1
|
Jünger ST, Zschernack V, Messing-Jünger M, Timmermann B, Pietsch T. Ependymoma from Benign to Highly Aggressive Diseases: A Review. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2024; 50:31-62. [PMID: 38592527 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-53578-9_2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
Ependymomas comprise biologically distinct tumor types with respect to age distribution, (epi)genetics, localization, and prognosis. Multimodal risk-stratification, including histopathological and molecular features, is essential in these biologically defined tumor types. Gross total resection (GTR), achieved with intraoperative monitoring and neuronavigation, and if necessary, second-look surgery, is the most effective treatment. Adjuvant radiation therapy is mandatory in high-risk tumors and in case of residual tumor. There is yet growing evidence that some ependymal tumors may be cured by surgery alone. To date, the role of chemotherapy is unclear and subject of current studies.Even though standard therapy can achieve reasonable survival rates for the majority of ependymoma patients, long-term follow-up still reveals a high probability of relapse in certain biological entities.With increasing knowledge of biologically distinct tumor types, risk-adapted adjuvant therapy gains importance. Beyond initial tumor control, and avoidance of therapy-induced morbidity for low-risk patients, intensified treatment for high-risk patients comprises another challenge. With identification of specific risk features regarding molecular alterations, targeted therapy may represent an option for individualized treatment modalities in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie T Jünger
- Department of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany.
- Center for Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Valentina Zschernack
- Department of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Germany, German Cancer Consortium, Essen, Germany
| | - Torsten Pietsch
- Department of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Perkins SM, Prime S, Watts M, Huang J, Zhao T. Pediatric Experience and Outcomes from the First Single-Vault Compact Proton Therapy Center. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4072. [PMID: 37627100 PMCID: PMC10452472 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The first single-vault compact proton therapy center opened in 2013, utilizing a gantry-mounted synchrocylotron. The center was placed within a large academic radiation oncology department with a high priority for pediatric cancer care. Here we performed a retrospective study of pediatric (≤21 years) patients treated with proton therapy at our institution between 2013-2022. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were obtained including race, socioeconomic status, insurance type, distance travelled, need for anesthesia, and outside referrals for proton therapy. In total, 250 pediatric patients were treated with proton therapy comprising 18% of our proton patient volume. Median follow-up was 3.1 years, 38.4% were female and 83% were white. The majority of cases were CNS (69.6%) and a large number of patients (80/250, 32%) required craniospinal irradiation. Anesthesia was required for 39.6% of patients. Average distance travelled for treatment was 111 miles and 23% of patients were referred from outside institutions for proton therapy. Insurance type was private/commercial for 61.2% followed by Medicaid for 32%. We found that 23% of patients lived in census tracts with >25% of people living below the national poverty line. Overall survival at 3 years was excellent at 83.7% with better outcomes for CNS patients compared to non-CNS patients. There were no cases of secondary malignancy at this early time point. As the world's first compact proton therapy center, we found that proton therapy increased our pediatric volume and provided proton therapy to a diverse group of children in our region. These data highlight some of the expected patient and tumor characteristics and necessary resources for providing pediatric proton beam therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M. Perkins
- S. Lee Kling Proton Therapy Center, Washington University School of Medicine/Siteman Cancer Center, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Howe GN, Edmonston DY, Dirks GC, Boop FA, Merchant TE. Conformal Radiation Therapy for Ependymoma at Age ≤3 Years: A 25-Year Experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:869-877. [PMID: 36690160 PMCID: PMC10782549 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) affects survival after surgery for young children (age <3 years) diagnosed with intracranial ependymoma. Conformal photon RT promised to spare normal tissue and was introduced more than 25 years ago to improve outcomes for these vulnerable patients. Long-term results for those first treated with conformal methods provide valuable information and serve as a comparison against newer methods. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 1997 and 2018, 101 patients <3.1-years-old were treated with conformal and intensity modulated photon therapy after definitive surgery for intracranial ependymoma. The median age at RT was 2.1 years and the time from diagnosis to the start of RT was 10 weeks. The extent of resection was gross-total in 82%, and 38% underwent more than 1 attempt at resection. The total prescribed dose was 54 to 59.4 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction. RESULTS The 10-year event-free and overall survivals were 58.5% ± 5.0% and 72.6% ± 4.5%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 18.4 years (range, 4.2-23.3 years). Tumor progression occurred in 34 patients with a median time of 1.6 years. Death occurred in 34 patients from ependymoma (n = 24), secondary malignancy (n = 6), necrosis (n = 2), shunt failure (n = 1), and anaphylactic reaction (n = 1). Twenty-three patients developed a secondary tumor including 6 cases of fatal high-grade glioma. Of the surviving cohort and those ≥18 years old, 98% obtained a high school diploma, 64% had a current driver's license, 89% were students or employed full or part time, 32% were living independently, and 70% received higher education or training. CONCLUSIONS Long-term results of children treated using photon conformal RT after surgery demonstrate that adjuvant RT resulted in long-term disease control and functional independence. These results point to the need for new treatment strategies to improve tumor control and provide investigators hope that newer RT methods will further reduce complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle N Howe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Drucilla Y Edmonston
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennesse
| | - Grace C Dirks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Frederick A Boop
- Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Thomas E Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Phuong C, Qiu B, Mueller S, Braunstein SE. Precision based approach to tailoring radiotherapy in the multidisciplinary management of pediatric central nervous system tumors. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER CENTER 2023; 3:141-149. [PMID: 39035723 PMCID: PMC11256719 DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Modern day survivorship from childhood malignancies is estimated to be over 80%. However, central nervous system tumors remain the leading cause of cancer mortality in children and is the most common solid tumor in this population. Improved survivorship is, in part, a result of improved multidisciplinary care, often with a combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy. With improved survival, long term effects of treatment and quality of life impacts have been recognized and pose a challenge to maximize the therapeutic ratio of treatment. It has been increasingly more apparent that precise risk stratification, such as with the inclusion of molecular classification, is instrumental in efforts to tailor radiotherapy for appropriate treatment, generally towards de-intensification for this vulnerable patient population. In addition, advances in radiotherapy techniques have allowed greater conformality and accuracy of treatment for those who do require radiotherapy for tumor control. Ongoing efforts to tailor radiotherapy, including de-escalation, omission, or intensification of radiotherapy, continue to improve as increasing insight into tumor heterogeneity is recognized, coupled with advances in precision medicine employing novel molecularly-targeted therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Phuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America
| | - Bo Qiu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America
| | - Sabine Mueller
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America
| | - Steve E. Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Oyefiade A, Parthab N, Skocic J, Moxon-Emre I, Tabori U, Bouffet E, Ramaswamy V, Laughlin S, Mabbott DJ. Insult to Short-Range White Matter Connectivity in Childhood Brain Tumor Survivors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023:S0360-3016(23)00068-8. [PMID: 36706870 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Children treated for brain tumors are at an increased risk for cognitive impairments due to the effect of radiation therapy on developing white matter (WM). Although damage to long-range WM is well documented in pediatric brain tumor survivors, the effect of radiation therapy on short-range WM remains unelucidated. We sought to clarify whether radiation treatment affects short-range WM by completing a virtual dissection of these connections and comparing their microstructural properties between brain tumor survivors and typically developing children. METHODS AND MATERIALS T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images were acquired for 26 brain tumor survivors and 26 typically developing children. Short-range WM was delineated using a novel, whole-brain approach. A random forest classifier was used to identify short-range connections with the largest differences in microstructure between patients and typically developing children. RESULTS The random forest classifier identified differences in short-range WM microstructure across the brain with an accuracy of 87.5%. Nine connections showed the largest differences in short-range WM between patients and typically developing children. For these connections, fractional anisotropy and axial diffusivity were significantly lower in patients. Short-range connections in the posterior fossa were disproportionately affected, suggesting that greater radiation exposure to the posterior fossa was more injurious to short-range WM. Lower craniospinal radiation dose did not predict reduced toxicity to short-range WM. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that treatment for medulloblastoma resulted in changes in short-range WM in patients. Lower fractional anisotropy and axial diffusivity may reflect altered microstructural organization and coherence of these connections, especially in the posterior fossa. Short-range WM may be especially sensitive to the effect of craniospinal radiation therapy, resulting in compromise to these connections regardless of dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adeoye Oyefiade
- Neurosciences and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nadeem Parthab
- Neurosciences and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jovanka Skocic
- Neurosciences and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Iska Moxon-Emre
- Neurosciences and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Uri Tabori
- Divisions of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Bouffet
- Divisions of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vijay Ramaswamy
- Divisions of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susanne Laughlin
- Divisions of Radiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Donald J Mabbott
- Neurosciences and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lei Y, Fu Y, Tian Z, Wang T, Dai X, Roper J, Yu DS, McDonald M, Bradley JD, Liu T, Zhou J, Yang X. Deformable CT image registration via a dual feasible neural network. Med Phys 2022; 49:7545-7554. [PMID: 35869866 PMCID: PMC9792435 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A quality assurance (QA) CT scans are usually acquired during cancer radiotherapy to assess for any anatomical changes, which may cause an unacceptable dose deviation and therefore warrant a replan. Accurate and rapid deformable image registration (DIR) is needed to support contour propagation from the planning CT (pCT) to the QA CT to facilitate dose volume histogram (DVH) review. Further, the generated deformation maps are used to track the anatomical variations throughout the treatment course and calculate the corresponding accumulated dose from one or more treatment plans. METHODS In this study, we aim to develop a deep learning (DL)-based method for automatic deformable registration to align the pCT and the QA CT. Our proposed method, named dual-feasible framework, was implemented by a mutual network that functions as both a forward module and a backward module. The mutual network was trained to predict two deformation vector fields (DVFs) simultaneously, which were then used to register the pCT and QA CT in both directions. A novel dual feasible loss was proposed to train the mutual network. The dual-feasible framework was able to provide additional DVF regularization during network training, which preserves the topology and reduces folding problems. We conducted experiments on 65 head-and-neck cancer patients (228 CTs in total), each with 1 pCT and 2-6 QA CTs. For evaluations, we calculated the mean absolute error (MAE), peak-signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), target registration error (TRE) between the deformed and target images and the Jacobian determinant of the predicted DVFs. RESULTS Within the body contour, the mean MAE, PSNR, SSIM, and TRE are 122.7 HU, 21.8 dB, 0.62 and 4.1 mm before registration and are 40.6 HU, 30.8 dB, 0.94, and 2.0 mm after registration using the proposed method. These results demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of our proposed method for pCT and QA CT DIR. CONCLUSION In summary, we proposed a DL-based method for automatic DIR to match the pCT to the QA CT. Such DIR method would not only benefit current workflow of evaluating DVHs on QA CTs but may also facilitate studies of treatment response assessment and radiomics that depend heavily on the accurate localization of tissues across longitudinal images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Lei
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Yabo Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Zhen Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Tonghe Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Xianjin Dai
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Justin Roper
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - David S Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mark McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jeffrey D Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Tian Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Donahue BR, MacDonald S. Protons for pediatric ependymoma: Where are we now? Neuro Oncol 2022; 24:1203-1204. [PMID: 35294554 PMCID: PMC9248382 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bernadine R Donahue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maimonides Cancer Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shannon MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The Current State of Radiotherapy for Pediatric Brain Tumors: An Overview of Post-Radiotherapy Neurocognitive Decline and Outcomes. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12071050. [PMID: 35887547 PMCID: PMC9315742 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumors of the central nervous system are the most common solid malignancies diagnosed in children. While common, they are also found to have some of the lowest survival rates of all malignancies. Treatment of childhood brain tumors often consists of operative gross total resection with adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The current body of literature is largely inconclusive regarding the overall benefit of adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy. However, it is known that both are associated with conditions that lower the quality of life in children who undergo those treatments. Chemotherapy is often associated with nausea, emesis, significant fatigue, immunosuppression, and alopecia. While radiotherapy can be effective for achieving local control, it is associated with late effects such as endocrine dysfunction, secondary malignancy, and neurocognitive decline. Advancements in radiotherapy grant both an increase in lifetime survival and an increased lifetime for survivors to contend with these late effects. In this review, the authors examined all the published literature, analyzing the results of clinical trials, case series, and technical notes on patients undergoing radiotherapy for the treatment of tumors of the central nervous system with a focus on neurocognitive decline and survival outcomes.
Collapse
|
9
|
Nogueira LM, Sineshaw HM, Jemal A, Pollack CE, Efstathiou JA, Yabroff KR. Association of Race With Receipt of Proton Beam Therapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Cancer in the US, 2004-2018. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e228970. [PMID: 35471569 PMCID: PMC9044116 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Black patients are less likely than White patients to receive guideline-concordant cancer care in the US. Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a potentially superior technology to photon radiotherapy for tumors with complex anatomy, tumors surrounded by sensitive tissues, and childhood cancers. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether there are racial disparities in the receipt of PBT among Black and White individuals diagnosed with all PBT-eligible cancers in the US. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study evaluated Black and White individuals diagnosed with PBT-eligible cancers between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2018, in the National Cancer Database, a nationwide hospital-based cancer registry that collects data on radiation treatment, even when it is received outside the reporting facility. American Society of Radiation Oncology model policies were used to classify patients into those for whom PBT is the recommended radiation therapy modality (group 1) and those for whom evidence of PBT efficacy is still under investigation (group 2). Propensity score matching was used to ensure comparability of Black and White patients' clinical characteristics and regional availability of PBT according to the National Academy of Medicine's definition of disparities. Data analysis was performed from October 4, 2021, to February 22, 2022. EXPOSURE Patients' self-identified race was ascertained from medical records. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcome was receipt of PBT, with disparities in this therapy's use evaluated with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Of the 5 225 929 patients who were eligible to receive PBT and included in the study, 13.6% were Black, 86.4% were White, and 54.3% were female. The mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 63.2 (12.4) years. Black patients were less likely to be treated with PBT than their White counterparts (0.3% vs 0.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.64-0.71). Racial disparities were greater for group 1 cancers (0.4% vs 0.8%; OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.44-0.55) than group 2 cancers (0.3% vs 0.4%; OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.70-0.80). Racial disparities in PBT receipt among group 1 cancers increased over time (annual percent change = 0.09, P < .001) and were greatest in 2018, the most recent year of available data. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cross-sectional study, Black patients were less likely to receive PBT than their White counterparts, and disparities were greatest for cancers for which PBT was the recommended radiation therapy modality. These findings suggest that efforts other than increasing the number of facilities that provide PBT will be needed to eliminate disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leticia M. Nogueira
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Helmneh M. Sineshaw
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Craig E. Pollack
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - K. Robin Yabroff
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stress Axis in the Cancer Patient: Clinical Aspects and Management. ENDOCRINES 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/endocrines2040044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis alterations are common in cancer patients, mainly due to the different antitumoral therapies, which lead to several acute and late endocrine side effects. This review summarizes the most recent evidence regarding HPA derangement, both in patients with active neoplasms and in cancer survivors, with particular attention to the impact of the different antitumoral treatments, focusing on the major clinical aspects. While acute hormone failure usually results from injury caused directly by tumor burden or surgical interventions, short- and long-term effects are generally due to chemotherapy, radiotherapy and, as more recently shown, to different types of targeted- and immuno-therapy. Adrenal insufficiency (AI) is mostly caused by pituitary or hypothalamic injury rather than a direct damage of the adrenal gland. Moreover, other treatments commonly employed as supportive therapy or in the context of palliative care (i.e., glucocorticoids, opioids) can lead to HPA dysfunction. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of stress axis alterations in cancer patients still require clarification. Since AI may represent a life-threatening condition, monitoring adrenal function in cancer patients is mandatory, especially in subjects who experience fatigue or during stress conditions, in order to promptly start replacement treatment when needed.
Collapse
|
11
|
Childhood Malignant Brain Tumors: Balancing the Bench and Bedside. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13236099. [PMID: 34885207 PMCID: PMC8656510 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13236099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Brain tumors remain the most common childhood solid tumors, accounting for approximately 25% of all pediatric cancers. They also represent the most common cause of cancer-related illness and death in this age group. Recent years have witnessed an evolution in our understanding of the biological underpinnings of many childhood brain tumors, potentially improving survival through both improved risk group allocation for patients to provide appropriate treatment intensity, and novel therapeutic breakthroughs. This review aims to summarize the molecular landscape, current trial-based standards of care, novel treatments being explored and future challenges for the three most common childhood malignant brain tumors—medulloblastomas, high-grade gliomas and ependymomas. Abstract Brain tumors are the leading cause of childhood cancer deaths in developed countries. They also represent the most common solid tumor in this age group, accounting for approximately one-quarter of all pediatric cancers. Developments in neuro-imaging, neurosurgical techniques, adjuvant therapy and supportive care have improved survival rates for certain tumors, allowing a future focus on optimizing cure, whilst minimizing long-term adverse effects. Recent times have witnessed a rapid evolution in the molecular characterization of several of the common pediatric brain tumors, allowing unique clinical and biological patient subgroups to be identified. However, a resulting paradigm shift in both translational therapy and subsequent survival for many of these tumors remains elusive, while recurrence remains a great clinical challenge. This review will provide an insight into the key molecular developments and global co-operative trial results for the most common malignant pediatric brain tumors (medulloblastoma, high-grade gliomas and ependymoma), highlighting potential future directions for management, including novel therapeutic options, and critical challenges that remain unsolved.
Collapse
|
12
|
Citation analysis of the most influential ependymoma research articles illustrates improved knowledge of the molecular biology of ependymoma. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 45:1041-1088. [PMID: 34613526 PMCID: PMC8976812 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01579-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
The history of academic research on ependymoma is expansive. This review summarizes its history with a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles on ependymoma. In March 2020, we queried the Web of Science database to identify the most cited articles on ependymoma using the terms “ependymoma” or “ependymal tumors,” yielding 3145 publications. Results were arranged by the number of times each article was cited in descending order. The top 100 articles spanned across nearly a century; the oldest article was published in 1924, while the most recent was in 2017. These articles were published in 35 unique journals, including a mix of basic science and clinical journals. The three institutions with the most papers in the top 100 were St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital (16%), the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (6%), and the German Cancer Research Center (5%). We analyzed the publications that may be considered the most influential in the understanding and treatment management of ependymoma. Studies focused on the molecular classification of ependymomas were well-represented among the most cited articles, reflecting the field’s current area of focus and its future directions. Additionally, this article also offers a reference for further studies in the ependymoma field.
Collapse
|
13
|
Dell'Oro M, Short M, Wilson P, Bezak E. Normal tissue tolerance amongst paediatric brain tumour patients- current evidence in proton radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 164:103415. [PMID: 34242771 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton radiotherapy (PT) is used increasingly for paediatric brain cancer patients. However, as demonstrated here, the knowledge on normal tissue dose constraints, to minimize side-effects, for this cohort is limited. METHODS A search strategy was systematically conducted on MEDLINE® database. 65 papers were evaluated ranging from 2013 to 2021. RESULTS Large variations in normal tissue tolerance and toxicity reporting across PT studies makes estimation of normal tissue dose constraints difficult, with the potential for significant late effects to go unmeasured. Mean dose delivered to the pituitary gland varies from 20 to 30 Gy across literature. Similarly, the hypothalamic dose delivery ranges from 20 to 54.6 Gy for paediatric patients. CONCLUSION There is a significant lack of radiobiological data for paediatric brain cancer patients undergoing proton therapy, often using data from x-ray radiotherapy and adult populations. The way forward is through standardisation of reporting in order to validate relevant dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikaela Dell'Oro
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
| | - Michala Short
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Puthenparampil Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Indelicato DJ, Ioakeim-Ioannidou M, Bradley JA, Mailhot-Vega RB, Morris CG, Tarbell NJ, Yock T, MacDonald SM. Proton Therapy for Pediatric Ependymoma: Mature Results From a Bicentric Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:815-820. [PMID: 33508372 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the long-term efficacy and toxicity of proton therapy for pediatric ependymoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 2000 and 2019, 386 children with nonmetastatic grade 2/3 intracranial ependymoma received proton therapy at 1 of 2 academic institutions. Median age at treatment was 3.8 years (range, 0.7-21.3); 56% were male. Most (72%) tumors were in the posterior fossa and classified as World Health Organization grade 3 (65%). Eighty-five percent had a gross total or near total tumor resection before radiation therapy; 30% received chemotherapy. Median radiation dose was 55.8 Gy relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) (range, 50.4-59.4). RESULTS Median follow-up was 5.0 years (range, 0.4-16.7). The 7-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 77.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.9%-81.5%), 63.8% (95% CI, 58.0%-68.8%), and 82.2% (95% CI, 77.2%-86.3%), respectively. Subtotal resection was associated with inferior local control (59% vs 80%; P < .005), progression-free survival (48% vs 66%; P < .001), and overall survival (70% vs 84%; P < .05). Male sex was associated with inferior progression-free (60% vs 69%; P < .05) and overall survival (76% vs 89%; P < .05). Posterior fossa tumor site was also associated with inferior progression-free (59% vs 74%; P < .05) and overall survival (79% vs 89%; P < .01). Twenty-one patients (5.4%) required hearing aids; of these, 13 received cisplatin, including the 3 with bilateral hearing loss. Forty-five patients (11.7%) required hormone replacement, typically growth hormone (38/45). The cumulative incidence of grade 2+ brain stem toxicity was 4% and occurred more often in patients who received >54 GyRBE. Two patients (0.5%) died of brain stem necrosis. The second-malignancy rate was 0.8%. CONCLUSION Proton therapy offers disease control commensurate with modern photon therapy without unexpected toxicity. The high rate of long-term survival justifies efforts to reduce radiation exposure in this young population. Independent of radiation modality, this large series confirms extent of resection as the most important modifiable factor for survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
| | | | - Julie A Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Raymond B Mailhot-Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Christopher G Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Nancy J Tarbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Torunn Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
An Insight into Pathophysiological Features and Therapeutic Advances on Ependymoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13133221. [PMID: 34203272 PMCID: PMC8269186 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Although biological information and the molecular classification of ependymoma have been studied, the treatment systems for ependymoma are still insufficient. In addition, because the disease occurs infrequently, it is difficult to obtain sufficient data to conduct large-scale or randomized clinical trials. Therefore, this study is intended to emphasize the importance of understanding its pathological characteristics and prognosis as well as developing treatments for ependymoma through multilateral studies. Abstract Glial cells comprise the non-sensory parts of the central nervous system as well as the peripheral nervous system. Glial cells, also known as neuroglia, constitute a significant portion of the mammalian nervous system and can be viewed simply as a matrix of neural cells. Despite being the “Nervenkitt” or “glue of the nerves”, they aptly serve multiple roles, including neuron repair, myelin sheath formation, and cerebrospinal fluid circulation. Ependymal cells are one of four kinds of glial cells that exert distinct functions. Tumorigenesis of a glial cell is termed a glioma, and in the case of an ependymal cell, it is called an ependymoma. Among the various gliomas, an ependymoma in children is one of the more challenging brain tumors to cure. Children are afflicted more severely by ependymal tumors than adults. It has appeared from several surveys that ependymoma comprises approximately six to ten percent of all tumors in children. Presently, the surgical removal of the tumor is considered a standard treatment for ependymomas. It has been conspicuously evident that a combination of irradiation therapy and surgery is much more efficacious in treating ependymomas. The main purpose of this review is to present the importance of both a deep understanding and ongoing research into histopathological features and prognoses of ependymomas to ensure that effective diagnostic methods and treatments can be developed.
Collapse
|
16
|
Shen CJ, Perkins SM, Bradley JA, Mahajan A, Marcus KJ. Radiation therapy for infants with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68 Suppl 2:e28700. [PMID: 33818894 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Revised: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The clinical outcomes for infants with malignant tumors are often worse than older children due to a combination of more biologically aggressive disease in some cases, and increased toxicity-or deintensification of therapies due to concern for toxicity-in others. Especially in infants and very young children, finding the appropriate balance between maximizing treatment efficacy while minimizing toxicity-in particular late side effects-is crucial. We review here the management of malignant tumors in infants and very young children, focusing on central nervous system (CNS) malignancies and rhabdomyosarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colette J Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Stephanie M Perkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Julie A Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Karen J Marcus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mizumoto M, Fuji H, Miyachi M, Soejima T, Yamamoto T, Aibe N, Demizu Y, Iwata H, Hashimoto T, Motegi A, Kawamura A, Terashima K, Fukushima T, Nakao T, Takada A, Sumi M, Oshima J, Moriwaki K, Nozaki M, Ishida Y, Kosaka Y, Ae K, Hosono A, Harada H, Ogo E, Akimoto T, Saito T, Fukushima H, Suzuki R, Takahashi M, Matsuo T, Matsumura A, Masaki H, Hosoi H, Shigematsu N, Sakurai H. Proton beam therapy for children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs): JASTRO and JSPHO Guidelines. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 98:102209. [PMID: 33984606 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are often treated with a multidisciplinary approach. This includes use of radiotherapy, which is important for local control, but may also cause adverse events in the long term, including second cancer. The risks for limited growth and development, endocrine dysfunction, reduced fertility and second cancer in children and AYAs are reduced by proton beam therapy (PBT), which has a dose distribution that decreases irradiation of normal organs while still targeting the tumor. To define the outcomes and characteristics of PBT in cancer treatment in pediatric and AYA patients, this document was developed by the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO) and the Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JSPHO).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Mizumoto
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Fuji
- Department of Radiology and National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Miyachi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Toshinori Soejima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Yamamoto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Norihiro Aibe
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yusuke Demizu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Atsushi Motegi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Atsufumi Kawamura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keita Terashima
- Children's Cancer Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Fukushima
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tomohei Nakao
- Department of Pediatrics, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Akinori Takada
- Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu-shi, Mie, Japan
| | - Minako Sumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Kensuke Moriwaki
- Department of Medical Statistics, Kobe Pharmaceutical University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Miwako Nozaki
- Department of Radiology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yuji Ishida
- Department of Pediatrics, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kosaka
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ae
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ako Hosono
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Harada
- Division of Radiation Therapy, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Etsuyo Ogo
- Department of Radiology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Saito
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroko Fukushima
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Ryoko Suzuki
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takayuki Matsuo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Akira Matsumura
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hidekazu Masaki
- Proton Therapy Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
| | - Hajime Hosoi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Shigematsu
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang T, Lei Y, Harms J, Ghavidel B, Lin L, Beitler JJ, McDonald M, Curran WJ, Liu T, Zhou J, Yang X. Learning-Based Stopping Power Mapping on Dual-Energy CT for Proton Radiation Therapy. Int J Part Ther 2021; 7:46-60. [PMID: 33604415 PMCID: PMC7886267 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-d-20-00020.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has been used to derive relative stopping power (RSP) maps by obtaining the energy dependence of photon interactions. The DECT-derived RSP maps could potentially be compromised by image noise levels and the severity of artifacts when using physics-based mapping techniques. This work presents a noise-robust learning-based method to predict RSP maps from DECT for proton radiation therapy. Materials and Methods The proposed method uses a residual attention cycle-consistent generative adversarial network to bring DECT-to-RSP mapping close to a 1-to-1 mapping by introducing an inverse RSP-to-DECT mapping. To evaluate the proposed method, we retrospectively investigated 20 head-and-neck cancer patients with DECT scans in proton radiation therapy simulation. Ground truth RSP values were assigned by calculation based on chemical compositions and acted as learning targets in the training process for DECT datasets; they were evaluated against results from the proposed method using a leave-one-out cross-validation strategy. Results The predicted RSP maps showed an average normalized mean square error of 2.83% across the whole body volume and an average mean error less than 3% in all volumes of interest. With additional simulated noise added in DECT datasets, the proposed method still maintained a comparable performance, while the physics-based stoichiometric method suffered degraded inaccuracy from increased noise level. The average differences from ground truth in dose volume histogram metrics for clinical target volumes were less than 0.2 Gy for D95% and Dmax with no statistical significance. Maximum difference in dose volume histogram metrics of organs at risk was around 1 Gy on average. Conclusion These results strongly indicate the high accuracy of RSP maps predicted by our machine-learning–based method and show its potential feasibility for proton treatment planning and dose calculation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tonghe Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Yang Lei
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Joseph Harms
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Beth Ghavidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Liyong Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jonathan J Beitler
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mark McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Walter J Curran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Tian Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jünger ST, Timmermann B, Pietsch T. Pediatric ependymoma: an overview of a complex disease. Childs Nerv Syst 2021; 37:2451-2463. [PMID: 34008056 PMCID: PMC8342354 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-021-05207-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Pediatric ependymomas comprise biologically distinct tumor entities with different (epi)genetics, age distribution and localization, as well as a different prognosis. Regarding risk stratification within these biologically defined entities, histopathological features still seem to be relevant. The mainstay of treatment is gross total resection (GTR) if possible, achieved with intraoperative monitoring and neuronavigation-and if necessary second surgery-followed by adjuvant radiation therapy. However, there is growing evidence that some ependymal tumors may be cured by surgery alone, while others relapse despite adjuvant treatment. To date, the role of chemotherapy is not clear. Current therapy achieves reasonable survival rates for the majority of ependymoma patients. The next challenge is to go beyond initial tumor control and use risk-adapted therapy to reduce secondary effect and therapy-induced morbidity for low-risk patients and to intensify treatment for high-risk patients. With identification of specific alterations, targeted therapy may represent an option for individualized treatment modalities in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Theresa Jünger
- Department of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Centre, University of Bonn Medical Centre, Bonn, Germany. .,Centre for Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Beate Timmermann
- grid.410718.b0000 0001 0262 7331Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
| | - Torsten Pietsch
- grid.15090.3d0000 0000 8786 803XDepartment of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Centre, University of Bonn Medical Centre, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fjæra LF, Indelicato DJ, Stokkevåg CH, Muren LP, Hsi WC, Ytre-Hauge KS. Implementation of a double scattering nozzle for Monte Carlo recalculation of proton plans with variable relative biological effectiveness. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65. [PMID: 33053524 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abc12d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
A constant relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 is currently used in clinical proton therapy. However, theRBEvaries with factors such as dose level, linear energy transfer (LET) and tissue type. MultipleRBEmodels have been developed to account for this biological variation. To enable recalculation of patients treated with double scattering (DS) proton therapy, includingLETand variableRBE, we implemented and commissioned a Monte Carlo (MC) model of a DS treatment nozzle. The main components from the IBA nozzle were implemented in the FLUKA MC code. We calibrated and verified the following entities to experimental measurements: range of pristine Bragg peaks (PBPs) and spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBPs), energy spread, lateral profiles, compensator range degradation, and absolute dose. We recalculated two patients with different field setups, comparing FLUKA vs. treatment planning system (TPS) dose, also obtainingLETand variableRBEdoses. We achieved good agreement between FLUKA and measurements. The range differences between FLUKA and measurements were for the PBPs within ±0.9 mm (83% ⩽ 0.5 mm), and for SOBPs ±1.6 mm (82% ⩽ 0.5 mm). The differences in modulation widths were below 5 mm (79% ⩽ 2 mm). The differences in the distal dose fall off (D80%-D20%) were below 0.5 mm for all PBPs and the lateral penumbras diverged from measurements by less than 1 mm. The mean dose difference (RBE= 1.1) in the target between the TPS and FLUKA were below 0.4% in a three-field plan and below 1.4% in a four-field plan. A dose increase of 9.9% and 7.2% occurred when using variableRBEfor the two patients, respectively. We presented a method to recalculate DS proton plans in the FLUKA MC code. The implementation was used to obtainLETand variableRBEdose and can be used for investigating variableRBEfor previously treated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Fredrik Fjæra
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America
| | - Camilla H Stokkevåg
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ludvig P Muren
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Wen C Hsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ozkan Loch C, Eichenberger MA, Togno M, Zinsli SP, Egloff M, Papa A, Ischebeck R, Lomax AJ, Peier P, Safai S. Characterization of a Low-Cost Plastic Fiber Array Detector for Proton Beam Dosimetry. SENSORS 2020; 20:s20205727. [PMID: 33050153 PMCID: PMC7601306 DOI: 10.3390/s20205727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
The Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) technique in proton therapy uses fast magnets to scan the tumor volume rapidly. Changing the proton energy allows changing to layers in the third dimension, hence scanning the same volume several times. The PBS approach permits adapting the speed and/or current to modulate the delivered dose. We built a simple prototype that measures the dose distribution in a single step. The active detection material consists of a single layer of scintillating fibers (i.e., 1D) with an active length of 100 mm, a width of 18.25 mm, and an insignificant space (20 μm) between them. A commercial CMOS-based camera detects the scintillation light. Short exposure times allow running the camera at high frame rates, thus, monitoring the beam motion. A simple image processing method extracts the dose information from each fiber of the array. The prototype would allow scaling the concept to multiple layers read out by the same camera, such that the costs do not scale with the dimensions of the fiber array. Presented here are the characteristics of the prototype, studied under two modalities: spatial resolution, linearity, and energy dependence, characterized at the Center for Proton Therapy (Paul Scherrer Institute); the dose rate response, measured at an electron accelerator (Swiss Federal Institute of Metrology).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cigdem Ozkan Loch
- Department of Large Scale Research Facilities, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (M.A.E.); (S.P.Z.); (R.I.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Michael Alexander Eichenberger
- Department of Large Scale Research Facilities, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (M.A.E.); (S.P.Z.); (R.I.)
| | - Michele Togno
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (M.T.); (M.E.); (A.J.L.); (S.S.)
| | - Simon Pascal Zinsli
- Department of Large Scale Research Facilities, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (M.A.E.); (S.P.Z.); (R.I.)
| | - Martina Egloff
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (M.T.); (M.E.); (A.J.L.); (S.S.)
| | - Angela Papa
- Department for Research with Neutrons and Muons, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland;
| | - Rasmus Ischebeck
- Department of Large Scale Research Facilities, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (M.A.E.); (S.P.Z.); (R.I.)
| | - Antony John Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (M.T.); (M.E.); (A.J.L.); (S.S.)
| | - Peter Peier
- Laboratory Ionising Radiation, Federal Institute of Metrology (METAS), 3003 Bern-Wabern, Switzerland;
| | - Sairos Safai
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (M.T.); (M.E.); (A.J.L.); (S.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Influence of Target Location, Size, and Patient Age on Normal Tissue Sparing- Proton and Photon Therapy in Paediatric Brain Tumour Patient-Specific Approach. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12092578. [PMID: 32927700 PMCID: PMC7563785 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton radiotherapy produces superior dose distributions compared to photon radiotherapy, reducing side effects. Differences between the two modalities are not fully quantified in paediatric patients for various intracranial tumour sites or age. Understanding these differences may help clinicians estimate the benefit and improve referral across available centres. Our aim was to compare intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) radiation doses for select paediatric intracranial tumours. METHODS IMPT and IMRT dose distributions for gender-matched paediatric cranial CT-datasets (ages 5, 9 and 13 years) were retrospectively calculated to simulate irradiation of supratentorial (ependymoma) and infratentorial (medulloblastoma) target volumes diameters (1-3 cm) and position (central and 1-2 cm shifts). RESULTS Clinical dosimetric objectives were achieved for all 216 treatment plans. Whilst infratentorial IMPT plans achieved greater maximum dose sparing to optic structures (4.8-12.6 Gy optic chiasm), brainstem sparing was limited (~0.5 Gy). Mean dose difference for optic chiasm was associated with medulloblastoma target position (p < 0.0197). Supratentorial IMPT plans demonstrated greater dose reduction for the youngest patients (pituitary gland p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Normal tissue sparing was achieved regardless of patient age for infratentorial tumours. However, for supratentorial tumours, there was a dosimetric advantage of IMPT across 9 vs. 13-year-old patients.
Collapse
|
23
|
Forsthoefel MK, Ballew E, Unger KR, Ahn PH, Rudra S, Pang D, Collins SP, Dritschilo A, Harter W, Paudel N, Collins BT, Lischalk JW. Early Experience of the First Single-Room Gantry Mounted Active Scanning Proton Therapy System at an Integrated Cancer Center. Front Oncol 2020; 10:861. [PMID: 32547953 PMCID: PMC7273355 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Review the early experience with a single-room gantry mounted active scanning proton therapy system. Material and Methods: All patients treated with proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved patient registry. Proton beam radiotherapy was delivered with a 250 MeV gantry mounted synchrocyclotron in a single-room integrated facility within the pre-existing cancer center. Demographic data, cancer diagnoses, treatment technique, and geographic patterns were obtained for all patients. Treatment plans were evaluated for mixed modality therapy. Insurance approval data was collected for all patients treated with PBT. Results: A total of 132 patients were treated with PBT between March 2018 and June 2019. The most common oncologic subsites treated included the central nervous system (22%), gastrointestinal tract (20%), and genitourinary tract (20%). The most common histologies treated included prostate adenocarcinoma (19%), non-small cell lung cancer (10%), primary CNS gliomas (8%), and esophageal cancer (8%). Rationale for PBT treatment included limitation of dose to adjacent critical organs at risk (67%), reirradiation (19%), and patient comorbidities (11%). Patients received at least one x-ray fraction delivered as prescribed (36%) or less commonly due to unplanned machine downtime (34%). Concurrent systemic therapy was administered to 57 patients (43%). Twenty-six patients (20%) were initially denied insurance coverage and required peer-to-peers (65%), written appeals (12%), secondary insurance approval (12%), and comparison x-ray to proton plans (8%) for subsequent approval. Proton beam radiotherapy approval required a median of 17 days from insurance submission. Discussion: Incorporation of PBT into our existing cancer center allowed for multidisciplinary oncologic treatment of a diverse population of patients. Insurance coverage for PBT presents as a significant hurdle and improvements are needed to provide more timely access to necessary oncologic care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew K Forsthoefel
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Elizabeth Ballew
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Keith R Unger
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Peter H Ahn
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sonali Rudra
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Dalong Pang
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sean P Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Anatoly Dritschilo
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - William Harter
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Nitika Paudel
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Brian T Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Jonathan W Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Greenberger BA, Yock TI. The role of proton therapy in pediatric malignancies: Recent advances and future directions. Semin Oncol 2020; 47:8-22. [PMID: 32139101 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Proton radiotherapy has promised an advantage in safely treating pediatric malignancies with an increased capability to spare normal tissues, reducing the risk of both acute and late toxicity. The past decade has seen the proliferation of more than 30 proton facilities in the United States, with increased capacity to provide access to approximately 3,000 children per year who will require radiotherapy for their disease. We provide a review of the initial efforts to describe outcomes after proton therapy across the common pediatric disease sites. We discuss the main attempts to assess comparative efficacy between proton and photon radiotherapy concerning toxicity. We also discuss recent efforts of multi-institutional registries aimed at accelerating research to better define the optimal treatment paradigm for children requiring radiotherapy for cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Greenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College & Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Urgent Proton Beam Therapy With Interinstitutional Transfer for Patients With Intracranial Rhabdomyosarcoma: Report of 3 Cases. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2020; 42:e12-e17. [PMID: 31688631 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000001620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
A number of cases have been reported in recent years regarding the use of proton beam therapy to mitigate adverse events affecting important cranial organs in cases of rhabdomyosarcoma at parameningeal sites. However, few reports have described the use of proton beam therapy as urgent radiotherapy for parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma with intracranial extension. We treated 3 patients diagnosed with parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma extending into the cranium who were assessed at other hospitals as suitable for urgent radiotherapy and transferred to our hospital for proton beam therapy. These patients comprised 2 boys and 1 girl 6 to 12 years of age at diagnosis, and proton beam therapy was started on days 5, 11, and 23 after diagnosis, respectively. Patients with parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma extending into the cranium can be transferred to institutions equipped to perform proton beam therapy. To minimize the interval to starting therapy, medical information should be shared with institutions capable of providing such therapy as soon as the possibility of intracranial soft-tissue sarcoma is recognized. Proton beam therapy is 1 option for radiotherapy in cases of intracranial rhabdomyosarcoma.
Collapse
|
26
|
Bitterman DS, MacDonald SM, Yock TI, Tarbell NJ, Wright KD, Chi SN, Marcus KJ, Haas-Kogan DA. Revisiting the Role of Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Low-Grade Glioma. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:3335-3339. [PMID: 31498029 PMCID: PMC9798905 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.01270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle S. Bitterman
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, MA,Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Karen D. Wright
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Susan N. Chi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Karen J. Marcus
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Daphne A. Haas-Kogan
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA,Daphne A. Haas-Kogan, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, DA-16-22, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02115; e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Carbonara R, Di Rito A, Monti A, Rubini G, Sardaro A. Proton versus Photon Radiotherapy for Pediatric Central Nervous System Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Dosimetric Comparison Studies. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2019; 2019:5879723. [PMID: 31885580 PMCID: PMC6900940 DOI: 10.1155/2019/5879723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy (RT) plays a fundamental role in the treatment of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) malignancies, but its late sequelae are still a challenging question. Despite developments in modern high-conformal photon techniques and proton beam therapy (PBT) are improving the normal tissues dose-sparing while maintaining satisfactory target coverage, clinical advantages supporting the optimal treatment strategy have to be better evaluated in long-term clinical studies and assessed in further radiobiological analyses. Our analysis aimed to systematically review current knowledge on the dosimetric advantages of PBT in the considered setting, which should be the basis for future specific studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS A PubMed and Google Scholar search was conducted in June 2019 to select dosimetric studies comparing photon versus proton RT for pediatric patients affected by CNS tumors. Then, a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA statement was performed. Average and standard deviation values of Conformity Index, Homogeneity Index, and mean and maximum doses to intracranial and extracranial organs at risk (OARs) were specifically evaluated for secondary dosimetric comparisons. The standardized mean differences (SMDs) for target parameters and the mean differences (MDs) for OARs were summarized in forest plots (P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant). Publication bias was also assessed by the funnel plot and Egger's regression test. RESULTS Among the 88 identified papers, a total of twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis. PBT showed dosimetric advantages in target homogeneity (significant especially in the subgroup comparing PBT and 3D conformal RT), as well as in the dose sparing of almost all analyzed OARs (significantly superior results for brainstem, normal brain, and hippocampal dose constraints and for extracranial OARs parameters, excluding the kidneys). Publication bias was observed for Conformity Index. CONCLUSION Our analysis supports the evidence of dosimetric advantages of PBT over photon RT, especially in the dose sparing of normal growing tissues. Confirmations from wider well-designed studies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Carbonara
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Alessia Di Rito
- Radiation Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Angela Monti
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rubini
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Nuclear Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Angela Sardaro
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ofuya M, McParland L, Murray L, Brown S, Sebag-Montefiore D, Hall E. Systematic review of methodology used in clinical studies evaluating the benefits of proton beam therapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2019; 19:17-26. [PMID: 31372521 PMCID: PMC6660607 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2019] [Revised: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton beam therapy (PBT) delivers high-energy radiation to target tumours while sparing surrounding normal tissues. The dosimetric advantages of PBT over traditional photon radiotherapy may be clear but the translation of this benefit into clinically meaningful reductions in toxicities and improved quality-of-life (QoL) needs to be determined. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for generating the highest-level evidence in medicine. The objectives of this systematic review were to provide an overview of published clinical studies evaluating the benefits of PBT, and to examine the methodology used in clinical trials with respect to study design and outcomes. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for published clinical studies where PBT was a cancer treatment intervention. All randomised and non-randomised studies, prospective or retrospective, were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS In total, 219 studies were included. Prospective studies comprised 89/219 (41%), and of these, the number of randomised phase II and III trials were 5/89 (6%) and 3/89 (3%) respectively. Of all the phase II and III trials, 18/24 (75%) were conducted at a single PBT centre. Over one-third of authors recommended an increase in length of follow up. Research design and/or findings were poorly reported in 74/89 (83%) of prospective studies. Patient reported outcomes were assessed in only 19/89 (21%) of prospective studies. CONCLUSIONS Prospective randomised evidence for PBT is limited. The set-up of national PBT services in several countries provides an opportunity to guide the optimal design of prospective studies, including RCTs, to evaluate the benefits of PBT across various disease sites. Collaboration between PBT centres, both nationally and internationally, would increase potential for the generation of practice changing evidence. There is a need to facilitate and guide the collection and analysis of meaningful outcome data, including late toxicities and patient reported QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mercy Ofuya
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy McParland
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Murray
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Leeds Institute of Molecular Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Brown
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - David Sebag-Montefiore
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Hall
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Brainstem Injury in Pediatric Patients Receiving Posterior Fossa Photon Radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:1034-1042. [PMID: 31472183 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brainstem necrosis is a rare, but dreaded complication of radiation therapy; however, data on the incidence of brainstem injury for tumors involving the posterior fossa in photon-treated patient cohorts are still needed. METHODS AND MATERIALS Clinical characteristics and dosimetric parameters were recorded for 107 pediatric patients who received photon radiation for posterior fossa tumors without brainstem involvement from 2000 to 2016. Patients were excluded if they received a prescription dose <50.4 Gy, a brainstem maximum dose <50.4 Gy, or had fewer than 2 magnetic resonance imaging scans within 18 months after radiation. Post-radiation therapy magnetic resonance imaging findings were recorded, and brainstem toxicity was graded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5. RESULTS The most common histologies were medulloblastoma (61.7%) and ependymoma (15.9%), and median age at diagnosis was 8.3 years (range, 0.8-20.7). Sixty-seven patients (62.6%) received craniospinal irradiation (median, 23.4 Gy; range, 18.0-39.6) as a component of their radiation therapy, and 39.3% and 40.2% of patients received an additional involved field or whole posterior fossa boost, respectively. Median prescribed dose was 55.8 Gy (range, 50.4-60.0). Median clinical and imaging follow-up were 4.7 years (range, 0.1-17.5) and 4.2 years (range, 0.1-17.3), respectively. No grade ≥2 toxicities were observed. The incidence of grade 1 brainstem necrosis was 1.9% (2 of 107). These patients were by definition asymptomatic and experienced resolution of imaging abnormality after 5.3 months and 2.1 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Risk of brainstem necrosis was minimal in this multi-institutional study of pediatric patients treated with photon radiation therapy for tumors involving the posterior fossa with no cases of symptomatic brainstem injury, suggesting that brainstem injury risk is minimal in patients treated with photon therapy.
Collapse
|
30
|
Tensaouti F, Ducassou A, Chaltiel L, Bolle S, Habrand JL, Alapetite C, Coche-Dequeant B, Bernier V, Claude L, Carrie C, Padovani L, Muracciole X, Supiot S, Huchet A, Leseur J, Kerr C, Hangard G, Lisbona A, Goudjil F, Ferrand R, Laprie A. Feasibility of Dose Escalation in Patients With Intracranial Pediatric Ependymoma. Front Oncol 2019; 9:531. [PMID: 31293971 PMCID: PMC6598548 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose: Pediatric ependymoma carries a dismal prognosis, mainly owing to local relapse within RT fields. The current prospective European approach is to increase the radiation dose with a sequential hypofractionated stereotactic boost. In this study, we assessed the possibility of using a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), comparing VMAT vs. IMPT dose delivery. Material and methods: The cohort included 101 patients. The dose to planning target volume (PTV59.4) was 59.4/1.8 Gy, and the dose to SIB volume (PTV67.6) was 67.6/2.05 Gy. Gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined as the tumor bed plus residual tumor, clinical target volume (CTV59.4) was GTV + 5 mm, and PTV59.4 was CTV59.4 + 3 mm. PTV67.6 was GTV+ 3 mm. After treatment plan optimization, quality indices and doses to target volume and organs at risk (OARs) were extracted and compared with the standard radiation doses that were actually delivered (median = 59.4 Gy [50.4 59.4]). Results: In most cases, the proton treatment resulted in higher quality indices (p < 0.001). Compared with the doses that were initially delivered, mean, and maximum doses to some OARs were no higher with SIB VMAT, and significantly lower with protons (p < 0.001). In the case of posterior fossa tumor, there was a lower dose to the brainstem with protons, in terms of V59 Gy, mean, and near-maximum (D2%) doses. Conclusion: Dose escalation with intensity-modulated proton or photon SIB is feasible in some patients. This approach could be considered for children with unresectable residue or post-operative FLAIR abnormalities, particularly if they have supratentorial tumors. It should not be considered for infratentorial tumors encasing the brainstem or extending to the medulla.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima Tensaouti
- ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Universite de Toulouse, Inserm, Toulouse, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du, Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Ducassou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du, Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Léonor Chaltiel
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Stéphanie Bolle
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean Louis Habrand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | | | - Valérie Bernier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Line Claude
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Christian Carrie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | | | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - Aymeri Huchet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, Bordeaux, France
| | - Julie Leseur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Christine Kerr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Regional du Cancer Montpellier, Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | - Grégorie Hangard
- Department of Engineering and Medical Physics, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Albert Lisbona
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - Farid Goudjil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Régis Ferrand
- Department of Engineering and Medical Physics, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Laprie
- ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Universite de Toulouse, Inserm, Toulouse, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du, Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
- Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ager BJ, Christensen MT, Burt LM, Poppe MM. The value of high-dose radiotherapy in intracranial ependymoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27697. [PMID: 30865382 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Revised: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to evaluate the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy dose on overall survival (OS) after surgical resection for localized intracranial ependymoma. PROCEDURE The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried from 2004 to 2015 for patients of all ages with intracranial WHO grade II to III ependymoma treated with surgery and 4500 to 7000 cGy of adjuvant radiotherapy. Pearson χ2 test and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess clinicodemographic factors and patterns of care. After propensity-score matching, OS was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analyses and doubly robust estimation with multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS Of the 1153 patients meeting criteria, 529 (46%) received ≤ 5400 cGy and 624 (54%) received > 5400 cGy. At a median follow-up of 54.5 months, an OS benefit was observed for > 5400 cGy in pediatric patients aged 2-18 years (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.99, P = 0.047). No OS difference was found between ≤ 5400 cGy and > 5400 cGy in pediatric patients aged < 2 years (P = 0.819) or in adults (P = 0.180). Increasing age, WHO grade III, subtotal resection, and receipt of chemotherapy portended worse OS. Age 2 to 18 years, WHO III grade, supratentorial location, and receipt of chemotherapy were associated with receiving > 5400 cGy. CONCLUSION Adjuvant radiotherapy dose > 5400 cGy was associated with improved OS for children aged 2-18 years with WHO grade II-III intracranial ependymoma. No OS benefit was found with > 5400 cGy in adults or children less than two years of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan J Ager
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Lindsay M Burt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Matthew M Poppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Weber DC, Lim PS, Tran S, Walser M, Bolsi A, Kliebsch U, Beer J, Bachtiary B, Lomax T, Pica A. Proton therapy for brain tumours in the area of evidence-based medicine. Br J Radiol 2019; 93:20190237. [PMID: 31067074 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This review details the indication of brain tumors for proton therapy and give a list of the open prospective trials for these challenging tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.,University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Pei S Lim
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Sebastien Tran
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Marc Walser
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Alessandra Bolsi
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Ulrike Kliebsch
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Jürgen Beer
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Barbara Bachtiary
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Tony Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Alessia Pica
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lawell MP, Bajaj BV, Gallotto SL, Hess CB, Patteson BE, Nartowicz JA, Giblin MJ, Kleinerman RA, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Ebb DH, Tarbell NJ, MacDonald SM, Weyman EA, Yock TI. Increased distance from a treating proton center is associated with diminished ability to follow patients enrolled on a multicenter radiation oncology registry. Radiother Oncol 2019; 134:25-29. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
34
|
Proton versus photon-based radiation therapy for prostate cancer: emerging evidence and considerations in the era of value-based cancer care. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2019; 22:509-521. [PMID: 30967625 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-019-0140-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Revised: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in radiation technology have transformed treatment options for patients with localized prostate cancer. The evolution of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) have allowed physicians to spare surrounding normal organs and reduce adverse effects. The introduction of proton beam technology and its physical advantage of depositing its energy in tissue at the end-of-range maximum may potentially spare critical organs such as the bladder and rectum in prostate cancer patients. Data thus far are limited to large, observational studies that have not yet demonstrated a definite benefit of protons over conventional treatment with IMRT. The cost of proton beam treatment adds to the controversy within the field. METHODS We performed an extensive literature review for all proton treatment-related prostate cancer studies. We discuss the history of proton beam technology, as well as its role in the treatment of prostate cancer, associated controversies, novel technology trends, a discussion of cost-effectiveness, and an overview of the ongoing modern large prospective studies that aim to resolve the debate between protons and photons for prostate cancer. RESULTS Present data have demonstrated that proton beam therapy is safe and effective compared with the standard treatment options for prostate cancer. While dosimetric studies suggest lower whole-body radiation dose and a theoretically higher relative biological effectiveness in prostate cancer compared with photons, no studies have demonstrated a clear benefit with protons. CONCLUSIONS Evolving trends in proton treatment delivery and proton center business models are helping to reduce costs. Introduction of existing technology into proton delivery allows further control of organ motion and addressing organs-at-risk. Finally, the much-awaited contemporary studies comparing photon with proton-based treatments, with primary endpoints of patient-reported quality-of-life, will help us understand the differences between proton and photon-based treatments for prostate cancer in the modern era.
Collapse
|
35
|
Are further studies needed to justify the use of proton therapy for paediatric cancers of the central nervous system? A review of current evidence. Radiother Oncol 2019; 133:140-148. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Revised: 12/31/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
36
|
Haas-Kogan D, Indelicato D, Paganetti H, Esiashvili N, Mahajan A, Yock T, Flampouri S, MacDonald S, Fouladi M, Stephen K, Kalapurakal J, Terezakis S, Kooy H, Grosshans D, Makrigiorgos M, Mishra K, Poussaint TY, Cohen K, Fitzgerald T, Gondi V, Liu A, Michalski J, Mirkovic D, Mohan R, Perkins S, Wong K, Vikram B, Buchsbaum J, Kun L. National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children: Considerations Regarding Brainstem Injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 101:152-168. [PMID: 29619963 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Revised: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 01/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton therapy can allow for superior avoidance of normal tissues. A widespread consensus has been reached that proton therapy should be used for patients with curable pediatric brain tumor to avoid critical central nervous system structures. Brainstem necrosis is a potentially devastating, but rare, complication of radiation. Recent reports of brainstem necrosis after proton therapy have raised concerns over the potential biological differences among radiation modalities. We have summarized findings from the National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children convened in May 2016 to examine brainstem injury. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty-seven physicians, physicists, and researchers from 17 institutions with expertise met to discuss this issue. The definition of brainstem injury, imaging of this entity, clinical experience with photons and photons, and potential biological differences among these radiation modalities were thoroughly discussed and reviewed. The 3 largest US pediatric proton therapy centers collectively summarized the incidence of symptomatic brainstem injury and physics details (planning, dosimetry, delivery) for 671 children with focal posterior fossa tumors treated with protons from 2006 to 2016. RESULTS The average rate of symptomatic brainstem toxicity from the 3 largest US pediatric proton centers was 2.38%. The actuarial rate of grade ≥2 brainstem toxicity was successfully reduced from 12.7% to 0% at 1 center after adopting modified radiation guidelines. Guidelines for treatment planning and current consensus brainstem constraints for proton therapy are presented. The current knowledge regarding linear energy transfer (LET) and its relationship to relative biological effectiveness (RBE) are defined. We review the current state of LET-based planning. CONCLUSIONS Brainstem injury is a rare complication of radiation therapy for both photons and protons. Substantial dosimetric data have been collected for brainstem injury after proton therapy, and established guidelines to allow for safe delivery of proton radiation have been defined. Increased capability exists to incorporate LET optimization; however, further research is needed to fully explore the capabilities of LET- and RBE-based planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Natia Esiashvili
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Torunn Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stella Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Shannon MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maryam Fouladi
- Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Kry Stephen
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - John Kalapurakal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Stephanie Terezakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hanne Kooy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mike Makrigiorgos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kavita Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Tina Young Poussaint
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kenneth Cohen
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Thomas Fitzgerald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Vinai Gondi
- Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Arthur Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jeff Michalski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Dragan Mirkovic
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stephanie Perkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kenneth Wong
- Children's Hospital of Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angles, California
| | - Bhadrasain Vikram
- Radiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Jeff Buchsbaum
- Radiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Larry Kun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Remick JS, Bentzen SM, Simone CB, Nichols E, Suntharalingam M, Regine WF. Downstream Effect of a Proton Treatment Center on an Academic Medical Center. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104:756-764. [PMID: 30885776 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2018] [Revised: 02/22/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To quantify the effects of opening a proton center (PC) on an academic medical center (AMC)/radiation oncology department. METHODS AND MATERIALS Radiation treatment volume and relative value units from fiscal year 2015 (FY15) to FY17 were retrospectively analyzed at the AMC and 2 community-based centers. To quantify new patient referrals to the AMC, we reviewed the electronic medical record for all patients seen at the PC since consults were initiated in November 2015 (n = 1173). Patients were excluded if the date of entry into the AMC electronic medical record predated their PC consultation. Hospital resource use and professional and technical charges were obtained for these patients. Academic growth, philanthropy, and resident education were evaluated based on grant submissions, clinical trial enrollment, philanthropy, and pediatric case exposure, respectively, from PC opening through FY17. RESULTS From FY15 to FY17, radiation fractions at the AMC and the 2 community sites decreased by 14% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12%-16%, P < .001) and increased by 19% (95% CI, 16%-23%, P < .001) and 2% (95% CI, -1.1 to 4.3%, P = NS), respectively; the number of new starts decreased by 3% (95% CI, -13% to 7%, P = NS) and 2% (95% CI, -20% to 16%, P = NS) and increased by 13% (95% CI -2% to 27%, P = NS), respectively. At the AMC, technical and professional relative value units decreased by 5% and 14%, respectively. The PC made 561 external referrals to the AMC, which resulted in $2.38 million technical and $2.13 million professional charges at the AMC. Fifteen grant submissions ($12.83 million) resulted in 6 awards ($3.26 million). Twenty-two clinical trials involving proton therapy were opened, on which a total of 5% (n = 54) of patients enrolled during calendar years 2017 and 2018. The PC was involved in gift donations of $1.6 million. There was a nonsignificant 37% increase in number of pediatric cases. CONCLUSIONS Despite a slight decline in AMC photon patient volumes and relative value units, a positive downstream effect was associated with the addition of a PC, which benefited the AMC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill S Remick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Elizabeth Nichols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mohan Suntharalingam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - William F Regine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Central nervous system ependymoma: clinical implications of the new molecular classification, treatment guidelines and controversial issues. Clin Transl Oncol 2019; 21:1450-1463. [PMID: 30868390 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-019-02082-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Ependymoma is an uncommon neuroepithelial tumor that may arise anywhere within the neuroaxis, both in children and in adults. It has been classically graded upon histopathological features, yet with limited clinical utility. Recently, DNA methylation profiling has provided a novel classification of ependymoma in nine molecular subgroups. This stratification method harbors prognostic value with supratentorial RELA-fusion and posterior fossa group A tumors showing a significantly shorter survival compared to the rest. Currently, the treatment of choice involves maximal safe resection and, in cases of residual disease, adjuvant conformal radiotherapy. Second-look surgery is also a feasible and recommended option for incompletely resected tumors. The role of chemotherapy is not yet established and can be considered in infants and children with relapsing disease or prior to re-intervention. Although targeted agents do not seem to play a role as adjuvant therapy, they are currently being tested for recurrent disease.
Collapse
|
39
|
Thorp N, Gandola L. Management of Ependymoma in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:162-170. [PMID: 30616927 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Revised: 11/18/2018] [Accepted: 11/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Paediatric ependymomas are rare, malignant tumours arising throughout the central nervous system, but most frequently (in children) the posterior fossa. The standard of care for localised disease is gross total resection and focal radiotherapy, resulting in overall survival rates of up to 85%. Despite improvements in survival, treatment remains challenging, with persistently high rates of (rarely curable) relapse alongside risks of significant tumour and treatment-related toxicity. Systemic therapy is currently used to delay radiotherapy in very young children and in the management of metastatic or recurrent disease. Its use in the adjuvant setting is the subject of ongoing studies. Current research efforts are aimed at eliciting a better understanding of molecular biology, correlating this with tumour behaviour and defining targets for potential new agents. Prognosis seems to be related to the extent of surgical resection and the age at presentation. This article reviews clinical aspects of ependymoma management in children and young people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Thorp
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK.
| | - L Gandola
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Radiotherapy Advances in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology. Bioengineering (Basel) 2018; 5:bioengineering5040097. [PMID: 30400370 PMCID: PMC6315761 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering5040097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2018] [Revised: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) represents an integral component in the treatment of many pediatric brain tumors. Multiple advances have emerged within pediatric radiation oncology that aim to optimize the therapeutic ratio—improving disease control while limiting RT-related toxicity. These include innovations in treatment planning with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) simulation, as well as increasingly sophisticated radiation delivery techniques. Advanced RT techniques, including photon-based RT such as intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), as well as particle beam therapy and stereotactic RT, have afforded an array of options to dramatically reduce radiation exposure of uninvolved normal tissues while treating target volumes. Along with advances in image guidance of radiation treatments, novel RT approaches are being implemented in ongoing and future prospective clinical trials. As the era of molecular risk stratification unfolds, personalization of radiation dose, target, and technique holds the promise to meaningfully improve outcomes for pediatric neuro-oncology patients.
Collapse
|
41
|
Kim DH, Park S, Jo K, Cho S, Shin E, Lim DH, Pyo H, Han Y, Suh TS. Investigations of line scanning proton therapy with dynamic multi-leaf collimator. Phys Med 2018; 55:47-55. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Revised: 09/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
42
|
Huynh M, Marcu LG, Giles E, Short M, Matthews D, Bezak E. Current status of proton therapy outcome for paediatric cancers of the central nervous system - Analysis of the published literature. Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 70:272-288. [PMID: 30326423 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2018] [Revised: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/06/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The most common solid tumours that develop in children are cancers of the central nervous system. Due to the increased rate of survival over the past decades, greater focus has been placed on the minimisation of long term side effects. In childhood cancer survivors, over 60% report one or more radiation-related late toxicities while half of these adverse events are graded as life-threatening or severe. Proton therapy enables high conformity with the planning target volume and a reduction in dose to areas beyond the target. Owing to the unique nature of dose delivery with proton therapy a reduction of low doses to normal tissues is achievable, and is believed to allow for a decrease in long-term treatment-related side effects. This paper aims to review the published literature around the effectiveness of proton therapy for the treatment of paediatric cancers of the central nervous system, with a focus on treatment outcomes and treatment-related toxicities. METHODS A search strategy utilising the Medline database was created with the intent of including all articles reporting on proton therapy, paediatric cancers, CNS tumours and treatment outcomes. The final search strategy included the following limitations: limited to humans, English, published from 2000 onwards. The final article count total was 74. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Proton therapy for the treatment of paediatric cancers of the central nervous system was found to provide survival and tumour control outcomes comparable to photon therapy. Reduced incidence of severe acute and late toxicities was also reported with the use of proton therapy. This includes reduced severity of endocrine, neurological, IQ and QoL deficits. Currently, extensive follow-up of proton patient populations still needs to be made to determine incidences of late-onset toxicities and secondary malignancies. Current evidence surrounding proton therapy use in paediatric patients supports its effectiveness and potential benefits in reducing the incidence of severe toxicities in later life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myxuan Huynh
- Cancer Research Institute and School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Loredana Gabriela Marcu
- Cancer Research Institute and School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Faculty of Science, University of Oradea, Oradea 410087, Romania
| | - Eileen Giles
- Cancer Research Institute and School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Michala Short
- Cancer Research Institute and School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Donna Matthews
- Cancer Research Institute and School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute and School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; School of Physical Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Alvarez Moret J, Obermeier T, Pohl F, Loeschel R, Koelbl O, Dobler B. Second cancer risk after radiation therapy of ependymoma using the flattening filter free irradiation mode of a linear accelerator. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:632-639. [PMID: 30125453 PMCID: PMC6123158 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Revised: 06/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Pediatric patients suffering from ependymoma are usually treated with cranial or craniospinal three‐dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). Intensity‐modulated techniques spare dose to the surrounding tissue, but the risk for second malignancies may be increased due to the increase in low‐dose volume. The aim of this study is to investigate if the flattening filter free (FFF) mode allows reducing the risk for second malignancies compared to the mode with flattening filter (FF) for intensity‐modulated techniques and to 3DCRT. A reduction of the risk would be advantageous for treating pediatric ependymoma. 3DCRT was compared to intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with and without flattening filter. Dose–volume histograms (DVHs) were compared to evaluate the plan quality and used to calculate the excess absolute risk (EAR) to develop second cancer in the brain. Dose verification was performed with a two‐dimensional (2D) ionization chamber array and the out‐of‐field dose was measured with an ionization chamber to determine the EAR in peripheral organs. Delivery times were measured. Both VMAT and IMRT achieved similar plan quality in terms of dose sparing in the OAR and higher PTV coverage as compared to 3DCRT. Peripheral dose in low‐dose region, which is proportional to the EAR in organs located in this region, for example, gonads, bladder, or bowel, could be significantly reduced using FFF. The lowest peripheral EAR and lowest delivery times were hereby achieved with VMATFFF. The EAR calculated based on DVH in the brain could not be reduced using FFF mode. VMATFFF improved the target coverage and homogeneity and kept the dose in the OAR similar compared to 3DCRT. In addition, delivery times were significantly reduced using VMATFFF. Therefore, for radiotherapy of ependymoma patients, VMATFFF may be considered advantageous for the combination of Elekta Synergy linac and Oncentra External Beam planning system used in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judit Alvarez Moret
- Department of Radiotherapy, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Tina Obermeier
- Department of Radiotherapy, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Fabian Pohl
- Department of Radiotherapy, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Rainer Loeschel
- Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, University of Applied Sciences, OTH Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Koelbl
- Department of Radiotherapy, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Barbara Dobler
- Department of Radiotherapy, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Radiation-Induced Cerebral Microbleeds in Pediatric Patients With Brain Tumors Treated With Proton Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:1465-1471. [PMID: 30092336 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Revised: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton beam radiation therapy (PBT) has been increasingly used to treat pediatric brain tumors; however, limited information exists regarding radiation-induced cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) among these patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and imaging appearance of CMBs in pediatric patients with brain tumors treated with PBT. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study was performed of 100 pediatric patients with primary brain tumors treated with PBT. CMBs were diagnosed by examination of serial magnetic resonance imaging scans, including susceptibility-weighted imaging. Radiation therapy plans were analyzed to determine doses to individual CMBs. Clinical records were used to determine risk factors associated with the development of CMBs in these patients. RESULTS The mean age at time of PBT was 8.1 years. The median follow-up duration was 57 months. The median time to development of CMBs was 8 months (mean, 11 months; range, 3-28 months). The percentage of patients with CMBs was 43%, 66%, 80%, 81%, 83%, and 81% at 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, and >5 years from completion of proton radiation therapy. Most of the CMBs (87%) were found in areas of brain exposed to ≥30 Gy. Risk factors included maximum radiation therapy dose (P = .001), percentage and volume of brain exposed to ≥30 Gy (P = .0004, P = .0005), and patient age at time of PBT (P = .0004). Chemotherapy was not a significant risk factor (P = .35). No CMBs required surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS CMBs develop in a high percentage of pediatric patients with brain tumors treated with proton radiation therapy within the first few years after treatment. Significant risk factors for development of CMBs include younger age at time of PBT, higher maximum radiation therapy dose, and higher percentage and volume of brain exposed to ≥30 Gy. These findings demonstrate similarities with CMBs that develop in pediatric patients with brain tumor treated with photon radiation therapy.
Collapse
|
45
|
Cachia D, Johnson DR, Kaufmann TJ, Lowe S, Andersen S, Olar A, Cooper SL, Frankel BM, Gilbert MR. Case-based review: ependymomas in adults. Neurooncol Pract 2018; 5:142-153. [PMID: 31386035 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npy026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Ependymomas are rare primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors in adults. They occur most commonly in the spinal cord, and have classically been graded histologically into World Health Organization (WHO) grades I, II, or III based on the level of anaplasia. Recent data are showing that genetic heterogeneity occurs within the same histological subgroup and that ependymomas arising from different CNS locations have different molecular signatures. This has renewed interest in developing targeting therapies based on molecular profiles especially given the variable outcomes with radiation and the poor results with cytotoxic agents. In this paper, we present the case of a 46-year-old woman with a classic presentation of spinal cord ependymoma and discuss the current histopathological and molecular classification for ependymomas as well as current guidelines for patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cachia
- Department of Neuro-surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - Derek R Johnson
- Department of Neurology and Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Stephen Lowe
- Department of Neuro-surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - Samuel Andersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - Adriana Olar
- Department of Neuro-surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - Samuel Lewis Cooper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - Bruce M Frankel
- Department of Neuro-surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ladra MM, MacDonald SM, Terezakis SA. Proton therapy for central nervous system tumors in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65:e27046. [PMID: 29630784 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2017] [Revised: 01/29/2018] [Accepted: 01/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Proton therapy is a form of particle therapy with physical properties that provide a superior dose distribution compared to photons. The ability to spare healthy, developing tissues from low dose radiation with proton therapy is well known. The capability to decrease radiation exposure for children has been lauded as an important advance in pediatric cancer care, particularly for central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Favorable clinical outcomes have been reported and justify the increased cost and burden of this therapy. In this review, we summarize the current literature for proton therapy for pediatric CNS malignancies, with a focus on clinical outcomes to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew M Ladra
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephanie A Terezakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Proton therapy for pediatric malignancies: Fact, figures and costs. A joint consensus statement from the pediatric subcommittee of PTCOG, PROS and EPTN. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:44-55. [PMID: 29937209 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2018] [Revised: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy plays an important role in the management of childhood cancer, with the primary aim of achieving the highest likelihood of cure with the lowest risk of radiation-induced morbidity. Proton therapy (PT) provides an undisputable advantage by reducing the radiation 'bath' dose delivered to non-target structures/volume while optimally covering the tumor with tumoricidal dose. This treatment modality comes, however, with an additional costs compared to conventional radiotherapy that could put substantial financial pressure to the health care systems with societal implications. In this review we assess the data available to the oncology community of PT delivered to children with cancer, discuss on the urgency to develop high-quality data. Additionally, we look at the advantage of combining systemic agents with protons and look at the cost-effectiveness data published so far.
Collapse
|
48
|
Indelicato DJ, Bradley JA, Rotondo RL, Nanda RH, Logie N, Sandler ES, Aldana PR, Ranalli NJ, Beier AD, Morris CG, Mendenhall NP. Outcomes following proton therapy for pediatric ependymoma. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:644-648. [PMID: 29239262 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1413248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton therapy can reduce the low and intermediate radiation dose to uninvolved brain tissue in children with intracranial ependymomas, which may improve functional outcomes and reduce second malignancies in survivors. Accordingly, ependymoma has become the most common pediatric tumor treated with proton therapy, yet data on efficacy and toxicity are limited. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between June 2007 and February 2017, 179 children (≤21 years old) with nonmetastatic grade II/III intracranial ependymoma received proton therapy at our institution. Median age, 3.5 years (range, 0.7-21); 58% were male. Most (66%) tumors were in the posterior fossa and classified as WHO grade III (67%). 27% underwent multiple operations to maximize the extent of resection; ultimately 85% had a gross total or near total tumor resection before radiotherapy. 33% received preradiation chemotherapy. Median radiation dose in children ≤3 years old, 54 Gy(RBE). Most (>90%) children over 3 years old received 59.4 Gy(RBE). Patient and treatment variables were assessed for correlation with disease control. RESULTS Median follow-up, 3.2 years. 3-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 85%, 76%, and 90%, respectively. First site of progression was local, metastatic, or simultaneous in 14, 17 and 6 patients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, subtotal resection was associated with inferior local control (67% vs. 88%; p ≤ .01) and progression-free survival (59% vs. 79%; p < .05). Male sex was associated with inferior progression-free (67% vs. 87%; p< .05) and overall survival (84% vs. 99%; p < .01). The 3-year CTCAE grade 2 + brainstem toxicity rate was 5.5% (95% CI: 2.9-10.2), including 1 grade 5 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS This series of proton therapy for pediatric intracranial ependymoma demonstrates disease control comparable to photon series without unexpected toxicity. Subtotal resection and male sex were associated with inferior disease control. Additional follow-up to quantify the expected reductions in late toxicity with proton therapy is ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J. Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Julie A. Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Ronny L. Rotondo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Ronica H. Nanda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Natalie Logie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Eric S. Sandler
- Department of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Philipp R. Aldana
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Nathan J. Ranalli
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Alexandra D. Beier
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Christopher G. Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Nancy P. Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Gentile MS, Yeap BY, Paganetti H, Goebel CP, Gaudet DE, Gallotto SL, Weyman EA, Morgan ML, MacDonald SM, Giantsoudi D, Adams J, Tarbell NJ, Kooy H, Yock TI. Brainstem Injury in Pediatric Patients With Posterior Fossa Tumors Treated With Proton Beam Therapy and Associated Dosimetric Factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 100:719-729. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2017] [Revised: 10/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
50
|
Les big data , généralités et intégration en radiothérapie. Cancer Radiother 2018; 22:73-84. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2017] [Revised: 04/11/2017] [Accepted: 04/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|