Return to activity after medial patellofemoral ligament repair or reconstruction

Patellofemoral Instability Part II: Surgical Treatment

Treatment of patellofemoral instability in skeletally mature patients remains an important area of clinical and research interest. Both nonsurgical and surgical interventions are used to treat the underlying causes. Surgical management is the mainstay of treatment of recurrent PFI that fails nonsurgical treatment, and it is broadly classified into bony and soft-tissue procedures. Proximal bony procedures include femoral trochleoplasty, derotational osteotomies, and coronal alignment correction of the femur. Distal bony procedures include tibial tubercle transfer and derotational (supratubercle and infratubercle) osteotomies. Soft-tissue procedures consist of medial patellofemoral ligament repair or reconstruction and lateral lengthening procedures. This article is the second part of our two-article review on PFI, which focuses on surgical treatment options, their indications, outcomes, and potential complications.

Arthroscopic medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with polyethylene suture combined with medial retinaculum plication for the treatment of acute patellar dislocation in young and middle-aged patients with a follow-up of at least 2 years

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to propose a surgical technique for arthroscopic medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with polyethylene suture combined with medial retinaculum plication and to evaluate the efficacy of this surgical technique in the treatment of acute patellar dislocation.

METHODS

Clinical data of patients with acute patellar dislocations treated with arthroscopic MPFL reconstruction with polyethylene tape (FiberTape) combined with medial support band compression were analyzed retrospectively from January 2018 to January 2021. The mean age of the patients was 25.15 ± 4.66 years; the mean follow-up time was 27.5 (24-36) months. Clinical evaluation consisted of apprehension test results, patellar extrapolation test results, Lysholm score, Kujala score, and IKDC score, the Patellar lateral shift distance and patellar tilt angle (PTA) measured by CT scan.

RESULTS

All patients had no recurrent patellar dislocation or subluxation after surgery, and the apprehension test was negative. In all patients, the Kujala score (36.0 ± 9.9 vs. 98.2 ± 3.1), the IKDC score (48.6 ± 7.0 vs. 90.6 ± 4.4) and the Lysholm score (32.8 ± 10.4 vs. 96.7 ± 3.1) had improved at the 24-month follow up (P < 0.05). In addition, PTA was significantly lower at the 12-month follow-up and 24-giving-month follow-up compared to the preoperative period (P < 0.05, Table 2). The patellar lateral shift distance decreased from 14.94 ± 6.11 mm preoperatively to 3.00 ± 1.40 mm (12-month follow up) and 3.26 ± 1.37 mm (24-month follow up), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic MPFL reconstruction with polyethylene suture combined with medial retinaculum plication is a safe and reliable surgical technique for the treatment of acute patellar dislocation in young and middle-aged patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Therapeutic Study.

MPFL Reconstruction and Implant-Mediated Guided Growth in Skeletally Immature Patients With Patellar Instability and Genu Valgum

BACKGROUND

There is a higher rate of failure of isolated MPFL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients with patellar instability compared to skeletally mature patients. Genu valgum is a known risk factor for patellar instability. There is potential for concomitant surgical correction of genu valgum to achieve better clinical outcomes and to decrease failure rates of MPFL reconstruction.

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes of combined medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and implant-mediated guided growth (IMGG) in skeletally immature patients with patellar instability and genu valgum.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

In a multicenter study, all skeletally immature patients with recurrent patellar instability and genu valgum who underwent MPFL reconstruction using hamstring graft and IMGG using a transphyseal screw or tension band plate for the distal femur and/or proximal tibia were included. The knee valgus angle and mechanical axis were measured on full-length radiographs and anatomic risk factors were measured on MRI. Patients were followed until correction of their lower limb alignment and implant removal or until skeletal maturity. Clinical outcomes, including complications, were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients (37 knees) were included in the study. The mean age and skeletal age of the cohort were 12.4 and 12.9 years, respectively. Simultaneous MPFL reconstruction and IMGG were performed in 26 of 37 knees; 11 underwent staged procedures. Twenty knees had transphyseal screws and 17 knees had tension band plates for IMGG. The knee valgus corrected from a mean of 12.4° to 5.1° in 12.1 months. Implants were removed from 22 of 37 knees once genu valgum was corrected. There was no significant difference (P = .65) in the correction rate between plates (0.7 deg/month) and screws (0.6 deg/month). Ten complications occurred in 4 patients (7 knees) and included 5 patellar redislocations, 2 rebound valgus, 1 varus overcorrection, 1 knee arthrofibrosis, and 1 implant loosening. For children <10 years of age, 3 of 6 (50%) knees had patellar redislocations and 5 of 6 knees had a complication. This was statistically significant (P = .003) compared with patients >10 years of age. Similarly, for patients with bilateral knee involvement, 5 of 12 (42%) knees had patellar redislocations and a total of 8 complications occurred in this subset. This was statistically significant (P < .001) compared with patients with unilateral involvement.

CONCLUSION

IMGG with plates or screws in the setting of combined MPFL reconstruction improves genu valgum. Children <10 years of age and those with bilateral instability with genu valgum remain difficult subsets to treat with higher complication rates.

Non-operative Management of Acute Knee Injuries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute knee injuries are commonly encountered in both the clinical and sideline setting and may be treated operatively or non-operatively. This article describes an evidence-based approach to non-operative acute knee injury. This includes history, physical exam, imaging, and initial management. In addition, the non-operative management of three such injuries-ligament injury, meniscus injury, and patellar dislocation injury-will be discussed via a case-based practical approach.

RECENT FINDINGS

Aside from grade III ACL tears, most acute knee ligament injuries, especially in the absence of other concurrent injuries, can be treated non-operatively. There is new evidence that acute traumatic meniscus tears in those younger than 40 can be successfully treated non-operatively and can do equally, as well as those that undergo surgery, at 1 year out from injury. Based on the current literature, a short period of knee bracing in extension with progression to weightbearing to tolerance is recommended after initial patellar dislocation. Many of the most common acute knee injuries, including MCL tears, meniscus tears, and patellar dislocations, can be managed non-operatively. A detailed systemic approach to initial evaluation, including pertinent history, physical exam, and appropriate imaging, is essential and complementary to the subsequent non-operative treatment algorithm.

Comparison of Failure Rates at Long-term Follow-up Between MPFL Repair and Reconstruction for Recurrent Lateral Patellar Instability

Background

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the primary soft tissue restraint to lateral patellar translation and is often disrupted by lateral patellar dislocation. Surgical management for recurrent patellar instability focuses on restoring the MPFL function with repair or reconstruction techniques. Recent studies have favored reconstruction over repair; however, long-term comparative studies are limited.

Purpose

To compare long-term clinical outcomes, complications, and recurrence rates of isolated MPFL reconstruction and MPFL repair for recurrent lateral patellar instability.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 55 patients (n = 58 knees) with recurrent lateral patellar instability were treated between 2005 and 2012 with either MPFL repair or MPFL reconstruction. The exclusion criteria were previous or concomitant tibial tubercle osteotomy or trochleoplasty and follow-up of <8 years. Pre- and postoperative descriptive, surgical, imaging, and clinical data were recorded for each patient.

Results

MPFL repair was performed on 26 patients (n = 29 knees; 14 women, 15 men), with a mean age of 18.4 years. MPFL reconstruction was performed on 29 patients (n = 29 knees; 18 women, 11 men), with a mean age of 18.2 years. At a mean follow-up of 12 years (range, 8.3-18.9 years), the reconstruction group had a significantly lower rate of recurrent dislocation compared with the repair group (14% vs 41%; P = .019). There were no differences in the number of preoperative dislocations or tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance. The reconstruction group had significantly more time from initial injury to surgery compared with the repair group (median, 1460 days vs 627 days; P = .007). There were no differences in postoperative Tegner, Lysholm, or Kujala scores at the final follow-up. In addition, no statistically significant differences were detected in return to sport (RTS) rates (repair [81%] vs reconstruction [75%]; P = .610) or reoperation rates for recurrent instability (repair [21%] vs reconstruction [7%]; P = .13).

Conclusion

MPFL repair resulted in a nearly 3-fold higher rate of recurrent patellar dislocation (41% vs 14%) at the long-term follow-up compared with MPFL reconstruction. Given this disparate rate, the authors recommend MPFL reconstruction over repair because of the lower failure rate and similar, if not superior, clinical outcomes and RTS.

Double-Limb Graft Versus Single-Limb Graft Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies

BACKGROUND

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the most important stabilizer of lateral dislocation of the patella. Single-limb (SL) and double-limb (DL) graft MPFL reconstructions have been increasingly used to treat recurrent patellar dislocations, but the clinical efficacy of SL versus DL graft MPFL reconstructions remains controversial owing to the inconsistent conclusions of previous studies.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of SL and DL graft MPFL reconstructions for patients with recurrent patellar dislocation by conducting a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. The retrieval time was up to July 25, 2022. Two evaluators independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the enrolled studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

A total of 4 randomized controlled trials and 3 cohort studies with 451 patients were included. The joint stability and functional scores in both groups improved significantly from baseline. When compared with SL graft reconstruction, DL graft reconstruction provided reduced recurrent instability (P = .01), anterior patella-related pain (P = .02), and patellar lateral shift rate (P = .02). Regarding functional recovery, patients undergoing DL graft reconstruction presented better scores on the Kujala (P < .001), Tegner (P = .009), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) (P < .001) but similar Lysholm scores as compared with SL graft reconstruction. No statistically significant difference was found between the techniques in the reduction of the patellar tilt angle, complications other than anterior patella-related pain, or postoperative pain.

CONCLUSION

When compared with SL graft MPFL reconstruction, DL graft MPFL reconstruction yielded better outcomes in terms of postoperative recurrent instability, anterior patella-related pain, patellar lateral shift rate, Kujala score, Tegner score, and IKDC score. The amount of high-quality evidence is insufficient, so this conclusion should be interpreted with caution.

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction appears to be a better treatment than repair, proximal realignment, or conservative management for primary patellar dislocation: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes and re-dislocation rates of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, MPFL repair, combined proximal realignment (CPR), and conservative management for primary patellar dislocation by conducting a systematic literature search of the available studies. The hypothesis was that MPFL repair and MPFL reconstruction would be better options for treating primary patellar dislocation.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials or prospective studies of primary patellar dislocation treated with MPFL reconstruction, MPFL repair, CPR, or conservative management were identified from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases through December 31, 2021. A total of 626 patients met the prespecified inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of each study was assessed using a risk of bias table, Detsky quality index, and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The end-point data collected included comparisons of the mean in functional scores on knee outcomes scales and the number of patients who experienced re-dislocation. A network meta-analysis of the relevant literature was performed to investigate which treatment showed better outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 10 trials were included in this study. There was no statistically significant difference in the subgroup analysis in terms of the functional outcomes among MPFL reconstruction, MPFL repair, CPR, and conservative management. However, MPFL reconstruction showed statistically significantly better outcomes than MPFL repair, CPR, or conservative management in terms of the re-dislocation rate. Additionally, surface under the cumulative ranking curve percentage showed that MPFL reconstruction had a lower probability of re-dislocation than MPFL repair even though there was no significant difference (0.24, 95% confidence interval: 0.02-2.91).

CONCLUSION

Using a network meta-analysis, this meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in functional outcomes in a subgroup analysis. In re-dislocation subgroup analysis, MPFL repair and MPFL reconstruction produced significantly better results than other treatments. Also, surface under the cumulative ranking curve percentage showed that MPFL reconstruction had a lower probability of re-dislocation than MPFL repair.

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing conservative and surgical treatments for acute patellar dislocation in children and adolescents

PURPOSE

This study sought to clarify treatment evidence to treat patellar dislocation by evaluating which treatment could yield better improvement of clinical outcomes for acute patellar dislocation in children and adolescents 18 years of age or younger.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials electronic databases were searched for relevant articles comparing clinical outcomes of conservative and surgical treatments for acute patellar dislocation in children and adolescents published from March 2008 to August 2022. Data searching, extraction, analysis, and quality assessment were performed on the basis of the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. The quality assessment of each study was investigated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) critical appraisal scoring system and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale scores. To calculate the overall combined effect size for each outcome, Review Manager Version 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Software Update, Oxford) was employed.

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one prospective study were investigated. In terms of pain [mean difference (MD) 6.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.73-11.45, I2 0%], there were significantly better outcomes in conservative group. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in any evaluated outcomes such as redislocation [risk ratio (RR) 1.36, 95% CI 0.72-2.54, I2 65%], Kujala score (MD 3.92, 95% CI -0.17 to 8.01, I2 0%), Tegner score (MD 1.04, 95% CI -0.04 to 2.11, I2 71%), or subjective results (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.74-1.34, I2 33%) between conservative and surgical treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite better pain outcomes with conservative group, the present study revealed no significant differences in clinical outcomes between conservative treatment and surgical treatment in children and adolescents with acute patellar dislocation. Since there are no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the two groups, routine surgical treatment is not advocated for treating acute patellar dislocation in children and adolescents.

Radiographic Changes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients Compared With an Age- and Sex-Matched Cohort

BACKGROUND

Despite recent evidence that medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) in the skeletally immature patient is both safe and effective, there are limited data evaluating postoperative coronal- and sagittal-plane growth and radiographic patellofemoral parameters in this population.

PURPOSE

The primary purpose was to assess radiographic measures of coronal-plane alignment, longitudinal growth, patellar congruence, and trochlear dysplasia after MPFLR in a skeletally immature population. A secondary purpose was to assess this population compared with a matched cohort with a focus on trochlear dysplasia prevalence and the effect of MPFLR on patellar height.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 28 children with a minimum 1-year follow-up who underwent isolated MPFLR were identified. All patients were skeletally immature, defined as fully open physes on both sides of the knee joint, at the time of surgery. The development of a limb length discrepancy or angular growth abnormalities were assessed on standing hip-to-ankle radiographs, patellar tilt and congruence were measured on the Merchant view of the knee, and the grade of trochlear dysplasia and patellar height were assessed on lateral knee radiographs. A sex- and age-matched group of patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was formed as a control for patellar height and trochlear dysplasia measurements.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 11.71 ± 2.02 years at the time of surgery with a mean follow-up of 23.54 ± 12.49 months. All but 1 patient in the MPFLR group had preoperative features consistent with trochlear dysplasia. There was no significant difference in limb length or coronal-plane alignment at final follow-up (P = .725 and P > .999, respectively). Both the MPFLR and the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction groups had a statistically significant decrease in the Caton-Deschamps index between the preoperative and postoperative time points (mean, 0.18 ± 0.20 and 0.11 ± 0.14, respectively; P = .161).

CONCLUSION

MPFLR may be safely performed utilizing an epiphyseal femoral socket in a skeletally immature cohort without affecting normal longitudinal growth or coronal limb alignment. The previously reported effect of MPFLR in reducing patellar height may be related to physiological growth based on similar changes noted in a comparison cohort that did not undergo the procedure.

Complication Rates After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Range From 0% to 32% With 0% to 11% Recurrent Instability: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To review the incidence of complications following primary medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted by querying PubMed and Scopus databases from database inception through August 2022 according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines using the terms "Medial Patellofemoral Ligament," "MPFL," "reconstruction," "patellar," and "instability." Inclusion criteria included studies reporting complications following primary MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. Exclusion criteria consisted of studies reporting on patients undergoing concurrent osteotomy procedures, revision reconstruction, and biomechanical or anatomic studies. The incidence of specific complications was aggregated from the included studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies, consisting of 1,478 patients (n = 1521 knees), with a mean age of 23.3 years (mean range, 19-34.3 years) were identified. The overall incidence of complications ranged from 0% to 32.3% of knees. Failure ranged from 0% to 10.7% of knees, whereas patellar fractures occurred in 0% to 8.3% of knees, primarily in patients treated with full-length transverse tunnel or 2-tunnel techniques. All patellar fractures occurred in patients with patellar tunnels ranging from 4.5 to 6.0 mm in diameter. The incidence of postoperative knee stiffness/range of motion deficit ranged from 0% to 20%. Persistent anterior knee pain, ranged from 0% to 32.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications following primary MPFL reconstruction ranged from 0% to 32.3% of knees, primarily consisting of residual anterior knee pain. Failure ranged from 0% to 10.7% of knees, whereas patellar fractures were reported in 0% to 8.3% of knees. Fractures primarily occurred with a full-length transverse tunnel or 2-tunnel techniques, whereas all fractures occurred with patellar tunnels ranging from 4.5 mm to 6.0 mm in diameter.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; Systematic Review of Level I-IV studies.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

Recurrentlateral patellar dislocation is a devastating condition associated with different pathologies, including medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) injury, increased tibial tubercle to trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, and trochlear dysplasia. This video aims to provide an overview of isolated MPFL reconstruction in a patient with recurrent patellar dislocation and chronic MPFL injury.

Indications:

Isolated MPFL reconstruction is indicated for patients with recurrent lateral patellar instability following an initial trial of nonoperative management, in the absence of other contributing anatomic factors. Candidates for isolated MPFL reconstruction should have a TT-TG distance of <20 mm, and normal or Dejour type A trochlear morphology.

Technique Description:

Semitendinosus allograft is used to reconstruct the torn or attenuated MPFL. Following diagnostic arthroscopy, an incision is made over the medial border of the patella and dissection is carried through the skin and subcutaneous tissue to the fascia. Two K-wires are over-drilled and two 3.5-mm Arthrex SwiveLock anchors are placed. The allograft is prepared and whipstitched on both sides. The central portion of the graft is tide down to the anchors. A second incision is then made on the medial side of the knee over the epicondyle. Dissection is carried down to the fascia, and palpation is used to identify Schottles’ point. This is confirmed with fluoroscopy. An 8-mm drill bit is then used to drill to a depth of 60 mm on the femoral side. The grafts are passed one at a time through the femoral tunnel. The femoral side is fixed with an Arthrex BioComposite Interference Screw and the incisions are subsequently irrigated and closed in a layered fashion.

Results:

MPFL reconstruction demonstrates good functional and clinical outcomes with high rates of patient satisfaction and low rates of failure. A recent systematic review demonstrated an 84% rate of return to sport, improved postoperative outcomes, and pooled risks of recurrent instability and reoperation of less than 5% following isolated MPFL reconstruction.

Conclusion:

Isolated MPFL reconstruction should be considered for patients with recurrent patellar instability in the absence of other clinical risk factors. The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation allows a good rate to return to sport

PURPOSE

Recurrent patellar dislocation is a frequent knee disorders in young, active patients. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) can restore knee stability and function, but the rate of return to sports is less clear. The aim of this study was to evaluate rate of return to sport following treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation with isolated MPFLR.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2018, 113 patients with recurrent patellar dislocation were treated with isolated MPFLR at an academic center. Pre-injury sports participation and Tegner score, pre-operative subjective IKDC score, time to return to sports, and post-operative Tegner and subjective IKDC scores were collected, with a minimum of follow-up of 2 years.

RESULTS

One hundred and three patients (91%) were evaluated at a mean of 4.5 ± 2.5-year post-operative. 92 patients (89%) participated in sports prior to onset of patellar instability. At final follow-up, 84 of these 92 patients (91%) were able to return to sports. The mean time from surgery to return to sports was 10.4 ± 8.6 months (range: 2-48 months). 62 patients (67%) returned to the same (50 patients) or higher (12 patients) level. 22 patients (26%) returned at a lower level. 19 of these patients attributed this decreased participation to ongoing knee problems. The median Tegner score was noted to decrease from 5 pre-injury to 4 post-operatively (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Isolated MPFL reconstruction allowed return to pre-injury sports in 91% of patients, with 67% of patients returning to the same or higher level than pre-injury. Mean time to return to sports was 10 months and post-operative Tegner score was noted to be modestly decreased from pre-injury level.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Repair or Medial Advancement: Is There a Role?

Patellar instability is one of the most prevalent knee disorders, with dislocations occurring in 5 to 43 cases per 10,000 annually. Traumatic patellar dislocation can result in significant morbidity and is associated with patellofemoral chondral injuries and fractures, medial soft tissue disruption, pain, and reduced function, and can lead to patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Chronic and recurrent instability can lead to deformation and incompetence of the medial soft tissue stabilizers. Despite recent gains in understanding the pathoanatomy of this disorder, the management of patients with this condition is complex and remains enigmatic.

Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Patellar Fixation Techniques in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Transosseous Sutures vs Suture Anchors

Background

Multiple techniques for fixing a graft to the patella in medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction have been described; however, no single technique has been shown to be superior to another.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical performance of 2 different patellar fixation techniques: suture anchor (SA) and transosseous suture (TS) fixation. The hypothesis was that there would be no significant differences between the groups in ultimate failure load, stiffness, or elongation.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

In this study, a new TS technique was biomechanically compared with the SA technique for MPFL reconstruction using 24 fresh-frozen mature porcine patellae and porcine flexor profundus tendons. The specimens were randomized into 2 groups undergoing MPFL reconstruction using either the SA technique or the TS technique (n = 12 per group). Fixation with TS was completed using 3 No. 2 UltraBraid sutures and three 2-mm transosseous tunnels. SA reconstruction was completed using 2 parallel 3.5-mm titanium SAs with 2 No. 2 UltraBraid sutures. We preconditioned each graft using a force between 5 and 20 N before cyclic loading. Then, the specimens were biomechanically tested (1000 cycles; 5-100 N; 1 Hz) and loaded under tension at 200 mm/min until failure. The ultimate failure load, stiffness, elongation, and failure mode were recorded for each specimen. The Shapiro-Wilk test and independent t tests were used to assess the data.

Results

The TS technique resulted in a significantly higher mean failure load than did the SA technique (496.18 ± 93.15 vs 399.43 ± 105.35 N; P = .03). The TS technique resulted in less stiffness than did the SA technique (55.42 ± 7.92 vs 72.11 ± 10.64 N/mm; P < .01). There was no significant difference between the groups in elongation. None of the graft fixation/patellar complexes failed during cyclic testing in either group. During the load-to-failure test, the most common mode of failure in the SA group was an anchor being pulled out of the bone, whereas that in the TS group was rupture of the suture material.

Conclusion

MPFL reconstruction with 3 TSs provided a higher load to failure than did the commonly used fixation method involving SAs.

Comparing Nonoperative Treatment, MPFL Repair, and MPFL Reconstruction for Patients With Patellar Dislocation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Background:

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, MPFL repair, and nonoperative treatment are important treatments for patients with patellar dislocation. However, it is unclear which treatment leads to better outcomes.

Purpose:

To determine the efficacy and safety of the 3 treatments in the treatment of patellar dislocation and compare the effect of MPFL reconstruction with MPFL repair, MPFL reconstruction with nonoperative treatment, and MPFL repair with nonoperative treatment.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

The PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), and Wanfang databases were searched from inception to December 2020. Included were clinical studies that described the efficacy and safety of 2 of the 3 treatments, studies directly comparing the clinical effects of the 2 operative techniques, or studies comparing the effects of reconstruction or repair with nonoperative treatment. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tools. The outcomes evaluated were postoperative redislocation rate, revision rate, complications, and Kujala score. We used traditional direct pairwise meta-analysis as well as network meta-analysis for comprehensive efficacy of all 3 treatment measures.

Results:

Twelve studies were included: 5 compared MPFL reconstruction with MPFL repair, 2 compared MPFL reconstruction with nonoperative treatment, and 5 compared MPFL repair with nonoperative treatment. The risk of bias was serious in 4, moderate in 4 and low in 4 articles. MPFL reconstruction led to significantly reduced redislocation and improved Kujala scores compared with MPFL repair and nonoperative treatment. MPFL repair led to reduced redislocation rates compared with nonoperative treatment but did not show an obvious benefit in primary dislocations. There was no significant difference among the 3 treatments in terms of revision rate and incidence of complications, although we found that treatment-related complications were least likely to occur in nonoperative treatment.

Conclusion:

The results of this review indicate that MPFL reconstruction decreases recurrent dislocation compared with MPFL repair or nonoperative treatment, but it has a higher possibility of complications. MPFL repair resulted in less postoperative redislocation than nonoperative treatment but did not show an obvious benefit in primary dislocation.

The Superficial "Swing-Down" Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Is a Viable Option for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review is to ascertain the reported clinical outcomes and complication profiles of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction performed using a superficial "swing-down" quadriceps tendon autograft.

METHODS

Three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE) were searched from January 1, 2000, to April 06, 2020. Keywords used in the search included: "medial patellofemoral ligament" and "reconstruction". After screening based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, patient demographics, graft type, outcomes, and complications were extracted. Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria were used to assess the quality of each included study.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included, comprising data from 226 patients with mean follow up ranging from 12 to 38 months. All reconstructions used a superficial "swing-down" quadriceps tendon autograft fixed at 20-30 degrees of knee flexion where reported. Eight of eleven studies reported significant improvement in patient reported outcomes such as Kujala score, Lysholm score, and Tegner score. The mean preoperative Kujala score ranged from 35.8 to 82.1 (167 patients), while the mean postoperative Kujala score ranged from 88.4 to 94.8 (197 patients). The mean of the preoperative Lysholm score ranged from 43.3 to 79.3 (77 patients), while the mean of the postoperative Lysholm score ranged from 81.9 to 90.9 (99 patients). The I² statistic for Lysholm and Kujala scores was 94% and 97%, respectively. Across data reported on 194 patients, there was no incidence of patellar redislocation, patellar fracture, or graft site morbidity.

CONCLUSION

The quadriceps tendon produced improved clinical outcomes with low rates of recurrent postoperative patellar dislocation. These data suggest that the quadriceps tendon remains a suitable alternative for MPFL reconstruction and should remain part of the arsenal of knee ligament surgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review of Level III and IV studies.

Primary Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in Military Servicemembers: Can We Reliably Restore Preinjury Function and Stability?

Background:

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for patellar instability is a commonly performed procedure with a reported high rate of return to preinjury activity. However, no previous study has assessed the functional outcomes of military servicemembers undergoing MPFL reconstruction.

Hypothesis:

Primary MPFL reconstruction confers patellar stability, but with limited return to preinjury function and ability to maintain unrestricted military active duty status.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Using the Management Analysis and Reporting Tool database, we conducted a retrospective review of active duty servicemembers throughout the US Department of Defense Health System who underwent primary MPFL reconstruction between 2012 and 2015. Demographic variables were recorded as well as ability to return to impact activities—defined as running, jumping, rucking with a load >40 pounds (18 kg), and returning to airborne operations—and to remain on active duty status. The rates of recurrent instability and the need for subsequent surgeries were identified and assessed for statistical significance using uni- and multivariate analyses. Patients were evaluated for a minimum of 2 years postoperatively.

Results:

Of the 213 patients who underwent primary MPFL reconstruction, including 34 with concomitant tibial tubercle osteotomy, 19 (8.9%) patients developed recurrent instability. The presence of bilateral patellar instability was associated with higher recurrence rate. Patients with bilateral instability comprised 47.3% of those with recurrence but only 24.9% of patients without recurrence (P = .019). Impact activity restrictions were present in 57.6% of patients (n = 121), with 86 patients (52.1%) undergoing medical separation from the military. Patients who were prescribed activity restriction before surgery were significantly more likely to have postoperative activity restrictions (64.5%; P = .019), and junior enlisted servicemembers were more likely to be medically separated from service postoperatively than higher ranking senior enlisted members or officers.

Conclusion:

Only 42.4% of US military servicemembers undergoing primary MPFL reconstruction were able to return to unrestricted impact activity after surgery. Bilateral instability negatively affected return to impact activities. Military servicemembers, particularly junior enlisted members, should be counseled on this poor prognosis for a full return to unrestricted activity postoperatively.

Timing for Safe Return to Sport after Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: The Role of a Functional Test Battery

The purpose of this article was to analyze clinical and functional results after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and to establish if a computer-assisted physical test battery could determine a "safe timing" to return to sport. We hypothesized that "time-based" criteria to declare safe return to sport could not be reliable to predict functional recover. Fifty-eight young athletic patients were selected after isolated reconstruction of MPFL. The minimum follow-up was 8 months. All the patients were evaluated subjectively with Kujala and Short Form 36 (SF-36) scores and objectively through a standardized computer-assisted physical battery of seven tests (Back in Action, Corehab). No patient was lost at the end point of follow-up and no recurrence of patellar dislocation was reported. At 8 months, 31 patients (53.4%) returned to sport at preoperative levels, and 23 (39.6%) participated in sports at lower levels. The subjective evaluation reported an increase of Kujala (60-92.7) and SF-36 score (28.6/25.4-52.2/53.6). At computer-assisted objective assessment, only 23 patients (39.6%) fulfilled the criteria for safe return to sport, while 31 (53.4%) got an insufficient outcome and 4 (6.9%) failed to complete the test. From our data, clinical scores after MPFL reconstruction provide only little insight into return to sport. The introduction of a computer-assisted objective analysis in the decision-making process for proper return to sport is necessary to evaluate functional recovery and dynamic knee stability.

Return to Play After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is being performed more frequently in athletes experiencing recurrent patellar instability.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to systematically review the evidence in the orthopaedic sports medicine literature to determine both the rate and timing of return to play after MPFL reconstruction and the rate of further patellar instability. Our hypothesis was that there would be a high rate of return to play after MPFL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, which utilized EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library databases. Inclusion criteria for literature included clinical studies reporting on return to play after MPFL reconstruction. Rate of return to play, level of return, timing of return, rate of recurrent instability, and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS.

RESULTS

Our review found 27 studies including 1278 patients meeting our inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were women (58%), and the total group had a mean age of 22.0 years and a mean follow-up of 39.3 months. The overall rate of return to play was 85.1%, with 68.3% returning to the same level of play. The average time to return to play was 7.0 months postoperatively. The rate of recurrent instability events following reconstruction was 5.4%. There was an improvement in both mean visual analog scale, pain scores (preoperative: 4.3, postoperative: 1.6) and Tegner activity scores (preoperative: 4.8, postoperative: 5.5).

CONCLUSION

The overall rate of return to play was high after MPFL reconstruction for the treatment of recurrent patellar instability. However, a relatively high percentage of those patients were unable to return to their preoperative level of sport. Additionally, there was a moderate time taken to return to play, at approximately 7 months after the procedure.

The majority of patellar avulsion fractures in first-time acute patellar dislocations included the inferomedial patellar border that was different from the medial patellofemoral ligament attachment

PURPOSE

Accurate assessment of the locations of patellar avulsion fractures in acute patellar dislocations is clinically relevant for decision making for treatment. The study aim was to classify the locations of patellar avulsion fractures with a focus on the ligament attachments of medial stabilizing structures.

METHODS

Out of 131 first-time acute traumatic patellar dislocations, 61 patients had patellar fractures. Subsequently, 10 patients with isolated osteochondral fractures of the articular surface in the patella were excluded. Finally, 51 patients (34 females and 17 males, average age: 18.5 years, 95% CI 16.1-20.9) were included in the study cohort. Based on the locations of the patellar attachment, the patients were divided into three groups: the superior group [medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) attachment], inferior group [medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL)/medial patellomeniscal ligament (MPML) attachment], and mixed group.

RESULTS

In the patellar avulsion group (51 patients), the superior group, mixed group, and inferior group contained 8/51 (16%), 12/51 (24%), and 31/51 (61%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that 84% of the patellar avulsion fractures were located in the inferomedial patellar border, which consisted of MPTL/MPML attachments that were clearly different from the true "MPFL" attachment at the superomedial patellar border. In terms of the clinical relevance, the acute surgical repair of MPTL/MPML attachments in the inferomedial patellar border may not sufficiently control the patella if optimal management of the MPFL is not performed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Anchor-Based Femoral Fixation for Physeal-Sparing Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Time-Zero Biomechanical Comparison With Tenodesis Screw Fixation

BACKGROUND

Open physes and trochlear/notch geometries in pediatric patients limit the safe corridor for femoral interference screw graft fixation during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. Accordingly, interest is increasing in anchor-based fixation, but biomechanical validation is deficient.

PURPOSE

To compare anchor-based and tenodesis screw femoral fixation of MPFL grafts in a time-zero biomechanical model.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twenty-seven fresh-frozen porcine distal femurs were potted for testing in an electromechanical load frame, while bovine tendons were used for MPFL grafts. Reconstructions were performed with 1 of 3 femoral fixation strategies: 4.5-mm biocomposite double-loaded threaded anchor (DLA group), 3.9-mm biocomposite knotless threaded anchor (KA group), or traditional 7 × 23-mm biocomposite tenodesis screw (TS group). For testing, femoral specimens were oriented and secured in the mechanical testing apparatus such that actuator tensile pull re-created the normal MPFL trajectory. Specimens underwent 10 cycles of 5- to 15-N loading at 1-Hz preconditioning, followed by 1000 cycles of 10- to 50 N-loading at 1 Hz. After cyclic loading, all specimens were loaded to failure at 305 mm/min. The average cyclic construct stiffness, displacement, and load-to-failure data between the 3 groups were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the significance level set at P < .05.

RESULTS

Average cyclic construct stiffnesses were comparable across groups per repeated-measures ANOVA analysis: 68.3 ± 6.3, 71.4 ± 6.4, and 74.3 ± 7.9 N/mm for TS, DLA, and KA groups, respectively (at cycle 1000). Average construct displacements at cycles 100 and 1000 were significantly less in the anchor versus tenodesis screw groups per ANOVA and Tukey post hoc analysis: 7.7 ± 4.2 mm for the TS group versus 3.7 ± 0.4 and 4.3 ± 0.6 mm for the DLA and KA groups, respectively (at cycle 1000). There was no significant difference in ultimate failure loads between the anchor and tenodesis screw groups, but 3 of 9 TS constructs failed at loads below the average failure load of the native MPFL.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the tenodesis group, anchor-based fixation produced constructs with equivalent cyclic stiffnesses, improved load-displacement characteristics, and had less failure load variability in the porcine cadaveric model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Femoral fixation of the MPFL graft with a single anchor (4.5 or 3.9 mm threaded) is a viable alternative to traditional tenodesis screw fixation.

Small, Short, Oblique Patellar Tunnels for Patellar Fixation Do Not Increase Fracture Risk or Complications in MPFL Reconstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Large (4.5 mm) and/or transpatellar bone tunnels have been associated with patellar fracture after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. To avoid this outcome, many surgeons now employ suture anchors to affix the MPFL graft to the patella.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the risk of patellar fracture and other outcomes associated with smaller (3.2-mm), short, oblique patellar tunnels as compared with suture anchor fixation in MPFL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A single institution's electronic medical record was queried for all patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction between March 2010 and December 2018. A chart review of operative reports was utilized to identify those who had undergone MPFL reconstruction. Patients undergoing revision MPFL reconstruction or reconstruction with fully transpatellar bone tunnels were excluded. The incidence of patellar fracture and outcomes were evaluated from chart review. The mean duration of follow-up was >2 years.

RESULTS

A total of 384 knees in 352 patients undergoing primary MPFL reconstruction were identified. Small (3.2-mm), short, oblique tunnels were used for patellar fixation in 215 cases, and suture anchors were utilized in 169 cases. The small, oblique tunnels and suture anchor techniques both resulted in a low incidence of patellar fracture, with rates of 0.47% and 0%, respectively. The use of suture anchors was associated with an increased risk of subluxation or dislocation compared with small, oblique tunnels (odds ratio, 3.98; P = .028). No significant difference was found in the need for revision MPFL reconstruction surgery with suture anchors (odds ratio, 1.925; P = .66).

CONCLUSION

The use of small, oblique tunnels with hamstring autograft is a safe means of patellar fixation in MPFL reconstruction. The use of small, oblique tunnels for patellar fixation versus 2 suture anchors can result in material cost savings with no significantly increased risk for fracture as well as an overall reduction in complication rates.

Comparison Between Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment for Primary Patellar Dislocations in Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

Background:

Whether surgical or nonsurgical management is more appropriate for primary patellar dislocations (PPDs) in adolescents (younger than 18 years) remains controversial.

Purpose:

To compare the clinical outcomes of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for adolescents and children with PPDs.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

There were 2 reviewers who independently searched the PubMed, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane databases for English-language studies of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and observational studies comparing surgical with nonsurgical treatment for PPDs. The primary outcomes were redislocations, the Kujala score, and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the secondary outcome was subsequent surgery.

Results:

A total of 6 studies were included in our systematic review and meta-analysis. Among patients younger than 18 years, surgery was associated with a lower redislocation rate compared with nonsurgical treatment within 5 years of treatment (risk ratio [RR], 0.58 [95% CI, 0.37-0.91]; P = .02; I² = 47%) but not beyond 5 years (RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.59-1.07]; P = .14; I² = 34%). However, surgery resulted in worse Kujala and KOOS scores compared with nonsurgical treatment. Yet, the treatment difference between the 2 groups tended to decrease over time.

Conclusion:

The available evidence suggests that for adolescents with PPDs, surgery was superior to nonsurgical treatment in the short term to reduce the redislocation rate but resulted in poorer outcomes of knee function based on the Kujala and KOOS scores. However, the superiority of either surgical or nonsurgical treatment in adolescents did not appear to persist in the long term.

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with allograft versus autograft tissue results in similar recurrent dislocation risk and patient-reported outcomes

PURPOSE

To determine the rate of recurrent dislocation and patellar instability following medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with allograft or autograft tissue and compare patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing allograft and autograft MPFL reconstruction.

METHODS

One hundred and fifteen MPFL reconstructions (78 allograft, 37 autograft) without concurrent bony procedures performed between 2008 and 2014 by four sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons at our center were identified. Patient demographics and surgical data were identified by chart review. Chart review and patient interviews were undertaken to identify recurrent patellar dislocations and as recurrent subjective patellofemoral instability. Recurrent dislocation and subjective instability risk were compared between the allograft and autograft groups.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients (76%) with complete baseline data and minimum 1-year follow-up were contacted at a mean of 4.1 years following isolated MPFL reconstruction, including 57 patient with allograft reconstructions and 30 with autograft reconstructions. No significant differences in patient sex, age at reconstruction, body mass index, or time to follow-up were noted between groups. Recurrent dislocation occurred in 2 patients in the allograft group (3.5%) and 1 patient in the autograft group (3.3%), (n.s.). Recurrent subjective instability occurred in 17 patients in the allograft group (28.9%) and 11 patients in the autograft group (36.7%), (n.s.). No significant differences in patient-reported outcomes were noted between groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of either allograft or autograft tissue for MPFL reconstruction results in low (< 3%) risk of recurrent patellar dislocation. Risk of recurrent subjective instability is higher but is similar for both graft types. Surgeons can utilize either graft choice at their discretion without anticipating a significant impact of graft choice on patient outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Editorial Commentary: Repair or Reconstruct? Addressing Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Insufficiency in the Absence of Morphologic Abnormalities

The role of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) repair versus reconstruction in the treatment of patellar instability continues to undergo debate. Repair of the ligament can be technically less demanding with fewer risks of morbidity, whereas reconstruction carries concerns of graft malpositioning or over-tensioning as well as the risk of patellar fracture. Studies directly comparing the 2 procedures in the setting of recurrent patellar instability have consisted of small series or low levels of evidence that inevitably include patients with concurrent morphologic risk factors such as tuberosity malalignment or patella alta, which are known factors that can influence the biomechanical behavior of the MPFL. Heterogeneity in patient-related risk factors and surgical techniques continues to pose limitations in allowing for direct comparisons between procedures. For the treatment of recurrent patellar instability in the setting of no (or concurrently addressed) morphologic abnormalities, MPFL reconstruction has become a common procedure and generally preferred approach. The superior outcomes associated with reconstruction over repair, however, should be qualified with the fact that attention to the critical details of the technique, including graft position and tension, is paramount to success when performing this procedure.

Recurrent Patellar Dislocations Without Untreated Predisposing Factors: Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Other Medial Soft-Tissue Surgical Techniques-A Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To provide a direct comparison between medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and the other medial patellofemoral soft-tissue surgeries in the restoration of the medial patellar restraint after lateral patellar dislocations in the absence of untreated predisposing factors such as high grade trochlear dysplasia, knee malalignment, patella alta or high tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane-library, Web of Science, and gray literature databases were searched to find all the relevant records. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed following the Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. Different techniques to treat lateral patellar dislocation in the absence of untreated predisposing factors were compared in terms of redislocation and complication rates, Kujala, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee, and Tegner scores at the short-term (3 years) and long-term (>3 years) follow-up through meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Six studies involving 319 knees were included in the meta-analysis. The analyses of redislocation (0.7% vs 2.9%) and minor complication rates (12% vs 9%) showed no significant differences between MPFL reconstruction and other medial soft-tissue surgeries. Significant differences favoring MPFL reconstruction were documented in Kujala and Lysholm scores at short-term (8.6, P< .001; 10.9, P < .001) and long-term follow-ups (6.3, P = .02; 13.5, P < .001). No significant differences were found in the analyses of International Knee Documentation Committee (P = .10) and Tegner scores (P = .19). Level of evidence was low or very low.

CONCLUSIONS

MPFL reconstruction and medial patellofemoral soft-tissue surgery procedures were both effective in restoring the medial restraining forces preventing redislocation, but MPFL reconstruction provided better functional outcomes both at short-term and long-term follow-up. Thus, besides the treatment of predisposing factors, MPFL reconstruction seems to be, based on the results of this meta-analysis, a suitable strategy to restore the medial restraining function in the treatment of recurrent LPD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III (meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized comparative trials).

Isolated versus combined medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for lateral instability of the patella

INTRODUCTION

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) is regularly combined with a tibial tuberosity transfer (TTT) in cases of recurrent patellar instability with underlying structural deformity. However, these indications for a TTT have recently come into question. This study aimed to assess the traditional indications by comparing the outcomes of isolated and combined MPFLR for the treatment of recurrent lateral patellar dislocation.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Included studies were those which reported the outcomes of either isolated or combined or both MPFLR. Studies were required to report at least one of the following: redislocation rate, revision due to instability, or the Kujala score.

RESULTS

We found no difference between isolated and combined MPFLR in terms of redislocation ( p = 0.48), revisions due to instability ( p = 0.36), positive apprehension tests ( p = 0.25), or the Kujala score ( p = 0.58). Combined reconstruction presented more complications compared to isolated procedures ( p = 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference between studies investigating isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction MPFLR performed in patients with normal tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distances only or in patients with both normal and elevated TT-TG distances.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the published data, there is no difference in outcomes between isolated and combined MPFLR. Underlying structural deformity did not demonstrate any significant effect on the success of the isolated MPFLR. Although there are definite indications for combined reconstruction, the current evidence suggests that our inclusion criteria may not be entirely correct. Further study is required to clarify and refine the true indications for combined MPFLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies.

Selective bundle tensioning in double-bundle MPFL reconstruction to improve restoration of dynamic patellofemoral contact pressure

PURPOSE

To evaluate the optimal graft tension angles in a medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with selective bundle tensioning in order to restore patellofemoral contact pressure distributions closest to the native state.

METHODS

Twelve human cadaveric knee specimens were mounted with the femur on a custom-made fixation device allowing free range of motion in the knee joint for testing. Using a sensitive pressure film (Tekscan) patellofemoral contact pressure was measured in 15° intervals during a dynamic flexion movement from 0°-90° in the native state, in cut MPFL and after MPFL-reconstruction with a gracilis tendon. The graft was separated in two bundles and was fixed independently on the patella using two knotless anchors. Two groups were made with either the proximal or distal bundle fixed at the femur at a knee flexion angle of 30° and the corresponding other bundle subsequently fixed at the femur at 15°, 45°, 60°, 75° and 90° of knee flexion using extra-cortical fixation and controlled tension of 2N in both groups. The sequence of the flexion angles at the graft fixation was alternated. Pressure measurements were repeated after every fixation of the graft.

RESULTS

Cutting the MPFL resulted in significantly reduced patellofemoral contact pressure at all flexion angles. After MPFL reconstruction the patellofemoral contact pressure remained significantly reduced during dynamic knee flexion in all tested double-bundle combinations (p < 0.05) except for fixation of the proximal bundle in 30° and the distal bundle in 75°. Selective evaluation of lateral patellofemoral contact pressure, however, showed significant reduction in all tested double-bundle combinations (p < 0.05) from 15° to 90°. Evaluation of isolated medial patellofemoral pressure changes showed no significant difference in all tested combinations compared to the intact knee. Furthermore, evaluation of the isolated proximal and distal patellofemoral contact pressure also revealed a significantly reduced contact pressure in all tested double-bundle combinations (p < 0.05) except for fixation of the proximal bundle in 30° and the distal bundle in 75°.

CONCLUSION

According to this study, selective bundle tensioning in anatomic MPFL-reconstruction should be considered as an easy and more anatomic alternative to current popular techniques to restore patella kinematics and give clear recommendation about knee flexion angle and tension during fixation. Although tensioning two bundles separately may further improve clinical results. If performed, fixation of the graft is recommended under low tension (2N) with the proximal bundle at 30° and the distal bundle at 75° of knee flexion.

Recurrent Patellofemoral Instability in the Pediatric Patient: Management and Pitfalls

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of the review is to discuss the relevant pathoanatomy, management, complications, and technical considerations for recurrent patellofemoral instability (PFI) in the pediatric population. Special consideration is given to recent literature and management of the patient with repeat instability following surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patellar stabilization surgery is in principle dependent upon restoration of normal patellofemoral anatomy and dynamic alignment. Historically, treatment options have been numerous and include extensor mechanism realignment, trochleoplasty, and more recently repair and/or reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) as a dynamic check rein during initial knee flexion. In skeletally immature patients, preference is given to physeal-sparing soft tissue procedures. While medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction has become a popular option, postoperative failure is a persistent issue with rates ranging from 5 to 30% for PFI surgery in general without any single procedure (e.g., distal realignment, MPFL reconstruction) demonstrating clear superiority. Failure of surgical patellar stabilization is broadly believed to occur for three main reasons: (1) technical failure of the primary stabilization method, (2) unaddressed static and dynamic pathoanatomy during the primary stabilization, and (3) intrinsic risk factors (e.g., collagen disorders, ligamentous laxity). PFI is a common orthopedic condition affecting the pediatric and adolescent population. Treatment of repeat instability following surgery in the PFI patient requires understanding and addressing underlying pathoanatomic risk factors as well as risks and reasons for failure.

Management of the First Patellar Dislocation: A Narrative Review

First patellar dislocation is a common injury of the knee, involving often adolescents and the active population. The consequences of the first episode can be various and potentially disabling. Among these, acute patellar dislocation can often result in recurrent patellar instability. Recurrent patellar instability is certainly multifactorial but depends primarily on the injury of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), the major soft-tissue stabilizer of the patella. Some classifications are extremely useful in establishing the diagnosis and therapy in patellofemoral disease, in particular in terms of instability. Among those, Henri Dejour and WARPS (weak atraumatic risky anatomy pain and subluxation)/STAID (strong traumatic anatomy normal instability and dislocation) classifications are certainly the most frequently used. There is no clear agreement on the management of the first patellar dislocation. A conservative approach seems to be the first choice in most of cases, but the presence of patellar displacement or osteochondral fractures makes surgery mandatory at the beginning. In addition, there is no clear consensus on which surgical strategy should be used to approach first dislocation, in relation to the possible variation in location of the MPFL injury, and to the eventual presence of preexisting predisposing factors for patellar instability. MPFL reconstruction may theoretically be more reliable than repair, while there is no clear evidence available that osseous abnormality should be addressed after the first episode of patellar dislocation. A narrative review was conducted to report the etiology, the diagnosis and all the possible treatment options of the first patellar dislocation. Modern classifications of the patellofemoral instability were also presented.

A Meta-analysis of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Primary Patella Dislocation

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes after surgery versus nonsurgical treatment in the management of primary lateral patellar dislocation (LPD) through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in terms of redislocation rate and clinical outcome, investigating both short-term (<6 years) functional recovery and overall benefit over time (>6 years).

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was performed in November 2018. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were evaluated according to the Cochrane guidelines. RCTs investigating differences between surgery and nonsurgical treatment in primary LPD were included. The outcomes evaluated were redislocation rate, reinterventions, and Kujala score at short-, mid-, and long-term follow-up, with subanalyses for the pediatric population.

RESULTS

We included 510 patients from 10 RCTs in the meta-analysis. Redislocation rate was 0.40 (0.25 to 0.66; P < .001) and 0.58 (0.29 to 1.15; P = .12) at the short- and mid-term follow-ups, respectively, and the risk ratio for the need for further operations at 6 to 9 months' follow-up was 0.14 (0.02 to 1.03; P = .05), all favoring surgery. Concerning the Kujala score, an advantage of the surgical approach of 10.2 points (1.6 to 18.7; P = .02) at short-term follow-up was seen, whereas long-term follow-up results were similar between the groups. The subanalysis of the pediatric population at heterogeneous follow-up confirmed a lower risk of recurrence in surgery, with a risk ratio of 0.60 (0.26 to 1.37; P = .22), although not significant.

CONCLUSION

The literature documents a low number of high-level trials. The meta-analysis of RCTs underlined that the redislocation rate is higher with the nonsurgical approach compared with the surgical one. Moreover, when looking at the clinical outcome, more favorable findings were found with the surgical approach up to 6 years, whereas results seems to be similar at a longer follow-up after either surgical or nonsurgical treatment of primary LPD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, meta-analysis of level I and level II randomized clinical trials.

Clinical Outcomes and Predictive Factors for Failure With Isolated MPFL Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Instability: A Series of 211 Reconstructions With a Minimum Follow-up of 3 Years

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is widely acknowledged as an integral part of the current therapeutic armamentarium for recurrent patellar instability. The procedure is often performed with concomitant bony procedures, such as distalization of the tibial tuberosity or trochleoplasty in the case of patella alta or high-grade trochlear dysplasia, respectively. At the present time, few studies have evaluated the clinical effectiveness of MPFL reconstruction as an isolated intervention.

PURPOSE

To report the clinical outcomes of isolated MPFL reconstruction in cases of patellar instability and to identify predictive factors for failure.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed, including all patients who had undergone isolated MPFL reconstruction between January 2008 and January 2014. Preoperative assessment included the Kujala score, assessment of patellar tracking ("J-sign"), and radiographic features, such as trochlear dysplasia according to Dejour classification, patellar height with the Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance, and patellar tilt. The Kujala score was assessed postoperatively. Failure was defined by a postoperative patellar dislocation or surgical revision for recurrent patellar instability.

RESULTS

A total of 239 MPFL reconstructions were included; 28 patients (11.7%) were uncontactable and considered lost to follow-up. Thus, 211 reconstructions were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 5.8 years (range, 3-9.3 years). The mean age at surgery was 20.6 years (range, 12-48 years), and 55% of patients were male. Twenty-seven percent of patients had a preoperative positive J-sign, and 93% of patients had trochlear dysplasia (A, 47%; B, 25%; C, 15%; D, 6%). The mean CDI was 1.2 (range, 1.0-1.7); mean tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance, 15 mm (range, 5-30 mm); and mean patellar tilt, 23° (range, 9°-47°). The mean Kujala score improved from 56.1 preoperatively to 88.8 ( P < .001). Ten failures were reported that required surgical revision for recurrent patellar instability (4.7%). Uni- and multivariate analyses highlighted 2 preoperative risk factors for failure: patella alta (CDI ≥1.3; odds ratio, 4.9; P = .02) and preoperative positive J-sign (odds ratio, 3.9; P = .04).

CONCLUSION

In cases of recurrent patellar instability, isolated MPFL reconstruction would appear to be a safe and efficient surgical procedure with a low failure rate. Preoperative failure risk factors identified in this study were patella alta with a CDI ≥1.3 and a preoperative positive J-sign.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of Single-Bundle Transpatellar Tunnel and Double-Anchor Anatomic Techniques for the Treatment of Recurrent Lateral Patellar Dislocation in Adults

PURPOSE

To compare the stability and clinical outcomes of 2 medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) techniques for the treatment of recurrent lateral patellar dislocation in adults.

METHODS

Ninety-one patients with recurrent patellar dislocation were randomly divided into 2 groups, undergoing either the traditional single-bundle transpatellar tunnel technique (group A) or the double-anchor anatomic reconstruction technique (group B). Preoperatively and at follow-up, the patellar position and rotation were evaluated by computed tomography with the congruence angle, lateral patellar angle, patellar tilt angle, and lateral patellar translation; the subjective symptoms and functional outcomes were evaluated with Kujala, Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective scores. Clinical examinations were also performed, and redislocations or episodes of instability were recorded.

RESULTS

Patients were followed up for a mean period of 41.11 ± 7.40 months (range, 29-62 months). At the final point, no recurrent patellar dislocations occurred, except in 4 patients with instability symptoms in group A; however, no significant difference between the 2 groups was seen (χ² = 2.503, P = .114). The measurement results from computed tomography decreased significantly to the normal range, and no significant difference was found between the 2 groups except for the lesser patellar tilt angle in group B (t = 2.175, P = .030). The clinical examination improved significantly, no patient exhibited a positive apprehension test in either group, and the number of patients with abnormal lateral patellar translation grade and firm end point showed no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (P > .05). All score systems significantly improved with no significant difference between the 2 groups except for the higher Kujala score (t = -40.635, P = .001) and International Knee Documentation Committee score (t = -33.823, P = .003) in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Both MPFLR techniques achieved good results in the treatment of patellar dislocation. Compared with the single-bundle transpatellar tunnel technique, the double-anchor anatomic MPFLR technique may be more effective with a more congruous patellofemoral joint and better knee function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.

Sporting activity is reduced following medial reefing performed for patellar dislocation : A retrospective case series of 144 patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months

Background

Patellar dislocation is common in young and active patients. The purpose of this study was to determine sporting activity following the medial reefing of patellar dislocation.

Methods

One hundred forty-four patients with objective patellar dislocation were treated between 2004 and 2013. Three groups were analyzed retrospectively with a minimum follow-up of 24 months: (1) primary dislocation that was treated with medial reefing without a recurrent dislocation until the day of follow-up (n = 74), (2) primary dislocation that was initially treated with medial reefing but with a recurrent dislocation until the day of follow-up (n = 44), and (3) medial reefing after failed conservative treatment (n = 26). Sporting activity was assessed using a widely-used sporting activity questionnaire and the Tegner score prior to the injury and at the follow-up (58.7 ± 22.6 months after the injury). Clinical outcomes were assessed using IKDC and Kujala score.

Results

The Kujala score was 94.7 ± 9.3 for Group 1, 84.1 ± 16.6 for Group 2 and 93.4 ± 9.7 for Group 3. IKDC at the time of follow-up was 97.2 ± 9.3 for Group 1, 86.1 ± 14.6 for Group 2 and 95.1 ± 11.1 for Group 3. 91.9% of Group 1 and 92.3% of Group 3 were active in sports prior to their injuries and at the time of the follow-up. In Group 2, sporting activity reduced from 81.8 to 75.0%. In all groups, a shift from high performance to recreational sports was found.

Conclusions

Despite good clinical results, sporting activity was reduced following patellar dislocation treated with medial reefing. Also, a shift from engagement in high- to low-impact sports among the participants was noted.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Repair With Suture Tape Augmentation

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the main restraining force in the first 20° of flexion against lateral patellar displacement and is disrupted after patellar subluxation or dislocation. MPFL reconstruction is frequently performed when conservative management fails and the patient has recurrent patellar dislocations. However, a variety of complications have been reported in the literature with this procedure. Internal bracing with suture tape augmentation encourages healing and allows early mobilization. This article describes, with video illustration, MPFL repair with suture tape augmentation.

Which Technique Is Better for Treating Patellar Dislocation? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To clarify the discrepancy in surgical options and present evidence to treat patellar dislocation by evaluating which of the techniques yields better improvement in stability and functional recovery for patellar dislocation.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus electronic databases were searched for relevant articles comparing the outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) treatment published up until August 2017. Data searching, extraction, analysis, and quality assessment were performed based on The Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using various outcome values in various techniques. For results with high heterogeneity, 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were also investigated.

RESULTS

Eleven clinical studies were investigated. In patients with primary patellar dislocation, there were no significant differences in all evaluated outcomes between the conservative and surgical treatment groups. For patients with recurrent patellar dislocation, MPFL reconstruction was associated with a favorable Kujala score (mean difference, -8.91; 95% confidence interval, -14.05 to -3.77; I² = 94%; 95% PI, -9.64 to -8.1) and Lysholm score (mean difference, -13.51; 95% confidence interval, -21.35 to -5.68; I² = 96%; 95% PI, -14.86 to -12.16) when compared with soft tissue realignment surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Although surgical treatment of the MPFL for primary patellar dislocation is not superior to conservative treatment in restoring knee function and clinical outcomes, MPFL reconstruction is associated with more favorable clinical outcomes compared with medial soft tissue realignment surgery in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation. Double-bundle MPFL reconstruction seems to provide more favorable outcomes than single-bundle MPFL reconstruction, but this finding should be interpreted with caution because the evidence levels were low and were from only a few studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, meta-analysis.

Patellar Instability Management: A Survey of the International Patellofemoral Study Group

BACKGROUND

Although patellofemoral instability is among the most prevalent knee disorders, the management of patients with this condition is complex and remains variable, given the lack of long-term, high-level clinical outcome studies to compare various operative and nonoperative modalities.

PURPOSE

To discover a consensus within treatment controversies in patellofemoral instability among experienced knee surgeons with a specific interest in the patellofemoral joint.

STUDY DESIGN

Expert opinion; Level of evidence, 5.

METHODS

A 3-step modified Delphi technique was used to establish a consensus. A 34-question, case-based online survey regarding patellofemoral instability was distributed to all active members of the International Patellofemoral Study Group. Consensus statements were generated if at least 66% of the respondents agreed and then redistributed to the same panel. Modifications to the consensus statements were made based on the iterative feedback process until no discordance was encountered in the third stage.

RESULTS

Eight consensus statements were achieved. Nonoperative management is the current standard of care for a first-time dislocation in the absence of an osteochondral fragment or loose body requiring excision (100% agreement). In patients with a first-time dislocation with an operative osteochondral fracture requiring excision or repair, patellar instability should be addressed concurrently (89% agreement). Recurrent instability should be treated surgically, with most surgeons favoring medial reconstruction (77%-86% agreement). While there is general agreement that bony procedures should be performed to correct underlying bony deformities, there is no consensus regarding the most appropriate type of procedure performed. Lateral release should not be performed in isolation for the treatment of patellar instability (89% agreement).

CONCLUSION

Despite the consensus generated in this study, our current understanding remains limited by a lack of high-level evidence as well as the numerous complex variables influencing treatment decision making. High-quality, multicenter randomized controlled trials, particularly those directly comparing specific surgical treatment methods while controlling for underlying risk factors, are needed to address these areas of uncertainty.

Surgical Management of Patellofemoral Instability in the Skeletally Immature Patient

Compared with skeletally mature patients, skeletally immature patients are at a higher risk of acute traumatic patellar dislocation. Surgical treatment is the standard of care for patients with recurrent instability and requires important and technically challenging physeal considerations. Physeal-sparing medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is the treatment of choice for these patients, replacing older nonanatomic extensor mechanism realignment techniques. Implant-mediated guided growth is an important adjunct to correct genu valgum angular deformities that contribute to patellar instability. Patient-specific surgical techniques and proper surgical indications are crucial for successful outcomes.

Modern synthetic material is a safe and effective alternative for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is often performed using gracilis autografts, which may be associated with donor site morbidity and complications. The use of a synthetic material can circumvent a harvest operation and has previously been demonstrated to be effective in other types of reconstructive procedures and may be effective in MPFL reconstruction. This study reports the clinical result with the use of a modern ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene with a braided jacket of polyester tape (FT) in MPFL reconstruction compared to using standard autografts.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively in 50 MPFL reconstructions. The first 27 underwent reconstruction using gracilis tendon (GT) autograft; the following 23 patients were treated with FT. All patients were clinically and radiologically assessed and underwent pre- and post-operative scoring using the Kujala score, Bartlett score, Tegner activity rating scale, SF-12 score and Lysholm score. Statistical significance was tested between groups using ANOVA with repeated measures.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the pre-operative scores between the FT and GT groups (n.s.). Both groups showed significant improvements across all scoring modalities between pre- and post-operative periods 12, 24 and 48 months of follow-up (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in knee function scores between the GT and FT groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of FiberTape in MPFL reconstruction is safe and effective, and it significantly improves patient's quality of life and related post-operative outcome measures. There were no significant differences in all knee scores compared to GT autografts. Using this technique for MPFL reconstruction, tendon harvesting is unnecessary and hence eliminates donor site morbidity-associated complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Operative Repair of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Injury Versus Knee Brace in Children With an Acute First-Time Traumatic Patellar Dislocation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

A lateral patellar dislocation (LPD) is the most common traumatic knee injury with hemarthrosis in children. The redislocation rate is high. Varying operative and nonoperative treatments have been advocated with no consensus on the best treatment.

PURPOSE

(1) To evaluate if arthroscopic-assisted repair of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) in patients with an acute first-time traumatic LPD would reduce the recurrence rate and offer better objective/subjective knee function compared with a knee brace without repair. (2) To study the presence of anatomic patellar instability risk factors (APIFs) and their association with a redislocation.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

This was a prospective series of 74 skeletally immature patients aged 9 to 14 years (38 girls and 36 boys; mean age, 13.1 years) with a first-time traumatic LPD, with clinical examinations, radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, and diagnostic arthroscopic surgery performed within 2 weeks of the index injury. The child was randomized to either (1) a knee brace (KB group) for 4 weeks and physical therapy or (2) arthroscopic-assisted repair (R group) of the MPFL with anchors, 4 weeks with a soft cast splint, and physical therapy. The follow-up time was 2 years.

RESULTS

The redislocation rate was significantly lower in the R group than in the KB group at final follow-up: 8 patients (22%) versus 16 patients (43%), respectively ( P = .047). The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for children sport/play and quality of life subscales had lower scores in the R group compared with the KB group; the significant differences were among those with redislocations. The mean Kujala score was excellent in the KB group (95.9) and good in the R group (90.9). An impaired Limb Symmetry Index (median, 83%) for concentric quadriceps torque at 90 deg/s was found only in the R group. Eighty-one percent of the study patients had ≥2 APIFs. Trochlear dysplasia (trochlear depth <3 mm) had the highest odds ratio for redislocations (2.35 [95% CI, 0.69-8.03]), with no significant association between APIFs and a redislocation.

CONCLUSION

Operative repair of an MPFL injury in the acute phase in skeletally immature children with a primary traumatic LPD significantly reduced the redislocation rate but did not improve subjective or objective knee function compared with a knee brace without repair. The majority of the patients in both groups were satisfied with their knee function. There was a high representation of APIFs, which needs to be considered when evaluating the risk of redislocations. Registration: ISRCTN 39959729 (Current Controlled Trials).

Medial patellofemoral ligament repair restores stability in pediatric patients when compared to reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Pediatric patellar instability has a high recurrence rate with non-operative care, and medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has known complications. MPFL repair offers an alternative method to restore patellar stability. This study's purpose was to assess the outcomes of MPFL repair in a pediatric cohort, and to compare these outcomes to a cohort of pediatric patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction.

METHODS

One surgeon performed 16 MPFL repairs on pediatric patients for traumatic patellar instability, with an average follow-up of 1.5 years. Age, sex, skeletal maturity, trochlear dysplasia, additional procedures, final range of motion, and complications were recorded. A sub-cohort with >1 dislocation (10 patients) was compared to a historical group (22 patients) with >1 dislocation who underwent allograft MPFL reconstructions by the same surgeon.

RESULTS

Ten out of 16 (63%) patients had >1 dislocation event at time of presentation. Thirteen out of 16 (81%) patients had trochlear dysplasia. There were no complications and no recurrent instability in the repair group at last follow-up. Patients in the reconstruction group were older than the repair group (15.6 years vs. 13.0 years, p < 0.05), had lower Caton-Deschamps ratio (1.2 vs. 1.4, p < 0.05), and had lower percentage of additional procedures (59% vs. 100%, p < 0.05). There were three complications in the reconstruction group: two patients with recurrent instability and one patient with patella fracture requiring revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

MPFL repair in pediatric patients resulted in a low risk of recurrent instability with rates comparable or better than that of allograft reconstruction.

Lateral Patellar Instability in the Skeletally Mature Patient: Evaluation and Surgical Management

Lateral patellar instability is a common disease process that affects all types of patients. Depending on the patient's anatomy and the results of preoperative imaging, surgical management options include medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, tibial tubercle osteotomy, and sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction or repair is useful for almost all patients, whereas tibial tubercle osteotomy is helpful to correct a lateralized tibial tubercle and the associated elevated lateral pull of the extensor mechanism. For a select subset of patients with severe trochlear dysplasia, a sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty can be a useful option to prevent future patellar instability. Many technical considerations exist for each procedure, and in most situations, no consensus exists to direct surgeons on the superior technique.

Graft Choice in Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Rates of Recurrent Instability and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Autograft, Allograft, and Synthetic Options

PURPOSE

To determine whether graft selection or patient age affects the following after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction: (1) rates of recurrent instability, (2) rates of postoperative complications (other than instability), and (3) subjective symptom improvement.

METHODS

A systematic search identified studies reporting outcomes for isolated MPFL reconstruction. Rates of recurrent instability, subjective Kujala knee function scores, and complications were tabulated. Symptom improvement was defined as change in Kujala score (preoperative evaluation to final follow-up).

RESULTS

Forty-five studies were included with 27 documented cases of recurrent instability among 1,504 patients (1.8%); instability rates ranged from 0% to 20.0% overall; among autograft in adults, 0% to 11.1% (1.4%, 18/1,260); among autograft in adolescents, 0% to 20% (10.0%, 8/80); among allograft, 0% (0/65 cases); and among synthetic, 0% to 3.3% (1.3%, 1/76). Among autograft choices in adults, rates of recurrent instability were low; recurrence with gracilis ranged from 0% to 11.1% (0.9%, 1/116); with semitendinosus, 0% to 6.3% (0.6%, 4/676); with quad or patellar tendon, 0% (0/65); and with adductor tendon, 5.6% to 8.3% (6.7%, 2/30). Complication rates ranged from 0% to 34.4%. All included studies reported significant improvement in Kujala scores after surgery (P < .01). There was significant heterogeneity in effect size and evidence of reporting bias among small studies, precluding reliable pooled analysis of treatment effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Autograft is not superior to allograft or synthetic grafts for isolated reconstruction of the MPFL, and rates of recurrent instability are generally low. Isolated MPFL reconstruction can provide significant symptom relief regardless of graft selection, although there is a bias toward reporting better than expected results among smaller studies. Pediatric patients and patients treated with adductor tendon autograft have higher recurrent instability rates. While caution should be used in making definitive recommendations secondary to the small number of allograft and synthetic studies, selection of graft type based on surgeon preference, comfort, and prior experience remains appropriate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Impact of Knee Flexion Angle During Graft Fixation on Dynamic Patellofemoral Contact Pressure-A Biomechanical Study

PURPOSE

Objective evaluation of the optimal graft tension angle to fully restore patellofemoral contact pressure in reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) in comparison to the native knee.

METHODS

Twelve cadaveric knee specimens were fixed in a custom-made fixation device. A sensitive pressure film (Tekscan) was fixed in the patellofemoral joint, and patellofemoral contact pressure was assessed during a dynamic flexion movement from 0° to 90°. The MPFL was cut and measurements were repeated. Reconstruction of the MPFL was performed with the gracilis tendon subsequently fixed in the femur at 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90° of knee flexion under controlled tension (2 N). The sequence of the flexion angles was alternated. Pressure measurements were repeated after every fixation of the graft.

RESULTS

No significant differences were seen in the overall patellofemoral contact pressure compared to the native knee (P > .05). However, medial patellofemoral pressure showed a significant increased patellofemoral contact pressure after MPFL reconstruction at a knee flexion angle during graft fixation of 15° (P = .027), 45° (P = .050, P = .044), and 75° (P = .039). Moreover, proximal/distal patellofemoral contact pressure revealed a significantly reduced contact pressure at 15° (P = .003), 30° (P = .009), 45° (P = .025), 75° (P = .021), and 90° (P = .022) of flexion distal after MPFL reconstruction compared with the intact knee. Lateral patellofemoral contact pressure was significantly reduced in all performed reconstructions (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The flexion angle during graft fixation for MPFL reconstruction did not have a significant impact on the overall patellofemoral contact pressure. However, selective medial, proximal, distal, and lateral patellofemoral contact pressure was significantly altered for all reconstructions. Fixation of the MPFL graft at 60° of flexion was able to most closely restore patellofemoral contact pressure compared with the intact knee.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Based on the findings of the present study, fixation of the graft in anatomic reconstruction of the MPFL should be considered in 60° of flexion under low tension (2 N) to most closely restore patellofemoral contact pressure compared with the native knee.

Editorial Commentary: Knee Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Does Not Always Result in the "Bee's Knees"

Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament has gained in popularity as a surgical technique to reconcile recurrent lateral patellar instability. This technique has shown success in a variety of settings including with concomitant osseous abnormalities. Despite the general good to excellent results with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, a number of technical errors are still commonly made and may result in decreased range of motion, pain, chondrosis, and arthrofibrosis. In a recent study, the importance of knee flexion angle during final fixation of the graft is emphasized. Even with appropriate tunnel placement, and minimal tension on the graft, graft fixation performed at less than or greater than 60° of knee flexion results in medial patellar overload with risk of the aforementioned complications.

Influence of graft source and configuration on revision rate and patient-reported outcomes after MPFL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the influence of graft source (allograft vs. autograft) and configuration (single-limbed vs. double-limbed) on failure rate and disease-specific patient-reported outcome (Kujala score) after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for patellar instability.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was performed. A total of 31 studies met inclusion/exclusion criteria and were used to extract cohorts of patients who underwent ligament reconstruction with various allograft, autograft, single-limbed, and double-limbed constructs. Failure rates and postoperative improvements in Kujala scores were compared between cohorts using inverse-variance weighting in a random-effects analysis model and appropriate comparative statistical analyses (Chi-squared and independent samples t tests).

RESULTS

A total of 1065 MPFL reconstructions were identified in 31 studies. Autograft reconstructions were associated with greater postoperative improvements in Kujala scores when compared to allograft (32.2 vs. 22.5, p < 0.001), but there was no difference in recurrent instability (5.7 vs. 6.7 %, p = 0.74). Double-limbed reconstructions were associated with both improved postoperative Kujala scores (37.8 vs. 31.6, p < 0.001) and lower failure rate (10.6 vs. 5.5 %, p = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

MPFL reconstructions should be performed using double-limbed graft configurations. While autograft tendon may be associated with higher patient-reported outcomes in the absence of associated connective tissue disorders or ligamentous laxity, patient factors and allograft processing techniques should be carefully considered when selecting an MPFL graft source, as revision rates were no different between graft sources.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Biomechanical evaluation of MPFL reconstructions: differences in dynamic contact pressure between gracilis and fascia lata graft

PURPOSE

To evaluate the knee kinematics of the intact, MPFL-ruptured and MPFL-reconstructed knee and, moreover, to compare dynamic patellofemoral contact pressure of the gracilis tendon and the fascia lata as an alternative graft option for reconstruction of the MPFL.

METHODS

Eight paired human cadaveric knees were fixed in a custom-made fixation device. Patellofemoral contact pressure was assessed during a dynamic flexion movement at 15°-30°-45°-60°-75° and 90° using a pressure-sensitive film (Tekscan). The medial patellofemoral ligament was cut, and measurements were repeated. Finally, reconstruction of the MPFL was performed using the gracilis tendon (group I) or a fascia lata graft (group II). Tunnel localization was performed under fluoroscopic control. Grafts were fixed at 30° of flexion, and pressure measurements were repeated.

RESULTS

Incision of the medial patellofemoral ligament significantly reduced patellofemoral contact pressure at 15°, 30° and 45° of knee flexion compared to the intact knee (p < 0.05), whereas reconstruction of the MPFL using either gracilis tendon of the fascia lata was able to restore pressure distributions at 15° and 30° of knee flexion. However, in the hamstring group, reconstruction of the MPFL revealed a significantly reduced contact pressure at 45° of flexion (p = 0.038) compared to the intact knee. In the fascia lata group, a significant reduction in patellofemoral contact pressure was observed after MPFL reconstruction at 45°, 60°, 75° and 90° of knee flexion (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic reconstruction of the MPFL with either a gracilis or a fascia lata graft showed comparable patellofemoral pressure distributions which were closely restored compared to the native knee. Therefore, the fascia lata has shown to be a viable alternative to the gracilis tendon for reconstruction of the MPFL. However, anatomic reconstruction of the MPFL may lead to persistently altered patellofemoral contact pressure during knee flexion compared to the native knee independent of the tested graft.

Does the Utilization of Allograft Tissue in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients Restore Patellar Stability?

BACKGROUND

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is one of several surgical procedures used to treat patellofemoral instability. Use of allograft tissue can preserve autogenous tissue and may be preferable in patients with connective tissue disorders or ligamentous laxity. Although there are successful reports in adults, it is unclear if the use of allograft tissue in MPFL reconstruction can restore patellofemoral stability in children and adolescents.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Does allograft tissue in MPFL reconstruction in pediatric and adolescent patients restore patellar stability? (2) What complications were associated with allograft MPFL reconstructions in children and adolescents?

METHODS

Between June 2012 and August 2015, one surgeon (NKP) performed 26 MPFL reconstructions in 23 patients with gracilis allograft for traumatic patellar instability. Of those, 25 (96%) were available for followup more than 1 year later (mean, 24 months; range, 12-44 months). During this time, the surgeon suggested reconstruction to patients who had recurrent dislocation or subluxation after 6 weeks of bracing, physical therapy, and activity modification if they were noted to have a torn or attenuated MPFL on MRI. During that period, this was the only surgical technique the surgeon used to treat traumatic patellar instability. Patients undergoing concurrent bony procedures were ineligible for inclusion. The mean age of the patients in the series was 16.0 (± 2) years. Age, sex, skeletal maturity, presence of trochlear dysplasia, and additional arthroscopic procedures at the time of reconstruction were collected. Postoperative notes and imaging were reviewed for presence of complications defined as recurrent dislocation, recurrent subluxations, fractures, infection, or arthrofibrosis. These complications were identified by chart review by the senior surgeon (NKP) and study personnel (EH) not involved in clinical care of the patients or by patient-reported complications. Recurrent subluxation or dislocation was patient-reported at the time of the clinic visit or followup phone/email contact. Fractures were defined as any cortical disruption in the femur or patella that required treatment (change in postoperative protocol), infection requiring treatment (antibiotics and/or return to the operating room), or arthrofibrosis (stiffness that necessitated a change in the postoperative protocol or manipulation under anesthesia).

RESULTS

Ninety-two percent (23 of 25) of patients reported no further instability episodes after MPFL reconstruction. Sixteen percent (four of 25) of patients had complications: two repeat episodes of patellar instability, one patella fracture, and one symptomatic hardware requiring interference screw removal. No patients developed arthrofibrosis or infection.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small case series, we found that MPFL reconstruction using allograft tissue in children and adolescents resulted in a low risk of recurrent instability, perhaps comparable to what has been published by others who have used autograft tissue. Longer followup is needed, because in some orthopaedic applications, allograft ligaments have been observed to attenuate over time. Future studies might compare these techniques using patient-reported outcomes scores as well as use a control group of patients with autograft tissue.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Increased Femoral Anteversion Influence Over Surgically Treated Recurrent Patellar Instability Patients

PURPOSE

To verify the influence that increased femoral anteversion (FA) has on patients with recurrent patellar instability (RPI) treated by anteromedialization tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) and to present the midterm outcomes of these patients.

METHODS

From January 2008 to August 2013, skeletally mature patients with RPI and tibial tubercle (TT)-trochlear groove (TG) ≥ 17 mm who underwent anteromedialization TTO combined with MPFLR were evaluated for J sign, patellar glide, apprehension test, increased FA, Caton index, trochlea dysplasia, TT-TG, Kujala, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee evaluation form, and Tegner. Increased FA was determined clinically by a difference of more than 30° between hip internal and external rotation, 70° or more of hip internal rotation, and 30° or more of femoral neck anteversion. A subgroup analysis involving increased FA was made.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients composed the study group. Mean follow-up was 41.5 ± 11.05 months. The J-sign was present in 86% before surgery and none postoperatively (P < .001). All patients had a positive apprehension test or a patellar luxation at the patellar glide test rated as grade 4 before surgery. After surgery, the mean glide was 1.29 ± 0.45 with no apprehension (P < .001). Increased FA was present in 18.7%. Caton index before surgery was 1.11 ± 0.21 and 0.99 ± 0.11 postoperatively (P = .004). Trochlea dysplasia was present in all patients. TT-TG preoperatively was 20.77 ± 2.12 mm and 11.33 ± 1.24 mm postoperatively (P < .001). Functional scores improved preoperatively to postoperatively (P < .001) with Kujala and International Knee Documentation Committee means: 59.08 to 84.37; 52.6 to 85.5, respectively. Tegner preinjury score was 5.4 and postoperatively was 5.2 (P = .01). Increased FA group had worse Kujala compared with the normal FA group and worse Kujala improvement: 77.7 and 85.89 (P = .012), and 21.7 and 26.1, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased FA in patients with RPI had a negative effect on the outcome of anteromedialization TTO combined with MPFLR. Combined anteromedialization TTO and MPFLR had good functional midterm outcomes in treating patients with RPI and TT-TG ≥ 17 mm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, comparative study.