1
|
Razmovski T, Bester C, Collins A, Tan E, O'Leary SJ. Four-Point Impedance Changes After Cochlear Implantation for Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Implants. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:e1107-e1114. [PMID: 36351225 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Monitor four-point impedance in cochlear implant recipients over time and determine if implant type, surgical approach, and electrode positioning affected impedance measurements. STUDY DESIGN Prospective observational. SETTING Hospital. PATIENTS Adult cochlear implant recipients implanted with a perimodiolar or lateral wall cochlear implant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Mean values for four-point impedances were calculated for all electrode contacts at perioperative and 3 months after surgery. Linear mixed models were applied to the impedance data to compare between implant types and time points. The angular insertion depth and electrode position relative to the medial and lateral wall, commonly termed the Intracochlear Position Index (ICPI), were collected and compared with impedance measurements. RESULTS Perioperatively, the four-point impedance was similar between implant types, with perimodiolar implants having marginally higher impedance values in the basal region. At 3 months after surgery, impedances significantly increased in the basal half of the electrode array for both implants, with higher impedance values for CI532 implants. There were no significant differences in insertion angle depth between implant types. The ICPI values for the seven most basal electrodes were similar for both implants; however, CI532 arrays were significantly more medially placed along the remaining apical portion of the array, which is expected. ICPI values did not correlate with impedance measurements for either implant. CONCLUSIONS Four-point impedance increases at 3 months after surgery may reflect fibrous tissue formation after cochlear implantation. The higher impedance values in perimodiolar implants may reflect a more extensive fibrosis formation as a result of surgical approaches used, requiring drilling of the cochlea bone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tayla Razmovski
- Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), The University of Melbourne
| | | | - Aaron Collins
- Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), The University of Melbourne
| | - Eren Tan
- Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), The University of Melbourne
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Henslee AM, Kaufmann CR, Andrick MD, Reineke PT, Tejani VD, Hansen MR. Development and Characterization of an Electrocochleography-Guided Robotics-Assisted Cochlear Implant Array Insertion System. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 167:334-340. [PMID: 34609909 PMCID: PMC9969559 DOI: 10.1177/01945998211049210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Electrocochleography (ECochG) is increasingly being used during cochlear implant (CI) surgery to detect and mitigate insertion-related intracochlear trauma, where a drop in ECochG signal has been shown to correlate with a decline in hearing outcomes. In this study, an ECochG-guided robotics-assisted CI insertion system was developed and characterized that provides controlled and consistent electrode array insertions while monitoring and adapting to real-time ECochG signals. STUDY DESIGN Experimental research. SETTING A research laboratory and animal testing facility. METHODS A proof-of-concept benchtop study evaluated the ability of the system to detect simulated ECochG signal changes and robotically adapt the insertion. Additionally, the ECochG-guided insertion system was evaluated in a pilot in vivo sheep study to characterize the signal-to-noise ratio and amplitude of ECochG recordings during robotics-assisted insertions. The system comprises an electrode array insertion drive unit, an extracochlear recording electrode module, and a control console that interfaces with both components and the surgeon. RESULTS The system exhibited a microvolt signal resolution and a response time <100 milliseconds after signal change detection, indicating that the system can detect changes and respond faster than a human. Additionally, animal results demonstrated that the system was capable of recording ECochG signals with a high signal-to-noise ratio and sufficient amplitude. CONCLUSION An ECochG-guided robotics-assisted CI insertion system can detect real-time drops in ECochG signals during electrode array insertions and immediately alter the insertion motion. The system may provide a surgeon the means to monitor and reduce CI insertion-related trauma beyond manual insertion techniques for improved CI hearing outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Viral D. Tejani
- iotaMotion, Inc, Iowa City, Iowa, USA,Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Marlan R. Hansen
- iotaMotion, Inc, Iowa City, Iowa, USA,Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Four-point Impedance Changes in the Early Post-Operative Period After Cochlear Implantation. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:e730-e737. [PMID: 35861642 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Monitoring four-point impedance changes after cochlear implantation with comparison to conventional impedance measurements. Four-point impedance provides information regarding the bulk biological environment surrounding the electrode array, which is not discernible with conventional impedances. STUDY DESIGN Prospective observational. SETTING Hospital. PATIENTS Adult cochlear implant recipients with no measurable hearing before implantation and implanted with a perimodiolar cochlear implant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Mean values for four-point and common ground impedances were calculated for all electrode contacts at intra-operative, 1 day, 1 week, 4 to 6 weeks, and 3 months post implantation. Linear mixed models were applied to the impedance data to compare between impedances and time points. Furthermore, patients were divided into groups dependent on the normalized change in four-point impedance from intra-operative to 1 day post-operative. The normalized change was then calculated for all other time points and compared across the two groups. RESULTS Significant increases in four-point impedance occurred 1 day and 3 months after surgery, particularly in the basal half of the array. Four-point impedance at 1 day was highly predictive of four-point impedance at 3 months. Four-point impedance at the other time points showed marginal or no increases from intra-operative. Patients with an average increase higher than 10% in four-point impedance from intra-operative to 1 day, had significantly higher values at 3 months ( p = 0.012). These patterns were not observed in common ground impedance. CONCLUSION This is the first study to report increases in four-point impedance within 24 hours of cochlear implantation. The increases at 1 day and 3 months align with the natural timeline of an acute and chronic inflammatory responses.
Collapse
|
4
|
Brotto D, Caserta E, Sorrentino F, Favaretto N, Marioni G, Martini A, Bovo R, Gheller F, Trevisi P. Long-Term Impedance Trend in Cochlear Implant Users with Genetically Determined Congenital Profound Hearing Loss. J Am Acad Audiol 2022; 33:105-114. [PMID: 35577055 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Impedance is a basic parameter registered at any cochlear implant (CI) fitting section. It is useful in monitoring electrode functioning and the status of the surrounding anatomical structures. PURPOSE The main aim of this study is to evaluate the 5-year impedance-value trend in patients affected by congenital genetically determined profound hearing loss implanted with Cochlear Nucleus devices. RESEARCH DESIGN Observational, retrospective, monocentric study. STUDY SAMPLE Twenty-seven consecutive patients (9 females: 12.0 ± 7.6 years old; range: 4.2-40.4) with genetic diagnosis of GJB2 mutation causing congenital profound hearing loss who underwent cochlear implantation from 2010 to 2020 with good auditory benefit. INTERVENTION Impedance values of the CIs were obtained from the CIs' programming software that registers those parameters for each follow-up section of each patient. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Impedance values were measured over time (activation, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months after cochlear implantation), for each of the 22 electrodes, in common ground, monopolar 1, monopolar 2, and monopolar 1 + 2 stimulation modes. RESULTS A significant variation was found between CI activation and 6-month follow-up. This difference was found for each of the 22 electrodes. Electrodes 1 to 4 showed higher impedance values compared with all other electrodes in each time interval. Repeated-measures analysis of variance ruled out significant variations in impedance values from 6-month to 5-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Impedance values were extremely stable after activation, at least for the first 5 years. In these cases, even minimal impedance variations should be carefully evaluated for their possible implications on hearing performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Brotto
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Ezio Caserta
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Flavia Sorrentino
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Niccolò Favaretto
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Gino Marioni
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Alessandro Martini
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Roberto Bovo
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Flavia Gheller
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Patrizia Trevisi
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Deep NL, Purcell PL, Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Roland Jr. JT, Waltzman SB. Cochlear Implantation in Infants: Evidence of Safety. Trends Hear 2021; 25:23312165211014695. [PMID: 34028328 PMCID: PMC8150451 DOI: 10.1177/23312165211014695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Revised: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate surgical, anesthetic, and device-related complications associated with cochlear implantation (CI) in children younger than 1 year of age. This was a multicenter, retrospective chart review of all children with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss who underwent cochlear implantation with a Cochlear Nucleus Implant System before 1 year of age. Endpoints included perioperative course, major and minor surgical, anesthetic and device-related complications, and 30-day readmission rates. One hundred thirty-six infants (242 ears) met criteria. The mean age at implantation was 9.4 months (standard deviation 1.8). Six-month follow-up was reported in all patients. There were no major anesthetic or device-related complications. Adverse events were reported in 34 of implanted ears (14%; 7 major, 27 minor). Sixteen adverse events occurred ≤30 days of surgery, and 18 occurred >30 days of surgery. The 30-day readmission rate was 1.5%. The rate of adverse events did not correlate with preexisting medical comorbidities or duration under anesthesia. There was no significant difference detected in complication rate for patients younger than 9 months of age versus those 9 to 11 months of age. This study demonstrates the safety of CI surgery in infants and supports reducing the indication for cochlear implantation to younger than 1 year of age for children with bilateral, profound sensorineural hearing loss obtaining a Cochlear Nucleus Implant System.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas L. Deep
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, United States
| | - Patricia L. Purcell
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karen A. Gordon
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Blake C. Papsin
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - J. Thomas Roland Jr.
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, United States
| | - Susan B. Waltzman
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Simoni E, Gentilin E, Candito M, Borile G, Romanato F, Chicca M, Nordio S, Aspidistria M, Martini A, Cazzador D, Astolfi L. Immune Response After Cochlear Implantation. Front Neurol 2020; 11:341. [PMID: 32477241 PMCID: PMC7240074 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
A cochlear implant (CI) is an electronic device that enables hearing recovery in patients with severe to profound hearing loss. Although CIs are a successful treatment for profound hearing impairment, their effectivity may be improved by reducing damages associated with insertion of electrodes in the cochlea, thus preserving residual hearing ability. Inner ear trauma leads to inflammatory reactions altering cochlear homeostasis and reducing post-operative audiological performances and electroacoustic stimulation. Strategies to preserve residual hearing ability led to the development of medicated devices to minimize CI-induced cochlear injury. Dexamethasone-eluting electrodes recently showed positive outcomes. In previous studies by our research group, intratympanic release of dexamethasone for 14 days was able to preserve residual hearing from CI insertion trauma in a Guinea pig model. Long-term effects of dexamethasone-eluting electrodes were therefore evaluated in the same animal model. Seven Guinea pigs were bilaterally implanted with medicated rods and four were implanted with non-eluting ones. Hearing threshold audiograms were acquired prior to implantation and up to 60 days by recording compound action potentials. For each sample, we examined the amount of bone and fibrous connective tissue grown within the scala tympani in the basal turn of the cochlea, the cochleostomy healing, the neuronal density, and the correlation between electrophysiological parameters and histological results. Detection of tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-6, and foreign body giant cells showed that long-term electrode implantation was not associated with an ongoing inflammation. Growth of bone and fibrous connective tissue around rods induced by CI was reduced in the scala tympani by dexamethasone release. For cochleostomy sealing, dexamethasone-treated animals showed less bone tissue growth than negative. Dexamethasone did not affect cell density in the spiral ganglion. Overall, these results support the use of dexamethasone as anti-inflammatory additive for eluting electrodes able to protect the cochlea from CI insertion trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edi Simoni
- Bioacoustics Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.,Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.,Section of Human Anatomy, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Erica Gentilin
- Bioacoustics Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.,Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Mariarita Candito
- Bioacoustics Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.,Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Giulia Borile
- Department of Physics and Astronomy "G. Galilei", University of Padua, Padua, Italy.,Laboratory for Nanofabrication of Nanodevices, Padua, Italy
| | - Filippo Romanato
- Department of Physics and Astronomy "G. Galilei", University of Padua, Padua, Italy.,Laboratory for Nanofabrication of Nanodevices, Padua, Italy
| | - Milvia Chicca
- Department of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Sara Nordio
- Fondazione Ospedale San Camillo IRCCS, Venice, Italy
| | - Marta Aspidistria
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| | - Alessandro Martini
- Bioacoustics Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.,Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Diego Cazzador
- Bioacoustics Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.,Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.,Section of Human Anatomy, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Laura Astolfi
- Bioacoustics Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.,Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ishiyama A, Risi F, Boyd P. Potential insertion complications with cochlear implant electrodes. Cochlear Implants Int 2020; 21:206-219. [PMID: 32079506 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2020.1730066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this discussion paper and literature review was to estimate the incidence of a variety of complications associated with the surgical placement of cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays and to discuss the implications and management of sub-optimal electrode placement. Results: A review of the peer-reviewed literature suggests that the incidence of incomplete electrode insertion and kinking is more prevalent in straight arrays and not more than about 2% in CI recipients with normal cochlear anatomy/patency. Incidence of tip fold-over is greater with perimodiolar arrays but also occurs with straight arrays and is typically less than 5%. Conversely, electrode migration is more common with straight arrays, and high rates (up to 46%) have been reported in some studies. Scalar translocations have also been reported for both perimodiolar and straight arrays. Higher rates have been reported for stylet-based perimodiolar electrodes inserted via cochleostomy (up to 56%), but with much lower rates (<10%) with both sheath-based perimodiolar arrays and lateral wall arrays. Electrode positioning complications represent a significant proportion of perioperative CI complications and compromise the level of benefit from the device. Careful surgical planning and appropriate pre- and intraoperative imaging can reduce the likelihood and impact of electrode positioning complications. There is also evidence that newer array designs are less prone to certain complications, particularly scalar translocation. Conclusions: It is important that implanting surgeons are aware of the impact of sub-optimal electrode placement and the steps that can be taken to avoid, identify and manage such complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Ishiyama
- Rehabilitation Center, 1000 Veteran Ave., Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Frank Risi
- Clinical Affairs, Cochlear Ltd, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Paul Boyd
- Clinical Affairs, Cochlear Ltd, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lipson S, O'Shea R, Gibbons S, Zhou G, Brodsky J. Evolution of Cochlear implant mapping and vestibular function in a pediatric case of Labyrinthitis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 49:7. [PMID: 32024552 PMCID: PMC7003438 DOI: 10.1186/s40463-020-0403-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Vestibular symptoms such as vertigo and imbalance are known to occur in some cochlear implant patients during the immediate postoperative period; however, acute vertigo in implanted children occurring remotely from the postoperative period has not been previously well-described. Case presentation A three-year-old girl with a history of bilateral sequential cochlear implantation presented with acute labyrinthitis associated with sudden onset of vertigo, balance impairment, and decline in right cochlear implant function 2 years after her most recent implant surgery. We describe her audiological and vestibular testing results during both the acute phase and following medical management and recovery. Conclusion Acute labyrinthitis should be considered when sudden onset vertigo and/or imbalance presents in children with cochlear implants outside of the perioperative period. Such symptoms should prompt early assessment of cochlear implant function, so that the device can be reprogrammed accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Lipson
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Ross O'Shea
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Susan Gibbons
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Guangwei Zhou
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Jacob Brodsky
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. .,Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Foggia MJ, Quevedo RV, Hansen MR. Intracochlear fibrosis and the foreign body response to cochlear implant biomaterials. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2019; 4:678-683. [PMID: 31890888 PMCID: PMC6929576 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report current knowledge on the topic of intracochlear fibrosis and the foreign body response following cochlear implantation (CI). METHODS A literature search was performed in PubMed to identify peer-reviewed articles. Search components included "cochlear implant," "Foreign body response (FBR)," and "fibrosis." Original studies and review articles relevant to the topic were included. RESULTS Ninety peer-reviewed articles describing the foreign body response or intracochlear fibrosis following CI were included. CONCLUSIONS Intracochlear fibrosis following CI represents a significant limiting factor for the success of CI users. Several strategies have been employed to mitigate the foreign body response within the cochlea including drug delivery systems and modifications in surgical technique and electrode design. A better understanding of the FBR has the potential to improve CI outcomes and the next generation of cochlear prostheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan J. Foggia
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck SurgeryUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and ClinicsIowa CityIowa
| | - Rene Vielman Quevedo
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck SurgeryUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and ClinicsIowa CityIowa
| | - Marlan R. Hansen
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck SurgeryUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and ClinicsIowa CityIowa
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and ClinicsIowa CityIowa
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Preservation of Cells of the Organ of Corti and Innervating Dendritic Processes Following Cochlear Implantation in the Human: An Immunohistochemical Study. Otol Neurotol 2019; 39:284-293. [PMID: 29342037 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS This study evaluates the degree of preservation of hair cells, supporting cells, and innervating dendritic processes after cochlear implantation in the human using immunohistochemical methods. BACKGROUND Surgical insertion of a cochlear implant electrode induces various pathologic changes within the cochlea including insertional trauma, foreign body response, inflammation, fibrosis, and neo-osteogenesis. These changes may result in loss of residual acoustic hearing, adversely affecting the use of hybrid implants, and may result in loss of putative precursor cells, limiting the success of future regenerative protocols. METHODS Twenty-eight celloidin-embedded temporal bones from 14 patients with bilateral severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss and unilateral cochlear implants were studied. Two sections including the modiolus or basal turn from each temporal bone were stained using antineurofilament, antimyosin-VIIa, and antitubulin antibodies in both the implanted and unimplanted ears. RESULTS Inner and outer hair cells: Immunoreactivity was reduced throughout the implanted cochlea and in the unimplanted cochlea with the exception of the apical turn.Dendritic processes in the osseous spiral lamina: Immunoreactivity was significantly less along the electrode of the implanted cochlea than in the other segments.Inner and outer pillars, inner and outer spiral bundles, and Deiters' cells: Immunoreactivity was similar in the implanted and unimplanted cochleae. CONCLUSION Insertion of a cochlear implant electrode may significantly affect the inner and outer hair cells both along and apical to the electrode, and dendritic processes in the osseous spiral lamina along the electrode. There was less effect on pillar cells, Deiters' cells, and spiral bundles.
Collapse
|
11
|
Auditory Performances in Older and Younger Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients: Use of the HEARRING Registry. Otol Neurotol 2019; 40:e787-e795. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
12
|
Zanoletti E, Mazzoni A, Martini A, Abbritti RV, Albertini R, Alexandre E, Baro V, Bartolini S, Bernardeschi D, Bivona R, Bonali M, Borghesi I, Borsetto D, Bovo R, Breun M, Calbucci F, Carlson ML, Caruso A, Cayé-Thomasen P, Cazzador D, Champagne PO, Colangeli R, Conte G, D'Avella D, Danesi G, Deantonio L, Denaro L, Di Berardino F, Draghi R, Ebner FH, Favaretto N, Ferri G, Fioravanti A, Froelich S, Giannuzzi A, Girasoli L, Grossardt BR, Guidi M, Hagen R, Hanakita S, Hardy DG, Iglesias VC, Jefferies S, Jia H, Kalamarides M, Kanaan IN, Krengli M, Landi A, Lauda L, Lepera D, Lieber S, Lloyd SLK, Lovato A, Maccarrone F, Macfarlane R, Magnan J, Magnoni L, Marchioni D, Marinelli JP, Marioni G, Mastronardi V, Matthies C, Moffat DA, Munari S, Nardone M, Pareschi R, Pavone C, Piccirillo E, Piras G, Presutti L, Restivo G, Reznitsky M, Roca E, Russo A, Sanna M, Sartori L, Scheich M, Shehata-Dieler W, Soloperto D, Sorrentino F, Sterkers O, Taibah A, Tatagiba M, Tealdo G, Vlad D, Wu H, Zanetti D. Surgery of the lateral skull base: a 50-year endeavour. ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA : ORGANO UFFICIALE DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI OTORINOLARINGOLOGIA E CHIRURGIA CERVICO-FACCIALE 2019; 39:S1-S146. [PMID: 31130732 PMCID: PMC6540636 DOI: 10.14639/0392-100x-suppl.1-39-2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Disregarding the widely used division of skull base into anterior and lateral, since the skull base should be conceived as a single anatomic structure, it was to our convenience to group all those approaches that run from the antero-lateral, pure lateral and postero-lateral side of the skull base as “Surgery of the lateral skull base”. “50 years of endeavour” points to the great effort which has been made over the last decades, when more and more difficult surgeries were performed by reducing morbidity. The principle of lateral skull base surgery, “remove skull base bone to approach the base itself and the adjacent sites of the endo-esocranium”, was then combined with function preservation and with tailoring surgery to the pathology. The concept that histology dictates the extent of resection, balancing the intrinsic morbidity of each approach was the object of the first section of the present report. The main surgical approaches were described in the second section and were conceived not as a step-by-step description of technique, but as the highlighthening of the surgical principles. The third section was centered on open issues related to the tumor and its treatment. The topic of vestibular schwannoma was investigated with the current debate on observation, hearing preservation surgery, hearing rehabilitation, radiotherapy and the recent efforts to detect biological markers able to predict tumor growth. Jugular foramen paragangliomas were treated in the frame of radical or partial surgery, radiotherapy, partial “tailored” surgery and observation. Surgery on meningioma was debated from the point of view of the neurosurgeon and of the otologist. Endolymphatic sac tumors and malignant tumors of the external auditory canal were also treated, as well as chordomas, chondrosarcomas and petrous bone cholesteatomas. Finally, the fourth section focused on free-choice topics which were assigned to aknowledged experts. The aim of this work was attempting to report the state of the art of the lateral skull base surgery after 50 years of hard work and, above all, to raise questions on those issues which still need an answer, as to allow progress in knowledge through sharing of various experiences. At the end of the reading, if more doubts remain rather than certainties, the aim of this work will probably be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Zanoletti
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - A Mazzoni
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - A Martini
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - R V Abbritti
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | | | - E Alexandre
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - V Baro
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - S Bartolini
- Neurosurgery, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - D Bernardeschi
- AP-HP, Groupe Hôspital-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Neuro-Sensory Surgical Department and NF2 Rare Disease Centre, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - R Bivona
- ENT and Skull-Base Surgery Department, Department of Neurosciences, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - M Bonali
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Italy
| | - I Borghesi
- Neurosurgery, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola (RA), Italy
| | - D Borsetto
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - R Bovo
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - M Breun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Julius Maximilians University Hospital Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - F Calbucci
- Neurosurgery, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola (RA), Italy
| | - M L Carlson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - A Caruso
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - P Cayé-Thomasen
- The Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - D Cazzador
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Section of Human Anatomy, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - P-O Champagne
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - R Colangeli
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - G Conte
- Department of Neuroradiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - D D'Avella
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - G Danesi
- ENT and Skull-Base Surgery Department, Department of Neurosciences, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - L Deantonio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - L Denaro
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - F Di Berardino
- Unit of Audiology, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milano, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - R Draghi
- Neurosurgery, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola (RA), Italy
| | - F H Ebner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - N Favaretto
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - G Ferri
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Italy
| | | | - S Froelich
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | | | - L Girasoli
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - B R Grossardt
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - M Guidi
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - R Hagen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, "Julius-Maximilians" University Hospital of Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - S Hanakita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - D G Hardy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - V C Iglesias
- ENT and Skull-Base Surgery Department, Department of Neurosciences, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - S Jefferies
- Oncology Department, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - H Jia
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninh People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiatong University School of Medicine, China
| | - M Kalamarides
- AP-HP, Groupe Hôspital-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Neuro-Sensory Surgical Department and NF2 Rare Disease Centre, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - I N Kanaan
- Department of Neurosciences, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Alfaisal University, College of Medicine, Riyadh, KSA
| | - M Krengli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - A Landi
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - L Lauda
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - D Lepera
- ENT & Skull-Base Department, Ospedale Nuovo di Legnano, Legnano (MI), Italy
| | - S Lieber
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - S L K Lloyd
- Department of Neuro-Otology and Skull-Base Surgery Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - A Lovato
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Audiology Unit, Padova University, Treviso, Italy
| | - F Maccarrone
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Italy
| | - R Macfarlane
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - J Magnan
- University Aix-Marseille, France
| | - L Magnoni
- Unit of Audiology, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milano, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - D Marchioni
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Verona, Italy
| | | | - G Marioni
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | | | - C Matthies
- Department of Neurosurgery, Julius Maximilians University Hospital Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - D A Moffat
- Department of Neuro-otology and Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - S Munari
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - M Nardone
- ENT Department, Treviglio (BG), Italy
| | - R Pareschi
- ENT & Skull-Base Department, Ospedale Nuovo di Legnano, Legnano (MI), Italy
| | - C Pavone
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | | | - G Piras
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - L Presutti
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Italy
| | - G Restivo
- ENT and Skull-Base Surgery Department, Department of Neurosciences, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - M Reznitsky
- The Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - E Roca
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - A Russo
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - M Sanna
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - L Sartori
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - M Scheich
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, "Julius-Maximilians" University Hospital of Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - W Shehata-Dieler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, "Julius-Maximilians" University Hospital of Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - D Soloperto
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Verona, Italy
| | - F Sorrentino
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - O Sterkers
- AP-HP, Groupe Hôspital-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Neuro-Sensory Surgical Department and NF2 Rare Disease Centre, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - A Taibah
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - M Tatagiba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - G Tealdo
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - D Vlad
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - H Wu
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninh People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiatong University School of Medicine, China
| | - D Zanetti
- Unit of Audiology, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milano, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Forli F, Lazzerini F, Fortunato S, Bruschini L, Berrettini S. Cochlear Implant in the Elderly: Results in Terms of Speech Perception and Quality of Life. Audiol Neurootol 2019; 24:77-83. [DOI: 10.1159/000499176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results after cochlear implant (CI) in elderly patients and to compare them to those obtained in younger adult patients. A possible correlation between the results in older CI recipients and some variables of the patients was also investigated. Methods: The sample consisted of 107 patients over 40 years of age at surgery divided into 3 subgroups according to age at implantation. Results in terms of speech perception in silence and with background noise were compared between the 3 groups. The patients also completed the Glasgow Benefits Inventory (GBI) questionnaire. Results: Older patients achieved significant benefits after CI with regard to speech perception in silence and with background noise. We also recorded benefits for the GBI. Discussion: In line with the literature, our data confirm that CI is an effective procedure also in elderly patients, conferring benefits in speech perception and quality of life.
Collapse
|
14
|
Delayed-onset facial nerve paresis following cochlear implantation: case report and literature review. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2018; 132:1150-1152. [PMID: 30565529 DOI: 10.1017/s0022215118002074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Facial nerve paresis is rare following cochlear implantation. Mechanisms underlying delayed-onset facial paresis are poorly understood. This paper describes the case of a patient who developed facial nerve paresis three years after implantation. A literature review was performed with the aim of identifying any similar cases. METHODS The patient case is reported, and the literature reviewed using PubMed, Embase and Ovid databases. RESULTS The literature review revealed that the vast majority of delayed-onset facial nerve paresis cases occur within the first month of implantation. Only two other cases occurring years after device implantation were identified. Although potential causative factors have been suggested, as in our case this phenomenon may be idiopathic. CONCLUSION Prognosis for recovery of late-onset facial nerve paresis seems promising, despite the unfortunate requirement for device explantation in all previous cases including our own.
Collapse
|
15
|
Olsen LB, Larsen S, Wanscher JH, Faber CE, Jeppesen J. Postoperative infections following cochlear implant surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 2018; 138:956-960. [PMID: 30015553 DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2018.1482422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to report the frequency and management of postoperative wound infections and to investigate bacteriology and biofilm formation following 653 consecutive cochlear implantations in adults. METHODS A retrospective file review of 653 consecutive adult cochlear implantations between 1994 and 2015 at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology at Odense University Hospital. A reporting consensus was used to classify infections. RESULTS The major and minor infection rates were 2% and 8%, respectively. The explantation rate due to infection was 1%. The most common pathogen found was Staphylococcus aureus and biofilm formation was found in 73% of the explantations. CONCLUSION Postoperative infection occurred in 10% of the implantations. However, few of these were severe. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen and the presence of biofilm seemed to be associated with a higher risk of explantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sára Larsen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | - Jonas Jeppesen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
Balamayooran G, Atkins HM, Whitlow CT, Aycock ST, Nader MA, Cline JM, Caudell DL. Labyrinthitis Ossificans in a Cynomolgus Macaque (Macaca fascicularis). Comp Med 2018; 68:239-242. [PMID: 29650059 PMCID: PMC6008717 DOI: 10.30802/aalas-cm-17-000070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2017] [Revised: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 09/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Labyrinthitis is inflammation of the membranous and bony labyrinth of the inner ear. Typical portals of entry includehematogenous spread from the cochlear vasculature, passage of otitis media pathogens through the round window, and mostcommonly, meningogenic spread from the subarachnoid space. The sequela of chronic inner ear inflammation is labyrinthitisossificans, in which inner ear structures are replaced by fibrous and osseous tissues. Labyrinthitis in humans has been reportedconcurrently with infection due to various viruses (for example, varicella-zoster, measles, mumps) and bacteria (for example,Treponema pallidum, Streptococcus pneumoniae) and may be associated with vertebrobasilar ischemia and meningitis. Profoundsensorineural hearing loss is a common, serious complication of this disease. Here, we report a case of labyrinthitisossificans in a cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis) with a potential infectious etiology. Historically, this animal hadan indwelling femoral intravenous catheter for more than 4 y. He presented with a right-sided head tilt and incoordinationof 2 mo duration. The macaque was treated with NSAID and antibiotics, which corrected the incoordination but not the headtilt. MRI revealed right-sided labyrinthitis, and euthanasia was elected due to clinical signs that were refractory to treatment.Gross pathology was unremarkable, but histopathology revealed chronic labyrinthitis ossificans with local fibroplasia andvestibuloauditory neuritis. We describe here the clinical features, imaging, and histologic lesions of labyrinthitis in a macaque.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Michael A Nader
- Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Liu W, Molnar M, Garnham C, Benav H, Rask-Andersen H. Macrophages in the Human Cochlea: Saviors or Predators-A Study Using Super-Resolution Immunohistochemistry. Front Immunol 2018; 9:223. [PMID: 29487598 PMCID: PMC5816790 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2017] [Accepted: 01/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The human inner ear, which is segregated by a blood/labyrinth barrier, contains resident macrophages [CD163, ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 (IBA1)-, and CD68-positive cells] within the connective tissue, neurons, and supporting cells. In the lateral wall of the cochlea, these cells frequently lie close to blood vessels as perivascular macrophages. Macrophages are also shown to be recruited from blood-borne monocytes to damaged and dying hair cells induced by noise, ototoxic drugs, aging, and diphtheria toxin-induced hair cell degeneration. Precise monitoring may be crucial to avoid self-targeting. Macrophage biology has recently shown that populations of resident tissue macrophages may be fundamentally different from circulating macrophages. We removed uniquely preserved human cochleae during surgery for treating petroclival meningioma compressing the brain stem, after ethical consent. Molecular and cellular characterization using immunofluorescence with antibodies against IBA1, TUJ1, CX3CL1, and type IV collagen, and super-resolution structured illumination microscopy (SR-SIM) were made together with transmission electron microscopy. The super-resolution microscopy disclosed remarkable phenotypic variants of IBA1 cells closely associated with the spiral ganglion cells. Monitoring cells adhered to neurons with “synapse-like” specializations and protrusions. Active macrophages migrated occasionally nearby damaged hair cells. Results suggest that the human auditory nerve is under the surveillance and possible neurotrophic stimulation of a well-developed resident macrophage system. It may be alleviated by the non-myelinated nerve soma partly explaining why, in contrary to most mammals, the human’s auditory nerve is conserved following deafferentiation. It makes cochlear implantation possible, for the advantage of the profoundly deaf. The IBA1 cells may serve additional purposes such as immune modulation, waste disposal, and nerve regeneration. Their role in future stem cell-based therapy needs further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Liu
- Section of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Matyas Molnar
- Immunology, Genetics and Pathology - Biovis Platform, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | - Helge Rask-Andersen
- Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
O'Malley JT, Burgess BJ, Galler D, Nadol JB. Foreign Body Response to Silicone in Cochlear Implant Electrodes in the Human. Otol Neurotol 2017; 38:970-977. [PMID: 28538471 PMCID: PMC5500409 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS Silicone as part of a cochlear implant electrode may be responsible for a foreign body response in the human. BACKGROUND Clinical evidence of a foreign body response to a cochlear implant has been reported. In a previous study, particulate material found within the fibrous sheath and within macrophages surrounding a cochlear implant has been identified as being consistent with platinum. However, to date, there has been no histologic evidence of a role for silicone in this cellular immune response. METHODS A total of 44 temporal bone specimens from 36 patients were reviewed by light microscopy for evidence of presumed platinum and/or silicone foreign bodies in an extracellular or intracellular location. Identification of cell type involved in phagocytosis of foreign body material was accomplished using CD163 immunostaining. The identity and source of the foreign body material was confirmed using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS Evidence for both platinum and silicone was found in all 44 specimens. In three patients, anti-CD 163 immunostaining demonstrated phagocytized platinum and silicone foreign bodies. In five specimens, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy demonstrated that the birefringent foreign bodies were consistent with silicone. Scanning electron microscopy of two electrodes removed from temporal bones demonstrated small cracks, fragmentation, and small circular defects in the silicone carrier. CONCLUSION Histologic evidence of a foreign body response to the presence of platinum and silicone in a cochlear implant has been demonstrated and may be responsible for some reported delayed failures or extrusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer T O'Malley
- *Otopathology Laboratory, Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston †Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institutes of Technology, Cambridge ‡Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ishai R, Herrmann BS, Nadol JB, Quesnel AM. The pattern and degree of capsular fibrous sheaths surrounding cochlear electrode arrays. Hear Res 2017; 348:44-53. [PMID: 28216124 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2016] [Revised: 01/25/2017] [Accepted: 02/14/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
An inflammatory tissue reaction around the electrode array of a cochlear implant (CI) is common, in particular at the electrode insertion region (cochleostomy) where mechanical trauma often occurs. However, the factors determining the amount and causes of fibrous reaction surrounding the stimulating electrode, especially medially near the perimodiolar location, are unclear. Temporal bone (TB) specimens from patients who had undergone cochlear implantation during life with either Advanced Bionics (AB) Clarion ™ or HiRes90K™ (Sylmar, CA, USA) devices that have a half-band and a pre-curved electrode, or Cochlear ™ Nucleus (Sydney, Australia) device that have a full-band and a straight electrode were evaluated. The thickness of the fibrous tissue surrounding the electrode array of both types of CI devices at both the lower (LB) and upper (UB) basal turns of the cochlea was quantified at three locations: the medial, inferior, and superior aspects of the sheath. Fracture of the osseous spiral lamina and/or marked displacement of the basilar membrane were interpreted as evidence of intracochlear trauma. In addition, post-operative word recognition scores, duration of implantation, and post-operative programming data were evaluated. Seven TBs from six patients implanted with AB devices and five TBs from five patients implanted with Nucleus devices were included. A fibrous capsule around the stimulating electrode array was present in all twelve specimens. TBs implanted with AB device had a significantly thicker fibrous capsule at the medial aspect than at the inferior or superior aspects at both locations (LB and UB) of the cochlea (Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, p < 0.01). TBs implanted with a Nucleus device had no difference in the thickness of the fibrous capsule surrounding the track of the electrode array (Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, p > 0.05). Nine of fourteen (64%) basal turns of the cochlea (LB and UB of seven TBs) implanted with AB devices demonstrated intracochlear trauma compared to two of ten (20%) basal turns of the cochlea (LB and UB of five TBs) with Nucleus devices, (Fisher exact test, p < 0.05). There was no significant correlation between the thickness of the fibrous tissue and the duration of implantation or the word recognition scores (Spearman rho, p = 0.06, p = 0.4 respectively). Our outcomes demonstrated the development of a robust fibrous tissue sheath medially closest to the site of electric stimulation in cases implanted with the AB device electrode, but not in cases implanted with the Nucleus device. The cause of the asymmetric fibrous sheath may be multifactorial including insertional trauma, a foreign body response, and/or asymmetric current flow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reuven Ishai
- Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Barbara S Herrmann
- Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Audiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joseph B Nadol
- Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alicia M Quesnel
- Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Idiopathic delayed-onset edema surrounding deep brain stimulation leads: Insights from a case series and systematic literature review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2016; 32:108-115. [PMID: 27622967 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2016] [Revised: 08/12/2016] [Accepted: 09/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
22
|
Kamakura T, Nadol JB. Correlation between word recognition score and intracochlear new bone and fibrous tissue after cochlear implantation in the human. Hear Res 2016; 339:132-41. [PMID: 27371868 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2016] [Revised: 06/20/2016] [Accepted: 06/26/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Cochlear implantation is an effective, established procedure for patients with profound deafness. Although implant electrodes have been considered as biocompatible prostheses, surgical insertion of the electrode induces various changes within the cochlea. Immediate changes include insertional trauma to the cochlea. Delayed changes include a tissue response consisting of inflammation, fibrosis and neo-osteogenesis induced by trauma and an immunologic reaction to a foreign body. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of these delayed changes on the word recognition scores achieved post-operatively. Seventeen temporal bones from patients who in life had undergone cochlear implantation were prepared for light microscopy. We digitally calculated the volume of fibrous tissue and new bone within the cochlea using Amira(®) three-dimensional reconstruction software and assessed the correlations of various clinical and histologic factors. The postoperative CNC word score was positively correlated with total spiral ganglion cell count. Fibrous tissue and new bone were found within the cochlea of all seventeen specimens. The postoperative CNC word score was negatively correlated with the % volume of new bone within the scala tympani, scala media/vestibuli and the cochlea, but not with the % volume of fibrous tissue. The % volume of new bone in the scala media/vestibuli was positively correlated with the degree of intracochlear insertional trauma, especially trauma to the basilar membrane. Our results revealed that the % volume of new bone as well as residual total spiral ganglion cell count are important factors influencing post-implant hearing performance. New bone formation may be reduced by limiting insertional trauma and increasing the biocompatibility of the electrodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takefumi Kamakura
- Human Otopathology Laboratory, Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joseph B Nadol
- Human Otopathology Laboratory, Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cevizci R, Düzlü M, Uyar PG, Karamert R, Bezgin SÜ, Tutar H, Göksu N, Bayazıt YA. Histopathological Effects of Parylene C (poly-chloro-p-xylylene) in the Inner Ear. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 54:53-57. [PMID: 29392017 DOI: 10.5152/tao.2016.1511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2016] [Accepted: 06/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the histopathological effects of parylene C (PC) (poly-chloro-p-xylylene) in the inner ear. Methods Nine adult Dunkin Hartley guinea pigs (500-600 g) were included in the study. PC pieces were inserted into the cochlea in the right ear of the animals (study group). The round windows were punctured in the left ears comprised the control group. After three months, the animals were sacrificed, and the dissected temporal bones were examined under a light microscope. Results No significant difference was revealed between the study and control groups regarding histopathological findings such as perineural congestion, perineural inflammation, neural fibrosis, number of ganglion cells, edema, and degeneration of ganglion cells (p>0.05). Conclusion PC did not cause any additional histopathologic damage in the cochlea. This finding may be promising regarding the use of PC in cochlear implant electrodes as an alternative to silicon materials in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raşit Cevizci
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, İstanbul Medipol University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Düzlü
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Pınar Göçün Uyar
- Department of Pathology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Recep Karamert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Selin Üstün Bezgin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Hakan Tutar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nebil Göksu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yıldırım Ahmet Bayazıt
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, İstanbul Medipol University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS This study evaluates the types and degrees of tissue response adjacent to the electrode of multichannel cochlear implants. BACKGROUND Cochlear implant electrodes have been classified as biocompatible prostheses. Nevertheless, in some reports, electrode extrusion, chronic inflammation, and even soft failure of the implant system have been attributed to a tissue response to the electrode. METHODS All celloidin-embedded temporal bones with multichannel cochlear implants from the temporal bone collection of the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary were included in the study. A total of 28 temporal bones from 21 subjects were identified and processed for histology. The severity of cellular response including eosinophil and lymphocytic infiltration, giant cell reaction, new bone formation, and fibrosis were scored on a scale from 0 to 3 at three 1-mm segments along the electrode: first 1 mm at the cochleostomy, last 1 mm from the tip of the electrode, and midway between these proximal and distal segments. The values were compared using the Wilcoxon test. RESULTS A granulomatous reaction to the electrode was observed in 27 (96.4%) temporal bones. Eosinophil infiltration was observed in 7 (25%) temporal bones, suggesting an allergic reaction. The Inflammatory response to the electrode was significantly greater at the basal turn of cochlea close to the cochleostomy (p < 0.05) than distal to it. CONCLUSION An inflammatory response is common after cochlear implantation, and it is more robust at the cochleostomy than distal to it, suggesting the role of trauma of insertion as a contributing factor.
Collapse
|
25
|
Jang CH, Cho YB, Jang YS, Kim MS, Kim GH. Antibacterial effect of electrospun polycaprolactone/polyethylene oxide/vancomycin nanofiber mat for prevention of periprosthetic infection and biofilm formation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 79:1299-305. [PMID: 26093530 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.05.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2014] [Revised: 05/26/2015] [Accepted: 05/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In this study, we developed a biocompatible and biodegradable vancomycin (VM)-eluting electrospun poly(ɛ-caprolactone) (PCL)/polyethylene oxide (PEO)/VM/PCL nanofiber mat. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of this nanofiber mat for preventing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilm on the ossicular prostheses and otitis media. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fabrication of VM eluting nanofiber mat was carried out using PCL and PEO. The release of VM was assessed by spectrophotometry in vitro. The antibacterial effect was evaluated by inhibition zone test and biofilm formation test in vitro. And prevention of MRSA infection by guinea pig was assessed by otoendoscopy, temporal bone CT and histopathologic examination in vivo. RESULTS VM released followed a triphasic pattern. VM eluting nanofiber mat prevented MRSA biofilm formation on the surface of ossicular prostheses regardless of materials in vitro, and MRSA otitis media in vivo. Otoendoscopy, temporal bone CT, and histopathologic findings revealed well ventilated middle ear. CONCLUSION From these results, VM eluting nanofiber mat may be a promising method for prevention of MRSA periprosthetic infection and biofilm formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chul Ho Jang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea.
| | - Yong Beom Cho
- Department of Otolaryngology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea
| | | | - Min Seong Kim
- Department of Bio-Mechatronics, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon, South Korea
| | - Geun Hyung Kim
- Department of Bio-Mechatronics, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cochlear Implant Outcomes and Genetic Mutations in Children with Ear and Brain Anomalies. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2015; 2015:696281. [PMID: 26236732 PMCID: PMC4506828 DOI: 10.1155/2015/696281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2014] [Accepted: 01/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background. Specific clinical conditions could compromise cochlear implantation outcomes and drastically reduce the chance of an acceptable development of perceptual and linguistic capabilities. These conditions should certainly include the presence of inner ear malformations or brain abnormalities. The aims of this work were to study the diagnostic value of high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in children with sensorineural hearing loss who were candidates for cochlear implants and to analyse the anatomic abnormalities of the ear and brain in patients who underwent cochlear implantation. We also analysed the effects of ear malformations and brain anomalies on the CI outcomes, speculating on their potential role in the management of language developmental disorders. Methods. The present study is a retrospective observational review of cochlear implant outcomes among hearing-impaired children who presented ear and/or brain anomalies at neuroimaging investigations with MRI and HRCT. Furthermore, genetic results from molecular genetic investigations (GJB2/GJB6 and, additionally, in selected cases, SLC26A4 or mitochondrial-DNA mutations) on this study group were herein described. Longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis was conducted using statistical tests. Results. Between January 1, 1996 and April 1, 2012, at the ENT-Audiology Department of the University Hospital of Ferrara, 620 cochlear implantations were performed. There were 426 implanted children at the time of the present study (who were <18 years). Among these, 143 patients (64 females and 79 males) presented ear and/or brain anomalies/lesions/malformations at neuroimaging investigations with MRI and HRCT. The age of the main study group (143 implanted children) ranged from 9 months and 16 years (average = 4.4; median = 3.0). Conclusions. Good outcomes with cochlear implants are possible in patients who present with inner ear or brain abnormalities, even if central nervous system anomalies represent a negative prognostic factor that is made worse by the concomitant presence of cochlear malformations. Common cavity and stenosis of the internal auditory canal (less than 2 mm) are negative prognostic factors even if brain lesions are absent.
Collapse
|
27
|
Cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear bone malformations with posterior labyrinth involvement: an exploratory study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 273:893-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3652-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2015] [Accepted: 05/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
28
|
Castiglione A, Benatti A, Girasoli L, Caserta E, Montino S, Pagliaro M, Bovo R, Martini A. Cochlear implantation outcomes in older adults. HEARING BALANCE AND COMMUNICATION 2015. [DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2015.1030885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|