1
|
Norbom LB, Syed B, Kjelkenes R, Rokicki J, Beauchamp A, Nerland S, Kushki A, Anagnostou E, Arnold P, Crosbie J, Kelley E, Nicolson R, Schachar R, Taylor MJ, Westlye LT, Tamnes CK, Lerch JP. Probing Autism and ADHD subtypes using cortical signatures of the T1w/T2w-ratio and morphometry. Neuroimage Clin 2025; 45:103736. [PMID: 39837011 PMCID: PMC11788868 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2025.103736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2024] [Revised: 12/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2025] [Indexed: 01/23/2025]
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are neurodevelopmental conditions that share genetic etiology and frequently co-occur. Given this comorbidity and well-established clinical heterogeneity, identifying individuals with similar brain signatures may be valuable for predicting clinical outcomes and tailoring treatment strategies. Cortical myelination is a prominent developmental process, and its disruption is a candidate mechanism for both disorders. Yet, no studies have attempted to identify subtypes using T1w/T2w-ratio, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based proxy for intracortical myelin. Moreover, cortical variability arises from numerous biological pathways, and multimodal approaches can integrate cortical metrics into a single network. We analyzed data from 310 individuals aged 2.6-23.6 years, obtained from the Province of Ontario Neurodevelopmental (POND) Network consisting of individuals diagnosed with ASD (n = 136), ADHD (n = 100), and typically developing (TD) individuals (n = 74). We first tested for differences in T1w/T2w-ratio between diagnostic categories and controls. We then performed unimodal (T1w/T2w-ratio) and multimodal (T1w/T2w-ratio, cortical thickness, and surface area) spectral clustering to identify diagnostic-blind subgroups. Linear models revealed no statistically significant case-control differences in T1w/T2w-ratio. Unimodal clustering mostly isolated single individual- or minority clusters, driven by image quality and intensity outliers. Multimodal clustering suggested three distinct subgroups, which transcended diagnostic boundaries, showing separate cortical patterns but similar clinical and cognitive profiles. T1w/T2w-ratio features were the most relevant for demarcation, followed by surface area. While our analysis revealed no significant case-control differences, multimodal clustering incorporating the T1w/T2w-ratio among cortical features holds promise for identifying biologically similar subsets of individuals with neurodevelopmental conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linn B Norbom
- PROMENTA Research Center, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway.
| | - Bilal Syed
- The Mouse Imaging Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rikka Kjelkenes
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway; Section for Precision Psychiatry, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jaroslav Rokicki
- Centre of Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Antoine Beauchamp
- The Mouse Imaging Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Stener Nerland
- Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Azadeh Kushki
- Autism Research Centre, Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada; University of Toronto, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Toronto, Canada
| | - Evdokia Anagnostou
- Autism Research Centre, Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Paul Arnold
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Departments of Psychiatry & Medical Genetics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Jennifer Crosbie
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Kelley
- Department of Psychology and Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Robert Nicolson
- Department of Psychiatry, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Russell Schachar
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Margot J Taylor
- Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lars T Westlye
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway; Section for Precision Psychiatry, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K.G Jebsen Center for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Christian K Tamnes
- PROMENTA Research Center, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway; Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jason P Lerch
- The Mouse Imaging Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao K, Chen P, Wang D, Zhou R, Ma G, Liu Y. A Multiform Heterogeneity Framework for Alzheimer's Disease Based on Multimodal Neuroimaging. Biol Psychiatry 2024:S0006-3223(24)01817-1. [PMID: 39725298 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2024] [Revised: 11/14/2024] [Accepted: 12/15/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024]
Abstract
Understanding the heterogeneity of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is crucial for advancing precision medicine specifically tailored to this disorder. Recent research has deepened our understanding of AD heterogeneity, yet translating these insights from bench to bedside via neuroimaging heterogeneity frameworks presents significant challenges. In this review, we systematically revisit prior studies and summarize the existing methodology of data-driven neuroimaging studies for AD heterogeneity. We organized the present methodology into (i) a subtyping cluster strategy for AD patients, and we also subdivided it into subtyping analysis based on cross-sectional multimodal neuroimaging profiles, and the identification of long-term disease progression from short-term datasets; (ii) a stratified strategy that integrates neuroimaging measures with biomarkers; (iii) individual-specific abnormal patterns based on the Normative model. We then evaluated the characteristics of these studies along two dimensions: (i) the understanding of pathology and (ii) clinical application. We systematically address the limitations, challenges, and future directions of research into AD heterogeneity. Our goal is to enhance the neuroimaging heterogeneity framework for AD, facilitating its transition from bench to bedside.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kun Zhao
- School of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China
| | - Pindong Chen
- Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Dong Wang
- School of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China
| | - Rongshen Zhou
- The School of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
| | - Guolin Ma
- Department of Radiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yong Liu
- School of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China; Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Limongi R, Skelton AB, Tzianas LH, Silva AM. Increasing the Construct Validity of Computational Phenotypes of Mental Illness Through Active Inference and Brain Imaging. Brain Sci 2024; 14:1278. [PMID: 39766477 PMCID: PMC11674655 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14121278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2024] [Revised: 12/16/2024] [Accepted: 12/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
After more than 30 years since its inception, the utility of brain imaging for understanding and diagnosing mental illnesses is in doubt, receiving well-grounded criticisms from clinical practitioners. Symptom-based correlational approaches have struggled to provide psychiatry with reliable brain-imaging metrics. However, the emergence of computational psychiatry has paved a new path not only for understanding the psychopathology of mental illness but also to provide practical tools for clinical practice in terms of computational metrics, specifically computational phenotypes. However, these phenotypes still lack sufficient test-retest reliability. In this review, we describe recent works revealing that mind and brain-related computational phenotypes show structural (not random) variation over time, longitudinal changes. Furthermore, we show that these findings suggest that understanding the causes of these changes will improve the construct validity of the phenotypes with an ensuing increase in test-retest reliability. We propose that the active inference framework offers a general-purpose approach for causally understanding these longitudinal changes by incorporating brain imaging as observations within partially observable Markov decision processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Limongi
- Department of Psychology, Brandon University, Brandon, MB R7A 6A9, Canada;
| | | | - Lydia H. Tzianas
- Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada;
| | - Angelica M. Silva
- Department of French and Francophone Studies, Brandon University, Brandon, MB R7A 6A9, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dall'Aglio L, Johanson SU, Mallard T, Lamballais S, Delaney S, Smoller JW, Muetzel RL, Tiemeier H. Psychiatric neuroimaging at a crossroads: Insights from psychiatric genetics. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2024; 70:101443. [PMID: 39500134 PMCID: PMC11570172 DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2024] [Revised: 08/21/2024] [Accepted: 09/05/2024] [Indexed: 11/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Thanks to methodological advances, large-scale data collections, and longitudinal designs, psychiatric neuroimaging is better equipped than ever to identify the neurobiological underpinnings of youth mental health problems. However, the complexity of such endeavors has become increasingly evident, as the field has been confronted by limited clinical relevance, inconsistent results, and small effect sizes. Some of these challenges parallel those historically encountered by psychiatric genetics. In past genetic research, robust findings were historically undermined by oversimplified biological hypotheses, mistaken assumptions about expectable effect sizes, replication problems, confounding by population structure, and shared biological patterns across disorders. Overcoming these challenges has contributed to current successes in the field. Drawing parallels across psychiatric genetics and neuroimaging, we identify key shared challenges as well as pinpoint relevant insights that could be gained in psychiatric neuroimaging from the transition that occurred from the candidate gene to (post) genome-wide "eras" of psychiatric genetics. Finally, we discuss the prominent developmental component of psychiatric neuroimaging and how that might be informed by epidemiological and omics approaches. The evolution of psychiatric genetic research offers valuable insights that may expedite the resolution of key challenges in psychiatric neuroimaging, thus potentially moving our understanding of psychiatric pathophysiology forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenza Dall'Aglio
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychology and Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam-Sophia Children's Hospital, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, the Netherlands; Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge St, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Precision Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge St., Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Saúl Urbina Johanson
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Travis Mallard
- Center for Precision Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge St., Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Sander Lamballais
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, the Netherlands
| | - Scott Delaney
- Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jordan W Smoller
- Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge St, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Center for Precision Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge St., Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Ryan L Muetzel
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam-Sophia Children's Hospital, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, the Netherlands
| | - Henning Tiemeier
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Medeiros GC, Demo I, Goes FS, Zarate CA, Gould TD. Personalized use of ketamine and esketamine for treatment-resistant depression. Transl Psychiatry 2024; 14:481. [PMID: 39613748 PMCID: PMC11607365 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-024-03180-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2024] [Accepted: 11/06/2024] [Indexed: 12/01/2024] Open
Abstract
A large and disproportionate portion of the burden associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) is due to treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Intravenous (R,S)-ketamine (ketamine) and intranasal (S)-ketamine (esketamine) are rapid-acting antidepressants that can effectively treat TRD. However, there is variability in response to ketamine/esketamine, and a personalized approach to their use will increase success rates in the treatment of TRD. There is a growing literature on the precision use of ketamine in TRD, and the body of evidence on esketamine is still relatively small. The identification of reliable predictors of response to ketamine/esketamine that are easily translatable to clinical practice is urgently needed. Potential clinical predictors of a robust response to ketamine include a pre-treatment positive family history of alcohol use disorder and a pre-treatment positive history of clinically significant childhood trauma. Pre-treatment versus post-treatment increases in gamma power in frontoparietal brain regions, observed in electroencephalogram (EEG) studies, is a promising brain-based biomarker of response to ketamine, given its time of onset and general applicability. Blood-based biomarkers have shown limited usefulness, with small-effect increases in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) being the most consistent indicator of ketamine response. The severity of treatment-emergent dissociative symptoms is typically not associated with a response either to ketamine or esketamine. Future studies should ensure that biomarkers and clinical variables are obtained in a similar manner across studies to allow appropriate comparison across trials and to reduce the signal-to-noise ratio. Most predictors of response to ketamine/esketamine have modest effect sizes; therefore, the use of multivariate predictive models will be needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo C Medeiros
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Advanced Depression Treatment (ADepT) Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Isabella Demo
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Fernando S Goes
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Carlos A Zarate
- Experimental Therapeutics & Pathophysiology Branch, Intramural Research Program, NIMH-NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Todd D Gould
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Advanced Depression Treatment (ADepT) Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Departments of Pharmacology and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wen Z, Hammoud MZ, Siegel CE, Laska EM, Abu-Amara D, Etkin A, Milad MR, Marmar CR. Neuroimaging-based variability in subtyping biomarkers for psychiatric heterogeneity. Mol Psychiatry 2024:10.1038/s41380-024-02807-y. [PMID: 39511450 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-024-02807-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Revised: 10/15/2024] [Accepted: 10/18/2024] [Indexed: 11/15/2024]
Abstract
Neuroimaging-based subtyping is increasingly used to explain heterogeneity in psychiatric disorders. However, the clinical utility of these subtyping efforts remains unclear, and replication has been challenging. Here we examined how the choice of neuroimaging measures influences the derivation of neuro-subtypes and the consequences for clinical delineation. On a clinically heterogeneous dataset (total n = 566) that included controls (n = 268) and cases (n = 298) of psychiatric conditions, including individuals diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), and comorbidity of both (PTSD&TBI), we identified neuro-subtypes among the cases using either structural, resting-state, or task-based measures. The neuro-subtypes for each modality had high internal validity but did not significantly differ in their clinical and cognitive profiles. We further show that the choice of neuroimaging measures for subtyping substantially impacts the identification of neuro-subtypes, leading to low concordance across subtyping solutions. Similar variability in neuro-subtyping was found in an independent dataset (n = 1642) comprised of major depression disorder (MDD, n = 848) and controls (n = 794). Our results suggest that the highly anticipated relationships between neuro-subtypes and clinical features may be difficult to discover.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenfu Wen
- Department of Psychiatry, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
- Faillace Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mira Z Hammoud
- Department of Psychiatry, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
- Faillace Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carole E Siegel
- Department of Psychiatry, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eugene M Laska
- Department of Psychiatry, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Duna Abu-Amara
- Department of Psychiatry, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amit Etkin
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Alto Neuroscience, Mountain View, CA, USA
| | - Mohammed R Milad
- Department of Psychiatry, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
- Faillace Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Charles R Marmar
- Department of Psychiatry, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
- Neuroscience Institute, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Andrés-Camazón P, Diaz-Caneja CM, Ballem R, Chen J, Calhoun VD, Iraji A. Neurobiology-based Cognitive Biotypes Using Multi-scale Intrinsic Connectivity Networks in Psychotic Disorders. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.05.14.24307341. [PMID: 38798576 PMCID: PMC11118619 DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.14.24307341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
Objective Understanding the neurobiology of cognitive dysfunction in psychotic disorders remains elusive, as does developing effective interventions. Limited knowledge about the biological heterogeneity of cognitive dysfunction hinders progress. This study aimed to identify subgroups of patients with psychosis with distinct patterns of functional brain alterations related to cognition (cognitive biotypes). Methods B-SNIP consortium data (2,270 participants including participants with psychotic disorders, relatives, and controls) was analyzed. Researchers used reference-informed independent component analysis and the NeuroMark 100k multi-scale intrinsic connectivity networks (ICN) template to obtain subject-specific ICNs and whole-brain functional network connectivity (FNC). FNC features associated with cognitive performance were identified through multivariate joint analysis. K-means clustering identified subgroups of patients based on these features in a discovery set. Subgroups were further evaluated in a replication set and in relatives. Results Two biotypes with different functional brain alteration patterns were identified. Biotype 1 exhibited brain-wide alterations, involving hypoconnectivity in cerebellar-subcortical and somatomotor-visual networks and worse cognitive performance. Biotype 2 exhibited hyperconnectivity in somatomotor-subcortical networks and hypoconnectivity in somatomotor-high cognitive processing networks, and better preserved cognitive performance. Demographic, clinical, cognitive, and FNC characteristics of biotypes were consistent in discovery and replication sets, and in relatives. 70.12% of relatives belonged to the same biotype as their affected family members. Conclusions These findings suggest two distinctive psychosis-related cognitive biotypes with differing functional brain patterns shared with their relatives. Patient stratification based on these biotypes instead of traditional diagnosis may help to optimize future research and clinical trials addressing cognitive dysfunction in psychotic disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Andrés-Camazón
- Institute of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, IiSGM, CIBERSAM, ISCIII, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
- Tri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University), Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | - Covadonga Martínez Diaz-Caneja
- Institute of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, IiSGM, CIBERSAM, ISCIII, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ram Ballem
- Tri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University), Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | - Jiayu Chen
- Tri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University), Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | - Vince D Calhoun
- Tri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University), Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | - Armin Iraji
- Tri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University), Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pettorruso M, Di Lorenzo G, De Risio L, Di Carlo F, d'Andrea G, Martinotti G. Addiction biotypes: a paradigm shift for future treatment strategies? Mol Psychiatry 2024; 29:1450-1452. [PMID: 38243073 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-024-02423-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2023] [Revised: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Pettorruso
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.
| | - Giorgio Di Lorenzo
- Chair of Psychiatry, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
- IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy
| | - Luisa De Risio
- Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, ASL Roma 5, Colleferro (Rome), Italy
| | - Francesco Di Carlo
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Giacomo d'Andrea
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Giovanni Martinotti
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacology, Clinical Science, University of Hertfordshire, Herts, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Murray L, Frederick BB, Janes AC. Data-driven connectivity profiles relate to smoking cessation outcomes. Neuropsychopharmacology 2024; 49:1007-1013. [PMID: 38280945 PMCID: PMC11039768 DOI: 10.1038/s41386-024-01802-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/29/2024]
Abstract
At a group level, nicotine dependence is linked to differences in resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC) within and between three large-scale brain networks: the salience network (SN), default mode network (DMN), and frontoparietal network (FPN). Yet, individuals may display distinct patterns of rs-FC that impact treatment outcomes. This study used a data-driven approach, Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation (GIMME), to characterize shared and person-specific rs-FC features linked with clinically-relevant treatment outcomes. 49 nicotine-dependent adults completed a resting-state fMRI scan prior to a two-week smoking cessation attempt. We used GIMME to identify group, subgroup, and individual-level networks of SN, DMN, and FPN connectivity. Regression models assessed whether within- and between-network connectivity of individual rs-FC models was associated with baseline cue-induced craving, and craving and use of regular cigarettes (i.e., "slips") during cessation. As a group, participants displayed shared patterns of connectivity within all three networks, and connectivity between the SN-FPN and DMN-SN. However, there was substantial heterogeneity across individuals. Individuals with greater within-network SN connectivity experienced more slips during treatment, while individuals with greater DMN-FPN connectivity experienced fewer slips. Individuals with more anticorrelated DMN-SN connectivity reported lower craving during treatment, while SN-FPN connectivity was linked to higher craving. In conclusion, in nicotine-dependent adults, GIMME identified substantial heterogeneity within and between the large-scale brain networks. Individuals with greater SN connectivity may be at increased risk for relapse during treatment, while a greater positive DMN-FPN and negative DMN-SN connectivity may be protective for individuals during smoking cessation treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Murray
- Cognitive and Pharmacological Neuroimaging Unit, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Biomedical Research Center, 251 Bayview Blvd, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
| | - Blaise B Frederick
- McLean Imaging Center, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill Street, Belmont, MA, 02478, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Amy C Janes
- Cognitive and Pharmacological Neuroimaging Unit, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Biomedical Research Center, 251 Bayview Blvd, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Martínez-Molina N, Sanz-Perl Y, Escrichs A, Kringelbach ML, Deco G. Turbulent dynamics and whole-brain modeling: toward new clinical applications for traumatic brain injury. Front Neuroinform 2024; 18:1382372. [PMID: 38590709 PMCID: PMC10999628 DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2024.1382372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a prevalent disorder mostly characterized by persistent impairments in cognitive function that poses a substantial burden on caregivers and the healthcare system worldwide. Crucially, severity classification is primarily based on clinical evaluations, which are non-specific and poorly predictive of long-term disability. In this Mini Review, we first provide a description of our model-free and model-based approaches within the turbulent dynamics framework as well as our vision on how they can potentially contribute to provide new neuroimaging biomarkers for TBI. In addition, we report the main findings of our recent study examining longitudinal changes in moderate-severe TBI (msTBI) patients during a one year spontaneous recovery by applying the turbulent dynamics framework (model-free approach) and the Hopf whole-brain computational model (model-based approach) combined with in silico perturbations. Given the neuroinflammatory response and heightened risk for neurodegeneration after TBI, we also offer future directions to explore the association with genomic information. Moreover, we discuss how whole-brain computational modeling may advance our understanding of the impact of structural disconnection on whole-brain dynamics after msTBI in light of our recent findings. Lastly, we suggest future avenues whereby whole-brain computational modeling may assist the identification of optimal brain targets for deep brain stimulation to promote TBI recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noelia Martínez-Molina
- Computational Neuroscience Group, Center for Brain and Cognition, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Yonatan Sanz-Perl
- Computational Neuroscience Group, Center for Brain and Cognition, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anira Escrichs
- Computational Neuroscience Group, Center for Brain and Cognition, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Morten L Kringelbach
- Centre for Eudaimonia and Human Flourishing, Linacre College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for Music in the Brain, Aarhus University and The Royal Academy of Music Aarhus/Aalborg, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Gustavo Deco
- Computational Neuroscience Group, Center for Brain and Cognition, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- Institució Catalana de la Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Voineskos AN, Hawco C, Neufeld NH, Turner JA, Ameis SH, Anticevic A, Buchanan RW, Cadenhead K, Dazzan P, Dickie EW, Gallucci J, Lahti AC, Malhotra AK, Öngür D, Lencz T, Sarpal DK, Oliver LD. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in schizophrenia: current evidence, methodological advances, limitations and future directions. World Psychiatry 2024; 23:26-51. [PMID: 38214624 PMCID: PMC10786022 DOI: 10.1002/wps.21159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Functional neuroimaging emerged with great promise and has provided fundamental insights into the neurobiology of schizophrenia. However, it has faced challenges and criticisms, most notably a lack of clinical translation. This paper provides a comprehensive review and critical summary of the literature on functional neuroimaging, in particular functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), in schizophrenia. We begin by reviewing research on fMRI biomarkers in schizophrenia and the clinical high risk phase through a historical lens, moving from case-control regional brain activation to global connectivity and advanced analytical approaches, and more recent machine learning algorithms to identify predictive neuroimaging features. Findings from fMRI studies of negative symptoms as well as of neurocognitive and social cognitive deficits are then reviewed. Functional neural markers of these symptoms and deficits may represent promising treatment targets in schizophrenia. Next, we summarize fMRI research related to antipsychotic medication, psychotherapy and psychosocial interventions, and neurostimulation, including treatment response and resistance, therapeutic mechanisms, and treatment targeting. We also review the utility of fMRI and data-driven approaches to dissect the heterogeneity of schizophrenia, moving beyond case-control comparisons, as well as methodological considerations and advances, including consortia and precision fMRI. Lastly, limitations and future directions of research in the field are discussed. Our comprehensive review suggests that, in order for fMRI to be clinically useful in the care of patients with schizophrenia, research should address potentially actionable clinical decisions that are routine in schizophrenia treatment, such as which antipsychotic should be prescribed or whether a given patient is likely to have persistent functional impairment. The potential clinical utility of fMRI is influenced by and must be weighed against cost and accessibility factors. Future evaluations of the utility of fMRI in prognostic and treatment response studies may consider including a health economics analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aristotle N Voineskos
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute and Brain Health Imaging Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Colin Hawco
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute and Brain Health Imaging Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nicholas H Neufeld
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute and Brain Health Imaging Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jessica A Turner
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Stephanie H Ameis
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute and Brain Health Imaging Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Cundill Centre for Child and Youth Depression and McCain Centre for Child, Youth and Family Mental Health, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alan Anticevic
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Robert W Buchanan
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kristin Cadenhead
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Paola Dazzan
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Erin W Dickie
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute and Brain Health Imaging Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Julia Gallucci
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute and Brain Health Imaging Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Adrienne C Lahti
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Anil K Malhotra
- Institute for Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Zucker Hillside Hospital Division of Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA
| | - Dost Öngür
- McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA
| | - Todd Lencz
- Institute for Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Zucker Hillside Hospital Division of Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA
| | - Deepak K Sarpal
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lindsay D Oliver
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute and Brain Health Imaging Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chen P, Zhang S, Zhao K, Kang X, Rittman T, Liu Y. Robustly uncovering the heterogeneity of neurodegenerative disease by using data-driven subtyping in neuroimaging: A review. Brain Res 2024; 1823:148675. [PMID: 37979603 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2023.148675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases are associated with heterogeneity in genetics, pathology, and clinical manifestation. Understanding this heterogeneity is particularly relevant for clinical prognosis and stratifying patients for disease modifying treatments. Recently, data-driven methods based on neuroimaging have been applied to investigate the subtyping of neurodegenerative disease, helping to disentangle this heterogeneity. We reviewed brain-based subtyping studies in aging and representative neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, frontotemporal dementia, and Lewy body dementia, from January 2000 to November 2022. We summarized clustering methods, validation, robustness, reproducibility, and clinical relevance of 71 eligible studies in the present study. We found vast variations in approaches between studies, including ten neuroimaging modalities, 24 cluster algorithms, and 41 methods of cluster number determination. The clinical relevance of subtyping studies was evaluated by summarizing the analysis method of clinical measurements, showing a relatively low clinical utility in the current studies. Finally, we conclude that future studies of heterogeneity in neurodegenerative disease should focus on validation, comparison between subtyping approaches, and prioritise clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pindong Chen
- Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Shirui Zhang
- School of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China
| | - Kun Zhao
- School of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaopeng Kang
- Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Timothy Rittman
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Yong Liu
- Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Drossel G, Zilverstand A. Towards personalized medicine: subtyping using functional profiles. Neuropsychopharmacology 2024; 49:347-348. [PMID: 37580461 PMCID: PMC10700316 DOI: 10.1038/s41386-023-01704-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Gunner Drossel
- Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Anna Zilverstand
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
- Medical Discovery Team on Addiction, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Krainc D, Martin WJ, Casey B, Jensen FE, Tishkoff S, Potter WZ, Hyman SE. Shifting the trajectory of therapeutic development for neurological and psychiatric disorders. Sci Transl Med 2023; 15:eadg4775. [PMID: 38190501 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adg4775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Clinical trials for central nervous system disorders often enroll patients with unrecognized heterogeneous diseases, leading to costly trials that have high failure rates. Here, we discuss the potential of emerging technologies and datasets to elucidate disease mechanisms and identify biomarkers to improve patient stratification and monitoring of disease progression in clinical trials for neuropsychiatric disorders. Greater efforts must be centered on rigorously standardizing data collection and sharing of methods, datasets, and analytical tools across sectors. To address health care disparities in clinical trials, diversity of genetic ancestries and environmental exposures of research participants and associated biological samples must be prioritized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitri Krainc
- Davee Department of Neurology, Simpson Querrey Center for Neurogenetics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Bradford Casey
- Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, New York, NY, USA
| | - Frances E Jensen
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sarah Tishkoff
- Departments of Genetics and Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Steven E Hyman
- Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chai Y, Sheline YI, Oathes DJ, Balderston NL, Rao H, Yu M. Functional connectomics in depression: insights into therapies. Trends Cogn Sci 2023; 27:814-832. [PMID: 37286432 PMCID: PMC10476530 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Depression is a common mental disorder characterized by heterogeneous cognitive and behavioral symptoms. The emerging research paradigm of functional connectomics has provided a quantitative theoretical framework and analytic tools for parsing variations in the organization and function of brain networks in depression. In this review, we first discuss recent progress in depression-associated functional connectome variations. We then discuss treatment-specific brain network outcomes in depression and propose a hypothetical model highlighting the advantages and uniqueness of each treatment in relation to the modulation of specific brain network connectivity and symptoms of depression. Finally, we look to the future promise of combining multiple treatment types in clinical practice, using multisite datasets and multimodal neuroimaging approaches, and identifying biological depression subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya Chai
- Key Laboratory of Brain-Machine Intelligence for Information Behavior (Ministry of Education and Shanghai), School of Business and Management, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China; Center for Functional Neuroimaging, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Yvette I Sheline
- Center for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress (CNDS), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Desmond J Oathes
- Center for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress (CNDS), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Penn Brain Science, Translation, Innovation and Modulation Center (brainSTIM), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Nicholas L Balderston
- Center for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress (CNDS), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hengyi Rao
- Key Laboratory of Brain-Machine Intelligence for Information Behavior (Ministry of Education and Shanghai), School of Business and Management, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China; Center for Functional Neuroimaging, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Meichen Yu
- Indiana Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University Network Science Institute, Bloomington, IN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Constable PA, Lim JKH, Thompson DA. Retinal electrophysiology in central nervous system disorders. A review of human and mouse studies. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1215097. [PMID: 37600004 PMCID: PMC10433210 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1215097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
The retina and brain share similar neurochemistry and neurodevelopmental origins, with the retina, often viewed as a "window to the brain." With retinal measures of structure and function becoming easier to obtain in clinical populations there is a growing interest in using retinal findings as potential biomarkers for disorders affecting the central nervous system. Functional retinal biomarkers, such as the electroretinogram, show promise in neurological disorders, despite having limitations imposed by the existence of overlapping genetic markers, clinical traits or the effects of medications that may reduce their specificity in some conditions. This narrative review summarizes the principal functional retinal findings in central nervous system disorders and related mouse models and provides a background to the main excitatory and inhibitory retinal neurotransmitters that have been implicated to explain the visual electrophysiological findings. These changes in retinal neurochemistry may contribute to our understanding of these conditions based on the findings of retinal electrophysiological tests such as the flash, pattern, multifocal electroretinograms, and electro-oculogram. It is likely that future applications of signal analysis and machine learning algorithms will offer new insights into the pathophysiology, classification, and progression of these clinical disorders including autism, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, depression, Parkinson's, and Alzheimer's disease. New clinical applications of visual electrophysiology to this field may lead to earlier, more accurate diagnoses and better targeted therapeutic interventions benefiting individual patients and clinicians managing these individuals and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul A. Constable
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Jeremiah K. H. Lim
- Discipline of Optometry, School of Allied Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Dorothy A. Thompson
- The Tony Kriss Visual Electrophysiology Unit, Clinical and Academic Department of Ophthalmology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mattoni M, Smith DV, Olino TM. Characterizing heterogeneity in early adolescent reward networks and individualized associations with behavioral and clinical outcomes. Netw Neurosci 2023; 7:787-810. [PMID: 37397889 PMCID: PMC10312268 DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Associations between connectivity networks and behavioral outcomes such as depression are typically examined by comparing average networks between known groups. However, neural heterogeneity within groups may limit the ability to make inferences at the individual level as qualitatively distinct processes across individuals may be obscured in group averages. This study characterizes the heterogeneity of effective connectivity reward networks among 103 early adolescents and examines associations between individualized features and multiple behavioral and clinical outcomes. To characterize network heterogeneity, we used extended unified structural equation modeling to identify effective connectivity networks for each individual and an aggregate network. We found that an aggregate reward network was a poor representation of individuals, with most individual-level networks sharing less than 50% of the group-level network paths. We then used Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation to identify a group-level network, subgroups of individuals with similar networks, and individual-level networks. We identified three subgroups that appear to reflect differences in network maturity, but this solution had modest validity. Finally, we found numerous associations between individual-specific connectivity features and behavioral reward functioning and risk for substance use disorders. We suggest that accounting for heterogeneity is necessary to use connectivity networks for inferences precise to the individual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Mattoni
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David V. Smith
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Thomas M. Olino
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Byington N, Grimsrud G, Mooney MA, Cordova M, Doyle O, Hermosillo RJM, Earl E, Houghton A, Conan G, Hendrickson TJ, Ragothaman A, Carrasco CM, Rueter A, Perrone A, Moore LA, Graham A, Nigg JT, Thompson WK, Nelson SM, Feczko E, Fair DA, Miranda-Dominguez O. Polyneuro risk scores capture widely distributed connectivity patterns of cognition. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2023; 60:101231. [PMID: 36934605 PMCID: PMC10031023 DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) is a powerful tool for characterizing brain changes, but it has yet to reliably predict higher-order cognition. This may be attributed to small effect sizes of such brain-behavior relationships, which can lead to underpowered, variable results when utilizing typical sample sizes (N∼25). Inspired by techniques in genomics, we implement the polyneuro risk score (PNRS) framework - the application of multivariate techniques to RSFC data and validation in an independent sample. Utilizing the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development® cohort split into two datasets, we explore the framework's ability to reliably capture brain-behavior relationships across 3 cognitive scores - general ability, executive function, learning & memory. The weight and significance of each connection is assessed in the first dataset, and a PNRS is calculated for each participant in the second. Results support the PNRS framework as a suitable methodology to inspect the distribution of connections contributing towards behavior, with explained variance ranging from 1.0 % to 21.4 %. For the outcomes assessed, the framework reveals globally distributed, rather than localized, patterns of predictive connections. Larger samples are likely necessary to systematically identify the specific connections contributing towards complex outcomes. The PNRS framework could be applied translationally to identify neurologically distinct subtypes of neurodevelopmental disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Byington
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States.
| | - Gracie Grimsrud
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States
| | - Michael A Mooney
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, United States; Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, United States
| | - Michaela Cordova
- Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University/University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA 92120, United States
| | - Olivia Doyle
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, United States
| | - Robert J M Hermosillo
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States
| | - Eric Earl
- Data Science and Sharing Team, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States
| | - Audrey Houghton
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States
| | - Gregory Conan
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States
| | - Timothy J Hendrickson
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States
| | | | - Cristian Morales Carrasco
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States
| | - Amanda Rueter
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States
| | - Anders Perrone
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States
| | - Lucille A Moore
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States
| | - Alice Graham
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, United States
| | - Joel T Nigg
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, United States; Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, United States
| | - Wesley K Thompson
- Center for Population Neuroscience and Genetics, Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK 74136, United States
| | - Steven M Nelson
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States
| | - Eric Feczko
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States
| | - Damien A Fair
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States
| | - Oscar Miranda-Dominguez
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States
| |
Collapse
|