1
|
Triner D, Daignault-Newton S, Singhal U, Sessine M, Dess RT, Caram MEV, Borza T, Ginsburg KB, Lane BR, Morgan TM. Variation in management of lymph node positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy within a statewide quality improvement consortium. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:220.e1-220.e8. [PMID: 38570271 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with lymph node positive (pN+) disease found at the time of radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer (CaP) are at high risk of disease persistence and progression. Contemporary management trends of pN+ CaP are not well described. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients in the Michigan Urologic Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy between 2012 and 2023 with cN0/pN+ disease were identified. The primary outcome was to evaluate patient and practice-level factors associated with time to secondary post-RP treatment. Secondary outcomes included practice-level variation in management of pN+ CaP and rates of secondary treatment modality. To assess factors associated with secondary treatment, a Cox proportional hazards model of a 60-day landmark analysis was performed. RESULTS We identified 666 patients with pN+ disease. Overall, 66% underwent secondary treatment within 12 months post-RP. About 19% of patients with detectable post-RP PSA did not receive treatment. Of patients receiving secondary treatment after 60-days post-RP, 34% received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone, 27% received radiation (RT) alone, 36% received combination, and 4% received other systemic therapies. In the multivariable model, pathologic grade group (GG)3 (HR 1.5; 95%CI: 1.05-2.14), GG4-5 (HR 1.65; 95%CI: 1.16-2.34), positive margins (HR 1.46; 95%CI: 1.13-1.88), and detectable postoperative PSA ≥0.1 ng/ml (HR 3.46; 95%CI: 2.61-4.59) were significantly associated with secondary post-RP treatment. There was wide variation in adjusted practice-level 12-month secondary treatment utilization (28%-79%). CONCLUSIONS The majority pN+ patients receive treatment within 12 months post-RP which was associated with high-risk pathological features and post-RP PSA. Variation in management of pN+ disease highlights the uncertainty regarding the optimal management. Understanding which patients will benefit from secondary treatment, and which type, will be critical to minimize variation in care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Triner
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | | | - Udit Singhal
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Michael Sessine
- Department of Urology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
| | - Robert T Dess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Megan E V Caram
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Tudor Borza
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Kevin B Ginsburg
- Department of Urology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
| | - Brian R Lane
- Division of Urology, Corewell Health Hospital System, Grand Rapids, MI
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim IE, Wang AH, Corpuz GS, Sprenkle PC, Leapman MS, Brito JM, Renzulli J, Kim IY. Association between pelvic lymph node dissection and survival among patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. Prostate Int 2024; 12:70-78. [PMID: 39036758 PMCID: PMC11255894 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Although the clinical benefits of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at the time of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer remain uncertain, major guidelines recommend PLND based on risk profile. Thus, the objective of this study was to examine the association between PLND and survival among patients undergoing RP stratified by Gleason grade group (GG) with the aim of allowing patients and physicians to make more informed care decisions about the potential risks and benefits of PLND. Materials and methods From the SEER-17 database, we examined overall (OS) and prostate cancer-specific (PCSS) survival of prostate cancer patients who underwent RP from 2010 to 2015 stratified by GG. We applied propensity score matching to balance pre-operative characteristics including race, age, PSA, household income, and housing status (urban/rural) between patients who did and did not undergo PLND for each GG. Statistical analyses included log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves. Results We extracted a matched cohort from 80,287 patients with GG1-5 who underwent RP. The median PSA value was 6.0 ng/mL, and the median age was 62-years-old. 49,453 patients underwent PLND (61.60%), while 30,834 (38.40%) did not. There was no difference in OS and PCSS between patients who received PLND and those who did not for all Gleason GG (OS-GG1: P = 0.20, GG2: P = 0.34, GG3: P > 0.05, GG4: P = 0.55, GG5: P = 0.47; PCSS-GG1: P = 0.11, GG2: P = 0.96, GG3: P = 0.81, GG4: P = 0.22, GG5: P = 0.14). Conclusions In this observational study, PLND at the time of RP was not associated with improved OS or PCSS among patients with cGS of 3 + 3, 3 + 4, 4 + 3, 4 + 4, 4 + 5, and 5 + 4. These findings suggest that until definitive clinical trials are completed, prostate cancer patients who have elected RP should be appropriately counseled on the potential risks and lack of proven survival benefit of PLND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac E. Kim
- Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Aaron H. Wang
- Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | - Preston C. Sprenkle
- Department of Urology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Michael S. Leapman
- Department of Urology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joseph M. Brito
- Department of Urology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joseph Renzulli
- Department of Urology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Isaac Yi Kim
- Department of Urology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shiota M, Takamatsu D, Matsui Y, Yokomizo A, Morizane S, Saito R, Miyake M, Tsutsumi M, Yamamoto Y, Tashiro K, Tomida R, Narita S, Edamura K, Yamaguchi T, Hashimoto K, Kato M, Kasahara T, Yoshino T, Akamatsu S, Kaneko T, Matsukawa A, Matsumoto R, Joraku A, Saito T, Kato T, Kato M, Enokida H, Sakamoto S, Terada N, Kanno H, Nishiyama N, Kimura T, Kitamura H, Eto M. Prognostication in Lymph Node-Positive Prostate Cancer with No PSA Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3872-3879. [PMID: 38353798 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14999-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to create a prognostic model to predict disease recurrence among patients with lymph node involvement but no prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence and to explore its clinical utility. METHODS The study analyzed patients with lymph node involvement after pelvic lymph node dissection with radical prostatectomy in whom no PSA persistence was observed between 2006 and 2019 at 33 institutions. Prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Among 231 patients, 127 experienced disease recurrence. The factors prognostic for RFS were PSA level at diagnosis (≥ 20 vs. < 20 ng/mL: hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-2.52; P = 0.017), International Society of Urological Pathology grade group at radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen (group ≥ 4 vs. ≤ 3: HR, 1.63; 95% CI 1.12-2.37; P = 0.010), pathologic T-stage (pT3b/4 vs. pT2/3a: HR, 1.70; 95% CI 1.20-2.42; P = 0.0031), and surgical margin status (positive vs. negative: HR, 1.60; 95% CI 1.13-2.28; P = 0.0086). The prognostic model using four parameters were associated with RFS and metastasis-free survival. CONCLUSION The prognostic model in combination with postoperative PSA value and number of lymph nodes is clinically useful for discussing treatment choice with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaki Shiota
- Department of Urology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
| | - Dai Takamatsu
- Department of Urology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Matsui
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Yokomizo
- Department of Urology, Harasanshin Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Shuichi Morizane
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Saito
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Makito Miyake
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | | | - Yoshiyuki Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kojiro Tashiro
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryotaro Tomida
- Department of Urology, Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | | | - Kohei Edamura
- Department of Urology, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | | | - Kohei Hashimoto
- Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Masashi Kato
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takashi Kasahara
- Division of Urology, Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | | | | | - Tomoyuki Kaneko
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Kashiwa Hospital, The Jikei University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Ryuji Matsumoto
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Akira Joraku
- Department of Urology, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, Ibaraki Cancer Center, Kasama, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Saito
- Department of Urology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takuma Kato
- Department of Urology, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Manabu Kato
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University, Tsu, Japan
| | - Hideki Enokida
- Department of Urology, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan
| | | | - Naoki Terada
- Department of Urology, Miyazaki University, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Hidenori Kanno
- Department of Urology, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan
| | | | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Masatoshi Eto
- Department of Urology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marra G, Rajwa P, Filippini C, Ploussard G, Montefusco G, Puche-Sanz I, Olivier J, Zattoni F, Moro FD, Magli A, Dariane C, Affentranger A, Grogg JB, Hermanns T, Chiu PK, Malkiewicz B, Kowalczyk K, Van den Bergh RCN, Shariat SF, Bianchi A, Antonelli A, Gallina S, Berchiche W, Sanchez-Salas R, Cathelineau X, Afferi L, Fankhauser CD, Mattei A, Karnes RJ, Scuderi S, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Deandreis D, Gontero P, Gandaglia G. The Prognostic Role of Preoperative PSMA PET/CT in cN0M0 pN+ Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:244-251. [PMID: 38155081 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Despite negative preoperative conventional imaging, up to 10% of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) harbor lymph-node involvement (LNI) at radical prostatectomy (RP). The advent of more accurate imaging modalities such as PET/CT improved the detection of LNI. However, their clinical impact and prognostic value are still unclear. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of preoperative PET/CT in patients node positive (pN+) at RP. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We retrospectively identified cN0M0 patients at conventional imaging (CT and/or MRI, and bone scan) who had pN+ PCa at RP at 17 referral centers. Patients with cN+ at PSMA/Choline PET/CT but cN0M0 at conventional imaging were also included. Systemic progression/recurrence was the primary outcome; Cox proportional hazards models were used for multivariate analysis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We included 1163 pN+ men out of whom 95 and 100 had preoperative PSMA and/or Choline PET/CT, respectively. ISUP grade ≥4 was detected in 66.6%. Overall, 42% of patients had postoperative PSA persistence (≥0.1 ng/mL). Postoperative management included initial observation (34%), ADT (22.7%) and adjuvant RT+/-ADT (42.8%). Median follow-up was 42 months. Patients with cN+ on PSMA PET/CT had an increased risk of systemic progression (52.9% vs. 13.6% cN0 PSMA PET/CT vs. 21.5% cN0 at conventional imaging; P < .01). This held true at multivariable analysis: (HR 6.184, 95% CI: 3.386-11-295; P < .001) whilst no significant results were highlighted for Choline PET/CT. No significant associations for both PET types were found for local progression, BCR, and overall mortality (all P > .05). Observation as an initial management strategy instead of adjuvant treatments was related with an increased risk of metastases (HR 1.808; 95% CI: 1.069-3.058; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS PSMA PET/CT cN+ patients with negative conventional imaging have an increased risk of systemic progression after RP compared to their counterparts with cN0M0 disease both at conventional and/or molecular imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Marra
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Claudia Filippini
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Gabriele Montefusco
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Ignacio Puche-Sanz
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
| | | | - Fabio Zattoni
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandro Magli
- Dipartimento di Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale Santa Maria della misericordia, Udine, Italia
| | - Charles Dariane
- Department of Urology, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Peter K Chiu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Bartosz Malkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Kamil Kowalczyk
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - William Berchiche
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Rafael Sanchez-Salas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Simone Scuderi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Désirée Deandreis
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Berchiche W, Long Depaquit T, Baboudjian M, Barret É, Rozet F, Cathelineau X, Bastide C. Mid-term oncologic outcomes of radical prostatectomy in lymph node metastatic prostate cancer patients. Prog Urol 2023:S1166-7087(23)00090-8. [PMID: 37248105 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2023.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Lymph node invasion (LNI) has been reported in 10-15% of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy (RP). The objective of this study was to describe the mid-term oncological outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with metastatic lymph node. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study at two French referral centers including consecutive cN0 PCa patients who underwent RP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection and had lymph node metastases on final pathological analysis (pN1) between January 2000 and May 2020. Follow-up was per institution, which generally included a PSA level measurement every 3 to 12 months for 5 years and annually thereafter. RESULTS A total of 123 patients were included: two (1.6%) low-risk, 64 (52%) intermediate-risk and 57 (46.4%) high-risk PCa according to the D'Amico risk classification. The median number of nodes removed and metastatic nodes per patient was 15 (IQR 11-22) and 1 (IQR 1-2), respectively. Adverse pathological features, i.e., ≥pT3a stage, ISUP grade ≥3, and positive surgical margins were reported in 113 (91.9%), 103 (83.7%), and 73 (59%) of cases, respectively. Postoperative treatment was administered in 104 patients, including radiotherapy alone (n=6), androgen deprivation therapy alone (n=27) or combination with androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy (n=71). The mean follow-up was 42.7 months. The estimated 3-year biochemical-free survival, clinical recurrence-free survival, and cancer-specific survival was 66% and 85% and 98.8%, respectively. In Cox regression analysis, the number of metastatic nodes was associated with clinical recurrence (P=0.04) and a persistently elevated PSA with biochemical recurrence (P<0.001). CONCLUSION The management of lymph node metastatic PCa patients is challenging. Risk stratification of node-positive patients, based on postoperative PSA levels and pathologic features being identified, should help physicians determine which patient would best benefit from multimodal treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Berchiche
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, France.
| | - T Long Depaquit
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - M Baboudjian
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, France; Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Hôpital de la Conception, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - É Barret
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - F Rozet
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - X Cathelineau
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - C Bastide
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Doan P, Katelaris A, Scheltema MJ, Hayen A, Amin A, Siriwardana A, Tran M, Geboers B, Gondoputro W, Haynes AM, Matthews J, Delprado W, Stricker PD, Thompson J. The relationship between biochemical recurrence and number of lymph nodes removed during surgery for localized prostate cancer. BMC Urol 2023; 23:68. [PMID: 37118731 PMCID: PMC10148506 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01228-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess whether completeness of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) as measured by lymph node yield reduces biochemical recurrence (BCR) in men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa), stratified according to Briganti nomogram-derived risk (≥5% vs. < 5%) of lymph node invasion (LNI). METHODS Retrospective study of 3724 men who underwent RP between January 1995 and January 2015 from our prospectively collected institutional database. All men included had minimum five years follow-up and were not given androgen deprivation therapy or radiotherapy prior to BCR. Primary endpoint was time to BCR as defined by PSA > 0.2ng/ml. Patients were analysed according to Briganti Nomogram derived risk of 'low-risk' (< 5%) vs. 'high-risk' (≥ 5%). Extent of PLND was analysed using number of nodes yielded at dissection as a continuous variable as well as a categorical variable: Group 1 (limited, 1-4 nodes), Group 2 (intermediate, 5-8 nodes) and Group 3(extensive, ≥9 nodes). RESULTS Median follow-up in the overall cohort was 79.7 months and 65% of the total cohort underwent PLND. There were 2402 patients with Briganti risk of LNI < 5% and 1322 with a Briganti risk of LNI ≥5%. At multivariate analysis, only PSA (HR1.01, p < 0.001), extracapsular extension at RP (HR 1.86, p < 0.001), positive surgical margin (HR 1.61, p < 0.001) and positive lymph node on pathology (HR 1.52, p = 0.02) were independently associated with BCR. In the high-risk group, increased nodal yield at PLND was associated with reduction in risk of BCR (HR 0.97, 95%CI 0.95-1.00 p = 0.05, Cochran Mantel Haenszel test, p < 0.05: respectively). In the low-risk group increased number of nodes at PLND did not reduce risk of BCR. CONCLUSIONS In this study of extent of PLND at RP, higher nodal yield did not reduce risk of BCR in low-risk men (Briganti risk < 5%), however there was a weak benefit in terms of reduced long-term risk of BCR in high-risk men (Briganti risk ≥5%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Doan
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Department of Urology, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, 384 Victoria St, 2010, NSW, Australia.
| | - Athos Katelaris
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Department of Urology, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, 384 Victoria St, 2010, NSW, Australia
| | - Matthijs J Scheltema
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Department of Urology, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, 384 Victoria St, 2010, NSW, Australia
- Departments of Urology and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andrew Hayen
- Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Amer Amin
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Department of Urology, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, 384 Victoria St, 2010, NSW, Australia
| | - Amila Siriwardana
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Department of Urology, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, 384 Victoria St, 2010, NSW, Australia
| | - Minh Tran
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Department of Urology, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bart Geboers
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Department of Urology, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, 384 Victoria St, 2010, NSW, Australia
- Departments of Urology and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - William Gondoputro
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Department of Urology, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, 384 Victoria St, 2010, NSW, Australia
| | - Anne Maree Haynes
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, 384 Victoria St, 2010, NSW, Australia
| | - Jayne Matthews
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Department of Urology, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Phillip D Stricker
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Department of Urology, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - James Thompson
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Department of Urology, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, 384 Victoria St, 2010, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meijer D, Ettema RH, van Leeuwen PJ, van der Kwast TH, van der Poel HG, Donswijk ML, Oprea-Lager DE, Bekers EM, Vis AN. The prognostic value of lymph node staging with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection in node-positive patients with prostate cancer. BJU Int 2023; 131:330-338. [PMID: 36069585 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate whether patients with suspected pelvic lymph node metastases (molecular imaging [mi] N1) on staging prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) had a different oncological outcome compared to those in whom the PSMA PET/CT did not reveal any pelvic lymph node metastases (miN0). PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients with pelvic lymph node metastatic (pN1) disease after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) between January 2017 and December 2020 were included. To assess predictors of biochemical progression of disease after RARP, a multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed, including number of tumour-positive lymph nodes, diameter of the largest nodal metastasis, and extranodal extension. RESULTS In total, 145 patients were diagnosed with pN1 disease after ePLND. The median biochemical progression-free survival in patients with miN0 on PSMA PET/CT was 13.7 months, compared to 7.9 months in patients with miN1 disease (P = 0.006). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, both number of tumour-positive lymph nodes (>2 vs 1-2: hazard ratio [HR] 1.97; P = 0.005) and diameter of the largest nodal metastasis (HR 1.12; P < 0.001) were significant independent predictors of biochemical progression of disease. CONCLUSION Patients in whom pelvic lymph node metastases were suspected on preoperative PSMA imaging (miN1), patients diagnosed with >2 tumour-positive lymph nodes, and patients with a larger diameter of the largest nodal metastasis had a significantly increased risk of biochemical disease progression after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennie Meijer
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rosemarijn H Ettema
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten L Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elise M Bekers
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N Vis
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The Changing Face of cN0M0 Prostate Cancer Being Found With pN+ After Surgery in the Contemporary Era: Results of an International European Survey on Disease Management. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 21:416.e1-416.e10. [PMID: 36609130 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The urological community's opinion over the management of men being found with pathologically positive nodes (pN+) following radical prostatectomy (RP) performed with curative intent after preoperative negative conventional staging (cN0M0) has never been assessed. This remains crucial, especially considering the advent of novel imaging modalities. Our aim was to investigate the current opinion on management of pN+ cN0M0 prostate cancer (PCa) in the European urological community. METHODS Following validation, a 31-item survey, complying with the Cherries checklist, was distributed using a web link from December 2021 to April 2022 to 10 urological societies mailing list. Social media (Twitter, Facebook) were also used. RESULTS We received 253 replies. The majority were Urologists (96.8%), younger than 60 (90.5%); 5.2% did not have access to PET-scans; 78.9% believed pN+ is a multifaceted category; 10-years CSS was marked as 71 to 95% by 17.5%. Gold standard management was stated not being ADT by 80.8% and being RT±ADT by 52.3%. Early sRT±ADT was considered an option vs. aRT±ADT by 72.4%. In case of BCR 71% would perform and decide management based on PSMA-PET whilst 3.7% would not perform PSMA-PET. pN+ management is still unclear for 77.1%. On multivariate analysis PSMA-PET availability related to a lower and higher likelihood of considering aRT±ADT as standard and of considering early salvage versus aRT respectively (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS The Urological community has an acceptable awareness of pN+ disease and management, although it may overestimate disease aggressiveness. The majority consider pN+ PCa as a multifaceted category and rely on a risk-adapted approach. Expectant compared to immediate upfront management and new imaging modalities are increasingly considered.
Collapse
|
9
|
Rocco B, Eissa A, Gaia G, Assumma S, Sarchi L, Bozzini G, Micali S, Calcagnile T, Sighinolfi MC. Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate and bladder cancers. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2022; 74:680-694. [PMID: 36197698 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.22.04904-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer and bladder cancer accounts for approximately 13.5% and 3% of all male cancers and all newly diagnosed cancers (regardless sex), respectively. Thus, these cancers represent a major health and economic burden globally. The knowledge of lymph node status is an integral part of the management of any solid tumor. In the urological field, pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is of paramount importance in the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of prostate and bladder cancers. However, PLND may be associated with several comorbidities. In this narrative review, the most recent updates concerning the patterns and incidence of lymph node metastasis, the role of different imaging studies and nomograms in determining patients' eligibility for PLND, and the anatomical templates of PLND in urologic patients with bladder or prostate cancer will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernardo Rocco
- Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Ahmed Eissa
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt -
| | - Giorgia Gaia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Assumma
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Luca Sarchi
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Salvatore Micali
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Tommaso Calcagnile
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Maria C Sighinolfi
- Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Extent of pelvic lymph node dissection improves early oncological outcomes for patients with high-risk prostate cancer without lymph node involvement after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 2022; 27:781-789. [DOI: 10.1007/s10147-022-02121-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
11
|
Laine C, Gandaglia G, Valerio M, Heidegger I, Tsaur I, Olivier J, Ceci F, van den Bergh RCN, Kretschmer A, Thibault C, Chiu PK, Tilki D, Kasivisvanathan V, Preisser F, Zattoni F, Fankhauser C, Kesch C, Puche-Sanz I, Moschini M, Pradere B, Ploussard G, Marra G. Features and management of men with pN1 cM0 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy: a systematic review of population-based evidence. Curr Opin Urol 2022; 32:69-84. [PMID: 34812201 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To investigate the features and optimal management of pN+ cM0 prostate cancer (PCa) according to registry-based studies. RECENT FINDINGS Up to 15% of PCa patients harbor lymph node invasion (pN+) at radical prostatectomy plus lymph node dissection. Nonetheless, the optimal management strategy in this setting is not well characterized. SUMMARY We performed a systematic review including n = 13 studies. Management strategies comprised 13 536 men undergoing observation, 11 149 adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (aADT), 7,075 adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) +aADT and 705 aRT. Baseline features showed aggressive PCa in the majority of men. At a median follow-up ranging 48-134months, Cancer-related death was 5% and overall-mortality 16.6%. aADT and aRT alone had no cancer-specific survival or overall survival advantages over observation only and over not performing aRT, respectively. aADT plus aRT yielded a survival benefit compared to observation and aADT, which in one study, were limited to certain intermediate-risk categories. Age, Gleason, Charlson score, positive surgical margins, pathological stage, and positive nodes number, but not prostate specific antigen, were most relevant prognostic factors. Our work further confirmed pN+ PCa is a multifaceted disease and will help future research in defining its optimal management based on different risk categories to maximize survival and patient's quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Laine
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Isabel Heidegger
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Igor Tsaur
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Mainz University Medicine, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Francesco Ceci
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Constance Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Peter K Chiu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Derya Tilki
- Department of Urology, Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Felix Preisser
- Department of Urology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Urology Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Claudia Kesch
- West German Cancer Center; Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ignacio Puche-Sanz
- Department of Urology, Bio-Health Research Institute, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, University of Granada Granada, Spain
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Toulouse, France and Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Department of Urology and Clinical Research Group on Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in comparison to positive lymph node count in penile squamous cell carcinoma. Int Urol Nephrol 2021; 53:2527-2540. [PMID: 34585313 PMCID: PMC8599252 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-021-02996-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Penile cancer is a rare male neoplasm with a wide variation in its global incidence. In this study, the prognostic value of lymph node ratio (LNR) was compared to that of positive lymph node count (PLNC) in penile squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS A total of 249 patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled from The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015. The X-tile program was used to calculate the optimal cut-off values of LNR and PLNC that discriminate survival. We used the χ2 or the Fisher exact probability test to assess the association between clinical-pathological characteristics and LNR or PLNC. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors for survival. Spearman correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation between LNR and PLNC. RESULTS We found that patients with high LNR tended to have advanced N stage, the 7th AJCC stage, and higher pathological grade, while patients with high PLNC had advanced N stage and the 7th AJCC stage. Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the N stage, M stage, the 7th AJCC stage, lymph-vascular invasion, LNR, and PLNC were significantly associated with prognosis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that LNR rather than PLNC was an independent prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival. Subgroup analysis of node-positive patients showed that LNR was associated with CSS, while PLNC was not. CONCLUSION LNR was a better predictor for long-term prognosis than PLNC in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hu JC, Wang SS, Chou YE, Chiu KY, Li JR, Chen CS, Hung SC, Yang CK, Ou YC, Cheng CL, Lin CY, Yang SF. Associations between LncRNA MALAT1 Polymorphisms and Lymph Node Metastasis in Prostate Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11091692. [PMID: 34574033 PMCID: PMC8468695 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11091692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Current evidence elucidates that long noncoding RNA metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) could regulate genetic expression and play a crucial role in both the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of MALAT1 could alter the oncogenesis in various cancers. However, the associations between MALAT1 SNPs and prostate cancer have barely been investigated to date. This study included 579 patients with prostate cancer who received robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy at Taichung Veterans General Hospital from 2012 to 2017. Three SNPs of MALAT1 were analyzed to identify the impacts of SNPs on the clinicopathologic features in Taiwanese prostate cancer. Our results show that patients with a polymorphic G allele at rs619586 had a significantly higher risk of being in an advanced Gleason grade group (AOR: 1.764; 95% CI: 1.011–3.077; p = 0.046). Moreover, individuals with at least one polymorphic A allele at MALAT1 rs1194338 in the PSA >10 ng/mL group were positively associated with node-positive prostate cancer. In conclusion, MALAT1 SNPs are significantly associated with the susceptibility to both advanced Gleason grade and nodal metastasis in prostate cancer. The presence of MALAT1 SNPs rs619586 and rs1194338 seems to enhance oncogenesis in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ju-Chuan Hu
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan; (J.-C.H.); (S.-S.W.); (Y.-E.C.); (J.-R.L.); (C.-S.C.); (S.-C.H.); (Y.-C.O.); (C.-L.C.)
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan; (K.-Y.C.); (C.-K.Y.)
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chiayi Branch, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Chiayi 600, Taiwan
| | - Shian-Shiang Wang
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan; (J.-C.H.); (S.-S.W.); (Y.-E.C.); (J.-R.L.); (C.-S.C.); (S.-C.H.); (Y.-C.O.); (C.-L.C.)
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan; (K.-Y.C.); (C.-K.Y.)
- Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi Nan University, Nantou 545, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Erh Chou
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan; (J.-C.H.); (S.-S.W.); (Y.-E.C.); (J.-R.L.); (C.-S.C.); (S.-C.H.); (Y.-C.O.); (C.-L.C.)
- School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 402, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Yuan Chiu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan; (K.-Y.C.); (C.-K.Y.)
- Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi Nan University, Nantou 545, Taiwan
| | - Jian-Ri Li
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan; (J.-C.H.); (S.-S.W.); (Y.-E.C.); (J.-R.L.); (C.-S.C.); (S.-C.H.); (Y.-C.O.); (C.-L.C.)
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan; (K.-Y.C.); (C.-K.Y.)
- Department of Medicine and Nursing, Hung Kuang University, Taichung 433, Taiwan
| | - Chuan-Shu Chen
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan; (J.-C.H.); (S.-S.W.); (Y.-E.C.); (J.-R.L.); (C.-S.C.); (S.-C.H.); (Y.-C.O.); (C.-L.C.)
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan; (K.-Y.C.); (C.-K.Y.)
| | - Sheng-Chun Hung
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan; (J.-C.H.); (S.-S.W.); (Y.-E.C.); (J.-R.L.); (C.-S.C.); (S.-C.H.); (Y.-C.O.); (C.-L.C.)
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan; (K.-Y.C.); (C.-K.Y.)
| | - Cheng-Kuang Yang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan; (K.-Y.C.); (C.-K.Y.)
| | - Yen-Chuan Ou
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan; (J.-C.H.); (S.-S.W.); (Y.-E.C.); (J.-R.L.); (C.-S.C.); (S.-C.H.); (Y.-C.O.); (C.-L.C.)
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan; (K.-Y.C.); (C.-K.Y.)
- Department of Urology, Tung’s Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung 433, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Li Cheng
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan; (J.-C.H.); (S.-S.W.); (Y.-E.C.); (J.-R.L.); (C.-S.C.); (S.-C.H.); (Y.-C.O.); (C.-L.C.)
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan; (K.-Y.C.); (C.-K.Y.)
| | - Chia-Yen Lin
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan; (J.-C.H.); (S.-S.W.); (Y.-E.C.); (J.-R.L.); (C.-S.C.); (S.-C.H.); (Y.-C.O.); (C.-L.C.)
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan; (K.-Y.C.); (C.-K.Y.)
- Correspondence: (C.-Y.L.); (S.-F.Y.)
| | - Shun-Fa Yang
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan; (J.-C.H.); (S.-S.W.); (Y.-E.C.); (J.-R.L.); (C.-S.C.); (S.-C.H.); (Y.-C.O.); (C.-L.C.)
- Department of Medical Research, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 402, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (C.-Y.L.); (S.-F.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
İzol V, Akdoğan N, Özen H, Akdoğan B, Kural AR, Tuna MB, Sözen S, Türkeri L, Tansuğ MZ. The effect of risk factors on surgical and oncological results in high-risk prostate cancer: A multicentre study of the urooncology society, Turkey. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75:e14281. [PMID: 33914398 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.14281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of risk factors and selected surgical methods on operative and oncological results of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC). METHODS Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent RP for HRPC from 13 urology centres between 1990 and 2019 was performed. Groups were created according to the risk factors of D'Amico classification. Patients with one risk factor were included in group 1 where group 2 consisted of patients with two or three risk factors. RESULTS A total of 1519 patients were included in this study and 1073 (70.6%) patients were assigned to group 1 and 446 (29.4%) patients to group 2. Overall (biochemical and/or clinical and/or radiological) progression rate was 12.4% in group 1 and 26.5% in group 2 (P = .001). Surgical procedure was open RP in 844 (55.6%) patients and minimally invasive RP in 675 (44.4%) patients (laparoscopic and robot-assisted RP in 230 (15.1%) and 445 (29.3%) patients, respectively). Progression rates were similar in different types of operations (P = .22). Progression rate was not significantly different in patients who either underwent pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) or not in each respective group. CONCLUSION RP alone is an effective treatment in the majority of patients with HRPC and PLND did not affect the progression rates after RP. According to the number of pre-operative high-risk features, as the number of risk factors increases, there is a need for additional treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volkan İzol
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Nebil Akdoğan
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Haluk Özen
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bülent Akdoğan
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ali Rıza Kural
- Department of Urology, Acibadem Maslak Hospital, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Bilal Tuna
- Department of Urology, Acibadem Maslak Hospital, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sinan Sözen
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Levent Türkeri
- Department of Urology, Altunizade Hospital, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Würnschimmel C, Wenzel M, Wang N, Tian Z, Karakiewicz PI, Graefen M, Huland H, Tilki D. Radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: 20-year oncological outcomes from a German high-volume center. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:830.e17-830.e26. [PMID: 34092484 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.04.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Long-term outcomes of prostate cancer (CaP) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) from European cohorts are under-reported. We report on 22,843 RP patients from the Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Centre treated between 1992 and 2017. PATIENTS AND METHODS Biochemical recurrence (BCR) free survival, metastasis free survival (MFS), and cancer specific survival (CSS) were stratified according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk categories, pT, and pN stages, RP Gleason Grade Groups (GGG), and surgical margin status (R0/R1). For time to event analyses, uni- and multivariable Cox's proportional hazards models and univariable Kaplan-Meier analyses were applied. RESULTS Median follow up was 68 months. Most favourable 20-year survival rates were exhibited in NCCN low risk (78.7% BCR-free, 96.8% MFS, 90.1% CSS) and pT2, GGG 1 to 2, R0 patients (83.1% BCR-free, 96.7% MFS, 92.6% CSS). 20-year follow up was not constantly reached in patients with aggressive CaP features. For example, NCCN very high-risk patients exhibited 15-year BCR-free survival of 30.5%, while 20-year MFS and CSS in these individuals was reached (64.1% and 60.8%, respectively). Lowest 10-year BCR-free survival (35.6%) was exhibited in pT3b, GGG 4 to 5, R0. Lowest 10-year MFS (49.5%) was exhibited in pT2, GGG 4 to 5, R1. Lowest 10-year CSS (69.8%) was exhibited in pT3b, GGG 4 to 5, R1 patients. In separate pN1 analyses, lowest 10-year BCR-free survival (14.5%), MFS (56.9%), and CSS (71.9%) were exhibited in patients with 3 or more positive lymph nodes. CONCLUSION Oncological outcomes after RP can be excellent for individuals with favorable CaP characteristics, also after 20 years of follow up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Würnschimmel
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada.
| | - Mike Wenzel
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nuowei Wang
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hartwig Huland
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Oncological outcomes of pathologically organ-confined, lymph node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2020; 39:234.e1-234.e7. [PMID: 33097398 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 09/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of lymph-node involvement on oncological outcomes in patients with pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer (pT2 CaP) after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 9,631 pT2 CaP patients who underwent RP at a single institution between 1998 and 2018. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression models (CRMs) assessed biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival and metastasis-free survival (MFS) according to N-stage. In subgroup analyses of N1 patients, Kaplan-Meier plots and CRMs were stratified according to adjuvant treatment. RESULTS Of 9,631 pT2 staged patients, 241 (2.5%) harbored lymph-node metastases after RP (pN1). The median follow-up was 60.8 months. No pT2 N1-staged patient died due to CaP. The 5-year BCR-free survival rates were 54.7 vs. 88.4% in pT2 N1 vs. pT2 N0 patients, respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year MFS rates were 92.5 vs. 98.9% in pT2 N1 vs. pT2 N0 patients, respectively (P < 0.001). Within pT2 N1 patients, presence of ≥3 positive lymph nodes was an independent risk factor for BCR (hazard ratio [HR] 3.4, P < 0.001) and for metastatic progression (HR 1.7, P = 0.04). Finally, 3-year BCR-free survival was improved in pT2 N1 patients treated with adjuvant radiation therapy (87.1% vs. 63.7% for patients who received other treatment options [P < 0.001]). CONCLUSION Patients with pathologically organ-confined but lymph node-positive CaP exhibited favorable oncological outcomes after RP. Presence of ≥3 positive LNs predicted higher rates of BCR and metastatic progression. In consequence, in pT2 N1 patients treated with RP with ≥3 positive LNs, adjuvant treatment may be considered.9.
Collapse
|
17
|
Marra G, Valerio M, Heidegger I, Tsaur I, Mathieu R, Ceci F, Ploussard G, van den Bergh RCN, Kretschmer A, Thibault C, Ost P, Tilki D, Kasivisvanathan V, Moschini M, Sanchez-Salas R, Gontero P, Karnes RJ, Montorsi F, Gandaglia G. Management of Patients with Node-positive Prostate Cancer at Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2020; 3:565-581. [PMID: 32933887 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Optimal management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients with lymph node invasion at radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection still remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of postoperative treatment strategies for pathologically node-positive PCa patients. The secondary aim was to identify the most relevant prognostic factors to guide the management of pN1 patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review was performed in January 2020 using Medline, Embase, and other databases. A total of 5063 articles were screened, and 26 studies including 12 537 men were selected for data synthesis and included in the current review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Ten-year biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free, clinical recurrence-free, cancer-specific (CSS), and overall (OS) survival rates ranged from 28% to 56%, 70% to 92%, 72% to 98%, and 60% to 87.6%, respectively. A total of seven, five, and six studies assessed the oncological outcomes of observation, adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT), or adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), respectively. Initial observation followed by salvage therapies at the time of recurrence represents a safe option in selected patients with a low disease burden. The use of aRT with or without ADT might improve survival in men with locally advanced disease and a higher number of positive nodes. Risk stratification according to pathological Gleason score, number of positive nodes, pathological stage, and surgical margins status is the key to risk stratification and selection of the optimal postoperative therapy. Limitations of this systematic review are the retrospective design of the studies included and the lack of data on adverse events. CONCLUSIONS While the majority of men with pN1 disease would experience BCR after surgery, long-term disease-free survival has been reported in selected patients. Management options to improve oncological outcomes include observation versus adjuvant therapies such as aRT and/or ADT. Disease characteristics should be used to select the optimal postoperative management for pN1 PCa patients. PATIENT SUMMARY Finding node-positive prostate cancer after a radical prostatectomy often leads to high postoperative prostate-specific antigen levels and is overall a poor prognostic factor. However, this does not necessarily translate into poor survival for all men. Management can be tailored to the severity of disease and options include observation, androgen deprivation therapy, and/or radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| | | | - Isabel Heidegger
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Igor Tsaur
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Mainz University Medicine, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Francesco Ceci
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Toulouse, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | - Constance Thibault
- Department of Oncology, Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kamel MG, Istanbuly S, Abd-Elhay FAE, Mohamed MYF, Huu-Hoai L, Sadik M, Dibas M, Huy NT. Examined and Positive Lymph Node Counts Are Associated with Mortality in Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis. Urol Int 2020; 104:699-709. [PMID: 32268338 DOI: 10.1159/000505410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PCa) is the third leading cause of death from cancer in the United States. We aimed to disclose the prognostic values of examined (dissected) lymph node (ELN), negative lymph node (NLN), and positive (metastatic) lymph node (PLN) counts and lymph node (LNs) ratio in PCa patients. METHODS We extracted data of PCa patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. We included patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis having at least one ELN and with the PCa as the primary tumor only. RESULTS We have included 96,064 patients. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression modelsdisclosed that patients having more ELNs were associated with better survival. However, we demonstrated that patients having more PLNs were associated with worse survival. Additionally, older age, unmarried patients, with Gleason's score of 8-10, T4 and M1 stages and those who received chemotherapy and/or radiation but did not receive surgery were significantly associated with worse PCa survival. CONCLUSIONS We have disclosed several independent predictors affecting PCa patients including age, marital status, Gleason's score, T and N stages, having received therapy, surgery, and ELN and PLN counts. Moreover, we demonstrated that patients with lower ELN and higher PLN counts were a high-risk group. We strongly recommend adding the ELN and/or PLN counts into consideration during patient staging/treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Gomaa Kamel
- Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.,Online Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Sedralmontaha Istanbuly
- Online Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo, Aleppo, Syrian Arab Republic
| | | | | | - Le Huu-Hoai
- Online Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan.,Saigon General Hospital, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
| | - Mohamed Sadik
- Online Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan.,Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mahmoud Dibas
- Online Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan.,Sulaiman Al Rajhi Colleges, Al Bukayriya, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nguyen Tien Huy
- Department of Clinical Product Development, Institute of Tropical Medicine (NEKKEN), School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan, .,Evidence Based Medicine Research Group & Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam,
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Guo L, Zhu Z, Zhang X. Adding radiotherapy to androgen deprivation therapy in men with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e19153. [PMID: 32150055 PMCID: PMC7478562 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000019153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies have tested the addition of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in node-positive prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP). This meta-analysis aims to assess the effects of adding RT to ADT in the treatment of PCa patients with lymph node invasion. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed and Embase through June 2018 for human studies comparing RT plus ADT versus ADT in men with node-positive PCa after RP. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end point was cancer-specific survival (CSS). Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the effects of RT plus ADT on OS and CSS were combined across studies using meta-analysis. RESULTS Five studies were selected for inclusion. Overall, 15,524 patients were enrolled in the 5 studies. This included 6309 (40.6%) patients receiving ADT, 4389 (28.3%) patients receiving adjuvant RT plus ADT, and 4826 (31.1%) patients receiving observation. In lymph node-positive PCa patients, the addition of adjuvant RT was associated with improved OS (HR: 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59-0.92; P = .008). Moreover, the addition of adjuvant RT was also associated with a dramatic CSS improvement (HR: 0.40; 95% CI, 0.27-0.59; P = .000). CONCLUSIONS Adding RT to ADT may be a clinically effective treatment option for men with lymph node-positive PCa after RP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lijuan Guo
- Department of Disease Prevention and Control
| | - Zhaowei Zhu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, PR China
| | - Xuepei Zhang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Onol FF, Bhat S, Moschovas M, Rogers T, Albala D, Patel V. The ongoing dilemma in pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy: who should decide and in which patients? J Robot Surg 2020; 14:549-558. [DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-01041-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
21
|
Maurer T, Graefen M, van der Poel H, Hamdy F, Briganti A, Eiber M, Wester HJ, van Leeuwen FW. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen–Guided Surgery. J Nucl Med 2019; 61:6-12. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.232330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
|
22
|
The Impact of Lymph Node Metastases Burden at Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus 2019; 5:399-406. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2017] [Revised: 12/08/2017] [Accepted: 12/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
23
|
Preisser F, Nazzani S, Bandini M, Marchioni M, Tian Z, Montorsi F, Saad F, Briganti A, Steuber T, Budäus L, Huland H, Graefen M, Tilki D, Karakiewicz PI. Increasing rate of lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection. Urol Oncol 2018; 36:365.e1-365.e7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2018] [Revised: 04/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
24
|
Preisser F, Bandini M, Marchioni M, Nazzani S, Tian Z, Pompe RS, Fossati N, Briganti A, Saad F, Shariat SF, Heinzer H, Huland H, Graefen M, Tilki D, Karakiewicz PI. Extent of lymph node dissection improves survival in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy without lymph node invasion. Prostate 2018; 78:469-475. [PMID: 29460290 DOI: 10.1002/pros.23491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2017] [Accepted: 01/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effect of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) extent on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients without lymph node invasion (LNI) treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End results (SEER) database (2004-2014), we identified patients with D'Amico intermediate- or high-risk characteristics who underwent RP with PLND, without evidence of LNI. First, multivariable logistic regression models tested for predictors of more extensive PLND, defined as removed lymph node count (NRN) ≥75th percentile. Second, Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariable Cox regression models tested the effect of NRN ≥75th percentile on CSM. Finally, survival analyses were repeated using continuously coded NRN. RESULTS In 28 147 RP and PLND patients without LNI, 67.3% versus 32.7% exhibited D'Amico intermediate- or high-risk characteristics. The median NRN was 6 (IQR 3-10), the 75th percentile defined patients with NRN ≥11. Patients with NRN ≥11 had higher rate of cT2/3 stage (29.8 vs 26.1%), GS ≥8 (25.7 vs 22.4%), and respectively more frequently exhibited D'Amico high-risk characteristics (34.6 vs 32.1%). In multivariable logistic regression models predicting the probability of more extensive PLND (NRN ≥11), higher biopsy GS, higher cT stage, higher PSA, more recent year of diagnosis, and younger age at diagnosis represented independent predictors. At 72 months after RP, CSM-free rates were 99.5 versus 98.1% for NRN ≥11 and NRN ≤10, respectively and resulted in a HR of 0.50 (P = 0.01), after adjustment for all covariates. Similarly, continuously coded NRN achieved independent predictor status (HR: 0.955, P = 0.01), where each additional removed lymph node reduced CSM risk by 4.5%. CONCLUSION More extensive PLND at RP provides improved staging information and consequently is associated with lower CSM in D'Amico intermediate- and high-risk PCa patients without evidence of LNI. Hence, more extensive PLND should be recommended in such individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Preisser
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marco Bandini
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Urology, SS Annunziata Hospital, "G.D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Nazzani
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Academic Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Raisa S Pompe
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Hans Heinzer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hartwig Huland
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Long-term oncological outcomes in patients with limited nodal disease undergoing radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection without adjuvant treatment. World J Urol 2017; 35:1833-1839. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2079-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2017] [Accepted: 08/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
26
|
Yossepowitch O. Curing Lymph Node Metastasis in Prostate Cancer: The Ongoing Battle Between Improving Surgical Quality and Tumor Biology. Eur Urol Focus 2017; 3:256-257. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2016] [Accepted: 04/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|