Early screening for gestational diabetes mellitus is not associated with improved pregnancy outcomes: an observational study including 9795 women

Post-load glucose is a stronger predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes than first-trimester HbA1c in women without gestational diabetes

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

A debate exists on the relation of adverse pregnancy outcomes with glycemic levels in early pregnancy. We aimed to investigate the association of maternal characteristics including post-load glucose and first-trimester HbA1c test results with adverse pregnancy outcomes in women without gestational diabetes mellitus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A dataset (January 2011 and September 2017) from a hospital prenatal clinic was explored to find the important predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes using maternal characteristics and glucose assessments in mothers without gestational diabetes. We used two machine learning algorithms to capture nonlinearity in selecting important maternal characteristics and developed predictive models for each outcome. In total, 1,618 pregnant women were included in the analytic dataset with a mean (SD) age of 26.8 (3.5) years and gravida of 1.7 (0.9).

RESULTS

Important associations were detected between maternal features and primary cesarean section, fetal distress, premature rupture of membranes, macrosomia, small or large for gestational age, APGAR <7 at 1 or 5 min, hyperbilirubinemia, and poly- or oligo-hydramnios. Overall, the predictive models showed good performance and large areas under the curves (0.732, 0.765, 0.646, 0.651, 0.730, 0.646, 0.684, 0.716, and 0.678, respectively). Specifically, they had high positive likelihood ratios.

CONCLUSIONS

High glucose levels were associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Post-load glucose was the most reliable test for predicting the outcomes. Overall, fasting blood sugar was of more predictive value than HbA1c. Our study showed that further research should account for the nonlinearity and interactions inherent in the data.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes according to the timing of diagnosis of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy: a nationwide cross-sectional study of 695,912 deliveries in France in 2018

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

We aimed to assess maternal-fetal outcomes according to various subtypes of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy.

METHODS

We used data from the French National Health Data System (Système National des Données de Santé), which links individual data from the hospital discharge database and the French National Health Insurance information system. We included all deliveries after 22 gestational weeks (GW) in women without pre-existing diabetes recorded in 2018. Women with hyperglycaemia were classified as having overt diabetes in pregnancy or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), then categorised into three subgroups according to their gestational age at the time of GDM diagnosis: before 22 GW (GDM<22); between 22 and 30 GW (GDM22-30); and after 30 GW (GDM>30). Adjusted prevalence ratios (95% CI) for the outcomes were estimated after adjusting for maternal age, gestational age and socioeconomic status. Due to the multiple tests, we considered an association to be statistically significant according to the Holm-Bonferroni procedure. To take into account the potential immortal time bias, we performed analyses on deliveries at ≥31 GW and deliveries at ≥37 GW.

RESULTS

The study population of 695,912 women who gave birth in 2018 included 84,705 women (12.2%) with hyperglycaemia in pregnancy: overt diabetes in pregnancy, 0.4%; GDM<22, 36.8%; GDM22-30, 52.4%; and GDM>30, 10.4%. The following outcomes were statistically significant after Holm-Bonferroni adjustment for deliveries at ≥31 GW using GDM22-30 as the reference. Caesarean sections (1.54 [1.39, 1.72]), large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants (2.00 [1.72, 2.32]), Erb's palsy or clavicle fracture (6.38 [2.42, 16.8]), preterm birth (1.84 [1.41, 2.40]) and neonatal hypoglycaemia (1.98 [1.39, 2.83]) were more frequent in women with overt diabetes. Similarly, LGA infants (1.10 [1.06, 1.14]) and Erb's palsy or clavicle fracture (1.55 [1.22, 1.99]) were more frequent in GDM<22. LGA infants (1.44 [1.37, 1.52]) were more frequent in GDM>30. Finally, women without hyperglycaemia in pregnancy were less likely to have preeclampsia or eclampsia (0.74 [0.69, 0.79]), Caesarean section (0.80 [0.79, 0.82]), pregnancy and postpartum haemorrhage (0.93 [0.89, 0.96]), LGA neonate (0.67 [0.65, 0.69]), premature neonate (0.80 [0.77, 0.83]) and neonate with neonatal hypoglycaemia (0.73 [0.66, 0.82]). Overall, the results were similar for deliveries at ≥37 GW. Although the estimation of the adjusted prevalence ratio of perinatal death was five times higher (5.06 [1.87, 13.7]) for women with overt diabetes, this result was non-significant after Holm-Bonferroni adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Compared with GDM22-30, overt diabetes, GDM<22 and, to a lesser extent, GDM>30 were associated with poorer maternal-fetal outcomes.

Glycemic status during pregnancy according to fasting and post-load glucose values: The association with adverse pregnancy outcomes. An observational study

AIM

Prognosis of treated hyperglycemia in pregnancy (HIP) may differ according to whether diagnosis following an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is based on high fasting and/or high post-load glucose values.

METHODS

From a multiethnic prospective study, we included 8,339 women screened for HIP after 22 weeks of gestation. We evaluated the risk of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infant (primary endpoint) and other adverse pregnancy outcomes according to HIP status in four groups defined as follows: no HIP (n = 6,832, reference); isolated fasting HIP (n = 465), isolated post-load HIP (n = 646), and fasting and post-load HIP (n = 396).

RESULTS

After adjusting for age, body mass index, ethnicity, smoking during pregnancy and parity, compared with no HIP, the adjusted odds ratios [95% confidence interval] for LGA infant were higher in the isolated fasting HIP (1.47 [1.11-1.96]) and fasting and post-load HIP (1.65 [1.23-2.21]) groups, but not in the isolated post-load HIP (1.13 [0.86-1.48]) group. The adjusted odds ratios for preterm delivery and neonatal intensive care unit were higher in the post-load HIP group (1.44 [1.03-2.03] and 1.28 [1.04-1.57], respectively), the fasting and post-load HIP group (1.81 [1.23-2.68] and 1.42 [1.10-1.81], respectively) but not in the isolated fasting HIP group (1.34 [0.90-2.00] and 1.20 [0.94-1.52], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Despite glucose-lowering care and adjustment for confounders, compared with no HIP, fasting HIP was associated with a higher rate of LGA infant, whereas post-load HIP was associated with higher preterm delivery and neonatal intensive care unit admission rates.

Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Is There a Need for Early Screening for All Women in Developing Countries?

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with significant adverse pregnancy outcomes. Early diagnosis and treatment have been proven to reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes among women diagnosed with GDM. Current guidelines recommend routine screening for GDM at 24-28 weeks of pregnancy, with early screening offered to those considered high risk. However, risk stratification may not always be helpful for those who would benefit from early screening, especially in non-Western settings.

AIM

To determine the need for early screening for GDM among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in two tertiary hospitals in Nigeria.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study from December 2016 to May 2017. We identified women who presented at the antenatal clinics of the Federal Teaching Hospital Ido-Ekiti and Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado Ekiti. A total of 270 women who fulfilled the study inclusion criteria were enrolled. The 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was used to screen participants for GDM before 24 weeks and between 24 and 28 weeks for those who screened negative before 24 weeks. Pearson's chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, independent t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test were utilized in the final analysis.

RESULTS

The median age of the women in the study was 30 (interquartile range: 27-32) years. Of our study participants, 40 (14.8%) were obese, 27 (10%) had a history of diabetes mellitus in a first-degree relative, and three (1.1%) women had a previous history of GDM. Twenty-one women (7.8%) were diagnosed with GDM, and six (28.6%) were diagnosed before 24 weeks. Women diagnosed with GDM before 24 weeks were older (37 years; interquartile range: 34-37) and more likely to be obese (80.0%). A significant number of these women also had identifiable risk factors for GDM: previous GDM (20.0%), family history of diabetes mellitus in a first-degree relative (80.0%), prior delivery of fetal macrosomia (60.0%), and previous history of congenital fetal anomaly (20.0%).

CONCLUSION

 The findings from the present study did not justify universal screening for GDM in all pregnant women. Patients diagnosed before the 24-28 weeks of universal screening are more likely to have significant risk factors for GDM and, therefore, would have been selected for screening based on the risk factor screening.

Is there a residual risk of large-for-gestational-age infant related to gestational diabetes mellitus when it is treated?

OBJECTIVE

The hyperglycaemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes (HAPO) study, where hyperglycaemia was untreated, showed a continuous association between large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infant and seven increasing categories of fasting plasma glucose (PG), 1-hour and 2-hour PG values after a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test at 24-32 gestational weeks. We evaluated whether the excess risk persisted in the 6th and 7th glucose categories - corresponding to women treated for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included 7,190 women meeting the HAPO criteria, of whom 655 (9.2%) were treated for GDM (dietary education in all; insulin therapy in 150 (20.3%)). We evaluated the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for each glucose category (reference 1st category) for LGA infant.

RESULTS

The aOR for LGA linearly increased from the 1st to 5th categories of fasting, 1-hour and 2-hour PG. Specifically, the aORs for the 5th category were 2.20 (95% confidence interval 1.41-3.44), 2.25 (1.11-4.59), and 2.51 (1.63-3.85), respectively. The aORs for the 6th category were globally stable at 2.52 (1.46-4.36), 2.87 (1.48-5.54), and 2.47 (1.46-4.16), respectively. The same was true for the 7th category: 1.41 (0.56-3.55), 2.84 (1.03-7.86), and 3.53 (1.77-7.06), respectively.

CONCLUSION

We confirmed the association between increasing PG category and LGA infant in women without GDM. We did not observe a residual risk of LGA infant in women treated for GDM in our hospital, irrespective of elevated fasting, 1-hour, or 2-hour PG diagnosis. The risk of LGA infant was globally similar to that in women with high normal glucose values.

The ability of a low value on an early GCT to identify women not needing repeat testing in the second trimester

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the predictive value of a low early glucose challenge test (GCT) in ruling out a subsequent diagnosis of gestational diabetes in the second trimester.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of women at a single clinic who had a normal early GCT between 2016 and 2020. Patients who did not have repeat screening in the late second trimester were excluded. Demographic data were extracted from the record. The primary outcome was a normal GCT or glucose tolerance test in the late second trimester. Logistic regression and receiver operator curves (ROC) were performed to assess the ability of the early GCT value to predict subsequent normal glucose screening.

RESULTS

Of the 532 pregnant persons with normal early GCT, 62 (11.7%) were subsequently diagnosed with gestational diabetes in the second trimester. None of the patients (N = 56), who had a GCT value less than 80 mg/dL were diagnosed with gestational diabetes in the second trimester. The prediction of subsequent normal screening using the early GCT on a ROC plot produced an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.67, 95% CI (0.60-0.74). Adding age, prior history of gestational diabetes and family history of diabetes mellitus to the prediction, only improved the AUC to 0.75, 95% CI (0.66, 0.82).

CONCLUSION

Early GCT value was a fair predictor for normal second trimester glucose testing for gestational diabetes. However, high-risk patients with an early GCT value of less than 80 mg/dL may be able to forego repeat second trimester screening.

Markers of Maternal Insulin Resistance and Lipid Ratios Measured in Early Pregnancy Are Related to Adverse Fetomaternal Outcomes in Women Treated for Hyperglycemia Detected in Early Pregnancy-Data from a Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Hyperglycemia detected in early pregnancy is still inadequately studied as a risk factor for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Methods: a retrospective study of a cohort of N = 193 women in singleton pregnancies with hyperglycemia diagnosed before the 20th gestational week (GW). Results: characteristics of the study group: GW at the diagnosis: 12.0 (9.0; 15.0), diabetes diagnosed in early pregnancy (eDiP): 21%, insulin-therapy required: 61.8%, gestational hypertension/preeclampsia: 7.7%, premature delivery: 9.2%, composite adverse neonatal outcome: 59.2%, high (LGA) birth weight/low (SGA) birth weight according to the WHO growth charts: 24.2%/9.2%, respectively. Women with eDiP have lower eGDR, a higher TAG/HDL ratio, and a higher atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) compared to women with gestational diabetes diagnosed in early pregnancy—eGDM (9.33 ± 1.56 vs. 7.92 ± 2.54, p = 0.007, 1.06 ± 0.78, vs. 1.25 ± 0.68, p = 0.020, and −0.06 ± 0.25 vs. 0.04 ± 0.23 p = 0.021, respectively). NonHDL/HDL cholesterol ratio > 2.6, and AIP > 0.24 total/HDL cholesterol ratio > 4.5 significantly predicted metabolic adverse neonatal outcome (hypoglycemia and/or hyperbilirubinemia)—OR (95% CI): 4.62 (1.35; 15.79), 3.60 (1.04; 12.48), 8.75 (1.02; 74.83), respectively. Conclusions: 1, Hyperglycemia diagnosed in early pregnancy coexists with a lipid profile suggestive of insulin resistance. 2, Lipid-related markers of cardiometabolic risk measured in early pregnancy can be useful tools in assessment of fetomaternal risk in high-risk populations. 3, Women with eDiP present a more severe insulin resistance phenotype than those with eGDM.

Metabolic characteristics and adverse pregnancy outcomes for women with hyperglycaemia in pregnancy as a function of insulin resistance

AIM

Recent studies have shown that women with hyperglycaemia in pregnancy and insulin resistance have a greater risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than women with normoglycaemic pregnancies. This study aimed to determine adverse pregnancy outcomes of women with hyperglycaemia in pregnancy only as a function of insulin resistance.

METHODS

From a prospective cohort study, we included 1,423 women with hyperglycaemia in pregnancy whose insulin resistance was evaluated using homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) when care was first provided for this condition. We compared the adverse pregnancy outcomes for different tertiles of HOMA-IR (intertertile range 1.9 and 3.3).

RESULTS

Increasing HOMA-IR tertiles were positively associated with the rate of insulin therapy (tertile 1, 2 and 3: 32.7, 47.0 and 58.7%, P < 0.0001), caesarean section (23.7, 26.0 and 32.2%, respectively, P < 0.01), gestational hypertension (1.3, 2.8 and 5.4% respectively, P < 0.01), preeclampsia (1.5, 2.8 and 4.5% respectively, P < 0.05), large-for-gestational-age infant (13.3, 10.4 and 17.6% respectively, P < 0.05), and neonatal hypoglycaemia (0.8, 1.5 and 3.2% respectively, P < 0.05). Women in the 3^rd HOMA-IR tertile were more likely to have insulin therapy (odds ratio 2.09 (95% interval confidence 1.61-2.71)), hypertensive disorders (2.26 (1.42-3.36)), and large-for-gestational-age infant (1.42 (1.01-1.99)) than those in the 1^st and 2^nd tertiles combined in multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for gestational age at HOMA-IR measurement, glycaemic status, age, body mass index, family history of diabetes, parity and ethnicity.

CONCLUSION

Despite suitable care and increased rates of insulin therapy during pregnancy, higher insulin resistance in women with hyperglycaemia in pregnancy was associated with a greater risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Sequential Screening Strategy in Early, Middle, and Late Pregnancy in Women at High Risk of Hyperglycemia

BACKGROUND

Hyperglycaemia in pregnancy (HIP) is closely associated with short- and long-term adverse fetal and maternal outcomes. However, the screening and diagnostic strategies for pregnant women with risk factors for HIP are not set. This prospective study aimed to explore a screening strategy for women at high risk for HIP.

METHODS

A total of 610 pregnant women were divided into experimental (n=305) and control (n=305) groups. Pregnant women underwent a 75-g OGTT in early (<20 weeks), middle (24-28 weeks), and late pregnancy (32-34 weeks) in the experimental group and only in middle pregnancy in the control group. The general conditions, HIP diagnosis, and perinatal outcomes of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

In the experimental group, HIP was diagnosed in 29.51% (90/305), 13.44% (41/305), and 10.49% (32/305) of patient in early, middle, and late pregnancy, respectively. The total HIP diagnosis rate was significantly higher in the experimental group (53.44% vs. 35.74%, P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that previous gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (odds ratio, OR=9.676, P<0.001), pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) ≥23 kg/m² (OR=4.273, P<0.001), and maternal age ≥35 years (OR=2.377, P=0.010) were risk factors for HIP diagnosis in early pregnancy. Previous GDM (OR=8.713, P=0.002) was a risk factor for HIP diagnosis in late pregnancy. No significant differences in perinatal clinical data were observed between the experimental and control groups. The gestational age at delivery was significantly earlier in the experimental subgroup with early-HIP than in the experimental and control subgroups with normal blood glucose (NBG). The weight gain during pregnancy was lower in the experimental early-HIP, middle-HIP, and control NBG subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend sequential screening in early and middle pregnancy for high-risk pregnant women with maternal age ≥35 years or pre-pregnancy BMI ≥23 kg/m², and in early, middle, and late pregnancy for high-risk pregnant women with a previous history of GDM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (no. ChiCTR2000041278).

Prognosis Associated with Sub-Types of Hyperglycaemia in Pregnancy

We aimed to compare pregnancy outcomes in 4665 women according to the following types of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy sub-types: (i) normoglycaemia, (ii) gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), (iii) diabetes in pregnancy (DIP), (iv) early-diagnosed (i.e., <22 weeks of gestation) GDM (eGDM), and (v) early-diagnosed DIP (eDIP). The prevalence of normoglycaemia, eGDM, eDIP, GDM, and DIP was 76.4%, 10.8%, 0.6%, 11.7%, and 0.6%, respectively. With regard to pregnancy outcomes, gestational weight gain (11.5 ± 5.5, 9.0 ± 5.4, 8.3 ± 4.7, 10.4 ± 5.3, and 10.1 ± 5.0 kg, p < 0.0001) and insulin requirement (none, 46.0%, 88.5%, 25.5%, and 51.7%; p < 0.001) differed according to the glycaemic sub-types. eGDM and eDIP were associated with higher rates of infant malformation. After adjustment for confounders, with normoglycaemia as the reference, only GDM was associated with large-for-gestational-age infant (odds ratio 1.34 (95% interval confidence 1.01-1.78) and only DIP was associated with hypertensive disorders (OR 3.48 (1.26-9.57)). To conclude, early-diagnosed hyperglycaemia was associated with an increased risk of malformation, suggesting that it was sometimes present at conception. Women with GDM, but not those with eGDM, had an increased risk of having a large-for-gestational-age infant, possibly because those with eGDM were treated early and therefore had less gestational weight gain. Women with DIP might benefit from specific surveillance for hypertensive disorders.

A prospective cohort study of postpartum glucose metabolic disorders in early versus standard diagnosed gestational diabetes mellitus

Early gestational diabetes mellitus (eGDM) is diagnosed when fasting plasma glucose before 24 weeks of gestation (WG) is ≥ 5.1 mmol/L, whilst standard GDM is diagnosed between 24 and 28 WG by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). eGDM seems to have worse obstetric outcomes than standard GDM. We compared the rates of postpartum glucose metabolism disorders between women with early versus standard GDM in this prospective study on women with GDM from three university hospitals between 2014 and 2016. Patients were included if they were < 24 WG with at least one risk factor for GDM and excluded if they had type 2 diabetes. Patients were assigned to Group 1 (G1) for eGDM according to IADPSG: fasting blood glucose < 24 WG between 5.1 and 7 mmol/L. Group 2 (G2) consisted of patients presenting a standard GDM at 24–28 WG on OGTT results according to IADPSG: T0 ≥ 5.1 mmol/L or T60 ≥ 10.0 mmol g/L or T120 ≥ 8.5 mmol/L. The primary outcome was postpartum OGTT result. Five hundred patients were analysed, with 273 patients undergoing OGTT at 4–18 weeks postpartum: 192 patients in G1 (early) and 81 in G2 (standard). Patients in G1 experienced more insulin therapy during pregnancy than G2 (52.2% versus 32.5%, p < 0.001), but no patients were taking insulin postpartum in either group. G1 patients experienced less preterm labour (2.6% versus 9.1%, p = 0.043), more induced deliveries (38% versus 25%, p = 0.049) and reduced foetal complications (29.2% versus 42.0%, p = 0.048). There was no significant difference in the rate of postpartum glucose metabolism disorders (type 2 diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glycaemia) between groups: 48/192 (25%) in G1 and 17/81 (21%) in G2, p = 0.58. Thus the frequency of early postpartum glucose metabolism disorders is high, without difference between eGDM and standard GDM. This supports measurement of fasting plasma glucose before 24 WG and the threshold of 5.1 mmol/L seems appropriate until verification in future studies.

Trial registration: NCT01839448, ClinicalTrials.gov on 22/04/2013.

COVID-19 pandemic: Can fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c replace the oral glucose tolerance test to screen for hyperglycaemia in pregnancy?

AIMS

To evaluate proposals considering HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurement as a substitute for oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to diagnose hyperglycaemia in pregnancy (HIP) during COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Of the 7,334 women who underwent the OGTT between 22 and 30 weeks gestation, 966 had HIP (WHO diagnostic criteria, reference standard). The 467 women who had an available HbA1c were used for analysis. French-speaking Society of Diabetes (SFD) proposal to diagnose HIP during COVID-19 pandemic was retrospectively applied: HbA1c ≥5.7% (39 mmol/mol) and/or FPG level ≥5.1 mmol/l. SFD proposal sensitivity for HIP diagnosis and the occurrence of HIP-related events (preeclampsia, large for gestational age infant, shoulder dystocia or neonatal hypoglycaemia) in women with false negative (FN) and true positive (TP) HIP-diagnoses were evaluated.

RESULTS

The sensitivity was 57% [95% confidence interval 52-62]. FN women had globally lower plasma glucose levels during OGTT, lower HbA1c and body mass index than those TP. The percentage of HIP-related events was similar in FN (who were cared) and TP cases, respectively 19.5 and 16.9% (p = 0.48). We observed similar results when women at high risk for HIP only were considered.

CONCLUSION

The SFD proposal has a poor sensitivity to detect HIP. Furthermore, it fails to have any advantages in predicting adverse outcomes.

Women with Mild Fasting Hyperglycemia in Early Pregnancy Have More Neonatal Intensive Care Admissions

AIMS

To determine impact of mild fasting hyperglycemia in early pregnancy (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] 5.1-5.5 mmol/L) on pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

We measured FPG at 11.9 ± 1.8 weeks in 2006 women from a prospective cohort study. Women with FPG ≥5.6 mmol/L (19) received treatment and were excluded from further analyses. A total of 1838 women with FPG <5.6 mmol/L received a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy.

RESULTS

Of all participants, 78 (4.2%) had FPG 5.1 to 5.5 mmol/L in early pregnancy, of which 49 had a normal OGTT later in pregnancy (high fasting normal glucose tolerance [NGT] group). Compared with the NGT group with FPG <5.1 mmol/L in early pregnancy (low fasting NGT group, n = 1560), the high fasting NGT group had a higher body mass index (BMI), higher insulin resistance with more impaired insulin secretion and higher FPG and 30 minute glucose levels on the OGTT. The admission rate to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) was significantly higher in the high fasting NGT group than in the low fasting NGT group (20.4% [10] vs 9.3% [143], P = .009), with no difference in duration (7.0 ± 8.6 vs 8.4 ± 14.3 days, P = .849) or indication for NICU admission between both groups. The admission rate to NICU remained significantly higher (odds ratio 2.47; 95% confidence interval 1.18-5.19, P = .017) after adjustment for age, BMI, and glucose levels at the OGTT.

CONCLUSIONS

When provision of an OGTT is limited such as in the Covid-19 pandemic, using FPG in early pregnancy could be an easy alternative to determine who is at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Limiting the Use of Oral Glucose Tolerance Tests to Screen for Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy during Pandemics

We aimed to evaluate each proposal of Australian–New Zealand Societies to limit the number of oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) to diagnose hyperglycemia in pregnancy (HIP) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. At our university hospital (2012–2016), we retrospectively applied in 4245 women who had OGTT between 22 and 30 weeks of gestation (reference standard: WHO criteria) the proposals in which OGTT is performed only in high-risk women; in all (Option 1) or high-risk (Option 1-Sel) women with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 4.7–5.0 mmol/L; in all (Option 2) or high-risk (Option 2-Sel) women without history of HIP and with FPG 4.7–5.0 mmol/L. We also tested FPG measurement alone in all high-risk women. Measuring FPG alone had a sensitivity of 49% (95% confidence interval 45–54) applying universal screening. Option 2 appeared to have the best balance considering the needed OGTT (17.3%), sensitivity (72% (67–76)) and rates of a composite outcome (true negative cases: 10.6%, false positive cases: 24.4%; true positive cases: 19.5%; false negative cases: 10.2%). Consideration of a history of HIP and measuring first FPG can avoid more than 80% of OGTTs and identify women with the highest risk of adverse HIP-related events.

Prognosis associated with initial care of increased fasting glucose in early pregnancy: A retrospective study

AIM

To evaluate whether the initial care of women with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels at 5.1-6.9mmol/L before 22 weeks of gestation (WG), termed 'early fasting hyperglycaemia', is associated with fewer adverse outcomes than no initial care.

METHODS

A total of 523 women with early fasting hyperglycaemia were retrospectively selected in our department (2012-2016) and separated into two groups: (i) those who received immediate care (n=255); and (ii) those who did not (n=268), but had an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at or after 22 WG, with subsequent standard care if hyperglycaemia (by WHO criteria) was present. The number of cases of large-for-gestational age (LGA) infants, shoulder dystocia and preeclampsia with initial care of early fasting hyperglycaemia were compared after propensity score modelling and accounting for covariates.

RESULTS

Of the 268 women with no initial care, 134 had hyperglycaemia after 22 WG and then received care. Women who received initial care vs those who did not were more likely to be insulin-treated during pregnancy (58.0% vs 20.9%, respectively; P<0.00001), gained less gestational weight (8.6±5.4kg vs 10.8±6.1kg, respectively; P<0.00001), had a lower rate of preeclampsia [1.2% vs 2.6%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.247 (0.082-0.759), P=0.01], and similar rates of LGA infants (12.2% vs 11.9%, respectively) and shoulder dystocia (1.6% vs 1.5%, respectively). When initial FPG levels were ≥5.5mmol/L (prespecified group, n=137), there was a lower rate of LGA infants [6.7% vs 16.1%, respectively; aOR: 0.332 (0.122-0.898); P=0.03].

CONCLUSION

Treating women with early fasting hyperglycaemia, especially when FPG is ≥5.5mmol/L, may improve pregnancy outcomes, although this now needs to be confirmed by randomized clinical trials.

Diabetes und Schwangerschaft – Update 2020

In einer kurzen Übersicht werden die aktuellen Erkenntnisse zur Coronaviruserkrankung 2019 (COVID-19) bei Schwangeren dargestellt. Selbstmonitoring der kapillaren Blutglukosewerte ist derzeit noch der Goldstandard bei Schwangeren. Bei Verwendung subkutaner Glukosesensoren sollte die „time in range“ (TIR) >70 % in dem Bereich 63–140 mg/dl (3,5–7,8 mmol/l) so früh wie möglich erreicht werden. Bei präexistentem Diabetes besteht bei Kindern mit einer Wachstumsrestriktion ein hohes Risiko für Totgeburten. Mangels nachgewiesener Verbesserung relevanter Endpunkte sollten pharmakologische Therapien bei Schwangeren mit frühem Gestationsdiabetes <24 + 0 Schwangerschaftswochen besonders kritisch abgewogen werden. Präkonzeptionell adipöse Frauen sollten bis zur Geburt nicht mehr als 6 kg zunehmen. Nach bariatrisch-metabolischer Chirurgie bestehen neben Vorteilen für die Mütter erhöhte Risiken für Neugeborene, z. B. eine erhöhte Rate an „small for gestational age“ nach Roux-en-Y-Magenbypass.

Diagnostic Strategies for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Review of Current Evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Currently, the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) lacks uniformity. Several controversies are still under debate, especially on the method of screening and diagnosis. This review focuses on recent literature and provides current evidence for the screening and diagnosis of GDM.

RECENT FINDINGS

Selective screening would miss a significant number of women with GDM. In contrast, universal screening has been shown to be cost-effective, compared with selective screening, and is recommended by many medical societies. For the diagnostic methods for GDM, most observational cohort studies reported that the one-step method is associated with improved pregnancy outcomes and is cost-saving or cost-effective, compared with the two-step method, although these findings should be confirmed in the upcoming randomized controlled trials which compare the performance of one-step and two-step methods. On the other hand, the methods of early screening or diagnosis of GDM are varied, and current evidence does not justify their use during early pregnancy. In conclusion, current evidence favors universal screening for GDM using the one-step method. Early screening for GDM is not favorably supported by the literature.

Physical activity pattern in early pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus risk among low-income women: A prospective cross-sectional study

Objective:

Gestational diabetes mellitus is increasing worldwide, mainly in developing countries, and physical activity has not been studied in gestational diabetes mellitus prevention among low-income population. This prospective cross-sectional study assessed the gestational diabetes mellitus risk related to physical activity in early pregnancy among low-income women.

Methods:

A prospective cross-sectional study with 544 low-income pregnant women was conducted at the Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira, Brazil. Gestational diabetes mellitus was diagnosed using the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria. Physical activity was assessed during early pregnancy using the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire and categorized as sedentary, light, moderate, or vigorous intensity.

Results:

Gestational diabetes mellitus occurred in 95 of 544 women (17.4%). Body mass index was higher in the gestational diabetes mellitus group. Nearly half of all pregnant women studied were physically inactive, and none of them were classified as vigorous physical active. Sedentary physical activity pattern was associated with a higher odds of gestational diabetes mellitus (odds ratio = 1.8, 95% confidence interval = 1.1–2.9), which did not change after adjusting for several covariates (odds ratio = 1.9, 95% confidence interval = 1.2–3.1).

Conclusion:

Physical inactivity in early pregnancy is associated with a higher risk of gestational diabetes mellitus among low-income women.