1
|
Rhind N. In through the out door: A loop-binding-first model for topological cohesin loading. Bioessays 2024:e2400120. [PMID: 39159466 DOI: 10.1002/bies.202400120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2024] [Revised: 08/04/2024] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
Cohesin is a ring-shaped complex that is loaded on DNA in two different conformations. In one conformation, it forms loops to organize the interphase genome; in the other, it topologically encircles sibling chromosomes to facilitate homologous recombination and to establish the cohesion that is required for orderly segregation during mitosis. How, and even if, these two loading conformation are related is unclear. Here, I propose that loop binding is a required first step for topological binding. This loop-binding-first model integrates the known information about the two loading mechanisms, explains genetic requirements for the two and explains how topological loading evolved from loop binding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Rhind
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biotechnology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cameron G, Gruszka D, Xie S, Kaya Ç, Nasmyth KA, Srinivasan M, Yardimci H. Sister chromatid cohesion establishment during DNA replication termination. Science 2024; 384:119-124. [PMID: 38484038 PMCID: PMC7615807 DOI: 10.1126/science.adf0224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
Newly copied sister chromatids are tethered together by the cohesin complex, but how sister chromatid cohesion coordinates with DNA replication is poorly understood. Prevailing models suggest that cohesin complexes, bound to DNA before replication, remain behind the advancing replication fork to keep sister chromatids together. By visualizing single replication forks colliding with preloaded cohesin complexes, we find that the replisome instead pushes cohesin to where a converging replisome is met. Whereas the converging replisomes are removed during DNA replication termination, cohesin remains on nascent DNA and provides cohesion. Additionally, we show that CMG (CDC45-MCM2-7-GINS) helicase disassembly during replication termination is vital for proper cohesion in budding yeast. Together, our results support a model wherein sister chromatid cohesion is established during DNA replication termination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sherry Xie
- The Francis Crick Institute; London, United Kingdom
| | - Çağla Kaya
- The Francis Crick Institute; London, United Kingdom
| | - Kim A Nasmyth
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford; Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Golov AK, Gavrilov AA. Cohesin-Dependent Loop Extrusion: Molecular Mechanics and Role in Cell Physiology. BIOCHEMISTRY. BIOKHIMIIA 2024; 89:601-625. [PMID: 38831499 DOI: 10.1134/s0006297924040023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
The most prominent representatives of multisubunit SMC complexes, cohesin and condensin, are best known as structural components of mitotic chromosomes. It turned out that these complexes, as well as their bacterial homologues, are molecular motors, the ATP-dependent movement of these complexes along DNA threads leads to the formation of DNA loops. In recent years, we have witnessed an avalanche-like accumulation of data on the process of SMC dependent DNA looping, also known as loop extrusion. This review briefly summarizes the current understanding of the place and role of cohesin-dependent extrusion in cell physiology and presents a number of models describing the potential molecular mechanism of extrusion in a most compelling way. We conclude the review with a discussion of how the capacity of cohesin to extrude DNA loops may be mechanistically linked to its involvement in sister chromatid cohesion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arkadiy K Golov
- Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119334, Russia.
- Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 3525433, Israel
| | - Alexey A Gavrilov
- Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119334, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Golov AK, Gavrilov AA. Cohesin Complex: Structure and Principles of Interaction with DNA. BIOCHEMISTRY. BIOKHIMIIA 2024; 89:585-600. [PMID: 38831498 DOI: 10.1134/s0006297924040011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
Accurate duplication and separation of long linear genomic DNA molecules is associated with a number of purely mechanical problems. SMC complexes are key components of the cellular machinery that ensures decatenation of sister chromosomes and compaction of genomic DNA during division. Cohesin, one of the essential eukaryotic SMC complexes, has a typical ring structure with intersubunit pore through which DNA molecules can be threaded. Capacity of cohesin for such topological entrapment of DNA is crucial for the phenomenon of post-replicative association of sister chromatids better known as cohesion. Recently, it became apparent that cohesin and other SMC complexes are, in fact, motor proteins with a very peculiar movement pattern leading to formation of DNA loops. This specific process has been called loop extrusion. Extrusion underlies multiple functions of cohesin beyond cohesion, but molecular mechanism of the process remains a mystery. In this review, we summarized the data on molecular architecture of cohesin, effect of ATP hydrolysis cycle on this architecture, and known modes of cohesin-DNA interactions. Many of the seemingly disparate facts presented here will probably be incorporated in a unified mechanistic model of loop extrusion in the not-so-distant future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arkadiy K Golov
- Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119334, Russia.
- Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 3525433, Israel
| | - Alexey A Gavrilov
- Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119334, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ochs F, Green C, Szczurek AT, Pytowski L, Kolesnikova S, Brown J, Gerlich DW, Buckle V, Schermelleh L, Nasmyth KA. Sister chromatid cohesion is mediated by individual cohesin complexes. Science 2024; 383:1122-1130. [PMID: 38452070 DOI: 10.1126/science.adl4606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
Eukaryotic genomes are organized by loop extrusion and sister chromatid cohesion, both mediated by the multimeric cohesin protein complex. Understanding how cohesin holds sister DNAs together, and how loss of cohesion causes age-related infertility in females, requires knowledge as to cohesin's stoichiometry in vivo. Using quantitative super-resolution imaging, we identified two discrete populations of chromatin-bound cohesin in postreplicative human cells. Whereas most complexes appear dimeric, cohesin that localized to sites of sister chromatid cohesion and associated with sororin was exclusively monomeric. The monomeric stoichiometry of sororin:cohesin complexes demonstrates that sister chromatid cohesion is conferred by individual cohesin rings, a key prediction of the proposal that cohesion arises from the co-entrapment of sister DNAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fena Ochs
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK
| | - Charlotte Green
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK
| | | | - Lior Pytowski
- Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, UK
| | - Sofia Kolesnikova
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna Austria
- Vienna BioCenter PhD Program, Doctoral School of the University of Vienna and Medical University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna Austria
| | - Jill Brown
- MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK
| | - Daniel Wolfram Gerlich
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna Austria
| | - Veronica Buckle
- MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Murayama Y, Endo S, Kurokawa Y, Kurita A, Iwasaki S, Araki H. Coordination of cohesin and DNA replication observed with purified proteins. Nature 2024; 626:653-660. [PMID: 38267580 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-07003-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Two newly duplicated copies of genomic DNA are held together by the ring-shaped cohesin complex to ensure faithful inheritance of the genome during cell division1-3. Cohesin mediates sister chromatid cohesion by topologically entrapping two sister DNAs during DNA replication4,5, but how cohesion is established at the replication fork is poorly understood. Here, we studied the interplay between cohesin and replication by reconstituting a functional replisome using purified proteins. Once DNA is encircled before replication, the cohesin ring accommodates replication in its entirety, from initiation to termination, leading to topological capture of newly synthesized DNA. This suggests that topological cohesin loading is a critical molecular prerequisite to cope with replication. Paradoxically, topological loading per se is highly rate limiting and hardly occurs under the replication-competent physiological salt concentration. This inconsistency is resolved by the replisome-associated cohesion establishment factors Chl1 helicase and Ctf4 (refs. 6,7), which promote cohesin loading specifically during continuing replication. Accordingly, we found that bubble DNA, which mimics the state of DNA unwinding, induces topological cohesin loading and this is further promoted by Chl1. Thus, we propose that cohesin converts the initial electrostatic DNA-binding mode to a topological embrace when it encounters unwound DNA structures driven by enzymatic activities including replication. Together, our results show how cohesin initially responds to replication, and provide a molecular model for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuto Murayama
- Department of Chromosome Science, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Japan.
- Department of Genetics, Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOUKENDAI), Mishima, Japan.
- PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Kawaguchi, Japan.
| | - Shizuko Endo
- Department of Chromosome Science, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Japan
| | - Yumiko Kurokawa
- Department of Chromosome Science, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Japan
- Department of Genetics, Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOUKENDAI), Mishima, Japan
| | - Ayako Kurita
- Department of Chromosome Science, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Japan
| | - Sanae Iwasaki
- Department of Chromosome Science, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Araki
- Department of Chromosome Science, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Japan
- Joint Support-Centre for Data Science Research, Research Organisation of Information and Systems, Tachikawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nasmyth KA, Lee BG, Roig MB, Löwe J. What AlphaFold tells us about cohesin's retention on and release from chromosomes. eLife 2023; 12:RP88656. [PMID: 37975572 PMCID: PMC10656103 DOI: 10.7554/elife.88656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Cohesin is a trimeric complex containing a pair of SMC proteins (Smc1 and Smc3) whose ATPase domains at the end of long coiled coils (CC) are interconnected by Scc1. During interphase, it organizes chromosomal DNA topology by extruding loops in a manner dependent on Scc1's association with two large hook-shaped proteins called SA (yeast: Scc3) and Nipbl (Scc2). The latter's replacement by Pds5 recruits Wapl, which induces release from chromatin via a process requiring dissociation of Scc1's N-terminal domain (NTD) from Smc3. If blocked by Esco (Eco)-mediated Smc3 acetylation, cohesin containing Pds5 merely maintains pre-existing loops, but a third fate occurs during DNA replication, when Pds5-containing cohesin associates with Sororin and forms structures that hold sister DNAs together. How Wapl induces and Sororin blocks release has hitherto remained mysterious. In the 20 years since their discovery, not a single testable hypothesis has been proposed as to their role. Here, AlphaFold 2 (AF) three-dimensional protein structure predictions lead us to propose formation of a quarternary complex between Wapl, SA, Pds5, and Scc1's NTD, in which the latter is juxtaposed with (and subsequently sequestered by) a highly conserved cleft within Wapl's C-terminal domain. AF also reveals how Scc1's dissociation from Smc3 arises from a distortion of Smc3's CC induced by engagement of SMC ATPase domains, how Esco acetyl transferases are recruited to Smc3 by Pds5, and how Sororin prevents release by binding to the Smc3/Scc1 interface. Our hypotheses explain the phenotypes of numerous existing mutations and are highly testable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim A Nasmyth
- Department of Biochemistry, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Byung-Gil Lee
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular BiologyCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | | | - Jan Löwe
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular BiologyCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kaur P, Lu X, Xu Q, Irvin EM, Pappas C, Zhang H, Finkelstein IJ, Shi Z, Tao YJ, Yu H, Wang H. High-speed AFM imaging reveals DNA capture and loop extrusion dynamics by cohesin-NIPBL. J Biol Chem 2023; 299:105296. [PMID: 37774974 PMCID: PMC10656236 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
3D chromatin organization plays a critical role in regulating gene expression, DNA replication, recombination, and repair. While initially discovered for its role in sister chromatid cohesion, emerging evidence suggests that the cohesin complex (SMC1, SMC3, RAD21, and SA1/SA2), facilitated by NIPBL, mediates topologically associating domains and chromatin loops through DNA loop extrusion. However, information on how conformational changes of cohesin-NIPBL drive its loading onto DNA, initiation, and growth of DNA loops is still lacking. In this study, high-speed atomic force microscopy imaging reveals that cohesin-NIPBL captures DNA through arm extension, assisted by feet (shorter protrusions), and followed by transfer of DNA to its lower compartment (SMC heads, RAD21, SA1, and NIPBL). While binding at the lower compartment, arm extension leads to the capture of a second DNA segment and the initiation of a DNA loop that is independent of ATP hydrolysis. The feet are likely contributed by the C-terminal domains of SA1 and NIPBL and can transiently bind to DNA to facilitate the loading of the cohesin complex onto DNA. Furthermore, high-speed atomic force microscopy imaging reveals distinct forward and reverse DNA loop extrusion steps by cohesin-NIPBL. These results advance our understanding of cohesin by establishing direct experimental evidence for a multistep DNA-binding mechanism mediated by dynamic protein conformational changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parminder Kaur
- Physics Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA; Center for Human Health and the Environment, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
| | - Xiaotong Lu
- Department of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Qi Xu
- Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, P.R. China; School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, P.R. China
| | | | - Colette Pappas
- Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hongshan Zhang
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Ilya J Finkelstein
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Zhubing Shi
- Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, P.R. China; School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, P.R. China
| | - Yizhi Jane Tao
- Department of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hongtao Yu
- Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, P.R. China; School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, P.R. China
| | - Hong Wang
- Physics Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA; Center for Human Health and the Environment, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA; Toxicology Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alonso-Gil D, Losada A. NIPBL and cohesin: new take on a classic tale. Trends Cell Biol 2023; 33:860-871. [PMID: 37062615 DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2023.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
Cohesin folds the genome in dynamic chromatin loops and holds the sister chromatids together. NIPBLScc2 is currently considered the cohesin loader, a role that may need reevaluation. NIPBL activates the cohesin ATPase, which is required for topological entrapment of sister DNAs and to fuel DNA loop extrusion, but is not required for chromatin association. Mechanistic dissection of these processes suggests that both NIPBL and the cohesin STAG subunit bind DNA. NIPBL also regulates conformational switches of the complex. Interactions of NIPBL with chromatin factors, including remodelers, replication proteins, and the transcriptional machinery, affect cohesin loading and distribution. Here, we discuss recent research addressing how NIPBL modulates cohesin activities and how its mutation causes a developmental disorder, Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dácil Alonso-Gil
- Chromosome Dynamics Group, Molecular Oncology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Losada
- Chromosome Dynamics Group, Molecular Oncology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kaushik A, Than T, Petela NJ, Voulgaris M, Percival C, Daniels P, Rafferty JB, Nasmyth KA, Hu B. Conformational dynamics of cohesin/Scc2 loading complex are regulated by Smc3 acetylation and ATP binding. Nat Commun 2023; 14:5929. [PMID: 37739959 PMCID: PMC10516938 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41596-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The ring-shaped cohesin complex is a key player in sister chromatid cohesion, DNA repair, and gene transcription. The loading of cohesin to chromosomes requires the loader Scc2 and is regulated by ATP. This process is hindered by Smc3 acetylation. However, the molecular mechanism underlying this inhibition remains mysterious. Here, using Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model system, we identify a novel configuration of Scc2 with pre-engaged cohesin and reveal dynamic conformations of the cohesin/Scc2 complex in the loading reaction. We demonstrate that Smc3 acetylation blocks the association of Scc2 with pre-engaged cohesin by impairing the interaction of Scc2 with Smc3's head. Lastly, we show that ATP binding induces the cohesin/Scc2 complex to clamp DNA by promoting the interaction between Scc2 and Smc3 coiled coil. Our results illuminate a dynamic reconfiguration of the cohesin/Scc2 complex during loading and indicate how Smc3 acetylation and ATP regulate this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Kaushik
- The Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Thane Than
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK
| | - Naomi J Petela
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK
| | | | - Charlotte Percival
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK
| | - Peter Daniels
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK
| | - John B Rafferty
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK
| | - Kim A Nasmyth
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK
| | - Bin Hu
- The Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Elias M, Gani S, Lerner Y, Yamin K, Tor C, Patel A, Matityahu A, Dessau M, Qvit N, Onn I. Developing a peptide to disrupt cohesin head domain interactions. iScience 2023; 26:107498. [PMID: 37664609 PMCID: PMC10470313 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Cohesin mediates the 3-D structure of chromatin and is involved in maintaining genome stability and function. The cohesin core comprises Smc1 and Smc3, elongated-shaped proteins that dimerize through globular domains at their edges, called head and hinge. ATP binding to the Smc heads induces their dimerization and the formation of two active sites, while ATP hydrolysis results in head disengagement. This ATPase cycle is essential for driving cohesin activity. We report on the development of the first cohesin-inhibiting peptide (CIP). The CIP binds Smc3 in vitro and inhibits the ATPase activity of the holocomplex. Treating yeast cells with the CIP prevents cohesin's tethering activity and, interestingly, leads to the accumulation of cohesin on chromatin. CIP3 also affects cohesin activity in human cells. Altogether, we demonstrate the power of peptides to inhibit cohesin in cells and discuss the potential application of CIPs as a therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Elias
- Chromosome Instability and Dynamics Lab, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Samar Gani
- Protein-Protein Interactions Lab, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Yana Lerner
- Protein-Protein Interactions Lab, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Katreen Yamin
- Chromosome Instability and Dynamics Lab, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Chen Tor
- Chromosome Instability and Dynamics Lab, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Adarsh Patel
- The Lab for Structural Biology of Infectious Diseases, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Avi Matityahu
- Chromosome Instability and Dynamics Lab, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Moshe Dessau
- The Lab for Structural Biology of Infectious Diseases, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Nir Qvit
- Protein-Protein Interactions Lab, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Itay Onn
- Chromosome Instability and Dynamics Lab, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nagasaka K, Davidson IF, Stocsits RR, Tang W, Wutz G, Batty P, Panarotto M, Litos G, Schleiffer A, Gerlich DW, Peters JM. Cohesin mediates DNA loop extrusion and sister chromatid cohesion by distinct mechanisms. Mol Cell 2023; 83:3049-3063.e6. [PMID: 37591243 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
Cohesin connects CTCF-binding sites and other genomic loci in cis to form chromatin loops and replicated DNA molecules in trans to mediate sister chromatid cohesion. Whether cohesin uses distinct or related mechanisms to perform these functions is unknown. Here, we describe a cohesin hinge mutant that can extrude DNA into loops but is unable to mediate cohesion in human cells. Our results suggest that the latter defect arises during cohesion establishment. The observation that cohesin's cohesion and loop extrusion activities can be partially separated indicates that cohesin uses distinct mechanisms to perform these two functions. Unexpectedly, the same hinge mutant can also not be stopped by CTCF boundaries as well as wild-type cohesin. This suggests that cohesion establishment and cohesin's interaction with CTCF boundaries depend on related mechanisms and raises the possibility that both require transient hinge opening to entrap DNA inside the cohesin ring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kota Nagasaka
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Iain F Davidson
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Roman R Stocsits
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Wen Tang
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Gordana Wutz
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Paul Batty
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, Vienna 1030, Austria; Vienna BioCenter PhD Program, Doctoral School of the University of Vienna and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Melanie Panarotto
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna 1030, Austria; Vienna BioCenter PhD Program, Doctoral School of the University of Vienna and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Gabriele Litos
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Alexander Schleiffer
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna 1030, Austria; Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Daniel W Gerlich
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna 1030, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Batty P, Langer CCH, Takács Z, Tang W, Blaukopf C, Peters J, Gerlich DW. Cohesin-mediated DNA loop extrusion resolves sister chromatids in G2 phase. EMBO J 2023; 42:e113475. [PMID: 37357575 PMCID: PMC10425840 DOI: 10.15252/embj.2023113475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetic information is stored in linear DNA molecules, which are highly folded inside cells. DNA replication along the folded template path yields two sister chromatids that initially occupy the same nuclear region in an intertwined arrangement. Dividing cells must disentangle and condense the sister chromatids into separate bodies such that a microtubule-based spindle can move them to opposite poles. While the spindle-mediated transport of sister chromatids has been studied in detail, the chromosome-intrinsic mechanics presegregating sister chromatids have remained elusive. Here, we show that human sister chromatids resolve extensively already during interphase, in a process dependent on the loop-extruding activity of cohesin, but not that of condensins. Increasing cohesin's looping capability increases sister DNA resolution in interphase nuclei to an extent normally seen only during mitosis, despite the presence of abundant arm cohesion. That cohesin can resolve sister chromatids so extensively in the absence of mitosis-specific activities indicates that DNA loop extrusion is a generic mechanism for segregating replicated genomes, shared across different Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) protein complexes in all kingdoms of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Batty
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA)Vienna BioCenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
- Vienna BioCenter PhD ProgramDoctoral School of the University of Vienna and Medical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Christoph CH Langer
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA)Vienna BioCenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Zsuzsanna Takács
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA)Vienna BioCenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Wen Tang
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP)Vienna BioCenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Claudia Blaukopf
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA)Vienna BioCenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Jan‐Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP)Vienna BioCenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Daniel W Gerlich
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA)Vienna BioCenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Borrie MS, Kraycer PM, Gartenberg MR. Transcription-Driven Translocation of Cohesive and Non-Cohesive Cohesin In Vivo. Mol Cell Biol 2023; 43:254-268. [PMID: 37178128 PMCID: PMC10251789 DOI: 10.1080/10985549.2023.2199660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Cohesin is a central architectural element of chromosomes that regulates numerous DNA-based events. The complex holds sister chromatids together until anaphase onset and organizes individual chromosomal DNAs into loops and self-associating domains. Purified cohesin diffuses along DNA in an ATP-independent manner but can be propelled by transcribing RNA polymerase. In conjunction with a cofactor, the complex also extrudes DNA loops in an ATP-dependent manner. In this study we examine transcription-driven translocation of cohesin under various conditions in yeast. To this end, obstacles of increasing size were tethered to DNA to act as roadblocks to complexes mobilized by an inducible gene. The obstacles were built from a GFP-lacI core fused to one or more mCherries. A chimera with four mCherries blocked cohesin passage in late G1. During M phase, the threshold barrier depended on the state of cohesion: non-cohesive complexes were also blocked by four mCherries whereas cohesive complexes were blocked by as few as three mCherries. Furthermore cohesive complexes that were stalled at obstacles, in turn, blocked the passage of non-cohesive complexes. That synthetic barriers capture mobilized cohesin demonstrates that transcription-driven complexes translocate processively in vivo. Together, this study reveals unexplored limitations to cohesin movement on chromosomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda S. Borrie
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Paul M. Kraycer
- Graduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Marc R. Gartenberg
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
- Member of The Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Taschner M, Gruber S. DNA segment capture by Smc5/6 holocomplexes. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2023; 30:619-628. [PMID: 37012407 DOI: 10.1038/s41594-023-00956-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
Three distinct structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes facilitate chromosome folding and segregation in eukaryotes, presumably by DNA loop extrusion. How SMCs interact with DNA to extrude loops is not well understood. Among the SMC complexes, Smc5/6 has dedicated roles in DNA repair and preventing a buildup of aberrant DNA junctions. In the present study, we describe the reconstitution of ATP-dependent DNA loading by yeast Smc5/6 rings. Loading strictly requires the Nse5/6 subcomplex which opens the kleisin neck gate. We show that plasmid molecules are topologically entrapped in the kleisin and two SMC subcompartments, but not in the full SMC compartment. This is explained by the SMC compartment holding a looped DNA segment and by kleisin locking it in place when passing between the two flanks of the loop for neck-gate closure. Related segment capture events may provide the power stroke in subsequent DNA extrusion steps, possibly also in other SMC complexes, thus providing a unifying principle for DNA loading and extrusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Taschner
- Department of Fundamental Microbiology, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Gruber
- Department of Fundamental Microbiology, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bozarth XL, Lopez J, Fang H, Lee-Eng J, Duan Z, Deng X. Phenotypes and Genotypes in Patients with SMC1A-Related Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathy. Genes (Basel) 2023; 14:852. [PMID: 37107610 PMCID: PMC10138066 DOI: 10.3390/genes14040852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The X-linked SMC1A gene encodes a core subunit of the cohesin complex that plays a pivotal role in genome organization and gene regulation. Pathogenic variants in SMC1A are often dominant-negative and cause Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS) with growth retardation and typical facial features; however, rare SMC1A variants cause a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) with intractable early-onset epilepsy that is absent in CdLS. Unlike the male-to-female ratio of 1:2 in those with CdLS associated with dominant-negative SMC1A variants, SMC1A-DEE loss-of-function (LOF) variants are found exclusively in females due to presumed lethality in males. It is unclear how different SMC1A variants cause CdLS or DEE. Here, we report on phenotypes and genotypes of three females with DEE and de novo SMC1A variants, including a novel splice-site variant. We also summarize 41 known SMC1A-DEE variants to characterize common and patient-specific features. Interestingly, compared to 33 LOFs detected throughout the gene, 7/8 non-LOFs are specifically located in the N/C-terminal ATPase head or the central hinge domain, both of which are predicted to affect cohesin assembly, thus mimicking LOFs. Along with the characterization of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) and SMC1A transcription, these variants strongly suggest that a differential SMC1A dosage effect of SMC1A-DEE variants is closely associated with the manifestation of DEE phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiuhua L. Bozarth
- Division of Neurology, Seattle Children’s Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| | - Jonathan Lopez
- Division of Neurology, Seattle Children’s Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| | - He Fang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jacqueline Lee-Eng
- Division of Neurology, Seattle Children’s Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| | - Zhijun Duan
- Division of Hematology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Xinxian Deng
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shin H, Kim Y. Regulation of loop extrusion on the interphase genome. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2023; 58:1-18. [PMID: 36921088 DOI: 10.1080/10409238.2023.2182273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
In the human cell nucleus, dynamically organized chromatin is the substrate for gene regulation, DNA replication, and repair. A central mechanism of DNA loop formation is an ATPase motor cohesin-mediated loop extrusion. The cohesin complexes load and unload onto the chromosome under the control of other regulators that physically interact and affect motor activity. Regulation of the dynamic loading cycle of cohesin influences not only the chromatin structure but also genome-associated human disorders and aging. This review focuses on the recently spotlighted genome organizing factors and the mechanism by which their dynamic interactions shape the genome architecture in interphase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyogyung Shin
- Department of New Biology, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), Daegu, South Korea
| | - Yoori Kim
- Department of New Biology, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), Daegu, South Korea.,New Biology Research Center, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), Daegu, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Choudhary K, Kupiec M. The cohesin complex of yeasts: sister chromatid cohesion and beyond. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2023; 47:6825453. [PMID: 36370456 DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fuac045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Each time a cell divides, it needs to duplicate the genome and then separate the two copies. In eukaryotes, which usually have more than one linear chromosome, this entails tethering the two newly replicated DNA molecules, a phenomenon known as sister chromatid cohesion (SCC). Cohesion ensures proper chromosome segregation to separate poles during mitosis. SCC is achieved by the presence of the cohesin complex. Besides its canonical function, cohesin is essential for chromosome organization and DNA damage repair. Surprisingly, yeast cohesin is loaded in G1 before DNA replication starts but only acquires its binding activity during DNA replication. Work in microorganisms, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe has greatly contributed to the understanding of cohesin composition and functions. In the last few years, much progress has been made in elucidating the role of cohesin in chromosome organization and compaction. Here, we discuss the different functions of cohesin to ensure faithful chromosome segregation and genome stability during the mitotic cell division in yeast. We describe what is known about its composition and how DNA replication is coupled with SCC establishment. We also discuss current models for the role of cohesin in chromatin loop extrusion and delineate unanswered questions about the activity of this important, conserved complex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karan Choudhary
- The Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv 69978, Israel
| | - Martin Kupiec
- The Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv 69978, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pradhan B, Barth R, Kim E, Davidson IF, Bauer B, van Laar T, Yang W, Ryu JK, van der Torre J, Peters JM, Dekker C. SMC complexes can traverse physical roadblocks bigger than their ring size. Cell Rep 2022; 41:111491. [PMID: 36261017 DOI: 10.1101/2021.07.15.452501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Ring-shaped structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes like condensin and cohesin extrude loops of DNA. It remains, however, unclear how they can extrude DNA loops in chromatin that is bound with proteins. Here, we use in vitro single-molecule visualization to show that nucleosomes, RNA polymerase, and dCas9 pose virtually no barrier to loop extrusion by yeast condensin. We find that even DNA-bound nanoparticles as large as 200 nm, much bigger than the SMC ring size, also translocate into DNA loops during extrusion by condensin and cohesin. This even occurs for a single-chain version of cohesin in which the ring-forming subunits are covalently linked and cannot open to entrap DNA. The data show that SMC-driven loop extrusion has surprisingly little difficulty in accommodating large roadblocks into the loop. The findings also show that the extruded DNA does not pass through the SMC ring (pseudo)topologically, hence pointing to a nontopological mechanism for DNA loop extrusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biswajit Pradhan
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Roman Barth
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Eugene Kim
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Iain F Davidson
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Benedikt Bauer
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Theo van Laar
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands; Nynke Dekker Lab, Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Wayne Yang
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Je-Kyung Ryu
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Jaco van der Torre
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Cees Dekker
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
CTCF-CTCF loops and intra-TAD interactions show differential dependence on cohesin ring integrity. Nat Cell Biol 2022; 24:1516-1527. [PMID: 36202971 PMCID: PMC10174090 DOI: 10.1038/s41556-022-00992-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The ring-like cohesin complex mediates sister-chromatid cohesion by encircling pairs of sister chromatids. Cohesin also extrudes loops along chromatids. Whether the two activities involve similar mechanisms of DNA engagement is not known. We implemented an experimental approach based on isolated nuclei carrying engineered cleavable RAD21 proteins to precisely control cohesin ring integrity so that its role in chromatin looping could be studied under defined experimental conditions. This approach allowed us to identify cohesin complexes with distinct biochemical, and possibly structural, properties that mediate different sets of chromatin loops. When RAD21 is cleaved and the cohesin ring is opened, cohesin complexes at CTCF sites are released from DNA and loops at these elements are lost. In contrast, cohesin-dependent loops within chromatin domains that are not anchored at pairs of CTCF sites are more resistant to RAD21 cleavage. The results show that the cohesin complex mediates loops in different ways depending on the genomic context and suggests that it undergoes structural changes as it dynamically extrudes and encounters CTCF sites.
Collapse
|
21
|
SMC complexes can traverse physical roadblocks bigger than their ring size. Cell Rep 2022; 41:111491. [DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
22
|
Collier JE, Nasmyth KA. DNA passes through cohesin's hinge as well as its Smc3-kleisin interface. eLife 2022; 11:80310. [PMID: 36094369 PMCID: PMC9467508 DOI: 10.7554/elife.80310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The ring model proposes that sister chromatid cohesion is mediated by co-entrapment of sister DNAs inside a single tripartite cohesin ring. The model explains how Scc1 cleavage triggers anaphase but has hitherto only been rigorously tested using small circular mini-chromosomes in yeast, where covalently circularizing the ring by crosslinking its three interfaces induces catenation of individual and sister DNAs. If the model applies to real chromatids, then the ring must have a DNA entry gate essential for mitosis. Whether this is situated at the Smc3/Scc1 or Smc1/Smc3 hinge interface is an open question. We have previously demonstrated DNA entrapment by cohesin in vitro (Collier et al., 2020). Here we show that cohesin in fact possesses two DNA gates, one at the Smc3/Scc1 interface and a second at the Smc1/3 hinge. Unlike the Smc3/Scc1 interface, passage of DNAs through SMC hinges depends on both Scc2 and Scc3, a pair of regulatory subunits necessary for entrapment in vivo. This property together with the lethality caused by locking this interface but not that between Smc3 and Scc1 in vivo suggests that passage of DNAs through the hinge is essential for building sister chromatid cohesion. Passage of DNAs through the Smc3/Scc1 interface is necessary for cohesin’s separase-independent release from chromosomes and may therefore largely serve as an exit gate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E Collier
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Kim A Nasmyth
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Arruda NL, Bryan AF, Dowen JM. PDS5A and PDS5B differentially affect gene expression without altering cohesin localization across the genome. Epigenetics Chromatin 2022; 15:30. [PMID: 35986423 PMCID: PMC9392266 DOI: 10.1186/s13072-022-00463-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cohesin is an important structural regulator of the genome, regulating both three-dimensional genome organization and gene expression. The core cohesin trimer interacts with various HEAT repeat accessory subunits, yielding cohesin complexes of distinct compositions and potentially distinct functions. The roles of the two mutually exclusive HEAT repeat subunits PDS5A and PDS5B are not well understood. RESULTS Here, we determine that PDS5A and PDS5B have highly similar localization patterns across the mouse embryonic stem cell (mESC) genome and they show a strong overlap with other cohesin HEAT repeat accessory subunits, STAG1 and STAG2. Using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to generate individual stable knockout lines for PDS5A and PDS5B, we find that loss of one PDS5 subunit does not alter the distribution of the other PDS5 subunit, nor the core cohesin complex. Both PDS5A and PDS5B are required for proper gene expression, yet they display only partially overlapping effects on gene targets. Remarkably, gene expression following dual depletion of the PDS5 HEAT repeat proteins does not completely overlap the gene expression changes caused by dual depletion of the STAG HEAT repeat proteins, despite the overlapping genomic distribution of all four proteins. Furthermore, dual loss of PDS5A and PDS5B decreases cohesin association with NIPBL and WAPL, reduces SMC3 acetylation, and does not alter overall levels of cohesin on the genome. CONCLUSIONS This work reveals the importance of PDS5A and PDS5B for proper cohesin function. Loss of either subunit has little effect on cohesin localization across the genome yet PDS5A and PDS5B are differentially required for gene expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole L Arruda
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Audra F Bryan
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Jill M Dowen
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Buskirk S, Skibbens RV. G1-Cyclin2 (Cln2) promotes chromosome hypercondensation in eco1/ctf7 rad61 null cells during hyperthermic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 (BETHESDA, MD.) 2022; 12:6613937. [PMID: 35736360 PMCID: PMC9339302 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Eco1/Ctf7 is a highly conserved acetyltransferase that activates cohesin complexes and is critical for sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, DNA damage repair, nucleolar integrity, and gene transcription. Mutations in the human homolog of ECO1 (ESCO2/EFO2), or in genes that encode cohesin subunits, result in severe developmental abnormalities and intellectual disabilities referred to as Roberts syndrome and Cornelia de Lange syndrome, respectively. In yeast, deletion of ECO1 results in cell inviability. Codeletion of RAD61 (WAPL in humans), however, produces viable yeast cells. These eco1 rad61 double mutants, however, exhibit a severe temperature-sensitive growth defect, suggesting that Eco1 or cohesins respond to hyperthermic stress through a mechanism that occurs independent of Rad61. Here, we report that deletion of the G1 cyclin CLN2 rescues the temperature-sensitive lethality otherwise exhibited by eco1 rad61 mutant cells, such that the triple mutant cells exhibit robust growth over a broad range of temperatures. While Cln1, Cln2, and Cln3 are functionally redundant G1 cyclins, neither CLN1 nor CLN3 deletions rescue the temperature-sensitive growth defects otherwise exhibited by eco1 rad61 double mutants. We further provide evidence that CLN2 deletion rescues hyperthermic growth defects independent of START and impacts the state of chromosome condensation. These findings reveal novel roles for Cln2 that are unique among the G1 cyclin family and appear critical for cohesin regulation during hyperthermic stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Buskirk
- Department of Biology, West Chester University, West Chester, PA 19383, USA
| | - Robert V Skibbens
- Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Warrier T, El Farran C, Zeng Y, Ho B, Bao Q, Zheng Z, Bi X, Ng HH, Ong D, Chu J, Sanyal A, Fullwood MJ, Collins J, Li H, Xu J, Loh YH. SETDB1 acts as a topological accessory to Cohesin via an H3K9me3-independent, genomic shunt for regulating cell fates. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:7326-7349. [PMID: 35776115 PMCID: PMC9303280 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
SETDB1 is a key regulator of lineage-specific genes and endogenous retroviral elements (ERVs) through its deposition of repressive H3K9me3 mark. Apart from its H3K9me3 regulatory role, SETDB1 has seldom been studied in terms of its other potential regulatory roles. To investigate this, a genomic survey of SETDB1 binding in mouse embryonic stem cells across multiple libraries was conducted, leading to the unexpected discovery of regions bereft of common repressive histone marks (H3K9me3, H3K27me3). These regions were enriched with the CTCF motif that is often associated with the topological regulator Cohesin. Further profiling of these non-H3K9me3 regions led to the discovery of a cluster of non-repeat loci that were co-bound by SETDB1 and Cohesin. These regions, which we named DiSCs (domains involving SETDB1 and Cohesin) were seen to be proximal to the gene promoters involved in embryonic stem cell pluripotency and lineage development. Importantly, it was found that SETDB1-Cohesin co-regulate target gene expression and genome topology at these DiSCs. Depletion of SETDB1 led to localized dysregulation of Cohesin binding thereby locally disrupting topological structures. Dysregulated gene expression trends revealed the importance of this cluster in ES cell maintenance as well as at gene 'islands' that drive differentiation to other lineages. The 'unearthing' of the DiSCs thus unravels a unique topological and transcriptional axis of control regulated chiefly by SETDB1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tushar Warrier
- Cell Fate Engineering and Therapeutics Lab, Cell Biology and Therapies Division, A*STAR Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore 138673, Singapore
- Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore
| | - Chadi El Farran
- Cell Fate Engineering and Therapeutics Lab, Cell Biology and Therapies Division, A*STAR Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore 138673, Singapore
- Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore
| | - Yingying Zeng
- Cell Fate Engineering and Therapeutics Lab, Cell Biology and Therapies Division, A*STAR Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore 138673, Singapore
- School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 60 Nanyang Drive 637551, Singapore
| | - Benedict Shao Quan Ho
- Cell Fate Engineering and Therapeutics Lab, Cell Biology and Therapies Division, A*STAR Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore 138673, Singapore
| | - Qiuye Bao
- Cell Fate Engineering and Therapeutics Lab, Cell Biology and Therapies Division, A*STAR Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore 138673, Singapore
| | - Zi Hao Zheng
- Cell Fate Engineering and Therapeutics Lab, Cell Biology and Therapies Division, A*STAR Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore 138673, Singapore
- Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117593, Singapore
| | - Xuezhi Bi
- Proteomics Group, Bioprocessing Technology Institute, A*STAR, Singapore 138668, Singapore
| | - Huck Hui Ng
- Gene Regulation Laboratory, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore
| | - Derrick Sek Tong Ong
- Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117593, Singapore
| | - Justin Jang Hann Chu
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117593, Singapore
- Infectious Disease Translational Research Programme, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Amartya Sanyal
- School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 60 Nanyang Drive 637551, Singapore
| | - Melissa Jane Fullwood
- School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 60 Nanyang Drive 637551, Singapore
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, 14 Medical Drive, Singapore 117599, Singapore
| | - James J Collins
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science Department of Biological Engineering, and Synthetic Biology Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02114, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hu Li
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Department of Molecular Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Jian Xu
- Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore
- Department of Plant Systems Physiology, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Yuin-Han Loh
- Cell Fate Engineering and Therapeutics Lab, Cell Biology and Therapies Division, A*STAR Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore 138673, Singapore
- Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore
- Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117593, Singapore
- NUS Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering, National University of Singapore, 28 MedicalDrive, Singapore 117456, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Shaltiel IA, Datta S, Lecomte L, Hassler M, Kschonsak M, Bravo S, Stober C, Ormanns J, Eustermann S, Haering CH. A hold-and-feed mechanism drives directional DNA loop extrusion by condensin. Science 2022; 376:1087-1094. [PMID: 35653469 DOI: 10.1126/science.abm4012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein complexes structure genomes by extruding DNA loops, but the molecular mechanism that underlies their activity has remained unknown. We show that the active condensin complex entraps the bases of a DNA loop transiently in two separate chambers. Single-molecule imaging and cryo-electron microscopy suggest a putative power-stroke movement at the first chamber that feeds DNA into the SMC-kleisin ring upon adenosine triphosphate binding, whereas the second chamber holds on upstream of the same DNA double helix. Unlocking the strict separation of "motor" and "anchor" chambers turns condensin from a one-sided into a bidirectional DNA loop extruder. We conclude that the orientation of two topologically bound DNA segments during the SMC reaction cycle determines the directionality of DNA loop extrusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indra A Shaltiel
- Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.,Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sumanjit Datta
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.,Collaboration for joint PhD degree between EMBL and Heidelberg University, Faculty of Biosciences, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Léa Lecomte
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.,Collaboration for joint PhD degree between EMBL and Heidelberg University, Faculty of Biosciences, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Hassler
- Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.,Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marc Kschonsak
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sol Bravo
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Catherine Stober
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jenny Ormanns
- Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Christian H Haering
- Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.,Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.,Structural and Computational Biology Unit, EMBL, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
A walk through the SMC cycle: From catching DNAs to shaping the genome. Mol Cell 2022; 82:1616-1630. [PMID: 35477004 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Revised: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
SMC protein complexes are molecular machines that provide structure to chromosomes. These complexes bridge DNA elements and by doing so build DNA loops in cis and hold together the sister chromatids in trans. We discuss how drastic conformational changes allow SMC complexes to build such intricate DNA structures. The tight regulation of these complexes controls fundamental chromosomal processes such as transcription, recombination, repair, and mitosis.
Collapse
|
28
|
Osadska M, Selicky T, Kretova M, Jurcik J, Sivakova B, Cipakova I, Cipak L. The Interplay of Cohesin and RNA Processing Factors: The Impact of Their Alterations on Genome Stability. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:3939. [PMID: 35409298 PMCID: PMC8999970 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23073939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Cohesin, a multi-subunit protein complex, plays important roles in sister chromatid cohesion, DNA replication, chromatin organization, gene expression, transcription regulation, and the recombination or repair of DNA damage. Recently, several studies suggested that the functions of cohesin rely not only on cohesin-related protein-protein interactions, their post-translational modifications or specific DNA modifications, but that some RNA processing factors also play an important role in the regulation of cohesin functions. Therefore, the mutations and changes in the expression of cohesin subunits or alterations in the interactions between cohesin and RNA processing factors have been shown to have an impact on cohesion, the fidelity of chromosome segregation and, ultimately, on genome stability. In this review, we provide an overview of the cohesin complex and its role in chromosome segregation, highlight the causes and consequences of mutations and changes in the expression of cohesin subunits, and discuss the RNA processing factors that participate in the regulation of the processes involved in chromosome segregation. Overall, an understanding of the molecular determinants of the interplay between cohesin and RNA processing factors might help us to better understand the molecular mechanisms ensuring the integrity of the genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela Osadska
- Cancer Research Institute, Biomedical Research Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia; (M.O.); (T.S.); (M.K.); (J.J.)
| | - Tomas Selicky
- Cancer Research Institute, Biomedical Research Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia; (M.O.); (T.S.); (M.K.); (J.J.)
| | - Miroslava Kretova
- Cancer Research Institute, Biomedical Research Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia; (M.O.); (T.S.); (M.K.); (J.J.)
| | - Jan Jurcik
- Cancer Research Institute, Biomedical Research Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia; (M.O.); (T.S.); (M.K.); (J.J.)
| | - Barbara Sivakova
- Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska Cesta 9, 845 38 Bratislava, Slovakia;
| | - Ingrid Cipakova
- Cancer Research Institute, Biomedical Research Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia; (M.O.); (T.S.); (M.K.); (J.J.)
| | - Lubos Cipak
- Cancer Research Institute, Biomedical Research Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia; (M.O.); (T.S.); (M.K.); (J.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zuilkoski CM, Skibbens RV. Integrating Sister Chromatid Cohesion Establishment to DNA Replication. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:genes13040625. [PMID: 35456431 PMCID: PMC9032331 DOI: 10.3390/genes13040625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The intersection through which two fundamental processes meet provides a unique vantage point from which to view cellular regulation. On the one hand, DNA replication is at the heart of cell division, generating duplicate chromosomes that allow each daughter cell to inherit a complete copy of the parental genome. Among other factors, the PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) sliding clamp ensures processive DNA replication during S phase and is essential for cell viability. On the other hand, the process of chromosome segregation during M phase—an act that occurs long after DNA replication—is equally fundamental to a successful cell division. Eco1/Ctf7 ensures that chromosomes faithfully segregate during mitosis, but functions during DNA replication to activate cohesins and thereby establish cohesion between sister chromatids. To achieve this, Eco1 binds PCNA and numerous other DNA replication fork factors that include MCM helicase, Chl1 helicase, and the Rtt101-Mms1-Mms22 E3 ubiquitin ligase. Here, we review the multi-faceted coordination between cohesion establishment and DNA replication. SUMMARY STATEMENT: New findings provide important insights into the mechanisms through which DNA replication and the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion are coupled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin M. Zuilkoski
- Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, 111 Research Drive, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA;
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 E. Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA
| | - Robert V. Skibbens
- Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, 111 Research Drive, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +610-758-6162
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Barton RE, Massari LF, Robertson D, Marston AL. Eco1-dependent cohesin acetylation anchors chromatin loops and cohesion to define functional meiotic chromosome domains. eLife 2022; 11:e74447. [PMID: 35103590 PMCID: PMC8856730 DOI: 10.7554/elife.74447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cohesin organizes the genome by forming intra-chromosomal loops and inter-sister chromatid linkages. During gamete formation by meiosis, chromosomes are reshaped to support crossover recombination and two consecutive rounds of chromosome segregation. Here we show that meiotic chromosomes are organised into functional domains by Eco1 acetyltransferase-dependent positioning of both chromatin loops and sister chromatid cohesion in budding yeast. Eco1 acetylates the Smc3 cohesin subunit in meiotic S phase to establish chromatin boundaries, independently of DNA replication. Boundary formation by Eco1 is critical for prophase exit and for the maintenance of cohesion until meiosis II, but is independent of the ability of Eco1 to antagonize the cohesin-release factor, Wpl1. Conversely, prevention of cohesin release by Wpl1 is essential for centromeric cohesion, kinetochore monoorientation and co-segregation of sister chromatids in meiosis I. Our findings establish Eco1 as a key determinant of chromatin boundaries and cohesion positioning, revealing how local chromosome structuring directs genome transmission into gametes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael E Barton
- The Wellcome Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Michael Swann Building, Max Born CrescentEdinburghUnited Kingdom
| | - Lucia F Massari
- The Wellcome Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Michael Swann Building, Max Born CrescentEdinburghUnited Kingdom
| | - Daniel Robertson
- The Wellcome Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Michael Swann Building, Max Born CrescentEdinburghUnited Kingdom
| | - Adèle L Marston
- The Wellcome Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Michael Swann Building, Max Born CrescentEdinburghUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
van Schie JJM, de Lange J. The Interplay of Cohesin and the Replisome at Processive and Stressed DNA Replication Forks. Cells 2021; 10:3455. [PMID: 34943967 PMCID: PMC8700348 DOI: 10.3390/cells10123455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 12/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The cohesin complex facilitates faithful chromosome segregation by pairing the sister chromatids after DNA replication until mitosis. In addition, cohesin contributes to proficient and error-free DNA replication. Replisome progression and establishment of sister chromatid cohesion are intimately intertwined processes. Here, we review how the key factors in DNA replication and cohesion establishment cooperate in unperturbed conditions and during DNA replication stress. We discuss the detailed molecular mechanisms of cohesin recruitment and the entrapment of replicated sister chromatids at the replisome, the subsequent stabilization of sister chromatid cohesion via SMC3 acetylation, as well as the role and regulation of cohesin in the response to DNA replication stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janne J. M. van Schie
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Human Genetics, Section Oncogenetics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Job de Lange
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Human Genetics, Section Oncogenetics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bürmann F, Funke LFH, Chin JW, Löwe J. Cryo-EM structure of MukBEF reveals DNA loop entrapment at chromosomal unloading sites. Mol Cell 2021; 81:4891-4906.e8. [PMID: 34739874 PMCID: PMC8669397 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The ring-like structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complex MukBEF folds the genome of Escherichia coli and related bacteria into large loops, presumably by active DNA loop extrusion. MukBEF activity within the replication terminus macrodomain is suppressed by the sequence-specific unloader MatP. Here, we present the complete atomic structure of MukBEF in complex with MatP and DNA as determined by electron cryomicroscopy (cryo-EM). The complex binds two distinct DNA double helices corresponding to the arms of a plectonemic loop. MatP-bound DNA threads through the MukBEF ring, while the second DNA is clamped by the kleisin MukF, MukE, and the MukB ATPase heads. Combinatorial cysteine cross-linking confirms this topology of DNA loop entrapment in vivo. Our findings illuminate how a class of near-ubiquitous DNA organizers with important roles in genome maintenance interacts with the bacterial chromosome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Bürmann
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Structural Studies Division, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Louise F H Funke
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Protein and Nucleic Acid Chemistry Division, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jason W Chin
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Protein and Nucleic Acid Chemistry Division, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jan Löwe
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Structural Studies Division, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
PCNA Loaders and Unloaders-One Ring That Rules Them All. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:genes12111812. [PMID: 34828416 PMCID: PMC8618651 DOI: 10.3390/genes12111812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
During each cell duplication, the entirety of the genomic DNA in every cell must be accurately and quickly copied. Given the short time available for the chore, the requirement of many proteins, and the daunting amount of DNA present, DNA replication poses a serious challenge to the cell. A high level of coordination between polymerases and other DNA and chromatin-interacting proteins is vital to complete this task. One of the most important proteins for maintaining such coordination is PCNA. PCNA is a multitasking protein that forms a homotrimeric ring that encircles the DNA. It serves as a processivity factor for DNA polymerases and acts as a landing platform for different proteins interacting with DNA and chromatin. Therefore, PCNA is a signaling hub that influences the rate and accuracy of DNA replication, regulates DNA damage repair, controls chromatin formation during the replication, and the proper segregation of the sister chromatids. With so many essential roles, PCNA recruitment and turnover on the chromatin is of utmost importance. Three different, conserved protein complexes are in charge of loading/unloading PCNA onto DNA. Replication factor C (RFC) is the canonical complex in charge of loading PCNA during the S-phase. The Ctf18 and Elg1 (ATAD5 in mammalian) proteins form complexes similar to RFC, with particular functions in the cell’s nucleus. Here we summarize our current knowledge about the roles of these important factors in yeast and mammals.
Collapse
|
34
|
Fisher GL, Bolla JR, Rajasekar KV, Mäkelä J, Baker R, Zhou M, Prince JP, Stracy M, Robinson CV, Arciszewska LK, Sherratt DJ. Competitive binding of MatP and topoisomerase IV to the MukB hinge domain. eLife 2021; 10:70444. [PMID: 34585666 PMCID: PMC8523169 DOI: 10.7554/elife.70444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) complexes have ubiquitous roles in compacting DNA linearly, thereby promoting chromosome organization-segregation. Interaction between the Escherichia coli SMC complex, MukBEF, and matS-bound MatP in the chromosome replication termination region, ter, results in depletion of MukBEF from ter, a process essential for efficient daughter chromosome individualization and for preferential association of MukBEF with the replication origin region. Chromosome-associated MukBEF complexes also interact with topoisomerase IV (ParC2E2), so that their chromosome distribution mirrors that of MukBEF. We demonstrate that MatP and ParC have an overlapping binding interface on the MukB hinge, leading to their mutually exclusive binding, which occurs with the same dimer to dimer stoichiometry. Furthermore, we show that matS DNA competes with the MukB hinge for MatP binding. Cells expressing MukBEF complexes that are mutated at the ParC/MatP binding interface are impaired in ParC binding and have a mild defect in MukBEF function. These data highlight competitive binding as a means of globally regulating MukBEF-topoisomerase IV activity in space and time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Lm Fisher
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jani R Bolla
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.,The Kavli Institute for Nanoscience Discovery, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jarno Mäkelä
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Baker
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Man Zhou
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Josh P Prince
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Mathew Stracy
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Carol V Robinson
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.,The Kavli Institute for Nanoscience Discovery, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - David J Sherratt
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Psakhye I, Branzei D. SMC complexes are guarded by the SUMO protease Ulp2 against SUMO-chain-mediated turnover. Cell Rep 2021; 36:109485. [PMID: 34348159 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMCs) complexes, cohesin, condensin, and Smc5/6, are essential for viability and participate in multiple processes, including sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, and DNA repair. Here we show that SUMO chains target all three SMC complexes and are antagonized by the SUMO protease Ulp2 to prevent their turnover. We uncover that the essential role of the cohesin-associated subunit Pds5 is to counteract SUMO chains jointly with Ulp2. Importantly, fusion of Ulp2 to kleisin Scc1 supports viability of PDS5 null cells and protects cohesin from proteasomal degradation mediated by the SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase Slx5/Slx8. The lethality of PDS5-deleted cells can also be bypassed by simultaneous loss of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) unloader, Elg1, and the cohesin releaser, Wpl1, but only when Ulp2 is functional. Condensin and Smc5/6 complex are similarly guarded by Ulp2 against unscheduled SUMO chain assembly, which we propose to time the availability of SMC complexes on chromatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Psakhye
- IFOM, the FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Via Adamello 16, 20139 Milan, Italy
| | - Dana Branzei
- IFOM, the FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Via Adamello 16, 20139 Milan, Italy; Istituto di Genetica Molecolare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IGM-CNR), Via Abbiategrasso 207, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Golov AK, Golova AV, Gavrilov AA, Razin SV. Sensitivity of cohesin-chromatin association to high-salt treatment corroborates non-topological mode of loop extrusion. Epigenetics Chromatin 2021; 14:36. [PMID: 34321070 PMCID: PMC8320178 DOI: 10.1186/s13072-021-00411-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Cohesin is a key organizer of chromatin folding in eukaryotic cells. The two main activities of this ring-shaped protein complex are the maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion and the establishment of long-range DNA-DNA interactions through the process of loop extrusion. Although the basic principles of both cohesion and loop extrusion have been described, we still do not understand several crucial mechanistic details. One of such unresolved issues is the question of whether a cohesin ring topologically embraces DNA string(s) during loop extrusion. Here, we show that cohesin complexes residing on CTCF-occupied genomic sites in mammalian cells do not interact with DNA topologically. We assessed the stability of cohesin-dependent loops and cohesin association with chromatin in high-ionic-strength conditions in G1-synchronized HeLa cells. We found that increased salt concentration completely displaces cohesin from those genomic regions that correspond to CTCF-defined loop anchors. Unsurprisingly, CTCF-anchored cohesin loops also dissipate in these conditions. Because topologically engaged cohesin is considered to be salt resistant, our data corroborate a non-topological model of loop extrusion. We also propose a model of cohesin activity throughout the interphase, which essentially equates the termination of non-topological loop extrusion with topological loading of cohesin. This theoretical framework enables a parsimonious explanation of various seemingly contradictory experimental findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arkadiy K. Golov
- Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
- Mental Health Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anastasia V. Golova
- Center of Life Sciences, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexey A. Gavrilov
- Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergey V. Razin
- Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
- Faculty of Biology, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Petela NJ, Gonzalez Llamazares A, Dixon S, Hu B, Lee BG, Metson J, Seo H, Ferrer-Harding A, Voulgaris M, Gligoris T, Collier J, Oh BH, Löwe J, Nasmyth KA. Folding of cohesin's coiled coil is important for Scc2/4-induced association with chromosomes. eLife 2021; 10:e67268. [PMID: 34259632 PMCID: PMC8279761 DOI: 10.7554/elife.67268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Cohesin's association with and translocation along chromosomal DNAs depend on an ATP hydrolysis cycle driving the association and subsequent release of DNA. This involves DNA being 'clamped' by Scc2 and ATP-dependent engagement of cohesin's Smc1 and Smc3 head domains. Scc2's replacement by Pds5 abrogates cohesin's ATPase and has an important role in halting DNA loop extrusion. The ATPase domains of all SMC proteins are separated from their hinge dimerisation domains by 50-nm-long coiled coils, which have been observed to zip up along their entire length and fold around an elbow, thereby greatly shortening the distance between hinges and ATPase heads. Whether folding exists in vivo or has any physiological importance is not known. We present here a cryo-EM structure of the apo form of cohesin that reveals the structure of folded and zipped-up coils in unprecedented detail and shows that Scc2 can associate with Smc1's ATPase head even when it is fully disengaged from that of Smc3. Using cysteine-specific crosslinking, we show that cohesin's coiled coils are frequently folded in vivo, including when cohesin holds sister chromatids together. Moreover, we describe a mutation (SMC1D588Y) within Smc1's hinge that alters how Scc2 and Pds5 interact with Smc1's hinge and that enables Scc2 to support loading in the absence of its normal partner Scc4. The mutant phenotype of loading without Scc4 is only explicable if loading depends on an association between Scc2/4 and cohesin's hinge, which in turn requires coiled coil folding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi J Petela
- Department of Biochemistry, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | | | - Sarah Dixon
- Department of Biochemistry, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Bin Hu
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of AberdeenAberdeenUnited Kingdom
| | - Byung-Gil Lee
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular BiologyCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Jean Metson
- Department of Biochemistry, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Heekyo Seo
- Department of Biological Sciences, KAIST Institute for the Biocentury, Cancer Metastasis Control Center, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyDaejeonRepublic of Korea
| | | | | | - Thomas Gligoris
- Department of Biochemistry, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - James Collier
- Department of Biochemistry, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Byung-Ha Oh
- Department of Biological Sciences, KAIST Institute for the Biocentury, Cancer Metastasis Control Center, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyDaejeonRepublic of Korea
| | - Jan Löwe
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular BiologyCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Kim A Nasmyth
- Department of Biochemistry, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Davidson IF, Peters JM. Genome folding through loop extrusion by SMC complexes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2021; 22:445-464. [PMID: 33767413 DOI: 10.1038/s41580-021-00349-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 218] [Impact Index Per Article: 72.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Genomic DNA is folded into loops and topologically associating domains (TADs), which serve important structural and regulatory roles. It has been proposed that these genomic structures are formed by a loop extrusion process, which is mediated by structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein complexes. Recent single-molecule studies have shown that the SMC complexes condensin and cohesin are indeed able to extrude DNA into loops. In this Review, we discuss how the loop extrusion hypothesis can explain key features of genome architecture; cellular functions of loop extrusion, such as separation of replicated DNA molecules, facilitation of enhancer-promoter interactions and immunoglobulin gene recombination; and what is known about the mechanism of loop extrusion and its regulation, for example, by chromatin boundaries that depend on the DNA binding protein CTCF. We also discuss how the loop extrusion hypothesis has led to a paradigm shift in our understanding of both genome architecture and the functions of SMC complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iain F Davidson
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Henrikus SS, Costa A. Towards a Structural Mechanism for Sister Chromatid Cohesion Establishment at the Eukaryotic Replication Fork. BIOLOGY 2021; 10:466. [PMID: 34073213 PMCID: PMC8229022 DOI: 10.3390/biology10060466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Cohesion between replicated chromosomes is essential for chromatin dynamics and equal segregation of duplicated genetic material. In the G1 phase, the ring-shaped cohesin complex is loaded onto duplex DNA, enriching at replication start sites, or "origins". During the same phase of the cell cycle, and also at the origin sites, two MCM helicases are loaded as symmetric double hexamers around duplex DNA. During the S phase, and through the action of replication factors, cohesin switches from encircling one parental duplex DNA to topologically enclosing the two duplicated DNA filaments, which are known as sister chromatids. Despite its vital importance, the structural mechanism leading to sister chromatid cohesion establishment at the replication fork is mostly elusive. Here we review the current understanding of the molecular interactions between the replication machinery and cohesin, which support sister chromatid cohesion establishment and cohesin function. In particular, we discuss how cryo-EM is shedding light on the mechanisms of DNA replication and cohesin loading processes. We further expound how frontier cryo-EM approaches, combined with biochemistry and single-molecule fluorescence assays, can lead to understanding the molecular basis of sister chromatid cohesion establishment at the replication fork.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alessandro Costa
- Macromolecular Machines Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Boavida A, Santos D, Mahtab M, Pisani FM. Functional Coupling between DNA Replication and Sister Chromatid Cohesion Establishment. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:2810. [PMID: 33802105 PMCID: PMC8001024 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22062810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Several lines of evidence suggest the existence in the eukaryotic cells of a tight, yet largely unexplored, connection between DNA replication and sister chromatid cohesion. Tethering of newly duplicated chromatids is mediated by cohesin, an evolutionarily conserved hetero-tetrameric protein complex that has a ring-like structure and is believed to encircle DNA. Cohesin is loaded onto chromatin in telophase/G1 and converted into a cohesive state during the subsequent S phase, a process known as cohesion establishment. Many studies have revealed that down-regulation of a number of DNA replication factors gives rise to chromosomal cohesion defects, suggesting that they play critical roles in cohesion establishment. Conversely, loss of cohesin subunits (and/or regulators) has been found to alter DNA replication fork dynamics. A critical step of the cohesion establishment process consists in cohesin acetylation, a modification accomplished by dedicated acetyltransferases that operate at the replication forks. Defects in cohesion establishment give rise to chromosome mis-segregation and aneuploidy, phenotypes frequently observed in pre-cancerous and cancerous cells. Herein, we will review our present knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying the functional link between DNA replication and cohesion establishment, a phenomenon that is unique to the eukaryotic organisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Boavida
- Istituto di Biochimica e Biologia Cellulare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via P. Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.B.); (D.S.); (M.M.)
| | - Diana Santos
- Istituto di Biochimica e Biologia Cellulare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via P. Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.B.); (D.S.); (M.M.)
| | - Mohammad Mahtab
- Istituto di Biochimica e Biologia Cellulare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via P. Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.B.); (D.S.); (M.M.)
- Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Ambientali Biologiche e Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Vivaldi 43, 81100 Caserta, Italy
| | - Francesca M. Pisani
- Istituto di Biochimica e Biologia Cellulare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via P. Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.B.); (D.S.); (M.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Belaghzal H, Borrman T, Stephens AD, Lafontaine DL, Venev SV, Weng Z, Marko JF, Dekker J. Liquid chromatin Hi-C characterizes compartment-dependent chromatin interaction dynamics. Nat Genet 2021; 53:367-378. [PMID: 33574602 PMCID: PMC7946813 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-021-00784-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Nuclear compartmentalization of active and inactive chromatin is thought to occur through microphase separation mediated by interactions between loci of similar type. The nature and dynamics of these interactions are not known. We developed liquid chromatin Hi-C to map the stability of associations between loci. Before fixation and Hi-C, chromosomes are fragmented, which removes strong polymeric constraint, enabling detection of intrinsic locus-locus interaction stabilities. Compartmentalization is stable when fragments are larger than 10-25 kb. Fragmentation of chromatin into pieces smaller than 6 kb leads to gradual loss of genome organization. Lamin-associated domains are most stable, whereas interactions for speckle- and polycomb-associated loci are more dynamic. Cohesin-mediated loops dissolve after fragmentation. Liquid chromatin Hi-C provides a genome-wide view of chromosome interaction dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Houda Belaghzal
- Program in Systems Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Tyler Borrman
- Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Andrew D Stephens
- Biology Department, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
| | - Denis L Lafontaine
- Program in Systems Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Sergey V Venev
- Program in Systems Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Zhiping Weng
- Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - John F Marko
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Job Dekker
- Program in Systems Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Carico ZM, Stefan HC, Justice M, Yimit A, Dowen JM. A cohesin cancer mutation reveals a role for the hinge domain in genome organization and gene expression. PLoS Genet 2021; 17:e1009435. [PMID: 33760811 PMCID: PMC7990204 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The cohesin complex spatially organizes interphase chromatin by bringing distal genomic loci into close physical proximity, looping out the intervening DNA. Mutation of cohesin complex subunits is observed in cancer and developmental disorders, but the mechanisms through which these mutations may contribute to disease remain poorly understood. Here, we investigate a recurrent missense mutation to the hinge domain of the cohesin subunit SMC1A, observed in acute myeloid leukemia. Engineering this mutation into murine embryonic stem cells caused widespread changes in gene expression, including dysregulation of the pluripotency gene expression program. This mutation reduced cohesin levels at promoters and enhancers, decreased DNA loops and interactions across short genomic distances, and weakened insulation at CTCF-mediated DNA loops. These findings provide insight into how altered cohesin function contributes to disease and identify a requirement for the cohesin hinge domain in three-dimensional chromatin structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary M. Carico
- Cancer Epigenetics Training Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Holden C. Stefan
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Megan Justice
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Askar Yimit
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jill M. Dowen
- Cancer Epigenetics Training Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Cohesin helps mediate sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, DNA repair, and transcription regulation. We exploited proximity-dependent labeling to define the in vivo interactions of cohesin domains with DNA or with other cohesin domains that lie within the same or in different cohesin complexes. Our results suggest that both cohesin's head and hinge domains are proximal to DNA, and cohesin structure is dynamic with differential folding of its coiled coil regions to generate butterfly confirmations. This method also reveals that cohesins form ordered clusters on and off DNA. The levels of cohesin clusters and their distribution on chromosomes are cell cycle-regulated. Cohesin clustering is likely necessary for cohesion maintenance because clustering and maintenance uniquely require the same subset of cohesin domains and the auxiliary cohesin factor Pds5p. These conclusions provide important new mechanistic and biological insights into the architecture of the cohesin complex, cohesin-cohesin interactions, and cohesin's tethering and loop-extruding activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siheng Xiang
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUnited States
| | - Douglas Koshland
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ryu JK, Bouchoux C, Liu HW, Kim E, Minamino M, de Groot R, Katan AJ, Bonato A, Marenduzzo D, Michieletto D, Uhlmann F, Dekker C. Bridging-induced phase separation induced by cohesin SMC protein complexes. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2021; 7:eabe5905. [PMID: 33568486 PMCID: PMC7875533 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abe5905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) protein complexes are able to extrude DNA loops. While loop extrusion constitutes a fundamental building block of chromosomes, other factors may be equally important. Here, we show that yeast cohesin exhibits pronounced clustering on DNA, with all the hallmarks of biomolecular condensation. DNA-cohesin clusters exhibit liquid-like behavior, showing fusion of clusters, rapid fluorescence recovery after photobleaching and exchange of cohesin with the environment. Strikingly, the in vitro clustering is DNA length dependent, as cohesin forms clusters only on DNA exceeding 3 kilo-base pairs. We discuss how bridging-induced phase separation, a previously unobserved type of biological condensation, can explain the DNA-cohesin clustering through DNA-cohesin-DNA bridges. We confirm that, in yeast cells in vivo, a fraction of cohesin associates with chromatin in a manner consistent with bridging-induced phase separation. Biomolecular condensation by SMC proteins constitutes a new basic principle by which SMC complexes direct genome organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Je-Kyung Ryu
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Céline Bouchoux
- Chromosome Segregation Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Hon Wing Liu
- Chromosome Segregation Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Eugene Kim
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Masashi Minamino
- Chromosome Segregation Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Ralph de Groot
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Allard J Katan
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Andrea Bonato
- SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, UK
| | - Davide Marenduzzo
- SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, UK
| | - Davide Michieletto
- SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, UK
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Frank Uhlmann
- Chromosome Segregation Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
| | - Cees Dekker
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Matityahu A, Onn I. Hit the brakes - a new perspective on the loop extrusion mechanism of cohesin and other SMC complexes. J Cell Sci 2021; 134:jcs247577. [PMID: 33419949 DOI: 10.1242/jcs.247577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The three-dimensional structure of chromatin is determined by the action of protein complexes of the structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) family. Eukaryotic cells contain three SMC complexes, cohesin, condensin, and a complex of Smc5 and Smc6. Initially, cohesin was linked to sister chromatid cohesion, the process that ensures the fidelity of chromosome segregation in mitosis. In recent years, a second function in the organization of interphase chromatin into topologically associated domains has been determined, and loop extrusion has emerged as the leading mechanism of this process. Interestingly, fundamental mechanistic differences exist between mitotic tethering and loop extrusion. As distinct molecular switches that aim to suppress loop extrusion in different biological contexts have been identified, we hypothesize here that loop extrusion is the default biochemical activity of cohesin and that its suppression shifts cohesin into a tethering mode. With this model, we aim to provide an explanation for how loop extrusion and tethering can coexist in a single cohesin complex and also apply it to the other eukaryotic SMC complexes, describing both similarities and differences between them. Finally, we present model-derived molecular predictions that can be tested experimentally, thus offering a new perspective on the mechanisms by which SMC complexes shape the higher-order structure of chromatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avi Matityahu
- 8 Henrietta Szold St., The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, P.O. Box 1589 Safed, Israel
| | - Itay Onn
- 8 Henrietta Szold St., The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, P.O. Box 1589 Safed, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rothschild G, Zhang W, Lim J, Giri PK, Laffleur B, Chen Y, Fang M, Chen Y, Nair L, Liu ZP, Deng H, Hammarström L, Wang J, Basu U. Noncoding RNA transcription alters chromosomal topology to promote isotype-specific class switch recombination. Sci Immunol 2020; 5:5/44/eaay5864. [PMID: 32034089 DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aay5864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
B cells undergo two types of genomic alterations to increase antibody diversity: introduction of point mutations into immunoglobulin heavy- and light-chain (IgH and IgL) variable regions by somatic hypermutation (SHM) and alteration of antibody effector functions by changing the expressed IgH constant region exons through IgH class switch recombination (CSR). SHM and CSR require the B cell-specific activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) protein, the transcription of germline noncoding RNAs, and the activity of the 3' regulatory region (3'RR) super-enhancer. Although many transcription regulatory elements (e.g., promoters and enhancers) reside inside the IgH and IgL sequences, the question remains whether clusters of regulatory elements outside IgH control CSR. Using RNA exosome-deficient mouse B cells where long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are easily detected, we identified a cluster of three RNA-expressing elements that includes lncCSRIgA (that expresses lncRNA-CSRIgA). B cells isolated from a mouse model lacking lncRNA-CSRIgA transcription fail to undergo normal levels of CSR to IgA both in B cells of the Peyer's patches and grown in ex vivo culture conditions. lncRNA-CSRIgA is expressed from an enhancer site (lncCSRIgA ) to facilitate the recruitment of regulatory proteins to a nearby CTCF site (CTCFlncCSR) that alters the chromosomal interactions inside the TADlncCSRIgA and long-range interactions with the 3'RR super-enhancer. Humans with IgA deficiency show polymorphisms in the lncCSRIgA locus compared with the normal population. Thus, we provide evidence for an evolutionarily conserved topologically associated domain (TADlncCSRIgA) that coordinates IgA CSR in Peyer's patch B cells through an lncRNA (lncRNA-CSRIgA) transcription-dependent mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerson Rothschild
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Wanwei Zhang
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Junghyun Lim
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Pankaj Kumar Giri
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Brice Laffleur
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Yiyun Chen
- Division of Life Science, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Center for Systems Biology and Human Health, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Mingyan Fang
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.,Division of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Yuling Chen
- School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Lekha Nair
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Zhi-Ping Liu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China
| | - Haiteng Deng
- School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Lennart Hammarström
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.,Division of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jiguang Wang
- Division of Life Science, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Center for Systems Biology and Human Health, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Uttiya Basu
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Datta S, Lecomte L, Haering CH. Structural insights into DNA loop extrusion by SMC protein complexes. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2020; 65:102-109. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2020.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Revised: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
48
|
Kurokawa Y, Murayama Y. DNA Binding by the Mis4 Scc2 Loader Promotes Topological DNA Entrapment by the Cohesin Ring. Cell Rep 2020; 33:108357. [PMID: 33176147 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Cohesin, a critical mediator of genome organization including sister chromatid cohesion, is a ring-shaped multi-subunit ATPase that topologically embraces DNA. Its loading and function on chromosomes require the Scc2-Scc4 loader. Using biochemical reconstitution, we show here that the ability of the loader to bind DNA plays a critical role in promoting cohesin loading. Two distinct sites within the Mis4Scc2 subunit are found to cooperatively bind DNA. Mis4Scc2 initially forms a tertiary complex with cohesin on DNA and promotes subsequent topological DNA entrapment by cohesin through its DNA binding activity, a process that requires an additional DNA binding surface provided by Psm3Smc3, the ATPase domain of cohesin. Furthermore, we show that mutations in the two DNA binding sites of Mis4 impair the chromosomal loading of cohesin. These observations demonstrate the physiological importance of DNA binding by the loader and provide mechanistic insights into the process of topological cohesin loading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yumiko Kurokawa
- Center for Frontier Research, National Institute of Genetics, 1111, Yata, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan
| | - Yasuto Murayama
- Center for Frontier Research, National Institute of Genetics, 1111, Yata, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan; Department of Genetics, SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), 1111, Yata, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Cutts EE, Vannini A. Condensin complexes: understanding loop extrusion one conformational change at a time. Biochem Soc Trans 2020; 48:2089-2100. [PMID: 33005926 PMCID: PMC7609036 DOI: 10.1042/bst20200241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Condensin and cohesin, both members of the structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) family, contribute to the regulation and structure of chromatin. Recent work has shown both condensin and cohesin extrude DNA loops and most likely work via a conserved mechanism. This review focuses on condensin complexes, highlighting recent in vitro work characterising DNA loop formation and protein structure. We discuss similarities between condensin and cohesin complexes to derive a possible mechanistic model, as well as discuss differences that exist between the different condensin isoforms found in higher eukaryotes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E. Cutts
- Division of Structural Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K
| | - Alessandro Vannini
- Division of Structural Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K
- Fondazione Human Technopole, Structural Biology Research Centre, 20157 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Collier JE, Lee BG, Roig MB, Yatskevich S, Petela NJ, Metson J, Voulgaris M, Gonzalez Llamazares A, Löwe J, Nasmyth KA. Transport of DNA within cohesin involves clamping on top of engaged heads by Scc2 and entrapment within the ring by Scc3. eLife 2020; 9:e59560. [PMID: 32930661 PMCID: PMC7492086 DOI: 10.7554/elife.59560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In addition to extruding DNA loops, cohesin entraps within its SMC-kleisin ring (S-K) individual DNAs during G1 and sister DNAs during S-phase. All three activities require related hook-shaped proteins called Scc2 and Scc3. Using thiol-specific crosslinking we provide rigorous proof of entrapment activity in vitro. Scc2 alone promotes entrapment of DNAs in the E-S and E-K compartments, between ATP-bound engaged heads and the SMC hinge and associated kleisin, respectively. This does not require ATP hydrolysis nor is it accompanied by entrapment within S-K rings, which is a slower process requiring Scc3. Cryo-EM reveals that DNAs transported into E-S/E-K compartments are 'clamped' in a sub-compartment created by Scc2's association with engaged heads whose coiled coils are folded around their elbow. We suggest that clamping may be a recurrent feature of cohesin complexes active in loop extrusion and that this conformation precedes the S-K entrapment required for sister chromatid cohesion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E Collier
- Department of Biochemistry, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Byung-Gil Lee
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular BiologyCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | | | | | - Naomi J Petela
- Department of Biochemistry, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Jean Metson
- Department of Biochemistry, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | | | | | - Jan Löwe
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular BiologyCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Kim A Nasmyth
- Department of Biochemistry, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|