The μ-opioid receptor subtype is required for the anorectic effect of an opioid receptor antagonist

Samidorphan mitigates olanzapine-induced weight gain and metabolic dysfunction in rats and non-human primates

BACKGROUND

Olanzapine, regarded as one of the most efficacious antipsychotic medications for the treatment of schizophrenia, is associated with a high risk of weight gain and metabolic dysfunction. ALKS 3831, a clinical candidate for treatment of schizophrenia, is a combination of olanzapine and samidorphan, an opioid receptor antagonist. The addition of samidorphan is intended to mitigate weight gain and the metabolic dysregulation associated with the use of olanzapine.

METHODS

Non-clinical studies were conducted to assess the metabolic effects of olanzapine and samidorphan alone and in combination at clinically relevant exposure levels.

RESULTS

Chronic olanzapine administration in male and female rats shifted body composition by increasing adipose mass, which was accompanied by an increase in the rate of weight gain in female rats. Co-administration of samidorphan normalized body composition in both sexes and attenuated weight gain in female rats. In hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp experiments conducted prior to measurable changes in weight and/or body composition, olanzapine decreased hepatic insulin sensitivity and glucose uptake in muscle while increasing uptake in adipose tissue. Samidorphan appeared to normalize glucose utilization in both tissues, but did not restore hepatic insulin sensitivity. In subsequent studies, samidorphan normalized olanzapine-induced decreases in whole-body glucose clearance following bolus insulin administration. Results from experiments in female monkeys paralleled the effects in rats.

CONCLUSIONS

Olanzapine administration increased weight gain and adiposity, both of which were attenuated by samidorphan. Furthermore, the combination of olanzapine and samidorphan prevented olanzapine-induced insulin insensitivity. Collectively, these data indicate that samidorphan mitigates several metabolic abnormalities associated with olanzapine in both the presence and the absence of weight gain.

Obesity: Current and potential pharmacotherapeutics and targets

Obesity is a global epidemic that contributes to a number of health complications including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, cancer and neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacotherapeutic strategies to treat obesity are urgently needed. Research over the past two decades has increased substantially our knowledge of central and peripheral mechanisms underlying homeostatic energy balance. Homeostatic mechanisms involve multiple components including neuronal circuits, some originating in hypothalamus and brain stem, as well as peripherally-derived satiety, hunger and adiposity signals that modulate neural activity and regulate eating behavior. Dysregulation of one or more of these homeostatic components results in obesity. Coincident with obesity, reward mechanisms that regulate hedonic aspects of food intake override the homeostatic regulation of eating. In addition to functional interactions between homeostatic and reward systems in the regulation of food intake, homeostatic signals have the ability to alter vulnerability to drug abuse. Regarding the treatment of obesity, pharmacological monotherapies primarily focus on a single protein target. FDA-approved monotherapy options include phentermine (Adipex-P®), orlistat (Xenical®), lorcaserin (Belviq®) and liraglutide (Saxenda®). However, monotherapies have limited efficacy, in part due to the recruitment of alternate and counter-regulatory pathways. Consequently, a multi-target approach may provide greater benefit. Recently, two combination products have been approved by the FDA to treat obesity, including phentermine/topiramate (Qsymia®) and naltrexone/bupropion (Contrave®). The current review provides an overview of homeostatic and reward mechanisms that regulate energy balance, potential therapeutic targets for obesity and current treatment options, including some candidate therapeutics in clinical development. Finally, challenges in anti-obesity drug development are discussed.

Endogenous opioids and feeding behavior: A decade of further progress (2004-2014). A Festschrift to Dr. Abba Kastin

Functional elucidation of the endogenous opioid system temporally paralleled the creation and growth of the journal, Peptides, under the leadership of its founding editor, Dr. Abba Kastin. He was prescient in publishing annual and uninterrupted reviews on Endogenous Opiates and Behavior that served as a microcosm for the journal under his stewardship. This author published a 2004 review, "Endogenous opioids and feeding behavior: a thirty-year historical perspective", summarizing research in this field between 1974 and 2003. The present review "closes the circle" by reviewing the last 10 years (2004-2014) of research examining the role of endogenous opioids and feeding behavior. The review summarizes effects upon ingestive behavior following administration of opioid receptor agonists, in opioid receptor knockout animals, following administration of general opioid receptor antagonists, following administration of selective mu, delta, kappa and ORL-1 receptor antagonists, and evaluating opioid peptide and opioid receptor changes in different food intake models.

Mu-opioid receptors and dietary protein stimulate a gut-brain neural circuitry limiting food intake

Intestinal gluconeogenesis is involved in the control of food intake. We show that mu-opioid receptors (MORs) present in nerves in the portal vein walls respond to peptides to regulate a gut-brain neural circuit that controls intestinal gluconeogenesis and satiety. In vitro, peptides and protein digests behave as MOR antagonists in competition experiments. In vivo, they stimulate MOR-dependent induction of intestinal gluconeogenesis via activation of brain areas receiving inputs from gastrointestinal ascending nerves. MOR-knockout mice do not carry out intestinal gluconeogenesis in response to peptides and are insensitive to the satiety effect induced by protein-enriched diets. Portal infusions of MOR modulators have no effect on food intake in mice deficient for intestinal gluconeogenesis. Thus, the regulation of portal MORs by peptides triggering signals to and from the brain to induce intestinal gluconeogenesis are links in the satiety phenomenon associated with alimentary protein assimilation.

Development of a cyclic adenosine monophosphate assay for Gi-coupled G protein-coupled receptors by utilizing the endogenous calcitonin activity in Chinese hamster ovary cells

Activation of G(i)-coupled G protein-coupled receptor (GPCRs) by their ligands leads to inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (AC) and reduction of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels in cells. The traditional cAMP assay for G(i)-coupled GPCRs commonly uses forskolin, a nonspecific AC activator, to increase the basal cAMP level in cells to create an assay window for ligand detection. However, there is still a need to develop a nonforskolin-based cAMP assay because of the challenges inherent in titrating the concentration of forskolin to achieve a reliable assay window, along with issues related to the cAMP-independent effects of forskolin. Herein, we describe such an assay by utilizing the endogenous activity of the calcitonin receptor in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. The calcitonin receptor is a G(s)-coupled GPCR that, when activated by calcitonin, leads to the stimulation of AC and increases cAMP in cells. Thus, we use calcitonin, instead of forskolin, to increase the basal cAMP level in CHO cells to achieve an assay window. We demonstrated that calcitonin peptides robustly increased cAMP accumulation in several CHO cell lines stably expressing well-known G(i)-coupled GPCRs, such as the Dopamine D2 receptor, the Opioid μ receptor, or the Cannabinoid receptor-1. Agonists of these G(i)-coupled GPCRs attenuated calcitonin-induced cAMP production in their receptor stable cell lines. On the other hand, antagonists and/or inverse agonists blocked the effects of their agonists on calcitonin-induced cAMP production. This calcitonin-based cAMP assay has been demonstrated to be sensitive and robust and exhibited acceptable assay windows (signal/noise ratio) and, thus, can be applied to screen for agonists and antagonists/inverse agonists of G(i)-coupled GPCRs in high-throughput screening formats.

From taste hedonics to motivational drive: central μ-opioid receptors and binge-eating behaviour

Endogenous opioids and μ-opioid receptors (MORs) have long been implicated in the mechanism of appetite control and, in particular, hedonic processes associated with food evaluation, consumption and orosensory reward processes. In animal models of binge eating, selective MOR antagonists suppress food consumption. In humans, non-selective opioid receptor antagonists reduce hedonic taste preferences and food intake, particularly for palatable foods, and cause short-term weight loss. These effects have been linked to direct stimulation of MORs and modulation of dopamine release within the reward circuitry including the nucleus accumbens. These findings suggest that reduction of MOR-mediated hedonic and motivation processes driving consumption of highly palatable foods may be a promising therapeutic approach and provide a strong rationale for developing safer and more selective MOR antagonists or inverse agonists for disorders of 'appetitive motivation' including obesity and binge-eating disorder.

Orally administered H-Dmt-Tic-Lys-NH-CH2-Ph (MZ-2), a potent mu/delta-opioid receptor antagonist, regulates obese-related factors in mice

Orally active dual mu-/delta-opioid receptor antagonist, H-Dmt-Tic-Lys-NH-CH(2)-Ph (MZ-2) was applied to study body weight gain, fat content, bone mineral density, serum insulin, cholesterol and glucose levels in female ob/ob (B6.V-Lep<ob>/J homozygous) and lean wild mice with or without voluntary exercise on wheels for three weeks, and during a two week post-treatment period under the same conditions. MZ-2 (10mg/kg/day, p.o.) exhibited the following actions: (1) reduced body weight gain in sedentary obese mice that persisted beyond the treatment period without effect on lean mice; (2) stimulated voluntary running on exercise wheels of both groups of mice; (3) decreased fat content, enhanced bone mineral density (BMD), and decreased serum insulin and glucose levels in obese mice; and (4) MZ-2 (30 microM) increased BMD in human osteoblast cells (MG-63) comparable to naltrexone, while morphine inhibited mineral nodule formation. Thus, MZ-2 has potential application in the clinical management of obesity, insulin and glucose levels, and the amelioration of osteoporosis.

Rational design of a combination medication for the treatment of obesity

Existing obesity therapies are limited by safety concerns and modest efficacy reflecting a weight loss plateau. Here, we explore combination therapy with bupropion (BUP), a putative stimulator of melanocortin pathways, and an opioid antagonist, naltrexone (NAL), to antagonize an inhibitory feedback loop that limits sustained weight reduction. In vitro electrophysiologic experiments were conducted to determine the extent to which BUP+NAL stimulated hypothalamic pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) neurons in mouse brain. A subsequent study further characterized the effect of combination BUP+NAL treatment on food intake in lean and obese mice. Finally, a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial in obese adult subjects was conducted. Randomization included: BUP (300 mg) + NAL (50 mg), BUP (300 mg) + placebo (P), NAL (50 mg) + P or P+P for up to 24 weeks. BUP+NAL stimulated murine POMC neurons in vitro and caused a greater reduction in acute food intake than either monotherapy, an effect consistent with synergism. Combined BUP+NAL provided sustained weight loss without evidence of an efficacy plateau through 24 weeks of treatment. BUP+NAL completers diverged from NAL+P (P < 0.01) and P+P (P < 0.001) at week 16 and from BUP+P by week 24 (P < 0.05). The combination was also well tolerated. Translational studies indicated that BUP+NAL therapy produced synergistic weight loss which exceeded either BUP or NAL alone. These results supported the hypothesis that NAL, through blockade of beta-endorphin mediated POMC autoinhibition, prevents the classic weight loss plateau observed with monotherapies such as BUP. This novel treatment approach (BUP+NAL) holds promise for the treatment of obesity.\

A naloxonazine sensitive (mu1 receptor) mechanism in the parabrachial nucleus modulates eating

The parabrachial nucleus (PBN) is an area of the brain stem that controls eating and contains endogenous opioids and their receptors. Previously, we demonstrated that acute activation of mu opioid receptors (MOPR) in the lateral PBN increased food consumption. MOPRs have been divided operationally into mu(1) and mu(2) receptor subtypes on the basis of the ability of naloxonazine (Nlxz) to block the former but not the latter. We used autoradiography to measure whether Nlxz blocks stimulation by the mu(1)/mu(2) agonist DAMGO (D-Ala2, N-Me-Phe4, Gly5-ol-enkephalin) of the incorporation of [(35)S]-guanosine 5'(gamma-thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]-GTPgammaS) into sections of the PBN. In vitro, Nlxz dose dependently inhibited receptor coupling in all areas of the PBN. The 1 muM concentration of Nlxz reduced stimulation by 93.1+/-5% in the lateral inferior PBN (LPBNi) and by 90.5+/-4% in the medial parabrachial subregion (MPBN). Administration of Nlxz directly into the LPBNi decreased both food intake and agonist stimulated coupling, ex vivo, for the 24-h period after infusion. Infusion of Nlxz into the intended area reduced food intake by 42.3% below baseline values. Nlxz infusion prevented DAMGO stimulation of G-protein coupling in LPBNi and markedly reduced this stimulation in the MPBN. The incomplete inhibition of DAMGO-stimulated coupling in the MPBN is most likely due to the limited diffusion of Nlxz from the site of infusion (LPBNi) into this brain region. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the mu(1) opioid receptor subtype is present in the parabrachial nucleus of the pons and that these receptors serve to modulate feeding in rats.

The brain, appetite, and obesity

Food intake and energy expenditure are controlled by complex, redundant, and distributed neural systems that reflect the fundamental biological importance of adequate nutrient supply and energy balance. Much progress has been made in identifying the various hormonal and neural mechanisms by which the brain informs itself about availability of ingested and stored nutrients and, in turn, generates behavioral, autonomic, and endocrine output. While hypothalamus and caudal brainstem play crucial roles in this homeostatic function, areas in the cortex and limbic system are important for processing information regarding prior experience with food, reward, and emotion, as well as social and environmental context. Most vertebrates can store a considerable amount of energy as fat for later use, and this ability has now become one of the major health risks for many human populations. The predisposition to develop obesity can theoretically result from any pathological malfunction or lack of adaptation to changing environments of this highly complex system.

Increased adiposity on normal diet, but decreased susceptibility to diet-induced obesity in mu-opioid receptor-deficient mice

The mu-opioid receptor encoded by the Oprm1 gene plays a crucial role in the mediation of food reward and drug-induced positive reinforcement, but its genetic deletion has been shown to provide food intake-independent, partial protection from diet-induced obesity. We hypothesized that mu-opioid receptor-deficient mice would show an even greater, intake-dependent, resistance to high-fat diet-induced obesity if the diet comprises a sweet component. We generated an F2 population by crossing the heterozygous offspring of homozygous female Oprm1(-/-) mice (on a mixed C57BL/6 and BALB/c genetic background) with male inbred C57BL/6 mice. Groups of genotyped wild-type (WT) and homozygous mutant (KO) males and females were fed either control chow or a high caloric palatable diet consisting of sweet, liquid chocolate-flavored Ensure together with a solid high-fat diet. Food intake, body weight, and body composition was measured over a period of 16 weeks. Unexpectedly, male, and to a lesser extent female, KO mice fed chow for the entire period showed progressively increased body weight and adiposity while eating significantly more chow. In contrast, when exposed to the sweet plus high-fat diet, male, and to a lesser extent female, KO mice gained significantly less body weight and fat mass compared to WT mice when using chow fed counterparts for reference values. Male KO mice consumed 33% less of the sweet liquid diet but increased intake of high-fat pellets, so that total calorie intake was not different from WT animals. These results demonstrate a dissociation of the role of mu-opioid receptors in the control of adiposity for different diets and sex. On a bland diet, normal receptor function appears to confer a slightly catabolic predisposition, but on a highly palatable diet, it confers an anabolic metabolic profile, favoring fat accretion. Because of the complexity of mu-opioid gene regulation and tissue distribution, more selective and targeted approaches will be necessary to fully understand the underlying mechanisms.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2006

This paper is the 29th consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, now spanning 30 years of research. It summarizes papers published during 2006 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurological disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration and thermoregulation (Section 16); and immunological responses (Section 17).

Interactions between the "cognitive" and "metabolic" brain in the control of food intake

If the new environment and modern lifestyle cause obesity in individuals with thrifty genes by increasing energy intake, it is important to know by what mechanisms hyperphagia occurs and why energy balance is not kept in check by the homeostatic regulator. The argument is developed that procuring and ingesting food is an evolutionarily conserved survival mechanism that occupies large parts of the brain's computing capacity including not only the hypothalamus but also a number of cortico-limbic structures. These forebrain systems evolved to engage powerful emotions for guaranteed supply and ingestion of beneficial foods from a sparse and often hostile environment. They are now simply overwhelmed with an abundance of food and food cues that is no longer interrupted by frequent famines. After briefly reviewing structure and functions of the relevant cortico-limbic structures and the better-known hypothalamic homeostatic regulator, the review focuses mainly on interactions between the two systems. Although several cortico-limbic processes are sensitive to metabolic depletion and repletion signals, it appears that they are underlying the same reversible leptin resistance that renders hypothalamic circuits insensible to continuously high leptin levels during periods of feast. It is hypothesized that this naturally occurring leptin resistance allowed temporary neutralization of satiety mechanisms and evolved as a response to survive subsequent periods of famine. With today's continuous and abundant food availability for a segment of the population, the powerful cognitive processes to eat and the resulting overweight can partially escape negative feedback control in prone individuals most strongly expressing such thrifty genes.