1
|
Hartner AM, Li X, Gaythorpe K. COVID-19 related disruption and resilience in immunisation activities in LMICs: a rapid review. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e076607. [PMID: 39107008 PMCID: PMC11331918 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/09/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We conducted a rapid review to determine the extent that immunisation services in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) were disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic and synthesised the factors that can be used to build resilience in future. DESIGN Rapid review reported in accordance with the Preferred reporting for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. DATA SOURCES PubMed and Web of Science were searched through 6 October 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES We included studies that focused on disruption to immunisation activities due to the COVID-19 pandemic in LMICs. Outcomes included routine vaccine coverage, supplementary immunisation activities, vaccine doses, timing of vaccination, supply chain changes, and factors contributing to disruption or resilience. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen and code studies. Quality assessment was performed using a modified version of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for qualitative research. Findings were summarised qualitatively. RESULTS Of 4978 identified studies, 85 met the eligibility criteria. Included studies showed declines in immunisation activities across LMICs related to the COVID-19 pandemic. These included reductions in achieved routine coverage, cancellation or postponement of campaigns and underimmunised cohorts. Immunisation was most disrupted in the early months of the pandemic; however, recovery varied by country, age-group and vaccine. Though many countries observed partial recovery in 2020, disruption in many countries continued into 2021. It has also been noted that clinician staff shortages and vaccine stock-outs caused by supply chain disruptions contributed to immunisation delays, but that concern over COVID-19 transmission was a leading factor. Key resiliency factors included community outreach and healthcare worker support. CONCLUSIONS There is limited information on whether reductions in vaccination coverage or delays have persisted beyond 2021. Further research is needed to assess ongoing disruptions and identify missed vaccine cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Maria Hartner
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Jameel Institute, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Centre for Artificial Intelligence in Public Health Research, Robert Koch Institute, Wildau, Germany
| | - Xiang Li
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Jameel Institute, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Katy Gaythorpe
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Jameel Institute, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Summan A, Nandi A, Laxminarayan R. Analysis of anthropometric outcomes in Indian children during the COVID-19 pandemic using National Family Health Survey data. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2024; 4:127. [PMID: 38951653 PMCID: PMC11217468 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-024-00543-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disruptions in food, health, and economic systems during the COVID-19 pandemic may have adversely affected child health. There is currently limited research on the potential effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on stunting, wasting, and underweight status of young children. METHODS We examine the short-term associations between the pandemic and anthropometric outcomes of under-5 children (n = 232,920) in India, using data from the National Family Health Survey (2019-2021). Children surveyed after March 2020 are considered as the post-COVID group, while those surveyed earlier are considered as pre-COVID. Potential biases arising from differences in socioeconomic characteristics of the two groups are mitigated using propensity score matching methods. RESULTS Post-COVID children surveyed in 2020 and 2021 have 1.2% higher underweight rates, 1.2% lower wasting rates, 0.1 lower height-for-age z-scores (HAZ), and 0.04 lower weight-for-height z-scores as compared with matched pre-COVID children. Post-COVID children surveyed in 2020 have 1.6%, 4.6%, and 2.4% higher stunting, underweight, and wasting rates, respectively, and 0.07 lower HAZ, as compared with matched pre-COVID children. Reductions in nutritional status are largest among children from households in the poorest wealth quintiles. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate a trend towards a recovery in child anthropometric outcomes in 2021 after the initial post-pandemic reductions. The resilience of health and food systems to shocks such as COVID-19 should be strengthened while immediate investments are required to decrease child malnutrition and improve broader child health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Summan
- One Health Trust, 5636 Connecticut Avenue NW, PO Box 42735, Washington, DC, 20015, USA
| | - Arindam Nandi
- One Health Trust, 5636 Connecticut Avenue NW, PO Box 42735, Washington, DC, 20015, USA.
- The Population Council, 1 Dag Hammarskjold Plaza, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
| | - Ramanan Laxminarayan
- One Health Trust, Obeya Pulse, First Floor, 7/1, Halasur Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560042, India
- High Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Guyot Hall, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Randell M, Wahyono TYM, Dynes M, Tinessia A, Li M, Danchin M, Oktarinda, Fitriyani F, Saraswati LD, Jenkins K, Aung KD, Noorzad AK, Shetye M, Dewi L, Yosephine P, Leask J, Sheel M. Service disruptions, trauma and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare providers delivering immunisation and maternal and child health services in Indonesia. BMJ Glob Health 2024; 9:e014318. [PMID: 38950913 PMCID: PMC11216070 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in extreme strain on health systems including the health workforce, essential health services and vaccination coverage. We examined disruptions to immunisation and maternal and child health (MCH) services, concerns of personal well-being and delivery of healthcare during the pandemic as well as factors associated with self-reported trauma or burnout among healthcare providers (HCPs). METHODS In March-April 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among HCPs in two provinces of Indonesia. HCPs involved in COVID-19 or routine immunisation and MCH services were randomly selected from district/city health office registration lists. We descriptively analysed service disruptions experienced by HCPs as well as trauma, burnout and concerns of personal well-being and delivery of healthcare during the pandemic. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were undertaken to identify factors associated with trauma or burnout. RESULTS We recruited 604 HCPs. Mobilisation of staff from routine health services to COVID-19 response duties was a key reason for service disruptions (87.9%). Strategies such as community outreach and task shifting were implemented to overcome disruptions. Trauma or burnout during the pandemic was reported by 64.1% HCPs, with 23.5% reporting worse mental or emotional health.Factors associated with trauma or burnout included delivery of COVID-19 immunisation (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.54, 95% CI 1.08 to 5.94); and delivery of both COVID-19 immunisation and routine immunisation compared with no involvement in vaccination programmes (aOR 2.42, 95% CI 1.06 to 5.52); poor treatment in the workplace (aOR 2.26, 95% CI 1.51 to 3.38) and lower confidence to respond to patient queries on COVID-19 immunisation (aOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.22). CONCLUSION HCPs experienced service disruptions, trauma and burnout and implemented strategies to minimise disruptions to service delivery and improve patient experiences. Our study highlights the need to ensure that workforce resilience and strategies to protect and support HCPs are considered for pandemic planning, preparedness and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine Randell
- The University of Sydney, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tri Yunis Miko Wahyono
- Universitas Indonesia, Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Michelle Dynes
- UNICEF East Asia and Pacific Regional Office, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Adeline Tinessia
- The University of Sydney, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mu Li
- The University of Sydney, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Margie Danchin
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Oktarinda
- Universitas Indonesia, Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Fitriyani Fitriyani
- Universitas Indonesia, Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Lintang Dian Saraswati
- Universitas Diponegoro, Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Kylie Jenkins
- The University of Sydney, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Lulu Dewi
- Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Prima Yosephine
- Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Julie Leask
- The University of Sydney, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Meru Sheel
- The University of Sydney, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kuandyk (Sabitova) A, Ortega MA, Ntegwa MJ, Sarria-Santamera A. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to and delivery of maternal and child healthcare services in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1346268. [PMID: 38655525 PMCID: PMC11036866 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1346268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has had a multifaceted impact on maternal and child services and adversely influenced pregnancy outcomes. This systematic review aims to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to and delivery of maternal and child healthcare services in low- and middle-income countries. Methods The review was reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A primary search of electronic databases was performed using a combination of search terms related to the following areas of interest: "impact' AND 'COVID-19' AND 'maternal and child health services' AND 'low- and middle-income countries. A narrative synthesis approach was used to analyse and integrate the results. Results Overall, 45 unique studies conducted across 28 low- and middle-income countries met the inclusion criteria for the review. The findings suggest the number of family planning visits, antenatal and postnatal care visits, consultations for sick children, paediatric emergency visits and child immunisation levels decreased compared to the pre-pandemic levels in the majority of included studies. An analytical framework including four main categories was developed based on the concepts that emerged from included studies: the anxiety of not knowing (1), overwhelmed healthcare systems (2), challenges perceived by healthcare professionals (3) and difficulties perceived by service users (4). Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted family planning services, antenatal and postnatal care coverage, and emergency and routine child services. Generalised conclusions are tentative due to the heterogeneity and inconsistent quality of the included studies. Future research is recommended to define the pandemic's impact on women and children worldwide and prepare healthcare systems for future resurgences of COVID-19 and potential challenges beyond. Systematic review registration PROSPERO (CRD42021285178).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Kuandyk (Sabitova)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan
| | - Miguel-Angel Ortega
- Department of Medicine and Medical Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain
| | | | - Antonio Sarria-Santamera
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jain G, Prajapati RKP, Bisen V. Assessing the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Maternal and Child Health Services: A Comprehensive Analysis of Government Initiatives in Northern India. Cureus 2024; 16:e56313. [PMID: 38629024 PMCID: PMC11020602 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly impacted healthcare services globally, with particular challenges observed in maternal and child health (MCH) care. This study aimed to assess the impact of the pandemic on MCH services in northern India, focusing on key government programs. METHODS Data were collected from four major MCH programs in India: Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY), Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakram (JSSK), Pradhan Mantri Surakshit Matritva Abhiyan (PMSMA), and the Universal Immunization Program (UIP). The study compared MCH service utilization and outcomes during the pandemic period (March-September 2020) with the same period in 2019. RESULTS Preliminary findings indicated a significant reduction in the utilization of MCH services during the pandemic, with a decrease observed in institutional deliveries, antenatal care visits, and immunization coverage. For instance, institutional deliveries declined by 30% compared with the previous year, with a similar decrease observed in antenatal care visits. Immunization coverage also decreased by approximately 25%, indicating a substantial decline in preventive care services. Challenges in accessing essential treatments for sick infants have also been reported, with a 40% decrease in the utilization of free treatment services under the JSSK program. CONCLUSION The COVID-19 pandemic has substantially impacted MCH services in northern India, highlighting the vulnerability of these essential health programs during public health emergencies. Addressing the challenges identified in this study is crucial to ensuring the continuity and resilience of MCH services in similar settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garima Jain
- Department of Management Sciences, Institute of Co-operative and Corporate Management, Research and Training, Lucknow, IND
| | - Ram Komal Prasad Prajapati
- Department of Management Sciences, Institute of Co-operative and Corporate Management, Research and Training, Lucknow, IND
| | - Vikram Bisen
- Department of Management Sciences, Basudev Institute of Management and Technology, Lucknow, IND
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Singh T, Kaur R, Kant S, Mani K, Yadav K, Gupta SK. Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on utilization of maternal healthcare services in a rural area of Haryana - A record-based comparative study. J Family Med Prim Care 2023; 12:2640-2644. [PMID: 38186835 PMCID: PMC10771182 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_99_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic posed a challenge for the public health system, as all the health facilities and manpower were diverted for the delivery of COVID-19-related services. This affected the provision of routine health services, including maternal healthcare services. There is a paucity of data from rural and primary healthcare settings, as the earlier studies were either modelling-based or from tertiary care centres. Materials and Methods This record-based study was conducted in 12 subcentres in the district Faridabad of Haryana. Data of pregnant women registered during 1 April to 30 September in the years 2017-2020 were retrieved. The utilization of maternal healthcare services among women registered during 1 April 2020 to 30 September 2020 was compared with those registered in the same period during the preceding 3 years (2017-2019). Results There was a significant decline in utilization of maternal healthcare services. Services like minimum four antenatal visits declined from 67.8% to 48.3% (P < 0.0001), at least 100 iron-folic acid tablets (45.4-20.9%; P < 0.001), and examination at each visit (90.8-72.3%; P < 0.001). The proportion of pregnant women who received full antenatal care decreased from 26.0% to 10.7% (P < 0.001). There was a significant increase in delivery in private health facilities (40.9-49.9%) and delivery by caesarean section (21.6-27.3%; P = 0.002). Conclusion COVID-19 pandemic had an adverse effect on utilization of maternal healthcare services. Effective planning and coordination between different levels of government health facilities and primary care providers, including family physicians, can ensure uninterrupted provision of essential services during similar emergencies in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tejbeer Singh
- Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Ravneet Kaur
- Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Shashi Kant
- Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Kalaivani Mani
- Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Kapil Yadav
- Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Sanjeev Kumar Gupta
- Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Angeles G, Silverstein H, Ahsan KZ, Kibria MG, Rakib NA, Escudero G, Singh K, Mpiima J, Simmons E, Weiss W. Estimating the effects of COVID-19 on essential health services utilization in Uganda and Bangladesh using data from routine health information systems. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1129581. [PMID: 37829090 PMCID: PMC10564984 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1129581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Since March 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a major shock to health systems across the world. We examined national usage patterns for selected basic, essential health services, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Uganda and Bangladesh, to determine whether COVID-19 affected reporting of service utilization and the use of health services in each country. Methods We used routine health information system data since January 2017 to analyze reporting and service utilization patterns for a variety of health services. Using time series models to replicate pre-COVID-19 trajectories over time we estimated what levels would have been observed if COVID-19 had not occurred during the pandemic months, starting in March 2020. The difference between the observed and predicted levels is the COVID-19 effect on health services. Results The time trend models for Uganda and Bangladesh closely replicated the levels and trajectories of service utilization during the 38 months prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results indicate that COVID-19 had severe effects across all services, particularly during the first months of the pandemic, but COVID-19 impacts on health services and subsequent recovery varied by service type. In general, recovery to expected levels was slow and incomplete across the most affected services. Conclusion Our analytical approach based on national information system data could be very useful as a form of surveillance for health services disruptions from any cause leading to rapid responses from health service managers and policymakers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Angeles
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Hannah Silverstein
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Karar Zunaid Ahsan
- Public Health Leadership Program, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Mohammad Golam Kibria
- Carolina Health Informatics Program, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Nibras Ar Rakib
- Carolina Health Informatics Program, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Gabriela Escudero
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Kavita Singh
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | | | - Elizabeth Simmons
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - William Weiss
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wagner Z, Heft-Neal S, Wang Z, Jing R, Bendavid E. Infant and Neonatal Mortality During the Covid-19 Pandemic: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis From Five Low- and Middle-Income Countries. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.08.03.23293619. [PMID: 37609306 PMCID: PMC10441505 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.03.23293619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Background The Covid-19 pandemic led to widespread changes to health and social institutions. The effects of the pandemic on neonatal and infant health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are poorly understood, and nationally representative data characterizing changes to health care and outcomes is only now emerging. Methods We used nationally representative survey data with vital status and perinatal care information on 2,959,203 children born in India, Madagascar, Cambodia, Nepal, and the Philippines. Using interrupted time series models, we estimated the change in neonatal mortality (death in first 30 days of life) and infant mortality (death in first year of life) following the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, controlling for granular location fixed-effects and seasonality. Findings We analyzed 2,935,052 births (146,820 deaths) before March 2020 and 24,151 births (799 deaths) after March 2020. We estimated that infant mortality increased by 9.9 deaths per 1,000 live births after March 2020 (95% CI 5.0, 15.0; p<0.01; 22% increase) and neonatal mortality increased by 6.7 deaths per 1,000 live births (95% CI 2.4, 11.1; p<0.01; 27% increase). We observe increased mortality in all study countries. We also estimated a 3.8 percentage point reduction in antenatal care use (95% CI -4.9, -2.7; p<0.01) and a 5.6 percentage point reduction in facility deliveries (95% CI -7.2, -4.0; p<0.01) during the pandemic. Interpretation Since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, neonatal and infant mortality are higher than expected in five LMICs. Helping LMICs resume pre-pandemic declines in neonatal and infant mortality should be a major global priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Wagner
- Department of Economics, Sociology, and Statistics, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA
- Pardee RAND Graduate School, Santa Monica, CA
| | - Sam Heft-Neal
- Center on Food Security and the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Zetianyu Wang
- Department of Economics, Sociology, and Statistics, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA
- Pardee RAND Graduate School, Santa Monica, CA
| | - Renzhi Jing
- Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Eran Bendavid
- Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
- Department of Health Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|