Diagnosis and Management of Immune Related Adverse Events (irAEs) in Cancer Immunotherapy

Advance on combination therapy strategies based on biomedical nanotechnology induced ferroptosis for cancer therapeutics

Globally, cancer is a serious health problem. It is unfortunate that current anti-cancer strategies are insufficiently specific and damage the normal tissues. There's urgent need for development of new anti-cancer strategies. More recently, increasing attention has been paid to the new application of ferroptosis and nano materials in cancer research. Ferroptosis, a condition characterized by excessive reactive oxygen species-induced lipid peroxidation, as a new programmed cell death mode, exists in the process of a number of diseases, including cancers, neurodegenerative disease, cerebral hemorrhage, liver disease, and renal failure. There is growing evidence that inducing ferroptosis has proven to be an effective strategy against a variety of chemo-resistant cancer cells. Nano-drug delivery system based on nanotechnology provides a highly promising platform with the benefits of precise control of drug release and reduced toxicity and side effects. This paper reviews the latest advances of combination therapy strategies based on biomedical nanotechnology induced ferroptosis for cancer therapeutics. Given the new chances and challenges in this emerging area, we need more attention to the combination of nanotechnology and ferroptosis in the treatment of cancer in the future.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with primary liver cancer and immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated adrenal insufficiency: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Adrenal insufficiency (AI) is a rare, but potentially serious adverse event associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study aims to examine the incidence, clinical features and the clinical correlation between occurrence of AI and efficacy in primary liver cancer (PLC) patients treated with ICIs; and to evaluate the significance of the continuation of ICIs treatment in PLC patients who developed AI.

METHODS

Between January 2020 and March 2022, 47 PLC patients with ICIs-associated AI (AI cohort) were screened from Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan university, a general hospital in China. Between December 2019 and August 2021, 419 PLC patients who were treated with ICIs were reviewed to identify those without immune- associated adverse events (irAEs) (control cohort). Clinical features and outcomes of the PLC patients from the two cohorts were compared.

RESULTS

Totally, 47 PLC patients with AI (AI cohort) and 63 PLC patients without irAEs (control cohort) were included. The incidence of grades 3-4 of AI and all irAEs were 40.4 % and 48.9 %, respectively. The median three-year survival was significantly longer in the AI cohort than that in the control cohort (26.3 months (95 % CI: 18.9--33.5) vs.16.1 months (95 % CI:10.4--21.7); p = 0.021). Multivariable cox proportional hazards regression model showed that the development of AI remained significantly associated with improved overall survival (HR = 0.561; p = 0.033) in the adjusted regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrated that PLC patients undergoing ICIs therapy and developing AI after ICIs treatment had favorable survival outcomes compared to those without irAEs.

Lectins as a promising therapeutic agent for breast cancer: A review

Efficient treatment of cancer has been a subject of research by scientists for many years. Current treatments for cancer, such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery have been used in traditional combination therapy, but they have major setbacks like non-specificity, non-responsiveness in certain cancer types towards treatment, tumor recurrence, etc. Epidemiological data has shown that breast cancer accounts for 14% of cancer cases occurring in Indian women. In recent years, scientists have started to focus on the use of natural compounds like lectins obtained from various sources to counter the side effects of traditional therapy. Lectins like Sambucus nigra Agglutinin, Maackia amurensis lectin, Okra lectins, Haliclona caerulea lectin, Sclerotium rolfsii lectin, etc., have been discovered to have both diagnostic and therapeutic potential for breast cancer patients. Lectins have been found to have inhibitory effects on various cancer cell activities such as neo-angiogenesis, causing cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase, and inducing apoptosis. The major idea behind the use of lectins in cancer diagnostics and therapeutics is their capability to bind to glycosylated proteins that are expressed on the cell surface. This review focuses on an exploration of the roles of post-translational modification in cancer cells, especially glycosylation, and the potential of lectins in cancer diagnosis and therapeutics.

Leveraging Semiconducting Polymer Nanoparticles for Combination Cancer Immunotherapy

Cancer immunotherapy has become a promising method for cancer treatment, bringing hope to advanced cancer patients. However, immune-related adverse events caused by immunotherapy also bring heavy burden to patients. Semiconducting polymer nanoparticles (SPNs) as an emerging nanomaterial with high biocompatibility, can eliminate tumors and induce tumor immunogenic cell death through different therapeutic modalities, including photothermal therapy, photodynamic therapy, and sonodynamic therapy. In addition, SPNs can work as a functional nanocarrier to synergize with a variety of immunomodulators to amplify anti-tumor immune responses. In this review, SPNs-based combination cancer immunotherapy is comprehensively summarized according to the SPNs' therapeutic modalities and the type of loaded immunomodulators. The in-depth understanding of existing SPNs-based therapeutic modalities will hopefully inspire the design of more novel nanomaterials with potent anti-tumor immune effects, and ultimately promote their clinical translation.

Update on Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Crucial Player in Cancer Immunotherapy

The idea of cancer immunotherapy has spread, and it has made tremendous progress with the advancement of new technology. Immunotherapy, which serves to assist the natural defenses of the body in eradicating cancerous cells, is a remarkable achievement that has revolutionized both cancer research and cancer treatments. Currently, the use of stem cells in immunotherapy is widespread and shares a special characteristic, including cancer cell migration, bioactive component release, and immunosuppressive activity. In the context of cancer, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are rapidly being identified as vital stromal regulators of tumor progression. MSCs therapy has been implicated in treating a wide range of diseases, including bone damage, autoimmune diseases, and particularly hematopoietic abnormalities, providing stem cell-based therapy with an extra dimension. Moreover, the implication of MSCs does not have ethical concerns, and the complications known in pluripotent and totipotent stem cells are less common in MSCs. MSCs have a lot of distinctive characteristics that, when coupled, make them excellent for cellular-based immunotherapy and as vehicles for gene and drug delivery in a variety of inflammations and malignancies. MSCs can migrate to the inflammatory site and exert immunomodulatory responses via cell-to-cell contacts with lymphocytes by generating soluble substances. In the current review, we discuss the most recent research on the immunological characteristics of MSCs, their use as immunomodulatory carriers, techniques for approving MSCs to adjust their immunological contour, and their usages as vehicles for delivering therapeutic as well as drugs and genes engineered to destroy tumor cells.

Nanotechnology Utilizing Ferroptosis Inducers in Cancer Treatment

Current cancer treatment options have presented numerous challenges in terms of reaching high efficacy. As a result, an immediate step must be taken to create novel therapies that can achieve more than satisfying outcomes in the fight against tumors. Ferroptosis, an emerging form of regulated cell death (RCD) that is reliant on iron and reactive oxygen species, has garnered significant attention in the field of cancer therapy. Ferroptosis has been reported to be induced by a variety of small molecule compounds known as ferroptosis inducers (FINs), as well as several licensed chemotherapy medicines. These compounds' low solubility, systemic toxicity, and limited capacity to target tumors are some of the significant limitations that have hindered their clinical effectiveness. A novel cancer therapy paradigm has been created by the hypothesis that ferroptosis induced by nanoparticles has superior preclinical properties to that induced by small drugs and can overcome apoptosis resistance. Knowing the different ideas behind the preparation of nanomaterials that target ferroptosis can be very helpful in generating new ideas. Simultaneously, more improvement in nanomaterial design is needed to make them appropriate for therapeutic treatment. This paper first discusses the fundamentals of nanomedicine-based ferroptosis to highlight the potential and characteristics of ferroptosis in the context of cancer treatment. The latest study on nanomedicine applications for ferroptosis-based anticancer therapy is then highlighted.

Case Report: Toripalimab: a novel immune checkpoint inhibitor in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma and severe immune-related colitis

Toripalimab, a specific immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor, represents a novel immunotherapeutic approach for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, showing promising curative potential. However, it is not without drawbacks, as some patients experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with this treatment, and there remains a limited body of related research. Here, we present a case of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a patient who developed colitis as an irAE attributed to Toripalimab. Subsequent to Toripalimab treatment, the patient achieved complete remission. Notably, the development of colitis was accompanied by inflammatory manifestations evident in colonoscopy and pathology results. Further investigation revealed cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, detected through immunohistochemistry in 11 colon biopsies. Subsequent treatment with ganciclovir and steroids resulted in symptom relief, and colonoscopy indicated mucosal healing. Our case highlights the association between irColitis induced by Toripalimab and CMV infection. Toripalimab demonstrates remarkable efficacy in treating advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, albeit with a notable risk of irAEs, particularly in the form of colitis. The link between symptoms and endoscopic pathology findings in irColitis is noteworthy. Standardized biopsy procedures can effectively confirm the diagnosis of CMV infection. Our findings may provide valuable guidance for managing acute CMV infection and irAEs associated with Toripalimab in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the future.

Image-Guided Precision Medicine in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas

In this comprehensive review, we aimed to discuss the current state-of-the-art medical imaging for pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) diagnosis and treatment. Despite major medical improvements, PPGLs, as with other neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), leave clinicians facing several challenges; their inherent particularities and their diagnosis and treatment pose several challenges for clinicians due to their inherent complexity, and they require management by multidisciplinary teams. The conventional concepts of medical imaging are currently undergoing a paradigm shift, thanks to developments in radiomic and metabolic imaging. However, despite active research, clinical relevance of these new parameters remains unclear, and further multicentric studies are needed in order to validate and increase widespread use and integration in clinical routine. Use of AI in PPGLs may detect changes in tumor phenotype that precede classical medical imaging biomarkers, such as shape, texture, and size. Since PPGLs are rare, slow-growing, and heterogeneous, multicentric collaboration will be necessary to have enough data in order to develop new PPGL biomarkers. In this nonsystematic review, our aim is to present an exhaustive pedagogical tool based on real-world cases, dedicated to physicians dealing with PPGLs, augmented by perspectives of artificial intelligence and big data.

Incidence and predictors of infections in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies: A monocentric retrospective cohort study

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent the cornerstone of the current treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the occurrence of concomitant infections might hamper success. All consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who started ICIs as a first- or second-line therapy from January 1, 2017 to June 30, 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. The occurrence of infectious events during ICIs was correlated with clinical characteristics, including previous Cytotoxic Chemotherapy (CC), occurrence of immune-related-adverse-events (irAEs). A total of 211 patients were included, 46 (22%) females, with a median (q1-q3) age of 69 (62-76) years. Overall, 85 patients (40%) received ICIs as a first treatment line and 126 (60%) as a second line; 40 patients (19%) had at least one infection during ICIs, and 17 (8%) more than one. Notably, autoimmune diseases (P < .005), neutropenia (P = .001) or infections during previous CC (P = .001), irAEs (P = .006), or steroid therapy for irAEs (P < .001) were associated with infection development. By multivariate Cox-regression, autoimmune diseases (aHR = 6.27; 95%CI = 2.38-16.48; P < .001) and steroid therapy for irAEs (aHR = 2.65; 95%CI = 1.27-5.52; P < .009) were associated with a higher risk of infection during ICIs. Interestingly, autoimmune diseases were confirmed as risk factors in patients treated with ICIs as a first line, while previous infections were the only independent predictor of infections in patients treated with ICIs as a second line. Patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs with concurrent autoimmune disease, receiving steroid therapy for management of irAEs, or having a history of previous infections during CC should be actively monitored for the risk of developing infectious complications.

Adverse Effects of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Comprehensive Imaging-Oriented Review

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies, which increase antitumor immunity of the host and facilitate T-cell-mediated actions against tumors. These medications have been used in recent years as a weapon against advanced stage malignancies, such as melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, lymphoma, small or non-small cell lung cancer, and colorectal cancer. Unfortunately, they are not free from possible adverse effects (immune-related adverse events-irAEs) that mainly affect skin, gastrointestinal, hepatic, and endocrine systems. Early diagnosis of irAEs is essential to correctly and rapidly manage patients, with ICIs suspension and therapies administration. Deep knowledge of the imaging and clinical patterns of irAEs is the key to promptly rule out other diagnoses. Here, we performed a review of the radiological signs and differential diagnosis, based on the organ involved. The aim of this review is to provide guidance to recognize the most significant radiological findings of the main irAEs, based on incidence, severity, and the role of imaging.

First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with two cycles of chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone (four cycles) in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: CheckMate 9LA 2-year patient-reported outcomes

BACKGROUND

In CheckMate 9LA (NCT03215706), first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy (2 cycles) significantly improved overall survival versus chemotherapy (4 cycles) in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and no known sensitising epidermal growth factor receptor/anaplastic lymphoma kinase alterations. We present exploratory patient-reported outcomes (PROs; minimum follow-up, 2 years).

METHODS

In patients (N = 719) randomised 1:1 to nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone, disease-related symptom burden and health-related quality of life were assessed using the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) and 3-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L). Treatment-phase changes in LCSS average symptom burden index (ASBI), LCSS three-item global index (3-IGI) and EQ-5D-3L visual analogue scale (VAS) and utility index (UI) over time were analysed descriptively and using mixed-effect model repeated measures. Time-to-deterioration/improvement analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Treatment-phase PRO questionnaire completion rates were >80%. Mean treatment-phase changes showed no deterioration from baseline in both arms for LCSS ASBI/3-IGI and EQ-5D-3L VAS/UI; however, minimally important differences were not met. Mixed-effect model repeated measures analyses showed overall reduction in symptom burden from baseline for both arms; changes from baseline for LCSS 3-IGI and EQ-5D-3L VAS/UI were numerically improved with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy, but minimally important differences were not met. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy delayed time-to-definitive-deterioration versus chemotherapy (LCSS ASBI: hazard ratio, 0.62 [95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.87]); results were similar across PRO measures.

CONCLUSIONS

At 2-year minimum follow-up, first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy reduced the risk of definitive deterioration in disease-related symptom burden and health-related quality of life versus chemotherapy and maintained QoL in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT03215706.

Immune signatures predict development of autoimmune toxicity in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are among the most promising treatment options for melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While ICIs can induce effective anti-tumor responses, they may also drive serious immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Identifying biomarkers to predict which patients will suffer from irAEs would enable more accurate clinical risk-benefit analysis for ICI treatment and may also shed light on common or distinct mechanisms underpinning treatment success and irAEs.

METHODS

In this prospective multi-center study, we combined a multi-omics approach including unbiased single-cell profiling of over 300 peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples and high-throughput proteomics analysis of over 500 serum samples to characterize the systemic immune compartment of patients with melanoma or NSCLC before and during treatment with ICIs.

FINDINGS

When we combined the parameters obtained from the multi-omics profiling of patient blood and serum, we identified potential predictive biomarkers for ICI-induced irAEs. Specifically, an early increase in CXCL9/CXCL10/CXCL11 and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) 1 to 2 weeks after the start of therapy are likely indicators of heightened risk of developing irAEs. In addition, an early expansion of Ki-67⁺ regulatory T cells (Tregs) and Ki-67⁺ CD8⁺ T cells is also likely to be associated with increased risk of irAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that the combination of these cellular and proteomic biomarkers may help to predict which patients are likely to benefit most from ICI therapy and those requiring intensive monitoring for irAEs.

FUNDING

This work was primarily funded by the European Research Council, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Cancer League, and the Forschungsförderung of the Kantonsspital St. Gallen.

An overview: Management of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has constituted a significant health burden worldwide, and patients with advanced HCC, which is stage C as defined by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, have a poor overall survival of 6-8 months. Studies have indicated the significant survival benefit of treatment based on sorafenib, lenvatinib, or atezolizumab-bevacizumab with reliable safety. In addition, the combination of two or more molecularly targeted therapies (first- plus second-line) has become a hot topic recently and is now being extensively investigated in patients with advanced HCC. In addition, a few biomarkers have been investigated and found to predict drug susceptibility and prognosis, which provides an opportunity to evaluate the clinical benefits of current therapies. In addition, many therapies other than tyrosine kinase inhibitors that might have additional survival benefits when combined with other therapeutic modalities, including immunotherapy, transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, hepatectomy, and chemotherapy, have also been examined. This review provides an overview on the current understanding of disease management and summarizes current challenges with and future perspectives on advanced HCC.

Serious adverse events and coping strategies of CAR-T cells in the treatment of malignant tumors

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells technology has been successfully used in the treatment of B cell-derived hematological tumors and multiple myeloma. CAR-T cells are also being studied in a variety of solid tumors. Current clinical reports on CAR-T cells in the treatment of malignant tumors are abundant. The tumor-killing activity of CAR-T cells and the unique adverse effects of CAR-T cells have been confirmed by many studies. There is evidence that serious adverse events can be life-threatening. CAR-T cells therapy is increasingly used in clinical settings, so it is important to pay attention to its serious adverse events. In this review, we summarized the serious adverse events of CAR-T cells in the treatment of malignant tumors by reading literature and searching relevant clinical studies, and discussed the management and treatment of serious adverse events in an effort to provide theoretical support for clinicians who deal with such patients.

A Single Center Retrospective Study of the Impact of COVID-19 Infection on Immune-related Adverse Events in Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause a variety of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with increased amounts of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which may affect the outcome of irAEs. Data are limited regarding the impact of COVID-19 on irAEs in ICI-treated cancer patients. Hence, in this study, we retrospectively analyzed ICI-treated adult patients with malignant solid tumors at a single institution between August 2020 and August 2021. Patients who had the most recent ICI treatment over 1-month before or after the positive COVID-19 test were excluded from the study. For the COVID-19 positive group, only the irAEs that developed after COVID-19 infection were considered as events. A total of 579 patients were included in our study, with 46 (7.9%) in the COVID-19 positive group and 533 (92.1%) in the COVID-19 negative group. The baseline characteristics of patients in the 2 groups were similar. With a median follow-up of 331 days (range: 21-2226), we noticed a nonsignificant higher incidence of all-grade irAEs in the COVID-19 positive group (30.4% vs. 19.9%, P =0.18). The incidence of grade 3 and 4 irAEs was significantly higher in the COVID-19 positive group (10.9% vs. 3.2%, P =0.02). Multivariate analysis confirmed the association between COVID-19 infection and increased risk of severe irAE development (odds ratio: 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.14, P =0.01). Our study suggested that COVID-19 may pose a risk of severe irAEs in cancer patients receiving ICIs. Close monitoring and possibly delaying ICI administration could be considered when cancer patients are infected with COVID-19.

Role of Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Cancer: A Systematic Review

Tremendous progress has been made in cancer research over the years, and, as a result, immunotherapy has emerged as an important therapy for the treatment of cancer, either as a stand-alone treatment or in conjunction with other cancer therapies. Immunotherapy has demonstrated encouraging outcomes and offers a viable strategy for not only enhancing the quality of life but also dramatically boosting the overall survival rate of cancer patients. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of immunotherapy in the treatment of cancer. Databases such as PubMed and Science Direct were searched from their inception until September 2021, using the following keywords: cancer immunotherapy, cancer recurrence, cancer treatment options, and cancer therapies. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA protocol. There were a total of 599 articles; however, after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final review ended up with 34 publications. In conclusion, the studies have demonstrated that immunotherapy is a viable alternative treatment option for patients with recurrent or metastatic cancer, since the overall survival rate and progression-free survival rate were shown to be successful.

Neuromuscular junction dysfunctions due to immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy: An analysis of FAERS data in the past 15 years

Introduction

The adverse effects of neuromuscular junction dysfunctions caused by immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) drugs have not been thoroughly assessed in the clinics.

Objective

To assess the neuromuscular junction dysfunctions in cancer patients with adverse events caused by ICI therapy by searching the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Methods

The FAERS data from January 2004 to December 2020 were collected to analyze the association between neuromuscular connection dysfunction and ICI use. Disproportionate analysis and Bayesian analysis were used to quantify the association between the neuromuscular junction dysfunctions and ICIs. The onset time and outcome of neuromuscular junction dysfunctions in different ICI regimens were also compared.

Results

Out of 88,617 adverse event reports, 557 neuromuscular junction dysfunction reports (0.63%) were analyzed. Marketed ICI drugs, including ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, cemiplimab, avelumab, as well as their combinations, showed positive associations with four detection methods. Most of the adverse event reports were associated with the use of nivolumab (53.32%) and pembrolizumab (31.96%). However, nivolumab-related neuromuscular junction dysfunctions were similar with pembrolizumab (33.33% vs 33.14%, p &gt; 0.05). The onset time of neuromuscular junction dysfunctions showed no significant difference among different ICIs (p &gt; 0.05).

Conclusions

Analysis of FAERS data identified that over 30% (32.85%) of reports of neuromuscular junction dysfunctions resulted in death. Ongoing monitoring, risk evaluations, and further comparative studies of ICIs should be considered.

Positive Correlation of Peripheral CD8+ T Lymphocytes with Immune-Related Adverse Events and Combinational Prognostic Value in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy has revolutionized the treatment patterns of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, patients treated with ICIs may experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Markers that could predict the onset of irAEs are still unclear. Here, we report the possible correlation of baseline peripheral lymphocytes with irAEs and clinical outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients receiving ICIs. A total of 109 advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICIs from April 2017 to January 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Logistic and Cox regression analyses was applied to evaluate independent risk factors for irAEs, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Among these patients, 55 (50.5%) patients experienced irAEs. The level of CD8+ T lymphocytes at baseline was the independent risk factor for the onset of irAEs (p = 0.008). A higher level of CD8+ T lymphocytes was associated with longer PFS (11.0 months vs. 3.0 months, p < 0.001) and OS (27.9 months vs. 11.7 months, p = 0.014). Furthermore, patients who had higher baseline CD8+ T lymphocytes and experienced irAEs had a longer PFS (18.4 months vs. 2.2 months, p < 0.001) and OS (32.8 months vs. 9.0 months, p = 0.001) than those who had lower CD8+ T lymphocytes and no irAEs. Our study highlights the value of baseline peripheral CD8+ T lymphocytes as a predictive factor for irAEs in advanced NSCLC patients receiving ICIs. In addition, patients who have higher baseline CD8+ T lymphocytes and experience irAEs would have a superior PFS and OS.

Emerging Management Approach for the Adverse Events of Immunotherapy of Cancer

Immunotherapy, which stimulates the body’s immune system, has received a considerable amount of press in recent years because of its powerful benefits. Cancer immunotherapy has shown long-term results in patients with advanced disease that are not seen with traditional chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, cytokines like interleukin 2 (IL-2) and interferon-alpha (IFN), and the cancer vaccine sipuleucel-T have all been licensed and approved by the FDA for the treatment of various cancers. These immunotherapy treatments boost anticancer responses by stimulating the immune system. As a result, they have the potential to cause serious, even fatal, inflammatory and immune-related side effects in one or more organs. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy are two immunotherapy treatments that are increasingly being used to treat cancer. Following their widespread usage in the clinic, a wave of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) impacting virtually every system has raised concerns about their unpredictability and randomness. Despite the fact that the majority of adverse effects are minimal and should be addressed with prudence, the risk of life-threatening complications exists. Although most adverse events are small and should be treated with caution, the risk of life-threatening toxicities should not be underestimated, especially given the subtle and unusual indications that make early detection even more difficult. Treatment for these issues is difficult and necessitates a multidisciplinary approach involving not only oncologists but also other internal medicine doctors to guarantee quick diagnosis and treatment. This study’s purpose is to give a fundamental overview of immunotherapy and cancer-related side effect management strategies.

Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) in Cancer, with Inputs from a Nursing Expert: A Review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPis) belong to a group of immunotherapeutic agents that act on different immune cells and tumor cells and reactivate the suppressed immune system of the host. The emergence of immunotherapy has resulted in the successful management of many malignancies. High success rates with certain advanced cancers have attributed wide importance and relevance to the use of immunotherapy. Although ICPis have gained huge popularity, their use often leads to side effects that can affect almost any system; immune-related adverse events (irAEs). These adverse events occur due to unrestrained T cell activity that unsettles the immune homeostasis of the host. Although close monitoring for toxicities controls the events on most of the occasions, the inability to diagnose them early may prove fatal on some occasions due to their subtle and nonspecific symptoms. This review summarizes in brief the usual irAEs and their management, besides a very important nursing perspective, from a nursing expert about an overall insight into the routine irAEs.

Application of Noninvasive Imaging to Combined Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Breast Cancer: Facts and Future

With the application of mono-immunotherapy in cancer, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, improved outcomes have been achieved. However, there are several limitations to immunotherapy, such as a poor response to the drugs, immune resistance, and immune-related adverse events. In recent years, studies of preclinical animal models and clinical trials have demonstrated that immune checkpoint inhibitors for breast cancer can significantly prolong the overall survival and quality of patients' lives. Meanwhile, combined immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment has attracted researchers' attention and showed great potential in the comprehensive treatment of breast cancer patients. Additionally, noninvasive imaging enables physicians to predict response to combined immunotherapeutic drugs, achieve treatment efficacy, and lead to better clinical management. Herein, we review the background of combined immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and summarize its targeted imaging as well as progress in noninvasive imaging aimed at evaluating therapeutic outcomes. Finally, we describe several factors that may influence the outcome of this combined immunotherapy, the future direction of medical imaging, and the potential application of artificial intelligence in breast cancer. With further development of noninvasive imaging for the guidance of combined immune checkpoint inhibitors, cures for this disease may be achieved.

Evaluation of the TCR Repertoire as a Predictive and Prognostic Biomarker in Cancer: Diversity or Clonality?

Simple Summary

The TCR is the T cell antigen receptor, and it is responsible of the T cell activation, through the HLA-antigen complex recognition. Studying the TCR repertoire in patients with cancer can help to better understand the anti-tumoural responses and it has been suggested to have predictive and or/prognostic values, both for the disease and in response to treatments. The aim of this review is to summarize TCR repertoire studies performed in patients with cancer found in the literature, thoroughly analyse the different factors that can be involved in shaping the TCR repertoire, and draw the current conclusions in this field, especially focusing on whether the TCR diversity—or its opposite, the clonality—can be used as predictors or prognostic biomarkers of the disease.

Abstract

T cells play a vital role in the anti-tumoural response, and the presence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes has shown to be directly correlated with a good prognosis in several cancer types. Nevertheless, some patients presenting tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes do not have favourable outcomes. The TCR determines the specificities of T cells, so the analysis of the TCR repertoire has been recently considered to be a potential biomarker for patients’ progression and response to therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The TCR repertoire is one of the multiple elements comprising the immune system and is conditioned by several factors, including tissue type, tumour mutational burden, and patients’ immunogenetics. Its study is crucial to understanding the anti-tumoural response, how to beneficially modulate the immune response with current or new treatments, and how to better predict the prognosis. Here, we present a critical review including essential studies on TCR repertoire conducted in patients with cancer with the aim to draw the current conclusions and try to elucidate whether it is better to encounter higher clonality with few TCRs at higher frequencies, or higher diversity with many different TCRs at lower frequencies.

Part 1: Imaging findings of common immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse effects

Over the last decade or so, immunotherapy and in particular immune checkpoint inhibitors have become common in the treatment of numerous cancers and have revolutionised oncology. The unique mechanisms of these agents has resulted in novel tumour response patterns and also new drug-related toxicities, both of which can have specific findings on imaging. The widespread and increasing use of these agents means these findings are now encountered across many radiology practices beyond just specialist oncology units. This pictorial essay aims to describe and illustrate imaging findings associated with common and important immune-related adverse events as a result of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

The ambiguous role of obesity in oncology by promoting cancer but boosting antitumor immunotherapy

Obesity is nowadays considered a pandemic which prevalence's has been steadily increasingly in western countries. It is a dynamic, complex, and multifactorial disease which propitiates the development of several metabolic and cardiovascular diseases, as well as cancer. Excessive adipose tissue has been causally related to cancer progression and is a preventable risk factor for overall and cancer-specific survival, associated with poor prognosis in cancer patients. The onset of obesity features a state of chronic low-grade inflammation and secretion of a diversity of adipocyte-derived molecules (adipokines, cytokines, hormones), responsible for altering the metabolic, inflammatory, and immune landscape. The crosstalk between adipocytes and tumor cells fuels the tumor microenvironment with pro-inflammatory factors, promoting tissue injury, mutagenesis, invasion, and metastasis. Although classically established as a risk factor for cancer and treatment toxicity, recent evidence suggests mild obesity is related to better outcomes, with obese cancer patients showing better responses to treatment when compared to lean cancer patients. This phenomenon is termed obesity paradox and has been reported in different types and stages of cancer. The mechanisms underlying this paradoxical relationship between obesity and cancer are still not fully described but point to systemic alterations in metabolic fitness and modulation of the tumor microenvironment by obesity-associated molecules. Obesity impacts the response to cancer treatments, such as chemotherapy and immunotherapy, and has been reported as having a positive association with immune checkpoint therapy. In this review, we discuss obesity's association to inflammation and cancer, also highlighting potential physiological and biological mechanisms underlying this association, hoping to clarify the existence and impact of obesity paradox in cancer development and treatment.

Retrospective study evaluating immune-related adverse events in cancer patients treated with pembrolizumab

INTRODUCTION

Pembrolizumab has been on the market for several years, but most of the safety data is based on clinical trials with limited literature evaluating post-marketing immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with its use. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of irAEs associated with pembrolizumab.

METHODS

We included adult patients who had received pembrolizumab between January 2016 and December 2020. The patient electronic profiles and the pharmacy adverse event reporting system were reviewed to identify adverse events. Patients were followed from the start of treatment until 12 months after the last dose, end of the study, or death. The characteristics of the patients and the irAEs were recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify variables associated with the development of irAE.

RESULTS

During the study period, 223 patients and 1601 cycles of pembrolizumab were evaluated. A total of 67 irAEs were reported in 58 patients. The median age was 53 years (range 18-84), and most patients were males (75%) with metastatic lung cancer (62%). The most common irAEs were respiratory (30%), followed by gastrointestinal (25%), endocrine (24%), and dermatologic (21%). Among the reported irAEs, 28 were associated with hospital admission, 15 required long-term treatment, and 9 resulted in pembrolizumab discontinuation. In logistic regression, there were no significant predictors associated with irAE.

CONCLUSIONS

Respiratory irAEs were the most common in our population. We were unable to identify predictors of irAE in this cohort. Further studies are necessary to identify predictors of adverse events.

Symphony of nanomaterials and immunotherapy based on the cancer-immunity cycle

The immune system is involved in the initiation and progression of cancer. Research on cancer and immunity has contributed to the development of several clinically successful immunotherapies. These immunotherapies often act on a single step of the cancer–immunity cycle. In recent years, the discovery of new nanomaterials has dramatically expanded the functions and potential applications of nanomaterials. In addition to acting as drug-delivery platforms, some nanomaterials can induce the immunogenic cell death (ICD) of cancer cells or regulate the profile and strength of the immune response as immunomodulators. Based on their versatility, nanomaterials may serve as an integrated platform for multiple drugs or therapeutic strategies, simultaneously targeting several steps of the cancer–immunity cycle to enhance the outcome of anticancer immune response. To illustrate the critical roles of nanomaterials in cancer immunotherapies based on cancer–immunity cycle, this review will comprehensively describe the crosstalk between the immune system and cancer, and the current applications of nanomaterials, including drug carriers, ICD inducers, and immunomodulators. Moreover, this review will provide a detailed discussion of the knowledge regarding developing combinational cancer immunotherapies based on the cancer–immunity cycle, hoping to maximize the efficacy of these treatments assisted by nanomaterials.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Colitis: From Mechanism to Management

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as one of the innovative types of immunotherapies, including programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, have obtained unprecedented benefit in multiple malignancies. However, the immune response activation in the body organs could arise immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Checkpoint inhibitor colitis (CIC) is the most widely reported irAEs. However, some obscure problems, such as the mechanism concerning gut microbiota, the confusing differential diagnosis with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the optimal steroid schedule, the reintroduction of ICIs, and the controversial prognosis features, influence the deep understanding and precise diagnosis and management of CIC. Herein, we based on these problems and comprehensively summarized the relevant studies of CIC in patients with NSCLC, further discussing the future research direction of this specific pattern of irAEs.

Adverse Effects and Toxicity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors For Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) occupies a high incidence among all the genitourinary malignancies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as alternative treatments of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), have been applied in the treatment of mUC after chemotherapy failure, with comparable efficacy and safety. ICIs can enhance anti-tumor T cell reactivity and promote immune control over the cancerous cells by blocking cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) or the combination of PD-1 and PD-L1. In the treatment of urothelial carcinoma, ICIs show obvious advantage and can enhance survival rates. However, their adverse effects are gradually manifested with increasing clinical applications. Therefore, we review the adverse effects and toxicity of ICIs in patients with UC, aiming to provide sound theoretical references and therapeutic strategies for their clinical application.

Epstein-Barr Virus+ B Cells in Breast Cancer Immune Response: A Case Report

EBV-specific T cells have been recently described to be involved in fatal encephalitis and myocarditis in cancer patients after immune checkpoint therapies. Here, we report the study of a human triple-negative breast cancer tumor (TNBC) and EBV-transformed B cells obtained from a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) that progressed into a lymphocytic neoplasm named xenograft-associated B-cell lymphoma (XABCL). T-cell receptor (TCR) high-throughput sequencing was performed to monitor the T-cell clonotypes present in the different samples. Forty-three T-cell clonotypes were found infiltrating the XABCL tissue after three passes in mice along 6 months. Eighteen of these (42%) were also found in the TNBC biopsy. TCR infiltrating the XABCL tissue showed a very restricted T-cell repertoire as compared with the biopsy-infiltrating T cells. Consequently, T cells derived from the TNBC biopsy were expanded in the presence of the B-cell line obtained from the XABCL (XABCL-LCL), after which the TCR repertoire obtained was again very restricted, i.e., only certain clonotypes were selected by the B cells. A number of these TCRs had previously been reported as sequences involved in infection, cancer, and/or autoimmunity. We then analyzed the immunopeptidome from the XABCL-LCL, to identify putative B-cell-associated peptides that might have been expanding these T cells. The HLA class I and class II-associated peptides from XABCL-LCL were then compared with published repertoires from LCL of different HLA typing. Proteins from the antigen processing and presentation pathway remained significantly enriched in the XABCL-LCL repertoire. Interestingly, some class II-presented peptides were derived from cancer-related proteins. These results suggest that bystander tumor-infiltrating EBV+ B cells acting as APC may be able to interact with tumor-infiltrating T cells and influence the TCR repertoire in the tumor site.

Biomimetic Nanomaterials Triggered Ferroptosis for Cancer Theranostics

Ferroptosis, as a recently discovered non-apoptotic programmed cell death with an iron-dependent form, has attracted great attention in the field of cancer nanomedicine. However, many ferroptosis-related nano-inducers encountered unexpected limitations such as immune exposure, low circulation time, and ineffective tumor targeting. Biomimetic nanomaterials possess some unique physicochemical properties which can achieve immune escape and effective tumor targeting. Especially, certain components of biomimetic nanomaterials can further enhance ferroptosis. Therefore, this review will provide a comprehensive overview on recent developments of biomimetic nanomaterials in ferroptosis-related cancer nanomedicine. First, the definition and character of ferroptosis and its current applications associated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy for enhancing cancer theranostics were briefly discussed. Subsequently, the advantages and limitations of some representative biomimetic nanomedicines, including biomembranes, proteins, amino acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and biomineralization-based ferroptosis nano-inducers, were further spotlighted. This review would therefore help the spectrum of advanced and novice researchers who are interested in this area to quickly zoom in the essential information and glean some provoking ideas to advance this subfield in cancer nanomedicine.

Real-world data analyses unveiled the immune-related adverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors across cancer types

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated significant survival benefits in treating many types of cancers. However, their immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have not been systematically evaluated across cancer types in large-scale real-world populations. To address this gap, we conducted real-world data analyses using nationwide insurance claims data with 85.97 million enrollees across 8 years. We identified a significantly increased risk of developing irAEs among patients receiving immunotherapy agents in all seven cancer types commonly treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. By six months after treatment initialization, those receiving immunotherapy were 1.50-4.00 times (95% CI, lower bound from 1.15 to 2.16, upper bound from 1.69 to 20.36) more likely to develop irAEs in the first 6 months of treatment, compared to matched chemotherapy or targeted therapy groups, with a total of 92,858 patients. The risk of developing irAEs among patients using nivolumab is higher compared to those using pembrolizumab. These results confirmed the need for clinicians to assess irAEs among cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy as part of management. Our methods are extensible to characterizing the effectiveness and adverse effects of novel treatments in large populations in an efficient and economical fashion.

Cellular based immunotherapy for primary liver cancer

Primary liver cancer (PLC) is a common malignancy with high morbidity and mortality. Poor prognosis and easy recurrence on PLC patients calls for optimizations of the current conventional treatments and the exploration of novel therapeutic strategies. For most malignancies, including PLC, immune cells play crucial roles in regulating tumor microenvironments and specifically recognizing tumor cells. Therefore, cellular based immunotherapy has its instinctive advantages in PLC therapy as a novel therapeutic strategy. From the active and passive immune perspectives, we introduced the cellular based immunotherapies for PLC in this review, covering both the lymphoid and myeloid cells. Then we briefly review the combined cellular immunotherapeutic approaches and the existing obstacles for PLC treatment.

Myositis/Myasthenia after Pembrolizumab in a Bladder Cancer Patient with an Autoimmunity-Associated HLA: Immune-Biological Evaluation and Case Report

Pembrolizumab (mAb to PD-1) has been recently approved for the therapy of pretreated urothelial cancer. Despite the efficacy, it is often accompanied by unpredictable and sometime severe immune-related (ir) adverse events (AEs). Here, we report the clinical and immune-biological characterization of a patient with a metastatic bladder cancer who developed myositis signs (M) and a myasthenia-like syndrome (MLS) during treatment with pembrolizumab. The patient presented an autoimmunity-associated HLA haplotype (HLA-A*02/HLA-B*08/HLA-C*07/HLA-DRB1*03) and experienced an increase in activated CD8 T-cells along the treatment. The symptomatology regressed after pembrolizumab discontinuation and a pyridostigmine and steroids-based therapy. This is the first report of concurrent M and MLS appearance in cancer patients receiving pembrolizumab. More efforts are needed to define early the risk and the clinical meaning of irAEs in this setting.

Incidence of Infections and Predictors of Mortality During Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment and significantly increased overall survival of patients. However, the incidence of concurrent infections and their management is still debated.

METHODS

From August 2015 to October 2019, all consecutive patients with NSCLC who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab as first- or second-line therapy were retrospectively evaluated. At the time of analysis all patients had died. Clinical characteristics of patients, type of infections, and predictors of mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients were identified: 74 in the nivolumab group and 44 in the pembrolizumab group. At least 1 infection was recorded in 22% of the nivolumab-group versus 27% of the pembrolizumab-group (P = .178). In both groups, the main infection was pneumonia, followed by skin and soft tissue infections, urinary tract infections, and gastroenteritis. Crude mortality for first infection was 10.7%, followed by 25% and 40% for the second and third recurrence, respectively (p for trend = .146). No opportunistic infections were recorded. It is notable that, by Cox-regression model, the independent predictor of mortality was a higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status at baseline (P < .001), whereas the multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment of concurrent infections was associated with a reduced probability of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.50; 95% confidence interval = 0.30-0.83; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs, multidisciplinary management of concurrent infections may reduce the risk of mortality. Further studies to investigate risk factors for infections, as well as appropriate management strategies and preventive measures in this setting, are warranted.

Immune Check Point Inhibitors and Immune-Related Adverse Events in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a malignant solid tumor. In recent years, although immune check point inhibitors (ICIs) have achieved important advances in the treatment of SCLC, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have occurred at the same time during the therapeutic period. Some irAEs lead to dose reduction or treatment rejection. The immune microenvironment of SCLC is complicated, therefore, understanding irAEs associated with ICIs is of great importance and necessity for the clinical management of SCLC. However, the lack of comprehensive understanding of irAEs in patients with SCLC remains remarkable. This review aims to provide an up-to-date overview of ICIs and their associated irAEs in patients with SCLC based on present clinical data.

Diagnosis, grading and management of toxicities from immunotherapies in children, adolescents and young adults with cancer

Cancer immunotherapies are associated with remarkable therapeutic response rates but also with unique and severe toxicities, which potentially result in rapid deterioration in health. The number of clinical applications for novel immune effector-cell therapies, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-expressing cells, and other immunotherapies, such as immune-checkpoint inhibitors, is increasing. In this Consensus Statement, members of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Cancer Immunotherapy (HCT-CI) Subgroup, Paediatric Diseases Working Party (PDWP) of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), Supportive Care Committee of the Pediatric Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Consortium (PTCTC) and MD Anderson Cancer Center CAR T Cell Therapy-Associated Toxicity (CARTOX) Program collaborated to provide updated comprehensive recommendations for the care of children, adolescents and young adults receiving cancer immunotherapies. With these recommendations, we address emerging toxicity mitigation strategies, we advocate for the characterization of baseline organ function according to age and discipline-specific criteria, we recommend early critical care assessment when indicated, with consideration of reversibility of underlying pathology (instead of organ failure scores) to guide critical care interventions, and we call for researchers, regulatory agencies and sponsors to support and facilitate early inclusion of young patients with cancer in well-designed clinical trials.

First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced NSCLC With 1% or Greater Tumor PD-L1 Expression: Patient-Reported Outcomes From CheckMate 227 Part 1

INTRODUCTION

In CheckMate 227 (NCT02477826), patients with treatment-naive stage IV or recurrent NSCLC and 1% or greater tumor programmed death ligand 1 expression had significantly improved overall survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy. We present the patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

METHODS

Patients (N = 1189) were randomized to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab, or chemotherapy. PROs were exploratory. Changes in Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) average symptom burden index, LCSS 3-item global index, EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS), and EQ-5D utility index were analyzed descriptively. Mixed-effect model repeated measures and time-to-first deterioration and improvement analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

PRO completion rates were generally greater than 80%. On-treatment improvements from baseline in LCSS measures of symptom burden and global health status with nivolumab plus ipilimumab generally met or exceeded the minimal important difference (smallest clinically meaningful change) from weeks 24 and 30, respectively; improvements with chemotherapy generally remained below the minimal important difference. Mean on-treatment EQ-5D VAS scores for both treatments approached the U.K. population norm at week 24, remaining so throughout the treatment period. Mixed-effect model repeated measures analyses revealed numerically greater improvements from baseline with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy across LCSS average symptom burden index and 3-item global index, and EQ-5D VAS and utility index. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab had delayed time-to-first deterioration (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.74 [0.56 to 0.98]) and a trend for more rapid time-to-first improvement (1.24 [0.98 to 1.59]) versus chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab revealed delayed deterioration and numerical improvement in symptoms and health-related quality of life versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC and 1% or greater programmed death ligand 1 expression.

Gastrointestinal toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a multicenter retrospective analysis

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are monoclonal antibodies that augment immune cell function and are used to treat malignancy. However, they may cause proinflammatory adverse events. This study investigated gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events associated with specific immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Methods

Charts of patients aged >18 years with a solid tumor who underwent treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors between 1st April 2011 and 1st August 2019 were reviewed for GI toxicities. Clinical data, including interventions, treatment duration and outcomes, were recorded.

Results

One hundred patients were included in the study, of whom 22 experienced a GI adverse event directly attributable to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Transaminitis (9/22; 40.9%) and colitis (8/22; 36.3%) were most prevalent. The majority of events occurred within 4 cycles of treatment onset and were most prevalent with the nivolumab + ipilimumab combination (7/12; 58.3%). In 91% of cases (20/22), patients showed improvement or resolution of the event. Among the colitis cases, there was a significant difference (P=0.004) in recovery time between those who received infliximab and those who did not. Despite symptom resolution, only 7/22 were left on the same or part of the same treatment regimen.

Conclusions

Most patients experienced their GI adverse events within 4 cycles of starting treatment, the most common being transaminitis and colitis. Nivolumab + ipilimumab dual therapy was most strongly associated with colitis. Most adverse events self-resolved, with infliximab being particularly helpful in improving colitis symptoms. However, most patients were unable to tolerate the same immunotherapy regimen and ultimately expired.

Real-world safety experience with immune checkpoint inhibitors in Saudi Arabia

Lay abstract Real-world safety experience with immune checkpoint inhibitors in Saudi Arabia: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) are rapidly growing and changing cancer care. With introduction of ICIs the landscape for cancer treatment has changed significantly. ICIs are known to induce immune-related adverse effects. This research is intended to shed light on ICIs and describe our safety experience with these agents. This study is a retrospective cohort study aimed to determine the safety of ICIs and its related adverse events at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. The study was conducted in the oncology center at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh. We identified study participants by using electronic health care system (BestCare)® to involve patients who received ICIs treatment during the study period from January 2016 up to December 2018, to include a total of 53 patients. Most of our patients were on nivolumab (37 patients) followed by atezolizumab (10 patients), and pembrolizumab (6 patients). The average number of emergency room visits after receiving treatment was three visits per patient. Renal adverse events occurred following ICIs use in nine patients, and none of the reported cases experienced a grade ≥3 event. Moreover, 13 patients experienced a hepatic adverse event, of whom only 1 patient experienced a grade ≥3 event leading to treatment discontinuation. As for diarrhea, among all patients who received ICIs, 14 patients experienced diarrhea, and 5 of them had grade ≥3 events. Also, thyroxine abnormalities occurred in seven patients. While, Pneumonitis occurred in four patients following ICIs use. In addition, we noticed other adverse events with ICIs including (skin reaction, nausea, vomiting, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and neurological adverse events). Furthermore, 17 patients required steroids to manage ICIs adverse events. And, no patients in our study required additional management with other immunosuppressive agents.Immunotherapies are rapidly growing and changing cancer care. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) have the ability to block inhibitory checkpoints and restore the functions of the immune system. ICIs are used for the treatment of several types of cancer, and nowadays, many studies are ongoing in order to get approvals for newer indications. ICIs are known to induce immune-related adverse effects. The safety of ICIs and the most common immune-related adverse events are not yet well recognized for our population since this class of medications is lately introduced in our region, where only limited studies in our population are available in the literature. This research is intended to shed light on ICIs and describe our safety experience with these agents. This study is a retrospective cohort study aimed to determine the safety of ICIs and its related adverse events at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. The study was conducted in the oncology center at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh. Study participants were identified by using the electronic health care system (BestCare)® to include patients who were treated with ICIs during the study period from January 2016 up to December 2018. A total of 53 patients were included. Most of our patients were on nivolumab (37 patients) followed by atezolizumab (10 patients), and pembrolizumab (6 patients). The average number of emergency room visits after receiving ICIs was three visits per patient. Renal adverse events occurred following ICIs use in nine patients, and none of the reported cases experienced a grade ≥3 event. Moreover, 13 patients experienced a hepatic adverse event, of whom only 1 patient experienced a grade ≥3 event leading to treatment discontinuation. As for diarrhea, among all patients who received ICIs, 14 patients experienced diarrhea, and 5 of them had grade ≥3 events. Also, thyroxine abnormalities occurred in seven patients. While, pneumonitis occurred in four patients following ICIs use. In addition, we noticed other adverse events with ICIs, including (skin reaction, nausea, vomiting, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and neurological adverse events). Furthermore, 17 patients required steroids to manage ICIs adverse events. And, no patients in our study required additional management with other immunosuppressive agents. Patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors could have a variety of adverse drug events that might lead to treatment discontinuation and increase overall emergency room visits. This study highlights the most common adverse drug events associated with ICIs use at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.

The Challenging Management of Cancer: An Immunonephrologist's Perspective

INTRODUCTION

Onconephrology is an emerging medical subspecialization that focuses on the numberless interrelations between cancer and kidney diseases. Tumor cells evade immune surveillance through activation of immune checkpoint pathways that suppress antitumor immune responses. By blocking checkpoints, new anticancer agents disrupt immune homeostasis but potentially induce immune-mediated diseases. Nephrologists and nephroimmunologists should be able to treat the nephrotoxic sequelae of cancer therapy and ensure continuation of the life-saving treatment.

METHODS

Thirty-seven renal biopsies have been carried out over 42 months in oncologic patients, that is, 5.2% of the total native renal biopsies were carried out in the same period. The commonest diagnoses (>6 cases) were interstitial tubular nephritis, membranous glomerulopathy, IgA nephropathy, vasculitis, and focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis.

CASE PRESENTATION

Three example cases, including focusing on key questions which could involve the nephrologists are reported in detail. They include a cancer-related Goodpasture Syndrome, the peculiar toxic effects of pemetrexed on tubular cells, and the intriguing relationship between bevacizumab and cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis.

CONCLUSION

As shown by these 3 example cases, nephrologists need to be open-minded with regard to kidney biopsy in order to get a timely diagnosis. Nephrologists also need to improve their knowledge of cancer biology and therapy in order to prevent kidney problems, manage therapy-related immune-mediated disorders, and improve patient life expectancy.

Collagenous colitis and atezolizumab therapy: an atypical case

Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4), anti-PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1), and PD-L1 (programmed cell death protein-ligand 1) are emerging drugs that have radically changed treatment and prognosis of different types of tumors. However, despite their considerable benefits, immune checkpoint inhibitors are associated with numerous side effects involving several organs. Gastrointestinal toxicities represent some of these most common adverse events. While clinical presentation usually ranges from mild diarrhea to life-threatening colitis, typical endoscopic and histologic findings of immune-mediated colitis often resemble those of inflammatory bowel diseases. However, less common patterns are lymphocytic colitis and, rarely, collagenous colitis. Physician and pathologists must be aware of the wide spectrum of clinical and histological findings that may be encountered in immune-related gastro-intestinal toxicities. We report a rare and atypical case of collagenous colitis occurred in a woman affected by stage IV lung adenocarcinoma, on atezolizumab therapy.

COVID-19 pneumonia and immune-related pneumonitis: critical issues on differential diagnosis, potential interactions, and management

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic occurred amid the cancer immunotherapy revolution. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care for several solid cancers and are associated with peculiar toxicities, including pneumonitis which has similar features to COVID-19 pneumonia.

AREAS COVERED

We summarize the main hallmarks of lung injury induced by ICIs and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and discuss the critical aspects for differential diagnosis and management. Symptoms and radiological findings are often similar; conversely, treatments are quite different. Furthermore, we focus on potential interactions generating hypotheses that need confirmatory studies.

EXPERT OPINION

All cancer patients treated with immunotherapy should receive screening for SARS-CoV-2. This would improve the diagnosis and management of pneumonia and guide therapeutic choices. Furthermore, clinicians could estimate the risk/benefit of continuing ICI treatment in COVID-19 positive patients. Temporary withdrawal of the immunotherapy treatment pending resolution of viral infection may be a reasonable option in long-responders patients.

Neuromuscular complications following targeted therapy in cancer patients: beyond the immune checkpoint inhibitors. Case reports and review of the literature

Introduction

In the last years, many new drugs have been developed targeting different oncology pathways, overall improving both quality of life and survival in several malignancies. However, the increase of those therapies is associated with novel toxicities, mainly immune-related adverse events (irAEs), never observed before. Different irAEs are now well characterized, and, among them, neuromuscular complications, following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi) therapy, are increasingly studied and described. However, there are also neurological complications related to the use of other targeted therapies, less known and probably underestimated. Herein we describe two oncological patients who developed neuromuscular diseases after administration of targeted therapies, different from ICPi.

Case reports

The first patient was treated with the combination of Vemurafenib and Cobimetinib, BRAF and MEK inhibitors, respectively, for a cutaneous melanoma. One year after the beginning of the combined treatment, she developed a sub-acute motor neuropathy with predominant cranial nerve involvement. She was successfully treated with methylprednisolone. The second patient received therapy with Imatinib, tyrosine kinase inhibitor and precursor of the targeted therapy, for a gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Few days after the first administration, he developed generalized myasthenia gravis with respiratory failure. Clinical remission was obtained with plasma-exchange, intravenous immunoglobulins and steroids.

Discussion and Conclusion

We strengthen the relevance of neuromuscular complications which may occur long after treatment start or in patients receiving not only the latest ICPi but also “older” and apparently better-known targeted therapies. Also in the latter cases, an immune-mediated “off-target” pathogenic mechanism can be hypothesized, and consequences can be life threatening, if not promptly diagnosed and appropriately managed.