Balancing Benefit vs Risk of Immunosuppressive Therapy for Individual Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Glucocorticoid-Induced Leucine Zipper Protein and Yeast-Extracted Compound Alleviate Colitis and Reduce Fungal Dysbiosis

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have a complex, poorly understood pathogenesis and lack long-lasting effective treatments. Recent research suggests that intestinal fungal dysbiosis may play a role in IBD development. This study investigates the effects of the glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper protein (GILZp)", known for its protective role in gut mucosa, and a yeast extract (Py) with prebiotic properties, either alone or combined, in DSS-induced colitis. Both treatments alleviated symptoms via overlapping or distinct mechanisms. In particular, they reduced the transcription levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNF-α, as well as the expression of the tight junction protein Claudin-2. Additionally, GILZp increased MUC2 transcription, while Py reduced IL-12p40 and IL-6 levels. Notably, both treatments were effective in restoring the intestinal burden of clinically important Candida and related species. Intestinal mycobiome analysis revealed that they were able to reduce colitis-associated fungal dysbiosis, and this effect was mainly the result of a decreased abundance of the Meyerozima genus, which was dominant in colitic mice. Overall, our results suggest that combined treatment regimens with GILZp and Py could represent a new strategy for the treatment of IBD by targeting multiple mechanisms, including the fungal dysbiosis.

IL-22 regulates MASTL expression in intestinal epithelial cells

Microtubule-associated serine-threonine kinase-like (MASTL) has recently been identified as an oncogenic kinase given its overexpression in numerous cancers. Our group has shown that MASTL expression is upregulated in mouse models of sporadic colorectal cancer and colitis-associated cancer (CAC). CAC is one of the most severe complications of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but a limited understanding of the mechanisms governing the switch from normal healing to neoplasia in IBD underscores the need for increased research in this area. However, MASTL levels in patients with IBD and its molecular regulation in IBD and CAC have not been studied. This study reveals that MASTL is upregulated by the cytokine interleukin (IL)-22, which promotes proliferation and has important functions in colitis recovery; however, IL-22 can also promote tumorigenesis when chronically elevated. Upon reviewing the publicly available data, we found significantly elevated MASTL and IL-22 levels in the biopsies from patients with late-stage ulcerative colitis compared with controls, and that MASTL upregulation was associated with high IL-22 expression. Our subsequent in vitro studies found that IL-22 increases MASTL expression in intestinal epithelial cell lines, which facilitates IL-22-mediated cell proliferation and downstream survival signaling. Inhibition of AKT activation abrogated IL-22-induced MASTL upregulation. We further found an increased association of carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) with MASTL in IL-22-treated cells, which stabilized MASTL expression. Inhibition of CAIX prevented IL-22-induced MASTL expression and cell survival. Overall, we show that IL-22/AKT signaling increases MASTL expression to promote cell survival and proliferation. Furthermore, CAIX associates with and stabilizes MASTL in response to IL-22 stimulation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY MASTL is upregulated in colorectal cancer; however, its role in colitis and colitis-associated cancer is poorly understood. This study is the first to draw a link between MASTL and IL-22, a proinflammatory/intestinal epithelial recovery-promoting cytokine that is also implicated in colon tumorigenesis. We propose that IL-22 increases MASTL protein stability by promoting its association with CAIX potentially via AKT signaling to promote cell survival and proliferation.

[Risks of Cancer Associated with Therapeutic Drugs for Inflammatory Bowel Disease]

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are lifelong chronic inflammatory conditions, with many patients requiring ongoing immunomodulatory drug therapy for maintenance treatment. Recent therapeutic goals in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are not only aimed at symptomatic remission but also at achieving mucosal healing to improve the natural course of the disease. In this context, therapeutic approaches are being applied in clinical settings that involve early and appropriate use of drugs, such as immunomodulators or biologics, that have the potential to induce healing of the inflamed intestine before irreversible intestinal damage occurs. All drugs that continuously control intestinal inflammation in IBD can heal the mucosa and potentially reduce the incidence of colitis-associated bowel cancer; however, the continuous use of immunosuppressants can potentially increase the risk of malignancies. The safety issues of the drugs used in clinical practice are partly confirmed during their development processes or shortly after initial marketing, but in other cases, they are estimated through post-marketing case reports or epidemiological studies, sometimes decades after drug approval. This review explores the risks associated with malignancies related to the treatment of IBD, focusing on drugs currently approved in Republic of Korea.

Gpr37 modulates the severity of inflammation-induced GI dysmotility by regulating enteric reactive gliosis

The enteric nervous system (ENS) is contained within two layers of the gut wall and is made up of neurons, immune cells, and enteric glia cells (EGCs) that regulate gastrointestinal (GI) function. EGCs in both inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) change in response to inflammation, referred to as reactive gliosis. Whether EGCs restricted to a specific layer or region within the GI tract alone can influence intestinal immune response is unknown. Using bulk RNA-sequencing and in situ hybridization, we identify G-protein coupled receptor Gpr37 , as a gene expressed only in EGCs of the myenteric plexus, one of the two layers of the ENS. We show that Gpr37 contributes to key components of LPS-induced reactive gliosis including activation of NF-kB and IFN-y signaling and response genes, lymphocyte recruitment, and inflammation-induced GI dysmotility. Targeting Gpr37 in EGCs presents a potential avenue for modifying inflammatory processes in the ENS.

Polymeric DNase-I nanozymes targeting neutrophil extracellular traps for the treatment of bowel inflammation

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is a family of chronic disorders along the gastrointestinal tract. Because of its idiopathic nature, IBD does not have a fundamental cure; current available therapies for IBD are limited to prolonged doses of immunomodulatory agents. While these treatments may reduce inflammation, limited therapeutic efficacy, inconsistency across patients, and adverse side effects from aggressive medications remain as major drawbacks. Recently, excessive production and accumulation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) also known as NETosis have been identified to exacerbate inflammatory responses and induce further tissue damage in IBD. Such discovery invited many researchers to investigate NETs as a potential therapeutic target. DNase-I is a natural agent that can effectively destroy NETs and, therefore, potentially reduce NETs-induced inflammations even without the use of aggressive drugs. However, low stability and rapid clearance of DNase-I remain as major limitations for further therapeutic applications. In this research, polymeric nanozymes were fabricated to increase the delivery and therapeutic efficacy of DNase-I. DNase-I was immobilized on the surface of polymeric nanoparticles to maintain its enzymatic properties while extending its activity in the colon. Delivery of DNase-I using this platform allowed enhanced stability and prolonged activity of DNase-I with minimal toxicity. When administered to animal models of IBD, DNase-I nanozymes successfully alleviated various pathophysiological symptoms of IBD. More importantly, DNase-I nanozyme administration successfully attenuated neutrophil infiltration and NETosis in the colon compared to free DNase-I or mesalamine.

Recent Advances in Nanozyme-Based Materials for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a type of chronic inflammatory disorder that interferes with the patient's lifestyle and, in extreme situations, can be deadly. Fortunately, with the ever-deepening understanding of the pathological cause of IBD, recent studies using nanozyme-based materials have indicated the potential toward effective IBD treatment. In this review, the recent advancement of nanozymes for the treatment of enteritis is summarized from the perspectives of the structural design of nanozyme-based materials and therapeutic strategies, intending to serve as a reference to produce effective nanozymes for moderating inflammation in the future. Last but not least, the potential and current restrictions for using nanozymes in IBD will also be discussed. In short, this review may provide a guidance for the development of innovative enzyme-mimetic nanomaterials that offer a novel and efficient approach toward the effective treatment of IBD.

Characteristic analysis of adverse reactions of five anti-TNFɑ agents: a descriptive analysis from WHO-VigiAccess

Introduction: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept, golimumab, and certolizumab pegol) have revolutionized the treatment of severe immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and ulcerative colitis. This study assessed adverse drug reactions (ADRs) after the use of TNFα inhibitors in VigiAccess of the World Health Organization (WHO) and compared the adverse reaction characteristics of five inhibitors to select the drug with the least risk for individualized patient use. Methods: The study was a retrospective descriptive analysis method in design. We sorted out five marketed anti-TNFα drugs, and their ADR reports were obtained from WHO-VigiAccess. Data collection included data on the age groups, sex, and regions of patients worldwide covered by ADR reports, as well as data on disease systems and symptoms caused by ADRs recorded in annual ADR reports and reports received by the WHO. By calculating the proportion of adverse reactions reported for each drug, we compared the similarities and differences in adverse reactions for the five drugs. Results: Overall, 1,403,273 adverse events (AEs) related to the five anti-TNFα agents had been reported in VigiAccess at the time of the search. The results show that the 10 most commonly reported AE manifestations were rash, arthralgia, rheumatoid arthritis, headache, pneumonia, psoriasis, nausea, diarrhea, pruritus, and dyspnea. The top five commonly reported AE types of anti-TNFα drugs were as follows: infections and infestations (184,909, 23.0%), musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (704,657, 28.6%), gastrointestinal disorders (122,373, 15.3%), skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (108,259, 13.5%), and nervous system disorders (88,498, 11.0%). The preferred terms of myelosuppression and acromegaly were obvious in golimumab. Infliximab showed a significantly higher ADR report ratio in the infusion-related reaction compared to the other four inhibitors. The rate of ADR reports for lower respiratory tract infection and other infections was the highest for golimumab. Conclusion: No causal associations could be established between the TNFα inhibitors and the ADRs. Current comparative observational studies of these inhibitors revealed common and specific adverse reactions in the ADR reports of the WHO received for these drugs. Clinicians should improve the rational use of these high-priced drugs according to the characteristics of ADRs.

Pre-existing Immunocompromised Status as a Preventer of Mortality in COVID-19 Patients: Friend or Foe?

Objective COVID-19 has been negatively impacted by a number of comorbidities. Aside from that, some conditions or treatments that cause immunosuppression can alter the course of the disease, leading to worse outcomes. The primary goal of this study is to compare the clinical presentation, laboratory analysis, radiological findings, and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 with and without immunosuppression. Materials and methods The study includes patients with pre-existing immunosuppression and COVID-19 infection who were admitted and received inpatient treatment at Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Pulmonary Medicine ward between April 2020 and June 2020. Data on demographics, epidemiology, clinical course, laboratory analysis, radiological findings, length of hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality were collected from all patients. Results The study group consisted of 23 patients who had pre-existing immunosuppression, and the control group consisted of 207 immunocompetent patients, making a total of 230 patients. Significant differences in lymphocyte count, ROX (respiratory-rate oxygenation) index on Day 0, and fibrinogen levels were discovered between the two groups. SARI (severe acute respiratory infection) was more common in the control group than in the study group (p<0.022), but there was no difference in mortality. Conclusion The mean number and percentage of lymphocytes were lower in immunocompromised COVID-19 patients at the time of diagnosis. Higher ROX index values and a lower risk of developing SARI could explain the hypothesis that these patients may be benefiting from a pre-existing corticosteroid regimen. Additional research with larger numbers of patients may be beneficial in drawing a more definitive conclusion.

Management of inflammatory bowel diseases in older adults

The burden of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in older adults (ie, aged over 60 years old) is increasing due to a combination of an ageing population with compounding prevalence of IBD and increasing incidence of elderly-onset (ie, onset over the age of 60 years) IBD. Despite the increasing prevalence of IBD, there is a paucity of evidence on which to base management of older adults with IBD, leading to substantial variability in care. This population is under-represented in clinical trials and has a high burden of chronic corticosteroid use, low uptake of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents, and high rates of unplanned health-care use and disability. Management of IBD in older adults requires carefully weighing an individual patient's risk of IBD-related complications, IBD-directed immunosuppressive therapy, and non-IBD comorbidities. A deeper understanding of biological and functional age, dynamic risk stratification strategies (including frailty-based risk assessment tools), comparative effectiveness and safety of current therapies and treatment strategies, and shared decision making to inform treatment goals and targets is needed to improve outcomes in older adults with IBD. In this Review, we discuss the epidemiology, natural history, pathophysiology, and medical and surgical management of older individuals living with IBD and identify key research gaps and approaches to address them.

Azathioprine Withdrawal Is Cost-Effective in Patients with Crohn's Disease in Remission on Infliximab and Azathioprine

BACKGROUND

In Crohn's disease, combination therapy with infliximab and azathioprine is more effective than either drug alone but is associated with a higher risk of therapy-related complications. Though therapy de-escalation can reduce risks and save costs, it is associated with a risk of Crohn's disease relapse.

AIMS

We aimed to study the cost-effectiveness of de-escalation strategies in Crohn's disease patients in remission on infliximab and azathioprine.

METHODS

We constructed a decision tree with Markov models for continuation of infliximab and azathioprine, discontinuation of azathioprine followed by its re-introduction in case of relapse, discontinuation of azathioprine followed by infliximab dose intensification without azathioprine reintroduction in case of relapse and discontinuation of infliximab. Third-party payers' perspective with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life years was used. Markov cycle length was 3 months, and the study period was 5 years. A 35-year-old patient with Crohn's disease in clinical remission on azathioprine 150 mg daily and infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks was used for base-case analysis.

RESULTS

Azathioprine withdrawal followed by its reintroduction upon relapse was the dominant strategy as it was the most effective and least expensive approach on base-case analysis. It was also cost-effective in 99.3% of Monte Carlo trial simulations. AZA withdrawal without IFX dose intensification upon relapse was the least effective and the most expensive strategy.

CONCLUSION

Azathioprine withdrawal is the most effective and least costly de-escalation strategy in CD patients in remission on combination therapy if AZA re-introduction is performed upon CD relapse.

Available Methods for Benefit-risk Assessment: Lessons for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Drugs

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Medical treatment for inflammatory bowel disease has advanced significantly over the two past decades. The advent of biologics and small molecules has revolutionised outcomes for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Knowledge of drug pharmacology, indications, and adverse events is essential to ensure the best clinical care while minimising toxicity. Our aim was to review the literature on current methods of benefit-risk assessment, and consider their practical applicability to inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted to investigate studies documenting benefit-risk assessment.

RESULTS

Several structured frameworks and quantitative methodologies have been developed to evaluate benefit-risk profiles of drugs in a more comprehensive and consistent framework. Quantitative methods integrate benefit and risk outcome measures or incorporate preference weights for benefit and risk criteria into the evaluation. Incorporation of preference weights from patients is an essential aspect of quantitative benefit-risk assessment. Benefit-risk assessment is still evolving in inflammatory bowel disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The risks and benefits of each medical therapy must be discussed with the patient and a shared decision-making process is recommended. Future initiatives should be developed to perform a benefit-risk assessment considering the characteristics of inflammatory bowel disease drugs.

Plasmablastic lymphoma occurring in ulcerative colitis during treatment with immunosuppressive therapy

A 53-year-old man who had a history of ulcerative colitis (UC) for 2 years underwent colonoscopy as regular follow-up. The results showed an elevated lesion in the descending colon, which was diagnosed as plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) based on pathological findings. In situ hybridization for the Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA probe was positive. Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed rearrangement of the MYC gene. He had been taking prednisolone, 5-aminosalicylic acid, azathiopurine, and ustekinumab at the diagnosis of PBL and had multiple prior therapies for UC including infliximab, tacrolimus, and tofacitinib due to steroid dependence. PBL is a rare aggressive B cell lymphoma initially described in the oral cavity of human immunodeficiency virus positive patients and it is suspected to have an association with immunocompromised status of patients. The number of cases of PBL in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is extremely rare. All these patients were administered immunosuppressive therapy including thiopurines or biologics. IBD patients with immunosuppressive therapy have a higher potential for developing lymphoproliferative disorders. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of lymphoma, including PBL.

Integrated systematic pharmacology analysis and experimental validation to reveal the mechanism of action of Semen aesculi on inflammatory bowel diseases

BACKGROUND AND ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Semen aesculi (SA), a traditional Chinese herb, has been used in the treatment of gastrointestinal disease for thousands of years. The escin was the main components of SA. A growing number of research showed that escin has a wide range of pharmacological activities in intestinal barrier dysfunction.

AIM OF THE STUDY

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are an idiopathic disease of the intestinal tract with the hallmark features of mucosal inflammation and loss of barrier function. The theory of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) suggests that SA plays a potential role in protecting the gastrointestinal diseases. The present study aimed to explore the effects of SA on the intestinal barrier under existing inflammatory conditions and elucidate underlying mechanisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The bioactive components of SA and their predicted biological targets were combined to develop a compound target pathway network. It is used to predict the bioactive components, molecular targets, and molecular pathways of SA in improving IBD. The ingredients of SA were extracted by decoction either in water and ethanol and separated into four fractions (AE, EE, PEE and PCE). The effects of extractions were evaluated in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced RAW264.7 macrophages cell model, LPS-induced intestinal barrier injury model and imodium-induced constipation model. The high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis was performed to identify the bioactive components.

RESULTS

The compound-target pathway network was identified with 10 bioactive compounds, 166 IBD-related targets, and 52 IBD-related pathways. In LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells, PEE and PCE significantly decreased nitric oxide (NO) production and TNF-α level. In mice, PEE and PCE administration improved intestinal barrier damage, increased intestinal motility, reduced levels of TNF-α and diamine oxidase (DAO). Furthermore, PEE and PCE administration not only decreased expression of p-Akt, p-IκBα, nuclear p-p65, and TNF-α level, but also increased expression of the zonula occludin-1 (ZO-1) in LPS-induced intestinal barrier injury model. The escin content of AE, EE, PEE and PCE gradually increased with an increase of the bioactivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Escin was the main bioactive components of SA. The effects of SA on IBD were mediated by repairing the intestinal barrier and promoting intestinal motility. The mechanism of action of SA is related to inhibiting the Akt/NF-κB signaling pathway in intestinal tissue, at least, in part. Our results provide a scientific basis for further exploring the mechanisms involved in the beneficial effects of SA in IBD.

Neutralizing Antibody Response, Safety, and Efficacy of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Pediatric Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Multicenter Case-Control Study

The vaccination of immunocompromised children against coronavirus disease 2019 is an important public health issue. We evaluated the serological response, safety, and efficacy of the BNT162b2 vaccine in children with and without inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A prospective, multicenter, case–control study was conducted in a pediatric population, including patients with IBD, aged 12–18 years. Clinical characteristics, safety profile, and serum samples for surrogate virus-neutralizing antibody testing pre- and post-BNT162b2 vaccination were assessed. The breakthrough infection rate during the Omicron outbreak was calculated to evaluate efficacy. Fifteen controls and twenty-three patients with IBD were enrolled. After two vaccine doses, the median level of percentage inhibition was highly increased, without significant differences between the groups (control 96.9 and IBD 96.3). However, it was significantly reduced in IBD patients receiving combination therapy (anti-tumor necrosis factor-α + immunomodulators) relative to those in other therapies and controls. Serious adverse events were not observed. The breakthrough infection rate was 42.1%, without statistical differences between the groups. Immunization with BNT162b2 in patients with IBD was comparable with that in healthy adolescents in terms of immunogenicity and safety. Nevertheless, the efficacy of BNT162b2 in preventing infection caused by the Omicron variant in the pediatric population was insufficient.

Impact of Anti-tumour Necrosis Factor Agents on the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Nationwide French Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with ulcerative colitis [UC] are at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Anti-tumour necrosis factor agents [anti-TNF] aim to reduce chronic colonic inflammation and may lower the risk of colorectal cancer [CRC], but the impact of anti-TNF exposure has not yet been assessed in population-based cohort studies. The aim of this nationwide study was to assess the risk of CRC in patients with UC exposed to anti-TNF.

METHODS

Based on the French health insurance database, patients aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of UC, previously exposed to or initiating immunosuppressive treatment, were followed from January 1, 2009, until December 31, 2018. The risk of CRC associated with anti-TNF exposure was assessed using marginal structural Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for baseline and time-varying comorbidities including primary sclerosing cholangitis, UC disease activity, colonoscopic surveillance, and other medications.

RESULTS

Among 32 403 patients with UC, 15 542 [48.0%] were exposed to anti-TNF. During a median follow-up of 6.1 years [198 249 person-years], 246 incident CRC occurred (incidence rate per 1000 person-years, 1.24; 95% confidence intrval [CI], 1.10-1.41). Whereas the risk of CRC associated with anti-TNF exposure was not decreased in the overall group of patients with UC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.58-1.26), anti-TNF exposure was associated with a decreased risk of CRC in patients with long-standing colitis [disease duration ≥10 years] [HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20-0.86].

CONCLUSIONS

In a nationwide cohort of patients with UC, anti-TNF exposure was associated with a decreased risk of CRC in patients with long-standing colitis.

Early Notice Pointer, an IoT-like Platform for Point-of-Care Feet and Body Balance Screening

Improper foot biomechanics associated with uneven bodyweight distribution contribute to impaired balance and fall risks. There is a need to complete the panel of commercially available devices for the self-measurement of BMI, fat, muscle, bone, weight, and hydration with one that measures weight-shifting at home as a pre-specialist assessment system. This paper reports the development of the Early Notice Pointer (ENP), a user-friendly screening device based on weighing scale technology. The ENP is designed to be used at home to provide a graphic indication and customised and evidence-based foot and posture triage. The device electronically detects and maps the bodyweight and distinct load distributions on the main areas of the feet: forefoot and rearfoot. The developed platform also presents features that assess the user's balance, and the results are displayed as a simple numerical report and map. The technology supports data display on mobile phones and accommodates multiple measurements for monitoring. Therefore, the evaluation could be done at non-specialist and professional levels. The system has been tested to validate its accuracy, precision, and consistency. A parallel study to describe the frequency of arch types and metatarsal pressure in young adults (1034 healthy subjects) was conducted to explain the importance of self-monitoring at home for better prevention of foot arch- and posture-related conditions. The results showed the potential of the newly created platform as a screening device ready to be wirelessly connected with mobile phones and the internet for remote and personalised identification and monitoring of foot- and body balance-related conditions. The real-time interpretation of the reported physiological parameters opens new avenues toward IoT-like on-body monitoring of human physiological signals through easy-to-use devices on flexible substrates for specific versatility.

Impact of COVID-19 on Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first identified in Wuhan, China, in late 2019. Responsible for the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 is one of three structurally similar beta-coronaviruses that can cause a strong upregulation of cytokines referred to as cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Unresolved CRS leads to respiratory symptoms, including pneumonia, and in more severe cases, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Although COVID-19 is widely known for these hallmark respiratory symptoms, it also impacts the gut, causing gastrointestinal (GI) tract inflammation and diarrhea. COVID-19's GI symptoms may be due to the high intestinal expression of angiotensin converting enzyme-2 receptors, which are for the binding of SARS-CoV-2 viral particles. Reports have shown that SARS-CoV-2 can be passed through fecal matter, with one study finding that 48.1% of COVID-19 patients expressed viral SARS-CoV-2 mRNA in their stool. Given that the GI tract is a target tissue affected by COVID-19, this causes concern for those with underlying GI pathologies, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Regrettably, there have been only limited studies on the impact of COVID-19 on gut health, and the impact of COVID-19 on intestinal inflammation among IBD patients remains unclear. In particular, questions regarding susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection, clinical impact of COVID-19 on IBD, and the potential influence of age, sex, and immunosuppressant medications are still poorly understood. An improved understanding of these issues is needed to address the unique risks of COVID-19 among IBD patients, as well as the potential impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the host intestinal microbiota.

COVID-19 in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Israeli Experience

Background: Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) affecting millions of people worldwide. IBD therapies, designed for continuous immune suppression, often render patients more susceptible to infections. The effect of the immune suppression on the risk of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is not fully determined yet. Objective: To describe COVID-19 characteristics and outcomes and to evaluate the association between IBD phenotypes, infection outcomes and immunomodulatory therapies. Methods: In this multi-center study, we prospectively followed IBD patients with proven COVID-19. De-identified data from medical charts were collected including age, gender, IBD type, IBD clinical activity, IBD treatments, comorbidities, symptoms and outcomes of COVID-19. A multivariable regression model was used to examine the effect of immunosuppressant drugs on the risk of infection by COVID-19 and the outcomes. Results: Of 144 IBD patients, 104 (72%) were CD and 40 (28%) were UC. Mean age was 32.2 ± 12.6 years. No mortalities were reported. In total, 94 patients (65.3%) received biologic therapy. Of them, 51 (54%) at escalated doses, 10 (11%) in combination with immunomodulators and 9 (10%) with concomitant corticosteroids. Disease location, behavior and activity did not correlate with the severity of COVID-19. Biologics as monotherapy or with immunomodulators or corticosteroids were not associated with more severe infection. On the contrary, patients receiving biologics had significantly milder infection course (p = 0.001) and were less likely to be hospitalized (p = 0.001). Treatment was postponed in 34.7% of patients until recovery from COVID-19, without consequent exacerbation. Conclusion: We did not witness aggravated COVID-19 outcomes in patients with IBD. Patients treated with biologics had a favorable outcome.

Efficacy, Safety and Future Perspectives of JAK Inhibitors in the IBD Treatment

Although development of biologics has importantly improved the effectiveness in inducing and maintaining remission in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), biologic therapies still have several limitations. Effective, low-cost drug therapy with good safety profile and compliance is therefore a substantial unmet medical need. A promising target for IBD treatment strategies are Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, which are small molecules that interact with cytokines implicated in pathogenesis of IBD. In contrast to monoclonal antibodies, which are able to block a single cytokine, JAK inhibitors have the potential to affect multiple cytokine-dependent immune pathways, which may improve the therapeutic response in some IBD patients. Tofacitinib, inhibiting signaling via different types of JAKs, has been already approved for ulcerative colitis, and several other small-molecule are still under investigation. However, one of the main concerns about using JAK inhibitors is the risk of thromboembolic events. Moreover, patients with COVID-19 appear to have an increased susceptibility for immunothrombosis. Therefore, thrombotic complications may become a serious limitation in the use of JAK inhibitors in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. As many questions about safety and efficacy of small molecules still remain unclear, in our review we present the current data regarding approved JAK inhibitors, as well as those in clinical development for the treatment of IBD.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients' Perspectives of Clinical Trials: A Global Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis

Background

Despite recent progress, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapies with pronounced long-term efficacy and improved safety are needed. IBD clinical trials face challenges with patient recruitment because of study designs, competitive or overlapping trials, and limited numbers of eligible patients. We aimed to better understand patients' awareness of, attitudes toward, and experience with IBD clinical trials.

Methods

This multinational, cross-sectional cohort study of adults with IBD recruited online consisted of 2 components: a quantitative 15-minute online survey completed by all participants and a qualitative 30-minute telephone interview completed by a subset of patients from the United States.

Results

Quantitative survey respondents (N = 226) included patients with ulcerative colitis (52%) and Crohn's disease (48%) from the United States (n = 100, 21 of whom were interviewed), Brazil (n = 26), Canada (n = 25), France (n = 25), Germany (n = 25), and Spain (n = 25); 96% of respondents reported at least a basic understanding of clinical trials. Patients rated conversations with health care providers most helpful for researching trials, but during interviews patients discussed their desire for increased patient-physician communication about trials. Major barriers to participation included invasive screening/monitoring (35% of quantitative responses) and concern over receiving placebo (35%) or suboptimal treatment (33%). Most respondents (68%) reported that clinical trial participants are "guinea pigs" for an experimental treatment.

Conclusions

Opportunities to improve participation in IBD trials include improved communication with health care providers, further patient education, and alternative trial designs. Ultimately, a better understanding of the patient perspective will be important for more informed patients and more successful recruitment and enrollment.

Why Do Immunosuppressed Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Not Seem to Be at a Higher Risk of COVID-19?

The COVID-19 pandemic has created a public health emergency. In this context, there are major concerns for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly for those treated with immunomodulators, biologics, and Janus Kinase inhibitors. Infection susceptibility is, in fact, one of the reported risks for immunotherapy drugs. This review provides the existing evidence from worldwide case series describing: (a) the risk for the SARS-CoV-2 infection and (b) the risk of a severe infection outcome in patients with IBD treated with immunotherapy. Further, the review discusses the potential mechanisms underlying why this group of patients with IBD might be protected from contracting the infection and from a worse disease. From the available data, it appears that these patients should have an enhanced adherence to the recommended preventive measures, suggesting a role in reducing their risk of infection. Furthermore, the immunotherapy may dampen the cytokine storm and inflammation associated with COVID-19. The results of this review seem to confirm that patients with IBD receiving immunomodulators, biologics, or Janus Kinase inhibitors do not have an increased risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection or develop a more severe COVID-19. According to the current evidence, it is advisable to maintain immunotherapy, apart from corticosteroids, in patients with IBD in order to avoid relapse. This review reports only on the cases of patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR of a nasopharyngeal swab sample. This is a limitation and a more accurate epidemiological picture of the infection will be obtained only via the expanded use of antibody tests.

Aggressive Colorectal Cancer in an Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patient following Treatment with Vedolizumab: A Case Report

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The increased risk of bowel cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease can be related with the extent, duration and severity of inflammation or with the cancer immune surveillance interference of immunosuppressive drugs used in inflammatory bowel disease treatment. Therefore, the risk-benefit ratio associated with long-term therapeutic strategies should be based on the patient’s age, sex, comorbidities and disease phenotype. <b><i>Case Report:</i></b> We present the case of a 76-year-old man with a history of melanoma stage Clark III and steroid-dependent left-sided colitis, refractory to mesalamine and thiopurines, with a diagnosis of a multifocal colorectal adenocarcinoma shortly after clinical and endoscopic remission 1 year after starting vedolizumab. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> Vedolizumab is a gut-selective monoclonal anti-α₄β₇-integrin antibody that inhibits lymphocyte migration into the gastrointestinal submucosa. Its effectiveness for induction and maintenance of remission and its favorable safety profile make it an alternative in patients with chronic refractory colitis and contraindications to anti-TNF-α. However, there is the hypothesis that, by reducing the migration of activated leukocytes to the gastrointestinal tract, it may also reduce immunosurveillance, increasing the colorectal malignancy risk in the long term. More studies are necessary to address this issue.

Hospitalisation for Drug Infusion Did Not Increase Levels of Anxiety and the Risk of Disease Relapse in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease during COVID-19 Outbreak

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, immunomodulatory therapies and hospital admission were suspected to increase the risk of infection. Nevertheless, patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) treated with intravenous (i.v.) biologics had to move to hospitals for drug infusion. We investigated the impact of hospitalisation in patients with IBD. We conducted a survey including consecutive IBD patients initially in clinical and biochemical remission treated with biologics at the end of the first lockdown period. Patients underwent the normally scheduled clinical visits, performed at hospital for i.v.-treated patients or at home for patients treated with s.c. drugs. We administered to all patients the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire and other 12 questions, specifically related to COVID-19 and its implications. A total of 189 IBD patients were recruited, 112 (59.3%) treated with i.v. drugs and 77 (40.7%) with s.c. ones. No relapses were recorded in either group (hospitalized vs. non-hospitalized, p = ns), as well as which, COVID-19 infections were not demonstrated in patients in contact with people with suspected symptoms or directly experiencing them. The total HADS score obtained by the sum of all items was also almost identical between groups (37.1 ± 2.8 vs. 37.2 ± 2.8; p = 0.98). In patients treated with i.v. drugs receiving a televisit (n = 17), the rate of satisfaction with telemedicine (58.8%) was significantly lower compared with those treated with s.c. drugs (94.8%; p < 0.0005). Our results suggest that hospitalisation during the COVID-19 outbreak does not increase the risk of COVID-19 infection as well as the risk of IBD relapse; moreover, the similar levels of anxiety in both groups could confirm that there is no need to convert patients from i.v. to s.c. therapy.

Treatment-based risk stratification of infections in inflammatory bowel disease: A comparison between anti-tumor necrosis factor-α and nonbiological exposure in real-world setting

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Infective issues about anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remain controversial, especially when compared with nonbiological treatments. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and prevalence of several infections in anti-TNF-α-exposed patients compared with nonbiological treatments.

METHODS

All naïve IBD subjects treated with anti-TNF-α and matched nonbiologic-exposed patients were included.

RESULTS

Among 3453 patients in the database, 288 anti-TNF-α-exposed subjects and 288 nonbiologic-exposed IBD controls met inclusion criteria. Fifty-eight infections (20.1%) occurred during anti-TNF-α treatment versus 23 (8%) in the matched group (odds ratio [OR] 2.9, P < 0.001) (incidence 5.72 vs 0.96/100 patient-years, incidence ratio [IR] 6, P < 0.001). IR was higher for anti-TNF-α versus mesalamine/sulfasalazine (IR 40.8, P < 0.001), similar to azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine/methotrexate (IR 0.78, P = 0.32) and lower than corticosteroids (IR 0.05, P < 0.001). The incidence rate of serious infections was 1.3 in the anti-TNF-α-exposed versus 0.38/100 patient-years in nonexposed subjects (IR 3.44, P = 0.002), without significant difference between anti-TNF-α and azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine/methotrexate (1.3 vs 3.03/100 patient-years, IR 0.43, P = 0.1). Predictors of infections in anti-TNF-α-exposed patients were concomitant use of systemic steroids (OR 1.9, P = 0.02) or azathioprine (OR 2.6, P = 0.01) and a body mass index < 18.5 at time of infection (OR 2.2, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of developing infections during anti-TNF-α therapy remains high, although not dissimilar to that found for other immunosuppressants, while concomitant immunosuppression and malnutrition appear the most important causes of infection.

Effect of Probiotic Use on Adverse Events in Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Alterations of intestinal microflora are involved in the pathogenesis and natural history of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Manipulation of human gut microbiota with probiotics may be a therapeutic option. In this retrospective cohort study, the benefits of probiotic use in reducing adverse events were analyzed. Data from clinical charts of IBD patients followed up for at least 36 months were retrieved. The occurrence of adverse events including the need for systemic steroids, hospitalization, and surgery related to IBD was analyzed according to age, gender, body mass index, treatments, IBD phenotype, disease duration, and probiotic use. The amount of probiotic use was calculated as the ratio of time under probiotic treatment to the disease duration starting from the date of the first probiotic administration and expressed as a percentage. Patients were stratified according to the percentage of probiotic use as ≤ 24%, 25-74%, and ≥ 75%, and the number of adverse events per patient-years was calculated. Results were adjusted for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) by multivariate analysis including study variables. Data from 200 patients (78 CD, 122 UC; 117 females; mean age 40.6 ± 15.3 years; mean disease duration 12.1 ± 8.7 years) were available. CD patients taking probiotics for 25-74% of the disease duration experienced a 64% reduction in total adverse events. The need for systemic steroids, hospitalization, and surgery dropped to zero events per person-year in UC patients and decreased by 93% (p < 0.001) in CD patients taking probiotics for ≥ 75% of the disease duration. Our findings suggest that the use of probiotics may be an additional therapeutic tool in patients with IBD.

AGA Technical Review on the Medical Management of Moderate to Severe Luminal and Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease

The incidence and prevalence of Crohn's disease (CD) is rising globally. Patients with moderate to severe CD are at high risk for needing surgery and hospitalization and for developing disease-related complications, corticosteroid dependence, and serious infections. Optimal management of outpatients with moderate to severe luminal and/or fistulizing (including perianal) CD often requires the use of immunomodulator (thiopurines, methotrexate) and/or biologic therapies, including tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab, either as monotherapy or in combination (with immunomodulators) to mitigate these risks. Decisions about optimal drug therapy in moderate to severe CD are complex, with limited guidance on comparative efficacy and safety of different treatments, leading to considerable practice variability. Since the last iteration of these guidelines published in 2013, significant advances have been made in the field, including the regulatory approval of 2 new biologic agents, vedolizumab and ustekinumab. Therefore, the American Gastroenterological Association prioritized updating clinical guidelines on this topic. To inform the clinical guidelines, this technical review was completed in accordance with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) framework. The review addressed the following focused questions (in adult outpatients with moderate to severe luminal CD): overall and comparative efficacy of different medications for induction and maintenance of remission in patients with or without prior exposure to tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists, comparative efficacy and safety of biologic monotherapy vs combination therapy with immunomodulators, comparative efficacy of a top-down (upfront use of biologics and/or immunomodulator therapy) vs step-up treatment strategy (acceleration to biologic and/or immunomodulator therapy only after failure of mesalamine), and the role of corticosteroids and mesalamine for induction and/or maintenance of remission. Finally, in adult outpatients with moderate to severe fistulizing CD, this review addressed the efficacy of pharmacologic interventions for achieving fistula and the role of adjunctive antibiotics without clear evidence of active infection.

Bile Salt Hydrolases: At the Crossroads of Microbiota and Human Health

The gut microbiota has been increasingly linked to metabolic health and disease over the last few decades. Several factors have been suggested to be involved in lipid metabolism and metabolic responses. One mediator that has gained great interest as a clinically important enzyme is bile salt hydrolase (BSH). BSH enzymes are widely distributed in human gastrointestinal microbial communities and are believed to play key roles in both microbial and host physiology. In this review, we discuss the current evidence related to the role of BSHs in health and provide useful insights that may pave the way for new therapeutic targets in human diseases.

Commensal flora triggered target anti-inflammation of alginate-curcumin micelle for ulcerative colitis treatment

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic, idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by dysregulation of colon immune response. Curcumin (Cur) has strong anti-inflammatory activities, but the application is severely hindered by the extremely hydrophobicity and pitiful bioavailability. Alginate (Alg), a natural polysaccharide with ideal solubility and biosafety, was introduced to prepare the esterified alginate-curcumin conjugate (Alg-Cur) and constructed stable Alg-Cur micelle in physiological solutions. Compared with crystalline Cur, the target anti-inflammatory activities of Alg-Cur were systematically investigated. The results showed that Alg-Cur exerted effective anti-inflammatory effects in Raw 264.7 cells. After oral administration, 92.32 % of Alg-Cur reached colon, and the ester bonds were quickly sheared by abundant esterase produced by commensal anaerobic flora. The released Cur was quickly absorbed in-situ in monomolecular state, and effectively ameliorated the colonic inflammation and tissue damage by inhibiting the TLR4 expression in colonic epithelial cell, reducing the transcription and expression of the pro-inflammation cytokines downstream, as well as the infiltration of lymphocytes, macrophages and neutrophils. The Alg-Cur micelle effectively enhanced the hydrophilicity and bioavailability of Cur, and the commensal flora triggered Cur release showed great potential for UC treatment.

A review on medical management of inflammatory bowel disease during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has engulfed the world and is the highlight of medical community at this time. As humanity fights the battle against this virus, questions are arising regarding the appropriate management of at risk patient populations. The immunocompromised cohort is particularly susceptible to this infection, and we have tried to explore the medical management of one such group, which is composed of individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). There is limited data on the management of IBD during the ongoing pandemic. Several medical societies have put forth suggestions on how to manage immunocompromised patients in order to minimize risk of developing coronavirus disease 2019. This review aims to present available recommendations from experts and provides an insight on preventive and therapeutic strategies that can be implemented for the medical management of patients with IBD. We anticipate that as more information arises, new guidelines will emerge.

Use of granulocyte/monocytapheresis in ulcerative colitis: A practical review from a European perspective

Half of the patients with ulcerative colitis require at least one course of systemic corticosteroids in their lifetime. Approximately 75% of these patients will also require immunosuppressive drugs (i.e., thiopurines or biological agents) in the mid-term to avoid colectomy. Immunosuppressive drugs raise some concerns due to an increased risk of serious and opportunistic infections and cancer, particularly in elderly and co-morbid patients, underlining the unmet need for safer alternative therapies. Granulocyte/monocytapheresis (GMA), a CE-marked, non-pharmacological procedure for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (among other immune-mediated diseases), remains the only therapy targeting neutrophils, the hallmark of pathology in ulcerative colitis. GMA has proven its efficacy in different clinical scenarios and shows an excellent and unique safety profile. In spite of being a first line therapy in Japan, GMA use is still limited to a small number of centres and countries in Europe. In this article, we aim to give an overview from a European perspective of the mechanism of action, recent clinical data on efficacy and practical aspects for the use of GMA in ulcerative colitis.

Risk of infection associated with Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors and biological therapies in inflammatory intestinal disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Prevention strategies

Patients with certain immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), have an increased risk of severe infectious diseases than the general population, which are mainly associated with the immunosuppressive treatments that they receive. These treatments act on the immune system through different mechanisms, causing different degrees of immunosuppression and a variable risk depending on whether the pathogen is a virus, bacteria or fungus. This article reviews the most relevant literature on the subject, which was selected and discussed by a panel of experts. The aim of this article is to review the risk of infections in patients with IBD and RA, and the potential preventive measures.

Healthy Lifestyle Is Associated With Reduced Mortality in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

BACKGROUND & AIMS

It is not clear whether a healthy lifestyle affects mortality of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

We collected data form the Nurses' Health Study (1986-2014), Nurses' Health Study II (1991-2015), and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1986-2014), which assess lifestyles with serial questionnaires. We estimated joint and individual associations between 5 healthy lifestyle factors after IBD diagnosis (never smoking, body mass index 18.5-24.9 kg/m², vigorous physical activity in the highest 50% with non-zero value, alternate Mediterranean diet score ≥4, and light drinking [0.1-5.0 g/d]) and mortality using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

We documented 83 deaths in 363 patients with CD during 4741 person-years and 80 deaths in 465 patients with UC during 6061 person-years. The median age of IBD diagnosis was 55 y. Compared to patients with IBD with no healthy lifestyle factors, patients with IBD with 3-5 healthy lifestyle factors had a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.29; 95% CI, 0.16-0.52; P_trend < .0001). This reduction was significant in patients with CD (P_trend = .003) as well as in patients with UC (P_trend = .0003). Individual associations were more than 25 pack-years (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.24-2.97; P_trend < .0001), physical activity (HR according to quintiles, 0.55-0.31; P_trend = .001), Mediterranean diet (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.98), and alcohol consumption (HR_{0.1-5 g/d} 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.95 vs HR_{>15 g/d} 1.84; 95% CI, 1.02-3.32). The findings did not change when we adjusted for family history of IBD, immunomodulator use, and IBD-related surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In an analysis of data from 3 large cohort studies, we associated adherence to a healthy lifestyle with reduced mortality in patients with CD or UC.

Thiopurines and non-melanoma skin cancer: partners in crime in inflammatory bowel diseases

INTRODUCTION

Several studies have shown that inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) patients treated with thiopurines have an increased risk of developing skin cancer.

SOURCES OF DATA

This review is based on recent published literature regarding the use of thiopurines in IBD and skin malignancies.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Exposure to thiopurines is significantly associated with nonmelanoma skin cancer, but not with melanoma. Primary and secondary prevention including sun-protective measures and regular dermatologic screening are recommended in IBD patients, particularly in those exposed to thiopurines.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Both when and how immunosuppressive therapy should be resumed in patients with a prior history of skin cancer still remain debatable topics.

GROWING POINTS

The benefit-risk balance between thiopurine therapy and risk of skin cancer should be evaluated in the drug decision process.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

The approval of new effective strategies requires the re-evaluation of the positioning of thiopurines within the therapeutic algorithm based on an increasingly individualized approach.

Disease- and Treatment-related Complications in Older Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Comparison of Adult-onset vs Elderly-onset Disease

BACKGROUND

The incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in older adults are rising. There is a limited comparative assessment of risk of disease- and treatment-related complications in older patients (older than 60 years) with adult-onset (age at disease onset, 18-59 years; AO-IBD) vs elderly-onset IBD (age at disease onset, older than 60 years; EO-IBD). We compared clinical outcomes in older patients with IBD with AO-IBD vs EO-IBD.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing risk of disease-related complications (IBD-related surgery, hospitalization, treatment escalation, clinical flare, or disease complication) and treatment-related complications (serious infection, malignancy, or death) in older patients with AO-IBD vs EO-IBD through Cox proportional hazard analysis, adjusting for age at cohort entry, disease phenotype, disease duration, prior surgery and/or hospitalization, medication use, disease activity at cohort entry, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

We included 356 older patients with IBD (AO-IBD, 191 patients, 67 ± 5 y at cohort entry; EO-IBD, 165 patients, 72 ± 8 y at cohort entry). No significant differences were observed in the risk of disease-related complications in older patients with prevalent vs incident IBD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.58-1.25), although risk of IBD-related surgery was lower in older patients with prevalent IBD (aHR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.89). Older patients with prevalent IBD were significantly less likely to experience treatment-related complications (aHR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.87).

CONCLUSION

Patients with AO-IBD have lower risk of treatment-related complications as they age compared with patients with EO-IBD, without a significant difference in risk of disease-related complications.

Clinical context for cancer risk of immunosuppressive agents used in dermatology

Dermatologic care of inflammatory skin conditions has been transformed over recent decades through the use of small molecules disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and targeted biologic therapies. Alongside the tremendous benefit of these agents, concerns remain regarding possible side effects, particularly cancer risk. To improve guidance and counseling of patients with skin diseases who are considering treatment with such agents, this article reviews available information on the risk of malignancies in patients treated with these agents. When possible, this article adds clinical context to risk through a number needed to harm that estimates the number of patients a provider would need to treat with a given agent in 1 year to cause a single adverse outcome over time.

Early Intervention in Ulcerative Colitis: Ready for Prime Time?

Growing evidence shows that ulcerative colitis (UC) is a progressive disease similar to Crohn’s disease (CD). The UC-related burden is often underestimated by physicians and a standard step-up therapeutic approach is preferred. However, in many patients with UC the disease activity is not adequately controlled by current management, leading to poor long-term prognosis. Data from both randomized controlled trials and real-world studies support early intervention in CD in order to prevent disease progression and irreversible bowel damage. Similarly, an early disease intervention during the so-called “window of opportunity” could lead to better outcomes in UC. Here, we summarize the literature evidence on early intervention in patients with UC, highlighting strengths and limitations of this approach.

Outcomes of COVID-19 in 79 patients with IBD in Italy: an IG-IBD study

OBJECTIVES

COVID-19 has rapidly become a major health emergency worldwide. Patients with IBD are at increased risk of infection, especially when they have active disease and are taking immunosuppressive therapy. The characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with IBD remain unclear.

DESIGN

This Italian prospective observational cohort study enrolled consecutive patients with an established IBD diagnosis and confirmed COVID-19. Data regarding age, sex, IBD (type, treatments and clinical activity), other comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)), signs and symptoms of COVID-19 and therapies were compared with COVID-19 outcomes (pneumonia, hospitalisation, respiratory therapy and death).

RESULTS

Between 11 and 29 March 2020, 79 patients with IBD with COVID-19 were enrolled at 24 IBD referral units. Thirty-six patients had COVID-19-related pneumonia (46%), 22 (28%) were hospitalised, 7 (9%) required non-mechanical ventilation, 9 (11%) required continuous positive airway pressure therapy, 2 (3%) had endotracheal intubation and 6 (8%) died. Four patients (6%) were diagnosed with COVID-19 while they were being hospitalised for a severe flare of IBD. Age over 65 years (p=0.03), UC diagnosis (p=0.03), IBD activity (p=0.003) and a CCI score >1 (p=0.04) were significantly associated with COVID-19 pneumonia, whereas concomitant IBD treatments were not. Age over 65 years (p=0.002), active IBD (p=0.02) and higher CCI score were significantly associated with COVID-19-related death.

CONCLUSIONS

Active IBD, old age and comorbidities were associated with a negative COVID-19 outcome, whereas IBD treatments were not. Preventing acute IBD flares may avoid fatal COVID-19 in patients with IBD. Further research is needed.

JAK Inhibition as a Therapeutic Strategy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background:

Inflammatory bowel disease, including both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, are two chronic and progressive disorders affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Research on the molecular mechanisms of both diseases has led to the introduction of targeted therapies which are able to selectively block the key inflammatory mediators.

Methods:

Here, we discuss the current evidence about the mechanism of action with an up to date review of the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease.

Results:

Multiple small molecule drugs have been evaluated for their use in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Janus kinase inhibitors represent the most important family of these drugs, as their particular mechanism of action enables a simultaneous and effective blockade of multiple cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of the disease.

Conclusion:

Janus kinase inhibitors represent a promising therapeutic strategy, especially in ulcerative colitis. More data are still necessary regarding its efficacy and safety in clinical practice.

Predicting, Preventing, and Managing Treatment-Related Complications in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Risk of complications from specific classes of drugs for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) can be kept low by respecting contraindications. Patients with IBD frequently develop serious infections resulting from the disease itself or its treatment. At the time of diagnosis, patients' vaccination calendars should be updated according to IBD guidelines-live vaccines should be postponed for patients receiving immunosuppressive drugs. Opportunistic infections should be detected and the vaccine against pneumococcus should be given before patients begin immunosuppressive therapy. Thiopurines promote serious viral infections in particular, whereas tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists promote all types of serious and opportunistic infections. Severe forms of varicella can be prevented by vaccinating seronegative patients against varicella zoster virus. Detection and treatment of latent tuberculosis is mandatory before starting anti-TNF therapy and other new IBD drugs. Tofacitinib promotes herpes zoster infection in a dose- and age-dependent manner. Physicians should consider giving patients live vaccines against herpes zoster before they begin immunosuppressive therapy or a recombinant vaccine, when available, at any time point during treatment. The risk of thiopurine-induced lymphomas can be lowered by limiting the use of thiopurines in patients who are seronegative for Epstein-Barr virus (especially young men) and in older men. The risk of lymphoma related to monotherapy with anti-TNF agents is still unclear. There are no robust data on the carcinogenic effects of recently developed IBD drugs. For patients with previous cancer at substantial risk of recurrence, physicians should try to implement a pause in the use of immunosuppressive therapy (except in patients with severe disease and no therapeutic alternative) and prioritize use of IBD drugs with the lowest carcinogenic effects. Finally, sun protection and skin surveillance from the time of diagnosis are recommended.

A User's Guide to De-escalating Immunomodulator and Biologic Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

De-escalation of immunomodulators and biologic agents in inflammatory bowel disease is frequently discussed with patients and must weigh the risk of continued medical therapy with the risk of disease recurrence. Risk factors for disease flare after withdrawal of inflammatory bowel disease medications such as disease activity at de-escalation, disease prognostic features, and prior course of disease have been identified predominately in retrospective studies, allowing for risk stratification of patients. This review evaluates the published literature regarding therapeutic de-escalation and provides a framework for physicians to apply this to clinical practice. Prospective trials are underway and planned, which should provide further insight into this treatment paradigm and better inform patient selection for this strategy.

AGA Technical Review on the Management of Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis

A subset of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) present with, or progress to, moderate to severe disease activity. These patients are at high risk for colectomy, hospitalization, corticosteroid dependence, and serious infections. The risk of life-threatening complications and emergency colectomy is particularly high among those patients hospitalized with acute severe ulcerative colitis. Optimal management of outpatients or inpatients with moderate to severe UC often requires the use of immunomodulator and/or biologic therapies, including thiopurines, methotrexate, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, TNF-α antagonists, vedolizumab, tofacitnib, or ustekinumab, either as monotherapy or in combination (with immunomodulators), to mitigate these risks. Decisions about optimal drug therapy in moderate to severe UC are complex, with limited guidance on comparative efficacy and safety of different treatments, leading to considerable practice variability. Therefore, the American Gastroenterological Association prioritized development of clinical guidelines on this topic. To inform the clinical guidelines, this technical review was completed in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Focused questions in adult outpatients with moderate to severe UC included: (1) overall and comparative efficacy of different medications for induction and maintenance of remission in patients with or without prior exposure to TNF-α antagonists, (2) comparative efficacy and safety of biologic monotherapy vs combination therapy with immunomodulators, (3) comparative efficacy of top-down (upfront use of biologics and/or immunomodulator therapy) vs step-up therapy (acceleration to biologic and/or immunomodulator therapy only after failure of 5-aminosalicylates, and (4) role of continuing vs stopping 5-aminosalicylates in patients being treated with immunomodulator and/or biologic therapy for moderate to severe UC. Focused questions in adults hospitalized with acute severe ulcerative colitis included: (5) overall and comparative efficacy of pharmacologic interventions for inpatients refractory to corticosteroids, in reducing risk of colectomy, (6) optimal dosing regimens for intravenous corticosteroids and infliximab in these patients, and (7) role of adjunctive antibiotics in the absence of confirmed infections.

Listening to the Patient: Improving the Design and Conduct of Clinical Trials in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

There is an urgent need for new treatments for inflammatory bowel diseases, but it’s hard to enroll the large number of patients needed for clinical trials. Making trials more patient-friendly by giving patients a voice would help solve this problem.

Impact of Aphthous Colitis at Diagnosis on Crohn's Disease Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The natural history of intestinal lesions in Crohn's disease [CD] is not fully understood. Although the extent of lesions at diagnosis usually defines the extent of the disease, some lesions seen at diagnosis, particularly aphthous ulcers [AUs], may resolve before follow-up. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of CD patients with colonic AUs seen at diagnosis.

METHODS

CD patients with aphthous colitis at diagnosis who had been followed since 2001 were included in a case control study matched with two groups of controls: one without colonic involvement at diagnosis and a second group with colonic lesions more severe than AUs at diagnosis.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were included, with a median follow-up of 7.3 years [interquartile range 2.7-9.8]. Seventy-one per cent of those having a second colonoscopy at least 6 months after diagnosis were stable or healed. Medical treatments were similar between the three groups. The AU group's rate of ileal surgery was similar to those without colitis. In multivariate analysis, the independent factors associated with ileal resection were ileal involvement (odds ratio [OR]: 8.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] [7.68-33.75]; p = 0.002) and the presence of severe colitis (OR = 0.5; 95% CI [0.32-0.79], p = 0.003). The risk of ileal surgery was not influenced by the presence of aphthous colitis (OR: 0.63; 95% CI [0.37-1.1]; p = 0.1).

CONCLUSION

Aphthous colitis at diagnosis seems to resolve in most patients. This suggests that these lesions are of little clinical significance and may not need to be considered prior to ileal resection in CD or when making other important therapeutic decisions.

Cancer Risk in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A 6-Year Prospective Multicenter Nested Case-Control IG-IBD Study

BACKGROUND

In a 6-year, multicenter, prospective nested case-control study, we aimed to evaluate risk factors for incident cancer in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), when considering clinical characteristics of IBD and immunomodulator use. The secondary end point was to provide characterization of incident cancer types.

METHODS

All incident cases of cancer occurring in IBD patients from December 2011-2017 were prospectively recorded in 16 Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease units. Each of the IBD patients with a new diagnosis of cancer was matched with 2 IBD patients without cancer, according to IBD phenotype (ulcerative colitis [UC] vs Crohn's disease [CD]), age (±5 years), sex. Risk factors were assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Cancer occurred in 403 IBD patients: 204 CD (CD cases), 199 UC (UC cases). The study population included 1209 patients (403 IBD cases, 806 IBD controls). Cancer (n = 403) more frequently involved the digestive system (DS; 32%), followed by skin (14.9%), urinary tract (9.7%), lung (6.9%), genital tract (6.5%), breast (5.5%), thyroid (1.9%), lymphoma (2.7%, only in CD), adenocarcinoma of the small bowel (SBA; 3.9%, 15 CD, 1 pouch in UC), other cancers (15.9%). Among cancers of the DS, colorectal cancer (CRC) more frequently occurred in UC (29% vs 17%; P < 0.005), whereas SBA more frequently occurred in CD (13% vs 6.3% P = 0.039). In CD, perforating (B3) vs non-stricturing non-perforating (B1) behavior represented the only risk factor for any cancer (odds ratio [OR], 2.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-4.11). In CD, risk factors for extracolonic cancer (ECC) were a B3 vs B1 and a stricturing (B2) vs B1 behavior (OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.62-5.43; OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.09-2.98). In UC, risk factors for ECC and for overall cancer were abdominal surgery for UC (OR, 4.63; 95% CI, 2.62-8.42; OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.88-5.92) and extensive vs distal UC (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.10-2.75; OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.16-3.47). Another risk factor for ECC was left-sided vs distal UC (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.00-2.86). Inflammatory bowel disease duration was a risk factor for skin and urinary tract cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Perforating CD, extensive UC, and abdominal surgery for UC were identified as risk factors for overall incident cancer and for ECC. The clinical characteristics associated with severe IBD may increase cancer risk.