Polymyxin B and colistimethate are comparable as to efficacy and renal toxicity

Efficacy and Safety Factors Related to Plasma Concentration-Optimized Polymyxin B Therapy in Treating Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections in China

Background

Polymyxin B (PMB)-based combination therapies are used to treat severe carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacterial (CR-GNB) infections. This observational study investigated the relationship between clinical factors, including PMB concentration, and clinical efficacy and safety.

Patients and Methods

Polymyxin B regimens were optimized through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). In all, 382 samples were tested from 130 patients. Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationships between variables with clinical efficacy and 30-day mortality factors were analyzed by Cox regression. The sensitivity and specificity of Cmin and AUC for the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) were determined by ROC curve analysis.

Results

The clinical effectiveness of PMB was 65.4%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that lung infection, continuous renal replacement therapy, and C-reactive protein were independent factors significantly associated with efficacy. AKI occurred in 14.6% of the patients during treatment; age > 73 years (OR: 3.63; 95% CI: 1.035-12.727; P = 0.044), Cmin greater than 2.3 µg/mL (OR: 7.37; 95% CI: 1.571-34.580; P = 0.011), combined vancomycin (OR: 9.47; 95% CI: 1.732-51.731; P = 0.009), and combined piperacillin-tazobactam (OR: 21.87; 95% CI: 3.139-152.324; P = 0.002) were independent risk factors. The identified PMB cut-offs for predicting AKI were Cmin = 2.3 µg/mL and AUC = 82.0 mg h/L.

Conclusion

Polymyxin B-based combination regimens are effective in treating CR-GNB infections, particularly bloodstream infections, but have shown unsatisfactory for lung infections. Cmin ≥ 2.3 µg /mL and AUC ≥ 82.0 mg h/L may increase PMB-associated AKI incidence. PMB dose should be adjusted based on TDM to ensure efficacy.

Efficiency of polymyxin B treatment against nosocomial infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Some cohort studies have explored the effects and safety of polymyxin B (PMB) in comparison to other antibiotics for the treatment of nosocomial infections, yielding inconsistent results. This systematic review aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of PMB and compared it with other antibiotics.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, searching specific terms to identify quantitative cohort studies or RCTs that compared the effects of PMB with other antibiotics in terms of their efficacy and safety. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was conducted to evaluate the risk of bias of observational studies. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used for outcome assessment. We evaluated heterogeneity using the I 2 test.

Results

A total of 22 observational trials were included in the analysis. The PMB group had a higher mortality rate compared to the control group (odds ratio: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.36-2.50, p<0.00001, I 2 = 73%). while, the ceftazidime-avibactam group demonstrated a distinct advantage with lower mortality rates, despite still exhibiting high heterogeneity (odds ratio 2.73, 95% confidence interval 1.59-4.69; p = 0.0003; I 2 = 53%). Additionally, the PMB group had a lower nephrotoxicity rate compared to the colistin group but exhibited high heterogeneity in the results (odds ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.93; p = 0.02; I 2 = 73%).

Conclusion

In patients with nosocomial infections, PMB is not superior to other antibiotics in terms of mortality, specifically when compared to ceftazidime-avibactam. However, PMB demonstrated an advantage in terms of nephrotoxicity compared to colistin.

Recent Advances in the Development of Polymyxin Antibiotics: 2010-2023

The polymyxins are nonribosomal lipopeptides produced by Paenibacillus polymyxa and are potent antibiotics with activity specifically directed against Gram-negative bacteria. While the clinical use of polymyxins has historically been limited due to their toxicity, their use is on the rise given the lack of alternative treatment options for infections due to multidrug resistant Gram-negative pathogens. The Gram-negative specificity of the polymyxins is due to their ability to target lipid A, the membrane embedded LPS anchor that decorates the cell surface of Gram-negative bacteria. Notably, the mechanisms responsible for polymyxin toxicity, and in particular their nephrotoxicity, are only partially understood with most insights coming from studies carried out in the past decade. In parallel, many synthetic and semisynthetic polymyxin analogues have been developed in recent years in an attempt to mitigate the nephrotoxicity of the natural products. Despite these efforts, to date, no polymyxin analogues have gained clinical approval. This may soon change, however, as at the moment there are three novel polymyxin analogues in clinical trials. In this context, this review provides an update of the most recent insights with regard to the structure-activity relationships and nephrotoxicity of new polymyxin variants reported since 2010. We also discuss advances in the synthetic methods used to generate new polymyxin analogues, both via total synthesis and semisynthesis.

Battle of polymyxin induced nephrotoxicity: Polymyxin B versus colistin

OBJECTIVES

Nephrotoxicity is the most serious and common adverse effect that limits the use of polymyxins. This study compared polymyxin E (colistin) and polymyxin B regarding drug-related nephrotoxicity.

METHODS

This study was conducted as a retrospective cohort study in a university hospital between January 2020 and July 2022. Patients older than 18 years and who received colistin or polymyxin B were identified using electronic hospital records. Kidney disease improving global outcome criteria were used for assessing nephrotoxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 190 patients, 95 in both groups, were evaluated. The incidence of acute kidney injury during the treatment was higher in the colistin group [52.6% (n = 50) and 34.7% (n = 33), P = 0.013]. In patients who were exposed to high-dose, the rate of nephrotoxicity was higher in patients receiving colistin [25% (n = 3) vs. 76.9% (n = 10); P = 0.017]. Nephrotoxicity was reversible in 64.4% (n = 38) of patients and the reversibility rate was similar (70% and 52.6% for colistin and polymyxin; P = 0.248). In the multivariable analysis, colistin treatment [odds ratio (OR): 3.882, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = (1.829-8.241)], concomitant vasopressor use (OR = 2.08, CI: 1.036-4.179), and age (OR=1.036, CI: 1.014-1.058) were found to be independent markers of nephrotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Nephrotoxicity was more common in patients receiving high-dose colistin than polymyxin B. Therefore, the use of appropriate doses of colistin is important in terms of preventing nephrotoxicity. In addition, advancing age and concomitant use of vasopressors contribute to polymyxin-related nephrotoxicity.

Acute kidney injury associated with colistin sulfate vs. polymyxin B sulfate therapy: A real-world, retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients treated with colistin sulfate (CS) and polymyxin B sulfate (PMB).

METHODS

Sociodemographic and laboratory measures of adult patients who received intravenous CS or PMB for at least 72 h for the first time at the study hospital from October 2021 to November 2022 were collected retrospectively. The primary outcome was the incidence of AKI, defined by the Kidney Diseases Improving Global Outcomes criteria. The secondary outcome was 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

In total, 109 patients were included in the CS cohort and 176 patients were included in the PMB cohort. The incidence of AKI was significantly higher in the PMB cohort compared with the CS cohort (50.6% vs. 18.3%; P<0.001). On multi-variate analysis, CS therapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.275; P<0.001] was an independent protective factor for AKI, along with higher estimated glomerular filtration rate. Nevertheless, 30-day mortality was similar in the PMB and CS cohorts (21.6% vs. 13.8%; P=0.099). Multi-variate analyses revealed that CS therapy was not associated with 30-day mortality (HR 0.968; P=0.926), while intensive care unit admission, combination with meropenem, Charlson score and stage 3 AKI were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. After balancing the baseline characteristics of patients using propensity score matching, the main results were unchanged.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of AKI was significantly lower in the CS cohort compared with the PMB cohort. However, 30-day mortality was similar in the two cohorts.

Semisynthetic polymyxins with potent antibacterial activity and reduced kidney cell toxicity

The growing incidence of infections caused by multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria has led to an increased use of last-resort antibiotics such as the polymyxins. Polymyxin therapy is limited by toxicity concerns, most notably nephrotoxicity. Recently we reported the development of a novel class of semisynthetic polymyxins with reduced toxicity wherein the N-terminal lipid and diaminobutyric acid residue are replaced by a cysteine-linked lipid featuring a reductively labile disulfide bond. In the present study we further explored the potential of this approach by also varying the amino acid residue directly adjacent to the polymyxin macrocycle. This led to the identification of new semisynthetic polymyxins that maintain the potent antibacterial activity of the clinically used polymyxin B while exhibiting a further reduction in toxicity toward human proximal tubule epithelial cells. Furthermore, these new polymyxins were found to effectively synergize with novobiocin, rifampicin, and erythromycin against mcr-positive, polymyxin resistant E. coli.

Comparison between Colistin and Polymyxin B in the Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex

Polymyxins are still widely used for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections (BSIs). This study seeks to evaluate the impact of polymyxin B versus colistin on mortality and nephrotoxicity in BSI caused by these bacteria. We conducted a retrospective cohort study from 2014 to 2021 in Porto Alegre, Brazil. We included patients aged ≥18 years and excluded patients with polymicrobial infection or treatment for ≤48 h. The 30-day mortality was the primary outcome evaluated through Cox regression. We included 259 patients with BSI episodes: 78.8% caused by A. baumannii and 21.2% caused by P. aeruginosa. Polymyxin B did not impact mortality compared to colistin (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-1.30; p = 0.40 (when adjusted for COVID-19 comorbidity, p = 0.05), Pitt bacteremia score, p < 0.01; Charlson comorbidity index, p < 0.001; time to start active antimicrobial therapy, p = 0.02). Results were maintained in the subgroups of BSI caused by A. baumannii (aHR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.55-1.54; p = 0.74), P. aeruginosa (aHR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.17-1.32; p = 0.15) and critical care patients (aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.47-1.26; p = 0.30). Treatment with polymyxin B or colistin did not impact 30-day mortality in patients with carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii or P. aeruginosa BSI.

Colistin versus polymyxin B: A pragmatic assessment of renal and neurological adverse effects and effectiveness in multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections

OBJECTIVES

Our study aimed to evaluate the real-world data on renal and neurological adverse effects and effectiveness of colistimethate sodium (CMS) and polymyxin B (PMB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational prospective study was performed on inpatients receiving CMS and PMB for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. CMS dose was titrated to renal function, and serum creatinine was assessed daily. The incidence of nephrotoxicity, the primary outcome, was evaluated based on an increase in serum creatinine from baseline as well as by the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage renal disease criteria. Neurological adverse effects were assessed based on clinical signs and symptoms, and the causality and severity were assessed by the Naranjo scale and modified Hartwig-Siegel scale, respectively. The effectiveness of polymyxin therapy was ascertained by a composite of microbiological eradication of causative bacteria and achievement of clinical cure. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was also determined.

RESULTS

Between CMS and PMB, the incidence of nephrotoxicity (59.3% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.653) or neurotoxicity (8.3% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.525) did not significantly differ. However, reversal of nephrotoxicity was significantly more with patients receiving CMS than PMB (48.4% vs. 23.3%, P = 0.021). Favorable clinical outcomes (67.6% vs. 37%, P < 0.001) and microbiological eradication of causative bacteria (73.1% vs. 46.3%, P = 0.001) were significantly more with CMS than PMB. Patients treated with CMS had lower all-cause mortality than those with PMB treatment (19.4% vs. 42.6%, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference in the incidence of renal and neurotoxic adverse effects between CMS and PMB when CMS is administered following renal dose modification. CMS shows better effectiveness and lower mortality compared to PMB.

Population pharmacokinetics and limited sampling strategies of polymyxin B in critically ill patients

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of polymyxin B in Chinese critically ill patients. The factors significantly affecting PK parameters are identified, and a limited sampling strategy for therapeutic drug monitoring of polymyxin B is explored.

METHODS

Thirty patients (212 samples) were included in a population PK analysis. A limited sampling strategy was developed using Bayesian estimation, multiple linear regression and modified integral equations. Non-linear mixed-effects models were developed using Phoenix NLME software.

RESULTS

A two-compartment population PK model was used to describe polymyxin B PK. Population estimates of the volumes of central compartment distribution (V) and peripheral compartment distribution (V2), central compartment clearance (CL) and intercompartmental clearance (Q) were 7.857 L, 12.668 L, 1.672 L/h and 7.009 L/h. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) significantly affected CL, and body weight significantly affected CL and Q. The AUC0-12h of polymyxin B in patients with CRRT was significantly lower than in patients without CRRT. CL and Q increased with increasing body weight. A limited sampling strategy was suggested using a two-sample scheme with plasma at 0.5h and 8h after the end of infusion (C0.5 and C8) for therapeutic drug monitoring in the clinic.

CONCLUSIONS

A dosing regimen should be based on body weight and the application of CRRT. A two-sample strategy for therapeutic drug monitoring could facilitate individualized treatment with polymyxin B in critically ill patients.

Does Monitoring Total and Free Polymyxin B1 Plasma Concentrations Predict Polymyxin B-Induced Nephrotoxicity? A Retrospective Study in Critically Ill Patients

INTRODUCTION

The correlation between total and free polymyxin B (PMB including PMB1 and PMB2) exposure in vivo and acute kidney injury (AKI) remains obscure. This study explores the relationships between plasma exposure of PMB1 and PMB2 and nephrotoxicity, and investigates the risk factors for PMB-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Critically ill patients who used PMB and met the criteria were enrolled. The total plasma concentration and plasma binding of PMB1 and PMB2 were analysed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and equilibrium dialysis.

RESULTS

A total of 89 patients were finally included, and AKI developed in 28.1% of them. The peak concentration of PMB1 (C_max (B1)) (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.68, 95% CI 1.08-2.62, p = 0.023), baseline BUN level (AOR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.16, p = 0.039) and hypertension (AOR = 3.73, 95% CI 1.21-11.54, p = 0.022) were independent risk factors for PMB-induced AKI. The area under the ROC curve of the model was 0.799. When C_max (B1) was 5.23 μg/ml or more, the probability of AKI was higher than 50%. The ratio of PMB1/PMB2 decreased after PMB preparation entered into the body. The protein binding rate in critically ill patients indicated significant individual differences. Free C_max (B) and free C_max (B1) levels in the AKI group were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those in the non-AKI group. Total and free concentrations of PMB in patients showed a positive correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the ROC curve and logistic regression model showed that C_max (B1) was a good predictor for the probability of PMB-induced AKI. Early therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of PMB should be considered in critically ill patients. Compared with C_min (B), C_max (B) and C_max (B1) may be helpful for the early prediction of PMB-induced AKI in critically ill patients.

Risk of polymyxin B-induced acute kidney injury with a non adjusted dose versus adjusted dose based on renal function

Aim: To observe the difference in the risk of polymyxin B (PMB)-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) with or without dose adjustment based on the patients renal function. Materials & methods: This retrospective cohort analysis was carried out in 115 patients treated with PMB from November 2018 to October 2019. Results: No significant difference in the incidence of AKI as well as secondary outcomes was observed between these two groups (47.5 vs 37.14%; p = 0.304). Conclusion: Dosing adjustment based on renal function does not significantly lower the risk of PMB-induced AKI. A non adjusted dosing strategy for PMB is recommended in patients exhibiting various levels of renal impairment.

Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022 Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa)

BACKGROUND

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. The initial guidance document on infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa) was published on 17 September 2020. Over the past year, there have been a number of important publications furthering our understanding of the management of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections, prompting a rereview of the literature and this updated guidance document.

METHODS

A panel of 6 infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections reviewed, updated, and expanded previously developed questions and recommendations about the treatment of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Preferred and alternative treatment recommendations are provided with accompanying rationales, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Recommendations apply for both adult and pediatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This document is current as of 24 October 2021. The most current versions of IDSA documents, including dates of publication, are available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance/.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of peptide antibiotics

Antimicrobial resistance is a major global health challenge. As few new efficacious antibiotics will become available in the near future, peptide antibiotics continue to be major therapeutic options for treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens. Rational use of antibiotics requires optimisation of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for the treatment of different types of infections. Toxicodynamics must also be considered to improve the safety of antibiotic use and, where appropriate, to guide therapeutic drug monitoring. This review focuses on the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics/toxicodynamics of peptide antibiotics against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens. Optimising antibiotic exposure at the infection site is essential for improving their efficacy and minimising emergence of resistance.

Trough polymyxin B plasma concentration is an independent risk factor for its nephrotoxicity

AIMS

Data regarding clinical pharmacokinetic/toxicodynamic (PK/TD) of polymyxin B is short of direct quantitative data. This study aims to investigate the risk factors of polymyxin B associated acute kidney injury (AKI) and to assess the relationship between polymyxin B plasma levels and its nephrotoxicity.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in adult patients treated with polymyxin B. Risk factors associated with AKI and plasma trough concentrations of polymyxin B were identified via medical record review. A multivariate logistic regression model was established and the risk of polymyxin B-associated AKI were predicted by a receiver operating characteristic curve, with maximal Youden index used to identify safety thresholds among the study population.

RESULTS

Fifty-four adult patients were included in the study. AKI was detected in 14 patients during polymyxin B treatment (25.9%, 14 out of 54). C_min (odds ratio [OR] 2.071; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.235-3.472) and baseline serum creatinine (OR 1.024; 95% CI 1.005-1.043) were significant independent risk factors for developing AKI. The area under the ROC curve of the combined predictor was larger based on the above factors. When the Youden index was at maximum, the optimal cut-off point was 6.678 of the ROC curve. When C_min  ≥ 3.13 mg/L, the probability of AKI was more than 50%.

CONCLUSION

In this study, when the calculated combined predictor value was >6.678, there was an increased risk of AKI. Maintaining a polymyxin B C_min level below 3.13 mg/L may be helpful in reducing the incidence of polymyxin B associated nephrotoxicity.

Clinical Efficacy of Polymyxin B in Patients Infected with Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms

Purpose

Carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs) pose great challenges for clinical treatment. Polymyxin B (PMB) is one of the “last resort” choices of CRO infections. We explored the possible factors affecting PMB efficacy.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective study involved CRO-infected patients treated with PMB for ≥72 h. The endpoint indicator was clinical efficacy. We compared the characteristics (demographics, pathogenic bacteria, PMB treatment) between patients who had “clinical success” (CS) and “clinical failure” (CF).

Results

A total of 191 patients were enrolled: 110 in the CS group and 81 in the CF group. The total cumulative dose for the CS group was higher than the CF group [1100 (700–1443.75) vs 800 (500–1112.5) mg; P = 0.001]. Treatment duration in the CS group was longer than the CF group [11 (8–14) vs 8 (6–11) days; P < 0.000]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed mechanical ventilation, vasoactive agents, multiple-site infection, and total cumulative dose to be independently associated with clinical efficacy. Cox survival analysis for 30-day mortality also showed that the use of vasoactive agents and the total cumulative dose of PMB could influence survival time and mortality rate independently.

Conclusion

PMB had good efficacy and a low prevalence of adverse reactions. The total cumulative dose, duration of PMB treatment, mechanical ventilation, vasoactive agents, and multiple-site infection were factors associated with the clinical efficacy of PMB.

Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa)

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial-resistant infections are commonly encountered in US hospitals and result in significant morbidity and mortality. This guidance document provides recommendations for the treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa).

METHODS

A panel of 6 infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections formulated common questions regarding the treatment of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections. Based on review of the published literature and clinical experience, the panel provide recommendations and associated rationale for each recommendation. Because of significant differences in the molecular epidemiology of resistance and the availability of specific anti-infective agents globally, this document focuses on treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Approaches to empiric treatment selection, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are briefly discussed. The majority of guidance focuses on preferred and alternative treatment recommendations for antimicrobial-resistant infections, assuming that the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility testing results are known. Treatment recommendations apply to both adults and children.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is dynamic and rapidly evolving, and the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections will continue to challenge clinicians. This guidance document is current as of 17 September 2020. Updates to this guidance document will occur periodically as new data emerge. Furthermore, the panel will expand recommendations to include other problematic gram-negative pathogens in future versions. The most current version of the guidance including the date of publication can be found at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance/.

Comparisons of adverse event reporting for colistin versus polymyxin B using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

Background: The polymyxins (colistin and polymyxin B) have recently reemerged in clinical practice. With the same antimicrobial activities, colistin has been more frequently prescribed in most countries, although available evidence on their nephrotoxicity is conflicting.Methods: The US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data from Q1-2004 to Q1-2020 were used to identify adverse events (AE) reports. We described the reporting patterns and compare the reporting rates of serious AEs, acute kidney diseases (AKD), and death between colistin and polymyxin B using reporting odds ratios (RORs).Results: The annual number of AE reports increased over time for both drugs. Heterogeneity in reporting characteristics was observed in age and reporter region. RORs of serious, AKD, and death AEs were significantly higher for both drugs versus other drugs. RORs of serious and AKD AEs were higher for colistin compared to polymyxin B (p = 0.0479 and p = 0.0306, respectively), but no difference in death RORs was detected (p = 0.2211).Conclusions: This study showed higher reporting rates of serious AEs and AKD for colistin than polymyxin B, but no difference in death. The findings support future research with stronger study design and larger sample size for the safety comparison between colistin and polymyxin B.

Clinical use of intravenous polymyxin B for the treatment of patients with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections: An evaluation of the current evidence

OBJECTIVES

The epidemic dimensions of the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections have led to the revival of old antibiotics, including the polymyxins.

METHODS

We performed a review and meta-analysis to evaluate the current literature data regarding the effectiveness and safety of intravenous polymyxin B in patients with MDR Gram-negative bacterial infections and the overall mortality and nephrotoxicity in patients treated with intravenous polymyxin B either as monotherapy or combination therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 5 prospective and 28 retrospective studies, 1 cross-sectional study, 2 retrospective case series and 7 case reports provided data regarding the effectiveness and/or toxicity of intravenous polymyxin B. All-cause mortality of 2910 patients (from 27 studies) who received intravenous polymyxin B was 41.2% (95% CI 35.5-47.0%). All-cause nephrotoxicity of 2994 patients (from 28 studies) treated with intravenous polymyxin B was 40.7% (95% CI 35.0-46.6%). Renal failure among 2111 patients (from 14 studies) was 11.2% (95% CI 8.7-13.9%).

CONCLUSION

Mortality of patients treated with intravenous polymyxin B is similar to the literature-reported mortality of patients treated with intravenous colistin, while nephrotoxicity associated with polymyxin B use is possibly milder compared with colistin use based on literature data. Head-to-head prospective studies would help to clarify the benefit of polymyxin B over colistin. However, a critical evaluation of the existing worldwide literature data supports the need for availability of the intravenous formulation of polymyxin B as a potentially useful option for the treatment of patients with MDR and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections.

Systematic review on estimated rates of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity in patients treated with polymyxins

BACKGROUND

Nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity are commonly associated with polymyxin treatment; however, the emergence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria with limited therapeutic options has resulted in increased use of polymyxins.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the rates of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity during polymyxin treatment and whether any factors influence these.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched on 2 January 2020.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies reporting nephrotoxicity and/or neurotoxicity rates in patients with infections treated with polymyxins were included. Reviews, meta-analyses and reports not in English were excluded.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients hospitalized with infections treated with systemic or inhaled polymyxins were included. For comparative analyses, patients treated with non-polymyxin-based regimens were also included.

METHODS

Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model; subgroup meta-analyses were conducted where data permitted using a mixed-effects model.

RESULTS

In total, 237 reports of randomized controlled trials, cohort and case-control studies were eligible for inclusion; most were single-arm observational studies. Nephrotoxic events in 35,569 patients receiving polymyxins were analysed. Overall nephrotoxicity rate was 0.282 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.259-0.307). When excluding studies where >50% of patients received inhaled-only polymyxin treatment or nephrotoxicity assessment was by methods other than internationally recognized criteria (RIFLE, KDIGO or AKIN), the nephrotoxicity rate was 0.391 (95% CI 0.364-0.419). The odds of nephrotoxicity were greater with polymyxin therapies compared to non-polymyxin-based regimens (odds ratio 2.23 (95% CI 1.58-3.15); p < 0.001). Meta-analyses showed a significant effect of polymyxin type, dose, patient age, number of concomitant nephrotoxins and use of diuretics, glycopeptides or vasopressors on the rate of nephrotoxicity. Polymyxin therapies were not associated with a significantly different rate of neurotoxicity than non-polymyxin-based regimens (p 0.051). The overall rate of neurotoxicity during polymyxin therapy was 0.030 (95% CI 0.020-0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Polymyxins are associated with a higher risk of nephrotoxicity than non-polymyxin-based regimens.

Polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity and its predictors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted using RIFLE criteria of acute kidney injury

Polymyxins are last-resort antibiotics re-emerged to treat infections caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections. However, polymyxin-associated nephrotoxicity has become the main safety concern. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis on polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity and its predictors using studies conducted based on the validated RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of Function and End-stage renal disease) criteria of acute kidney damage. Literature search was carried out through visiting legitimate databases and indexing services including PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid®), EMBASE (Ovid®), and Scopus to retrieve relevant studies. Following screening and eligibility evaluation, relevant data were extracted from included studies and analyzed using STATA 15.0 and Rev-Man 5.3. Inverse variance method with random effects pooling model was used for the analysis of outcome measures at 95% confidence interval. Besides, meta-regression, meta-influence, and publication bias analyses were conducted. A total of 48 studies involving 6,199 adult patients aged ≥ 18 years were included for systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity was found to be 45% (95% CI: 41- 49%; I² = 92.52%). Stratifying with RIFLE severity scales, pooled estimates of polymyxin-treated patients identified as 'risk', 'injury' and 'failure' were 17% (95% CI: 14-20%), 13% (95% CI: 11-15%), and 10% (95% CI: 9-11%), respectively. Besides, the pooled incidence of colistin-induced nephrotoxicity was about 48% (95% CI: 42-54%), whereas that of polymyxin B was 38% (95% CI: 32-44%). Likewise, colistin had 37% increased risk of developing nephrotoxicity compared to the polymyxin B treated cohorts (RR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.13-1.67; I² = 57%). Older age (AOR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05), daily dose (AOR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.09-1.96), underlying diabetes mellitus (AOR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.25-2.63), and concomitant nephrotoxic drugs (AOR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.79-3.00) were independent risk factors for polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity. Patients with high serum albumin level were less likely (AOR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56-0.85] to experience nephrotoxicity compared to those with low albumin level. Despite the resurgence of these antibiotics for the chemotherapy of MDR/XDR-Gram-negative superbugs, the high incidence of nephrotoxicity has become a contemporary clinical concern. Being elderly, high daily dose, having underlying diseases such as diabetes, and use of concomitant nephrotoxic drugs were independent predictors of nephrotoxicity. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring should be done to these patients to outweigh the potential benefits of polymyxin therapy from its risk.

Treatment of infections caused by Gram-negative pathogens: current status on the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of parenteral and inhaled polymyxins in patients

Polymyxins are increasingly used as a last resort for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in patients. Over the last decade, significant progress has been made in understanding the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics/toxicodynamics (PK/PD/TD) of parenteral and inhaled polymyxins. This mini-review provides an overview of polymyxin chemistry, different dose definitions, and the latest research on their clinical use, toxicities, and PK/PD after intravenous and inhalation administration. Optimising the PK/PD/TD of polymyxins in patients is critical to maximise their efficacy while minimising toxicities and the emergence of resistance.

Agents of Last Resort: An Update on Polymyxin Resistance

Polymyxin resistance is a major public health threat, because the polymyxins represent last-line therapeutics for gram-negative pathogens resistant to essentially all other antibiotics. Minimizing any potential emergence and dissemination of polymyxin resistance relies on an improved understanding of mechanisms of and risk factors for polymyxin resistance, infection prevention and stewardship strategies, together with optimization of dosing of polymyxins (eg, combination regimens).

International Consensus Guidelines for the Optimal Use of the Polymyxins: Endorsed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP), European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), International Society for Anti-infective Pharmacology (ISAP), Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP)

The polymyxin antibiotics colistin (polymyxin E) and polymyxin B became available in the 1950s and thus did not undergo contemporary drug development procedures. Their clinical use has recently resurged, assuming an important role as salvage therapy for otherwise untreatable gram-negative infections. Since their reintroduction into the clinic, significant confusion remains due to the existence of several different conventions used to describe doses of the polymyxins, differences in their formulations, outdated product information, and uncertainties about susceptibility testing that has led to lack of clarity on how to optimally utilize and dose colistin and polymyxin B. We report consensus therapeutic guidelines for agent selection and dosing of the polymyxin antibiotics for optimal use in adult patients, as endorsed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), International Society of Anti-Infective Pharmacology (ISAP), Society for Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP). The European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) endorses this document as a consensus statement. The overall conclusions in the document are endorsed by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). We established a diverse international expert panel to make therapeutic recommendations regarding the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the drugs and pharmacokinetic targets, polymyxin agent selection, dosing, dosage adjustment and monitoring of colistin and polymyxin B, use of polymyxin-based combination therapy, intrathecal therapy, inhalation therapy, toxicity, and prevention of renal failure. The treatment guidelines provide the first ever consensus recommendations for colistin and polymyxin B therapy that are intended to guide optimal clinical use.

Is colistin-associated acute kidney injury clinically important in adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Colistin is the last-resort antimicrobial agent against infections caused by multidrug-resistance Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB). However, a differing risk of colistin-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) has been demonstrated without affecting mortality, thus the association and its importance needs to be questioned. To assess the impact of this adverse effect, a meta-analysis comparing colistin with other antibiotics in treating MDR-GNB infections was conducted. The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched up to 31 December 2018 for cohort studies and randomised controlled trials with at least two arms with one arm containing colistin-based treatment. The primary endpoint was the incidence of AKI. The secondary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. A total of 34 studies, including 26 regarding colistin-based therapy versus other antibiotics and 9 regarding colistin monotherapy versus combination therapy, were included. The incidence of CA-AKI was 32.3%. Colistin was associated with an 82% higher incidence of AKI than other antibiotics [odd ratio (OR) = 1.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-2.92; P = 0.01]. Most CA-AKI events were mild and reversible without a higher rate of mortality or the requirement for renal replacement therapy (RRT). Only 1.0% of patients required RRT for > 4 weeks. Compared with colistin monotherapy, combination therapy was associated with a significantly lower incidence of AKI (OR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.10-1.94; P = 0.009), particularly in combination with a carbapenem (OR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.30-2.99; P = 0.001). In conclusion, CA-AKI might not be an important limitation of colistin in MDR-GNB therapy.

Meta-analysis of Polymyxin Use in Patients

In this chapter, we systematically reviewed studies that assessed polymyxin's effectiveness and summarized results through meta-analysis. The outcomes addressed were all-cause mortality, assuming that for patients with severe multidrug-resistant infections survival is the most important outcome, and resistance development, important for future patients. Most clinical data on polymyxins in the literature are from retrospective, observational studies at high risk of bias. The majority of clinical studies were unpowered to examine mortality controlling for other risk factors. The studies had no control of dosage regimens and treatment modifications. We identified several areas of missing data, in particular randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, different dosage regimens, polymyxins versus alternative antibiotics (e.g. aminoglycosides, tigecycline), and monotherapy versus specific combination therapies. Ideally, mortality and development of resistance should be examined in RCTs, with further longitudinal studies required for the latter.

Polymyxin Acute Kidney Injury: Dosing and Other Strategies to Reduce Toxicity

Polymyxins are valuable antimicrobials for the management of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria; however, nephrotoxicity associated with these drugs is a very common side effect that occurs during treatment. This article briefly reviews nephrotoxic mechanisms and risk factors for polymyxin-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) and discusses dosing strategies that may mitigate kidney damage without compromising antimicrobial activity. Polymyxins have a very narrow therapeutic window and patients requiring treatment with these drugs are frequently severely ill and have multiple comorbidities, which increases the risk of AKI. Notably, there is a significant overlap between therapeutic and toxic plasma polymyxin concentrations that substantially complicates dose selection. Recent dosing protocols for both colistin and polymyxin B have been developed and may help fine tune dose adjustment of these antibiotics. Minimizing exposure to modifiable risk factors, such as other nephrotoxic agents, is strongly recommended. The dose should be carefully selected, particularly in high-risk patients. The administration of oxidative stress-reducing drugs is a promising strategy to ameliorate polymyxin-associated AKI, but still requires support from clinical studies.

Clinical Use of Polymyxin B

Polymyxin B is another clinically available polymyxin that has re-emerged in clinical practice to treat infections caused by multi-drug (MDR) or extensively-drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). Its chemical structure is very similar to the structure of polymyxin E (colistin). However, since the latter is administered as a prodrug, there are major pharmacokinetic differences between both polymyxins that may potentially determine different clinical and microbiological outcomes. Studies addressing clinical or microbiological outcomes in patients treated with polymyxin B for MDR or XDR GNB are reviewed in this chapter.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Toxicodynamics of Polymyxins: Implications for Therapeutic Use

The availability of sensitive, accurate and specific analytical methods for the measurement of polymyxins in biological fluids has enabled an understanding of the pharmacokinetics of these important antibiotics in healthy humans and patients. Colistin is administered as its inactive prodrug colistin methanesulfonate (CMS) and has especially complex pharmacokinetics. CMS undergoes conversion in vivo to the active entity colistin, but the rate of conversion varies from brand to brand and possibly from batch to batch. The extent of conversion is generally quite low and depends on the relative magnitudes of the conversion clearance and other clearance pathways for CMS of which renal excretion is a major component. Formed colistin in the systemic circulation undergoes very extensive tubular reabsorption; the same mechanism operates for polymyxin B which is administered in its active form. The extensive renal tubular reabsorption undoubtedly contributes to the propensity for the polymyxins to cause nephrotoxicity. While there are some aspects of pharmacokinetic behaviour that are similar between the two clinically used polymyxins, there are also substantial differences. In this chapter, the pharmacokinetics of colistin, administered as CMS, and polymyxin B are reviewed, and the therapeutic implications are discussed.

The use of polymyxins to treat carbapenem resistant infections in neonates and children

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of healthcare-associated multidrug resistant bacterial infections, particularly due to carbapenem resistant organisms, has been on the rise globally. Among these are the carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterobacteriaceae, which have been responsible for numerous outbreaks in neonatal units. The polymyxins (colistin and polymyxin B) are considered to be the last resort antibiotics for treating such infections. However, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data on the use of polymyxins in neonates and children are very limited, and there are safety concerns.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors summarize the global burden of multidrug resistance, particularly carbapenem resistance, in the neonatal and paediatric population, and the potential wider use of polymyxins in treating these infections.

EXPERT OPINION

Both colistin and polymyxin B have similar efficacy in treating multidrug resistant infections but have safety concerns. However, polymyxin B appears to be a better therapeutic option, with more rapid and higher steady state concentrations achieved compared to colistin and less reported nephrotoxicity. There is virtually no data in neonates and children currently; there is therefore an urgent need for pharmacokinetic and safety trials in these populations to determine the optimal drug and dosing regimens and provide recommendations for their use against carbapenem resistant infections.

Colistin and polymyxin B for treatment of nosocomial infections in intensive care unit patients: pharmacoeconomic analysis

Background The emergence and rapid spread of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria related to nosocomial infections is a growing worldwide problem, and polymyxins have become important due to the lack of new antibiotics. Objectives To evaluate the outcomes and pharmacoeconomic impact of using colistin and polymyxin B to treat nosocomial infections. Setting Neurosurgical, cardiovascular, or transplantation intensive care unit (ICU) at the Clinical Hospital of the University of Campinas (São Paulo, Brazil). Method A retrospective cohort study was conduct in patients in the ICU. The renal function was determined daily during treatment by measuring the serum creatinine. A cost minimization analysis was performed to compare the relative costs of treatment with colistin and polymyxin B. Main outcomes measure The outcomes were 30-day mortality and frequency and onset of nephrotoxicity after beginning treatment. Results Fifty-one patients treated with colistin and 51 with polymyxin B were included. 30-day mortality was observed in 25.49% and 33.33% of patients treated with colistin and polymyxin B, respectively; Nephrotoxicity was observed in 43.14% and 54.90% of patients in colistin and polymyxin B groups, respectively; and onset time of nephrotoxicity was 9.86 ± 13.22 days for colistin and 10.68 ± 9.93 days for polymyxin B group. Colistin treatment had a lower cost per patient compared to the cost for polymyxin B treatment (USD $13,389.37 vs. USD $13,639.16, respectively). Conclusion We found no difference between 30-day mortality and nephrotoxicity between groups; however, colistin proved to be the best option from a pharmacoeconomic point of view.

Purification, Characterization and in vitro Evaluation of Polymyxin A From Paenibacillus dendritiformis: An Underexplored Member of the Polymyxin Family

Nosocomial infections caused by antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative pathogens are of grave concern today. Polymyxins are considered as the last resorts of therapy to treat these multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria. But their associated nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity calls for the development of safer polymyxin therapy until novel and less toxic antibiotics are discovered. No other polymyxin molecule except polymyxin B and E (colistin) is explored thoroughly in literature to demonstrate its clinical relevance. In the present study, we have isolated two antimicrobial compounds named P1 and P2 from the soil isolate Paenibacillus dendritiformis strain PV3-16, which we later identified as polymyxin A₂ and A₁ respectively. We tested their minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against MDR clinical isolates, performed membrane permeabilization assays and determined their interaction with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Finally, we studied their toxicity against human Leukemic monocyte cell line (THP-1) and embryonic kidney cell line (HEK 293). Both compounds displayed equal efficacy when compared with standard polymyxins. P1 was 2-4 fold more active in most of the clinical strains tested. Moreover, P1 showed higher affinity toward LPS. In cytotoxicity studies, P1 had IC₅₀ value (>1000 μg/ml) similar to colistin against HEK cells but immune cells, i.e., THP-1 cell lines were more sensitive to polymyxins. P1 showed less toxicity in THP-1 cell line than all other polymyxins checked. To sum up, P1 (polymyxin A₂) possessed better efficacy than polymyxin B and E and had least toxicity to immune cells. Since polymyxin A was not investigated thoroughly, we performed the comprehensive in vitro assessment of this molecule. Moreover, this is the first report of isolation and characterization of polymyxin A from P. dendritiformis. This compound should be further investigated for its in vivo efficacy and toxicity to develop it as a drug candidate.

Nephrotoxicity prevalence in patients treated with polymyxins: a systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies

Colistin and polymyxin B are increasingly reintroduced in clinical practice due to the absence of effective antibiotics for the treatment of emerging infections caused by gram-negative bacteria. The synthesis of current evidence on the characteristics of polymyxins, especially regarding nephrotoxicity, is necessary. This study aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort-type observational studies in order to identify the prevalence of nephrotoxicity in patients treated with either colistin or polymyxin B. PubMed, Scopus, and DOAJ electronic databases were searched, and manual searches were done. Cohort studies evaluating renal damage (nephrotoxicity) in adult patients caused by colistin or polymyxin B were included. Meta-analyses of the prevalence of nephrotoxicity as well as cumulative meta-analysis and meta-regression were conducted. After the systematic searches, 95 cohorts (n = 7911 patients) were included for analysis. The nephrotoxicity prevalence was 26.7% [confidence interval (CI) 95%: 22.8-30.9%] for colistin and 29.8% (CI 23.8-36.7%) for polymyxin B (P = 0.720). The publication year of the studies, the criteria used to classify renal damage, and the nephrotoxicity as primary or secondary outcome showed a significant influence on the adverse event rates.

A Comparison of Adjusted Versus Unadjusted Doses of Polymyxin B Based on Renal Function and Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury

Purpose:

To determine whether or not polymyxin B needs dose adjustments based on renal function by comparing the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients whose polymyxin B doses were adjusted versus not adjusted according to renal function.

Methods:

This was a single-center, prospective study with a retrospective cohort taking place in an acute care community hospital. Forty-two patients treated with polymyxin B were evaluated between April 2012 and December 2015. The primary outcome was incidence of AKI at day 7 after initiation of polymyxin B therapy with secondary outcomes including microbiological cure, clinical cure, and 30-day mortality.

Results:

There was no difference in the incidence of AKI at day 7 in patients with polymyxin B doses adjusted according to renal function versus patients without polymyxin B dose adjustment (20.0% vs 18.2%; P = .882). There were no differences between groups in occurrence of microbiological cure, clinical cure, or 30-day mortality (27.8% vs 57.1%; P = .065, 70.0% vs 72.7%; P = .845, 40.0% vs 31.8%; P = .581, respectively).

Conclusion:

The results from this study support the use of polymyxin B without any dose adjustment in the setting of renal impairment.

Personalizing Polymyxin B Dosing Using an Adaptive Feedback Control Algorithm

Polymyxin B is used as an antibiotic of last resort for patients with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections; however, it carries a significant risk of nephrotoxicity. Herein we present a polymyxin B therapeutic window based on target area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values and an adaptive feedback control algorithm (algorithm) which allows for the personalization of polymyxin B dosing. The upper bound of this therapeutic window was determined through a pharmacometric meta-analysis of polymyxin B nephrotoxicity data, and the lower bound was derived from murine thigh infection pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) studies. A previously developed polymyxin B population pharmacokinetic model was used as the backbone for the algorithm. Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) were performed to evaluate the performance of the algorithm using different sparse PK sampling strategies. The results of the nephrotoxicity meta-analysis showed that nephrotoxicity rate was significantly correlated with polymyxin B exposure. Based on this analysis and previously reported murine PK/PD studies, the target AUC_0–24 (AUC from 0 to 24 h) window was determined to be 50 to 100 mg · h/liter. MCS showed that with standard polymyxin B dosing without adaptive feedback control, only 71% of simulated subjects achieved AUC values within this window. Using a single PK sample collected at 24 h and the algorithm, personalized dosing regimens could be computed, which resulted in >95% of simulated subjects achieving AUC_0–24 values within the target window. Target attainment further increased when more samples were used. Our algorithm increases the probability of target attainment by using as few as one pharmacokinetic sample and enables precise, personalized dosing in a vulnerable patient population.

Comparison of nephrotoxicity of Colistin with Polymyxin B administered in currently recommended doses: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

The most important concern with polymyxins (Colistin and Polymyxin B) use is nephrotoxicity. There is no prospective data comparing nephrotoxicity of these two drugs, when administered in high doses and as per current recommendations. We conducted a prospective study to compare their trend of nephrotoxicity in our patient population.

METHODS

Our study included adult ICU patients who received more than 48 h of Colistin or Polymyxin B and had no confounding factors for nephrotoxicity. Loading and maintenance doses were given as per a uniform protocol. Nephrotoxicity was defined as twofold increase in serum creatinine, or 50% decrease in estimated baseline creatinine clearance. Patients were followed up for 1 week after therapy. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0.

RESULTS

61 patients were included in Colistin group, and 51 patients in Polymyxin B group. Median Colistin dose was 233.3 (IQR 150-300) mg/day and median Polymyxin B dose was 200 (IQR 180-240) mg/day. Median duration of Colistin and Polymyxin B use was 7 (IQR 5-7) days and 7 (IQR 7-9) days respectively. Nephrotoxicity developed in 39.3% patients in Colistin group compared to 11.8% patients in Polymyxin B group. Mean onset of nephrotoxicity was 3.8 ± 0.8 days with Colistin, and 4.2 ± 0.7 days with Polymyxin B therapy. In bivariate analysis, Colistin daily dose ≥ 300 mg was found to be associated with nephrotoxicity. There was no effect of age or BMI on Colistin toxicity. Mean duration of renal failure was 4.9 ± 3.1 days with Colistin use, and 5.0 ± 2.4 days with Polymyxin B use. 75% patients in Colistin group and 83.3% patients in Polymyxin B group who developed nephrotoxicity recovered their renal function by 1 week.

CONCLUSIONS

Colistin in currently recommended doses is significantly more nephrotoxic than Polymyxin B. Colistin toxicity is dose-dependent, mostly mild to moderate, and is reversible in most cases.

Recent advances and perspectives in the design and development of polymyxins

Covering: 1947-early 2017, particularly from 2005-early 2017The rise of bacterial pathogens with acquired resistance to almost all available antibiotics is becoming a serious public health issue. Polymyxins, antibiotics that were mostly abandoned a few decades ago because of toxicity concerns, are ultimately considered as a last-line therapy to treat infections caused by multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. This review surveys the progress in understanding polymyxin structure, and their chemistry, mechanisms of antibacterial activity and nephrotoxicity, biomarkers, synergy and combination with other antimicrobial agents and antibiofilm properties. An update of recent efforts in the design and development of a new generation of polymyxin drugs is also discussed. A novel approach considering the modification of the scaffold of polymyxins to integrate metabolism and detoxification issues into the drug design process is a promising new line to potentially prevent accumulation in the kidneys and reduce nephrotoxicity.

Nephrotoxicity in Patients with or without Cystic Fibrosis Treated with Polymyxin B Compared to Colistin

Nephrotoxicity is the primary adverse effect of the polymyxins. The relative rates of toxicity of polymyxin B and colistin have not been fully elucidated, especially in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). A retrospective cohort study of adults treated with polymyxin B or colistin for at least 48 h was conducted. The primary endpoint was the incidence of kidney injury assessed by RIFLE (i.e., risk, injury, failure, loss, end-stage renal disease) criteria. Risk factors for kidney injury were evaluated using multivariate Cox regression. A total of 414 patients were evaluated, 220 of whom had CF. In patients without CF, there was no difference in kidney injury with polymyxin B and colistin (42.9% versus 50.3%, P = 0.46). Loop diuretic exposure was a risk factor for kidney injury (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 2.83) in this population. In patients with CF, polymyxin B and colistin were associated with similar rates of kidney injury (34.5% versus 29.8%, P = 0.77). Diabetes (aHR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.01 to 7.11), loop diuretics (aHR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.36 to 6.73), and progressive care unit admission (aHR, 8.21; 95% CI, 2.55 to 26.46) were risk factors for kidney injury, while higher baseline serum creatinine levels (per 1 mg/dl) were protective (aHR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.48). Total unadjusted kidney injury in polymyxin-treated patients was less frequent in those who had CF (30.5% versus 48.5%, P < 0.001). Polymyxin B and colistin are associated with a high incidence of kidney injury; cystic fibrosis may be protective against polymyxin nephrotoxicity, but further investigation is needed to confirm this conjecture.

Can Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Principles Be Applied to the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter?

OBJECTIVE:

To discuss treatment options that can be used for treatment of Acinetobacter infections.

DATA SOURCES:

A MEDLINE search (1966-November 2010) was conducted to identify English-language literature on pharmacotherapy of Acinetobacter and the bibliographies of pertinent articles. Programs and abstracts from infectious diseases meetings were also searched. Search terms included Acinetobacter, multidrug resistance, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, Monte Carlo simulation, nosocomial pneumonia, carbapenems, polymyxins, sulbactam, aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, tigecycline, rifampin, and fluoroquinolones.

DATA SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION:

All articles were critically evaluated and all pertinent information was included in this review.

DATA SYNTHESIS:

Multidrug resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter, defined as resistance to 3 or more antimicrobial classes, has increased over the past decade. The incidence of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter is also increasing, leading to an increased use of dose optimization techniques and/or alternative antimicrobials, which is driven by local susceptibility patterns. However, Acinetobacter infections that are resistant to all commercially available antibiotics have been reported. General principles are available to guide dose optimization of aminoglycosides, β-lactams, fluoroquinolones, and tigecycline for infections due to gram-negative pathogens. Unfortunately, data specific to patients with Acinetobacter infections are limited. Recent pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic information has shed light on colistin dosing. The dilemma with colistin is its concentration-dependent killing, which makes once-daily dosing seem like an attractive option, but its short postantibiotic effect limits a clinician's ability to extend the dosing interval. Localized delivery of antimicrobials is also an attractive option due to the ability to increase drug concentration at the infection site while minimizing systemic adverse events, but more data are needed regarding this approach.

CONCLUSIONS:

Increased reliance on dosage optimization, combination therapy, and localized delivery of antimicrobials are methods to pursue positive clinical outcomes in MDR Acinetobacter infections since novel antimicrobials will not be available for several years. Well-designed clinical trials with MDR Acinetobacter are needed to define the best treatment options for these patients.

Nephrotoxicity of Polymyxins: Is There Any Difference between Colistimethate and Polymyxin B?

Nephrotoxicity is a common adverse effect of the clinically used polymyxins, colistin and polymyxin B. This adverse effect is dose limiting for both polymyxins, as the plasma polymyxin concentrations associated with renal damage overlap those required for antibacterial effect. Since development of acute kidney injury (AKI) during therapy is highly undesirable, it is extremely important to know whether there is any difference between the nephrotoxic potential of colistin (administered as its inefficient prodrug, colistimethate) and polymyxin B (administered as the active form). Both polymyxins are cytotoxic to renal tubular cells and are prone to cause nephrotoxicity in vivo because of the renal handling mechanisms that facilitate accumulation of these compounds in these cells, processes that are reviewed in this article. Also reviewed are the emerging data that strongly suggest significantly higher rates of AKI in patients treated with colistimethate compared to patients treated with polymyxin B. This finding may be due to differences in pharmacokinetics and renal handling mechanisms of colistimethate and formed colistin versus polymyxin B, and consequently the relative amount of polymyxin material delivered to tubular cells. A lower risk of AKI with polymyxin B is one of several potential advantages over colistimethate. The relative safety and efficacy of the two agents require closer examination in well-designed clinical studies.

Clinical and microbiological characteristics of OXA-23- and OXA-143-producing Acinetobacter baumannii in ICU patients at a teaching hospital, Brazil

Background

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAb) is an important cause of nosocomial infections especially in intensive care units. This study aimed to assess clinical aspects and the genetic background of CRAb among ICU patients at a Brazilian teaching hospital.

Methods

56 critically ill patients colonized or infected by CRAb, during ICU stay, were prospectively assessed. Based on imipenem MIC ≥ 4 μg/mL, 28 CRAB strains were screened for the presence of genes encoding metallo-β-lactamases and OXA-type β-lactamases. The blaOXA-type genes were characterized by PCR using primers targeting ISAba-1 or -3. Genetic diversity of blaOXA-positive strains was determined by ERIC-PCR analysis.

Results

Patient's mean age (±SD) was 61 (±15.1), and 58.9% were male. Eighty-percent of the patients presented risk factors for CRAb colonization, mainly invasive devices (87.5%) and previous antibiotic therapy (77.6%). Thirty-three patients died during hospital stay (59.0%). Resistance to carbapenems was associated with a high prevalence of blaOXA-23 (51.2%) and/or blaOXA-143 (18.6%) genes. ERIC-PCR genotyping identified 10 clusters among OXA-producing CRAb. Three CRAb strains exhibited additional resistance to polymyxin B (MIC ≥ 4 μg/mL), whereas 10 CRAb strains showed tigecycline MICs > 2 μg/mL.

Conclusions

In this study, clonally unrelated OXA-123- and OXA-143-producing A. baumannii strains in ICU patients were strongly correlated to colonization with infected patients being associated with a poor outcome.

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of colistin and polymyxin B: are we there yet?

The polymyxin antibiotics [colistin and polymyxin B (PMB)] are increasingly used as a last-line option for the treatment of infections caused by extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Despite having similar structures and antibacterial activity in vitro, the two clinically available polymyxins have very different pharmacological properties, as colistin (polymyxin E) is intravenously administered to patients in the form of an inactive prodrug colistin methanesulphonate (sodium). This review will discuss recent progress in the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and toxicity of colistin and PMB, the factors that affect their pharmacological profiles, and the challenges for the effective use of both polymyxins. Strategies are proposed for optimising their clinical utility based upon the recent pharmacological studies in vitro, in animals and patients. In the 'Bad Bugs, No Drugs' era, polymyxins are a critically important component of the antibiotic armamentarium against difficult-to-treat Gram-negative 'superbugs'. Rational approaches to the use of polymyxins must be pursued to increase their effectiveness and to minimise resistance and toxicity.

Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of Renal Failure in Patients Treated with Colistin versus Polymyxin B

Nephrotoxicity is the main adverse effect of colistin and polymyxin B (PMB). It is not clear whether these two antibiotics are associated with different nephrotoxicity rates. We compared the incidences of renal failure (RF) in patients treated with colistimethate sodium (CMS) or PMB for ≥48 h. A multicenter prospective cohort study was performed that included patients aged ≥18 years. The primary outcome was renal failure (RF) according to Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage renal disease (RIFLE) criteria. Multivariate analysis with a Cox regression model was performed. A total of 491 patients were included: 81 in the CMS group and 410 in the PMB group. The mean daily doses in milligrams per kilogram of body weight were 4.2 ± 1.3 and 2.4 ± 0.73 of colistin base activity and PMB, respectively. The overall incidence of RF was 16.9% (83 patients): 38.3% and 12.7% in the CMS and PMB groups, respectively (P< 0.001). In multivariate analysis, CMS therapy was an independent risk factor for RF (hazard ratio, 3.35; 95% confidence interval, 2.05 to 5.48;P< 0.001) along with intensive care unit admission, higher weight, older age, and bloodstream and intraabdominal infections. CMS was also independently associated with a higher risk of RF in various subgroup analyses. The incidence of RF was higher in the CMS group regardless of the patient baseline creatinine clearance. The development of RF during therapy was not associated with 30-day mortality in multivariate analysis. CMS was associated with significantly higher rates of RF than those of PMB. Further studies are required to confirm our findings in other patient populations.