Effectiveness of urease inhibition on the abatement of ammonia, nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions in a non-irrigated Mediterranean barley field

Mycorrhizal associations relate to stable convergence in plant-microbial competition for nitrogen absorption under high nitrogen conditions

Nitrogen (N) immobilization (Nim, including microbial N assimilation) and plant N uptake (PNU) are the two most important pathways of N retention in soils. The ratio of Nim to PNU (hereafter Nim:PNU ratio) generally reflects the degree of N limitation for plant growth in terrestrial ecosystems. However, the key factors driving the pattern of Nim:PNU ratio across global ecosystems remain unclear. Here, using a global data set of 1018 observations from 184 studies, we examined the relative importance of mycorrhizal associations, climate, plant, and soil properties on the Nim:PNU ratio across terrestrial ecosystems. Our results show that mycorrhizal fungi type (arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) or ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi) in combination with soil inorganic N mainly explain the global variation in the Nim:PNU ratio in terrestrial ecosystems. In AM fungi-associated ecosystems, the relationship between Nim and PNU displays a weaker negative correlation (r = -.06, p < .001), whereas there is a stronger positive correlation (r = .25, p < .001) in EM fungi-associated ecosystems. Our meta-analysis thus suggests that the AM-associated plants display a weak interaction with soil microorganisms for N absorption, while EM-associated plants cooperate with soil microorganisms. Furthermore, we find that the Nim:PNU ratio for both AM- and EM-associated ecosystems gradually converge around a stable value (13.8 ± 0.5 for AM- and 12.1 ± 1.2 for EM-associated ecosystems) under high soil inorganic N conditions. Our findings highlight the dependence of plant-microbial interaction for N absorption on both plant mycorrhizal association and soil inorganic N, with the stable convergence of the Nim:PNU ratio under high soil N conditions.

Nitrous oxide emissions are driven by environmental conditions rather than nitrogen application methods in a perennial hayfield

Agricultural best management practices (BMPs) intended to solve one environmental challenge may have unintended climate impacts. For example, manure injection is often promoted for its potential to reduce runoff and nitrogen (N) loss as NH3 , but the practice has been shown to increase N2 O, a powerful greenhouse gas, compared to surface application. Urease inhibitor application with N fertilizer is another BMP that can enhance N retention by reducing NH3 emissions, but its impact on N2 O emissions is mixed. Thus, we measured N2 O, CO2 , soil mineral N availability, soil moisture, soil temperature, and yield in a 2-year perennial hayfield trial with four fertilization treatments (manure injection, manure broadcast, synthetic urea, and control) applied with or without a urease inhibitor in Alburgh, VT. We used linear models to examine treatment effects on daily and cumulative N2 O emissions and a boosted regression tree (BRT) model to identify the most important drivers of daily N2 O fluxes in our trial. While fertilization type had a significant impact on N2 O fluxes (p < 0.05), our treatments explained an unexpectedly small amount of the variation in emissions (R2  = 0.042), and urease inhibitor had no effect. Instead, soil moisture was the most important predictor of daily N2 O fluxes (39.7% relative influence in BRT model), followed by CO2 fluxes, soil inorganic N, and soil temperature. Soil moisture and temperature interacted to produce the largest daily N2 O fluxes when both were relatively high, suggesting that injecting manure during dry periods or during wet but cool periods could reduce its climate impacts.

Drivers of ammonia volatilization in Mediterranean climate cropping systems

Ammonia (NH3) volatilization is the major source of nitrogen (N) loss resulting from the application of synthetic and organic N fertilizers to croplands. It is well known that in Mediterranean cropping systems, there is a relationship between the intrinsic characteristics of the climate and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, but whether the same relation exists for NH3 emissions remains uncertain. Here, we estimated the impact of edaphoclimatic conditions (including meteorological conditions after N fertilization), crop management factors, and the measurement technique on both the cumulative emissions and the NH3 emission factor (EF) in Mediterranean climate zones, drawing on a database of 234 field treatments. We used a machine learning method, random forest (RF), to predict volatilization and ranked variables based on their importance in the prediction. Random forest had a good predictive power for the NH3 EF and cumulative emissions, with an R2 of 0.69 and 0.76, respectively. Nitrogen fertilization rate (N rate) was the top-ranked predictor variable, increasing NH3 emissions substantially when N rate was higher than 170 kg N ha-1. Soil pH was the most important edaphoclimatic variable, showing greater emissions (36.7 kg NH3 ha-1, EF = 19.3%) when pH was above 8.2. Crop type, fertilizer type, and N application method also affected NH3 emission patterns, while water management, mean precipitation, and soil texture were ranked low by the model. Our results show that intrinsic Mediterranean characteristics had only an indirect effect on NH3 emissions. For instance, relatively low N fertilization rates result in small NH3 emissions in rainfed areas, which occupy a very significant surface of Mediterranean agricultural land. Overall, N fertilization management is a key driver in reducing NH3 emissions, but additional field factors should be studied in future research to establish more robust abatement strategies.

Effects of hotter, drier conditions on gaseous losses from nitrogen fertilisers

Global warming is expected to cause hotter, drier summers and more extreme weather events including heat waves and droughts. A little understood aspect of this is its effects on the efficacy of fertilisers and related nutrient losses into the environment. We explored the effects of high soil temperature (>25 °C) and low soil moisture (<40% water filled pore space; WFPS) on emissions of ammonia (NH3) and nitrous oxide (N2O) following application of urea to soil and the efficacy of urease inhibitors (UI) in slowing N losses. We incubated soil columns at three temperatures (15, 25, 35 °C) and three soil moisture contents (20, 40, 60% WFPS) with urea applied on the soil surface with and without UIs, and measured NH3 and N2O emissions using chambers placed over the columns. Four fertiliser treatments were applied in triplicate in a randomised complete block design: (1) urea; (2) urea with a single UI (N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT); (3) urea with two UI (NBPT and N-(n-propyl) thiophosphoric triamide; NPPT); and (4) a zero N control. Inclusion of UI with urea, relative to urea alone, delayed and reduced peak NH3 emissions. However, the efficacy of UI was reduced with increasing temperature and decreasing soil moisture. Cumulative NH3 emission did not differ between the two UI treatments for a given set of conditions and was reduced by 22-87% compared with urea alone. Maximum cumulative NH3 emission occurred at 35 °C and 20% WFPS, accounting for 31% of the applied N for the urea treatment and 25%, on average for the UI treatments. Urease inhibitors did not influence N2O emissions; however, there were interactive impacts of temperature and moisture, with higher cumulative emissions at 40% WFPS and 15 and 25 °C accounting for 1.85-2.62% of the applied N, whereas at 35 °C there was greater N2O emission at 60% WFPS. Our results suggest that inclusion of UI with urea effectively reduces NH3 losses at temperatures reaching 35 °C, although overall effectiveness decreases with increasing temperature, particularly under low soil moisture conditions.

Fabrication of metal-organic salts with heterogeneous conformations of a ligand as dual-functional urease and nitrification inhibitors

Urease inhibitors (UIs) and nitrification inhibitors (NIs) can greatly reduce nitrogen loss in agriculture soil. However, design and synthesis of an efficient and environmentally friendly dual-functional inhibitor is still a great challenge. Herein, four metal-organic salts (MOSs) based on heterogeneous conformations of the ligand N1,N1,N2,N2-tetrakis(2-fluorobenzyl)ethane-1,2-diamine (L), namely, [2HL]2+·[MCl4]2- (M = Cu, Zn, Cd, and Co), have been synthesized by the "second sphere" coordination method and structurally characterized in detail. Single crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD) analyses reveal that the four MOSs are 0D supramolecular structures containing [2HL]2+ and [MCl4]2-, which are connected through non-covalent bonds. Furthermore, the urease and nitrification inhibitory activities of MOSs are evaluated, showing excellent nitrification inhibitory activity with the nitrification inhibitory rate as high as 70.57% on the 28th day in soil cultivation experiment. In particular, MOS 1 shows significant urease inhibitory activity with half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of 0.89 ± 0.01 μM (0.5 h) and 1.87 ± 0.01 μM (3 h), which can serve as a dual-functional inhibitor.

Effect of Natural Liquid Hydroabsorbents on Ammonia Emission from Liquid Nitrogen Fertilizers and Plant Growth of Maize (Zea Mays L.) under Drought Conditions

The use of mineral nitrogen (N) fertilizers is associated with significant nitrogen loss through the volatilization. Ammonia (NH₃) emissions are common from fertilizers with amide (NH₂) and ammonium (NH₄) nitrogen forms applied to the soil surface without incorporation. The objective of the laboratory and greenhouse pot experiments was to verify the hypothesis that liquid mineral fertilizers and fertilizer solutions containing N-NH₂ and N-NH₄ applied to the soil surface in combination with natural hydroabsorbents (NHAs) will reduce the volatilization of nitrogen. The effect of NHAs addition to urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) fertilizer and urea, ammonium nitrate (AN) and ammonium sulphate (AS) solutions was evaluated in a laboratory experiment. The effect of the two types of NHAs (acidic and neutral) was compared with the control (UAN) and its mixture with the commercially used urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT). The proportion of volatilized NH₃ of the total N from the examined fertilizers applied to the soil surface was determined by the titration method. Subsequently, the effect of fertilization with UAN and its mixture with NHAs and NBPT on the growth of maize under the drought conditions was verified in a greenhouse pot experiment. While the addition of NBPT resulted in a reduction of NH₃ emission for the fertilizers containing NH₂ (UAN, urea solution), a decrease in volatilization after the addition of both acidic and neutral NHA was observed especially for UAN. A reduction in ammonia emission was also observed for AS after the addition of acidic NHA. The addition of both NHAs and NBPT to UAN increased the utilization of nitrogen from the applied fertilizer, which was reflected by an increase in chlorophyll content and increased CO₂ assimilation by maize plants grown under the drought stress. UAN fertilizer combined with acidic NHA and NBPT significantly increased aboveground biomass production and root system capacity of maize. Significant increases in UAN nitrogen recovery were observed for all examined additives (UI and both types of NHAs). In addition to the known effects of hydroabsorbents, especially their influence on soil physical and biological properties and soil water retention, the effect of NHAs application in combination with UAN and AS solutions on the reduction of gaseous N loss, maize plant growth and fertilizer nitrogen recovery was found.

Global evaluation of inhibitor impacts on ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils: A meta-analysis

Inhibitors are widely considered an efficient tool for reducing nitrogen (N) loss and improving N use efficiency, but their effectiveness is highly variable across agroecosystems. In this study, we synthesized 182 studies (222 sites) worldwide to evaluate the impacts of inhibitors (urease inhibitors [UI], nitrification inhibitors [NI] and combined inhibitors) on crop yields and gaseous N loss (ammonia [NH₃ ] and nitrous oxide [N₂ O] emissions) and explored their responses to different management and environmental factors including inhibitor application timing, fertilization regime, cropping system, water management, soil properties and climatic conditions using subgroup meta-analysis, meta-regression and multivariate analyses. The UI were most effective in enhancing crop yields (by 5%) and reducing NH₃ volatilization (by 51%), whereas NI were most effective at reducing N₂ O emissions (by 49%). The application of UI mitigates NH₃ loss and increases crop yields especially in high NH₃ -N loss scenarios, whereas NI application would minimize the net N₂ O emissions and the resultant environmental impacts especially in low NH₃ -N loss scenarios. Alternatively, the combined application of UI and NI enables producers to balance crop production and environmental conservation goals without pollution tradeoffs. The inhibitor efficacy for decreasing gaseous N loss was dependent upon soil and climatic conditions and management practices. Notably, both meta-regression and multivariate analyses suggest that inhibitors provide a greater opportunity for reducing fertilizer N inputs in high-N-surplus systems and presumably favor crop yield enhancement under soil N deficiency situations. The pursuit of an improved understanding of the interactions between plant-soil-climate-management systems and different types of inhibitors should continue to optimize the effectiveness of inhibitors for reducing environmental losses while increasing productivity.

Biochar and urease inhibitor mitigate NH3 and N2O emissions and improve wheat yield in a urea fertilized alkaline soil

In this study, we explored the role of biochar (BC) and/or urease inhibitor (UI) in mitigating ammonia (NH₃) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) discharge from urea fertilized wheat cultivated fields in Pakistan (34.01°N, 71.71°E). The experiment included five treatments [control, urea (150 kg N ha^-1), BC (10 Mg ha^-1), urea + BC and urea + BC + UI (1 L ton^-1)], which were all repeated four times and were carried out in a randomized complete block design. Urea supplementation along with BC and BC + UI reduced soil NH₃ emissions by 27% and 69%, respectively, compared to sole urea application. Nitrous oxide emissions from urea fertilized plots were also reduced by 24% and 53% applying BC and BC + UI, respectively, compared to urea alone. Application of BC with urea improved the grain yield, shoot biomass, and total N uptake of wheat by 13%, 24%, and 12%, respectively, compared to urea alone. Moreover, UI further promoted biomass and grain yield, and N assimilation in wheat by 38%, 22% and 27%, respectively, over sole urea application. In conclusion, application of BC and/or UI can mitigate NH₃ and N₂O emissions from urea fertilized soil, improve N use efficiency (NUE) and overall crop productivity.

Mitigation of yield-scaled nitrous oxide emissions and global warming potential in an oilseed rape crop through N source management

Enhanced-efficiency nitrogen (N) fertilizers, such as those containing nitrification or urease inhibitors, can mitigate the carbon (C) footprint linked to the production of bioenergy crops through a reduction in direct nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions and indirect N₂O losses. These indirect emissions are derived from ammonia (NH₃) volatilization, which also have important environmental and health implications. The evaluation of the global warming potential (GWP) of different N sources using site-specific data of yield and direct and indirect emissions is needed for oilseed rape under rainfed semi-arid conditions, especially when meteorological variability is taken into account. Using urea as a N source, the N₂O mitigation efficacy of the urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) alone or combined with the nitrification inhibitor 2-(3,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl) succinic acid isomeric mixture (DMPSA) was evaluated under field conditions in a rainfed oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) crop. Two additional N sources from calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN), with and without DMPSA, were included. The GWP of the treatments was estimated considering the emissions from inputs, operations and other direct and indirect emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), such as methane (CH₄) and the volatilization of NH₃. We also measured the abundance of key genes involved in nitrification and denitrification to improve the understanding of N₂O emissions on a biochemical basis under the conditions of our study. The results show that due to the intense rainfall after fertilization and a rewetting event, N₂O losses from fertilizers without inhibitors were greater than those previously reported under Mediterranean conditions, while NH₃ losses were low and not affected by the urease inhibitor. The cumulative N₂O emissions (which were greatly influenced by a rewetting peak three months after fertilization) from the urea fertilization were significantly higher than those from CAN. The presence of NBPT significantly reduced N₂O losses by an average of 71%, with respect to urea. The use of DMPSA with CAN resulted in an abatement of N₂O emissions (by 57%) and a significant increase in oil yield in comparison with CAN alone. All inhibitor-based treatments were effective in abating N₂O emissions during the rewetting peak. The abundances of the nitrifier and denitrifier communities, especially ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB), significantly decreased relative to the urea or CAN treatments as inhibitors were applied. Under the conditions of our study, the sustainability of a bioenergy crop such as oilseed rape can be improved by using inhibitors because they mitigated N₂O emissions and/or enhanced the oil yield.

Influence of rye cover cropping on denitrification potential and year-round field N2O emissions

Cover cropping is beneficial for reducing soil erosion and nutrient losses, but there are conflicting reports on how cover cropping affects emissions of nitrous oxide (N₂O), a potent greenhouse gas. In this study, we measured N₂O fluxes over a full year in Illinois corn plots with and without rye cover crop. We compared these year-round measurements to N₂O emissions predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Tier 1 equation and the Denitrification-Decomposition (DNDC) model. In addition, we measured potential denitrification and N₂O production rates. The field measurements showed typical N₂O peaks shortly after fertilizer application, as well as a significant late-winter peak. Cover cropping significantly reduced all peak N₂O fluxes, with decreases ranging from 39 to 95%. Neither model was able to accurately predict annual N₂O fluxes or the decrease in N₂O emissions from cover-cropped fields. In contrast to field measurements, lab assays found that cover cropping significantly increased potential denitrification by 90-127% and potential N₂O production by 54-106%. The rye cover-cropped plots had lower soil nitrate and higher soil carbon. When limiting nitrate and excess carbon were provided in lab assays, the proportion of N₂O resulting from denitrification decreased. These results suggest that the discrepancy between the observed decrease in field N₂O emissions and the increase in denitrification potential may be due to the difference in available nutrients between the field and laboratory measurements. Overall, these results suggest the importance of late-winter peaks in N₂O emissions and the potential of rye cover cropping to reduce N₂O emissions from agricultural fields.

A 2-year study of the impact of reduced nitrogen application combined with double inhibitors on soil nitrogen transformation and wheat productivity under drip irrigation

BACKGROUND

Nitrification inhibitors (NIs) and urease inhibitors (UIs) can decrease the risk of nitrogen (N) loss and extend N uptake by plants. However, there are few case studies about reduced N application combined with double inhibitors (DIs, NI plus UI), especially under drip irrigation systems. A 2-year field experiment was therefore conducted to explore the effect of 80% N application rate combined with NI or DIs on soil N transformation, wheat productivity and N use efficiency (NUE) in a drip-irrigated field. The four treatments included a no-fertilizer control, 100% urea, 80% urea + NI (nitrapyrin) and 80% urea + DIs (nitrapyrin and N-(n-butyl) thiophosphorictriamide (NBPT)).

RESULTS

Our results showed that the 80% urea + DIs treatment significantly increased the ratio of NH₄ ⁺ to NO₃ ^- and N content (urea-N, NH₄ ⁺ -N and NO₃ ^- -N) in soil at 0-20 cm depth (P < 0.05) at the heading stage and the filling stage of wheat in both 2013 and 2014, relative to the 100% urea treatment. A total of 80% urea + NI treatment decreased wheat N uptake and wheat productivity (plant biomass and yield) compared to 100% urea treatments (P < 0.05). However, application of 80% urea combined with DIs achieved equivalent wheat productivity with 100% urea treatment. Moreover, the greatest NUE (43.6%) was recorded with the application of DIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Cutting the N application rate by 20% combined with NBPT and nitrapyrin could provide a sustainable fertilization strategy for wheat production under drip irrigation. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.

Effects of different types of humic acid isolated from coal on soil NH3 volatilization and CO2 emissions

Humic acid can improve soil nutrients and promote plant growth. Weathered coal and lignite can be used as agricultural resources due to high humic acid content, but their impact on soil NH₃ volatilization and CO₂ emissions are yet to be determined. In this study, a field experiment was carried out to compare the effects of four types of humic acid isolated from coal (pulverized weathered coal (HC), pulverized lignite (HL), alkalized weathered coal (AC) and alkalized lignite (AL)) on NH₃ volatilization, CO₂ emissions, pH, the C/N ratio and enzyme activities in soil cultivated with maize. The effect of biotechnology humic acids (BHA) was also examined for comparison. HL, AC, AL and BHA all increased cumulative NH₃ losses by 147.7, 278.5, 113.9, and 355.3%, respectively, compared with the control (chemical fertilizer only), and notably, BHA caused an increase of 90.71% compared with the humic acids isolated from coal. A significant increase in cumulative CO₂ losses was observed only under AL treatment, by 14.44-24.90% compared with all other treatments. Soil urease activity was positively correlated with cumulative NH₃ losses (P < 0.001), while the soil C/N ratio (P < 0.001) and soil sucrase activity (P < 0.05) were positively correlated with cumulative CO₂ losses. Since humic acid from pulverized weathered coal caused no increase in NH₃ volatilization or CO₂ emissions, it is therefore thought to be the most suitable humic acid for field application.

Effects of the nitrification inhibitor nitrapyrin and mulch on N2O emission and fertilizer use efficiency using 15N tracing techniques

Nitrous oxide (N₂O), is a potent greenhouse gas (GHG) that shares 7% of global warming around the world. Among different sources, agricultural systems account for approx. 60% of global anthropogenic N₂O emissions. These N₂O emissions are associated with the activity of nitrifiers and denitrifiers that contribute to >4 Tg (teragrams) N₂O-N emission per year. Application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers and manures in agricultural fields plays an imperative role in this regard. On the other hand nitrification inhibitors are an effective approach to minimize N₂O-N emissions from agricultural fields. Here we examined the effects of applying urea with a nitrification inhibitor (Ni) nitrapyrin and mulch (Mu) on urea transformation, nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions, grain yield and nitrogen (N) uptake efficiency. The treatments include a control (zero N), urea (U) applied at 200 kg N ha^-1, U + Ni (Ni applied at 700 g ha^-1), U+ Mu (Mu applied at 4 t ha^-1) and U + Ni + Mu. The N₂O emission factor (EF) was 66% and 75% when U and Mu were applied, respectively. Yield-scaled N₂O emissions were lower in U and Mu by 45% and 55%, respectively. The Ni coupled with Mu enhanced urea-¹⁵N recovery by 58% and wheat grain yield by 23% and total N uptake by 30% compared with U alone. In conclusion, Ni usage is an effective strategy to mitigate N₂O emissions under field conditions.

Use of a urease inhibitor to mitigate ammonia emissions from urine patches

Urine deposition by grazing livestock is the single largest source of ammonia (NH₃) volatilisation losses in New Zealand. Urease inhibitors (UI) have been used to mitigate NH₃ losses from fertiliser urea and animal urine. In previous trials, the UI effect in reducing NH₃ emissions from urine has been measured by applying urine mixed with the UI to the pasture soil thus increasing the chances of better interaction of the UI in inhibiting the urease enzyme. However, these trials do not represent a realistic grazing scenario where only urine is deposited onto the soil. This current research aimed to identify the best time to spray nBTPT (a UI containing 0.025% N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide) onto pasture soil to reduce NH₃ losses from urine patches. The treatments were: a control (without urine and nBTPT), urine alone at 530 kg N ha^-1 and urine plus nBTPT. The UI was applied to the chambers and soil plots 5 and 3 days prior to urine deposition, on the same day and 1, 3 and 5 after urine deposition in autumn. Ammonia losses were measured using the dynamic chamber method. The application of the inhibitor prior to urine deposition reduced NH₃ losses with reductions of 27.6% and 17.5% achieved for UAgr-5 and UAgr-3, respectively. However, reductions in NH₃ emission were 0.6-2.9% for inhibitor applied post urine deposition. There was also a reduction in both soil NH₄ ⁺-N concentration and soil pH in comparison with urine alone or with the treatments where nBTPT was applied after urine deposition.

Dynamics of localised nitrogen supply and relevance for root growth of Vicia faba ('Fuego') and Hordeum vulgare ('Marthe') in soil

Root growth responds to local differences in N-form and concentration. This is known for artificial systems and assumed to be valid in soil. The purpose of this study is to challenge this assumption for soil mesocosms locally supplied with urea with and without nitrification inhibitor. Soil column experiments with Vicia faba ('Fuego') and Hordeum vulgare ('Marthe') were performed to investigate soil solution chemistry and root growth response of these two species with contrasting root architectures to the different N-supply simultaneously. Root growth was analysed over time and separately for the fertiliser layer and the areas above and below with X-ray CT (via region growing) and WinRHIZO. Additionally, NO3- and NH4+ in soil and soil solution were analysed. In Vicia faba, no pronounced differences were observed, although CT analysis indicated different root soil exploration for high NH4+. In Hordeum vulgare, high NO3- inhibited lateral root growth while high NH4+ stimulated the formation of first order laterals. The growth response to locally distributed N-forms in soil is species specific and less pronounced than in artificial systems. The combination of soil solution studies and non-invasive imaging of root growth can substantially improve the mechanistic understanding of root responses to different N-forms in soil.

Heterologous expression and functional study of nitric oxide reductase catalytic reduction peptide from Achromobacter denitrificans strain TB

Biological denitrification is a promising and green technology for air pollution control. To investigate the nitric oxide reductase (NOR) that dominates NO reduction efficiency in biological purification, the heterologous prokaryotic expression system of the norB gene, which encodes the core peptide of the catalytic reduction structure in the NOR from Achromobacter denitrificans strain TB, was constructed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). Results showed that the 1218 bp-long norB gene was expressed at the highest level under 1.0 mM IPTG for 5 h at 30 °C, and the relative expression abundance of norB in recombinant E. coli was increased by 16.6 times compared with that of the wild-type TB. However, the NO reduction efficiency and NOR activity of strain TB was 2.7 and 1.83 times higher than those of recombinant E. coli, respectively. On the basis of genomic reassembly and protein structure modeling, the core peptide of the NOR catalytic reduction structure from Achromobacter sp. TB can independently exert NO reduction. The low NO degradation efficiency of recombinant E. coli may be due to the lack of a NorC-like structure that increases the enzyme activity of the NorB protein. The results of this study can be used as basis for further research on the structure and function of NOR.

Nitrogen fertilisers with urease inhibitors reduce nitrous oxide and ammonia losses, while retaining yield in temperate grassland

Nitrogen fertilisation, although a cornerstone of modern agricultural production, negatively impacts the environment through gaseous losses of nitrous oxide (N₂O), a potent greenhouse gas (GHG), and ammonia (NH₃), a known air pollutant. The aim of this work was to assess the feasibility of urea treated with urease inhibitors to reduce gaseous N losses in temperate grassland, while maintaining or improving productivity compared to conventional fertiliser formulations. Urease inhibitors were N-(n-butyl)-thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) (urea + NBPT) and N-(n-propyl)-thiophosphoric triamide (NPPT) (urea+ NBPT + NPPT), while conventional fertilisers were urea and calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN). N₂O emission factors were 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.09% and 0.58% from urea + NBPT, urea, urea + NBPT + NPPT and CAN, respectively, with CAN significantly higher than all the urea formulations, which were not significantly different from each other. Ammonia loss measured over one fertiliser application was significantly larger from urea, at 43%, compared with other formulations at 13.9%, 13.8% and 5.2% from urea + NBPT, urea + NBPT + NPPT and CAN, respectively. Changing fertiliser formulation had no significant impact on grass yield or N uptake in four out of five harvests. In the last harvest urea + NBPT significantly out-yielded urea, but not CAN or urea + NBPT + NPPT. Overall, urea treated with either one or both urease inhibitors significantly reduced emissions of N₂O and NH₃, while preserving yield quantity and quality. Therefore, changing fertiliser formulation to these products should be encouraged as a strategy to reduce GHG and air pollution from agricultural practices in temperate climate.

Urea Ammonium Nitrate Solution Treated with Inhibitor Technology: Effects on Ammonia Emission Reduction, Wheat Yield, and Inorganic N in Soil

Urea is the most used fertilizer nitrogen (N), and is often applied as urea ammonium nitrate (UAN), which may be an ammonia (NH3) emission source after application. This study examined whether the addition of urease inhibitors reduced NH3 emission, and, in combination with nitrification inhibitors, enhanced fertilizer N crop uptake. In three experiments, NH3 emission was measured from plots (100 m2) to which UAN was added with and without inhibitors. In March and May, the plots were covered with Triticum aestivum L., Sheriff (var), and in July, the soil was bare. The inhibitor mixed with urea was N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) and a mixture of NBPT and the new nitrification inhibitor DMPSA (3,4-Dimethylpyrazole succinic acid). Ammonia emissions were negligible from all plots after the first application of UAN due to the wet and cold weather while an average of 7% of applied UAN was emitted after application of UAN in April, where no significant effect of additives was observed. The harvest yield was low due to drought from May till August. Yield was highest when UAN was mixed with NBPT and lowest for untreated UAN. The highest emission from the bare plots was obtained from untreated UAN (17% of N), in contrast to 11% of N from the plots with added UAN + NBPT (not significant) and 7% from the plots with added UAN + NBPT + DMPSA (significantly different). Under the conditions of the current study, urease inhibitors reduce NH3 emissions in periods where the risk of emission is high, and the combination of urease and nitrification inhibitors increased yields.

The effect of nitrification inhibitors on NH3 and N2O emissions in highly N fertilized irrigated Mediterranean cropping systems

There is an increasing concern about the negative impacts associated to the release of reactive nitrogen (N) from highly fertilized agro-ecosystems. Ammonia (NH₃) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) are harmful N pollutants that may contribute both directly and indirectly to global warming. Surface applied manure, urea and ammonium (NH₄⁺) based fertilizers are important anthropogenic sources of these emissions. Nitrification inhibitors (NIs) have been proposed as a useful technological approach to reduce N₂O emission although they can lead to large NH₃ losses due to increasing NH₄⁺ pool in soils. In this context, a field experiment was carried out in a maize field with aiming to simultaneously quantify NH₃ volatilization and N₂O emission, assessing the effect of two NIs 3,4‑dimethilpyrazol phosphate (DMPP) and 3,4‑dimethylpyrazole succinic acid (DMPSA). The first treatment was pig slurry (PS) before seeding (50 kg N ha^-1) and calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) at top-dressing (150 kg N ha^-1), and the second was DMPP diluted in PS (PS + DMPP) (50 kg N ha^-1) and CAN + DMPSA (150 kg N ha^-1) also before seeding and at top-dressing, respectively. Ammonia emissions were quantified by a micrometeorological method during 20 days after fertilization and N₂O emissions were assessed using manual static chambers during all crop period. The treatment with NIs was effective in reducing c. 30% cumulative N₂O losses. However, considering only direct N₂O emissions after second fertilization event, a significant reduction was not observed using CAN+DMPSA, probably because high WFPS of soil, driven by irrigation, favored denitrification. Cumulative NH₃ losses were not significantly affected by NIs. Indeed, NH₃ volatilization accounted 14% and 10% of N applied in PS + DMPP and PS plots, respectively and c. 2% of total N applied in CAN+DMPSA and CAN plots. Since important NH₃ losses still exist even although abating strategies are implemented, structural and political initiatives are needed to face this issue.

Effects of application of inhibitors and biochar to fertilizer on gaseous nitrogen emissions from an intensively managed wheat field

The effects of biochar combined with the urease inhibitor, hydroquinone, and nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide, on gaseous nitrogen (N₂O, NO and NH₃) emissions and wheat yield were examined in a wheat crop cultivated in a rice-wheat rotation system in the Taihu Lake region of China. Eight treatments comprised N fertilizer at a conventional application rate of 150kgNha^-1 (CN); N fertilizer at an optimal application rate of 125kgNha^-1 (ON); ON+wheat-derived biochar at rates of 7.5 (ONB1) and 15tha^-1 (ONB2); ON+nitrification and urease inhibitors (ONI); ONI+wheat-derived biochar at rates of 7.5 (ONIB1) and 15tha^-1 (ONIB2); and, a control. The reduced N fertilizer application rate in the ON treatment decreased N₂O, NO, and NH₃ emissions by 45.7%, 17.1%, and 12.3%, respectively, compared with the CN treatment. Biochar application increased soil organic carbon, total N, and pH, and also increased NH₃ and N₂O emissions by 32.4-68.2% and 9.4-35.2%, respectively, compared with the ON treatment. In contrast, addition of urease and nitrification inhibitors decreased N₂O, NO, and NH₃ emissions by 11.3%, 37.9%, and 38.5%, respectively. The combined application of biochar and inhibitors more effectively reduced N₂O and NO emissions by 49.1-49.7% and 51.7-55.2%, respectively, compared with ON and decreased NH₃ emission by 33.4-35.2% compared with the ONB1 and ONB2 treatments. Compared with the ON treatment, biochar amendment, either alone or in combination with inhibitors, increased wheat yield and N use efficiency (NUE), while addition of inhibitors alone increased NUE but not wheat yield. We suggest that an optimal N fertilizer rate and combined application of inhibitors+biochar at a low application rate, instead of biochar application alone, could increase soil fertility and wheat yields, and mitigate gaseous N emissions.

Combining Urease and Nitrification Inhibitors with Incorporation Reduces Ammonia and Nitrous Oxide Emissions and Increases Corn Yields

Less than 50% of applied nitrogen (N) fertilizer is typically recovered by corn ( L.) due to climatic constraints, soil degradation, overapplication, and losses to air and water. Two application methods, two N sources, and two inhibitors were evaluated to reduce N losses and enhance crop uptake. The treatments included broadcast urea (BrUrea), BrUrea with a urease inhibitor (BrUrea+UI), BrUrea with a urease and a nitrification inhibitor (BrUrea+UI+NI), injection of urea ammonium nitrate (InjUAN), and injected with one or both inhibitors (InjUAN+UI, InjUAN+UI+NI), and a control. The BrUrea treatment lost 50% (64.4 kg N ha) of the applied N due to ammonia volatilization, but losses were reduced by 64% with BrUrea+UI+NI (23.0 kg N ha) and by 60% with InjUAN (26.1 kg N ha). Ammonia losses were lower and crop yields were greater in 2014 than 2013 as a result of the more favorable weather when N was applied in 2014. When ammonia volatilization was reduced by adding a urease inhibitor, NO emissions were increased by 30 to 31% with BrUrea+UI and InjUAN+UI compared with BrUrea and InjUAN, respectively. Pollution swapping was avoided when both inhibitors were used (BrUrea+UI+NI, InjUAN+UI+NI) as both ammonia volatilization and NO emissions were reduced, and corn grain yields increased by 5% with BrUrea+UI+NI and by 7% with InjUAN+UI+NI compared with BrUrea and InjUAN, respectively. The combination of two N management strategies (InjUAN+UI+NI) increased yields by 19% (12.9 t ha) compared with BrUrea (10.8 t ha).

Reducing nitrous oxide emissions by changing N fertiliser use from calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) to urea based formulations

The accelerating use of synthetic nitrogen (N) fertilisers, to meet the world's growing food demand, is the primary driver for increased atmospheric concentrations of nitrous oxide (N2O). The IPCC default emission factor (EF) for N2O from soils is 1% of the N applied, irrespective of its form. However, N2O emissions tend to be higher from nitrate-containing fertilisers e.g. calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) compared to urea, particularly in regions, which have mild, wet climates and high organic matter soils. Urea can be an inefficient N source due to NH3 volatilisation, but nitrogen stabilisers (urease and nitrification inhibitors) can improve its efficacy. This study evaluated the impact of switching fertiliser formulation from calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) to urea-based products, as a potential mitigation strategy to reduce N2O emissions at six temperate grassland sites on the island of Ireland. The surface applied formulations included CAN, urea and urea with the urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) and/or the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD). Results showed that N2O emissions were significantly affected by fertiliser formulation, soil type and climatic conditions. The direct N2O emission factor (EF) from CAN averaged 1.49% overall sites, but was highly variable, ranging from 0.58% to 3.81. Amending urea with NBPT, to reduce ammonia volatilisation, resulted in an average EF of 0.40% (ranging from 0.21 to 0.69%)-compared to an average EF of 0.25% for urea (ranging from 0.1 to 0.49%), with both fertilisers significantly lower and less variable than CAN. Cumulative N2O emissions from urea amended with both NBPT and DCD were not significantly different from background levels. Switching from CAN to stabilised urea formulations was found to be an effective strategy to reduce N2O emissions, particularly in wet, temperate grassland.

Application effects of coated urea and urease and nitrification inhibitors on ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from a subtropical cotton field of the Mississippi delta region

Nitrogen (N) fertilization affects both ammonia (NH3) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that have implications in air quality and global warming potential. Different cropping systems practice varying N fertilizations. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of applications of polymer-coated urea and urea treated with N process inhibitors: NBPT [N-(n-butyl)thiophosphoric triamide], urease inhibitor, and DCD [Dicyandiamide], nitrification inhibitor, on NH3 and GHG emissions from a cotton production system in the Mississippi delta region. A two-year field experiment consisting of five treatments including the Check (unfertilized), urea, polymer-coated urea (ESN), urea+NBPT, and urea+DCD was conducted over 2013 and 2014 in a Cancienne loam (Fine-silty, mixed, superactive, nonacid, hyperthermic Fluvaquentic Epiaquepts). Ammonia and GHG samples were collected using active and passive chamber methods, respectively, and characterized. The results showed that the N loss to the atmosphere following urea-N application was dominated by a significantly higher emission of N2O-N than NH3-N and the most N2O-N and NH3-N emissions were during the first 30-50 days. Among different N treatments compared to regular urea, NBPT was the most effective in reducing NH3-N volatilization (by 58-63%), whereas DCD the most significant in mitigating N2O-N emissions (by 75%). Polymer-coated urea (ESN) and NBPT also significantly reduced N2O-N losses (both by 52%) over urea. The emission factors (EFs) for urea, ESN, urea-NBPT, urea+DCD were 1.9%, 1.0%, 0.2%, 0.8% for NH3-N, and 8.3%, 3.4%, 3.9%, 1.0% for N2O-N, respectively. There were no significant effects of different N treatments on CO2-C and CH4-C fluxes. Overall both of these N stabilizers and polymer-coated urea could be used as a mitigation strategy for reducing N2O emission while urease inhibitor NBPT for reducing NH3 emission in the subtropical cotton production system of the Mississippi delta region.

Management of irrigation frequency and nitrogen fertilization to mitigate GHG and NO emissions from drip-fertigated crops

Drip irrigation combined with split application of fertilizer nitrogen (N) dissolved in the irrigation water (i.e. drip fertigation) is commonly considered best management practice for water and nutrient efficiency. As a consequence, its use is becoming widespread. Some of the main factors (water-filled pore space, NH4(+) and NO3(-)) regulating the emissions of greenhouse gases (i.e. N2O, CO2 and CH4) and NO from agroecosystems can easily be manipulated by drip fertigation without yield penalties. In this study, we tested management options to reduce these emissions in a field experiment with a melon (Cucumis melo L.) crop. Treatments included drip irrigation frequency (weekly/daily) and type of N fertilizer (urea/calcium nitrate) applied by fertigation. Crop yield, environmental parameters, soil mineral N concentrations and fluxes of N2O, NO, CH4 and CO2 were measured during 85 days. Fertigation with urea instead of calcium nitrate increased N2O and NO emissions by a factor of 2.4 and 2.9, respectively (P<0.005). Daily irrigation reduced NO emissions by 42% (P<0.005) but increased CO2 emissions by 21% (P<0.05) compared with weekly irrigation. We found no relation between irrigation frequency and N2O emissions. Based on yield-scaled Global Warming Potential as well as NO cumulative emissions, we conclude that weekly fertigation with a NO3(-)-based fertilizer is the best option to combine agronomic productivity with environmental sustainability. Our study shows that adequate management of drip fertigation, while contributing to the attainment of water and food security, may provide an opportunity for climate change mitigation.