Ventricular tachycardia burden and mortality: association or causality?

Efficacy of prescribing Inderal for polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in a young patient with the normal QT interval: A case report study

Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PVT) is a group of life-threatening heart rhythm disorders. These arrhythmias share similar electrocardiographic characteristics but require different modes of therapy for effective treatment. It is important to note that the medications that are considered the first-line treatment for one type of PVT may not be appropriate for another type, and may worsen the condition. Therefore, it is crucial to accurately diagnose the type of PVT before initiating treatment to provide the most effective therapy for the patient. A 42-year-old man was admitted to the emergency department with dyspnea, Levine sign, and severe chest pain. His electrocardiogram showed ST elevation, and the QT interval was normal. The patient was sent to the cath lab based on the treatment protocols. According to the results of angiography, three coronary arteries were severely obstructed. His coronary arteries did not open during percutaneous coronary intervention; thus, the healthcare team decided on open heart surgery. He suffered from recurrent PVT following open heart surgery and did not respond to any of the drugs suitable for this type of tachycardia. Inderal prevented the recurrence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in a patient with polymorphic VT without QT prolongation, contrary to the healthcare team's expectations. Inderal was used as the last line of treatment because this patient's arrhythmia was polymorphic VT without QT prolongation. Inderal is typically used for treating VT in patients with long QT syndromes and heart structural disorders. This case report aims to highlight the impact of Inderal on polymorphic tachycardia, specifically in cases where the QT interval is not elongated. In this particular case, the standard treatment approaches were ineffective in preventing reversibility, but Inderal proved to be successful. Therefore, we feel it is important to document and share this case.

A randomized clinical trial of catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy for suppression of ventricular tachycardia in ischemic cardiomyopathy: The VANISH2 trial

BACKGROUND

Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with prior myocardial infarction is associated with adverse quality of life and clinical outcomes, despite the presence of implanted defibrillators (ICDs). Suppression of recurrent VT can be accomplished with antiarrhythmic drug therapy or catheter ablation. The Ventricular Tachycardia Antiarrhythmics or Ablation In Structural Heart Disease 2 (VANISH2) trial is designed to determine whether ablation is superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy as first line therapy for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and VT.

METHODS

The VANISH2 trial enrolls patients with prior myocardial infarction and VT (with one of: ≥1 ICD shock; ≥3 episodes treated with antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and symptoms; ≥5 episodes treated with ATP regardless of symptoms; ≥3 episodes within 24 hours; or sustained VT treated with electrical cardioversion or pharmacologic conversion). Enrolled patients are classified as either sotalol-eligible, or amiodarone-eligible, and then are randomized to either catheter ablation or to that antiarrhythmic drug therapy, with randomization stratified by drug-eligibility group. Drug therapy, catheter ablation procedures and ICD programming are standardized. All patients will be followed until two years after randomization. The primary endpoint is a composite of mortality at any time, appropriate ICD shock after 14 days, VT storm after 14 days, and treated sustained VT below detection of the ICD after 14 days. The outcomes will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle using survival analysis techniques RESULTS: The results of the VANISH2 trial are intended to provide data to support clinical decisions on how to suppress VT for patients with prior myocardial infarction.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov registration NCT02830360.

Optimizing ventricular tachycardia ablation through imaging-based assessment of arrhythmic substrate: A comprehensive review and roadmap for the future

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life-threatening heart rhythm and has long posed a complex challenge in the field of cardiology. Recent developments in advanced imaging modalities have aimed to improve comprehension of underlying arrhythmic substrate for VT. To this extent, high-resolution cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and cardiac computed tomography (CCT) have emerged as tools for accurately visualizing and characterizing scar tissue, fibrosis, and other critical structural abnormalities within the heart, providing novel insights into VT triggers and substrate. However, clinical implementation of knowledge derived from these advanced imaging techniques in improving VT treatment and guiding invasive therapeutic strategies continues to pose significant challenges. A pivotal concern lies in the absence of standardized imaging protocols and analysis methodologies, resulting in a large variance in data quality and consistency. Furthermore, the clinical significance and outcomes associated with VT substrate characterization through CMR and CCT remain dynamic and subject to ongoing evolution. This highlights the need for refinement of these techniques before their reliable integration into routine patient care can be realized. The primary objectives of this study are twofold: firstly, to provide a comprehensive overview of the studies conducted over the last 15 years, summarizing the current available literature on imaging-based assessment of VT substrate. Secondly, to critically analyze and evaluate the selected studies, with the aim of providing valuable insights that can inform current clinical practice and future research.

Impact of Catheter Ablation of Electrical Storm on Survival: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Electrical storm (ES) is a life-threatening condition, associated with substantial early and subacute mortality. Catheter ablation (CA) is a well-established therapy for ES. However, data regarding the impact of CA on the short-term and midterm survival of patients admitted for ES remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This multicenter study aimed to investigate the impact of CA of ES on survival outcomes, while accounting for key patient characteristics associated with treatment selection.

METHODS

A propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis was performed on 780 consecutive patients admitted for ES in 4 tertiary centers. PSM (1:1) based on the main characteristics associated with the use of CA or medical therapy alone was performed, resulting in 2 groups of 288 patients.

RESULTS

After PSM, patients who underwent CA (n = 288) and those treated with medical therapy alone (n = 288) did not present any significant differences in the main demographic characteristics, ES presentation, and management. Compared with medical therapy alone, CA was associated with a significantly lower rate of ES recurrence at 1 year (5% vs 26%; P < 0.001). Similarly, CA was associated with a higher 1-year (91% vs 81%; P < 0.001) and 3-year (78% vs 71%; P = 0.017) survival after discharge. In subgroup analyses, effect of ablation therapy remained consistent in patients older than 70 years of age (HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.24-0.66), with substantial efficacy in patients with a LVEF <35% (HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.27-0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

In propensity-matched analyses, this large study shows that CA-based management of patients admitted for ES is associated with a reduction in mortality compared with medical treatment, particularly in patients with a low ejection fraction.

Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A propensity-score matched analysis

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Catheter ablation (CA) is effective in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Although some observational data suggest patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) have less favorable outcomes when compared to those with an ischemic etiology (ICM), direct comparisons are rarely reported. We aimed to compare the outcomes of VT ablation in a propensity-score matched population of ICM or NICM patients.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing VT ablation from 2012 to 2023. A propensity score (PS) was used to match ICM and NICM patients in a 1:1 fashion according to age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), NYHA class, electrical storm (ES) at presentation, and previous endocardial ablation. The outcomes of interest were VT-free survival and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The PS yielded two groups of 71 patients each (mean age 63±10 years, 92% male, mean LVEF 35±10%, 36% with ES at presentation, and 23% with previous ablation), well matched for baseline characteristics. During a median follow-up of 2.3 (interquartile range IQR 1.3-3.8) years, patients with NICM had a significantly lower VT-free survival (53.5% vs. 69.0%, log-rank p=0.037), although there were no differences regarding all-cause mortality (22.5% vs. 16.9%, log-rank p=0.245). Multivariate analysis identified NICM (HR 2.34 [95% CI 1.32-4.14], p=0.004), NYHA class III/IV (HR 2.11 [95% CI 1.11-4.04], p=0.024), and chronic kidney disease (HR 2.23 [95% CI 1.25-3.96], p=0.006), as independent predictors of VT recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients were at increased risk of VT recurrence after ablation, although long-term mortality did not differ.

Impact of initiation of SGLT2 inhibitor treatment on the development of arrhythmias in patients with implantable cardiac devices

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been associated with improved prognosis in patients with heart failure, but their impact on atrial arrhythmic (AA) and ventricular arrhythmic (VA) events is not fully understood.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators who initiated treatment with SGLT2i. AA and VA events were compared in 2 time periods for each patient: 1 year before and 1 year after starting SGLT2i.

RESULTS

The study included 195 patients (66.8 [61.3-73.1] years, 18.5% women). In the post-SGLT2i period, there was a reduction in the percentage of patients with any VA (pre: 52.3% vs post: 30.3%; P<.001) and clinically relevant VA (excluding nonsustained ventricular tachycardia) (pre: 21.5% vs post: 8.7%; P<.001). There was also a decrease in the number of episodes per patient/y of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (pre: 2 (1-5) vs post: 1 (0-2); P<.001) and sustained ventricular tachycardia (pre: 1 (1-3) vs post: 0 (0-2); P=0.046). However, no differences were observed in the prevalence of AA (24.7% vs 18.8%; P=.117) or the burden of atrial fibrillation (pre: 0% (0-0.1) vs post: 0% (0-0); P=.097).

CONCLUSIONS

Initiation of SGLT2i treatment was associated with a decrease in the percentage of patients with relevant VA but this effect was not observed for AA.

Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Pre-eclampsia: Prevalence, Predictors, and Associated In-Hospital Adverse Events

Introduction Pre-eclampsia is a pregnancy-associated multisystem disorder; in rare cases, it can be complicated by arrhythmias such as ventricular tachycardia (VT). The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and predictors of VT among patients admitted with pre-eclampsia as well as to analyze the independent association of VT with in-hospital outcomes in this population. Methods Data were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample from January 2016 to December 2019. Patients with a primary diagnosis of pre-eclampsia were selected using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. Subsequently, the study population was divided into patients who developed VT versus patients who did not develop this complication. We then assessed the predictors of VT in women with pre-eclampsia as well as the independent association of VT with outcomes taking into account confounders such as age, race, and comorbidities. Results Of 255,946 patients with pre-eclampsia, 92 developed VT (0.04%) during their hospital stay. Multivariate logistic regression showed that patients with VT were far more likely to develop cardiac arrest (adjusted odds ratio, or aOR: 92.582, 95% CI: 30.958-276.871, p=0.001), require permanent pacemaker implantation (aOR: 41.866, 95% CI: 14.800-118.432, p=0.001), develop postpartum hemorrhage (aOR: 2.932, 95% CI: 1.655-5.196, p=0.001), and require left heart catheterization (aOR: 19.508, 95% CI: 3.261-116.708, p=0.001). Predictors of VT included being African American (aOR: 1.939, 95% CI: 1.183-3.177, p=0.009), cerebrovascular disease (aOR: 23.109, 95% CI: 6.953-76.802, p=0.001), congestive heart failure (aOR: 50.340, 95% CI: 28.829-87.901, p=0.001), atrial fibrillation (aOR: 20.148, 95% CI: 6.179-65.690, p=0.001), and obstructive sleep apnea, or OSA (aOR: 3.951, 95% CI: 1.486-10.505, p=0.006). Patients in the VT cohort were found to have an increased length of hospital stay compared to the non-VT cohort (7.16 vs. 4.13 days, p=0.001). Conclusion In a large cohort of women admitted with pre-eclampsia, we found the prevalence of VT to be <1%. Predictors of VT included conditions such as atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, and OSA and being African American. VT was found to be independently associated with several adverse outcomes as well as an increased length of hospital stay.

Comprehensive Cardiovascular Management of Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 Patients: A Report from the Italian Neuro-Cardiology Network

Myotonic dystrophy is a hereditary disorder with systemic involvement. The Italian Neuro-Cardiology Network-"Rete delle Neurocardiologie" (INCN-RNC) is a unique collaborative experience involving neurology units combined with cardio-arrhythmology units. The INCN facilitates the creation of integrated neuro-cardiac teams in Neuromuscular Disease Centers for the management of cardiovascular involvement in the treatment of myotonic dystrophy type 1 (MD1).

Ventricular Tachycardia Catheter Ablation: Retrospective Analysis and Prospective Outlooks-A Comprehensive Review

Ventricular tachycardia is a potentially life-threatening arrhythmia associated with an overall high morbi-mortality, particularly in patients with structural heart disease. Despite their pivotal role in preventing sudden cardiac death, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, although a guideline-based class I recommendation, are unable to prevent arrhythmic episodes and significantly alter the quality of life by delivering recurrent therapies. From open-heart surgical ablation to the currently widely used percutaneous approach, catheter ablation is a safe and effective procedure able to target the responsible re-entry myocardial circuit from both the endocardium and the epicardium. There are four main mapping strategies, activation, entrainment, pace, and substrate mapping, each of them with their own advantages and limitations. The contemporary guideline-based recommendations for VT ablation primarily apply to patients experiencing antiarrhythmic drug ineffectiveness or those intolerant to the pharmacological treatment. Although highly effective in most cases of scar-related VTs, the traditional approach may sometimes be insufficient, especially in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathies, where circuits may be unmappable using the classic techniques. Alternative methods have been proposed, such as stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation or radiotherapy ablation, surgical ablation, needle ablation, transarterial coronary ethanol ablation, and retrograde coronary venous ethanol ablation, with promising results. Further studies are needed in order to prove the overall efficacy of these methods in comparison to standard radiofrequency delivery. Nevertheless, as the field of cardiac electrophysiology continues to evolve, it is important to acknowledge the role of artificial intelligence in both the pre-procedural planning and the intervention itself.

One-year mortality and causes of death after stereotactic radiation therapy for refractory ventricular arrhythmias: A systematic review and pooled analysis

Patients treated with cardiac stereotactic body radiation therapy (radioablation) for refractory ventricular arrhythmias are patients with advanced structural heart disease and significant comorbidities. However, data regarding 1-year mortality after the procedure are scarce. This systematic review and pooled analysis aimed at determining 1-year mortality after cardiac radioablation for refractory ventricular arrhythmias and investigating leading causes of death in this population. MEDLINE/EMBASE databases were searched up to January 2023 for studies including patients undergoing cardiac radioablation for the treatment of refractory ventricular arrhythmias. Quality of included trials was assessed using the NIH Tool for Case Series Studies (PROSPERO CRD42022379713). A total of 1,151 references were retrieved and evaluated for relevance. Data were extracted from 16 studies, with a total of 157 patients undergoing cardiac radioablation for refractory ventricular arrhythmias. Pooled 1-year mortality was 32 % (95 %CI: 23-41), with almost half of the deaths occurring within three months after treatment. Among the 157 patients, 46 died within the year following cardiac radioablation. Worsening heart failure appeared to be the leading cause of death (52 %), although non-cardiac mortality remained substantial (41 %) in this population. Age≥70yo was associated with a significantly higher 12-month all-cause mortality (p<0.022). Neither target volume size nor radiotherapy device appeared to be associated with 1-year mortality (p = 0.465 and p = 0.199, respectively). About one-third of patients undergoing cardiac stereotactic body radiation therapy for refractory ventricular arrhythmias die within the first year after the procedure. Worsening heart failure appears to be the leading cause of death in this population.

Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia Presenting As Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are among the most common cardiac rhythms seen among patients. Patients presenting with frequent, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) pose a dilemma for clinicians due to the constant risk of sudden cardiovascular compromise. Ventricular tachycardia, which is commonly seen in patients with defects in cardiac anatomy, has been associated with an increased risk of sudden death. A previous myocardial scar from a previous myocardial infarction remains the most common cause of sustained monomorphic VT (SMVT) in patients with structural cardiac disease. Studies have shown that implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) can be used for primary prevention in patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy whose ejection fraction remains below 35% despite guideline-directed medical therapy. It can also be used for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients who have had a VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Identifying individuals at risk for developing deleterious VTs who will benefit from ICD placement for prevention has been the objective of many large studies in recent years. We present a case of clinical importance involving the use of ICD in the primary prevention of mortality from sustained ventricular arrhythmias.

Ventricular tachycardia and in-hospital mortality in the intensive care unit

Background

Continuous electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring is used to identify ventricular tachycardia (VT), but false alarms occur frequently.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of 30-day in-hospital mortality associated with VT alerts generated from bedside ECG monitors to those from a new algorithm among intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in consecutive adult ICU patients at an urban academic medical center and compared current bedside monitor VT alerts, VT alerts from a new-unannotated algorithm, and true-annotated VT. We used survival analysis to explore the association between VT alerts and mortality.

Results

We included 5679 ICU admissions (mean age 58 ± 17 years; 48% women), 503 (8.9%) experienced 30-day in-hospital mortality. A total of 30.1% had at least 1 current bedside monitor VT alert, 14.3% had a new-unannotated algorithm VT alert, and 11.6% had true-annotated VT. Bedside monitor VT alert was not associated with increased rate of 30-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.27), but there was an association for VT alerts from our new-unannotated algorithm (aHR 1.38; 95% CI 1.12-1.69) and true-annotated VT(aHR 1.39; 95% CI 1.12-1.73).

Conclusion

Unannotated and annotated-true VT were associated with increased rate of 30-day in-hospital mortality, whereas current bedside monitor VT was not. Our new algorithm may accurately identify high-risk VT; however, prospective validation is needed.

Tic-Tac: A Translational Approach in Mechanisms Associated with Irregular Heartbeat and Sinus Rhythm Restoration in Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac condition predominantly affecting older adults, characterized by irregular heartbeat rhythm. The condition often leads to significant disability and increased mortality rates. Traditionally, two therapeutic strategies have been employed for its treatment: heart rate control and rhythm control. Recent clinical studies have emphasized the critical role of early restoration of sinus rhythm in improving patient outcomes. The persistence of the irregular rhythm allows for the progression and structural remodeling of the atria, eventually leading to irreversible stages, as observed clinically when AF becomes permanent. Cardioversion to sinus rhythm alters this progression pattern through mechanisms that are still being studied. In this review, we provide an in-depth analysis of the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for maintaining AF and how they are modified during sinus rhythm restoration using existing therapeutic strategies at different stages of clinical investigation. Moreover, we explore potential future therapeutic approaches, including the promising prospect of gene therapy.

inHEART Models software - novel 3D cardiac modeling solution

INTRODUCTION

Advanced cardiac imaging is an important component in pre-procedural planning for ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablations. inHEART's proprietary software, inHEART Models, and its academic version, Multimodality Platform for Specific Imaging in Cardiology (MUSIC), provide detailed characterization of anatomical structures and scars.

AREAS COVERED

This review highlights the current overview of the market and offers insight into inHEART Models and MUSIC and its application during VT ablations with supporting case examples. An overview of the clinical profile and regulatory status of inHEART Models, and other competing technologies, such as Automatic Detection of Arrhythmia Substrate (ADAS) 3D software and Catheter Precision's View into Ventricular Onset (VIVO), are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

inHEART and MUSIC utilization has increased over the last few years and continues to establish its presence as an important aspect of VT ablations. Its unique proprietary software sets itself apart from others in the field. The introduction of dual source-photon counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) is expected to make significant advancements in the field and take imaging to a new level. inHEART's continued research in cardiac imaging and digital technology is expected to increase as is its global presence in the electrophysiology (EP) community.

Ventricular Tachycardia and ICD Therapy Burden With Catheter Ablation Versus Escalated Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation improves ventricular tachycardia (VT) event-free (time to event) survival in patients with antiarrhythmic drug (AAD)-refractory VT and previous myocardial infarction (MI). The effects of ablation on recurrent VT and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy (burden) have yet to be investigated.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare the VT and ICD therapy burden following treatment with either ablation or escalated AAD therapy among patients with VT and previous MI in the VANISH (Ventricular tachycardia AblatioN versus escalated antiarrhythmic drug therapy in ISchemic Heart disease) trial.

METHODS

The VANISH trial randomized patients with previous MI and VT despite initial AAD therapy to either escalated AAD treatment or catheter ablation. VT burden was defined as the total number of VT events treated with ≥1 appropriate ICD therapy. Appropriate ICD therapy burden was defined as the total number of appropriate shocks or antitachycardia pacing therapies (ATPs) delivered. The Anderson-Gill recurrent event model was used to compare burden between the treatment arms.

RESULTS

Of the 259 enrolled patients (median age, 69.8 years; 7.0% women), 132 patients were randomized to ablation and 129 patients were randomized to escalated AAD therapy. Over 23.4 months of follow-up, ablation-treated patients had a 40% lower shock-treated VT event burden and a 39% lower appropriate shock burden compared with patients who received escalated AAD therapy (P <0.05 for all). A reduction in VT burden, ATP-treated VT event burden, and appropriate ATP burden among ablation patients was only demonstrated in the stratum of patients with amiodarone-refractory VT (P <0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with AAD-refractory VT and a previous MI, catheter ablation reduced shock-treated VT event burden and appropriate shock burden compared with escalated AAD therapy. There was also lower VT burden, ATP-treated VT event burden, and appropriate ATP burden among ablation-treated patients; however, the effect was limited to patients with amiodarone-refractory VT.

One-year outcomes in cardiogenic shock triggered by ventricular arrhythmia: An analysis of the FRENSHOCK multicenter prospective registry

Background

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening condition carrying poor prognosis, potentially triggered by ventricular arrhythmia (VA). Whether the occurrence of VA as trigger of CS worsens the prognosis compared to non-VA triggers  remains  unclear.  The  aim  of  this  study  was  to  evaluate  1-year  outcomes [mortality, heart transplantation, ventricular assist devices (VAD)] between VA-triggered and non-VA-triggered CS.

Methods

FRENSHOCK is a prospective multicenter registry including 772 CS patients from 49 centers. One to three triggers can be identified in the registry (ischemic, mechanical complications, ventricular/supraventricular arrhythmia, bradycardia, iatrogenesis, infection, non-compliance). Baseline characteristics, management and 1-year outcomes were analyzed according to the VA-trigger in the CS population.

Results

Within 769 CS patients included, 94 were VA-triggered (12.2%) and were compared to others. At 1 year, although there was no mortality difference [42.6 vs. 45.3%, HR 0.94 (0.67-1.30), p = 0.7], VA-triggered CS resulted in more heart transplantations and VAD (17 vs. 9%, p = 0.02). Into VA-triggered CS group, though there was no 1-year mortality difference between ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies [42.5 vs. 42.6%, HR 0.97 (0.52-1.81), p = 0.92], non-ischemic cardiomyopathy led to more heart transplantations and VAD (25.9 vs. 5%, p = 0.02).

Conclusion

VA-triggered CS did not show higher mortality compared to other triggers but resulted in more heart transplantation and VAD at 1 year, especially in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, suggesting the need for earlier evaluation by advanced heart failure specialized team for a possible indication of mechanical circulatory support or heart transplantation.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02703038.

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia associated with structural heart disease: Current status and perspectives

Catheter ablation is an effective and safe treatment for ventricular tachycardia attributable to structural heart disease, reducing the risk of recurrent arrhythmias and defibrillator shock therapy. Advances in medical technology and an accumulation of data have led to the development of detailed guidelines. Successful ablation requires accurate identification of the arrhythmia substrate and effective delivery of radiofrequency energy to the target tissue. Modern practice requires use of traditional electrophysiological mapping processes such as entrainment mapping and three-dimensional activation sequence mapping in combination with newer functional mapping techniques for which there is growing support. Thorough non-invasive preoperative assessment is also necessary before an invasive procedure is undertaken. In this review, we summarize contemporary practice and recent randomized controlled trials underpinning the latest developments in mapping and ablation and discuss potential future developments in this field.

Promising Therapies for Atrial Fibrillation and Ventricular Tachycardia

Sudden cardiac death due to arrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia, account for 15-20% of all deaths. Myocardial infarction increases the burden of atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia by structural and electrical remodeling of the heart. The current management of new-onset atrial fibrillation includes electric cardioversion with very high conversion rates and pharmacologic cardioversion, with less a than 50% conversion rate. If atrial fibrillation cannot be converted, the focus becomes the control of the symptoms ensuring a constant rhythm and rate control, without considering other contributory factors such as autonomic imbalance. Recently, a huge success was obtained by developing ablation techniques or addressing the vagal nerve stimulation. On the other hand, ventricular tachycardia is more sensitive to drug therapies. However, in cases of non-responsiveness to drugs, the usual therapeutic choice is represented by stereotactic ablative therapy or catheter ablation. This review focuses on these newly developed strategies for treatment of arrhythmias in clinical practice, specifically on vernakalant and low-level tragus stimulation for atrial fibrillation and stereotactic ablative therapy for drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia. These therapies are important for the significant improvement of the management of atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia, providing: (1) a safer profile than current therapies, (2) higher success rate than current solutions, (3) low cost of delivery.