Can spinal cord stimulation reduce ventricular arrhythmias?

Cardiovascular Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation: The Highs, the Lows, and the Don't Knows

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There are many potential etiologies of impaired cardiovascular control, from chronic stress to neurodegenerative conditions or central nervous system lesions. Since 1959, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been reported to modulate blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and HR variability (HRV), yet the specific stimulation sites and parameters to induce a targeted cardiovascular (CV) change for mitigating abnormal hemodynamics remain unclear. To investigate the ability and parameters of SCS to modulate the CV, we reviewed clinical studies using SCS with reported HR, BP, or HRV findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A keyword-based electronic search was conducted through MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed data bases, last searched on February 3, 2023. Inclusion criteria were studies with human participants receiving SCS with comparison with SCS turned off, with reporting of either HR, HRV, or BP findings. Non-English studies, conference abstracts, and studies not reporting standalone effects of SCS when comparing SCS with non-SCS interventions were excluded. Results were plotted for visual analysis. When available, participant-specific stimulation parameters and effects were extracted and quantitatively analyzed using ordinary least squares regression.

RESULTS

A total of 59 studies were included in this review; 51 studies delivered SCS invasively through implanted/percutaneous leads. Eight studies used noninvasive, transcutaneous electrodes. We found numerous reports of cervical, high thoracic, and mid-to-low thoracolumbar SCS increasing resting BP, and cervical/mid-to-low thoracolumbar SCS decreasing BP. The effect of SCS location on HR and HRV was equivocal. We were unable to analyze stimulation parameters owing to inadequate parameter reporting in many publications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest CV neuromodulation, particularly BP modulation, with SCS to be a promising frontier. Further research with larger randomized controlled trials and detailed reporting of SCS parameters will be necessary for appropriate evaluation of SCS as a CV therapy.

Use of Spinal Cord Stimulators in Patients With Pacemakers or Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators: A Review of Documented Accounts of Interference

OBJECTIVES

To assess the currently available evidence regarding associations between spinal cord stimulator (SCS) lead type, clinical indications for device placement, and interference between SCSs and cardiac pacemakers (CPMs)/implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs).

STUDY DESIGN

Review of case reports and original research studies assessing the interference between SCS and CPM/ICD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for articles commenting on the interference between SCS and CPM/ICD. The search criteria which generated the greatest number of relevant studies was (spinal cord stimulator AND [pacemaker OR implantable cardioverter defibrillator]). Additional, empiric review was conducted using JSTOR, ScienceDirect, and EBSCOhost databases; however, no additional eligible studies were identified. Data were extracted, summarized into tables, and quantitatively analyzed using LibreTexts and MedCalc software.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant interference observed between SCS and CPM/ICD devices in patients regardless of indication for SCS placement and SCS lead polarity.

LIMITATIONS

Limited by variability of patient cases and variability in maximum frequency and amplitude of SCS devices tried in individual cases. Also limited by small sample size and the absence of a standard definition for device interference across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Interference between cardiac devices and SCSs is a rare occurrence. As there are currently no published guidelines, devices should be interrogated on a case-by-case basis in the SCS trial period (if implanted after cardiac device), during permanent implantation, and during scheduled follow-up visits. Peri-operative testing should include increasing the SCS settings to maximally tolerated levels with cardiac device set at its maximum sensitivity.

Device-Based Sympathetic Nerve Regulation for Cardiovascular Diseases

Sympathetic overactivation plays an important role in promoting a variety of pathophysiological processes in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), including ventricular remodeling, vascular endothelial injury and atherosclerotic plaque progression. Device-based sympathetic nerve (SN) regulation offers a new therapeutic option for some CVDs. Renal denervation (RDN) is the most well-documented method of device-based SN regulation in clinical studies, and several large-scale randomized controlled trials have confirmed its value in patients with resistant hypertension, and some studies have also found RDN to be effective in the control of heart failure and arrhythmias. Pulmonary artery denervation (PADN) has been clinically shown to be effective in controlling pulmonary hypertension. Hepatic artery denervation (HADN) and splenic artery denervation (SADN) are relatively novel approaches that hold promise for a role in cardiovascular metabolic and inflammatory-immune related diseases, and their first-in-man studies are ongoing. In addition, baroreflex activation, spinal cord stimulation and other device-based therapies also show favorable outcomes. This review summarizes the pathophysiological rationale and the latest clinical evidence for device-based therapies for some CVDs.

Autonomic modulation of ventricular electrical activity: recent developments and clinical implications

PURPOSE

This review aimed to provide a complete overview of the current stance and recent developments in antiarrhythmic neuromodulatory interventions, focusing on lifethreatening vetricular arrhythmias.

METHODS

Both preclinical studies and clinical studies were assessed to highlight the gaps in knowledge that remain to be answered and the necessary steps required to properly translate these strategies to the clinical setting.

RESULTS

Cardiac autonomic imbalance, characterized by chronic sympathoexcitation and parasympathetic withdrawal, destabilizes cardiac electrophysiology and promotes ventricular arrhythmogenesis. Therefore, neuromodulatory interventions that target the sympatho-vagal imbalance have emerged as promising antiarrhythmic strategies. These strategies are aimed at different parts of the cardiac neuraxis and directly or indirectly restore cardiac autonomic tone. These interventions include pharmacological blockade of sympathetic neurotransmitters and neuropeptides, cardiac sympathetic denervation, thoracic epidural anesthesia, and spinal cord and vagal nerve stimulation.

CONCLUSION

Neuromodulatory strategies have repeatedly been demonstrated to be highly effective and very promising anti-arrhythmic therapies. Nevertheless, there is still much room to gain in our understanding of neurocardiac physiology, refining the current neuromodulatory strategic options and elucidating the chronic effects of many of these strategic options.

Spinal Cord Stimulation Reduces Ventricular Arrhythmias by Attenuating Reactive Gliosis and Activation of Spinal Interneurons

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated spinal cord neuronal and glial cell activation during cardiac ischemia-reperfusion (IR)-triggered ventricular arrhythmias and neuromodulation therapy by spinal cord stimulation (SCS).

BACKGROUND

Myocardial ischemia induces changes in cardiospinal neural networks leading to sudden cardiac death. Neuromodulation with SCS decreases cardiac sympathoexcitation; however, the molecular mechanisms remain unknown.

METHODS

Yorkshire pigs (n = 16) were randomized to Control, IR, or IR+SCS groups. A 4-pole SCS lead was placed in the T1-T4 epidural space with stimulation for 30 minutes before IR (50 Hz, 0.4-ms duration, 90% motor threshold). Cardiac electrophysiological mapping and Ventricular Arrhythmia Score (VAS) were recorded. Immunohistochemistry of thoracic spinal sections was used to map and identify Fos-positive neuronal and glial cell types during IR with and without SCS.

RESULTS

IR increased cardiac sympathoexcitation and arrhythmias (VAS = 6.2 ± 0.9) that were attenuated in IR + SCS (VAS = 2.8 ± 0.5; P = 0.017). IR increased spinal cellular Fos expression (#Fos+ cells Control = 23 ± 2 vs IR = 88 ± 5; P < 0.0001) in T1-T4, with the greatest increase localized to T3, and the greatest %Fos+ cells being microglia and astrocytes. Fos expression was attenuated by IR + SCS (62 ± 4; P < 0.01), primarily though a reduction in Fos+ microglia and astrocytes, as SCS also led to increase in Fos+ neurons in deep dorsal laminae.

CONCLUSIONS

In a porcine model, cardiac IR was associated with astrocyte and microglial cell activation. Our results suggest that preemptive thoracic SCS decreased IR-induced cardiac sympathoexcitation and ventricular arrhythmias through attenuation of reactive gliosis and activation of inhibitory interneurons in the dorsal horn of spinal cord.

Autonomic Modulation of Cardiac Arrhythmias: Methods to Assess Treatment and Outcomes

The autonomic nervous system plays a central role in the pathogenesis of multiple cardiac arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia. As such, autonomic modulation represents an attractive therapeutic approach in these conditions. Notably, autonomic modulation exploits the plasticity of the neural tissue to induce neural remodeling and thus obtain therapeutic benefit. Different forms of autonomic modulation include vagus nerve stimulation, tragus stimulation, renal denervation, baroreceptor activation therapy, and cardiac sympathetic denervation. This review seeks to highlight these autonomic modulation therapeutic modalities, which have shown promise in early preclinical and clinical trials and represent exciting alternatives to standard arrhythmia treatment. We also present an overview of the various methods used to assess autonomic tone, including heart rate variability, skin sympathetic nerve activity, and alternans, which can be used as surrogate markers and predictors of the treatment effect. Although the use of autonomic modulation to treat cardiac arrhythmias is supported by strong preclinical data and preliminary studies in humans, in light of the disappointing results of a number of recent randomized clinical trials of autonomic modulation therapies in heart failure, the need for optimization of the stimulation parameters and rigorous patient selection based on appropriate biomarkers cannot be overemphasized.

Autonomic modulation and cardiac arrhythmias: old insights and novel strategies

The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a critical role in both health and states of cardiovascular disease. There has been a long-recognized role of the ANS in the pathogenesis of both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). This historical understanding has been expanded in the context of evolving insights into the anatomy and physiology of the ANS, including dysfunction of the ANS in cardiovascular disease such as heart failure and myocardial infarction. An expanding armamentarium of therapeutic strategies-both invasive and non-invasive-have brought the potential of ANS modulation to contemporary clinical practice. Here, we summarize the integrative neuro-cardiac anatomy underlying the ANS, review the physiological rationale for autonomic modulation in atrial and VAs, highlight strategies for autonomic modulation, and finally frame future challenges and opportunities for ANS therapeutics.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Cardiac Sympathetic Innervation Imaging with PET Radiotracers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present article reviews the pathophysiology of cardiac sympathetic denervation, the principles of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of the sympathetic innervation of the heart and its potential clinical role, based on current and expected future evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Imaging of cardiac sympathetic denervation can be performed with radiolabeled noradrenaline analogues, e.g., ¹¹C-hydroxyephedrine. A greater burden of sympathetic denervation carries prognostic significance, e.g., in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%, who are more likely to experience sudden cardiac death. Abnormalities of sympathetic cardiac innervation have been demonstrated in hypertrophic, dilated, and arrhythmic right ventricular cardiomyopathies, and may be helpful in better phenotyping patients who will benefit from device therapy, e.g., cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. The results of future trials, e.g., the Prediction of Arrhythmic Events with Positron Emission Tomography (PAREPET) II study, are awaited to inform on the role of PET cardiac sympathetic imaging in the selection of device therapy. PET cardiac sympathetic innervation imaging allows visualization and quantification of autonomic denervation secondary to various cardiac diseases, and has significant potential to influence clinical decision-making, e.g., the titration of pharmacotherapy and more directed selection of candidates for device implantation.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

[The First in Russia Experience of Successful Implementation of Constant Neurostimulation of the Spinal Cord in the Complex Treatment of a Patient with Permanent Form of Atrial Fibrillation Combined with Spinal Stenosis]

This article describes for the first time in the domestic literature a clinical case of the therapeutic effect of neuromodulation on the permanent form of atrial fibrillation and chronic heart failure in an elderly patient with spinal stenosis which led to the development of pain syndrome and movement disorders. For the treatment of neurological pathology, at the beginning epidural administration of drugs was applied, followed by spinal cord stimulation trial and implantation of permanent neurostimulator. At each stage of treatment conducted by a functional neurosurgeon the patient had a spontaneous restoration of sinus rhythm, and during continuous neurostimulation a stable retention of sinus rhythm and regression of heart failure symptoms have been observed throughout a long observation period. The article also presents the data of a few experimental and clinical studies on the use of neuromodulation in cardiology, describes the method of implantation of spinal electrodes and analyzes possible mechanisms of modulation of the autonomic innervation of the heart, implemented by spinal cord stimulation.

Neuromodulation for the Treatment of Heart Rhythm Disorders

•

Derangement of autonomic nervous signaling is an important contributor to cardiac arrhythmogenesis.

•

Modulation of autonomic nervous signaling holds significant promise for the prevention and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias.

•

Further clinical investigation is necessary to establish the efficacy and safety of autonomic modulatory therapies in reducing cardiac arrhythmias.

There is an increasing recognition of the importance of interactions between the heart and the autonomic nervous system in the pathophysiology of arrhythmias. These interactions play a role in both the initiation and maintenance of arrhythmias and are important in both atrial and ventricular arrhythmia. Given the importance of the autonomic nervous system in the pathophysiology of arrhythmias, there has been notable effort in the field to improve existing therapies and pioneer additional interventions directed at cardiac-autonomic targets. The interventions are targeted to multiple and different anatomic targets across the neurocardiac axis. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the rationale for neuromodulation in the treatment of arrhythmias and to review the specific treatments under evaluation and development for the treatment of both atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmias.

Neuromodulation for Ventricular Tachycardia and Atrial Fibrillation: A Clinical Scenario-Based Review

Autonomic dysregulation in cardiovascular disease plays a major role in the pathogenesis of arrhythmias. Cardiac neural control relies on complex feedback loops consisting of efferent and afferent limbs, which carry sympathetic and parasympathetic signals from the brain to the heart and sensory signals from the heart to the brain. Cardiac disease leads to neural remodeling and sympathovagal imbalances with arrhythmogenic effects. Preclinical studies of modulation at central and peripheral levels of the cardiac autonomic nervous system have yielded promising results, leading to early stage clinical studies of these techniques in atrial fibrillation and refractory ventricular arrhythmias, particularly in patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes and structural heart disease. However, significant knowledge gaps in basic cardiac neurophysiology limit the success of these neuromodulatory therapies. This review discusses the recent advances in neuromodulation for cardiac arrhythmia management, with a clinical scenario-based approach aimed at bringing neurocardiology closer to the realm of the clinical electrophysiologist.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Neuromodulation Approaches for Cardiac Arrhythmias: Recent Advances

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to describe the latest advances in autonomic neuromodulation approaches to treating cardiac arrhythmias, with a focus on ventricular arrhythmias.

RECENT FINDINGS

The increasing understanding of neuronal remodeling in cardiac diseases has led to the development and improvement of novel neuromodulation therapies targeting multiple levels of the autonomic nervous system. Thoracic epidural anesthesia, spinal cord stimulation, stellate ganglion modulatory therapies, vagal stimulation, renal denervation, and interventions on the intracardiac nervous system have all been studied in preclinical models, with encouraging preliminary clinical data. The autonomic nervous system regulates all the electrical processes of the heart and plays an important role in the pathophysiology of cardiac arrhythmias. Despite recent advances in the clinical application of cardiac neuromodulation, our comprehension of the anatomy and function of the cardiac autonomic nervous system is still limited. Hopefully in the near future, more preclinical data combined with larger clinical trials will lead to further improvements in neuromodulatory treatment for heart rhythm disorders.

Autonomic Neuromodulation for Preventing and Treating Ventricular Arrhythmias

The cardiac autonomic nervous system (CANS) is associated with modulation of cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmogenesis. In this mini review, we will briefly introduce cardiac autonomic anatomy and autonomic activity in ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and discuss novel approaches of CANS modulation for treating VAs. Studies over the decades have provided a better understanding of cardiac autonomic innervation and revealed overwhelming evidence of the relationship between autonomic tone and VAs. A high sympathetic tone and low parasympathetic (vagal) tone are considered as the major triggers of VAs in patients with myocardial ischemia, which can cause sudden cardiac death. In recent years, novel methods of autonomic neuromodulation have been investigated to prevent VAs, and they have been verified as being beneficial for malignant VAs in animal models and humans. The clinical outcome of autonomic neuromodulation depends on the level of cardiac neuraxis, stimulation parameters, and patient's pathological status. Since autonomic modulation for VA treatment is still in the early stage of clinical application, more basic and clinical studies should be performed to clarify these mechanisms and optimize autonomic neuromodulation therapies for patients with VAs in the future.

Cardiac Innervation and the Autonomic Nervous System in Sudden Cardiac Death

Neural remodeling in the autonomic nervous system contributes to sudden cardiac death. The fabric of cardiac excitability and propagation is controlled by autonomic innervation. Heart disease predisposes to malignant ventricular arrhythmias by causing neural remodeling at the level of the myocardium, the intrinsic cardiac ganglia, extracardiac intrathoracic sympathetic ganglia, extrathoracic ganglia, spinal cord, and the brainstem, as well as the higher centers and the cortex. Therapeutic strategies at each of these levels aim to restore the balance between the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches. Understanding this complex neural network will provide important therapeutic insights into the treatment of sudden cardiac death.

Effects of local cardiac denervation on cardiac innervation and ventricular arrhythmia after chronic myocardial infarction

Background

Modulation of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) has already been demonstrated to display antiarrhythmic effects in patients and animals with MI. In this study, we investigated whether local cardiac denervation has any beneficial effects on ventricular electrical stability and cardiac function in the chronic phase of MI.

Methods

Twenty-one anesthetized dogs were randomly assigned into the sham-operated, MI and MI-ablation groups, respectively. Four weeks after local cardiac denervation, LSG stimulation was used to induce VPCs and VAs. The ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) and the incidence of inducible VPCs were measured with electrophysiological protocol. Cardiac innervation was determined with immunohistochemical staining of growth associated protein-43 (GAP43) and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH). The global cardiac and regional ventricular function was evaluated with doppler echocardiography in this study.

Results

Four weeks after operation, the incidence of inducible VPC and VF in MI-ablation group were significantly reduced compared to the MI dogs (p<0.05). Moreover, local cardiac denervation significantly improved VFT in the infarcted border zone (p<0.05). The densities of GAP43 and TH-positive nerve fibers in the infarcted border zone in the MI-ablation group were lower than those in the MI group (p<0.05). However, the local cardiac denervation did not significantly improve cardiac function in the chronic phase of MI, determined by the left ventricle diameter (LV), left atrial diameter (LA), ejection fraction (EF).

Conclusions

Summarily, in the chronic phase of MI, local cardiac denervation reduces the ventricular electrical instability, and attenuates spatial heterogeneity of sympathetic nerve reconstruction. Our study suggests that this methodology might decrease malignant ventricular arrhythmia in chronic MI, and has a great potential for clinical application.

Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmias and Use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators to Improve Survival in Older Adult Patients with Cardiac Disease

Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) are well-recognized problems in the overall heart failure population, but treatment decisions can be more complex and nuanced in older patients. Sustained VA does not always lead to SCD, but identifies a higher risk population and may cause significant symptoms. Antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) and catheter ablation are the mainstays for prevention of VA, but have not been shown to improve mortality. The value of implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) may be influenced by patient age. This article discusses long-term treatment of VA and the use of ICDs in the elderly.

The role of the autonomic nervous system in arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death

The autonomic nervous system (ANS) is complex and plays an important role in cardiac arrhythmia pathogenesis. A deeper understanding of the anatomy and development of the ANS has shed light on its involvement in cardiac arrhythmias. Alterations in levels of Sema-3a and NGF, both growth factors involved in innervation patterning during development of the ANS, leads to cardiac arrhythmias. Dysregulation of the ANS, including polymorphisms in genes involved in ANS development, have been implicated in sudden infant death syndrome. Disruptions in the sympathetic and/or parasympathetic systems of the ANS can lead to cardiac arrhythmias and can vary depending on the type of arrhythmia. Simultaneous stimulation of both the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems is thought to lead to atrial fibrillation whereas increased sympathetic stimulation is thought to lead to ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia. In inherited arrhythmia syndromes, such as Long QT and Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia, sympathetic system stimulation is thought to lead to ventricular tachycardia, subsequent arrhythmias, and in severe cases, cardiac death. On the other hand, arrhythmic events in Brugada Syndrome have been associated with periods of high parasympathetic tone. Increasing evidence suggests that modulation of the ANS as a therapeutic strategy in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias is safe and effective. Further studies investigating the involvement of the ANS in arrhythmia pathogenesis and its modulation for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias is warranted.

Heart Rhythm Society: expert consensus statements-part 1

One of the most important roles for professional societies in medicine is assembling multiple stakeholders and experts to develop documents that can help guide and define policies and strategies for best medical care. Each year the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) develops several consensus documents that address critical clinical subjects that have been identified by input from HRS members and HRS committees. Over the past 5 years, HRS has produced documents with multiple professional societies from around the world, and although the topics chosen for exploration center around arrhythmia management, the reviews and recommendations made in the documents are important for clinical cardiologists and generalists who are not arrhythmia specialists. When an internist or other primary care provider identifies a patient who may be having symptoms from an arrhythmia, the referral first is made to the clinical cardiologist and only later, if necessary, does an arrhythmia specialist become involved. These expert consensus statements are developed for specific clinical questions regarding arrhythmia management where there is controversy or uncertainty, often with less data from randomized controlled trials to help guide recommendations, which must then be made by extrapolation of existing data, observational data, and expert opinion. In this 2-part review, the consensus statements developed by the HRS over the past 5 years that pertain to adults are discussed in part 1; part 2 focuses on consensus statements that HRS has developed in conjunction with the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society that address arrhythmia issues in children and adults with congenital heart disease.

The sympathetic innervation of the heart: Important new insights

Autonomic control of the heart has a significant influence over development of life threatening arrhythmias that can lead to sudden cardiac death. Sympathetic activity is known to be upregulated during these conditions and hence the sympathetic nerves present a target for treatment. However, a better understanding of the anatomy and physiology of cardiac sympathetic nerves is required for the progression of clinical interventions. This review explores the organization of the cardiac sympathetic nerves, from the preganglionic origin to the postganglionic innervations, and provides an overview of literature surrounding anti-arrhythmic therapies including thoracic sympathectomy and dorsal spinal cord stimulation. Several features of the innervation are clear. The cardiac nerves differentially supply the nodal and myocardial tissue of the heart and are dependent on activity generated in spinal neurones in the upper thoracic cord which project to synapse with ganglion cells in the stellate complex on each side. Networks of spinal interneurones determine the pattern of activity. Groups of spinal neurones selectively target specific regions of the heart but whether they exhibit a functional selectivity has still to be elucidated. Electrical or ischemic signals can lead to remodeling of nerves in the heart or ganglia. Surgical and electrical methods are proving to be clinically beneficial in reducing atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure and severe cardiac pain. This is a rapidly developing area and we need more basic understanding of how these methods work to ensure safety and reduction of side effects.

Medical therapy to prevent recurrence of ventricular arrhythmia in normal and structural heart disease patients

INTRODUCTION

Recurrent ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are a source of significant morbidity in patients without structural heart disease (SHD) and also mortality in patients with SHD. The treatment goals for these two patient populations differ greatly. Areas covered: The secondary prevention of recurrent VA in patients without and with SHD will be reviewed, focusing on clinical data (especially randomized, controlled trials) in the literature as determined through searches in PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. This will include β blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers and antiarrhythmic drugs in both subgroups and non-antiarrhythmic medications in SHD. Expert commentary: The available options for medical therapy for VA in both normal hearts and SHD are insufficient, due to substandard efficacy and toxicities. While non-pharmacologic therapies may provide an excellent option, further drug development and randomized trials are needed, as is a reappraisal of the current mode of utilization.

Ventricular fibrillation: triggers, mechanisms and therapies

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is a common, life-threatening arrhythmia responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. Due to challenges in safely mapping VF, a comprehensive understanding of its mechanisms remains elusive. Recent findings have provided new insights into mechanisms that sustain early VF. Notably, the central role of electrical rotors and catheter-based ablation of VF rotor substrate have been recently reported. In this article, we will review data regarding four stages of VF: initiation, transition, maintenance and evolution. We will discuss the particular mechanisms for each stage and therapies targeting these mechanisms. We also examine inherited arrhythmia syndromes, including the mechanisms and therapies specific to each. We hope that the overview of VF outlined in this work will assist other investigators in designing future therapies to interrupt this life-threatening arrhythmia.

Treatment of Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias Through Autonomic Modulation

This paper reviews the contribution of autonomic nervous system (ANS) modulation in the treatment of arrhythmias. Both the atria and ventricles are innervated by an extensive network of nerve fibers of parasympathetic and sympathetic origin. Both the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous system exert arrhythmogenic electrophysiological effects on atrial and pulmonary vein myocardium, while in the ventricle the sympathetic nervous system plays a more dominant role in arrhythmogenesis. Identification of ANS activity is possible with nuclear imaging. This technique may provide further insight in mechanisms and treatment targets. Additionally, the myocardial effects of the intrinsic ANS can be identified through stimulation of the ganglionic plexuses. These can be ablated for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. New (non-) invasive treatment options targeting the extrinsic cardiac ANS, such as low-level tragus stimulation and renal denervation, provide interesting future treatment possibilities both for atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmias. However, the first randomized trials have yet to be performed. Future clinical studies on modifying the ANS may not only improve the outcome of ablation therapy but may also advance our understanding of the manner in which the ANS interacts with the myocardium to modify arrhythmogenic triggers and substrate.

Targeted stellate decentralization: Implications for sympathetic control of ventricular electrophysiology

BACKGROUND

Selective bilateral cervicothoracic sympathectomy has proven to be effective for managing ventricular arrhythmias in the setting of structural heart disease. In the procedure currently used, the caudal portions of both stellate ganglia along with thoracic chain ganglia down to T4 ganglia are removed.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to define the relative contributions of the T1-T2 and T3-T4 paravertebral ganglia in modulating ventricular electrical function.

METHODS

In anesthetized vagotomized porcine subjects (n = 8), the heart was exposed via sternotomy along with right and left paravertebral sympathetic ganglia to the T4 level. A 56-electrode epicardial sock was placed over both ventricles to assess epicardial activation-recovery intervals (ARIs) in response to individually stimulating right and left stellate vs T3 paravertebral ganglia. Responses to T3 stimuli were repeated after surgical removal of the caudal portions of stellate ganglia and T2 bilaterally.

RESULTS

In intact preparations, stellate ganglion vs T3 stimuli (4 Hz, 4-ms duration) were titrated to produce equivalent decreases in global ventricular ARIs (right side: 85 ± 6 ms vs 55 ± 10 ms; left side: 24 ± 3 ms vs 17 ± 7 ms). Threshold of stimulus intensity applied to T3 ganglia to achieve threshold was 3 times that of T1 threshold. ARIs in unstimulated states were unaffected by bilateral stellate-T2 ganglion removal. After acute decentralization, T3 stimulation failed to change ARIs.

CONCLUSION

Preganglionic sympathetic efferents arising from the T1-T4 spinal cord that project to the heart transit through stellate ganglia via the paravertebral chain. Thus, T1-T2 surgical excision is sufficient to functionally interrupt central control of peripheral sympathetic efferent activity.

Management of ventricular arrhythmias in structural heart disease

Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are a source of significant morbidity and mortality in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). The advent of the implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) has had a positive effect on mortality, but the associated morbidity remains a significant problem. Modern treatment of VA has advanced far beyond medical therapy and includes strategies as simple as intelligent ICD programming and as complex as catheter ablation (CA). In these pages, the spectrum of management strategies will be discussed; from anti-arrhythmic drugs and ICD implantation and programming to CA and autonomic modulation. The focus of this review will be on strategies for secondary prevention of VA in patients with SHD, supported by clinical evidence for their utilization.

Spinal cord stimulation protects against ventricular arrhythmias by suppressing left stellate ganglion neural activity in an acute myocardial infarction canine model

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) may reduce ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) induced by acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Furthermore, activation of left stellate ganglion (LSG) appears to facilitate VAs after AMI.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether pretreatment with SCS could protect against VAs by reducing LSG neural activity in an AMI canine model.

METHODS

Thirty dogs were anesthetized and randomly divided into SCS group (with SCS, n = 15) and sham group (sham operation without SCS, n = 15). SCS was performed for 1 hour before AMI. Heart rate variability (HRV), ventricular effective refractory period (ERP), serum norepinephrine level, LSG function measured by blood pressure increases in response to LSG stimulation, and LSG neural activity were measured for 1 minute at baseline and 1 hour after SCS. AMI was induced by left anterior descending coronary artery ligation, and then HRV, LSG neural activity, and VAs were measured.

RESULTS

Compared to baseline, SCS for 1 hour significantly prolonged ventricular ERP, increased HRV, and attenuated LSG function and LSG activity in the SCS group, whereas no significant change was shown in the sham group. AMI resulted in a significant decrease in HRV and increase in LSG neural activity in the sham group, which were attenuated in the SCS group (frequency: 99 ± 34 impulses/min vs 62 ± 22 impulses/min; amplitude: 0.41 ± 0.12 mV vs 0.18 ± 0.05 mV; both P <.05). The incidence of VAs was significantly lower in the SCS group than in the sham group.

CONCLUSION

SCS may prevent AMI-induced VAs, possibly by suppressing LSG activity.

Role of the autonomic nervous system in modulating cardiac arrhythmias

The autonomic nervous system plays an important role in the modulation of cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmogenesis. Decades of research has contributed to a better understanding of the anatomy and physiology of cardiac autonomic nervous system and provided evidence supporting the relationship of autonomic tone to clinically significant arrhythmias. The mechanisms by which autonomic activation is arrhythmogenic or antiarrhythmic are complex and different for specific arrhythmias. In atrial fibrillation, simultaneous sympathetic and parasympathetic activations are the most common trigger. In contrast, in ventricular fibrillation in the setting of cardiac ischemia, sympathetic activation is proarrhythmic, whereas parasympathetic activation is antiarrhythmic. In inherited arrhythmia syndromes, sympathetic stimulation precipitates ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death except in Brugada and J-wave syndromes where it can prevent them. The identification of specific autonomic triggers in different arrhythmias has brought the idea of modulating autonomic activities for both preventing and treating these arrhythmias. This has been achieved by either neural ablation or stimulation. Neural modulation as a treatment for arrhythmias has been well established in certain diseases, such as long QT syndrome. However, in most other arrhythmia diseases, it is still an emerging modality and under investigation. Recent preliminary trials have yielded encouraging results. Further larger-scale clinical studies are necessary before widespread application can be recommended.

Spinal cord stimulation for heart failure: preclinical studies to determine optimal stimulation parameters for clinical efficacy

Spinal cord stimulation with implantable devices has been used worldwide for decades to treat regional pain conditions and cardiac angina refractory to conventional therapies. Preclinical studies with spinal cord stimulation in experimental animal models of heart disease have described interesting effects on cardiac and autonomic nervous system physiology. In canine and porcine animals with failing hearts, spinal cord stimulation reverses left ventricular dilation and improves cardiac function, while suppressing the prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias. In this paper, we present further canine studies that determined the optimal site and intensity of spinal cord stimulation that produced the most robust and beneficial clinical response in heart failure animals. We then explore and discuss the clinically relevant aspects and potential impediments that may be encountered in translating spinal cord stimulation to human patients with advanced cardiac disease.