Effects of a Digital Diabetes Prevention Program: An RCT

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a digital diabetes-prevention programme versus an in-person diabetes-prevention programme in people with prediabetes in the United States

AIM

To assess the cost-effectiveness of a digital diabetes prevention programme (d-DPP) compared with a diabetes prevention programme (DPP) for preventing type 2 diabetes (T2D) in individuals with prediabetes in the United States.

METHODS

A Markov cohort model was constructed, simulating a 10-year period starting at the age of 45 years, with a societal and healthcare sector perspective. The effectiveness of the d-DPP intervention was evaluated using a meta-analysis, with that of the DPP as the comparator. The initial cycle represented the treatment period, and transition probabilities for the post-treatment period were derived from a long-term lifestyle intervention meta-analysis. The onset of T2D complications was estimated using microsimulation. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated based on health utility measured by short form (SF)-12 scores, and a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY gained was applied.

RESULTS

The d-DPP intervention resulted in cost savings of $3,672 from a societal perspective and $2,990 from a healthcare sector perspective and a gain of 0.08 QALYs compared with the DPP. The dropout rate was identified as a significant factor influencing the results. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the d-DPP intervention was preferred in 85.8% in the societal perspective and 85.2% in the healthcare sector perspective.

CONCLUSIONS

The d-DPP is a cost-effective alternative to in-person lifestyle interventions for preventing the development of T2D among individuals with prediabetes in the United States.

Reach and Weight Loss Among Comparison Group Participants Who Enrolled in the Active Intervention After a Diabetes Prevention Trial

We examined participation rates, engagement, and weight-loss outcomes of comparison group participants in a diabetes prevention trial who enrolled in a digitally delivered diabetes prevention program (ie, an active intervention) after the original trial ended. We evaluated these outcomes by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and 1-sample z test. We found a high participation rate (73%) among comparison group participants and comparable weight-loss outcomes at 12 months (6.8 lb) after initiating participation in the active intervention relative to intervention group participants during the original trial. Findings support providing evidence-based interventions for comparison or control group participants post-trial. Findings also support examining the cost-effectiveness of post-trial interventions, regardless of the limitations of acquiring post-trial data on weight in an uncontrolled setting.

The Role of Digital Health Technology Interventions in the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review

Objectives

Diabetes in the 21st century presents one of the greatest burdens of disease on the global population. Digitally mediated interventions have become imperative in alleviating this disease epidemic. We aimed to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on different health technologies for preventing Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and their efficacy in decreasing diabetes risk-related outcomes in at-risk patients in comparison to standard care.

Methods

Five electronic databases were searched between October 2021 and December 2022. Studies including digital health technology interventions used for preventing diabetes development by reducing diabetes risk-related outcomes in at-risk adults (⩾18 years) were identified. Data on glycemic levels, incidence of T2DM, weight, and intervention descriptions were extracted, and the risk of bias (ROB) was assessed.

Results

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria and 5 studies (56%) achieved clinically significant outcomes in at least one of the following: decreased weight (22%), glycemic levels (22%), or incidence of T2DM (11%). Two of the 3 (67%) computer-based interventions effectively reduced the HbA1c levels and mean weight of their study population, and 3 of 6 (50%) mobile based interventions (text messages, mobile app, and telehealth) decreased the incidence of T2DM and HbA1c levels. Four studies each had an overall low ROB and one had a high ROB due to attrition.

Conclusion

Preliminary evidence identified in our review demonstrated that health technologies for diabetes prevention are effective for improving diabetes risk-related outcomes. Future research into digital technology protocol and studies of longer duration and more diverse populations are needed for clinical feasibility.

Effectiveness of artificial intelligence vs. human coaching in diabetes prevention: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Prediabetes is a highly prevalent condition that heralds an increased risk of progression to type 2 diabetes, along with associated microvascular and macrovascular complications. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) is an established effective intervention for diabetes prevention. However, participation in this 12-month lifestyle change program has historically been low. Digital DPPs have emerged as a scalable alternative, accessible asynchronously and recognized by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Yet, most digital programs still incorporate human coaching, potentially limiting scalability. Furthermore, existing effectiveness results of digital DPPs are primarily derived from per protocol, longitudinal non-randomized studies, or comparisons to control groups that do not represent the standard of care DPP. The potential of an AI-powered DPP as an alternative to the DPP is yet to be investigated. We propose a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to directly compare these two approaches.

METHODS

This open-label, multicenter, non-inferiority RCT will compare the effectiveness of a fully automated AI-powered digital DPP (ai-DPP) with a standard of care human coach-based DPP (h-DPP). A total of 368 participants with elevated body mass index (BMI) and prediabetes will be randomized equally to the ai-DPP (smartphone app and Bluetooth-enabled body weight scale) or h-DPP (referral to a CDC recognized DPP). The primary endpoint, assessed at 12 months, is the achievement of the CDC's benchmark for type 2 diabetes risk reduction, defined as any of the following: at least 5% weight loss, at least 4% weight loss and at least 150 min per week on average of physical activity, or at least a 0.2-point reduction in hemoglobin A1C. Physical activity will be objectively measured using serial actigraphy at baseline and at 1-month intervals throughout the trial. Secondary endpoints, evaluated at 6 and 12 months, will include changes in A1C, weight, physical activity measures, program engagement, and cost-effectiveness. Participants include adults aged 18-75 years with laboratory confirmed prediabetes, a BMI of ≥ 25 kg/m2 (≥ 23 kg/m2 for Asians), English proficiency, and smartphone users. This U.S. study is conducted at Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore, MD, and Reading Hospital (Tower Health) in Reading, PA.

DISCUSSION

Prediabetes is a significant public health issue, necessitating scalable interventions for the millions affected. Our pragmatic clinical trial is unique in directly comparing a fully automated AI-powered approach without direct human coach interaction. If proven effective, it could be a scalable, cost-effective strategy. This trial will offer vital insights into both AI and human coach-based behavioral change strategies in real-world clinical settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05056376. Registered on September 24, 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05056376.

Digital interventions for self-management of prediabetes: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Rates of prediabetes, which can lead to type 2 diabetes, are increasing worldwide. Interventions for prediabetes mainly focus on lifestyle changes to diet and exercise. While these interventions are effective, they are often delivered face-to-face, which may pose a barrier to those with limited access to healthcare. Given the evidence for digital interventions addressing other noncommunicable diseases, these may also be effective for prediabetes self-management. The aim of this scoping review was to assess the breadth of evidence around digital interventions for prediabetes self-management.

METHODS

We developed a targeted search strategy and relevant studies were identified through searches conducted in four bibliographic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, and Scopus). Published studies were eligible if they included a digital intervention to support adults aged 18+ with prediabetes self-management. Titles and abstracts were first screened for relevance by one researcher. Full texts of selected records were assessed against the review criteria independently by two researchers for inclusion in the final analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies were included, of which nine were randomised controlled trials. Most efficacy studies reported significant changes in at least one primary and/or secondary outcome, including participants' glycaemic control, weight loss and/or physical activity levels. About one-third of studies reported mixed outcomes or early significant outcomes that were not sustained at long-term follow-up. Interventions varied in length, digital modalities, and complexity. Delivery formats included text messages, mobile apps, virtually accessible dietitians/health coaches, online peer groups, and web-based platforms. Approximately half of studies assessed participant engagement/acceptability outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Whilst the evidence here suggests that digital interventions to support prediabetes self-management are acceptable and have the potential to reduce one's risk of progression to type 2 diabetes, more research is needed to understand which interventions, and which components specifically, have the greatest reach to diverse populations, are most effective at promoting user engagement, and are most effective in the longer term.

The Impact of Intervention Design on User Engagement in Digital Therapeutics Research: Factorial Experiment With a Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND

User engagement is crucial for digital therapeutics (DTx) effectiveness; due to variations in the conceptualization of engagement and intervention design, assessment and retention of engagement remain challenging.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the influence of the perceived acceptability of experimental intervention components and satisfaction with core intervention components in DTx on user engagement, while also identifying potential barriers and facilitators to user engagement.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed methods study with a 2 × 2 factorial design, involving 12 outpatients with atopic dermatitis. Participants were randomized into 4 experimental groups based on push notification ("basic" or "advanced") and human coach ("on" or "off") experimental intervention components. All participants engaged in self-monitoring and learning courses as core intervention components within an app-based intervention over 8 weeks. Data were collected through in-app behavioral data, physician- and self-reported questionnaires, and semistructured interviews assessed at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to evaluate user engagement, perceived acceptability of experimental intervention components (ie, push notification and human coach), satisfaction with core intervention components (ie, self-monitoring and learning courses), and intervention effectiveness through clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The primary outcome indicated that group 4, provided with "advanced-level push notifications" and a "human coach," showed higher completion rates for self-monitoring forms and learning courses compared to the predetermined threshold of clinical significance. Qualitative data analysis revealed three key themes: (1) perceived acceptability of the experimental intervention components, (2) satisfaction with the core intervention components, and (3) suggestions for improvement in the overall intervention program. Regarding clinical outcomes, the Perceived Stress Scale and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores presented the highest improvement in group 4.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings will help refine the intervention and inform the design of a subsequent randomized trial to test its effectiveness. Furthermore, this design may serve as a model for broadly examining and optimizing overall engagement in DTx and for future investigation into the complex relationship between engagement and clinical outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Research Information Service KCT0007675; http://tinyurl.com/2m8rjrmv.

Weight loss and lifestyle change among high-risk individuals enrolled in a digital diabetes prevention program: A longitudinal study of private and public health insurance members in Western New York

Weight loss is critical to reduce diabetes risk. Diabetes Prevention Programs (DPPs) are effective for weight loss, although less is known about digital DPPs. This study explores the association between Brook+, a 52-week digital DPP, and weight loss. This longitudinal observational study uses a sample of 5,516 private, Medicare, and Medicaid health insurance members from Western New York enrolled into Brook+ between December 2020 and December 2022. We used multivariable generalized linear regression models to estimate the association between completion of the Brook+ program, overall and stratified by health insurance type, and 5% weight loss using odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for age and gender. We also estimated average weight loss from baseline associated with high engagement with the program using adjusted linear regression models. In the pooled sample, those who completed the Brook + program had 21% increased odds of 5% weight loss (OR = 1.21 95% CI: (1.02 - 1.44)). Among users enrolled in private, Medicare, and Medicaid health insurance, program completion was associated with 21%, 33%, and 13% increased odds of 5% weight loss, compared to those who did not complete Brook+. Interacting with health coaches, increased physical activity, and meal logging were all significant predictors of weight loss. Our results suggest that digital DPPs are promising for large-scale diabetes prevention via weight loss and lifestyle change.

Effectiveness of a group-based Diabetes Prevention Education Program (DiPEP) in a population with pre-diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial in Nepal

Background

Although several lifestyle intervention studies have been conducted in low/middle-income countries, there were no such studies in Nepal. Therefore, a group-based culturally tailored Diabetes Prevention Education Program (DiPEP) was conducted recently. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of DiPEP in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), weight, waist circumference, physical activity and diet among population with pre-diabetes.

Method

A two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 12 clusters of two urban areas in Nepal. The DiPEP was a 6 month intervention (four 1-hour weekly educational sessions and 5 months of follow-up by community health workers/volunteers (CHW/Vs)). A postintervention assessment was done after 6 months. Linear mixed model was used to estimate the mean difference in primary outcome (HbA1c) and secondary outcomes (weight, waist circumference, physical activity and diet) between intervention and control arms, adjusted for baseline measure.

Results

In intention-to-treat analysis with a total of 291 participants, the estimated mean difference in HbA1c was found to be 0.015 percentage point (95% CI -0.074 to 0.104) between the intervention arm and the control arm, while it was -0.077 (95% CI -0.152 to -0.002) among those who attended at least 3 out of 4 educational sessions. The estimated mean difference in weight (in participants who attended ≥1 educational session) was -1.6 kg (95% CI -3.1 to -0.1). A significantly lower grain consumption was found in intervention arm (-39 g/day, 95% CI -65 to -14) compared with the control arm at postintervention assessment.

Conclusion

Although compliance was affected by COVID-19, individuals who participated in ≥3 educational sessions had significant reduction in HbA1c and those who attended ≥1 educational session had significant weight reduction. Grain intake was significantly reduced among the intervention arm than the control arm. Hence, group-based lifestyle intervention programmes involving CHW/vs is recommended for diabetes prevention.

Trial registration number

NCT04074148.

Patterns of Sustainability Capacity Among Organizations That Deliver the National Diabetes Prevention Program: A Latent Profile Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Since the launch of the National Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) in 2010, more than 3,000 organizations have registered with the Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention to deliver the program; today, however, only approximately 2,000 organizations are registered, indicating challenges with sustainability. We used the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT) to explore patterns of sustainability capacity among National DPP delivery organizations.

METHODS

We used data from a cross-sectional online survey conducted in August and September 2021 of staff members (N = 440) at National DPP delivery organizations. We conducted a latent profile analysis to identify latent subpopulations on the basis of respondent PSAT domain scores. Regression analyses were used to estimate associations between derived latent classes, PSAT scores, and respondent characteristics.

RESULTS

The 4-class model included 4 groups of capacity for program sustainability, ranging from low to high: low (class 1) with 8.0% of the sample, medium-low (class 2) with 22.0%, medium-high (class 3) with 41.6%, and high (class 4) with 28.4%. Program evaluation (mean score = 5.1 [SD = 1.4]) and adaptation (mean score = 5.3 [SD = 1.3]) were the domains with the highest scores, while funding stability (mean score = 4.0 [SD = 1.6]) and Partnerships (mean score = 4.0 [SD = 1.7]) had the lowest scores. In our sample of National DPP delivery organizations, most reported relatively high capacity for program sustainability, and key indicators associated with sustainability capacity were virtual delivery, location of delivery, funding sources, and organization type.

DISCUSSION

Similar to sustainability capacity findings from other PSAT studies, our study found that funding stability and partnerships are areas to strengthen. This insight is useful in sustainability planning at organizational and national levels across multiple programs.

The (cost) effectiveness of a very low-energy diet intervention with the use of eHealth in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity: study protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial (E-diet trial)

BACKGROUND

Despite preventive measures, the number of people with type 2 diabetes and obesity is increasing. Obesity increases morbidity and mortality in people with type 2 diabetes, making weight loss a cornerstone of treatment. We previously developed a very low energy diet (VLED) intervention that effectively reduced weight in people with type 2 diabetes in the long term. However, this intervention requires considerable time and manpower, which reduces the number of people who can benefit from it. eHealth offers more efficient solutions but has proven to be less effective than face-to-face interventions. Therefore, we want to investigate whether a blended version of our VLED intervention (in which face-to-face contact is partly replaced by an eHealth (mobile) application (E-VLED)) would be more cost-effective than the current face-to-face intervention.

METHODS

We will conduct a randomised, controlled trial with non-inferiority design in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2), aged 18-75 years. The control group will receive the usual care VLED intervention, while the intervention group will receive the E-VLED intervention for 1 year, where face-to-face contact will be partly replaced by an eHealth (mobile) application. The main study endpoint is the difference in weight (% change) between the control and intervention group after 1 year, plus the difference between the total costs (euro) of the treatment in the control and intervention groups. The secondary aims are to investigate the effectiveness of the E-VLED diet intervention regarding cardiovascular risk factors, quality of life, patient satisfaction, compliance, and to study whether there is a difference in effectiveness in pre-specified subgroups. General linear models for repeated measurements will be applied for the statistical analysis of the data.

DISCUSSION

We hypothesise that the E-VLED intervention will be equally effective compared to the usual care VLED but lower in costs due to less time invested by the dietician. This will enable to help more people with type 2 diabetes and obesity to effectively lose weight and improve their health-related quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register, NL7832, registered on 26 June 2019.

Telemedicine: an Effective and Low-Cost Lesson From the COVID-19 Pandemic for the Management of Heart Failure Patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to explore the benefits and controversies that telemedicine (TM), applied to patients with heart failure (HF), can provide in terms of diagnosis, therapeutic management, and prognosis improvement. During the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) outbreak, TM emerged as the most effective and feasible method available to ensure continuous care for chronic diseases. Among these, HF, characterized by high mortality, morbidity, and the need for frequent visits, may benefit of the TM role. HF patients are affected by frequent exacerbations undergoing a progressive prognosis impoverishment, strongly depending on the disease's management. A precise clinical handling is always required, with a constant optimization of the therapy, a continuous control of risk factors, and a sensitive attention to any change in symptoms, clinical signs, and laboratory tests. In this context, TM has shown to improve therapy adherence and HF: patients' self-care, impacting the prognosis even if specific results are controversial. Major evidence shows that TM may allow an adequate primary prevention, reducing the impact of the main cardiovascular risk factors. TM can also be useful for the secondary prevention, early detecting a likely HF exacerbation before it becomes clinically manifest, thereby lowering the need for hospitalization. Moreover, an optimal up-titration of the therapy and an increase in treatment adherence are feasible by using TM. However, some studies did not show unambiguous results, and uncertainties still remain.

Effectiveness of the Telemedical Lifestyle Intervention Program TeLIPro for Improvement of HbA1c in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized-Controlled Trial in a Real-Life Setting

The effectiveness of the multimodal Telemedical Lifestyle Intervention Program (TeLIPro) was proven in the advanced stages of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Since its therapeutic potential focusing on telemedical coaching without using a formula diet is unknown, we evaluated improvements in HbA1c, HbA1c normalisation rate, cardiometabolic risk factors, quality-of-life, and eating behaviour in real life. In this randomized-controlled trial, AOK Rhineland/Hamburg insured T2DM patients (n = 1163) were randomized (1:1) into two parallel groups, and 817 received the allocated intervention. In addition to routine care, all participants got scales, step counters, and access to an online portal. The TeLIPro group additionally received equipment for self-monitoring of blood glucose and telemedical coaching. Data were collected at baseline, after 6 and 12 months of intervention as well as after a 6-month follow-up. The primary endpoint after 12 months was (i) the estimated treatment difference (ETD) in HbA1c change and (ii) the HbA1c normalisation rate in those with diabetes duration < 5 years. The TeLIPro group demonstrated significantly stronger improvements in HbA1c (ETD -0.4% (-0.5; -0.2); p < 0.001), body weight, body-mass-index, quality-of-life, and eating behaviour, especially in T2DM patients with diabetes duration ≥ 5 years (ETD -0.5% (-0.7; -0.3); p < 0.001). The HbA1c normalisation rate did not significantly differ between groups (25% vs. 18%). Continuous addition of TeLIPro to routine care is effective in improving HbA1c and health-related lifestyle in T2DM patients with longer diabetes duration in real life.

The characteristics and acceptance of Technology-Enabled diabetes prevention programs (t-DPP) amongst individuals with prediabetes: A scoping review

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

As rising global prevalence of diabetes burdens an overstrained healthcare system, it would be prudent to employ primary prevention strategies. This review aims to detail characteristics of technology-enabled diabetes prevention programs (t-DPP) and the technology acceptance amongst prediabetic individuals.

DESIGN

A scoping review.

REVIEW METHODS

Summative and direct content analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Seven electronic databases-PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO and Web of Science-were searched from inception till 9 June 2022 for primary studies conducted on t-DPP. Initial search identified 2412 unique articles. Removal of duplicates and irrelevant articles resulted in 58 full text articles screened and 17 articles meeting the eligibility criteria. There was no limitation to study type or year of publication, but language was limited to English.

RESULTS

Common t-DPP characteristics include physical activity (n = 17), diet control (n = 16), coaching (n = 12), social support (n = 9) and skills acquisition (n = 12). Technological acceptance of t-DPPs were generally positive as participants found them useful (n = 5) and easy to use (n = 4), with majority of the participants interested (n = 5) and engaging well with it (n = 13). However, personal-, design- and technological-level factors were found to negatively influence t-DPPs acceptance.

CONCLUSION

This review reported a generally positive technological acceptance. The result encourages remote delivery of diabetes prevention programs, offering researchers a guide to t-DPP development. However, it also highlights the need for integration of behavioural change theories and socio-cultural considerations, with gaps in knowledge amongst men and young adults.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

The success of t-DPP can reinforce clinical advice and sustain health behaviours advocated by nurses. Involvement of diabetes-trained nurses would enable continual risk assessment, monitoring and timely intervention to prevent diabetes and potential complications.

REPORTING METHOD

PRISMA-ScR checklist.

The Effect of Including eHealth in Dietary Interventions for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes with Overweight or Obesity: A Systematic Review

eHealth has a growing impact on the delivery of healthcare, making health systems more efficient. This study examined the effect of dietary interventions using eHealth compared to face-to-face contact in patients with (pre-) type 2 diabetes (T2D) and who are overweight/obese. Literature databases were searched upon November 2022. Inclusion criteria: randomized controlled trial; duration ≥ 6 months; involving dietary interventions; performed in adults with (pre-) T2D and who are overweight/obese; using eHealth compared to face-to-face contact; and report outcomes on weight loss, glycemic regulation, and/or cost-effectiveness. Selection of articles was performed manually and using ASReviewLab. Fifteen studies were included for data extraction, investigating a wide variety of eHealth interventions. Seven studies reporting on weight loss showed a significant between-group difference (-1.18 to -5.5 kg); five studies showed a trend in favor of the eHealth programs. Eleven studies reported on HbA1c; three found a significant between-group difference (-0.23 to -0.70%) in favor of the eHealth programs and six studies showed non-significant improvements. Interaction with healthcare professionals led to better results of the dietary interventions. Two studies reported incomplete data on cost-effectiveness. In conclusion, eHealth shows better results of dietary interventions in (pre-) T2D patients compared to face-to-face, especially when combined with interaction with healthcare professionals.

Cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of a digital diabetes prevention program: results from the PREDICTS trial

Although technology-assisted diabetes prevention programs (DPPs) have been shown to improve glycemic control and weight loss, information are limited regarding relevant costs and their cost-effectiveness. To describe a retrospective within-trial cost and cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) to compare a digital-based DPP (d-DPP) with small group education (SGE), over a 1-year study period. The costs were summarized into direct medical costs, direct nonmedical costs (i.e., times that participants spent engaging with the interventions), and indirect costs (i.e., lost work productivity costs). The CEA was measured by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity analysis was performed using nonparametric bootstrap analysis. Over 1 year, the direct medical costs, direct nonmedical costs, and indirect costs per participant were $4,556, $1,595, and $6,942 in the d-DPP group versus $4,177, $1,350, and $9,204 in the SGE group. The CEA results showed cost savings from d-DPP relative to SGE based on a societal perspective. Using a private payer perspective for d-DPP, ICERs were $4,739 and $114 to obtain an additional unit reduction in HbA1c (%) and weight (kg), and were $19,955 for an additional unit gain of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to SGE, respectively. From a societal perspective, bootstrapping results indicated that d-DPP has a 39% and a 69% probability, at a willingness-to-pay of $50,000/QALY and $100,000/QALY, respectively, of being cost-effective. The d-DPP was cost-effective and offers the prospect of high scalability and sustainability due to its program features and delivery modes, which can be easily translated to other settings.

Evaluation of feasibility and acceptability of a web-based diabetes prevention program (DPP) for diabetes risk reduction in Chinese Americans in New York City

Introduction

Intensive lifestyle intervention remains an effective modality to reduce diabetes incidence and delay the progression to type 2 diabetes. The primary aim of this study was to pilot-test the feasibility and acceptability of a culturally and linguistically tailored web-based DPP intervention among Chinese Americans with prediabetes living in New York City.

Methods

Thirteen Chinese American participants with prediabetes were recruited to complete a 1-year web-based Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) lifestyle intervention. Quantitative and qualitative measures such as retention rate and data collected from web-based questionnaires and focus groups were collected and analyzed to assess study feasibility and acceptability.

Results and Discussion

Participants were receptive to the program through high engagement, retention and satisfaction. Retention rate was 85%. 92% of participants completed at least 16 sessions out of 22 sessions. Post-trial surveys indicated high satisfaction of 27.2/32 based on Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) score. Participants expressed the program increased their knowledge and methods to prevent onset of type 2 diabetes such as incorporating healthy eating habits and increasing physical activities. Although not a primary outcome, there was a significant weight reduction of 2.3% at the end of month 8 of the program (p < 0.05). The culturally and linguistically adapted DPP via online platform successfully demonstrated feasibility and acceptability among Chinese Americans with prediabetes. Further evaluation of the web-based Chinese Diabetes Prevention Program in a larger trial is warranted.

Effects of telemedicine-based follow-up management on adults with obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of telemedicine-based follow-up management on adults with obstructive sleep apnea.

METHODS

Publications were searched in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase. Studies were selected according to the predefined screening criteria, and their qualities were assessed by the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The statistical analyses were performed using Stata12.0 software. It was registered in PROSPERO with the number: CRD42021276414.

RESULTS

A total of 33 articles with 8,689 participants were included. Telemedicine-based follow-up management improved average daily continuous positive airway pressure usage by 36 min (weighted mean difference:0.61;95% confidence interval: 0.39 to 0.83), and the percentage of days with continuous positive airway pressure usage more than four hours by 10.67% in obstructive sleep apnea patients. The meta-analysis of good continuous positive airway pressure compliance showed telemedicine-based follow-up management did not lead to good continuous positive airway pressure compliance (odds ratio: 1.13;95% confidence interval: 0.72 to 1.76). The pooled mean difference of sleep quality was 0.15 (standardized mean difference:0.15; 95% confidence interval: -0.03 to 0.32), and daytime sleepiness was -0.26 (weighted mean difference: -0.26;95% confidence interval: -0.79 to 0.28). The pooled mean difference of apnea hypopnea index was -0.53 (95% confidence interval: -3.58 to 2.51). As for the overall quality of life, the pooled mean difference was -0.25 (standardized mean difference: -0.25;95% confidence interval: -0.25 to 0.76).

CONCLUSION

Telemedicine-based follow-up management was beneficial for continuous positive airway pressure compliance of obstructive sleep apnea patients within six months. However, it could not improve sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, the severity of obstructive sleep apnea, and quality of life in obstructive sleep apnea patients compared with traditional follow-up. Moreover, it was more cost-effective, but there was no consensus on whether it would increase the workload of medical staff.

Telemedicine for diabetes management during COVID-19: what we have learnt, what and how to implement

The past two decades have witnessed telemedicine becoming a crucial part of health care as a method to facilitate doctor-patient interaction. Due to technological developments and the incremental acquisition of experience in its use, telemedicine's advantages and cost-effectiveness has led to it being recognised as specifically relevant to diabetology. However, the pandemic created new challenges for healthcare systems and the rate of development of digital services started to grow exponentially. It was soon discovered that COVID-19-infected patients with diabetes had an increased risk of both mortality and debilitating sequelae. In addition, it was observed that this higher risk could be attenuated primarily by maintaining optimal control of the patient's glucose metabolism. As opportunities for actual physical doctor-patient visits became restricted, telemedicine provided the most convenient opportunity to communicate with patients and maintain delivery of care. The wide range of experiences of health care provision during the pandemic has led to the development of several excellent strategies regarding the applicability of telemedicine across the whole spectrum of diabetes care. The continuation of these strategies is likely to benefit clinical practice even after the pandemic crisis is over.

Influences on Patient Uptake of and Engagement With the National Health Service Digital Diabetes Prevention Programme: Qualitative Interview Study

BACKGROUND

Digital diabetes prevention programs (digital-DPPs) are being implemented as population-based approaches to type 2 diabetes mellitus prevention in several countries to address problems with the uptake of traditional face-to-face diabetes prevention programs. However, assessments of digital-DPPs have largely focused on clinical outcomes and usability among those who have taken them up, whereas crucial information on decision-making about uptake (eg, whether a user downloads and registers on an app) and engagement (eg, the extent of use of an app or its components over time) is limited. Greater understanding of factors that influence uptake and engagement decisions may support large-scale deployments of digital-DPPs in real-world settings.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the key influences on uptake and engagement decisions of individuals who were offered the National Health Service Healthier You: Digital Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS-digital-DPP).

METHODS

A qualitative interview study was conducted using semistructured interviews. Participants were adults, aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with nondiabetic hyperglycemia, and those who had been offered the NHS-digital-DPP. Recruitment was conducted via 4 providers of the NHS-digital-DPP and 3 primary care practices in England. Interviews were conducted remotely and were guided by a theoretically informed topic guide. Analysis of interviews was conducted using an inductive thematic analysis approach.

RESULTS

Interviews were conducted with 32 participants who had either accepted or declined the NHS-digital-DPP. In total, 7 overarching themes were identified as important factors in both decisions to take up and to engage with the NHS-digital-DPP. These were knowledge and understanding, referral process, self-efficacy, self-identity, motivation and support, advantages of digital service, and reflexive monitoring. Perceptions of accessibility and convenience of the NHS-digital-DPP were particularly important for uptake, and barriers in terms of the referral process and health care professionals' engagement were reported. Specific digital features including health coaches and monitoring tools were important for engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

This study adds to the literature on factors that influence the uptake of and engagement with digital-DPPs and suggests that digital-DPPs can overcome many barriers to the uptake of face-to-face diabetes prevention programs in supporting lifestyle changes aimed at diabetes prevention.

The Use of Mobile Health Interventions for Outcomes among Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Prediabetes: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

There are currently limited systematic reviews of mobile health interventions for middle-aged and elderly patients with prediabetes from trial studies. This review aimed to gather and analyze information from experimental studies investigating the efficacy of mobile health usability for outcomes among middle-aged and elderly patients with prediabetes.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search in five databases: Clinicaltrials.gov, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), PubMed, ProQuest, and EBSCO, with a date range of January 2007 to July 2022 written in English, following a registered protocol on PROSPERO (CRD42022354351). The quality and possibility of bias were assessed using the Jadad score. The data extraction and analysis were conducted in a methodical manner.

RESULTS

A total of 25 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, with 19 studies using randomized trial designs and 6 studies with non-randomized designs. The study outcomes were the incidence of diabetes mellitus, anthropometric measures, laboratory examinations, measures of physical activity, and dietary behavior. During long-term follow-up, there was no significant difference between mobile health interventions and controls in reducing the incidence of type 2 diabetes. The findings of the studies for weight change, ≥3% and ≥5% weight loss, body mass index, and waist circumference changes were inconsistent. The efficacy of mobile health as an intervention for physical activity and dietary changes was lacking in conclusion. Most studies found that mobile health lacks sufficient evidence to change hbA1c. According to most of these studies, there was no significant difference in blood lipid level reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of mobile health was not sufficiently proven to be effective for middle-aged and elderly patients with prediabetes.

Feasibility and Comparative Effectiveness for the Delivery of the National Diabetes Prevention Program through Cooperative Extension in Rural Communities

The U.S. Cooperative Extension Service (CE) has potential to deliver the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) to rural residents with prediabetes. However, the CE remains underutilized for the delivery of NDPP. We compared the feasibility/effectiveness of the NDPP (0-6 mos.) delivered by CE personnel to rural residents with prediabetes using Zoom® (CE-Zoom®) or by our research staff using Facebook® (FB). Adults (n = 31, age ~55 years) were enrolled (CE-Zoom® n = 16, FB n = 15). Attendance did not differ significantly between groups (CE Zoom® = 69%, FB = 83%, p = 0.15). Participant retention was similar in the CE Zoom® (88%) and FB groups (87%). CE-Zoom® and FB® groups provided weekly, self-monitoring data for 83% and 84% of the 24 potential weeks, respectively. Six-month weight loss was not different between groups (CE-Zoom® = -5.99 ± 8.0 kg, -5.4%, FB = -1.68 ± 3.3 kg, -1.6% p = 0.13). Participants achieving ≥5% weight loss was greater in the CE-Zoom® (44%) compared with the FB group (7%, p = 0.04). Participants achieving the NDPP program goal for physical activity (≥150 min/week) did not differ (CE-Zoom® = 75%, FB = 67%, p = 0.91). This pilot trial demonstrated the potential feasibility and effectiveness of the NDPP delivered by CE personnel in a group remote format (Zoom®) to adults with prediabetes living in rural areas.