Not all immune-checkpoint inhibitors are created equal: Meta-analysis and systematic review of immune-related adverse events in cancer trials

A comprehensive review of immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment

Immunology-based therapies are emerging as an effective cancer treatment, using the body's immune system to target tumors. Immune checkpoints, which regulate immune responses to prevent tissue damage and autoimmunity, are often exploited by cancer cells to avoid destruction. The discovery of checkpoint proteins like PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 was pivotal in developing cancer immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown great success, with FDA-approved drugs like PD-1 inhibitors (Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Cemiplimab), PD-L1 inhibitors (Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, Avelumab), and CTLA-4 inhibitors (Ipilimumab, Tremelimumab), alongside LAG-3 inhibitor Relatlimab. Research continues on new checkpoints like TIM-3, VISTA, B7-H3, BTLA, and TIGIT. Biomarkers like PDL-1 expression, tumor mutation burden, interferon-γ presence, microbiome composition, and extracellular matrix characteristics play a crucial role in predicting responses to immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors. Despite their effectiveness, not all patients experience the same level of benefit, and organ-specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs) such as rash or itching, colitis, diarrhea, hyperthyroidism, and hypothyroidism may occur. Given the rapid advancements in this field and the variability in patient outcomes, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive review that consolidates the latest findings on immune checkpoint inhibitors, covering their clinical status, biomarkers, resistance mechanisms, strategies to overcome resistance, and associated adverse effects. This review aims to fill this gap by providing an analysis of the current clinical status of ICIs, emerging biomarkers, mechanisms of resistance, strategies to enhance therapeutic efficacy, and assessment of adverse effects. This review is crucial to furthering our understanding of ICIs and optimizing their application in cancer therapy.

Risk Factors and Prognostic Analysis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Colitis in Lung Cancer

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related colitis and its impact on prognosis in the treatment of lung cancer.

Methods

This retrospective, single-center, observational study included lung cancer patients who received ICIs treatment between January 2016 and January 2022. The correlation between immune-related colitis and prognosis was evaluated. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the median overall survival (OS).

Results

Among the lung cancer patients treated with ICIs, the incidence of colitis was 5.88% (35/595). The severity of colitis was graded as follows: grade 1 (8 cases), grade 2 (15 cases), grade 3 (9 cases), and grade 4 (3 cases). Except for the 1 case that resulted in death due to grade 4 adverse events, the remaining patients showed significant improvement after corticosteroid intervention. Among the 35 patients with ICI-related colitis, complete remission was not achieved. Partial remission was observed in 11 cases, disease stability in 16 cases, disease progression in 7 cases, and death in 1 case. Among the included patients, 19 chose to continue ICI treatment after symptom relief. The overall survival for all participants was 34 months (IQR: 24-36), while the overall survival for those who received ICI treatment again was 36 months (IQR: 32-NA), and for those who did not receive ICI treatment again was 32 months (IQR: 21-35). Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed that patients who received ICI treatment again had significantly better overall survival compared to other patients.

Conclusion

Immune-related colitis remains a significant concern in lung cancer patients treated with ICIs and requires close monitoring and timely intervention. Restarting treatment after symptom relief can provide additional benefits for patients.

The gut microbiome modulate response to immunotherapy in cancer

Gut microbiota have been reported to play an important role in the occurrence and development of malignant tumors. Currently, clinical studies have identified specific gut microbiota and its metabolites associated with efficacy of immunotherapy in multiple types of cancers. Preclinical investigations have elucidated that gut microbiota modulate the antitumor immunity and affect the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. Certain microbiota and its metabolites may favorably remodel the tumor microenvironment by engaging innate and/or adaptive immune cells. Understanding how the gut microbiome interacts with cancer immunotherapy opens new avenues for improving treatment strategies. Fecal microbial transplants, probiotics, dietary interventions, and other strategies targeting the microbiota have shown promise in preclinical studies to enhance the immunotherapy. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating these approaches. This review presents the recent advancements in understanding the dynamic interplay among the host immunity, the microbiome, and cancer immunotherapy, as well as strategies for modulating the microbiome, with a view to translating into clinical applications.

A Retrospective Analysis of the Prognostic Factors and Adverse Events in the Treatment of Mucosal Melanoma in a Single Centre

Background: Despite the dramatic advances in the management of metastatic cutaneous melanoma, there remains no consensus-based, evidence-based strategy for the management of mucosal melanoma. The rare nature of the disease, its late clinical presentation, and distinct tumour biology all complicate efforts to optimise patient outcomes. Methods: To this end, we carried out a monocentric, retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with mucosal melanoma and treated between 2013 and 2021. Both tumour- and patient-specific characteristics were recorded, in addition to immune-related adverse events, in order to provide real-world data on disease progression, treatment efficacy, and the identification of prognostic markers. Results: A total of 20 patients were identified (14 females and 6 males), with a mean age at diagnosis of 65.9 years. The median follow-up was 3.9 years (95% CI 1.4-6.4 years) from the initiation of systemic therapy. The median OS in the entire cohort was 1.9 years (95% CI 0.5-3.3 years). Performance status, sex, body mass index, and the presence of brain metastases were not associated with poorer outcomes. However, serum lactate dehydrogenase levels (LDH) (p = 0.04) and an NRAS mutation were markers of a poor prognosis (p = 0.004). Conclusuion: There is a pressing need for real-world, prospective, and clinical trial data to inform the optimal management of mucosal melanoma, and data supporting the use of adjuvant and neo-adjuvant immunotherapy are currently lacking. However, an elevated LDH is a reliable, independent negative prognostic marker. Inter-disciplinary management remains essential in order to develop optimal treatment strategies.

Pituitary-related immune adverse events induced by programmed death Protein-1 inhibitors differ clinically from hypophysitis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to elucidate the clinical features of pituitary immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by PD-1 inhibitors in a Chinese cohort and the previous literatures.

PATIENTS AND DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS

We retrospectively analysed the clinical manifestations, laboratory examination findings, imaging features and treatments of 14 patients with pituitary irAEs caused by PD-1 inhibitors in our cohort. In addition, we searched PubMed for all English articles on pituitary irAEs induced by PD-1 inhibitors published from 1950 to 2023. A total of 47 articles were included, and the clinical characteristics of 94 patients with pituitary irAEs induced by PD-1 inhibitors in these literatures were compared to the characteristics of our cohort.

RESULTS

Among the 14 patients in our cohort with pituitary irAEs induced by PD-1 inhibitors, 12 patients (85.71%, 12/14) exhibited isolated ACTH deficiency (IAD), 100.0% (14/14) of the central adrenocortical insufficiency, and 2 patients showed more than one hypothalamic-pituitary axis injury (14.29%, 2/14). Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging in all the 14 patients showed no pituitary enlargement. In previous studies we reviewed, 82.98% of the total (78/94) presented with pituitary irAEs as IAD, 100.0% (94/94) of the central adrenocortical insufficiency, and 78.33% of the patients showed no abnormality of the pituitary gland (47/60). The pituitary irAEs caused by PD-1 inhibitors did not involve typical manifestations of hypophysitis, such as pituitary enlargement, headache, visual field defects, and multiple pituitary function impairments in our cohort and the previous literatures.

CONCLUSION

In our study, pituitary immune-related adverse reactions induced by PD-1 inhibitors mainly manifested isolated ACTH deficiency rather than hypophysitis.

Delayed immune-related adverse events in long-responders of immunotherapy: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) often cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The spectrum of irAEs and their managements has been partially clarified, however the knowledge on time-course of irAEs is not well understood.

METHODS

A retrospective study based on the medical record was performed. The study subjects were consisting of patients with various types of solid tumors for whom ICIs (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, durvalumab, atezolizumab, nivolumab plus ipilimumab) were used between April 2016 and October 2021. We focused on irAEs developed more than 1-year after commencement ICIs (delayed irAE group) and compared with irAEs developed within 1-year (non-delayed irAE group) in terms of types and severity of irAEs.

RESULTS

A total of 336 patients were enrolled in the study. Eighty-eight patients (26.2%) developed irAEs and 248 did not. Most of the patients developing irAEs were treated using PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors. Eighty-one patients (24.1%) in non-delayed irAE group and 7 patients (2.1%) in delayed irAE group developed irAEs. The median onset of irAEs in the delayed irAE group was 18.6 months (range: 13.5-24.3). The types of irAEs observed in delayed irAE group were dermatitis (2 cases), pneumonitis (2 cases), nephritis (1 case), arthritis (1 case), and gastritis (1 case). The severity of irAEs was almost mild (≤G2), but one patient (.3%) developed G3 nephritis.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors frequently caused various irAEs but their severities were mostly tolerable. Few patients developed delayed irAE with mild toxities.

Immunotherapy for endometrial cancer

Advanced recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) has a poor prognosis and new treatment options are needed. In 2013, EC was classified by genomic analysis into four groups: the POLE ultra-mutated group, the MSI-high hypermutated group (MSI-H), the copy number low group, and the copy number high group. The prognosis differs based on the classification, which should enable the individualization of treatment. The MSI-H and POLE types can induce PD-L1 expression in cancer cells. Among the gynecological cancers, EC exhibits the highest levels of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression and has the highest proportion of MSI-H. Thus, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is expected to be effective. The first ICI to show efficacy in recurrent EC was the anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab, which exhibited efficacy in MSI-H EC. The combination of pembrolizumab and the multi-kinase inhibitor lenvatinib significantly prolongs OS/PFS compared with single-agent chemotherapy in previously treated recurrent EC, regardless of MSI status. ICIs are now moving from second-line and beyond to first-line treatment regimens. The efficacy of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) and ICI combinations compared with TC have been demonstrated, including an ongoing Phase III trial comparing chemotherapy with the combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib. Although ICIs are becoming the mainstay of EC, they cause systemic inflammatory side effects known as irAEs. The incidence of irAEs is higher for combination therapy with CT or lenvatinib compared with ICI therapy alone. Even though they are rarely fatal, irAEs should be addressed promptly.

Microsatellite Instability, Mismatch Repair, and Tumor Mutation Burden in Lung Cancer

Since US Food and Drug Administration approval of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) as the first companion diagnostic for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small cell lung cancer, many patients have experienced increased overall survival. To improve selection of ICI responders versus nonresponders, microsatellite instability/mismatch repair deficiency (MSI/MMR) and tumor mutation burden (TMB) came into play. Clinical data show PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and TMB are independent predictive immunotherapy biomarkers. Harmonization of testing methodologies, optimization of assay design, and results analysis are ongoing. Future algorithms to determine immunotherapy eligibility might involve complementary use of current and novel biomarkers. Artificial intelligence could facilitate algorithm implementation to convert complex genetic data into recommendations for specific ICIs.

The nutrition-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review

AIMS

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy used for lung cancer has significantly changed response and survival rates, however, the impact on patients' nutritional status remains largely unexplored. This review aims to identify common adverse events that increase nutrition risk induced in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and assess impact on nutritional status.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline and CINAHL were systematically searched in September 2023 for randomised controlled trials comparing immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment of non-small cell lung cancer to a control group. Treatment-related adverse events that increased nutrition impact symptoms identified in the patient-generated subjective global assessment and clinical guidelines were extracted and qualitatively analysed. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.

RESULTS

Eleven eligible randomised controlled trial studies were identified and analysed. The data demonstrated immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment was associated with a lower percentage of reported nutrition impact symptoms, for example, decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, compared to chemotherapy treatment. Conversely, immune checkpoint inhibitor treated patients recorded a greater percentage of immune-related adverse events that alter metabolism or nutrient absorption.

CONCLUSION

Non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors still experience nutrition impact symptoms but less frequently than patients treated with chemotherapy. This combined with unique nutrition-related consequences from colitis and thyroid disorders induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy indicates patients should be screened, assessed and interventions implemented to improve nutrition.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in Cancer patients with rheumatologic preexisting autoimmune diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with rheumatologic preexisting autoimmune disease (PAD) have not been enrolled in clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, the risks and benefits of ICI therapy in such patients are unclear. Herein, we investigated the safety and efficacy of ICIs in rheumatologic PAD patients through a meta-analysis.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched for additional studies. We analyzed the following data through Stata software: incidence of total irAEs (TirAEs), rate of flares, incidence of new on-set irAEs, rate of discontinuation, objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).

RESULTS

We identified 23 articles including 643 patients with rheumatologic PAD. The pooled incidences of TirAEs, flares and new-onset irAEs were 64% (95% CI 55%-72%), 41% (95% CI 31%-50%), and 33% (95% CI 28%-38%), respectively. In terms of severity, the incidences were 7% (95% CI 2%-14%) for Grade 3-4 flares and 12% (95% CI 9%-15%) for Grade 3-4 new-onset irAEs. Patients with RA had a greater risk of flares than patients with other rheumatologic PADs did (RR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.03-1.77). The ORR and DCR were 30% and 44%, respectively. Baseline anti-rheumatic treatment was not significantly associated with the frequency of flares (RR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.63-1.77) or the ORR (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.12-1.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with rheumatologic PAD, particularly those with RA, are susceptible to relapse of their rheumatologic disease following ICI therapy. ICIs are also effective for treating rheumatologic PAD patients. PROSPECTIVE REGISTER OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (PROSPERO): number CRD 42,023,439,702.

Off-label prescribing of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy at a single pediatric cancer center

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved outcomes in a variety of adult cancers and are prescribed with increasing frequency across oncology. However, patterns of off-label use of ICI in pediatrics remain unclear.

METHODS

This is a single-institution, retrospective cohort study evaluating off-label ICI use in pediatric and young adult patients with cancer treated at our institution from 2014 to 2022. Response was based on clinician assessment derived from clinical records. Immune-related adverse events (iRAEs) were classified according to CTCAE v5.0.

RESULTS

We identified 50 unique patients treated with off-label ICI (28 with solid tumors, 20 with central nervous system (CNS) tumors, 2 with hematologic malignancies). At time of ICI initiation, only five patients (10%) had localized disease, and all but one patient was treated in the relapsed/refractory setting. All patients were treated with the FDA-approved weight-based dosing recommendations. Overall, there was disease control in 21 patients (42%), with best response including one complete response (melanoma), two partial responses (high-grade glioma, CNS nongerminomatous germ cell tumor), and 18 patients with stable disease. Forty-four patients (88%) eventually experienced disease progression. Among 22 patients (44%) experiencing iRAEs, 10 (20%) had a grade ≥3 irAE, 12 (24%) required corticosteroids, and 14 (28%) required ICI discontinuation. irAE occurrence was associated with significantly improved progression-free survival (HR 0.35; 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.68; p = 0.002) and overall survival (HR 0.33; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.66; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

At our institution, ICI was most commonly prescribed in the relapsed/refractory setting to patients with metastatic disease. The treatment was generally well-tolerated in the pediatric population. The overall response rate was low, and the majority of patients eventually experienced disease progression. A few patients, however, had durable treatment responses. Further studies are needed to identify which pediatric patients are most likely to benefit from ICI.

Hemorrhage profile associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and a real-world study based on the FAERS database

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the risk of hemorrhage associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) and characterize its clinical features.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of hemorrhage related to ICIs and calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Pharmacovigilance studies were conducted by collecting ICIs-related hemorrhage cases from the FAERS database and assessing disproportionalities by reporting odds ratios (RORs) and information components (ICs).

RESULTS

A total of 79 RCTs involving 45,100 patients were finally included in the systematic review, with four published RCTs (n = 1965) and 75 unpublished RCTs (n = 43135). The primary analysis showed no significant difference in ICIs compared to the control group (OR 1.18 [95% CI 1.00-1.38], p = 0.05). In subgroup analyses, anti-PD-L1 combined with anti-CTLA-4 increased the risk of hemorrhage (OR 1.95, p = 0.03), and anti-CTLA-4 increased the risk of hemorrhage in the gastrointestinal system (OR 2.23, p = 0.04). 3555 cases of hemorrhage from the FAERS database were included in the disproportionate analysis, and the result suggested that ICIs increased the risk of hemorrhage (IC025 = 0.23).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that ICIs increase the risk of hemorrhage, and in particular, anti-CTLA-4 significantly increases the risk of hemorrhage in the gastrointestinal system.

Incidence of immune-related adverse events in U.S. veterans treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are associated with potentially severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Emerging clinical practice reports have suggested higher incidence of irAEs in real-world settings than initially observed in phase III clinical trials. Objectives were to determine the incidence of irAEs associated with ICIs in a clinical population, the Veterans Health Administration, characterize their time to onset, and explore potential risk factors.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included patients from eight Midwest VA medical centers who initiated an ICI between January 1, 2014, and June 30, 2022. Courses of incident prednisone therapy lasting at least seven days at a dose ≥ 20 mg/day were used to identify irAEs, within two years following ICI initiation. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to explore potential irAE risk factors.

RESULTS

Of 1314 patients, the incidence of irAEs was 19.8%, with most (86.5%) occurring within one year of ICI initiation. Monthly incidence rates peaked three months following ICI initiation at 3.0% and decreased thereafter. Female gender (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-4.00) and combination therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab (HR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.44-4.21) were significantly associated with irAE incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings are consistent with recent studies in clinical populations that demonstrate higher irAE incidence rates than originally reported in clinical trials. Our findings may enhance prompt recognition and treatment of irAEs for VA patients.

Safety and effectiveness of combination versus monotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases

Patients with preexisting autoimmune disease (pAID) are generally excluded from clinical trials for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for cancer due to concern of flaring pAID. In this multi-center, retrospective observational study, we compared safety of ICI combination (two ICI agents) versus monotherapy in cancer patients with pAIDs. The primary outcome was time to AEs (immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and/or pAID flares), with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival as secondary outcomes. Sixty-four of 133 patients (48%) received ICI combination and 69 (52%) monotherapy. Most had melanoma (32%) and lung cancer (31%). Most common pAIDs were rheumatic (28%) and dermatologic (23%). Over a median follow-up of 15 months (95%CI, 11-18 mo), the cumulative incidence of any-grade irAEs was higher for combination compared to monotherapy (subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) 2.27, 95%CI 1.35-3.82). No statistically significant difference was observed in high-grade irAEs (sHR 2.31 (0.95-5.66), P = .054) or the cumulative incidence of pAID flares. There was no statistically significant difference for melanoma PFS between combination versus monotherapy (23.2 vs. 17.1mo, P = .53). The combination group was more likely to discontinue or hold ICI, but > 50% of the combination group was still able to continue ICI therapy. No treatment-related deaths occurred. In our cohort with pAIDs, patients had a tolerable toxicity profile with ICI combination therapy. Our results support the use of ICI combination if deemed necessary for cancer therapy in patients with pAIDs, since the ICI toxicities were comparable to monotherapy, able to be effectively managed and mostly did not require ICI interruption.

Testing a Model of Care for Patients on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Based on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Protocol for a Randomized Phase II Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Management of severe symptomatic immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) related to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be facilitated by timely detection. As patients face a heterogeneous set of symptoms outside the clinical setting, remotely monitoring and assessing symptoms by using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may result in shorter delays between symptom onset and clinician detection.

OBJECTIVE

We assess the effect of a model of care for remote patient monitoring and symptom management based on PRO data on the time to detection of symptomatic IrAEs from symptom onset. The secondary objectives are to assess its effects on the time between symptomatic IrAE detection and intervention, IrAE grade (severity), health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, and overall survival at 6 months.

METHODS

For this study, 198 patients with cancer receiving systemic treatment comprising ICIs exclusively will be recruited from 2 Swiss university hospitals. Patients are randomized (1:1) to a digital model of care (intervention) or usual care (control group). Patients are enrolled for 6 months, and they use an electronic app to complete weekly Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General questionnaire and PROMIS (PROs Measurement Information System) Self-Efficacy to Manage Symptoms questionnaires. The intervention patient group completes a standard set of 37 items in a weekly PROs version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) questionnaire, and active symptoms are reassessed daily for the first 3 months by using a modified 24-hour recall period. Patients can add items from the full PRO-CTCAE item library to their questionnaire. Nurses call patients in the event of new or worsening symptoms and manage them by using a standardized triage algorithm based on the United Kingdom Oncology Nursing Society 24-hour triage tool. This algorithm provides guidance on deciding if patients should receive in-person care, if monitoring should be increased, or if self-management education should be reinforced.

RESULTS

The Institut Suisse de Recherche Expérimentale sur le Cancer Foundation and Kaiku Health Ltd funded this study. Active recruitment began since November 2021 and is projected to conclude in November 2023. Trial results are expected to be published in the first quarter of 2024 and will be disseminated through publications submitted at international scientific conferences.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial is among the first trials to use PRO data to directly influence routine care of patients treated with ICIs and addresses some limitations in previous studies. This trial collects a wider spectrum of self-reported symptom data daily. There are some methodological limitations brought by changes in evolving treatment standards for patients with cancer. This trial's results could entail further academic discussions on the challenges of diagnosing and managing symptoms associated with treatment remotely by providing further insights into the burden symptoms represent to patients and highlight the complexity of care procedures involved in managing symptomatic IrAEs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05530187; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05530187.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/48386.

Incidence, mortality, and risk factors of acute kidney injury after immune checkpoint inhibitors: Systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world evidence

BACKGROUND

To precisely quantify the incidence, mortality, and risk factors for acute kidney injury (AKI) following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment for cancer in real-world scenarios.

METHODS

Comprehensive searches were performed on PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library. Real-world observational studies reporting incidence, mortality and/or factors for AKI in ICI-treated patients were eligible. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI for potential predictors and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI for mortality risk associated with AKI were calculated using the random-effect model.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles comprising 12,111 patients receiving ICI were finally eligible. The pooled incidence was 16.0% (95% CI 11.2%-20.8%; n = 15) for AKI following ICI therapies overall and 3.5% (95% CI 2.1%-4.9%; n = 8) for ICI-induced AKI. Patients who developed AKI during ICI therapies had 51% increased risk of death compared with those without (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.07-2.14). Regarding risk factors, statistically increased risk for AKI during ICI therapies was observed with preexisting chronic kidney diseases (OR 1.86, 1.25-2.78), diabetes (OR 1.26, 1.04-1.53), and concomitant extrarenal immune-related adverse events (OR 2.53, 1.79-3.56). Ipilimumab (OR 2.18, 1.43-3.32), combined ICI therapies (OR 1.80, 1.14-2.83) and concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (OR 1.97, 1.56-2.49), renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (OR 1.50, 1.05-2.14), diuretics (OR 1.69, 1.27-2.26) also significantly predicted the incident AKI.

CONCLUSIONS

AKI episode is frequently observed during ICI exposure for cancer treatment, but ICI induced nephrotoxicity is only occasionally. Higher risk of AKI during ICI therapies was significantly associated with specific comorbidities, concomitant of certain drugs, ipilimumab and ICI combination therapies.

T-cell receptor beta variable gene polymorphism predicts immune-related adverse events during checkpoint blockade immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer treatment. However, they are associated with a unique spectrum of side effects, called immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can cause significant morbidity and quickly progress to severe or life-threatening events if not treated promptly. Identifying predictive biomarkers for irAEs before immunotherapy initiation is therefore a critical area of research. Polymorphisms within the T-cell receptor beta (TCRB) variable (TRBV) gene have been implicated in autoimmune disease and may be mechanistically linked to irAEs. However, the repetitive nature of the TCRB locus and incomplete genome assembly has hampered the evaluation of TRBV polymorphisms in the past.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used a novel method for long-amplicon next generation sequencing of rearranged TCRB chains from peripheral blood total RNA to evaluate the link between TRBV polymorphisms and irAEs in patients treated with immunotherapy for cancer. We employed multiplex PCR to create amplicons spanning the three beta chain complementarity-determining regions (CDR) regions to enable detection of polymorphism within the germline-encoded framework and CDR1 and CDR2 regions in addition to CDR3 profiling. Resultant amplicons were sequenced via the Ion Torrent and TRBV allele profiles constructed for each individual was correlated with irAE annotations to identify haplotypes associated with severe irAEs (≥ grade 3).

RESULTS

Our study included 81 patients who had irAEs when treated with immunotherapy for cancer. By using principal component analysis of the 81 TRBV allele profiles followed by k-means clustering, we identified six major TRBV haplotypes. Strikingly, we found that one-third of this cohort possessed a TRBV allele haplotype that appeared to be protective against severe irAEs.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that long-amplicon TCRB repertoire sequencing can potentially identify TRBV haplotype groups that correlate with the risk of severe irAEs. Germline-encoded TRBV polymorphisms may serve as a predictive biomarker of severe irAEs.

Toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic study

BACKGROUND

Available evidence shows that the incidence of toxicities associated with cancer immunotherapy, such as programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1)-related toxicities, is estimated to be between 0.3 and 1.3%.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to investigate cancer patients' susceptibility to toxicities associated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and establish a clinically relevant landscape of side effects of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant publications from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) between 2014 and 2019.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS

We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting treatment-related toxicities associated with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of cancers. The primary endpoint was to assess the difference in the incidences of toxicities between cancer patients who did and did not receive PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. A total of 29 RCTs, incorporating 8576 patients, met the eligibility criteria.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

We calculated the pooled relative risks and corresponding 95% CIs using a random-effects model and assessed the heterogeneity between different groups. The subgroup analyses were conducted based on cancer type, toxicity grade (severity), system and organ, treatment regimens in the intervention arm and the control arm, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor drug type, and cancer type.

RESULTS

A total of 11 categories (e.g. endocrine toxicity), and 39 toxicity types (e.g. hyperthyroidism) were identified. For toxicities at any grade, those treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were at lower risks for gastrointestinal toxicity, hematologic toxicity, and treatment event leading to discontinuation; and were at higher risks for respiratory toxicity (all P <0.05). Those treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were at lower risks for fatigue, asthenia, and peripheral edema and were at higher risks for pyrexia, cough, dyspnea, pneumonitis, and pruritus.

LIMITATIONS

The present research is a meta-analysis at the study level rather than at the patient level; insights on risk factors associated with the development of toxicities cannot be found in our study. There was a possible overlap in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) definitions which prevents understanding the true rates of specific toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

For most toxicity types based on system and organ, the incidence proportions for patients in the intervention arm were lower than those in the control arm, which suggested the general safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors against conventional chemotherapy and cytotoxic t-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors. Future research should focus on taking effective targeted measures to decrease the risks of different toxicities for different patient populations.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

We registered the research protocol with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42019135113).

Selective immune suppression using interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors for management of immune-related adverse events

BACKGROUND

Management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is important as they cause treatment interruption or discontinuation, more often seen with combination immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Here, we retrospectively evaluated the safety and effectiveness of anti-interleukin-6 receptor (anti-IL-6R) as therapy for irAEs.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective multicenter study evaluating patients diagnosed with de novo irAEs or flare of pre-existing autoimmune disease following ICI and were treated with anti-IL-6R. Our objectives were to assess the improvement of irAEs as well as the overall tumor response rate (ORR) before and after anti-IL-6R treatment.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 92 patients who received therapeutic anti-IL-6R antibodies (tocilizumab or sarilumab). Median age was 61 years, 63% were men, 69% received anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibodies alone, and 26% patients were treated with the combination of anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies. Cancer types were primarily melanoma (46%), genitourinary cancer (35%), and lung cancer (8%). Indications for using anti-IL-6R antibodies included inflammatory arthritis (73%), hepatitis/cholangitis (7%), myositis/myocarditis/myasthenia gravis (5%), polymyalgia rheumatica (4%), and one patient each with autoimmune scleroderma, nephritis, colitis, pneumonitis and central nervous system vasculitis. Notably, 88% of patients had received corticosteroids, and 36% received other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as first-line therapies, but without adequate improvement. After initiation of anti-IL-6R (as first-line or post-corticosteroids and DMARDs), 73% of patients showed resolution or change to ≤grade 1 of irAEs after a median of 2.0 months from initiation of anti-IL-6R therapy. Six patients (7%) stopped anti-IL-6R due to adverse events. Of 70 evaluable patients by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) V.1.1 criteria; the ORR was 66% prior versus 66% after anti-IL-6R (95% CI, 54% to 77%), with 8% higher complete response rate. Of 34 evaluable patients with melanoma, the ORR was 56% prior and increased to 68% after anti-IL-6R (p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Targeting IL-6R could be an effective approach to treat several irAE types without hindering antitumor immunity. This study supports ongoing clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab (anti-IL-6R antibody) in combination with ICIs (NCT04940299, NCT03999749).

Safety profile of immune checkpoint inhibitors according to cancer type

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer treatment in recent years, but have led to the emergence of new so-called immune-related adverse events (irAE). The objective of this study was to determine whether cancer type is a potential predictive factor of irAEs.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who had started an ICI treatment between 2019 and 2020 at the Grenoble Alpes University Hospital. A logistic regression model and a Fine and Gray survival model with death as a competing risk were used to identify variables associated with grade≥2 irAEs and grade≥2 irAEs-free survival.

RESULTS

Of the 512 patients included, 160 (31.2%) had a grade≥2 irAE. Grade≥2 irAEs were less frequent in head and neck cancer compared to other cancers. Ipilimumab (odds ratio [OR]: 6.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.81-13.7), treatment duration (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.01-1.02), and history of autoimmune disease (OR: 6.04; 95% CI: 2.45-16.5) were independently associated with grade≥2 irAEs. With death as a competing risk, grade≥2 irAEs-free survival was independently improved with treatment duration (subdistribution hazard ratio [sdHR]: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.92-0.94), ipilimumab (sdHR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.1-0.59) and history of autoimmune disease (sdHR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.08-0.69) whereas it was poorer for patients with performance status≥2 (sdHR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.5-2.76) and an older age (sdHR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.03).

CONCLUSION

Ipilimumab and history of autoimmune disease were both associated with the presence of grade≥2 irAEs and grade≥2 irAEs-free survival. The different cancer groups were not.

Progress and Challenges of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Hypophysitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a new type of antitumor drug which can achieve antitumor goals by blocking the binding of immune checkpoints to their ligands, thereby enhancing the activity of T cells. Meanwhile, ICIs block the binding of immune checkpoints to their ligands, disrupting the immune tolerance of T cells to self-antigens, which may lead to a series of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced hypophysitis (IH) is a relatively rare irAE. Due to the lack of specificity in clinical manifestations, it is difficult to accurately diagnose IH in a timely manner in clinical practice. However, the risk of adverse events, especially IH, for patients receiving ICIs has not been adequately investigated. Missed or delayed diagnosis may lead to poor prognosis or even adverse clinical outcomes. In this article, we summarize the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment of IH.

Use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of patients with cancer and preexisting autoimmune disease: An integrative review

INTRODUCTION

Checkpoint inhibitors (PCI) have reached an important place in the pharmaceutical market in the treatment of various types of cancer. However, due to immune-related adverse events (IRAE) to the treatment, patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases (PAD) are excluded from clinical studies, leading to a large gap in knowledge on this topic. This study aims to discuss the use of PCI in the patients with cancer and PAD by an integrative review.

METHODS

For this integrative review we carried out research from 2013 to 2022 using database platforms for observational studies reporting data from safety and efficacy of PCI in patients with cancer and PAD.

RESULTS

The search resulted in 161 articles and after applying the exclusion criteria, 15 clinical studies that adopted a retrospective observational design were selected and analyzed. The age range of patients was 54-71 years, with 19-68% male. The proportion of patients clinically active or receiving immunosuppressants who were initiated on PCI ranged from 0% to 57% and 14% to 73%, respectively. The mean reported follow-up time ranged from 8.0 to 16.8 months. The occurrence of an outbreak or the new IRAE had an average of 32.6%.

CONCLUSION

IRAE are frequent in patients who use PCI and have cancer and PAD, carrying discontinuation of therapy. However, the multidisciplinary team needs to be aligned to manage these situations in the best way.

Targeting Cancer Metabolism to Improve Outcomes with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment paradigm of several cancers. However, not all patients respond to treatment. Tumor cells reprogram metabolic pathways to facilitate growth and proliferation. This shift in metabolic pathways creates fierce competition with immune cells for nutrients in the tumor microenvironment and generates by-products harmful for immune cell differentiation and growth. In this review, we discuss these metabolic alterations and the current therapeutic strategies to mitigate these alterations to metabolic pathways that can be used in combination with checkpoint blockade to offer a new path forward in cancer management.

Immune-Checkpoint Induced Skin Toxicity Masked as Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Case Report on Mimickers of Dermatological Toxicity with PD-1 Inhibition

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are increasingly the mainstay of oncology treatment. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) from ICI therapy differ from cytotoxic adverse events. Cutaneous irAEs are one of the most common irAEs and require careful attention to optimize the quality of life for oncology patients.

PATIENT AND METHODS

These are two cases of patients with advanced solid-tumour malignancies treated with PD-1 inhibitor therapy.

RESULTS

Both patients developed multiple pruritic hyperkeratotic lesions, which were initially diagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma from skin biopsies. The presentation as squamous cell carcinoma was atypical and, upon further pathology review, the lesions were more in keeping with a lichenoid immune reaction stemming from the immune checkpoint blockade. With the use of oral or topical steroids and immunomodulators, the lesions resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

These cases emphasize that patients on PD-1 inhibitor therapy who develop lesions resembling squamous cell carcinoma on initial pathology may require an additional pathology review to assess for immune-mediated reactions, allowing appropriate immunosuppressive therapy to be initiated.

Impaired tolerance to the autoantigen LL-37 in acute coronary syndrome

Background

LL-37 is the only member of the cathelicidin family of antimicrobial peptides in humans and is an autoantigen in several autoimmune diseases and in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In this report, we profiled the specific T cell response to the autoimmune self-antigen LL-37 and investigated the factors modulating the response in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of healthy subjects and ACS patients.

Methods and results

The activation induced marker (AIM) assay demonstrated differential T cell profiles characterized by the persistence of CD134 and CD137, markers that impair tolerance and promote immune effector and memory response, in ACS compared to Controls. Specifically, CD8+CD69+CD137+ T cells were significantly increased by LL-37 stimulation in ACS PBMCs. T effector cell response to LL-37 were either HLA dependent or independent as determined by blocking with monoclonal antibody to either Class-I HLA or Class-II HLA. Blocking of immune checkpoints PD-1 and CTLA-4 demonstrated the control of self-reactive T cell response to LL-37 was modulated predominantly by CTLA-4. Platelets from healthy controls down-modulated CD8+CD69+CD137+ T cell response to LL-37 in autologous PBMCs. CD8+CD69+CD137+ T cell AIM profile negatively correlated with platelet count in ACS patients.

Conclusions

Our report demonstrates that the immune response to the autoantigen LL-37 in ACS patients is characterized specifically by CD8+CD69+CD137+ T cell AIM profile with persistent T cell activation and the generation of immunologic memory. The results provide potentially novel insight into mechanistic pathways of antigen-specific immune signaling in ACS.

Cutaneous manifestations associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies that block key mediators of tumor-mediated immune evasion. The frequency of its use has increased rapidly and has extended to numerous cancers. ICIs target immune checkpoint molecules, such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), PD ligand 1 (PD-L1), and T cell activation, including cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4). However, ICI-driven alterations in the immune system can induce various immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that affect multiple organs. Among these, cutaneous irAEs are the most common and often the first to develop. Skin manifestations are characterized by a wide range of phenotypes, including maculopapular rash, psoriasiform eruption, lichen planus-like eruption, pruritus, vitiligo-like depigmentation, bullous diseases, alopecia, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. In terms of pathogenesis, the mechanism of cutaneous irAEs remains unclear. Still, several hypotheses have been proposed, including activation of T cells against common antigens in normal tissues and tumor cells, increased release of proinflammatory cytokines associated with immune-related effects in specific tissues/organs, association with specific human leukocyte antigen variants and organ-specific irAEs, and acceleration of concurrent medication-induced drug eruptions. Based on recent literature, this review provides an overview of each ICI-induced skin manifestation and epidemiology and focuses on the mechanisms underlying cutaneous irAEs.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Primary Hyperparathyroidism in a Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patient: A Case Report

Immunotherapy is increasingly being used in the treatment of tumors. Adverse effects, however, are not uncommon, with the most common immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) including rash, fatigue, anemia, diarrhea, constipation, and elevated transaminase, among others. Rare IrAEs, which may include thrombocytopenia, hypoparathyroidism, pancreatitis glomerulonephritis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and celiac disease, may also present. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) has not yet been reported on, and no research currently exists regarding its pathogenesis. We describe how a 50-year-old man diagnosed with advanced small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) developed severe PHPT after receiving the programmed cell death (PD)-1 inhibitor camrelizumab. The patient eventually died of respiratory failure and a progressive malignancy. We speculate that the hypercalcemia and hypophosphatemia observed in this case were secondary to ICI-induced PHPT. Although fatal PHPT is rare, early intervention may reduce the risk of future complications. Therefore, further exploration of the underlying mechanisms is needed to guide solutions.

Arrhythmic events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy: A real‐world study based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database

BACKGROUND

Although arrhythmias have been reported in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the association between arrhythmias and ICIs has not been thoroughly evaluated in real-world studies. We aimed to describe the major features of ICI-related arrhythmic events and identify the factors that contributed to death.

METHODS

A disproportionality analysis was performed using data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from January 2011 to December 2021. Reporting odds ratios (RORs), proportional reporting ratio and information component were used to assess whether adverse arrhythmic events were associated with ICIs. The clinical characteristics of patients with ICI-associated arrhythmias were compared with fatal and non-fatal arrhythmias. The time to onset (TTO), fatality rates of arrhythmic events were also investigated.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 1945 cases of ICI-related arrhythmic events. Men (64.78%) were identified significantly more frequently than women (28.84%). The median age was 68 years ([interquartile range, IQR] 60-75 years). Anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) were associated with adverse arrhythmic events, corresponding to ROR 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.17) and ROR 1.34 (95% CI 1.20-1.49), respectively. However, anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 or combination immunotherapy did not appear to be associated with arrhythmic events. Atrial fibrillation (N  = 576, 0.62%), cardiac arrest (N  = 284, 0.31%), tachycardia (N  = 175, 0.19%) were the most common adverse arrhythmic events. Sudden death and complete atrioventricular block are adverse events that are significantly associated with ICI-related arrhythmic events and have strong signal intensity. The TTO of cases that resulted in death (30 days [IQR] 11-73.75) was significantly earlier than that of cases that did not result in death (33 days [IQR 10.5-88.5], p  = 0.003). ICI-related arrhythmic events were severe with death occurring in 507 (26.07%) of 1945 arrhythmias cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 may cause arrhythmic events, which are severe and tend to occur early on during treatment. It is important to identify ICI-related arrhythmias as early as possible, and to manage them appropriately.

Neuro-ophthalmic complications of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Current status and future directions

Since 2011, use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in cancer immunotherapy dramatically expanded, both alone and in combination with either a different cancer treatment or with two different ICIs. With this increase in use have come a myriad of adverse effects from enhanced immune activation, including ophthalmic and neurologic immune related adverse events (irAE). Neuro-ophthalmic immune related adverse events (NOirAE) associated with use of ICIs are increasingly recognized and their severity may actually limit use of potentially life-saving immunotherapy. NOirAEs comprise a wide variety of presentations involving both the central and peripheral nervous system. They cause afferent or efferent visual dysfunction, including among them optic neuropathy and edema, orbital inflammatory disease, and ocular myasthenia. While treatment for irAEs typically involves immunosuppression with corticosteroids, there is no expert consensus regarding best practices for treatment of NOirAEs and whether to stop ICI immunotherapy for the cancer or not. This state-of-the-art review explores the pathophysiologic basis for NOirAEs, provides a framework for categorizing them within neuro-ophthalmology, and discusses what is needed to close the current knowledge gaps in diagnosis and management of an increasing population of cancer patients requiring neuro-ophthalmic care.

Immune-related adverse events in patients with pre-existing autoimmune rheumatologic disease on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) enhance the immune system’s ability to target and destroy cancer cells, but this non-specific immune overactivation can result in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Patients with underlying autoimmune diseases were excluded from the original ICI clinical trials because of the theoretical risk of irAEs. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of irAEs in patients with pre-existing rheumatologic diseases on ICIs, impact of anti-rheumatic therapy on irAEs, and malignancy outcomes.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with a pre-existing rheumatologic diagnosis receiving ICIs at the University of North Carolina from 2014 to 2019. Risk differences (RD) and asymptotic 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) using a continuity correction along with odds ratios (OR) and exact 95% CIs were produced between pre-specified risk factors and flares of the underlying rheumatologic disease and/or irAEs. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates for time to unfavorable cancer response between subsets of patients were compared using the log-rank test.

Results

We identified 45 patients receiving an ICI with an underlying rheumatologic diagnosis, including 22 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Overall, 13 patients (29%) had a flare of their autoimmune disease, 20 patients (44%) had a new-onset irAE, and 27 (60%) had either a flare or new-onset irAE. Patients with RA had higher risk of flares compared to those with other rheumatologic disorders (45% vs 13%, RD 32%, 95% CI 2.0–56.8); all RA flares were ≤ grade 2 and treated in the outpatient setting. Concurrent treatment of the rheumatologic disease at the start of ICI therapy was not associated with a reduced risk of flare (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.19–3.76) or new onset irAE (OR 3.21, 95% CI 0.83–13.6) compared to those not on anti-rheumatic medications. Anti-rheumatic therapy did not impact time to unfavorable malignancy outcome (p = 0.52).

Conclusion

The majority of our study cohort experienced a flare or new onset irAE with ICI treatment. Treatment with anti-rheumatic therapy did not prevent disease flares or new onset irAEs, but did not negatively impact malignancy outcomes. Research is needed to determine safe anti-rheumatic therapy options to prevent flares and irAEs that do not interfere with malignancy outcomes.

Interaction between gut microbiota and immune checkpoint inhibitor-related colitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a promising therapeutic strategy for malignant tumors, improving patient prognosis, along with a spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including gastrointestinal toxicity, ICI-related colitis (IRC), and diarrhea. The gut microbiota has been suggested as an important regulator in the pathogenesis of IRC, and microbiota modulations like probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation have been explored to treat the disease. This review discusses the interaction between the gut microbiota and IRC, focusing on the potential pathogenic mechanisms and promising interventions.

Association of Immune-Related Adverse Effects and Survival in Solid Tumor Patients Treated with PD1 Inhibitors

Kumar PrabhashBackground  The development of immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) can corroborate with the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including programmed cell death 1 (PD1) inhibitors. However, there is extremely limited data on the association of irAEs with survival in patients who have shown a response to ICIs. Patients and Methods  This study is a retrospective audit of the prospectively collected database of patients who received PD1 inhibitors for advanced solid tumors. Responders were defined as patients who attained the best response of either complete response or partial response. Time-to-event analysis was done using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, and the hazard ratio (HR) was calculated by using Cox proportional model. A point-biserial correlation was used to find out the potential influence of irAEs on overall survival (OS). Results  A total of 155 patients (49% lung cancer, 31% head and neck cancer) who received ICI during the specified period were evaluated for this study. The overall response rate was 19.4% and disease control rate was 43.2%. The median (OS) for patients who developed irAE was 12.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.9-15.6), while it was not reached for patients without irAE (HR: 10.5, 95% CI: 1.2-NR, p  = 0.007). One-year OS for the corresponding group of patients was 53.6% (standard deviation [SD]: 15.6) versus 92.9% (SD: 6.9), respectively. Among responders, 12 (40%) developed at least grade 1 irAE, while among nonresponders, 38 (30.4%) developed irAE ( p  = 0.312). Conclusions  In our study, we found significant improvement in survival of solid tumor patients treated with ICIs who developed irAEs on treatment as compared with those who did not. On specifically analyzing patients who responded to ICIs, there was no difference in OS who developed irAEs versus those who did not. However, this needs to be studied in a larger sample to reach a definite conclusion.

Perspectives for Combining Viral Oncolysis With Additional Immunotherapies for the Treatment of Melanoma

Melanoma is the deadliest type of skin cancer with steadily increasing incidence worldwide during the last few decades. In addition to its tumor associated antigens (TAAs), melanoma has a high mutation rate compared to other tumors, which promotes the appearance of tumor specific antigens (TSAs) as well as increased lymphocytic infiltration, inviting the use of therapeutic tools that evoke new or restore pre-existing immune responses. Innovative therapeutic proposals, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have emerged as effective options for melanoma. However, a significant portion of these patients relapse and become refractory to treatment. Likewise, strategies using viral vectors, replicative or not, have garnered confidence and approval by different regulatory agencies around the world. It is possible that further success of immune therapies against melanoma will come from synergistic combinations of different approaches. In this review we outline molecular features inherent to melanoma and how this supports the use of viral oncolysis and immunotherapies when used as monotherapies or in combination.

Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Overview of Systematic Reviews

BACKGROUND

Recognition and management of adverse events (AEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) use by cancer patients requires expertise from multiple disciplines. Greater awareness of potential AEs may result in earlier recognition, appropriate management, and better patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this overview of systematic reviews was to synthesize and consolidate systematic review evidence describing the incidence proportion and severity of AEs associated with various ICI therapies across different cancers.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of four databases was conducted to identify systematic reviews that describe the incidence proportion and severity of AEs related to ICI therapy in cancer patients. A systematic review was eligible if it included adults with cancer; on ICI alone or in combination with another ICI, chemotherapy, or targeted therapy; severity (graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) and incidence proportion of AEs and whether it reported its eligibility criteria. AEs of interest were identified through an iterative ranking exercise by key stakeholders and knowledge users. Extraction of PICOTTS elements and quality indicators (AMSTAR-2) were used to manage overlap of primary studies across systematic reviews at the outcome level. Cancer subtypes were mapped to drug class and AE severity.

RESULTS

Overall, 129 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria for data mapping. Systematic reviews reported incidence proportions for more than 76 AEs, of which 34 were identified as AEs of interest. After overlap assessment, 65 systematic reviews were chosen for data extraction. The three AEs with the highest median incidence were fatigue (18.3%, interquartile range [IQR] 15.0-28.0%), diarrhea (15.3%, IQR 9.7-29.2%) and rash (14.4%, IQR 10.3-19.2%). The three AEs (high-grade) with the highest median incidence were diarrhea (1.5%, IQR 1.2-6.0%), colitis (1.3%, IQR 0.6-6.1%) and neutropenia (1.2%, IQR 0.4-3.3%). Incidence proportions of high-grade AEs were often considerably lower than all-grade AEs and combination therapy (ICI combinations or combinations of ICI with chemotherapy or targeted therapy) was responsible for some of the highest incidence proportions regardless of AE. Rare AEs and certain cancer subtypes were not well reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Early recognition of AEs associated with ICIs requires expertise from diverse specialists, not just oncologists. Greater awareness of potential AEs may result in earlier recognition, appropriate management, and better patient outcomes.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42021231593.

Immune-related adverse events in various organs caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors

Current cancer immunotherapies target immune checkpoint molecules such as the inhibitory receptor programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), one of its ligands, programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), a competitive ligand for CD28 binding to stimulatory receptors CD80 and CD86. Multiple biological drugs use monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 as cancer immunotherapies. These are termed immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, activation of the immune system by ICIs can induce the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can affect multiple organ systems. The most frequent irAEs are cutaneous and mimic various types of spontaneous skin disorders. Most irAEs are classified as autoimmune conditions mediated by ICI-activated CD8⁺ cytotoxic T cells, some of which are also related to activated B cells and production of pathogenic antibodies. Interestingly, blockade of CTLA-4 mainly induces activation of T cells and inhibition of T_reg cells. On the other hand, the mechanisms underlying anti-PD-1/PD-L1 ICI-induced irAEs are more complicated. PD-1 is a receptor expressed on T and B cells, which binds not only PD-L1, but also PD-L2. The role of PD-L1 is dominant in Th1 and Th17 immunity, while PD-L2 works mainly in Th2 immunity. Better understanding of the mechanisms underlying irAEs will allow for better management of irAEs and improve outcomes and quality of life in cancer patients.

Biomarkers of response to PD-1 pathway blockade

The binding of T cell immune checkpoint proteins programmed death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) to their ligands allows immune evasion by tumours. The development of therapeutic antibodies, termed checkpoint inhibitors, that bind these molecules or their ligands, has provided a means to release this brake on the host anti-tumour immune response. However, these drugs are costly, are associated with potentially severe side effects, and only benefit a small subset of patients. It is therefore important to identify biomarkers that discriminate between responders and non-responders. This review discusses the determinants for a successful response to antibodies that bind PD-1 or its ligand PD-L1, dividing them into markers found in the tumour biopsy and those in non-tumour samples. It provides an update on the established predictive biomarkers (tumour PD-L1 expression, tumour mismatch repair deficiency and tumour mutational burden) and assesses the evidence for new potential biomarkers.

Intestinal Microbiome Associated With Immune-Related Adverse Events for Patients Treated With Anti-PD-1 Inhibitors, a Real-World Study

Aim

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have updated the treatment landscape for patients with advanced malignancies, while their clinical prospect was hindered by severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The aim of this study was to research the association between gut microbiome diversity and the occurrence of ICI-induced irAEs.

Patients and Method

We prospectively obtained the baseline fecal samples and clinical data from patients treated with anti-PD-1 inhibitors as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy or antiangiogenesis regardless of treatment lines. The 16S rRNA V3-V4 sequencing was used to test the gene amplicons of fecal samples. The development of irAEs was evaluated and monitored from the beginning of therapy based on CTCAE V5.01.

Results

A total of 150 patients were included in the study and followed up for at least 6 months. A total of 90 (60%) patients developed at least one type of adverse effect, among which mild irAEs (grades 1–2) occurred in 65 patients (72.22%) and severe irAEs (grades 3–5) in 25 patients (27.78%). Patients with severe irAEs showed a visible higher abundance of Streptococcus, Paecalibacterium, and Stenotrophomonas, and patients with mild irAEs had a higher abundance of Faecalibacterium and unidentified_Lachnospiraceae. With the aid of a classification model constructed with 5 microbial biomarkers, patients without irAEs were successfully distinguished from those with severe irAEs (AUC value was 0.66).

Conclusion

Certain intestinal bacteria can effectively distinguish patients without irAEs from patients with severe irAEs and provide evidence of gut microbiota as an informative source for developing predictive biomarkers to predict the occurrence of irAEs.

Biomarkers and risk factors for the early prediction of immune-related adverse events: a review

In recent years, immunotherapy has been widely used to treat patients with malignant tumors. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) significantly improve the prognosis of cancer patients, the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is increasing. Not only can irAEs accumulate in multiple organ systems throughout the body, but rare adverse reactions may also occur continuously. In severe cases, irAEs can be life-threatening or even lead to death. Therefore, the early identification, diagnosis and treatment of irAEs are very important. Early identification of patients with high-risk irAEs as well as the reduction or avoidance of severe irAEs have important clinical significance. This article will review the research progress of early predictive biomarkers and risk factors for the occurrence of irAEs and propose potential future directions for follow-up research and clinical applications.

Targeting KRAS in NSCLC: Old Failures and New Options for "Non-G12c" Patients

Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) gene mutations are among the most common driver alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite their high frequency, valid treatment options are still lacking, mainly due to an intrinsic complexity of both the protein structure and the downstream pathway. The increasing knowledge about different mutation subtypes and co-mutations has paved the way to several promising therapeutic strategies. Despite the best results so far having been obtained in patients harbouring KRAS exon 2 p.G12C mutation, even the treatment landscape of non-p.G12C KRAS mutation positive patients is predicted to change soon. This review provides a comprehensive and critical overview of ongoing studies into NSCLC patients with KRAS mutations other than p.G12C and discusses future scenarios that will hopefully change the story of this disease.

The importance of immune checkpoints in immune monitoring: A future paradigm shift in the treatment of cancer

The growth and development of cancer are directly correlated to the suppression of the immune system. A major breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy depends on various mechanisms to detect immunosuppressive factors that inhibit anti-tumor immune responses. Immune checkpoints are expressed on many immune cells such as T-cells, regulatory B cells (Bregs), dendritic cells (DCs), natural killer cells (NKs), regulatory T (Tregs), M2-type macrophages, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Immune inhibitory molecules, including CTLA-4, TIM-3, TIGIT, PD-1, and LAG-3, normally inhibit immune responses via negatively regulating immune cell signaling pathways to prevent immune injury. However, the up-regulation of inhibitory immune checkpoints during tumor progression on immune cells suppresses anti-tumor immune responses and promotes immune escape in cancer. It has recently been indicated that cancer cells can up-regulate various pathways of the immune checkpoints. Therefore, targeting immune inhibitory molecules through antibodies or miRNAs is a promising therapeutic strategy and shows favorable results. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are introduced as a new immunotherapy strategy that enhance immune cell-induced antitumor responses in many patients. In this review, we highlighted the function of each immune checkpoint on different immune cells and therapeutic strategies aimed at using monoclonal antibodies and miRNAs against inhibitory receptors. We also discussed current challenges and future strategies for maximizing these FDA-approved immunosuppressants' effectiveness and clinical success in cancer treatment.

Prognostic Role of TIGIT Expression in Patients with Solid Tumors: A Meta-Analysis

Background

T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) is a recently identified immunosuppressive receptor. The expression levels of TIGIT affect the prognosis of patients with solid tumors. To fully comprehend the role of TIGIT on the prognosis of patients with solid tumors, we conducted a meta-analysis.

Methods

We performed an online search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (WOS), and MEDLINE databases for literature published till March 31, 2021. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the literature, and Stata 16.0 and Engauge Digitizer 4.1 software were used for data analysis.

Results

Our literature search identified eight papers comprising 1426 patients with solid tumors. Increased expression of TIGIT was associated with poor prognosis. High expression of TIGIT was a risk factor for overall survival (OS) {hazard ratio (HR) = 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.26, 2.20], P < 0.001} and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.44, 95% CI [1.15, 1.81], P = 0.01). We performed subgroup analysis to explore the source of heterogeneity, colorectal cancer (HR = 2.07, 95% CI [0.23, 18.82], P = 0.518), lung cancer (HR = 1.29, 95% CI [0.96, 1.72], P = 0.094), esophageal cancer (HR = 1.70, 95% CI [1.20, 2.40], P = 0.003), and other cancers (HR = 1.83, 95% CI [1.25, 2.68], P = 0.002). In addition to cancer type, expression location, sample size, and different statistical analysis methods are also considered the possible causes of heterogeneity between studies. Funnel plots suggested no publication bias for OS (P = 0.902), and Egger's test supported this conclusion (P = 0.537).

Conclusion

TIGIT expression was associated with OS and PFS in patients with solid tumors. Patients with elevated TIGIT expression have a shorter OS and PFS, and TIGIT expression could be a novel biomarker for prognosis prediction and a valuable therapeutic target for solid tumors.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and the Heart

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a break-through treatment for a large number of cancer types. This treatment is increasingly being recommended. ICIs are prescribed for primary tumours and for metastases, adjuvant/neo-adjuvant therapy. Thus, there is an increased need for expertise in the field, including the ways of response and toxicities related to them. ICIs become toxic because of the removal of self-tolerance, which in turn induces autoimmune processes that affect every organ. However, when relating to the heart, it has been noticed to be leading to acute heart failure and even death caused by various mechanisms, such as: myocarditis, pericarditis, arrhythmia, and Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. This review aims to address the above issues by focusing on the latest findings on the topic, by adding some insights on the mechanism of action of ICIs with a special focus on the myocardial tissue, by providing information on clinical manifestations, diagnosis and (wherever possible) treatment of the cardiotoxic events related to this therapy. The information is expanding and in many cases, the articles we found refer mainly to case-presentations and studies conducted on small populations. However, we consider that it is worthwhile to raise awareness of this new treatment, especially since it is widely now and it provides a significant increase in the survival rate in patients who receive it.

Occurrence of Possible Rheumatologic Immune-Related Adverse Events (rh-irAEs) Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Therapy

Introduction

Current epidemiologic literature of rheumatologic immune-related adverse events (rh-irAEs) consists of clinical trials, case reports, or smaller, single-center series. We evaluate the occurrence of rh-irAEs during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy from US commercial claims data.

Methods

Patients newly initiating ICI therapy in commercial claims data were eligible for inclusion. Rh-irAEs were defined using ≥ 1 International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 or ICD-10-Clinical Modification (CM) claims for selected events, ranging from joint pain and myalgia to ankylosing spondylitis and psoriasis. The percentage of patients experiencing rh-irAEs after ICI initiation was determined.

Results

A total of 5722 patients initiating an ICI between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2018, were included; 201 patients (3.5%) had a history of rheumatic disease. Among the 5521 patients without a history of rheumatic disease, 29.6% experienced ≥ 1 rh-irAE in follow-up, decreasing to 22.6% when assessing events for which there was no diagnostic history. Limiting to claims for rh-irAE with a rheumatologist provider, the proportion of patients experiencing an event decreased to 0.9%. Among patients with a history of rheumatic disease, 71.6% experienced ≥ 1 rh-irAE. Limiting to events for which the patient did not have a history during baseline, 35.3% experienced an event.

Conclusions

Occurrence of rh-irAEs during ICI use is higher in patients with pre-existing rheumatic disease compared to those with no pre-existing rheumatic disease. However, the most common events were not definitive rheumatic diseases but rather symptoms, such as pain in joints. Occurrence of events associated with a rheumatologist provider was substantially lower, suggesting that either patients are not referred to a rheumatologist or referral does not result in confirmation of the diagnosis by the rheumatologist.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00359-z.

Comparison of EQ-5D-3L with QLU-C10D in Metastatic Melanoma Using Cost-Utility Analysis

BACKGROUND

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) prefers the use of the generic EQ-5D instrument to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and recommends that condition-specific instruments only be used when EQ-5D data are not available or not appropriate.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the utility gain and cost-effectiveness results of using the generic EQ-5D-3L instrument to the condition-specific Quality-of-Life Utility Measure-Core 10 dimensions (QLU-C10D) by applying both sets of values in a published cost-utility analysis (CUA) of immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma.

METHODS

Quality-of-life data were drawn from a clinical study in which both QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-3L tools were used. The potential influence of the two instruments on cost-effectiveness was assessed using a three-state Markov model. Descriptive statistics and standard health economic outputs were compared between analyses that applied the two different utility measures.

RESULTS

Mean baseline utility values as measured by the QLU-C10D (mean = 0.744, SD = 0.219) were not statistically different (p > 0.05) compared to values derived from EQ-5D-3L (mean = 0.735, SD = 0.239). The two instruments were correlated (Pearson's correlation = 0.74); however, concordance was low (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient < 0.90) at baseline. The model predicted slightly higher QALYs gained when using EQ-5D-3L over QLU-C10D-derived utilities (1.87 vs 1.74, respectively). This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$30.5K when using EQ-5D-3L utilities, compared to US$32.7K when using QLU-C10D utilities. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves based on the two sets of utilities were almost indistinguishable.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the use of the generic EQ-5D instrument in immunotherapy treated metastatic melanoma, and found no additional benefit for using the disease-specific QLU-C10D when using Australian weights.

Clinical course and management of pembrolizumab-associated isolated adrenocorticotrophic hormone deficiency: a new case and literature review

Hypophysitis is rarely reported in patients receiving pembrolizumab-only immunotherapies. Since the clinical presentation is usually as isolated adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) deficiency, patients may be misjudged as having clinical symptoms due to cancer or chemotherapy. A 49-year-old male with laryngeal cancer applied to our clinic just after the tenth cycle of his pembrolizumab treatment, with weakness and nausea/vomiting. Serum morning cortisol and ACTH were 0.47 mcg/dl and 10.1 pg/ml, respectively; the remaining anterior pituitary hormone levels were normal. Pituitary MRI revealed mild glandular enlargement and loss of posterior pituitary bright-spot. All symptoms and signs improved with low-dose prednisolone. This is the second reported case of pembolizumab-associated isolated ACTH deficiency having abnormal pituitary MRI findings as we have reviewed all reported cases in the literature.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Pneumonitis in Lung Cancer: Real-World Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management Practices Across Six Health Care Centers in North Carolina

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer and have expanded use in small cell lung cancer. Although generally better tolerated than traditional chemotherapy, immune-related adverse events, such as immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (ICI-P), remain poorly understood toxicities that limit ICI treatment and can result in considerable morbidity. In this retrospective case-control study, we assessed a lung cancer cohort to identify ICI-P risk factors.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the risk factors, clinical presentations, radiographic findings, and outcomes for ICI-P in a real-world lung cancer cohort? Do chronic pulmonary diseases confer increased risk for ICI-P?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Medical records from lung cancer patients receiving nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or combination ipilimumab and nivolumab at six centers in North Carolina were reviewed (January 2004-July 2017). Patients with ICI-P and control participants were characterized, and logistic regression was used to assess for ICI-P risk factors.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifteen lung cancer patients who predominantly received nivolumab (76.5%) or pembrolizumab (22%) were included. The incidence of ICI-P was 9.5%, with a median time to diagnosis of 52.5 days. Most patients with ICI-P had cases of high severity, and eight patients (27%) died with ongoing ICI-P treatment. Development of ICI-P was independently associated with the presence of baseline fibrosis on chest CT scan (adjusted OR [aOR], 6.61; 95% CI, 2.48-17.7), a composite measure of obstructive lung disease (aOR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.07-7.29), and treatment with pembrolizumab (aOR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.08-6.11).

INTERPRETATION

In this cohort, ICI-P was more common and severe than previously reported and carried an unexpectedly high mortality rate. Risk for ICI-P was shown to be independently associated with several chronic pulmonary diseases, which may account for the higher incidence of ICI-P in patients with lung cancer.