Profile of anti-herpetic action of ASP2151 (amenamevir) as a helicase-primase inhibitor

The varicella-zoster virus ORF16 protein promotes both the nuclear transport and the protein abundance of the viral DNA polymerase subunit ORF28

Although all herpesviruses utilize a highly conserved replication machinery to amplify their viral genomes, different members may have unique strategies to modulate the assembly of their replication components. Herein, we characterize the subcellular localization of seven essential replication proteins of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and show that several viral replication enzymes such as the DNA polymerase subunit ORF28, when expressed alone, are localized in the cytoplasm. The nuclear import of ORF28 can be mediated by the viral DNA polymerase processivity factor ORF16. Besides, ORF16 could markedly enhance the protein abundance of ORF28. Noteworthily, an ORF16 mutant that is defective in nuclear transport still retained the ability to enhance ORF28 abundance. The low abundance of ORF28 in transfected cells was due to its rapid degradation mediated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. We additionally reveal that radicicol, an inhibitor of the chaperone Hsp90, could disrupt the interaction between ORF16 and ORF28, thereby affecting the nuclear entry and protein abundance of ORF28. Collectively, our findings imply that the cytoplasmic retention and rapid degradation of ORF28 may be a key regulatory mechanism for VZV to prevent untimely viral DNA replication, and suggest that Hsp90 is required for the interaction between ORF16 and ORF28.

Interaction and assembly of the DNA replication core proteins of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus

IMPORTANCE

Eukaryotic DNA replication is a highly regulated process that requires multiple replication enzymes assembled onto DNA replication origins. Due to the complexity of the cell's DNA replication machinery, most of what we know about cellular DNA replication has come from the study of viral systems. Herein, we focus our study on the assembly of the Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus core replication complex and propose a pairwise protein-protein interaction network of six highly conserved viral core replication proteins. A detailed understanding of the interaction and assembly of the viral core replication proteins may provide opportunities to develop new strategies against viral propagation.

A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating a single, patient-initiated dose of amenamevir for recurrent herpes labialis

Amenamevir (ASP2151), a novel, non-nucleoside analog, antiviral drug, inhibits the enzyme activities of helicase and primase, which are essential for replication of herpes viral genomic DNA. In this phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, the authors investigated the efficacy and safety of a single patient-initiated dose of amenamevir to treat recurrent herpes labialis. Adult immunocompetent patients with recurrent herpes labialis who had the experience and ability to recognize prodromal symptoms were randomly assigned to administer amenamevir 1200 mg or placebo as a patient-initiated therapy within 6 hours after onset of prodromal symptoms. The primary efficacy end point was time to healing of all herpes labialis lesions in the modified intention-to-treat population. Secondary efficacy end points were time to crusting of all herpes labialis lesions, time to resolution of pain accompanying herpes labialis, proportion of patients with aborted lesions, and time to resolution of subjective symptoms accompanying herpes labialis. The modified intention-to-treat population, which excluded patients with aborted lesions, comprised 298 patients who self-initiated amenamevir and 307 who took placebo. Amenamevir demonstrated superiority over placebo for the primary end point; the median time to all lesion healing was 5.1 days for amenamevir versus 5.5 days for placebo (hazard ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.46; p = 0.0085). Time to crusting of all lesions was significantly shorter with amenamevir versus placebo (p = 0.0065); there were no significant between-group differences in other secondary outcomes. Treatment-emergent adverse events in both groups were generally mild in severity; there were two moderate events that were judged unrelated to study treatment, and no severe or serious events. In summary, a single patient-initiated dose of amenamevir 1200 mg taken within 6 hours of prodromal symptom onset significantly shortened the time to all lesion healing of recurrent herpes labialis compared with placebo, with no clinically important safety concerns.

Antiviral therapy for COVID-19: Derivation of optimal strategy based on past antiviral and favipiravir experiences

Favipiravir, a broad-spectrum RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitor, inhibits the replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) at significantly lower concentrations than the plasma trough levels achieved by the dosage adopted for influenza treatment and exhibits efficacy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Although high doses of favipiravir are required due to the molecule being a purine analog, its conversion into the active form in infected cells with active viral RNA synthesis enhances the antiviral specificity and selectivity as a chain terminator with lethal mutagenesis. Another characteristic feature is the lack of generation of favipiravir-resistant virus. COVID-19 pneumonia is caused by strong cell-mediated immunity against virus-infected cells, and the inflammatory response induced by adaptive immunity continues to peak for 3 to 5 days despite antiviral treatment. This has also been observed in herpes zoster (HZ) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonia. Inflammation due to an immune response may mask the effectiveness of favipiravir against COVID-19 pneumonia. Favipiravir significantly shortened the recovery time in patients with mild COVID-19 pneumonia by 3 days with the start of treatment by the 5th day of symptom onset. Since both CMV and COVID-19 pneumonia are caused by adaptive immunity and prevention of cytomegalovirus pneumonia is the standard treatment due to difficulties in treating refractory CMV pneumonia, COVID-19 pneumonia should be prevented with early treatment as well. In the present study, we have comprehensively reviewed the optimal antiviral therapy for COVID-19 based on clinical trials of favipiravir for the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia and the concurrently established therapies for other viral infections, particularly HZ and CMV pneumonia. Optimally, antivirals should be administered immediately after COVID-19 diagnosis, similar to that after influenza diagnosis, to prevent COVID-19 pneumonia and complications resulting from microangiopathy.

A Comparison Between Effects of Amenamevir and Famciclovir on Intensities of Acute Pain and the Incidence of Postherpetic Neuralgia in Adult Patients with Herpes Zoster

Objective

Herpes zoster (HZ) is a common disease, whose most common complication is postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). We conducted this study to compare effects of amenamevir (AMNV) and famciclovir (FCV) on intensities of acute HZ pain and the incidence of PHN, which have not been compared yet.

Methods

After approval by the Ethics Committee, we retrospectively investigated adult patients with HZ treated with AMNV or FCV at Juntendo University Hospital between October, 2018 and February, 2020. We compared, between 143 AMNV-treated and 131 FCV-treated patients, pain scores of acute HZ pain evaluated on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) and the incidence of PHN with the Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson's chi-square test, respectively. The univariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of PHN.

Results

Pain scores during the acute HZ period remained significantly lower in AMNV-treated patients than FCV-treated patients (p = 0.049, 0.011, and 0.016 for Day 3-4, Day 7, and Week 2-3, respectively), although the pain score at Day 0 before treatment didn't differ between them (p > 0.05). The incidence of PHN didn't differ between them (9.8% vs. 11.5%, p > 0.05). In the total cohort, the pain score at Week 2-3 was significantly associated with the development of PHN (r 2 = 0.180, p < 0.00001).

Conclusions

Compared with FCV, AMNV was more effective in reducing acute HZ pain, possibly reflecting its unique mechanism of action. However, AMNV didn't reduce the incidence of PHN possibly due to the multifactorial etiology of PHN.

Helicase primase inhibitors (HPIs) are efficacious for therapy of human herpes simplex virus (HSV) disease in an infection mouse model

Although the seroprevalence of Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) currently amounts to ∼ 67% worldwide, the annual incidence of a severe disease progression, particularly herpes encephalitis, is approximately 2-4 cases per 1,000,000 infections. Nucleoside analogues, such as acyclovir (ACV), valacyclovir (VACV) or famciclovir, are still the therapeutic treatment of choice for HSV infections. However, nucleoside drugs have limited efficacy against severe HSV disease and for treatment of nucleoside-resistant viral strains, alternative therapies such as helicase-primase inhibitors (HPIs) which are highly potent by inhibiting viral replication are under development. In preclinical studies we analyzed the antiviral efficacy of drug candidates of a novel compound class of HPIs for the treatment of HSV to identify the most active eutomer structure in an intranasal infection mouse lethal challenge model. HSV-1 infected BALB/c mice treated with vehicle control developed fatal disease according to humane endpoints after 5-7 days. In contrast, the animals dosed orally once daily with the HPI compounds at 10 or 4 mg/kg/day showed a significantly increased survival (70% and 100% for 10 mg/kg/day; 90% and 100% for 4 mg/kg/day, respectively) compared to the vehicle treatment (0-10%), when therapy was initiated 6 h post HSV-1 inoculation. We observed a significantly improved outcome in clinical parameters and survival over 21 days in the group receiving novel HPI candidates using even the lowest dose of 4 mg/kg/day. With VACV treatment of 75 mg/kg daily survival was also significantly increased (80%-90% for 75 mg/kg/day) but to lesser extent. Initial IM-250 therapy at 10 mg/kg/day could be delayed up to 72 h resulting in significantly increased survival compared to the vehicle control. Furthermore, we detected significantly fewer viral genome copies in the lungs and brains of HPI treated animals compared to vehicle (440-fold reduction for 4 mg/kg/day IM-250 in the brain) or VACV controls by quantitative PCR. In conclusion the preclinical studies of the novel HPI compounds showed superior efficacy in comparison to the current standard HSV treatment represented by VACV with respect to the survival according humane endpoints, the clinical score and virus load in lungs and brains. Thus, candidates of this new drug class are promising antivirals of HSV infections and further translation into clinical trials is warranted.

Amenamevir, a Helicase-Primase Inhibitor, for the Optimal Treatment of Herpes Zoster

Acyclovir, valacyclovir, and famciclovir are used for the treatment of herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infections. Helicase-primase inhibitors (HPIs) inhibit replication fork progression that separates double DNA strands into two single strands during DNA synthesis. The HPIs amenamevir and pritelivir have novel mechanisms of anti-herpetic action, and their once-daily administration has clinical efficacy for genital herpes. Among HPIs, amenamevir has anti-VZV activity. The concentrations of HSV-1 and VZV required for the 50% plaque reduction of amenamevir were 0.036 and 0.047 μM, respectively. We characterized the features of amenamevir regarding its mechanism, resistance, and synergism with acyclovir. Its antiviral activity was not influenced by the viral replication cycle, in contrast to acyclovir. A clinical trial of amenamevir for herpes zoster demonstrated its non-inferiority to valacyclovir. To date, amenamevir has been successfully used in over 1,240,000 patients with herpes zoster in Japan. Post-marketing surveillance of amenamevir in Japan reported side effects with significant potential risk identified by the Japanese Risk Management Plan, including thrombocytopenia, gingival bleeding, and palpitations, although none of these were serious. The clinical efficacy and safety profiles of amenamevir were established in patients with herpes zoster. Therefore, amenamevir as an HPI opens a new era of anti-herpes therapy.

Characteristics of Helicase-primase Inhibitor Amenamevir-resistant Herpes Simplex Virus

The antiherpetic drug amenamevir (AMNV) inhibits the helicase-primase complex of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), HSV-2 and varicella-zoster virus directly as well as inhibiting the replication of these viruses. Although several mutated HSV viruses resistant to helicase-primase inhibitors have been reported, the mutations contributing to the resistance remain unclear as recombinant viruses containing a single mutation have not been analyzed. We obtained AMNV-resistant viruses with amino acid substitutions by several passages under AMNV-treatment. Twenty HSV-1 and 19 HSV-2 mutants with mutation(s) in UL5 helicase and/or UL52 primase, but not in co-factor UL8, were isolated. The mutations in UL5 were located downstream of motif IV, with UL5 K356N in HSV-1 and K355N in HSV-2, in particular, identified as having the highest frequency: 9/20 and 9/19, respectively. We generated recombinant AMNV-resistant HSV-1 with a single amino acid substitution using BAC mutagenesis. As a result, G352C in UL5 helicase and F360C/V and N902T in UL52 primase were identified as novel mutations. The virus with K356N in UL5 showed 10-fold higher AMNV resistance than did other mutants, and showed equivalent viral growth in vitro and virulence in vivo as the parent HSV-1, although other mutants showed attenuated virulence. All recombinant viruses were susceptible to the other antiherpetic drugs, acyclovir and foscarnet. In conclusion, based on BAC mutagenesis, this study identified for the first time mutations in UL5 and UL52 that contributed to AMNV resistance, and found that a mutant with the most frequent K356N mutation in HSV-1 maintained viral growth and virulence equivalent to the parent virus.

Current Drugs to Treat Infections with Herpes Simplex Viruses-1 and -2

Herpes simplex viruses-1 and -2 (HSV-1 and -2) are two of the three human alphaherpesviruses that cause infections worldwide. Since both viruses can be acquired in the absence of visible signs and symptoms, yet still result in lifelong infection, it is imperative that we provide interventions to keep them at bay, especially in immunocompromised patients. While numerous experimental vaccines are under consideration, current intervention consists solely of antiviral chemotherapeutic agents. This review explores all of the clinically approved drugs used to prevent the worst sequelae of recurrent outbreaks by these viruses.

Emergence of varicella-zoster virus resistance to acyclovir: epidemiology, prevention, and treatment

Introduction: Acyclovir has led to the development of successful systemic therapy for herpes simplex virus and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infection, and the use of valacyclovir and famciclovir has improved treatment. Additionally, the use of a helicase-primase (HP) inhibitor (HPI), amenamevir, is changing the treatment of herpes zoster (HZ).Area covered: VZV infection is prevented by vaccines and is treated with antiviral agents. Acyclovir and penciclovir are phosphorylated by viral thymidine kinase and work as chain terminators. Improvements in the management of immunocompromised patients have reduced severe and prolonged immunosuppression and chronic VZV infection with acyclovir-resistant mutants has become rarer. The HP is involved in the initial step of DNA synthesis and amenamevir has novel mechanisms of action, efficacy to acyclovir-resistant mutants, and pharmacokinetic characteristics. The literature search for PUBMED was conducted on 10 April 2020 and updated on 4 November 2020.Expert opinion: Amenamevir has been used to treat HZ in Japan. Although the number of patients with VZV infection will decrease owing to the use of vaccines, the addition of HPI will improve treatment and treatment options for resistant viruses. The clinical use of HPIs in addition to current nucleoside analogs opens a new era of antiherpes therapy.

Viral ribonucleotide reductase attenuates the anti-herpes activity of acyclovir in contrast to amenamevir

Amenamevir is a helicase-primase inhibitor of herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and is used for the treatment of herpes zoster in Japan. The half maximal effective concentrations (EC₅₀s) of acyclovir and sorivudine for VZV increased as the time of treatment was delayed from 6 to 18 h after infection, while those of amenamevir and foscarnet were not affected. Susceptibility of infected cells at 0 and 18 h after infection was examined with four anti-herpes drugs, and the fold increases in EC₅₀ for acyclovir, sorivudine, amenamevir, and foscarnet were 13.1, 6.3, 1.3, and 1.0, respectively. The increase in the EC₅₀s for acyclovir in the late phase of infection in VZV and HSV was abolished by hydroxyurea, a ribonucleotide reductase (RR) inhibitor. The common mechanism affecting antiviral activities of acyclovir to HSV and VZV was examined in HSV-infected cells. The amount of HSV DNA in cells treated with amenamevir at 10 x EC₅₀ was similar at 0 and 12 h but less than that in cells treated with acyclovir at 10 x EC₅₀. dGTP, produced through viral RR, peaked at 4 h and decreased thereafter as it was consumed by viral DNA synthesis. Because acyclovir and amenamevir inhibited viral DNA synthesis, thus making dGTP unnecessary, dGTP was significantly more abundant in the presence of acyclovir and amenamevir than in untreated, infected cells. Abundant dGTP supplied by RR may compete with acyclovir triphosphate and attenuate its antiviral activity. In contrast, abundant dGTP did not influence the inhibitory action of amenamevir on viral helicase-primase activity. ATP was significantly decreased at 12 h after infection and significantly more abundant in untreated infected cells compared to cells treated with acyclovir and amenamevir. The anti-herpetic activity of amenamevir was not affected by the replication cycle of VZV and HSV, indicating the suitability of amenamevir for the treatment of herpes zoster and suppressive therapy for genital herpes.

Inhibitory effect of amenamevir on acute herpetic pain and postherpetic neuralgia in mice infected with herpes simplex virus-1

BACKGROUND

Amenamevir (AMNV) is a helicase-primase inhibitor with antiviral activity against herpesviruses [herpes simplex viruses (HSV)-1 and -2, and varicella-zoster virus], which are associated with the development of acute herpetic pain (AHP) and postherpetic neuralgia. However, the inhibitory effects of helicase-primase inhibitors on AHP and postherpetic neuralgia remain incompletely understood.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we investigated the effects of AMNV on AHP and postherpetic pain (PHP) in HSV-1-infected mice accompanied by zosteriform-like skin lesions.

METHODS

HSV-1 was percutaneously infected on the femoral region of mice. AMNV was orally administered twice a day for 5 days. Pain-related response in the hind paw was evaluated using a paintbrush. The infiltration of inflammatory cells in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and spinal cord (SC) was evaluated by hematoxylin and eosin staining. The viral load in DRG and the expression of pain-related genes in SC were measured by real-time PCR.

RESULTS

Pain response was begun to be observed from day 3 post-infection (pi) in HSV-1-infected mice. AMNV administered repeatedly from day 3 pi or day 4 pi, but not day 5 pi, showed an inhibitory effect on the development of AHP and the transition to PHP. Repeated AMNV administration inhibited inflammatory cell infiltration and increases in the viral load and the expression of pain-related genes (ATF-3, TNF-α, COX-2).

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that AMNV potently suppresses the development of AHP and the transition to PHP as a consequence of decreased viral load in DRG and reduced expression of pain-related genes in SC.

Acyclovir, cidofovir, and amenamevir have additive antiviral effects on herpes simplex virus TYPE 1

Herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) affects a large portion of the global population and has been shown to cause more severe symptoms in immunocompromised patients. It is in immunocompromised populations that HSV-1 has shown to have higher rates of resistance to the most commonly used antiherpetics, such as acyclovir/valacyclovir/penciclovir/famciclovir. The development of drug resistance has forced research into new antiherpetic therapies, including combination drug therapies. One potential complication of multidrug therapies is the existence of drug-drug interactions; as more drugs are used in the therapy, those interactions tend to become more complicated. This study tested the combination of acyclovir/cidofovir/amenamevir, the last drug being a new antiherpetic that targets the helicase-primase complex to prevent replication of viral DNA, for multidrug intervention. We used the design of experiments (DOE) function in Minitab to analyze the drug-drug interactions in their ability to inhibit growth of HSV-1. The DOE software was unable to detect any significant drug-drug interactions among these three antiherpetics as dosed. This would imply that these drugs could be used in combination to suppress viral replication without synergistic or antagonistic effects. This study shows that this therapy holds potential for further study and that DOE software is a potentially useful tool for determining complex drug-drug interactions.

An Open-Label, Single-Dose, Human Mass Balance Study of Amenamevir in Healthy Male Adults

Amenamevir is an inhibitor of the helicase-primase enzyme complex developed for the treatment of varicella zoster virus. This mass balance study investigated the absorption, metabolism, and excretion of a single dose (200 mg) of ¹⁴ C-labeled amenamevir in healthy male volunteers. Blood, urine, and feces samples were collected for up to 8 days after the dose. Safety and tolerability were assessed through voluntary reporting of adverse events, physical examination, and clinical laboratory testing. Amenamevir was rapidly absorbed, with a median time to peak drug concentration of 1.0 to 1.5 hours and a plasma half-life of 8 to 9 hours. Overall, 95.3% of the administered dose was recovered, with the majority of radiolabeled drug excreted in feces (74.6%) followed by urine (20.6%). The major route of elimination was fecal, with around 70% of the dose excreted as metabolites and <0.1% as the unchanged drug. Metabolic profiling revealed that predominantly radiolabeled amenamevir (80%) and its hydroxyl metabolite R5 (up to 7.1%) were present in plasma. Single-dose amenamevir was well tolerated; 3 transient and mild adverse events were reported in 3 subjects. Overall, >95% of a single 200-mg dose of amenamevir was eliminated by 168 hours after the dose, with the major route of elimination being fecal.

Antiviral efficacy of the helicase-primase inhibitor amenamevir in murine models of severe herpesvirus infection

Existing treatments have limited efficacy against severe infection associated with herpes simplex virus (HSV) and herpes zoster virus (VZV), particularly in immunocompromized patients and those with multidermatomal infection. This issue, along with issues regarding drug resistance, support the need for improved therapeutic options. To investigate the antiviral effect of amenamevir, a VZV and HSV helicase-primase inhibitor, in severe infection conditions, mouse models of severe HSV-1 infection were developed by immunosuppression or multidermatomal infection. Mice with cyclosporin-induced immunosuppression and HSV-1 infection via inoculation of a dorsolateral area of skin were orally treated with amenamevir (10-100 mg/kg/day) for different durations (2-5 days). Immunosuppressed mice maintained high skin HSV-1 titers in the absence of treatment. Amenamevir successfully reduced HSV-1 titers at all tested doses in immunosuppressed mice, but required a longer treatment period to avoid a rebound in viral titers due to immunosuppression. To compare the efficacy of amenamevir and valacyclovir, a murine model of multidermatomal HSV-1 infection was generated by scarifying the dorsolateral area of skin in a line and inoculating broadly with HSV-1. The mice were treated with amenamevir or valacyclovir starting on Day 3, 4, or 5 post-infection for 5 days. Although both drugs similarly reduced disease scores when treatment was started on Day 3, amenamevir also reduced disease severity when treatment was initiated on Day 4, whereas valacyclovir did not. Amenamevir was not affected by the host's immune status in terms of effective oral doses and was more efficacious in treating severe cutaneous infection even when treatment initiation was delayed.

Antiviral Drugs Against Alphaherpesvirus

The discovery of acyclovir and penciclovir has led to the development of a successful systemic therapy for treating herpes simplex virus infection and varicella-zoster virus infection, and the orally available prodrugs, valacyclovir and famciclovir, have improved antiviral treatment compliance. Acyclovir and penciclovir are phosphorylated by viral thymidine kinase and are incorporated into the DNA chain by viral DNA polymerase, resulting in chain termination. Helicase-primase plays an initial step in DNA synthesis to separate the double strand into two single strands (replication fork) and is a new target of antiviral therapy. The helicase-primase inhibitors (HPIs) pritelivir and amenamevir have novel mechanisms of action, drug resistance properties, pharmacokinetic characteristics, and clinical efficacy for treating genital herpes. The clinical study of amenamevir in herpes zoster has been completed, and amenamevir has been submitted for approval for treating herpes zoster in Japan. The clinical use of HPIs will be the beginning of a new era of anti-herpes therapy.