1
|
Liu X, Zhang Y, Yang KY, Zhang N, Jin F, Zou GR, Zhu XD, Xie FY, Liang XY, Li WF, He ZY, Chen NY, Hu WH, Wu HJ, Shi M, Zhou GQ, Mao YP, Guo R, Sun R, Huang J, Liang SQ, Wu WL, Su Z, Li L, Ai P, He YX, Zang J, Chen L, Lin L, Huang SH, Xu C, Lv JW, Li YQ, Hong SB, Jie YS, Li H, Huang SW, Liang YL, Wang YQ, Peng YL, Zhu JH, Zang SB, Liu SR, Lin QG, Li HJ, Tian L, Liu LZ, Zhao HY, Lin AH, Li JB, Liu N, Tang LL, Chen YP, Sun Y, Ma J. Induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without sintilimab in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China (CONTINUUM): a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2024; 403:2720-2731. [PMID: 38824941 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00594-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-PD-1 therapy and chemotherapy is a recommended first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but the role of PD-1 blockade remains unknown in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. We assessed the addition of sintilimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, to standard chemoradiotherapy in this patient population. METHODS This multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was conducted at nine hospitals in China. Adults aged 18-65 years with newly diagnosed high-risk non-metastatic stage III-IVa locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (excluding T3-4N0 and T3N1) were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using blocks of four to receive gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent cisplatin radiotherapy (standard therapy group) or standard therapy with 200 mg sintilimab intravenously once every 3 weeks for 12 cycles (comprising three induction, three concurrent, and six adjuvant cycles to radiotherapy; sintilimab group). The primary endpoint was event-free survival from randomisation to disease recurrence (locoregional or distant) or death from any cause in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints included adverse events. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03700476) and is now completed; follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS Between Dec 21, 2018, and March 31, 2020, 425 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the sintilimab (n=210) or standard therapy groups (n=215). At median follow-up of 41·9 months (IQR 38·0-44·8; 389 alive at primary data cutoff [Feb 28, 2023] and 366 [94%] had at least 36 months of follow-up), event-free survival was higher in the sintilimab group compared with the standard therapy group (36-month rates 86% [95% CI 81-90] vs 76% [70-81]; stratified hazard ratio 0·59 [0·38-0·92]; p=0·019). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 155 (74%) in the sintilimab group versus 140 (65%) in the standard therapy group, with the most common being stomatitis (68 [33%] vs 64 [30%]), leukopenia (54 [26%] vs 48 [22%]), and neutropenia (50 [24%] vs 46 [21%]). Two (1%) patients died in the sintilimab group (both considered to be immune-related) and one (<1%) in the standard therapy group. Grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 20 (10%) patients in the sintilimab group. INTERPRETATION Addition of sintilimab to chemoradiotherapy improved event-free survival, albeit with higher but manageable adverse events. Longer follow-up is necessary to determine whether this regimen can be considered as the standard of care for patients with high-risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. FUNDING National Natural Science Foundation of China, Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation, Guangzhou Municipal Health Commission, and Cancer Innovative Research Program of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. TRANSLATION For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kun-Yu Yang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ning Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China
| | - Feng Jin
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | - Guo-Rong Zou
- Department of Oncology, Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Fang-Yun Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Yu Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wen-Fei Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhen-Yu He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Nian-Yong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wei-Han Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Jun Wu
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Mei Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Guan-Qun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan-Ping Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, China
| | - Rui Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rui Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jing Huang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Shao-Qiang Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China
| | - Wei-Li Wu
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | - Zhen Su
- Department of Oncology, Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ling Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Ping Ai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yu-Xiang He
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jian Zang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Lei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shao Hui Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Cheng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jia-Wei Lv
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ying-Qing Li
- Emergency Department, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shu-Bin Hong
- Department of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu-Sheng Jie
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hao Li
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sai-Wei Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ye-Lin Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ya-Qin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ying-Lin Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jin-Han Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sheng-Bing Zang
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Song-Ran Liu
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qing-Guang Lin
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hao-Jiang Li
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li Tian
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li-Zhi Liu
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hong-Yun Zhao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ai-Hua Lin
- Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ji-Bin Li
- Clinical Trials Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Na Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, China
| | - Ling-Long Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, China
| | - Yu-Pei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sahoo PK, Bhowmick AK, Sarkar S, Mahata S, Pal R, Mistry T, Ghosh S, Choudhury T, Kumar RS, Mondal S, Datta S, Nath P, Mukherjee KK, Nasare VD. Outcomes of 3-year follow up with induction vs first line chemotherapy in oral cancer patients: An observational hospital-based study. J Cancer Res Ther 2024; 20:1006-1012. [PMID: 38261440 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2179_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our study aims to analyse and compare the efficacy, adverse effect profile and survival among the Paclitaxel/Cisplatin/5-Flurouracil (TPF) induction chemotherapy and Paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC) first line or cisplatin chemotherapy in a high-volume tertiary care cancer centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS 215 patients with oral cavity cancer were recruited in this study. Patients with stages I-IIc underwent surgical resection or radiation therapy 66-74 GY/fraction. Patients of Stages III-IV were administered with either induction chemotherapy TPF or PC or cisplatin regimen. Treatment responses were assessed by CT and MRI. Response rates, survival and adverse effects data were tabulated and analysed. RESULTS The mean age was 49.2 ± 11.68 years. Symptoms were ulceration (33.5%), growth (20.5%), pain (13%), ulcer-proliferative growth (8.4%) and swelling (13, 6%). The tumour site was found at the base of the tongue, C01 (42.2%) followed by C06 (35.8%), C08 (6.5%), C07 (5.2%) and C05 (4.6%). There were no significant differences ( P > 0.05) in efficacy and survival outcomes between the different groups of treatment. Median survival was achieved within 36 months. The major side effect observed were anaemia (15.81%), diarrhoea (36.2%), dyspepsia (28.8%), fever (33.95%), mucositis (28.85%), myalgia (33.95%) and nausea (7.9%). Survival among the responder categories (CR, PR and NR) was significantly different as per Log-rank analysis ( P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS TPF induction therapy and PC first line chemotherapy showed similar efficacy, safety profile and survival whereas cisplatin shows poor efficacy and safety and survival in Indian oral cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pranab Kumar Sahoo
- Department of Pathology and Cancer Screening, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Fine Chemical Technology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Anup Kumar Bhowmick
- Department of ENT Oncology, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Sinjini Sarkar
- Department of Pathology and Cancer Screening, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Sutapa Mahata
- Department of Pathology and Cancer Screening, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Ranita Pal
- Department of Pathology and Cancer Screening, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Tanuma Mistry
- Department of Pathology and Cancer Screening, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Sushmita Ghosh
- Department of Pathology and Cancer Screening, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Trisha Choudhury
- Department of Pathology and Cancer Screening, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - R Suresh Kumar
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Cancer Prevention, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Syamsundar Mondal
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Sriparna Datta
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Fine Chemical Technology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Partha Nath
- Department of Pathology and Cancer Screening, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Kalyan Kusum Mukherjee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Vilas D Nasare
- Department of Pathology and Cancer Screening, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Özkaya Toraman K, Meral R, Karadeniz AN, Kaval G, Başaran M, Ekenel M, Altun M. Cisplatin-docetaxel induction chemotherapy for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a non-endemic cohort. J Chemother 2024; 36:133-142. [PMID: 37211862 DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.2023.2215090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
This is the report on our clinic's 15 years of experience (2004-2018) on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), treated with induction chemotherapy (IC) and subsequent concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), comprising population characteristics and treatment outcomes of 203 patients with non-metastatic NPC. IC comprised docetaxel (75 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2) combination (TP). Concurrent cisplatin (P) was applied either weekly (40 mg/m2, 32 cases) or every-3-week (100 mg/m2, 171 cases). The median follow-up duration was 85 months (range, 5-204 months). Overall and distant failure rates were observed in 27.1% (n = 55) and 13.8% (n = 28) patients, respectively. The 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 84.1%, 86.4%, 75%, and 78.7% respectively. The overall stage was an independent prognostic factor for the LRRFS, DMFS, DFS, and OS. The WHO histological type was a prognostic factor for the LRRFS, DFS, and OS. Age was a prognostic factor for the DMFS, DFS, and OS. Concurrent P schedule was independent prognostic only the LRRFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kübra Özkaya Toraman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Rasim Meral
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Nafiz Karadeniz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gizem Kaval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mert Başaran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Meltem Ekenel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Musa Altun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang SX, Yang Y, Xie H, Yang X, Liu ZQ, Li HJ, Huang WJ, Luo WJ, Lei YM, Sun Y, Ma J, Chen YF, Liu LZ, Mao YP. Radiomics-based nomogram guides adaptive de-intensification in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma following induction chemotherapy. Eur Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00330-024-10678-8. [PMID: 38514481 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10678-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to construct a radiomics-based model for prognosis and benefit prediction of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) following induction chemotherapy (IC). MATERIALS AND METHODS A cohort of 718 LANPC patients treated with IC + IMRT or IC + CCRT were retrospectively enrolled and assigned to a training set (n = 503) and a validation set (n = 215). Radiomic features were extracted from pre-IC and post-IC MRI. After feature selection, a delta-radiomics signature was built with LASSO-Cox regression. A nomogram incorporating independent clinical indicators and the delta-radiomics signature was then developed and evaluated for calibration and discrimination. Risk stratification by the nomogram was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS The delta-radiomics signature, which comprised 19 selected features, was independently associated with prognosis. The nomogram, composed of the delta-radiomics signature, age, T category, N category, treatment, and pre-treatment EBV DNA, showed great calibration and discrimination with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.80 (95% CI 0.75-0.85) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.64-0.85) in the training and validation sets. Risk stratification by the nomogram, excluding the treatment factor, resulted in two groups with distinct overall survival. Significantly better outcomes were observed in the high-risk patients with IC + CCRT compared to those with IC + IMRT, while comparable outcomes between IC + IMRT and IC + CCRT were shown for low-risk patients. CONCLUSION The radiomics-based nomogram can predict prognosis and survival benefits from concurrent chemotherapy for LANPC following IC. Low-risk patients determined by the nomogram may be potential candidates for omitting concurrent chemotherapy during IMRT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT The radiomics-based nomogram was constructed for risk stratification and patient selection. It can help guide clinical decision-making for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma following induction chemotherapy, and avoid unnecessary toxicity caused by overtreatment. KEY POINTS • The benefits from concurrent chemotherapy remained controversial for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma following induction chemotherapy. • Radiomics-based nomogram achieved prognosis and benefits prediction of concurrent chemotherapy. • Low-risk patients defined by the nomogram were candidates for de-intensification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shun-Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Yi Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Hui Xie
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Xin Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Zhi-Qiao Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Hao-Jiang Li
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Wen-Jie Huang
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Wei-Jie Luo
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yi-Ming Lei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Ying Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Yan-Feng Chen
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| | - Li-Zhi Liu
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| | - Yan-Ping Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lin Y, Yang Z, Chen J, Li M, Cai Z, Wang X, Zhai T, Lin Z. A contrast-enhanced CT radiomics-based model to identify candidates for deintensified chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:1302-1313. [PMID: 37594526 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09987-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) radiomics-based model to identify locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) patients who would benefit from deintensified chemoradiotherapy. METHODS LA-NPC patients who received low-dose concurrent cisplatin therapy (cumulative: 150 mg/m2), were randomly divided into training and validation groups. 107 radiomics features based on the primary nasopharyngeal tumor were extracted from each pre-treatment CECT scan. Through Cox regression analysis, a radiomics model and patients' corresponding radiomics scores were created with predictive independent radiomics features. T stage (T) and radiomics score (R) were compared as predictive factors. Combining the N stage (N), a clinical model (T + N), and a substitution model (R + N) were constructed. RESULTS Training and validation groups consisted of 66 and 33 patients, respectively. Three significant independent radiomics features (flatness, mean, and gray level non-uniformity in gray level dependence matrix (GLDM-GLN)) were found. The radiomics score showed better predictive ability than the T stage (concordance index (C-index): 0.67 vs. 0.61, AUC: 0.75 vs. 0.60). The R + N model had better predictive performance and more effective risk stratification than the T + N model (C-index: 0.77 vs. 0.68, AUC: 0.80 vs. 0.70). The R + N model identified a low-risk group as deintensified chemoradiotherapy candidates in which no patient developed progression within 3 years, with 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) both 90.7% (hazard ratio (HR) = 4.132, p = 0.018). CONCLUSION Our radiomics-based model combining radiomics score and N stage can identify specific LA-NPC candidates for whom de-escalation therapy can be performed without compromising therapeutic efficacy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Our study shows that the radiomics-based model (R + N) can accurately stratify patients into different risk groups, with satisfactory prognosis in the low-risk group when treated with low-dose concurrent chemotherapy, providing new options for individualized de-escalation strategies. KEY POINTS • A radiomics score, consisting of 3 predictive radiomics features (flatness, mean, and GLDM-GLN) integrated with the N stage, can identify specific LA-NPC populations for deintensified treatment. • In the selection of LA-NPC candidates for de-intensified treatment, radiomics score extracted from primary nasopharyngeal tumors based on CECT can be superior to traditional T stage classification as a predictor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinbing Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, 7 Raoping Road, Shantou, 515000, Guangdong, China
- Shantou University Medical College, 22 Xinling Road, Shantou 515000, 515041, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhining Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, 7 Raoping Road, Shantou, 515000, Guangdong, China
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Research Center, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou University, 7 Raoping Road, Shantou, 515000, Guangdong, China
| | - Jiechen Chen
- Shantou University Medical College, 22 Xinling Road, Shantou 515000, 515041, Guangdong, China
| | - Mei Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, 7 Raoping Road, Shantou, 515000, Guangdong, China
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Research Center, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou University, 7 Raoping Road, Shantou, 515000, Guangdong, China
| | - Zeman Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, 7 Raoping Road, Shantou, 515000, Guangdong, China
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Research Center, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou University, 7 Raoping Road, Shantou, 515000, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, 7 Raoping Road, Shantou, 515000, Guangdong, China
- Shantou University Medical College, 22 Xinling Road, Shantou 515000, 515041, Guangdong, China
| | - Tiantian Zhai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, 7 Raoping Road, Shantou, 515000, Guangdong, China.
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Research Center, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou University, 7 Raoping Road, Shantou, 515000, Guangdong, China.
| | - Zhixiong Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, 7 Raoping Road, Shantou, 515000, Guangdong, China.
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Research Center, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou University, 7 Raoping Road, Shantou, 515000, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yu-Chen, Luo MJ, Liu RP, Jin J, Deng SW, Tang LQ, Li XY, Liu LT, Luo DH, Sun R, Liu SL, Li JB, Liu Q, Wang P, Chen QY, Mai HQ, Guo SS. Phase I dose-escalation study of nab-paclitaxel combined with cisplatin and capecitabin as induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2024; 191:110051. [PMID: 38135184 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Nab-paclitaxel is a promising albumin-bound paclitaxel with a therapeutic index superior to that of docetaxel, but the optimal dose of nab-paclitaxel combined with cisplatin and capecitabine as induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was an open-label, single-arm study investigating the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel + cisplatin + capecitabin as IC for three cycles, followed by cisplatin CCRT, conducted by using the standard "3 + 3" design in LA-NPC. If more than one-third of the patients in a cohort experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), the dose used in the previous cohort was designated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was defined as one level below the MTD. RESULTS From 29 May 2021 to 17 March 2022, 19 patients with LA-NPC were enrolled, one patient withdrew informed consent. Two DLTs occurred in cohort 4 (grade 4 febrile neutropenia and grade 3 peripheral neuropathy), and an MTD was established as 225 mg/m2. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (16.7 %), hypertriglyceridemia (16.7 %), leukopenia (5.6 %) and peripheral neuropathy (5.6 %) during IC. CONCLUSION The RP2D is nab-paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 on day 1, combined with cisplatin 75 mg/mg2 on day 1 and capecitabin1000 mg/m2 on days 1-14, twice a day, every 3 weeks, for three cycles as an IC regimen prior to CCRT. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04850235.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Chen
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinial Reserch Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Mei-Juan Luo
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinial Reserch Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Rong-Ping Liu
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinial Reserch Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Jing Jin
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinial Reserch Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Sheng-Wen Deng
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinial Reserch Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Lin-Quan Tang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinial Reserch Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Yun Li
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinial Reserch Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Li-Ting Liu
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinial Reserch Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Dong-Hua Luo
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinial Reserch Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Rui Sun
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinial Reserch Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Sai-Lan Liu
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinial Reserch Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Ji-Bin Li
- Clinical Trials Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinial Reserch Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Qing Liu
- Clinical Trials Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinial Reserch Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Pan Wang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinial Reserch Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiu-Yan Chen
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinial Reserch Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Hai-Qiang Mai
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinial Reserch Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Shan-Shan Guo
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinial Reserch Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zheng Y, Xue F, Ou D, Niu X, Hu C, He X. Deletion of concurrent chemotherapy on the basis of sequential chemoradiotherapy for non-metastatic stage T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma in IMRT era. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6578. [PMID: 38457191 PMCID: PMC10922019 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with concurrent chemotherapy is deemed as the mainstay treatment in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Nevertheless, the tolerance of severe acute toxicity of concurrent chemotherapy was unsatisfied. In addition, T4 is the predicting factor of poor prognosis for NPC patients. In this retrospective analysis, the long-term outcomes IMRT combined by induction chemotherapy deleting concurrent chemotherapy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy for T4 non-metastatic NPC were analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2005 to November 2016, a total of 145 biopsy-proven non-metastatic T4 NPC was treated with IMRT combined by induction chemotherapy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. The survival and side effects of the patients were analyzed. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 74 months (ranges, 8-186 months). 10.0%, 61.3%, 27.3%, and 1.3% developed grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 mucositis during IMRT, respectively. 5.5% and 2.0% patients experienced grade 1 and 2 nausea and vomiting; no patients developed grade 3 or 4 nausea and vomiting. Of 145 patients enrolled, 5-year and 10-year overall survival(OS) rates were 73.7% and 53.9%, local progression-free survival(LPFS) rates were 86.1% and 71.6%, regional progression-free survival(RPFS) rates were 96.7% and 92.8%, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 86.7%, 78.2%, respectively. At the last follow-up, five patients developed cranial nerve injury, one patient developed mandibular bone necrosis, four patients developed temporal lobe injury, four patients developed nasopharyngeal massive hemorrhage (three cases after recurrence and one case without recurrence), and five patients developed second primary tumor. CONCLUSION The survival outcomes of treating T4 NPC IMRT combined by induction chemotherapy deleting concurrent chemotherapy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy are encouraging. Moreover, mucosal reaction, nausea, and vomiting reaction were reduced during IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuming Zheng
- Department of Radiation OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of OncologyShanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
| | - Fen Xue
- Department of Radiation OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of OncologyShanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
| | - Dan Ou
- Department of Radiation OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of OncologyShanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
| | - Xiaoshuang Niu
- Department of Radiation OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of OncologyShanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
| | - Chaosu Hu
- Department of Radiation OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of OncologyShanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
| | - Xiayun He
- Department of Radiation OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of OncologyShanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lan K, Mao J, Sun X, Li S, Xie S, Sun R, Liu S, Mai H. Combined pre-treatment and middle-treatment Epstein-Barr virus DNA load contributes to prognostication and treatment modification in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2024; 16:17588359231221343. [PMID: 38188461 PMCID: PMC10771739 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231221343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate whether pre-treatment and middle-treatment plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA loads are useful predictors of prognosis and indicators of therapy modification in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients undergoing radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Methods Plasma EBV DNA load was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction before treatment (pre-DNA) and during the second cycle of DDP (mid-DNA). The primary endpoint was 5-year progression-free survival (PFS). Results A total of 775 NPC patients treated with CCRT were included. In total, 553 patients with pre-DNA <4000 copies/mL and 222 with ⩾4000 copies/mL. A total of 559 patients had mid-DNA undetectable and 216 had detectable. Multivariate analysis showed that pre- and mid-DNA were independent prognostic predictors of PFS [hazard ratio (HR), 2.035; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.406-2.944; p < 0.001; HR, 1.597; 95% CI, 1.101-2.316; p = 0.014]. The area under the curve of the combination of pre-DNA and mid-DNA for 5-year PFS was higher than that of pre-DNA, mid-DNA, and tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage (0.679 versus 0.622, 0.608, 0.601). In the low-risk group (pre-DNA <4000 copies/mL and undetectable mid-DNA), patients receiving ⩽200 mg/m2 showed similar efficacy as those receiving >200 mg/m2 cumulative cisplatin dose (CCD) but were associated with fewer all-grade late toxicities. However, in the high-risk group (pre-DNA ⩾4000 copies/mL or detectable mid-DNA), patients receiving >200 mg/m2 CCD showed a higher 5-year PFS (73.1% versus 58.6%, p = 0.027) and locoregional relapse-free survival (88.5% versus 76.1%, p = 0.028) than those receiving ⩽200 mg/m2 CCD. Conclusion The combination of pre-DNA and mid-DNA could be particularly useful for guiding risk stratification and early treatment modification for NPC treated with CCRT. A total of 200 mg/m2 cisplatin seemed to be the optimal dose for the low-risk patients, while >200 mg/m2 cisplatin may be adequate to achieve satisfactory survival outcomes in the high-risk group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaiqi Lan
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jingrong Mao
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xuesong Sun
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Suchen Li
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Siyi Xie
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rui Sun
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou 510060, ChinaSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sailan Liu
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou 510060, ChinaSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Haiqiang Mai
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou 510060, China
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhu F, Wu Y, Wang H. Advance in integrating platinum-based chemotherapy with radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1259331. [PMID: 37860184 PMCID: PMC10583715 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1259331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignant tumor characterized by the malignant transformation of nasopharyngeal epithelial cells. It is highly sensitive to radiation therapy, making radiotherapy the primary treatment modality. However, 60-80% of patients are initially diagnosed with locally advanced NPC (LA-NPC), where radiotherapy alone often fails to achieve desirable outcomes. Therefore, combining radiotherapy with chemotherapy has emerged as an effective strategy to optimize treatment for LA-NPC patients. Among the various chemotherapy regimens, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) using platinum-based drugs has been established as the most commonly utilized approach for LA-NPC patients. The extensive utilization of platinum drugs in clinical settings underscores their therapeutic potential and emphasizes ongoing efforts in the development of novel platinum-based complexes for anticancer therapy. The aim of this review is to elucidate the remarkable advances made in the field of platinum-based therapies for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, emphasizing their transformative impact on patient prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fubin Zhu
- Department of Cancer Center, Chengdu Seventh People's Hospital (Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Chengdu Medical College), Chengdu, China
| | - Yidan Wu
- Center for Geriatric Medicine Assessment and Treatment, The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China
| | - Hua Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Chengdu Public Health Clinical Medical Center, Sichuan, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liu LT, Liu H, Huang Y, Yang JH, Xie SY, Li YY, Guo SS, Qi B, Li XY, Chen DP, Jin F, Sun XS, Yang ZC, Liu SL, Luo DH, Li JB, Liu Q, Wang P, Guo L, Mo HY, Qiu F, Yang Q, Liang YJ, Jia GD, Wen DX, Yan JJ, Zhao C, Chen QY, Sun R, Tang LQ, Mai HQ. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine versus cisplatin-fluorouracil chemotherapy for N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:798-810. [PMID: 37290468 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00232-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma have a high risk of treatment being unsuccessful despite the current practice of using a concurrent adjuvant cisplatin-fluorouracil regimen. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of concurrent adjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine with cisplatin-fluorouracil in N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS We conducted an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial at four cancer centres in China. Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years with untreated, non-keratinising, stage T1-4 N2-3 M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1, and adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m2 intravenously) on days 1, 22, and 43 of intensity-modulated radiotherapy followed by either gemcitabine (1 g/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenously for 4 h on day 1) once every 3 weeks or fluorouracil (4 g/m2 in continuous intravenous infusion for 96 h) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenously for 4 h on day 1) once every 4 weeks, for three cycles. Randomisation was done using a computer-generated random number code with a block size of six, stratified by treatment centre and nodal category. The primary endpoint was 3-year progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all patients randomly assigned to treatment). Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of chemoradiotherapy. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03321539, and patients are currently under follow-up. FINDINGS From Oct 30, 2017, to July 9, 2020, 240 patients (median age 44 years [IQR 36-52]; 175 [73%] male and 65 [27%] female) were randomly assigned to the cisplatin-fluorouracil group (n=120) or cisplatin-gemcitabine group (n=120). As of data cutoff (Dec 25, 2022), median follow-up was 40 months (IQR 32-48). 3-year progression-free survival was 83·9% (95% CI 75·9-89·4; 19 disease progressions and 11 deaths) in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 71·5% (62·5-78·7; 34 disease progressions and seven deaths) in the cisplatin-fluorouracil group (stratified hazard ratio 0·54 [95% CI 0·32-0·93]; log rank p=0·023). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events that occurred during treatment were leukopenia (61 [52%] of 117 in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group vs 34 [29%] of 116 in the cisplatin-fluorouracil group; p=0·00039), neutropenia (37 [32%] vs 19 [16%]; p=0·010), and mucositis (27 [23%] vs 32 [28%]; p=0·43). The most common grade 3 or worse late adverse event (occurring from 3 months after completion of radiotherapy) was auditory or hearing loss (six [5%] vs ten [9%]). One (1%) patient in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group died due to treatment-related complications (septic shock caused by neutropenic infection). No patients in the cisplatin-fluorouracil group had treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION Our findings suggest that concurrent adjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine could be used as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of patients with N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma, although long-term follow-up is required to confirm the optimal therapeutic ratio. FUNDING National Key Research and Development Program of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research, Sci-Tech Project Foundation of Guangzhou City, Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program, Innovative Research Team of High-level Local Universities in Shanghai, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province for Distinguished Young Scholar, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, Postdoctoral Innovative Talent Support Program, Pearl River S&T Nova Program of Guangzhou, Planned Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province, Key Youth Teacher Cultivating Program of Sun Yat-sen University, the Rural Science and Technology Commissioner Program of Guangdong Province, and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Ting Liu
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Huai Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Hunan Key Laboratory of Translational Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Ying Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Jin-Hao Yang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Si-Yi Xie
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Yuan-Yuan Li
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
| | - Shan-Shan Guo
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Bin Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiao-Yun Li
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Dong-Ping Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Feng Jin
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
| | - Xue-Song Sun
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Zhen-Chong Yang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Sai-Lan Liu
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Dong-Hua Luo
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Ji-Bin Li
- Clinical Trials Centre, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Qing Liu
- Clinical Trials Centre, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Pan Wang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Ling Guo
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Hao-Yuan Mo
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Fang Qiu
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Qi Yang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Yu-Jing Liang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Guo-Dong Jia
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Dong-Xiang Wen
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Jin-Jie Yan
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Chong Zhao
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Qiu-Yan Chen
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Rui Sun
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Lin-Quan Tang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Hai-Qiang Mai
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hu YJ, Zhang L, Xiao YP, Lu TZ, Guo QJ, Lin SJ, Liu L, Chen YB, Huang ZL, Liu Y, Su Y, Liu LZ, Gong XC, Pan JJ, Li JG, Xia YF. MRI-based deep learning model predicts distant metastasis and chemotherapy benefit in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma. iScience 2023; 26:106932. [PMID: 37378335 PMCID: PMC10291473 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy remains controversial for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma because of its considerable prognostic heterogeneity. We aimed to develop an MRI-based deep learning model for predicting distant metastasis and assessing chemotherapy efficacy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma. This multicenter retrospective study enrolled 1072 patients from three Chinese centers for training (Center 1, n = 575) and external validation (Centers 2 and 3, n = 497). The deep learning model significantly predicted the risk of distant metastases for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma and was validated in the external validation cohort. In addition, the deep learning model outperformed the clinical and radiomics models in terms of predictive performance. Furthermore, the deep learning model facilitates the identification of high-risk patients who could benefit from chemotherapy, providing useful additional information for individualized treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Jun Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lin Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University), Jiangxi, China
| | - You-Ping Xiao
- Department of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Tian-Zhu Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University), Jiangxi, China
- Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Research, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China
| | - Qiao-Juan Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shao-Jun Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, China
| | - Lan Liu
- Department of Radiology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Yun-Bin Chen
- Department of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Zi-Lu Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ya Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yong Su
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University), Jiangxi, China
| | - Li-Zhi Liu
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Chang Gong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University), Jiangxi, China
- Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Research, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China
| | - Jian-Ji Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jin-Gao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University), Jiangxi, China
- Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Research, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yun-Fei Xia
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Feng Zong J, Lin PJ, Tsou HH, Guo Q, Liu YC, Xu H, Twu CW, Zheng W, Jiang RS, Liang KL, Lin TY, Ji Pan J, Jun Lin S, Lin JC. Comparison the Acute Toxicity of Two Different Induction Chemotherapy Schedules with Cisplatin and Fluorouracil in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients. Radiother Oncol 2023; 184:109699. [PMID: 37169301 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the acute toxicity of two different induction chemotherapy (IndCT) regimen followed by the same IMRT in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS From July 2015 to December 2016, 110 NPC patients with stage III-IV diseases were prospectively randomized to receive either a conventional triweekly cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil (PF) for 3 cycles or weekly P-F for 10 doses, followed by the same IMRT to both arms. The primary endpoints of this study were grade 3/4 and any grade acute toxicities during IndCT period. The secondary endpoints included tumor response and various survivals. RESULTS Baseline patient characteristics were comparable in both groups. Patients who received weekly P-F experienced significant reduction of grade 3/4 acute toxicities, including neutropenia (12.7% vs. 40.0%, P=0.0012), anorexia (0% vs. 14.6%, P=0.0059), mucositis (0% vs. 14.6%, P=0.0059), and hyponatremia (0% vs. 16.4%, P=0.0027), compared with the triweekly PF group, resulting in fewer IndCT interruptions (1.8% vs. 16.4%, P=0.0203), emergency room visits (0% vs. 12.7%, P=0.0128), and additional hospitalizations (0% vs. 9.1%, P=0.0568). The acute toxicities during IMRT period were similar. Weekly P-F arm had higher complete response rates (83.6% vs. 61.8%, P=0.0152) and lower relapse rates (16.4% vs. 33.3%, P=0.0402) after a median follow-up of 67 months. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses revealed a better trend of locoregional failure-free (P=0.0892), distant metastasis failure-free (P=0.0775), and progression-free (P=0.0709) survivals, favoring the weekly P-F arm. CONCLUSION IndCT of weekly schedule does reduce acute toxicities without compromised tumor response and survivals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Feng Zong
- Departmentof Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China; FujianProvincial Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, China
| | - Po-Ju Lin
- Departmentof Radiation Oncology, Taichung Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Hui Tsou
- Instituteof Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan; GraduateInstitute of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Qiaojuan Guo
- Departmentof Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China; FujianProvincial Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yi-Chun Liu
- Departmentof Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hanchuan Xu
- Departmentof Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China; FujianProvincial Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chih-Wen Twu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan; Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Wei Zheng
- Departmentof Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China; FujianProvincial Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, China
| | - Rong-San Jiang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Kai-Li Liang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Tian-Yun Lin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jian Ji Pan
- Departmentof Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China; FujianProvincial Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shao Jun Lin
- Departmentof Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China; FujianProvincial Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
| | - Jin-Ching Lin
- Departmentof Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan; Departmentof Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Guo Y, Dai G, Xiong X, Wang X, Chen H, Zhou X, Huang W, Chen F. Intravoxel incoherent motion radiomics nomogram for predicting tumor treatment responses in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Transl Oncol 2023; 31:101648. [PMID: 36905870 PMCID: PMC10020114 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) plays an important role in predicting treatment responses in patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The goal of this study was to develop and validate a radiomics nomogram based on IVIM parametric maps and clinical data for the prediction of treatment responses in NPC patients. METHODS Eighty patients with biopsy-proven NPC were enrolled in this study. Sixty-two patients had complete responses and 18 patients had incomplete responses to treatment. Each patient received a multiple b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) examination before treatment. Radiomics features were extracted from IVIM parametric maps derived from DWI image. Feature selection was performed by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method. Radiomics signature was generated by support vector machine based on the selected features. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC curve (AUC) values were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiomics signature. A radiomics nomogram was established by integrating the radiomics signature and clinical data. RESULTS The radiomics signature showed good prognostic performance to predict treatment response in both training (AUC = 0.906, P<0.001) and testing (AUC = 0.850, P<0.001) cohorts. The radiomic nomogram established by integrating the radiomic signature with clinical data significantly outperformed clinical data alone (C-index, 0.929 vs 0.724; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The IVIM-based radiomics nomogram provided high prognostic ability to treatment responses in patients with NPC. The IVIM-based radiomics signature has the potential to be a new biomarker in prediction of the treatment responses and may affect treatment strategies in patients with NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yihao Guo
- Department of Radiology, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou 570311, China
| | - Ganmian Dai
- Department of Radiology, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou 570311, China
| | - Xiaoli Xiong
- Department of Radiology, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou 570311, China
| | - Xiaoyi Wang
- Department of Radiology, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou 570311, China
| | - Huijuan Chen
- Department of Radiology, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou 570311, China
| | - Xiaoyue Zhou
- Siemens Healthineers Digital Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201306, China
| | - Weiyuan Huang
- Department of Radiology, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou 570311, China.
| | - Feng Chen
- Department of Radiology, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou 570311, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lian CL, Zhou R, Zhou Y, Zhou P, Wu SG. Assessment of Response to Different Induction Chemotherapy Regimens in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Drug Des Devel Ther 2023; 17:551-562. [PMID: 36855516 PMCID: PMC9968429 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s399937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare the short-term treatment response and survival of the three induction chemotherapy (IC) regimens, including gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP), docetaxel and cisplatin (TP), and docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluoropyrimidines (TPF) in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC). Methods We included stage III-IVA NPC patients who received ≥3 cycles of IC in this study. The chi-square test, multivariate logistic regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier method were used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 227 patients were included. The overall response rate (ORR) of the primary nasopharyngeal tumors after IC with GP, TP, and TPF was 91.9%, 83.8%, and 91.7%, respectively (P=0.729), and the ORR of the cervical lymph nodes was 94.6%, 72.3%, and 85.0%, respectively (P<0.001). For the primary nasopharyngeal tumor, there was no significant difference in the ORR among the three IC regimens. For cervical lymph nodes, patients treated with GP had significantly higher ORR compared to those treated with the TP regimen (P=0.014), and comparable ORR was found between TPF and GP regimens (P=0.161). Similar progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.501) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.504) were found among three IC regimens. There were comparable PFS (P=0.123) and OS (P=0.478) among those with complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD)/progressive disease (PD) in the primary nasopharyngeal tumors. However, patients who had CR in the primary nasopharyngeal tumor (P=0.014) and the cervical lymph nodes (P=0.022) had better PFS compared to those who had PR or SD/PD. Conclusion GP and TPF regimens are equivalent to the TP regimen in the response to primary nasopharyngeal tumors after IC, but with better ORR in the cervical lymph nodes than the TP regimen. The response to IC may be a powerful indicator for predicting prognosis and developing individualized follow-up and treatment strategies for LANPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen-Lu Lian
- The School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People’s Republic of China,Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, People’s Republic of China,Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (Xiamen Branch), Xiamen, People's Republic of China
| | - Rui Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yuan Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ping Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, People’s Republic of China
| | - San-Gang Wu
- The School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People’s Republic of China,Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, People’s Republic of China,Correspondence: San-Gang Wu, Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, People’s Republic of China, Email
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jiang D, Cao J, Guo L, Chen Y, Yuan G, Huang J. Induction chemotherapy with sequential nimotuzumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective real-world study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e32732. [PMID: 36705354 PMCID: PMC9876024 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000032732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Many locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients develop local recurrence or distant metastasis. Our retrospective real-world study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of curative sequential approach with induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation + nimotuzumab as first-line therapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. From 2015 to 2021, the clinic data of 117 patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (stage III-IV a) who were treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-four patients in observation group received taxanes, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil/taxanes and cisplatin induction chemotherapy and nimotuzumab (200 mg, weekly) combined with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (cisplatin: 40 mg/m2 weekly; intensity-modulated radiation therapy); 63 patients in control group received same therapy without nimotuzumab. There was no significant difference in patients' characteristic baseline between 2 groups (P > .05). The complete response rate and objective response rate of the observational group was significantly higher than control group (46.30% vs 17.64%, P = .01; 96.30% vs 82.54%, P = .02). The median follow-up time was 24.77 (3.53-65.97) months. Both of the median progress free survival time and overall survival time were not reached. The 5-year progression-free survival rate of observation group was greater than control group (84.40% vs 63.70%, hazard ratios 0.365, 95% confidence intervals 0.147-0.909, P = .03). The 5-year overall survival rate of observation group and control group were 91.70% and 84.60%, respectively (P = .20). None of the patients withdrew from the study due to adverse events. Nimotuzumab combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma can improve objective response rate and 5-year progress free survival rate with good safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danxian Jiang
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China
| | - Jinxin Cao
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China
| | - Linying Guo
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China
| | - Yonghua Chen
- Department of Pathology, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China
| | - Ge Yuan
- Department of Radiotherapy, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China
| | - Jing Huang
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China
- * Correspondence: Jing Huang, Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, No. 57 South Renmin Avenue, Xiashan District, Zhanjiang 524001, China (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Qu W, Wang X, Qiao Q, Wang Y. Chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Who really needs it. Cancer Med 2022; 12:6994-7004. [PMID: 36494918 PMCID: PMC10067101 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The CSCO and ASCO guidelines in 2021 recommend chemotherapy for stage III-IVA (8th edition of AJCC staging) nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Actually, patients with stage T3-4N0M0 are often excluded from various clinical trials of the locoregionally advanced NPC, and the survival benefit of chemotherapy in such patients has always been controversial. This study aims to explore the benefit of chemotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC, especially those with negative lymph nodes. METHODS A total of 2741 patients were extracted from the SEER database. After a 1:1 PSM analysis, 272 patients were obtained to further explore whether the addition of chemotherapy would achieve survival benefits. RESULTS After PSM, Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the overall survival (OS) of patients receiving chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.031) was higher than those receiving radiotherapy alone. Similar results were observed for cancer-specific survival (CSS). We further stratified the patients according to lymph node status and found that the addition of chemotherapy in patients with positive lymph nodes could significantly improve 5-year OS rates (58.08% vs. 43.95%; p = 0.025) and 5-year CSS rates (67.42% vs. 51.95%; p = 0.015) compared with radiotherapy alone, but there was no additional benefit of chemotherapy in patients with negative lymph nodes. For all 449 cases of T3-4N0M0 NPC, radiotherapy improved the OS rates (HR 0.293, 95% CI 0.203-0.424) and the CSS rates (HR 0.252, 95% CI 0.171-0.371) compared with no radiotherapy, while chemotherapy did not show significant survival benefit compared with no chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Our results reveal that stage T3-4N0M0 NPC may be exempted from chemotherapy, and use radiotherapy alone to reduce toxic and side effects. These results still need to be verified by future prospective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiling Qu
- Department of Radiation Oncology the First Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang Liaoning China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine Zhejiang University Hangzhou Zhejiang China
| | - Xuan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology the First Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang Liaoning China
| | - Qiao Qiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology the First Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang Liaoning China
| | - Yanli Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology the First Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang Liaoning China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shi W, Fijardo M, Bruce JP, Su J, Xu W, Bell R, Bissey PA, Hui ABY, Waldron J, Pugh TJ, Yip KW, Liu FF. CD8+ Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Abundance Is a Positive Prognostic Indicator in Nasopharyngeal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:5202-5210. [PMID: 36129469 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) are immune cell populations found within tumors, critical in the antigen-specific host immune response. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the prognostic significance of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ TILs in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Immune cell infiltration was quantified in NPC samples (n = 50) using RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data based on rearranged T-cell receptor (TCR) reads and the Estimation of Stromal and Immune cells in malignant tumors using expression data (ESTIMATE) immune score tool. The differential abundances of TIL subset populations were also characterized through IHC staining of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples from a training cohort (n = 35), which was a subset of the RNA-seq cohort (n = 50). RESULTS In the RNA-seq cohort, patients with higher rearranged TCR reads experienced superior 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS; P < 0.001), and disease-free survival (DFS; P < 0.001). Similarly, patients with higher ESTIMATE immune scores experienced superior 5- and 10-year OS (P = 0.024) and DFS (P = 0.007). In the training cohort, high abundances of CD8+ TILs were significantly associated with improved 5- and 10-year OS (P = 0.003) and DFS (P = 0.005). These findings were corroborated in an independent validation cohort (n = 84), and combined analysis of the training and validation cohorts [n = 119 (35+84)], which further demonstrated improved 5- and 10-year survival in terms of locoregional control (P < 0.001) and distant metastasis (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Taken together, our study highlights the prognostic value of CD8+ TILs in NPC, and the potential of future investigations into cellular-based immunotherapies employing CD8+ lymphocytes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Shi
- Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mackenzie Fijardo
- Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeff P Bruce
- Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jie Su
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Bell
- Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - John Waldron
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Trevor J Pugh
- Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kenneth W Yip
- Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fei-Fei Liu
- Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yang XL, Zhang LL, Kou J, Zhou GQ, Wu CF, Sun Y, Lin L. Cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy improved the survival of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma after induction chemotherapy by reducing early treatment failure. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1230. [PMID: 36443685 PMCID: PMC9706941 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10237-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aims of this study focusing on Locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) were mainly two-fold: on the one hand, to establish a cut-off value to differentiate early and late failure based on prognosis after recurrence or metastasis; and on the other hand, to investigate the duration of concurrent cisplatin benefit over follow-up time. The results of our study have the potential to guide clinical practice and follow-up. METHODS In total, 3123 patients with stage III-IVa NPC receiving Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent cisplatin or not were analysed. The cut-off value of treatment failure was calculated using the minimum P-value approach. Random survival forest (RSF) model was to simulate the cumulative probabilities of treatment failure (locoregional recurrence and /or distant metastasis) over-time, as well as the monthly time-specific, event-occurring probabilities, for patients at different treatment groups. RESULTS Based on subsequent prognosis, early locoregional failure (ELRF) should be defined as recurrence within 14 months (P = 1.47 × 10 - 3), and early distant failure (EDF) should be defined as recurrence within 20 months (P = 1.95 × 10 - 4). A cumulative cisplatin dose (CCD) > 200 mg/m2 independently reduced the risk of EDF (hazard ratio, 0.351; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.169-0.732; P = 0.005). Better failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) were observed in concurrent chemotherapy settings ([0 mg/m2 vs. 1-200 mg/m2 vs. >200 mg/m2]: FFS: 70.4% vs. 74.4% vs. 82.6%, all P < 0.03; OS: 79.5% vs. 83.8% vs. 90.8%, all P < 0.01). In the monthly analysis, treatment failure mainly occurred during the first 4 years, and the risk of distant failure in patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy never exceeded that of patients without concurrent chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Locoregional failure that developed within 14 months and/or distant failure within 20 months had poorer subsequent survival. Concurrent chemotherapy provides a significant FFS benefit, primarily by reducing EDF, translating into a long-term OS benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xing-Li Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 510060, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Lu-Lu Zhang
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 510060, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jia Kou
- Department of Anaesthesiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 510060, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Guan-Qun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, 651 Dongfeng Road East, 510060, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Chen-Fei Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, 651 Dongfeng Road East, 510060, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, 651 Dongfeng Road East, 510060, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
| | - Li Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, 651 Dongfeng Road East, 510060, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gao J, Li Y, Zou X, Lei T, Xu T, Chen Y, Wang Z. HEY1-mediated cisplatin resistance in lung adenocarcinoma via epithelial-mesenchymal transition. MEDICAL ONCOLOGY (NORTHWOOD, LONDON, ENGLAND) 2022; 40:18. [PMID: 36396748 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-022-01886-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancer is one of the most common malignancies and the leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. In patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who are negative for driver gene mutations, platinum-based chemotherapy represented by cisplatin remain the standard of care. Therefore, studying the mechanism behind inevitable cisplatin resistance in lung adenocarcinoma is still important. In this study, the potentially related differential expression gene for cisplatin resistance in lung adenocarcinoma was screened in the GEO database. The expression level of HEY1 in cell lines of lung adenocarcinoma was detected and HEY1 expression was up-regulated in cisplatin-resistant lung adenocarcinoma tissues and cell lines A549/DDP. Patients with high HEY1 expression have poor prognosis after cisplatin therapy. Gain and loss function assays uncovered that HEY1 could regulate the cisplatin sensitivity of NSCLC cells. In vivo experiments have confirmed that silence of HEY1 expression can induce cisplatin resistance, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) changes occur during this process. Mechanically, HEY1 silencing significantly up-regulated E-cadherin expression and down-regulated Vimentin in A549/DDP cells. While up-regulation of HEY1 resulted in down-regulation of E-cadherin and up-regulation of Vimentin in A549 cells. Immunohistochemical experiments confirmed that E-cadherin was significantly decreased, and Vimentin expression was significantly up-regulated in cisplatin-resistant lung adenocarcinoma tissues. HEY1 can mediate the occurrence of cisplatin-acquired resistance in lung adenocarcinoma, and the possible mechanism is to regulate the EMT. The results of this study can provide a new direction and target for clinical research on the reversal of cisplatin resistance in lung adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Gao
- Cancer Medical Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangjiayuan Road 121#, Nanjing, 210011, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.,Department of Medical Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing, Medical University, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Yadong Li
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Guangzhou Road 30#, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210011, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoteng Zou
- Cancer Medical Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangjiayuan Road 121#, Nanjing, 210011, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Tianyao Lei
- Cancer Medical Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangjiayuan Road 121#, Nanjing, 210011, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Tianwei Xu
- Cancer Medical Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangjiayuan Road 121#, Nanjing, 210011, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Yijiang Chen
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Guangzhou Road 30#, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
| | - Zhaoxia Wang
- Cancer Medical Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangjiayuan Road 121#, Nanjing, 210011, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yang ZC, Hu YY, Liu LT, Guo SS, Du CC, Liang YJ, Chen QY, Mai HQ. Determining the suitability of definitive radiation therapy in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on PET/CT: a large cohort study. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:7722-7732. [PMID: 35505116 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08814-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) who would benefit from receiving definitive radiation therapy (DRT) along with their pre-existing palliative chemotherapy (PCT) by evaluating their post-PCT Deauville scores and EBV DNA. METHODS A total of 570 mNPC patients, treated with PCT or PCT+DRT, were studied. EBV DNA levels, along with post-PCT Deauville scores, were used to stratify risk based on the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). RESULTS Significant differences were observed in the survival rates of patients with Deauville scores of 1-3 and 4-5 (2-year progression-free survival (PFS): 23.4% versus 8.5%, p < 0.001; 2-year overall survival (OS): 56.8% versus 18.8%, p < 0.001). RPA yielded three distinct groups in the increasing order of risk (Deauville scores of all RPA I-II were within the range of 1-3): (1) RPA I: EBV DNA levels at a pretreatment concentration ≤ 4000 copies/mL and undetectable post-PCT; (2) RPA II: EBV DNA levels either at a pretreatment concentration > 4000 copies/mL or at a pretreatment concentration ≤ 4000 copies/mL and detectable post-PCT; (3) RPA III: Deauville scores 4-5. While patients in RPA I and RPA II had significantly PFS rates when treated with PCT+DRT than when treated with PCT alone (RPA I: 72.7% versus 13.4%, RPA II: 37.8% versus 6.3%), those in RPA III did not experience such PFS benefits (6.5% versus 9.7%). CONCLUSION PCT+DRT might improve the survival rates in mNPC patients in the low- and mid-risk strata but not those of patients in the high-risk strata. KEY POINTS We use the Deauville scores and the concentrations of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA to determine those patients with de novo metastatic NPC who would benefit from radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen-Chong Yang
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ying-Ying Hu
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li-Ting Liu
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shan-Shan Guo
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chao-Chao Du
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu-Jing Liang
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiu-Yan Chen
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China. .,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Hai-Qiang Mai
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China. .,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Miao J, Wang L, Tan SH, Li JG, Yi J, Ong EH, Tan LL, Zhang Y, Gong X, Chen Q, Xiang YQ, Chen MY, Guo Y, Lv X, Xia WX, Tang L, Deng X, Guo X, Han F, Mai HQ, Chua MLK, Zhao C. Adjuvant Capecitabine Following Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:2797486. [PMID: 36227615 PMCID: PMC9562101 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.4656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Importance Induction or adjuvant chemotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) are first-line treatment options for treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). Adjuvant platinum regimens are, however, poorly tolerated, highlighting the unmet need for an efficacious, tolerable adjuvant regimen. Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant capecitabine with CCRT for the treatment of patients with LA-NPC. Design, Setting, and Participants This open-label randomized clinical trial recruited patients from March 31, 2014, to July 27, 2018, at 3 institutions in China, with at least 3 years of follow-up. The data collection cutoff date was February 9, 2022. Eligibility included stage III-IVb nasopharyngeal carcinoma and at least 1 of the following: T3-4N2 or T1-4N3; plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA titer higher than 20 000 copies/mL; primary gross tumor volume larger than 30.0 cm3; fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography/computed tomography maximum standard uptake value of the primary gross tumor volume larger than 10.0; or multiple nodal metastases and any larger than 4.0 cm. Interventions Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks for 8 cycles) or observation following CCRT (100 mg/m2 cisplatin every 3 weeks for 2 to 3 cycles, depending on duration of radiotherapy). Main Outcomes and Measures Failure-free survival in the intention-to-treat cohort was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves compared with the log-rank test. Unstratified Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios, with corresponding 95% CIs based on the Wald test. Results There were 180 patients enrolled (median [IQR] age, 47 [40-55] years; 143 [79.4%] men). Among 90 patients in the capecitabine group, 76 (84.4%) had at least 2 high-risk factors; among 90 patients in the control group, 80 (88.9%) had at least 2 high-risk factors. All patients completed CCRT, except 1 patient in the capecitabine group who received 1 cycle of cisplatin. Of the 90 patients in the capecitabine group, 85 (94.4%) received capecitabine, with 71 (78.9%) completing 8 cycles. With a median (IQR) follow-up of 58.0 (49.5-80.1) months, 18 events were recorded in the capecitabine group vs 31 events in the control group. Failure-free survival was improved with adjuvant capecitabine (3 years, 83.3% vs 72.2%; 5 years, 78.5% vs 65.9%; hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.30-0.94]; P = .03). The incidence of grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was higher in the capecitabine group than in the control group (54 of 90 patients [60.0%] vs 46 of 90 patients [51.1%]). Treatment-related adverse events included xerostomia (17 [18.9%] vs 9 [10.0%] patients), mucositis (21 [23.3%] vs 15 [16.7%] patients), and anorexia (8 [8.9%] vs 4 [4.4%] patients). The incidence of grade 3 delayed treatment-related adverse events was comparable in both groups (9 of 83 [10.8%] vs 7 of 81 [8.6%] patients). Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, adjuvant capecitabine at the full dose following CCRT was well tolerated and improved failure-free survival among patients with LA-NPC and high-risk factors. Further investigations assessing optimal dose and duration are warranted. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02143388.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjing Miao
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Lin Wang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Sze Huey Tan
- Division of Clinical Trials & Epidemiological Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Jin-gao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
- National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Junlin Yi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, PR China
| | - Enya H.W. Ong
- Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Laura L.Y. Tan
- Department of Head and Neck and Thoracic Cancers, Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Ministry of Health Holdings, Singapore
| | - Ye Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, PR China
| | - Xiaochang Gong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
- National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Qiuyan Chen
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Yan-qun Xiang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Ming-yuan Chen
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Ying Guo
- Department of Clinical Trials Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Xing Lv
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Wei-xiong Xia
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Linquan Tang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Xiaowu Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Xiang Guo
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Fei Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Hai-qiang Mai
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Melvin L. K. Chua
- Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Head and Neck and Thoracic Cancers, Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chong Zhao
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Twu CW, Lin PJ, Tsou HH, Liu YC, Jiang RS, Liang KL, Lin TY, Wang WY, Lin JC. Maintenance metronomic chemotherapy for metastatic/recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck 2022; 44:1453-1461. [PMID: 35362634 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated the survival impact and toxicity of maintenance metronomic chemotherapy in patients with metastatic/recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (met/rec NPC). METHODS Ninety-eight patients with met/rec NPC were first salvaged by IV cisplatin-based chemotherapy and showed nonprogression disease; then maintenance metronomic chemotherapy for at least 12 months was recommended. We analyzed the treatment outcome between patients who received (n = 51) and did not receive (n = 47) maintenance chemotherapy. RESULTS Baseline patient characteristics showed no significant differences between both arms. Median overall survival for patients with and without maintenance chemotherapy was 36.0 and 12.3 months, respectively (p < 0.0001). Similarly, median progression-free survival was 24.7 and 7.3 months, respectively (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, toxicities during maintenance oral chemotherapy period were usually mild. Transient grade 3 leucopenia (9.8%), anemia (3.9%), thrombocytopenia (7.8%), and no grade 4 toxicity were observed. CONCLUSION After IV salvage chemotherapy, maintenance oral metronomic chemotherapy significantly improved overall and progression-free survivals while demonstrating low toxicity in patients with met/rec NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Wen Twu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Po-Ju Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Hui Tsou
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chun Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Rong-San Jiang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Kai-Li Liang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Tian-Yun Lin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Yi Wang
- Department of Nursing, Hung Kuang University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jin-Ching Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Xu Z, Yang L, Ng WT, Helali AE, Lee VHF, Ma L, Liu Q, Li J, Shen L, Huang J, Zha J, Zhou C, Lee AWM, Chen L. A Single-Arm Phase 2 Trial on Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiation in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Using a Reduced Cumulative Dose of Cisplatin. Front Oncol 2022; 12:842281. [PMID: 35574402 PMCID: PMC9092977 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.842281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We conducted this study to evaluate if a reduced cumulative dose of induction and concurrent cisplatin conferred similar favorable outcomes when compared to trial NPC-0501. Methods Newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with stage III-IVA were prospectively recruited from January 2015 to September 2019. Induction chemotherapy (IC) consisted of cisplatin 80mg/m2 on day 1 and capecitabine 1000mg/m2 twice daily from day 1 to 14 every 3 weeks for 3 cycles followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with 2 cycles of cisplatin 100mg/m2 given every 3 weeks. Tumor response was evaluated according to RECIST v1.1. Acute and late adverse events (AEs) were graded with CTCAE v4.0 and Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring of the RTOG, respectively. Results 135 patients were recruited. At 16 weeks after CCRT, all 130 patients who completed the entire course of radiotherapy (RT) had a complete response upon final assessment. With a median follow-up of 36.2 months, 22 treatment failures and 8 deaths were observed. The 3-year progression-free survival, overall survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, and distant recurrence-free survival were 83.7%, 94.1%, 94.1%, and 85.9%, respectively. Our survival data outcomes were similar to those reported in the cisplatin and capecitabine (PX) induction arm of the 0501 trial. 103 patients (76.3%) reported acute grade 3-4 AEs. Two patients (1.5%) had late grade 3-4 complications, numerically fewer than those reported in the NPC-0501 trial. Conclusions Induction PX and concurrent cisplatin with a reduced cumulative cisplatin dose yield survival outcomes comparable to those reported in the NPC-0501 trial with excellent tolerability. Therefore, a reduced cumulative dose of cisplatin is a promising treatment scheme for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyuan Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Clinical Oncology Centre, The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Li Yang
- Clinical Oncology Centre, The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Wai-Tong Ng
- Clinical Oncology Centre, The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Aya El Helali
- Clinical Oncology Centre, The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Victor Ho-Fun Lee
- Clinical Oncology Centre, The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Lingyu Ma
- Clinical Oncology Centre, The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Qin Liu
- Clinical Oncology Centre, The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jishi Li
- Clinical Oncology Centre, The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Lin Shen
- Clinical Oncology Centre, The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jijie Huang
- Clinical Oncology Centre, The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jiandong Zha
- Clinical Oncology Centre, The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Cheng Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Anne W M Lee
- Clinical Oncology Centre, The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Longhua Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Li WZ, Lv X, Hu D, Lv SH, Liu GY, Liang H, Ye YF, Yang W, Zhang HX, Yuan TZ, Wang DS, Lu N, Ke LR, Tang WB, Tong LH, Chen ZJ, Liu T, Cao KJ, Mo HY, Guo L, Zhao C, Chen MY, Chen QY, Huang PY, Sun R, Qiu F, Luo DH, Wang L, Hua YJ, Tang LQ, Qian CN, Mai HQ, Guo X, Xiang YQ, Xia WX. Effect of Induction Chemotherapy With Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, and Capecitabine vs Cisplatin and Fluorouracil on Failure-Free Survival for Patients With Stage IVA to IVB Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Multicenter Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:706-714. [PMID: 35323856 PMCID: PMC8949760 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Importance Induction chemotherapy added to concurrent chemoradiotherapy significantly improves survival for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but the optimal induction regimen remains unclear. Objective To determine whether induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine (TPC) improves survival vs cisplatin and fluorouracil (PF) prior to chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage IVA to IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized, open-label, phase 3 clinical trial recruited 238 patients at 4 hospitals in China from October 20, 2016, to August 29, 2019. Patients were 18 to 65 years of age with treatment-naive, nonkeratinizing stage IVA to IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Interventions Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive induction chemotherapy with two 21-day cycles of TPC (intravenous paclitaxel [150 mg/m2, day 1], intravenous cisplatin [60 mg/m2, day 1], and oral capecitabine [1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily, days 1-14]) or PF (intravenous cisplatin [100 mg/m2, day 1] and fluorouracil [800 mg/m2 daily, days 1-5]), followed by chemoradiotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was failure-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary end points included distant metastasis-free survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, overall survival, tumor response, and safety. Results Overall, 238 eligible patients (187 men [78.6%]; median age, 45 years [range, 18-65 years]) were randomly assigned to receive TPC (n = 118) or PF (n = 120). The median follow-up duration was 48.4 months (IQR, 39.6-53.3 months). Failure-free survival at 3 years was 83.5% (95% CI, 77.0%-90.6%) in the TPC group and 68.9% (95% CI, 61.1%-77.8%) in the PF group (stratified hazard ratio [HR] for recurrence or death, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.28-0.79; P = .004). Induction with the TPC regimen resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of distant metastases (stratified HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.24-0.98]; P = .04) and locoregional recurrence (stratified HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.18-0.93]; P = .03) compared with the PF regimen. However, there was no effect on early overall survival (stratified HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.17-1.18]; P = .10). The incidences of grade 3 to 4 acute adverse events and late-onset toxicities were 57.6% (n = 68) and 13.6% (16 of 118), respectively, in the TPC group and 65.8% (n = 79) and 17.9% (21 of 117), respectively, in the PF group. One treatment-related death occurred in the PF group. Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial found that induction chemotherapy with 2 cycles of TPC for patients with stage IVA to IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma improved failure-free survival compared with 2 cycles of PF, with no increase in the toxicity profile. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02940925.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wang-Zhong Li
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xing Lv
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dan Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, Meizhou, China
| | - Shu-Hui Lv
- Department of Ultrasound, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China
| | - Guo-Ying Liu
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hu Liang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan-Fang Ye
- Clinical Research Design Division, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wen Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanhai People’s Hospital, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, Foshan, China
| | - Han-Xiong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, Meizhou, China
| | - Tai-Ze Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - De-Shen Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Nian Lu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liang-Ru Ke
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wu-Bing Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanhai People’s Hospital, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, Foshan, China
| | - Li-Hua Tong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanhai People’s Hospital, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, Foshan, China
| | - Zhi-Jie Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, Meizhou, China
| | - Ting Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, Meizhou, China
| | - Ka-Jia Cao
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hao-Yuan Mo
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ling Guo
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chong Zhao
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ming-Yuan Chen
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiu-Yan Chen
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pei-Yu Huang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rui Sun
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fang Qiu
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dong-Hua Luo
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lin Wang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi-Jun Hua
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lin-Quan Tang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chao-Nan Qian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Qiang Mai
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiang Guo
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan-Qun Xiang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei-Xiong Xia
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Li XY, Luo DH, Guo L, Mo HY, Sun R, Guo SS, Liu LT, Yang ZC, Yang JH, Qiu F, Sun XS, Wang P, Liu Q, Li JB, Tang QN, Lin C, Yang Q, Liu SL, Liang YJ, Jia GD, Wen DX, Guo CY, Yan JJ, Zhao C, Chen QY, Tang LQ, Mai HQ. Deintensified Chemoradiotherapy for Pretreatment Epstein-Barr Virus DNA-Selected Low-Risk Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Phase II Randomized Noninferiority Trial. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1163-1173. [PMID: 34990291 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cumulative doses of 200 mg/m2 for concurrent cisplatin (DDP) were indicated by retrospective studies as sufficient in conferring survival benefit for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). We performed an open-label, phase II, randomized, controlled trial to test the noninferiority of a two-cycle 100 mg/m2 concurrent DDP regimen over three-cycle in patients with low-risk LA-NPC with pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus DNA levels < 4,000 copies/mL. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive two cycles or three cycles concurrent DDP-based chemoradiotherapy. The primary end point was 3-year progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end points included overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, etc. RESULTS Between September 2016 and October 2018, 332 patients were enrolled, with 166 in each arm. After a median follow-up of 37.7 months, the estimated 3-year PFS rates were 88.0% in the two-cycle group and 90.4% in the three-cycle group, with a difference of 2.4% (95% CI, -4.3 to 9.1, Pnoninferiority = .014). No differences were observed between groups in terms of PFS, overall survival, and the cumulative incidences of locoregional relapse and distant metastasis. Patients in the three-cycle group developed significantly more grade 3-4 mucositis (41 [24.8%] v 25 [15.1%]), hyponatremia (26 [15.8%] v 14 [8.4%]), and dermatitis (9 [5.5%] v 2 [1.2%]). The overall all-grade and grade 3-4 toxicity burdens were heavier in three-cycle group (T-scores, 12.33 v 10.57, P < .001 for all grades; 1.76 v 1.44, P = .05 for grade 3-4). Patients in the three-cycle group also showed more all-grade hearing impairment, dry mouth and skin fibrosis, and impaired long-term quality of life. CONCLUSION Intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus two cycles of concurrent 100 mg/m2 DDP could be an alternative treatment option for patients with low-risk LA-NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Yun Li
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dong-Hua Luo
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ling Guo
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hao-Yuan Mo
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rui Sun
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shan-Shan Guo
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li-Ting Liu
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhen-Chong Yang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jin-Hao Yang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fang Qiu
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xue-Song Sun
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pan Wang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qing Liu
- Clinical Trials Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ji-Bin Li
- Clinical Trials Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qing-Nan Tang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chao Lin
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qi Yang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sai-Lan Liu
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu-Jing Liang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guo-Dong Jia
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dong-Xiang Wen
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chun-Yan Guo
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jin-Jie Yan
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chong Zhao
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiu-Yan Chen
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lin-Quan Tang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Qiang Mai
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lee AW, Ng WT, Choi CW, But B, Ngan RKC, Tung S, Cheng AC, Kwong DL, Lu TX, Chan AT, Yiu H, Lee S, Wong F, Yuen KT, Chappell RJ. Exploratory Study of NPC-0501 Trial - Optimal Cisplatin Dose of Concurrent and Induction/Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:2679-2689. [PMID: 35381064 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-3375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background The current recommendation for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients is cisplatin-based induction (IC) or adjuvant (AC) chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, data on the optimal platinum doses for each phase of combined regimens are lacking. Patients and Methods 742 NPC patients in the NPC-0501 Trial treated with CRT plus IC/AC and irradiated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were analyzed. The optimal platinum dose to achieve the best overall survival (OS) in the concurrent and induction/adjuvant phases were studied. Results Evaluation of the whole series shows the optimal platinum dose was 160 mg/m2 in the concurrent and 260 mg/m2 in the induction/adjuvant phase. Repeating the analyses on 591 patients treated with cisplatin throughout (no replacement by carboplatin) confirmed the same results. The cohort with optimal platinum doses in both phases had better OS than the cohort suboptimal in both phases (Stage III: 90% vs 75%, Stage IVA-B: 80% vs 56%, at 5-year). Multivariable analyses confirmed optimal platinum doses in both phases vs. suboptimal dose in each phase are significant independent factors for OS, with hazard ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.41-0.91) and 0.67 (95% CI=0.48-0.94), respectively. Treatment sequence was statistically insignificant after adjusting for platinum doses. Conclusion Both concurrent and IC/AC are needed for locoregionally advanced NPC, even for patients irradiated by IMRT; the concurrent platinum dosage could be set at {greater than or equal to}160 mg/m2 when coupled with adequate induction/adjuvant dosage at {greater than or equal to}260 mg/m2 (or at least {greater than or equal to}240 mg/m2). To achieve these optimal dosages, IC-CRT at conventional fractionation is favored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wai-Tong Ng
- University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | - Barton But
- University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | | | | | | | - Tai-Xiang Lu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | | | - Harry Yiu
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Sarah Lee
- Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong
| | | | | | - Richard J Chappell
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Yang ZC, Du CC, Liu LT, Liang YJ, Tang LQ, Chen QY, Mai HQ, Guo SS. The prognostic role of plasma Epstein–Barr virus DNA levels in the middle of intensity-modulated radiotherapy to guide cisplatin dose recommendation in concurrent chemoradiation therapy in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A large cohort study. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100908. [PMID: 35647403 PMCID: PMC9133362 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Methods and Materials Results Conclusions
Collapse
|
28
|
Raman D, Tay P, Hirpara JL, Liu D, Pervaiz S. TRAIL sensitivity of nasopharyngeal cancer cells involves redox dependent upregulation of TMTC2 and its interaction with membrane caspase-3. Redox Biol 2021; 48:102193. [PMID: 34839142 PMCID: PMC8636823 DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2021.102193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Preferential expression of receptors for TNF-family related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL), DR4 and DR5 makes TRAIL an attractive anti-cancer therapeutic. However, the efficacy of targeting death receptors has not been extensively studied in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). Here we investigated TRAIL sensitivity and its underlying mechanism in NPC cell lines, and assessed the potential of TRAIL as a therapeutic option against NPC. RESULTS Using two established NPC cell lines, we report the expression of DR4 and DR5, which respond to TRAIL ligation by triggering efficient Type II apoptosis. Mechanistically, early activation of caspase-3 and its membrane recruitment is identified in NPC cell lines, which is associated with, hitherto unreported, interaction with transmembrane and tetratricopeptide repeat containing 2 (TMTC2) in the lipid raft domains. TMTC2 expression is induced upon exposure to TRAIL and involves intracellular increase in peroxynitrite (ONOO-) production. While ONOO- increase is downstream of caspase-8 activation, it is involved in the upregulation of TMTC2, gene knockdown of which abrogated TRAIL-induced apoptotic execution. Bioinformatics analyses also provide evidence for a strong correlation between TMTC2 and DR4 or caspase-3 as well as a significantly better disease-free survival in patients with high TMTC2 expression. INNOVATION AND CONCLUSION Collectively, redox-dependent execution of NPC cells upon ligation of TRAIL receptors reintroduces the possible therapeutic use of TRAIL in NPC as well as underscores the potential of using TMTC2 as a biomarker of TRAIL sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepika Raman
- Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Patricia Tay
- Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Dan Liu
- Integrated Science and Engineering Program (ISEP), NUS Graduate School, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shazib Pervaiz
- Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Cancer Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore; NUS Centre for Cancer Research (N2CR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; National University Cancer Institute, National University Health System, Singapore; Healthy Longevity Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tang LL, Chen YP, Chen CB, Chen MY, Chen NY, Chen XZ, Du XJ, Fang WF, Feng M, Gao J, Han F, He X, Hu CS, Hu DS, Hu GY, Jiang H, Jiang W, Jin F, Lang JY, Li JG, Lin SJ, Liu X, Liu QF, Ma L, Mai HQ, Qin JY, Shen LF, Sun Y, Wang PG, Wang RS, Wang RZ, Wang XS, Wang Y, Wu H, Xia YF, Xiao SW, Yang KY, Yi JL, Zhu XD, Ma J. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2021; 41:1195-1227. [PMID: 34699681 PMCID: PMC8626602 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignant epithelial tumor originating in the nasopharynx and has a high incidence in Southeast Asia and North Africa. To develop these comprehensive guidelines for the diagnosis and management of NPC, the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) arranged a multi‐disciplinary team comprising of experts from all sub‐specialties of NPC to write, discuss, and revise the guidelines. Based on the findings of evidence‐based medicine in China and abroad, domestic experts have iteratively developed these guidelines to provide proper management of NPC. Overall, the guidelines describe the screening, clinical and pathological diagnosis, staging and risk assessment, therapies, and follow‐up of NPC, which aim to improve the management of NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling-Long Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China
| | - Yu-Pei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China
| | - Chuan-Ben Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Department of Radiation Oncology, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University Provincial Clinical College, Cancer Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350014, P. R. China
| | - Ming-Yuan Chen
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China
| | - Nian-Yong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China
| | - Xiao-Zhong Chen
- Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, P. R. China
| | - Xiao-Jing Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China
| | - Wen-Feng Fang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Medical Oncology Department, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China
| | - Mei Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China
| | - Jin Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anhui Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, P. R. China
| | - Fei Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China
| | - Xia He
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, P. R. China
| | - Chao-Su Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China
| | - De-Sheng Hu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430079, P. R. China
| | - Guang-Yuan Hu
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, P. R. China
| | - Hao Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, 233004, P. R. China
| | - Wei Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, Guangxi, 541001, P. R. China
| | - Feng Jin
- Key Laboratory of Basic Pharmacology and Joint International Research Laboratory of Ethnomedicine of Ministry of Education, Zunyi Medical University, No. 6, Xuefu West Road, Xinpu New District, Zunyi, Guizhou, 563000, P. R. China
| | - Jin-Yi Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China
| | - Jin-Gao Li
- Department of Radiotherapy, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330029, P. R. China
| | - Shao-Jun Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Department of Radiation Oncology, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University Provincial Clinical College, Cancer Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350014, P. R. China
| | - Xu Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China
| | - Qiu-Fang Liu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Medical College, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710000, P. R. China
| | - Lin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100000, P. R. China
| | - Hai-Qiang Mai
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China
| | - Ji-Yong Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, 650100, P. R. China
| | - Liang-Fang Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, P. R. China
| | - Ying Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China
| | - Pei-Guo Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, 300060, P. R. China
| | - Ren-Sheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530000, P. R. China
| | - Ruo-Zheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Oncology in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830000, P. R. China
| | - Xiao-Shen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital & Chongqing Cancer Institute & Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400000, P. R. China
| | - Hui Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, P. R. China
| | - Yun-Fei Xia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China
| | - Shao-Wen Xiao
- Department of Radiotherapy, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, Haidian District, 100142, P. R. China
| | - Kun-Yu Yang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, P. R. China
| | - Jun-Lin Yi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, P. R. China
| | - Xiao-Dong Zhu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, 530000, P. R. China
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Liu LT, Liang YJ, Guo SS, Xie Y, Jia GD, Wen DX, Tang LQ, Chen QY, Mai HQ. Identifying distinct risks of treatment failure in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A study based on the dynamic changes in peripheral blood lymphocytes, monocytes, N classification, and plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA. Head Neck 2021; 44:34-45. [PMID: 34636116 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the prognostic value of the dynamic change in absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) and absolute monocyte counts (AMCs) and identify patients with N stage and plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA levels in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who are at risk of treatment failure. METHODS A total of 1124 eligible patients with Stage II-IVb NPC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were enrolled. Percentage changes in the ALC (ΔALC%) and AMC (ΔAMC%) were calculated. RESULTS Patients with high ΔALC% were correlated with poorer 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates than those with low ΔALC%. Likewise, high ΔAMC% was significantly associated with worse outcome than low ΔAMC% (OS, p = 0.001; PFS, p = 0.001; DMFS, p = 0.034). Multivariate analyses revealed that ΔALC% (p = 0.046), ΔAMC% (p = 0.019), and EBV DNA level (p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for OS. With respect to PFS, ΔALC% (p = 0.036), ΔAMC% (p = 0.011), N classification (p = 0.016), and EBV DNA level (p < 0.001) were also independent prognosticators. Based on the aforementioned independent risk factors (ΔALC% ≥ 83.33%, ΔAMC% ≥ 40.00%, Stage N2-3, EBV DNA ≥ 4000 copies/ml), patients were divided into three different risk groups (low-risk group [with <1 risk factor], intermediate risk group [with 1-3 risk factors], and high-risk group [with 4 risk factors]) that correlated with disparate risks of death (p < 0.001), disease progression (p < 0.001), and distant metastasis (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS High ΔALC% and ΔAMC% were correlated with poor prognosis in patients with NPC. Risk stratification based on ΔALC%, ΔAMC%, N classification, and plasma EBV DNA levels could provide potential utility for risk-adapted therapeutic strategies for NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Ting Liu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu-Jing Liang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shan-Shan Guo
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yao Xie
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guo-Dong Jia
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dong-Xiang Wen
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lin-Quan Tang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiu-Yan Chen
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Qiang Mai
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Xiong Y, Shi L, Zhu L, Peng G. Comparison of TPF and TP Induction Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on TNM Stage and Pretreatment Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index. Front Oncol 2021; 11:731543. [PMID: 34616680 PMCID: PMC8488348 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.731543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the two IC (induction chemotherapy) regimens, TPF (taxanes, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) and TP (taxanes and cisplatin) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) patients. Methods Ultimately, we enrolled 213 patients at stage III-IVA in this retrospective study. The prognosis of TPF and TP was compared by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression. The toxicities were evaluated according to CTCAE v4.0 and RTOG criteria. Results TPF was found to have a higher 5-year DMFS in stage IVA and N2-3 patients. The optimal value of pretreatment SII was 432.48. A further subgroup analysis revealed that patients in stage IVA combined with SII ≥432.48 showed superior OS (P=0.038) and DMFS (P=0.028) from TPF. Also, SII was proved to be a prognostic element for PFS (HR 2.801, P=0.018) and DMFS (HR 3.735, P=0.032) in multivariate analysis, and IC regimen (HR 2.182, P=0.049) for predicting DMFS. The rate of grade 3–4 leukopenia (P=0.038), neutropenia (P=0.021), radiation oral mucositis (P=0.048), diarrhea (P=0.036), and ear damage (P=0.046) were more common in TPF group. Conclusion Our study revealed that TPF regimen showed a higher 5-year DMFS for stage IVA and N2-3 patients, while for stage III and N0-1, TP might be ample. In high-risk LA-NPC patients (stage IVA combined with pretreatment SII ≥432.48), TPF had a higher 5-year OS and DMFS, with more grade 3–4 toxicities, but most of them were endurable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Xiong
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Liangliang Shi
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Lisheng Zhu
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Gang Peng
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Zhu MY, Sun XS, Guo SS, Chen QY, Tang LQ, Liu LT, Mai HQ. Do all patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma benefit from the maintenance chemotherapy using S-1/capecitabine? Oral Oncol 2021; 122:105539. [PMID: 34547555 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The goal of this study was to explore the benefits of S-1/capecitabine as maintenance therapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with different risks of treatment failure. METHODS A total of 2205 eligible, locoregionally advanced NPC patients were recruited for this retrospective study. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify optimal predictors of overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) for constructing the nomograms. Patients were stratified into high-risk or low-risk groups based on the total score of the nomograms. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to match the maintenance and non-maintenance cohorts in different risk groups. A log-rank test was performed to evaluate correlations between maintenance therapy and survival. RESULTS A nomogram for OS was established (C-index, 0.664; 95% confidence interval, 0.635-0.693). The 5-year OS rate was significantly higher in the low-risk group than in the high-risk group (83.5% vs. 67.2%, P < 0.001). Patients in the high-risk group who received S-1/capecitabine maintenance therapy achieved significant improvement in the 5-year OS rate (82.8% vs. 67.1%, p = 0.034), whereas patients in the low-risk group did not (86.7% vs. 80.9%, P = 0.081). There was no significant difference in OS, DMFS, progression-free survival (PFS), or toxicities between the S-1 and capecitabine groups (all P > 0.05), and overall treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were not severe (grade 1-2). CONCLUSION S-1/capecitabine maintenance therapy could prolong OS for locoregionally advanced NPC patients in the high-risk group. The toxicities of S-1/capecitabine maintenance therapy were mild and tolerable. Our findings can help guide maintenance therapy in locoregionally advanced NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Man-Yi Zhu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, PR China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, PR China.
| | - Xue-Song Sun
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, PR China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, PR China.
| | - Shan-Shan Guo
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, PR China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, PR China.
| | - Qiu-Yan Chen
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, PR China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, PR China.
| | - Lin-Quan Tang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, PR China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, PR China.
| | - Li-Ting Liu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, PR China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, PR China.
| | - Hai-Qiang Mai
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, PR China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Niu X, Xue F, Liu P, Hu C, He X. Long-term outcomes of induction chemotherapy followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with N3 disease. Transl Oncol 2021; 14:101216. [PMID: 34530195 PMCID: PMC8450248 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 07/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate long-term outcomes of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with N3 disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS From September 2005 to August 2016, 143 patients confirmed NPC with the 8th AJCC/UICC staging criteria N3 were reviewed. All patients received IC followed by IMRT and AC. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 67 months, the 5-year and 10-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), local progression-free survival (LPFS) and regional progression-free survival (RPFS) were 75.7% and 61.6%, 61.2% and 53.4%, 73.1% and 72.1%, 92.4% and 87%, 88.9% and 81.8%, respectively. Multivariate analyses indicated that T stage (P = 0.001) appeared to be prognostic factors for OS. T stage (P = 0.001 and P = 0.002) and neck lymph node necrosis (P = 0.015 and P = 0.045) were independent predictors of PFS and DMFS. The acute toxicities were mainly grade 1/2 hematologic toxicities in patients treated with IC+IMRT+AC, and severe toxicities were uncommon. CONCLUSIONS IC followed by IMRT and AC achieved satisfactory long-term survival outcomes in NPC patients with N3 disease. Neck lymph node necrosis and late T stage served as predictors of poor prognosis for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoshuang Niu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Fen Xue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Peiyao Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Chaosu Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Xiayun He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wang P, Dong F, Cai C, Ke C. Treatment outcomes of induction chemotherapy combined with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Southeast China. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e27023. [PMID: 34414997 PMCID: PMC8376380 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000027023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Induction chemotherapy (IC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) are used to enhance tumor locoregional control and support early treatment for distant metastases. However, optimum combinatorial treatment of these chemoradiotherapy regimens with radiotherapy in curing locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains unclear. Here, we evaluate the efficacy and therapeutic outcome of a combinatorial treatment strategy involving IC, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and AC, by retrospectively analyzing 243 NPC patients who were treated by IC followed by IMRT and AC. The rates of 3-/5-year local-regional control rate, distant failure-free rate (DFFR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 93.3%/90.3%, 84.2%/79.4%, 79.6%/74.4%, and 84.0%/72.6%, respectively. The 3-/5-year OS rates of patients in stage III or IVA were 91.5%/75.1% and 86.5%/56.5%, respectively. Combination cisplatin with paclitaxel showed no significance in OS as compared to cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (P-value = .17). Total four-cycle IC and AC was significantly beneficious versus three-cycle in DFFR (P-value = .04), as well as total 6 chemotherapy cycles compared to 4 in DFFR and PFS (P-value = .03 and P-value = .01, respectively). All survival indicators were adversely affected by T-category, while N-category could only predict DFFR and PFS. Radiation dosage represented as a second prognostic factor for local control. We propose that IC combined with IMRT and AC for locoregionally advanced NPC shows effective treatment outcomes.
Collapse
|
35
|
Volumetric modulated arctherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Clinical efficacy and late toxicity. Cancer Radiother 2021; 26:433-439. [PMID: 34366239 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report our experience of 86 consecutive patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma who were treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 86 patients with histologically proven primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with volumetric modulated arctherapy technique radiotherapy. Primary endpoints were local, regional, distant control, and overall survival, second endpoint was late toxicity. RESULTS The median age was 47.5 years (range: 13-79 years) with sex ratio 1.09. At diagnosis, rhinologic symptoms represented the most common clinical presentation, reported by 61 patients (70.9%). Almost 88.4% of patients presented non-keratinizing undifferentiated carcinoma histology (n=76). Most of the patients presented a locally advanced disease defined by stage III and IVa (95.3%). Therefore, 31 patients were treated by concurrent chemoradiation (36%), 52 patients received induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (57%), three patients received induction chemotherapy followed by exclusive radiotherapy (3.5%). and three patients treated with exclusive irradiation (3.5%). With a median follow up of 15.7 months (range: 4-33.3 months), nine patients died (10.4%), three presented local or locoregional relapse (3.4%), while nine patients presented distant recurrences (10.4%). The two years overall and disease-free survival rates were 88.7% and 83.1% respectively, locoregional control was 100% at 12 months and 96.2% at 24 months, and the two years distant failure-free survival was 86.7%. Time to relapse was the only prognostic factor in univariate analysis for overall survival in our study. The therapeutic tolerance was good with 61.7% of grade 3 and 2.3% grade 4 hyposialia respectively, 46.5% of otological disorders and no radionecrosis was noted. CONCLUSION Volumetric modulated arctherapy technique with concurrent chemoradiotherapy is an effective treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with excellent overall and locoregional control without severe toxicity. Distant metastasis is the major site of failure, so induction chemotherapy added to chemoradiotherapy must be discussed in multidisciplinary consultation meeting because it significantly improved recurrence-free survival and overall survival, as compared with chemoradiotherapy alone.
Collapse
|
36
|
Chen YP, Liu X, Zhou Q, Yang KY, Jin F, Zhu XD, Shi M, Hu GQ, Hu WH, Sun Y, Wu HF, Wu H, Lin Q, Wang H, Tian Y, Zhang N, Wang XC, Shen LF, Liu ZZ, Huang J, Luo XL, Li L, Zang J, Mei Q, Zheng BM, Yue D, Xu J, Wu SG, Shi YX, Mao YP, Chen L, Li WF, Zhou GQ, Sun R, Guo R, Zhang Y, Xu C, Lv JW, Guo Y, Feng HX, Tang LL, Xie FY, Sun Y, Ma J. Metronomic capecitabine as adjuvant therapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2021; 398:303-313. [PMID: 34111416 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01123-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma have a high risk of disease relapse, despite a high proportion of patients attaining complete clinical remission after receiving standard-of-care treatment (ie, definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without induction chemotherapy). Additional adjuvant therapies are needed to further reduce the risk of recurrence and death. However, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma remains controversial, highlighting the need for more effective adjuvant treatment options. METHODS This multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was done at 14 hospitals in China. Patients (aged 18-65 years) with histologically confirmed, high-risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (stage III-IVA, excluding T3-4N0 and T3N1 disease), no locoregional disease or distant metastasis after definitive chemoradiotherapy, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, sufficient haematological, renal, and hepatic function, and who had received their final radiotherapy dose 12-16 weeks before randomisation, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either oral metronomic capecitabine (650 mg/m2 body surface area twice daily for 1 year; metronomic capecitabine group) or observation (standard therapy group). Randomisation was done with a computer-generated sequence (block size of four), stratified by trial centre and receipt of induction chemotherapy (yes or no). The primary endpoint was failure-free survival, defined as the time from randomisation to disease recurrence (distant metastasis or locoregional recurrence) or death due to any cause, in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of capecitabine or who had commenced observation. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02958111. FINDINGS Between Jan 25, 2017, and Oct 25, 2018, 675 patients were screened, of whom 406 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the metronomic capecitabine group (n=204) or to the standard therapy group (n=202). After a median follow-up of 38 months (IQR 33-42), there were 29 (14%) events of recurrence or death in the metronomic capecitabine group and 53 (26%) events of recurrence or death in the standard therapy group. Failure-free survival at 3 years was significantly higher in the metronomic capecitabine group (85·3% [95% CI 80·4-90·6]) than in the standard therapy group (75·7% [69·9-81·9]), with a stratified hazard ratio of 0·50 (95% CI 0·32-0·79; p=0·0023). Grade 3 adverse events were reported in 35 (17%) of 201 patients in the metronomic capecitabine group and in 11 (6%) of 200 patients in the standard therapy group; hand-foot syndrome was the most common adverse event related to capecitabine (18 [9%] patients had grade 3 hand-foot syndrome). One (<1%) patient in the metronomic capecitabine group had grade 4 neutropenia. No treatment-related deaths were reported in either group. INTERPRETATION The addition of metronomic adjuvant capecitabine to chemoradiotherapy significantly improved failure-free survival in patients with high-risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, with a manageable safety profile. These results support a potential role for metronomic chemotherapy as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. FUNDING The National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province, the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, the Innovation Team Development Plan of the Ministry of Education, and the Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation. TRANSLATION For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Pei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xu Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Kun-Yu Yang
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Feng Jin
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China; Department of Oncology, Affiliated Wuming Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Mei Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital Of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Guo-Qing Hu
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Wei-Han Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hong-Fen Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jilin Cancer Hospital, Changchun, China
| | - Hui Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Qin Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Hui Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital and The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Ye Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Ning Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China
| | - Xi-Cheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liang-Fang Shen
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zheng-Zheng Liu
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jing Huang
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiu-Ling Luo
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | - Ling Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Jian Zang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital Of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Qi Mei
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Bao-Min Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Dan Yue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jilin Cancer Hospital, Changchun, China
| | - Jing Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - San-Gang Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Yan-Xia Shi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan-Ping Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wen-Fei Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guan-Qun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rui Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rui Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Cheng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jia-Wei Lv
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ying Guo
- Clinical Trials Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui-Xia Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ling-Long Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fang-Yun Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ying Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Li J, Li D, Zhang X, Li C, Zhu F. Long noncoding RNA SLC9A3‑AS1 increases E2F6 expression by sponging microRNA‑486‑5p and thus facilitates the oncogenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncol Rep 2021; 46:165. [PMID: 34165171 PMCID: PMC8218295 DOI: 10.3892/or.2021.8116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Long noncoding RNA SLC9A3 antisense RNA 1 (SLC9A3-AS1) plays a central role in lung cancer; yet, its functions in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) have not been elucidated. The present study revealed the roles of SLC9A3-AS1 in NPC and dissected the mechanisms downstream of SLC9A3-AS1. SLC9A3-AS1 levels in NPC were assessed by applying RT-qPCR. The modulatory role of SLC9A3-AS1 interference on NPC cells was examined using numerous functional experiments. High expression of SLC9A3-AS1 was observed in NPC samples. Patients with NPC with a high level of SLC9A3-AS1 experienced a shorter overall survival than those with a low SLC9A3-AS1 level. Loss of SLC9A3-AS1 reduced NPC cell proliferation, colony formation, migration, and invasion but induced cell apoptosis in vitro. Animal experiments further revealed that the depletion of SLC9A3-AS1 hindered NPC tumour growth in vivo. As a competitive endogenous RNA, SLC9A3-AS1 sponged microRNA-486-5p (miR-486-5p), consequently upregulating E2F transcription factor 6 (E2F6). Finally, the effects of SLC9A3-AS1 silencing on NPC cells were reversed by inhibiting miR-486-5p or overexpressing E2F6. In summary, SLC9A3-AS1 exerted carcinogenic effects on NPC cells by adjusting the miR-486-5p/E2F6 axis. Accordingly, the newly identified SLC9A3-AS1/miR-486-5p/E2F6 pathway may offer attractive therapeutic targets for future development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiansheng Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, The People's Hospital of Rizhao, Rizhao, Shandong 276826, P.R. China
| | - Dongzhi Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, The People's Hospital of Rizhao, Rizhao, Shandong 276826, P.R. China
| | - Xianhua Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology, The People's Hospital of Rizhao, Rizhao, Shandong 276826, P.R. China
| | - Cuijuan Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, The People's Hospital of Rizhao, Rizhao, Shandong 276826, P.R. China
| | - Fengjuan Zhu
- Department of Otolaryngology, The People's Hospital of Rizhao, Rizhao, Shandong 276826, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kitano H, Masaoka Y, Mamiya A, Fujiwara Y, Miki T, Hidai C. Combination Cancer Therapy of a Del1 Fragment and Cisplatin Enhanced Therapeutic Efficiency In Vivo. In Vivo 2021; 35:779-791. [PMID: 33622870 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Revised: 12/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Combination cancer therapy is currently under investigation. This study examined the effect of cancer combination therapy using the E3 and C1 (E3C1) domains of developmental endothelial locus-1 (Del1) and cisplatin (CDDP) in murine transplanted tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Mice with transplanted tumors (A431, SCCKN or SCC-4 cells) were injected intraperitoneally with CDDP and injected locally with nonviral plasmid vectors encoding E3C1. Histochemical analysis of the transplanted tumors was then performed to assess the effects on prognosis. RESULTS The CDDP+E3C1 injected group had reduced tumor growth and longer survival compared to the CDDP injected group. In addition, cell death was observed in the tumor of the CDDP+E3C1 group.. Furthermore, angiogenesis and increased blood vessels were observed together with stromal development. CONCLUSION The CDDP+E3C1 treatment resulted in improved survival and poor tumor stromal development in mice with transplanted tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hisataka Kitano
- Division of Oral Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoh Masaoka
- Division of Oral Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Mamiya
- Division of Oral Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Fujiwara
- Division of Oral Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshio Miki
- Division of Physiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chiaki Hidai
- Medical Education Center, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Xia WX, Lv X, Liang H, Liu GY, Sun R, Zeng Q, Li SW, Mo HY, Han F, Luo DH, Liu Q, Shi MY, Ye YF, Yang J, Ke LR, Qiang MY, Qiu WZ, Yu YH, Liu KY, Huang XJ, Li WZ, Lv SH, Cai ZC, Miao JJ, Guo L, Chen MY, Cao KJ, Wang L, Zhao C, Huang PY, Chen QY, Hua YJ, Tang LQ, Qian CN, Mai HQ, Guo X, Xiang YQ. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Different Schedules for Cisplatin Treatment in Patients with Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:4186-4194. [PMID: 34083231 PMCID: PMC8974421 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-4532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous studies suggest that a cumulative cisplatin dose of 200 mg/m2 might be adequate in the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) era for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC). However, two cycles of once-every-3-weeks cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 has never been prospectively compared with standard once-a-week cisplatin regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS This trial was conducted at three hospitals from 2011 to 2016. Patients who met the eligibility criteria were recruited (ChiCTR-TRC-12001979) and randomly assigned (1:1) via a computer-generated sequence to receive once-every-3-weeks cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 for two cycles or once-a-week cisplatin at 40 mg/m2 for six cycles concurrently with IMRT. Primary endpoint was failure-free survival and between-group absolute difference of 10% as the noninferiority margin. RESULTS A total of 510 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up time was 58.3 months with 85.4% of 3-year failure-free survival in the once-every-3-weeks group and 85.6% in the once-a-week group. An absolute difference of -0.2% (95% confidence interval, -6.3 to 5.9; P noninferiority = 0.0016). Acute toxicities of grade 3 or higher occurred in 55.8% in the once-every-3-weeks group and 66.3% in the once-a-week group (P = 0.015). The most common acute toxicities were hematologic abnormalities, including leukopenia (16% vs. 27%; P = 0.0022) and thrombocytopenia (1% vs. 5%; P = 0.015). The late grade 3-4 auditory loss rate was significantly lower in the once-every-3-weeks group than the once-a-week group (6% vs. 13%; P = 0.0039). CONCLUSIONS Once-every-3-weeks cisplatin as concurrent chemoradiotherapy is noninferior to once-a-week cisplatin in the treatment efficacy in the LANPC. Although both regimens are well tolerated, severe acute toxicities and late-onset auditory loss are higher in the once-a-week group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Xiong Xia
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Xing Lv
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Hu Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Guo-Ying Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Rui Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Qi Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, P.R. China
| | - Si-Wei Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, P.R. China
| | - Hao-Yuan Mo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Fei Han
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Dong-Hua Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Qing Liu
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Meng-Yun Shi
- Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Yan-Fang Ye
- Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Jing Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Liang-Ru Ke
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Meng-Yun Qiang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Wen-Ze Qiu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Ya-Hui Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Kui-Yuan Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Xin-Jun Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Wang-Zhong Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Shu-Hui Lv
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Zhuo-Chen Cai
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Jing-Jing Miao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Ling Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Ming-Yuan Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Ka-Jia Cao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Lin Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Chong Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Pei-Yu Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Qiu-Yan Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Yi-Jun Hua
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Lin-Quan Tang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Chao-Nan Qian
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Hai-Qiang Mai
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,Corresponding Authors: Yan-Qun Xiang, Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, P.R. China. Phone: 86208734-3392; Fax: 8620-87343359; E-mail: ; Xiang Guo, ; and Hai-Qiang Mai,
| | - Xiang Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,Corresponding Authors: Yan-Qun Xiang, Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, P.R. China. Phone: 86208734-3392; Fax: 8620-87343359; E-mail: ; Xiang Guo, ; and Hai-Qiang Mai,
| | - Yan-Qun Xiang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,Corresponding Authors: Yan-Qun Xiang, Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, P.R. China. Phone: 86208734-3392; Fax: 8620-87343359; E-mail: ; Xiang Guo, ; and Hai-Qiang Mai,
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Xiang ZF, Hu DF, Xiong HC, Li MY, Zhang ZC, Shen ED, Li WZ, Xiang YQ. Benefit of chemotherapy in stage III nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Oral Oncol 2021; 117:105284. [PMID: 33845238 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We aimed to reveal factors associated with chemotherapy use and evaluate chemotherapy's benefit in patients with stage III NPC stratified by lymph node status. PATIENTS AND METHODS Overall, 1452 patients with stage III NPC who underwent radiotherapy with (n = 1361) or without (n = 91) chemotherapy were identified in the SEER database. We examined predictors for chemotherapy use using logistic regression analysis. We compared all-cause mortality (ACM) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression and competing risk analyses were used to evaluate the benefit of chemotherapy. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach was applied to reduce selection bias and adjust for competing risks. Subgroup analyses and interaction effects were explored. RESULTS Factors including age, sex, insured status, tumor grade, and N category were associated with chemotherapy use. Chemotherapy was associated with decreased 5-year ACM (31.4% vs. 48.4%, p < 0.001) and CSM (25.5% vs. 35.8%; p = 0.017) in stage III NPC patients. The IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio for 5-year ACM was 0.57 (95% CI: 0.38-0.86, p = 0.008), whereas IPTW-adjusted sub-hazard ratio for 5-year CSM was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.42-0.93, p = 0.003). A significant interaction effect existed between lymph node status and treatment modality. Chemotherapy offered a significant survival benefit in node-positive stage III NPC. However, no chemotherapy benefit for the node-negative disease was observed. CONCLUSION Chemotherapy adds survival benefit in stage III NPC, especially in patients with node-positive disease. The magnitude of chemotherapy benefit in node-negative stage III NPC warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen-Fei Xiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315040, China
| | - Dan-Fei Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315040, China
| | - Hua-Cai Xiong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315040, China
| | - Ming-Yao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315040, China
| | - Zhan-Chun Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315040, China
| | - Er-Dong Shen
- Department of Medical Oncology, the First People Hospital of Yueyang, Yueyang, China
| | - Wang-Zhong Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
| | - Yan-Qun Xiang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Zhang SQ, Pan SM, Liang SX, Han YS, Chen HB, Li JC. Research status and prospects of biomarkers for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of high‑throughput omics (Review). Int J Oncol 2021; 58:9. [PMID: 33649830 PMCID: PMC7910009 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2021.5188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
As a malignant tumor type, nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is characterized by distinct geographical, ethnic and genetic differences; presenting a major threat to human health in many countries, especially in Southern China. At present, no accurate and effective methods are available for the early diagnosis, efficacious evaluation or prognosis prediction for NPC. As such, a large number of patients have locoregionally advanced NPC at the time of initial diagnosis. Many patients show toxic reactions to overtreatment and have risks of cancer recurrence and distant metastasis owing to insufficient treatment. To solve these clinical problems, high‑throughput '‑omics' technologies are being used to screen and identify specific molecular biomarkers for NPC. Because of the lack of comprehensive descriptions regarding NPC biomarkers, the present study summarized the research progress that has been made in recent years to discover NPC biomarkers, highlighting the existing problems that require exploration. In view of the lack of authoritative reports at present, study design factors that affect the screening of biomarkers are also discussed here and prospects for future research are proposed to provide references for follow‑up studies of NPC biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shan-Qiang Zhang
- Medical Research Center, Yue Bei People's Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Wujiang, Shaoguan, Guangdong 512025, P.R. China
| | - Su-Ming Pan
- Department of Radiotherapy, Yue Bei People's Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Wujiang, Shaoguan, Guangdong 512025, P.R. China
| | - Si-Xian Liang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Yue Bei People's Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Wujiang, Shaoguan, Guangdong 512025, P.R. China
| | - Yu-Shuai Han
- Institute of Cell Biology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, P.R. China
| | - Hai-Bin Chen
- Department of Histology and Embryology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong 515041, P.R. China
| | - Ji-Cheng Li
- Medical Research Center, Yue Bei People's Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Wujiang, Shaoguan, Guangdong 512025, P.R. China
- Institute of Cell Biology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, P.R. China
- Correspondence to: Professor Ji-Cheng Li, Medical Research Center, Yue Bei People's Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, 133 Huimin South Road, Wujiang, Shaoguan, Guangdong 512025, P.R. China, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Riaz N, Sherman E, Lee N. The Importance of Locoregional Therapy in Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2021; 6:1353-1354. [PMID: 32701124 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eric Sherman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nancy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Experimental Therapeutics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Chen YP, Ismaila N, Chua MLK, Colevas AD, Haddad R, Huang SH, Wee JTS, Whitley AC, Yi JL, Yom SS, Chan ATC, Hu CS, Lang JY, Le QT, Lee AWM, Lee N, Lin JC, Ma B, Morgan TJ, Shah J, Sun Y, Ma J. Chemotherapy in Combination With Radiotherapy for Definitive-Intent Treatment of Stage II-IVA Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: CSCO and ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:840-859. [PMID: 33405943 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.03237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this joint guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and other healthcare providers on definitive-intent chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage II-IVA nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) and ASCO convened an expert panel of radiation oncology, medical oncology, surgery, and advocacy representatives. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2020. Outcomes of interest included survival, distant and locoregional disease control, and quality of life. Expert panel members used this evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 108 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Five overarching clinical questions were addressed, which included subquestions on radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy sequence, and concurrent, induction, and adjuvant chemotherapy options. RECOMMENDATIONS Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address aspects of care related to chemotherapy in combination with RT for the definitive-intent treatment of stage II to IVA NPC.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Pei Chen
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | | | - Melvin L K Chua
- National Cancer Centre Singapore/Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | | | | - Shao Hui Huang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joseph T S Wee
- National Cancer Centre Singapore/Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | | - Jun-Lin Yi
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Sue S Yom
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Anthony T C Chan
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Chao-Su Hu
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jin-Yi Lang
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chengdu, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Anne W M Lee
- The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, People's Republic of China, and The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Nancy Lee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Brigette Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | | | - Jatin Shah
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ying Sun
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Ma
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lee A, Chow JCH, Lee NY. Treatment Deescalation Strategies for Nasopharyngeal Cancer: A Review. JAMA Oncol 2020; 7:2774310. [PMID: 33355642 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Since the advent of modern radiotherapy techniques and incorporation of systemic chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer, locoregional control has been excellent. However, the rate of treatment-related complications, many of which are irreversible, remains high. New approaches are being explored to determine whether the toxic effects of treatment can be relieved while maintaining disease control. This review presents the current state of deescalation strategies for nasopharyngeal cancer. OBSERVATIONS A review of the literature shows that deescalation approaches can be generally categorized into deescalating systemic therapy vs deescalating radiotherapy. This review discusses studies that have explored sparing chemotherapy in selected patients with stage II cancer as well as altering the chemotherapy scheduling, dosing, and agent from the current standard of care, cisplatin. Deescalating radiotherapy has involved decreasing the dose and the treatment volume. In many cases, these approaches are being guided by measuring Epstein-Barr virus DNA levels, which is a robust biomarker for screening, treatment monitoring, and surveillance. Ongoing work with various imaging modalities, such as fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and dynamic contrast-enhanced or diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences, have shown promise as another biomarker to safely guide practitioners toward deescalation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Various strategies to deescalate treatment in nasopharyngeal cancer have been explored, and outcomes have remained excellent in most approaches. Patient selection remains key, and long-term outcomes and late complications are still to be determined. Continued investigation with prospective, multi-institutional studies are needed to better elucidate how treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma can best be individualized and deescalated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- now with Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - James C H Chow
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Combining tumor response and personalized risk assessment: Potential for adaptation of concurrent chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era. Radiother Oncol 2020; 155:56-64. [PMID: 33039423 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era, the role of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) after induction chemotherapy (IC) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) is undetermined, while concerns exist about CCRT-associated excessive toxicity. We aimed to combine tumor response and risk assessment to guide decisions about concurrent chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS From April 2009 to December 2015, 744 LANPC patients treated with CCRT/IMRT after IC were included. Matching techniques were performed for treatment effect evaluation. Tumor response to IC was used for patient stratification. A nomogram was built based on multivariable Cox regression analysis to predict overall survival (OS). RESULTS After IC, 508 patients (68.3%) had favorable tumor response (complete or partial response), among whom IC + CCRT achieved significantly superior 5-year disease-free survival and OS than IC + IMRT (82.2% vs. 72.5%, P = 0.025; 89.2% vs. 79.9%, P = 0.025). However, no significant difference was found in patients with unfavorable response (both P > 0.05). For favorable responders, a nomogram was built integrating age, smoking, T category, N category, pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus DNA and treatment modality. The concordance index was 0.713 and calibration was good. The nomogram determined three risk groups with distinct OS. High-risk patients benefited from CCRT after IC regarding disease-free survival, OS and distant metastasis-free survival, whereas low- and intermediate-risk patients did not. CONCLUSIONS For LANPC patients with unfavorable response to IC, subsequent CCRT seems inadequate, rendering intensification necessary. For favorable responders with low risk, IC + IMRT represents a reasonable de-intensification approach, although confirmation by prospective data is needed.
Collapse
|
46
|
Wen DW, Li ZX, Chen FP, Lin L, Peng BY, Kou J, Zheng WH, Yang XL, Xu SS, Sun Y, Zhou GQ. Individualized cumulative cisplatin dose for locoregionally-advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients receiving induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Oral Oncol 2020; 107:104675. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
|
47
|
Bissey PA, Teng M, Law JH, Shi W, Bruce JP, Petit V, Tsao SW, Yip KW, Liu FF. MiR-34c downregulation leads to SOX4 overexpression and cisplatin resistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:597. [PMID: 32586280 PMCID: PMC7318489 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07081-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A major cause of disease-related death in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is the development of distant metastasis (DM) despite combination chemoradiotherapy treatment. We previously identified and validated a four microRNA (miRNA) signature that is prognostic for DM. In this study, characterization of a key component of this signature, miR-34c, revealed its role in chemotherapy resistance. Methods Two hundred forty-six NPC patient biopsy samples were subject to comprehensive miRNA profiling and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Two human normal nasopharyngeal cell lines (immortalized; NP69 and NP460), as well as the NPC cell line C666–1, were used for miR-34c gain-of-function and loss-of-function experiments. Signaling pathways were assessed using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and Western blot. Cell viability was measured using the ATPlite assay. Results MiR-34c was downregulated in NPC patient samples, and confirmed in vitro to directly target SOX4, a master regulator of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). MiR-34c downregulation triggered EMT-representative changes in NP69 and NP460 whereby Snail, ZEB1, CDH2, and SOX2 were upregulated, while Claudin-1 and CDH1 were downregulated. Phenotypically, inhibition of miR-34c led to cisplatin resistance, whereas miR-34c over-expression sensitized NPC cells to cisplatin. TGFβ1 decreased miR-34c and increased SOX4 expression in vitro. The TGFβ receptor 1 inhibitor SB431542 reduced SOX4 expression and increased cisplatin sensitivity. Finally, IHC revealed that lower SOX4 expression was associated with improved overall survival in chemotherapy-treated NPC patients. Conclusion miR-34c is downregulated in NPC. Repression of miR-34c was shown to increase SOX4 expression, which leads to cisplatin resistance, while TGFβ1 was found to repress miR-34c expression. Taken together, our study demonstrates that inhibition of the TGFβ1 pathway could be a strategy to restore cisplatin sensitivity in NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mona Teng
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jacqueline H Law
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Wei Shi
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jeff P Bruce
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Valentin Petit
- LabEx DEVweCAN, Université de Lyon, F-69000, Lyon, France
| | - Sai W Tsao
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kenneth W Yip
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Fei-Fei Liu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. .,Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. .,Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Peng L, Chen JL, Zhu GL, Huang CL, Li JY, Ma J, Wen WP, Tang LL. Treatment effects of cumulative cisplatin dose during radiotherapy following induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: propensity score analyses. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020; 12:1758835920937424. [PMID: 32647541 PMCID: PMC7325541 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920937424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The treatment effects of cumulative cisplatin dose (CCD) during radiotherapy (RT) following induction chemotherapy (IC) have not been determined for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: A total of 3460 patients with locoregionally advanced NPC who were treated with IC plus cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy or RT alone were included in this retrospective study. Three CCD groups (0 mg/m2 ⩽ CCD <100 mg/m2, 100 mg/m2 ⩽ CCD <200 mg/m2, CCD ⩾200 mg/m2) were balanced through the inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores estimated by a general boosted model. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); the secondary endpoints were distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Results: CCD ⩾200 mg/m2 and <200 mg/m2 exhibited similar treatment effects for OS and DMFS, and were both superior to CCD <100 mg/m2 for OS and DMFS in patients with stage IVa NPC. The three CCD groups achieved similar treatment effects for patients with stage II–III NPC. After IC, CCD during RT appeared to exert little treatment effect on LRFS. Conclusion: The CCD during RT exerts treatment effects and improves OS by reducing the risk of distant metastasis for patients with stage IVa NPC following IC, and CCD <200 mg/m2 (mainly 160 mg/m2 in this group) is recommended. However, RT alone may be sufficient after IC in patients with stage II–III NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
| | - Jia-Luo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan, China
| | - Guang-Li Zhu
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Cheng-Long Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
| | - Jun-Yan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
| | - Wei-Ping Wen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
| | - Ling-Long Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lin TY, Lan MY, Tsou HH, Ho CY, Twu CW, Liu YC, Lin PJ, Huang PI, Shiau CY, Lin JC. Survival impacts of different nodal characteristics and T-classification in N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Oral Oncol 2020; 108:104820. [PMID: 32531741 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We investigated the survival impacts of various nodal characteristics and T-classification on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with the 8th AJCC/UICC staging criteria N3. MATERIALS AND METHODS Pretreatment MRIs from 110 staged N3 NPC patients were reviewed. There were 23 T1, 25 T2, 32 T3, and 30 T4, respectively. All except one patient belonged to WHO type II pathology. All patients received curative radiotherapy 68.0-76.8 Gy plus different chemotherapy, including induction, concurrent, adjuvant or any combination. Various endpoints, including OS (overall survival), DFS (disease-free survival), LRFFS (locoregional failure-free survival), DMFFS (distant metastasis failure-free survival) were compared between different nodal characteristics and T-classification. RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences in all analyzed survival curves between various nodal characteristics, including unilateral N3 vs. bilateral N3, "large" nodes (>6 cm) alone vs. "low" nodes (below the caudal border of cricoid cartilage) alone vs. combined "large" and "low" nodes, risk score 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 vs. 4 (by counting the sum of "large" and "low" nodes in the same case), and radiologic extra-nodal extension. Patients with T4, compared with those of T1-3 have worse OS (5-year rates, 42.2% vs. 82.8%, P < 0.0001), DFS (5-year rates, 43.9% vs. 68.9%, P = 0.0037), LRFFS (5-year rates, 69.3% vs. 82.7%, P = 0.0432), and DMFFS (5-year rates, 57.2% vs. 77.7%, P = 0.0163). CONCLUSIONS Our results support merging previous N3a and N3b as a N3 category in the 8th edition new staging system. Patients with T4N3 diseases have extremely poor outcome and deserve to strengthen the treatment intensity in future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tian-Yun Lin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Ying Lan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Hui Tsou
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Yin Ho
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Otolaryngology, Cheng Hsin Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Wen Twu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chun Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Po-Ju Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Pin-I Huang
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Ying Shiau
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jin-Ching Lin
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lee AWM, Ngan RKC, Ng WT, Tung SY, Cheng AAC, Kwong DLW, Lu TX, Chan ATC, Sze HCK, Yiu HHY, Wong FCS, Yuen KT, Chappell R, Choi HCW. NPC-0501 trial on the value of changing chemoradiotherapy sequence, replacing 5-fluorouracil with capecitabine, and altering fractionation for patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 2020; 126:3674-3688. [PMID: 32497261 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Revised: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A current recommendation for the treatment of patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is conventional fractionated radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent cisplatin followed by adjuvant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF). This randomized NPC-0501 trial evaluated the therapeutic effect of changing to an induction-concurrent sequence or accelerated-fractionation sequence, and/or replacing 5-fluorouracil with capecitabine (X). METHODS Patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer stage III to stage IVB NPC initially were randomly allocated to 1 of 6 treatment arms (6-arm full-randomization cohort). The protocol was amended in 2009 to permit centers to opt out of randomization regarding fractionation (3-arm chemotherapy cohort). RESULTS A total of 803 patients were accrued (1 of whom was nonevaluable) from 2006 to 2012. Based on the overall comparisons, neither changing the chemotherapy sequence nor accelerated fractionation improved treatment outcome. However, secondary analyses demonstrated that when adjusted for RT parameters and other significant factors, the induction-concurrent sequence, especially the induction-PX regimen, achieved significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Efficacy varied among different RT groups: although no impact was observed in the accelerated-fractionation group and the 3-arm chemotherapy cohort, a comparison of the induction-concurrent versus concurrent-adjuvant sequence in the conventional-fractionation group demonstrated a significant benefit in PFS (78% vs 62% at 5 years; P = .015) and a marginal benefit in overall survival (84% vs 72%; P = .042) after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Comparison of the induction-PX versus the adjuvant-PF regimen demonstrated better PFS (78% vs 62%; P = .027) without an increase in overall late toxicity. CONCLUSIONS For patients irradiated using conventional fractionation, changing the chemotherapy sequence from a concurrent-adjuvant to an induction-concurrent sequence, particularly using induction cisplatin and capecitabine, potentially could improve efficacy without an adverse impact on late toxicity. However, further validation is needed for confirmation of these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne W M Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong, China.,Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Roger K C Ngan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.,Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Wai-Tong Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Stewart Y Tung
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ashley A C Cheng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Dora L W Kwong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.,Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Tai-Xiang Lu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Anthony T C Chan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Henry C K Sze
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Harry H Y Yiu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Frank C S Wong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Kam-Tong Yuen
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Rick Chappell
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Horace C W Choi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|