Interim Results from the IMPACT Study: Evidence for Prostate-specific Antigen Screening in BRCA2 Mutation Carriers

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Biopsy Strategies in Prostate Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Prostate cancer (PCa) screening using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) thresholding and systematic biopsies reduces advanced disease presentations and cancer-specific mortality, but also leads to overdiagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) integration may maintain screening benefits, while reducing overdiagnosis and unnecessary biopsies. This review analyses the benefit-harm balance when MRI is integrated as first-line and second-stage (after PSA >3 ng/ml) test in PCa screening.

METHODS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed a PROSPERO-registered systematic review (CRD420251006926). Literature searches identified five first-line and four second-stage MRI screening studies. We assessed MRI strategies (first-line/second-stage and risk thresholds), biopsy avoidance, and biopsy methods (targeted/systematic) for histological outcomes (grade group [GG] ≥2/GG 1 cancer detection and benign biopsies). Benefit-to-harm ratios of >1 suggest a positive net benefit.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

First-line MRI screening detects twice as many men with GG ≥2 cancer as second-stage MRI screening but has more MRI-negative men (range, 66-89% vs 56-61%). Second-stage MRI significantly reduced biopsy rates (range, 42-79%) compared with systematic biopsy rates in all PSA-positive men. Subsequently, GG ≥2/GG 1 cancer detection ratios increased in MRI-positive men undergoing targeted and systematic biopsies (range, 1.9-6.2) and targeted biopsies alone (range, 1.8-7.0), compared with systematic biopsies alone (range, 0.8-1.4). First-line and second-stage MRI screening allowed biopsy avoidance in three to 125 and two to 15 men, respectively, for each benign diagnosis. All benefit-to-harm ratios showed positive net benefits (>1). Heterogeneity in the study protocols limits generalisability.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Targeted biopsies in second-stage MRI screening optimise clinically significant PCa detection, while reducing the number of biopsies. First-line MRI screening requires further assessments of its feasibility. PCa screening quality assurance requires standardised MRI interpretations and biopsy protocols.

Optimizing Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Work-Up Through Micro-Ultrasound: Minimizing Unnecessary Procedures and Reducing Overdiagnoses

INTRODUCTION

We aim to critically assess Microultrasound (mUS) clinical performance in an outpatient setting, focusing on its ability to reduce unnecessary diagnostic procedures, potentially reshape prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostic protocols, and increase the ability to rule out clinically significant (Gleason Score ≥ 3 + 4) PCa (csPCa).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between November 2018 and April 2022, we conducted a prospective study involving men who underwent mUS examination due to clinical symptoms, PSA elevation, or opportunistic early detection of PCa. Experienced urologists performed mUS assessments in an outpatient setting using the prostate risk identification using micro-ultrasound (PRI-MUS) protocol to identify lesions suspicious of csPCa (PRI-MUS score ≥ 3). Men with negative mUS results were followed through consistent phone follow-up calls and visits until October 2023 to assess their diagnostic and therapeutic pathways. Using Cox regression models adjusted for PSA levels, DRE results, age, and previous biopsy history, we calculated the hazard ratio (HR) for biopsy-free (BFS), defined as the time from mUS to biopsy or last follow-up, cancer-free survival (CFS), and clinically significant cancer-free survival (csCFS) within the cohort based on mUS results.

RESULTS

Overall, 425 men were enrolled. The median (IQR) age was 66 (59-72) years, PSA levels were 5.7 (4.0-7.9) ng/mL, prostate volume was 44 (31.5-62.1) mL, and the median follow-up was 39 months (27-53). mUS identified lesions suggesting csPCa in 201/425 (47.3%) men. Overall, mUS resulted negative in 224/425 (52.7%) men, of whom 207/224 (92.4%) did not undergo subsequent mpMRI, while 22/224 (9.8%) proceeded with mpMRI according to the referring physician's decision. The latter detected suspicious lesions in 12/22 cases (54.5%), but only 2/12 (16.7%) were confirmed by biopsy as csPCa. Among those with negative mUS results, 192/224 (85.7%) men avoided additional biopsies during follow-up. Men with negative mUS results exhibited superior BFS (aHR: 0.17; p < 0.001), CFS (aHR:0.12; p < 0.001), and csCFS (aHR:0.09; p < 0.001) survival rates compared to their mUS-positive counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that mUS can potentially refine patient stratification and transform PCa screening and diagnostic protocols. Pending validation by other studies, a wider implementation of mUS could optimize resource allocation, minimize wastage, and reserve additional costly tests.

Implementing and Optimizing Universal Germline Genetic Testing for Patients With Prostate Cancer in Clinical Practice

OBJECTIVE

To advocate for universal germline genetic testing (UGGT) in prostate cancer and provide practical recommendations for its implementation.

METHODS

Although guidelines for germline genetic testing in prostate cancer have progressed, usage remains limited and inconsistent due to barriers including access, cost, and variable guideline adherence. These issues prevent some patients with germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants from benefiting from risk assessment, precision therapies (eg, PARP inhibitors, PD-1 inhibitors), and potential clinical trials. Despite these benefits, studies indicate that germline genetic testing use remains low, especially in prostate cancer care. The PROCLAIM trial (Shore et al, 2023) highlighted that nearly half of patients with pathogenic variants are missed under National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, particularly impacting non-white patients and those with incomplete family history data. Additional racial and socioeconomic disparities further hinder access and variant interpretation accuracy. Given these challenges, UGGT for all prostate cancer patients has been proposed to improve care equity and decision-making. In March 2024, prostate cancer experts convened to discuss strategies for UGGT implementation.

RESULTS

The outcome of that meeting includes recommendations for integrating UGGT into oncology and urology practices and have been outlined in this paper.

CONCLUSION

To maximize the benefits while mitigating the potential risks of UGGT, it is essential to address implementation details, including careful gene panel selection, variants of uncertain significance reporting and management, appropriate genetics follow-up, and seamless integration of test reports into electronic medical records for accessibility by patients and providers.

BRCA mutations and prostate cancer: should urologist improve daily clinical practice?

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate BRCA1-2 (breast cancer) detection in men with high risk PCa, including the oncological consequences for the patient and family members.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2023 to December 2024, 52 men (median age 73 years;) with confirmed PCa diagnosis underwent somatic and germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 assessment; 11/52 (21%) patients documented a family history of cancer. Patients were at different clinical stages: high-grade (71% had a Gleason score ≥ 8), locally advanced (54% of cases) and/or metastatic PCa (46% of cases) at initial diagnosis, hormone-sensitive and/or castration-resistant PCa (38.2% of cases) at clinical progression. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues and next generation sequencing (NGS) analyses of BRCA genes were evaluated on 52 samples (prostate biopsies or definitive samples) collected at Gravina Hospital (Caltagirone, Italy) from different Sicilian pathology departments. The therapeutic and clinical impact of genetic testing for BRCA somatic and germline mutations was evaluated for patients and their families.

RESULTS

All FFPE cases were successfully genotyped, with a good library and sequencing CQ metrics for all genes of interest; 10/52 (19.2%) patients had somatic or germline BRCA mutations, specifically, 3/52 (5.7%) had somatic and 7/52 (13.5%) had germline mutations. In the seven cases with germline variants, 4/7 (57%) had a family history of PCa or other diseases, while the remaining 3/7 (43%) patients had no hereditary predisposition. All identified genetic variants were related to the BRCA2 gene; after genetic screening of the corresponding relatives, various members of the analysed families carried the mutation identified in the proband, so that cancer prevention and/or active surveillance was possible.

CONCLUSIONS

NGS analysis for BRCA genetic testing using FFPE tissue in the clinical setting of patients with high-grade and/or metastatic PCa appears to be a valuable tool, not only for therapeutic purposes, but also to identify families with genetic predisposition who may be underdiagnosed according to canonical criteria.

Assessment of a Polygenic Risk Score in Screening for Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

The incidence of prostate cancer is increasing. Screening with an assay of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has a high rate for false positive results. Genomewide association studies have identified common germline variants in persons with prostate cancer, which can be used to calculate a polygenic risk score associated with risk of prostate cancer.

METHODS

We recruited persons 55 to 69 years of age from primary care centers in the United Kingdom. Using germline DNA extracted from saliva, we derived polygenic risk scores from 130 variants known to be associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer. Participants with a polygenic risk score in the 90th percentile or higher were invited to undergo prostate cancer screening with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transperineal biopsy, irrespective of PSA level.

RESULTS

Among 40,292 persons invited to participate, 8953 (22.2%) expressed interest in participating and 6393 had their polygenic risk score calculated; 745 (11.7%) had a polygenic risk score in the 90th percentile or higher and were invited to undergo screening. Of these 745 participants, 468 (62.8%) underwent MRI and prostate biopsy; prostate cancer was detected in 187 participants (40.0%). The median age at diagnosis was 64 years (range, 57 to 73). Of the 187 participants with cancer, 103 (55.1%) had prostate cancer classified as intermediate or higher risk according to the 2024 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria, so treatment was indicated; cancer would not have been detected in 74 (71.8%) of these participants according to the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway currently used in the United Kingdom (high PSA level and positive MRI results). In addition, 40 of the participants with cancer (21.4%) had disease classified as unfavorable intermediate risk or as high or very high risk according to NCCN criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

In a prostate cancer screening program involving participants in the top decile of risk as determined by a polygenic risk score, the percentage found to have clinically significant disease was higher than the percentage that would have been identified with the use of PSA or MRI. (Funded by the European Research Council Seventh Framework Program and others; BARCODE1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03857477.).

Early diagnosis of prostate cancer in healthy men with germline mutations in DNA Damage Response (DDR) pathways: A literature review and proposal for a screening strategy

INTRODUCTION

Men with mutations in DNA damage response (DDR) pathways have a higher risk of developing prostate neoplasia compared to the general population. The best studied alterations are mutations in BRCA1/2, ATM and MMR-Lynch syndrome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A review of the clinical and prognostic implications of mutations in DDR pathways, as well as an evaluation of the different screening strategies available for affected patients.

OBJECTIVE

To propose an early diagnostic strategy for men with mutations in DDR pathways.

RESULTS

Current guidelines do not provide clear, specific recommendations for this subgroup of men. Among mutations in the MMR pathway, the germline MSH2 mutation is most strongly associated with prostate cancer. Men with germline mutations in BRCA1/2, ATM, and MSH2 have a higher incidence of prostate neoplasia, tend to develop the disease at a younger age, and are more likely to have aggressive forms of the disease. Furthermore, men with BRCA1/2 mutations have a lower cancer-specific survival rate compared to the general population. In these patients, PSA levels have important limitations in detecting prostate cancer. Multiparametric MRI of the prostate may be more effective than periodic PSA testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with mutations in DDR pathways are at increased risk for aggressive prostate neoplasms and require earlier and more intensive screening. PSA-based screening has notable limitations. A screening strategy incorporating multiparametric MRI could offer a more effective strategy for this patient group.

Impact of prostate cancer screening in European ancestry un-affected men with germline DNA repair pathogenic variants

Background and Objective

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a significant global health concern, ranking as the second most prevalent cancer among men worldwide. Genetic factors, particularly germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in DNA repair genes (DRGs), play a crucial role in PCa predisposition. Our study aimed to assess patients' adherence to a targeted PCa screening program targeting high-risk individuals with DRG PVs and evaluate the potential reduction in biopsy and MRI rates by employing our screening protocol.

Methods

We conducted a prospective ongoing trial evaluating targeted PCa screening in men with documented PVs in DRGs. Screening involved annual assessment of medical history, physical examination, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, Prostate Health Index (PHI), and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) when indicated. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse patient characteristics, and adherence to screening was evaluated at three time points: baseline (T0), one year (T1), and two years (T2) from enrolment.

Key Findings and Limitations

A total of 101 high-risk individuals were enrolled, with a median age of 52 years. Adherence to screening was high, with 72.3% of patients attending the first annual follow-up (T1) and 100% attending the second follow-up (T2). Despite elevated PSA levels in some patients, no PCa was detected during the study period. However, our screening protocol demonstrated the potential in reducing unnecessary biopsies and MRIs, particularly in patients with elevated PSA but low PHI values. Limitations include the ongoing nature of the study, small sample size, and lack of non-carrier controls.

Conclusions and Clinical Implications

Our findings described a new PCa screening strategy integrated with genetic risk factors. The incorporation of PHI shows promise in improving the efficiency of diagnostic procedures while minimizing unnecessary interventions. High adherence among high-risk individuals underscores the potential effectiveness of targeted screening programs.

Causative Genes of Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD)-Related Breast Cancer and Specific Strategies at Present

Recently, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) has become a new target for hereditary cancers. Molecular-based approaches for hereditary cancers in the clinical setting have been reviewed. In particular, the efficacy of the PARP inhibitor has been considered by several clinical trials for various kinds of hereditary cancers. This indicates that the PARP inhibitor can be effective for any kind of BRCA mutated cancers, regardless of the organ-specific cancer. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) has become a new target for hereditary cancers, indicating the necessity to confirm the status of HRD-related genes. ARID1A, ATM, ATRX, PALB2, BARD1, RAD51C and CHEK2 are known as HRD-related genes for which simultaneous examination as part of panel testing is more suitable. Both surgical and medical oncologists should learn the basis of genetics including HRD. An understanding of the basic mechanism of homologous repair recombination (HRR) in BRCA-related breast cancer is mandatory for all surgical or medical oncologists because PARP inhibitors may be effective for these cancers and a specific strategy of screening for non-cancers exists. The clinical behavior of each gene should be clarified based on a large-scale database in the future, or, in other words, on real-world data. Firstly, HRD-related genes should be examined when the hereditary nature of a cancer is placed in doubt after an examination of the relevant family history. Alternatively, HRD score examination is a solution by which to identify HRD-related genes at the first step. If lifetime risk is estimated at over 20%, an annual breast MRI is necessary for high-risk screening. However, there are limited data to show its benefit compared with BRCA. Therefore, a large-scale database, including clinical information and a long-term follow-up should be established, after which a periodical assessment is mandatory. The clinical behavior of each gene should be clarified based on a large-scale database, or, in other words, real-world data.

Early Detection of the Pathogenetic Variants of Homologous Recombination Repair Genes in Prostate Cancer: Critical Analysis and Experimental Design

It has been shown that the pathogenic variants (PVs) of the DNA Damage Response (DDR) genes, whether of a germinal or somatic nature, represent a predictive biomarker of high sensitivity to treatment with inhibitors of the enzyme poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) in patients with hormone-resistant metastatic prostate cancer (HRPCa). Moreover, the detection of PVs of the Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) genes in PCa patients can help to define the patient's prognosis and the choice of the therapeutic procedure. Among men with metastatic PCa, the frequency of PVs in HRR genes ranges from 11% to 33%, which is a significantly higher rate compared to non-metastatic PCa, where the incidence is between 5% and 10%. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) results were more commonly obtained from newly acquired somatic samples compared to archived samples (prostate biopsy or prostatectomy). We developed an experimental multidisciplinary prospective study in patients with a new diagnosis of high-risk PCa at biopsy. The aim was to evaluate the presence of PVs of different HRR genes in patients with the first diagnosis of PCa in relation to a metastatic or non-metastatic stage, tumor aggressiveness, and early risk of progression. Among 43 initial tumor samples from 22 patients, 25 samples from 12 patients were selected for library preparation based on their DNA concentration and quality. After the NGS, 14 different DNA variants were prioritized. Oncogenetic and likely oncogenetic variants were found in the ATM, BRCA1, PTEN, KMT2D, and CDH1 genes. Moreover, variants of uncertain significance were found in ATM, DDR2, FANCA, FOXA1, PLCB4, PTCH1, and RB1.

Prostate-specific antigen screening at low thresholds of men with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants

BACKGROUND

Men with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants are at higher risk of prostate cancer We included men with likely pathogenic/pathogenic (LP/P) variants in BRCA1/2 in a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening program after cascade germline testing since 2014. PSA was tested yearly and an age-specific low PSA threshold for biopsy was used, to determine if a low PSA threshold for biopsy is justified for men with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants.

METHODS

From 2014 to 2023 a total of 340 men were included in the program. We report demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes at 7 years.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of a primary biopsy was 37% (95CI: 31‒43) after 7 years. Incidence of prostate cancer diagnosis was 11% (95CI: 7.1‒15). Men referred were 7.8 (95CI: 5.3‒11, p < 0.001) times more likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer than the general Danish male population. The cumulative incidence of biochemical failure (PSA > = 0.2 ng/ml) 4 years after RP was 22% (95CI: 2.3‒41). The main limitation is that not all men underwent a pre-biopsy MRI.

CONCLUSION

We found a high incidence of prostate cancer in men with LP/P BRCA1/2 variants, but this may be explained by the low PSA threshold for scheduling biopsies. More studies are needed to compare this patient population to men with other germline features. The high risk of recurrence after curative therapy is worrisome and requires further evaluation as to whether this is a biological phenomenon.

[Early detection of prostate cancer-individualized, risk-adapted and successful]

BACKGROUND

Population-based screening for prostate cancer (PC) is still controversially discussed. Furthermore, an organized, risk-adapted screening program is already being called for across Europe. Although large randomized controlled trials have shown that prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening can significantly reduce PC-specific mortality, all known screening strategies still frequently lead to overdiagnosis and consecutively to overtreatment of clinically insignificant PC.

OBJECTIVE

This review article presents the current evidence regarding PC screening.

RESULTS

The current German early detection program, which is based on the annually recommended digital rectal examination (DRE), lacks specificity and sensitivity. In Germany, an opportunistic PSA screening is currently being carried out, which is no longer recommended due to an unfavorable benefit-risk ratio. Since 2022, the European Commission has been calling for the development of organized, risk-adapted screening strategies that combine the PSA test with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The integration of MRI improves the detection of clinically relevant PC and reduces the overdiagnosis of low-risk cancers. In the future, an algorithm for early detection of PC needs to be developed, which, in an organized and personalized screening, combines the PSA test with MRI and possibly genetic markers.

CONCLUSION

The early detection of prostate cancer should be organized at the population level and integrated into personalized, evidence-based screening strategies.

[Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and PARP inhibitors: From tumor genomics to new therapeutic combinations]

Castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer remains lethal and a therapeutic challenge. Current strategies are geared towards the personalization of treatments based on the identification of relevant molecular targets, including genomic alterations involved in tumoral processes. Among these novel targeted therapies, poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), by blocking the action of enzymes involved in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair, induce the destruction of cells carrying defects in homologous recombination repair, often associated with alterations in genes involved in this mechanism. Thus, determining the presence of a molecular anomaly, particularly alterations in the BRCA1/2 genes, is a prerequisite for initiating PARPi monotherapy. In patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer , around 20-30 % carry this type of mutation. In this population, single-agent studies have demonstrated PARPi ability to prolong overall survival, and to improve symptom control, including pain. Other studies are underway to assess their effectiveness in combination with other therapies, and it already appears that association with new-generation hormone therapy can further prolong radiological progression-free survival, regardless of the mutation status of the genes involved in DNA repair, indicating a synergistic action between PARPi and new-generation hormone therapy.

Real-world efficacy and safety of combined first-line treatment with PARP inhibitors and novel hormonal therapy in mCRPC patients with HRR gene mutations

Objective

This study evaluated the real-world efficacy and safety of combining PARP inhibitors with novel hormonal therapy (NHT) as a first-line treatment in Chinese patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harboring homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutations.

Methods

We enrolled 41 mCRPC patients who received at least 1 month of combined treatment with PARP inhibitors and NHT. Patients were divided into two groups: Cohort A (mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM genes) and Cohort B (mutations in other HRR genes). The primary endpoint was imaging-based progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), PSA50 response, and adverse events (AEs). To ensure accurate research results and control confounding factors, we will employ multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate key variables affecting mCRPC patient survival outcomes.

Results

This study enrolled 41 patients, 22 in Cohort A and 19 in Cohort B. The median PFS for all patients was 21.8 months, and the median OS had yet to be reached. The overall ORR was 48.8%, and the DCR was 61.0%. Specifically, the median PFS for Cohort A was 21.8 months compared to 14.5 months for Cohort B. The median OS had yet to be reached for either cohort. Regarding efficacy, 81.8% of patients in Cohort A and 73.7% in Cohort B achieved a PSA50 response. Imaging assessments showed ORRs of 54.6% for Cohort A and 42.1% for Cohort B, with DCRs of 72.7% and 47.4%, respectively. 85.4% of patients experienced grade 1 or 2 adverse events, and 51.2% encountered grade 3 or 4. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis focusing on PFS, the Gleason score was identified as a significant predictor (HR = 5.8, 95% CI: 1.65-20.2, p = 0.006).

Conclusion

Combined first-line treatment with PARP inhibitors and NHT is effective and well-tolerated in mCRPC patients with HRR gene mutations, particularly those with BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM mutations. These findings underscore the potential of this therapeutic combination in managing mCRPC in the Chinese population, suggesting a favorable outcome for those with specific genetic backgrounds.

Systematic identification of pathogenic variants of non-small cell lung cancer in the promoters of DNA-damage repair genes

BACKGROUND

Deficiency in DNA-damage repair (DDR) genes, often due to disruptive coding variants, is linked to higher cancer risk. Our previous study has revealed the association between rare loss-of-function variants in DDR genes and the risk of lung cancer. However, it is still challenging to study the predisposing role of rare regulatory variants of these genes.

METHODS

Based on whole-genome sequencing data from 2984 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 3020 controls, we performed massively parallel reporter assays on 1818 rare variants located in the promoters of DDR genes. Pathway- or gene-level burden analyses were performed using Firth's logistic regression or generalized linear model.

FINDINGS

We identified 750 rare functional regulatory variants (frVars) that showed allelic differences in transcriptional activity within the promoter regions of DDR genes. Interestingly, the burden of frVars was significantly elevated in cases (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17, p = 0.026), whereas the burden of variants prioritized solely based on bioinformatics annotation was comparable between cases and controls (OR = 1.04, p = 0.549). Among the frVars, 297 were down-regulated transcriptional activity (dr-frVars) and 453 were up-regulated transcriptional activity (ur-frVars); especially, dr-frVars (OR = 1.30, p = 0.008) rather than ur-frVars (OR = 1.06, p = 0.495) were significantly associated with risk of NSCLC. Individuals with NSCLC carried more dr-frVars from Fanconi anemia, homologous recombination, and nucleotide excision repair pathways. In addition, we identified seven genes (i.e., BRCA2, GTF2H1, DDB2, BLM, ALKBH2, APEX1, and RAD51B) with promoter dr-frVars that were associated with lung cancer susceptibility.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings indicate that functional promoter variants in DDR genes, in addition to protein-truncating variants, can be pathogenic and contribute to lung cancer susceptibility.

FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation of China, Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Province, Research Unit of Prospective Cohort of Cardiovascular Diseases and Cancer of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Prostate Cancer Screening in Carriers of Pathogenic Germline Mutations: Interim Results from the Initial Screening Round of the Prostate Cancer Genetic Risk Evaluation and Screening Study

BACKGROUND

The risk of early-onset and clinically aggressive prostate cancer is elevated in carriers of certain rare pathogenic germline mutations. The utility of augmenting traditional prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening measures with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in this population is not yet known.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate MRI-based screening in comparison with traditional PSA-based screening among individuals at an elevated genetic risk for prostate cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Male germline carriers of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in any of 19 prostate cancer risk genes between the ages of 35 and 74 yr with no prior history of prostate cancer were recruited. Intervention Enrolled participants underwent screening with annual PSA, digital rectal examination (DRE), and triennial multiparametric MRI. Individuals with abnormal DRE, elevated age-adjusted PSA (>1.5 ng/ml for 35-49 yr, >2.0 ng/ml for 50-54 yr, and >3.0 ng/ml for 55-74 yr), or suspicious multiparametric MRI (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] ≥3 lesion) were offered prostate biopsy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Endpoints were diagnosis of any and clinically significant prostate cancer, and alternative screening strategies were compared by a decision curve analysis.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

To date, 101 males have completed the first round of screening. The greatest proportion of participants are carriers of BRCA2 (n = 44), BRCA1 (n = 35), and ATM (n = 7) variants. Twenty-one have undergone biopsy, resulting in the detection of nine cases of cancer (seven clinically significant). For the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, abnormal MRI (PI-RADS ≥3) demonstrated 100% sensitivity (7/7) with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%, whereas PSA-based screening alone had 57% (4/7) sensitivity with an NPV of 73%. Of six screening strategies evaluated in the decision curve analysis, MRI-based screening alone achieved superior net benefit at all threshold probabilities compared with PSA screening-detecting one additional cancer case per 7.5 patients, while avoiding more unnecessary biopsies at the same threshold probability.

CONCLUSIONS

Disease prevalence is high among carriers of prostate cancer-associated pathogenic germline mutations. Early results suggest that MRI-based screening enhances early detection of clinically significant disease beyond PSA screening alone.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, we present the interim results from the PROGRESS prostate cancer screening trial. We found that in certain germline carriers of prostate cancer risk mutations, magnetic resonance imaging-based screening enhances detection of prostate cancer while reducing biopsies triggered, in comparison with traditional prostate-specific antigen screening strategies.

Guidelines for genetic testing in prostate cancer: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Genetic testing, to identify pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in prostate cancer, is valuable in guiding treatment decisions for men with prostate cancer and to inform cancer prevention and early detection options for their immediate blood relatives. There are various guidelines and consensus statements for genetic testing in prostate cancer. Our aim is to review genetic testing recommendations across current guidelines and consensus statements and the level of evidence supporting those recommendations.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Electronic database searches and manual searches of grey literature, including websites of key organisations were conducted. Using the Population, Concept, Context (PCC) framework, this scoping review included: men with prostate cancer or men at high risk of prostate cancer and their biological families; existing guidelines and consensus statements with supporting evidence for genetic testing of men with prostate cancer from any geographical location worldwide.

RESULTS

Of the 660 citations identified, 23 guidelines and consensus statements met the inclusion criteria for the scoping review. Based on different levels of evidence about who should be tested and how, a diverse range of recommendations were identified. There was general consensus among the guidelines and consensus statements that men with metastatic disease be offered genetic testing; however, there was less consensus in relation to genetic testing in localised prostate cancer. While there was some consensus in relation to which genes to test, recommendations varied regarding who to test, testing methods and implementation.

CONCLUSION

While genetic testing in prostate cancer is routinely recommended and numerous guidelines exist, there is still considerable lack of consensus regarding who should be tested and how they should be tested. Further evidence is needed to inform value-based genetic testing strategies for implementation in practice.

Prostate cancer and genetic contributions

Prostate cancer remains a lethal disease for many men. Knowledge of genetic contributions to this condition has increasingly been used in its management. In this narrative review, we summarize various genetic alterations and syndromes associated with prostate cancer, including hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, Lynch syndrome, and hereditary prostate cancer, among others. Indications for germline testing are reviewed, as well as incorporation of genetic data at different phases of management for prostate cancer, such as screening and monitoring, and treatment of localized and metastatic disease.

Hereditary and Familial Traits in Urological Cancers and Their Underlying Genes

Early recognition of hereditary urological cancers may influence diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making, and potentially alter the fate of patients and family members. Here, we introduce readers to the current knowledge on germline genetic testing and clinical practice in prostate, bladder, renal, and testicular carcinoma. Considering all urological cancer patients, routine inquiries about familial cancer history should become a standard practice in clinical settings. If suspicion arises, patients can opt for two avenues: referral to genetic counseling or undergoing genetic tests after consultation with the treating urologist.

Patient summary

Tumors of the urogenital tract (prostate, kidney, bladder, and testes) can sometimes be related to genetic mutations that are present in all the cells of the body. Such mutations can be inherited and run in families. Therefore, it is relevant to obtain information on the incidence of all cancers in the family history. The information obtained may initiate genetic testing, leading to the identification of mutations that are related to cancer in the current or next generation. In addition, these mutations may offer alternative treatment options for patients.

The Cost-Effectiveness of Germline BReast CAncer Gene Testing in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Followed by Cascade Testing of First-Degree Relatives of Mutation Carriers

OBJECTIVES

Patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) with BReast CAncer gene (BRCA) mutations benefit from targeted treatments (eg, olaparib). In addition, family members of affected patients have increased risk of hereditary cancers and benefit from early detection and prevention. International guidelines recommend genetic testing in mPCa; however, the value for money of testing patients with mPCa and cascade testing of blood-related family members has not been assessed. In this context, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of germline BRCA testing in patients with mPCa followed by cascade testing of first-degree relatives (FDRs) of mutation carriers.

METHODS

We conducted a cost-utility analysis of germline BRCA testing using 2 scenarios: (1) testing patients with mPCa only and (2) testing patients with mPCa and FDRs of those who test positive. A semi-Markov multi-health-state transition model was constructed using a lifetime time horizon. The analyses were performed from an Australian payer perspective. Decision uncertainty was characterized using probabilistic analyses.

RESULTS

Compared with no testing, BRCA testing in mPCa was associated with an incremental cost of AU$3731 and a gain of 0.014 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of AU$265 942/QALY. Extending testing to FDRs of variant-positive patients resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of AU$16 392/QALY. Probability of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay of AU$75 000/QALY was 0% in the standalone mPCa analysis and 100% in the cascade testing analysis.

CONCLUSION

BRCA testing when performed as a standalone strategy in patients with mPCa may not be cost-effective but demonstrates significant value for money after the inclusion of cascade testing of FDRs of mutation carriers.

French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2024-2026: Prostate cancer - Diagnosis and management of localised disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the Oncology Committee of the French Urology Association is to propose updated recommendations for the diagnosis and management of localized prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature from 2022 to 2024 was conducted by the CCAFU on the elements of diagnosis and therapeutic management of localized PCa, evaluating references with their level of evidence.

RESULTS

The recommendations set out the genetics, epidemiology and diagnostic methods of PCa, as well as the concepts of screening and early detection. MRI, the reference imaging test for localized cancer, is recommended before prostate biopsies are performed. Molecular imaging is an option for disease staging. Performing biopsies via the transperineal route reduces the risk of infection. Active surveillance is the standard treatment for tumours with a low risk of progression. Therapeutic methods are described in detail, and recommended according to the clinical situation.

CONCLUSION

This update of French recommendations should help to improve the management of localized PCa.

Screening guidelines for individuals at increased risk for prostate cancer

Individuals at increased risk for prostate cancer (PCa) are inconsistently defined in national and international guidelines. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) defines people at increased risk for PCa to include those with a concerning family history, West African/Caribbean/African-American individuals, and those who have germline mutations in known PCa-related genes. Recommendations for screening are also inconsistently defined in national and international guidelines. The NCCN and American Urological Association recommend that individuals at increased risk for PCa be screened with prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal exam starting at age 40. Defining increased risk groups and defining lifetime risk is an ongoing academic process that can be facilitated through patient registries of these cohorts at academic centers.

Organized prostate cancer screening program: a proposal from the Italian Society of Urology (SIU)

To contrast opportunistic PCa screening, the European Union Council suggested extending screening programs to PCa by recommending the implementation of a stepwise approach in the EU Countries to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an organized program based on PSA testing in combination with additional MRI as a follow-up test. The objective of this expert-based document is to propose an organized PCa screening program according to the EU Council recommendations. The Italian Society of Urology (SIU) developed a team of experts with the aim to report 1) the most recent epidemiologic data about incidence, prevalence, and mortality of PCa; 2) the most important risk factors to identify categories of men with an increased risk to eventually develop the disease; 3) the most relevant studies presenting data on population-based screening; and 4) the current recommendations of the leading International Guidelines. According to previous evidence, the Panel proposed some indications to develop a new organized PCa screening program for asymptomatic men with a life-expectancy of at least fifteen years. The SIU Panel strongly supports the implementation of a pilot, organized PCa screening program inviting asymptomatic men in the age range of 50-55 years. Invited men who are already performing opportunistic screening will be randomized to continue opportunistic screening or to cross into the organized protocol. Men with PSA level ≤3 ng/mL and familiarity for PCa received a DRE as well as all those with PSA levels >3 ng/mL. All other men with PSA levels greater than 3 ng/mL proceed to secondary testing represented by mpMRI. Men with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) lesions 3 and PSAD 0.15 ng/mL/cc or higher as well as those with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions proceed to targeted plus systematic prostate biopsy. The primary outcome of the proposed pilot PCa screening program will be the detection rate of clinically significant PCa defined as a tumor with a ISUP Grade Group ≥2. Main secondary outcomes will be the detection rate of aggressive PCa (ISUP Grade Group ≥4); the detection rate of insignificant PCa (ISUP Grade Group 1); the number of unnecessary prostate biopsy avoided, the metastasis-free survival, and the overall survival. Men will be invited over a one-year period. Preliminary analyses will be planned 2 and 5 years after the baseline enrollment. According to the recent EU Council recommendations on cancer screening, pilot studies evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of PCa screening programs using PSA as the primary and mpMRI as the secondary screening test in selected cohorts of patients must be strongly promoted by scientific societies and supported by national governments.

Genetics of prostate cancer: a review of latest evidence

Prostate cancer (PrCa) is a largely heritable and polygenic disease. It is the most common cancer in people with prostates (PwPs) in Europe and the USA, including in PwPs of African descent. In the UK in 2020, 52% of all cancers were diagnosed at stage I or II. The National Health Service (NHS) long-term plan is to increase this to 75% by 2028, to reduce absolute incidence of late-stage disease. In the absence of a UK PrCa screening programme, we should explore how to identify those at increased risk of clinically significant PrCa.Incorporating genomics into the PrCa screening, diagnostic and treatment pathway has huge potential for transforming patient care. Genomics can increase efficiency of PrCa screening by focusing on those with genetic predisposition to cancer-which when combined with risk factors such as age and ethnicity, can be used for risk stratification in risk-based screening (RBS) programmes. The goal of RBS is to facilitate early diagnosis of clinically significant PrCa and reduce overdiagnosis/overtreatment in those unlikely to experience PrCa-related symptoms in their lifetime. Genetic testing can guide PrCa management, by identifying those at risk of lethal PrCa and enabling access to novel targeted therapies.PrCa is curable if diagnosed below stage III when most people do not experience symptoms. RBS using genetic profiling could be key here if we could show better survival outcomes (or reduction in cancer-specific mortality accounting for lead-time bias), in addition to more cost efficiency than age-based screening alone. Furthermore, PrCa outcomes in underserved communities could be optimised if genetic testing was accessible, minimising health disparities.

BRCA1, BRCA2, and Associated Cancer Risks and Management for Male Patients: A Review

Importance

Half of all carriers of inherited cancer-predisposing variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are male, but the implications for their health are underrecognized compared to female individuals. Germline variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (also known as pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, referred to here as BRCA1/2 PVs) are well known to significantly increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancers in female carriers, and knowledge of BRCA1/2 PVs informs established cancer screening and options for risk reduction. While risks to male carriers of BRCA1/2 PVs are less characterized, there is convincing evidence of increased risk for prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, and breast cancer in males. There has also been a rapid expansion of US Food and Drug Administration-approved targeted cancer therapies, including poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, for breast, pancreatic, and prostate cancers associated with BRCA1/2 PVs.

Observations

This narrative review summarized the data that inform cancer risks, targeted cancer therapy options, and guidelines for early cancer detection. It also highlighted areas of emerging research and clinical trial opportunities for male BRCA1/2 PV carriers. These developments, along with the continued relevance to family cancer risk and reproductive options, have informed changes to guideline recommendations for genetic testing and strengthened the case for increased genetic testing for males.

Conclusions and Relevance

Despite increasing clinical actionability for male carriers of BRCA1/2 PVs, far fewer males than female individuals undergo cancer genetic testing. Oncologists, internists, and primary care clinicians should be vigilant about offering appropriate genetic testing to males. Identifying more male carriers of BRCA1/2 PVs will maximize opportunities for cancer early detection, targeted risk management, and cancer treatment for males, along with facilitating opportunities for risk reduction and prevention in their family members, thereby decreasing the burden of hereditary cancer.

The psychosocial impact of prostate cancer screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers

OBJECTIVES

To report the long-term outcomes from a longitudinal psychosocial study that forms part of the 'Identification of Men with a genetic predisposition to ProstAte Cancer: Targeted Screening in men at higher genetic risk and controls' (IMPACT) study. The IMPACT study is a multi-national study of targeted prostate cancer (PrCa) screening in individuals with a known germline pathogenic variant (GPV) in either the BReast CAncer gene 1 (BRCA1) or the BReast CAncer gene 2 (BRCA2).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Participants enrolled in the IMPACT study were invited to complete a psychosocial questionnaire prior to each annual screening visit for a minimum of 5 years. The questionnaire included questions on sociodemographics and the following measures: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Impact of Event Scale, 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, Memorial Anxiety Scale for PrCa, Cancer Worry Scale, risk perception and knowledge.

RESULTS

A total of 760 participants completed questionnaires: 207 participants with GPV in BRCA1, 265 with GPV in BRCA2 and 288 controls (non-carriers from families with a known GPV). We found no evidence of clinically concerning levels of general or cancer-specific distress or poor health-related quality of life in the cohort as a whole. Individuals in the control group had significantly less worry about PrCa compared with the carriers; however, all mean scores were low and within reported general population norms, where available. BRCA2 carriers with previously high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels experience a small but significant increase in PrCa anxiety (P = 0.01) and PSA-specific anxiety (P < 0.001). Cancer risk perceptions reflected information provided during genetic counselling and participants had good levels of knowledge, although this declined over time.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to report the longitudinal psychosocial impact of a targeted PrCa screening programme for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. The results reassure that an annual PSA-based screening programme does not have an adverse impact on psychosocial health or health-related quality of life in these higher-risk individuals. These results are important as more PrCa screening is targeted to higher-risk groups.

EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2024 Update. Part I: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines provide recommendations for the management of clinically localised prostate cancer (PCa). This paper aims to present a summary of the 2024 version of the EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG guidelines on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised PCa.

METHODS

The panel performed a literature review of all new data published in English, covering the time frame between May 2020 and 2023. The guidelines were updated, and a strength rating for each recommendation was added based on a systematic review of the evidence.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

A risk-adapted strategy for identifying men who may develop PCa is advised, generally commencing at 50 yr of age and based on individualised life expectancy. The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in order to avoid unnecessary biopsies is recommended. When a biopsy is considered, a combination of targeted and regional biopsies should be performed. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography imaging is the most sensitive technique for identifying metastatic spread. Active surveillance is the appropriate management for men with low-risk PCa, as well as for selected favourable intermediate-risk patients with International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 2 lesions. Local therapies are addressed, as well as the management of persistent prostate-specific antigen after surgery. A recommendation to consider hypofractionation in intermediate-risk patients is provided. Patients with cN1 PCa should be offered a local treatment combined with long-term intensified hormonal treatment.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The evidence in the field of diagnosis, staging, and treatment of localised PCa is evolving rapidly. These PCa guidelines reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This article is the summary of the guidelines for "curable" prostate cancer. Prostate cancer is "found" through a multistep risk-based screening process. The objective is to find as many men as possible with a curable cancer. Prostate cancer is curable if it resides in the prostate; it is then classified into low-, intermediary-, and high-risk localised and locally advanced prostate cancer. These risk classes are the basis of the treatments. Low-risk prostate cancer is treated with "active surveillance", a treatment with excellent prognosis. For low-intermediary-risk active surveillance should also be discussed as an option. In other cases, active treatments, surgery, or radiation treatment should be discussed along with the potential side effects to allow shared decision-making.

Disrupting prostate cancer research: Challenge accepted; report from the 2023 Coffey-Holden Prostate Cancer Academy Meeting

INTRODUCTION

The 2023 Coffey-Holden Prostate Cancer Academy (CHPCA) Meeting, themed "Disrupting Prostate Cancer Research: Challenge Accepted," was convened at the University of California, Los Angeles, Luskin Conference Center, in Los Angeles, CA, from June 22 to 25, 2023.

METHODS

The 2023 marked the 10th Annual CHPCA Meeting, a discussion-oriented scientific think-tank conference convened annually by the Prostate Cancer Foundation, which centers on innovative and emerging research topics deemed pivotal for advancing critical unmet needs in prostate cancer research and clinical care. The 2023 CHPCA Meeting was attended by 81 academic investigators and included 40 talks across 8 sessions.

RESULTS

The central topic areas covered at the meeting included: targeting transcription factor neo-enhancesomes in cancer, AR as a pro-differentiation and oncogenic transcription factor, why few are cured with androgen deprivation therapy and how to change dogma to cure metastatic prostate cancer without castration, reducing prostate cancer morbidity and mortality with genetics, opportunities for radiation to enhance therapeutic benefit in oligometastatic prostate cancer, novel immunotherapeutic approaches, and the new era of artificial intelligence-driven precision medicine.

DISCUSSION

This article provides an overview of the scientific presentations delivered at the 2023 CHPCA Meeting, such that this knowledge can help in facilitating the advancement of prostate cancer research worldwide.

Outcomes of 10 years of PSA screening for prostate cancer in Norwegian men with Lynch syndrome

BACKGROUND

Pathogenic germline variants in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes are associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer (PCa). Since 2010 we have recommended MMR carriers annual PSA testing from the age of 40. Prospective studies of the outcome of long-term PSA screening are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and characteristics of PCa in Norwegian MMR carriers attending annual PSA screening (PSA threshold >3.0 ng/mL) to evaluate whether our recommendations should be continued.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study of 225 male MMR carriers who were recommended annual PSA screening by the Section of Inherited Cancer, Oslo University Hospital from 2010 and onwards. Incidence and tumor characteristics (age, PSA at diagnosis, Gleason score, TNM score) were described. IHC and MSI-analyses were done on available tumors. Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was calculated based on data from the Cancer Registry of Norway.

RESULTS

Twenty-two of 225 (9.8%) had been diagnosed with PCa, including 10/69 (14.5%) MSH2 carriers and 8/61 (13.1%) MSH6 carriers. Ten of 20 (50%) tumors had Gleason score ≥4 + 3 on biopsy and 6/11 (54.5%) had a pathological T3a/b stage. Eight of 17 (47.1%) tumors showed abnormal staining on IHC and 3/13 (23.1%) were MSI-high. SIR was 9.54 (95% CI 5.98-14.45) for all MMR genes, 13.0 (95% CI 6.23-23.9) for MSH2 and 13.74 for MSH6 (95% CI 5.93-27.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the MMR genes, and especially MSH2 and MSH6, are associated with a significant risk of PCa, and a high number of tumors show aggressive characteristics. While the impact of screening on patient outcomes remains to be more firmly established, the high SIR values we observe provide support for continued PSA screening of MSH2 and MSH6 carriers. Studies are needed to provide optimal recommendations for PSA-threshold and to evaluate whether MLH1 and PMS2 carriers should not be recommended screening.

Evolution of European prostate cancer screening protocols and summary of ongoing trials

Population-based organised repeated screening for prostate cancer has been found to reduce disease-specific mortality, but with substantial overdiagnosis leading to overtreatment. Although only very few countries have implemented a screening programme on a national level, individual prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is common. This opportunistic testing may have little favourable impact, while stressing the side-effects. The classic early detection protocols as were state-of-the-art in the 1990s applied a PSA and digital rectal examination threshold for sextant systematic prostate biopsy, with a fixed interval for re-testing, and limited indication for expectant management. In the three decades since these trials were started, different important improvements have become available in the cascade of screening, indication for biopsy, and treatment. The main developed aspects include: better identification of individuals at risk (using early/baseline PSA, family history, and/or genetic profile), individualised re-testing interval, optimised and individualised starting and stopping age, with gradual invitation at a fixed age rather than invitation of a wider range of age groups, risk stratification for biopsy (using PSA density, risk calculator, magnetic resonance imaging, serum and urine biomarkers, or combinations/sequences), targeted biopsy, transperineal biopsy approach, active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer, and improved staging of disease. All these developments are suggested to decrease the side-effects of screening, while at least maintaining the advantages, but Level 1 evidence is lacking. The knowledge gained and new developments on early detection are being tested in different prospective screening trials throughout Europe. In addition, the European Union-funded PRostate cancer Awareness and Initiative for Screening in the European Union (PRAISE-U) project will compare and evaluate different screening pilots throughout Europe. Implementation and sustainability will also be addressed. Modern screening approaches may reduce the burden of the second most frequent cause of cancer-related death in European males, while minimising side-effects. Also, less efficacious opportunistic early detection may be indirectly reduced.

Men with metastatic prostate cancer carrying a pathogenic germline variant in breast cancer genes: disclosure of genetic test results to relatives

Some patients with metastatic prostate cancer carry a pathogenic germline variant (PV) in a gene, that is mainly associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in women. If they test positive for such a PV, prostate cancer patients are encouraged to disclose the genetic test result to relatives who are at risk in case the carrier status changes the relatives' medical care. Our study aimed to investigate how men who learned they carry a PV in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, CHEK2 or ATM disclosed their carrier status to at-risk relatives and to assess the possible psychological burden for the carrier and their perception of the burden for relatives. In total, 23 men with metastatic prostate cancer carrying a PV completed the IRI questionnaire about family communication; 14 also participated in a semi-structured interview. Patients felt highly confident in discussing the genetic test result with relatives. The diagnosis of prostate cancer was experienced as a burden, whereas being informed about genetic testing results did in most cases not add to this burden. Two patients encountered negative experiences with family communication, as they considered the genetic test result to be more urgent than their relatives. This mixed-methods study shows that metastatic prostate cancer patients with a PV in genes mainly associated with increased risk of breast cancer feel well-equipped to communicate about this predisposition in their families. Carriers felt motivated to disclose their genetic test result to relatives. Most of them indicated that the disclosure was not experienced as a psychological burden.

Germline and somatic mutations in prostate cancer: Implications for treatment

Genetic testing is an integral part of the workup of metastatic prostate cancer, in part, because the results can have a profound impact on the subsequent management of this disease. There are now several Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approved therapeutics available for patients with prostate cancer and certain genetic abnormalities - most notably, mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways such mismatch repair (MMR) and homologous recombination repair (HRR). In this review of the current literature, we discuss the indications for somatic and germline testing, the genetic changes of particular clinical relevance, the associated therapeutic options, and the clinical data supporting their use. We also highlight select trials-in-progress and future directions for the field.

Cascade testing in Italian Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer families: a missed opportunity for cancer prevention?

Healthy carriers of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) may benefit from risk-reducing measures of proven efficacy. The main approach to identify these individuals is cascade testing, and strategies to support this complex process are under investigation. In Italy, cascade testing has received little attention; therefore, we analyzed the uptake and characteristics of BRCA1/2 cascade testing in families diagnosed with HBOC between 2017 and 2019 at two Italian genetics centers. All blood relatives aged 18 years or older at September 2022 and who could be involved in the first step of cascade testing (i.e., all the living relatives closest to the proband) were included. In addition to first-degree relatives, individuals who were second-, third- or fourth-degree relatives were included if the closest relative(s) was/were deceased. Overall, 213 families were included (103, Genoa; 110, Bologna). Most probands were women affected by breast and/or ovarian cancer (86.4%, Genoa; 84.5%, Bologna), and the branch segregating the PV was known/suspected in 62% of families (62.1%, Genoa; 60.9%, Bologna). Overall, the uptake of cascade testing was 22.8% (25.8%, Genoa; 19.9%, Bologna; OR = 0.59: 95%CI 0.43-0.82). It was strongly associated with female gender (OR = 3.31, 95%CI 2.38-4.59), age ≤ 70 years (< 30 years OR = 3.48, 95%CI 1.85-6.56; 30-70 years OR = 3.08, 95%CI 2.01-4.71), first-degree relationship with the proband (OR = 16.61, 95%CI 10.50-26.28) and segregation of the PV in both the maternal (OR = 2.54, 95%CI 1.72-3.75) and the paternal branch (OR = 4.62, 95%CI 3.09-6.91). These real-world data may be important to inform the design and implementation of strategies aimed at improving the uptake of HBOC cascade testing in Italy.

[Prostate cancer screening-current overview]

BACKGROUND

The harm-to-benefit ratio of prostate cancer (PCa) screening remains controversial mainly due to the unfavorable test characteristics of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a screening test.

METHODS

In this nonsystematic review, we present a current overview of the body of evidence on prostate cancer screening with a focus on the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate.

RESULTS

Evidence generated in large randomized controlled trials showed that PSA-based screening significantly decreases cancer-specific mortality. The main obstacle in developing and implementing PCa screening strategies is the resulting overdiagnosis and as a consequence overtreatment of indolent cancers. Opportunistic screening is characterized by an adverse benefit-to-harm ratio and should, therefore, not be recommended. The German Statutory Early Detection Program for prostate cancer, which consists of a digital rectal examination (DRE) as a stand-alone screening test, is not evidence-based, neither specific nor sensitive enough and results in unnecessary diagnostics. The European Commission recently urged member states to develop population-based and organized risk-adapted PSA-based screening programs, which are currently tested in the ongoing German PROBASE trial. Finetuning of the diagnostic pathway following PSA-testing seems key to improve its positive and negative predictive value and thereby making PCa screening more accurate. Incorporation of prostatic MRI into screening strategies leads to more accurate diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer, while diagnosis of indolent cancers is reduced. In the future, molecular liquid-based biomarkers have the potential to complement or even replace PSA in PCa screening and further personalize screening strategies. Active surveillance as an alternative to immediate radical therapy of demographically increasing PCa diagnoses can potentially further improve the benefit-to-harm ratio of organized screening.

CONCLUSION

Early detection of PCa should be organized on a population level into personalized and evidence-based screening strategies. Multiparametric MRI of the prostate may play a key role in this setting.

The association between neighborhood obesogenic factors and prostate cancer risk and mortality: the Southern Community Cohort Study

Background

Prostate cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality among men in the United States. We examined the role of neighborhood obesogenic attributes on prostate cancer risk and mortality in the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS).

Methods

From the total of 34,166 SCCS male participants, 28,356 were included in the analysis. We assessed the relationship between neighborhood obesogenic factors [neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) and neighborhood obesogenic environment indices including the restaurant environment index, the retail food environment index, parks, recreational facilities, and businesses] and prostate cancer risk and mortality by controlling for individual-level factors using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. We further stratified prostate cancer risk analysis by race and body mass index (BMI).

Results

Median follow-up time was 133 months [interquartile range (IQR): 103, 152], and the mean age was 51.62 (SD: ± 8.42) years. There were 1,524 (5.37%) prostate cancer diagnoses and 98 (6.43%) prostate cancer deaths during follow-up. Compared to participants residing in the wealthiest quintile, those residing in the poorest quintile had a higher risk of prostate cancer (aHR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.12-1.57, p = 0.001), particularly among non-obese men with a BMI < 30 (aHR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.07-1.98, p = 0.016). The restaurant environment index was associated with a higher prostate cancer risk in overweight (BMI ≥ 25) White men (aHR = 3.37, 95% CI 1.04-10.94, p = 0.043, quintile 1 vs. None). Obese Black individuals without any neighborhood recreational facilities had a 42% higher risk (aHR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.04-1.94, p = 0.026) compared to those with any access. Compared to residents in the wealthiest quintile and most walkable area, those residing within the poorest quintile (aHR = 3.43, 95% CI 1.54-7.64, p = 0.003) or the least walkable area (aHR = 3.45, 95% CI 1.22-9.78, p = 0.020) had a higher risk of prostate cancer death.

Conclusion

Living in a lower-nSES area was associated with a higher prostate cancer risk, particularly among Black men. Restaurant and retail food environment indices were also associated with a higher prostate cancer risk, with stronger associations within overweight White individuals. Finally, residing in a low-SES neighborhood or the least walkable areas were associated with a higher risk of prostate cancer mortality.

Homologous Recombination Repair Deficiency in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: New Therapeutic Opportunities

More than 20% of metastatic prostate cancer carries genomic defects involving DNA damage repair pathways, mainly in homologous recombination repair-related genes. The recent approval of olaparib has paved the way to precision medicine for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with PARP inhibitors in this subset of patients, especially in the case of BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants. In face of this new therapeutic opportunity, many issues remain unsolved. This narrative review aims to describe the relationship between homologous recombination repair deficiency and prostate cancer, the techniques used to determine homologous recombination repair status in prostate cancer, the crosstalk between homologous recombination repair and the androgen receptor pathway, the current evidence on PARP inhibitors activity in metastatic prostate cancer also in homologous recombination repair-proficient tumors, as well as emerging mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitors. The possibility of combination therapies including a PARP inhibitor is an attractive option, and more robust data are awaited from ongoing phase II and phase III trials outlined in this manuscript.

Racial Differences in Germline Genetic Testing Completion Among Males With Pancreatic, Breast, or Metastatic Prostate Cancers

BACKGROUND

Germline genetic testing is a vital component of guideline-recommended cancer care for males with pancreatic, breast, or metastatic prostate cancers. We sought to determine whether there were racial disparities in germline genetic testing completion in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included non-Hispanic White and Black males with incident pancreatic, breast, or metastatic prostate cancers between January 1, 2019, and September 30, 2021. Two nationwide cohorts were examined: (1) commercially insured individuals in an administrative claims database, and (2) Veterans receiving care in the Veterans Health Administration. One-year germline genetic testing rates were estimated by using Kaplan-Meier methods. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to test the association between race and genetic testing completion. Causal mediation analyses were performed to investigate whether socioeconomic variables contributed to associations between race and germline testing.

RESULTS

Our cohort consisted of 7,894 males (5,142 commercially insured; 2,752 Veterans). One-year testing rates were 18.0% (95% CI, 16.8%-19.2%) in commercially insured individuals and 14.2% (95% CI, 11.5%-15.0%) in Veterans. Black race was associated with a lower hazard of testing among commercially insured individuals (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.91; P=.005) but not among Veterans (aHR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.75-1.32; P=.960). In commercially insured individuals, income (aHR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86-0.96) and net worth (aHR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.98) mediated racial disparities, whereas education (aHR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.94-1.01) did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall rates of guideline-recommended genetic testing are low in males with pancreatic, breast, or metastatic prostate cancers. Racial disparities in genetic testing among males exist in a commercially insured population, mediated by net worth and household income; these disparities are not seen in the equal-access Veterans Health Administration. Alleviating financial and access barriers may mitigate racial disparities in genetic testing.

The association between neighborhood obesogenic factors and prostate cancer risk and mortality: the Southern Community Cohort Study

Background

Prostate cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality among men in the United States. We examined the role of neighborhood obesogenic attributes on prostate cancer risk and mortality in the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS).

Methods

From the total of 34,166 SCCS male participants, 28,356 were included in the analysis. We assessed the relationship between neighborhood obesogenic factors [neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) and neighborhood obesogenic environment indices including the restaurant environment index, the retail food environment index, parks, recreational facilities, and businesses] and prostate cancer risk and mortality by controlling for individual-level factors using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. We further stratified prostate cancer risk analysis by race and body mass index (BMI).

Results

Median follow-up time was 133 months [interquartile range (IQR): 103, 152], and the mean age was 51.62 (SD: ± 8.42) years. There were 1,524 (5.37%) prostate cancer diagnoses and 98 (6.43%) prostate cancer deaths during follow-up. Compared to participants residing in the wealthiest quintile, those residing in the poorest quintile had a higher risk of prostate cancer (aHR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.12-1.57, p = 0.001), particularly among non-obese men with a BMI < 30 (aHR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.07-1.98, p = 0.016). The restaurant environment index was associated with a higher prostate cancer risk in overweight (BMI ≥ 25) White men (aHR = 3.37, 95% CI 1.04-10.94, p = 0.043, quintile 1 vs. None). Obese Black individuals without any neighborhood recreational facilities had a 42% higher risk (aHR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.04-1.94, p = 0.026) compared to those with any access. Compared to residents in the wealthiest quintile and most walkable area, those residing within the poorest quintile (aHR = 3.43, 95% CI 1.54-7.64, p = 0.003) or the least walkable area (aHR = 3.45, 95% CI 1.22-9.78, p = 0.020) had a higher risk of prostate cancer death.

Conclusion

Living in a lower-nSES area was associated with a higher prostate cancer risk, particularly among Black men. Restaurant and retail food environment indices were also associated with a higher prostate cancer risk, with stronger associations within overweight White individuals. Finally, residing in a low-SES neighborhood or the least walkable areas were associated with a higher risk of prostate cancer mortality.

Review on the Role of BRCA Mutations in Genomic Screening and Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer

(1) Background: Somatic and germline alterations can be commonly found in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. The aim of our present study was to perform a comprehensive review of the current literature in order to examine the impact of BRCA mutations in the context of PCa as well as their significance as genetic biomarkers. (2) Methods: A narrative review of all the available literature was performed. Only "landmark" publications were included. (3) Results: Overall, the number of PCa patients who harbor a BRCA2 mutation range between 1.2% and 3.2%. However, BRCA2 and BRCA1 mutations are responsible for most cases of hereditary PCa, increasing the risk by 3-8.6 times and up to 4 times, respectively. These mutations are correlated with aggressive disease and poor prognosis. Gene testing should be offered to patients with metastatic PCa, those with 2-3 first-degree relatives with PCa, or those aged < 55 and with one close relative with breast (age ≤ 50 years) or invasive ovarian cancer. (4) Conclusions: The individualized assessment of BRCA mutations is an important tool for the risk stratification of PCa patients. It is also a population screening tool which can guide our risk assessment strategies and achieve better results for our patients and their families.

Incorporating Genetic Risk Into Prostate Cancer Care: Implications for Early Detection and Precision Oncology

The availability and cost of germline and somatic genetic testing have dramatically improved over the past two decades, enabling precision medicine approaches in oncology, with significant implications for prostate cancer (PCa) care. Roughly 12% of individuals with advanced disease are carriers of rare pathogenic germline variants that predispose to particularly aggressive and earlier-onset disease. Several of these variants are already established as clinically actionable by modern precision oncology therapeutics, while others may come to aid the selection of active surveillance, definitive local therapies, and systemic therapies. Concurrently, the number of common variants (ie, incorporated into polygenic risk scores) associated with PCa risk has continued to grow, but with several important considerations both at the intersection of race and ancestry and for early detection of aggressive disease. Family history has historically been used as a proxy for this inherited genetic risk of PCa, but recently emerging evidence examining this relation has shifted our understanding of how best to leverage this tool in PCa care. This review seeks to clarify and contextualize the existing and emerging precision oncology paradigms that use inherited genetic risk in PCa care, for both early detection and localized disease management.

Theranostic biomarkers and PARP-inhibitors effectiveness in patients with non-BRCA associated homologous recombination deficient tumors: Still looking through a dirty glass window?

Breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) and breast cancer susceptibility gene 2 (BRCA2) deleterious variants were the first and, still today, the main biomarkers of poly(ADP)ribose polymerase (PARP)-inhibitors (PARPis) benefit. The recent, increased, numbers of individuals referred for counseling and multigene panel testing, and the remarkable expansion of approved PARPis, not restricted to BRCA1/BRCA2-Pathogenic Variants (PVs), produced a strong clinical need for non-BRCA biomarkers. Significant limitations of the current testing and assays exist. The different approaches that identify the causes of Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD), such as the germline and somatic Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) gene PVs, the testing showing its consequences, such as the genomic scars, or the novel functional assays such as the RAD51 foci testing, are not interchangeable, and should not be considered as substitutes for each other in clinical practice for guiding use of PARPi in non-BRCA, HRD-associated tumors. Today, the deeper knowledge on the significant relationship among all proteins involved in the HRR, not limited to BRCA, expands the possibility of a successful non-BRCA, HRD-PARPi synthetic lethality and, at the same time, reinforces the need for enhanced definition of HRD biomarkers predicting the magnitude of PARPi benefit.

Genetic landscape of homologous recombination repair genes in early-onset/familial prostate cancer patients

Prostate cancer (PrCa) is one of the three most frequent and deadliest cancers worldwide. The discovery of PARP inhibitors for the treatment of tumors with deleterious variants in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes has placed PrCa on the roadmap of precision medicine. However, the overall contribution of HRR genes to the 10%-20% of carcinomas arising in men with early-onset/familial PrCa has not been fully clarified. We used targeted next-generation sequencing (T-NGS) covering eight HRR genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CHEK2, NBN, PALB2, and RAD51C) and an analysis pipeline querying both small and large genomic variations to clarify their global and relative contribution to hereditary PrCa predisposition in a series of 462 early-onset/familial PrCa cases. Deleterious variants were found in 3.9% of the patients, with CHEK2 and ATM being the most frequently mutated genes (38.9% and 22.2% of the carriers, respectively), followed by PALB2 and NBN (11.1% of the carriers, each), and finally by BRCA2, RAD51C, and BRIP1 (5.6% of the carriers, each). Using the same NGS data, exonic rearrangements were found in two patients, one pathogenic in BRCA2 and one of unknown significance in BRCA1. These results contribute to clarify the genetic heterogeneity that underlies PrCa predisposition in the early-onset and familial disease, respectively.

[Early detection of prostate cancer: Towards a new paradigm?]

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a public health issue. The diagnostic strategy for PCa is well codified and assessed by digital rectal examination, PSA testing and multiparametric MRI, which may or may not lead to prostate biopsies. The formal benefit of organized PCa screening, studied more than 10 years ago at an international scale and for all incomers, is not demonstrated. However, diagnostic and therapeutic modalities have evolved since the pivotal studies. The contribution of MRI and targeted biopsies, the widespread use of active surveillance for unsignificant PCa, the improvement of surgical techniques and radiotherapy… have allowed a better selection of patients and strengthened the interest for an individualized approach, reducing the risk of overtreatment. Aiming to enhance coverage and access to screening for the population, the European Commission recently promoted the evaluation of an organized PCa screening strategy, including MRI. The lack of screening programs has become detrimental to the population and must shift towards an early detection policy adapted to the risk of each individual.

Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer: From Diagnosis to Treatment

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a widespread malignancy with global significance, which substantially affects cancer-related mortality. Its spectrum varies widely, from slow-progressing cases to aggressive or even lethal forms. Effective patient stratification into risk groups is crucial to therapeutic decisions and clinical trials. This review examines a wide range of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, several of which are integrated into clinical guidelines, such as the PHI, the 4K score, PCA3, Decipher, and Prolaris. It also explores the emergence of novel biomarkers supported by robust preclinical evidence, including urinary miRNAs and isoprostanes. Genetic alterations frequently identified in PCa, including BRCA1/BRCA2, ETS gene fusions, and AR changes, are also discussed, offering insights into risk assessment and precision treatment strategies. By evaluating the latest developments and applications of PCa biomarkers, this review contributes to an enhanced understanding of their role in disease management.

Is It Time to Anticipate the Use of PARP Inhibition in Prostate Cancer Patients?

The increasing diffusion of genetic analysis regarding the pathogenetic variants (PVs) of genes involved in DNA Damage Repair (DDR) mechanisms and the development of Poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) led to the first valid precision medicine option tailored toward metastatic prostate cancer (mPC). The concept of anticipation in the systemic treatment of mPC was initially adopted for androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) to describe the expansion of their indications, from the setting of the late-stage second-line treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) to first-line therapy in selected cases. There is already mounting evidence in favor of the anticipation of PARPis in the first line of mCRPC therapy, and further evidence in favor of mHSPC is emerging. Many studies have demonstrated the synergism between ARSIs and PARP inhibitors. Recent discoveries regarding the crosstalk between the androgen receptor (AR) and DNA repair mechanisms are disconnecting the use of PARPis from genetic analysis. The new message emerging is that the combination of PARPis with ARSIs may work independently of DDR mutational status. As a matter of fact, most of the recent trials analyzing the combination of PARPis with abiraterone or enzalutamide as a first-line therapy enrolled mCRPC patients irrespective of their mutational status. The PROPEL trial concluded that the advantage of the combination was independent of PV status, despite a higher advantage being reported in the BRCA1/2 mutated subgroup. The MAGNITUDE trial, however, showed a significant advantage only in the DDR mutated subgroup, and the DDR non-mutated cohort was closed for further enrollment. The combination of PARPis with ARSIs represents a significant strategy with a view to the anticipation and intensification of care in mPC. However, it should not nullify the advantages of precision medicine linked to the genetic analysis of DDR genes.

Clinical risk management of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostatic cancers for BRCA1/2 variant carriers in Japan

Opportunities for genetic counseling and germline BRCA1/2 (BRCA) testing are increasing in Japan owing to cancer genomic profiling testing and companion diagnostics being covered by national health insurance for patients with BRCA-related cancers. These tests are useful not only to judge whether platinum agents and PARP inhibitors are indicated but also to reveal an autosomal-dominant inherited cancer syndrome: hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. In individuals with germline BRCA variants, risk of cancers of the breast, ovary, pancreas, and prostate is significantly increased at various ages of onset, but the stomach, uterus, biliary tract, and skin might also be at risk. For women with pathogenic BRCA variants, breast awareness and image analyses should be initiated in their 20s, and risk-reducing procedures such as mastectomy are recommended starting in their 30s, with salpingo-oophorectomy in their late 30s. For male BRCA pathogenic variant carriers, prostatic surveillance should be applied using serum prostate-specific antigen starting in their 40s. For both sexes, image examinations ideally using endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and blood testing should begin in their 50s for pancreatic surveillance. Homologous recombination pathway-associated genes are also causative candidates. Variant pathogenicity needs to be evaluated every 6-12 months when results are uncertain for clinical significance. Genetic counseling needs to be offered to the blood relatives of the pathogenic variant carriers with suitable timing. We review the recommended cross-organ BRCA risk management in Japan.

DNA Damage Repair Pathways in Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review of Molecular Mechanisms, Emerging Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Precision Oncology

Prostate cancer (PCa) has a distinct molecular signature, including characteristic chromosomal translocations, gene deletions and defective DNA damage repair mechanisms. One crucial pathway involved is homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and it is found in almost 20% of metastatic castrate-resistant PCa (mCRPC). Inherited/germline mutations are associated with a hereditary predisposition to early PCa development and aggressive behavior. BRCA2, ATM and CHECK2 are the most frequently HRD-mutated genes. BRCA2-mutated tumors have unfavorable clinical and pathological characteristics, such as intraductal carcinoma. PARP inhibitors, due to the induction of synthetic lethality, have been therapeutically approved for mCRPC with HRD alterations. Mutations are detected in metastatic tissue, while a liquid biopsy is utilized during follow-up, recognizing acquired resistance mechanisms. The mismatch repair (MMR) pathway is another DNA repair mechanism implicated in carcinogenesis, although only 5% of metastatic PCa is affected. It is associated with aggressive disease. PD-1 inhibitors have been used in MMR-deficient tumors; thus, the MMR status should be tested in all metastatic PCa cases. A surrogate marker of defective DNA repair mechanisms is the tumor mutational burden. PDL-1 expression and intratumoral lymphocytes have ambivalent predictive value. Few experimental molecules have been so far proposed as potential biomarkers. Future research may further elucidate the role of DNA damage pathways in PCa, revealing new therapeutic targets and predictive biomarkers.

Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline Part I: Prostate Cancer Screening

PURPOSE

The summary presented herein covers recommendations on the early detection of prostate cancer and provides a framework to facilitate clinical decision-making in the implementation of prostate cancer screening, biopsy, and follow-up. This is Part I of a two-part series that focuses on prostate cancer screening. Please refer to Part II for discussion of initial and repeat biopsies as well as biopsy technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The systematic review utilized to inform this guideline was conducted by an independent methodological consultant. The systematic review was based on searches in Ovid MEDLINE and Embase and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (January 1, 2000-November 21, 2022). Searches were supplemented by reviewing reference lists of relevant articles.

RESULTS

The Early Detection of Prostate Cancer Panel developed evidence- and consensus-based guideline statements to provide guidance in prostate cancer screening, initial and repeat biopsy, and biopsy technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based prostate cancer screening in combination with shared decision-making (SDM) is recommended. Current data regarding risk from population-based cohorts provide a basis for longer screening intervals and tailored screening, and the use of available online risk calculators is encouraged.

Impact of DNA damage repair alterations on prostate cancer progression and metastasis

Prostate cancer is among the most common diseases worldwide. Despite recent progress with treatments, patients with advanced prostate cancer have poor outcomes and there is a high unmet need in this population. Understanding molecular determinants underlying prostate cancer and the aggressive phenotype of disease can help with design of better clinical trials and improve treatments for these patients. One of the pathways often altered in advanced prostate cancer is DNA damage response (DDR), including alterations in BRCA1/2 and other homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. Alterations in the DDR pathway are particularly prevalent in metastatic prostate cancer. In this review, we summarise the prevalence of DDR alterations in primary and advanced prostate cancer and discuss the impact of alterations in the DDR pathway on aggressive disease phenotype, prognosis and the association of germline pathogenic alterations in DDR genes with risk of developing prostate cancer.