After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Returning to Normalcy or Returning to a New Normal?

Building towards organisational resilience and complexity leadership: a case study of impacts and changes in a Dutch blood establishment during COVID-19

OBJECTIVES

This study examined how one large blood-related establishment coped and adapted during the first 1.5 years of the pandemic by evaluating the impacts and changes on its resources, communication, collaborations, and monitoring and feedback. Furthermore, we explored whether elements of complexity leadership emerged during this time.

DESIGN

Duchek's organisational resilience framework was primarily used. We followed a three-step sequential approach: (1) a document analysis of over 150 intranet, internet and internal reports; (2) 31 semistructured interviews with employees and (3) four feedback sessions.

SETTING

Sanquin is known as the Dutch national blood bank and a large multidivisional expertise organisation in the Netherlands.

RESULTS

Sanquin coped well. Respondents accepted the crisis and catalysed many collaborations to implement solutions, which were communicated to the public. There were many positive aspects related to internal collaborations, yet challenges remained related to its historical siloed structure and culture. Sanquin adapted partially. Many respondents experienced the organisation becoming more connected and flexible during the pandemic. However, Sanquin was not permanently changed due to significant leadership changes and organisational restructuring occurring simultaneously. Respondents reflected on lessons learnt, including the need for continual collaboration and improvements in Sanquin's culture. An important driver in the successful coping was management's enabling attitude and the adaptations occurring within and through the collaborative groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Sanquin improved its organisational resilience by exhibiting elements of adaptive spaces, enabling leadership and (temporary) emergence from complexity leadership. This illuminates how the organisation could continue benefiting from complexity leadership for non-crises and for future uncertainties.

Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outpatient Case Volume During the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic in New York and California

BACKGROUND

Inpatient total hip and total knee arthroplasty were substantially impacted by the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. We sought to characterize the transition of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) to the outpatient setting in 2 large state health systems during this pandemic.

METHODS

Adult patients who underwent primary elective TJA between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System and California Department of Health Care Access and Information datasets. Yearly inpatient and outpatient case volumes and patient demographics, including age, sex, race, and payer coverage, were recorded. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using descriptive statistics. Significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

In New York during 2020, TJA volume decreased 16% because 22,742 fewer inpatient TJAs were performed. Much of this lost volume (46.6%) was offset by a 166% increase in outpatient TJA. In California during 2020, TJA volume decreased 20% because 34,114 fewer inpatient TJAs were performed. Much of this lost volume (37%) was offset by a 47% increase in outpatient TJA.

CONCLUSIONS

This present study demonstrates a marked increase in the proportion of TJA being performed on an outpatient basis in both California and New York. In both states, despite a decrease in overall TJA volume in 2020, outpatient TJA volume increased markedly.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Hospitalizations for Obstetrical Conditions During and After the Covid-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

During the Covid-19 pandemic there have been a drastic decrease in hospitalizations for non-Covid conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trend in hospitalizations for obstetrical conditions during and after the Covid-19 pandemic.

METHODS

For this study there we used electronical data base in order to search for all the obstetrical patients that were hospitalized in a tertiary maternity, Clinical Emergency County Hospital Craiova, during the pre-pandemic period (between March - December 2019), during pandemics (2020 March - December, 2021 March - December) and post pandemics (2022 March - December).

RESULTS

The total number of hospitalizations during 2020 dropped by 28% compared to the pre-pandemic year - 2019, and further by 30% in 2021, and by 26% in 2022. In terms of day admissions, a decreasing trend can be observed, with a total of 3230 admissions, from which, 208 in 2020 showing a decrease of 93%, 695 in 2021 with a decrease of 78% and 941 in 2022 with a decrease of 70% compared to 2019.We experienced a significant increase of vaginal birth rate during the pandemic (2020-2021) of 24% that can be attributed to the unavailability of many surrounding low-risk birth units during the pandemic.

CONCLUSION

The obstetrical conditions hospitalizations dramatically dropped during the COVID-19 pandemic and have not yet recovered to the pre-pandemic level.

The Differential Effect of COVID on Total Joint Arthroplasty Between Hospital and Ambulatory Surgery Centers/Hospital Outpatient Departments: A Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative Analysis

Background

Coronavirus disease (COVID) created unprecedented challenges, especially for high-volume elective subspecialties like total joint arthroplasty. Limited inpatient capacity and resource conservation led to new outpatient selection criteria and site of service changes. As a Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Quality Collaborative Initiative quality project, demographic changes, complications, and differential effects on inpatient vs outpatient centers pre- and post-COVID were analyzed.

Methods

The registry identified all total joint arthroplasty at hospitals and ASCs/HOPDs between 07/2019-12/2019 and 07/2020-12/2020. These intervals represented pre-COVID and post-COVID elective surgery shutdowns. Case volumes, demographics, and 90-day complications were compared.

Results

Comparing 2020 to 2019, hospital volumes decreased (-9% total hip arthroplasty [THA], -17% total knee arthroplasty [TKA]), and ambulatory surgery center (ASC)/hospital outpatient department (HOPD) increased (+84% THA, +125% TKA). Entering 2020, ASC/HOPD patients were older (P = .0031, P < .0001: THA, TKA), had more American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3-4 (P = .0105, P = .0021), fewer attended joint class (P < .0001, P < .0001), and more hips were women (P = .023). Hospital patients had higher preoperative pain scores (P = .0117, P < .0001; THA, TKA), less joint education attendance (P < .0001, P < .0001), younger TKAs (P = .0169), and more American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3-4 (0.0009). After propensity matching, there were no significant differences between site of service for 90-day fractures, deep vein thromboses or pulmonary embolisms, infection, or hip dislocations. Hospital THAs had higher readmissions (P = .0003) and TKAs had higher 30-day emergency department visits (P = .005). ASC/HOPD patients were prescribed higher oral morphine equivalents (P < .0001, P < .0001; THA, TKA).

Conclusions

COVID's elective surgery shutdown caused a dramatic site of service shift. Traditional preoperative education was negatively impacted, and older and sicker patients became outpatients. But short-term complications were not increased in ASCs/HOPDs. These site of service and associated patient demographic changes may be safely sustained.

A Role for Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) gained favor during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our objective was to critically evaluate the safety and short-term outcomes of outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) throughout the pandemic compared with pre-pandemic given their increased use. This was a retrospective review of 941 patients who underwent elective, outpatient TKA and THA at a single institution. Patients were divided into two cohorts: pre-pandemic (N=611) and pandemic (N=330). Data points included demographics, comorbidities, failure of same calendar day discharge (SCDD), and 90-day readmissions and re-operations. The pandemic cohort was older (61.0 vs 59.0 years; P=.001) and had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (2 vs 1; P=.004). There were no differences between the pandemic and pre-pandemic cohorts regarding SCDD failures (23.3% vs 21.9%; P=.623) and reoperations (4.2% vs 6.2%; P=.205). The pandemic cohort had a lower readmission rate (4.8% vs 8.2%; P=.056). Overall, patients who had failure of SCDD more commonly underwent TKA than THA (63.5% vs 36.5%; P<.001), were older (63.0 vs 58.5 years; P<.001), had a higher body mass index (30.8 vs 29.9 kg/m2; P=.006) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (2 vs 1; P<.001), had an American Society of Anesthesiologists class greater than 2 (51.2% vs 31.6%; P<.001), received physical therapy later postoperatively (4.15 vs 3.12 hours; P<.001), and had a history significant for myocardial infarction (P=.025), chronic kidney disease (P=.004), or diabetes (P=.003). This study supports broadening indications for outpatient TJA because we found a shift toward older patients with more comorbidities successfully undergoing the procedure. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):303-309.].

Elective Joint Arthroplasty Should be Delayed by One Month After COVID-19 Infection to Prevent Postoperative Complications

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether a history of recent COVID-19 infection affects the outcomes and risks of complications of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of TJA in patients who have and have not had a recent COVID-19 infection.

METHODS

A large national database was queried for patients undergoing total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Patients who had a diagnosis of COVID-19 within 90-days preoperatively were matched to patients who did not have a history of COVID-19 based on age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and procedure. A total of 31,453 patients undergoing TJA were identified, of which 616 (2.0%) had a preoperative diagnosis of COVID-19. Of these, 281 COVID-19 positive patients were matched with 281 patients who did not have COVID-19. The 90-day complications were compared between patients who did and did not have a diagnosis of COVID-19 at 1, 2, and 3 months preoperatively. Multivariate analyses were used to further control for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis of the matched cohorts showed that COVID-19 infection within 1 month prior to TJA was associated with an increased rate of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (odds ratio [OR]: 6.50, 95% confidence interval: 1.48-28.45, P = .010) and venous thromboembolic events (odds ratio: 8.32, confidence interval: 2.12-34.84, P = .002). COVID-19 infection within 2 and 3 months prior to TJA did not significantly affect outcomes.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 infection within 1 month prior to TJA significantly increases the risk of postoperative thromboembolic events; however, complication rates returned to baseline after that time point. Surgeons should consider delaying elective total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty until 1 month after a COVID-19 infection.

Challenges with patient management of osteoarthritis during the COVID-19 pandemic: review

Osteoarthritis is a growing public health concern, affecting millions of people worldwide. With progressively worsening joint function and pain, management of osteoarthritis is important to ensure high quality of life for patients. Treatment includes a combination of pharmacologic agents and non-pharmacologic methods such as exercise and physical therapy. However, if multiple treatments fail to improve symptoms, joint replacement surgery is the final course of action. When the new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), was declared a pandemic, all aspects of osteoarthritis treatment become affected. Due to increased public health measures, non-pharmacologic modalities and elective surgeries became limited in accessibility. Additionally, there were concerns about the interaction of current medications for osteoarthritis with the virus. As a result of limited options for treatment and quality of life of patients was negatively impacted, especially in those with severe osteoarthritis. Furthermore, a backlog of joint replacement surgeries was created which could take up to several months or years to address. In this review, we describe the impact COVID-19 had on osteoarthritis management as well as tactics to deal with the large caseload of surgeries as operative rooms begin to re-open for elective surgeries.

Impact of COVID-19 on Clinical Outcomes Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Background

The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has introduced patient stressors and changes to perioperative protocols in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the short-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on various patient outcomes and satisfaction following elective TSA.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed on 147 patients who underwent primary TSA at a single institution between the June 2019 and December 2020. Patients were divided into two cohorts: pre-COVID (June 2019-March 2020; n=74) and post-COVID (April 2020-December 2020; n=73). No elective TSA were performed between 10 March 2020 and 23 April 2020 at our institution. Data were collected prospectively both pre- and postoperatively. Range of motion (ROM) testing included active abduction, internal (IR), and external rotation (ER). Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) included global shoulder function, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scoring systems, and patient satisfaction. ROM and PROMs were compared at preoperative, 3-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up intervals. Operative time, length of stay (LOS), 90-day readmission, and 90-day reoperation were also compared.

Results

There were no differences in baseline patient characteristics. Operative time, LOS, home discharge rate, readmission, and reoperation did not differ between groups. For both cohorts, PROMs and ROM improved at each follow-up visit postoperatively. While preoperative abduction, IR, and ER were significantly greater in the post-COVID group, all ROM measures were similar at 3-month and 12-month follow-up visits. There was no difference in pain, global function, SST, ASES, or patient satisfaction between groups at all time intervals.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing elective TSA amidst the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrate excellent PROMs, ROM, and high satisfaction up to 12-months postoperatively that are comparable to pre-pandemic standards. Operative time, length of stay, discharge destination, as well as 90-day readmission and reoperation rates were not impacted by the pandemic. Patients can expect similar outcomes for TSA when comparing pre-COVID to post-COVID as the pandemic continues.

An Investigation for Future Practice of Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasties during COVID-19 in Romania

Background and Objectives: Elective arthroplasty in Romania has been severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and its effects are not quantified so far. The aim of this paper is to determine the impact of COVID-19 on arthroplasty interventions and how they varied in Romania. Materials and Methods: We performed a national retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary and revision elective hip and knee interventions at the 120 orthopedic-traumatology hospitals in Romania that are registered in the National Endoprosthesis Registry from 1 January 2019 to 1 September 2022. First, we examined the monthly trend in the number of surgeries for seven categories of arthroplasties. We calculated the percentage change in the average number of cases per month and compared them with other types of interventions. We then examined the percentage change in the average monthly number of arthroplasty cases, relative to the number of COVID-19 cases reported nationwide, the influence of the pandemic on length of hospital stay, and the percentage of patients discharged at home who no longer follow recovery protocols. Finally, we calculated the impact of the pandemic on hospital revenues. Results: There was an abrupt decrease in the volume of primary interventions in hip and knee patients by up to 69.14% with a low degree of patient care, while the average duration of scheduled hospitalizations increased. We found a 1-2-day decrease in length of hospital stays for explored arthroplasties. We saw an increasing trend of home discharge, which was higher for primary interventions compared to revision interventions. The total hospital revenues were 50.96% lower in 2020 compared to 2019, and are currently increasing, with the 2022 estimate being 81.46%. Conclusions: The conclusion of this study is that the COVID-19 pandemic severely affected the volume of arthroplasty of the 120 hospitals in Romania, which also had unfavorable financial implications. We proposed the development of new procedures and alternative clinical solutions, as well as personalized home recovery programs, to be activated if necessary, for possible future outbreaks.

Early Postoperative Complications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Analysis of 38,234 Patients

Background

The outcomes of total joint arthroplasty during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are unknown. We sought to compare early postoperative complications in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who had THA or TKA in the latter halves (July to December) of 2019 and 2020 were identified. Patients were divided into pre-COVID-19 (2019) and during-COVID-19 (2020) cohorts. Propensity score matching and logistic regression were used to detect correlations between operative period and outcomes. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.

Results

A total of 38,234 THA and 61,956 TKA patients were included. There was a significantly higher rate of outpatient procedures in 2020 than that in 2019 for both THA (41.68% vs 6.59%, P < .001) and TKA (41.68% vs 7.56%, P < .001). On matched analysis, surgery in 2020 had lower odds of hospital stay for >1 day (THA: odds ratio [OR] 0.889; P < .001) (TKA: OR 0.644; P < .001) and nonhome discharge (THA: 0.655; P < .001) (TKA: 0.497; P < .001). There was also increased odds of superficial surgical site infection in THA (OR 1.272; P = .040) and myocardial infarction in TKA patients (OR 1.488; P = .042) in 2020 compared to those in 2019. There was no difference in the 15 other outcomes assessed.

Conclusions

Total joint arthroplasty surgery remains safe despite the COVID-19 pandemic. A statistically significant increase was detected in superficial surgical site infection and myocardial infarction risk during 2020 compared to 2019; however, the clinical significance of this is questionable. A shift away from inpatient stay was also present, possibly reflecting efforts to minimize nosocomial exposure to COVID-19.

The impact of COVID-19 on the orthopaedic patient in Slovenia: Hip and knee replacement surgery, 90-Day mortality, outpatient visits and waiting times

Introduction

The purpose of the study was to analyse the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the healthcare of the orthopaedic patient, i.e. numbers of hip and knee replacement surgeries, 90-day mortality, waiting times and outpatient clinic visits.

Methods

The Hip (HR) and Knee Replacement (KR) records from The National Arthroplasty Registry of Slovenia in the pandemic year 2020 were compared to the year 2019. To compare reasons for revision and 90-day mortality the Chi-square test was used. The median values of the number of operations and waiting times were compared with the 95% confidence intervals. The number of outpatient clinic visits was tested with the Wilcoxon Signed Ranked test.

Results

All operations fell by 19%, from 7825 to 6335. The number of Primary Total HR declined from 3530 to 2792 (21%) and the number of Primary KR from 3191 to 2423 (24%). The number of hip revisions declined by 10% and knee revisions by 25%. We did not find differences in 90-day mortality (p=0.408). Outpatient clinic visits fell from 228682 to 196582 (14%) per year. Waiting times increased by 15% for HR and by 12% for KR.

Conclusion

There was an inevitable drop in the number of surgeries and outpatient clinic visits in the spring and autumn lockdown. With the reorganisation of the orthopaedic service in Slovenia, the number of KR and HR stayed at a relatively high level despite the pandemic. An epidemiological model and mechanisms for the reduction of waiting times could overcome the impact of the epidemic.

The Impact of COVID-19 on the Oral Health of Patients with Special Needs

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared a global public health emergency due to the spread of COVID-19, and medical and dental elective care was suspended, disproportionally affecting persons with special needs. As many of the special needs population live in a communal environment, they were at higher risk of being infected with and dying of COVID-19. Consequently, their access to medical and dental services was limited to emergency care. A method of reaching these populations evolved by the expansion of telehealth, including dentistry, to provide diagnosis, management, prevention, and provision of psychosocial support for patients.

Effect of Institution and COVID-19 on Access to Adult Arthroplasty Surgery

Background

Although insurance status is important to patients’ ability to access care, it varies significantly by race, age, and socioeconomic status. Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) negatively impacted access to care, while simultaneously widening pre-existing health-care disparities. The purpose of the present study was to document this phenomena within orthopedics.

Methods

Patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty at two medical centers in San Francisco, California, were evaluated. One cohort came from the University of California San Francisco (UCSF), a tertiary center, and the other from Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital (ZSFGH), a safety-net hospital. Patients who underwent arthroplasty before the pandemic (March 2020) and those after pandemic declaration were evaluated. Patient demographics, surgical wait times, and operative volumes were compared.

Results

Two-hundred sixty-nine (pre-COVID, 184; post-COVID, 85) cases at UCSF and 63 (pre-COVID, 47; post-COVID, 16) cases at ZSFGH met inclusion criteria. Patients at ZSFGH had a significantly higher body mass index, were more often racial minorities, and were less likely to speak English. Patients at ZSFGH were less likely to have private insurance. A comparison of case volumes showed a larger decrease at ZSFGH than at UCSF after COVID. Wait times between the two sites before and after COVID showed a larger increase in wait times at ZSFGH. Notably, wait times at ZSFGH before COVID were more than double the wait times at UCSF after COVID.

Conclusions

COVID-19 worsened access to primary hip and knee arthroplasties at two academic medical centers in San Francisco. The pandemic also worsened pre-existing disparities. Racial minorities, non-English speakers, and those with nonprivate insurance were affected the most.

Incidence of Symptomatic COVID-19 in Unvaccinated Patients within One Month after Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Multicentre Study

Background

The safety of continuing total joint arthroplasty (TJA), as an elective procedure, during the pandemic is controversial. The present study aimed to investigate the incidence of symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its related risk factors in unvaccinated patients after TJA within 1 month after discharge in 2 large cities of our country.

Material and methods

The present prospective study included all the patients admitted to 3 hospitals, located in Tehran and Isfahan, 2 highly populated cities of Iran, from April 1, 2020, to April 1, 2021, for elective TJA. Urgent TJA (traumatic fractures) were excluded. The primary outcome was symptomatic COVID-19 within 1 month after discharge that was diagnosed using the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test. Afterward, the incidence of COVID-19 in the study population was compared with that in the general population to estimate the safety of elective TJA during the pandemic.

Results

From the 1007 patients undergoing TJA, 755 patients met the inclusion criteria. None of the patients was vaccinated against COVID-19. Among them, 18 patients (2.4%) developed symptomatic COVID-19 within 1 month after discharge. In the same time interval, the incidence of COVID-19 was 2.2% in the general population of these 2 cities, which was similar to the incidence reported in the study population. Of the patients who were positive for COVID-19, 4 patients were hospitalized, and 3 of them were admitted to an intensive care unit; however, no mortality was reported.

Conclusion

The TJA will be a safe elective procedure for the patients during the pandemic if the preventive protocols are followed strictly.

A Weighted Scoring System Based on Preoperative and Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Guide Timing of Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There is currently no existing consensus regarding timing of knee arthroplasty. This study aimed to develop a weighted scoring system from patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide timing of knee arthroplasty based on preoperative severity and long-term effectiveness.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of 766 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) and 382 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) at a single institution were analyzed. PROMs were assessed preoperatively and at 10 years using the Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and Short Form-36 physical component score (SF-36 PCS). Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified thresholds where preoperative PROMs predicted 10-year clinically meaningful improvements (minimal clinically important difference [MCID]). Threshold weights were assigned to PROMs based on their ability to predict MCID in isolation or in combination.

RESULTS

Poorer baseline PROMs predicted 10-year MCID attainments. The threshold of 49.5 points for the KSS, 30.5 points for the OKS, and 40.7 points for the SF-36 PCS and 55.5 points for the KSS, 33.5 points for the OKS, and 40.5 points for the SF-36 PCS was weighted 1 point for predicting MCID in 1 PROM for TKA and UKA, respectively. The threshold of 33.4 and 33.9 points for the SF-36 PCS was weighted 2 points for predicting MCID in 2 PROMs, whereas 29.3 and 31.3 points for the SF-36 PCS were weighted 3 points for predicting MCID in 3 PROMs for TKA and UKA, respectively. The sum of weighted components from 0 (lowest) to 5 (highest) represented likelihood for long-term benefits at 10 years.

CONCLUSION

This scoring system is a useful clinical adjunct for deciding timing of knee arthroplasty and prioritizing patients in institutions with long waitlists.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Practice of New Normal Lifestyles, Economic and Social Disruption, and Level of Happiness Among General Public in China in the Post-COVID-19 Era

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the practice of ‘new normal’ lifestyles, economic and social distribution, and individuals’ well-being of people in China after the country ease the lockdown restriction.

Methods

A cross-sectional, self-administered online survey was carried out between 3 September and 15 October 2020.

Results

A total of 8393 complete responses were received from a nationwide sample. Poor sustainability in the practice of “new norm” was reported. Noteworthy disparities were observed in willingness to carry out “new normal” practices by gender, urban-rural locality, non-Han and Han Chinese and educational attainment. There was evidence of economic and social disruption associated with COVID-19 or “new normal” practices. The current mean (±standard deviation [SD]) happiness score (110.45 ± 17.55) was slightly lower than the mean happiness score before (111.12 ± 17.83) the COVID-19 pandemic (t= −9.01, p<0.001). Lower socioeconomic status and greater economic and social disruptions were associated with lower current happiness scores. Moreover, greater willingness to adapt to “new normal” practices was associated with higher levels of happiness.

Conclusion

There is a need to encourage sustainable practice of new norm post-pandemic. Segments of the public continue to experience significant economic and social effects and the post-pandemic ‘new norms’ remain at risk of leading to psychological consequences.

COVID-19: lessons learnt and priorities in trauma and orthopaedic surgery

The COVID-19 pandemic is the most serious health crisis of our time. Global public measures have been enacted to try to prevent healthcare systems from being overwhelmed. The trauma and orthopaedic (T&O) community has overcome challenges in order to continue to deliver acute trauma care to patients and plan for challenges ahead. This review explores the lessons learnt, the priorities and the controversies that the T&O community has faced during the crisis. Historically, the experience of major incidents in T&O has focused on mass casualty events. The current pandemic requires a different approach to resource management in order to create a long-term, system-sustaining model of care alongside a move towards resource balancing and facilitation. Significant limitations in theatre access, anaesthetists and bed capacity have necessitated adaptation. Strategic changes to trauma networks and risk mitigation allowed for ongoing surgical treatment of trauma. Outpatient care was reformed with the uptake of technology. The return to elective surgery requires careful planning, restructuring of elective pathways and risk management. Despite the hope that mass vaccination will lift the pressure on bed capacity and on bleak economic forecasts, the orthopaedic community must readjust its focus to meet the challenge of huge backlogs in elective caseloads before looking to the future with a robust strategy of integrated resilient pathways. The pandemic will provide the impetus for research that defines essential interventions and facilitates the implementation of strategies to overcome current barriers and to prepare for future crises.

Total Joint Arthroplasty During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review with Implications for Future Practice

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the practice of total joint arthroplasty. A scoping review of the literature with compiled recommendations is a useful tool for arthroplasty surgeons as they resume their orthopedic practices during the pandemic.

METHODS

In June 2020, PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Library (Wiley), Scopus, LitCovid, CINAHL, medRxiv, and bioRxiv were queried for articles using controlled vocabulary and keywords pertaining to COVID-19 and total joint arthroplasty. Studies were characterized by their region of origin, design, and Center of Evidence Based Medicine level of evidence. The identified relevant studies were grouped into 6 categories: changes to future clinical workflow, education, impact on patients, impact on surgeons, technology, and surgical volume.

RESULTS

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on arthroplasty practice, including the disruption of the clinical teaching environment, personal and financial consequences for patients and physicians, and the drastic reduction in surgical volume. New pathways for clinical workflow have emerged, along with novel technologies with applications for both patients and trainees.

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic emphasizes the recent trend in arthroplasty toward risk stratification and outpatient surgery, which may result in improved clinical outcomes and significant cost-savings. Furthermore, virtual technologies are a promising area of future focus that may ultimately improve upon previous existing inefficiencies in the education and clinical environments.

Free Falling: Declining Inflation-Adjusted Payment for Arthroplasty Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, there have been ongoing concerns over declining surgeon compensation for lower extremity arthroplasty. We aimed to determine changes in surgeon payment, patient charges, and overall reimbursement rates for patients undergoing unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA) and both primary and revision total knee (TKA) and hip (THA) arthroplasty.

METHODS

Using Medicare data from 2012 to 2017, we determined inflation-adjusted changes in annual surgeon payment (professional fee), patient charges, and reimbursement rate (payment-to-charge ratio) for UKA and primary/revision TKA and THA. Both nonweighted and weighted (by procedure frequency/volume) means were calculated.

RESULTS

Inflation-adjusted surgeon payment decreased for all procedures analyzed, with primary TKA (-17%) and THA (-11%) falling the most. Payment for UKA increased the most (+30%). There was a small increase in charges for THA revision (+2.2%, +2.1%, and +3.2% for acetabulum only, femur only, and both components, respectively). Charges for primary TKA (-3.7%) and THA (-1.5%) decreased slightly. The reimbursement rate for all procedures fell with UKA (-15%), TKA (-14%), and THA (-10%) falling the most. After weighting by procedure frequency/volume and combining all surgeries, average charges fell slightly (-0.7%), whereas surgeon payment (-13%) and reimbursement rate (-12%) fell more sharply.

CONCLUSION

Although patient charges have grown in pace with the inflationary rate for primary and revision TKA and THA, surgeon payment and reimbursement rates have fallen sharply. The orthopedic community needs to be aware of these financial trends to communicate to payers and health care policy makers the importance of protecting a sustainable payment infrastructure.

Early observations on the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on air quality trends across the UK

UK government implemented national lockdown in response to COVID-19 on the 23-26 March 2020. As elsewhere in Europe and Internationally, associated restrictions initially limited individual mobility and workplace activity to essential services and travel, and significant air quality benefits were widely anticipated. Here, break-point/segment methods are applied to air pollutant time-series from the first half of 2020 to provide an independent estimate of the timings of discrete changes in NO, NO₂, NO_x, O₃, PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 time-series from Automatic Urban Rural Network (AURN) monitoring stations across the UK. NO, NO₂ and NO_x all exhibit abrupt decreases at the time the UK locked down of (on average) 7.6 to 17 μg·m^-3 (or 32 to 50%) at Urban Traffic stations and 4 to 5.7 μg·m^-3 (or 26 to 46%) at Urban Background stations. However, after the initial abrupt reduction, gradual increases were then observed through lockdown. This suggests that the return of vehicles to the road during early lockdown has already offset much of the air quality improvement seen when locking down (provisional estimate 50 to 70% by 01 July). While locking down O₃ increased (7 to 7.4 μg·m^-3 or 14 to 17% at Urban stations) broadly in line with NO₂ reductions, but later changes suggest significant non-lockdown contributions to O₃ during the months that followed. Increases of similar magnitudes were observed for both PM₁₀ (5.9 to 6.3 μg·m^-3) and PM_2.5 (3.9 to 5.0 μg·m^-3) at both Rural and Urban stations alike, but the distribution of changes suggests the lockdown was not an obvious direct source of changes in levels of either of these species during this period, and that more complex contributions, e.g. from resuspension and secondary aerosol, may be more likely major drivers for these changes.

Perspectives and Consensus among International Orthopaedic Surgeons during Initial and Mid-lockdown Phases of Coronavirus Disease

With a lot of uncertainty, unclear, and frequently changing management protocols, COVID-19 has significantly impacted the orthopaedic surgical practice during this pandemic crisis. Surgeons around the world needed closed introspection, contemplation, and prospective consensual recommendations for safe surgical practice and prevention of viral contamination. One hundred orthopaedic surgeons from 50 countries were sent a Google online form with a questionnaire explicating protocols for admission, surgeries, discharge, follow-up, relevant information affecting their surgical practices, difficulties faced, and many more important issues that happened during and after the lockdown. Ten surgeons critically construed and interpreted the data to form rationale guidelines and recommendations. Of the total, hand and microsurgery surgeons (52%), trauma surgeons (32%), joint replacement surgeons (20%), and arthroscopy surgeons (14%) actively participated in the survey. Surgeons from national public health care/government college hospitals (44%) and private/semiprivate practitioners (54%) were involved in the study. Countries had lockdown started as early as January 3, 2020 with the implementation of partial or complete lifting of lockdown in few countries while writing this article. Surgeons (58%) did not stop their surgical practice or clinics but preferred only emergency cases during the lockdown. Most of the surgeons (49%) had three-fourths reduction in their total patients turn-up and the remaining cases were managed by conservative (54%) methods. There was a 50 to 75% reduction in the number of surgeries. Surgeons did perform emergency procedures without COVID-19 tests but preferred reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR; 77%) and computed tomography (CT) scan chest (12%) tests for all elective surgical cases. Open fracture and emergency procedures (60%) and distal radius (55%) fractures were the most commonly performed surgeries. Surgeons preferred full personal protection equipment kits (69%) with a respirator (N95/FFP3), but in the case of unavailability, they used surgical masks and normal gowns. Regional/local anesthesia (70%) remained their choice for surgery to prevent the aerosolized risk of contaminations. Essential surgical follow-up with limited persons and visits was encouraged by 70% of the surgeons, whereas teleconsultation and telerehabilitation by 30% of the surgeons. Despite the protective equipment, one-third of the surgeons were afraid of getting infected and 56% feared of infecting their near and dear ones. Orthopaedic surgeons in private practice did face 50 to 75% financial loss and have to furlough 25% staff and 50% paramedical persons. Orthopaedics meetings were cancelled, and virtual meetings have become the preferred mode of sharing the knowledge and experiences avoiding human contacts. Staying at home, reading, and writing manuscripts became more interesting and an interesting lifestyle change is seen among the surgeons. Unanimously and without any doubt all accepted the fact that COVID-19 pandemic has reached an unprecedented level where personal hygiene, hand washing, social distancing, and safe surgical practices are the viable antidotes, and they have all slowly integrated these practices into their lives. Strict adherence to local authority recommendations and guidelines, uniform and standardized norms for admission, inpatient, and discharge, mandatory RT-PCR tests before surgery and in selective cases with CT scan chest, optimizing and regularizing the surgeries, avoiding and delaying nonemergency surgeries and follow-up protocols, use of teleconsultations cautiously, and working in close association with the World Health Organization and national health care systems will provide a conducive and safe working environment for orthopaedic surgeons and their fraternity and also will prevent the resurgence of COVID-19.

Crisis change management during COVID-19 in the elective orthopaedic hospital: Easing the trauma burden of acute hospitals

Introduction

With the emergence of the 2019 novel coronavirus and its resulting pandemic status in March 2020 all routine elective orthopaedic surgery was cancelled in our institution. The developing picture in Italy, of acute hospitals becoming overwhelmed with treating patients suffering with severe and life-threatening symptoms from the disease, prompted the orthopaedic surgeons to formulate a plan to transfer trauma patients requiring surgery to the elective hospital to unburden the acute hospital system.

Methods

Under the threat of this pandemic; protocols and algorithms were established for referral, acceptance and care of trauma patients from acute hospitals in the region. Each day, as new guidance on COVID-19 emerged, our process and algorithms were adjusted to reflect pertinent change.

Results

The screening of all patients referred, worked well in keeping our hospital “COVID-free” with respect to patients undergoing operations. An upward trend in cases referred reflected the decreased capacity in the acute hospitals due to rising cases of COVID-19 within the hospital network. During the first 7 weeks of the pandemic 308 operations were performed, (31.1% upper limb, 33.4% lower limb, 4.1% spine, 14.1% urgent elective, 17.4% plastic surgery cases). Regular review and audit of the activity in the hospital as well as communication with the referring teams enabled appropriate planning to accommodate the increase in case-mix as the need arose.

Discussion

This paper details the steps that were taken in planning for such a change in management specific to the orthopaedic surgery setting and the lessons learnt during this process. The success of the development of this pathway was facilitated by clear communication channels, flexibility to adapt to changing process and feedback from all stakeholders. The implementation of this pathway allowed the unburdening of acute hospitals dealing with the pandemic that was steadily reducing access to operating theatres and anaesthetic resources.

COVID-19-related healthcare closures negatively affect patient health and postoperative recovery

Objective

To determine how COVID-19-related healthcare closures affect the health, recovery and access to resources of preoperative and postoperative orthopaedic sport medicine patients.

Methods

Patients whose orthopaedic restorative surgeries were postponed as well as those within 3 months postoperative completed electronic questionnaires assessing physical health, emotional health, virtual care and access to resources. The EuroQoL-five-dimensional-three level (EQ-5D-3L) was included as a quantitative and standardised measure of general health status. Data were descriptively analysed using means, SD and qualitative measures.

Results

A total of 115 patients whose surgeries were postponed completed the survey. Notable findings included that 41.7% of patients reported an increase in their symptoms during the COVID-19-related closures, and 68.7% described a negative impact on their physical health. Furthermore, 62.6% of patients reported that the postponement of their surgery would negatively affect their ability to return to work. A substantial percentage of patients (71.3%) reported that postponement of their surgery had an overall negative impact on their physical and/or emotional health. The mean health state on the EQ-5D-3L visual analogue scale (VAS) scale was 69.9 (SD=18.7). A total of 198 patients within 3 months postoperative completed the survey. A majority of patients (69.7%) indicated that COVID-19-related healthcare closures had an overall negative affect on their recovery. One-third of patients (35.4%) stated that they experienced increased symptoms as a direct result of limited postoperative follow-up. Less than half (41.4%) of patients accessed virtual physiotherapy, and only 42.9% of those that did found it to be helpful in some way. Virtual orthopaedic follow-up was deemed helpful by 61.3% of patients but many commented that it did not replace inperson visits. The mean health state reported on the EQ-5D-3L VAS scale was 76.9 (SD=15.6).

Conclusion

This study highlighted the significant impact of COVID-19-related healthcare closures on preoperative and postoperative orthopaedic sport medicine patients. It revealed that restorative procedures play an important role in maintaining physical and emotional health, as well as returning individuals to work and leisure activities. It also showed that virtual care did not adequately replace the hands-on assessments of allied care and orthopaedic specialists.

Level of Evidence

V.

Regional trauma patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

The current pandemic has impacted heavily on health systems, making unprecedented demands on resources, and forcing reconfiguration of services. Trauma and orthopaedic units have cancelled elective surgery, moved to virtual based clinics and have been forced to reconsider the provision of trauma. Our national elective orthopaedic centre has been re-designated as a trauma centre to allow tertiary centres re-direct triaged trauma. Many governments, as part of their COVID-19 management, have significantly restricted activity of the general population. We proposed that trauma patterns would change alongside these changes and maintaining existing standards of treatment would require dedicated planning and structures.

Methods

Referrals over a six-week period (March 15th to April 30th) were retrospectively reviewed. Data was collected directly from our referral database and a database populated. Analysis was performed to assess trauma volume, aetiology, and changes in trends.

Results

There were one hundred and fifty-nine referrals from three individual hospitals within the timeframe. Mean age of patient's referred was 55 (range17–92). Males accounted for 45% of cases. F&A injuries were the most common (32%), followed by H&W (28%), UL (17%), H&F (16%) and K&T (7%). In comparison to the corresponding time-period in 2019, trauma theatre activity reduced by almost one half (45.3%)

Conclusion

The majority of trauma referred to our Dublin based centre during COVID-19 related population restrictions appears to be home based and trauma volumes have decreased. Significant reductions are apparent in work and sport related injuries suggestive of compliance with COVID-19 activity guidelines. Maintaining existing standards of treatment requires dedicated planning.

Post-COVID-19 return to elective orthopaedic surgery-is rescheduling just a reboot process? Which timing for tests? Is chest CT scan still useful? Safety of the first hundred elective cases? How to explain the "new normality health organization" to patients?

PURPOSE

The long incubation period and asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 present considerable challenges for health care institutions when patients return to elective surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the first adult elective cases performed between May 18, 2020 and June 14, 2020, after the end of lockdown was analysed in Belgium to answer the following questions: (1) for the 236 cancelled patients during the outbreak, how easy was rescheduling? (2) How useful was universal RT-PCR testing and chest CT scan for the 211 orthopaedic and trauma admissions? (3) How were surgical difficulty category, number of operations and complications different when compared to the pre-COVID period? (4) How would patients balance the benefit of surgery against the unknown risk of developing COVID-19?

RESULTS

Before surgery, blood tests for anaesthesiology and imaging related to the surgical procedure were scheduled prior to universal testing (COVID-19 PCR and chest CT) performed 72-120 hours before surgery. Among the 211 asymptomatic patients who were tested before surgery, six had positive PCR, while no abnormality was found on the chest CT scan of all the patients. With this timing for tests, the 104 patients included in the current study for elective surgery were free of disease before undergoing surgery and remained without COVID-19 after surgery. Among the 366 cancelled patients during the outbreak, only 12% of the patients accepted to proceed with rescheduling immediately. Therefore, this resulted in a 70% reduction for elective surgery and in a 50% reduction for arthroplasties as compared to pre-COVID period. The rate of complications was not increased during the post-COVID period. A portion of patients have confused idea of screening and have difficulty to perceive the new rules of health organization.

CONCLUSIONS

Resumption of elective surgical procedures appears more difficult for patients than for surgeons with a low percentage of cancelled patients accepting to reschedule surgery. Universal testing allowed securing patients; however, surgeons must explore better patient perceptions regarding COVID-19 to facilitate a fully informed decision in the current period.

COVID-19 pandemic and lacrimal practice: Multipronged resumption strategies and getting back on our feet

The aim of this review was to propose multi-pronged resumption strategies for lacrimal practice in an effort to plan a sustainable recommencement of elective surgeries after we emerge from the peak of COVID-19 pandemic. The strategies for lacrimal practice were classified into 7 subtypes, and each of the blueprints were reassessed based on existing information on resumption strategies of elective surgeries from other specialties in COVID-19 era. The specific needs of lacrimal practice were then added to construct algorithms summarizing the resumption strategies. The basic principle of 'primum non nocere' needs to be followed. The overall proposed plan advocates the transition to a more sustainable health care reality in a world where we would still co-exist with COVID-19. A comprehensive effort involving screening, laboratory testing, appropriate triage, effective personal protection and specific precautionary measures for lacrimal clinics and operating room are needed to be able to safely resume elective surgery when the pandemic peak declines. To predict the timing of the resumption of elective surgeries is quite complex and influenced by several geographic, political and economic factors. It is equally important to remember that COVID-19 crisis is a dynamic situation and constantly evolving, hence the strategies provided are subject to change. Strict adherence to standard COVID-19 guidelines combined with effective testing and personal protection strategies can ensure slow yet smooth and safe return to full lacrimal practice after the COVID-19 pandemic calms down. The local government directives, individual and institutional discretion are advised.