Interpretation and reporting of large regions of homozygosity and suspected consanguinity/uniparental disomy, 2021 revision: A technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)

Clinical utility of regions of homozygosity (ROH) identified in exome sequencing: when to pursue confirmatory uniparental disomy testing for imprinting disorders?

OBJECTIVES

Regions of homozygosity (ROH) could implicate uniparental disomy (UPD) on specific chromosomes associated with imprinting disorders. Though the algorithms for ROH detection in exome sequencing (ES) have been developed, optimal reporting thresholds and when to pursue confirmatory UPD testing for imprinting disorders remain in ambiguity. This study used a data-driven approach to assess optimal reporting thresholds of ROH in clinical practice.

METHODS

ROH analysis was performed using Automap in a retrospective cohort of 8,219 patients and a prospective cohort of 1,964 patients with ES data. Cases with ROH on imprinting-disorders related chromosomes were selected for additional methylation-specific confirmatory testing. The diagnostic yield, the ROH pattern of eventually diagnosed cases and optimal thresholds for confirmatory testing were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the retrospective analysis, 15 true UPD cases of imprinting disorders were confirmed among 51 suspected cases by ROH detection. Pattern of ROH differed between confirmed UPD and non-UPD cases. Maximized yield and minimized false discovery rate of confirmatory UPD testing was achieved at the thresholds of >20 Mb or >25 % chromosomal coverage for interstitial ROH, and >5 Mb for terminal ROH. Current recommendation by ACMG was nearly optimal, though refined thresholds as proposed in this study could reduce the workload by 31 % without losing any true UPD diagnosis. Our refined thresholds remained optimal after independent evaluation in a prospective cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

ROH identified in ES could implicate the presence of clinically relevant UPD. This study recommended size and coverage thresholds for confirmatory UPD testing after ROH detection in ES, contributing to the development of evidence-based reporting guidelines.

Automatized detection of uniparental disomies in a large cohort

Uniparental disomy (UPD) is the inheritance of both homologues of a chromosome from only one parent. The detection of UPDs in sequencing data is not well established and a common gap in genetic diagnostics. We applied our in-house UPD detection pipeline to evaluate a cohort of 9212 samples, including multigene panels as well as exome sequencing data in a single, duo or trio constellation. We used the results to inform the design of our publicly available web app altAFplotter. UPDs categorized as heterodisomy, whole chromosome or segmental isodisomy were identified and validated with microsatellites, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification as well as Sanger sequencing. We detected 14 previously undiagnosed UPDs including nine isodisomies, four segmental isodisomies as well as one heterodisomy on chromosome 22. We characterized eight findings as potentially causative through homozygous pathogenic variants or imprinting disorders. Overall, our study demonstrates the utility of our UPD detection pipeline with our web app, altAFplotter, to reliably identify UPDs. This not only increases the diagnostic yield of cases with growth and metabolic disturbances, as well as developmental delay, but also enhances the understanding of UPDs that may be relevant for recurrence risks and genetic counseling.

Chromosomal abnormalities detected by chromosomal microarray analysis and pregnancy outcomes of 4211 fetuses with high-risk prenatal indications

With the gradual liberalization of the three-child policy and the development of assisted reproductive technology in China, the number of women with high-risk pregnancies is gradually increasing. In this study, 4211 fetuses who underwent chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) with high-risk prenatal indications were analysed. The results showed that the overall prenatal detection rate of CMA was 11.4% (480/4211), with detection rates of 5.82% (245/4211) for abnormal chromosome numbers and 5.58% (235/4211) for copy number variants. Additionally, the detection rates of clinically significant copy number variants were 3.78% (159/4211) and 1.8% (76/4211) for variants of uncertain significance. The detection rates of fetal chromosomal abnormalities were 6.42% (30/467) for pregnant women with advanced maternal age (AMA), 6.01% (50/832) for high-risk maternal serum screening (MSS) results, 39.09% (224/573) with abnormal non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results, 9.21% (127/1379) with abnormal ultrasound results, and 5.1% (49/960) for other indications. Follow-up results were available for 4211 patients, including 3677 (3677/4211, 87.32%) whose infants were normal after birth, 462 (462/4211, 10.97%) who terminated their pregnancy, 51 (51/4211, 1.21%) whose infants were abnormal after birth, and 21 (21/4211, 0.50%) who refused follow-up. The results of this study demonstrate significant variation in the diagnostic rate of chromosomal microarray analysis across different indications, providing valuable guidance for clinicians to assess the applicability of CMA technology in prenatal diagnosis.

The genetics and clinical outcomes in 151 cases of fetal growth restriction: A Chinese single-center study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities and pregnancy outcomes in fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction. Study design A total of 151 fetal samples with intrauterine growth restriction were divided into the isolated fetal growth restriction (FGR) group, FGR group with structural malformation, and FGR group with non-structural malformation, according to ultrasound abnormalities. The enrolled patients were divided into an early onset FGR group (<32 weeks) and a late-onset FGR group (≥32 weeks). Chromosomal karyotype and microarray analyses were performed and pregnancy outcomes were monitored. Results The karyotypes of 122 patients were analyzed. Four patients exhibited abnormal chromosome numbers or structures. Variations in copy number were detected in 151 cases; 19 cases were found to have chromosomal abnormalities, with a positivity rate of 12.6 %. There was one trisomy in 18 cases, one trisomy in 21 cases, eight pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs), and nine CNVs of unknown clinical significance. The detection rate of FGR combined with structural malformation was significantly higher than that of isolated FGR group. The detection rate of FGR with structural malformations was significantly higher than that with non-structural malformations. The positive detection rate in the FGR group was similar to that in the FGR group with non-structural malformations, with no statistical significance. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 17 patients with early onset FGR, with a positivity rate of 13.8 %. Two cases of chromosomal abnormalities were detected in the late-onset FGR group, with a positive rate of 7.1 %, with no statistical significance. A total of 151 fetuses with FGR were followed up for pregnancy outcomes, resulting in 36 cases of pregnancy termination and 13 cases of loss to follow-up. Among the 102 delivered fetuses, six exhibited delayed growth and development, one presented with hypospadias, and another failed the hearing screening. The remaining 94 fetuses demonstrated normal growth and development. Conclusions This study confirms the value of CNV detection in fetuses and dynamic ultrasound monitoring for fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction.

Case reports on uniparental disomy of chromosomes 6 and 3 in paternity testing

In paternity testing, when there are Mendelian errors in the alleles between the child and the parents, a slippage mutation, or silent allele may not fully explain the phenomenon. Sometimes, it is attributed to chromosomal abnormalities, such as uniparental disomy (UPD). Here, we present the investigation of two cases of suspected UPD in paternity testing based on short tandem repeat (STR) detection (capillary electrophoresis platform). Case 1 involves a trio, where all genotypes detected on chromosome 6 in the child are homozygous and found in the father. Case 2 is a duo (mother and child), where all genotypes on chromosome 3 in the child are homozygous and not always found in the mother. At the same time, Mendelian error alleles were also observed at specific loci in these two chromosomes. Furthermore, we used the MGIEasy Signature Identification Library Prep Kit for sequencing on the massively parallel sequencing platform, which included common autosomal, X and Y chromosomes, and mitochondrial genetic markers used in forensic practice. The results showed that the genotypes of shared STRs on the two platforms were consistent, and STRs and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on these two chromosomes were homozygous. All other genetic markers followed the laws of inheritance. A comprehensive analysis supported the parent-child relationship between the child and the alleged parent, and the observed genetic anomalies can be attributed to UPD. UPD occurrences are rare, and ignoring its presence can lead to erroneous exclusions in paternity testing, particularly when multiple loci on a chromosome exhibit homozygosity.

An Incidental Detection of a Rare UPD in SNP-Array Based PGT-SR: A Case Report

Uniparental disomies (UPD) refers to the inheritance of both homologs of a chromosome from only one parent with no representative copy from the other parent. UPD was with an estimated prevalence of 0.15‰ in population. Current understanding of UPD was limited to subjects for which UPD was associated with clinical manifestation due to imprinting disorders or recessive diseases. Segmental UPD was rare, especially for a segmental UPD with a combination of hetero- and isodisomy. This paper presents a couple with reciprocal translocation 46,XY, t(14;22)(q32.3;q12.2) for PGT-SR. Among 8 biopsied blastocysts, one euploid blastocyst (No.4) with segmental loss of heterozygosity (LOH)(22) [arr[hg19] q12.1q22.3 (28,160,407 - 35,407,682)] was detected by B allele frequency. We found the chromosome contained both UPiD(22) [arr[hg19] q12.1q22.3 (28,160,407 - 35,407,682) ×2 hmz mat] and UPhD(22) [arr[hg19] q22.3qter(35,407,682 - 51,169,045) ×2 htz mat] by haplotype analysis. UPDtool software confirmed the result. What's more, the segmental UPD and reciprocal translocation shared the same breakpoint, chr22q12.1 (28,160,407), while the breakpoint between iso- and heterodisomy was chr22q22.3 (35,407,682). We reported the first segmental UPD with a combination of hetero- and isodisomy, which may result from aneuploidy rescue. This case emphasizes the importance of the combination of comprehensive chromosome screening and haplotype analysis to reduce the risk of misdiagnosis.

Homozygosity in any HLA locus is a risk factor for specific antibody production: the taboo concept 2.0

Objective

In a cooperative study of the University Hospital Leipzig, University of Leipzig, and the Charité Berlin on kidney transplant patients, we analysed the occurrence of HLA-specific antibodies with respect to the HLA setup of the patients. We aimed at the definition of specific HLA antigens towards which the patients produced these antibodies.

Methods

Patients were typed for the relevant HLA determinants using mainly the next-generation technology. Antibody screening was performed by the state-of-the-art multiplex-based technology using microspheres coupled with the respective HLA alleles of HLA class I and II determinants.

Results

Patients homozygous for HLA-A*02, HLA-A*03, HLA-A*24, HLA-B*07, HLA-B*18, HLA-B*35, HLA-B*44, HLA-C*03, HLA-C*04, and HLA-C*07 in the class I group and HLA-DRB1*01, HLA-DRB1*03, HLA-DRB1*07, HLA-DRB1*15, HLA-DQA1*01, HLA-DQA1*05, HLA-DQB1*02, HLA-DQB1*03(7), HLA-DQB1*06, HLA-DPA1*01, and HLA-DPB1*04 in the class II group were found to have a significant higher antibody production compared to the heterozygous ones. In general, all HLA determinants are affected. Remarkably, HLA-A*24 homozygous patients can produce antibodies towards all HLA-A determinants, while HLA-B*18 homozygous ones make antibodies towards all HLA-B and selected HLA-A and C antigens, and are associated with an elevation of HLA-DRB1, parts of DQB1 and DPB1 alleles. Homozygosity for the HLA class II HLA-DRB1*01, and HLA-DRB1*15 seems to increase the risk for antibody responses against most of the HLA class I antigens (HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C) in contrast to HLA-DQB1*03(7) where a lower risk towards few HLA-A and HLA-B alleles is found. The widely observed differential antibody response is therefore to be accounted to the patient's HLA type.

Conclusion

Homozygous patients are at risk of producing HLA-specific antibodies hampering the outcome of transplantation. Including this information on the allocation procedure might reduce antibody-mediated immune reactivity and prevent graft loss in a patient at risk, increasing the life span of the transplanted organ.

Disruption in CYLC1 leads to acrosome detachment, sperm head deformity, and male in/subfertility in humans and mice

The perinuclear theca (PT) is a dense cytoplasmic web encapsulating the sperm nucleus. The physiological roles of PT in sperm biology and the clinical relevance of variants of PT proteins to male infertility are still largely unknown. We reveal that cylicin-1, a major constituent of the PT, is vital for male fertility in both mice and humans. Loss of cylicin-1 in mice leads to a high incidence of malformed sperm heads with acrosome detachment from the nucleus. Cylicin-1 interacts with itself, several other PT proteins, the inner acrosomal membrane (IAM) protein SPACA1, and the nuclear envelope (NE) protein FAM209 to form an 'IAM-cylicins-NE' sandwich structure, anchoring the acrosome to the nucleus. WES (whole exome sequencing) of more than 500 Chinese infertile men with sperm head deformities was performed and a CYLC1 variant was identified in 19 patients. Cylc1-mutant mice carrying this variant also exhibited sperm acrosome/head deformities and reduced fertility, indicating that this CYLC1 variant most likely affects human male reproduction. Furthermore, the outcomes of assisted reproduction were reported for patients harbouring the CYLC1 variant. Our findings demonstrate a critical role of cylicin-1 in the sperm acrosome-nucleus connection and suggest CYLC1 variants as potential risk factors for human male fertility.

Rapid genomic sequencing for genetic disease diagnosis and therapy in intensive care units: a review

Single locus (Mendelian) diseases are a leading cause of childhood hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mortality, and healthcare cost. Rapid genome sequencing (RGS), ultra-rapid genome sequencing (URGS), and rapid exome sequencing (RES) are diagnostic tests for genetic diseases for ICU patients. In 44 studies of children in ICUs with diseases of unknown etiology, 37% received a genetic diagnosis, 26% had consequent changes in management, and net healthcare costs were reduced by $14,265 per child tested by URGS, RGS, or RES. URGS outperformed RGS and RES with faster time to diagnosis, and higher rate of diagnosis and clinical utility. Diagnostic and clinical outcomes will improve as methods evolve, costs decrease, and testing is implemented within precision medicine delivery systems attuned to ICU needs. URGS, RGS, and RES are currently performed in <5% of the ~200,000 children likely to benefit annually due to lack of payor coverage, inadequate reimbursement, hospital policies, hospitalist unfamiliarity, under-recognition of possible genetic diseases, and current formatting as tests rather than as a rapid precision medicine delivery system. The gap between actual and optimal outcomes in children in ICUs is currently increasing since expanded use of URGS, RGS, and RES lags growth in those likely to benefit through new therapies. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that URGS, RGS, or RES should be considered in all children with diseases of uncertain etiology at ICU admission. Minimally, diagnostic URGS, RGS, or RES should be ordered early during admissions of critically ill infants and children with suspected genetic diseases.

Genetic testing for fetal loss of heterozygosity using single nucleotide polymorphism array and whole-exome sequencing

The study explored the clinical significance of fetal loss of heterozygosity (LOH) identified by single-nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP array). We retrospectively reviewed data from pregnant women who underwent invasive diagnostic procedures at prenatal diagnosis centers in southeastern China from December 2016 to December 2021. SNP array was performed by the Affymetrix CytoScan 750 K array platform. Fetuses with LOH were further identified by parental verification, MS-MLPA, and/or trio whole-exome sequencing (trio-WES). The genetic results, fetal clinical manifestations, and perinatal outcome were analyzed. Of 11,062 fetuses, 106 (0.96%) had LOH exhibiting a neutral copy number, 88 (83.0%) had LOH in a single chromosome, whereas 18 (17.0%) had multiple LOHs on different chromosomes. Sixty-six fetuses had ultrasound anomalies (UAs), most frequently fetal growth restriction (18/66 (27.3%)). Parental SNP array verification was performed in 21 cases and trio-WES in 21 cases. Twelve cases had clinically relevant uniparental disomy, five had pathogenic variants, four had likely pathogenic variants, six had variants of unknown significance, and eight had identity by descent. The rate of adverse pregnancy outcomes in fetuses with LOH and UAs (24/66 (36.4%)) was higher than in those without UAs (6/40 (15.0%)) (p < 0.05). LOH is not uncommon. Molecular genetic testing techniques, including parental SNP array verification, trio-WES, methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, regular and systematic ultrasonic monitoring, and placental study, can accurately assess the prognosis and guide the management of the affected pregnancy.

Molecular investigation in individuals with orofacial clefts and microphthalmia-anophthalmia-coloboma spectrum

This study describes genomic findings among individuals with both orofacial clefts (OC) and microphthalmia/anophthalmia/coloboma (MAC) recorded in the Brazilian Database on Craniofacial Anomalies (BDCA). Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) were performed in 17 individuals with OC-MAC. Clinical interpretation of molecular findings was based on data available at the BDCA and on re-examination. No copy number variants (CNVs) classified as likely pathogenic or pathogenic were detected by CMA. WES allowed a conclusive diagnosis in six individuals (35.29%), two of them with variants in the CHD7 gene, and the others with variants in the TFAP2A, POMT1, PTPN11, and TP63 genes with the following syndromes: CHARGE, CHD7-spectrum, Branchiooculofacial, POMT1-spectrum, LEOPARD, and ADULT. Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) possibly associated to the phenotypes were found in six other individuals. Among the individuals with VUSes, three individuals presented variants in genes associated to defects of cilia structure and/or function, including DYNC2H1, KIAA0586, WDR34, INTU, RPGRIP1L, KIF7, and LMNA. These results show that WES was the most effective molecular approach for OC-MAC in this cohort. This study also reinforces the genetic heterogeneity of OC-MAC, and the importance of genes related to ciliopathies in this phenotype.

Exome and genome sequencing for rare genetic disease diagnosis: A scoping review and critical appraisal of clinical guidance documents produced by genetics professional organizations

PURPOSE

Exome and genome sequencing have rapidly transitioned from research methods to widely used clinical tests for diagnosing rare genetic diseases. We sought to synthesize the topics covered and appraise the development processes of clinical guidance documents generated by genetics professional organizations.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of guidance documents published since 2010, systematically identified in peer-reviewed and gray literature, using established methods and reporting guidelines. We coded verbatim recommendations by topic using content analysis and critically appraised documents using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool.

RESULTS

We identified 30 guidance documents produced by 8 organizations (2012-2022), yielding 611 recommendations covering 21 topics. The most common topic related to findings beyond the primary testing indication. Mean AGREE II scores were low across all 6 quality domains; scores for items related to rigor of development were among the lowest. More recently published documents generally received higher scores.

CONCLUSION

Guidance documents included a broad range of recommendations but were of low quality, particularly in their rigor of development. Developers should consider using tools such as AGREE II and basing recommendations on living knowledge syntheses to improve guidance development in this evolving space.

Uniparental disomy: expanding the clinical and molecular phenotypes of whole chromosomes

Uniparental disomy (UPD) refers to as both homologous chromosomes inherited from only one parent without identical copies from the other parent. Studies on clinical phenotypes in UPDs are usually focused on the documented UPD 6, 7, 11, 14, 15, and 20, which directly lead to imprinting disorders. This study describes clinical phenotypes and genetic findings of three patients with UPD 2, 9, and 14, respectively. Chromosomal microarray (CMA), UPDtool, methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA) and whole-exome sequencing (WES) analysis were performed to characterize the genetic etiology. The CMA revealed a homozygous region involving the whole chromosome 2 and 9, a partial region of homozygosity in chromosome 14. UPD-tool revealed a paternal origin of the UPD2. MS-MLPA showed hypomethylation of imprinting gene MEG3 from maternal origin in the UPD14 case. In addition, UPD14 case displayed complex symptoms including growth failure, hypotonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), accompanied by several gene mutations with heterozygous genotype by WES analysis. Furthermore, we reviewed the documented UPDs and summarized the clinical characteristics and prognosis. This study highlighted the importance to confirm the diagnosis and origin of UPD using genetic testing. Therefore, it is suggested that expanding of the detailed phenotypes and genotypes provide effective guidance for molecule testing and genetic counseling, and promote further biological investigation to the underlying mechanisms of imprinted disorders and accompanied copy number variations.

Features of chromosomal abnormalities in relation to consanguinity: analysis of 10,556 blastocysts from IVF/ICSI cycles with PGT-A from consanguineous and non-consanguineous couples

Consanguineous marriage is defined as marriage between first or second-degree cousins, with high prevalence in many cultures and societies. Descendants from consanguineous unions have an increased risk for genetic diseases. Additionally, in consanguineous couples, chromosomal disjunction during embryogenesis could also be affected, increasing the risk of chromosomal errors. Nowadays, genomic testing allows to identify new genetic syndromes and variants related to copy-number variations (CNV), including whole chromosome, segmental and micro-segmental errors. This is the first study evaluating chromosomal ploidy status on blastocysts formed from consanguineous couples during IVF/ICSI treatments with Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies (PGT-A), compared to non-consanguineous couples. Although consanguine couples were significantly younger, no differences were observed between groups for fertilisation rate, blastulation rate and euploidy rate, once adjusted by age. Nevertheless, the number of blastocysts biopsied on day 5 was lower for consanguine couples. Segmental errors, and aneuploidies of chromosomes 13 and 14 were the most prominent abnormalities in relation to consanguinity, together with errors in chromosome 16 and sex chromosomes when the female partner was younger than 35. Once euploid blastocysts were considered for subsequent frozen embryo transfer, pregnancy outcomes were similar in both groups. The current findings point toward the fact that in consanguine unions, not only the risk of having a child with genetic disorders is increased, but also the risk of specific chromosomal abnormalities seems to be increased. Premarital counselling and tailored reproductive treatments should be offered to these couples.

Three siblings with variable degrees of neuromuscular involvement and congenital sideroblastic anemia: A peculiar phenotype and a surprise genotypic explanation

INTRODUCTION

Congenital sideroblastic anemias (CSAs) are a group of inherited bone-marrow disorders manifesting with erythroid hyperplasia and ineffective erythropoiesis.

METHODS

We describe a detailed clinical and genetic characterization of three siblings with CSA.

RESULTS

Two of them had limb-girdle myopathy and global developmental delay. The two elder siblings performed allogenic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation 5 and 3 years prior with stabilization of the hematological features. Exome sequencing in the non-transplanted sibling revealed a novel homozygous nonsense variant in SLC25A38 gene NM_017875.2:c.559C > T; p.(Arg187*) causing autosomal-recessive sideroblastic anemia type-2, and a second homozygous pathogenic previously reported variant in GMPPB gene NM_013334.3:c.458C > T; p.(Thr153Ile) causing autosomal-recessive muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy type B14. With the established diagnosis, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is now being scheduled for the youngest sibling, and a trial therapy with acetylcholine esterase inhibitors was started for the two neurologically affected patients with partial clinical improvement.

CONCLUSION

This family emphasizes the importance of whole-exome sequencing for familial cases with complex phenotypes and vague neurological manifestations.

Evaluating Genetic Disorders in the Neonate: The Role of Exome Sequencing in the NICU

With recent advances in the technologies used for genetic diagnosis as well as our understanding of the genetic basis of disease, a growing list of options is available for providers when caring for a newborn with features suggesting an underlying genetic etiology. The choice of the most appropriate genetic test for a specific situation includes clinical considerations such as the phenotypic features and type of genetic abnormality suspected, as well as practical considerations such as cost and turnaround time. In this review, we discuss clinical exome sequencing in the context of genetic evaluation of newborns, including technical considerations, variant interpretation, and incidental/secondary findings. Strengths and limitations of exome sequencing are discussed and compared with those of other commonly known tests such as karyotype analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization, chromosomal microarray, and sequencing panels, along with integration of results from prenatal testing if available. We also review future directions including genome sequencing and other emerging technologies that are starting to be used in clinical settings.

Clinical experience of noninvasive prenatal testing for rare chromosome abnormalities in singleton pregnancies

Objectives: The study aimed to investigate the clinical use of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for common fetal aneuploidies as a prenatal screening tool for the detection of rare chromosomal abnormalities (RCAs).

Methods: Gravidas with positive NIPT results for RCAs who subsequently underwent amniocentesis for a single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP array) were recruited. The degrees of concordance between the NIPT and SNP array were classified into full concordance, partial concordance, and discordance. The positive predictive value (PPV) was used to evaluate the performance of NIPT.

Results: The screen-positivity rate of NIPT for RCAs was 0.5% (842/158,824). Of the 528 gravidas who underwent amniocentesis, 29.2% (154/528) were confirmed to have positive prenatal SNP array results. PPVs for rare autosomal trisomies (RATs) and segmental imbalances were 6.1% (7/115) and 21.1% (87/413), respectively. Regions of homozygosity/uniparental disomy (ROH/UPD) were identified in 9.5% (50/528) of gravidas. The PPV for clinically significant findings was 8.0% (42/528), including 7 cases with mosaic RATs, 30 with pathogenic/likely pathogenic copy number variants, and 5 with imprinting disorders.

Conclusion: NIPT for common fetal aneuploidies yielded low PPVs for RATs, moderate PPVs for segmental imbalances, and incidental findings for ROH/UPD. Due to the low PPV for clinically significant findings, NIPT for common fetal aneuploidies need to be noticed for RCAs.