Association between variations of physiological prolactin serum levels and the risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The relationship between low prolactin and type 2 diabetes

Prolactin (PRL) is secreted throughout life in men and women. At elevated levels, its physiological role in pregnancy and lactation, and pathological effects, are well known. However clinical implications of low circulating PRL are not well established. We conducted a meta-analysis to examine the relationship between low PRL levels and type 2 diabetes. Five papers included cross-sectional studies comprising 8,720 men (mean age range 51.4-60 years) and 3,429 women (49.5-61.6 years), and four papers included cohort studies comprising 2,948 men (52.1-60.0 years) and 3,203 women (49.2-60.1 years). Individuals with pregnancy, lactation and hyperprolactinemia, drugs known to alter circulating PRL levels, or pituitary diseases had been excluded. Although most studies used quartiles to categorize PRL groups for analysis, PRL cut-off values (all measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay) were variably defined between studies: the lowest PRL quartiles ranged from 3.6 ng/ml to 7.2 ng/ml in men and between 4.5 ng/ml to 8 ng/ml in women; and the highest PRL quartiles ranged from 6.9 ng/ml to 13 ng/ml in men and 9.6 ng/ml to 15.8 ng/ml in women. Type 2 diabetes was defined variably using self-reported physician's diagnosis, fasting blood glucose, oral glucose tolerance test or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C). In cross-sectional studies, compared to individuals in the highest PRL groups (reference), those in the lowest PRL groups had greater risk of type 2 diabetes both in men: odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval = 1.86 (1.56-2.22) and in women: OR = 2.15 (1.63-2.85). In cohort studies, women showed a significant association between low PRL and type 2 diabetes: OR = 1.52 (1.02-2.28) but not men: OR = 1.44 (0.46-4.57). Relatively low heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 25-38.4%) for cross-sectional studies, but higher for cohort studies (I2 = 52.8-79.7%). In conclusion, low PRL is associated with type 2 diabetes, but discrepancy between men and women in the relationship within cohort studies requires further research.

Effect size and inferential statistical techniques coupled with machine learning for assessing the association between prolactin concentration and metabolic homeostasis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Recent guidelines classify low prolactin levels as low as <7 ng/mL and high levels as >25 ng/mL, while the "Homeostatically Functionally Increased Transient Prolactinemia" (HomeoFIT-PRL) range (25-100 ng/mL) suggests that a temporary increase in prolactin could be metabolically beneficial if no related health issues are present. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between mean prolactin concentrations and disturbances in glycidic and lipidic metabolism and to identify the gray zone associated with prolactin inflection points that correlate with these metabolic changes.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study involved 65,795 adults who underwent HOMA-IR, glucose, insulin, total cholesterol, HDL-c, LDL-c, and triglyceride tests. Data was categorized into 106 partitions based on prolactin results. Employing an approach referred to in this study as "Hierarchical Multicriteria Analysis of Differences Between Groups - Statistical and Effect Size Approach" (HiMADiG-SESA) comparing the mean concentrations of metabolic tests across prolactin ranges. A machine learning model was utilized to determine inflection points and their corresponding confidence intervals (CIs). These CIs helped establish gray zones in mean prolactin results related to metabolic changes.

RESULTS

Statistically and clinically, metabolic test means differed for prolactin <7 ng/mL, except insulin. In the HomeoFIT-PRL range, means were lower except for HDL-c. The gray zones of the mean prolactin results associated with changes in glycidic and lipidic metabolism were 9.58-12.87 ng/mL and 13.81-18.73 ng/mL, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A strong correlation was identified between mean prolactin concentrations and the results of metabolism tests below the gray zones associated with inflection points, indicating the potential role of prolactin in the appearance of metabolic disorders. Mean prolactin results can provide deeper insight into metabolic balance.

The effects of different physiologic concentrations of prolactin in association with reproductive hormones on the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in men: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study

BACKGROUND

Data is inconsistent and, for the most part, not sufficient to demonstrate the association between serum Prolactin (PRL) concentration within the physiologic range and the incidence rate of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) among men. Moreover, since both PRL and type 2 DM are associated with reproductive hormones, investigating these hormones might improve our understanding of how PRL might impose its effect on the incidence rate of type 2 DM.

METHODS

For the present study, 652 eligible men aged 29-70 with a normal baseline PRL concentration were selected from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS). Participants were sub-classified into three groups (tertiles) according to the serum concentration of PRL and were followed for 15.8 years. The incidence of type 2 DM and PRL, LH, FSH, testosterone, and AMH concentrations were measured. The effect of hormonal variables on the incidence of type 2 DM was estimated using the log-binomial model, adjusted for major confounding factors. The correlations between PRL and the indicators of glucose and lipid metabolism and other hormonal variables were also explored.

RESULTS

In the unadjusted model, PRL was not significantly associated with the incidence rate of type 2 DM (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.94 - 1.03). After adjusting for potential confounders, the inverse effect of AMH on the incidence rate of type 2 DM was the only significant association. The analyses also indicated a significant positive association between PRL and LH/FSH ratio (r = 0.1, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

No significant association was found between serum PRL concentrations within the physiologic range and the incidence rate of type 2 diabetes mellitus among middle-aged men. Men with higher concentrations of PRL within the physiologic range tended to show higher levels of LH and LH/FSH. AMH was the only variable significantly linked to the incidence rate of type 2 DM in men.

A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies on Prolactin Levels in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are reported to have different levels of prolactin (PRL) compared to women without PCOS. This study aimed to evaluate the PRL levels in women with PCOS, compared to the control group, before and after adjustment for potential confounders. Using a logical combination of keywords, a comprehensive search was carried out in PubMed and Web of Science, from inception to 30 August 2022. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) with corresponding 95% CIs in PRL levels were employed with a random-effects model. I² was applied to evaluate heterogeneity among studies. A meta-regression analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted to explore heterogeneity sources. Publication bias was assessed by the Egger test. Thirty-two studies, measuring PRL levels in 8551 PCOS patients according to the Rotterdam criteria and 13,737 controls, were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled effect size suggested that the overall weighted mean difference (WMD) of PRL level was significantly higher in women with PCOS, compared to controls (WMD = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.04-1.98, p = 0.040). The result of meta-regression adjusted for age, BMI, and the continent of origin, revealed no confounding effect on results. Sub-group analysis of PRL levels according to the continent of origin showed significantly higher PRL levels among Eurasian PCOS patients compared to the control; this difference was not statistically significant in the subgroups of women from Asia, Europe, and South America. In conclusion, PRL levels in patients who were diagnosed according to the Rotterdam criteria were significantly higher than non-PCOS participants. Slightly higher levels of PRL could be presented as a diagnostic feature of PCOS.

Cross-sectional association between prolactin levels and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective analysis of patients from a single hospital in China

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to retrospectively assess the association between prolactin (PRL) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

DESIGN AND SETTING

A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted at a single hospital in Anhui, China.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 406 patients with T2DM (230 men and 176 women) was included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

P values for the independent t-test, the Mann-Whitney rank-sum test, the Spearman correlation analysis and multiple logistic regression models were used to explore the association between PRL and NAFLD in patients with T2DM.

RESULTS

The results indicated that in both men and women, the levels of PRL were significantly lower in the T2DM with NAFLD group than in the T2DM without NAFLD group (men: 9.56 ng/mL vs 10.36 ng/mL, women: 10.38 ng/mL vs 12.97 ng/mL). In male patients, the levels of PRL were negatively correlated with hip circumference (r=-0.141, p=0.032), homoeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (C-peptide) (r=-0.141, p=0.032) and triglyceride (TG) (r=-0.252, p=0.000) values and inversely correlated with high-density lipoprotein (r=0.147, p=0.025) levels. In female patients, PRL levels were negatively related to body mass index (r=-0.192, p=0.011), diastolic blood pressure (r=-0.220, p=0.003), waist circumference (r=-0.152, p=0.044), hip circumference (r=-0.157, p=0.037) and TG (r=-0.258, p=0.001) values. Logistic regression analysis revealed a negative relationship between PRL and NAFLD (men: OR 0.891, 95% CI 0.803 to 0.989, p=0.031; women: OR 0.874, 95% CI 0.797 to 0.957, p=0.004). As PRL levels increased, NAFLD prevalence decreased in both sexes (men: p=0.012, women: p=0.013).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that low levels of PRL in the physiological range were markers of NAFLD in patients with T2DM and that PRL within the biologically high range may play a protective role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD.

Prolactin and Maternal Metabolism in Women With a Recent GDM Pregnancy and Links to Future T2D: The SWIFT Study

CONTEXT

Prolactin is a multifaceted hormone known to regulate lactation. In women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) history, intensive lactation has been associated with lower relative risk of future type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the role of prolactin in T2D development and maternal metabolism in women with a recent GDM pregnancy has not been ascertained.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the relationships among prolactin, future T2D risk, and key clinical and metabolic parameters.

METHODS

We utilized a prospective GDM research cohort (the SWIFT study) and followed T2D onset by performing 2-hour 75-g research oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at study baseline (6-9 weeks postpartum) and again annually for 2 years, and also by retrieving clinical diagnoses of T2D from 2 years through 10 years of follow up from electronic medical records. Targeted metabolomics and lipidomics were applied on fasting plasma samples collected at study baseline from 2-hour 75-g research OGTTs in a nested case-control study (100 future incident T2D cases vs 100 no T2D controls).

RESULTS

Decreasing prolactin quartiles were associated with increased future T2D risk (adjusted odds ratio 2.48; 95% CI, 0.81-7.58; P = 0.05). In women who maintained normoglycemia during the 10-year follow-up period, higher prolactin at baseline was associated with higher insulin sensitivity (P = 0.038) and HDL-cholesterol (P = 0.01), but lower BMI (P = 0.001) and leptin (P = 0.002). Remarkably, among women who developed future T2D, prolactin was not correlated with a favorable metabolic status (all P > 0.05). Metabolomics and lipidomics showed that lower circulating prolactin strongly correlated with a T2D-high risk lipid profile, with elevated circulating neutral lipids and lower concentrations of specific phospholipids/sphingolipids.

CONCLUSION

In women with recent GDM pregnancy, low circulating prolactin is associated with specific clinical and metabolic parameters and lipid metabolites linked to a high risk of developing T2D.

Prolactin and its significance in the placenta

Prolactin, a pituitary hormone that was discovered about 80 years ago and is primarily known for its functions in mammary gland development and lactation, is now known to participate in numerous functions across different phylogenetic groups. Fundamentally known for its secretion from lactotroph cells in adenohypophysis region of pituitary gland, newer studies have demonstrated a number of extrapituitary sites which secrete prolactin, where it acts in an autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine manner to regulate essential physiological and biochemical processes. These sites include lymphocytes, epithelial cells of lactating mammary glands, breast cancer cells of epithelial origin, and the placenta. The placenta is one of the most important organs secreting prolactin; however, its role in placental biology has not to date been reviewed comprehensively. This review elaborates upon the various facets of prolactin hormone, including prolactin production and its post-translational modifications and signaling. Major emphasis is placed on placental prolactin and its potential roles, ranging from the role of prolactin in angiogenesis, preeclampsia, maternal diabetes, and anti-apoptosis, among others.

Association of Serum Prolactin With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study From South India

BACKGROUND

 The association of serum prolactin (PRL) with diabetes is still uncertain, with a paucity of data in the south Indian population. This study aims to compare the serum PRL levels between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients and normoglycaemic volunteers and correlate the serum PRL level with fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, and the lipid profile in the study population.

METHODS

 This was a comparative cross-sectional study among 112 T2DM participants and 112 healthy volunteers in a tertiary care centre in India. All participants were tested for FPG, PPG, HbA1c, fasting serum lipid profile, and serum PRL, which were compared between T2DM patients and healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

 The serum PRL in T2DM patients was significantly lower compared to healthy volunteers (8.67 ± 4.37 vs. 13.76 ± 6.55 ng/ml, P < 0.001). FPG, PPG, and HbA1c correlated inversely with serum PRL in our study population. On multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age and sex, a higher serum PRL level within the physiological range was protective for T2DM (adjusted odds ratio: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77-0.90, P < 0.001). Serum PRL levels were inversely correlated with serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides, but not with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

CONCLUSIONS

A high serum PRL within the physiological range was inversely associated with the prevalence of T2DM in the south Indian population. Serum PRL also correlated inversely with glycaemic and blood lipid parameters. Larger longitudinal studies are required to further validate the association of serum PRL with various components of metabolic syndrome in the south Indian population.

The beneficial metabolic actions of prolactin

The role of prolactin (PRL) favoring metabolic homeostasis is supported by multiple preclinical and clinical studies. PRL levels are key to explaining the direction of its actions. In contrast with the negative outcomes associated with very high (>100 μg/L) and very low (<7 μg/L) PRL levels, moderately high PRL levels, both within but also above the classically considered physiological range are beneficial for metabolism and have been defined as HomeoFIT-PRL. In animal models, HomeoFIT-PRL levels counteract insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, adipose tissue hypertrophy and fatty liver; and in humans associate with reduced prevalence of insulin resistance, fatty liver, glucose intolerance, metabolic syndrome, reduced adipocyte hypertrophy, and protection from type 2 diabetes development. The beneficial actions of PRL can be explained by its positive effects on main metabolic organs including the pancreas, liver, adipose tissue, and hypothalamus. Here, we briefly review work supporting PRL as a promoter of metabolic homeostasis in rodents and humans, the PRL levels associated with metabolic protection, and the proposed mechanisms involved. Finally, we discuss the possibility of using drugs elevating PRL for the treatment of metabolic diseases.

Prolactin in relation to gestational diabetes and metabolic risk in pregnancy and postpartum: A systematic review and meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Pre-clinical evidence suggests that prolactin has important metabolic functions in pregnancy and postpartum, in addition to lactogenic actions.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the relationship between prolactin and maternal metabolic outcomes in human pregnancy and postpartum, particularly in relation to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE via OVID, CINAHL plus, Embase.

STUDY SELECTION

Eligible studies included women who were pregnant or up to 12 months postpartum, reporting at least one maternal serum prolactin level in relation to key metabolic outcomes including GDM, glycaemic parameters, obesity, and gestational weight gain.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent reviewers extracted data.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-six articles were included. Meta-analysis showed no relationship between maternal prolactin levels and GDM status, with a weighted mean difference of -2.14 ng/mL (95% CI -12.54 to 8.27 ng/mL, p=0.7) between GDM and controls in early pregnancy (n=3 studies) and -3.89 ng/mL (95% CI, -15.20 to 7.41 ng/mL, p=0.5) in late pregnancy (n=11 studies). In narrative synthesis of other outcomes (due to study heterogeneity and/or lack of data), prolactin levels were not associated with maternal glycaemic or weight-related parameters during pregnancy, but in the postpartum period (particularly with lactation) a high-prolactin environment was associated with low circulating insulin and beta-cell function, and increased insulin sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence from human studies does not clearly support a relationship between prolactin and metabolic parameters during pregnancy, including with GDM status. Elevated prolactin was associated with lower insulin and beta-cell function and higher insulin sensitivity in the post-partum period, but the direction of causality remains unclear.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier [CRD42021262771].

The interplay between prolactin and cardiovascular disease

Hyperprolactinemia can be caused by several conditions and its effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis are understood in more detail. Nevertheless, in recent decades, other metabolic effects have been studied and data pointed to a potential increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. A recent study showed a decrease in total and LDL- cholesterol only in men with prolactinoma treated with dopamine agonists (DA) supporting the previous results of a population study with increased CVD risk in men harboring prolactinoma. However, other population studies did not find a correlation between prolactin (PRL) levels and CVD risk or mortality. There is also data pointing to an increase in high-density lipoprotein levels, and decreases in triglycerides, carotid-intima-media thickness, C-reactive protein, and homocysteine levels in patients with prolactinoma on DA treatment. PRL was also implicated in endothelial dysfunction in pre and postmenopausal women. Withdrawal of DA resulted in negative changes in vascular parameters and an increase in plasma fibrinogen. It has been shown that PRL levels were positively correlated with blood pressure and inversely correlated with dilatation of the brachial artery and insulin sensitivity, increased homocysteine levels, and elevated D-dimer levels. Regarding possible mechanisms for the association between hyperprolactinemia and CVD risk, they include a possible direct effect of PRL, hypogonadism, and even effects of DA treatment, independently of changes in PRL levels. In conclusion, hyperprolactinemia seems to be associated with impaired endothelial function and DA treatment could improve CVD risk. More studies evaluating CVD risk in hyperprolactinemic patients are important to define a potential indication of treatment beyond hypogonadism.