Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer. Part I: Intermediate-/High-risk and Locally Advanced Disease, Biochemical Relapse, and Side Effects of Hormonal Treatment: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2022

Late Urinary Toxicity and Quality of Life With Pelvic Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Dose-Effect Relations in the POP-RT Randomized Phase 3 Trial

PURPOSE

The POP-RT phase 3 randomized trial showed improved biochemical failure-free survival and metastasis-free survival with whole pelvic radiation therapy versus prostate-only radiation therapy for high and very high-risk prostate cancer, albeit with worse RTOG late urinary toxicity. We report updated late urinary adverse effects and bladder dose-effect relations within this trial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Late urinary toxicity and the cumulative severity of each symptom during the follow-up period were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0. Bladder dosimetry in 5-Gy increments (V5, V10, V15, V65, V68Gy) in the approved radiation therapy plans was compared with urinary symptoms and overall grade 2+ toxicity. Potential factors influencing urinary toxicity were tested using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Updated urinary quality of life (QOL) scores were compared between the trial arms.

RESULTS

Complete combined data for late urinary symptoms and dosimetry was available for 193 of 224 patients. At a median follow-up of 75 months, cumulative late urinary CTCAE grade 3 toxicity was low and similar for whole pelvic radiation therapy and prostate-only radiation therapy (5.2% vs 4.1%, P = .49), and grade 2 toxicity was 31.3% versus 22.7%, respectively (P = .12). Cumulative rates of each urinary symptom were similar between both arms. Multivariable analysis with age at diagnosis, known diabetes, tumor stage, trial arm, prior transurethral resection of prostate, grade 2+ acute urinary toxicity, low bladder dose (V10Gy), and moderate bladder dose (V40Gy) did not identify any significant association with late urinary toxicity. Urinary QOL scores was similar between both the arms for all the symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

During long-term follow-up, whole pelvic radiation therapy resulted in low (∼5%) and similar grade 3 cumulative urinary toxicity as prostate-only radiation therapy. The long-term patient-reported QOL scores were similar. No causative factors affecting the late urinary toxicity were identified.

Current issues and management consensus of advanced prostate cancer: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference-JAPAN 2023

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the voting results of Japanese urologists with the global panel at the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2022.

METHODS

Among the 198 questions discussed at the APCCC 2022, the APCCC-JAPAN 2023 focused on 14 key questions related to the management of advanced prostate cancer with insufficient high-level evidence based on their relevance to the Japanese cohort. A panel of six prostate cancer experts addressed these 14 questions and presented the latest evidence to Japanese urologists who voted on-site using a web-based system. The results were compared with those of APCCC 2022.

RESULTS

This study found significant differences in the voting results between Japanese urologists and the global panel regarding several crucial issues related to advanced prostate cancer management. These differences were those observed in treatment preferences, monitoring strategies, and treatment choices in specific clinical scenarios. These findings highlight the need for a nuanced approach tailored to the unique challenges with considerations of the Japanese healthcare environment.

CONCLUSIONS

APCCC-JAPAN 2023 provides valuable insights into the current clinical issues surrounding the management of advanced prostate cancer in Japan. The partial divergence in the consensus between Japanese urologists and the global panel underscores the importance of a context-specific approach. The results of this study provide practical guidance for physicians facing complex challenges and should be used to inform decision-making in the management of advanced prostate cancer.

DNA damage-mediated FTO downregulation promotes CRPC progression by inhibiting FOXO3a via an m6A-dependent mechanism

Polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) represent a promising novel treatment for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with encouraging results. However, the combination targets in CRPC remain largely unexplored. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) has been shown to play a crucial role in cancer progression and DNA damage response. Here, we observed a higher overall level of m6A and a downregulation of Fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO), which correlated with unfavorable clinicopathological parameters in prostate cancer (PCa). Functionally, reduced FTO promotes PCa growth, while overexpression of FTO has the opposite effect. Mechanistically, FOXO3a was identified as the downstream target of FTO in PCa. FTO downregulates the expression of FOXO3a in an m6A-dependent manner, leading to the degradation of its mRNA. Importantly, DNA damage can degrade FTO through the ubiquitination pathway. Finally, we found that overexpression of FTO can enhance the effect of PARPi on PCa. Therefore, our findings may provide insight into novel therapeutic approaches for CRPC.

Cost Effectiveness of Systemic Treatment Intensification for Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: Is Triplet Therapy Cost Effective?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

There has been a shift toward systemic treatment intensification for men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Recent trials have demonstrated the efficacy of triplet therapy with an androgen receptor signalling inhibitor (ARSI), docetaxel, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, ARSI treatment is expensive. The objective was to determine the cost effectiveness of current treatments strategies for men with mHSPC.

METHODS

We developed a Markov state-transition model to simulate outcomes for men with newly diagnosed mHSPC. For the simulation, patients were entered in the model in the mHSPC disease state before progressing to castration-resistant disease and finally dying from prostate cancer. Costs were calculated from a USA health sector perspective in 2022 US dollars. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for uncertainty in the parameter estimates. We also performed scenario analyses for costs in the UK and Australian health sectors.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Treatment intensification with doublet and triplet therapy resulted in an improvement in quality-adjusted survival for all strategies in comparison to ADT monotherapy. However, only docetaxel doublet therapy was cost effective at standard thresholds, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $13 647. The cost of ARSIs needed to be discounted by 47-70% before they were cost effective. Only medication costs impacted the model results. If the generic price for abiraterone acetate is used, then triplet therapy with abiraterone is the best-value option. Similar results were obtained for analyses for the UK and Australian health sectors.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Treatment intensification with ARSIs in men with mHSPC results in better quality-adjusted survival but is not cost effective according to standard thresholds. The costs of these medications would need to be heavily discounted before they are cost effective. The cost of generic ARSIs, once available, would render these strategies cost effective.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This report examines whether increasing the number of systemic drugs used to treat a patient's metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer is cost effective for the health care system. We found that the additional cost of triplet therapy does not justify the increase in patient benefit.

Management of advanced prostate cancer in the Asia-Pacific region: Summary of the Asia-Pacific Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2023

AIM

The aim of the third Asia-Pacific Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APAC APCCC 2023) was to discuss the application in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region of consensus statements from the 4th Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022).

METHODS

The one-day meeting in July 2023 brought together 27 experts from 14 APAC countries. The meeting covered five topics: (1) Intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer; (2) Management of newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; (3) Management of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; (4) Homologous recombination repair mutation testing; (5) Management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Pre- and post-symposium polling gathered APAC-specific responses to APCCC consensus questions and insights on current practices and challenges in the APAC region.

RESULTS

APAC APCCC highlights APAC-specific considerations in an evolving landscape of diagnostic technologies and treatment innovations for advanced prostate cancer. While new technologies are available in the region, cost and reimbursement continue to influence practice significantly. Individual patient considerations, including the impact of chemophobia on Asian patients, also influence decision-making.

CONCLUSION

The use of next-generation imaging, genetic testing, and new treatment combinations is increasing the complexity and duration of prostate cancer management. Familiarity with new diagnostic and treatment options is growing in the APAC region. Insights highlight the continued importance of a multidisciplinary approach that includes nuclear medicine, genetic counseling, and quality-of-life expertise. The APAC APCCC meeting provides an important opportunity to share practice and identify APAC-specific issues and considerations in areas of low evidence where clinical experience is growing.

Organ-confined pT2 ISUP4/5 vs. nonorgan confined pT3/4 ISUP2 vs. ISUP3 prostate cancer: Differences in biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

To test for differences in organ-confined pathological tumor stage (pT) and intermediate International Society of Urological Pathologists (ISUP) grade vs. nonorgan confined pT stage and high ISUP grade and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

Relying on a tertiary-care database, prostate cancer patients undergoing RP between January 2014 and December 2021 were stratified according to their combination of pT stage and ISUP grade in RP specimens (pT2 ISUP4/5 vs. pT3/4 ISUP2 vs. pT3/4 ISUP3). As Active Surveillance is recommended in ISUP1, these patients were excluded. Moreover, patients with pT2 ISUP2/3 are known for their good prognosis and pT3/4 ISUP4/5 patients for their poor prognosis. Therefore, these patients were also excluded from analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and multivariable Cox regression models addressed BCR after RP.

RESULTS

Of 215 RP patients, 29 (13%) exhibited pT2 ISUP4/5 vs. 122 (57%) pT3/4 ISUP2 vs. 64 (30%) pT3/4 ISUP3 pathology. In survival analyses, 3-year BCR-free survival rates were 95% in pT2 ISUP4/5 vs. 88% in pT3/4 ISUP2 vs. 65% in pT3/4 ISUP3 patients (P < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression models addressing BCR, pT3/4 ISUP3 pathology was associated with higher BCR rate relative to pT2 ISUP4/5 pathology (hazard ratio 3.42, 95% confidence interval 1.07-10.94; P = 0.039), but not pT3/4 ISUP2 pathology (P = 0.6).

CONCLUSION

Compared to prostate cancer patients with pT2 ISUP4/5 pathology, the combination of pT3/4 ISUP3 pathology is associated with higher risk of BCR after RP. In consequence, patients with pT3/4 ISUP3 pathology should be considered for a closer postoperative follow-up.

The value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the diagnosis of intracapsular prostate cancer with a poor prognosis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic value of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for intracapsular prostate cancer with a poor prognosis (PPC) and no extracapsular invasion or distant metastasis.

METHODS

The PET/CT images and clinical data of 221 patients were retrospectively analyzed. These patients all had clear pathological results. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of the main lesions was measured at the postprocessing workstation and was tested for correlation with the pathological score. The diagnostic accuracy was calculated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the best diagnostic threshold was calculated. The correlation between SUVmax and the International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (GG) was also analyzed.

RESULTS

The pathological results of the 221 patients were 48 benign lesions and 173 malignant lesions, including 81 PPC. Low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancers made up 21.97% (38/173), 54.33% (94/173), and 23.70% (41/173) of the malignant lesions, respectively. SUVmax and GG were positively correlated (r = 0.54, P < 0.01). The best SUVmax thresholds for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the diagnosis of intracapsular PC and PPC were 7.95 and 13.94, respectively; the specificities were 0.83 and 0.85, the negative predictive values were 0.55 and 0.87, and the areas under the ROC curves were 0.88 and 0.88, respectively.

CONCLUSION

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT has high specificity and NPV in the diagnosis of intracapsular PPC, but the sensitivity for the diagnosis of intracapsular low-risk PC is low, which may cause some cases to be undetected.

Controversies in prostate cancer management: Consensus recommendations from experts in northern Spain

In recent years, various aspects of prostate cancer (PC) management have undergone significant changes, including the implementation of therapeutic strategies such as the use of new hormonal agents like abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide or darolutamide and the incorporation of next generation imaging techniques (NGI). However, the evidence regarding the role of NGI and the therapeutic decision-making based on their findings is not solid. Following the methodology of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC), a multidisciplinary expert consensus was developed to address controversial questions concerning the use of NGI and clinical management in four priority scenarios: localized PC, PC after radical prostatectomy, PC after radiotherapy with curative intent, and metastatic hormone-sensitive PC. This consensus represents the opinions of medical oncology, radiation oncology and urology physicians and provides useful recommendations for clinical practice.

Magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics nomogram for the evaluation of therapeutic responses to neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy in high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the potential application of a radiomics features-based nomogram for predicting therapeutic responses to neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) in patients with high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

Clinicopathologic information was retrospectively collected from 162 patients with high-risk non-metastatic PCa receiving NCHT and radical prostatectomy at our center. The postoperative pathological findings were used as the gold standard for evaluating the efficacy of NCHT. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was conducted to develop radiomics signature. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the predictors of a positive pathological response to NCHT, and a nomogram was constructed based on these predictors.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients (38.89%) experienced positive pathological response to NCHT. Receiver operating characteristic analyses showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of periprostatic fat (PPF) radiomics signature was 0.835 (95% CI, 0.754-0.898), while the AUC of intratumoral radiomics signature was 0.822 (95% CI, 0.739-0.888). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that PSA level, PPF radiomics signature and intratumoral radiomics signature were independent predictors of positive pathological response. A nomogram based on these three predictors was constructed. The AUC was 0.908 (95% CI, 0.839-0.954). The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed that the nomogram was well calibrated. Decision curve analysis revealed the favorable clinical practicability of the nomogram. The nomogram was successfully validated in the validation cohort. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that nomogram and positive pathological response were significantly related with survival of PCa.

CONCLUSION

The radiomics-clinical nomogram based on mpMRI radiomics features exhibited superior predictive ability for positive pathological response to NCHT in high-risk non-metastatic PCa.

Radiographic Progression at Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Prognostic Indicator of Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

The critical role of radiographic assessment at the time of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) diagnosis is underscored by this study. We performed a retrospective analysis of radiographic changes in metastasis from the time of diagnosis of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) to CRPC diagnosis. We also explored its impact on prognosis post-CRPC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 98 men who underwent radiographic examinations (bone scans and computed tomography [CT]) at the time of CRPC diagnosis. When radiographic studies demonstrated progression at CRPC diagnosis, patients were assigned to the radiographic progressive disease (rPD) group. The remaining patients were placed in the "non-rPD" group. The overall survival (OS) post-CRPC was compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The median OS post-CRPC was significantly shorter in the rPD group (n = 50) compared to the non-rPD group (n = 48) (32 months vs. not reached, P = .0124). Multivariate analysis showed that radiographic progression and shorter time to CRPC were associated with a shorter OS post-CRPC (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-8.12, P = .019).

CONCLUSION

Radiographic progression at the point of CRPC diagnosis independently predicts a shorter OS post-CRPC in patients with mHSPC. Therefore, assessing radiographic changes at the time of CRPC diagnosis could be instrumental in managing CRPC in patients with mHSPC.

Prevalence and influencing factors of social alienation among elderly patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

Objectives

This study aims to not only investigate the prevalence of social alienation among elderly patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer but also identify the contributing factors.

Materials and methods

A total of 245 elderly patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and undergoing radical prostatectomy at a tertiary care general hospital in Jinan were included in this study. To assess the patients, several questionnaires were used. These included the General Situation Questionnaire, General Alienation Scale, Social Impact Scale, Modified Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer, and Perceived Social Support Scale. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to examine the relationships between variables, whereas multiple linear regression was used to identify the factors influencing social alienation among patients who underwent radical prostatectomy.

Results

Patients who underwent radical prostatectomy had a mean total score of 44.13 ± 7.24 on the Social Alienation Scale. The results of the Pearson correlation analysis indicated that social alienation showed an inverse association with social support (r = -0.627, p < 0.05) and positive associations with age, disease stigma, and anxiety (r = 0.325, 0.575, 0.421, all p's < 0.01) among patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. The findings from multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that educational level, age, urinary incontinence, disease stigma, anxiety, and social support significantly influenced social alienation among elderly patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Elderly patients who undergo radical prostatectomy often experience social alienation. This study found that social alienation was associated with factors such as educational level, age, urinary incontinence, social support, anxiety, and disease stigma. Consequently, healthcare providers should actively monitor the degree of social alienation in elderly patients after radical prostatectomy and provide suitable psychological care to facilitate positive social reintegration and alleviate their feelings of social alienation.

Refining Risk Stratification of High-risk and Locoregional Prostate Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Radiotherapy (RT) and long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ltADT; 18-36 mo) is a standard of care in the treatment of high-risk localized/locoregional prostate cancer (HRLPC). We evaluated the outcomes in patients treated with RT + ltADT to identify which patients have poorer prognosis with standard therapy.

METHODS

Individual patient data from patients with HRLPC (as defined by any of the following three risk factors [RFs] in the context of cN0 disease-Gleason score ≥8, cT3-4, and prostate-specific antigen [PSA] >20 ng/ml, or cN1 disease) treated with RT and ltADT in randomized controlled trials collated by the Intermediate Clinical Endpoints in Cancer of the Prostate group. The outcome measures of interest were metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), time to metastasis, and prostate cancer-specific mortality. Multivariable Cox and Fine-Gray regression estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for the three RFs and cN1 disease.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 3604 patients from ten trials were evaluated, with a median PSA value of 24 ng/ml. Gleason score ≥8 (MFS HR = 1.45; OS HR = 1.42), cN1 disease (MFS HR = 1.86; OS HR = 1.77), cT3-4 disease (MFS HR = 1.28; OS HR = 1.22), and PSA >20 ng/ml (MFS HR = 1.30; OS HR = 1.21) were associated with poorer outcomes. Adjusted 5-yr MFS rates were 83% and 78%, and 10-yr MFS rates were 63% and 53% for patients with one and two to three RFs, respectively; corresponding 10-yr adjusted OS rates were 67% and 60%, respectively. In cN1 patients, adjusted 5- and 10-yr MFS rates were 67% and 36%, respectively, and 10-yr OS was 47%.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

HRLPC patients with two to three RFs (and cN0) or cN1 disease had the poorest outcomes on RT and ltADT. This will help in counseling patients treated in routine practice and in guiding adjuvant trials in HRLPC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Radiotherapy and long-term hormone therapy are standard treatments for high-risk and locoregional prostate cancer. In this report, we defined prognostic groups within high-risk/locoregional prostate cancer and showed that outcomes to standard therapy are poorest in those with two or more "high-risk" factors or evidence of lymph node involvement. Such patients may therefore be the best candidates for intensification of treatment.

Discrepancy in the Location of Prostate Cancer Indicated on Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathologically Diagnosed Using Surgical Specimens

Accurate diagnosis of the localization of prostate cancer (PCa) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains a challenge. We aimed to assess discrepancy between the location of PCa pathologically diagnosed using surgical specimens and lesions indicated as possible PCa by the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System on MRI. The primary endpoint was the concordance rate between the site of probable clinically significant PCa (csPCa) identified using biparametric MRI (bpMRI) and location of PCa in the surgical specimen obtained using robot-assisted total prostatectomy. Among 85 lesions identified in 30 patients; 42 (49.4%) were identified as possible PCa on MRI. The 85 PCa lesions were divided into positive and negative groups based on the bpMRI results. None of the patients had missed csPCa. Although the diagnostic accuracy of bpMRI was relatively high for PCas located in the middle of the prostate (p = 0.029), it was relatively low for PCa located at the base of the prostate, all of which were csPCas. Although current modalities can accurately diagnose PCa, the possibility that PCa is present with multiple lesions in the prostate should be considered, even if MRI does not detect PCa.

Recurrent Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer After Radiotherapy or Ablation: Should We Observe Them All? Results from a Large Multicenter Salvage Radical Prostatectomy Consortium

BACKGROUND

Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) yields poor functional outcomes and relatively high complication rates. Gleason score (GS) 6 prostate cancer (PCa) has genetic and clinical features showing little, if not absent, metastatic potential. However, the behavior of GS 6 PCa recurring after previous PCa treatment including radiotherapy and/or ablation has not been investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the oncological outcomes of sRP for radio- and/or ablation-recurrent GS 6 PCa.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Retrospective data of sRP for recurrent PCa after local nonsurgical treatment were collected from 14 tertiary referral centers from 2000 to 2021.

INTERVENTION

Prostate biopsy before sRP and sRP.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

A survival analysis was performed for pre-sRP biopsy and sRP-proven GS 6. Concordance between PCa at pre-sRP biopsy and sRP histology was assessed.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

We included GS 6 recurrent PCa at pre-sRP biopsy (n = 142) and at sRP (n = 50), as two cohorts. The majority had primary radiotherapy and/or brachytherapy (83.8% of GS 6 patients at pre-sRP biopsy; 78% of GS 6 patients at sRP) and whole-gland treatments (91% biopsy; 85.1% sRP). Biopsy GS 6 10-yr metastasis, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were 79% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61-89%), 98% (95-99%), and 89% (78-95%), respectively. Upgrading at sRP was 69%, 35.5% had a pT3 stage, and 13.4% had positive nodes. The sRP GS 6 10-yr metastasis-free survival, CSS, and OS were 100%, 100%, and 90% (95% CI 58-98%) respectively; pT3 and pN1 disease were found in 12% and 0%, respectively. Overall complications, high-grade complications, and severe incontinence were experienced by >50%, >10%, and >15% of men, respectively (in both the biopsy and the sRP cohorts). Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and absence of a centralized pathological review.

CONCLUSIONS

GS 6 sRP-proven PCa recurring after nonsurgical primary treatment has almost no metastatic potential, while patients experience relevant morbidity of the procedure. However, a significant proportion of GS 6 cases at pre-sRP biopsy are upgraded at sRP. In the idea not to overtreat, efforts should be made to improve the diagnostic accuracy of pre-sRP biopsy.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We investigated the oncological results of salvage radical prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer of Gleason score (GS) 6 category. We found a very low malignant potential of GS 6 confirmed at salvage radical prostatectomy despite surgical complications being relatively high. Nonetheless, biopsy GS 6 was frequently upgraded and had less optimal oncological control. Overtreatment for recurrent GS 6 after nonsurgical first-line treatment should be avoided, and efforts should be made to increase the diagnostic accuracy of biopsies for recurrent disease.

Comparative effectiveness of multiple androgen receptor signaling inhibitor medicines with androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a study in the real world

Background

The current treatment strategy for metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC) is the combination of Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors (ARSIs) medicines with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, there is a lack of real-world data comparing the efficacy of different ARSI pharmaceuticals. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of bicalutamide, abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide in combination with ADT for patients with mHSPC.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 82 patients diagnosed with mHSPC, including 18 patients treated with abiraterone acetate with prednisone, 21 patients with enzalutamide, 20 patients with apalutamide, and 23 patients with bicalutamide. We evaluated PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), imaging progression-free survival (r PFS), castration resistance progression-free survival (CRPC-PFS), and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Additionally, we explored relevant factors affecting prognosis through univariate and multivariate Cox risk-proportionality models. PSA response rates at 3, 6, and 12 months, nadir PSA levels (nPSA), and time to nadir (TTN) in different medication subgroups after treatment were documented, and we used one-way ANOVA to determine the effect of these measures on patient prognosis.

Results

In comparison with bicalutamide, both enzalutamide and apalutamide have shown significant advantages in delaying disease progression among mHSPC patients. Specifically, enzalutamide has been found to significantly prolong PSA-PFS (HR 2.244; 95% CI 1.366-3.685, p=0.001), rPFS (HR 2.539; 95% CI 1.181-5.461; p= 0.007), CRPC-PFS (HR 2.131; 95% CI 1.295-3.506; p= 0.003), and OS (HR 2.06; 95% CI 1.183-3.585; P=0.005). Similarly, apalutamide has significantly extended PSA-PFS (HR 5.071; 95% CI 1.711-15.032; P= 0.003) and CRPC-PFS (HR 6.724; 95% CI 1.976-22.878; P=0.002) among patients. On the other hand, the use of abiraterone in combination with ADT did not demonstrate a significant advantage in delaying diseases progression when compared with the other three agents in mHSPC patients. There were no significant differences in overall adverse event rates among the four pharmaceuticals in terms of safety. Additionally, the observation of PSA kinetics revealed that enzalutamide, apalutamide, and abiraterone acetate had a significant advantage in achieving deep PSA response (PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/ml) compared with bicalutamide (p=0.007 at 12 months). Enzalutamide and apalutamide exhibited preeminence efficacy, with no substantial difference observed between the two medications.

Conclusions

Abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide were found to significantly reduce and stabilize PSA levels in mHSPC patients more quickly and thoroughly than bicalutamide. Furthermore, enzalutamide and apalutamide were found to significantly prolong survival and delay disease progression in mHSPC patients compared with bicalutamide. It should be noted that abiraterone did not demonstrate a significant advantage in delaying disease compared with enzalutamide and apalutamide. After conducting drug toxicity analyses, it was determined that there were no significant differences among the four drugs.

Clinical Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: Quarter-Century Transformation of Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging

Although positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) underwent rapid growth during the last quarter-century, becoming a new standard-of-care for imaging most cancer types, CT and bone scan remained the gold standard for patients with prostate cancer. This occurred as 2-fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose was perceived to have a limited role owing to low sensitivity in many patients. A resurgence of interest occurred with the use of fluorine-18-sodium-fluoride PET/CT as a replacement for bone scintigraphy, and then choline, fluciclovine, and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) PET/CT as prostate "specific" radiotracers. The last decade, however, has seen a true revolution with the meteoric rise of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT.

MRI in-bore biopsy following MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy in patients with persistent suspicion of clinically significant prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Patients with suspicion of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) on multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) but negative or inconclusive MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy (FB) can be challenging in clinical practice. To assess the utility of MRI in-bore biopsy (IB) in patients with discordant imaging and histopathological findings after FB.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) category 4 or 5 on mpMRI at 3T after FB without histologically confirmed csPC who underwent IB between 01/2014 and 05/2022, were retrospectively included. The primary objective was to assess the detection rate of csPC. Secondary objectives were to analyze clinical parameters, MRI parameters, and lesion localization.

RESULTS

In the final cohort of 51 patients, the IB resulted in an overall detection rate of 71% for PC and 47% for csPC. Furthermore, in 55% of cases with initial low-grade PC, the Gleason score was upgraded after IB. CsPC was often detected apical and/or anterior. The detection rate for PC was 58% in PI-RADS category 4 and 94% in PI-RADS category 5 (csPC 39% and 61%, respectively). Patients with csPC had statistically significant smaller prostate volumes, a higher PI-RADS category, a higher prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), and were older.

CONCLUSIONS

For a relevant proportion of patients with PI-RADS category 4 or 5 and negative or inconclusive findings on previous FB, but with persistent suspicion of csPC, a subsequent IB verified the presence of csPC. Therefore, IB can be a backup in cases of uncertainty.

The Current Therapeutic Landscape for Metastatic Prostate Cancer

In 2024, there will be an estimated 1,466,718 cases of prostate cancer (PC) diagnosed globally, of which 299,010 cases are estimated to be from the US. The typical clinical approach for PC involves routine screening, diagnosis, and standard lines of treatment. However, not all patients respond to therapy and are subsequently diagnosed with treatment emergent neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). There are currently no approved treatments for this form of aggressive PC. In this review, a compilation of the clinical trials regimen to treat late-stage NEPC using novel targets and/or a combination approach is presented. The novel targets assessed include DLL3, EZH2, B7-H3, Aurora-kinase-A (AURKA), receptor tyrosine kinases, PD-L1, and PD-1. Among these, the trials administering drugs Alisertib or Cabozantinib, which target AURKA or receptor tyrosine kinases, respectively, appear to have promising results. The least effective trials appear to be ones that target the immune checkpoint pathways PD-1/PD-L1. Many promising clinical trials are currently in progress. Consequently, the landscape of successful treatment regimens for NEPC is extremely limited. These trial results and the literature on the topic emphasize the need for new preventative measures, diagnostics, disease specific biomarkers, and a thorough clinical understanding of NEPC.

Bone-Modifying Agents in Patients With High-Risk Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated With Abiraterone Acetate

Importance

The association between the use of bone-modifying agents (BMAs) and the outcomes among patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) treated with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) remains unclear.

Objective

To investigate the association between BMA use and the outcomes of patients with mCSPC receiving AAP.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cohort study, a post hoc analysis of individual participant data from the LATITUDE trial was performed. The LATITUDE trial, a phase 3 randomized clinical trial, aimed to assess the efficacy of AAP and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs dual-placebo and ADT in patients with high-risk mCSPC (data cutoff, August 15, 2018). Eligible patients had newly diagnosed prostate cancer with metastases and at least 2 of 3 high-risk factors (Gleason score ≥8, presence of ≥3 lesions on bone scan, or presence of measurable visceral metastasis). The trial was conducted at 235 sites in 34 countries. Data for the present study were evaluated from July 18 to September 23, 2023.

Exposures

Use of BMAs was defined as the administration of bisphosphonates and denosumab within 90 days before and after randomization.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcomes were time to skeletal-related events (SREs) and overall survival (OS). An SRE was defined as a clinical or pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, palliative radiation to bone, or surgery involving bone. Differences in these outcomes were examined using the restricted mean survival time from inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves, estimated until the last event was observed (longest time observed, 63.9 months). Treatment × covariate interactions were analyzed using weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models for the total cohort.

Results

In the total cohort of 1199 patients (956 [79.7%] younger than 75 years), 597 (49.8%) received AAP and ADT, including 474 (79.4%) younger than 75 years and 384 (64.3%) with more than 10 bone metastases (AAP cohort); 602 (50.2%) were treated with dual placebo and ADT, including 482 (80.1%) younger than 75 years and 377 (62.6%) with more than 10 bone metastases (ADT cohort). In the AAP cohort, 132 patients (22.1%) received BMAs, while in the ADT cohort, 131 (21.8%) did. Zoledronic acid was the most frequently administered BMA in both the AAP (93 [70.5%]) and the ADT (88 [67.2%]) cohorts. During the median follow-up of 51.8 (IQR, 47.2-57.0) months in the AAP cohort, BMA use was associated with a longer time to SRE (difference, 7.8 [95% CI, 4.2-11.3] months) but not with OS (difference, 1.6 [95% CI, -2.5 to 5.8] months). In the ADT cohort, BMA use was associated with both time to SRE (difference, 9.3 [95% CI, 5.2-13.3] months) and OS (difference, 5.5 [95% CI, 3.2-9.8] months). No evidence was found that the outcomes of BMA varied by AAP or ADT (hazard ratio for time to SRE, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.48-2.08]; P = .99 for interaction; hazard ratio for OS, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.88-1.96]; P = .18 for interaction).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this cohort study suggest that use of BMAs was associated with a longer time to SRE in patients with high-risk mCSPC treated with ADT, with or without AAP, suggesting that BMA use might provide benefits to this population.

A multidisciplinary approach to address unmet needs in the management of patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

With the availability of second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (SGARIs), the treatment landscape has changed dramatically for patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). In clinical trials, the SGARIs (apalutamide, enzalutamide, darolutamide) increased metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), and patient quality of life compared to placebo. These drugs were subsequently integrated into nmCRPC clinical practice guidelines. With advances in radiographic imaging, disease assessment, and patient monitoring, nmCRPC strategies are evolving to address limitations related to tracking disease progression using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics.

METHODS

A panel of 10 multidisciplinary experts in prostate cancer conducted reviews and discussions of unmet needs in the management and monitoring of patients with nmCRPC in order to develop consensus recommendations.

RESULTS

Across the SGARI literature, patient MFS and OS are generally comparable for all treatments, but important distinctions exist regarding short- and long-term drug safety profiles and drug-drug interactions. With respect to disease monitoring, a substantial proportion of patients using SGARIs may experience disease progression without rising PSA levels, suggesting a need for enhanced radiographic imaging in addition to PSA monitoring. Recent data also indicate that novel prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography radiotracers provide enhanced accuracy for disease detection, as compared to conventional imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical decision-making in nmCRPC has become more complex, with new opportunities to apply precision medicine to patient care. Multidisciplinary teams can ensure that patients with nmCRPC receive optimal and individualized disease management.

The predictive significance of chromobox family members in prostate cancer in humans

PURPOSE

The Chromobox (CBX) family proteins are crucial elements of the epigenetic regulatory machinery and play a significant role in the development and advancement of cancer. Nevertheless, there is limited understanding regarding the role of CBXs in development or progression of prostate cancer (PCa). Our objective is to develop a unique prognostic model associated with CBXs to improve the accuracy of predicting outcomes of patients with PCa.

METHODS

Data from TCGA and GEO databases were analyzed to assess differential expression, prognostic value, gene pathway enrichment, and immune cell infiltration. COX regression analysis was utilized to identify the independent prognostic factors that impact disease-free survival (DFS). The expression of CBX2 and FOXP3+ cells infiltration was verified by immunohistochemical staining of clinical tissue sections. In vitro proliferation, migration and invasion assay were conducted to examine the function of CBX2. RNA-seq was employed to examine the CBX2 related pathway enrichment.

RESULTS

CBX2, CBX3, CBX4, and CBX8 were upregulated, while CBX6 and CBX7 were downregulated in PCa tissues. CBXs expression varied by stage and grade. Elevated expression of CBX1, CBX2, CBX3, CBX4 and CBX8 is correlated with poor outcome. CBX2 expression, T stage, and Gleason score were independent prognostic factors. The expression level of CBX2 in PCa tissues was significantly higher than that in adjacent normal tissues. More Treg infiltration was observed in the group with high CBX2 expression. CBX2 expression affected PCa cell growth, migration, and invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

CBX2 is involved in the development and advancement of PCa, suggesting its potential as a reliable prognostic indicator for PCa patients.

Toward Informed Selection and Interpretation of Clinical Genomic Tests in Prostate Cancer

Clinical genomic testing of patient germline, tumor tissue, or plasma cell-free DNA can enable a personalized approach to cancer management and treatment. In prostate cancer (PCa), broad genotyping tests are now widely used to identify germline and/or somatic alterations in BRCA2 and other DNA damage repair genes. Alterations in these genes can confer cancer sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, are linked with poor prognosis, and can have potential hereditary cancer implications for family members. However, there is huge variability in genomic tests and reporting standards, meaning that for successful implementation of testing in clinical practice, end users must carefully select the most appropriate test for a given patient and critically interpret the results. In this white paper, we outline key pre- and post-test considerations for choosing a genomic test and evaluating reported variants, specifically for patients with advanced PCa. Test choice must be based on clinical context and disease state, availability and suitability of tumor tissue, and the genes and regions that are covered by the test. We describe strategies to recognize false positives or negatives in test results, including frameworks to assess low tumor fraction, subclonal alterations, clonal hematopoiesis, and pathogenic versus nonpathogenic variants. We assume that improved understanding among health care professionals and researchers of the nuances associated with genomic testing will ultimately lead to optimal patient care and clinical decision making.

[Local therapies for oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer]

BACKGROUND

Oligometastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (omHSPC) is increasingly diagnosed due to the implementation of molecular imaging. OmHSPC is mostly defined as a maximum of four bone metastases without visceral metastases on conventional imaging.

OBJECTIVES

This study highlights the existing evidence regarding local treatment of omHSPC, taking into account molecular imaging and modern therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Narrative review article based on expert consensus and national/international guideline recommendations, supported by a nonsystematic literature search in PubMed (MEDLINE). The authors consider the cited studies as the most significant works in this regard and these were selected to illustrate developments and fundamental concepts, without claiming completeness.

RESULTS

Initially, the STAMPEDE study prospectively demonstrated an oncologic benefit of radiotherapy (RT) to the prostate in addition to androgen deprivation therapy for omHSPC. At 3 years, overall survival (OS) was 81% with RT versus 73% without RT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.90; p = 0.007). However, this benefit was not observed in polymetastatic HSPC (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.90-1.28; p = 0.4). In a study by Dai et al., local therapy for omHSPC was performed surgically in 85% of cases, also demonstrating an OS advantage (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.24-0.81; p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

OmHSPC should be treated using adjunctive RT. Preliminary prospective evidence shows comparable efficacy with prostatectomy. Modern systemic combination therapies challenge the role of local therapy.

Differences and Common Ground in 177Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy Practice Patterns: International Survey of 95 Theranostic Centers

177Lu-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy effectively treats metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients requiring treatment, and consequently the number of theranostic centers, are expected to increase significantly after Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approval. This requires standardization or harmonization among theranostic centers. The aim of this study was to assess operational differences and similarities among 177Lu-PSMA treatment centers. Methods: A questionnaire comprising 62 items, designed by a core team of 5 physicians and externally reviewed by international experts, was developed. Study participants were asked to provide answers about their center, patient selection, radiopharmaceuticals, clinical assessment before and after 177Lu-PSMA treatments, laboratory values, treatment discontinuation, posttreatment imaging, and general information. An invitation e-mail to participate in the study was sent in June 2022. Duplicates were removed to allow for only one valid response per center. Results: Ninety-five of 211 (45%) contacted centers completed the questionnaire. Most participating centers were in Europe (51%), followed by America (22%) and Asia (22%). During the 12 mo before this study, a total of 5,906 patients received 177Lu-PSMA therapy at the 95 participating centers. Most of these patients were treated in Europe (2,840/5,906; 48%), followed by Asia (1,313/5,906; 22%) and Oceania (1,225/5,906; 21%). PSMA PET eligibility for 177Lu-PSMA was determined most frequently using 68Ga-PSMA-11 (77%). Additional pretherapy imaging included 18F-FDG PET/CT, CT, renal scintigraphy, and bone scintigraphy at 41 (49%), 27 (32%), 25 (30%), and 13 (15%), respectively, of the 84 centers for clinical standard of care, compassionate care, or local research protocols and 11 (26%), 25 (60%), 9 (21%), and 28 (67%), respectively, of the 42 centers for industry-sponsored trials. PSMA PET eligibility criteria included subjective qualitative assessment of PSMA positivity at 33% of centers, VISION criteria at 23%, and TheraP criteria at 13%. The mean standard injected activity per cycle was 7.3 GBq (range, 5.5-11.1 GBq). Sixty-two (65%) centers applied standardized response assessment criteria, and PSMA PET Progression Criteria were the most applied (37%). Conclusion: Results from this international survey revealed interinstitutional differences in several aspects of 177Lu-PSMA radionuclide therapy, including patient selection, administered activity, and the response assessment strategy. Standardization or harmonization of protocols and dedicated training are desirable in anticipation of increasing numbers of patients and theranostic centers.

Initial management approach for localized/locally advanced disease is critical to guide metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer care

BACKGROUND

Currently, several therapies are available for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) but no specific clinical factors to personalize treatment. We first sought the prognostic value of duration on androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) in patients receiving androgen-receptor-signaling inhibitors (ARSI) for mCRPC.

METHODS

A multicenter cohort of mCRPC patients who started ARSI between July 2011 and October 2021 was identified. Based on their initial disease burden and duration on ADT for HSPC, primary progressive (PP) men were classified into four groups: low/intermediate-risk localized disease (LOC) and high-risk localized/locally advanced disease (LAD) and short-term (ST) < 24 vs. long-term (LT) ADT ≥ 24 months, whereas de novo (DN) mHSPC were subdivided into short-time vs. long-time to CRPC.

RESULTS

We included 919 mCRPC patients with a median age of 77 years [interquartile range (IQR) = 71-82)]. Median ADT duration in HSPC was 24 months (IQR = 14-40). Median follow-up was 91 months (IQR = 62-138), median OS and PFS from ARSI start were 20 (IQR 10-32) and 10 months (IQR = 5-19), respectively. In PP developing metastatic disease (n = 655, 71.3%), LOC and LAD with ST ADT had a greater than almost double-risk of death compared to LT ADT (LOC/ST: hazard ratio [HR] = 2.01; 95% CI 1.54-2.64; LAD/ST: HR = 1.73; 95% CI 1.34-2.24; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis including age, prognostic cohort, Gleason, ECOG, radical radiotherapy and prostatectomy, groups with ST ADT were associated with worse OS compared to LT ADT (LOC/ST: HR = 1.84; 95% CI 1.38-2.45; p < 0.001; LAD/ST: HR = 1.59; 95% CI 1.21-2.10; p < 0.001), along with ECOG > 2 (HR = 1.55; 95% CI 1.06-2.26; p = 0.03). There were also similar results of PFS. Moreover, long-time to CRPC in patients with history of DN mHSPC (n = 264, 28.7%) resulted in a better OS/PFS (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.56-1.02, p = 0.064 and HR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.99, p = 0.042, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that duration on ADT for mHSPC was significantly associated with survival in mCRPC undergoing ARSI. These findings suggest a possible connection between initial management of prostate tumour and a better prognostication in mCRPC. Prospective trials are warranted.

F-SHARP: a Phase I/II trial of focal salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for Radiorecurrent prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Intraprostatic local radiorecurrence (LRR) after definitive radiation is being increasingly identified due to the implementation of molecular positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging for the evaluation of biochemical recurrence. Salvage high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy offers a promising local therapy option, with encouraging toxicity and efficacy based on early series. Furthermore, the incorporation of advanced imaging allows for focal HDR to further reduce toxicity to maximise the therapeutic ratio. The objectives of the 'focal salvage HDR brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer in patients treated with prior radiotherapy' (F-SHARP) trial are to determine the acute and late toxicity and efficacy outcomes of focal salvage HDR brachytherapy for LRR prostate cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

The F-SHARP is a multi-institutional two-stage Phase I/II clinical trial of salvage focal HDR brachytherapy for LRR prostate cancer enrolling patients at three centres.

ENDPOINTS

The primary endpoint is the acute radiation-related Grade ≥3 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, version 4.03) genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity rate, defined as within 3 months of brachytherapy. Secondary endpoints include acute and late CTCAE toxicity, biochemical failure, patterns of clinical progression, disease-specific and overall survival, and health-related quality of life, as measured by the International Prostate Symptom Score and 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite instruments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Key eligibility criteria include: biopsy confirmed LRR prostate adenocarcinoma after prior definitive radiation therapy using any radiotherapeutic modality, no evidence of regional or distant metastasis, and cT1-3a Nx or N0 prostate cancer at initial treatment. All patients will have multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and molecular PET/CT imaging if possible. In Stage 1, seven patients will be accrued. If there are two or more GI or GU Grade ≥3 toxicities, the study will be stopped. Otherwise, 17 additional patients will be accrued (total of 24 patients). For Stage 2, the cohort will expand to 62 subjects to study the efficacy outcomes, long-term toxicity profile, quality of life, and compare single- vs multi-fraction HDR. Transcriptomic analysis of recurrence biopsies will be performed to identify potential prognostic and predictive biomarkers.

Molecular Mechanisms of Prostate Cancer Development in the Precision Medicine Era: A Comprehensive Review

The progression of prostate cancer (PCa) relies on the activation of the androgen receptor (AR) by androgens. Despite efforts to block this pathway through androgen deprivation therapy, resistance can occur through several mechanisms, including the abnormal activation of AR, resulting in castration-resistant PCa following the introduction of treatment. Mutations, amplifications, and splicing variants in AR-related genes have garnered attention in this regard. Furthermore, recent large-scale next-generation sequencing analysis has revealed the critical roles of AR and AR-related genes, as well as the DNA repair, PI3K, and cell cycle pathways, in the onset and progression of PCa. Moreover, research on epigenomics and microRNA has increasingly become popular; however, it has not translated into the development of effective therapeutic strategies. Additionally, treatments targeting homologous recombination repair mutations and the PI3K/Akt pathway have been developed and are increasingly accessible, and multiple clinical trials have investigated the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this comprehensive review, we outline the status of PCa research in genomics and briefly explore potential future developments in the field of epigenetic modifications and microRNAs.

A Phase 2 Randomized Open-label Study of Oral Darolutamide Monotherapy Versus Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Men with Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer (EORTC-GUCG 1532)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Darolutamide is an androgen receptor inhibitor that increases overall survival in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive and nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa). This phase 2 study assessed the efficacy and safety of darolutamide as monotherapy without ADT in patients with eugonadal testosterone levels.

METHODS

This was a 24-wk, open-label, randomized study of patients with hormone-sensitive, histologically confirmed PCa requiring gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH); an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0/1; and life expectancy >1 yr. All patients received darolutamide 600 mg bid or a commercially available GnRH analog. The primary endpoint is a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, defined as a ≥80% decline at week 24 relative to baseline in the darolutamide study arm. The GnRH arm is used as an internal control. The secondary endpoints included changes in T levels, safety/tolerability, and quality of life.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Among 61 men enrolled, the median (range) age was 72 yr (53-86 yr); 42.6% of them had metastases. In the darolutamide arm, the evaluable population with available PSA values at baseline and week 24 consisted of 23 patients. Twenty-three (100%) evaluable darolutamide patients achieved a PSA decline of >80% at week 24 (primary endpoint), with a median (range) decrease of -99.1% (-91.9%, -100%). Serum T levels increased by a median (range) of 44.3 (5.7-144.0) at week 24, compared with baseline. In the darolutamide arm, 48.4% of men reported drug-related adverse events (AEs; mostly grade 1 or 2). The most frequent treatment-emergent AEs included gynecomastia (35.5%), fatigue (12.9%), hot flush (12.9%), and hypertension (12.9%). Health-related quality of life measures are descriptive, and GnRH arm results will be presented as an internal reference.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Darolutamide monotherapy was associated with a significant PSA response in nearly all men with hormone-naïve PCa. Testosterone-level changes and most common AEs (gynecomastia, fatigue, hypertension, and hot flush) were consistent with potent androgen receptor inhibition.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, we report the first use of darolutamide, a novel antiandrogen, as monotherapy without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The study shows that darolutamide induce a profound suppression of prostate-specific antigen in all patients, with a safety profile different from that of ADT.

How to Report PSMA PET

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer diagnosed in men in most developed countries and a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) has become a valuable tool in the staging and assessment of disease recurrence in PCa, and more recently for assessment for treatment eligibility to PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT). Harmonization of PSMA-PET interpretation and synoptic reports are needed to communicate concisely and reproducibly PSMA-PET/CT to referring physicians and to support clinician therapeutic management decisions in various stages of the disease. Uniform image interpretation is also important to provide comparable data between clinical trials and to translate such data from research to daily practice. This review provides an overview of the value of PSMA-PET across the different clinical stages of PCa, discusses published reporting criteria for PSMA-PET, identifies pitfalls in reporting PSMA, and provides recommendations for synoptic reports.

European Association of Nuclear Medicine Focus 5: Consensus on Molecular Imaging and Theranostics in Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

In prostate cancer (PCa), questions remain on indications for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and PSMA radioligand therapy, integration of advanced imaging in nomogram-based decision-making, dosimetry, and development of new theranostic applications.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to critically review developments in molecular hybrid imaging and systemic radioligand therapy, to reach a multidisciplinary consensus on the current state of the art in PCa.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The results of a systematic literature search informed a two-round Delphi process with a panel of 28 PCa experts in medical or radiation oncology, urology, radiology, medical physics, and nuclear medicine. The results were discussed and ratified in a consensus meeting.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Forty-eight statements were scored on a Likert agreement scale and six as ranking options. Agreement statements were analysed using the RAND appropriateness method. Ranking statements were analysed using weighted summed scores.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

After two Delphi rounds, there was consensus on 42/48 (87.5%) of the statements. The expert panel recommends PSMA PET to be used for staging the majority of patients with unfavourable intermediate and high risk, and for restaging of suspected recurrent PCa. There was consensus that oligometastatic disease should be defined as up to five metastases, even using advanced imaging modalities. The group agreed that [177Lu]Lu-PSMA should not be administered only after progression to cabazitaxel and that [223Ra]RaCl2 remains a valid therapeutic option in bone-only metastatic castration-resistant PCa. Uncertainty remains on various topics, including the need for concordant findings on both [18F]FDG and PSMA PET prior to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a high proportion of agreement among a panel of experts on the use of molecular imaging and theranostics in PCa. Although consensus statements cannot replace high-certainty evidence, these can aid in the interpretation and dissemination of best practice from centres of excellence to the wider clinical community.

PATIENT SUMMARY

There are situations when dealing with prostate cancer (PCa) where both the doctors who diagnose and track the disease development and response to treatment, and those who give treatments are unsure about what the best course of action is. Examples include what methods they should use to obtain images of the cancer and what to do when the cancer has returned or spread. We reviewed published research studies and provided a summary to a panel of experts in imaging and treating PCa. We also used the research summary to develop a questionnaire whereby we asked the experts to state whether or not they agreed with a list of statements. We used these results to provide guidance to other health care professionals on how best to image men with PCa and what treatments to give, when, and in what order, based on the information the images provide.

Overall survival with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): secondary outcomes of a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

The TheraP study reported improved prostate-specific antigen responses with lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel. In this Article, we report the secondary outcome of overall survival with mature follow-up, and an updated imaging biomarker analysis. We also report the outcomes of participants excluded due to ineligibility on gallium-68 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-[18F]FDG) PET-CT.

METHODS

TheraP was an open-label, randomised phase 2 trial at 11 centres in Australia. Eligible participants had metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel, and PET imaging with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and 2-[18F]FDG that showed prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive disease and no sites of metastatic disease with discordant 2-[18F]FDG-positive and PSMA-negative findings. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (every 6 weeks for a maximum of six cycles; starting at 8·5 GBq, decreasing by 0.5 GBq to 6·0 GBq for the sixth cycle) versus cabazitaxel (20 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, maximum of ten cycles). Overall survival was analysed by intention-to-treat and summarised as restricted mean survival time (RMST) to account for non-proportional hazards, with a 36-month restriction time corresponding to median follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03392428, and is complete.

FINDINGS

291 men were registered from Feb 6, 2018, to Sept 3, 2019; after study imaging, 200 were eligible and randomly assigned to treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (n=99) or cabazitaxel (n=101). After completing study treatment, 20 (20%) participants assigned to cabazitaxel and 32 (32%) assigned to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 were subsequently treated with the alternative regimen. After a median follow-up of 35·7 months (IQR 31·1 to 39·2), 77 (78%) participants had died in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 70 (69%) participants had died in the cabazitaxel group. Overall survival was similar among those assigned to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus those assigned to cabazitaxel (RMST 19·1 months [95% CI 16·9 to 21·4] vs 19·6 months [17·4 to 21·8]; difference -0·5 months [95% CI -3·7 to 2·7]; p=0·77). No additional safety signals were identified with the longer follow-up in this analysis. 80 (27%) of 291 men who were registered after initial eligibility screening were excluded after [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and 2-[18F]FDG PET. In the 61 of these men with follow-up available, RMST was 11·0 months (95% CI 9·0 to 13·1).

INTERPRETATION

These results support the use of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 as an alternative to cabazitaxel for PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel. We did not find evidence that overall survival differed between the randomised groups. Median overall survival was shorter for men who were excluded because of low PSMA expression or 2-[18F]FDG-discordant disease.

FUNDING

Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Endocyte (a Novartis company), Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization, Movember, It's a Bloke Thing, CAN4CANCER, and The Distinguished Gentleman's Ride.

Evaluation of Recurrent Disease after Radiation Therapy for Patients Considering Local Salvage Therapy: Past vs. Contemporary Management

Recurrent prostate cancer after primary treatment with radiation therapy is a common problem. Patients with localized recurrence may benefit from salvage therapy, but careful patient selection is crucial because not all patients will benefit from local salvage therapy, and salvage therapy has increased morbidity compared to primary treatments for prostate cancer. This review aims to provide an overview of the evaluation of patients with recurrent disease after radiation therapy and how it is continuing to evolve with increasing data on outcomes, as well as improving technologies and techniques. Our enhanced understanding of treatment outcomes and risk stratification has influenced the identification of patients who may benefit from local salvage treatment. Advances in imaging and biopsy techniques have enhanced the accuracy of locating the recurrence, which affects treatment decisions. Additionally, the growing interest in image-targeted ablative therapies that have less morbidity and complications than whole-gland therapies for suitable patients influences the evaluation process for those considering focal salvage therapy. Although significant changes have been made in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with recurrent disease after radiation therapy, it remains unclear whether these changes will ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Presence of lymph nodes and metastasis within prostatic anterior fat pad in radical prostatectomy patients: A single Chinese institution experience and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Limited data from China, aim to investigate the incidence and the risk fctors of lymph node metastases in the prostatic anterior fat pad (PAFP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) were enrolled between March 2020 to December 2022 at a single institution. Separate pathological analysis of PAFP was performed within this area. Univariate analysis and Multivariate analysis were performed to determine the risk factor of PAFP metastasis.

RESULT

A total of 255 patients were included. The study revealed an average age of 67.72 ± 7.07 years, with a mean total tumor volume of 41.54 ± 23.79 mL, and an average Pre-op PSA of 16.85 ng/mL. Clinical T stage was divided into T2, T3, and T4 (226, 25, 4 cases, respectively), while the Clinical M stage was categorized as M0 and M1 (248 and 7 cases, respectively). Out of the patients with PAFP, 19 (7.45 %) had lymph node in PAFP, and 3 (1.18 %) patients had metastases. In the univariate and multivariate analysis, Clinical M stage and anterior primary tumor were found to be a significant high-risk factor. Among the other 15 studies, six examined the risk factors associated with it, including anterior tumors, higher tumour volume, intermediate or high risk prostate cancer.

CONCLUSION

Due to the low proportion of lymph node involvement (7.45 %) and rare tumor metastasis (1.18 %), routine separate pathological analysis of PAFP is not recommended in all RP patients unless there are anterior tumors, higher tumor volume, or intermediate/high risk prostate cancer.

[Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer-what are rational sequential treatment options?]

BACKGROUND

In advanced prostate cancer, disease progression during ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is referred to as castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Various therapeutic modalities are available for its treatment, including endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase [PARP] inhibition, radionuclide therapy, and radioligand therapy.

OBJECTIVES

This review outlines practical aspects and considerations regarding treatment sequencing in mCRPC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The findings are based on existing prospective phase 3 studies that have demonstrated clinically relevant and statistically significant benefits in radiographically progression-free and/or overall survival.

RESULTS

Sequential therapy, aside from numerous patient-specific factors, depends on the treatment patients received in the hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) setting. Following pretreatment with ADT alone or ADT plus docetaxel in the mHSPC context, additional endocrine therapy is the standard approach. In the event of progression under combined endocrine therapy initiated in the mHSPC setting, docetaxel currently serves as the standard for the majority of patients. Patients who received triplet therapy as a pretreatment in the mHSPC scenario can be treated with radioligand therapy or second-line chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Various active and well-tolerated treatment options are available for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The choice of therapy is primarily determined by previous treatments, but many other individual factors are also taken into consideration.

Molecular classifications of prostate cancer: basis for individualized risk stratification and precision therapy

Tumour classifications play a pivotal role in prostate cancer (PCa) management. It can predict the clinical outcomes of PCa as early as the disease is diagnosed and then guide therapeutic schemes, such as active monitoring, standalone surgical intervention, or surgery supplemented with postoperative adjunctive therapy, thereby circumventing disease exacerbation and excessive treatment. Classifications based on clinicopathological features, such as prostate cancer-specific antigen, Gleason score, and TNM stage, are still the main risk stratification strategies and have played an essential role in standardized clinical decision-making. However, mounting evidence indicates that clinicopathological parameters in isolation fail to adequately capture the heterogeneity exhibited among distinct PCa patients, such as those sharing identical Gleason scores yet experiencing divergent prognoses. As a remedy, molecular classifications have been introduced. Currently, molecular studies have revealed the characteristic genomic alterations, epigenetic modulations, and tumour microenvironment associated with different types of PCa, which provide a chance for urologists to refine the PCa classification. In this context, numerous invaluable molecular classifications have been devised, employing disparate statistical methodologies and algorithmic approaches, encompassing self-organizing map clustering, unsupervised cluster analysis, and multifarious algorithms. Interestingly, the classifier PAM50 was used in a phase-2 multicentre open-label trial, NRG-GU-006, for further validation, which hints at the promise of molecular classification for clinical use. Consequently, this review examines the extant molecular classifications, delineates the prevailing panorama of clinically pertinent molecular signatures, and delves into eight emblematic molecular classifications, dissecting their methodological underpinnings and clinical utility.

Identification of Early Biochemical Recurrence Predictors in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy and Androgen Deprivation Therapy

The aim of this retrospective study was to identify clinical predictors of early biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). A total of 670 high-risk PCa patients treated with CIRT and ADT were included in the study. Early BCR was defined as recurrence occurring during adjuvant ADT after CIRT or within 2 years after completion of ADT. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify clinical predictors of early BCR. Patients were also classified according to the Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate cancer (STAMPEDE) PCa classification. Early BCR was observed in 5.4% of the patients. Multivariate analysis identified clinical T3b stage and ≥75% positive biopsy cores as clinical predictors of early BCR after CIRT and ADT. The STAMPEDE PCa classification was also significantly associated with early BCR based on univariate analysis. These predictors can help clinicians identify patients who are at risk of early BCR. In the future, combination therapy of ADT with abiraterone may be an option for high-risk PCa patients who are at risk of early BCR, based on the results of the STAMPEDE study.

Can PSMA PET/CT help in dose-tailoring in post-prostatectomy radiotherapy?

There are few randomized trials to evaluate the use of PSMA-PET in the planning of post-prostatectomy radiotherapy. There are two unresolved questions 1) should we increase the dose to lesions visible on PSMA-PET 2) can we reduce dose in the case of a negative PSMA-PET. In this review, we summarize and discuss the available evidence in the literature. We found that in general, there seems to be an advantage for dose-increase, but ta large recent study from the pre-PSMA era didn't show an advantage for dose escalation. Retrospective studies have shown that conventional doses to PSMA-PET-positive lesions seem sufficient. On the other hand, in the case of a negative PSMA-PET, there is no evidence that dose-reduction is possible. In the future, the combination of PSMA-PET with genomic classifiers could help in better identify patients who might benefit from either dose- de-or -increase. We further need to identify intraindividual references to help identify lesions with higher aggressiveness.

The Current Trend of Radiation Therapy for Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer

A recent approach to radiotherapy for prostate cancer is the administration of high doses of radiation to the prostate while minimizing the risk of side effects. Thus, image-guided radiotherapy utilizes advanced imaging techniques and is a feasible strategy for increasing the radiation dose. New radioactive particles are another approach to achieving high doses and safe procedures. Prostate brachytherapy is currently considered as a combination therapy. Spacers are useful to protect adjacent organs, specifically the rectum, from excessive radiation exposure.

Node Oligorecurrence in Prostate Cancer: A Challenge

Within the oligometastatic state, oligorecurrent lymph node disease in prostate cancer represents an interesting clinical entity characterized by a relatively indolent biology that makes it unique: it can be treated radically, and its treatment is usually associated with a long period of control and excellent survival. Additionally, it is an emergent situation that we are facing more frequently mainly due to (a) the incorporation into clinical practice of the PSMA-PET that provides strikingly increased superior images in comparison to conventional imaging, with higher sensitivity and specificity; (b) the higher detection rates of bone and node disease with extremely low levels of PSA; and (c) the availability of high-precision technology in radiotherapy treatments with the incorporation of stereotaxic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or stereotaxic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) technology that allows the safe administration of high doses of radiation in a very limited number of fractions with low toxicity and excellent tolerance. This approach of new image-guided patient management is compelling for doctors and patients since it can potentially contribute to improving the clinical outcome. In this work, we discuss the available evidence, areas of debate, and potential future directions concerning the utilization of new imaging-guided SBRT for the treatment of nodal recurrence in prostate cancer.

Modified Citrus Pectin Treatment in Non-Metastatic Biochemically Relapsed Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Results of a Prospective Phase II Study

The optimal therapy for patients with non-metastatic biochemically relapsed prostate cancer (BRPC-M0) after local therapy is elusive. Thus, the evaluation of new non-toxic compounds in BRPC-M0 patients is warranted. PectaSol®-Modified citrus pectin (P-MCP) is a food supplement categorized as GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) by the FDA. It is a competitive inhibitor of the galectin-3 protein, which is involved in cancer pathogenesis. In an early report of the present phase 2 study, P-MCP treatment for 6 months led to prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) improvement in 75% of patients with BRPC-M0. Herein, we report the second long-term treatment phase of an additional 12 months of P-MCP therapy (4.8 g × 3/day orally) in patients without disease progression after the initial 6 months of therapy. Of the 46 patients that entered the second treatment phase, 7 patients withdrew consent and decided to continue therapy out of pocket, and 39 initiated the second treatment phase. After a total of 18 months of P-MCP treatment, 85% (n = 33) had a durable long-term response, with 62% (n = 24) showing decreased/stable PSA, 90% (n = 35) PSADT improvement, and all with negative scans. No patient had grade 3/4 toxicity. In conclusion, P-MCP may have long-term durable efficacy and is safe in BRPC-M0.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen-based imaging for stereotactic irradiation of low-volume progressive prostate cancer: a single-center experience

Introduction

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a transmembrane protein that may be expressed on the surface of prostate cancer (PC) cells. It enables a more sensitive and specific diagnosis PC, compared to conventional anatomical imaging.

Aim

The integration of PSMA-based imaging in the personalized radiotherapy of PC patients and the evaluation of its impact on target volume definition if stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is planned for locally recurrent or oligometastatic disease.

Patients and methods

The data from 363 examinations were analyzed retrospectively. Inclusion criteria were histologically verified PC and clinical data suggesting local recurrence or distant metastasis. Whole-body 99mTc-PSMA-I&S single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT or 18F-JK-PSMA-7 positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PET/CT) was carried out, and the evaluation of the scans and biological tumor volume contouring was performed at the Department of Nuclear Medicine. The target volume delineation on topometric CT (TCT) scan was performed at the Department of Oncotherapy. The comparison of the two volumes was performed by image fusion and registration.

Results

From 363 PSMA isotope-based examinations, 84 lesions of 64 patients were treated with SBRT. In 50 patients, 70 lesions were examined for intermodality comparison. The target volume defined by the PSMA density was significantly smaller than the tumor size defined by the TCT scan: GTVCT (gross tumor volume on the TCT), 27.58 ± 46.07 cm3; BTVPSMA (biological target volume on the PSMA-based examination), 16.14 ± 29.87 cm3. During geometrical analyses, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was 0.56 ± 0.20 (0.07-0.85). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) control was performed to evaluate the response: mean pre-radiotherapy (pre-RT) PSA was 16.98 ng/ml ( ± SD: 33.81), and post-RT PSA at 3 months after SBRT was 11.19 ng/ml ( ± SD: 32.85). Three-month post-therapy PSMA-based imaging was performed in 14 cases, in which we observed a decrease or cessation of isotope uptake. Conventional imaging control was performed in 42 cases (65.6% of all cases): 22 (52.4%) complete remissions, 14 (33.3%) partial remissions, four (9.5%) stable diseases, and two (4.8%) progressive diseases were described.

Conclusion

PSMA-based imaging is a promising diagnostic method for specifying the stage and detecting the low-volume progression. Our results suggest that PSMA-based hybrid imaging can influence treatment decisions and target volume delineation for SBRT.

Analysis of Clinical Trials and Review of Recent Advances in Therapy Decisions for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer

Despite the implementation of screening and early detection in many countries, the prostate cancer mortality rate remains high, particularly when the cancer is locally advanced. Targeted therapies with high efficacy and minimal harms should be particularly beneficial in this group, and several new approaches show promise. This article briefly analyses relevant clinical studies listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, combined with a short literature review that considers new therapeutic approaches that can be investigated in future clinical trials. Therapies using gold nanoparticles are of special interest in low-resource settings as they can localize and enhance the cancer-cell killing potential of X-rays using equipment that is already widely available.

Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer-metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2022

BACKGROUND

Innovations in imaging and molecular characterisation together with novel treatment options have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. However, we still lack high-level evidence in many areas relevant to making management decisions in daily clinical practise. The 2022 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022) addressed some questions in these areas to supplement guidelines that mostly are based on level 1 evidence.

OBJECTIVE

To present the voting results of the APCCC 2022.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The experts voted on controversial questions where high-level evidence is mostly lacking: locally advanced prostate cancer; biochemical recurrence after local treatment; metastatic hormone-sensitive, non-metastatic, and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; oligometastatic prostate cancer; and managing side effects of hormonal therapy. A panel of 105 international prostate cancer experts voted on the consensus questions.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The panel voted on 198 pre-defined questions, which were developed by 117 voting and non-voting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. A total of 116 questions on metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer are discussed in this manuscript. In 2022, the voting was done by a web-based survey because of COVID-19 restrictions.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The voting reflects the expert opinion of these panellists and did not incorporate a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions received varying degrees of support from panellists, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results are reported in the supplementary material. We report here on topics in metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and oligometastatic and oligoprogressive prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

These voting results in four specific areas from a panel of experts in advanced prostate cancer can help clinicians and patients navigate controversial areas of management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting and can help research funders and policy makers identify information gaps and consider what areas to explore further. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions always have to be individualised based on patient characteristics, including the extent and location of disease, prior treatment(s), co-morbidities, patient preferences, and treatment recommendations and should also incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2022 once again identified important gaps where there is non-consensus and that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference aims to share the knowledge of international experts in prostate cancer with healthcare providers worldwide. At each APCCC, an expert panel votes on pre-defined questions that target the most clinically relevant areas of advanced prostate cancer treatment for which there are gaps in knowledge. The results of the voting provide a practical guide to help clinicians discuss therapeutic options with patients and their relatives as part of shared and multidisciplinary decision-making. This report focuses on the advanced setting, covering metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and both non-metastatic and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

TWITTER SUMMARY

Report of the results of APCCC 2022 for the following topics: mHSPC, nmCRPC, mCRPC, and oligometastatic prostate cancer.

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

At APCCC 2022, clinically important questions in the management of advanced prostate cancer management were identified and discussed, and experts voted on pre-defined consensus questions. The report of the results for metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer is summarised here.