Fear of intrauterine contraception among adolescents in New York City

Smooth Muscle Relaxants for Intrauterine Device Placement: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review evidence on whether medications with smooth muscle relaxant properties improve patient and provider outcomes for intrauterine device (IUD) placement.

STUDY DESIGN

We searched multiple databases through August 2022 for randomized clinical trials assessing smooth muscle relaxants for IUD placement. Primary outcomes were pain experienced with IUD placement, provider ease of placement, need for adjunctive placement measures, placement success, patient satisfaction with procedure, medication side effects occurring before clinic discharge, and adverse events occurring before clinic discharge. We extracted data from included articles, assessed risk of bias for each trial, narratively summarized results, and determined certainty of evidence for all outcomes.

RESULTS

Five trials met inclusion criteria; four trials had low risk of bias and one had moderate risk. Two trials of topical nitroprusside gel or nitroglycerin ointment found no differences in patient pain, provider ease of placement, patient satisfaction, placement success, side effects, or adverse events. One trial suggested that drotaverine plus mefenamic acid reduced patient pain but did not improve placement success. Two trials suggested that isonicotinic acid hydrazide reduced patient pain, improved provider ease of placement and patient satisfaction, reduced need for analgesia and for cervical dilation (in one trial) and did not increase side effects; neither trial reported improved placement success.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence on smooth muscle relaxants for IUD placement remains sparse with inconsistent findings across specific medications. Certainty of evidence for all outcomes was low for topical nitroprusside gel and nitroglycerin ointment, very low for drotaverine plus mefenamic acid, and mostly high for isonicotinic acid hydrazide.

IMPLICATIONS

Before IUD placement, healthcare providers can counsel patients on the potential for pain during placement and options for pain management. However, more evidence is needed on specific smooth muscle relaxants to determine their effectiveness as an intervention for IUD placement.

Virtual reality simulation in reducing discomfort and pain during intrauterine device insertion: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the patient-reported overall experience when using virtual reality (VR) simulation during intrauterine device (IUD) insertion (primary), the impact of VR in reducing pain, on patient satisfaction, and to assess the difficulty and success of the procedure utilizing VR (secondary).

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-center randomized controlled trial in a Belgian tertiary teaching hospital. Two hundred participants, requesting a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD, were 1:1 computer randomized in either the VR group, where participants wore VR goggles, or in the standard-of-care group. The primary outcome is the patient's overall experience assessed by means of a Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-100 mm, continuous, higher is better). A Numeric Pain Rating Scale (0-100, continuous, higher is more pain) was used to address pain during insertion.

RESULTS

In the VR group, 95 participants were included (five were excluded due to failed previous IUD extraction), and in the standard-of-care group, 100 participants were included. There is no evidence for differences in general patient experience (median VAS 72 [intervention] vs 70 [control]; odds ratio [OR] 1.22, 95% CI 0.92-1.61) or pain (median Numeric Pain Rating Scale 50 [intervention] vs 45 [control]; OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.79-1.37) between groups. After 6 weeks, VR-patients reported no evidence for improved general experience (median VAS 70 [intervention] vs 74 [control]; OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.83-1.43) and were less likely to repeat the procedure or recommend it compared to the control group (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.17-3.56).

CONCLUSIONS

VR simulation does not conclusively alter the overall experience or reduce pain, therefore not reducing discomfort during IUD insertion in this randomized controlled trial.

IMPLICATIONS

Although VR has already been successfully used in the management of acute pain or during procedures, this study cannot demonstrate improved patient-reported outcomes during the insertion of a levonorgestrel-containing IUD.

Preferred use of contraceptive methods and reasons for non-use: a cross-sectional survey of a sample of Black, Indigenous, and people of color in the United States

Use of preferred contraceptive methods is a measure of reproductive autonomy, yet barriers persist across the United States in accessing preferred methods of contraception, with disparities in access among communities of color. Using data from a 2021-2022 cross-sectional survey of 727 people aged 13-50 and living in the United States who identified as Asian American, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander (29%); Black or African American (34%), Indigenous (13%), and Latina/Latinx (31%), we examined those who were not using their preferred contraceptive method(s), including the preferred method type and the reasons for not using this method(s). We ran an adjusted logistic regression to test the association between the quality of the last health care interaction related to contraception and the use of a non-preferred method. Thirty-seven percent of respondents preferred a contraceptive method they were not currently using. Among current contraceptive users, long-acting methods were preferred most often, while non-current contraceptive users desired long-acting and short-acting hormonal methods equally. Respondents most often cited concerns about side effects/health risks (65%) and financial/logistical reasons (42%) as the top reasons for not using their preferred method(s). Those who reported receiving higher quality care in a recent contraceptive visit were more likely to be using the method they wanted to be using. Use of a preferred contraceptive method may increase when receiving high-quality counselling and care. Strategies to improve access to preferred methods should address side effects and health concerns, as well as financial and logistical barriers among Black, Indigenous, and people of color.

Common misperceptions and public knowledge about intrauterine devices among US-based online respondents

OBJECTIVES

Misperceptions about intrauterine devices (IUDs) may dissuade potential users and public beliefs are not well understood. We sought to describe public knowledge of mechanism of action, failure rate, and IUD health risks. Secondary objectives included identifying inaccurate information and information sources about IUDs.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a convenience-based survey of participants living in the United States 18 years and older using Amazon Mechanical Turk and ResearchMatch. We collected information on demographics, reproductive history, and IUD knowledge. We asked about IUD mechanism of action, failure rate, potential health risks, and information sources. We used multivariable logistic regression to test the association between gender and perceived lower (vs. higher) risks of IUDs.

RESULTS

We included 1597 individuals with 726 (45.5%) self-reported men and 871 (54.5%) self-reported women. For both hormonal and non-hormonal IUDs, participants most often selected implantation prevention as the primary mechanism of action. In our sample, 55.5% of individuals believed the failure rate was greater than five percent. Weight gain, uterine perforation, and expulsion were cited as health risks likely to occur ≥5% of the time by 42.1%, 34.3%, and 38.4% of participants, respectively. Participants identified healthcare providers as their primary source of contraceptive information. Our multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed women had higher odds of perceiving IUDs as higher risk (aOR=1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.68) compared to men.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals underestimated IUD effectiveness while overestimating perceived health risks. Our results highlight areas to target education about IUDs to support informed contraceptive decision-making.

IMPLICATIONS

Participants misunderstood IUD mechanism of action, underestimated efficacy, and overestimated failure rates and health risks. Providers should begin clinical counseling by assessing baseline knowledge, since mechanism of action, side effect profiles, and concepts like female anatomy should not be assumed to be known.

U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2024

The 2024 U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use (U.S. SPR) addresses a selected group of common, yet sometimes complex, issues regarding initiation and use of specific contraceptive methods. These recommendations for health care providers were updated by CDC after review of the scientific evidence and a meeting with national experts in Atlanta, Georgia, during January 25-27, 2023. The information in this report replaces the 2016 U.S. SPR (CDC. U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2016. MMWR 2016;65[No. RR-4]:1-66). Notable updates include 1) updated recommendations for provision of medications for intrauterine device placement, 2) updated recommendations for bleeding irregularities during implant use, 3) new recommendations for testosterone use and risk for pregnancy, and 4) new recommendations for self-administration of injectable contraception. The recommendations in this report are intended to serve as a source of evidence-based clinical practice guidance for health care providers. The goals of these recommendations are to remove unnecessary medical barriers to accessing and using contraception and to support the provision of person-centered contraceptive counseling and services in a noncoercive manner. Health care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking contraceptive services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients; when needed, patients should seek advice from their health care providers about contraceptive use.

IUD Insertion Under Conscious Sedation: Patient Characteristics with Clinical Decisions

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Uptake of intrauterine devices (IUDs) in the adolescent population may be limited by anxiety and pain anticipated during the insertion procedure. Our institution offers conscious sedation for IUD insertion to mitigate this concern. The objective of this study was to identify characteristics and outcomes of teens choosing between two types of conscious sedation for insertion of a levonorgestrel IUD.

METHODS

This was a single-site, retrospective cohort study over a one year period, reviewing the electronic medical records of patients who had undergone an attempted IUD insertion using conscious sedation. Conscious sedation included nitrous gas (termed "light" sedation) or intravenous midazolam and fentanyl (termed "moderate" sedation). Patient demographic characteristics and medical and gynecological histories were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 69 attempted IUD insertions during the study period. Most patients (75.36%) were placed under light sedation, and 92.75% were successfully inserted. The only significant factor associated with choice in the type of conscious sedation was previous sexual activity, which increased the odds by 10.0 that the patient would choose light sedation (95% CI, 1.23-81.34; P = 0.031). Differences between other factors (age, history of sexual assault, tampon use, and gender identity) were not statistically significant between successful and failed insertions.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, history of sexual activity significantly differed between patients in our cohort who selected light sedation over moderate sedation. No other factors influenced the choice in sedative or success of IUD insertion. Knowing the characteristics of patients who choose nitrous versus intravenous sedation, and how it relates to successful insertion, may help guide pre-procedural counseling for patients regarding sedation for IUD insertion.

The use of LNG-IUS-19.5 mg in daily gynecological routine practice in Germany: data from the Kyleena™ Satisfaction Study (KYSS)

PURPOSE

The Kyleena™ Satisfaction Study (KYSS) provided the first data on 19.5 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS-19.5 mg) use in routine clinical practice. Here we report results from the German participants in KYSS.

METHODS

This prospective, observational, single-arm cohort study recruited women who independently chose to use LNG-IUS-19.5 mg during routine counseling in Germany. Overall satisfaction and bleeding profile satisfaction, continuation rates, and safety profile were evaluated at 12 months or premature end of observation (EoO).

RESULTS

In the German study population, LNG-IUS-19.5 mg placement was attempted in 508 women and successful in 506 women. Mean age was 32.3 years, and 60.0% (n = 305/508) were parous. Placement was considered easy and associated with no more than mild pain, even in younger and nulliparous participants. Of those with satisfaction data available, 87.6% (n = 388/443) were satisfied with LNG-IUS-19.5 mg at 12 months/EoO. Satisfaction was similar for parous (86.9%, n = 238/274) and nulliparous (88.8%, n = 150/169) women, and was independent of age, prior contraceptive method, or reason for choosing LNG-IUS-19.5 mg. Most participants (73.6%, n = 299/406) were also satisfied with their bleeding profile at 12 months/EoO, independent of parity, age, prior contraceptive method, presence of amenorrhea or dysmenorrhea severity. The 12-month continuation rate was 84.1% (n = 427/508). Most discontinuations were due to loss to follow-up (8.5%, n = 43/508) or treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (4.7%, n = 24/508). TEAEs were reported in 12.6% (n = 64) of participants, with 9.3% (n = 47) considered to have an LNG-IUS-19.5 mg-related TEAE.

CONCLUSION

Our real-world findings on LNG-IUS-19.5 mg use in German KYSS participants reflected its suitability for a broad population, including young and nulliparous women.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03182140 (date of registration: June 2017).

Factors associated with a negative Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) response with intrauterine device placement: A retrospective survey of HER Salt Lake participants

OBJECTIVES

In an established cohort of HER Salt Lake Contraceptive Initiative participants with a prior intrauterine device (IUD) placement, we sought to (1) define the proportion of participants who reported a negative Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) response, (2) explore factors associated with an unacceptable PASS response, and (3) identify pain management preferences for IUD placement.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective survey was sent to 1440 HER Salt Lake IUD users. A PASS question queried IUD placement pain experience acceptability. We explored associations between an unacceptable PASS response and sociodemographic, reproductive and other individual characteristics using t-tests, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of those surveyed, 620 responded (43%), and 41.6% reported an unacceptable PASS response. Those with an unacceptable PASS response reported a significantly higher experienced pain level (79.2 mm vs 51.8 mm; p < 0.01) than those with an acceptable response, were more likely to have an anxiety diagnosis (47.7% vs 37.1%; p < 0.01), and have a trauma history (33.7% vs 25.1%; p = 0.02). Most patients were not offered pain control options, but 29.4% used ibuprofen and 25.3% had a support person. Regardless of PASS response, if offered, 59.0% desired numbing medication, 56.8% ibuprofen, 51% heating pad, 33.2% support person, and 31.8% anti-anxiety medication, among others. In our multivariable logistic regression model, higher pain was associated with unacceptable PASS response (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05-1.08; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The common finding of unacceptable pain experiences with IUD placement may cause negative perceptions of an otherwise desirable method. Incorporation of the PASS response into IUD pain management studies could expand our pain experience understanding.

IMPLICATIONS

IUD placement resulted in unacceptable pain experiences for 41.6% of respondents. Screening for anxiety and trauma history could identify at-risk patients to individualize pain management strategies. Incorporation of the PASS into future IUD pain management studies could result in a more comprehensive, patient-centered measure of patient experiences.

Randomized Trial of a Sexual Health Video Intervention for Black and Hispanic Adolescent Females

Despite significant declines, adolescent birth rates in the USA are higher than other industrialized countries, with black and Hispanic youth disproportionately affected. This study assessed the efficacy of a single-session, entertainment-education sexual health video intervention for these populations. Using an individual-level randomized controlled trial, 1770 18- to 19-year-old black and Hispanic females were assigned to watch Plan A (n = 886) or a control video (n = 884) prior to a sexual reproductive health (SRH) visit. Participants self-reported data at baseline and 3 months post-baseline. Within an intent-to-treat framework, we estimated the average causal effect of assignment to Plan A on three confirmatory and five exploratory outcomes. We found that individuals assigned to Plan A had higher contraceptive knowledge, may be more likely to get sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing, and may have elevated HIV/STI risk perceptions 3 months post-video. Although we found no difference in long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) use nor frequency of condomless sex in the full sample, we did observe that first-time SRH visitors assigned to Plan A had a higher probability of using LARC than those in the control group. This study demonstrates that Plan A is a low-burden, inexpensive, and highly scalable video intervention for black and Hispanic adolescent females that has significant and borderline significant effects on protective sexual health behaviors and important antecedents. It adds to the evidence base of effective teen pregnancy prevention programs and the limited set of rigorous and causal studies investigating the effectiveness of entertainment-education interventions on sexual risk reduction. Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03238313) on August 3, 2017.

Why Pakistani Women Do Not Use Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Misconceptions

This review explores barriers limiting the adoption of Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices (IUCDs) in Pakistan, focusing exclusively on local articles. As Pakistan's high population calls for widespread contraception, we aim to pinpoint obstacles hindering IUCD utilization, irrespective of parity. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, PakMedinet, and Wiley Online Library for English-language primary studies published between 2000 and 2022, reporting on IUCD utilization in Pakistan. Our analysis reveals multiple barriers impeding IUCD use in Pakistan. These encompass patriarchal social norms, male dominance, low education, socioeconomic status, and unemployment. Post-insertion health concerns, inadequate counseling, government commitment, and awareness were also identified barriers. Provider confidence, client trust, women's autonomy, social constraints, and limited male partner involvement hindered IUCD adoption. A desire for larger families and male offspring, vague religious beliefs, fear, and misconceptions further restricted usage. Accessibility and high service costs also posed challenges. This review highlights prevailing impediments to IUCD adoption in Pakistan, encompassing knowledge gaps, motivation deficits, resistance from husbands and in-laws, cultural and religious beliefs, limited access, and communication barriers. To promote IUCDs as a modern contraceptive method, it is essential to raise awareness among both men and women. Active involvement of religious leaders and community stakeholders is crucial in addressing these social factors hindering IUCD utilization.

Negative Perceptions and Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Choice in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVE

Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) have high rates of safety, satisfaction, and continuation in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Despite this, utilization of these methods by AYAs is low. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the negative personal perceptions or beliefs about birth control and LARCs and their association with contraceptive use in AYAs.

METHODS

We surveyed young people (14-24 years old) seeking care at a Title X-supported adolescent reproductive and sexual health clinic to assess negative perceptions of birth control methods, with an emphasis on LARCs. We used appropriate bivariate statistics to compare those endorsing 3 or fewer negative perceptions with those who had more than 3 and logistic regression to identify predictors of contraceptive choice.

RESULTS

We recruited 345 participants; 337 (97.7%) completed the survey. Among respondents, the median age was 20 (range 14-24) years, and 7.04% of participants had ever been pregnant. The most commonly held negative perceptions were fear of device migration or breakage causing adverse health effects and concern about effect on future fertility. The number of negative perceptions endorsed did not differ significantly by age. However, a greater number of negative perceptions and younger age were clinical predictors of LARC nonuse.

CONCLUSION

AYAs have negative perceptions about LARCs that are often inaccurate and may limit contraceptive acceptability and perceived options. Engaged and respectful dialogue with AYAs about their concerns and fears is essential to provide accurate and patient-centered contraceptive counseling and to ensure that young people can make informed contraceptive choices.

Understanding barriers to using long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis

BACKGROUND

Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) are highly effective. In primary care, LARCs are prescribed less frequently than user-dependent contraceptives despite higher efficacy rates. Unplanned pregnancies are rising in the UK, and LARCs may have a role in reducing these through and redressing inequitable contraceptive access. To provide contraceptive services that offer maximal choice and patient benefit, we must understand what contraception users and healthcare professionals (HCPs) think about LARCs and uncover barriers to their use.

METHODS

A systematic search using CINAHL, MEDLINE via Ovid, PsycINFO, Web of Science and EMBASE identified research about LARC use for pregnancy prevention in primary care. The approach adhered to the 'Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses' methodology, critically appraised the literature, and used NVivo software to organise data and perform thematic analysis to determine key themes.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies met our inclusion criteria. Three themes were identified: (1) trustworthiness (where and from whom participants obtained information regarding LARCs), (2) control (whether LARCs detract from personal autonomy) and (3) systems (how HCPs influenced LARC access). Misgivings about LARCs frequently arose from social networks and fears of surrendering control over fertility were prominent. HCPs perceived access issues and lack of familiarity or training as the main barriers to prescribing LARCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary care plays a key role in improving access to LARC but barriers need to be addressed especially those involving misconception and misinformation. Access to LARC removal services are key to empower choice and prevent coercion. Facilitating trust within patient-centred contraceptive consult is essential.

Safety and efficacy of a suction cervical stabilizer for intrauterine contraceptive device insertion: Results from a randomized, controlled study

OBJECTIVES

To compare patient-reported pain, bleeding, and device safety between intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) insertion procedures employing a suction cervical stabilizer or single-tooth tenaculum.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a randomized, prospective, single-blinded study conducted at two centers, enrolling women aged 18 years or older, eligible for IUD insertion. The primary end point measure was patient-reported pain, measured on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale. Safety was assessed on the amount of bleeding, adverse events, and serious adverse events.

RESULTS

One hundred women were randomized, 48 to the investigational device and 52 to control. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in factors potentially associated with pain on IUD insertion. IUD insertion was successful in 94% of all subjects. Subjects in the investigational device group reported pain scores ≥14 points lower than in the control group at cervix grasping (14.9 vs 31.3; p < 0.001) and traction (17.0 vs 35.9; p < 0.001), and smaller differences in pain scores at the IUD insertion (31.5 vs 44.9; p = 0.021) and cervix-release (20.6 vs 30.9; p = 0.049) steps. Nulliparous women experienced the greatest pain differences to control. Mean blood loss was 0.336 (range 0.022-2.189) grams in the investigational device group and 1.336 (range 0.201-11.936) grams in the control group, respectively (p = 0.03 for the comparison). One adverse event (bruising and minor bleeding) in the investigational device group was considered causally related to the study device.

CONCLUSIONS

The suction cervical stabilizer had a reassuring safety profile and its use was associated with significant reductions in pain during the IUD insertion procedure compared with standard single-tooth tenaculum use, particularly among nulliparous women.

IMPLICATIONS

Pain can be an important barrier to greater use of IUD devices among prescribers and users, particularly nulliparous women. The suction cervical stabilizer may provide an appealing alternative to currently available tenacula, filling an important unmet need.

Pain and ease of insertion of three different intrauterine devices in Brazilian adolescents: A participant-blinded randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

To compare pain and ease of insertion of the copper 380 mm², levonorgestrel 52 mg, and levonorgestrel 19.5-mg intrauterine devices (IUDs) in Brazilian adolescents.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a participant-blinded randomized trial at two clinics in Brazil. We enrolled 318 adolescents<19 years old in a 1:1:1 ratio from November 2021 to February 2022. We informed the adolescents about the IUD type inserted after they evaluated the pain associated with the IUD insertion using a Visual Analogue Scale and immediately after that the healthcare provider who placed the IUD evaluated the ease of the procedure.

RESULTS

The VAS pain level was significantly higher after the levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD placement, median and [interquartile range, IQ] 8.0 [4.0] than the copper 380-mm² IUD 7.0 [4.0], and the levonorgestrel 19.5-mg IUD 7.0 [6.0] (p = 0.001). The placement was easier after the copper 380-mm² IUD (87/106, 82.1%) and the levonorgestrel 19.5-mg IUD (91/106, 85.8%) when compared with the levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD (75/105, 70.7%). After multiple logistic regression analyses, the higher VAS pain scores were associated with the levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD (OR = 2.90), low number of pregnancies (OR -0.48), and with a history of dysmenorrhea (OR = 2.67).

CONCLUSIONS

The placement of the copper 380-mm² IUD and the levonorgestrel 19.5-mg IUD was associated with lower pain according to the adolescent and was easier according to the provider when compared with the levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD. However, the small observed differences may not be clinically relevant.

IMPLICATIONS

We found that the three types of IUDs were generally easy to place; however, mean pain scores were high during insertions. Our findings of high pain scores reinforce the need for interventions to reduce pain for adolescent IUD insertion.

Bleeding profile satisfaction and pain and ease of placement with levonorgestrel 19.5 mg IUD: findings from the Kyleena® Satisfaction study

PURPOSE

To investigate bleeding profile satisfaction and pain and ease of placement with levonorgestrel 19.5 mg IUD in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Women who independently chose levonorgestrel 19.5 mg IUD during routine counselling were invited to participate in this prospective, multinational, observational study. Patient-reported pain and clinician-reported ease of placement were assessed. Bleeding profile satisfaction was evaluated at 12 months/premature end of observation.

RESULTS

Most participants (77.8%, n = 878/1129) rated levonorgestrel 19.5 mg IUD placement pain as 'none' or 'mild' and most clinicians (91.1%, n = 1029/1129) rated placement as 'easy'. Pain was more often rated higher in nulliparous compared with parous (p < .0001) and younger (<26 years) compared with older participants (p < .0001), although 67.7% and 69.0% of nulliparous and younger participants respectively reported 'none' or 'mild' pain. Bleeding profile satisfaction at 12 months/end of observation was similar in parous (72.9%, n = 318/436) and nulliparous (69.6%, n = 314/451) participants. Most participants irrespective of age reported bleeding profile satisfaction, ranging from 67.8% (n = 206/304) for 18-25 years to 76.5% (n = 218/285) for >35 years.

CONCLUSION

We observed high bleeding profile satisfaction regardless of age or parity with levonorgestrel 19.5 mg IUD and confirmed that device placement is easy and associated with no more than mild pain in most cases in routine clinical practice. Real-world evidence from the Kyleena^® Satisfaction Study in routine clinical practice shows high bleeding profile satisfaction with levonorgestrel 19.5 mg IUD regardless of age or parity. IUD placement was easy and associated with little to no pain for most women.

Avaliação da dor e seus fatores associados durante a inserção do dispositivo intrauterino na Atenção Primária à Saúde

Introdução: A inserção do dispositivo intrauterino é uma competência esperada para o médico generalista. No entanto, esse método encontra muitas barreiras ao ser inserido nas unidades básica de saúde, como a falta de treinamento dos profissionais e o medo que as mulheres têm de sentir dor. Objetivo: Avaliar a intensidade da dor durante o procedimento de inserção do dispositivo intrauterino realizado por médicos generalistas em unidades básicas de saúde na região metropolitana de João Pessoa e sua associação com fatores sociodemográficos, aspectos clínicos da mulher e formação médica. Métodos: Estudo transversal e descritivo, com dados coletados em 16 unidades básicas de saúde nos municípios de Conde, Caaporã, João Pessoa e Sapé, no intervalo de março a outubro de 2019. A coleta de dados foi realizada por entrevista individual com questionário estruturado, e a dor foi graduada pela escala visual analógica. Os dados foram analisados utilizando-se os testes de Mann-Whitney e χ². Resultados: Participaram do estudo 139 mulheres com idade mínima de 14 e máxima de 47 anos, cuja média de dor foi de 5,5 para aquelas que estavam menstruadas e de 4,6 para as que não estavam. A dor leve esteve presente em 20,1%, a dor moderada em 38% e dor intensa em 31,7%. Histerometria acima de 7 cm, histórico de uso de anti-inflamatórios na menstruação e de dismenorreia estiveram mais presentes em quem referiu dor intensa (p<0,001). Quanto à qualificação do médico que insere o dispositivo intrauterino, não houve significância estatística na correlação de dor intensa com o fato de ele ser residente (p=0,268), com o tempo de formatura (p=0,080) nem com a dificuldade técnica encontrada (p=0,065). Conclusões: A dor foi considerada pela maioria das mulheres como moderada, sendo uma oferta e um procedimento viável de ser ensinado e inserido na Atenção Primária à Saúde.

Cochrane Fertility Regulation Group, Zapata LB, Nguyen A, Snyder E, Whiteman MK, Kapp N, Ti A, Curtis KM. Analgesics for intrauterine device placement

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows:

To examine the effectiveness of analgesics for routine intrauterine device (IUD) placement on patient (e.g. pain, side effects, satisfaction) and provider outcomes (e.g. ease of placement, need for adjunctive placement measures, placement success) compared with placebo or no treatment.

Attitudes Toward the Copper IUD in Sweden: A Survey Study

Background

While the efficacy and safety of the contraceptive copper intrauterine device (IUD) have been affirmed, alongside its importance for the prevention of unintended pregnancies, some studies have pointed to negative attitudes toward the device. In recent years, social media communication about it has included claims about systemic side effects, unsubstantiated by medical authorities. Research from the Swedish context is sparse. This study investigates attitudes toward the copper IUD and any correlations between negative attitudes toward or experiences of the device, and (1) sociodemographic characteristics, (2) the evaluation of the reliability of different sources of information, and (3) trust in healthcare and other societal institutions.

Methods

A survey was distributed online to adult women in Sweden (n = 2,000). Aside from descriptive statistics, associations between negative attitudes toward or experiences of the copper IUD and sociodemographic and other variables were calculated using logistic regressions and expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Open survey responses (n = 650) were analyzed thematically.

Results

While many reported positive attitudes toward and experiences of the IUD, 34.7% of all respondents reported negative attitudes and 45.4% of users reported negative experiences. Negative attitudes were strongly correlated with negative experiences. Negative attitudes and experiences were associated with low income, but no conclusive associations were identified with other socioeconomic variables. Negative attitudes and experiences were associated with lower levels of confidence in and satisfaction with healthcare, as well as lower self-assessed access and ability to assess the origin and reliability of information about the IUD. In open responses, negative comments were prevalent and included references to both common and unestablished perceived side-effects. Respondents pointed to problematic aspects of information and knowledge about the copper IUD and called for improved healthcare communication and updated research.

Conclusion

Healthcare provider communication about the copper IUD should promote reproductive autonomy and trust by providing clear information about potential side effects and being open to discuss women's experiences and concerns. Further research on copper IUD dissatisfaction and ways in which health professionals do and may best respond to it is needed.

"For Me, It's Having Something Meaningful": Women's Emotional Understandings of Sex and the Sexual Acceptability of Contraception

While the sexual acceptability of contraception - or, the impact of contraceptive methods on individuals' sexual experiences - is a growing area of research, less frequently do studies engage the importance of individual emotions around sex when it comes to perceptions of sexual acceptability. Building on Higgins and Smith's model of sexual acceptability and drawing upon insights from the sociology of gender, we used qualitative interview data with 30 women in Utah (USA) to explore the importance of emotional understandings of sex for women's assessments of the sexual acceptability of different contraceptives. Here we posit that emotional understandings of sex are not just individualistic - they are also structured by experiences with sexual partners and broader gendered expectations. This work adds insight into the importance of emotions in sexual acceptability and suggests the need for an amendment to Higgins and Smith's model that reflects the synergistic nature of the micro/individual, meso/interactional, and macro factors related to sexual acceptability. We conclude that assessing the sexual acceptability of contraceptives requires a nuanced multi-level interaction framework.

Safety and Efficacy of an Atraumatic Uterine Cervical Traction Device: A Pilot Study

Introduction: Alignment of the uterine cervix with the vaginal canal is often required during insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD). Currently available instruments are traumatic tenacula, which can cause pain and bleeding and represent an obstacle for certain patients to pursue their medical follow-up. A novel investigational cervical vacuum tenaculum, enables atraumatic traction of the cervix using a semi-circular suction pad, designed to conform to the anatomical shape of the external cervical os. Suction is generated by manually pulling out a sliding tube in a vacuum chamber.

Methods: We performed a single arm non-comparative pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of the cervical vacuum tenaculum in 13 women receiving an IUD. Data on procedural efficacy, safety, patient-reported pain scores at specific time points during IUD insertion procedure and patient satisfaction were collected prospectively.

Results: Insertion of IUD was successful with use of the study device in 7 of the 13 enrolled patients (54%). No bleeding or only limited ecchymosis were caused by the device. No adverse events were reported. Participants reported very little pain (mean Visual Analog Scale <10) when applying the device. Participants who achieved IUD insertion with the device reported strong overall satisfaction with the procedure.

Conclusions: The suction-based atraumatic tenaculum can be used to manipulate the cervix during IUD insertion with satisfactory efficacy and safety. The results of this pilot study support further studies of this device in larger populations comparing with standard single-tooth tenaculum.

Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT 04441333.

Provider Perspectives of Barriers to Contraceptive Access and Use among Women with Substance Use Disorders

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies conducted from the patient perspective indicate that women with substance use disorders (SUDs) experience extensive barriers to contraceptive access and use (CAU), but there is limited research investigating this topic from the provider perspective. We explored provider perspectives on the barriers to CAU for women with SUDs. As a secondary objective, we highlighted provider contraceptive counseling strategies to address patient CAU barriers.

METHODS

We conducted 24 qualitative interviews with a purposeful sample of women's health providers, including medical doctors, nurse practitioners, and certified nurse-midwives. We used thematic analysis to code the interviews with inductive codes and organized findings according to levels of influence within the Dahlgren and Whitehead rainbow model, a socioecological model of health.

RESULTS

Provider-reported barriers to CAU were identified at four levels of socioecological influence and included reproductive misconceptions; active substance use; trauma, interpersonal violence, and reproductive coercion; limited social support; lack of housing, employment, health insurance, and transportation; stigma; discrimination; and punitive prenatal substance use policies and child welfare reporting requirements. Strategies for addressing CAU barriers mainly focused on patient-centered communication, including open information exchange, shared decision-making, and relationship building. However, providers described disproportionately highlighting the benefits of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and directing conversations toward LARC when they perceived that such methods would help patients to overcome adherence and other challenges related to active substance use or logistical barriers. Notably, there was no mention of CAU facilitators during the interviews.

CONCLUSIONS

Providers perceived that women with SUDs experience a range of CAU barriers, which they addressed within the clinical setting through use of both patient-centered communication and highlighting the benefits of LARC when they perceived that such methods would help clients to overcome barriers. Improving CAU for women with SUDs will require multidisciplinary, multipronged strategies that prioritize reproductive autonomy and are implemented across clinical, community, and policy settings.

Satisfaction and continuation with LNG-IUS 12: findings from the real-world kyleena® satisfaction study

PURPOSE

The Kyleena^® Satisfaction Study (KYSS) aimed to assess satisfaction and continuation with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 12 (Kyleena^®) in routine clinical practice and to evaluate factors that influence satisfaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, observational, multicentre, single-arm cohort study, with 1-year follow-up, was conducted in Belgium, Canada, Germany, Mexico, Norway, Sweden, Spain and the United States from 2017 to 2018. During routine counselling, women who independently selected to use LNG-IUS 12 were invited to participate in the study. KYSS assessed LNG-IUS 12 satisfaction, continuation and safety.

RESULTS

Overall, there were 1126 successful LNG-IUS 12 placements, with insertion attempted in 1129 women. Most participants (833/968, 86.1%, 95% CI 83.7-88.2%, with satisfaction outcome data available) reported satisfaction with LNG-IUS 12 at 12 months (or at the final visit if the device was discontinued prematurely). Satisfaction was not associated with age, parity or motivation for choosing LNG-IUS 12. The majority of women (919/1129, 81.4%) chose to continue after 12 months. Discontinuation was not correlated with age or parity. Overall, 191 women (16.9%) reported a treatment-emergent adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from KYSS provide the first real-world evidence assessing LNG-IUS 12, and demonstrate high satisfaction and continuation rates irrespective of age or parity. Clinical trial registration: NCT03182140.

Intrauterine device use, sexually transmitted infections, and fertility: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

In the 1970s, numerous medical reports, media coverage, and litigation around the Dalkon Shield intrauterine device led to a perception that all intrauterine devices cause upper genital tract infection and infertility.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the association between intrauterine device use and time to conception.

STUDY DESIGN

The Fertility After Contraceptive Termination Study is a multicenter, prospective cohort study of women stopping their contraceptive method to attempt conception. We recruited participants between 2011 and 2017. Participants were a convenience sample of women recruited from academic centers in Philadelphia, PA; Los Angeles, CA; St. Louis, MO; Indianapolis, IN; Aurora, CO; and Salt Lake City, UT. Women were eligible if they stopped their contraceptive method within the past 120 days before enrollment, were between 18 and 35 years of age, had no history of infertility or sterilization, and had at least 6 months of follow-up. Baseline data included demographic and reproductive characteristics, past contraceptive use, nucleic acid amplification testing for sexually transmitted infections, and serology for past infection with Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis, and Mycoplasma genitalium. The primary exposure was intrauterine device use (ever); the primary outcome was time to conception. All participants were observed longitudinally for up to 24 months. We used piecewise exponential proportional hazards models with multiple imputation to provide hazard ratios and their respective 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Of the 461 participants, mean age was 28.2 years, 178 (38.7%) were Black, 157 (34.1%) were considered as low socioeconomic status, and 275 (59.7%) had a history of intrauterine device use. Without adjusting for any covariates, the median time to conception was shorter for participants who had a history of intrauterine device use (5.1 months) than participants who never used an intrauterine device (7.5 months). After controlling for potential confounders, the association of past intrauterine device use with time to conception was not statistically significant (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.58). In our multivariable model, age, nulligravidity, Black race, low socioeconomic status, and past Mycoplasma genitalium infection were associated with longer times to conception (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.99). Conception by 12 months was lower in participants with past Mycoplasma genitalium infection (68% vs 80% without past infection; P=.019).

CONCLUSION

We found no impairment of fertility with ever use of an intrauterine device. Serologic evidence of past Mycoplasma genitalium infection was associated with longer times to conception and higher rates of infertility. Mycoplasma genitalium infection is a potential modifiable cause of infertility.

Women's perspectives on long-acting reversible contraception: a critical scoping review of qualitative research

Long-acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) has significant promise both from a public health outlook and a social justice perspective. However, if women's empowerment is to be supported, then perspectives and experiences of LARC must be considered. This scoping review assesses research about contraceptive users' perspectives and experiences of contraceptive decision-making and practices. A content analysis was conducted to identify research trends in qualitative studies of contraceptive-user perspectives (n = 54), located by means of a systematic search. Interpreting findings through a reproductive justice lens, three main limitations in the scholarship were identified, viz., (1) an instrumentalist, individual-level focus; (2) a lack of consideration for diverse perspectives; and (3) an uncritical focus on young women. While the small body of qualitative research on LARC offers some valuable insights, when viewed from a sexual and reproductive justice perspective, it is not sufficiently user-centered or grounded within the reproductive politics surrounding contraceptive care and provision. Research is needed that draws on appropriate social theory; widens its focus beyond dominant groups; and is cognizant of the multi-level power relations surrounding LARC. Such work provides a nuanced picture of the complex social and contextual factors at play and inform person-centered approaches in sexual and reproductive health policy and programming.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Receipt of Sexual Health Care and Education Among A Nationally Representative Sample of Adolescent Females

OBJECTIVE(S)

The USA has a high rate of adolescent pregnancy, with non-Hispanic (NH) Black and Hispanic women disproportionately affected. We sought to investigate the presence of racial/ethnic disparities in the receipt of sexual health (SRH) care and education and whether such disparities contribute to differences in sexual health outcomes for youth.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a cross-sectional study of females aged 15-21 years who participated in the National Survey of Family Growth from 2008 to 2015. Multivariable logistic regression was used to measure the association between race/ethnicity and SRH outcomes after adjustment for potential confounders. Models were developed to measure whether receipt of SRH care and education served as an effect modifier on SRH outcomes.

RESULTS

The sample included 4316 participants, representing 33.5 million females. Almost half (47.2%) received birth control services in the last 12 months; NH-Blacks (aOR 0.7 [0.5, 0.9]) and Hispanics (aOR 0.6 [0.5, 0.8]) were less likely to have obtained birth control services than NH-whites. Hispanics (aOR 1.5 [1.2, 1.9]) had a higher likelihood of receipt of condom education than NH-whites. We found that disparities in SRH outcomes were slightly mitigated after adjustment for access to SRH care and education.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified racial/ethnic disparities in sexual health outcomes and in SRH and education; however, SRH care and education can mitigate some of these differences in sexual behaviors and outcomes. Racial/ethnic differences in sexual health outcomes may be at least partially related to the differential receipt of sexual health care and education and deserve further investigation.

Rates of Intrauterine Device Expulsion Among Adolescents and Young Women

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to determine the rate of intrauterine device (IUD) expulsion and risk factors for expulsion among adolescents and young adults.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

IUD insertions were performed at a single children's hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Eligible adolescent and young adult patients who underwent IUD insertion between August 2009 and March 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

IUD insertion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was the incidence of IUD expulsion in adolescents and young women. Secondary outcomes were risk factors for IUD expulsion including heavy menstrual bleeding, abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), anemia, or a bleeding disorder diagnosis.

RESULTS

Six hundred forty-two eligible patients underwent IUD insertion. The incidence of first IUD expulsion in this population was 58/642 (9.03%). Among those who chose to have a second IUD placed (n = 29), 8/29 (27.6%) had a second expulsion. Patients who expelled their IUD were more likely to have a history of AUB, heavy menstrual bleeding, anemia, or a bleeding disorder. When controlled for body mass index and age at insertion, history of AUB and anemia remained significant risks for IUD expulsion.

CONCLUSION

This study similarly showed a higher risk of primary and secondary IUD expulsion in adolescents and young women. A history of AUB, anemia, bleeding disorder, and elevated body mass index are associated with higher risk for IUD expulsion. This population should be counseled that these conditions might place them at higher risk for expulsion.

Contraceptive Method Uptake at Title X Health Centers in Utah

BACKGROUND

The Title X family planning program previously supported contraception for Utah clients with low incomes, yet its contributions may not have been sufficient to allow clients to select their preferred methods, including long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs). In this study, we compare the contraceptive method choices of self-paying clients with low incomes at three participating Title X health centers in Salt Lake County, Utah, before and after the removal of additional cost barriers.

METHODS

We used retrospective medical record review to assess clients' contraceptive choices during two 6-month periods: a control period with Title X-assisted sliding scale payment schedules (n = 2,776) and an intervention period offering no-cost contraceptive care (n = 2,065). We used logistic regression to identify the likelihood of selecting a LARC during the intervention period and multinomial regression to identify the selection probability of different types of available LARCs.

RESULTS

During the control period, 16% of participants chose a LARC compared with 26% in the intervention period (p ≤ .001). During the intervention period, participants were 1.8 times more likely to select LARCs (95% confidence interval, 1.65-2.13) compared with non-LARC methods, holding covariates constant. In the multinomial regression, participants were three times more likely during the intervention period to select an implant than a pill, patch, or ring, holding all other covariates constant (odds ratio, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 2.47-3.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Title X clients offered contraceptive methods without cost more frequently selected a LARC method. Title X funding reductions may impede individuals' access to their contraceptive methods of choice.

Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Attitudes and Acceptability in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Key to Patient-Centered Contraceptive Counseling

PURPOSE

To examine the attitudes of adolescent and young adults (AYA) toward long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), and to assess how attitudes are associated with acceptability.

DESIGN

Survey.

SETTING

Children's Hospital Colorado Adolescent Family Planning Clinic in Aurora, Colorado.

PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Young persons 14-24 years of age presenting for any type of visit between March and August 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 332 participants were enrolled; the majority (62.3%) had high LARC acceptability. We found 5 "attitude" factors: 77.7% of the sample endorsed "Effective" attitudes (eg, wants most effective method), 37.3% endorsed "Good attributes" (eg, discreet, convenient), 23.1% endorsed "Scary" (eg, fears device will move), 16.1% endorsed "Bad for health," (eg, too many side effects), and 9% endorsed "Not for me" (eg, concerns about pain). Although participants who endorsed "Effective" (OR 6.60, 95% CI 3.01-14.49) and "Good attributes" (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.51-6.66) were more likely to have high LARC acceptability than those who endorsed "Scary" (OR 0.28, 95% CI: (0.13-0.61)) and "Not for me" (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.41) factors, approximately 10% of participants with high LARC acceptability endorsed "Scary" or "Bad for health" attitudes, whereas 54% of those with low LARC acceptability endorsed "Effective" attitudes.

CONCLUSION

Although most participants had high LARC acceptability and valued contraceptive effectiveness, the association between LARC attitudes and acceptability is nuanced. Providers should identify and discuss young people's contraceptive knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability.

Differences in knowledge and attitudes toward the intrauterine device: Do age and race matter?

AIM

The intrauterine device (IUD) is highly effective birth control, but US IUD usage lags. Barriers to usage, including patient attitudes and lack of knowledge, are not well-characterized. This study sought to investigate how attitudes and knowledge about IUD vary by age and race.

METHODS

A survey was distributed to all women in the outpatient obstetrics and gynecology office of a large, urban, academic medical center in Philadelphia. Exclusion criteria included inability to read English or age less than 14 years. Surveys queried participant demographics, knowledge about and opinions of IUD. The authors performed exploratory bi-variable analysis using t tests and chi-square testing to determine which outcomes differed by age and race. For those differing significantly, the authors performed regression analysis to assess for confounding by other factors.

RESULTS

Of 1366 women approached, 521 completed the survey (38% response rate). After controlling for confounding, only responses to the statement 'Hormonal birth control is safe and effective' differed significantly by age. Knowledge about IUD did not differ significantly by race, but black women were significantly more likely to perceive that they had insufficient knowledge about IUD compared to white women (odds ratio [OR]: 1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-3.46). Black women had a more negative opinion of IUD safety (OR: 5.0; 95% CI: 2.35-10.66) and reliability (OR: 5.5; 95% CI: 2.20-14.13) than white women.

CONCLUSION

Attitudes and knowledge about IUD do not differ significantly by age. While knowledge about IUD is similar between races, black women may have more negative opinions of IUD.

Patient Opinions About Foreign Body Contraceptives

Background: Prior studies have noted patient reluctance to use contraceptive devices that require insertion into their bodies. We sought to better understand this “foreign body” concern, as well as to clarify how women perceive long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) devices compared with other implanted medical devices.

Materials and Methods: We performed semistructured qualitative individual interviews with female obstetric/gynecologic patients and probed their opinions regarding LARC devices. Trained coders analyzed interview content using an inductive iterative approach and identified key themes.

Results: We found three major themes in our analysis. First, women frequently expressed uncertainty about where in the body intrauterine devices reside and the impact of a foreign body in that space. Second, women expressed discomfort with the invisibility of the device itself and the “set and forget” feature of LARCs. Finally, when asked to consider contraceptive devices in the context of other implantable medical devices, patients highlighted that contraceptive devices are elective and have alternative options.

Conclusions: When women express concerns about contraceptive devices “up in them,” they are expressing concerns about how these devices interact with their anatomy and the possibilities of harm and failure. These perceived risks of LARCs may not compare favorably with other contraceptive methods that are not foreign bodies. Understanding this perspective improves our ability to participate in shared decision-making.

Best Practices for Counseling Adolescents about the Etonogestrel Implant

Among young persons, ease of use, high efficacy, and high acceptability makes the etonogestrel contraceptive implant an important choice for this age group. Adolescent-friendly, patient-centered counseling considers the patient's cognitive development, the influence of friends and family, as well as their own preferences and values. Age-appropriate language, graphics, and models are useful to explain contraceptive options and relevant side effects. Effectiveness, reversibility, safety, noncontraceptive benefits, and side effects are important attributes and should be discussed when teens are choosing a contraceptive method. In this review we describe suggested best practices for counseling adolescents about the etonogestrel implant so they can make informed, prudent decisions about using this contraceptive method.

Verbal analgesia is as good as oral tramadol prior to intrauterine device (IUD) insertion, among nulliparous women: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare two pain management strategies: oral tramadol or a verbal analgesia technique during insertion of an intrauterine device (IUD) among nulliparous women.

STUDY DESIGN

In this randomized, controlled trial, 54 nulliparous women undergoing insertion of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (IUD), from December 2015 to December 2018 were randomized to receive oral tramadol for analgesia or verbal analgesia prior to IUD insertion. Demographic data, clinical symptoms, visual analogue scale (VAS) and complications were reviewed from patient records.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the two groups regarding gravidity, age, smoking or body mass index. No significant differences were detected between the groups regarding the procedure, including ease of insertion (p = .415), number of insertion attempts (p = .514) and complications during the insertion (p = .150). Mean pain level by VAS was 4.5 ± 1.6 (range 2-8) for the tramadol group and 4.8 ± 2.4 (0-10) for the verbal analgesia group (p = .610). There was no spontaneous ejection of the IUD in either group, and no endometritis or discomfort that resulted in IUD removal.

CONCLUSION

There was no benefit in using oral tramadol for analgesia prior to IUD insertion among nulliparous women. Verbal analgesia can be a suitable technique for this process and clinicians should become more familiar with its use.

Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Specific Issues for Adolescents

Long-acting reversible contraceptives are the most effective methods to prevent pregnancy and also offer noncontraceptive benefits such as reducing menstrual blood flow and dysmenorrhea. The safety and efficacy of long-acting reversible contraception are well established for adolescents, but the rate of use remains low for this population. The pediatrician can play a key role in increasing access to long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents by providing accurate patient-centered contraception counseling and by understanding and addressing the barriers to use.

Patient Satisfaction with IUD Services in a School-Based Health Center: A Pilot Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the acceptability to and satisfaction of high school students receiving an intrauterine device (IUD) at a school-based health center (SBHC). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In this prospective pilot study at a Bronx SBHC, adolescent patients who had an IUD inserted in the SBHC between November 2010 and June 2013 completed a self-administered survey on the day of IUD insertion and a follow-up survey within 6 months. The initial survey addressed patient sexual and contraceptive history, reasons for choosing the IUD, and the insertion experience, whereas the follow-up survey addressed IUD continuation and side effects.

RESULTS

In all, 104 of 139 (75%) eligible patients agreed to participate, and 75 (72%) of those completed the follow-up survey. Respondents chose IUDs because they were long-lasting, effective, private, and easy to remember, and chose the SBHC for services because it was convenient, recommended, free, and a trusted setting. Participants rated their interactions with SBHC staff highly, and almost all described their procedure experience as somewhat or very acceptable. Of the respondents, 92% were still using the IUD at the time of the follow-up survey, with 32% stating that they were somewhat satisfied and 65% stating they were very satisfied with this method of contraception.

CONCLUSION

Our research demonstrates that IUD services can be integrated into the SBHC setting with high rates of acceptability and satisfaction. Furthermore, SBHCs provide a unique and acceptable option for providing these services and have the potential to increase adolescents' contraceptive access and choice.

Knowledge about the intrauterine device and interest in using it among women users of primary care services

OBJECTIVE

to analyze the level of knowledge about the intrauterine device, the interest in using it and the relationship between these events among women in reproductive age.

METHOD

cross-sectional study conducted with 1858 women between 18 and 49 years old, attending Primary Health Care Facilities. Data were obtained in face-to-face interviews. The level of knowledge was evaluated by items with answers options "agree", "disagree" and "I don't know". Knowledge was categorized as below/equal and above the median. Chi-square and multiple logistic regression were used in Stata 14.2 (95% confidence level).

RESULTS

intrauterine device current use was not frequent (1.7%; n=32) and the level of knowledge was higher among women between 25 and 34 years old, white, living in Aracaju (Sergipe), who were more educated, and who were currently using or had already used the intrauterine device. Interest in using the intrauterine device (38.0%; n=634) was higher among younger women, single, more educated, had health insurance, no children and with higher level of knowledge about the intrauterine device.

CONCLUSION

the level of knowledge about the intrauterine device was associated with the interest in using it.

Anticipated Pain During Intrauterine Device Insertion

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To identify predictors of anticipated pain with intrauterine device (IUD) insertion in adolescents and young women.

DESIGN

We performed linear regression to identify demographic, sexual/gynecologic history, and mood covariates associated with anticipated pain using a visual analogue scale pain score collected as part of a single-blind randomized trial of women who received a 13.5-mg levonorgestrel IUD.

SETTING

Three academic family planning clinics in Philadelphia Pennsylvania.

PARTICIPANTS

Ninety-three adolescents and young adult women aged 14-22 years.

INTERVENTION

Participants received either a 1% lidocaine or sham paracervical block.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Anticipated pain measured using a visual analogue scale before and perceived pain at 6 time points during the IUD insertion procedure.

RESULTS

Black or African American participants had a median anticipated pain score of 68 (interquartile range [IQR], 52-83), White participants had a median anticipated pain of 51 (IQR, 35-68), whereas participants of other races had a median anticipated pain score of 64 (IQR, 36-73); P = .012. In multivariate analysis, race was the only covariate that significantly predicted anticipated pain at IUD insertion. Women with anticipated pain scores above the median had significantly higher perceived pain during all timepoints of the IUD insertion procedure.

CONCLUSION

Increased anticipated pain is associated with increased perceived pain with IUD insertion. Black adolescent women experience greater anticipated pain with IUD insertion. This population might benefit from counseling and clinical measures to reduce this barrier to IUD use.

Exploring young women's reasons for adopting intrauterine or oral emergency contraception in the United States: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The recent focus on increasing access to long-acting reversible contraceptive methods has often overlooked the diverse reasons why women may choose less effective methods even when significant access barriers have been removed. While the copper intrauterine device (IUD) is considered an acceptable alternative to emergency contraception pills (ECPs), it is unclear to what extent low rates of provision and use are due to patient preferences versus structural access barriers. This study explores factors that influence patients' choice between ECPs and the copper IUD as EC, including prior experiences with contraception and attitudes toward EC methods, in settings where both options are available at no cost.

METHODS

We telephone-interviewed 17 patients seeking EC from three San Francisco Bay Area youth-serving clinics that offered the IUD as EC and ECPs as standard practice, regarding their experiences choosing an EC method. We thematically coded all interview transcripts, then summarized the themes related to reasons for choosing ECPs or the IUD as EC.

RESULTS

Ten participants left their EC visit with ECPs and seven with the IUD as EC option. Women chose ECPs because they were familiar and easily accessible. Reasons for not adopting the copper IUD included having had prior negative experiences with the IUD, concerns about its side effects and the placement procedure, and lack of awareness about the copper IUD. Women who chose the IUD as EC did so primarily because of its long-term efficacy, invisibility, lack of hormones, longer window of post-coital utility, and a desire to not rely on ECPs. Women who chose the IUD as EC had not had prior negative experiences with the IUD, had already been interested in the IUD, and were ready and able to have it placed that day.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights that women have varied and well-considered reasons for choosing each EC method. Both ECPs and the copper IUD are important and acceptable EC options, each with their own features offering benefits to patients. Efforts to destigmatize repeated use of ECPs and validate women's choice of either EC method are needed to support women in their EC method decision-making.

Will it Hurt? The Intrauterine Device Insertion Experience and Long-Term Acceptability Among Adolescents and Young Women

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To examine how the intrauterine device (IUD) insertion experience affects long-term IUD acceptability among adolescents.

DESIGN

Text to Web survey study.

SETTING

Boston Children's Hospital and Cambridge Health Alliance in Massachusetts.

PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Nulliparous adolescents aged 13-21 years who received an IUD or etonogestrel implant between January 2012 and May 2018.

RESULTS

We received survey responses from 95 adolescents (n = 46 IUD; n = 49 implant; response rate = 95/1098 (9%)). Mean current age (20.8 years) and time since device insertion (2.4 years) were similar between groups. Although a large proportion of both groups (64%) experienced moderate to severe preprocedural anxiety, IUD users expected more insertional pain compared with implant users (55.6 vs 39.6; P = .01). Compared with implant users, more IUD users experienced moderate to severe insertional pain (80% vs 18%; P < .0001), recalled that the procedure hurt more than expected (52% vs 4%; P < .0001), and endorsed lower rates of pain management satisfaction (72.4 vs 85.6; P = .04). Most respondents would recommend their method to a friend (75%) or consider getting the same device in the future (63%). When explicitly asked, more IUD users reported that dislike of the insertion procedure might or would probably prevent them from getting the same device in the future (41% vs 14%; P = .005).

CONCLUSION

Compared with implant users, IUD users reported more negative insertion experiences, although preprocedural anxiety was prevalent in both groups. Dislike of the insertion experience might negatively affect adolescents' willingness to continue using an IUD in the future. Findings should encourage multimodal interventions to holistically improve the IUD insertion experience.

How do women and health care professionals view hormonal long-acting reversible contraception? Results from an international survey

Purpose: Evidence from real-world settings is important to provide an accurate picture of health care delivery. We investigated use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) in women aged 15-49 years.Materials and methods: Two surveys, one of women and one of health care professionals (HCPs), were conducted in parallel across seven countries. Participating women completed an online survey to assess contraceptive awareness, current method of contraception, age, and experience with current contraceptive method. HCPs participated in an online survey to provide practice-level information and three anonymous charts of hormonal LARC users.Results: Of 6903 women who completed the survey, 3225 provided information about their current primary contraception method. Overall, 16% used LARC methods, while 52% used oral contraceptives (OCs). Of hormonal intrauterine system users, 72% described their experience as 'very favourable', compared with only 53% of women using OCs. Anonymous patient records (n = 1605) were provided by 550 HCPs who completed the online survey. Most women (64%) had used short-acting reversible contraception before switching to LARC. Physicians perceived 56-84% of LARC users to be highly satisfied with their current form of contraception.Conclusions: Although usage of LARC was low, most women using LARC were highly satisfied with their method of contraception.

Satisfaction With the Intrauterine Device Insertion Procedure Among Adolescent and Young Adult Women

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate satisfaction with intrauterine device (IUD) insertion procedures among adolescent and young adult women.

METHODS

This secondary analysis of data from a multisite, single-blind, sham-controlled randomized trial of women having a levonorgestrel 13.5-mg IUD inserted enrolled participants from March 2015 through July 2016 at three family planning clinics in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Eligible participants were 14-22 years of age, nulliparous, not pregnant, and English-speaking. Randomization was computer-generated allocation in block sizes of four to a 1% lidocaine paracervical or sham block. Only patients were blinded. Satisfaction was measured with three items that assessed overall satisfaction with the procedure, whether participants would recommend the IUD to a friend, and the perception that the IUD was worth the discomfort. Predictors included demographics, sexual and reproductive history, pain after IUD insertion, and treatment group.

RESULTS

Ninety-five women enrolled; 93 (97.9%) were included in the analysis. Forty-five (47.4%) were white, 34 (36.0%) were black, 62 (66.0%) were privately insured, and 75 (79.0%) had used contraception previously. Most (n=73 [76.8%]) reported high overall satisfaction with the procedure, 64 (67.4%) would recommend an IUD to a friend, and 79 (83.2%) perceived the IUD was worth the discomfort. The odds of reporting high overall satisfaction were lower among adolescents compared with young adults (odds ratio [OR] 0.07, 95% CI 0.008-0.68); those who never had a gynecologic examination compared with those who had (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.99); and decreased as pain score increased (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99). Higher pain scores were negatively correlated with the odds of recommending an IUD to a friend and perceiving the IUD was worth the discomfort.

CONCLUSION

Adolescent and young adult women report high levels of satisfaction after the IUD insertion procedure. Young age, lack of experience with gynecologic examinations, and high pain were inversely related to satisfaction.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02352714.

Barriers and Solutions to Improve Adolescent Intrauterine Device Access

Professional organizations agree that adolescents are good candidates for intrauterine device (IUD) use. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists affirm that IUDs should be considered first-line as contraceptive methods for adolescents. Although the number of teens using IUDs is growing, multiple barriers remain, including systems, and patient- and provider-level obstacles. Only through concerted efforts and a committed action plan will adolescents achieve better access to IUDs.

Using the theory of planned behavior and self-identity to explore women's decision-making and intention to switch from combined oral contraceptive pill (COC) to long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC)

Background

\Most college women use the combined oral contraceptive pill (COC) despite more effective long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods (e.g., IUDs and implant) being available. Resistance to change methods may be impacted by how a woman identifies with being a COC-user.

Methods

Data were collected via 186 web-based surveys distributed to female students attending a university in the southeastern United States (Mean age = 20.0 ± 1.; range = 18–22). Structural equation modeling (SEM) determined TPB fit in understanding LARC intention.

Results

SEM results received acceptable fit (χ2 (670, N = 186) p < 0.01, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) of 0.84, and Normative Fit Index (NFI) of 0.75). A Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) of 0.09 was produced, with a 90% confidence interval of 0.08 to 0.09. Including self-identity in the model yielded similar fit, with χ2 (866, N = 186) p < 0.01, CFI of 0.83, and NFI of 0.73. Self-identity and attitude pathways were significant (p < 0.01) toward intention, extending the TPB model.

Conclusions

The TPB proved to be acceptable in understanding COC users’ intention to obtain LARC. Results provide direction for LARC messaging tailored toward COC users and self-identity.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12905-019-0772-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Understanding Commercially Sexually Exploited Youths' Facilitators and Barriers toward Contraceptive Use: I Didn't Really Have a Choice

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Because of the high reproductive health risks that commercially sexually exploited youth (CSEY) face, we sought to understand facilitators and barriers related to their use of condoms and hormonal contraception. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We conducted semistructured interviews with 21 female CSEY. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded for emergent themes. Participants were enrolled through group homes and a juvenile specialty court serving CSEY.

RESULTS

Overall, CSEY reported relatively easy access to hormonal contraception and condoms, expressing a strong preference for condoms as their primary form of contraception. Most respondents described an aversion toward hormonal birth control, attributed to personal experiences and peer accounts of side effects. Many also shared a common belief that hormonal methods are "unnatural," cause infertility, and have low efficacy. Although youth expressed a preference for condom use, they also reported frequent unprotected sex. Furthermore, there were notable barriers to hormonal contraception and condom use that were specific to youths' sexual exploitation, primarily because of their lack of control while trafficked.

CONCLUSION

Although participants noted relatively easy access to contraception, a number of barriers to condom and hormonal contraceptive use exist. Many of these barriers align with youth identified in other at-risk adolescent populations, however, CSEY also face a number of barriers that might be attributable to their unique experience of commercial sexual exploitation. Contraceptive education that dispels prevailing myths, sets clear expectations regarding side effects, and emphasizes autonomy is most likely to resonate with their world view and experiences.

Pediatric Provider Education and Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception in Adolescents

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric primary care providers prescribe the majority of contraception to adolescents, but they often lack training in long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Our objective was to assess whether a provider education initiative was associated with a change in LARC use for adolescents.

METHOD

Using electronic medical records, we examined LARC use for 7,331 women ages 15 to 21 years with an established primary care provider before and after a provider education initiative on LARC. We used an interrupted time series design to examine trends in LARC use related to the intervention.

RESULTS

Before the intervention, 3.4% to 3.8% of adolescents were using a LARC method, and LARC use was declining by 4 devices/10,000 adolescents per month (95% confidence interval = [-5, -2] per 10,000 adolescents). After the intervention, LARC use stabilized. The number of adolescents using a LARC method increased nonsignificantly at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the intervention.

DISCUSSION

Education of pediatric primary care providers reversed a trend toward decreased use of long-acting reversible contraception.

Self-administered vaginal lidocaine gel for pain management with intrauterine device insertion: a blinded, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

A major barrier to intrauterine device use is fear of pain during insertion. Trials exploring analgesic interventions for intrauterine device insertion have yielded mixed results, and no standardized pain management guidelines currently exist for this procedure. In an abortion-related study, self-administered lidocaine gel over a prolonged time interval showed promise as a method of pain control.

OBJECTIVE(S)

The objective of the study was to assess pain control with intrauterine device insertion after patient-administered lidocaine gel compared with placebo.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a randomized, blinded trial of women undergoing levonorgestrel or copper intrauterine device insertion in an outpatient gynecology clinic between July 2016 and April 2017. Participants self-administered either 20 mL of 2% lidocaine gel or placebo gel vaginally at least 15 minutes prior to intrauterine device insertion. No other analgesics were administered. The primary outcome was pain during intrauterine device insertion, measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale (0 being no pain and 100 being worst pain imaginable). Secondary outcomes included anticipated and baseline pain and pain with speculum insertion and tenaculum placement. In a postprocedure questionnaire, participants reported acceptability of vaginal gel and willingness to wait for pain control. Median values were assessed because of the nonnormal distribution of visual analog scale scores using the Mann-Whitney U test. Predictors of intrauterine device insertion pain were assessed using a multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

In total, 220 women were randomized and 215 were included in analysis (108 in lidocaine gel, 107 in placebo gel groups). Median (range) time from gel administration to speculum insertion was 21 (14-74) and 20 (12-43) minutes in the lidocaine and placebo groups, respectively (P = .13). The median pain scores during intrauterine device insertion were not significantly different: 65 (1-99) mm in the lidocaine group and 59 (5-100) mm in the placebo group (P = .09). Among secondary outcome time points, only median pain scores at speculum insertion were significantly different between the lidocaine and placebo groups (7 [0-81] mm vs 11 [0-80] mm, respectively; P = .046). Anticipated pain and menstrual pain were both predictors of pain with intrauterine device insertion. The majority of women in both groups found the amount of vaginal leakage following gel insertion to be acceptable (>80%). Ninety-two percent of participants (n = 194) stated they would be willing to wait before intrauterine device placement for a potential analgesic effect.

CONCLUSION

Self-administered lidocaine gel at least 15 minutes before intrauterine device insertion does not appear to reduce pain compared with placebo but may help with speculum insertion. We found that women are willing to extend visit time to gain pain control. Self-administration of local anesthetic is acceptable to patients and should be considered in future research.

Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) and the Depo-Provera Shot in Adolescents

The intrauterine devices (IUDs) and the subdermal implant, collectively known as long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC), along with the Depo-Provera shot, represent highly efficacious methods of birth control for all reproductive-age women, including adolescents. They are also safe, private, and convenient, and can be used for their noncontraceptive benefits. Additionally, LARC and Depo-Provera represent methods of contraception that do not contain estrogen and may be safely used in young women who have contraindications to estrogen-containing medications. The LARC methods have traditionally been underused by adolescents due to lack of knowledge and misperceptions about safety and effects on future fertility. However, studies have found that when barriers to the use of LARC are removed, adolescents have increasingly chosen the IUD and implant for birth control and most continue to use these methods with satisfaction. This chapter will provide an overview of IUDs, the subdermal implant and Depo-Provera, address barriers to care for adolescents, efficacy, continuation rates, common side effects and reasons for discontinuation, contraindications, and noncontraceptive benefits.

Use of a novel suction cervical retractor for intrauterine device insertion: a pilot feasibility trial

INTRODUCTION

The Bioceptive suction cervical retractor (SCR) is a novel device that can replace the standard single-tooth tenaculum to place traction on the cervix. A feasibility trial was conducted on the device for intrauterine device (IUD) placement.

METHODS

Our three-stage feasibility process began with Stage 1, where the device was tested on in-vitro and ex-vivo samples. In Stage 2, 10 women received their IUD using the device. In Stage 3, a feasibility trial, we randomly assigned 25 consenting women to receive their IUD using either the Bioceptive SCR or the standard single-tooth tenaculum. In Stages 2 and 3, we collected pain scores using an electronically adapted 100-point visual analogue scale (VAS) at eight timepoints during and after the insertion procedure, as well as satisfaction and acceptability measures. The primary outcome was the pain score after attaching the SCR or tenaculum (VAS 3). Wilcoxon rank sum tests compared pain scores between devices.

RESULTS

In Stage 2, pain scores with the SCR were lower than historical controls with the single-tooth tenaculum. In Stage 3, the median VAS 3 pain scores were 31 and 57 for the intervention and control groups, respectively. The differences in pain scores were not statistically significant but the trend was to lower pain scores with the intervention. Reported patient satisfaction with the SCR device was 80% in Stage 2% and 90% in Stage 3.

CONCLUSIONS

The Bioceptive SCR has potential as an atraumatic alternative to standard cervical retractor devices for gynaecological procedures. These findings can guide point estimates for future clinical studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02283463.