 220A, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Iltis AS, Rolf L, Yaeger L, Goodman MS, DuBois JM. Attitudes and beliefs regarding race-targeted genetic testing of Black people: A systematic review. J Genet Couns 2023; 32:435-461. [PMID: 36644818 PMCID: PMC10349658 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Geographical ancestry has been associated with an increased risk of various genetic conditions. Race and ethnicity often have been used as proxies for geographical ancestry. Despite numerous problems associated with the crude reliance on race and ethnicity as proxies for geographical ancestry, some genetic testing in the clinical, research, and employment settings has been and continues to be race- or ethnicity-based. Race-based or race-targeted genetic testing refers to genetic testing offered only or primarily to people of particular racial or ethnic groups because of presumed differences among groups. One current example is APOL1 testing of Black kidney donors. Race-based genetic testing raises numerous ethical and policy questions. Given the ongoing reliance on the Black race in genetic testing, it is important to understand the views of people who identify as Black or are identified as Black (including African American, Afro-Caribbean, and Hispanic Black) regarding race-based genetic testing that targets Black people because of their race. We conducted a systematic review of studies and reports of stakeholder-engaged projects that examined how people who identify as or are identified as Black perceive genetic testing that specifically presumes genetic differences exist among racial groups or uses race as a surrogate for ancestral genetic variation and targets Black people. Our review identified 14 studies that explicitly studied this question and another 13 that implicitly or tacitly studied this matter. We found four main factors that contribute to a positive attitude toward race-targeted genetic testing (facilitators) and eight main factors that are associated with concerns regarding race-targeted genetic testing (barriers). This review fills an important gap. These findings should inform future genetic research and the policies and practices developed in clinical, research, public health, or other settings regarding genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Liz Rolf
- Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine
| | - Lauren Yaeger
- Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Briggs LG, Steele GL, Qian ZJ, Subbana S, Alkhatib KY, Labban M, Langbein BJ, Nguyen DD, Cellini J, Kilbridge K, Kibel AS, Trinh QD, Rana HQ, Cole AP. Racial Differences in Germline Genetic Testing for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:e784-e793. [PMID: 36649495 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Testing for pathogenic variants can aid in oncologic risk stratification and identification of targeted therapies. Despite known disparities in access to prostate cancer (PCa) care, little has been written about access to germline genetic testing (GGT) for Black men and other historically marginalized populations. This systematic review sought to delineate racial/ethnic disparities in GGT for PCa. METHODS This systematic review identified articles published from January 1996 through May 2021 in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. We included studies that reported rates of GGT in men with PCa in the United States by race/ethnicity as reflective of routine clinical care or research. A narrative synthesis was performed. RESULTS Of 4,309 unique records, 91 studies examining 50 unique study populations met inclusion criteria. Of these, four populations included men who received GGT through routine clinical care, accounting for 4,415 men (72.6% White and 7.2% Black). The other 46 populations included men who received GGT as part of a research study, accounting for 30,824 men (64.3% White and 21.6% Black). Of these 46 research populations, 19 used targeted methods to increase recruitment from a specific demographic. CONCLUSION Most studies that report GGT rates by race/ethnicity are in research settings. Many of these studies used targeted recruitment methods and subsequently have a greater proportion of Black men than clinical and US population-based studies. Other historically marginalized populations are not well represented. There remains a knowledge gap regarding the extent of racial disparities in the use of GGT, particularly in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan G Briggs
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.,Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Grant L Steele
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Zhiyu Jason Qian
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Khalid Y Alkhatib
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Muhieddine Labban
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Bjoern J Langbein
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - David-Dan Nguyen
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Kerry Kilbridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Huma Q Rana
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.,Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Alexander P Cole
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Janes JL, Boyer MJ, Bennett JP, Thomas VM, De Hoedt AM, Edwards V DK, Singla PK, Abran JM, Aboushwareb T, Salama JK, Freedland SJ. The 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score Test Is Prognostic for Outcomes After Primary External Beam Radiation Therapy in Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:120-131. [PMID: 36306979 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) assay has been validated as a strong prognostic indicator of adverse pathology, biochemical recurrence, distant metastasis (DM), and prostate cancer (PCa)-related death (PCD) in men with localized PCa after radical prostatectomy. However, it has yet to be tested in men undergoing external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), for whom assessing PCa progression risk could inform decisions on treatment intensity. We analyzed whether GPS results are associated with time to biochemical failure (BCF), DM, and PCD after EBRT in men with localized PCa and whether the association is modified by race. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a retrospective study of men with localized PCa treated with EBRT at the VA Health Care System in Durham, NC from 2000 to 2016. Study endpoints were time to BCF per the Phoenix criteria, DM, and PCD. The association of GPS results, per 20-unit increase or dichotomous variable (0-40 vs 41-100), was evaluated with each endpoint using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results were then stratified by race. RESULTS A total of 238 patients (69% Black) met the eligibility criteria. Median follow-up for patients who did not experience BCF was 7.6 years. GPS results per 20-unit increase were significantly associated with BCF (hazard ratio [HR], 3.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.59-5.02), DM (HR, 4.48; 95% CI, 2.75-7.38), and PCD (HR, 5.36; 95% CI, 3.06-9.76) in univariable analysis. GPS results remained significant in multivariable models adjusted for baseline clinical and pathological factors, with HRs being similar to the univariable analysis. There was no significant interaction between the GPS assay and race (P = .923). HRs for BCF were similar in Black men (HR, 3.88; 95% CI, 2.40-6.24) versus non-Black men (HR, 4.01; 95% CI, 2.42-6.45). CONCLUSIONS Among men treated with EBRT, the GPS assay is a strong, independent prognostic indicator of time to BCF, DM, and PCD, and performs similarly in Black and non-Black men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Janes
- Research Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Matthew J Boyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Radiation Oncology Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Vanessa M Thomas
- Research Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Amanda M De Hoedt
- Research Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | - John M Abran
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Redwood City, California
| | | | - Joseph K Salama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Radiation Oncology Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Stephen J Freedland
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Department of Surgery, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lillard JW, Moses KA, Mahal BA, George DJ. Racial disparities in Black men with prostate cancer: A literature review. Cancer 2022; 128:3787-3795. [PMID: 36066378 PMCID: PMC9826514 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Black men are disproportionately affected by prostate cancer (PCa), with earlier presentation, more aggressive disease, and higher mortality rates versus White men. Furthermore, Black men have less access to PCa treatment and experience longer delays between diagnosis and treatment. In this review, the authors discuss the factors contributing to racial disparities and present solutions to improve access to care and increase clinical trial participation among Black men with PCa. Racial disparities observed among Black men with PCa are multifaceted, evolving from institutional racism. Cultural factors include generalized mistrust of the health care system, poor physician-patient communication, lack of information on PCa and treatment options, fear of PCa diagnosis, and perceived societal stigma of the disease. In the United States, geographic trends in racial disparities have been observed. Economic factors, e.g., cost of care, recovery time, and cancer debt, play an important role in racial disparities observed in PCa treatment and outcomes. Racial diversity is often lacking in genomic and precision medicine studies. Black men are largely underrepresented in key phase 3 PCa trials and may be less willing to enroll in clinical trials due to lack of awareness, lack of diversity in clinical trial research teams, and bias of health care providers to recommend clinical research. The authors propose solutions to address these factors that include educating clinicians and institutions on the barriers Black men experience, increasing the diversity of health care providers and clinical research teams, and empowering Black men to be involved in their treatment, which are keys to creating equity for Black men with PCa. LAY SUMMARY: Prostate cancer negatively affects Black men more than men of other races. The history of segregation and mistreatment in the health care system may contribute to mistrust among Black men. Outcomes are worse for Black men because they are less likely to be screened or to receive treatment for prostate cancer. Black men also are unlikely to participate in clinical research, making it difficult for investigators to understand how Black men are affected by prostate cancer. Suggestions for addressing these differences include teaching physicians and nurses about the issues Black men experience getting treatment and improving how Black men get information on prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James W. Lillard
- Department of MicrobiologyBiochemistry, and Immunology, Morehouse School of MedicineAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Kelvin A. Moses
- Department of UrologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTennesseeUSA
| | - Brandon A. Mahal
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiFloridaUSA
| | - Daniel J. George
- Duke Cancer InstituteUniversity School of MedicineDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Weise N, Shaya J, Javier-Desloges J, Cheng HH, Madlensky L, McKay RR. Disparities in germline testing among racial minorities with prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2022; 25:403-410. [PMID: 34775478 PMCID: PMC8590439 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-021-00469-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Germline testing is becoming increasingly relevant in prostate cancer (PCa) screening, prognosis, and management. A subset of patients with PCa harbor pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LPVs) in genes mediating DNA-repair processes, and these P/LPVs have implications for cancer screening, treatment, and cascade testing. As a result, it is recommended that all men with high-risk localized and metastatic PCa undergo routine germline testing. As more PCa patients undergo germline testing, it is important that clinicians and genetics experts recognize current disparities in germline testing rates among racial/ethnic minorities in the United States. The reasons for these disparities are multiple and require similarly manifold consideration to close the germline testing gap and reduce inequities in PCa screening, management, and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Weise
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Justin Shaya
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Heather H Cheng
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Rana R McKay
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rogers CR, Rogers TN. Psychosocial determinants of colorectal Cancer screening uptake among African-American men: understanding the role of masculine role norms, medical mistrust, and normative support. ETHNICITY & HEALTH 2022; 27:1103-1122. [PMID: 33249920 PMCID: PMC8163893 DOI: 10.1080/13557858.2020.1849569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Despite having the highest colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality across all major racial/ethnic groups, African-American men consistently have poor CRC screening rates. Gendered and racialized beliefs and norms have been associated with African-American men's lower medical assistance-seeking rates, but how these notions influence African-American men's CRC screening practices merits further investigation. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of psychosocial determinants of men's health on CRC screening uptake among African-American men in three states. DESIGN Participants were recruited via CuttingCRC.com and through culturally-tailored flyers, newspaper ads, and snowball sampling, among other methods. From April 2019-August 2019, 11 focus groups were conducted with English-speaking Black/African-American men who (a) were between ages 45-75, (b) were born in the United States, (c) had a working telephone, and (d) lived in Minnesota, Ohio, or Utah. Multiple-cycle coding, Hatch's 9-step approach, and constant comparative data analysis was employed for de-identified transcript data. RESULTS Eighty-four African-American men met inclusion criteria and participated. Their mean age was 59.34 ± 7.43. In regards to CRC screening status, Ohio had the most previously screened participants (85%), followed by Minnesota (84%) and Utah (76%). Two major CRC screening barriers (masculine role norms and medical mistrust) - both encompassed 3-5 subthemes, and one major facilitator (normative support from family members or social networks) emerged. CONCLUSIONS Despite CRC screening's life-saving potential, African-American men have had the lowest 5-year relative survival for more than 40 years. When developing interventions and health promotion programs aiming to eliminate the racial disparity in CRC outcomes, addressing both masculine role norms and medical mistrust barriers to CRC screening completion among African-American men is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles R. Rogers
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, 375 Chipeta Way, Suite A, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
| | - Tiana N. Rogers
- University of Utah - David Eccles School of Business, Sorenson Impact Center, 85 Fort Douglas Blvd, Building #602, Salt Lake City, UT 84113, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Laditi F, Nie J, Jones T, Leapman MS. Variation and Disparity in the Use of Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification Tools in the United States. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:910-912. [PMID: 35778364 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In this review we summarize evidence from US studies examining variation in the use of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and tissue-based gene expression tests (genomic tests), focusing on sources of regional and racial variation. Large observational studies indicate that prostate MRI and genomic testing vary significantly at the regional level as measured across multiple geographic boundaries. Similarly, there is lower use of prostate MRI among Black versus White-identified patients Black in comparison to those who are White, as well as evidence of less use among Hispanic and Asian versus White patients. These findings indicate opportunities to address modifiable sources of practice variation in localized prostate cancer. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this review, we found that use of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and genetic testing differed by region, and race, with less prostate MRI use among Black versus White patients. These findings can help raise awareness about gaps in access to new prostate cancer tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James Nie
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Tashzna Jones
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Michael S Leapman
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Owens-Walton J, Williams C, Rompré-Brodeur A, Pinto PA, Ball MW. Minority Enrollment in Phase II and III Clinical Trials in Urologic Oncology. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1583-1589. [PMID: 35196107 PMCID: PMC9084430 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Proportionate minority representation in clinical trials is an important step toward addressing health care inequities. Given the paucity of data on this topic in urologic oncology, we sought to quantify the enrollment of minority patients in clinical trials studying prostate, kidney, and bladder/urothelial cancers. METHODS The ClincialTrials.gov database was queried for completed phase II and III interventional trials in prostate, kidney, and bladder cancers. The SEER database was used to calculate the US prevalence of these genitourinary cancers. Representation quotients (RQ) were calculated to describe the relative proportion of each racial/ethnic group enrolled in clinical trials over the proportion of persons from each group among national cancer cases by cancer type. RESULTS Of 341 trials that met initial eligibility criteria, only 169 (49.7%) reported data on race or ethnicity. Aggregate RQs from 2000 to 2017 showed that White patients were continually over-represented in trials for all cancer types. Black and Asian patients were poorly represented across all cancer types. When stratified by 3-year increments, the RQs remained stable for all races, from 2000 to 2017. When stratified by ethnicity, Hispanic patients were under-represented across all cancer types in the study period. When examining representation by funding source, we found that US government-funded clinical trials proportionally enroll the most diverse patient populations over those funded by academic institutions and industry. Interestingly, more than 50% of the trials examined did not report race nor ethnicity, highlighting a crucial flaw in investigator compliance with federal clinical trial mandates. CONCLUSION Clinical trials targeting prostate, kidney, and bladder cancers continue to under-represent racial/ethnic minority patients. On the basis of the incidence of these cancers within minority populations, efforts should focus on creating racially and ethnically inclusive cancer research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeunice Owens-Walton
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Cheyenne Williams
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Alexis Rompré-Brodeur
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Peter A. Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Mark W. Ball
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Curtin M, Dickerson SS. Precision Medicine Testing and Disparities in Health Care for Individuals With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review. Oncol Nurs Forum 2022; 49:257-272. [PMID: 35446830 DOI: 10.1188/22.onf.257-272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Precision medicine initiatives provide opportunities for optimal targeted therapy in individuals with non-small cell lung cancer. However, there are barriers to these initiatives that reflect social determinants of health. LITERATURE SEARCH MEDLINE®, CINAHL®, PsycINFO®, Embase®, and Google ScholarTM databases were searched for articles published in English in the United States from 2016 to 2020. DATA EVALUATION Data that were collected included individual demographic information, specific diagnosis, status of targeted genomic testing, and receipt of targeted therapy. All studies were retrospective and involved database review of insurance claims or medical records. SYNTHESIS Individuals with non-small cell lung cancer received less genetic testing and targeted therapy if they were of a lower socioeconomic status, had public health insurance or no health insurance, were Black, or lived in rural communities. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING Social determinants of health affect health equity, including in precision medicine initiatives for individuals with lung cancer. Gaining an understanding of this impact is the first step in mitigating inequities.
Collapse
|
24
|
Esdaille AR, Ibilibor C, Holmes A, Palmer NR, Murphy AB. Access and Representation: A Narrative Review of the Disparities in Access to Clinical Trials and Precision Oncology in Black men with Prostate Cancer. Urology 2022; 163:90-98. [PMID: 34582887 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide commentary on the disparities in access to clinical trials and precision oncology specific to Black men with Prostate Cancer (PCa) in the United States and lend a general framework to aid in closing these gaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS The ideas, commentaries and data presented in this narrative review were synthesized by utilizing qualitative and quantitative studies, reviews, and randomized control trials performed between 2010 and 2021. We searched PubMed using the key words "Medicaid", "Medicare", "clinical trials", "African Americans", "Black", "underrepresentation", "access", "Prostate Cancer", "minority recruitment", "racial disparities", "disparity", "genomics", "biomarkers", "diagnostic" "prognostic", "validation", "precision medicine", and "precision oncology" to identify important themes, trends and data described in the current review. Keywords were used alone and combination with both "AND" and "OR" terms. RESULTS Black men with prostate cancer (PCa) in the United States have earlier onset of disease, present with more advanced stages, and worse prostate cancer-specific survival than their White counterparts. Potential causative factors vary from disparities in health care access to differences in tumor immunobiology and genomics along with disparate screening rates, management patterns and underrepresentation in clinical and translational research such as clinical trials and precision oncology. CONCLUSION To avoid increasing the racial disparity in PCa outcomes for Black men, we must increase inclusion of Black men into precision oncology and clinical trials, using multilevel change. Underrepresentation in clinical and translational research may potentiate poorly validated risk calculators and biomarkers, leading to poor treatment decisions in high-risk populations. Relevant actions include funding to include minority-serving institutions as recruitment sites, and inclusion of evidence based recruitment methods in funded research to increase Black representation in clinical trials and translational research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashanda R Esdaille
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin at Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Christine Ibilibor
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Arturo Holmes
- Department of Urology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
| | - Nynikka R Palmer
- Department of Medicine, Urology and Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
| | - Adam B Murphy
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Odedina FT, Walsh-Childers K, Young ME, Kaninjing E, Krieger J, Pereira D, Dagne G, Askins N, Fathi P. Development of a Minority Prostate Cancer Research Digest: Communication Strategy Statement for Black Men. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2022; 37:328-337. [PMID: 32638289 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01815-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Since prostate cancer incidence, prevalence and mortality are still highest among Black men in the United States, it is important to effectively address the factors that contribute to prostate cancer disparities in this at-risk population as well as their low participation in biomedical research/clinical trials. An effective communication strategy that can be used to disseminate information with high public health impact to Black men is one way to combat prostate cancer disparities. The objective of this study was to develop a Minority Prostate Cancer (MiCaP) research communication strategy using focus group methodology and expert in-depth interviews. The communication strategy statement developed in this study provides a guide for message concepts and materials for Black men, including communication content, source, channel, and location. Specifically, it provides recommendations on how to deliver information, how to choose the language and relevant images, how to gain attention, who is preferred to deliver messages, and other ways to engage Black men in health communication strategies. The communication strategy statement was used to develop the MiCaP Research Digest, a research communication program that is currently being tested in Orange County, Duval County, Leon County, Gadsden County, and the Tampa Bay area of Florida.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Folakemi T Odedina
- College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
- Prostate Cancer Transatlantic Consortium, Orlando, FL, USA.
| | - Kim Walsh-Childers
- College of Journalism & Communication, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Mary Ellen Young
- College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Janice Krieger
- College of Journalism & Communication, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Deidre Pereira
- College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Getachew Dagne
- Prostate Cancer Transatlantic Consortium, Orlando, FL, USA
- University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Nissa Askins
- College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
- Prostate Cancer Transatlantic Consortium, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Parisa Fathi
- College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
- Prostate Cancer Transatlantic Consortium, Orlando, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Khan A, Rogers CR, Kennedy CD, Lopez A, Jeter J. Genetic Evaluation for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes Among African Americans: A Critical Review. Oncologist 2022; 27:285-291. [PMID: 35380723 PMCID: PMC8982373 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
While hereditary cancer syndromes have been described and studied for centuries, the completion of the human genome project fueled accelerated progress in precision medicine due to the introduction of genetic testing in the 1990s, creating avenues for tailored treatments and medical management options. However, genetic testing has not benefited everyone equitably, with nearly all of the published work based on individuals of non-Hispanic White/European ancestry. There remains a gap in knowledge regarding the prevalence, penetrance, and manifestations of common hereditary cancer syndromes in the African-American population due to significant disparities in access and uptake of genetic testing. This review summarizes the available literature on genetic testing for breast, colon, and prostate cancers in the African-American population and explores the disparities in access to genetic testing between non-Hispanic White and African-American patients. This article also addresses the barriers to genetic testing and discrepancies in the uptake of recommendations for hereditary cancer syndromes in the African-American population when compared with non-Hispanic Whites. The review offers practice implications for many healthcare providers and demonstrates gaps in the existing knowledge to be addressed in future studies to help eliminate the persisting health disparities faced by the African-American population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambreen Khan
- Family Cancer Assessment Clinic, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Charles R Rogers
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, USA
| | - Carson D Kennedy
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, USA
| | - AnaMaria Lopez
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joanne Jeter
- Family Cancer Assessment Clinic, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Smith PD, Murray M, Hoffman LS, Ester TV, Kohli R. Addressing Black men's oral health through community engaged research and workforce recruitment. J Public Health Dent 2022; 82 Suppl 1:83-88. [PMID: 35726473 PMCID: PMC9543032 DOI: 10.1111/jphd.12508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Racism negatively affects the life experiences and subsequent health of Black men, including oral disease prevalence and outcomes. Few examples in the literature discuss how racism may affect successful, unsuccessful, and non-attempts to address Black men's oral health. AIMS This commentary describes anti-racism approaches to address Black men's oral health through community-based participatory research, oral health promotion, and workforce recruitment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Stakeholders from two organizations and one dental school share their experiences and key insights on how to strengthen efforts while minimizing the influence of racism on Black men's participation. RESULTS Common insights identified were a need to engage a diverse range of Black men within varying social and economic contexts, race and gender concordance among program leaders and participants, and the value of partnership to reach Black men in places where they feel comfortable and supported. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION These examples stress the imperative of addressing racism among Black men in the development and improvement of targeted oral health interventions. They also emphasize the value of commitment from institutional leadership, relationship building with Black men, and the empowerment of Black men to lead program development and implementation efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick D Smith
- Division of Prevention and Public Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago College of Dentistry, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - La Shawn Hoffman
- Pittsburgh Community Improvement Association, Community Coalition Board, Morehouse School of Medicine Prevention Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Todd V Ester
- Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Richie Kohli
- Department of Community Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University School of Dentistry, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hoadley A, Bass SB, Chertock Y, Brajuha J, D’Avanzo P, Kelly PJ, Hall MJ. The Role of Medical Mistrust in Concerns about Tumor Genomic Profiling among Black and African American Cancer Patients. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19052598. [PMID: 35270290 PMCID: PMC8909390 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Tumor genomic profiling (TGP) is used in oncology practice to optimize cancer treatment and improve survival rates. However, TGP is underutilized among Black and African American (AA) patients, creating potential disparities in cancer treatment outcomes. Cost, accuracy, and privacy are barriers to genetic testing, but medical mistrust (MM) may also influence how Black and AA cancer patients perceive TGP. From December 2019 to February 2020, 112 Black and AA adults from two outpatient oncology sites in Philadelphia, PA without a known history of having TGP testing conducted completed a cross-sectional survey. Items queried included sociodemographic characteristics, clinical factors, patient-oncologist relationship quality, medical mistrust, and concerns about TGP. A k-means cluster analysis revealed two distinct psychographic clusters: high (MM-H) versus low (MM-L) medical mistrust. Clusters were not associated with any sociodemographic or clinical factors, except for age (MM-H patients older than MM-L patients, p = 0.006). Eleven TGP concerns were assessed; MM-H patients expressed greater concerns than MM-L patients, including distrust of the government, insurance carriers, and pharmaceutical companies. TGP concerns varied significantly based on level of medical mistrust, irrespective of sociodemographic characteristics. Targeted communications addressing TGP concerns may mitigate disparities in TGP uptake among those with medical mistrust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel Hoadley
- Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Rm 947, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA; (S.B.B.); (J.B.); (P.D.); (P.J.K.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Sarah Bauerle Bass
- Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Rm 947, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA; (S.B.B.); (J.B.); (P.D.); (P.J.K.)
| | - Yana Chertock
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Department of Clinical Genetics, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA; (Y.C.); (M.J.H.)
| | - Jesse Brajuha
- Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Rm 947, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA; (S.B.B.); (J.B.); (P.D.); (P.J.K.)
| | - Paul D’Avanzo
- Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Rm 947, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA; (S.B.B.); (J.B.); (P.D.); (P.J.K.)
| | - Patrick J. Kelly
- Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Rm 947, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA; (S.B.B.); (J.B.); (P.D.); (P.J.K.)
| | - Michael J. Hall
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Department of Clinical Genetics, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA; (Y.C.); (M.J.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lee G, Varughese LA, Conway L, Stojinski C, Ashokkumar S, Monono K, Matthai W, Kolansky DM, Giri J, Tuteja S. Attitudes toward pharmacogenetics in patients undergoing CYP2C19 testing following percutaneous coronary intervention. Per Med 2022; 19:93-101. [PMID: 34984913 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2021-0064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Aim: Patient knowledge and attitudes toward pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing may impact adoption of clinical testing. Methods: Questionnaires regarding knowledge, attitudes and ethics of PGx testing were distributed to 504 patients enrolled in the ADAPT study conducted at two urban hospitals in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Responses were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Results: 311 completed the survey (62% response rate). 74% were unaware of PGx testing, but 79% indicated using PGx results to predict medication efficacy was important. In a multivariable model, higher education level (p = 0.031) and greater genetics knowledge (p < 0.001) were associated with more positive attitudes toward PGx testing. Conclusion: Greater patient knowledge of genetics was associated with a more positive attitude toward PGx testing, indicating that educational strategies aimed at increasing genetics knowledge may enhance adoption of PGx testing in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Lee
- Department of Genetic Counseling, Arcadia University, Glenside, PA, USA
| | - Lisa A Varughese
- Division of Translational Medicine & Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Laura Conway
- Department of Genetic Counseling, Arcadia University, Glenside, PA, USA.,Division of Translational Medicine & Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Carol Stojinski
- Department of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sandhya Ashokkumar
- Department of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Karen Monono
- Division of Translational Medicine & Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - William Matthai
- Cardiovascular Medicine Division, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daniel M Kolansky
- Cardiovascular Medicine Division, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jay Giri
- Cardiovascular Medicine Division, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Penn Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality, & Evaluative Research Center & the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sony Tuteja
- Division of Translational Medicine & Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Meagher KM, Stuttgen Finn K, Curtis SH, Borucki J, Beck AT, Cheema AW, Sharp RR. Lay understandings of drug-gene interactions: The right medication, the right dose, at the right time, but what are the right words? Clin Transl Sci 2021; 15:721-731. [PMID: 34755460 PMCID: PMC8932688 DOI: 10.1111/cts.13193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
As pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing increases in popularity, lay concepts of drug‐gene interactions set the stage for shared decision making in precision medicine. Few studies explore what recipients of PGx results think is happening in their bodies when a drug‐gene interaction is discovered. To characterize biobank participants’ understanding of PGx research results, we conducted a focus group study, which took place after PGx variants conferring increased risk of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency were disclosed to biobank contributors. DPD deficiency confers an increased risk of adverse reaction to commonly used cancer chemotherapeutics. Ten focus groups were conducted, ranging from two to eight participants. Fifty‐four individuals participated in focus groups. A framework approach was used for descriptive and explanatory analysis. Descriptive themes included participants’ efforts to make sense of PGx findings as they related to: (1) health implications, (2) drugs, and (3) genetics. Explanatory analysis supplied a functional framework of how participant word choices can perform different purposes in PGx communication. Results bear three main implications for PGx research‐related disclosure. First, participants’ use of various terms suggest participants generally understanding their PGx results, including how positive PGx results differ from positive disease susceptibility genetic results. Second, PGx disclosure in biobanking can involve participant conflation of drug‐gene interactions with allergies or other types of medical reactions. Third, the functional framework suggests a need to move beyond a deficit model of genetic literacy in PGx communication. Together, findings provide an initial evidence base for supporting bidirectional expert‐recipient PGx results communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M Meagher
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Susan H Curtis
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jack Borucki
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Annika T Beck
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Amal W Cheema
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Richard R Sharp
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lee DJ, Hausler R, Le AN, Kelly G, Powers J, Ding J, Feld E, Desai H, Morrison C, Doucette A, Gabriel P, Genetics Center R, Judy RL, Weaver J, Kember R, Damrauer SM, Rader DJ, Domchek SM, Narayan V, Schwartz LE, Maxwell KN. Association of Inherited Mutations in DNA Repair Genes with Localized Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2021; 81:559-567. [PMID: 34711450 PMCID: PMC9035481 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.09.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background: Identification of germline mutations in DNA repair genes has significant implications for the personalized treatment of individuals with prostate cancer (PrCa). Objective: To determine DNA repair genes associated with localized PrCa in a diverse academic biobank and to determine genetic testing burden. Design, setting, and participants: A cross-sectional study of 2391 localized PrCa patients was carried out. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Genetic ancestry and mutation rates (excluding somatic interference) in 17 DNA repair genes were determined in 1588 localized PrCa patients and 3273 cancer-free males. Burden testing within individuals of genetically determined European (EUR) and African (AFR) ancestry was performed between biobank PrCa cases and cancer-free biobank and gnomAD males. Results and limitations: AFR individuals with localized PrCa had lower DNA repair gene mutation rates than EUR individuals (1.4% vs 4.0%, p = 0.02). Mutation rates in localized PrCa patients were similar to those in biobank and gnomAD controls (EUR: 4.0% vs 2.8%, p = 0.15, vs 3.1%, p = 0.04; AFR: 1.4% vs 1.8%, p = 0.8, vs 2.1%, p = 0.5). Gene-based rare variant association testing revealed that only BRCA2 mutations were significantly enriched compared with gnomAD controls of EUR ancestry (1.0% vs 0.28%, p = 0.03). Of the participants, 21% and 11% met high-risk and very-high-risk criteria; of them, 3.7% and 6.2% had any germline genetic mutation and 1.0% and 2.5% had a BRCA2 mutation, respectively. Limitations of this study include an analysis of a relatively small, single-institution cohort. Conclusions: DNA repair gene germline mutation rates are low in an academic biobank cohort of localized PrCa patients, particularly among individuals of AFR genetic ancestry. Mutation rates in genes with published evidence of association with PrCa exceed 2.5% only in high-risk, very-high-risk localized, and node-positive PrCa patients. These findings highlight the importance of risk stratification in localized PrCa patients to identify appropriate patients for germline genetic testing. Patient summary: In the majority of patients who develop localized prostate cancer, germline genetic testing is unlikely to reveal an inherited DNA repair mutation, regardless of race. High-risk features increase the possibility of a germline DNA repair mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ryan Hausler
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anh N Le
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gregory Kelly
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jacquelyn Powers
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James Ding
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Emily Feld
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Heena Desai
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Casey Morrison
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Abigail Doucette
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Peter Gabriel
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Renae L Judy
- Department of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joellen Weaver
- Department of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rachel Kember
- Department of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Scott M Damrauer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daniel J Rader
- Department of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Vivek Narayan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lauren E Schwartz
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kara N Maxwell
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Carthon B, Sibold HC, Blee S, D. Pentz R. Prostate Cancer: Community Education and Disparities in Diagnosis and Treatment. Oncologist 2021; 26:537-548. [PMID: 33683758 PMCID: PMC8265358 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer remains the leading diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of death among American men. Despite improvements in screening modalities, diagnostics, and treatment, disparities exist among Black men in this country. The primary objective of this systematic review is to describe the reported disparities in screening, diagnostics, and treatments as well as efforts to alleviate these disparities through community and educational outreach efforts. Critical review took place of retrospective, prospective, and socially descriptive data of English language publications in the PubMed database. Despite more advanced presentation, lower rates of screening and diagnostic procedures, and low rates of trial inclusion, subanalyses have shown that various modalities of therapy are quite effective in Black populations. Moreover, patients treated on prospective clinical trials and within equal-access care environments have shown similar outcomes regardless of race. Additional prospective studies and enhanced participation in screening, diagnostic and genetic testing, clinical trials, and community-based educational endeavors are important to ensure equitable progress in prostate cancer for all patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Notable progress has been made with therapeutic advances for prostate cancer, but racial disparities continue to exist. Differing rates in screening and utility in diagnostic procedures play a role in these disparities. Black patients often present with more advanced disease, higher prostate-specific antigen, and other adverse factors, but outcomes can be attenuated in trials or in equal-access care environments. Recent data have shown that multiple modalities of therapy are quite effective in Black populations. Novel and bold hypotheses to increase inclusion in clinical trial, enhance decentralized trial efforts, and enact successful models of patient navigation and community partnership are vital to ensure continued progress in prostate cancer disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Shannon Blee
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Tucker-Seeley RD, Wallington SF, Canin B, Tang W, McKoy JM. Health Equity for Older Adults With Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2205-2216. [PMID: 34043411 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Reginald D Tucker-Seeley
- Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.,USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sherrie F Wallington
- The George Washington University School of Nursing & Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC
| | - Beverly Canin
- Cancer and Aging Research Group, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Weizhou Tang
- Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - June M McKoy
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cackowski FC, Mahal B, Heath EI, Carthon B. Evolution of Disparities in Prostate Cancer Treatment: Is This a New Normal? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2021; 41:1-12. [PMID: 33979195 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_321195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Despite notable screening, diagnostic, and therapeutic advances, disparities in prostate cancer incidence and outcomes remain prevalent. Although commonly discussed in the context of men of African descent, disparities also exist based on socioeconomic level, education level, and geographic location. The factors in these disparities span systemic access issues affecting availability of care, provider awareness, and personal patient views and mistrust. In this review, we will discuss common themes that patients have noted as impediments to care. We will review how equitable access to care has helped improve outcomes among many different groups of patients, including those with local disease and those with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Even with more advanced presentation, challenges with recommended screening, and lower rates of genomic testing and trial inclusion, Black populations have benefited greatly from various modalities of therapy, achieving comparable and at times superior outcomes with certain types of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, androgen receptor-based inhibitors, and radiopharmaceuticals in advanced disease. We will also briefly discuss access to genomic testing and differences in patterns of gene expression among Black patients and other groups that are traditionally underrepresented in trials and genomic cohort studies. We propose several strategies on behalf of providers and institutions to help promote more equitable care access environments and continued decreases in prostate cancer disparities across many subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brandon Mahal
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ledet EM, Burgess EF, Sokolova AO, Jaeger EB, Hatton W, Moses M, Miller P, Cotogno P, Layton J, Barata P, Lewis BE, Nakazawa M, Zhu J, Dellinger B, Elrefai S, Nafissi NN, Egan JB, Shore N, McKay RR, Bryce AH, Cheng HH, Antonarakis ES, Sartor O. Comparison of germline mutations in African American and Caucasian men with metastatic prostate cancer. Prostate 2021; 81:433-439. [PMID: 33792945 PMCID: PMC8252583 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The goal of this study is to evaluate germline genetic variants in African American men with metastatic prostate cancer as compared to those in Caucasian men with metastatic prostate cancer in an effort to understand the role of genetic factors in these populations. METHODS African American and Caucasian men with metastatic prostate cancer who had germline testing using multigene panels were used to generate comparisons. Germline genetic results, clinical parameters, and family histories between the two populations were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 867 patients were included in this retrospective study, including 188 African American and 669 Caucasian patients. There was no significant difference in the likelihood of a pathogenic or likely-pathogenic variants (PV/LPVs) between African American and Caucasian patients (p = .09). African American patients were more likely to have a variant of unknown significance than Caucasians (odds ratio [OR] = 1.95; p < .0001). BRCA1 PV/LPVs were higher in African Americans (OR = 4.86; p = .04). African American patients were less likely to have a PV/LPV in non-BRCA DNA repair genes (OR = 0.30; p = .008). Family history of breast (OR = 2.09; p = .002) or ovarian cancer (OR = 2.33; p = .04) predicted PV/LPVs in Caucasians but not African-Americans. This underscores the limitations of family history in AA men and the importance of personal history to guide germline testing in AA men. CONCLUSIONS In metastatic prostate cancer patients, PV/LPVs of tested genes did not vary by race, BRCA1 PV/LPVs were more common in the African American subset. However, PV/LPVs in non-BRCA DNA repair genes were less likely to be encountered in African Americans. Family history associated with genetic testing results in Caucasians only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa M. Ledet
- Department of Medicine, Tulane Cancer CenterTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Earle F. Burgess
- Genitourinary Oncology SectionLevine Cancer Institute/Atrium HealthCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Alexandra O. Sokolova
- Division of Oncology, Department of MedicineUniversity of Washington Medical Center/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/VA Puget Sound HCSSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Ellen B. Jaeger
- Department of Medicine, Tulane Cancer CenterTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Whitley Hatton
- Department of Medicine, Tulane Cancer CenterTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Marcus Moses
- School of MedicineTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Patrick Miller
- Department of Medicine, Tulane Cancer CenterTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Patrick Cotogno
- Department of Medicine, Tulane Cancer CenterTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Jodi Layton
- Department of Medicine, Tulane Cancer CenterTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Pedro Barata
- Deming Department of MedicineTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Brian E. Lewis
- Department of Medicine, Tulane Cancer CenterTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Mari Nakazawa
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Jason Zhu
- Genitourinary Oncology SectionLevine Cancer Institute/Atrium HealthCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Beth Dellinger
- Genitourinary Oncology SectionLevine Cancer Institute/Atrium HealthCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Sara Elrefai
- Genitourinary Oncology SectionLevine Cancer Institute/Atrium HealthCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | - Jan B. Egan
- Center for Individualized MedicineMayo ClinicScottsdaleArizonaUSA
| | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research CenterAtlantic Urology ClinicsMyrtle BeachSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - Rana R. McKay
- Moores Cancer CenterUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Alan H. Bryce
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic Cancer CenterMayo ClinicPhoenixArizonaUSA
| | - Heather H. Cheng
- Division of Oncology, Department of MedicineUniversity of Washington Medical Center/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/VA Puget Sound HCSSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Emmanuel S. Antonarakis
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Oliver Sartor
- Department of Medicine, Tulane Cancer CenterTulane UniversityNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Borno HT, Andemeskel G, Palmer NR. Redefining Attribution From Patient to Health System-How the Notion of "Mistrust" Places Blame on Black Patients. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:780. [PMID: 33662096 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.8482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hala T Borno
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Ghilamichael Andemeskel
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Nynikka R Palmer
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.,Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Armstrong N, Quek RGW, Ryder S, Ross J, Buksnys T, Forbes C, Fox KM, Castro E. DNA damage repair gene mutation testing and genetic counseling in men with/without prostate cancer: a systematic review. Future Oncol 2021; 17:853-864. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-0569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Ongoing clinical trials are investigating PARP inhibitors to target the DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway in prostate cancer. DDR mutation screening will guide treatment strategy and assess eligibility for clinical trials. Materials & methods: This systematic review estimated the rate of DDR mutation testing or genetic counseling among men with or at risk of prostate cancer. Results: From 6856 records, one study fulfilled the inclusion criteria and described men undiagnosed with prostate cancer with a family history of BRCA1/2 mutation who received DDR mutation testing. Conclusion: With only one study included in this first systematic review of DDR mutation testing or genetic counseling in men with or at risk of prostate cancer, more research is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Kathleen M Fox
- Strategic Healthcare Solutions, LLC, Aiken, SC 29803, USA
| | - Elena Castro
- Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Spain
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Borno HT, Duffy C, Zhang S, Canchola AJ, Loya Z, Golden T, Oh DL, Odisho AY, Gomez S. Integration of electronic pathology reporting with clinical trial matching for advanced prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:494.e7-494.e14. [PMID: 33419644 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Racial/ethnic diversity in prostate cancer (CaP) clinical trials (CTs) is essential to address CaP disparities. California Cancer Registry mandated electronic reporting (e-path) of structured data elements from pathologists diagnosing cancer thereby creating an opportunity to identify and approach patients rapidly. This study tested the utility of an online CT matching tool (called Trial Library) used in combination with e-path to improve matching of underrepresented CaP patients into CTs at time of diagnosis. METHODS This was a nonrandomized, single-arm feasibility study among patients with a new pathologic diagnosis of high-risk CaP (Gleason Score ≥8). Eligible patients were sent recruitment materials and enrolled patients were introduced to Trial Library. RESULTS A total of 419 case listings were assessed. Patients were excluded due to physician contraindication, not meeting baseline eligibility, or unable to be reached. Final participants (N = 52) completed a baseline survey. Among study participants, 77% were White, 10% were Black/Hispanic/Missing, and 14% were Asian. The majority of the study participants were over 65 years of age (81%) and Medicare insured (62%). Additionally, 81% of participants reported using the Internet to learn about CaP. The majority (62%) of participants reported that Trial Library increased their interest in CT participation. CONCLUSIONS The current study demonstrated that leveraging structured e-path data reporting to a population-based cancer registry to recruit men with high risk CaP to clinical research is feasible and acceptable. We observed that e-path may be linked with an online CT matching tool, Trial Library. Future studies will prioritize recruitment from reporting facilities that serve more racially/ethnically diverse patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hala T Borno
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA.
| | - Christine Duffy
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Sylvia Zhang
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Alison J Canchola
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Zinnia Loya
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Todd Golden
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Debora L Oh
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Anobel Y Odisho
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Center for Digital Health Innovation, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Scarlett Gomez
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lewis DD, Cropp CD. The Impact of African Ancestry on Prostate Cancer Disparities in the Era of Precision Medicine. Genes (Basel) 2020; 11:E1471. [PMID: 33302594 PMCID: PMC7762993 DOI: 10.3390/genes11121471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer disproportionately affects men of African ancestry at nearly twice the rate of men of European ancestry despite the advancement of treatment strategies and prevention. In this review, we discuss the underlying causes of these disparities including genetics, environmental/behavioral, and social determinants of health while highlighting the implications and challenges that contribute to the stark underrepresentation of men of African ancestry in clinical trials and genetic research studies. Reducing prostate cancer disparities through the development of personalized medicine approaches based on genetics will require a holistic understanding of the complex interplay of non-genetic factors that disproportionately exacerbate the observed disparity between men of African and European ancestries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deyana D. Lewis
- Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
| | - Cheryl D. Cropp
- Department of Pharmaceutical, Social and Administrative Sciences, Samford University McWhorter School of Pharmacy, Birmingham, AL 35229, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wright ML, Newhall K, Barcelona V, Taylor JY. African American mothers' attitudes towards genetic testing in the InterGEN study. J Community Genet 2020; 11:285-290. [PMID: 31811592 PMCID: PMC7295918 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-019-00440-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The paucity of representation of people of color, particularly those of African ancestry, is a major issue in contemporary omics research. Metadata summarizing genome-wide association studies from 2005 to 2015 suggest that nearly 80% of participants are of European ancestry and only 2.4% are of African ancestry. Negative attitude towards genetic testing is a commonly cited belief as to why there is low representation of Americans of African ancestry participating in genetic studies. Using the attitudes towards genetic testing survey, administered as part of our parent (epi)genome-wide association study, we characterized the perceptions of genetic research among our cohort of African ancestry women (n = 168). Our data show generally favorable perceptions of genetic testing among our cohort. Further, we demonstrate that more favorable attitudes towards genetic testing correlated with higher levels of income, even when accounting for commonly cited negative predictors such as maternal age, education, country of origin, and religion. Overall, our data characterize generally positive perceptions of genetic testing among women of African ancestry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle L. Wright
- School of Nursing, University of Texas, Austin, TX USA
- Dell Medical School, Department of Women’s Health, Austin, TX USA
| | - Kevin Newhall
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
McKinney LP, Gerbi GB, Caplan LS, Claridy MD, Rivers BM. Predictors of genetic beliefs toward cancer risk perceptions among adults in the United States: Implications for prevention or early detection. J Genet Couns 2020; 29:494-504. [PMID: 32103577 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study is to assess predictors of genetic beliefs toward cancer risk perceptions among adults, aged 18 years and over, in the United States (US). Data were obtained from the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Health Information National Trends Survey 2014 (HINTS) 4 Cycle 4. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess factors associated with an individual's beliefs about genetic and cancer risk perceptions. The results showed that African Americans, Non-White Hispanics, Non-Hispanic Asians, individuals with a high school education or less, and annual household incomes less than $20,000 and do not believe that health behaviors play some role in determining whether a person will develop cancer was significantly less likely to report that genetics plays at least some role in whether a person will develop cancer. Findings of this study provide an opportunity for genetic counselors to address beliefs about genetics and cancer risk perceptions among minority populations and promote health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawrence P McKinney
- Cancer Health Equity Institute, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Gemechu B Gerbi
- Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lee S Caplan
- Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mechelle D Claridy
- Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Brian M Rivers
- Cancer Health Equity Institute, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Petersen C. User-focused data sharing agreements: a foundation for the genomic future. JAMIA Open 2020; 2:402-406. [PMID: 32025634 PMCID: PMC6993993 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Data sharing agreements that clearly describe what individuals are agreeing to and what responsibilities data stewards will undertake are crucial for the establishment, maintenance, and flourishing of genomic datasets. To optimize genomic data resources, researchers, care professionals, and informaticians must regard system design, user objectives, and environmental considerations through users' eyes, identifying fundamental values on which to build and potential barriers to success that must be avoided. Design of agreements that promote desired data sharing and protect valuable data resources as necessary begins with a review of user interests and concerns. Nontraditional approaches for informed consent (eg, abbreviated informed consent, electronic informed consent, and dynamic consent) can facilitate achievement of data donors' privacy-related goals while making data available to researchers. Transparency in individual-researcher interactions, recognition and accommodation of cultural differences, and identification of shared needs and goals create a foundation for data sharing agreements that work over short and long terms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Petersen
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Global Business Solutions, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hamel LM, Dougherty DW, Albrecht TL, Wojda M, Jordan A, Moore TF, Senft N, Carducci M, Heath EI, Manning MA, Penner LA, Kim S, Eggly S. Unpacking Trial Offers and Low Accrual Rates: A Qualitative Analysis of Clinic Visits With Physicians and Patients Potentially Eligible for a Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 16:e124-e131. [PMID: 31790330 PMCID: PMC7587411 DOI: 10.1200/jop.19.00444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer clinical trial accrual rates are low, and information about contributing factors is needed. We examined video-recorded clinical interactions to identify circumstances under which patients potentially eligible for a trial at a major cancer center were offered a trial. METHODS We conducted a qualitative directed content analysis of 62 recorded interactions with physicians (n = 13) and patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer (n = 43). Patients were screened and potentially eligible for a trial. We observed and coded the interactions in 3 steps: (1) classification of all interactions as explicit offer, offer pending, trial discussed/not offered, or trial not discussed; (2) in interactions with no explicit offer, classification of whether the cancer had progressed; (3) in interactions classified as progression but no trial offered, identification of factors discussed that may explain the lack of an offer. RESULTS Of the 62 interactions, 29% were classified as explicit offer, 12% as offer pending, 18% as trial discussed/not offered, and 39% as trial not discussed. Of those with no offer, 57% included information that the cancer had not progressed. In 68% of the remaining interactions with patients whose cancer had progressed but did not receive an offer, reasons for the lack of offer were identified, but in 32%, no explanation was provided. CONCLUSION Even in optimal circumstances, few patients were offered a trial, often because their cancer had not progressed. Findings support professional recommendations to broaden trial inclusion criteria. Findings suggest accrual rates should reflect the proportion of eligible patients who enroll.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren M. Hamel
- Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
| | | | | | - Mark Wojda
- Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
| | - Alice Jordan
- Johns Hopkins/Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Tanina F. Moore
- Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
| | | | - Michael Carducci
- Johns Hopkins/Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Mark A. Manning
- Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
| | - Louis A. Penner
- Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
| | - Seongho Kim
- Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
| | - Susan Eggly
- Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mendoza NS, Moreno FA, Hishaw GA, Gaw AC, Fortuna LR, Skubel A, Porche MV, Roessel MH, Shore J, Gallegos A. Affirmative Care Across Cultures: Broadening Application. FOCUS: JOURNAL OF LIFE LONG LEARNING IN PSYCHIATRY 2020; 18:31-39. [PMID: 32047395 DOI: 10.1176/appi.focus.20190030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Affirmative practice is an approach to health and behavioral health care that validates and supports the identities stated or expressed by those served. Affirmative care requires the practitioner to actively honor and celebrate identity while at the same time validating the oppression felt by individuals seeking services. Validation and empathy fundamentally result from increased understanding of individuals' history, cultural context, and lived experiences. Origins of the approach honored the experience of those in LGBTQ+ communities; however, affirmative care should be valued across cultures, systems, and settings in which health and behavioral health care are offered. Affirmative care principles should be applied across cultures and communities while recognizing the worth of the individual and avoiding stereotyping. Along with delineating historical and demographic contexts, the authors offer recommendations for affirmative care in practice with African American, Asian, Indigenous, and Latinx individuals, as well as those living in rural communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha S Mendoza
- Center for Applied Behavioral Health Policy, Watts College of Public Service and Community Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix (Mendoza, Gallegos); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson and Phoenix (Moreno); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson (Hishaw); University of California, San Francisco, Medical School, San Francisco (Gaw); Boston Medical Center, School of Medicine (Fortuna), and Wheelock College of Education and Human Development (Skubel, Porche), all at Boston University, Boston; Caucus of American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Psychiatrists, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC (Roessel); Department of Psychiatry, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora (Shore)
| | - Francisco A Moreno
- Center for Applied Behavioral Health Policy, Watts College of Public Service and Community Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix (Mendoza, Gallegos); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson and Phoenix (Moreno); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson (Hishaw); University of California, San Francisco, Medical School, San Francisco (Gaw); Boston Medical Center, School of Medicine (Fortuna), and Wheelock College of Education and Human Development (Skubel, Porche), all at Boston University, Boston; Caucus of American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Psychiatrists, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC (Roessel); Department of Psychiatry, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora (Shore)
| | - G Alexander Hishaw
- Center for Applied Behavioral Health Policy, Watts College of Public Service and Community Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix (Mendoza, Gallegos); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson and Phoenix (Moreno); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson (Hishaw); University of California, San Francisco, Medical School, San Francisco (Gaw); Boston Medical Center, School of Medicine (Fortuna), and Wheelock College of Education and Human Development (Skubel, Porche), all at Boston University, Boston; Caucus of American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Psychiatrists, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC (Roessel); Department of Psychiatry, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora (Shore)
| | - Albert C Gaw
- Center for Applied Behavioral Health Policy, Watts College of Public Service and Community Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix (Mendoza, Gallegos); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson and Phoenix (Moreno); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson (Hishaw); University of California, San Francisco, Medical School, San Francisco (Gaw); Boston Medical Center, School of Medicine (Fortuna), and Wheelock College of Education and Human Development (Skubel, Porche), all at Boston University, Boston; Caucus of American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Psychiatrists, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC (Roessel); Department of Psychiatry, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora (Shore)
| | - Lisa R Fortuna
- Center for Applied Behavioral Health Policy, Watts College of Public Service and Community Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix (Mendoza, Gallegos); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson and Phoenix (Moreno); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson (Hishaw); University of California, San Francisco, Medical School, San Francisco (Gaw); Boston Medical Center, School of Medicine (Fortuna), and Wheelock College of Education and Human Development (Skubel, Porche), all at Boston University, Boston; Caucus of American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Psychiatrists, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC (Roessel); Department of Psychiatry, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora (Shore)
| | - Anna Skubel
- Center for Applied Behavioral Health Policy, Watts College of Public Service and Community Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix (Mendoza, Gallegos); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson and Phoenix (Moreno); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson (Hishaw); University of California, San Francisco, Medical School, San Francisco (Gaw); Boston Medical Center, School of Medicine (Fortuna), and Wheelock College of Education and Human Development (Skubel, Porche), all at Boston University, Boston; Caucus of American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Psychiatrists, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC (Roessel); Department of Psychiatry, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora (Shore)
| | - Michelle V Porche
- Center for Applied Behavioral Health Policy, Watts College of Public Service and Community Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix (Mendoza, Gallegos); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson and Phoenix (Moreno); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson (Hishaw); University of California, San Francisco, Medical School, San Francisco (Gaw); Boston Medical Center, School of Medicine (Fortuna), and Wheelock College of Education and Human Development (Skubel, Porche), all at Boston University, Boston; Caucus of American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Psychiatrists, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC (Roessel); Department of Psychiatry, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora (Shore)
| | - Mary Hasbah Roessel
- Center for Applied Behavioral Health Policy, Watts College of Public Service and Community Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix (Mendoza, Gallegos); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson and Phoenix (Moreno); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson (Hishaw); University of California, San Francisco, Medical School, San Francisco (Gaw); Boston Medical Center, School of Medicine (Fortuna), and Wheelock College of Education and Human Development (Skubel, Porche), all at Boston University, Boston; Caucus of American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Psychiatrists, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC (Roessel); Department of Psychiatry, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora (Shore)
| | - Jay Shore
- Center for Applied Behavioral Health Policy, Watts College of Public Service and Community Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix (Mendoza, Gallegos); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson and Phoenix (Moreno); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson (Hishaw); University of California, San Francisco, Medical School, San Francisco (Gaw); Boston Medical Center, School of Medicine (Fortuna), and Wheelock College of Education and Human Development (Skubel, Porche), all at Boston University, Boston; Caucus of American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Psychiatrists, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC (Roessel); Department of Psychiatry, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora (Shore)
| | - Anthony Gallegos
- Center for Applied Behavioral Health Policy, Watts College of Public Service and Community Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix (Mendoza, Gallegos); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson and Phoenix (Moreno); College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson (Hishaw); University of California, San Francisco, Medical School, San Francisco (Gaw); Boston Medical Center, School of Medicine (Fortuna), and Wheelock College of Education and Human Development (Skubel, Porche), all at Boston University, Boston; Caucus of American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Psychiatrists, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC (Roessel); Department of Psychiatry, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora (Shore)
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Veilleux S, Bouffard M, Bourque Bouliane M. Patient and Health Care Provider Needs and Preferences in Understanding Pharmacogenomic and Genomic Testing: A Meta-Data Analysis. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2020; 30:43-59. [PMID: 31322055 DOI: 10.1177/1049732319858325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Tests that feature genomic indicators can now be used to guide the pharmacological treatment of patients. To better identify the needs and preferences of patients and health care providers in facilitating their understanding of information related to such pharmacogenomic tests (PGx), a review of literature on knowledge translation and health literacy in the context of testing was conducted. Using a grounded theory-based approach, a comparative analysis of data from 36 studies meeting the criteria for the meta-data analysis has revealed the recurrence of three principal themes: (a) knowledge and understanding of genetics and pharmacogenomics; (b) experiences with genetic, genomic, or PGx testing (decision about the test, information delivery, and understanding of test results); and (c) educational/informational resources. This synthesis sheds light on each theme from the standpoint of both patients and health care providers and suggests avenues in which to direct efforts to support the introduction of pharmacogenomic tests in current practice.
Collapse
|
46
|
Dubé K, Simoni J, Louella M, Sylla L, Mohamed ZH, Patel H, Luter S, Collier AC. Acceptability of Cell and Gene Therapy for Curing HIV Infection Among People Living with HIV in the Northwestern United States: A Qualitative Study. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2019; 35:649-659. [PMID: 30990052 PMCID: PMC6602097 DOI: 10.1089/aid.2019.0021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple strategies to cure HIV infection are under investigation, including cell and gene therapy (C>) approaches. Research, and ultimately treatment, with these novel strategies will require patients' willingness to participate. To elicit the perspectives of people living with HIV specific to these novel approaches, we conducted 4 focus group discussions with a diverse group of 19 English-speaking men and women living with HIV in care at a large academic HIV clinic in the northwestern United States. Thematic analysis indicated participants expressed initial fear about C> research. They articulated specific concerns about risks, including analytical treatment interruptions, and thought only a person in desperate straits would participate. They voiced significant mistrust of research in general and believed there was already a cure from HIV that was being withheld from the poor. Overall, they were satisfied with their health and quality of life on antiretroviral therapy. These findings suggest the importance of community engagement and educational efforts about C> for HIV cure to ensure optimal collaborative partnerships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jane Simoni
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Michael Louella
- defeatHIV Community Advisory Board (CAB), Seattle, Washington
- University of Washington Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Laurie Sylla
- defeatHIV Community Advisory Board (CAB), Seattle, Washington
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Zahra H. Mohamed
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Hursch Patel
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Stuart Luter
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ann C. Collier
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Randolph SD, Cary MP, Johnson R, Gonzalez-Guarda RM. Black Fathers' Preferences for Sexual Health Interventions with their Adolescent Sons. J Natl Med Assoc 2019; 111:569-572. [PMID: 30955854 DOI: 10.1016/j.jnma.2019.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
48
|
Bruce MA, Norris KC, Beech BM, Bowie JV, Thorpe RJ. Perspective: A Call for Precision in Faith-based Initiatives Promoting Health among African Americans. Ethn Dis 2019; 29:17-20. [PMID: 30713411 DOI: 10.18865/ed.29.1.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Ethn Dis. 2019;29(1):17-20; doi:10.18865/ed.29.1.17
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marino A Bruce
- Program for Research on Faith and Health, Center for Research on Men's Health, Vanderbilt University.,Center for Medicine, Health and Society, Vanderbilt University.,Department of Population Health Science, John D. Bower School of Population Health, University of Mississippi Medical Center
| | - Keith C Norris
- Department of Population Health Science, John D. Bower School of Population Health, University of Mississippi Medical Center.,David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
| | - Bettina M Beech
- Department of Population Health Science, John D. Bower School of Population Health, University of Mississippi Medical Center
| | - Janice V Bowie
- Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
| | - Roland J Thorpe
- Department of Population Health Science, John D. Bower School of Population Health, University of Mississippi Medical Center.,Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Borno H, George DJ, Schnipper LE, Cavalli F, Cerny T, Gillessen S. All Men Are Created Equal: Addressing Disparities in Prostate Cancer Care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2019; 39:302-308. [PMID: 31099647 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_238879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The global cancer burden is estimated to have risen to 18.1 million new cases and 9.6 million deaths in 2018. By 2030, the number of cancer cases is projected to increase to 24.6 million and the number of cancer deaths, to 13 million. Global data mask the social and health disparities that influence cancer incidence and survival. Inequality in exposure to carcinogens, education, access to quality diagnostic services, and affordable treatments all affect the probability of survival. Worryingly, despite the fact that many cancers could be prevented by stronger public health actions and many others could be largely cured by better access to diagnostics and affordable treatments, the international community has yet to make a substantial move to tackle this challenge. In prostate cancer, studies show that there are geographic and racial/ethnic distribution differences as well as a number of other variables, including environmental factors, limited access to standard cancer treatments, reduced probability to be included in trials, and the financial burden of cancer treatments. Financial burden for the patients can result in poor adherence, increased debt, and poor long-term outcomes. The following article will discuss some of the important causes for disparity in prostate cancer and prostate cancer care, focused on the current situation in the United States, as well as possible remedies to address these causes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hala Borno
- 1 University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Franco Cavalli
- 4 Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Cerny
- 5 Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Shikany JM, Schoenberger YMM, Konety BR, Vickers SM. African American Men's Health: Research, Practice, and Policy. Am J Prev Med 2018; 55:S1-S4. [PMID: 30670194 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2018] [Revised: 07/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- James M Shikany
- Division of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
| | - Yu-Mei M Schoenberger
- Division of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Badrinath R Konety
- Department of Urology, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Selwyn M Vickers
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|