1
|
Jiang D, Jin P, Xu H, Wang D, Xie C, Wang X, Zhou F, Liu H. Online adaptive radiotherapy in stereotactic body radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer patients. Sci Rep 2024; 14:22101. [PMID: 39333319 PMCID: PMC11436912 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-72831-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 09/11/2024] [Indexed: 09/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising treatment modality for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the dosimetric efficacy of online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) in comparison to image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) for pancreatic cancer. We conducted a retrospective analysis involving 8 patients diagnosed with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The gross tumor volume (GTV) delineates the visible extent of the tumor on imaging, while the planning tumor volume (PTV) was generated by expanding 5 mm from the GTV and ensuring a 3 mm distance from the small intestine, duodenum, and stomach simultaneously. Treatment planning was executed using the United Imaging Healthcare Treatment Planning System workstation. The control group underwent evaluation based on daily validated fan-beam CT (FBCT) scans, assessing both the dose delivered to actual organs at risk (OARs) and the target volume. Radiotherapy plans were developed utilizing simulation CT, and conventional radiotherapy with daily image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) was administered using FBCT-Linac. Conversely, patients in the study group received daily validated FBCT-guided adaptive radiotherapy plans, with a focus on mean dose assessment of both the target volume and OARs. Subsequently, we compared the average outcomes of each treatment fraction between IGRT and online adaptive radiotherapy (ART). Comparison between ART and IGRT treatment plans revealed significant differences in various dosimetric parameters: For PTV: V98%: ART (96.28%) vs IGRT (89.73%), p = 0.000, V95%: ART (96.28%) vs IGRT (89.73%), p = 0.031, V90%: ART (98.58%) vs IGRT (93.65%), p = 0.000, Dmean: ART (4912.91) vs IGRT (4804.11), p = 0.000. For GTV: V100%: ART (97.96%) vs IGRT (94.85%), p = 0.314, V98%: ART (100.00%) vs IGRT (96.83%), p = 0.000, V90%: ART (100.00%) vs IGRT (97.75%), p = 0.000, Dmean: ART (4972.17) vs IGRT (4907.23), p = 0.000. For the duodenum: D0.5cc: ART (2883.92) vs IGRT (3359.35), p = 0.000, D1cc: ART (2726.32) vs IGRT (3128.66), p = 0.001, D5cc: ART (2051.96) vs IGRT (2273.93), p = 0.015, D10cc: ART (1650.73) vs IGRT (1731.74), p = 0.211. For the small bowel: D0.5cc: ART (3022.3) vs IGRT (3142.64), p = 0.037. D5cc: ART (2151.09) vs IGRT (2389.15), p = 0.043, D10cc: ART (1775.20) vs IGRT (1942.00), p = 0.079. For the stomach: D0.5cc: ART (3353.92) vs IGRT (4117.85), p = 0.000, D5cc: ART (2860.20) vs IGRT (3235.41), p = 0.000, D10cc: ART (2553.72) vs IGRT (2836.73), p = 0.000. For the Dmean of the left kidney and right kidney: Left kidney: ART (248.28) vs IGRT (239.65), p = 0.100. Right kidney: ART (314.55) vs IGRT (307.17), p = 0.345. These results suggest significant improvements in PTV coverage and sparing of OARs with ART compared to IGRT, indicating the potential of ART in optimizing treatment outcomes for pancreatic cancer patients. Compared to conventional IGRT-guided SBRT programs, ART-based SBRT for pancreatic cancer not only enhances the dose distribution to the target volume but also mitigates the radiation exposure to critical organs-at-risk (OARs) such as the duodenum, small intestine, and stomach. This approach may offer a more favorable safety profile while concurrently enhancing treatment efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dazhen Jiang
- Radiotherapy Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China
| | - Peng Jin
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Hui Xu
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Dajiang Wang
- Radiotherapy Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China
| | - Conghua Xie
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Xiaoyong Wang
- Radiotherapy Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China
| | - Fuxiang Zhou
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.
| | - Hui Liu
- Radiotherapy Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brunner TB, Boda-Heggemann J, Bürgy D, Corradini S, Dieckmann UK, Gawish A, Gerum S, Gkika E, Grohmann M, Hörner-Rieber J, Kirste S, Klement RJ, Moustakis C, Nestle U, Niyazi M, Rühle A, Lang ST, Winkler P, Zurl B, Wittig-Sauerwein A, Blanck O. Dose prescription for stereotactic body radiotherapy: general and organ-specific consensus statement from the DEGRO/DGMP Working Group Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:737-750. [PMID: 38997440 PMCID: PMC11343978 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02254-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE To develop expert consensus statements on multiparametric dose prescriptions for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) aligning with ICRU report 91. These statements serve as a foundational step towards harmonizing current SBRT practices and refining dose prescription and documentation requirements for clinical trial designs. MATERIALS AND METHODS Based on the results of a literature review by the working group, a two-tier Delphi consensus process was conducted among 24 physicians and physics experts from three European countries. The degree of consensus was predefined for overarching (OA) and organ-specific (OS) statements (≥ 80%, 60-79%, < 60% for high, intermediate, and poor consensus, respectively). Post-first round statements were refined in a live discussion for the second round of the Delphi process. RESULTS Experts consented on a total of 14 OA and 17 OS statements regarding SBRT of primary and secondary lung, liver, pancreatic, adrenal, and kidney tumors regarding dose prescription, target coverage, and organ at risk dose limitations. Degree of consent was ≥ 80% in 79% and 41% of OA and OS statements, respectively, with higher consensus for lung compared to the upper abdomen. In round 2, the degree of consent was ≥ 80 to 100% for OA and 88% in OS statements. No consensus was reached for dose escalation to liver metastases after chemotherapy (47%) or single-fraction SBRT for kidney primaries (13%). In round 2, no statement had 60-79% consensus. CONCLUSION In 29 of 31 statements a high consensus was achieved after a two-tier Delphi process and one statement (kidney) was clearly refused. The Delphi process was able to achieve a high degree of consensus for SBRT dose prescription. In summary, clear recommendations for both OA and OS could be defined. This contributes significantly to harmonization of SBRT practice and facilitates dose prescription and reporting in clinical trials investigating SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas B Brunner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 32, 8036, Graz, Austria.
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Graz, 8036, Graz, Austria.
| | - Judit Boda-Heggemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medicine Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Daniel Bürgy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medicine Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ute Karin Dieckmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 32, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - Ahmed Gawish
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Sabine Gerum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Maximilian Grohmann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rainer J Klement
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Robert-Koch-Straße 10, 97422, Schweinfurt, Germany
| | - Christos Moustakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Stephanstraße 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Stephanstraße 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Stephanie-Tanadini Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Peter Winkler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 32, 8036, Graz, Austria
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Graz, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - Brigitte Zurl
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Graz, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Oliver Blanck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Weisz Ejlsmark M, Bahij R, Schytte T, Rønn Hansen C, Bertelsen A, Mahmood F, Bau Mortensen M, Detlefsen S, Weber B, Bernchou U, Pfeiffer P. Adaptive MRI-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer - A phase II study. Radiother Oncol 2024; 197:110347. [PMID: 38815694 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising new modality for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). The current study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of SBRT in patients with LAPC (NCT03648632). METHODS This prospective single institution phase II study recruited patients with histologically or cytologically proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreas after more than two months of combination chemotherapy with no sign of progressive disease. Patients were prescribed 50-60 Gy in 5-8 fractions. Patients were initially treated on a standard linac (n = 4). Since 2019, patients were treated using online magnetic resonance (MR) image-guidance on a 1.5 T MRI-linac, where the treatment plan was adapted to the anatomy of the day. The primary endpoint was resection rate. RESULTS Twenty-eight patients were enrolled between August 2018 and March 2022. All patients had non-resectable disease at time of diagnosis. Median follow-up from inclusion was 28.3 months (95 % CI 24.0-NR). Median progression-free and overall survival from inclusion were 7.8 months (95 % CI 5.0-14.8) and 16.5 months (95 % CI 10.7-22.6), respectively. Six patients experienced grade III treatment-related adverse events (jaundice, nausea, vomiting and/or constipation). One of the initial four patients receiving treatment on a standard linac experienced a grade IV perforation of the duodenum. Six patients (21 %) underwent resection. A further one patient was offered resection but declined. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that SBRT in patients with LAPC was associated with promising overall survival and resection rates. Furthermore, SBRT was safe and well tolerated, with limited severe toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde Weisz Ejlsmark
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Rana Bahij
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Tine Schytte
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Christian Rønn Hansen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Danish Centre of Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anders Bertelsen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Faisal Mahmood
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Michael Bau Mortensen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Sönke Detlefsen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Britta Weber
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Danish Centre of Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Uffe Bernchou
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Per Pfeiffer
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Namysl-Kaletka A, Wydmanski J, Debosz-Suwinska I, Kaszuba M, Gabrys D, Roch-Zniszczol A, Handkiewicz-Junak D. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Symptomatic Pancreatic Insulinoma: Two-Case Report and Literature Review. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:4123-4132. [PMID: 39057179 PMCID: PMC11275479 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31070307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2024] [Revised: 07/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Insulinoma is the most common functional neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas, with the main clinical symptom being hypoglycemia. The standard treatment is surgery, but some patients are not eligible for surgery, while in those operated on, the risk of perioperative complications is up to 30%. Diazoxide treatment to prevent hypoglycemia is effective only in 50% of patients. To prevent tumor growth and hormonal excess, stereotactic radiotherapy may be an alternative to surgical treatment. In our paper, we present two cases of patients with insulinoma treated successfully with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnieszka Namysl-Kaletka
- Radiotherapy Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
| | - Jerzy Wydmanski
- Radiotherapy Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
| | - Iwona Debosz-Suwinska
- Radiotherapy Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
| | - Malgorzata Kaszuba
- Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
| | - Dorota Gabrys
- Radiotherapy Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
| | - Agata Roch-Zniszczol
- Radiotherapy Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
| | - Daria Handkiewicz-Junak
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Neibart SS, Moningi S, Jethwa KR. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2024; 17:213-225. [PMID: 39050120 PMCID: PMC11268661 DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s341189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction For patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), who are candidates for radiation therapy, dose-escalated radiation therapy (RT) offers unique benefits over traditional radiation techniques. In this review, we present a historical perspective of dose-escalated RT for LAPC. We also outline advances in SBRT delivery, one form of dose escalation and a framework for selecting patients for treatment with SBRT. Results Techniques for delivering SBRT to patients with LAPC have evolved considerably, now allowing for dose-escalation and superior respiratory motion management. At the same time, advancements in systemic therapy, particularly the use of induction multiagent chemotherapy, have called into question which patients would benefit most from radiation therapy. Multidisciplinary assessment of patients with LAPC is critical to guide management and select patients for local therapy. Results from ongoing trials will establish if there is a role of dose-escalated SBRT after induction chemotherapy for carefully selected patients. Conclusion Patients with LAPC have more therapeutic options than ever before. Careful selection for SBRT may enhance patient outcomes, pending the maturation of pivotal clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shane S Neibart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shalini Moningi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Miller SR, Chang DT. Local-Regional Therapy for Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cancer J 2024; 30:272-279. [PMID: 39042779 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the United States as well as a leading cause of cancer-related death. Upward of 30% of patients ultimately develop metastatic disease, most commonly to the liver and lung. Untreated, patients have poor survival. Historically, patients with oligometastatic disease were treated with resection leading to long-term survival; however, there are many patients who are not surgical candidates. Innovations in thermal ablation, hepatic artery infusions, chemoembolization and radioembolization, and stereotactic ablative radiation have led to an expansion of patients eligible for local therapy. This review examines the evidence behind each modality for the most common locations of oligometastatic colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean R Miller
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shouman MA, Fuchs F, Walter F, Corradini S, Westphalen CB, Vornhülz M, Beyer G, Andrade D, Belka C, Niyazi M, Rogowski P. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer - A systematic review of prospective data. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100738. [PMID: 38370495 PMCID: PMC10873666 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose This systematic review aims to comprehensively summarize the current prospective evidence regarding Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in various clinical contexts for pancreatic cancer including its use as neoadjuvant therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC), induction therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), salvage therapy for isolated local recurrence (ILR), adjuvant therapy after radical resection, and as a palliative treatment. Special attention is given to the application of magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT). Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the Medline database via PubMed was conducted focusing on prospective studies published within the past decade. Data were extracted concerning study characteristics, outcome measures, toxicity profiles, SBRT dosage and fractionation regimens, as well as additional systemic therapies. Results and conclusion 31 studies with in total 1,571 patients were included in this review encompassing 14 studies for LAPC, 9 for neoadjuvant treatment, 2 for adjuvant treatment, 2 for ILR, with an additional 4 studies evaluating MRgRT. In LAPC, SBRT demonstrates encouraging results, characterized by favorable local control rates. Several studies even report conversion to resectable disease with substantial resection rates reaching 39%. The adoption of MRgRT may provide a solution to the challenge to deliver ablative doses while minimizing severe toxicities. In BRPC, select prospective studies combining preoperative ablative-dose SBRT with modern induction systemic therapies have achieved remarkable resection rates of up to 80%. MRgRT also holds potential in this context. Adjuvant SBRT does not appear to confer relevant advantages over chemotherapy. While prospective data for SBRT in ILR and for palliative pain relief are limited, they corroborate positive findings from retrospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed A Shouman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Frederik Fuchs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska Walter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - C Benedikt Westphalen
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Marlies Vornhülz
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Georg Beyer
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Dorian Andrade
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, Germany
| | - Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de la Pinta C. Stereotactic body radiotherapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2024; 23:14-19. [PMID: 36990839 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2023.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in pancreatic cancer allows high delivery of radiation doses on tumors without affecting surrounding tissue. This review aimed at the SBRT application in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. DATA SOURCES We retrieved articles published in MEDLINE/PubMed from January 2017 to December 2022. Keywords used in the search included: "pancreatic adenocarcinoma" OR "pancreatic cancer" AND "stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)" OR "stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)" OR "chemoradiotherapy (CRT)". English language articles with information on technical characteristics, doses and fractionation, indications, recurrence patterns, local control and toxicities of SBRT in pancreatic tumors were included. All articles were assessed for validity and relevant content. RESULTS Optimal doses and fractionation have not yet been defined. However, SBRT could be the standard treatment in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma in addition to CRT. Furthermore, the combination of SBRT with chemotherapy may have additive or synergic effect on pancreatic adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS SBRT is an effective modality for patients with pancreatic cancer, supported by clinical practice guidelines as it has demonstrated good tolerance and good disease control. SBRT opens a possibility of improving outcomes for these patients, both in neoadjuvant treatment and with radical intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina de la Pinta
- Radiation Oncology Department, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, Alcalá University, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van ‘t Land FR, Aziz MH, Michiels N, Mieog JSD, Bonsing BA, Luelmo SA, Homs MY, Groot Koerkamp B, Papageorgiou G, van Eijck CH. Increasing Systemic Immune-inflammation Index During Treatment in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer is Associated With Poor Survival: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study. Ann Surg 2023; 278:1018-1023. [PMID: 37010512 PMCID: PMC10631500 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES A high systemic immune-inflammation index (SIII) at diagnosis of various cancers, including pancreatic cancer, is associated with poor prognosis. The impact of FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy on this index is unknown. In addition, the prognostic value of changes in the SIII during treatment is unclear. In this retrospective analysis, we aimed to find answers regarding patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy alone or with FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy followed by stereotactic body radiotherapy between 2015 and 2021 in 2 tertiary referral centers were included. Baseline characteristics, laboratory values at 3 time points during treatment, and survival outcomes were collected. The patient-specific evolutions of SIII and their association with mortality were assessed with joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data. RESULTS Data of 141 patients were analyzed. At a median follow-up time of 23.0 months (95% CI: 14.6-31.3), 97 (69%) patients had died. Median overall survival was 13.2 months (95% CI: 11.0-15.5). During treatment with FOLFIRINOX, the log (SIII) was reduced by -0.588 (95% CI: -0.0978, -0.197; P = 0.003). One unit increase in log (SIII) increased the hazard ratio of dying by 1.604 (95% CI: 1.068-2.409; P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS In addition to carbohydrate antigen 19-9, the SIII is a reliable biomarker in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mohammad H. Aziz
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nynke Michiels
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - J. Sven D. Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Bert A. Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Saskia A.C. Luelmo
- Department of Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Y.V. Homs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Grigorios Papageorgiou
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
SHIRATO H. Biomedical advances and future prospects of high-precision three-dimensional radiotherapy and four-dimensional radiotherapy. PROCEEDINGS OF THE JAPAN ACADEMY. SERIES B, PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES 2023; 99:389-426. [PMID: 37821390 PMCID: PMC10749389 DOI: 10.2183/pjab.99.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
Biomedical advances of external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with improvements in physical accuracy are reviewed. High-precision (±1 mm) three-dimensional radiotherapy (3DRT) can utilize respective therapeutic open doors in the tumor control probability curve and in the normal tissue complication probability curve instead of the one single therapeutic window in two-dimensional EBRT. High-precision 3DRT achieved higher tumor control and probable survival rates for patients with small peripheral lung and liver cancers. Four-dimensional radiotherapy (4DRT), which can reduce uncertainties in 3DRT due to organ motion by real-time (every 0.1-1 s) tumor-tracking and immediate (0.1-1 s) irradiation, have achieved reduced adverse effects for prostate and pancreatic tumors near the digestive tract and with similar or better tumor control. Particle beam therapy improved tumor control and probable survival for patients with large liver tumors. The clinical outcomes of locally advanced or multiple tumors located near serial-type organs can theoretically be improved further by integrating the 4DRT concept with particle beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki SHIRATO
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fogaroli RC, Castro DG, Silva ML, Pellizzon ACA, Gondim GR, Chen MJ, Ramos H, Neto ES, Abrahão CH. Involved-Field Radiation Therapy for Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas: Failure Pattern Analysis. Cureus 2023; 15:e48106. [PMID: 37920425 PMCID: PMC10619996 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Unresectable pancreatic tumors are frequently diagnosed. Initial treatment is carried out with chemotherapy. Eventually, in selected cases, radiotherapy may be used to improve local control rates and relieve the symptoms. The volume of radiotherapy treatment fields is the subject of controversy in the literature. The use of involved fields with the gross tumor volume encompassing the primary tumor and lymph nodes considered clinically positive is associated with a lower rate of side effects, but can lead to a higher rate of regional loco failures, especially in regional lymph nodes. The purpose of this article is to analyze the failure pattern of chemotherapy and involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) for treating patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Methods Clinical records of thirty consecutive patients treated from March 2016 to June 2020 for unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma were analyzed. The patients were treated with initial systemic chemotherapy (median: 6 cycles) with regimens based on gemcitabine or oxaliplatin-irinotecan (folfirinox/folfox) followed by radiotherapy (total dose of 50-54 Gy/with fractionation of 2 Gy/day). The patients were treated with IFRT. Local failure (LF) was defined as an increase in radiographic abnormality within the planning target volume (PTV). Elective nodal failure (ENF) was defined as recurrence in any lymph node region outside the PTV. Any other failure was defined as distant failure (DF). Results The median age of the patients was 68 years (range: 44-80 years); 20 patients (66.7%) were men, and 11 (36.6%) and 19 (63.4%) patients presented with tumors of stage II and III, respectively. Most patients (63.3%) had tumors in the pancreatic head. The median survival was 17.2 months. Tumor recurrences were classified as LF, DF, LF and DF in 7 (23.3%), 17 (56.7%), and 5 (16.7%) patients, respectively. Only one patient (3.3%) had both LF and ENF. No severe side effects related to radiotherapy were reported. Conclusion The use of IFRT did not cause a significant amount of ENF, besides presenting low morbidity, which is of special importance for patients with locally advanced tumors or low performance status. The predominant failure pattern was distant metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Maria L Silva
- Radiation Oncology, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, BRA
| | | | | | - Michael J Chen
- Radiation Oncology, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, BRA
| | | | - Elson S Neto
- Radiotherapy, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, BRA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Teoh S, Ooms A, George B, Owens R, Chu KY, Drabble J, Robinson M, Parkes MJ, Swan L, Griffiths L, Nugent K, Good J, Maughan T, Mukherjee S. Evaluation of hypofractionated adaptive radiotherapy using the MR Linac in localised pancreatic cancer: protocol summary of the Emerald-Pancreas phase 1/expansion study located at Oxford University Hospital, UK. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e068906. [PMID: 37709321 PMCID: PMC10503372 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy allows for dose escalation to pancreatic cancer while sparing surrounding critical organs. We seek to evaluate the safety of delivering hypofractionated five-fraction, three-fraction and single-fraction MR-guided stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to the pancreas. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a single-centre three-arm phase 1 non-randomised safety study. Patients with localised pancreatic cancer will receive either 50 Gy in five (biological equivalent dose (BED10)=100 Gy), 39 Gy in three (BED10=90 Gy) or 25 Gy in a single fraction (BED10=87.5 Gy) MR-guided daily online adaptive radiotherapy. Each fractionation regimen will be assessed as independent cohorts to determine tolerability, assessed continuously using Bayesian conjugate posterior beta distributions. The primary endpoint of the study is to establish the safety of five-fraction, three-fraction and single-fraction MR-guided hypofractionation SABR in localised pancreatic cancer by assessing dose-limiting toxicities. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, progression-free survival, local control rates, overall control rate, resection rates, long-term toxicities and freedom from second-line chemotherapy. This study plans to also explore imaging and immune biomarkers that may be useful to predict outcome and personalise treatment. The trial will recruit up to 60 patients with a safety run-in. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial is approved by the West Midlands-Black Country Research Ethics Committee 22/WM/0122. The results will be disseminated via conference presentations, peer-reviewed scientific journals and submission to regulatory authorities. The data collected for the study, including individual participant data, will be made available to researchers on request to the study team and with appropriate reason, via octo-enquiries@oncology.ox.ac.uk. The shared data will be deidentified participant data and will be available for 3 years following publication of the study. Data will be shared with investigator support, after approval of a proposal and with a signed data access agreement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN10557832.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suliana Teoh
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Alexander Ooms
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Disorders, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ben George
- Department of Stereotactic and MR-guided Radiotherapy, GenesisCare UK, Oxford, UK
| | - Rob Owens
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Department of Stereotactic and MR-guided Radiotherapy, GenesisCare UK, Oxford, UK
| | - Kwun-Ye Chu
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Joe Drabble
- Department of Stereotactic and MR-guided Radiotherapy, GenesisCare UK, Oxford, UK
| | - Maxwell Robinson
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Matthew J Parkes
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit (OCTRU), Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Lynda Swan
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Killian Nugent
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Department of Stereotactic and MR-guided Radiotherapy, GenesisCare UK, Oxford, UK
| | - James Good
- Department of Stereotactic and MR-guided Radiotherapy, GenesisCare UK, Oxford, UK
| | - Tim Maughan
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Somnath Mukherjee
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Reyngold M, Karam SD, Hajj C, Wu AJ, Cuaron J, Lobaugh S, Yorke ED, Dickinson S, Jones B, Vinogradskiy Y, Shukla-Dave A, Do RKG, Sigel C, Zhang Z, Crane CH, Goodman KA. Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study of SBRT Using 3 Fractions for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:53-63. [PMID: 36918130 PMCID: PMC11229378 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.03.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The optimal dose and fractionation of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) have not been defined. Single-fraction SBRT was associated with more gastrointestinal toxicity, so 5-fraction regimens have become more commonly employed. We aimed to determine the safety and maximally tolerated dose of 3-fraction SBRT for LAPC. METHODS AND MATERIALS Two parallel phase 1 dose escalation trials were conducted from 2016 to 2019 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and University of Colorado. Patients with histologically confirmed LAPC without distant progression after at least 2 months of induction chemotherapy were eligible. Patients received 3-fraction linear accelerator-based SBRT at 3 dose levels, 27, 30, and 33 Gy, following a modified 3+3 design. Dose-limiting toxicity, defined as grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity within 90 days, was scored by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4. The secondary endpoints included cumulative incidence of local failure (LF) and distant metastasis (DM), as well as progression-free and overall survival PFS and OS, respectively, toxicity, and quality of life (QoL) using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the pancreatic cancer-specific QLQ-PAN26 questionnaire. RESULTS Twenty-four consecutive patients were enrolled (27 Gy: 9, 30 Gy: 8, 33 Gy: 7). The median (range) age was 67 (52-79) years, and 12 (50%) had a head/uncinate tumor location, with a median tumor size of 3.8 (1.1-11) cm and CA19-9 of 60 (1-4880) U/mL. All received chemotherapy for a median of 4 (1.4-10) months. There were no grade ≥3 toxicities. Two-year rates (95% confidence interval) of LF, DM, PFS, and OS were 31.7% (8.6%-54.8%), 70.2% (49.7%-90.8%), 20.8% (4.6%-37.1%), and 29.2% (11.0%-47.4%), respectively. Three- and 6-month QoL assessment showed no detriment. CONCLUSIONS For select patients with LAPC, dose escalation to 33 Gy in 3 fractions resulted in no dose-limiting toxicities, no detriments to QoL, and disease outcomes comparable with conventional RT. Further exploration of SBRT schemes to maximize tumor control while enabling efficient integration with systemic therapy is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marsha Reyngold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| | - Sana D Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Carla Hajj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Abraham J Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - John Cuaron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Stephanie Lobaugh
- Department of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ellen D Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Shannan Dickinson
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bernard Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Yevgeniy Vinogradskiy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Richard Kinh Gian Do
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Carlie Sigel
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Christopher H Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Comito T, Massaro M, Teriaca MA, Franzese C, Franceschini D, Navarria P, Clerici E, Di Cristina L, Bertolini A, Tomatis S, Reggiori G, Bresolin A, Bozzarelli S, Rimassa L, Bonifacio C, Carrara S, Santoro A, Zerbi A, Scorsetti M. Can STEreotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Improve the Prognosis of Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer? Long-Term Clinical Outcomes, Toxicity and Prognostic Factors on 142 Patients (STEP Study). Curr Oncol 2023; 30:7073-7088. [PMID: 37504373 PMCID: PMC10378012 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM The gold standard of care for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the integrated treatment of surgery and chemotherapy (ChT), but about 50% of patients present with unresectable disease. Our study evaluated the efficacy in terms of local control, survival and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS A retrospective study (STEP study) analyzed patients with LAPC treated with a dose of 45 Gy in 6 fractions. Local control (LC), distant progression free survival (DPFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity were analyzed according to the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS A total of 142 patients were evaluated. Seventy-six patients (53.5%) received induction ChT before SBRT. The median follow-up was 11 months. One-, 2- and 3-year LC rate was 81.9%, 69.1% and 58.5%. Median DPFS was 6.03 months; 1- and 2-year DPFS rate was 19.9% and 4.5%. Median OS was 11.6 months and 1-, 2- and 3-year OS rates were 45.4%, 16.1%, and 9.8%. At univariate analysis, performed by the log-rank test, age < 70 years (p = 0.037), pre-SBRT ChT (p = 0.004) and post-SBRT ChT (p = 0.019) were associated with better OS. No patients experienced G3 toxicity. CONCLUSION SBRT represents an effective and safe therapeutic option in the multimodal treatment of patients with LAPC in terms of increased LC. When SBRT was sequentially integrated with ChT, the treatment proved to be promising in terms of OS as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiziana Comito
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Massaro
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Ausilia Teriaca
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Franceschini
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Clerici
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Luciana Di Cristina
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Bertolini
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Tomatis
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Reggiori
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Bresolin
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Bozzarelli
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenza Rimassa
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Milan, Italy
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Cristiana Bonifacio
- Department of Radiology, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Santoro
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Milan, Italy
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Milan, Italy
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ejlsmark MW, Schytte T, Bernchou U, Bahij R, Weber B, Mortensen MB, Pfeiffer P. Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma-A Critical Review of Randomised Trials. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:6820-6837. [PMID: 37504359 PMCID: PMC10378124 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is rising as one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Patients often present with advanced disease, limiting curative treatment options and therefore making management of the disease difficult. Systemic chemotherapy has been an established part of the standard treatment in patients with both locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. In contrast, the use of radiotherapy has no clear defined role in the treatment of these patients. With the evolving imaging and radiation techniques, radiation could become a plausible intervention. In this review, we give an overview over the available data regarding radiotherapy, chemoradiation, and stereotactic body radiation therapy. We performed a systematic search of Embase and the PubMed database, focusing on studies involving locally advanced pancreatic cancer (or non-resectable pancreatic cancer) and radiotherapy without any limitation for the time of publication. We included randomised controlled trials involving patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, including radiotherapy, chemoradiation, or stereotactic body radiation therapy. The included articles represented mainly small patient groups and had a high heterogeneity regarding radiation delivery and modality. This review presents conflicting results concerning the addition of radiation and modality in the treatment regimen. Further research is needed to improve outcomes and define the role of radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde Weisz Ejlsmark
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Tine Schytte
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Uffe Bernchou
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Rana Bahij
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Britta Weber
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
- Danish Centre of Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Michael Bau Mortensen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Per Pfeiffer
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Arcelli A, Tarantino G, Cellini F, Buwenge M, Macchia G, Bertini F, Guido A, Deodato F, Cilla S, Scotti V, Rosetto ME, Djan I, Parisi S, Mattiucci GC, Fiore M, Bonomo P, Belgioia L, Niespolo RM, Gabriele P, Di Marco M, Simoni N, Ma J, Strigari L, Mazzarotto R, Morganti AG. Comparative Effectiveness of Chemotherapy Alone Versus Radiotherapy-Based Regimens in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Analysis (PAULA-1). Curr Oncol 2023; 30:5690-5703. [PMID: 37366910 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30060427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Different options for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) are available based on international guidelines: chemotherapy (CHT), chemoradiation (CRT), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). However, the role of radiotherapy is debated in LAPC. We retrospectively compared CHT, CRT, and SBRT ± CHT in a real-world setting in terms of overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). LAPC patients from a multicentric retrospective database were included (2005-2018). Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox analysis was performed to identify predictors of LC, OS, and DMFS. Of the 419 patients included, 71.1% were treated with CRT, 15.5% with CHT, and 13.4% with SBRT. Multivariable analysis showed higher LC rates for CRT (HR: 0.56, 95%CI 0.34-0.92, p = 0.022) or SBRT (HR: 0.27, 95%CI 0.13-0.54, p < 0.001), compared to CHT. CRT (HR: 0.44, 95%CI 0.28-0.70, p < 0.001) and SBRT (HR: 0.40, 95%CI 0.22-0.74, p = 0.003) were predictors of prolonged OS with respect to CHT. No significant differences were recorded in terms of DMFS. In selected patients, the addition of radiotherapy to CHT is still an option to be considered. In patients referred for radiotherapy, CRT can be replaced by SBRT considering its duration, higher LC rate, and OS rate, which are at least comparable to that of CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Arcelli
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tarantino
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Francesco Cellini
- Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Federica Bertini
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
| | - Alessandra Guido
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | | | | | - Igor Djan
- Institute of Oncology Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Medical Faculty, University of Novi Sad, 21204 Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Salvatore Parisi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Gian Carlo Mattiucci
- Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy
| | - Michele Fiore
- Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
- Operative Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Bonomo
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Liliana Belgioia
- Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy
- Health Science Departmente (DISSAL), University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, Italy
| | - Rita Marina Niespolo
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Pietro Gabriele
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia (FPO), IRCCS Candiolo, 10060 Candiolo, Italy
| | - Mariacristina Di Marco
- Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Nicola Simoni
- Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Johnny Ma
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Lidia Strigari
- Department of Medical Physics, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wu TC, Yoon SM, Cao M, Raldow AC, Xiang M. Identifying predictors of on-table adaptation for pancreas stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 40:100603. [PMID: 36896266 PMCID: PMC9989520 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To identify any clinical or dosimetric parameters that predict which individuals may benefit from on-table adaptation during pancreas stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with MRI-guided radiotherapy. Methods and materials This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing MRI-guided SBRT from 2016 to 2022. Pre-treatment clinical variables and dosimetric parameters on the patient's simulation scan were recorded for each SBRT course, and their ability to predict for on-table adaptation was analyzed using ordinal logistic regression. The outcome measure was number of fractions adapted. Results Sixty-three SBRT courses consisting of 315 fractions were analyzed. Median prescription dose was 40 Gy in five fractions (range, 33-50 Gy); 52% and 48% of courses were prescribed ≤40 Gy and >40 Gy, respectively. The median minimum dose delivered to 95% (D95) of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and planning target volume (PTV) was 40.1 Gy and 37.0 Gy, respectively. Median number of fractions adapted per course was three, with 58% (183 out of 315) total fractions adapted. On univariable analysis, the prescription dose (>40 Gy vs ≤40 Gy), GTV volume, stomach V20 and V25, duodenum V20 and dose maximum, large bowel V33 and V35, GTV dose minimum, PTV dose minimum, and gradient index were significant determinants for adaptation (all p < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, only the prescription dose was significant (adjusted odds ratio 19.7, p = 0.005), but did not remain significant after multiple test correction (p = 0.08). Conclusions The likelihood of needing on-table adaptation could not be reliably predicted a priori using pre-treatment clinical characteristics, dosimetry to nearby organs at risk, or other dosimetric parameters based on the patient's anatomy at the time of simulation, suggesting the critical importance of day-to-day variations in anatomy and increasing access to adaptive technology for pancreas SBRT. A higher (ablative) prescription dose was associated with increased use of adaptation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trudy C. Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Stephanie M. Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ann C. Raldow
- Corresponding authors at: 200 Medical Plaza Driveway, Suite #B265, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA (M. Xiang).
| | - Michael Xiang
- Corresponding authors at: 200 Medical Plaza Driveway, Suite #B265, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA (M. Xiang).
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hurmuz P, Cengiz M, Ozyigit G, Yuce Sari S, Kahvecioglu A, Beduk Esen CS, Yalcin S, Zorlu F. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy as an Effective Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer. Cureus 2023; 15:e38255. [PMID: 37252548 PMCID: PMC10225161 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) allows the delivery of an ablative radiation dose to the tumor with minimal toxicity. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided SBRT appears to be a promising approach in the modern era, X-ray image-guided SBRT is still used worldwide for pancreatic cancer. This study aims to evaluate the results of X-ray image-guided SBRT in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methodology Medical records of 24 patients with unresectable LAPC who underwent X-ray image-guided SBRT between 2009 and 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was utilized for all analyses. Results The median age was 64 years (range = 42-81 years), and the median tumor size was 3.5 cm (range = 2.7-4 cm). The median total dose of SBRT was 35 Gy (range = 33-50 Gy) in five fractions. After SBRT, 30% of patients showed complete and 41% showed partial response, whereas 20% had stable disease and 9% had progression. Median follow-up was 15 months (range = 6-58 months). During follow-up, four (16%) patients had local recurrence, one (4%) had a regional recurrence, and 17 (70%) had distant metastasis (DM). The two-year local control (LC), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), overall survival (OS), and DM-free survival (DMFS) rate was 87%, 36%, 37%, and 29%, respectively. In univariate analysis, a larger tumor size (>3.5 cm) and higher cancer antigen 19-9 level (>106.5 kU/L) significantly decreased the OS, LRFS, and DMFS rates. No severe acute toxicity was observed. However, two patients had severe late toxicity as intestinal bleeding. Conclusions X-ray image-guided SBRT provides a good LC rate with minimal toxicity for unresectable LAPC. However, despite modern systemic treatments, the rate of DM remains high which plays a major role in survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pervin Hurmuz
- Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, TUR
| | - Mustafa Cengiz
- Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, TUR
| | - Gokhan Ozyigit
- Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, TUR
| | - Sezin Yuce Sari
- Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, TUR
| | - Alper Kahvecioglu
- Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, TUR
| | | | - Suayib Yalcin
- Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, TUR
| | - Faruk Zorlu
- Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, TUR
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bryant JM, Weygand J, Keit E, Cruz-Chamorro R, Sandoval ML, Oraiqat IM, Andreozzi J, Redler G, Latifi K, Feygelman V, Rosenberg SA. Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance-Guided Adaptive and Non-Adaptive Radiotherapy on Combination MR-Linear Accelerators: Current Practice and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2081. [PMID: 37046741 PMCID: PMC10093051 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective radiation therapy technique that has allowed for shorter treatment courses, as compared to conventionally dosed radiation therapy. As its name implies, SBRT relies on daily image guidance to ensure that each fraction targets a tumor, instead of healthy tissue. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers improved soft-tissue visualization, allowing for better tumor and normal tissue delineation. MR-guided RT (MRgRT) has traditionally been defined by the use of offline MRI to aid in defining the RT volumes during the initial planning stages in order to ensure accurate tumor targeting while sparing critical normal tissues. However, the ViewRay MRIdian and Elekta Unity have improved upon and revolutionized the MRgRT by creating a combined MRI and linear accelerator (MRL), allowing MRgRT to incorporate online MRI in RT. MRL-based MR-guided SBRT (MRgSBRT) represents a novel solution to deliver higher doses to larger volumes of gross disease, regardless of the proximity of at-risk organs due to the (1) superior soft-tissue visualization for patient positioning, (2) real-time continuous intrafraction assessment of internal structures, and (3) daily online adaptive replanning. Stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) has enabled the safe delivery of ablative doses to tumors adjacent to radiosensitive tissues throughout the body. Although it is still a relatively new RT technique, SMART has demonstrated significant opportunities to improve disease control and reduce toxicity. In this review, we included the current clinical applications and the active prospective trials related to SMART. We highlighted the most impactful clinical studies at various tumor sites. In addition, we explored how MRL-based multiparametric MRI could potentially synergize with SMART to significantly change the current treatment paradigm and to improve personalized cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Stephen A. Rosenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (J.M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy combined with intradermal heat-killed mycobacterium obuense (IMM-101) vaccination for non-progressive locally advanced pancreatic cancer, after induction chemotherapy with (modified)FOLFIRINOX - The LAPC-2 trial. Radiother Oncol 2023; 183:109541. [PMID: 36813171 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In this phase I/II trial, non-progressive locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients after (modified)FOLFIRINOX therapy were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) combined with heat-killed mycobacterium (IMM-101) vaccinations. We aimed to assess safety, feasibility, and efficacy of this treatment approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS On five consecutive days, patients received a total of 40 Gray (Gy) of SBRT with a dose of 8 Gy per fraction. Starting two weeks prior to SBRT, they in addition received six bi-weekly intradermal vaccinations with one milligram of IMM-101. The primary outcomes were the number of grade 4 or higher adverse events and the one-year progression free-survival (PFS) rate. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were included and started study treatment. Median follow-up was 28.4 months (95 %CI 24.3 - 32.6). We observed one grade 5, no grade 4 and thirteen grade 3 adverse events, none related to IMM-101. The one-year PFS rate was 47 %, the median PFS was 11.7 months (95 %CI 11.0 - 12.5) and the median overall survival was 19.0 months (95 %CI 16.2 - 21.9). Eight (21 %) tumors were resected, of which 6 (75 %) were R0 resections. Outcomes were comparable with the outcomes of the patients from the previous LAPC-1 trial, in which LAPC patients were treated with SBRT, without IMM-101. CONCLUSION Combination treatment with IMM-101 and SBRT was safe and feasible for non-progressive locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients after (modified)FOLFIRINOX. No improvement in the progression-free survival could be demonstrated by adding IMM-101 to SBRT.
Collapse
|
21
|
Kim H, Olsen JR, Green OL, Chin RI, Hawkins WG, Fields RC, Hammill C, Doyle MB, Chapman W, Suresh R, Tan B, Pedersen K, Jansen B, DeWees TA, Lu E, Henke LE, Badiyan S, Parikh PJ, Roach MC, Wang-Gillam A, Lim KH. MR-Guided Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel Chemotherapy in Inoperable Pancreatic Cancer: A TITE-CRM Phase I Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:214-223. [PMID: 35878713 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ablative radiation therapy for borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR/LA-PDAC) may limit concurrent chemotherapy dosing and usually is only safely deliverable to tumors distant from gastrointestinal organs. Magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy may safely permit radiation and chemotherapy dose escalation. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a single-arm phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of ablative hypofractionated radiation with full-dose gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in patients with BR/LA-PDAC. Patients were treated with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (1000/125 mg/m2) x 1c then concurrent gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel and radiation. Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel and radiation doses were escalated per time-to-event continual reassessment method from 40 to 45 Gy 25 fxs with chemotherapy (600-800/75 mg/m2) to 60 to 67.5 Gy/15 fractions and concurrent gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (1000/100 mg/m2). The primary endpoint was maximum tolerated dose of radiation as defined by 60-day dose limiting toxicity (DLT). DLT was treatment-related G5, G4 hematologic, or G3 gastrointestinal requiring hospitalization >3 days. Secondary endpoints included resection rates, local progression free survival (LPFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Thirty patients enrolled (March 2015-February 2019), with 26 evaluable patients (2 progressed before radiation, 1 was determined ineligible for radiation during planning, 1 withdrew consent). One DLT was observed. The DLT rate was 14.1% (3.3%-24.9%) with a maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (1000/100 mg/m2) and 67.5 Gy/15 fractions. At a median follow-up of 40.6 months for living patients the median OS was 14.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.9-28.2 months). The median OS for patients with Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group 0 and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 <90 were 34.1 (95% CI, 13.6-54.1) and 43.0 (95% CI, 8.0-not reached) months, respectively. Two-year LPFS and DMFS were 85% (95% CI, 63%-94%) and 57% (95% CI, 34%-73%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Full-dose gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel with ablative magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy dosing is safe in patients with BR/LA-PDAC, with promising LPFS and DMFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Kim
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri.
| | - Jeffrey R Olsen
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Denver, Colorado
| | - Olga L Green
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Re-I Chin
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - William G Hawkins
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Section of Pancreatic, Hepatobiliary and Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ryan C Fields
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Section of Pancreatic, Hepatobiliary and Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Chet Hammill
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Section of Pancreatic, Hepatobiliary and Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Majella B Doyle
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Section of Pancreatic, Hepatobiliary and Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - William Chapman
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Section of Pancreatic, Hepatobiliary and Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Rama Suresh
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Section of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Benjamin Tan
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Section of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Katrina Pedersen
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Section of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Brandi Jansen
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Esther Lu
- Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Lauren E Henke
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Shahed Badiyan
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Parag J Parikh
- Henry Ford Health System, Department of Radiation Oncology, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Michael C Roach
- Hawai'i Pacific Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Andrea Wang-Gillam
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Section of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kian-Huat Lim
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Section of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Stereotactic ablative radiation for pancreatic cancer on a 1.5 Telsa magnetic resonance-linac system. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 24:88-94. [PMID: 36386447 PMCID: PMC9640311 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Ablative radiation therapy (A-RT) appears to improve outcomes in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) yet requires solutions for respiratory and digestive motion. We report outcomes of A-RT for pancreatic cancer using 1.5 T MR-adaptive treatment delivery. Methods Between March 2020 and July 2021, we treated 30 patients with pancreatic cancer with 50 Gy in 5 fractions (biologically effective dose [BED10] = 100 Gy10) using a novel compression belt workflow and remote planning on the Unity 1.5 T MR linac system. Cumulative incidence of progression was computed from A-RT initiation with death as a competing risk. Overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan Meier methods. Results Of 30 patients, most (73 %) were locally advanced, 4 (13 %) were metastatic, 2 (7 %) were medically inoperable, and 2 (7 %) were locally recurrent. Most (73 %) received FOLFIRINOX prior to A-RT. Median follow-up times from diagnosis and A-RT were 17.6 (IQR 15.8-23.1) and 11.5 months (IQR 9.7-16.1), respectively. Cumulative incidences at 1-year of local and distant progression were 19.3 % (95 %CI 6.7-36.8 %) and 47.4 % (95 %CI 26.7-65.6 %), respectively. Median OS from diagnosis and A-RT were not reached. One-year OS from diagnosis and A-RT were 96.4 % (95 %CI 77.2-99.5 %) and 80.0 % (95 %CI 57.3-91.4 %), respectively. Median and 1-year PFS were 10.1 months (95 %CI 4.4-14.4) and 39.7 % (95 %CI 20.3-58.5 %), respectively. No grade 3 + toxicities were observed. Conclusions A-RT using the 1.5 T Unity MR Linac resulted in promising LC and OS with no severe toxicity in patients with LAPC despite radiosensitive organs adjacent to the target volumes. Longer follow-up is needed to assess long-term outcomes.
Collapse
|
23
|
Schaal JL, Bhattacharyya J, Brownstein J, Strickland KC, Kelly G, Saha S, Milligan J, Banskota S, Li X, Liu W, Kirsch DG, Zalutsky MR, Chilkoti A. Brachytherapy via a depot of biopolymer-bound 131I synergizes with nanoparticle paclitaxel in therapy-resistant pancreatic tumours. Nat Biomed Eng 2022; 6:1148-1166. [PMID: 36261625 PMCID: PMC10389695 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-022-00949-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Locally advanced pancreatic tumours are highly resistant to conventional radiochemotherapy. Here we show that such resistance can be surmounted by an injectable depot of thermally responsive elastin-like polypeptide (ELP) conjugated with iodine-131 radionuclides (131I-ELP) when combined with systemically delivered nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel. This combination therapy induced complete tumour regressions in diverse subcutaneous and orthotopic mouse models of locoregional pancreatic tumours. 131I-ELP brachytherapy was effective independently of the paclitaxel formulation and dose, but external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) only achieved tumour-growth inhibition when co-administered with nanoparticle paclitaxel. Histological analyses revealed that 131I-ELP brachytherapy led to changes in the expression of intercellular collagen and junctional proteins within the tumour microenvironment. These changes, which differed from those of EBRT-treated tumours, correlated with the improved delivery and accumulation of paclitaxel nanoparticles within the tumour. Our findings support the further translational development of 131I-ELP depots for the synergistic treatment of localized pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey L Schaal
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jayanta Bhattacharyya
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Center for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, India
| | - Jeremy Brownstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kyle C Strickland
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Garrett Kelly
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Soumen Saha
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Joshua Milligan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Samagya Banskota
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Xinghai Li
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Wenge Liu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David G Kirsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pharmacology & Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael R Zalutsky
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ashutosh Chilkoti
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Shin H, Yu JI, Park HC, Yoo GS, Cho S, Park JO, Lee KT, Lee KH, Lee JK, Park JK, Heo JS, Han IW, Shin SH. The Feasibility of Stereotactic Body Proton Beam Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194556. [PMID: 36230475 PMCID: PMC9559584 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body proton beam therapy (SBPT) for pancreatic cancer. Methods: This retrospective study included 49 patients who underwent SBPT for pancreatic cancer between 2017 and 2020. Survival outcomes, bowel-related toxicities, and failure patterns were analysed. SBPT was performed after induction chemotherapy in 44 (89.8%) patients. The dose-fractionation scheme included 60 gray (Gy) relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in five fractions (n = 42, 85.7%) and 50 GyRBE in five fractions (n = 7, 14.3%). The median follow-up was 16.3 months (range, 1.8−45.0 months). Results: During follow-up, the best responses were complete response, partial response, and stable disease in four (8.2%), 13 (26.5%), and 31 (63.3%) patients, respectively. The 2-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and local control (LC) rates were 67.6%, 38.0%, and 73.0%, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 gastroduodenal (GD) toxicity occurred in three (6.1%) patients. Among them, one patient underwent endoscopic haemostasis. The other two patients received surgical management. They were followed up without disease progression for >30 months after SBPT. Overall, there was no significant dosimetric difference between the grade ≥ 2 and lower toxicity groups. Conclusions: SBPT provides relatively high LC rates with acceptable toxicities in pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunju Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Jeong Il Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
- Correspondence: (J.I.Y.); (H.C.P.)
| | - Hee Chul Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
- Correspondence: (J.I.Y.); (H.C.P.)
| | - Gyu Sang Yoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Sungkoo Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Joon Oh Park
- Divisions of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Kyu Taek Lee
- Divisions of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Kwang Hyuck Lee
- Divisions of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Jong Kyun Lee
- Divisions of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Joo Kyung Park
- Divisions of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Jin Seok Heo
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - In Woong Han
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Sang Hyun Shin
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Evolution of Radiation Therapy in Pancreas Cancer Management toward MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11185380. [PMID: 36143027 PMCID: PMC9500969 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11185380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreas cancer has a poor prognosis despite aggressive treatment and is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States. At diagnosis, most patients have either metastatic or locally advanced disease. In this article, we review the evolution of treatments in locally advanced pancreas cancer (LAPC) and discuss the various radiation therapy fractionation schemes. Furthermore, we examine the data supporting dose escalation and the delivery of ablative biologically effective doses in the setting of LAPC. Finally, we review the role of MRI-guided radiation therapy in escalating dose while sparing organs at risk in the era of stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiation therapy.
Collapse
|
26
|
He X, Cai W, Li F, Zhang P, Reyngold M, Cuaron JJ, Cerviño LI, Li T, Li X. Automatic stent recognition using perceptual attention U-net for quantitative intrafraction motion monitoring in pancreatic cancer radiotherapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:5283-5293. [PMID: 35524706 PMCID: PMC9827417 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Stent has often been used as an internal surrogate to monitor intrafraction tumor motion during pancreatic cancer radiotherapy. Based on the stent contours generated from planning CT images, the current intrafraction motion review (IMR) system on Varian TrueBeam only provides a tool to verify the stent motion visually but lacks quantitative information. The purpose of this study is to develop an automatic stent recognition method for quantitative intrafraction tumor motion monitoring in pancreatic cancer treatment. METHODS A total of 535 IMR images from 14 pancreatic cancer patients were retrospectively selected in this study, with the manual contour of the stent on each image serving as the ground truth. We developed a deep learning-based approach that integrates two mechanisms that focus on the features of the segmentation target. The objective attention modeling was integrated into the U-net framework to deal with the optimization difficulties when training a deep network with 2D IMR images and limited training data. A perceptual loss was combined with the binary cross-entropy loss and a Dice loss for supervision. The deep neural network was trained to capture more contextual information to predict binary stent masks. A random-split test was performed, with images of ten patients (71%, 380 images) randomly selected for training, whereas the rest of four patients (29%, 155 images) were used for testing. Sevenfold cross-validation of the proposed PAUnet on the 14 patients was performed for further evaluation. RESULTS Our stent segmentation results were compared with the manually segmented contours. For the random-split test, the trained model achieved a mean (±standard deviation) stent Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95), the center-of-mass distance (CMD), and volume difference V o l d i f f $Vo{l_{diff}}$ were 0.96 (±0.01), 1.01 (±0.55) mm, 0.66 (±0.46) mm, and 3.07% (±2.37%), respectively. The sevenfold cross-validation of the proposed PAUnet had the mean (±standard deviation) of 0.96 (±0.02), 0.72 (±0.49) mm, 0.85 (±0.96) mm, and 3.47% (±3.27%) for the DSC, HD95, CMD, and V o l d i f f $Vo{l_{diff}}$ . CONCLUSION We developed a novel deep learning-based approach to automatically segment the stent from IMR images, demonstrated its clinical feasibility, and validated its accuracy compared to manual segmentation. The proposed technique could be a useful tool for quantitative intrafraction motion monitoring in pancreatic cancer radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiuxiu He
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Weixing Cai
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Feifei Li
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Pengpeng Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Marsha Reyngold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - John J. Cuaron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Laura I. Cerviño
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Tianfang Li
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Xiang Li
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Corresponding Author: Xiang Li, Ph.D., Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, Tel: (516) 559-1501,
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lv W, Wang Q, Hu Q, Wang X, Cao D. Comparative efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for patients with borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e050558. [PMID: 35831044 PMCID: PMC9280870 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The optimal dose and treatment modality of neoadjuvant radiotherapy applied for treating borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have been debated topics in oncology. The objective of the present network meta-analysis (NMA) is to study and compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant radiotherapy comprehensively using different doses in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS AND ANALYSIS Four electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Web of science, will be searched thoroughly to identify relevant studies published from 2006 to October 2020. Electronic searching by titles using neoadjuvant treatments for PDAC will be performed in the annual meetings of European Society of Medical Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology (2018-2020). CLINICALTRIALS gov will also be searched for grey literature. Two reviewers will perform search strategies and extract data independently. R0 resection rate and local control rate are defined as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes include overall survival, disease-free survival and acute and late grade 3 and grade 4 toxicities. For randomised control trials, the risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, while the risk of bias for non-randomised, observational studies will be evaluated using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions. The quality of evidence will be evaluated using the version of Cochrane tool and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis will be conducted in the present NMA. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study will synthesise the evidence regarding dose schedule of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in patients with BRPC and LAPC. We hope the findings from this NMA will help clinicians and patients select the optimal modality and dose schedule of neoadjuvant radiotherapy with respect to patient-reported outcomes. As no primary data collection will be undertaken, no ethics approval is required. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020222408.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanrui Lv
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qingfeng Wang
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qiancheng Hu
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Dan Cao
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hammer L, Hausner D, Ben-Ayun M, Shacham-Shmueli E, Morag O, Margalit O, Boursi B, Yarom N, Jacobson G, Katzman T, Abrams R, Dicker A, Golan T, Symon Z, Lawrence YR. Single-Fraction Celiac Plexus Radiosurgery: A Preliminary Proof-of-Concept Phase 2 Clinical Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:588-593. [PMID: 35257800 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.02.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Refractory epigastric/midback pain is associated with locally advanced abdominal malignancies, especially pancreatic cancer. The pain is caused by tumor infiltration of the celiac plexus, a nerve network attached to the abdominal aorta. Contemporary palliative approaches are often inadequate. We hypothesized that ablative radiation targeted to the celiac plexus would alleviate this pain. METHODS AND MATERIALS We performed a single-arm prospective clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02356406). Eligible and evaluable patients had celiac pain of at least 5 out of 10 on the Numerical Rating Scale, completed treatment per protocol, and had at least 1 posttreatment visit. The entire retroperitoneal celiac plexus was irradiated with a single 25-Gy fraction. The primary endpoint was change in the Numerical Rating Scale 3 weeks posttreatment. Toxic effects and pain interference (as measured with the Brief Pain Inventory) were secondary endpoints. RESULTS For our study, 31 patients signed consent, and, of these, 18 patients were treated and evaluable. Median age was 68 years (range, 51-79); 89% of the patients had pancreatic cancer; the median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 1; and the median interval from initial diagnosis to treatment was 9 months (range, 1-36), and, in this interval, patients received a median of 1 systemic treatment line (range, 0-3). Acute toxicity was limited to grade 1 to 2. Three weeks after treatment, 16 patients (84%) reported decreased celiac pain, with median pain level falling from 6 out of 10 (interquartile range [IQR], 5.0-7.5) at baseline to 3 out of 10 (IQR, 1.0-4.3); six weeks after treatment, the Numerical Rating Scale number fell further to 2.8 out of 10 (IQR, 0-3.3; both P < .005 vs baseline), including 4 patients who reported complete eradication of their celiac pain. Total daily morphine milligram equivalents decreased from 59 pretreatment to 50 at 3 weeks, and from 50 to 45 at 6 weeks. Significant improvement was seen in pain-interference scores. CONCLUSIONS Celiac plexus radiosurgery appears to alleviate cancer-related pain. An international multicenter phase 2 trial is currently accruing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liat Hammer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute of Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - David Hausner
- Institute of Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Maoz Ben-Ayun
- Institute of Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Einat Shacham-Shmueli
- Institute of Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ofir Morag
- Institute of Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ofer Margalit
- Institute of Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ben Boursi
- Institute of Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nirit Yarom
- Institute of Oncology, Shamir Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Galia Jacobson
- Institute of Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Tamar Katzman
- Institute of Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ross Abrams
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Adam Dicker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Talia Golan
- Institute of Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Zvi Symon
- Institute of Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yaacov R Lawrence
- Institute of Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Moningi S, Lei X, Fang P, Taniguchi CM, Holliday EB, Koay EJ, Koong AC, Ludmir EB, Minsky BD, Das P, Giordano SH, Smith GL. Contemporary use and outcomes of radiation and chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 35:9-16. [PMID: 35510142 PMCID: PMC9058953 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This study examines 5,624 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Across “real-world” US practice, overall use of radiation treatment (RT) has declined. Among those receiving RT, stereotactic body radiation treatment (SBRT) increased. Contemporary risks of gastrointestinal complications after SBRT have decreased.
Background We assessed radiation treatment (RT) use and complications for unresectable pancreatic cancer in the US, comparing conventionally fractionated (CFRT) and stereotactic body radiation treatment (SBRT) to inform real-world expected outcomes and practice. Material and Methods We analyzed 5,624 patients with non-metastatic, unresectable pancreatic cancer (2,522 older patients age > 65, diagnosed 2006–2013 in Medicare linked data; and 3,102 younger patients age < 65, diagnosed 2006–2016 in MarketScan data), comparing CFRT vs. SBRT vs. chemotherapy alone. Cochran-Armitage tested temporal trends. Fisher’s Exact Test and proportional hazards models compared gastrointestinal (GI) complications. Healthcare payments (Consumer Price Index adjusted to 2015) through 12 months were compared using generalized linear regression models with log link and gamma distribution. Results RT use declined from 55% to 45% of older patients (2006–2013) and 52% to 47% of younger patients (2006–2016) (Ptrend < 0.001 both). Among RT patients, SBRT use increased to 10% of older patients and 12% of younger patients in the most recent years (Ptrend = 0.04 and < 0.001 respectively). Addition of RT was associated with more frequent GI bleeds, strictures, and fistulas (Δ= +3% to 9% excess events, all P ≤ 0.05). Temporal patterns suggested decreasing complications over time (Ptrend = 0.05 and 0.05 for older and younger patients). Among younger patients, there was no difference in GI complications for SBRT vs. CFRT (P > 0.05, all comparisons). Among older patients, increased complications were seen for SBRT in 1–4 fractions vs. CFRT (P < 0.05), but not SBRT in 5 fractions (P = 0.72). Healthcare payments were greatest for SBRT when compared with CFRT or chemotherapy under US Medicare (P < 0.001) and employer-based insurance (P < 0.001). Conclusion Real-world treatment has shifted toward more selectivity for RT in unresectable pancreatic cancer. However, SBRT uptake and improving trends in complications profiles represent opportunities to optimize current use and benefit. Findings are applicable to inform future comparative and cost effectiveness models of RT for this disease.
Collapse
|
30
|
Michalet M, Bordeau K, Cantaloube M, Valdenaire S, Debuire P, Simeon S, Portales F, Draghici R, Ychou M, Assenat E, Dupuy M, Gourgou S, Colombo PE, Carrere S, Souche FR, Aillères N, Fenoglietto P, Azria D, Riou O. Stereotactic MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Pancreatic Tumors: Dosimetric Benefit of Adaptation and First Clinical Results in a Prospective Registry Study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:842402. [PMID: 35356227 PMCID: PMC8959839 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.842402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) is an attractive modality of radiotherapy for pancreatic tumors. The objectives of this prospective registry study were to report the dosimetric benefits of daily adaptation of SMART and the first clinical results in pancreatic tumors. Materials and Methods All patients treated in our center with SMART for a pancreatic tumor were included. Patients were planned for five daily-adapted fractions on consecutive days. Endpoints were acute toxicities, late toxicities, impact of adaptive treatment on target volume coverage and organs at risk (OAR) sparing, local control (LC) rate, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). Results Thirty consecutive patients were included between October 2019 and April 2021. The median dose prescription was 50 Gy. No patient presented grade > 2 acute toxicities. The most frequent grade 1–2 toxicities were asthenia (40%), abdominal pain (40%), and nausea (43%). Daily adaptation significantly improved planning target volume (PTV) and gross tumor volume (GTV) coverage and OAR sparing. With a median follow-up of 9.7 months, the median OS, 6-month OS, and 1-year OS were 14.1 months, 89% (95% CI: 70%–96%), and 75% (95% CI: 51%–88%), respectively, from SMART completion. LC at 6 months and 1 year was respectively 97% (95% CI: 79–99.5%) and 86% (95% CI: 61%–95%). There were no grade > 2 late toxicities. With a median follow-up of 10.64 months, locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) patients (22 patients) had a median OS, 6-month OS, and 1-year OS from SMART completion of 14.1 months, 76% (95% CI: 51%–89%), and 70% (95% CI: 45%–85%), respectively. Nine patients underwent surgical resection (42.1% of patients with initial LAPC and 33.3% of patients with BRPC), with negative margins (R0). Resected patients had a significantly better OS as compared to unresected patients (p = 0.0219, hazard ratio (HR) = 5.78 (95% CI: 1.29–25.9)). Conclusion SMART for pancreatic tumors is feasible without limiting toxicities. Daily adaptation demonstrated a benefit for tumor coverage and OAR sparing. The severity of observed acute and late toxicities was low. OS and LC rates were promising. SMART achieved a high secondary resection rate in LAPC patients. Surgery after SMART seemed to be feasible and might increase OS in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan Michalet
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - Karl Bordeau
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - Marie Cantaloube
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - Simon Valdenaire
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre Debuire
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - Sebastien Simeon
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - Fabienne Portales
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier Cancer Institute, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Roxana Draghici
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - Marc Ychou
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier Cancer Institute, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Eric Assenat
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) St Eloi, Montpellier, France
| | - Marie Dupuy
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) St Eloi, Montpellier, France
| | - Sophie Gourgou
- Biometrics Unit Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier Cancer Institute, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo
- Digestive Surgery Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier Cancer Institute, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Sebastien Carrere
- Digestive Surgery Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier Cancer Institute, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - François-Regis Souche
- Surgical Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) St Eloi, Montpellier, France
| | - Norbert Aillères
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - Pascal Fenoglietto
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - David Azria
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - Olivier Riou
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gough J, Hall W, Good J, Nash A, Aitken K. Technical Radiotherapy Advances – The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Radiation in the Delivery of Hypofractionation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:301-312. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
32
|
Aitken K, Mukherjee S. When Less is More: The Rising Tide of Hypofractionation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:277-279. [PMID: 35305887 PMCID: PMC8926304 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
33
|
Shin YS, Park HH, Park JH, Seo DW, Lee SS, Yoo C, Kim S, Yoon SM, Jung J, Kim MH, Lee SK, Park DH, Song TJ, Oh D, Ryoo BY, Chang HM, Kim KP, Jeong JH, Kim JH. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051166. [PMID: 35267485 PMCID: PMC8909663 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
In locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been applied as an alternative to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT); however, direct comparative evidence between these two modalities is scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of SBRT with CCRT for LAPC. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with LAPC who received SBRT (n = 95) or CCRT (n = 66) with a concurrent 5-FU-based regimen between January 2008 and July 2016. The clinical outcomes of freedom from local progression (FFLP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities were analyzed before and after propensity score (PS) matching. After a median follow-up duration of 15.5 months (range, 2.3-64.5), the median OS, PFS, and FFLP of the unmatched patients were 17.3 months, 11 months, and 19.6 months, respectively. After PS matching, there were no significant differences between the SBRT and CCRT groups in terms of the 1-year rates of OS (66.7% vs. 80%, p = 0.455), PFS (40.0% vs. 54.2%, p = 0.123), and FFLP (77.2% and 87.1%, p = 0.691). Our results suggest SBRT could be a feasible alternative to CCRT in treating patients with LAPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Seob Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea; (Y.S.S.); (H.H.P.); (S.M.Y.); (J.J.); (J.H.K.)
| | - Hee Hyun Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea; (Y.S.S.); (H.H.P.); (S.M.Y.); (J.J.); (J.H.K.)
| | - Jin-hong Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea; (Y.S.S.); (H.H.P.); (S.M.Y.); (J.J.); (J.H.K.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-2-3010-5616
| | - Dong-Wan Seo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea; (D.-W.S.); (S.S.L.); (M.-H.K.); (S.K.L.); (D.H.P.); (T.J.S.); (D.O.)
| | - Sang Soo Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea; (D.-W.S.); (S.S.L.); (M.-H.K.); (S.K.L.); (D.H.P.); (T.J.S.); (D.O.)
| | - Changhoon Yoo
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea; (C.Y.); (B.-Y.R.); (H.-M.C.); (K.-p.K.); (J.H.J.)
| | - Seonok Kim
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea;
| | - Sang Min Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea; (Y.S.S.); (H.H.P.); (S.M.Y.); (J.J.); (J.H.K.)
| | - Jinhong Jung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea; (Y.S.S.); (H.H.P.); (S.M.Y.); (J.J.); (J.H.K.)
| | - Myung-Hwan Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea; (D.-W.S.); (S.S.L.); (M.-H.K.); (S.K.L.); (D.H.P.); (T.J.S.); (D.O.)
| | - Sung Koo Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea; (D.-W.S.); (S.S.L.); (M.-H.K.); (S.K.L.); (D.H.P.); (T.J.S.); (D.O.)
| | - Do Hyun Park
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea; (D.-W.S.); (S.S.L.); (M.-H.K.); (S.K.L.); (D.H.P.); (T.J.S.); (D.O.)
| | - Tae Jun Song
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea; (D.-W.S.); (S.S.L.); (M.-H.K.); (S.K.L.); (D.H.P.); (T.J.S.); (D.O.)
| | - Dongwook Oh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea; (D.-W.S.); (S.S.L.); (M.-H.K.); (S.K.L.); (D.H.P.); (T.J.S.); (D.O.)
| | - Baek-Yeol Ryoo
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea; (C.Y.); (B.-Y.R.); (H.-M.C.); (K.-p.K.); (J.H.J.)
| | - Heung-Moon Chang
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea; (C.Y.); (B.-Y.R.); (H.-M.C.); (K.-p.K.); (J.H.J.)
| | - Kyu-pyo Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea; (C.Y.); (B.-Y.R.); (H.-M.C.); (K.-p.K.); (J.H.J.)
| | - Jae Ho Jeong
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea; (C.Y.); (B.-Y.R.); (H.-M.C.); (K.-p.K.); (J.H.J.)
| | - Jong Hoon Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea; (Y.S.S.); (H.H.P.); (S.M.Y.); (J.J.); (J.H.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Pavic M, Niyazi M, Wilke L, Corradini S, Vornhülz M, Mansmann U, Al Tawil A, Fritsch R, Hörner-Rieber J, Debus J, Guckenberger M, Belka C, Mayerle J, Beyer G. MR-guided adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of primary tumor for pain control in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC): an open randomized, multicentric, parallel group clinical trial (MASPAC). Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:18. [PMID: 35078490 PMCID: PMC8788088 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-01988-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Pain symptoms in the upper abdomen and back are prevalent in 80% of patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), where the current standard treatment is a systemic therapy consisting of at least doublet-chemotherapy for fit patients. Palliative low-dose radiotherapy is a well-established local treatment option but there is some evidence for a better and longer pain response after a dose-intensified radiotherapy of the primary pancreatic cancer (pPCa). Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can deliver high radiation doses in few fractions, therefore reducing chemotherapy-free intervals. However, prospective data on pain control after SBRT of pPCa is very limited. Therefore, we aim to investigate the impact of SBRT on pain control in patients with mPDAC in a prospective trial.
Methods
This is a prospective, double-arm, randomized controlled, international multicenter study testing the added benefit of MR-guided adaptive SBRT of the pPca embedded between standard of care-chemotherapy (SoC-CT) cycles for pain control and prevention of pain in patients with mPDAC. 92 patients with histologically proven mPDAC and at least stable disease after initial 8 weeks of SoC-CT will be eligible for the trial and 1:1 randomized in 3 centers in Germany and Switzerland to either experimental arm A, receiving MR-guided SBRT of the pPCa with 5 × 6.6 Gy at 80% isodose with continuation of SoC-CT thereafter, or control arm B, continuing SoC-CT without SBRT. Daily MR-guided plan adaptation intents to achieve good target coverage, while simultaneously minimizing dose to organs at risk. Patients will be followed up for minimum 6 and maximum of 18 months. The primary endpoint of the study is the “mean cumulative pain index” rated every 4 weeks until death or end of study using numeric rating scale.
Discussion
An adequate long-term control of pain symptoms in patients with mPDAC is an unmet clinical need. Despite improvements in systemic treatment, local complications due to pPCa remain a clinical challenge. We hypothesize that patients with mPDAC will benefit from a local treatment of the pPCa by MR-guided SBRT in terms of a durable pain control with a simultaneously favorable safe toxicity profile translating into an improvement of quality-of-life.
Trial registration
German Registry for Clinical Trials (DRKS): DRKS00025801. Meanwhile the study is also registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the Identifier: NCT05114213.
Collapse
|
35
|
Seo DW, Oh D, Song T, Park D, Lee S, Kim MH. Clinical outcomes of EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation for unresectable pancreatic cancer: A prospective observational study. Endosc Ultrasound 2022; 11:68-74. [PMID: 35083978 PMCID: PMC8887047 DOI: 10.4103/eus-d-21-00049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has been increasingly used for the treatment of pancreatic neoplasms. The role of EUS-RFA in the management of pancreatic cancer has not yet been elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the survival impact of EUS-RFA in unresectable pancreatic cancer. Methods: Twenty-two patients (n = 14, locally advanced unresectable; n = 8, metastatic) with unresectable pancreatic cancer underwent EUS-RFA combined with subsequent chemotherapy between May 2016 and June 2019. Survival outcomes including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated. Results: EUS-RFA was successful in all patients. The median number of RFA sessions was 5 (interquartile range, [IQR], 3.25–5.75). After successful EUS-RFA, subsequent gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was performed. Early procedure-related adverse events occurred in 4 out of 107 sessions (3.74%), including peritonitis (n = 1) and abdominal pain (n = 3). During follow-up over a median of 21.23 months (IQR, 10.73–27.1), the median OS and PFS were 24.03 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16–35.8) and 16.37 months (95% CI, 8.87–19), respectively. Conclusions: EUS-RFA is technically feasible and safe for the management of unresectable pancreatic cancer. EUS-RFA combined with systemic chemotherapy may be associated with favorable survival outcomes. Further larger-scale prospective comparative study is required to confirm these findings.
Collapse
|
36
|
Spiliopoulos S, Zurlo MT, Casella A, Laera L, Surico G, Surgo A, Fiorentino A, de'Angelis N, Calbi R, Memeo R, Inchingolo R. Current status of non-surgical treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:2064-2075. [PMID: 35070042 PMCID: PMC8713317 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i12.2064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is the 7th leading cause of death due to cancer in industrialized countries and the 11th most common cancer globally, with 458918 new cases (2.5% of all cancers) and 432242 deaths (4.5% of all cancer deaths) in 2018. Unfortunately, 80% to 90% of the patients present with unresectable disease, and the reported 5-year survival rate range between 10% and 25%, even after successful resection with tumor-free margins. Systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and minimally invasive image-guided procedures that have emerged over the past years, are used for the management of non-operable PC. This review focuses on currently available non-surgical options of locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavros Spiliopoulos
- 2nd Radiology Department, Interventional Radiology Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 12461, Greece
| | - Maria Teresa Zurlo
- Interventional Radiology Unit, “F. Miulli” Regional General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Annachiara Casella
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, “F. Miulli” Regional General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Letizia Laera
- Department of Oncology, General Regional Hospital “F. Miulli”, Acquaviva delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Giammarco Surico
- Department of Oncology, General Regional Hospital “F. Miulli”, Acquaviva delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Alessia Surgo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, “F. Miulli” Regional General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Alba Fiorentino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, “F. Miulli” Regional General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Unit of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Digestive Surgery, “F. Miulli” Regional General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Roberto Calbi
- Department of Radiology, General Regional Hospital “F. Miulli”, Acquaviva delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, “F. Miulli” Regional General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Riccardo Inchingolo
- Interventional Radiology Unit, “F. Miulli” Regional General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wang G, Wang H, Zhuang H, Yang R. An Investigation of Non-Coplanar Volumetric Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Using a Trajectory Optimization Method. Front Oncol 2021; 11:717634. [PMID: 34604054 PMCID: PMC8485751 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.717634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study was conducted in order to develop a trajectory optimization algorithm for non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and investigate the potential of organs at risk (OARs) sparing in locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients using non-coplanar VMAT. METHODS AND MATERIALS Firstly, a cost map that represents the ray-OAR voxel intersections at each source position was generated using a ray-tracing algorithm. A graph search algorithm was then used to determine the least-cost path from the cost map. Lastly, full arcs or partial arcs were selected based on the least-cost path to generate the non-coplanar VMAT (ncVMAT) trajectories. Clinical coplanar VMAT (coVMAT) plans for 11 patients diagnosed with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC) receiving 45 to 70 Gy in 25 fractions were replanned using non-coplanar VMAT trajectories. Both coplanar and non-coplanar plans were normalized to cover 95% of the PTV45 Gy volume with a prescription dose of 45 Gy. The conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), PTV coverage, and dose to the OARs were compared between coVMAT and ncVMAT plans. RESULTS With ncVMAT, the mean coverage of PTV50 Gy, PTV54 Gy, PTV60 Gy, and PTV70 Gy increased significantly. The mean conformity index of PTV45 Gy, PTV54 Gy, and PTV70 Gy was also improved in the ncVMAT plans. Compared with coVMAT plans, the ncVMAT plans resulted in significantly lower doses to the spinal cord, bilateral kidneys, stomach, and duodenum. The maximum dose to the spinal cord decreased by 6.11%. The mean dose to the left and right kidneys decreased by an average of 5.52% and 11.71%, respectively. The D max, D mean, and D 15% of the stomach were reduced by an average of 7.45%, 15.82%, and 16.79%, separately. The D 15% and D mean of the duodenum decreased 6.38% and 5.64%, respectively. CONCLUSION A trajectory optimization algorithm was developed for non-coplanar VMAT. Compared with conventional coplanar VMAT, non-coplanar VMAT resulted in improved coverage and conformity to the targets. The sparing of OARs was significantly improved in non-coplanar VMAT compared with coVMAT plans for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ruijie Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Huguet F, Dabout V, Rivin Del Campo E, Gaujoux S, Bachet JB. The role of radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20210044. [PMID: 34374297 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
At diagnosis, about 15% of patients with pancreatic cancer present with a resectable tumour, 50% have a metastatic tumour, and 35% a locally advanced tumour, non-metastatic but unresectable due to vascular invasion, or borderline resectable. Despite the technical progress made in the field of radiation therapy and the improvement of the efficacy of chemotherapy, the prognosis of these patients remains very poor. Recently, the role of radiation therapy in the management of pancreatic cancer has been much debated. This review aims to evaluate the role of radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Huguet
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpital Tenon, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Victoire Dabout
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpital Tenon, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | | | - Sébastien Gaujoux
- Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service de Chirurgie digestive et hépato-bilio-pancréatique, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Jean Baptiste Bachet
- Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service de Chirurgie digestive et hépato-bilio-pancréatique, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service d'Hépato - Gastro - Entérologie, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Qing S, Gu L, Zhang H. Phase I study of dose-escalated stereotactic body radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic head cancers: Initial clinical results. Cancer Med 2021; 10:6736-6743. [PMID: 34405577 PMCID: PMC8495286 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for locally advanced pancreatic head cancers. Methods A total of 16 patients were included in the single‐institution phase I dose‐escalation study. The initial dose level was 35 Gy in five fractions, doses were then sequentially escalated to 37.5 Gy, 40 Gy, 42.5 Gy, and 45 Gy. The dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as III/IV GI (gastrointestinal) toxicity. Results A total of 16 patients with locally advanced pancreatic head cancers were analyzed, 14 patients had received gemcitabine or S1‐based chemotherapy. Median OS and LPFS were 14.5 months and 12.5 months, respectively; The OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 68.8% and 25%, respectively. No grade 3 or 4 acute or late GI toxicities were observed. Grade 3 toxicities were observed in four patients with three hematologic toxicities and one biliary obstruction for acute toxicities, G1–2 of GI late toxicity were in 31.25% of patients. Conclusions SBRT doses ranging from 35 to 45 Gy in five fractions could be given for patients with locally advanced pancreatic head cancers without severe GI toxicities, whereas the side effect of biliary obstruction should be paid more attention. Trial registration Clinical trials:NCT02716207.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuiwang Qing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Huojun Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Yoon SM, Luterstein E, Chu FI, Cao M, Lamb J, Agazaryan N, Low D, Raldow A, Steinberg ML, Lee P. Clinical outcomes of stereotactic magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiotherapy for primary and metastatic tumors in the abdomen and pelvis. Cancer Med 2021; 10:5897-5906. [PMID: 34288538 PMCID: PMC8419771 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers ablative doses with excellent local control. However, implementing SBRT for abdominal and pelvic tumors has been limited by the risk for treatment‐related gastrointestinal toxicity. MRI‐guided radiotherapy may ameliorate these risks and increase the therapeutic ratio. We report the clinical outcomes of stereotactic MRI‐guided adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) for primary and metastatic tumors in the abdomen and pelvis. Methods From November 2014 to August 2017, the first 106 consecutive patients with 121 tumors in the abdomen and pelvis were treated with SMART at a single institution. Of the cohort, 41.5%, 15.1%, and 43.4% had primary, locally recurrent, and oligometastatic tumors, respectively. SMART was delivered using a tri‐cobalt‐60 gantry with on‐board 0.35 Tesla MRI with respiratory breath‐hold and daily adaptive re‐planning when anatomically necessary. A median of 40Gy in five fractions was prescribed. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.03 was used to score treatment‐related toxicities. Local control (LC), progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan–Meier method. Results Of the 510 treatments, seventy‐one (13.9%) were adapted. Fatigue, nausea, and pain were the most common acute toxicities. 0.9 and 0% of patients experienced acute grade three and four toxicities, respectively. 5.2 and 2.1% of patients experienced late grade three and four toxicities, respectively. After a median follow‐up of 20.4 months, the 2‐year LC rate was 74% on a per‐lesion basis. Two‐year LC was 96% for lesions that were treated with BED10≥100 versus 69% for BED10<100 (p = 0.02). PFS was significantly different between patients with and without locally controlled tumors (2‐year PFS 21 vs. 8%, p = 0.03). Two‐year OS was 57% for the entire cohort. Conclusions Favorable LC and PFS outcomes were observed with minimal morbidity for tumors in the abdomen and pelvis treated with SMART. Future prospective clinical trials to validate these findings are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elaine Luterstein
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Fang-I Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - James Lamb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nzhde Agazaryan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ann Raldow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rouffiac M, Ghirardi S, Chevalier C, Bessières I, Peignaux-Casasnovas K, Truc G, Créhange G. [Extreme hypofractionated radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer]. Cancer Radiother 2021; 25:692-698. [PMID: 34284971 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.06.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer has poor prognosis and a continuously growing incidence. By 2030, it should become the second cause of death by cancer worldwide and in France. The only curative treatment is surgery that is achievable in only 20% of patients at the time of initial diagnosis, with a high rate of incomplete resection. Neoadjuvant treatments using chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy are more often admitted to play an important role by selecting non-progressing cases who will benefit from surgery, by increasing the number of complete resection, and by making locally advanced and borderline tumours accessible to resection. However, the role of radiotherapy is still debated. Because of its dosimetric advantages, its short total duration, and its good tolerance with reduced volumes of irradiation, stereotactic radiotherapy has been largely studied. Compared to chemoradiotherapy, this technique could improve the therapeutic index helping to preserve the general status of patients in order to give them access to secondary surgery. It remains a promising technique still under evaluation, to be delivered ideally, as part of a clinical trial, or within an experimented team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rouffiac
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue Professeur-Marion, 77980, 21079 Dijon cedex, France.
| | - S Ghirardi
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue Professeur-Marion, 77980, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
| | - C Chevalier
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue Professeur-Marion, 77980, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
| | - I Bessières
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue Professeur-Marion, 77980, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
| | - K Peignaux-Casasnovas
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue Professeur-Marion, 77980, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
| | - G Truc
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue Professeur-Marion, 77980, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
| | - G Créhange
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, institut Curie, 25, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Courtney PT, Paravati AJ, Atwood TF, Raja N, Zimmerman CT, Fanta PT, Lowy AM, Simpson DR, Xu R, Murphy JD. Phase I Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dose Escalation in Pancreatic Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:1003-1012. [PMID: 33571625 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has demonstrated encouraging local tumor control rates in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, yet we lack prospective clinical trials evaluating dose-escalation strategies among patients treated with 5-fraction SBRT. This phase 1 dose-escalation trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose of SBRT in patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Thirty patients with pancreatic cancer were enrolled and treated with 40, 45, or 50 Gy SBRT in 5 fractions with doses determined using a time-to-event continual reassessment method trial design. Systemic therapy was permitted before and after SBRT, but not mandated by the study protocol. Toxicity was the primary study endpoint, and any grade ≥3 acute or late toxicity potentially attributable to SBRT was considered a dose-limiting toxicity. Secondary endpoints included local progression, distant progression, and overall survival. RESULTS The median follow up from SBRT was 8.9 months (range, 1.7-62.6 months). Nineteen patients (63%) had locally advanced disease, 3 patients (10%) had metastatic disease, and 8 patients (27%) had medically unresectable disease. Three patients (10%) received 40 Gy, 16 patients (53%) received 45 Gy, and 11 patients (37%) received 50 Gy. Seven patients (23%) experienced grade ≤2 acute toxicity, and 2 patients (6.7%) experienced grade 4 to 5 late toxicity, both of which occurred in the 45 Gy group. Median survival time was 17.1 months from the time of diagnosis and 9.8 months from SBRT. The 1-year cumulative incidence of local progression was 14.2% (95% confidence interval, 4.2%-30%). CONCLUSIONS This dose-escalation trial evaluated high-dose SBRT delivered in 5 fractions, and overall demonstrated favorable local control and survival, but was associated with nontrivial rates of severe late gastrointestinal toxicity potentially attributable to radiation. Further prospective studies are needed to define the safety and efficacy of high-dose SBRT in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Travis Courtney
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California; Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Anthony J Paravati
- Kettering Cancer Care Department of Radiation Oncology, Kettering Health Network, Kettering, Ohio
| | - Todd F Atwood
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Nandita Raja
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, San Diego, California
| | - Collin T Zimmerman
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, San Diego, California
| | - Paul T Fanta
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Andrew M Lowy
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Daniel R Simpson
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California; Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Ronghui Xu
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health and Department of Mathematics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - James D Murphy
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California; Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Zakem SJ, Mueller AC, Meguid C, Torphy RJ, Holt DE, Schefter T, Messersmith WA, McCarter MD, Del Chiaro M, Schulick RD, Goodman KA. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on R0 resection rate for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1072-1083. [PMID: 33277184 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with borderline resectable pancreas cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreas cancer (LAPC) remains controversial. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated BRPC and LAPC patients treated at our institution who underwent 2-3 months of chemotherapy followed by SBRT to a dose of 30-33 Gy. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were estimated and compared by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. RESULTS We identified 103 (85 BRPC and 18 LAPC) patients treated per our neoadjuvant paradigm between 2011 and 2018, with resectability based on NCCN definitions. Median follow up was 25 months. Of patients completing neoadjuvant therapy, 73 (71%) underwent definitive resection. Seventy-one (97%) patients with definitively resected tumors had R0 resection and 5 (7%) had a complete pathologic response CR to neoadjuvant therapy. The median overall survival (OS) of the cohort was 24 months. Those with a complete or marked pathologic response had significantly better OS than those with a moderate response (41 vs 24 months, p < 0.02) and patients unable to undergo definitive surgery (17 months, p < 0.0003). Six resected patients experienced grade ≥3 surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and SBRT are associated with promising pathologic response rates and R0 resection rates, with acceptable perioperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara J Zakem
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Adam C Mueller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Cheryl Meguid
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Robert J Torphy
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Douglas E Holt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Tracey Schefter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Wells A Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Martin D McCarter
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Richard D Schulick
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Attaluri A, Kandala SK, Zhou H, Wabler M, DeWeese TL, Ivkov R. Magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia for treating locally advanced unresectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancers: the role of tumor size and eddy-current heating. Int J Hyperthermia 2021; 37:108-119. [PMID: 33426990 PMCID: PMC8363047 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1798514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Tumor volume largely determines the success of local control of borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer with current therapy. We hypothesized that a tumor-mass normalized dose of magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia (MNPH) with alternating magnetic fields (AMFs) reduces the effect of tumor volume for treatment. Methods: 18 female athymic nude mice bearing subcutaneous MiaPaCa02 human xenograft tumors were treated with MNPH following intratumor injections of 5.5 mg Fe/g tumor of an aqueous suspension of magnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles. Mice were randomly divided into control (n = 5) and treated groups having small (0.15 ± 0.03 cm3, n = 4) or large (0.30 ± 0.06 cm3, n = 5) tumors. We assessed the clinical feasibility of this approach and of pulsed AMF to minimize eddy current heating using a finite-element method to solve a bioheat equation for a human-scale multilayer model. Results: Compared to the control group, both small and large MiaPaCa02 subcutaneous tumors showed statistically significant growth inhibition. Conversely, there was no significant difference in tumor growth between large and small tumors. Both computational and xenograft models demonstrated higher maximum tumor temperatures for large tumors compared to small tumors. Computational modeling demonstrates that pulsed AMF can minimize nonspecific eddy current heating. Conclusions: MNPH provides an advantage to treat large tumors because the MION dose can be adjusted to increase power. Pulsed AMF, with adjusted treatment time, can enhance MNPH in challenging cases such as low MION dose in the target tissue and/or large patients by minimizing nonspecific eddy current heating without sacrificing thermal dose to the target. Nanoparticle heterogeneity in tumors remains a challenge for continued research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anilchandra Attaluri
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Science, Engineering, and Technology, The Pennsylvania State University - Harrisburg, Middletown, PA, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sri Kamal Kandala
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Mechanical Engineering, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Haoming Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michele Wabler
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Theodore L DeWeese
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robert Ivkov
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Mechanical Engineering, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Survival outcome after stereotactic body radiotherapy for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Oncol 2021; 14:101139. [PMID: 34091293 PMCID: PMC8188566 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
For LAPC, median OS was 14.1 months; pooled 1/2/3-year OS rates were 57%, 19% and 10%. The median PFS was 10 months; pooled 1/2/3-year PFS rates were 36%, 12% and 4%. Pooled rates of acute GI, acute hematologic and late GI toxicities were 2%, 4% and 8%. For BRPC, median OS was 17.5 months; pooled 1/2-year OS rates were 75% and 29%. The median PFS was 12.2 months; pooled 1/2-year PFS rates were 48% and 18%.
Background Some studies reported stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has demonstrated superior therapeutic results than conventional radiotherapy. Nevertheless, this statement is controversial and the trial attempting to prove this is underway. We conducted this systemic review and meta-analysis aiming to combine the latest and most complete information about the survival outcomes and toxicities following SBRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). Methods Items involving SBRT and pancreatic cancer were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS and Web of Science. Median overall survival (OS), 1/2/3-year OS, median progression-free survival (PFS), 1/2/3-year PFS and incidence of grade 3–5 toxicities were the endpoints of interest in this meta-analysis. These endpoint proportions were pooled and analyzed using R. Results For the LAPC series, the median OS was 14.1 months; pooled 1/2/3-year OS rates were 57%, 19% and 10%, respectively; the median PFS was 10 months; pooled 1/2/3-year PFS rates were 36%, 12% and 4%; pooled incidence rates of acute gastrointestinal (GI), acute hematologic and late GI toxicity (grade≥3) were 2%, 4% and 8%. For the BRPC series, the median OS was 17.5 months; pooled 1/2-year OS rates were 75% and 29%; the median PFS was 12.2 months; pooled 1/2-year PFS rates were 48% and 18%; the incidence rates of toxicity (grade ≥ 3) were all 0%. Conclusions Our meta-analysis based on published results of OS, PFS and incidence rates of toxicity demonstrated that SBRT does not show desirable therapeutic result than the standard therapies for LAPC and BRPC.
Collapse
|
46
|
Tchelebi LT, Zaorsky NG, Rosenberg JC, Sharma NK, Tuanquin LC, Mackley HB, Ellis RJ. Reducing the Toxicity of Radiotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer With Magnetic Resonance-guided Radiotherapy. Toxicol Sci 2021; 175:19-23. [PMID: 32053201 DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfaa021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a highly fatal malignancy for which surgery is currently considered to be the only curative treatment. However, less than a quarter of patients have disease amenable to definitive surgical resection. Local treatment with radiation therapy is a promising alternative to surgery for those patients with unresectable disease. However, conventional radiation techniques with computed tomography (CT)-guided therapy have yielded disappointing results due to the inability to deliver ablative doses of ionizing radiation, while sparing the radiosensitive adjacent organs at risk. Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has emerged as an alternative to CT-guided radiation treatment which allows for the delivery of higher doses of radiation with low toxicity to surrounding structures. Further study into the use of MRgRT and dose escalation for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033
| | | | - Navesh K Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute
| | | | - Heath B Mackley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute
| | - Rodney J Ellis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Nehlsen AD, Goodman KA. Controversies in radiotherapy for pancreas cancer. J Surg Oncol 2021; 123:1460-1466. [PMID: 33831248 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains an area of controversy and ongoing discovery. Despite advances in surgical and radiation techniques, as well as chemotherapeutic agents, outcomes of patients diagnosed with this devastating malignancy remain poor. This article aims to review the available literature evaluating the efficacy of adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and definitive radiation therapy. We will also highlight areas of ongoing research efforts being carried out to improve outcomes in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony D Nehlsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Augustyn A, Reed VI, Ahmad N, Bhutani MS, Bloom ES, Bowers JR, Chronowski GM, Das P, Holliday EB, Delclos ME, Huey RW, Koay EJ, Lee SS, Nelson CL, Taniguchi CM, Koong AC, Chun SG. Implementation of a stereotactic body radiotherapy program for unresectable pancreatic cancer in an integrated community academic radiation oncology satellite network. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 27:147-151. [PMID: 33665384 PMCID: PMC7907676 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PDSA methodology was used to implement a pancreas SBRT in an academic satellite network. Oncologic outcomes were favorable with no serious adverse events. This technical note provides groundwork for safe establishment of SBRT pancreas programs.
With increasing interest in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for unresectable pancreatic cancer, quality improvement (QI) initiatives to develop integrated clinical workflows are crucial to ensure quality assurance (QA) when introducing this challenging technique into radiation practices. Materials/Methods: In 2017, we used the Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) QI methodology to implement a new pancreas SBRT program in an integrated community radiation oncology satellite. A unified integrated information technology infrastructure was used to virtually integrate the planned workflow into the community radiation oncology satellite network (P – Plan/D – Do). This workflow included multiple prospective quality assurance (QA) measures including multidisciplinary evaluation, prospective scrutiny of radiation target delineation, prospective radiation plan evaluation, and monitoring of patient outcomes. Institutional review board approval was obtained to retrospectively study and report outcomes of patients treated in this program (S – Study). Results: There were 12 consecutive patients identified who were treated in this program from 2017 to 2020 with a median follow-up of 27 months. The median survival was 13 months, median local failure free survival was 12 months and median progression free survival was 6 months from SBRT. There were no acute or late Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE) version 5 toxicities ≥ Grade 3. Conclusion: We report the successful implementation of a community pancreas SBRT program involving multiple prospective QA measures, providing the groundwork to safely expand access to pancreas SBRT in our community satellite network (A – Act).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Augustyn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Valerie I. Reed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Neelofur Ahmad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Manoop S. Bhutani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Elizabeth S. Bloom
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - John R. Bowers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, M.D. Anderson Albuquerque, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | - Gregory M. Chronowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Emma B. Holliday
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Marc E. Delclos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ryan W. Huey
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Eugene J. Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sunyoung S. Lee
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Christopher L. Nelson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Cullen M. Taniguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Albert C. Koong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Stephen G. Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Holyoake DLP, Robinson M, Silva M, Grose D, McIntosh D, Sebag-Montefiore D, Radhakrishna G, Mukherjee S, Hawkins MA. SPARC, a phase-I trial of pre-operative, margin intensified, stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer. Radiother Oncol 2021; 155:278-284. [PMID: 33217498 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Following resection of pancreatic cancer, risk of positive margins and local recurrence remain high, especially for borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). We aimed to establish the maximum tolerated dose of a margin-intensified five-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) regimen designed to treat the region at risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a prospective multicentre phase-1 rolling-six dose-escalation study. BRPC patients received pre-operative SBRT, with one dose to the primary tumour and an integrated boost to the region where tumour was in contact with vasculature. Four dose-levels were proposed, with starting dose 30 Gy to primary PTV and 45 Gy to boost volume (PTV_R), in five daily fractions. Primary endpoint was maximum tolerated dose (MTD), defined as highest dose where zero of three or one of six patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). RESULTS Twelve patients were registered, eleven received SBRT. Radiotherapy was well tolerated with all treatment completed as scheduled. Dose was escalated one level up from starting dose without encountering any DLT (prescribed 32.5 Gy PTV, 47.5 Gy PTV_R). Nine serious adverse reactions or events occurred (seven CTCAE Grade 3, two Grade 4). Two patients went on to have surgical resection. Median overall survival for SBRT patients was 8.1 months. The study closed early when it was unable to recruit to schedule. CONCLUSION Toxicity of SBRT was low for the two dose-levels that were tested, but MTD was not established. Few patients subsequently underwent resection of pancreatic tumour after SBRT, and it is difficult to draw conclusions regarding the safety or toxicity of these therapies in combination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel L P Holyoake
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Maxwell Robinson
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Silva
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Derek Grose
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - David McIntosh
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - David Sebag-Montefiore
- University of Leeds, United Kingdom; Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, United Kingdom
| | | | - Somnath Mukherjee
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Maria A Hawkins
- Dept of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, University College London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Buss EJ, Kachnic LA, Horowitz DP. Radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Semin Oncol 2021; 48:106-110. [PMID: 33771355 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2021.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has a poor prognosis with a median overall survival of 10-16 months. It is defined by tumor involvement of neighboring blood vessels that precludes resection. Standard doses of conventionally fractionated radiation have had little effect on overall survival in this setting, although they are associated with improved progression-free survival and time off chemotherapy. Evolving radiotherapy techniques have allowed for higher, ablative doses of radiotherapy to target tumor while also respecting normal tissue constraints of neighboring radiosensitive structures in the gastrointestinal tract. Moreover, advancements in image guidance, organ motion management, and the use of adaptive planning have enabled safe delivery of higher, ablative doses of radiation. This has resulted in improved survival. This review will summarize the expanding role of radiotherapy in the management of locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
|