Contemporary Management of Electrical Storm

Impact of Catheter Ablation of Electrical Storm on Survival: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Electrical storm (ES) is a life-threatening condition, associated with substantial early and subacute mortality. Catheter ablation (CA) is a well-established therapy for ES. However, data regarding the impact of CA on the short-term and midterm survival of patients admitted for ES remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This multicenter study aimed to investigate the impact of CA of ES on survival outcomes, while accounting for key patient characteristics associated with treatment selection.

METHODS

A propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis was performed on 780 consecutive patients admitted for ES in 4 tertiary centers. PSM (1:1) based on the main characteristics associated with the use of CA or medical therapy alone was performed, resulting in 2 groups of 288 patients.

RESULTS

After PSM, patients who underwent CA (n = 288) and those treated with medical therapy alone (n = 288) did not present any significant differences in the main demographic characteristics, ES presentation, and management. Compared with medical therapy alone, CA was associated with a significantly lower rate of ES recurrence at 1 year (5% vs 26%; P < 0.001). Similarly, CA was associated with a higher 1-year (91% vs 81%; P < 0.001) and 3-year (78% vs 71%; P = 0.017) survival after discharge. In subgroup analyses, effect of ablation therapy remained consistent in patients older than 70 years of age (HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.24-0.66), with substantial efficacy in patients with a LVEF <35% (HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.27-0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

In propensity-matched analyses, this large study shows that CA-based management of patients admitted for ES is associated with a reduction in mortality compared with medical treatment, particularly in patients with a low ejection fraction.

Efficacy of early use of Percutaneous Stellate Ganglion Block for electrical storms

BACKGROUND

Electrical Storm (ES) is a life-threatening condition requiring a rapid management. Percutaneous Stellate Ganglion Block (PSGB) proved to be safe and effective on top of standard therapy, but no data are available about its early use.

METHODS

We considered all patients enrolled from 1st July 2017 to 30th April 2024 in the STAR registry (STellate ganglion block for Arrhythmic stoRm), a multicentre, international, observational, prospective registry. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of the first PSGB only. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they received PSGB before (Early-PSGB, often due to AAD contraindication) or after (Delayed-PSGB) intravenous antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs other than beta-blockers).

RESULTS

We considered 180 PSGB (26 Early-PSGB and 154 AAD-first). In the early-PSGB group we observed a statistically significant reduction of treated arrhythmic events in the hour after PSGB compared to the hour before: 0 (0-0) vs 4.5 (1-10), p<0.001 and the extent of the reduction was similar in the Early-PSGB and delayed-PSGB group [-4.5 (-7 to -2) vs. -2.5 (-3.5 to -1.5), p=ns]. The percentage of patients free from arrhythmias was similar in the two groups up to 12 hours after PSGB (81%vs 84%, p=0.6 after one hour; 77% vs 79%, p=0.8 at three hours and 65% vs 69%, p= 0.7 after 12 hours).

CONCLUSIONS

PSGB proved to be effective also when used early in the treatment of ES. Due to its rapidity of action, our results may suggest its early use to reduce the number of defibrillations and possibly to reduce the likelihood of a refractory ES.

Characteristics and Outcome of Patients with or without Previous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Interventions Undergoing Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia

Background: Catheter ablation (CA) is a well-established treatment in patients with ventricular tachycardia and appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies. Methods: We enrolled 57 consecutive carriers of ICD undergoing CA for electrical storm (ES). Our aim was to investigate differences in clinical, device-related, and electroanatomic features among patients who had history of appropriate ICD interventions before the ES compared to those who had not. The primary endpoint was a composite of death from any cause and recurrences of sustained VT, ventricular fibrillation, appropriate ICD therapy, or ES. Results: During a median follow up of 39 months, 28 patients (49%) met the primary endpoint. Those with previous ICD interventions had a higher prevalence of late potentials and a greater unipolar low-voltage area at electroanatomic mapping. Patients who met the primary endpoint had a higher prevalence of ATP/shock episodes preceding the ES event. At Cox regression analysis, non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM), QRS duration, and previous ATP and/or shock before the ES were associated with arrhythmic recurrences and/or death. At multivariate analysis, NIDCM and previous shock were associated with arrhythmic recurrences and/or death. Conclusions: A history of recurrent ICD therapies predicts worse outcomes when CA is needed because of ES. Although more studies are needed to definitively address this question, our data speak in support of an early referral for CA of ES.

Cease the storm - Successful stellate ganglion block in terminating refractory electrical storm

An electrical storm also known as a ventricular tachycardia storm (VT storm) tends to recur and form a vicious cycle, eventually leading to a refractory electrical storm, refractory to electrical and pharmacological cardioversion. The treatment of refractory VT storm is challenging. Here we discuss the case of a middle-aged gentleman who presented to our emergency department 6 months apart with a refractory VT storm. When all the anti-arrhythmic agents and multiple cardioversion attempts failed in terminating the storm, we attempted ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block. On both occasions, it successfully terminated the storm. Hence emergency physicians need to be aware of the right technique and timing of stellate ganglion block and ultrasound-guided needle tracking, as it can be a final rescue technique in treating refractory electrical storm in the emergency department.

Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Sympathetic Blockade by Proximal Intercostal Block in Electrical Storm Patients

BACKGROUND

Electrical storm (ES) patients who fail standard therapies have a high mortality rate. Previous studies report effective management of ES with bedside, ultrasound-guided percutaneous stellate ganglion block (SGB). We report our experience with sympathetic blockade administered via a novel alternative approach: proximal intercostal block (PICB). Compared with SGB, this technique targets an area typically free of other catheters and support devices, and may pose less strict requirements for anticoagulation interruption, along with lower risk of focal neurological side effects.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to describe the safety and efficacy of PICB in patients with refractory ES.

METHODS

We reviewed our institutional data on ES patients who underwent PICB between January 2018 and February 2023 to analyze procedural safety and short- and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 15 consecutive patients with ES underwent PICB during this period. Of those, 11 patients (73.3%) were maintained on PICB alone, and 4 patients (26.6%) were maintained on combined block with SGB and PICB. Overall, 72.7% patients who were maintained on PICB alone and 77.8% patients who were maintained on bilateral PICB had excellent arrhythmia suppression. After PICB, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies were significantly reduced (P < 0.05), with 93.3% of patients receiving PICB having no implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock until discharge or heart transplant. Anticoagulation was continued in all patients and there were no procedure-related complications. Apart from mild transient neurological symptoms seen in 3 patients, no significant neurological or hemodynamic sequelae were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with refractory ES, continuous PICB provided safe and effective sympathetic block (77.8% ventricular arrhythmia suppression), achievable without interruption of anticoagulation, and without significant side effects.

Electrical Storm/Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia

Audience

This simulation case was created for emergency medicine (EM) residents at all levels of training.

Background

Cardiac electrical storm (ES) is commonly defined as three or more episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or three shocks from an implantable defibrillator within a 24 hour period.1 This can occur in up to 30-40% of patients with implantable defibrillators; however, it may also present in a wide variety of patients, including those with structural heart disease, myocardial infarction, electrolyte disturbances, and channelopathies.2,3 With each subsequent episode of ventricular arrhythmia, the arrhythmogenic potential of the heart may increase secondary to increased intracellular calcium dysregulation, myocardial injury, and increased endogenous release of catecholamines. The increased pain and catecholamine release from cardioversion/defibrillation and exogenous epinephrine during cardiac arrest further exacerbates ES.2 This carries a significant mortality risk of up to 12% in the first 48 hours.3This case involves a basic knowledge of the Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) for ventricular tachycardia, both with and without a pulse, and the application of Sgarbossa criteria in a patient with an ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) which makes it ideal for the PGY-1. However, the case quickly becomes refractory to the basic management prescribed in ACLS, requiring trouble shooting and quick thinking about deeper pathophysiology, a skill that is crucial for all emergency medicine physicians. There are multiple ways to troubleshoot this case, making for a good variety of discussion and recent literature review on the complexities of a relatively common arrhythmia, ventricular tachycardia.

Educational Objectives

By the end of this simulation, learners should be able to: 1) recognize unstable ventricular tachycardia and initiate ACLS protocol, 2) practice dynamic decision making by switching between various ACLS algorithms, 3) create a thoughtful approach for further management of refractory ventricular tachycardia, 4) interpret electrocardiogram (ECG) with ST-segment elevation (STE) and left bundle branch block (LBBB), 5) appropriately disposition the patient and provide care after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 6) navigate a difficult conversation with the patient's husband when she reveals that the patient's wishes were to not be resuscitated.

Educational Methods

This simulation was performed using high-fidelity simulation followed by an immediate debriefing with nine learners who directly participated in the SIM and twenty-three residents, who were online observers via Zoom. This case was done during our conference day, and there were a total of approximately forty total learners comprised of medical students, PGY-1, PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents. There were several medical students who also observed via Zoom but were not surveyed, and the survey was sent to 32 learners. The case was run three separate times with each session consisting of three-four learners at the same level of training, with other learners in the same level of training observing via Zoom™ video platform. Since we can only have a team of three-four learners participate per group during simulation, the rest of the learners were observing the case and the debrief. There was one simulation instructor and one technician.

Research Methods

We sent an online survey to all the participants and the observers after the debrief via surveymonkey.com. The survey collected responses to the following statements: (1) the case was believable, (2) the case had right amount of complexity, (3) the case helped in improving medical knowledge and patient care, (4) the simulation environment gave me a real-life experience and, (5) the debriefing session after simulation helped improve my knowledge. Likert scale was used to collect the responses.

Results

A total of thirteen participants responded to the survey. One hundred percent of them either strongly agreed or agreed that the case was believable and that it helped in improving medical knowledge and patient care. Fifty-four percent strongly agreed, 38 percent agreed, and eight percent were neutral about the case having the right amount of complexity. Thirty one percent strongly agreed, 61 percent agreed, and eight percent were neutral about the case giving them real-life experience. All of them agreed that the debriefing session helped them improve their knowledge.

Discussion

The high-fidelity simulation case was helpful with educating learners with ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Learners learned how to switch between various ACLS algorithms and how to manage a patient with refractory ventricular fibrillation. Learners enforced their knowledge in how to communicate with patient's family members when the patient does not want resuscitation.

Topics

Stable ventricular tachycardia, unstable ventricular tachycardia, refractory ventricular tachycardia, electrical storm, STEMI equivalents, medical simulation.

Use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) and ultrasound-guided left stellate ganglion block to rescue out of hospital cardiac arrest due to refractory ventricular fibrillation: A case report

Out of hospital cardiac arrest from shockable rhythms that is refractory to standard treatment is a unique challenge. Such patients can achieve neurological recovery even with long low-flow times if perfusion can somehow be restored to the heart and brain. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation is an effective treatment for refractory cardiac arrest if applied early and accurately, but often cannot be directly implemented by frontline providers and has strict inclusion/exclusion criteria. We present the case of a novel treatment strategy for out of hospital cardiac arrest due to refractory ventricular fibrillation utilizing Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation and intra-arrest left stellate ganglion blockade to achieve return of spontaneous circulation and eventual good neurological outcome after 101 minutes of downtime.

Etiologies, Mechanisms, Management, and Outcomes of Electrical Storm

Electrical storm (ES) is characterized by three or more discrete sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes occurring within a limited time frame (generally ≤ 24 h) or an incessant ventricular tachyarrhythmia lasting > 12 h. In patients with an implantable cardioverterdefibrillator (ICD), ES is defined as three or more appropriate device therapies, separated from each other by at least 5 min, which occur within a 24-h period. ES may constitute a medical emergency, depending on the number arrhythmic episodes, their duration, the type, and the cycle length of the ventricular arrhythmias, as well as the underlying ventricular function. This narrative review was facilitated by a search of MEDLINE to identify peer-reviewed clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and other clinically relevant studies. The search was limited to English-language reports published between 1999 and 2023. ES was searched using the terms mechanisms, genetics, channelopathies, management, pharmacological therapy, sedation, neuraxial modulation, cardiac sympathetic denervation, ICDs, and structural heart disease. Google and Google scholar as well as bibliographies of identified articles were reviewed for additional references. This manuscript examines the current strategies available to treat ES and compares pharmacological and invasive treatment strategies to diminish ES recurrence, morbidity, and mortality.

[Electrical storm in patients with Automatic Implantable Defibrillator : A single Center study]

BACKGROUND

Electrical storms (ES) are serious cardiac emergencies associated with increased short-term mortality. The true incidence of ES in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is still difficult to estimate because of the heterogeneous definition. The clinical presentation is variable and its management is multidisciplinary.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to analyze the epidemiological profile and evolution of a group of patients implanted with an ICD who had electrical storms detected by a home monitoring system.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective observational study, which included 14 patients who were implanted with ICDs, for primary or secondary prevention between 2008 and 2021. All of them were followed by home monitoring. All these patients had an ES detected by home monitoring and authenticated by ECG.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients at the time of onset of the electrical storm was 75.4 ± 14.5 years, with extremes ranging from 49 to 101 years. Most of patients (n = 11) were male. The majority of them had underlying ischaemic cardiomyopathy (n = 12). In a third of cases (n = 5) patients were implanted for secondary prevention. The electrical storm was related to recurrent episodes of VT. No cases of VF were detected. Syncope was the most frequent clinical presentation (four patients). Nine patients received internal shocks, with an average of four shocks per patient. The triggering factor was myocardial ischaemia in four cases. Majority of patients were managed in the cardiac intensive care unit. Two patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. In addition to anti-arrhythmic treatment with amiodarone and beta blockers. Nine patients underwent ablation of ventricular tachycardia focus. Mortality was high (in half of the cases) mainly due to a cardiogenic shock.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that OR remain rare, but are still associated with high mortality. Home monitoring makes it possible to manage them earlier.

Heart transplantation as a rescue strategy for patients with refractory electrical storm

AIMS

Heart transplantation (HT) can be proposed as a therapeutic strategy for patients with severe refractory electrical storm (ES). Data in the literature are scarce and based on case reports. We aimed at determining the characteristics and survival of patients transplanted for refractory ES.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients registered on HT waiting list during the following days after ES and eventually transplanted, from 2010 to 2021, were retrospectively included in 11 French centres. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Forty-five patients were included [82% men; 55.0 (47.8-59.3) years old; 42.2% and 26.7% non-ischaemic dilated or ischaemic cardiomyopathies, respectively]. Among them, 42 (93.3%) received amiodarone, 29 received (64.4%) beta blockers, 19 (42.2%) required deep sedation, 22 had (48.9%) mechanical circulatory support, and 9 (20.0%) had radiofrequency catheter ablation. Twenty-two patients (62%) were in cardiogenic shock. Inscription on wait list and transplantation occurred 3.0 (1.0-5.0) days and 9.0 (4.0-14.0) days after ES onset, respectively. After transplantation, 20 patients (44.4%) needed immediate haemodynamic support by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). In-hospital mortality rate was 28.9%. Predictors of in-hospital mortality were serum creatinine/urea levels, need for immediate post-operative ECMO support, post-operative complications, and surgical re-interventions. One-year survival was 68.9%.

CONCLUSION

Electrical storm is a rare indication of HT but may be lifesaving in those patients presenting intractable arrhythmias despite usual care. Most patients can be safely discharged from hospital, although post-operative mortality remains substantial in this context of emergency transplantation. Larger studies are warranted to precisely determine those patients at higher risk of in-hospital mortality.

Early ganglion stellate blockade as part of two-step treatment algorithm suppresses electrical storm and need for intubation

BACKGROUND

For the treatment of patients with electrical storm (ES), we established a two-step algorithm comprising standard anti-arrhythmic measures and early ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion blockade (SGB). In this single-center study, we evaluated the short-term efficacy of the algorithm and tested the hypothesis that early SGB might prevent the need for intubations.

METHODS

Overall, we analyzed data for 70 ES events in 59 patients requiring SGB (mean age 67.7 ± 12.4 years, 80% males, left ventricular ejection fraction 30.0% ± 9.1%), all with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs).

RESULTS

The mean time from ES onset to SGB was 13.2 ± 12.3 hours. Percentage and mean absolute reduction in shocks at 48 hours after SGB reached 86.8% (-6.3 shocks), and anti-tachycardiac pacing (ATP) declined by 65.9% (-51.1 ATPs; all P < 0.001). Patients with the highest sustained ventricular arrhythmia (VA) burden (shocks ≥10/48 h; ATPs 10-99/48 h and ≥100/48 h) experienced the highest percentage decrease in ICD therapy (shocks -99.1%; ATPs -92.1% and -100.0%, respectively). For clinical response by defined criteria and two outcome periods (1/no sustained VA ≤48 hours post SGB, and 2/no ICD shock or <3 ATPs/day from day 3 to discharge/catheter ablation/day 8), 75.7% and 76.1% experienced complete response, respectively. Catecholamine support, no/low-dose β-blocker therapy, polymorphic/mixed-type VA, and baseline sinus rhythm versus atrial fibrillation were more frequent in patients with early arrhythmia recurrence. Temporary Horner's syndrome occurred in 67.1%, and no other adverse events were recorded. Intubation and general anesthesia during and after SGB were not needed.

CONCLUSION

The presented two-step algorithm for treating ES proved efficacious and safe. The results support implementation of early SGB in routine ES management.

Post-Myocardial Revascularization: As a Nidus for an Electrical Storm!

Electrical storm (ES) is a critical and potentially life-threatening cardiac rhythm disorder. It is characterized by the presence of three or more distinct episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) that necessitate appropriate termination. ES may occur in the setting of acute myocardial infarction or following myocardial reperfusion. An urgent treatment approach is necessary for better outcomes. We represent a case of a 64-year-old patient who presented with sudden chest pain and an episode of palpitations related to non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), who has undergone percutaneous coronary intervention of the stenotic epicardial artery, but subsequently experienced an ES in the absence of stent thrombosis. ES presented in the form of sustained monomorphic VT that required synchronous direct current cardioversion, anti-arrhythmic drugs, deep sedation, and endotracheal intubation with a favorable course, with the patient being discharged after 14 days hospital stay. The practitioner should be mindful of the potential occurrence of ES following myocardial revascularization and should tailor the management approach.

Electrical storm in a middle-aged man

Electrical storm (ES) refers to a life-threatening condition characterised by three or more episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), or appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks in 24 hours. We report a case of a 58-year-old man who suffered recurrent episodes of sustained VT despite appropriate defibrillation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy. On stepwise evaluation, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) was considered the most likely substrate for his dysrhythmia. He was managed conservatively on antiarrhythmic drugs with no further clinical episodes of VT, and ICD implantation for secondary prophylaxis was recommended.

Funding

None declared.

Stellate ganglion block catheters for refractory electrical storm: a retrospective cohort and care pathway

BACKGROUND

Electrical storm can be challenging to treat, requiring a multidisciplinary team to coordinate medical management and invasive procedures. As the stellate ganglion provides efferent sympathetic outflow to the myocardium, stellate ganglion blocks (SGB) can be used to combat ventricular arrhythmias that arise from sympathetic overactivity. Data are scarce regarding SGB catheters as a treatment for electrical storm. We reviewed our use of SGB catheters for refractory electrical storm using our pathway collaboratively developed by critical care, cardiology, and regional anesthesia teams.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent an SGB for electrical storm between January 2020 and April 2022 in our cardiovascular intensive care unit. The primary outcome was the sustained cessation of electrical storm for 24 hours.

RESULTS

Upon chart review, 27 patients were identified and 11 met inclusion criteria. Cessation of electrical storm for 24 hours was achieved in 90% (n=10) of patients after left SGB. Similarly, 90% (n=10) had no documented episodes of ventricular arrhythmias requiring intervention within 6 hours after SGB.

CONCLUSIONS

SGBs can interrupt or treat electrical storm. SGB catheters allow for prolonged arrhythmia cessation without repeated blocks and decrease the risk of repeat episodes of ventricular arrhythmias.

Emergency Management of Electrical Storm: A Practical Overview

Electrical storm is a medical emergency characterized by ventricular arrythmia recurrence that can lead to hemodynamic instability. The incidence of this clinical condition is rising, mainly in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients, and its prognosis is often poor. Early acknowledgment, management and treatment have a key role in reducing mortality in the acute phase and improving the quality of life of these patients. In an emergency setting, several measures can be employed. Anti-arrhythmic drugs, based on the underlying disease, are often the first step to control the arrhythmic burden; besides that, new therapeutic strategies have been developed with high efficacy, such as deep sedation, early catheter ablation, neuraxial modulation and mechanical hemodynamic support. The aim of this review is to provide practical indications for the management of electrical storm in acute settings.

Electrical storm refractory multiple antiarrhythmic medications was stopped by interatrial shunting procedure—A case report

Electrical storm (ES) remains a major dilemma for clinicians, often presenting as a medical emergency associated with significant adverse outcomes. The mechanisms behind triggering ES are complex. Although the increased activation of the sympathetic nervous system was widely accepted as a major mechanism in initiating and maintaining ES, it's thought that the interaction between mechanical and electrical substrates may play an important role in some situations. Here we present a case of ES that was refractory to multiple antiarrhythmic medications but was stopped by interatrial shunting. We aim to highlight the importance of mechano-electric feedback (MEF) as the pathophysiological mechanisms of some types of ES and the utility of interatrial shunting as an alternative therapeutic strategy for patients with ES initially refractory to antiarrhythmic medications when there is evidence to indicate increased left ventricular filling pressure or left atrial pressure.

Short-Coupled Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation: A Literature Review With Extended Follow-Up

Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation is responsible for approximately 10% of cases of aborted cardiac arrest. Recent studies have shown that short-coupled ventricular premature complexes are present at the onset of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation in 6.6%-17% of patients. The present review provided information on 86 patients with short-coupled malignant ventricular arrhythmias that were reported as case reports or small patient series during the last 70 years. In 75% of the 81 cases published during the last 40 years, extended information and follow-up (from 2.63 ± 4.5 to 10.67 ± 7.8 years; P < 0.001, between the original publication to the latest update) could be obtained from the authors. The review shows that short-coupled malignant ventricular arrhythmias occurred almost equally in males and females, at the mean age of 40 years. A tendency for later occurrence of the arrhythmia by 4 years was observed in females. A prior history of syncope was noted in 45.3% of the patients, whereas arrhythmic storm occurred in 42% at presentation. The most common mode of revelation of short-coupled malignant ventricular arrhythmias was syncope (53.5%), followed by aborted cardiac arrest (26.7%) and recurrent arrhythmic event after prior implantable-cardioverter defibrillator implantation for idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (17.4%). For the first time, short-coupled malignant arrhythmias exhibiting "not-so-short" coupling intervals (≥350 ms) were found in a significant proportion of patients (17.4%). During long-term follow-up, quinidine yielded a slightly higher success rate in arrhythmia control than ablation. Larger studies are necessary to assess the best strategy for the management of this potentially lethal arrhythmia.

Substrate Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Symptomatic Ventricular Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) reduce ICD shocks, but the most effective approach remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

This trial compares the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation vs AAD as first-line therapy in ICD patients with symptomatic ventricular tachycardias (VTs).

METHODS

The SURVIVE-VT (Substrate Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Symptomatic Ventricular Tachycardia) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial including patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and appropriated ICD shock. Patients were 1:1 randomized to complete endocardial substrate-based catheter ablation or antiarrhythmic therapy (amiodarone + beta-blockers, amiodarone alone, or sotalol ± beta-blockers). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, appropriate ICD shock, unplanned hospitalization for worsening heart failure, or severe treatment-related complications.

RESULTS

In this trial, 144 patients (median age, 70 years; 96% male) were randomized to catheter ablation (71 patients) or AAD (73 patients). After 24 months, the primary outcome occurred in 28.2% of patients in the ablation group and 46.6% of those in the AAD group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.30-0.90; P = 0.021). This difference was driven by a significant reduction in severe treatment-related complications (9.9% vs 28.8%, HR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.13-0.71; P = 0.006). Eight patients were hospitalized for heart failure in the ablation group and 13 in the AAD group (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.23-1.35; P = 0.198). There was no difference in cardiac mortality (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.19-4.61; P = 0.929).

CONCLUSIONS

In ICD patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and symptomatic VT, catheter ablation reduced the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, appropriate ICD shock, hospitalization due to heart failure, or severe treatment-related complications compared to AAD. (Substrate Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Symptomatic Ventricular Tachycardia [SURVIVE-VT]: NCT03734562).

Brain-heart communication in health and diseases

Tight connections between the brain and heart have attracted a considerable amount of attention. This review focuses on the anatomical (extrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system and intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system) and functional (neuroendocrine-heart axis and neuroimmune-heart axis) connections between the brain and heart, the linkage between central nervous system diseases and cardiovascular diseases, the harm of sympathetic hyperactivity to the heart, and current neuromodulation therapies. Depression is a comorbidity of cardiovascular diseases, and the two are causally related. This review summarizes the mechanisms and treatment of depression and cardiovascular diseases, providing theoretical evidence for basic research and clinical studies to improve treatment options.

Recent insights into mechanisms and clinical approaches to electrical storm

Electrical storm, characterized by repetitive ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) over a short period, is becoming commoner with widespread use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Electrical storm, sometimes called "arrhythmic storm" or "VT-storm", is usually a medical emergency requiring hospitalization and expert management, and significantly affects short- and long-term outcomes. This syndrome typically occurs in patients with underlying structural heart disease (ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy) or inherited channelopathies. Triggers for electrical storm should be sought but are often unidentifiable. Initial management is dictated by the hemodynamic status, while subsequent management typically involves ICD interrogation and reprogramming to reduce recurrent shocks, identification/management of triggers like electrolyte abnormalities, myocardial ischemia, or decompensated heart failure, and antiarrhythmic-drug therapy or catheter ablation. Sympathetic nervous system activation is central to the initiation and maintenance of arrhythmic storm, so autonomic modulation is a cornerstone of management. Sympathetic inhibition can be achieved with medications (particularly beta-adrenoreceptor blockers), deep sedation, or cardiac sympathetic denervation. More definitive management targets the underlying ventricular arrhythmia substrate to terminate and prevent recurrent arrhythmia. Arrhythmia targeting can be achieved with antiarrhythmic medications, catheter ablation or more novel therapies such as stereotactic radiation therapy that targets the arrhythmic substrate. Mechanistic studies point to adrenergic activation and other direct consequences of ICD-shocks in promoting further arrhythmogenesis and hypocontractility. Here, we review the pathophysiologic mechanisms, clinical features, prognosis, and therapeutic options for electrical storm. We also outline a clinical approach to this challenging and complex condition, along with its mechanistic basis.

Management of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy: contemporary armamentarium

Worldwide, ∼4 million people die from sudden cardiac death every year caused in more than half of the cases by ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Prevention of sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction by implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the most common, even though not curative, therapy to date. Optimized ICD programming should be strived for in order to decrease the incidence of ICD interventions. Catheter ablation reduces the recurrence of ventricular tachycardias (VTs) and is an important adjunct to sole ICD-based treatment or pharmacological antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with ICM, as conclusively demonstrated by seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the last two decades. However, none of the conducted trials was powered to reveal a survival benefit for ablated patients as compared to controls. Whereas thorough consideration of an early approach is necessary following two recent RCTs (PAUSE-SCD, BERLIN VT), catheter ablation is particularly recommended in patients with recurrent VT after ICD therapy. In this context, novel, pathophysiologically driven ablation strategies referring to deep morphological and functional substrate phenotyping based on high-resolution mapping and three-dimensional visualization of scars appear promising. Emerging concepts like sympathetic cardiac denervation as well as radioablation might expand the therapeutical armamentarium especially in patients with therapy-refractory VT. Randomized controlled trials are warranted and on the way to investigate how these translate into improved patient outcome. This review summarizes therapeutic strategies currently available for the prevention of VT recurrences, the optimal timing of applicability, and highlights future perspectives after a PAUSE in BERLIN.

Clinical management of electrical storm: a current overview

The number of patients affected by electrical storm has been continuously increasing in emergency departments. Patients are often affected by multiple comorbidities requiring multidisciplinary interventions to achieve a clinical stability. Careful reprogramming of cardiac devices, correction of electrolyte imbalance, knowledge of underlying heart disease and antiarrhythmic drugs in the acute phase play a crucial role. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of pharmacological treatment, latest transcatheter ablation techniques and advanced management of patients with electrical storm.

Electrical storm: Prognosis and management

Electrical storm is present when a cluster of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) occurs within a short time frame. The most widely accepted definition is 3 or more episodes of VA within a 24-h period, although prognostic risk begins to rise when 2 or more events occur within 3months. Electrical storm often presents as a medical emergency in the form of recurrent implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) shocks, recurrent syncope in patients with no ICD or low cardiac output symptoms. Management often requires a multimodality approach including ICD management, pharmacologic therapy, catheter ablation and modulations of the autonomic nervous system. In this article, we review the definition, prognosis and management of electrical storm.

Stellate ganglion blockade for treating refractory electrical storm: a historical cohort study

BACKGROUND

Stellate ganglion blockade (SGB) has been used to treat electrical storm (ES) refractory to antiarrhythmic therapy or to stabilize patients before more definitive intervention. Nevertheless, its efficacy is not well understood, with only a few case reports and retrospective case series in the literature.

METHODS

We conducted a historical cohort study on patients with drug-refractory ES who underwent ultrasound-guided unilateral SGB from 1 January 2010 until 19 July 2019 at two hospital sites. Stellate ganglion blockade was performed with variable combinations of bupivacaine, lidocaine, ropivacaine, and dexamethasone. We collected data on demographic and procedural characteristics, the number of arrhythmias and defibrillation episodes, antiarrhythmic and anticoagulant medication, left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), and respiratory support requirement.

RESULTS

We identified N = 13 patients; their mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 64 (13) yr, and 10 (77%) were male. The baseline mean (SD) number of overall arrhythmia and defibrillation episodes per day were 9 (6) and 4 (3), respectively; the mean (SD) pre-SGB EF was 23 (7)%. Seven patients (54%) received dexamethasone in addition to local anesthetic for SGB. One patient experienced hypotension after SGB. Arrhythmias and defibrillation episodes significantly decreased at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hr after SGB; at 96 hr, 62% and 92% of patients had no VA and defibrillation episodes, respectively (P < 0.001 for all time points). Ejection fraction and the number of patients receiving antiarrhythmic medications or requiring respiratory support were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral SGB was associated with a reduction in arrhythmias and defibrillation episodes, but did not affect antiarrhythmic medication, respiratory support, or EF. Randomized controlled trials on larger cohorts are needed to confirm these findings.

Expert consensus on acute management of ventricular arrhythmias - VT network Austria

The Arrhythmia Working Group of the Austrian Society of Cardiology (ÖKG) has set the goal of systematically structuring and organizing the acute care of patients with ventricular arrhythmias (VA), i.e. ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in Austria. Within a consensus paper, national recommendations on the basic diagnostic work-up of VA (12-lead ECG, medical history, family history, laboratory analyses, echocardiography, search for reversible causes, ICD interrogation), as well as further medical treatment and therapeutic measures (indication of coronary angiography, ablation therapy) are established. Since acute ablation of VT is indicated in the current ESC guidelines as a class IB indication for scar-associated incessant VT or electrical storm (ES; ≥ 3 ICD therapies in 24 h) as well as for ischemic cardiomyopathy (iCMP) with recurrent ICD shocks, organizational measures must be taken to ensure that these guidelines can be implemented. Therefore, a VT network will be established covering all areas in Austria, consisting of primary and secondary VT centers. Organizational aspects of an acute VT network are defined and should subsequently be implemented by the participating hospitals. All electrophysiologic centers in Austria that deal with VT ablation are to be integrated into the network in the medium-term. Centers that co-operate in the network are divided into primary and secondary VT centers according to predefined criteria.

Five Hours of Resuscitation With 150 Electrical Shocks and Complete Recovery

Background: Myocardial ischemia may lead to lethal arrhythmias. Treatment of these arrhythmias without addressing the cause of ischemia may be futile. The length of resuscitation is an important parameter for determining when to stop resuscitation but with shockable rhythms and reversible cause of the cardiac arrest, the decision to terminate resuscitation is complex. 

Case Summary: A patient with a three-month history of shortness of breath with effort developed pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT) at the early stages of a stress test. In coronary angiography, a critical lesion in the right coronary artery (RCA) was observed and treated with two stents. During the procedure and for a total of five hours, the patient had more than 100 separate episodes of VT and ventricular fibrillation (VF) that were treated by 150 defibrillations, artificial ventilation, intra-aortic counter-pulsation balloon insertion, and multiple drugs. One hour after the initial stenting procedure, thrombosis of the RCA was demonstrated and treated successfully with angioplasty. Use of procainamide resolved the arrhythmias and the patient recovered completely without neurological deficit, ejection fraction of 45%, and is asymptomatic at one year following the event.

Discussion: Our case shows that with a revisable cause of cardiac arrest, resuscitation should be directed at maintaining perfusion of essential organs and treating the reversible cause. Without re-opening the RCA, we could not have saved the patient's life. The use of an extracorporeal membrane oxygenator, if available, should be considered in similar cases. Finally, the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation determines the neurological outcome regardless of the length of resuscitation, as was evident in our patient who recovered completely.

Limited Left Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy Effectively Silences Refractory Electrical Storm

BACKGROUND

Electrical Storm is a life-threatening condition that affects up to 20% of patients with ICDs. In this small retrospective study, we report our results with left video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy/ganglionectomy (VATSG) to treat refractory electrical storm in low ejection fraction patients who were not candidates for catheter ablations (CA).

METHODS

We identified 12 patients who presented with electrical storm and underwent a total of 14 video assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy/ganglionectomy, including three patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO). We reviewed demographic data, survival to discharge, number of cardioversions (before and after VATSG), need for readmissions, and need for right-sided procedures.

RESULTS

In the 30 days prior to a left VATSG the mean number of shocks was 22.67 for all patients. For the patients who survived to discharge the mean was 3.55 since surgery with a median of zero shocks after a median follow up of 358 days. Six patients have not experienced any further cardioversions since their last VATSG and five have never been readmitted for VT. Two patients had staged bilateral procedures due to recurrences and of those, one never required any further cardioversions.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited left VATSG is an appropriate and effective initial treatment for ES patients who are not candidates for CA, including patients on VA ECMO for hemodynamic support.

Management of ventricular electrical storm: a contemporary appraisal

Ventricular electrical storm (VES) is a clinical scenario characterized by the clustering of multiple episodes of sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA) over a short duration. Patients with VES are prone to psychological disorders, heart failure decompensation, and increased mortality. Studies have shown that 10–28% of the patients with secondary prevention ICDs can sustain VES. The triad of a susceptible electrophysiologic substrate, triggers, and autonomic dysregulation govern the pathogenesis of VES. The rate of VA, underlying ventricular function, and the presence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) determine the clinical presentation. A multi-faceted approach is often required for management consisting of acute hemodynamic stabilization, ICD reprogramming when appropriate, antiarrhythmic drug therapy, and sedation. Some patients may be eligible for catheter ablation, and autonomic modulation with thoracic epidural anesthesia, stellate ganglion block, or cardiac sympathetic denervation. Hemodynamically unstable patients may benefit from the use of left ventricular assist devices, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Special scenarios such as idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, Brugada syndrome, Long and short QT syndrome, early repolarization syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, and cardiac sarcoidosis have been described as well. VES is a cardiac emergency that requires swift intervention. It is associated with poor short and long-term outcomes. A structured team-based management approach is paramount for the safe and effective treatment of this sick cohort.

Secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death

The prevention and treatment of sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a significant public health challenge. For patients with a history of sudden death attributable to ventricular arrhythmia, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is a mainstay of treatment, although these patients remain at high risk for recurrent ventricular arrhythmia and defibrillator therapies. In this review, we summarize landmark clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of ICD therapy in secondary prevention patients, review clinical outcomes including mode of death in survivors of SCD, and highlight the role for systematic diagnostic evaluation. We additionally discuss the invasive electrophysiological management of these patients, including ICD selection and programming as well as the role and timing of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and catheter ablation. Finally, we frame future challenges and needs to advance the care for secondary prevention patients.

Intrapericardial administration of anti-arrhythmic medications in patients with electrical storm

INTRODUCTION

Electrical storm (ES) is cardiac electrical instability characterized by recurrent episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. ES is associated with increased mortality and morbidity, hence requires prompt intervention. Treatment of underlying etiology is of prime importance in termination of ES. Anti-arrhythmic medications serve as an adjunctive therapy in suppression of ES by reducing myocardial excitability. The anti-arrhythmic conventionally employed is amiodarone in combination with non-selective beta-blockers to reduce the adrenergic input to myocardium. However, anti-arrhythmics at increased concentrations can lead to adverse systemic effects including hemodynamic instability.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesize 1. The use of intravenous or oral anti-arrhythmic therapy for patients in electrical storm is limited by their toxicities and blood pressure lowering effect. Corollary 1. Injection of anti-arrhythmic medications into the pericardial space, an extra-vascular structure encasing the heart, provides an option for use of higher concentration of anti-arrhythmic while limiting systemic absorption. Corollary 2. The pericardial space has direct communication to the epicardium, the outer most layer of cardiac muscle, spatial proximity may allow for effective therapeutic options in electrical storm. We present experimental and clinical evidence in support of these hypothesis.

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Non-ischemic cardiomyopathies are a heterogeneous group of diseases of the myocardium that have a distinct proclivity to ventricular arrhythmias. Of these, ventricular tachycardias pose significant management challenges with the risk of sudden cardiac death and morbidity from multiple causes. Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardias is becoming an increasingly utilised intervention that has been found to have significant benefits with improving symptoms, reducing anti-arrhythmic drug burden and debilitating device therapies, thereby improving quality of life. Nonetheless, the approach to the ablation of ventricular tachycardias in non-ischemic cardiomyopathies is governed heavily by the disease process, with several distinct differences from ischemic cardiomyopathy including a preponderance to epicardial and deep intramural substrate. This contemporary review aims to present the various disease processes within non-ischemic cardiomyopathies, catheter ablation techniques which have been developed to target ventricular tachycardia and more novel adjunctive therapeutic measures.

Neuromodulation for Ventricular Tachycardia and Atrial Fibrillation: A Clinical Scenario-Based Review

Autonomic dysregulation in cardiovascular disease plays a major role in the pathogenesis of arrhythmias. Cardiac neural control relies on complex feedback loops consisting of efferent and afferent limbs, which carry sympathetic and parasympathetic signals from the brain to the heart and sensory signals from the heart to the brain. Cardiac disease leads to neural remodeling and sympathovagal imbalances with arrhythmogenic effects. Preclinical studies of modulation at central and peripheral levels of the cardiac autonomic nervous system have yielded promising results, leading to early stage clinical studies of these techniques in atrial fibrillation and refractory ventricular arrhythmias, particularly in patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes and structural heart disease. However, significant knowledge gaps in basic cardiac neurophysiology limit the success of these neuromodulatory therapies. This review discusses the recent advances in neuromodulation for cardiac arrhythmia management, with a clinical scenario-based approach aimed at bringing neurocardiology closer to the realm of the clinical electrophysiologist.