Automated seizure detection using wearable devices: A clinical practice guideline of the International League Against Epilepsy and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology

Common Critiques and Recommendations for Studies in Neurology Using Machine Learning Methods

Machine learning (ML) methods are becoming more prevalent in the neurology literature as alternatives to traditional statistical methods to address challenges in the analysis of modern data sets. Despite the increase in the popularity of ML methods in neurology studies, some authors do not fully address all items recommended in reporting guidelines. The authors of this Research Methods article are members of the Neurology® editorial board and have reviewed many studies using ML methods. In their review reports, several critiques often appear, which could be avoided if guidance were available. In this article, we detail common critiques found in ML research studies and make recommendations for how to avoid them. The first critique involves misalignment of the study goals and the analysis conducted. The second critique focuses on ML terminology being appropriately used. Critiques 3-6 are related to the study design: justifying sample sizes and the suitability of the data set for the study goals, describing the ML analysis pipeline sufficiently, quantifying the amount of missing data and providing information about missing data handling, and including uncertainty estimates for key metrics. The seventh critique focuses on fairly describing both strengths and limitations of the ML study, including the analysis methodology and results. We provide examples in neurology for each critique and guidance on how to avoid the critique. Overall, we recommend that authors use ML-specific checklists developed by research consortia for designing and reporting studies using ML. We also recommend that authors involve both a statistician and an ML expert in work that uses ML. Although our list of critiques is not exhaustive, our recommendations should help improve the quality and rigor of ML studies. ML has great potential to revolutionize neurology, but investigators need to conduct and report the results in a way that allows readers to fully evaluate the benefits and limitations of ML approaches.

Update review on SUDEP: Risk assessment, background & seizure detection devices

This review focusses on sudden unexpected death in epilepsy patients (SUDEP) and incorporates risk stratification (through SUDEP risk factors and SUDEP risk scores), hypotheses on the mechanism of SUDEP and eligible seizure detection devices (SDDs) for further SUDEP prevention studies. The main risk factors for SUDEP are the presence and the frequency of generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTC). In Swedish population-based case control study, the Odds ratio of the presence of GTC in the absence of bedroom sharing is 67. SUDEP risk scoring systems express a score that represents the cumulative presence of SUDEP risk factors, but not the exact effect of their combination. We describe 4 of the available scoring systems: SUDEP-7 inventory, SUDEP-3 inventory, SUDEP-ClinicAl Risk scorE (SUDEP-CARE score) and Kempenhaeghe SUDEP risk score. Although they all include GTC, their design is often different. Three of 4 scoring systems were validated (SUDEP-7 inventory, SUDEP-3 inventory and SUDEP-CARE score). None of the available scoring systems has been sufficiently validated for the use in a general epilepsy population. Plausible mechanisms of SUDEP are discussed. In the MORTEMUS-study (Mortality in Epilepsy Monitoring Unit Study), SUDEP was a postictal cardiorespiratory arrest after a GTC. The parallel respiratory and cardiac dysfunction in SUDEP suggests a central dysfunction of the brainstem centers that are involved in the control of respiration and heart rhythm. In the (consequent) adenosine serotonin hypotheses SUDEP occurs when a postictal adenosine-mediated respiratory depression is not compensated by the effect of serotonin. Other (adjuvant) mechanisms and factors are discussed. Seizure detection devices (SDDs) may help to improve nocturnal supervision. Five SDDs have been validated in phase 3 studies for the detection of TC: Seizure Link®, Epi-Care®, NightWatch, Empatica, Nelli®. They have demonstrated a sensitivity of at least 90 % combined with an acceptable false positive alarm rate. It has not yet been proven that the use will actually lead to SUDEP prevention, but clinical experience supports their effectiveness.

Effects of epileptic seizures on the quality of biosignals recorded from wearables

OBJECTIVE

Wearable nonelectroencephalographic biosignal recordings captured from the wrist offer enormous potential for seizure monitoring. However, signal quality remains a challenging factor affecting data reliability. Models trained for seizure detection depend on the quality of recordings in peri-ictal periods in performing a feature-based separation of ictal periods from interictal periods. Thus, this study aims to investigate the effect of epileptic seizures on signal quality, ensuring accurate and reliable monitoring.

METHODS

This study assesses the signal quality of wearable data during peri-ictal phases of generalized tonic-clonic and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (TCS), focal motor seizures (FMS), and focal nonmotor seizures (FNMS). We evaluated accelerometer (ACC) activity and the signal quality of electrodermal activity (EDA) and blood volume pulse (BVP) data. Additionally, we analyzed the influence of peri-ictal movements as assessed by ACC (ACC activity) on signal quality and examined intraictal subphases of focal to bilateral TCS.

RESULTS

We analyzed 386 seizures from 111 individuals in three international epilepsy monitoring units. BVP signal quality and ACC activity levels differed between all seizure types. We found the largest decrease in BVP signal quality and increase in ACC activity when comparing the ictal phase to the pre- and postictal phases for TCS. Additionally, ACC activity was strongly negatively correlated with BVP signal quality for TCS and FMS, and weakly for FNMS. Intraictal analysis revealed that tonic and clonic subphases have the lowest BVP signal quality and the highest ACC activity.

SIGNIFICANCE

Motor elements of seizures significantly impair BVP signal quality, but do not have significant effect on EDA signal quality, as assessed by wrist-worn wearables. The results underscore the importance of signal quality assessment methods and careful selection of robust modalities to ensure reliable seizure detection. Future research is needed to explain whether seizure detection models' decisions are based on signal responses induced by physiological processes as opposed to artifacts.

Improving Quality of Care for Status Epilepticus: Putting Protocols into Practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Timely treatment of status epilepticus (SE) improves outcomes, however gaps between recommended and implemented care are common. This review analyzes obstacles and explores interventions to optimize effective, evidence-based treatment of SE.

RECENT FINDINGS

Seizure action plans, rescue medications, and noninvasive wearables with seizure detection capabilities can facilitate early intervention for prolonged seizures in the home and school. In the field, standardized EMS protocols, EMS education, and screening tools can address variability in SE definitions and treatment, particularly benzodiazepine dosing. In the emergency room and hospital, provider education, SE order sets and alerts, and rapid EEG technologies, can shorten time to first-line therapy, second-line therapy, and EEG initiation. Widespread, sustained improvement in SE care remains challenging. A multipronged approach including emphasis on pre-hospital intervention, treatment protocols adapted to local contexts, and SE databases to systematically collect process and outcome metrics have the potential to transform SE treatment and outcomes.

Reliable detection of generalized convulsive seizures using an off-the-shelf digital watch: A multisite phase 2 study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop a machine learning algorithm using an off-the-shelf digital watch, the Samsung watch (SM-R800), and evaluate its effectiveness for the detection of generalized convulsive seizures (GCS) in persons with epilepsy.

METHODS

This multisite epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) phase 2 study included 36 adult patients. Each patient wore a Samsung watch that contained accelerometer, gyroscope, and photoplethysmographic sensors. Sixty-eight time and frequency domain features were extracted from the sensor data and were used to train a random forest algorithm. A testing framework was developed that would better reflect the EMU setting, consisting of (1) leave-one-patient-out cross-validation (LOPO CV) on GCS patients, (2) false alarm rate (FAR) testing on nonseizure patients, and (3) "fixed-and-frozen" prospective testing on a prospective patient cohort. Balanced accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and FAR were used to quantify the performance of the algorithm. Seizure onsets and offsets were determined by using video-electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring. Feature importance was calculated as the mean decrease in Gini impurity during the LOPO CV testing.

RESULTS

LOPO CV results showed balanced accuracy of .93 (95% confidence interval [CI] = .8-.98), precision of .68 (95% CI = .46-.85), sensitivity of .87 (95% CI = .62-.96), and FAR of .21/24 h (interquartile range [IQR] = 0-.90). Testing the algorithm on patients without seizure resulted in an FAR of .28/24 h (IQR = 0-.61). During the "fixed-and-frozen" prospective testing, two patients had three GCS, which were detected by the algorithm, while generating an FAR of .25/24 h (IQR = 0-.89). Feature importance showed that heart rate-based features outperformed accelerometer/gyroscope-based features.

SIGNIFICANCE

Commercially available wearable digital watches that reliably detect GCS, with minimum false alarm rates, may overcome usage adoption and other limitations of custom-built devices. Contingent on the outcomes of a prospective phase 3 study, such devices have the potential to provide non-EEG-based seizure surveillance and forecasting in the clinical setting.

Autonomic biosignals, seizure detection, and forecasting

Wearable devices have attracted significant attention in epilepsy research in recent years for their potential to enhance patient care through improved seizure monitoring and forecasting. This narrative review presents a detailed overview of the current clinical state of the art while addressing how devices that assess autonomic nervous system (ANS) function reflect seizures and central nervous system (CNS) state changes. This includes a description of the interactions between the CNS and the ANS, including physiological and epilepsy-related changes affecting their dynamics. We first discuss technical aspects of measuring autonomic biosignals and considerations for using ANS sensors in clinical practice. We then review recent seizure detection and seizure forecasting studies, highlighting their performance and capability for seizure detection and forecasting using devices measuring ANS biomarkers. Finally, we address the field's challenges and provide an outlook for future developments.

Visual detection of seizures in mice using supervised machine learning

Seizures are caused by abnormally synchronous brain activity that can result in changes in muscle tone, such as twitching, stiffness, limpness, or rhythmic jerking. These behavioral manifestations are clear on visual inspection and the most widely used seizure scoring systems in preclinical models, such as the Racine scale in rodents, use these behavioral patterns in semiquantitative seizure intensity scores. However, visual inspection is time-consuming, low-throughput, and partially subjective, and there is a need for rigorously quantitative approaches that are scalable. In this study, we used supervised machine learning approaches to develop automated classifiers to predict seizure severity directly from noninvasive video data. Using the PTZ-induced seizure model in mice, we trained video-only classifiers to predict ictal events, combined these events to predict an univariate seizure intensity for a recording session, as well as time-varying seizure intensity scores. Our results show, for the first time, that seizure events and overall intensity can be rigorously quantified directly from overhead video of mice in a standard open field using supervised approaches. These results enable high-throughput, noninvasive, and standardized seizure scoring for downstream applications such as neurogenetics and therapeutic discovery.

Ambulatory seizure detection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent advances in the field of seizure detection in ambulatory patients with epilepsy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have shown that wrist or arm wearable sensors, using 3D-accelerometry, electrodermal activity or photoplethysmography, in isolation or in combination, can reliably detect focal-to-bilateral and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS), with a sensitivity over 90%, and false alarm rates varying from 0.1 to 1.2 per day. A headband EEG has also demonstrated a high sensitivity for detecting and help monitoring generalized absence seizures. In contrast, no appropriate solution is yet available to detect focal seizures, though some promising findings were reported using ECG-based heart rate variability biomarkers and subcutaneous EEG.

SUMMARY

Several FDA and/or EU-certified solutions are available to detect GTCS and trigger an alarm with acceptable rates of false alarms. However, data are still missing regarding the impact of such intervention on patients' safety. Noninvasive solutions to reliably detect focal seizures in ambulatory patients, based on either EEG or non-EEG biosignals, remain to be developed. To this end, a number of challenges need to be addressed, including the performance, but also the transparency and interpretability of machine learning algorithms.

Detection of seizures with ictal tachycardia, using heart rate variability and patient adaptive logistic regression machine learning methods: A hospital-based validation study

OBJECTIVE

Automated seizure detection of focal epileptic seizures is needed for objective seizure quantification to optimize the treatment of patients with epilepsy. Heart rate variability (HRV)-based seizure detection using patient-adaptive threshold with logistic regression machine learning (LRML) methods has presented promising performance in a study with a Danish patient cohort. The objective of this study was to assess the generalizability of the novel LRML seizure detection algorithm by validating it in a dataset recorded from long-term video-EEG monitoring (LTM) in a Brazilian patient cohort.

METHODS

Ictal and inter-ictal ECG-data epochs recorded during LTM were analyzed retrospectively. Thirty-four patients had 107 seizures (79 focal, 28 generalized tonic-clonic [GTC] including focal-to-bilateral-tonic-clonic seizures) eligible for analysis, with a total of 185.5 h recording. Because HRV-based seizure detection is only suitable in patients with marked ictal autonomic change, patients with >50 beats/min change in heart rate during seizures were selected as responders. The patient-adaptive LRML seizure detection algorithm was applied to all elected ECG data, and results were computed separately for responders and non-responders.

RESULTS

The patient-adaptive LRML seizure detection algorithm yielded a sensitivity of 84.8% (95% CI: 75.6-93.9) with a false alarm rate of .25/24 h in the responder group (22 patients, 59 seizures). Twenty-five of the 26 GTC seizures were detected (96.2%), and 25 of the 33 focal seizures without bilateral convulsions were detected (75.8%).

SIGNIFICANCE

The study confirms in a new, independent external dataset the good performance of seizure detection from a previous study and suggests that the method is generalizable. This method seems useful for detecting both generalized and focal epileptic seizures. The algorithm can be embedded in a wearable seizure detection system to alert patients and caregivers of seizures and generate objective seizure counts helping to optimize the treatment of the patients.

The sound of silence: Quantification of typical absence seizures by sonifying EEG signals from a custom-built wearable device

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a method for long-term (24-h) objective quantification of absence seizures in the EEG of patients with childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) in their real home environment using a wearable device (waEEG), comparing automatic detection methods with auditory recognition after seizure sonification.

METHODS

The waEEG recording was acquired with two scalp electrodes. Automatic analysis was performed using previously validated software (Persyst® 14) and then fully reviewed by an experienced clinical neurophysiologist. The EEG data were converted into an audio file in waveform format with a 60-fold time compression factor. The sonified EEG was listened to by three inexperienced observers and the number of seizures and the processing time required for each data set were recorded blind to other data. Quantification of seizures from the patient diary was also assessed.

RESULTS

Eleven waEEG recordings from seven CAE patients with an average age of 8.18 ± 1.60 years were included. No differences in the number of seizures were found between the recordings using automated methods and expert audio assessment, with significant correlations between methods (ρ > .89, p < .001) and between observers (ρ > .96, p < .001). For the entire data set, the audio assessment yielded a sensitivity of .830 and a precision of .841, resulting in an F1 score of .835.

SIGNIFICANCE

Auditory waEEG seizure detection by lay medical personnel provided similar accuracy to post-processed automatic detection by an experienced clinical neurophysiologist, but in a less time-consuming procedure and without the need for specialized resources. Sonification of long-term EEG recordings in CAE provides a user-friendly and cost-effective clinical workflow for quantifying seizures in clinical practice, minimizing human and technical constraints.

Current state of the epilepsy drug and device pipeline

The field of epilepsy has undergone substantial advances as we develop novel drugs and devices. Yet considerable challenges remain in developing broadly effective, well-tolerated treatments, but also precision treatments for rare epilepsies and seizure-monitoring devices. We summarize major recent and ongoing innovations in diagnostic and therapeutic products presented at the seventeenth Epilepsy Therapies & Diagnostics Development (ETDD) conference, which occurred May 31 to June 2, 2023, in Aventura, Florida. Therapeutics under development are targeting genetics, ion channels and other neurotransmitters, and many other potentially first-in-class interventions such as stem cells, glycogen metabolism, cholesterol, the gut microbiome, and novel modalities for delivering electrical neuromodulation.

Minimum clinical utility standards for wearable seizure detectors: A simulation study

OBJECTIVE

Epilepsy management employs self-reported seizure diaries, despite evidence of seizure underreporting. Wearable and implantable seizure detection devices are now becoming more widely available. There are no clear guidelines about what levels of accuracy are sufficient. This study aimed to simulate clinical use cases and identify the necessary level of accuracy for each.

METHODS

Using a realistic seizure simulator (CHOCOLATES), a ground truth was produced, which was then sampled to generate signals from simulated seizure detectors of various capabilities. Five use cases were evaluated: (1) randomized clinical trials (RCTs), (2) medication adjustment in clinic, (3) injury prevention, (4) sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) prevention, and (5) treatment of seizure clusters. We considered sensitivity (0%-100%), false alarm rate (FAR; 0-2/day), and device type (external wearable vs. implant) in each scenario.

RESULTS

The RCT case was efficient for a wide range of wearable parameters, though implantable devices were preferred. Lower accuracy wearables resulted in subtle changes in the distribution of patients enrolled in RCTs, and therefore higher sensitivity and lower FAR values were preferred. In the clinic case, a wide range of sensitivity, FAR, and device type yielded similar results. For injury prevention, SUDEP prevention, and seizure cluster treatment, each scenario required high sensitivity and yet was minimally influenced by FAR.

SIGNIFICANCE

The choice of use case is paramount in determining acceptable accuracy levels for a wearable seizure detection device. We offer simulation results for determining and verifying utility for specific use case and specific wearable parameters.

Real-Time Seizure Detection Using Behind-the-Ear Wearable System

INTRODUCTION

This study examines the usability and comfort of a behind-the-ear seizure detection device called brain seizure detection (BrainSD) that captures ictal electroencephalogram (EEG) data using four scalp electrodes.

METHODS

This is a feasibility study. Thirty-two patients admitted to a level 4 Epilepsy Monitoring Unit were enrolled. The subjects wore BrainSD and the standard 21-channel video-EEG simultaneously. Epileptologists analyzed the EEG signals collected by BrainSD and validated it using video-EEG data to confirm its accuracy. A poststudy survey was completed by each participant to evaluate the comfort and usability of the device. In addition, a focus group of UT Southwestern epileptologists was held to discuss the features they would like to see in a home EEG-based seizure detection device such as BrainSD.

RESULTS

In total, BrainSD captured 11 of the 14 seizures that occurred while the device was being worn. All 11 seizures captured on BrainSD had focal onset, with three becoming bilateral tonic-clonic and one seizure being of subclinical status. The device was worn for an average of 41 hours. The poststudy survey showed that most users found the device comfortable, easy-to-use, and stated they would be interested in using BrainSD. Epileptologists in the focus group expressed a similar interest in BrainSD.

CONCLUSIONS

Brain seizure detection is able to detect EEG signals using four behind-the-ear electrodes. Its comfort, ease-of-use, and ability to detect numerous types of seizures make BrainSD an acceptable at-home EEG detection device from both the patient and provider perspective.

Feasibility of cardiac-based seizure detection and prediction: A systematic review of non-invasive wearable sensor-based studies

A reliable seizure detection or prediction device can potentially reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with epileptic seizures. Previous findings indicating alterations in cardiac activity during seizures suggest the usefulness of cardiac parameters for seizure detection or prediction. This study aims to examine available studies on seizure detection and prediction based on cardiac parameters using non-invasive wearable devices. The Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases were used to systematically search according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Human studies that evaluated seizure detection or prediction based on cardiac parameters collected using wearable devices were included. The QUADAS-2 tool and proposed standards for validation for seizure detection devices were used for quality assessment. Twenty-four articles were identified and included in the analysis. Twenty studies evaluated seizure detection algorithms, and four studies focused on seizure prediction. Most studies used either a wrist-worn or chest-worn device for data acquisition. Among the seizure detection studies, cardiac parameters utilized for the algorithms mainly included heart rate (HR) (n = 11) or a combination of HR and heart rate variability (HRV) (n = 6). HR-based seizure detection studies collectively reported a sensitivity range of 56%-100% and a false alarm rate (FAR) of 0.02-8/h, with most studies performing retrospective validation of the algorithms. Three of the seizure prediction studies retrospectively validated multimodal algorithms, combining cardiac features with other physiological signals. Only one study prospectively validated their seizure prediction algorithm using HRV extracted from ECG data collected from a custom wearable device. These studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using cardiac parameters for seizure detection and prediction with wearable devices, with varying algorithmic performance. Many studies are in the proof-of-principle stage, and evidence for real-time detection or prediction is currently limited. Future studies should prioritize further refinement of the algorithm performance with prospective validation using large-scale longitudinal data. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This systematic review highlights the potential use of wearable devices, like wristbands, for detecting and predicting seizures via the measurement of heart activity. By reviewing 24 articles, it was found that most studies focused on using heart rate and changes in heart rate for seizure detection. There was a lack of studies looking at seizure prediction. The results were promising but most studies were not conducted in real-time. Therefore, more real-time studies are needed to verify the usage of heart activity-related wearable devices to detect seizures and even predict them, which will be beneficial to people with epilepsy.

Seizure Detection Devices in Children: One Step Closer

Multimodal Nocturnal Seizure Detection in Children With Epilepsy: A Prospective, Multicenter, Long-Term, In-Home Trial van Westrhenen A, Lazeron RHC, van Dijk JP, Leijten FSS, Thijs RD; Dutch TeleEpilepsy Consortium. Epilepsia. 2023;64(8):2137-2152. doi:10.1111/epi.17654 Objective: There is a pressing need for reliable automated seizure detection in epilepsy care. Performance evidence on ambulatory non-electroencephalography-based seizure detection devices is low, and evidence on their effect on caregiver’s stress, sleep, and quality of life (QoL) is still lacking. We aimed to determine the performance of NightWatch, a wearable nocturnal seizure detection device, in children with epilepsy in the family home setting and to assess its impact on caregiver burden. Methods: We conducted a phase 4, multicenter, prospective, video-controlled, in-home NightWatch implementation study (NCT03909984). We included children aged 4-16 years, with ≥1 weekly nocturnal major motor seizure, living at home. We compared a 2-month baseline period with a 2-month NightWatch intervention. The primary outcome was the detection performance of NightWatch for major motor seizures (focal to bilateral or generalized tonic-clonic [TC] seizures, focal to bilateral or generalized tonic seizures lasting >30 s, hyperkinetic seizures, and a remainder category of focal to bilateral or generalized clonic seizures and “TC-like” seizures). Secondary outcomes included caregivers’ stress (Caregiver Strain Index [CSI]), sleep (Pittsburgh Quality of Sleep Index), and QoL (EuroQol five-dimension five-level scale). Results: We included 53 children (55% male, mean age = 9.7 ± 3.6 years, 68% learning disability) and analyzed 2310 nights (28 173 h), including 552 major motor seizures. Nineteen participants did not experience any episode of interest during the trial. The median detection sensitivity per participant was 100% (range = 46%-100%), and the median individual false alarm rate was .04 per hour (range = 0-.53). Caregiver’s stress decreased significantly (mean total CSI score = 8.0 vs. 7.1, p = .032), whereas caregiver’s sleep and QoL did not change significantly during the trial. Significance: The NightWatch system demonstrated high sensitivity for detecting nocturnal major motor seizures in children in a family home setting and reduced caregiver stress.

Automated detection of focal seizures using subcutaneously implanted electrocardiographic device: A proof-of-concept study

Phase 2 studies showed that focal seizures could be detected by algorithms using heart rate variability (HRV) in patients with marked autonomic ictal changes. However, wearable surface electrocardiographic (ECG) devices use electrode patches that need to be changed often and may cause skin irritation. We report the first study of automated seizure detection using a subcutaneously implantable cardiac monitor (ICM; Confirm Rx, Abbott). For this proof-of-concept (phase 1) study, we recruited six patients admitted to long-term video-electroencephalographic monitoring. Fifteen-minute epochs of ECG signals were saved for each seizure and for control (nonseizure) epochs in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) and in the patients' home environment (1-8 months). We analyzed the ICM signals offline, using a previously developed HRV algorithm. Thirteen seizures were recorded in the EMU, and 41 seizures were recorded in the home-monitoring period. The algorithm accurately identified 50 of 54 focal seizures (sensitivity = 92.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 85.6%-99.6%). Twelve of the 13 seizures in the EMU were detected (sensitivity = 92.3%, 95% CI = 77.2%-100%), and 38 of the 41 seizures in the out-of-hospital setting were detected (sensitivity = 92.7%, 95% CI = 84.7%-100%). Four false detections were found in the 141 control (nonseizure) epochs (false alarm rate = 2.7/24 h). Our results suggest that automated seizure detection using a long-term, subcutaneous ICM device is feasible and accurate in patients with focal seizures and autonomic ictal changes.

Real-world user experience with seizure detection wearable devices in the home environment

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate direct user experience with wearable seizure detection devices in the home environment.

METHODS

A structured online questionnaire was completed by 242 users (175 caregivers and 67 persons with epilepsy), most of the patients (87.19%) having tonic-clonic seizures.

RESULTS

The vast majority of the users were overall satisfied with the wearable device, considered that using the device was easy, and agreed that the use of the device improved their quality of life (median = 6 on 7-point Likert scale). A high retention rate (84.58%) and a long median usage time (14 months) were reported. In the home environment, most users (75.85%) experienced seizure detection sensitivity similar (≥95%) to what was previously reported in validation studies in epilepsy monitoring units. The experienced false alarm rate was relatively low (0-0.43 per day). Due to the alarms, almost one third of persons with epilepsy (PWEs; 30.00%) experienced decrease in the number of seizure-related injuries, and almost two thirds of PWEs (65.41%) experienced improvement in the accuracy of seizure diaries. Nonvalidated devices had significantly lower retention rate, overall satisfaction, perceived sensitivity, and improvement in quality of life, as compared with validated devices.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our results demonstrate the feasibility and usefulness of automated seizure detection in the home environment.

Automated detection of absence seizures using a wearable electroencephalographic device: a phase 3 validation study and feasibility of automated behavioral testing

OBJECTIVE

Our primary goal was to measure the accuracy of fully automated absence seizure detection, using a wearable electroencephalographic (EEG) device. As a secondary goal, we also tested the feasibility of automated behavioral testing triggered by the automated detection.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 3 clinical trial (NCT04615442), with a prospective, multicenter, blinded study design. The input was the one-channel EEG recorded with dry electrodes embedded into a wearable headband device connected to a smartphone. The seizure detection algorithm was developed using artificial intelligence (convolutional neural networks). During the study, the predefined algorithm, with predefined cutoff value, analyzed the EEG in real time. The gold standard was derived from expert evaluation of simultaneously recorded full-array video-EEGs. In addition, we evaluated the patients' responsiveness to the automated alarms on the smartphone, and we compared it with the behavioral changes observed in the clinical video-EEGs.

RESULTS

We recorded 102 consecutive patients (57 female, median age = 10 years) on suspicion of absence seizures. We recorded 364 absence seizures in 39 patients. Device deficiency was 4.67%, with a total recording time of 309 h. Average sensitivity per patient was 78.83% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 69.56%-88.11%), and median sensitivity was 92.90% (interquartile range [IQR] = 66.7%-100%). The average false detection rate was .53/h (95% CI = .32-.74). Most patients (n = 66, 64.71%) did not have any false alarms. The median F1 score per patient was .823 (IQR = .57-1). For the total recording duration, F1 score was .74. We assessed the feasibility of automated behavioral testing in 36 seizures; it correctly documented nonresponsiveness in 30 absence seizures, and responsiveness in six electrographic seizures.

SIGNIFICANCE

Automated detection of absence seizures with a wearable device will improve seizure quantification and will promote assessment of patients in their home environment. Linking automated seizure detection to automated behavioral testing will provide valuable information from wearable devices.

Artificial intelligence in epilepsy phenotyping

Artificial intelligence (AI) allows data analysis and integration at an unprecedented granularity and scale. Here we review the technological advances, challenges, and future perspectives of using AI for electro-clinical phenotyping of animal models and patients with epilepsy. In translational research, AI models accurately identify behavioral states in animal models of epilepsy, allowing identification of correlations between neural activity and interictal and ictal behavior. Clinical applications of AI-based automated and semi-automated analysis of audio and video recordings of people with epilepsy, allow significant data reduction and reliable detection and classification of major motor seizures. AI models can accurately identify electrographic biomarkers of epilepsy, such as spikes, high-frequency oscillations, and seizure patterns. Integrating AI analysis of electroencephalographic, clinical, and behavioral data will contribute to optimizing therapy for patients with epilepsy.

Further advances in epilepsy

In 2017, one of us reviewed advances in epilepsy (Manford in J Neurol 264:1811-1824, 2017). The current paper brings that review up to date and gives a slight change in emphasis. Once again, the story is of evolution rather than revolution. In recognition that most of our current medications act on neurotransmitters or ion channels, and not on the underlying changes in connectivity and pathways, they have been renamed as antiseizure (ASM) medications rather than antiepileptic drugs. Cenobamate is the one newly licensed medication for broader use in focal epilepsy but there have been a number of developments for specific disorders. We review new players and look forward to new developments in the light of evolving underlying science. We look at teratogenicity; old villains and new concerns in which clinicians play a vital role in explaining and balancing the risks. Medical treatment of status epilepticus, long without evidence, has benefitted from high-quality trials to inform practice; like buses, several arriving at once. Surgical treatment continues to be refined with improvements in the pre-surgical evaluation of patients, especially with new imaging techniques. Alternatives including stereotactic radiotherapy have received further focus and targets for palliative stimulation techniques have grown in number. Individuals' autonomy and quality of life continue to be the subject of research with refinement of what clinicians can do to help persons with epilepsy (PWE) achieve control. This includes seizure management but extends to broader considerations of human empowerment, needs and desires, which may be aided by emerging technologies such as seizure detection devices. The role of specialist nurses in improving that quality has been reinforced by specific endorsement from the International League against Epilepsy (ILAE).

Non-electroencephalogram-based seizure detection devices: State of the art and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

The continuously expanding research and development of wearable devices for automated seizure detection in epilepsy uses mostly non-invasive technology. Real-time alarms, triggered by seizure detection devices, are needed for safety and prevention to decrease seizure-related morbidity and mortality, as well as objective quantification of seizure frequency and severity. Our review strives to provide a state-of-the-art on automated seizure detection using non-invasive wearable devices in an ambulatory (home) environment and to highlight the prospects for future research.

METHODS

A joint working group of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN) recently published a clinical practice guideline on automated seizure detection using wearable devices. We updated the systematic literature search for the period since the last search by the joint working group. We selected studies qualifying minimally as phase-2 clinical validation trials, in accordance with standards for testing and validation of seizure detection devices.

RESULTS

High-level evidence (phases 3 and 4) is available only for the detection of tonic-clonic seizures and major motor seizures when using wearable devices based on accelerometry, surface electromyography (EMG), or a multimodal device combining accelerometry and heart rate. The reported sensitivity of these devices is 79.4-96%, with a false alarm rate of 0.20-1.92 per 24 hours (0-0.03 per night). A single phase-3 study validated the detection of absence seizures using a single-channel wearable EEG device. Two phase-4 studies showed overall user satisfaction with wearable seizure detection devices, which helped decrease injuries related to tonic-clonic seizures. Overall satisfaction, perceived sensitivity, and improvement in quality-of-life were significantly higher for validated devices.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the vast number of studies published on seizure detection devices, most are strongly affected by potential bias, providing a too-optimistic perspective. By applying the standards for clinical validation studies, potential bias can be reduced, and the quality of a continuously growing number of studies in this field can be assessed and compared. The ILAE-IFCN clinical practice guideline on automated seizure detection using wearable devices recommends using clinically validated wearable devices for automated detection of tonic-clonic seizures when significant safety concerns exist. The studies published after the guideline was issued only provide incremental knowledge and would not change the current recommendations.

Computational modeling allows unsupervised classification of epileptic brain states across species

Current advances in epilepsy treatment aim to personalize and responsively adjust treatment parameters to overcome patient heterogeneity in treatment efficiency. For tailoring treatment to the individual and the current brain state, tools are required that help to identify the patient- and time-point-specific parameters of epilepsy. Computational modeling has long proven its utility in gaining mechanistic insight. Recently, the technique has been introduced as a diagnostic tool to predict individual treatment outcomes. In this article, the Wendling model, an established computational model of epilepsy dynamics, is used to automatically classify epileptic brain states in intracranial EEG from patients (n = 4) and local field potential recordings from in vitro rat data (high-potassium model of epilepsy, n = 3). Five-second signal segments are classified to four types of brain state in epilepsy (interictal, preonset, onset, ictal) by comparing a vector of signal features for each data segment to four prototypical feature vectors obtained by Wendling model simulations. The classification result is validated against expert visual assessment. Model-driven brain state classification achieved a classification performance significantly above chance level (mean sensitivity 0.99 on model data, 0.77 on rat data, 0.56 on human data in a four-way classification task). Model-driven prototypes showed similarity with data-driven prototypes, which we obtained from real data for rats and humans. Our results indicate similar electrophysiological patterns of epileptic states in the human brain and the animal model that are well-reproduced by the computational model, and captured by a key set of signal features, enabling fully automated and unsupervised brain state classification in epilepsy.

Wearable Electromyography Classification of Epileptic Seizures: A Feasibility Study

Accurate diagnosis and classification of epileptic seizures can greatly support patient treatments. As many epileptic seizures are convulsive and have a motor component, the analysis of muscle activity can provide valuable information for seizure classification. Therefore, this paper present a feasibility study conducted on healthy volunteers, focusing on tracking epileptic seizures movements using surface electromyography signals (sEMG) measured on human limb muscles. For the experimental studies, first, compact wireless sensor nodes were developed for real-time measurement of sEMG on the gastrocnemius, flexor carpi ulnaris, biceps brachii, and quadriceps muscles on the right side and the left side. For the classification of the seizure, a machine learning model has been elaborated. The 16 common sEMG time-domain features were first extracted and examined with respect to discrimination and redundancy. This allowed the features to be classified into irrelevant features, important features, and redundant features. Redundant features were examined with the Big-O notation method and with the average execution time method to select the feature that leads to lower complexity and reduced processing time. The finally selected six features were explored using different machine learning classifiers to compare the resulting classification accuracy. The results show that the artificial neural network (ANN) model with the six features: IEMG, WAMP, MYOP, SE, SKEW, and WL, had the highest classification accuracy (99.95%). A further study confirms that all the chosen eight sensors are necessary to reach this high classification accuracy.

Neurophysiology, Neuropsychology, and Epilepsy, in 2022: Hills We Have Climbed and Hills Ahead. Neurophysiology in epilepsy

Since the discovery of the human electroencephalogram (EEG), neurophysiology techniques have become indispensable tools in our armamentarium to localize epileptic seizures. New signal analysis techniques and the prospects of artificial intelligence and big data will offer unprecedented opportunities to further advance the field in the near future, ultimately resulting in improved quality of life for many patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. This article summarizes selected presentations from Day 1 of the two-day symposium "Neurophysiology, Neuropsychology, Epilepsy, 2022: Hills We Have Climbed and the Hills Ahead". Day 1 was dedicated to highlighting and honoring the work of Dr. Jean Gotman, a pioneer in EEG, intracranial EEG, simultaneous EEG/ functional magnetic resonance imaging, and signal analysis of epilepsy. The program focused on two main research directions of Dr. Gotman, and was dedicated to "High-frequency oscillations, a new biomarker of epilepsy" and "Probing the epileptic focus from inside and outside". All talks were presented by colleagues and former trainees of Dr. Gotman. The extended summaries provide an overview of historical and current work in the neurophysiology of epilepsy with emphasis on novel EEG biomarkers of epilepsy and source imaging and concluded with an outlook on the future of epilepsy research, and what is needed to bring the field to the next level.

Personalized seizure detection using logistic regression machine learning based on wearable ECG-monitoring device

PURPOSE

Wearable automated detection devices of focal epileptic seizures are needed to alert patients and caregivers and to optimize the medical treatment. Heart rate variability (HRV)-based seizure detection devices have presented good detection sensitivity. However, false alarm rates (FAR) are too high.

METHODS

In this phase-2 study we pursued to decrease the FAR, by using patient-adaptive logistic regression machine learning (LRML) to improve the performance of a previously published HRV-based seizure detection algorithm. ECG-data were prospectively collected using a dedicated wearable electrocardiogram-device during long-term video-EEG monitoring. Sixty-two patients had 174 seizures during 4,614 h recording. The dataset was divided into training-, cross-validation-, and test-sets (chronological) in order to avoid overfitting. Patients with >50 beats/min change in heart rate during first recorded seizure were selected as responders. We compared 18 LRML-settings to find the optimal algorithm.

RESULTS

The patient-adaptive LRML-classifier in combination with using only responders to train the initial decision boundary was superior to both the generic approach and including non-responders to train the LRML-classifier. Using the optimal setting of the LRML in responders in the test dataset yielded a sensitivity of 78.2% and FAR of 0.62/24 h. The FAR was reduced by 31% compared to the previous method, upholding similar sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

The novel, patient-adaptive LRML seizure detection algorithm outperformed both the generic approach and the previously published patient-tailored method. The proposed method can be implemented in a wearable online HRV-based seizure detection system alerting patients and caregivers of seizures and improve seizure-count which may help optimizing the patient treatment.

Assessment of a 16-Channel Ambulatory Dry Electrode EEG for Remote Monitoring

Ambulatory EEGs began emerging in the healthcare industry over the years, setting a new norm for long-term monitoring services. The present devices in the market are neither meant for remote monitoring due to their technical complexity nor for meeting clinical setting needs in epilepsy patient monitoring. In this paper, we propose an ambulatory EEG device, OptiEEG, that has low setup complexity, for the remote EEG monitoring of epilepsy patients. OptiEEG's signal quality was compared with a gold standard clinical device, Natus. The experiment between OptiEEG and Natus included three different tests: eye open/close (EOC); hyperventilation (HV); and photic stimulation (PS). Statistical and wavelet analysis of retrieved data were presented when evaluating the performance of OptiEEG. The SNR and PSNR of OptiEEG were slightly lower than Natus, but within an acceptable bound. The standard deviations of MSE for both devices were almost in a similar range for the three tests. The frequency band energy analysis is consistent between the two devices. A rhythmic slowdown of theta and delta was observed in HV, whereas photic driving was observed during PS in both devices. The results validated the performance of OptiEEG as an acceptable EEG device for remote monitoring away from clinical environments.

Assessment of an under-mattress sensor as a seizure detection tool in an adult epilepsy monitoring unit

OBJECTIVE

Because of SUDEP (Sudden and unexpected death in epilepsy) and other direct consequences of generalized tonic-clonic seizures, the use of efficient seizure detection tool may be helpful for patients, relatives and caregivers. We aimed to evaluate an under-mattress detection tool (EMFIT®) in real-life hospital conditions, in particular its sensitivity and false alarm rate (FAR), as well as its impact on patient care.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective study on a cohort of patients with epilepsy admitted between September 2017 and June 2021 to Amiens University Hospital for a video-EEG of at least 24 h, during which at least one epileptic seizure was recorded. All video-EEGs records were analyzed visually in order to assess the sensitivity of the under-mattress tool (triggering of the alarm) and to classify the seizure type (convulsive/non convulsive). We also considered whether nurses intervened during the seizure, and the time of their intervention if applicable. An additional prospective survey was conducted over 272 days to analyze the FAR of the tool.

RESULTS

A total of 220 seizures were included in the study, from 55 patients, including 23 convulsive seizures from 15 patients and 197 non-convulsive seizures. Sensitivity for convulsive seizure detection was 69.6%. As expected, none of the non-convulsive seizures was detected. The false alarm rate was 0.007/day. Median trigger time was 74 s, decreasing to 5 s for generalized tonic-clonic seizure. The frequency of nurses' intervention during convulsive seizures was significantly greater in case of the alarm triggering (100% vs 57%, p<0.02).

SIGNIFICANCE

These results suggest that EMFIT® sensor is able to detect convulsive seizures with good sensitivity and low FAR, and allows caregivers to intervene more often in the event of a nocturnal seizure. This would be an interesting complementary tool to better secure the patients with epilepsy during hospitalization or at home.

A Review of Commercial and Non-Commercial Wearables Devices for Monitoring Motor Impairments Caused by Neurodegenerative Diseases

Neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) are among the 10 causes of death worldwide. The effects of NDDs, including irreversible motor impairments, have an impact not only on patients themselves but also on their families and social environments. One strategy to mitigate the pain of NDDs is to early identify and remotely monitor related motor impairments using wearable devices. Technological progress has contributed to reducing the hardware complexity of mobile devices while simultaneously improving their efficiency in terms of data collection and processing and energy consumption. However, perhaps the greatest challenges of current mobile devices are to successfully manage the security and privacy of patient medical data and maintain reasonable costs with respect to the traditional patient consultation scheme. In this work, we conclude: (1) Falls are most monitored for Parkinson's disease, while tremors predominate in epilepsy and Alzheimer's disease. These findings will provide guidance for wearable device manufacturers to strengthen areas of opportunity that need to be addressed, and (2) Of the total universe of commercial wearables devices that are available on the market, only a few have FDA approval, which means that there is a large number of devices that do not safeguard the integrity of the users who use them.

Approximate zero-crossing: a new interpretable, highly discriminative and low-complexity feature for EEG and iEEG seizure detection

Objective. Long-term monitoring of people with epilepsy based on electroencephalography (EEG) and intracranial EEG (iEEG) has the potential to deliver key clinical information for personalised epilepsy treatment. More specifically, in outpatient settings, the available solutions are not satisfactory either due to poor classification performance or high complexity to be executed in resource-constrained devices (e.g. wearable systems). Therefore, we hypothesize that obtaining high discriminative features is the main avenue to improve low-complexity seizure-detection algorithms.Approach. Inspired by how neurologists recognize ictal EEG data, and to tackle this problem by targeting resource-constrained wearable devices, we introduce a new interpretable and highly discriminative feature for EEG and iEEG, namely approximate zero-crossing (AZC). We obtain AZC by applying a polygonal approximation to mimic how our brain selects prominent patterns among noisy data and then using a zero-crossing count as a measure of the dominating frequency. By employing Kullback-Leiber divergence, leveraging CHB-MIT and SWEC-ETHZ iEEG datasets, we compare the AZC discriminative power against a set of 56 classical literature features (CLF). Moreover, we assess the performances of a low-complexity seizure detection method using only AZC features versus employing the CLF set.Main results. Three AZC features obtained with different approximation thresholds are among the five with the highest median discriminative power. Moreover, seizure classification based on only AZC features outperforms an equivalent CLF-based method. The former detects 102 and 194 seizures, against 99 and 161 for the latter (CHB-MIT and SWEC-ETHZ, respectively). Moreover, the AZC-based method keeps a similar false-alarm rate (i.e. an average of 2.1 and 1.0, against 2.0 and 0.5, per day).Significance. We propose a new feature and demonstrate its capability in seizure classification for both scalp and intracranial EEG. We envision the use of such a feature to improve outpatient monitoring with resource-constrained devices.

Seizure detection based on wearable devices: A review of device, mechanism, and algorithm

With sudden and unpredictable nature, seizures lead to great risk of the secondary damage, status epilepticus, and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. Thus, it is essential to use a wearable device to detect seizure and inform patients' caregivers for assistant to prevent or relieve adverse consequence. In this review, we gave an account of the current state of the field of seizure detection based on wearable devices from three parts: devices, physiological activities, and algorithms. Firstly, seizure monitoring devices available in the market primarily involve wristband-type devices, patch-type devices, and armband-type devices, which are able to detect motor seizures, focal autonomic seizures, or absence seizures. Secondly, seizure-related physiological activities involve the discharge of brain neurons presented, autonomous nervous activities, and motor. Plenty of studies focus on features from one signal, while it is a lack of evidences about the change of signal coupling along with seizures. Thirdly, the seizure detection algorithms developed from simple threshold method to complicated machine learning and deep learning, aiming at distinguish seizures from normal events. After understanding of some preliminary studies, we will propose our own thought for future development in this field.

Automated detection of nocturnal motor seizures using an audio-video system

BACKGROUND

Unsupervised nocturnal tonic-clonic seizures (TCSs) may lead to sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Major motor seizures (TCSs and hypermotor seizures) may lead to injuries. Our goal was to develop and validate an automated audio-video system for the real-time detection of major nocturnal motor seizures.

METHODS

In this Phase-3 clinical validation study, we assessed the performance of automated detection of nocturnal motor seizures using audio-video streaming, computer vision and an artificial intelligence-based algorithm (Nelli). The detection threshold was predefined, the validation dataset was independent from the training dataset, patients were prospectively recruited, and the analysis was performed in real time. The gold standard was based on expert evaluation of long-term video electroencephalography (EEG). The primary outcome was the detection of nocturnal major motor seizures (TCSs and hypermotor seizures). The secondary outcome was the detection of other (minor) nocturnal motor seizures.

RESULTS

We recruited 191 participants aged 1-72 years (median: 20 years), and we monitored them for 4183 h during the night. Device deficiency was present 10.5% of the time. Fifty-one patients had nocturnal motor seizures during the recording. The sensitivity for the major motor seizures was 93.7% (95% confidence interval: 69.8%-99.8%). The system detected all 11 TCS and four out of five (80%) hypermotor seizures. For the minor motor seizure types, the sensitivity was low (8.3%). The false detection rate was 0.16 per h.

CONCLUSION

The Nelli system detects nocturnal major motor seizures with a high sensitivity and is suitable for implementation in institutions (hospitals, residential care facilities), where rapid interventions triggered by alarms can potentially reduce the risk of SUDEP and injuries.

An economic evaluation of the NightWatch for children with refractory epilepsy: Insight into the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility

PURPOSE

We performed an economic evaluation, from a societal perspective, to examine the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of a wearable multimodal seizure detection device: NightWatch.

METHODS

We collected data between November 2018 and June 2020 from the PROMISE trial (NCT03909984), including children aged 4-16 years with refractory epilepsy living at home. Caregivers completed questionnaires on stress, quality of life, health care consumption and productivity costs after two-month baseline and two-month intervention with NightWatch. We used costs, stress levels and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Missing items were handled by mean imputation. Sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the robustness of the results including bootstrap sampling.

RESULTS

We included 41 children (44% female; mean age 9.8 years, standard deviation (SD) 3.7 years). Total societal costs of the baseline period (T1) were on average €3,238 per patient, whereas after intervention (T2) this reduced to 2,463 (saving €775). The QALYs were similar between both periods (mean QALY 0.90 per participant, SD at T1 0.10, SD at T2 0.13). At a ceiling ratio of €50.000, NightWatch showed a 72% cost-effective probability. Univariate sensitivity analyses, on the perspective and imputation method, demonstrated result robustness.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that NightWatch might be a cost-effective addition to current standard care for children with refractory epilepsy living at home. Further research with an additional target group for a large timeframe may support the findings of this research.

Extreme value theory inspires explainable machine learning approach for seizure detection

Epilepsy is one of the brightest manifestations of extreme behavior in living systems. Extreme epileptic events are seizures, that arise suddenly and unpredictably. Usually, treatment strategies start by analyzing brain activity during the seizures revealing their type and onset mechanisms. This approach requires collecting data for a representative number of events which is only possible during the continuous EEG monitoring over several days. A big part of the further analysis is searching for seizures on these recordings. An experienced medical specialist spends hours checking the data of a single patient and needs assistance from the automative systems for seizure detection. Machine learning methods typically address this issue in a supervised fashion and exhibit a lack of generalization. The extreme value theory allows addressing this issue with the unsupervised machine learning methods of outlier detection. Here, we make the first step toward using this approach for the seizure detection. Based on our recent work, we specified the EEG features showing extreme behavior during seizures and loaded them to the one-class SVM, a popular outlier detection algorithm. Testing the proposed approach on 83 patients, we reported 77% sensitivity and 12% precision. In 60 patients, sensitivity was 100%. In the rest 23 subjects, we observed deviations from the extreme behavior. The one-class SVM used a single subject's data for training; therefore, it was stable against between-subject variability. Our results demonstrate an effective convergence between the extreme value theory, a physical concept, and the outlier detection algorithms, a machine learning concept, toward solving the meaningful task of medicine.

Seizures detection using multimodal signals: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Epileptic seizures are common neurological disorders in the world, impacting 50 million people globally. Around 30% of patients with seizures suffer from refractory epilepsy, where seizures are not controlled by medications. The unpredictability of seizures makes it essential to have a continuous seizure monitoring system outside clinical settings for the purpose of minimizing patients' injuries and providing additional pathways for evaluation and treatment follow-up. Autonomic changes related to seizure events have been extensively studied and attempts made to apply them for seizure detection and prediction tasks. This scoping review aims to depict current research activities associated with the implementation of portable, wearable devices for seizure detection or prediction and inform future direction in continuous seizure tracking in ambulatory settings.

METHODS

Overall methodology framework includes 5 essential stages: research questions identification, relevant studies identification, selection of studies, data charting and summarizing the findings. A systematic searching strategy guided by systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) was implemented to identify relevant records on two databases (PubMed, IEEE).

RESULTS

A total of 30 articles were included in our final analysis. Most of the studies were conducted off-line and employed consumer-graded wearable device. ACM is the dominant modality to be used in seizure detection, and widely deployed algorithms entail Support Vector Machine, Random Forest and threshold-based approach. The sensitivity ranged from 33.2% to 100% for single modality with a false alarm rate (FAR) ranging from 0.096 /day to 14.8 /day. Multimodality has a sensitivity ranging from 51% to 100% with FAR ranging from 0.12/day - 17.7/day.

CONCLUSION

The overall performance in seizure detection system based on non-cerebral physiological signals is promising, especially for the detection of motor seizures and seizures accompanied with intense ictal autonomic changes.

The Prospects of Non-EEG Seizure Detection Devices in Dogs

The unpredictable nature of seizures is challenging for caregivers of epileptic dogs, which calls the need for other management strategies such as seizure detection devices. Seizure detection devices are systems that rely on non-electroencephalographic (non-EEG) ictal changes, designed to detect seizures. The aim for its use in dogs would be to provide owners with a more complete history of their dog's seizures and to help install prompt (and potentially life-saving) intervention. Although seizure detection via wearable intracranial EEG recordings is associated with a higher sensitivity in humans, there is robust evidence for reliable detection of generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) using non-EEG devices. Promising non-EEG changes described in epileptic humans, include heart rate variability (HRV), accelerometry (ACM), electrodermal activity (EDA), and electromyography (EMG). Their sensitivity and false detection rate to detect seizures vary, however direct comparison of studies is nearly impossible, as there are many differences in study design and standards for testing. A way to improve sensitivity and decrease false-positive alarms is to combine the different parameters thereby profiting from the strengths of each one. Given the challenges of using EEG in veterinary clinical practice, non-EEG ictal changes could be a promising alternative to monitor seizures more objectively. This review summarizes various seizure detection devices described in the human literature, discusses their potential use and limitations in veterinary medicine and describes what is currently known in the veterinary literature.

Noninvasive mobile EEG as a tool for seizure monitoring and management: A systematic review

In the last two decades new noninvasive mobile electroencephalography (EEG) solutions have been developed to overcome limitations of conventional clinical EEG and to improve monitoring of patients with long-term conditions. Despite the availability of mobile innovations, their adoption is still very limited. The aim of this study is to review the current state-of-the-art and highlight the main advantages of adopting noninvasive mobile EEG solutions in clinical trials and research studies of people with epilepsy or suspected seizures. Device characteristics are described, and their evaluation is presented. Two authors independently performed a literature review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A combination of different digital libraries was used (Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health, PsycINFO and https://clinicaltrials.gov/). Twenty-three full-text, six conference abstracts, and eight webpages were included, where a total of 14 noninvasive mobile solutions were identified. Published studies demonstrated at different levels how EEG recorded via mobile EEG can be used for visual detection of EEG abnormalities and for the application of automatic-detection algorithms with acceptable specificity and sensitivity. When the quality of the signal was compared with scalp EEG, many similarities were found in the background activities and power spectrum. Several studies indicated that the experience of patients and health care providers using mobile EEG was positive in different settings. Ongoing trials are focused mostly on improving seizure-detection accuracy and also on testing and assessing feasibility and acceptability of noninvasive devices in the hospital and at home. This review supports the potential clinical value of noninvasive mobile EEG systems and their advantages in terms of time, technical support, cost, usability, and reliability when applied to seizure detection and management. On the other hand, the limitations of the studies confirmed that future research is needed to provide more evidence regarding feasibility and acceptability in different settings, as well as the data quality and detection accuracy of new noninvasive mobile EEG solutions.

Automatic annotation correction for wearable EEG based epileptic seizure detection

OBJECTIVE

Video-electroencephalography (vEEG), which defines the ground truth for the detection of epileptic seizures, is inadequate for long-term home monitoring. Thanks to their advantages in comfort and unobtrusiveness, wearable EEG devices have been suggested as a solution for home monitoring. However, one of the challenges in data-driven automated seizure detection with wearable EEG data is to have reliable seizure annotations. Seizure annotations on the gold-standard 25-channel vEEG recordings may not be optimal to delineate seizure activity on the concomitantly recorded wearable EEG, due to artifacts or absence of ictal activity on the limited set of electrodes of the wearable EEG. This paper aims to develop an automatic approach to correct the imperfect annotations of seizure activity on wearable EEG, which can be used to train seizure detection algorithms.

APPROACH

This paper first investigates the effectiveness of correcting the seizure annotations for the training set with a visual annotation correction. Then a novel approach has been proposed to automatically remove non-seizure data from wearable EEG in epochs annotated as seizures in gold-standard video-EEG recordings. The performance of the automatic annotation correction approach was evaluated by comparing the seizure detection models trained with 1. original vEEG seizure annotations, 2. visually corrected seizure annotations, and 3. automatically corrected seizure annotations.

RESULTS

The automatic seizure detection approach trained with automatically corrected seizure annotations was more sensitive and had fewer false-positive detections compared to the approach trained with visually corrected seizure annotations, and the approach trained with the original seizure annotations from gold-standard vEEG.

SIGNIFICANCE

The wearable EEG seizure detection approach performs better when trained with automatic seizure annotation correction.

Proposal for an updated seizure classification framework in clinical trials

The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) seizure classification scheme has been periodically updated to improve its reliability and applicability to clinicians and researchers alike. Here, members of the Epilepsy Study Consortium propose a pragmatic seizure classification, based on the ILAE scheme, designed for use in clinical trials with a focus on outcome measures that have high reliability, broad interpretability across stakeholders, and clinical relevance in the context of the development of novel antiseizure medications. Controversies around the current ILAE classification scheme are discussed in the context of clinical trials, and pragmatic simplifications to the existing scheme are proposed, for intended use by investigators, industry sponsors, and regulatory agencies.

Current advances and challenges in nanosheet-based wearable power supply devices

Nowadays, wearable devices mainly exist in the form of portable accessories with various functions, connecting various kinds of terminals like mobile phones to form various wearable systems. In a wearable system, the wearable power supply device is the key component as energy dispenser for all devices. Nanosheets, a kind of two-dimensional material, which always displays a high surface-to-volume ratio and thus is lightweight and has remarkable conductive as well as electrochemical properties, have become the optimal choice for wearable power supply devices. The development and status of nanosheet-based wearable power supply devices including nanosheet-based wearable batteries, nanosheet-based wearable supercapacitors, nanosheet-based wearable self-powered energy suppliers are introduced in this article. Besides, the future opportunities and challenges of wearable devices are discussed.

Delivering epilepsy care in low-resource settings: the role of technology

INTRODUCTION

The implementation of technology in the field of epileptology has traditionally focused on its use for diagnosis and treatment and has, unsurprisingly, been capital-intensive, making it therefore mainly implementable in advanced high-income countries. Because of technological innovations over the past 20 years there has been almost a paradigm shift, particularly in access to and the potential for implementing relevant technology in lesser developed environments. Nearly 80% of people living with epilepsy live in low and middle-income countries.

AREAS COVERED

The challenge and the purpose of this paper is to discuss how technology can be implemented into lesser-resourced contexts not only cost-effectively but in a cost-saving way while also building capacity and thus sustainability.

EXPERT OPINION

The rate of technological advancement presents the risk of progressive widening of the technology and care gaps between advanced and lesser developed regions. Implementing technology is both about finding relevant appropriate technologies for the individual contexts of a diverse range of countries but also about repurposing low-tech technologies for application in epilepsy care in these areas. Finally exciting advances such as autonomous driving, digital twinning and robotic surgery will likely transform epilepsy care in several lower-resourced settings in the next 5-10 years.

Ambulatory seizure forecasting with a wrist-worn device using long-short term memory deep learning

The ability to forecast seizures minutes to hours in advance of an event has been verified using invasive EEG devices, but has not been previously demonstrated using noninvasive wearable devices over long durations in an ambulatory setting. In this study we developed a seizure forecasting system with a long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network (RNN) algorithm, using a noninvasive wrist-worn research-grade physiological sensor device, and tested the system in patients with epilepsy in the field, with concurrent invasive EEG confirmation of seizures via an implanted recording device. The system achieved forecasting performance significantly better than a random predictor for 5 of 6 patients studied, with mean AUC-ROC of 0.80 (range 0.72–0.92). These results provide the first clear evidence that direct seizure forecasts are possible using wearable devices in the ambulatory setting for many patients with epilepsy.

The Challenging Path to Developing a Mobile Health Device for Epilepsy: The Current Landscape and Where We Go From Here

Seizure detection, and more recently seizure forecasting, represent important avenues of clinical development in epilepsy, promoted by progress in wearable devices and mobile health (mHealth), which might help optimizing seizure control and prevention of seizure-related mortality and morbidity in persons with epilepsy. Yet, very long-term continuous monitoring of seizure-sensitive biosignals in the ambulatory setting presents a number of challenges. We herein provide an overview of these challenges and current technological landscape of mHealth devices for seizure detection. Specifically, we display, which types of sensor modalities and analytical methods are available, and give insight into current clinical practice guidelines, main outcomes of clinical validation studies, and discuss how to evaluate device performance at point-of-care facilities. We then address pitfalls which may arise in patient compliance and the need to design solutions adapted to user experience.

Seizures, semiology, and syndromes: A narrative review

Clinical seizure signs continue to be of central importance to guide diagnosis, classification, treatment and prognosis. Some basic principles guide history-taking and observation in clinical epileptology. The information contained within subjective seizure descriptions can be framed within standardized vocabulary and a classification of ictal signs, seizure types, and the integrated framework of epilepsy syndromes. As illustrative examples, we discuss the historical origins and current research context of Dravet syndrome and Janz syndrome, two genetic epilepsy syndromes. In candidates for epilepsy surgery, ictal signs aid us in identifying the symptomatogenic zone and hence delineating the ictal onset zone. Here, historical reports from Victor Horsley and Hughlings Jackson provide valuable perspective on clinical reasoning. Lastly, the information contained within clinical signs and syndromes presents an indispensable data source in future efforts of large-scale genotype-phenotype correlations and machine learning methods.

Seizure Diaries and Forecasting With Wearables: Epilepsy Monitoring Outside the Clinic

It is a major challenge in clinical epilepsy to diagnose and treat a disease characterized by infrequent seizures based on patient or caregiver reports and limited duration clinical testing. The poor reliability of self-reported seizure diaries for many people with epilepsy is well-established, but these records remain necessary in clinical care and therapeutic studies. A number of wearable devices have emerged, which may be capable of detecting seizures, recording seizure data, and alerting caregivers. Developments in non-invasive wearable sensors to measure accelerometry, photoplethysmography (PPG), electrodermal activity (EDA), electromyography (EMG), and other signals outside of the traditional clinical environment may be able to identify seizure-related changes. Non-invasive scalp electroencephalography (EEG) and minimally invasive subscalp EEG may allow direct measurement of seizure activity. However, significant network and computational infrastructure is needed for continuous, secure transmission of data. The large volume of data acquired by these devices necessitates computer-assisted review and detection to reduce the burden on human reviewers. Furthermore, user acceptability of such devices must be a paramount consideration to ensure adherence with long-term device use. Such devices can identify tonic–clonic seizures, but identification of other seizure semiologies with non-EEG wearables is an ongoing challenge. Identification of electrographic seizures with subscalp EEG systems has recently been demonstrated over long (>6 month) durations, and this shows promise for accurate, objective seizure records. While the ability to detect and forecast seizures from ambulatory intracranial EEG is established, invasive devices may not be acceptable for many individuals with epilepsy. Recent studies show promising results for probabilistic forecasts of seizure risk from long-term wearable devices and electronic diaries of self-reported seizures. There may also be predictive value in individuals' symptoms, mood, and cognitive performance. However, seizure forecasting requires perpetual use of a device for monitoring, increasing the importance of the system's acceptability to users. Furthermore, long-term studies with concurrent EEG confirmation are lacking currently. This review describes the current evidence and challenges in the use of minimally and non-invasive devices for long-term epilepsy monitoring, the essential components in remote monitoring systems, and explores the feasibility to detect and forecast impending seizures via long-term use of these systems.