Role of gemcitabine-based combination therapy in the management of advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of randomised trials

Identification of 6-Fluorine-Substituted Coumarin Analogues as POLRMT Inhibitors with High Potency and Safety for Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer

Increasing evidence has demonstrated that oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) is closely associated with the progression of pancreatic cancer (PC). Given its central role in mitochondrial transcription, the human mitochondrial RNA polymerase (POLRMT) is a promising target for developing PC treatments. Herein, structure-activity relationship exploration led to the identification of compound S7, which was the first reported POLRMT inhibitor possessing single-digit nanomolar potency of inhibiting PC cells proliferation. Mechanistic studies showed that compound S7 exerted antiproliferative effects without affecting the cell cycle, apoptosis, mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), or intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels specifically in MIA PaCa-2 cells. Notably, compound S7 inhibited tumor growth in MIA PaCa-2 xenograft tumor model with a tumor growth inhibition (TGI) rate of 64.52% demonstrating significant improvement compared to the positive control (44.80%). In conclusion, this work enriched SARs of POLRMT inhibitors, and compound S7 deserved further investigations of drug-likeness as a candidate for PC treatment.

Petite Integration Factor 1 knockdown enhances gemcitabine sensitivity in pancreatic cancer cells via increasing DNA damage

Chemoresistance is still a vital obstacle in various tumors chemotherapy. This study aimed to explore the role of Petite Integration Factor 1 (PIF1) in the sensitivity of gemcitabine response to pancreatic cancer cells. Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) database was employed for evaluating the level of PIF1 in pancreatic cancer tissues and normal tissues. The mRNA level of PIF1 was detected via reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis. The relative protein expression of PIF1, cleaved caspase-3, and phosphorylated histone H2Ax (γH2Ax) was assessed through western blot. Cell viability and apoptosis were assessed via Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay and flow cytometry, respectively. Moreover, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release and caspase-3 activity were determined via the corresponding LDH Cytotoxicity Assay Kit and caspase-3 colorimetric assay kit. PIF1 expression was upregulated in pancreatic cancer tissues and cells. Knockdown of PIF1 exhibited the repressive impact on the viability of AsPC-1 and PANC-1 cells. PIF1 knockdown enhanced LDH release and apoptosis in both AsPC-1 and PANC-1 cells. PIF1 downregulation could augment the sensitivity of gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer cells, as evidenced by lower cell viability and higher LDH release and apoptosis rate after knocking down PIF1 in gemcitabine-treated pancreatic cancer cells relative to pancreatic cancer cells treated with gemcitabine alone. Moreover, PIF1 knockdown increased γH2Ax protein expression and DNA damage, and gemcitabine treatment-induced DNA damage in AsPC-1 and PANC-1 cells was exacerbated by PIF1 silencing. Furthermore, gemcitabine treatment-caused increase of DNA damage was alleviated by PIF1 overexpression; whereas, this effect of PIF1 upregulation was reversed by thymidine, a DNA synthesis inhibitor. In addition, the decreased gemcitabine sensitivity response to pancreatic cancer cells caused by PIF1 upregulation was also hindered by thymidine treatment. In conclusion, PIF1 silencing enhanced gemcitabine sensitivity response to pancreatic cancer cells through aggrandizing DNA damage.

JNTX-101, a novel albumin-encapsulated gemcitabine prodrug, is efficacious and operates via caveolin-1-mediated endocytosis

Albumin is an attractive candidate carrier for the development of novel therapeutic drugs. Gemcitabine has been FDA approved for the treatment of solid tumors; however, new drugs that optimize gemcitabine delivery are not available for clinical use. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of a novel albumin-encapsulated gemcitabine prodrug, JNTX-101, and investigate whether Cav-1 expression predicts the therapeutic efficacy of JNTX-101. We first determined the treatment efficacy of JNTX-101 in a panel of pancreatic/lung cancer cell lines and found that increases in Cav-1 expression resulted in higher uptake of albumin, while Cav-1 depletion attenuated the sensitivity of cells to JNTX-101. In addition, decreased Cav-1 expression markedly reduced JNTX-101-induced apoptotic cell death in a panel of cells, particularly in low-serum conditions. Furthermore, we tested the therapeutic efficacy of JNTX-101 in xenograft models and the role of Cav-1 in JNTX-101 sensitivity using a Tet-on-inducible tumor model in vivo. Our data suggest that JNTX-101 effectively inhibits cell viability and tumor growth, and that Cav-1 expression dictates optimal sensitivity to JNTX-101. These data indicate that Cav-1 correlates with JNTX-101 sensitivity, especially under nutrient-deprived conditions, and supports a role for Cav-1 as a predictive biomarker for albumin-encapsulated therapeutics such as JNTX-101.

Treatment sequences and prognostic/predictive factors in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: univariate and multivariate analyses of a real-world study in Europe

BACKGROUND

Real-world data on treatment patterns/outcomes for metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPAC) are limited. This study aims to assess real-world treatment patterns, survival outcomes, and prognostic/predictive factors in patients with mPAC.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational, chart-review involving medical oncologists and gastroenterologists from five European countries. Physicians reported information on disease and patient characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment for patients diagnosed with mPAC from January-October 2016. Outcomes included median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), and the impact of baseline performance status on survival. Univariate/multivariate regression analyses were undertaken to identify prognostic/predictive factors.

RESULTS

Three hundred four physicians and 3432 patients were included. First-line therapies included modified (m)FOLFIRINOX (28.4%), gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (28.0%), and gemcitabine monotherapy (23.0%). Frequent second-line therapies were gemcitabine monotherapy (25.0%), fluorouracil (5-FU) + oxaliplatin (21.8%), and gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (16.7%). Most frequent first- to second-line treatment sequences were gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel followed by fluoropyrimidine combinations. Longest unadjusted estimated mOS was observed with (m)FOLFIRINOX followed by gemcitabine-based combinations (19.1 months). Multivariate analysis identified significant prognostic/predictive factors for OS and PFS including performance status and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment and treatment sequences were generally in accordance with guidelines at the time of the study. Identification of prognostic/predictive factors for survival may help inform the individualised management of mPAC patients in the future.

Chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter AGEO study

Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) account for <5% of pancreatic malignancies. The efficacy of modern chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced PASC is unknown. Patients with advanced PASC from 2008 to 2021 were consecutively included in this retrospective multicenter study. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method. Ninety-four PASC from 16 French centers were included (median age, 67.3 years; males, 56.4%; metastatic disease, 85.1%). The first-line treatment was chemotherapy for 79 patients (84.0%) (37 FOLFIRINOX (FX), 7 Gemcitabine-nab paclitaxel (GN) and 35 for all other regimen) or best supportive care (BSC) alone for 15 patients (16.0%). No significant difference was observed between FX and GN in terms of PFS (P = .67) or OS (P = .5). Modern regimens pooled together (FX and GN) as compared to all others chemotherapy regimens showed an improvement of overall response rate (39.5% and 9.7%, P = .002), PFS (median, 7.8 vs 4.7 months, P = .02) and OS (median, 12.7 vs 9.2 months, P = .35). This large study evaluating first-line treatment regimens in advanced PASC suggests that modern regimens as FX or GN may be preferable to all other chemotherapy regimens. These results deserve confirmation in prospective studies.

Synergistic effect of Abraxane that combines human IL15 fused with an albumin-binding domain on murine models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Nab‐paclitaxel (Abraxane), which is a nanoparticle form of albumin‐bound paclitaxel, is one of the standard chemotherapies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study determined the effect of Abraxane in combination with a fusion protein, hIL15‐ABD, on subcutaneous Panc02 and orthotopic KPC C57BL/6 murine PDAC models. Abraxane combined with hIL15‐ABD best suppressed tumour growth and produced a 40%–60% reduction in the tumour size for Panc02 and KPC, compared to the vehicle group. In the combination group, the active form of interferon‐γ (IFN‐γ)‐secreting CD8⁺ T cells and CD11b⁺CD86⁺ M1 macrophages in tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were increased. In the tumour drainage lymph nodes (TDLNs) of the combination group, there was a 18% reduction in CD8⁺IFN‐γ⁺ T cells and a 0.47% reduction in CD4⁺CD25⁺FOXP3⁺ regulatory T cells, as opposed to 5.0% and 5.1% reductions, respectively, for the control group. Superior suppression of CD11b⁺GR‐1⁺ myeloid‐derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and the induction of M1 macrophages in the spleen and bone marrow of mice were found in the combination group. Abraxane and hIL15‐ABD effectively suppressed NF‐κB‐mediated immune suppressive markers, including indoleamine 2,3‐dioxygenase (IDO), Foxp3 and VEGF. In conclusion, Abraxane combined with hIL15‐ABD stimulates the anticancer activity of effector cells, inhibits immunosuppressive cells within the tumour microenvironment (TME) of PDAC, and produces a greater inhibitory effect than individual monotherapies.

Permeability of Gemcitabine and PBPK Modeling to Assess Oral Administration

Gemcitabine is a nucleoside analog effective against several solid tumors. Standard treatment consists of an intravenous infusion over 30 min. This is an invasive, uncomfortable and often painful method, involving recurring visits to the hospital and costs associated with medical staff and equipment. Gemcitabine’s activity is significantly limited by numerous factors, including metabolic inactivation, rapid systemic clearance of gemcitabine and transporter deficiency-associated resistance. As such, there have been research efforts to improve gemcitabine-based therapy efficacy, as well as strategies to enhance its oral bioavailability. In this work, gemcitabine in vitro and clinical data were analyzed and in silico tools were used to study the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine after oral administration following different regimens. Several physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were developed using simulation software GastroPlus™, predicting the PK parameters and plasma concentration–time profiles. The integrative biomedical data analyses presented here are promising, with some regimens of oral administration reaching higher AUC in comparison to the traditional IV infusion, supporting this route of administration as a viable alternative to IV infusions. This study further contributes to personalized health care based on potential new formulations for oral administration of gemcitabine, as well nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems.

Treatment optimization of locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer (Review)

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignant tumor types, being the sixth leading cause of mortality worldwide and the fourth in Europe. Globally, it has a mortality/incidence ratio of 98%, and the 5‑year survival rate in Europe is only 3%. Although risk factors, such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, smoking, alcohol consumption and genetic factors, have been identified, the causes of PDAC remain elusive. Additionally, the only curative treatment for PDAC is surgery with negative margins. However, upon diagnosis, ~30% of the patients already present with locally advanced disease. In these cases, a multidisciplinary approach is required to improve disease‑related symptoms and prolong patient survival. In the present article, a comprehensive review of PDAC epidemiology, physiology and treatment is provided. Moreover, guidelines on patient treatment are suggested. Among the different available therapeutic options for the treatment of advanced PDAC, results are modest, most likely due to the complexity of the disease, and so the prognostic remains poor. Molecular approaches based on multi‑omics research are promising and will contribute to groundbreaking personalized medicine. Thus, economic investment that promotes research of pancreatic cancer will be critical to the development of more efficient diagnostic and treatment strategies.

Benzophenones from Betula alnoides with Antiausterity Activities against the PANC-1 Human Pancreatic Cancer Cell Line

The antiausterity strategy is a promising approach for the discovery of lead compounds with unprecedented anticancer activities by targeting the tolerance of cancer cells to nutrition starvation. These agents are selectively cytotoxic under the tumor microenvironment-mimicking condition of nutrition starvation, without apparent toxicity in the normal nutrient-rich condition. In this study, an ethanol extract of Betula alnoides showed antiausterity activity against PANC-1 human pancreatic cancer cells under nutrient-deprived conditions, with a PC₅₀ value of 13.2 μg/mL. Phytochemical investigation of this active extract led to the isolation of eight benzophenones (1-8), including six new compounds, named betuphenones A-F (2-7), and three known xanthones (9-11). The structure elucidation of the new compounds was achieved by HRFABMS, NMR, and ECD spectroscopic analyses. A plausible biogenetic pathway of the new compounds was proposed. Compounds 1-7 displayed antiausterity activity with PC₅₀ values of 4.9-8.4 μM. Moreover, compounds 2 and 7 induced alterations in PANC-1 cell morphology under nutrient-deprived conditions and also inhibited PANC-1 colony formation under nutrient-rich conditions.

Improving Gemcitabine Sensitivity in Pancreatic Cancer Cells by Restoring miRNA-217 Levels

Chemoresistance is a major problem in the therapeutic management of pancreatic cancer, concurring to poor clinical outcome. A number of mechanisms have been proposed to explain resistance to gemcitabine, a standard of care for this malignancy, among which is included aberrant miRNA expression. In the current study, we investigated the role of miR-217, which is strongly down-regulated in cancerous, compared to normal, pancreatic tissues or cells, in sensitizing human pancreatic cancer cell lines to this drug. The low expression of miR-217 in pancreatic cancer patients was confirmed in two gene expression datasets (GSE41372 and GSE60980), and the prognostic value of two target genes (ANLN and TRPS1), was estimated on clinical data from the Tumor Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Transfecting miR-217 mimic in pancreatic cancer cells reduced viability, enhanced apoptosis, and affected cell cycle by promoting a S phase arrest in gemcitabine-treated cells. Moreover, in drug-exposed cells subjected to miR-217 forced expression, a down-regulation for several genes involved in cancer drug resistance was observed, many of which are cell cycle regulators, such as CCND1, CCNE1, CDK2, CDKN1A, CDKN1B, while others, such as ARNT, BRCA1, BRCA2, ELK1, EGFR, ERBB4, and RARA are involved in proliferation and cell cycle progression. Our results support the notion that miR-217 enhances pancreatic cancer sensitivity to gemcitabine, mainly impairing cell cycle progression.

A self-sustained nanoplatform reverses TRAIL-resistance of pancreatic cancer through coactivating of exogenous and endogenous apoptotic pathway

Since the 5-year survival rate of pancreatic cancer is only 10.0%, new therapies are urgently needed. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces apoptosis specifically on tumor cells, nevertheless its clinical application was seriously restricted by resistance and short in vivo half-life. Herein, a novel multifunctional R6ST protein equipped with cell penetrating peptides R6, intrinsic apoptosis inducing tetrapeptide AVPI and soluble TRAIL was designed and constructed. Then, it was recruited to prepare self-sustained nanoplatform (SSN) to reverse TRAIL-resistance of pancreatic cancer through simultaneously promoting extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathway, as well to elongate circulation time. Once administrated, high tumor accumulation and cellular uptake of SSN were achieved through prolonged circulation time, targeting ability of soluble TRAIL to death receptors and positive-charged R6, and further enhanced through reversed upregulation of death receptors on TRAIL-resistant tumor cells by the cumulated artesunate released in cytoplasm as a positive feedback loop. Furthermore, this loop simultaneously promoted extrinsic apoptosis of TRAIL fragment via the upregulated death receptors on TRAIL-resistant pancreatic cancer cells and intrinsic apoptosis of AVPI tetrapeptide via the efficient accumulation and uptake of R6ST on SSN. Hence, SSN exhibited synergistic antitumor effect and provided a new strategy for TRAIL-resistant pancreatic cancer therapy.

Irreversible electroporation of locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) constitutes approximately one-third of all pancreatic cancer, with standard of care inconsistently defined and achieving modest outcomes at best. While resection after downstaging offers the chance for cure, only a fraction of patients with LAPC become candidates for resection. Chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for the remainder. In these patients, ablative therapy may be given for local control of the tumor. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an attractive ablative technique. IRE changes the permeability of tumor cell membranes to induce apoptosis. Unlike other ablative therapies, IRE causes little thermal injury to the target area, making it ideal for LAPC involving major vessels. Compared to systemic chemotherapy alone, IRE seems to offer some survival benefit. Although early studies reported notable morbidity and mortality rates, IRE presents opportunities for those who cannot undergo resection and who otherwise have limited options. Another role of IRE is to extend the margins of resected tumors when there is a concern for R1 resection. Perhaps most exciting, IRE is thought to have effects beyond local ablation. IRE has immunomodulatory effects, which may induce in vivo vaccination and may potentially synergize with immunotherapy. Through electrochemotherapy, IRE may enhance drug delivery to residual tumor cells. Ultimately the role of IRE in the treatment of LAPC still needs to be validated through well designed randomized trials. Investigations of its future possibilities are in the early stages. IRE offers the potential to provide more options to LAPC patients.

Pancreatic cancer drug-sensitivity predicted by synergy of p53-Activator Wnt Inhibitor-2 (PAWI-2) and protein biomarker expression

Today, pancreatic cancer (PC) is a major health problem in the United States. It remains a challenge to develop efficacious clinically useful PC therapies. New avenues, based on translational approaches and innovative validated biomarkers could be a preclinical option to evaluate PC drug candidates or drug combinations before clinical trials. Herein, we describe evaluation of combination therapies by incorporating a novel pathway modulator, p53-Activator Wnt Inhibitor-2 (PAWI-2) with other FDA-approved cancer drugs that have been used in PC clinical trials. PAWI-2 is a potent inhibitor of drug-resistant PC cells that has been shown to selectively ameliorate human pancreatic cancer stem cells (i.e., hPCSCs, FGβ₃ cells). In the present study, we showed PAWI-2 produced therapeutic synergism with certain types of anti-cancer drugs. These drugs themselves oftentimes do not ameliorate PC cells (especially PCSCs) due to high levels of drug-resistance. PAWI-2 has the ability to rescue the potency of drugs (i.e., erlotinib, trametinib) and inhibit PC cell growth. Key molecular regulators of PAWI-2 could be used to predict synergistic/antagonistic effects between PAWI-2 and other anti-cancer drugs. Anti-cancer results showed potency could be quite accurately correlated to phosphorylation of optineurin (OPTN) in PC cells. Synergism/antagonism was also associated with inhibition of PCSC marker SOX2 that was observed in FGβ₃ cells. Synergism broadens the potential use of PAWI-2 as an adjunct chemotherapy in patients with PC that have developed resistance to first-line targeted therapies or chemotherapies.

A Critical Overview of Systematic Reviews of Chemotherapy for Advanced and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer using both AMSTAR2 and ROBIS as Quality Assessment Tools

BACKGROUND

We performed a critical overview of published systematic reviews (SRs) of chemotherapy for advanced and locally advanced pancreatic cancer, and evaluated their quality using AMSTAR2 and ROBIS tools.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed and Cochrane Central Library were searched for SRs on 13th June 2020. SRs with meta-analysis which included only randomized controlled trials and that had assessed chemotherapy as one of the treatment arms were included. The outcome measures, which were looked into, were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or above. Two reviewers independently assessed all the SRs with both ROBIS and AMSTAR2.

RESULTS

Out of the 1,879 identified records, 26 SRs were included for the overview. Most SRs had concluded that gemcitabine-based combination regimes, prolonged OS and PFS, but increased the incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities when compared to gemcitabine monotherapy, but survival benefits were not consistent when gemcitabine was combined with molecular targeted agents. As per ROBIS, 24/26 SRs had 'high' risk of bias, with only 1/26 SR having 'low' risk of bias. As per AMSTAR2, 25/26 SRs had 'critically low', and 1/26 SR had 'low' confidence in the results. The study which scored 'low risk of bias' in ROBIS scored 'low confidence in results' in AMSTAR2. The inter- rater reliability for scoring the overall confidence in the SRs with AMSTAR2 and the overall domain in ROBIS was substantial; ROBIS: kappa=0.785, SEM=0.207, p<0.001; AMSTAR2: kappa= 0.649, SEM=0.323, p<0.001.

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine-based combination regimens can prolong OS and PFS but also worsen AEs when compared to gemcitabine monotherapy. The included SRs have an overall low methodological quality and high risk of bias as per AMSTAR2 and ROBIS respectively.

Glutathione S-Transferase Mu-3 Predicts a Better Prognosis and Inhibits Malignant Behavior and Glycolysis in Pancreatic Cancer

Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a lethal malignancy with an extremely unfavorable 5-year survival rate and a high mortality rate. Glutathione S-transferase mu-3 (GSTM3) has been shown to exert different functions in the progression and development of various cancers, except for PC. This study aimed to explore the role of GSTM3 in the malignant behavior and metabolic aspects of PC, its clinical significance, and its possible molecular mechanism in pancreatic cancer.

Methods: Tumor microarrays of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) were used to evaluate the clinicopathological variables and GSTM3 expression by immunohistochemical staining. Kaplan–Meier survival and Cox regression analyses were further performed to assess the prognosis. The effect of GSTM3 on PC aggressiveness was detected using overexpressing and silencing transfection methods. Western blot, RT-qPCR, CCK-8, and cell cycle assay were applied to evaluate the expression level and proliferation. A xenograft animal model was assessed. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) were measured using the laser confocal scanner and glycolysis was detected using an Agilent Seahorse kit. RNA sequencing was used to assess the underlying mechanism and the signaling pathway involved.

Results: GSTM3 was relatively poorly expressed in PDAC tissues compared to para-tumoral tissues and a high level of GSTM3 indicated good overall survival. Functionally, overexpression of GSTM3 could significantly inhibit cell proliferation by delaying the G0/G1 transition, whereas the opposite results were found in the GSTM3 downregulation group. In addition, xenograft animal models further confirmed the effect on proliferation. Moreover, silencing of GSTM3 induced ROS accumulation and promoted glycolysis in PC, indicating its tumor suppressive effect, and vice versa when GSTM3 was upregulated. Finally, RNA sequencing results demonstrated that GSTM3 facilitates anti-tumorigenicity partly via the JAK-STAT signaling pathway in PC.

Conclusion: GSTM3 inhibited tumor progression and altered the metabolic pattern in PC. This may be a potential predictive biomarker in PC and a prospective therapeutic target.

Mint3 depletion restricts tumor malignancy of pancreatic cancer cells by decreasing SKP2 expression via HIF-1

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most fatal cancers without druggable molecular targets. Hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) is a heterodimeric transcriptional factor that promotes malignancy in various cancers including pancreatic cancer. Herein, we found that HIF-1 is accumulated in normoxic or moderate hypoxic areas of pancreatic cancer xenografts in vivo and is active even during normoxia in pancreatic cancer cells in vitro. This prompted us to analyze whether the HIF-1 activator Mint3 contributes to malignant features of pancreatic cancer. Mint3 depletion by shRNAs attenuated HIF-1 activity during normoxia and cell proliferation concomitantly with accumulated p21 and p27 protein in pancreatic cancer cells. Further analyses revealed that Mint3 increased transcription of the oncogenic ubiquitin ligase SKP2 in pancreatic cancer cells via HIF-1. This Mint3-HIF-1-SKP2 axis also promoted partial epithelial-mesenchymal transition, stemness features, and chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer cells. Even in vivo, Mint3 depletion attenuated tumor growth of orthotopically inoculated human pancreatic cancer AsPC-1 cells. Database and tissue microarray analyses showed that Mint3 expression is correlated with SKP2 expression in human pancreatic cancer specimens and high Mint3 expression is correlated with poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients. Thus, targeting Mint3 may be useful for attenuating the malignant features of pancreatic cancer.

Intensified systemic therapy and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy dose for patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

We aimed to report the long-term impact of modern chemotherapy and SABR dose regimens on oncologic outcomes of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the treatment characteristics and outcomes of all patients who received multi-fraction SABR for unresectable PA between February 2007 and August 2018 at our institution. Time-to-events were calculated from date of diagnosis treating death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients were identified. Median follow-up was 15 months (range: 5-47). Median SABR dose was 33 Gy (range: 20-45) delivered in 5 fractions in 143 patients, and 3 or 6 fractions in 6 patients. 107 patients (72%) received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy while 31 (21%) received modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX). Median OS was 16 months (95% CI, 14-17), with a 1-year cumulative incidence of LF of 14%. The combination of SABR doses ≥40 Gy and mFFX (n = 21) showed a superior PFS and OS to the use of GEM-based chemotherapy with <40 Gy SABR doses (median PFS: 14 vs. 10 months, HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.29-0.71, P = 0.003; median OS: 24 vs. 14 months, HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.22-0.59, P = 0.002), with 1-year PFS and OS of 67% and 90% compared to 35% and 59% for those who received GEM-based chemotherapy with <40 Gy SABR doses, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of mFFX and a SABR dose ≥40 Gy in 5 fractions may be superior compared to regimens that utilize gemcitabine-based chemotherapy or SABR doses <40 Gy.

Pharmacometabolomics Identifies 3-Hydroxyadipic Acid, d-Galactose, Lysophosphatidylcholine (P-16:0), and Tetradecenoyl-l-Carnitine as Potential Predictive Indicators of Gemcitabine Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer Patients

Gemcitabine (GEM)-based chemotherapy is the standard regimen for the treatment of pancreatic cancer (PC). However, chemoresistance is a major challenge in PC treatment. Reliable biomarkers are urgently needed to predict the response to GEM-based therapies. GEM-sensitive (GEM-S) and GEM-resistant (GEM-R) pancreatic carcinoma xenograft models were established, and GEM monotherapy and GEM plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) doublet therapy were administered to GEM-S/R tumor-bearing mice. Metabolomic mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of serum, liver, and tumor samples was performed using an ultraperformance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer. The results showed that both GEM monotherapy and combination therapy significantly inhibited the tumor growth in GEM-S subgroup. However, in the GEM-R subgroup, tumor growth was not significantly inhibited by GEM monotherapy, but was significantly suppressed by GEM combination therapy. Metabolic profiling analysis by hierarchical cluster analysis and partial least squares discriminant analysis showed that the differences in metabolites were most significant in serum of three types of samples in the GEM-S/R subgroups, regardless of the administration of GEM monotherapy or combination therapy. The differential metabolite analysis of serum samples revealed 38 and 26 differential metabolites between the GEM-R and GEM-S subgroups treated with GEM monotherapy or combination therapy, and four common discriminating metabolites were investigated: 3-hydroxyadipic acid, d-galactose, lysophosphatidylcholine (LysoPC) (P-16:0), and tetradecenoyl-l-carnitine. The relative amounts of the four metabolites changed significantly and consistently after GEM monotherapy or combination therapy. The levels of these four metabolites were significantly different in the GEM-S and GEM-R pancreatic carcinoma xenograft models; thus, these metabolites could be effective predictive indicators of the efficacy of chemotherapy in PC patients, regardless of the administration of GEM alone or GEM plus nab-PTX.

Gas Plasma-Conditioned Ringer's Lactate Enhances the Cytotoxic Activity of Cisplatin and Gemcitabine in Pancreatic Cancer In Vitro and In Ovo

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive tumor entities. Diffuse metastatic infiltration of vessels and the peritoneum restricts curative surgery. Standard chemotherapy protocols include the cytostatic drug gemcitabine with limited efficacy at considerable toxicity. In search of a more effective and less toxic treatment modality, we tested in human pancreatic cancer cells (MiaPaca and PaTuS) a novel combination therapy consisting of cytostatic drugs (gemcitabine or cisplatin) and gas plasma-conditioned Ringer’s lactate that acts via reactive oxygen species. A decrease in metabolic activity and viability, change in morphology, and cell cycle arrest was observed in vitro. The combination treatment was found to be additively toxic. The findings were validated utilizing an in ovo tumor model of solid pancreatic tumors growing on the chorion-allantois membrane of fertilized chicken eggs (TUM-CAM). The combination of the drugs (especially cisplatin) with the plasma-conditioned liquid significantly enhanced the anti-cancer effects, resulting in the induction of cell death, cell cycle arrest, and inhibition of cell growth with both of the cell lines tested. In conclusion, our novel combination approach may be a promising new avenue to increase the tolerability and efficacy of locally applied chemotherapeutic in diffuse metastatic peritoneal carcinomatosis of the pancreas.

Patients with hepatic oligometastatic pancreatic body/tail ductal adenocarcinoma may benefit from synchronous resection

BACKGROUND

Synchronous resection of primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and liver metastases in highly selective patients is being accepted based on oncology research progress showing safe surgical outcomes with low morbidity and mortality. We also tried to determine patients who would benefit from the operation.

METHODS

From January 2012 to October 2017, 48 patients who underwent synchronous resection of primary PDAC and liver metastases were retrospectively evaluated. Twenty-three of them underwent oligometastatic synchronous resection.

RESULTS

The majority of synchronous resection PDAC patients underwent hepatic wedge resection, and no oligometastatic patient was treated with hemihepatectomy. The median overall survival (OS) of the synchronous resection patients was 7.8 months. Hepatic oligometastatic PDAC patients had a longer OS than that of non-oligometastatic synchronous resection patients, systemic chemotherapy patients and palliative patients (16.1 vs 6.4 months, P = 0.02; 16.1 vs 7.6 months, P = 0.02; 16.1 vs 4.3 months, P < 0.0001; respectively). Further analysis showed that localized pancreatic body/tail PDAC had a better OS in oligometastatic patients than in non-oligometastatic synchronous resection patients (16.8 months vs 7.05 months, P = 0.0004) and systemic chemotherapy patients (16.8 months vs 8 months, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Patients with pancreatic body/tail PDAC with liver oligometastases can benefit from synchronous resection.

Long-Term Survival Outcomes of Metabolically Supported Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine-Based or FOLFIRINOX Regimen Combined with Ketogenic Diet, Hyperthermia, and Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite introduction of new chemotherapeutic agents, outcomes of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer are still poor. Metabolically supported chemotherapy (MSCT) is a novel approach targeting dysregulated energy mechanism of the tumor cell.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine the efficacy of metabolically supported administration of chemotherapy combined with ketogenic diet, hyperthermia, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

METHOD

This retrospective observational study included 25 patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal carcinoma (stage IV) who received MSCT (either gemcitabine-based or FOLFIRINOX regimen administered concomitantly with induced hypoglycemia) plus ketogenic diet, hyperthermia, and HBOT combination. Survival outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

During the mean follow-up duration of 25.4 ± 19.3 months, median overall survival and median progression-free survival were 15.8 months (95% CI, 10.5-21.1) and 12.9 months (95% CI, 11.2-14.6), respectively. Age and gender did not have any effect on overall survival (p > 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

MSCT administered together with ketogenic diet, hyperthermia, and HBOT appears to be a viable option with the potential to improve survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Further research, particularly with larger comparative clinical trials, is warranted.

Long noncoding RNA GSTM3TV2 upregulates LAT2 and OLR1 by competitively sponging let-7 to promote gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemoresistance is one of the main causes of poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer patients. Understanding the mechanisms implicated in chemoresistance of pancreatic cancer is critical to improving patient outcomes. Recent evidences indicate that the long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are involving in chemoresistance of pancreatic cancer. However, the mechanisms of lncRNAs contribute to resistance in pancreatic cancer and remain largely unknown. The objective of this study is to construct a chemoresistance-related lncRNA-associated competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network of pancreatic cancer and identify the key lncRNAs in regulating chemoresistance of the network.

METHODS

Firstly, lncRNA expression profiling of gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cells was performed to identify lncRNAs related to chemoresistance by microarray analysis. Secondly, with insights into the mechanism of ceRNA, we used a bioinformatics approach to construct a chemoresistance-related lncRNAs-associated ceRNA network. We then identified the topological key lncRNAs in the ceRNA network and demonstrated its function or mechanism in chemoresistance of pancreatic cancer using molecular biological methods. Further studies evaluated its expression to assess its potential association with survival in patients with pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

Firstly, we demonstrated that lncRNAs were dysregulated in gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cells. We then constructed a chemoresistance-related lncRNA-associated ceRNA network and proposed that lncRNA Homo sapiens glutathione S-transferase mu 3, transcript variant 2 and noncoding RNA (GSTM3TV2; NCBI Reference Sequence: NR_024537.1) might act as a key ceRNA to enhance chemoresistance by upregulating L-type amino acid transporter 2 (LAT2) and oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor 1(OLR1) in pancreatic cancer. Further studies demonstrated that GSTM3TV2, overexpressed in gemcitabine-resistant cells, enhanced the gemcitabine resistance of pancreatic cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, we identified that GSTM3TV2 upregulated LAT2 and OLR1 by competitively sponging let-7 to promote gemcitabine resistance. In addition, we revealed that the expression levels of GSTM3TV2 were significantly increased in pancreatic cancer tissues and were associated with poor prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that GSTM3TV2 is a crucial oncogenic regulator involved in chemoresistance and could be a new therapeutic target or prognostic marker in pancreatic cancer.

Clinical Characteristics of Patients Experiencing Pathologic Complete Response Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Borderline Resectable/Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to describe clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) who achieved pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single institution clinical database for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was queried. Between 2008 and 2014 patients were identified with BRPC and LAPC, who underwent surgical resection after receiving neoadjuvant treatment. Clinical and pathologic features of the patients who achieved pCR were acquired retrospectively.

RESULTS

Six patients were identified to have pCR on pathology of the postoperative specimen. On the basis of pretreatment clinical staging, 2 patients were considered to have BRPC and 4 LAPC. Four patients received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and 2 patients received FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin). Five of 6 patients received radiation therapy before operative resection. Operative procedures included distal pancreatectomy (n=3) and pancreatoduodenectomy (n=3). Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia 1 to 2 was present in 3 cases, and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia 3 in 1 case. During a median follow-up of 21.3 months, 2 patients died, with a median survival of 11.0 months (range, 10.4 to 11.6 mo). Four patients are alive and continue to follow-up with median survival of 28.7 months (range, 20.1 to 42.4 mo).

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodality neoadjuvant therapy may lead to complete pathologic response in a small number of patients with borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. pCR to neoadjuvant therapy does not lead to cure in most cases, and the majority of patients appear to relapse locally or systemically.

Dual delivery nanoscale device for miR-345 and gemcitabine co-delivery to treat pancreatic cancer

A polymeric dual delivery nanoscale device (DDND) was designed for combined delivery of microRNA (miR-345) and gemcitabine (GEM) to treat pancreatic cancer (PC). This temperature and pH-responsive pentablock copolymer system was able to restore miR-345, making xenograft tumors more susceptible to GEM, the standard therapy for PC. Restoration using DDND treatment results in sonic hedgehog signaling down regulation, which decreases desmoplasia, thereby resulting in improved GEM perfusion to the tumor and better therapeutic outcomes. The release of miR-345 and GEM could be tuned by using the DDND in the form of micelles or in the form of thermoreversible gels, based on polymer concentration. The DDNDs enabled miR-345 stability and sustained co-release of miR-345 and GEM, thereby facilitating dose-sparing use of GEM. Further, enhanced in vitro cellular uptake due to amphiphilic character, and endosomal escape because of the cationic end blocks led to efficient transfection with DDNDs. The combined DDND treatment enabled efficient reduction in cell viability of Capan-1 and CD18/HPAF cells in vitro compared with either GEM or miR-345 treatment alone. Mice carrying xenograft tumors treated with DDNDs carrying both miR-345 and GEM combination therapy displayed reduced tumor growth and less metastasis in distant organs compared to individual drug treatments. Immunohistochemical analysis of the xenograft tissues revealed significant down regulation of desmoplastic reaction, SHH, Gli-1, MUC4, and Ki67 compared to control groups.

Pancreatic cancer: French clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, ACHBT, AFC)

BACKGROUND

This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA), updated in July 2018.

DESIGN

This collaborative work was produced under the auspices of all French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of PA. It is based on the previous guidelines, recent literature review and expert opinions. Recommendations were graded in three categories, according to the level of evidence.

RESULTS

Over the last seven years, significant changes in PA management have been implemented in clinical practice. Imaging/staging: diffusion magnetic resonance imaging is useful before surgery to rule out small liver metastases.

SURGERY

centralization of pancreatic surgery in expert centers is associated with a decreased postoperative mortality. Adjuvant chemotherapy: modified FOLFIRINOX in fit patients, or gemcitabine, or 5-FU, or gemcitabine plus capecitabine, to be discussed on a case-by-case basis. Locally advanced PA: no survival benefit of chemoradiotherapy. Metastatic PA: FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel combination are first-line standards in fit patients; second-line with 5FU/nal-IRI or 5FU/oxaliplatin combination after first-line gemcitabine.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines for management of PA are continuously evolving and need to be regularly updated. This constant progress is made possible through clinical and translational research. However, as each individual case is particular, they cannot substitute to multidisciplinary tumor board discussion.

Nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 as first-line followed by S-1 maintenance for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a single-arm phase II trial

PURPOSE

We conducted a single-arm prospective phase II study to determine the efficacy and safety of the first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel and S-1 followed by S-1 maintenance therapy.

METHODS

Nab-paclitaxel was administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 at 120 mg/m². S-1 at 120 mg/day (for surface area ≥ 1.5 m²), 100 mg/day (for surface area between 1.25-1.5 m²), and 80 mg/day (for surface area < 1.25 m²) were given two times daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks. Patients who achieved response and stable disease after 6 cycles were given S-1 maintenance treatment in the same schedule until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity developed. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Between 01/2015 and 07/2017, 32 patients were enrolled.

RESULTS

The ORR in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (N = 32) was 53.1%, and the DCR was 87.5%. In the 30 evaluable patients, the ORR and DCR were 56.7 and 93.3%, respectively. The median follow-up time was 18 (range 12-36) months, the median PFS was 6.2 (range 4.4-8) months, and the median OS was 13.6 (range 8.7-18.5) months. The incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was 27.6%. Other grade 3 adverse events included 1 (3.1%) hand-foot syndrome, 1 (3.1%) rash and 2 (6.3%) diarrheas.

CONCLUSIONS

Nab-paclitaxel and S-1 regimen has presented encouraging ORR, OS, and manageable toxicities as first-line therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Advanced pancreatic cancer: The standard of care and new opportunities

Presentation of pancreatic cancer is localized, locally advanced or metastatic. With the later represented the main bulk (more than 80%). Despite the significant innovation in molecular analysis and therapeutic approach in many types of cancer in the last two decades, still the outcome of advanced pancreatic cancer is disappointing and the mortality rate approximately unchanged. In this mandated review we intended to highlight the standard of care and emerging agents for advanced pancreatic cancer treatment.

From First Line to Sequential Treatment in the Management of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

The current management of patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) is based on systemic chemotherapy. The results of the MPACT and PRODIGE clinical trials have demonstrated that the combination of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine (GEM) as well as FOLFIRINOX regimen result in improvement in overall survival when compared to GEM alone. Treatment guidelines now recommend either one of these two regimens as first line treatment for fit patients with mPDAC. Because no head-to-head comparison between the two regimens exists, the selection of one versus the other is based on clinical criteria. The design and eligibility criteria of these two clinical trials are dissimilar, making the results of the MPACT trial more applicable to the general population of patients with mPDAC. In addition, the combination of nab-paclitaxel and GEM is better tolerated and easier to administer in clinical practice than FOLFIRINOX. Furthermore, when the regimens are studied in comparable patient populations the efficacy results are very similar. Nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5FU has recently demonstrated a significant increase in efficacy rates after a GEM-based treatment. Importantly, treatment of mPDAC should now be considered as a continuum care for patients who are fit, with second and even third line treatments. Different sequential treatment algorithms are proposed based on available data. In retrospective studies, patients who were managed with GEM-based regimens followed by fluoropyrimidine-based regimens appear to have the most favorable outcome.

Gemcitabine in Combination with a Second Cytotoxic Agent in the First-Line Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

It remains controversial whether the addition of a second cytotoxic agent can further improve the therapeutic effect of gemcitabine monotherapy in advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (LA/MPC).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-based doublet chemotherapy regimens compared to single-agent gemcitabine in the first-line treatment of unresectable LA/MPC.

METHODS

We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of gemcitabine monotherapy versus gemcitabine in combination with a second cytotoxic agent in patients with LA/MPC. The last search date was December 31, 2016.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven RCTs were identified and included in the present systematic review and meta-analysis, involving a total of 7343 patients. The meta-analysis showed that gemcitabine-based combination therapy significantly improved overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85-0.94; P < 0.0001), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.73-0.88; P < 0.0001), and overall response rate (ORR) (RR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.62-2.07; P < 0.0001) in comparison to single-agent gemcitabine. Subgroup analysis suggested that the antitumor activity differed between gemcitabine-based combination regimens: doublet regimens of gemcitabine plus a taxoid, and gemcitabine plus a fluoropyrimidine, in particular an oral fluoropyrimidine, resulted in a significant OS benefit for the patients. However, the combination of gemcitabine with other cytotoxic agents, such as platinum compounds or topoisomerase inhibitors failed to reduce the mortality risk. Combination therapy caused more grade 3/4 toxicities, including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, vomiting, diarrhea, and fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine-based doublet regimens demonstrated superiority over gemcitabine monotherapy in overall efficacy, but were associated with increased toxicity. Different gemcitabine-based combinations showed different antitumor activity, and doublet regimens of gemcitabine in combination with a taxoid or a fluoropyrimidine, in particular an oral fluoropyrimidine provided significant survival benefits in the first-line treatment of unresectable LA/MPC.

The best strategy for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients in first-line treatment: A classic and Bayesian meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

At present, there is uncertainty on the best systemic treatment in first-line setting for RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Indeed, several chemotherapy and biologics combinations showed an improvement on survival. We performed a systematic review with a pair-wise and bayesan meta-analysis to rank the best strategy for these patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature search through March 2017 was performed to evaluate the association between several treatment combinations and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and toxicity rate (TR) in RAS WT mCRC patients. Data were extracted from studies and pooled using the random-effect model for pair-wise meta-analyses and bayesan model for network meta-analysis (NMA).

RESULTS

Eight studies with a total of 2518 individuals were included in the meta-analyses. Pooled analyses for subgroups stratified by type of schedule and tumor location demonstrated that anti-EGFR + doublet had the best OS when compared to doublet ± bevacizumab (0.767; 95%CI, 0.695-0.846; P < 0.0001). This benefit is limited to LSCC when compared to a doublet-based schedule and doublet + bevacizumab (HRs, 0.692; 95%CI, 0.596-0.804; P < 0.001; 0.706; 95%CI, 0.584-0.854; P < 0.001; respectively). No significant differences are detected in PFS, whereas the cetuximab-based regimens showed the highest ORR and TR. In NMA our ranking showed the best performance for FOLFOX + panitumumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that FOLFOX + panitumumab has the major probability to provide an improvement of survival with a good safety profile in patients with RAS WT mCRC with an added value from selection based on sidedness.

Mutant KRAS Circulating Tumor DNA Is an Accurate Tool for Pancreatic Cancer Monitoring

BACKGROUND

Many new pancreatic cancer treatment combinations have been discovered in recent years, yet the prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains grim. The advent of new treatments highlights the need for better monitoring tools for treatment response, to allow a timely switch between different therapeutic regimens. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a tool for cancer detection and characterization with growing clinical use. However, currently, ctDNA is not used for monitoring treatment response. The high prevalence of KRAS hotspot mutations in PDAC suggests that mutant KRAS can be an efficient ctDNA marker for PDAC monitoring.

SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS

Seventeen metastatic PDAC patients were recruited and serial plasma samples were collected. CtDNA was extracted from the plasma, and KRAS mutation analysis was performed using next-generation sequencing and correlated with serum CA19-9 levels, imaging, and survival.

RESULTS

Plasma KRAS mutations were detected in 5/17 (29.4%) patients. KRAS ctDNA detection was associated with shorter survival (8 vs. 37.5 months). Our results show that, in ctDNA positive patients, ctDNA is at least comparable to CA19-9 as a marker for monitoring treatment response. Furthermore, the rate of ctDNA change was inversely correlated with survival.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm that mutant KRAS ctDNA detection in metastatic PDAC patients is a poor prognostic marker. Additionally, we were able to show that mutant KRAS ctDNA analysis can be used to monitor treatment response in PDAC patients and that ctDNA dynamics is associated with survival. We suggest that ctDNA analysis in metastatic PDAC patients is a readily available tool for disease monitoring.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Avoiding futile chemotherapy in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients by monitoring response to treatment is of utmost importance. A novel biomarker for monitoring treatment response in PDAC, using mutant KRAS circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), is proposed. Results, although limited by small sample numbers, suggest that ctDNA can be an effective marker for disease monitoring and that ctDNA level over time is a better predictor of survival than the dynamics of the commonly used biomarker CA19-9. Therefore, ctDNA analysis can be a useful tool for monitoring PDAC treatment response. These results should be further validated in larger sample numbers.

Clinical Trials in Pancreatic Cancer: A Long Slog

Many investigators have turned their efforts toward improving the gemcitabine/nab‐paclitaxel combination by the addition of a third agent. This commentary highlights efforts to date, including the Clinical Trial Results by Ko et al.: A Randomized Double‐Blinded Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine and Nab‐Paclitaxel Plus Apatorsen or Placebo in Patients with Metastati Pancreatic Cancer: The RAINIER Trial.

Prognostic value of postdiagnostic inflammation-based scores in short-term overall survival of advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients

The prognostic relevance of commonly used composite inflammation-based scores remains severely underdiscussed in pancreatic cancer (PC), especially for advanced PC. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to discuss the association between multiple inflammatory scores and the short-term overall survival (OS) of advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. A total of 66 histologically confirmed PDAC patients were retrospectively analyzed. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to explore the association between 6 commonly used inflammatory scores measured right after diagnosis, Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), prognostic index (PI), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and the short-term OS of advanced PDAC. Analytical results revealed that among GPS, mGPS, NLR, PLR, PI and PNI only PLR was significantly associated with short-term OS of PDAC. For both 1-year and 2-year OS, every 10 increase of PLR value resulted in 1.10 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.16) folds hazard ratio (HR). Further analysis identified a statistically significant dose-response relationship between PLR and HR. Our study results probably suggested that PLR is a promising prognostic factor of advanced PDAC; maintaining normally ranged platelet count may gain short-term survival benefit among such patients.

Role of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Elderly and Poor Performance Status Patients With Pancreatic Cancer

Literature on the management of nonmetastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in patients who are elderly or have poor performance status is sparse. The median survival of this unique cohort of patients is < 6 months, and most patients are only offered single-agent gemcitabine or supportive care. Recently, adding nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel to gemcitabine was shown to improve survival of patients with metastatic disease with Eastern Cooperative Group performance status of 2. Although standard chemoradiotherapy provides long-term locoregional control in locally advanced pancreatic cancer, it is difficult for this group of patients to tolerate 6 weeks of therapy. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) can be delivered in only 3 to 5 days, does not require concurrent chemotherapy, and has limited toxicity, and tumor control rates appear to be equivalent to or better than those achieved with standard chemoradiotherapy. Additionally, SBRT has been shown to improve cancer-related pain and patient-reported quality of life. Given the favorable toxicity profile, SBRT seems like an obvious choice for patients who are elderly, have multiple comorbidities, or have poor performance status. Herein, we review the literature on SBRT in this unique patient population and discuss future directions.

Germline mutations in pancreatic cancer and potential new therapeutic options

Due to short-lived treatment responses in unresectable disease, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) continues to be one of the deadliest cancers. There is availability of new information about germline and sporadic mutations in the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage repair pathway in PDAC in recent decades and the expectation is that novel targeted therapies will thus be developed. A variety of germline mutations (BRCA2, BRCA1, PALB2, CDKN2A, ATM, TP53 and mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6) have been reported in these patients with the highest prevalence being BRCA1/2. Positive results have been reported with the use of targeted therapies, particularly poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in BRCA-mutated ovarian and breast cancers, and their use is currently being investigated in germline-mutated pancreatic cancer. The aim of this review is to provide an outline of germline DNA damage repair mutations in pancreatic cancer and their effect on the incidence, outcomes and responses to different therapeutic options.

Next generation sequencing of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: right or wrong?

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has the highest mortality rate of all epithelial malignancies and a paradoxically rising incidence rate. Clinical translation of next generation sequencing (NGS) of tumour and germline samples may ameliorate outcomes by identifying prognostic and predictive genomic and transcriptomic features in appreciable fractions of patients, facilitating enrolment in biomarker-matched trials. Areas covered: The literature on precision oncology is reviewed. It is found that outcomes may be improved across various malignancies, and it is suggested that current issues of adequate tissue acquisition, turnaround times, analytic expertise and clinical trial accessibility may lessen as experience accrues. Also reviewed are PDAC genomic and transcriptomic NGS studies, emphasizing discoveries of promising biomarkers, though these require validation, and the fraction of patients that will benefit from these outside of the research setting is currently unknown. Expert commentary: Clinical use of NGS with PDAC should be used in investigational contexts in centers with multidisciplinary expertise in cancer sequencing and pancreatic cancer management. Biomarker directed studies will improve our understanding of actionable genomic variation in PDAC, and improve outcomes for this challenging disease.

Gemcitabine-based combination therapy compared with gemcitabine alone for advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive malignancies and chemotherapy is an effective strategy for advanced pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine (GEM) is one of first-line agents. However, GEM-based combination therapy has shown promising efficacy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of GEM-based combination therapy versus GEM alone in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive search of literature was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed based on the inclusion criteria from all eligible randomized controlled trials. The outcome indicators included overall survival (OS), 6-month survival, 1-year survival, progression-free survival/time-to-progression (PFS/TTP), and toxicities.

RESULTS

A total of nine randomized controlled trials involving 1661 patients were included in this meta-analysis. There was significant improvement in the GEM-based combination therapy with regard to the OS (HR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.76-0.95, P=0.003), PFS (HR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.65-0.90, P=0.002), 6-month survival (RR=1.09, 95% CI: 1.01-1.17, P=0.03), and the overall toxicity (RR=1.68, 95% CI: 1.52-1.86, P<0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the 1-year survival.

CONCLUSIONS

GEM-based combination chemotherapy might improve the OS, 6-month survival, and PFS in advanced pancreatic cancer. However, combined therapy also added toxicity.

Pancreatic Cancer Genomes: Implications for Clinical Management and Therapeutic Development

Pancreatic cancer has become the third leading cause of cancer-related death, with little improvement in outcomes despite decades of research. Surgery remains the only chance of cure, yet only 20% of patients will be alive at 5 years after pancreatic resection. Few chemotherapeutics provide any improvement in outcome, and even then, for approved therapies, the survival benefits are marginal. Genomic sequencing studies of pancreatic cancer have revealed a small set of consistent mutations found in most pancreatic cancers and beyond that, a low prevalence for targetable mutations. This may explain the failure of conventional clinical trial designs to show any meaningful survival benefit, except in small and undefined patient subgroups. With the development of next-generation sequencing technology, genomic sequencing and analysis can be performed in a clinically meaningful turnaround time. This can identify therapeutic targets in individual patients and personalize treatment selection. Incorporating preclinical discovery and molecularly guided therapy into clinical trial design has the potential to significantly improve outcomes in this lethal malignancy. In this review, we discuss the findings of recent large-scale genomic sequencing projects in pancreatic cancer and the potential relevance of these data to therapeutic development. Clin Cancer Res; 23(7); 1638-46. ©2017 AACRSee all articles in this CCR Focus section, "Pancreatic Cancer: Challenge and Inspiration."

Pancreatic Cancer: “A Riddle Wrapped in a Mystery inside an Enigma”

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most difficult-to-treat cancers. With an increasing incidence and inability to make major progress, it represents the very definition of unmet medical need. Progress has been made in understanding the basic biology—systematic genomic sequencing has led to the recognition that PDAC is not typically a heavily mutated tumor, although there are exceptions. The most consistently mutated genes are KRAS, CDKN2A, TP53, and SMAD4/DPC4. Study of familial PDAC has led to the recognition that a variety of defects in DNA repair genes can be associated with the emergence of pancreatic cancer. Recent studies suggest that epigenetics may play a larger role than previously recognized. A major new understanding is the recognition that PDAC should be considered a composite of tumor cells, as well as pancreatic stellate cells, immune cells, and extracellular matrix. The individual components contribute to metabolic aberration, immune dysfunction, and chemotherapy resistance, and therapeutic innovations may be needed to address them individually. It has also been recognized that metastatic seeding from PDAC occurs very early in the disease course—in an estimated 73% of cases, once the tumor reaches 2 cm. The implication of this is that therapies directed toward micrometastatic disease and increasing fractional cell kill are most needed. Neoadjuvant approaches have been taken to increase resectability and improve outcome. So much work remains, and most critical is the need to understand how this tumor originates and develops. Clin Cancer Res; 23(7); 1629–37. ©2017 AACR.

See all articles in this CCR Focus section, “Pancreatic Cancer: Challenge and Inspiration.”

nab-Paclitaxel for the treatment of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-P) plus gemcitabine (Gem) became a standard treatment option for metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) following positive results from a global phase III trial (MPACT). A large number of studies have now published results on the use of nab-P/Gem to treat advanced and early-stage disease, warranting a comprehensive review. The main goal of this systematic review is to summarize the efficacy and safety data of nab-P/Gem for the treatment of pancreatic cancer (PC).

METHODS

This systematic review includes results from studies that either published results in a peer-reviewed journal or presented the results at a major oncology conference.

RESULTS

Sixty-two studies were included (50 in the advanced/metastatic setting and 12 in the locally advanced setting). Most studies on the treatment of MPC were exclusively first line (33/50). Nevertheless, the studies in this review comprised a broad spectrum of patients, including those <65 and ≥65 years of age and those with a Karnofsky performance status of 70-100. Median overall survival (OS) in studies of nab-P/Gem in the advanced/metastatic setting ranged from 8.7 to 13.5 months. In addition, 15 studies of patients with advanced/metastatic PC examined nab-P/Gem as a backbone on which to add a variety of agents, including cancer stem cell inhibitors, stromal disrupting agents, and immune-modulating agents (median OS, 6.9-17 months). Ongoing trials are investigating nab-P/Gem with or without other agents across disease settings.

DISCUSSION

Studies conducted after MPACT have demonstrated that nab-P/Gem is an effective regimen for the first-line treatment of MPC for a wide range of patients. Regimens using nab-P/Gem as a backbone on which to combine additional agents are being studied actively, particularly in the advanced disease setting. Ongoing studies will yield valuable insights on the utility of nab-P-containing regimens to improve patient outcomes in PC in both earlier-stage and advanced disease.

Network meta-analysis of randomized trials in multiple myeloma: efficacy and safety in relapsed/refractory patients

Despite major therapeutic advancements, multiple myeloma (MM) is still incurable and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) remains a challenge; the rational choice of the most appropriate regimen in this setting is currently undefined. We performed a systematic review and 2 standard pairwise meta-analyses to evaluate the efficacy of regimens that have been directly compared with bortezomib or immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiDs) in head-to-head clinical trials and a network meta-analysis (NMA) to determine the relevance of each regimen on the basis of all the available direct and indirect evidence. Sixteen trials were included in the pairwise meta-analyses, and 18 trials were included in the NMA. Pairwise meta-analyses showed that a 3-drug regimen (bortezomib- or IMiD-based) was superior to a 2-drug regimen in progression-free-survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR). NMA showed that an IMiD backbone associated with anti-MM monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (preferably) or proteasome inhibitors had the highest probability of being the most effective regimen with the lowest toxicity. The combination of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone ranked as the first regimen in terms of activity, efficacy, and tolerability according to the average value between surface under the cumulative ranking curve of PFS, overall survival, ORR, complete response rate, and safety. This is the first NMA comparing all currently available regimens evaluated in published randomized trials for the treatment of RRMM, but our results need to be interpreted taking into account differences in their patient populations. Our analysis suggests that IMiDs plus new anti-MM mAb-containing regimens are the most active therapeutic option in RRMM.