Role of epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation in alpha1B-adrenoceptor phosphorylation

Unveiling the therapeutic prospects of EGFR inhibition in rotenone-mediated parkinsonism in rats: Modulation of dopamine D3 receptor

Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. The dopamine D3 receptor (D3R) plays a significant role in the pathogenesis and treatment of PD. Activation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) inhibits signaling mediated by G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). Epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) and dopamine D3 receptors in the brain are directly associated with PD, both in terms of its development and potential treatment. Therefore, we investigated the impact of modulating the EGFR, a member of the RTKs family, and the dopamine D3R, a member of the GPCR family. In the present study, 100 mg/kg of lapatinib (LAP) was administered to rotenone-intoxicated rats for three weeks. Our findings indicate that LAP effectively alleviated motor impairment, improved histopathological abnormalities, and restored dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. This restoration was achieved through the upregulation of dopamine D3R and increase of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) expression, as well as boosting dopamine levels. Furthermore, LAP inhibited the activity of p-EGFR, GRK2, and SCR. Additionally, LAP exhibited antioxidant properties by inhibiting the 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) and PLCγ/PKCβII pathway, while enhancing the antioxidant defense mechanism by increasing GSH-GPX4 pathway. The current study offers insights into the potential repositioning of LAP as a disease-modifying drug for PD. This could be achieved by modulating the dopaminergic system and curbing oxidative stress.

Cell Trafficking and Function of G Protein-coupled Receptors

The G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are plasma membrane proteins that function as sensors of changes in the internal and external milieux and play essential roles in health and disease. They are targets of hormones, neurotransmitters, local hormones (autacoids), and a large proportion of the drugs currently used as therapeutics and for "recreational" purposes. Understanding how these receptors signal and are regulated is fundamental for progress in areas such as physiology and pharmacology. This review will focus on what is currently known about their structure, the molecular events that trigger their signaling, and their trafficking to endosomal compartments. GPCR phosphorylation and its role in desensitization (signaling switching) are also discussed. It should be mentioned that the volume of information available is enormous given the large number and variety of GPCRs. However, knowledge is fragmentary even for the most studied receptors, such as the adrenergic receptors. Therefore, we attempt to present a panoramic view of the field, conscious of the risks and limitations (such as oversimplifications and incorrect generalizations). We hope this will provoke further research in the area. It is currently accepted that GPCR internalization plays a role signaling events. Therefore, the processes that allow them to internalize and recycle back to the plasma membrane are briefly reviewed. The functions of cytoskeletal elements (mainly actin filaments and microtubules), the molecular motors implicated in receptor trafficking (myosin, kinesin, and dynein), and the GTPases involved in GPCR internalization (dynamin) and endosomal sorting (Rab proteins), are discussed. The critical role phosphoinositide metabolism plays in regulating these events is also depicted.

Roles of receptor phosphorylation and Rab proteins in G protein-coupled receptor function and trafficking

The G Protein-Coupled Receptors form the most abundant family of membrane proteins and are crucial physiological players in the homeostatic equilibrium, which we define as health. They also participate in the pathogenesis of many diseases and are frequent targets of therapeutic intervention. Considering their importance, it is not surprising that different mechanisms regulate their function, including desensitization, resensitization, internalization, recycling to the plasma membrane, and degradation. These processes are modulated in a highly coordinated and specific way by protein kinases and phosphatases, ubiquitin ligases, protein adaptors, interaction with multifunctional complexes, molecular motors, phospholipid metabolism, and membrane distribution. This review describes significant advances in the study of the regulation of these receptors by phosphorylation and endosomal traffic (where signaling can take place); we revisited the bar code hypothesis and include two additional observations: a) that different phosphorylation patterns seem to be associated with internalization and endosome sorting for recycling or degradation, and b) that, surprisingly, phosphorylation of some G protein-coupled receptors appears to be required for proper receptor insertion into the plasma membrane. Significance Statement G protein-coupled receptor phosphorylation is an early event in desensitization/ signaling switching, endosomal traffic, and internalization. These events seem crucial for receptor responsiveness, cellular localization, and fate (recycling/ degradation) with important pharmacological/ therapeutic implications. Phosphorylation sites vary depending on the cells in which they are expressed and on the stimulus that leads to such covalent modification. Surprisingly, evidence suggests that phosphorylation also seems to be required for proper insertion into the plasma membrane for some receptors.

Novel Structural Approaches to Study GPCR Regulation

BACKGROUND

Upon natural agonist or pharmacological stimulation, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are subjected to posttranslational modifications, such as phosphorylation and ubiquitination. These posttranslational modifications allow protein-protein interactions that turn off and/or switch receptor signaling as well as trigger receptor internalization, recycling or degradation, among other responses. Characterization of these processes is essential to unravel the function and regulation of GPCR.

METHODS

In silico analysis and methods such as mass spectrometry have emerged as novel powerful tools. Both approaches have allowed proteomic studies to detect not only GPCR posttranslational modifications and receptor association with other signaling macromolecules but also to assess receptor conformational dynamics after ligand (agonist/antagonist) association.

RESULTS

this review aims to provide insights into some of these methodologies and to highlight how their use is enhancing our comprehension of GPCR function. We present an overview using data from different laboratories (including our own), particularly focusing on free fatty acid receptor 4 (FFA4) (previously known as GPR120) and α1A- and α1D-adrenergic receptors. From our perspective, these studies contribute to the understanding of GPCR regulation and will help to design better therapeutic agents.

Phosphorylation and Internalization of Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptors LPA1, LPA2, and LPA3

Results

The lysophosphatidic acid receptors LPA₁, LPA₂, and LPA₃ were individually expressed in C9 cells and their signaling and regulation were studied. Agonist-activation increases intracellular calcium concentration in a concentration-dependent fashion. Phorbol myristate acetate markedly inhibited LPA₁- and LPA₃-mediated effect, whereas that mediated by LPA₂ was only partially diminished; the actions of the phorbol ester were inhibited by bisindolylmaleimide I and by overnight incubation with the protein kinase C activator, which leads to down regulation of this protein kinase. Homologous desensitization was also observed for the three LPA receptors studied, with that of LPA₂ receptors being consistently of lesser magnitude; neither inhibition nor down-regulation of protein kinase C exerted any effect on homologous desensitization. Activation of LPA_1–3 receptors induced ERK 1/2 phosphorylation; this effect was markedly attenuated by inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase activity, suggesting growth factor receptor transactivation in this effect. Lysophosphatidic acid and phorbol myristate acetate were able to induce LPA_1–3 phosphorylation, in time- and concentration-dependent fashions. It was also clearly observed that agonists and protein kinase C activation induced internalization of these receptors. Phosphorylation of the LPA₂ subtype required larger concentrations of these agents and its internalization was less intense than that of the other subtypes.

Conclusion

Our data show that these three LPA receptors are phosphoproteins whose phosphorylation state is modulated by agonist-stimulation and protein kinase C-activation and that differences in regulation and cellular localization exist, among the subtypes.

α1B-adrenergic receptors differentially associate with Rab proteins during homologous and heterologous desensitization

Internalization of G protein-coupled receptors can be triggered by agonists or by other stimuli. The process begins within seconds of cell activation and contributes to receptor desensitization. The Rab GTPase family controls endocytosis, vesicular trafficking, and endosomal fusion. Among their remarkable properties is the differential distribution of its members on the surface of various organelles. In the endocytic pathway, Rab 5 controls traffic from the plasma membrane to early endosomes, whereas Rab 4 and Rab 11 regulate rapid and slow recycling from early endosomes to the plasma membrane, respectively. Moreover, Rab 7 and Rab 9 regulate the traffic from late endosomes to lysosomes and recycling to the trans-Golgi. We explore the possibility that α_1B-adrenergic receptor internalization induced by agonists (homologous) and by unrelated stimuli (heterologous) could involve different Rab proteins. This possibility was explored by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) using cells coexpressing α_1B-adrenergic receptors tagged with the red fluorescent protein, DsRed, and different Rab proteins tagged with the green fluorescent protein. It was observed that when α_1B-adrenergic receptors were stimulated with noradrenaline, the receptors interacted with proteins present in early endosomes, such as the early endosomes antigen 1, Rab 5, Rab 4, and Rab 11 but not with late endosome markers, such as Rab 9 and Rab 7. In contrast, sphingosine 1-phosphate stimulation induced rapid and transient α_1B-adrenergic receptor interaction of relatively small magnitude with Rab 5 and a more pronounced and sustained one with Rab 9; interaction was also observed with Rab 7. Moreover, the GTPase activity of the Rab proteins appears to be required because no FRET was observed when dominant-negative Rab mutants were employed. These data indicate that α_1B-adrenergic receptors are directed to different endocytic vesicles depending on the desensitization type (homologous vs. heterologous).

Tyrosine kinase receptor alteration of renal vasoconstriction in rats is sex- and age-related

Male rat renal blood vessels undergo reduced contraction to norepinephrine with aging. There is a greater renal vascular impairment in male compared with female rats. We investigated specific tyrosine kinase receptor inhibition of renal interlobar artery responsiveness to phenylephrine in male and female rats at specifically designated ages. Vessels from young male rats contracted much less to phenylephrine when the vessels were pretreated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors Lavendustin A, HNMPA-(AM)₃, or AG1478. Vessels from adult female rats pretreated with Lavendustin A showed no difference in contraction from control, but did demonstrate a slightly reduced contraction when pretreated with AG1478. Middle-aged male rat vessels treated with Lavendustin A demonstrated no inhibition, but the insulin and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antagonists both induced a decline in contraction. Vessels from aged male rats demonstrated no effect related to the 3 pretreatments. Middle-aged and aged female rats pretreated with any inhibitor demonstrated no inhibitor-dependent alterations. We conclude that maximum contraction of interlobar arteries from adult male rats is reduced when tyrosine kinase receptor activity is reduced. Female rats demonstrated much less inhibitor-related change of contraction.

Sphingosine 1-phosphate-mediated α1B-adrenoceptor desensitization and phosphorylation. Direct and paracrine/autocrine actions

Sphingosine-1-phosphate-induced α1B-adrenergic receptor desensitization and phosphorylation were studied in rat-1 fibroblasts stably expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein-tagged adrenoceptors. Sphingosine-1-phosphate induced adrenoceptor desensitization and phosphorylation through a signaling cascade that involved phosphoinositide 3-kinase and protein kinase C activities. The autocrine/paracrine role of sphingosine-1-phosphate was also studied. It was observed that activation of receptor tyrosine kinases, such as insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-I) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptors increased sphingosine kinase activity. Such activation and consequent production of sphingosine-1-phosphate appear to be functionally relevant in IGF-I- and EGF-induced α1B-adrenoceptor phosphorylation and desensitization as evidenced by the following facts: a) expression of a catalytically inactive (dominant-negative) mutant of sphingosine kinase 1 or b) S1P1 receptor knockdown markedly reduced this growth factor action. This action of sphingosine-1-phosphate involves EGF receptor transactivation. In addition, taking advantage of the presence of the eGFP tag in the receptor construction, we showed that S1P was capable of inducing α1B-adrenergic receptor internalization and that its autocrine/paracrine generation was relevant for internalization induced by IGF-I. Four distinct hormone receptors and two autocrine/paracrine mediators participate in IGF-I receptor-α1B-adrenergic receptor crosstalk.

EGF and angiotensin II modulate lysophosphatidic acid LPA(1) receptor function and phosphorylation state

BACKGROUND

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a local mediator that exerts its actions through G protein coupled receptors. Knowledge on the regulation of such receptors is scarce to date. Here we show that bidirectional cross-talk exits between LPA(1) and EGF receptors.

METHODS

C9 cells expressing LPA(1) receptor fussed to the enhanced green fluorescent protein were used. We studied intracellular calcium concentration, Akt/PKB phosphorylation, LPA(1) and EGF receptor phosphorylation.

RESULTS

EGF diminished LPA-mediated intracellular calcium response and induced LPA(1) receptor phosphorylation, which was sensitive to protein kinase C inhibitors. Angiotensin II and LPA induced EGF receptor transactivation as evidenced by Akt/PKB phosphorylation through metalloproteinase-catalyzed membrane shedding of heparin-binding EGF and autocrine/paracrine activation of EGF receptors. This process was found to be of major importance in angiotensin II-induced LPA(1) receptor phosphorylation. Attempts to define a role for EGF receptor transactivation in homologous LPA(1) receptor desensitization and phosphorylation suggested that G protein-coupled receptor kinases are the major players in this process, overshadowing other events.

CONCLUSIONS

EGF receptors and LPA(1) receptors are engaged in an intense liaison, in that EGF receptors are capable of modulating LPA(1) receptor function through phosphorylation cascades. EGF transactivation plays a dual role: it mediates some LPA actions, and it modulates LPA(1) receptor function in inhibitory fashion.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

EGF and LPA receptors coexist in many cell types and play key roles in maintaining the delicate equilibrium that we call health and in the pathogenesis of many diseases. The intense cross-talk described here has important physiological and pathophysiological implications.

Mechanisms involved in α1B-adrenoceptor desensitization

α(1B)-Adrenergic receptors mediate many of the actions of the natural catecholamines, adrenaline and noradrenaline. They belong to the seven transmembrane domains G protein-coupled receptor superfamily and exert their actions mainly through activation of Gq proteins and phosphoinositide turnover/calcium signaling. Many hormones and neurotransmitters are capable of inducing α(1B)-adrenergic receptor phosphorylation and desensitization; among them: adrenaline and noradrenaline, phorbol esters, endothelin-I, bradykinin, lysophosphatidic acid, insulin, EGF, PDGF, IGF-I, TGF-β, and estrogens. Key protein kinases for these effects are G protein coupled receptor kinases and protein kinase C. The lipid/protein kinase, phosphoinositide-3 kinase also appears to play a key role, acting upstream of protein kinase C. In addition to the agents employed for cells stimulation, we observed that paracrine/autocrine mediators also participate; these processes include EGF transactivation and sphingosine-1-phosphate production and action. The complex regulation of these receptors unlocks opportunities for therapeutic intervention.

Dissecting how receptor tyrosine kinases modulate G protein-coupled receptor function

Receptor tyrosine kinases and G protein-coupled receptors modulate physiological processes and are also involved in the pathogenesis of some diseases. These receptors have intense bidirectional crosstalks leading to interactions in their signaling pathways and also modulation of the receptors themselves. In some cases, the receptor tyrosine kinases phosphorylate G protein-coupled receptors whereas in others phosphoinositide 3-kinase, protein kinase B and protein kinase C are key elements in these crosstalks. Two paracrine/ autocrine processes also participate, i.e., epidermal growth factor transactivation and sphingosine 1-phosphate generation and signaling. G proteins seem to mediate actions of receptor tyrosine kinases, but how this takes place is far from completely understood; some models are presented. Recent data indicate that the mitogen activated protein kinase cascade also mediate crosstalks. In the present perspective these processes are outlined using information from receptors that have been intensively studied, and important gaps in our knowledge are indicated.

Effect of inhibitors of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase on alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor phosphorylation

1 Mitogen-activated protein kinases mediate hormone/neurotransmitter action on proliferation and differentiation and participate in receptor regulation. The effect of inhibitors of mitogen-activated kinase kinase (MEK) on alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor phosphorylation state and function was studied using different cell lines. It was observed that at nanomolar concentrations the MEK inhibitors, PD98059 (2'-amino-3'-methoxyflavone) and UO126 [1,4-(diamino-2,3-dicyano/1,4-bis-(2-aminophenylthio)-butadiene], increased alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor phosphorylation and diminished the functional response of this receptor to noradrenaline. These agents did not alter the action of lysophosphatidic acid. 2 Staurosporine (IC(50) approximately 0.8 nm) (a general protein kinase inhibitor) and bis-indolyl-maleimide I (IC(50) approximately 200 nm) (a selective protein kinase C inhibitor) inhibited PD98059-induced alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor phosphorylation. In contrast, neither wortmannin (phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitor) nor genistein (protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor) had any effect. The data suggest the possibility that MEK might exert control on the activity of the enzymes that regulate receptor phosphorylation, such as G-protein-coupled receptor kinases, protein kinase C or serine/threonine protein phosphatases. 3 Coimmunoprecipitation studies showed a constant association of total extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 (ERK2) with alpha(1B)-adrenoceptors. Association of phospho-ERK 1/2 to alpha(1B)-adrenoceptors increased not only in response to agonist but also in response to agents that increase alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor and ERK1/2 phosphorylation [such as endothelin-1, phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) and epidermal growth factor (EGF)]; not surprisingly, PD98059 decreased this effect. 4 Our data show that blockade of MEK activity results in increased alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor phosphorylation, diminished adrenoceptor function and perturbation of receptor-ERK1/2 interaction.

Receptor tyrosine kinases regulate alpha1D-adrenoceptor signaling properties: phosphorylation and desensitization

Human alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors (truncated at the amino terminus (Delta1-79) to increase their membrane expression) were stably expressed in Rat-1 fibroblasts (1-1.5 pmol/mg protein). The receptors were functional as evidenced by a robust increase in intracellular calcium in response to noradrenaline. Using this cell line, the possibility that activation of receptor tyrosine kinases could modulate this adrenoceptor subtype was studied. It was observed that cell preincubation with insulin, IGF-I, EGF or PDGF markedly reduced the intracellular calcium increase observed in response to noradrenaline. Inhibitors of PI3K and PKC essentially blocked insulin-, IGF-I- and EGF-induced desensitizations. Interestingly, PDGF-induced alpha(1D)-adrenergic desensitization was only partially ameliorated by PI3K inhibitors and was not affected by those of PKC. Insulin, IGF-I, EGF and PDGF induced concentration-dependent increases in the phosphorylation state of alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors; phosphorylation took place on serine residues. Inhibitors of PI3K and PKC markedly reduced the effects of insulin, IGF-I and EGF on this parameter. These inhibitors only marginally reduced PDGF-induced alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors phosphorylation. The ability of IGF-I to induce alpha(1D)-adrenergic desensitization and phosphorylation was confirmed in cells expressing non-truncated rat alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors. Our data indicate that the function and phosphorylation state of alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors is modulated by activation of receptor tyrosine kinases. Insulin, IGF-I and EGF actions take place through the action of PI3K and PKC; additional pathway(s) seem to participate in PDGF-induced alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor desensitization and phosphorylation.

Roles of c-Src in alpha1B-adrenoceptor phosphorylation and desensitization

1 The role of the protein tyrosine kinase, c-Src, on the function and phosphorylation of alpha1B-adrenoceptors (alpha1B-AR) and their association with G-protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) isozymes was studied. 2 Inhibitors of this kinase (PP2 and Src Inhibitor II) decreased ( approximately 50-75%) noradrenaline- (NA) and phorbol myristate acetate-mediated receptor phosphorylation. Expression of a dominant-negative mutant of c-Src similarly reduced receptor phosphorylation induced by the natural agonists, active phorbol esters and endothelin-1 (ET-1). 3 c-Src, GRK2, GRK3 and GRK5 coimmunoprecipitate with alpha1B-ARs in the basal state. In cells treated with NA or phorbol myristate acetate the amount of coimmunoprecipitated GRK2 and GRK3 increased ( approximately 2- to 3-fold), while treatment with ET-1 only augmented the amount of coimmunoprecipitated GRK2 ( approximately 2-fold). The Src inhibitor, PP2, markedly attenuated all these increases. 4 Cell pretreatment with PP2 amplified the increase in intracellular-free calcium observed with NA, in the basal state and after the stimulation (desensitization) induced by ET-1. 5 The data suggest a role of c-Src in alpha1B-AR desensitization/phosphorylation and in the interaction of these ARs with GRKs.

Phosphorylation, desensitization and internalization of human alpha1B-adrenoceptors induced by insulin-like growth factor-I

The effect of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) on human alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor function, phosphorylation state and cellular location was studied. Rat-1 fibroblasts were transfected with a plasmid construction containing enhanced green fluorescent protein joined to the carboxyl terminus of the human alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor. Receptors were identified by radioligand binding and photoaffinity labeling, and were immunoprecipitated with an antiserum generated against the enhanced green fluorescent protein. The receptor was functional, as evidenced by noradrenaline action on intracellular calcium and inositol phosphate production. IGF-I had no significant effect by itself on these parameters but markedly reduced the effects of noradrenaline. IGF-I induced alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor phosphorylation, which was markedly reduced by the following agents: pertussis toxin, a metalloproteinase inhibitor, diphtheria toxin mutant CRM 197, an epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor intrinsic kinase activity inhibitor, and by phosphoinositide 3-kinase and protein kinase C inhibitors. IGF-I action appears to involve activation of a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein, shedding of heparin-binding EGF and autocrine activation of EGF receptors. G protein subunits and phosphotyrosine residues stimulate phosphoinositide 3-kinase activity leading to activation of protein kinase C, which in turn phosphorylates alpha(1B)-adrenoceptors. Confocal fluorescent microscopy showed that alpha(1B)-adrenoceptors fussed to the green fluorescent protein were located in plasma membrane and intracellular vesicles in the basal state. IGF-I induced receptor redistribution favoring the intracellular location; this effect was blocked by hypertonic sucrose and concanavalin A. Our data show that IGF-I induces alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor desensitization associated to receptor phosphorylation and internalization.

Insulin-like growth factor-I induces alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor phosphorylation through G beta gamma and epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation

IGF-I induces alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor (alpha(1B)-AR) phosphorylation. The effect of IGF-I was rapid and transient, reaching near-maximal values at 10 min and decreasing after 30 min; it was observed at low IGF-I concentrations (EC(50) approximately 10 ng/ml) and was associated to receptor desensitization as evidenced by a decreased alpha(1B)-adrenergic effect on intracellular calcium and production of inositol phosphates. The effect of IGF-I was markedly decreased in cells treated with pertussis toxin suggesting involvement of pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins. Transfection of the carboxyl terminus of the beta-adrenergic receptor kinase or the Deltap85 mutant of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) markedly decreased the alpha(1B)-AR phosphorylation induced by IGF-I without decreasing the receptor phosphorylation induced by noradrenaline. Inhibitors of PI3K and protein kinase C blocked IGF-I-induced alpha(1B)-AR phosphorylation. In addition, it was observed that AG1478, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor kinase, and BB-94, a metalloproteinase inhibitor, also diminished IGF-I-induced adrenoceptor phosphorylation. The data clearly show that IGF-I triggers a complex signaling pathway, which leads to the phosphorylation and desensitization of a serpentine G protein-coupled receptor, suggesting the following hypothetical model: 1) stimulation of IGF-I receptors activate pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins; 2) the growth factor action activates metalloproteinases, which catalyze heparin binding-EGF shedding, and transactivation of EGF receptors, and 3) dissociated Gbetagamma subunits and phosphotyrosine residues seem to trigger PI3K activity, which leads to activation of protein kinase C, resulting in alpha(1B)-AR phosphorylation and desensitization.