Impact of diabetes on outcomes in breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Complications and patient-reported outcomes after radiotherapy in breast cancer patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction: a retrospective study from a large Chinese breast disease center

BACKGROUND

Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) can influence the outcome of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). This study aims to investigate the complications and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following PMRT between direct-to-implant (DTI) and tissue expander-to-implant (TEI) reconstruction.

METHODS

The retrospective study included breast cancer patients undergoing IBBR and PMRT. Patients were divided into a permanent implant group (PI-PMRT) and a tissue expander group (TE-PMRT). Complications, reconstruction failure, and reoperation were compared between the two groups. PROs were assessed using the BREAST-Q scale.

RESULTS

A total of 203 patients were included: 99 in the PI-PMRT group and 104 in the TE-PMRT group. The incidence of severe capsular contracture was significantly higher in the PI-PMRT group compared to the TE-PMRT group (37.4% vs. 24.0%, p = 0.039). The PI-PMRT group had a significantly lower rate of reconstruction failure (9.1% vs. 19.2%, p = 0.039) and reoperation (13.1% vs. 24.0%, p = 0.046). Multivariate analysis revealed that the absence of mesh (OR = 2.177, p = 0.040) and DTI reconstruction (OR = 1.922, p = 0.046) were independent predictors of severe capsular contracture; the absence of mesh (OR = 4.699, p = 0.015) and TEI reconstruction (OR = 2.429, p = 0.043) were independent predictors of reconstruction failure. BREAST-Q scores indicated greater breast satisfaction in the PI-PMRT group (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Although DTI reconstruction resulted in a higher risk of severe capsular contracture, the higher risk of reconstruction failure and reoperation in patients undergoing TEI reconstruction was even more concerning. Furthermore, patients were more likely to report greater breast satisfaction with DTI reconstruction. Therefore, DTI reconstruction may be a more appropriate option for patients anticipating PMRT.

Closing the Loop on Revision: The Impact of Emotional Well-being on Elective Revision After Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

A diagnosis of breast cancer has a significant impact on a patient's physical and emotional health. Breast reconstruction improves quality of life and self-esteem following mastectomy. However, many patients undergo additional elective revision procedures after reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between perioperative emotional well-being and elective revisions in breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent breast reconstruction with a single surgeon between January 2007 and December 2017. Revision procedures were defined as additional operations that fall outside the index reconstructive plan. Medical records were reviewed for a history of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and/or major depressive disorder. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with revision.

RESULTS

A total of 775 patients undergoing breast reconstruction were included, of whom 121 (15.6%) underwent elective revision. Overall, a history of any psychiatric history (P < .001), depression alone (P = .001%), and GAD and depression together (P = .003) were significantly associated with revision surgery. On multivariate logistic regression controlling for comorbidities and reconstruction modality, depression alone, and GAD and depression together were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of revision surgery (odds ratio, 3.20, P < .001; odds ratio, 2.63, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative emotional well-being and reconstruction modality impact the rate of secondary revision surgery. An understanding of the surgical and patient-related risk factors for revision can provide more informed patient-decision making and improve surgical planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Goldilocks mastectomy with immediate reconstruction: enhancing aesthetic outcomes and preserving nipple complex

Despite significant advancements in early breast cancer detection, mastectomy remains a crucial treatment option for some patients. Immediate breast reconstruction post-mastectomy has emerged as an ideal procedure to minimize physical and psychosocial patient impacts, striving for improved cosmetic results. The "enhanced "Goldilocks mastectomy technique, characterized by nipple preservation or grafting and utilizing the fifth perforator anatomy, offers a sound approach to reconstruction in comorbid and large-breasted patients. This paper discusses the advantages, disadvantages, and real-world application of Goldilocks mastectomy in enhancing breast reconstruction outcomes and meeting patients' diverse needs.

Nafamostat mesylate decreases skin flap necrosis in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes by protecting the endothelial glycocalyx

The success rate of flap tissue reconstruction has increased in recent years owing to advancements in microsurgical techniques. However, complications, such as necrosis, are still more prevalent in diabetic patients compared to non-diabetic individuals, presenting an ongoing challenge. To address this issue, many previous studies have examined vascular anastomoses dilation and stability, primarily concerning surgical techniques or drugs. In contrast, in the present study, we focused on microvascular damage of the peripheral microvessels in patients with diabetes mellitus and the preventative impact of nafamostat mesylate. Herein, we aimed to investigate the effects of hyperglycemia on glycocalyx (GCX) levels in mice with type 2 diabetes. We examined the endothelial GCX (eGCX) in skin flap tissue of 9-12-week-old type 2 diabetic mice (db/db mice) using a perforator skin flap and explored treatment with nafamostat mesylate. The growth rates were compared after 1 week. Heterotype (db/+) mice were used as the control group. Morphological examination of postoperative tissues was performed at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days post-surgery. In addition, db/db mice were treated with 30 mg/kg/day of nafamostat mesylate daily and were evaluated on postoperative day 7. Seven days after surgery, all db/db mice showed significant partial flap necrosis. Temporal observation of the skin flaps revealed a stasis-like discoloration and necrosis starting from the contralateral side of the remaining perforating branch. The control group did not exhibit flap necrosis, and the flap remained intact. In the quantitative assessment of endothelial glycans using lectins, intensity scoring showed that the eGCX in the db/db group was significantly thinner than that in the db/+ group. These results were consistent with the scanning electron microscopy findings. In contrast, treatment with nafamostat mesylate significantly improved the flap engraftment rate and suppressed eGCX injury. In conclusion, treatment with nafamostat mesylate improves the disrupted eGCX structure of skin flap tissue in db/db mice, potentially ameliorating the impaired capillary-to-venous return in the skin flap tissue.

Postoperative Outcomes following Buried Penis Reconstruction: A Single-Institution Experience Using the Wisconsin Classification System

BACKGROUND

Adult acquired buried penis (AABP) is a complex condition often necessitating surgical intervention. This study sought to examine the validity of the Wisconsin Classification System (WCS) in guiding the surgical management of AABP. In addition, the authors aimed to identify which factors contribute to postoperative complications and persistent symptoms following AABP repair.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent surgical repair of AABP from 2015 to 2021 by the senior author at our institution. Patients were categorized according to anatomical characteristics using the WCS. Preoperative symptoms, postoperative symptoms, and postoperative complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients underwent AABP repair. The mean patient age was 56.5 ± 14.8 years, and the mean duration of follow-up was 350.0 ± 517.4 days. The assigned preoperative WCS score was congruent with operative management in most patients (86.0%). Morbid obesity (body mass index >40.0 kg/m 2 ) and postoperative complications were associated with persistent symptoms following AABP repair ( P = 0.026 and P = 0.021, respectively). Increased WCS score was not associated with persistent postoperative symptoms ( P = 0.314). Morbid obesity ( P = 0.003), diabetes ( P = 0.029), and having a panniculectomy during AABP repair ( P = 0.046) increased the odds of developing postoperative complications. Patients with type I AABP had significantly fewer complications than those with type II, III, or IV AABP ( P = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

The WCS serves as a preoperative guide and an educational tool for patients, and it provides a framework for the discussion of intraoperative maneuvers and the likelihood of complications. It is imperative that patients are counselled on the surgical management of AABP and the postoperative course, as this may permit realistic patient expectations and optimize outcomes.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

The causality between Type 2 diabetes and breast cancer: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Objective: Observational studies showed that Type 2 diabetes increased the risk of breast cancer, and vice versa. However, it is uncertain whether the link is causal or just due to confounding factors. Using bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis, we assessed the bidirectional causal relationship from a genetic level. Methods: Large genome-wide association studies yielded summary-level data for Type 2 diabetes and breast cancer. Results: Genetically predicted Type 2 diabetes presented no statistically significant association with overall breast cancer or its subtypes. Similarly, genetically predicted overall breast cancer or its subtypes had no causal effect on Type 2 diabetes. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. Conclusion: Our bidirectional Mendelian randomization studies revealed no causal links between Type 2 diabetes and breast cancer.

In hospital outcomes of autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction in patients with diabetes mellitus: A population-based study of 2015-2020 national inpatient sample

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstruction encompasses autologous (ABR) and implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) each with its own sets of potential complications. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with breast reconstruction complications, although most of the studies did not differentiate between the reconstruction procedures. This study conducted a population-based study examining impact of DM on inhospital outcomes in ABR and IBR.

METHODS

Patients underwent ABR or IBR were identified in National Inpatient Sample from Q4 2015 to 2020. A 1:2 propensity score matching was used to address differences in demographics, hospital characteristics, primary payer status, comorbidities, and reconstruction staging between DM and non-DM patients. In hospital outcomes were assessed separately in ABR and IBR.

RESULTS

There were 997 (7.68%) DM and 11,987 (92.32%) non-DM patients in ABR. Meanwhile, 1325 (7.38%) DM and 16,638 (92.62%) non-DM patients underwent IBR. DM cohorts in ABR and IBR were matched to 1930 and 2558 non-DM patients, respectively. After matching, DM patients in both ABR and IBR had higher risks of renal complications (ABR, 3.73% vs. 1.76%, p < 0.01; IBR, 1.83% vs. 0.78%, p = 0.01) and longer length of stay (ABR, p = 0.01; IBR, p = 0.04). In ABR, DM patients had higher respiratory complications (2.82% vs. 1.19%, p < 0.01), excessive scarring (2.72% vs. 1.55%, p = 0.03), and infection (2.42% vs. 1.14%, p = 0.01), while in IBR, DM patients had higher hemorrhage/hematoma (5.40% vs. 3.40%, p < 0.01) and transfer out (1.52% vs. 0.78%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

DM was associated with distinct sets of inhospital complications in ABR and IBR, which can be valuable for preoperative risk stratification and informing clinical decision-making for DM patients.

The impact of metabolic syndrome in breast reconstruction decision-making and postoperative outcomes: A nationwide analysis

BACKGROUND

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of cardiometabolic abnormalities including hypertension, obesity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia. The safety profiles of patients with MetS undergoing breast reconstruction remain underreported. This study aims to evaluate the impact of MetS on the BR decision-making process and postoperative complication rates.

METHODS

The ACS-NSQIP database was utilized to identify women who underwent BR between 2012 and 2021. Baseline characteristics were compared based on the presence of MetS, defined as patients receiving medical treatment for diabetes mellitus and hypertension, with a body mass index greater than 30 kg/m2. Group differences were assessed using t tests and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression models evaluated postoperative complications between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 160,115 patients underwent BR. A total of 4570 had a diagnosis of MetS compared to 155,545 without MetS. No statistically significant differences were observed in the type of BR patients received across cohorts. Logistic regression models demonstrated a higher likelihood of postoperative wound complications (OR 2.21; 95% CI 1.399, 3.478; p = 0.001), and readmission rates (OR 2.045; 95% CI 1.337, 3.128; p = 0.001) in the MetS group compared to the non-MetS patients. No significant differences were identified in other postoperative complications between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MetS appear to have an increased risk of postoperative wound complications and readmission after breast reconstruction. The synergistic effects of these comorbidities on postoperative outcomes underscore the importance of addressing MetS as a holistic condition and considering choosing Delayed breast reconstruction over Immediate Breast Reconstruction in this population. Thus, integrating MetS management and patient counseling at various stages of BR may improve outcomes and facilitate patient decision-making.

Risk Factors and Complications in Reduction Mammaplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Reduction mammaplasty (RM) has become established as the standard effective method for treating macromastia, but reports on the risk factors that predispose to postoperative complications have been conflicting. This meta-analysis aimed to pool the available data to identify predictors of complications following RM.

METHODS

The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases were screened from inception to 1 Jan 2022, and studies were included based on predefined criteria. The perioperative risk factors BMI, smoking, age, diabetes, radiation therapy, and tissue resection weight were extracted and their correlation with complications assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 40 studies comprising of 5908 patients were included. BMI ≥ 30kg/m2 (OR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.35-2.02; p < 0.01) and ≥ 40 kg/m2 (OR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.26-3.08; p < 0.01), smoking (OR = 2.57, 95% CI 2.01-3.28; p < 0.01), diabetes (OR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.19-4.07; p < 0.05), a unilateral resection weight ≥ 1000 g (OR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.02-3.05; p < 0.05), and radiation therapy (OR = 11.11, 95% CI 2.01-3.28; p < 0.01) were associated with higher rates of postoperative complications. Obese patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) were more likely to experience fat necrosis (OR = 3.00, 95% CI 1.37-6.57; p < 0.01) and infection (OR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.15-2.40; p < 0.05). Smokers had a 2.03 times higher risk of infection (95% CI 1.24-3.31; p < 0.01) and 2.34 times higher risk of dehiscence (95% CI 1.38-3.98; p < 0.01). No association between complication occurrence and age 40 or 50 years or total tissue resection weight ≥ 1000 g was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides evidence that obesity, smoking, diabetes, unilateral resection weight ≥ 1000 g, and preoperative radiation therapy predispose to complication occurrence in RM. This information can optimize the ability of surgeons to provide preoperative patient education, perioperative assessment, and postoperative care planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Predictors of Complications in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using DIEP Flaps: Implications for Management

BACKGROUND

Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps are the standard for autologous breast reconstruction. This study investigated risk factors for DIEP complications in a large, contemporary cohort to optimize surgical evaluation and planning.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent DIEP breast reconstruction between 2016 and 2020 at an academic institution. Demographics, treatment, and outcomes were evaluated in univariable and multivariable regression models for postoperative complications.

RESULTS

In total, 802 DIEP flaps were performed in 524 patients (mean age, 51.2 ± 9.6 years; mean body mass index, 29.3 ± 4.5). Most patients (87%) had breast cancer; 15% were BRCA -positive. There were 282 (53%) delayed and 242 (46%) immediate reconstructions and 278 (53%) bilateral and 246 (47%) unilateral reconstructions. Overall complications occurred in 81 patients (15.5%), including venous congestion (3.4%), breast hematoma (3.6%), infection (3.6%), partial flap loss (3.2%), total flap loss (2.3%), and arterial thrombosis (1.3%). Longer operative time was significantly associated with bilateral immediate reconstructions and higher body mass index. Prolonged operative time (OR, 1.16; P = 0.001) and immediate reconstruction (OR, 1.92; P = 0.013) were significant predictors of overall complications. Partial flap loss was associated with bilateral immediate reconstructions, higher body mass index, current smoking status, and longer operative time.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged operative time is a significant risk factor for overall complications and partial flap loss in DIEP breast reconstruction. For each additional hour of surgical time, the risk of developing overall complications increases by 16%. These findings suggest that reducing operative time through co-surgeon approaches, consistency in surgical teams, and counseling patients with more risk factors toward delayed reconstructions may mitigate complications.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

The surgical patient of yesterday, today, and tomorrow-a time-trend analysis based on a cohort of 8.7 million surgical patients

BACKGROUND

Global healthcare delivery is challenged by the aging population and the increase in obesity and type 2 diabetes. The extent to which such trends affect the cohort of patients the authors surgically operate on remains to be elucidated. Comprising of 8.7 million surgical patients, the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database can be analyzed to investigate the echo of general population dynamics and forecast future trends.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The authors reviewed the ACS-NSQIP database (2008-2020) in its entirety, extracting patient age, BMI, and diabetes prevalence. Based on these data, the authors forecasted future trends up to 2030 using a drift model.

RESULTS

During the review period, median age increased by 3 years, and median BMI by 0.9 kg/m2. The proportion of patients with overweight, obesity class I, and class II rates increased. The prevalence of diabetes rose between 2008 (14.9%) and 2020 (15.3%). The authors forecast the median age in 2030 to reach 61.5 years and median BMI to climb to 29.8 kg/m2. Concerningly, in 2030, eight of ten surgical patients are projected to have a BMI above normal. Diabetes prevalence is projected to rise to 15.6% over the next decade.

CONCLUSION

General population trends echo in the field of surgery, with the surgical cohort aging at an alarmingly rapid rate and increasingly suffering from obesity and diabetes. These trends show no sign of abating without dedicated efforts and call for urgent measures and fundamental re-structuring for improved future surgical care.

The Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Breast Reconstruction Outcomes and Complications: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

As the incidence of breast cancer and diabetes rises, so does the number of patients with diabetes undergoing breast reconstruction (BR). Patients with diabetes are at a higher risk for post-operative complications. The current study examined the effects of diabetes on BR wound outcomes and overall complications post-operatively.

METHODS

This study followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We conducted a systematic search and meta-analysis for published articles on the effects of DM on BR in January 2022 using the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases. Diabetes, breast reconstruction, and complications were used as keywords.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and five provided data to be included in the meta-analysis published between 2006 and 2020. A total of 19,731 patients (9.07%) had diabetes, whereas 197,812 patients had no diabetes. The results of the pooled outcomes revealed no differences in the risk of total flap loss (p = 0.892) and wound infection (p = 0.579,). Nevertheless, the risk of wound dehiscence was significantly higher among patients with diabetes than their non-diabetic counterparts (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Diabetic patients undergoing BR have a significantly higher risk of wound dehiscence. As a result of the adverse effects of diabetes status on BR outcomes, patients need to be counseled about optimizing their diabetes management before surgery. Because of the heterogeneity in our results, prospective randomized studies are needed to shed light on the consequences of diabetes mellitus in BR surgeries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

[Position statement: surgery and diabetes mellitus (Update 2023)]

This position statement reflects the perspective of the Austrian Diabetes Association concerning the perioperative management of people with diabetes mellitus based on the available scientific evidence. The paper covers necessary preoperative examinations from an internal/diabetological point of view as well as the perioperative metabolic control by means of oral antihyperglycemic and/or insulin therapy.