1
|
Cengel KA, Kim MM, Diffenderfer ES, Busch TM. FLASH Radiotherapy: What Can FLASH's Ultra High Dose Rate Offer to the Treatment of Patients With Sarcoma? Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:218-228. [PMID: 38508786 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2024.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
FLASH is an emerging treatment paradigm in radiotherapy (RT) that utilizes ultra-high dose rates (UHDR; >40 Gy)/s) of radiation delivery. Developing advances in technology support the delivery of UHDR using electron and proton systems, as well as some ion beam units (eg, carbon ions), while methods to achieve UHDR with photons are under investigation. The major advantage of FLASH RT is its ability to increase the therapeutic index for RT by shifting the dose response curve for normal tissue toxicity to higher doses. Numerous preclinical studies have been conducted to date on FLASH RT for murine sarcomas, alongside the investigation of its effects on relevant normal tissues of skin, muscle, and bone. The tumor control achieved by FLASH RT of sarcoma models is indistinguishable from that attained by treatment with standard RT to the same total dose. FLASH's high dose rates are able to mitigate the severity or incidence of RT side effects on normal tissues as evaluated by endpoints ranging from functional sparing to histological damage. Large animal studies and clinical trials of canine patients show evidence of skin sparing by FLASH vs. standard RT, but also caution against delivery of high single doses with FLASH that exceed those safely applied with standard RT. Also, a human clinical trial has shown that FLASH RT can be delivered safely to bone metastasis. Thus, data to date support continued investigations of clinical translation of FLASH RT for the treatment of patients with sarcoma. Toward this purpose, hypofractionated irradiation schemes are being investigated for FLASH effects on sarcoma and relevant normal tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania..
| | - Michele M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Eric S Diffenderfer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Theresa M Busch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guadagnolo BA, Baldini EH. Are We Ready for Life in the Fast Lane? A Critical Review of Preoperative Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Localized Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:180-194. [PMID: 38508783 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
This critical review aims to summarize the relevant published data regarding hypofractionation regimens for preoperative radiation therapy (RT) prior to surgery for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremity or superficial trunk. We identified peer-reviewed publications using a PubMed search on the MeSH headings of "soft tissue sarcoma" AND "hypofractionated radiation therapy." To obtain complication data on similar anatomical radiotherapeutic scenarios we also searched "hypofractionated radiation therapy" AND "melanoma" as well as "hypofractionated radiation therapy" AND "breast cancer." We then used reference lists from relevant articles to obtain additional pertinent publications. We also incorporated relevant abstracts presented at international sarcoma meetings and relevant clinical trials as listed on the ClinicalTrials.gov website. Detailed data are presented and contextualized for ultra-hypofractionated and moderately hypofractionated regimens with respect to local control, wound complications, and amputation rates. Comparative data are also presented for late toxicities including: fibrosis, joint limitation, edema, skin integrity, and bone fracture or necrosis. These data are compared to a standard regimen of 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions delivered over 5 weeks. This analysis supports the continued use of a standard regimen for preoperative RT for STS of 25 × 2 Gy over 5 weeks without concurrent chemotherapy. Use of concurrent chemotherapy with preoperative RT for STS should be reserved for well-designed clinical trials. A randomized trial of ultra-hypofractionated and moderately hypofractionated pre op RT for STS is warranted, but it is critical for the primary endpoint (or co-primary endpoint) to be late toxicity to: bone, soft tissue, joint, and skin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elizabeth H Baldini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber/Brigham Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Te Velde JP, Zijlstra H, Lans A, Patel CG, Raje N, Delawi D, Kempen DHR, Verlaan JJ, van Royen BJ, Schwab JH. Fracture rate after conventional external beam radiation therapy to the spine in multiple myeloma patients. Spine J 2024; 24:137-145. [PMID: 37734495 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT) is used in multiple myeloma (MM) to treat severe pain, spinal cord compression, and disease-related bone disease. However, radiation may be associated with an increased risk of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs), which could substantially impair survival and quality of life. Additionally, the use of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) in MM is debated in MM. PURPOSE To determine the incidence of VCFs after cEBRT in patients with MM and to assess the applicability of the SINS score in the prediction of VCFs in MM. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective multicenter cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE MM patients with spinal myeloma lesions who underwent cEBRT between January 2010 and December 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES Frequency of new or progressed VCFs and subdistribution hazard ratios for potentially associated factors. METHODS Patient and treatment characteristics were manually collected from the patients' electronic medical records. Computed tomography (CT) scans from before and up to 3 years after the start of radiation were used to score radiographic variables at baseline and at follow-up. Multivariable Fine and Gray competing risk analyses were performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the SINS score to predict the postradiation VCF rate. RESULTS A total of 127 patients with 427 eligible radiated vertebrae were included in this study. The mean age at radiation was 64 years, and 66.1% of them were male. At the start of radiation, 57 patients (44.9%) had at least one VCF. There were 89 preexisting VCFs (18.4% of 483 vertebrae). Overall, 39 of 127 patients (30.7%) reported new fractures (number of vertebrae (n)=12) or showed progression of existing fractures (n=36). This number represented 11.2% of all radiated vertebrae. Five of the 39 (12.8%) patients with new or worsened VCFs received an unplanned secondary treatment (augmentation [n=2] or open surgery [n=3]) within 3 years. Both the total SINS score (SHR 1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.54-2.03; p<.001) and categorical SINS score (SHR 10.83; 95% CI 4.20-27.94; p<.001) showed an independent association with higher rates of new or progressed VCFs in adjusted analyses. The use of bisphosphonates was independently associated with a lower rate of new or progressed VCFs (SHR 0.47 [95% CI 0.24-0.92; p=.027]). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that new or progressed VCFs occurred in 30.7% of patients within 3 years, in a total of 11.2% of vertebrae. The SINS score was found to be independently associated with the development or progression of VCFs and could thus be applied in MM for fracture prediction and possibly prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens P Te Velde
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hester Zijlstra
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Amanda Lans
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Chirayu G Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Noopur Raje
- Department of Hematology/Oncology - Center for Multiple Myeloma, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Diyar Delawi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Soestwetering 1, 3543 AZ Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik H R Kempen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, OLVG Amsterdam, Oosterpark 9, 1091 AC Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Barend J van Royen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ouyang Z, Trent S, McCarthy C, Cosker T, Stuart R, Pratap S, Whitwell D, White HB, Tao H, Guo X, Maxime Gibbons CL. The incidence, risk factors and outcomes of wound complications after preoperative radiotherapy and surgery for high grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas: A 14-year retrospective study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:107086. [PMID: 37741042 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to analyze the wound complication (WC) rate and to determine the risk factors for WC in patients with soft tissue sarcoma treated with preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgical resection. METHODS Using the database of Oxford University Hospital (OUH) we retrospectively studied 126 cases of soft tissue sarcomas treated with preoperative radiotherapy and surgery between 2007 and 2021. WC were defined as minor wound complication (MiWC) not requiring surgical intervention or major wound complication (MaWC) if they received a secondary surgical intervention. Univariate and multiple regression analyses were performed using frequency of WC and MaWC as a dependent variable. RESULTS The incidence of WC and MaWC was 43.7% (55/126) and 19% (24/126). Age (OR:1.03, 95%CI: 1.00-1.06, p = 0.016), tumor size (OR:1.11, 95%CI:1.01-1.21, p = 0.027) and tumor site namely proximal lower limb vs upper limb (OR:10.87, 95%CI 1.15-103.03, p = 0.038) were risk factors on multivariate analysis. In nested case control analysis, the incidence of MaWC was 43.6% (24/55), the mean recovery time is 143 days in patients with MaWC. Smoking increases the risk for MaWC (OR:8.32, 95%CI:1.36-49.99, p = 0.022). The time interval between surgery and wound complication reduces the risk for MaWC (OR:0.91, 95%CI:0.84-0.99, p = 0.028) in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Age, tumor site and size are risk factors for WC requiring preoperative radiotherapy. Smoking and the time interval between surgery and wound complication are risk factors for MaWC as compared with MiWC. MaWC rate (19%) are comparable to those in postoperative radiotherapy and surgery alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhengxiao Ouyang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China; Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Sally Trent
- Department of Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, Ox3 7LE, UK
| | - Catherine McCarthy
- Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Thomas Cosker
- Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Robert Stuart
- Department of Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, Ox3 7LE, UK
| | - Sarah Pratap
- Department of Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, Ox3 7LE, UK
| | - Duncan Whitwell
- Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Harriet Branford White
- Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Huai Tao
- School of Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410208, Hunan, China
| | - Xiaoning Guo
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Iwasaki R, Yoshikawa R, Umeno R, Seki A, Matsukawa T, Takeno S, Yokoyama K, Mori T, Suzuki M, Ono K. The effects of BPA-BNCT on normal bone: determination of the CBE value in mice‡. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2023; 64:795-803. [PMID: 37517393 PMCID: PMC10516729 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrad054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) with p-boronophenylalanine (BPA) is expected to have less effect on the decrease in normal bone strength than X-ray therapy. However, the compound biological effectiveness (CBE) value necessary to convert the boron neutron capture reaction (BNCR) dose into a bioequivalent X-ray dose has not been determined yet. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of BNCT on normal bone in mice and to elucidate the CBE factor. We first searched the distribution of BPA in the normal bone of C3H/He mice and then measured the changes in bone strength after irradiation. The CBE value was determined when the decrease in bone strength was set as an index of the BNCT effect. The 10B concentrations in the tibia after subcutaneous injection of 125, 250 and 500 mg/kg BPA were measured by prompt gamma-ray spectroscopy and inductively coupled plasma (ICP)-atomic emission spectrometry. The 10B mapping in the tibia was examined by alpha-track autoradiography and laser ablation-ICP-mass spectrometry. The 10B concentration increased dose-dependently; moreover, the concentrations were maintained until 120 min after BPA administration. The administered 10B in the tibia was abundantly accumulated in the growth cartilage, trabecular bone and bone marrow. The bone strength was analyzed by a three-point bending test 12 weeks after irradiation. The bending strength of the tibia decreased dose-dependently after the irradiation of X-ray, neutron and BNCR. The CBE factor was obtained as 2.27 by comparing these dose-effect curves; the value determined in this study will enable an accurate dosimetry of normal bone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryota Iwasaki
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu-shi, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
| | - Ryutaro Yoshikawa
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu-shi, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
| | - Ryo Umeno
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu-shi, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
| | - Azusa Seki
- HAMRI Co. Ltd., 2638-2 Ozaki, Koga-shi, Ibaragi 306-0101, Japan
| | - Takehisa Matsukawa
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
| | - Satoshi Takeno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-machi Takatsuki-shi, Osaka 569-8686, Japan
- Kansai BNCT Medical Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-machi Takatsuki-shi, Osaka 569-8686, Japan
| | - Kazuhito Yokoyama
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
- Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, 4-1-26 Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107-8402, Japan
| | - Takashi Mori
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu-shi, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
| | - Minoru Suzuki
- Particle Radiation Oncology Research Center, Institute for Integrated Radiation and Nuclear Science, Kyoto University, 2-1010, Asashiro-nishi, Kumatori-cho, Sennan-gun, Osaka 590-0494, Japan
| | - Koji Ono
- Kansai BNCT Medical Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-machi Takatsuki-shi, Osaka 569-8686, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lebas A, Le Fèvre C, Waissi W, Chambrelant I, Brinkert D, Noël G. Prognostic Factors in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas Treated with Radiotherapy: Systematic Review of the Literature. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4486. [PMID: 37760456 PMCID: PMC10526842 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2023] [Revised: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities are rare tumors with various prognostic factors. Their management is debatable due to their inconsistent results within the literature and the lack of large prospective studies. The objective of this systematic review is to analyze the available scientific data on prognostic factors concerning the characteristics of the patients, the disease and the treatments performed, as well as their potential complications, on studies with a median follow-up of 5 years at minimum. A search of articles following the "PRISMA method" and using the PubMed search engine was conducted to select the most relevant studies. Twenty-five articles were selected, according to preestablished criteria. This review provides a better understanding of the prognosis and disease outcome of these tumors. Many factors were described comparing the frequency of occurrence according to the studies, which remain heterogeneous between them. Significant factors that could orient patients to radiotherapy were highlighted. These positive prognostic factors provide valuable insight to optimize radiotherapy treatments for patients treated for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Lebas
- Radiotherapy Department, ICANS, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (A.L.); (C.L.F.); (I.C.)
| | - Clara Le Fèvre
- Radiotherapy Department, ICANS, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (A.L.); (C.L.F.); (I.C.)
| | - Waisse Waissi
- Radiotherapy Department, Léon Bérard Center, 28 Rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France;
| | - Isabelle Chambrelant
- Radiotherapy Department, ICANS, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (A.L.); (C.L.F.); (I.C.)
| | - David Brinkert
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, University Hospital of Hautepierre, 1 Rue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Georges Noël
- Radiotherapy Department, ICANS, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (A.L.); (C.L.F.); (I.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Simões R, Augustin Y, Gulliford S, Dehbi HM, Hoskin P, Miles E, Harrington K, Miah AB. Toxicity, normal tissue and dose-volume planning parameters for radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: A systematic review of the literature. Radiother Oncol 2023; 186:109739. [PMID: 37315584 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities (STSE) are left with high incidence of toxicities after Radiotherapy (RT). Understanding the normal tissue dose relationship with the development of long-term toxicities may enable better RT planning in order to reduce treatment toxicities for STSE. This systematic review of the literature aims at reporting the incidence of acute and late toxicities and identifying RT delineation guidance the normal tissues structures and dose-volume parameters for STSE. METHODS A literature search of PUBMED-MEDLINE for studies that reported data on RT toxicity outcomes, delineation guidelines and dose-volume parameters for STSE from 2000 to 2022. Data has been tabulated and reported. RESULTS Thirty of 586 papers were selected after exclusion criteria. External beam RT prescriptions ranged from 30 to 72 Gy. The majority of studies reported the use of Intensity Modulated RT (IMRT) (27%). Neo-adjuvant RT was used in 40%. The highest long-term toxicities were subcutaneous and lymphoedema, reported when delivering 3DCRT. IMRT had a lower incidence of toxicities. Normal tissue outlining such as weight-bearing bones, skin and subcutaneous tissue, corridor and neurovascular bundle was recommended in 6 studies. Nine studies recommended the use of dose-volume constraints, but only one recommended evidence-based dose-volume constraints. CONCLUSION Although the literature is replete with toxicity reports, there is a lack of evidence-based guidance on normal tissue and dose-volume parameters and strategies to reduce the normal tissues irradiation when optimising RT plans for STSE are poor compared to other tumour sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Simões
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA) group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK; University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | | | - Sarah Gulliford
- University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; University College London, London, UK.
| | | | - Peter Hoskin
- Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA) group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Elizabeth Miles
- Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA) group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK.
| | - Kevin Harrington
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| | - Aisha B Miah
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Laughlin BS, Golafshar M, Prince M, Liu W, Kutyreff CJ, Ahmed SK, Vern Gross TZ, Haddock M, Petersen I, DeWees TA, Ashman JB. Dosimetric comparison between proton beam therapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy, and 3D conformal therapy for soft tissue extremity sarcoma. Acta Oncol 2023:1-7. [PMID: 37154167 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2209267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES Proton beam therapy (PBT) may provide a dosimetric advantage in sparing soft tissue and bone for selected patients with extremity soft sarcoma (eSTS). We compared PBT with photons plans generated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). MATERIALS/METHODS Seventeen patients previously treated with pencil beam scanning PBT were included in this study. Of these patients, 14 treated with pre-operative 50 Gy in 25 fractions were analyzed. IMRT and 3D-CRT plans were created to compare against the original PBT plans. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) indices were evaluated amongst PBT, IMRT, and 3D plans. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests were used to get the statistical significance. A p value smaller than .05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS For the clinical target volume (CTV), D2%, D95%, D98%, Dmin, Dmax, and V50Gy, were assessed. Dmin, D1%, Dmax, Dmean, V1Gy, V5Gy, and V50Gy were evaluated for the adjacent soft tissue. D1%, Dmax, Dmean, and V35-50% were evaluated for bone. All plans met CTV target coverage. The PBT plans delivered less dose to soft tissue and bone. The mean dose to the soft tissue was 2 Gy, 11 Gy, and 13 Gy for PBT, IMRT, and 3D, respectively (p < .001). The mean dose to adjacent bone was 15 Gy, 26 Gy, and 28 Gy for PBT, IMRT, and 3D, respectively (p = .022). CONCLUSION PBT plans for selected patients with eSTS demonstrated improved sparing of circumferential soft tissue and adjacent bone compared to IMRT and 3D-CRT. Further evaluation will determine if this improved dosimetry correlates with reduced toxicity and improved quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael Golafshar
- Department of Quanitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Matthew Prince
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Safia K Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Michael Haddock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ivy Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Department of Quanitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Radiation therapy is an integral component of local management with oncologic resection for soft tissue sarcoma. Radiotherapy is indicated in patients at an increased risk of local recurrence so that improved local control may be achieved. Sequencing of radiotherapy and resection should be determined by multidisciplinary input before treatment initiation. For most patients, preoperative delivery of radiation therapy is preferred. In patients initially thought to be at low risk for local recurrence and found to have unexpected adverse pathologic features at resection, postoperative radiation therapy is indicated. The use of radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma is controversial; when used, preoperative delivery of radiation is recommended.
Collapse
|
10
|
Laughlin BS, Golafshar MA, Ahmed S, Prince M, Anderson JD, Vern-Gross T, Seetharam M, Goulding K, Petersen I, DeWees T, Ashman JB. Early Experience Using Proton Beam Therapy for Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Multicenter Study. Int J Part Ther 2022; 9:1-11. [PMID: 35774491 PMCID: PMC9238125 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-21-00037.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Proton beam therapy (PBT) may provide an advantage when planning well-selected patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS), specifically for large, anatomically challenging cases. We analyzed our early experience with PBT on toxicity and outcomes.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective study was performed for eSTS treated between June 2016 and October 2020 with pencil beam scanning PBT at 2 institutions. Diagnostic, treatment, and toxicity characteristics were gathered from baseline to last follow-up or death. Wound complications were defined as secondary operations for wound repair (debridement, drainage, skin graft, and muscle flap) or nonoperative management requiring hospitalization. Statistical analysis was performed with R software.
Results
Twenty consecutive patients with a median age 51.5 years (range, 19–78 years) were included. Median follow-up was 13.7 months (range, 1.7–48.1 months). Tumor presentation was primary (n = 17) or recurrent after prior combined modality therapy (n = 3). Tumor location was either lower extremity (n = 16) or upper extremity (n = 4). Radiation was delivered preoperatively in most patients (n = 18). Median pretreatment tumor size was 7.9 cm (range, 1.3 –30.0 cm). The 1-year locoregional control was 100%. Four patients (20%) had developed metastatic disease by end of follow-up. Maximum toxicity for acute dermatitis was grade 2 in 8 patients (40%) and grade 3 in 3 patients (15%). After preoperative radiation and surgical resection, acute wound complications occurred in 6 patients (35%). Tumor size was larger in patients with acute wound complications compared with those without (medians 16 cm, range [12–30.0 cm] vs 6.3 cm, [1.3–14.4 cm], P = .003).
Conclusion
PBT for well selected eSTS cases demonstrated excellent local control and similar acute wound complication rate comparable to historic controls. Long-term follow-up and further dosimetric analyses will provide further insight into potential advantages of PBT in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Safia Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew Prince
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Mahesh Seetharam
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Krista Goulding
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Ivy Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Todd DeWees
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dosimetric Comparison of VMAT and IMRT Pre-Operative Radiotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:e306-e311. [PMID: 35278718 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiotherapy is a standard part of limb conserving therapy for extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at high risk of recurrence. Toxicities increase with radiation dose and volume of normal tissue irradiated. This study sought to compare dosimetry of volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT), with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and to investigate the optimal planning technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty patients with extremity STS who underwent preoperative radiotherapy (50 Gy in 25 fractions) between 2016 and 2020 at a sarcoma specialist centre were included. The original treatment techniques were sliding window IMRT or 3D conformal. VMAT plans were retrospectively generated according to the original tumour and organ at risk constraints. Quality assurance was performed as per departmental protocol. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare dosimetric parameters (for planning target volume, in-field bone, and soft tissue structures), monitor units (MU) and treatment time. RESULTS Median patient age was 65 years and majority were male (n=14, 70%). Commonest subtype was undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n=14, 70%) and most tumours were located on the thigh (n=12, 60%). Median PTV volume was 1110 cm3 and median volume of in-field bone 236 cm3. VMAT plans had significantly lower average MU (480 vs 862 MU, p<0.001) and overall treatment time (300 vs 153 seconds, p<0.001). PTV coverage favoured VMAT, with marginally higher mean, minimum, and maximum doses, and higher Conformity Index. However, differences were not statistically significant. Dose to infield bone and soft tissue structures were similar or slightly lower with VMAT. CONCLUSIONS In extremity soft tissue sarcoma, VMAT plans demonstrated a favourable trend toward tumour coverage and dose conformity compared to IMRT along with significantly lower monitor units and half the overall treatment time.
Collapse
|
12
|
Do We Need to Delineate the Humeral Head in Breast Cancer Patients? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030496. [PMID: 35158764 PMCID: PMC8833338 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Humeral heads can be unintentionally exposed during breast radiotherapy, particularly when regional lymph nodes are targeted. The aim of this study was to analyze late adverse events involving the humeral head occurring after adjuvant locoregional breast radiotherapy. We included 159 breast cancer patients locoregionally irradiated in an adjuvant setting with helical tomotherapy. After a median delay of 48 months, 10 patients (6.06% (3.20–10.92%) of breasts treated) presented clinical events such as localized bone pain, shoulder functional limitation and humeral head fracture. The average mean and maximum doses to humeral heads were 9.18 Gy and 24.41 Gy, respectively, and were not statistically associated with humeral head adverse events. We found that clinical adverse events involving the humeral head after adjuvant helical tomotherapy for breast cancer were rare, and the radiation exposure was low. No correlation was found between dosimetric parameters and late toxicity. Abstract Humeral heads can be unintentionally exposed during breast radiotherapy, particularly when regional lymph nodes are targeted. Moreover, rotational intensity-modulated radiation therapy techniques, such as helical tomotherapy (HT), increase the low-dose bath, the consequences of which are subject to debate. The aim of this study was to analyze late adverse events involving humeral heads occurring after adjuvant locoregional breast radiotherapy with HT. This single-center retrospective study included 159 breast cancer patients locoregionally irradiated, including the regional lymph nodes, in an adjuvant setting with HT at Institut Curie (Paris, France), between January 2010 and 2016. After a median delay of 48 months, six patients (3.8%) developed localized bone pain, three (1.9%) developed a shoulder functional limitation and one (0.6%) developed a traumatic humeral head fracture. The average mean and maximum doses to humeral heads were 9.18 Gy and 24.41 Gy, respectively, and were not statistically associated with humeral head adverse events. Adverse events were statistically more frequent after mastectomy than after breast-conserving surgery. Berg’s level 1 and 2/3 irradiation, and right-sided radiotherapy were associated with an increased maximum dose. In summary, clinical adverse events were rare, and radiation exposure to humeral heads was low. No correlation was found between dosimetric parameters and late toxicity.
Collapse
|
13
|
Matsunobu T, Maekawa A, Nomoto S, Iwamoto Y. Successful Management of Radiation-Associated Insufficiency Fracture of the Tibial Plateau with Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS 2022; 23:e934372. [PMID: 35031593 PMCID: PMC8772390 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.934372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Patient: Female, 52-year-old
Final Diagnosis: Fracture
Symptoms: Knee pain
Medication:—
Clinical Procedure: —
Specialty: Oncology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoya Matsunobu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyushu Rosai Hospital, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Akira Maekawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu Rosai Hospital, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nomoto
- Department of Radiology, Kyushu Rosai Hospital, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yukihide Iwamoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu Rosai Hospital, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Free Functional Latissimus Dorsi Reconstruction of the Quadriceps and Hamstrings following Oncologic Resection of Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Thigh. Sarcoma 2021; 2021:8480737. [PMID: 34924809 PMCID: PMC8674066 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8480737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Limb-salvage surgery combined with radiotherapy has become the primary treatment for soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity. Free functional latissimus flaps (FFLF) are an option to restore function in the setting of volumetric muscle loss. The purpose of the current study was to examine the use of FFLF in patients undergoing resection of thigh sarcoma. Methods Twelve patients with a sarcoma involving the hamstring (n = 6), quadriceps (n = 5), or combined (n = 1) defects which included multiple muscle groups were reviewed. This included 9 males and 3 females with a mean age and body mass index of 56 ± 12 years and 31.3 ± 5.7 kg/m2. Results The mean defect volume and operative time was 3,689 ± 2,314 cm3 and 587 ± 73 minutes. Following reconstruction, the mean knee range of motion (ROM), MSTS93 score, and muscle strength was 89 ± 24°, 90 ± 15%, and 4 ± 1; with 75% of patients ambulating without gait aids. Seven (58%) patients sustained a complication, namely, delayed wound healing (n = 2). Conclusion Although there was a high incidence of complications, FFLF can restore active knee ROM and function, with most patients ambulating without gait aids following reconstruction of large oncologic defects in the thigh.
Collapse
|
15
|
Hypofractionated preoperative radiotherapy for high risk soft tissue sarcomas in a geriatric patient population. Radiol Oncol 2021; 55:459-466. [PMID: 34821137 PMCID: PMC8647799 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2021-0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Standard therapy for localised, resectable high risk soft tissue sarcomas consists of wide excision and radiotherapy over several weeks. This treatment schedule is hardly feasible in geriatric and frail patients. In order not to withhold radiotherapy from these patients, hypofractionated radiotherapy with 25 Gy in 5 fractions was evaluated in a geriatric patient population. Patients and methods A retrospective analysis was performed of 18 geriatric patients with resectable high risk soft tissue sarcomas of extremities and thoracic wall. Wound healing and short term oncologic outcome were analysed. In addition, dose constraints for radiotherapy of the extremities were transferred from normofractionated to hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens. Results Feasibility was good with 17/18 patients completing treatment as planned. Wound healing complication rate was in the range of published data. Two patients developed local and distant recurrence, two patients isolated distant recurrences. No isolated local recurrences were observed. Keeping the constraints was possible in all cases without compromising the coverage of the target volume. Conclusions Hypofractionated radiotherapy and surgery was well tolerated even in this specific patient population. With feasibility concerning early wound healing problems and adapted constraints, which allow for the treatment of most resectable extremity tumours, the concept warrants further evaluation in patients unfit for standard radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
16
|
Salerno KE, Alektiar KM, Baldini EH, Bedi M, Bishop AJ, Bradfield L, Chung P, DeLaney TF, Folpe A, Kane JM, Li XA, Petersen I, Powell J, Stolten M, Thorpe S, Trent JC, Voermans M, Guadagnolo BA. Radiation Therapy for Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Adults: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 11:339-351. [PMID: 34326023 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations addressing the indications for radiation therapy (RT), sequencing of local therapies, and appropriate dose and planning techniques for management of primary, operable, localized, soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in adults. METHODS The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 5 key questions focused on the use of RT for management of STS. These questions included indications for RT for STS of the extremity and superficial trunk; considerations for sequencing of RT with respect to surgery, dose of RT, appropriate treatment volumes and techniques; and the role of RT in management of retroperitoneal sarcoma. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength. RESULTS Multidisciplinary evaluation and decision making are recommended for all cases of STS. RT is recommended for patients in whom there is increased risk of local recurrence of resected STS, particularly if close or microscopically positive margins are anticipated or have occurred. When RT is indicated, preoperative RT is strongly recommended over postoperative RT. Postoperative RT is conditionally recommended in specific clinical circumstances (eg, uncontrolled pain or bleeding) or when the risk of wound complications outweighs that of late toxicity from RT. Routine use of RT in addition to oncologic resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma is conditionally not recommended. When RT is used for retroperitoneal sarcoma, preoperative RT is recommended, whereas postoperative RT is not recommended. CONCLUSIONS Based on currently published data, the American Society for Radiation Oncology task force has proposed evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of RT for STS in adults. Future studies will ascertain whether alterations in dosing and sequencing may optimize outcomes and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian E Salerno
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Kaled M Alektiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York
| | - Elizabeth H Baldini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Manpreet Bedi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Andrew J Bishop
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Lisa Bradfield
- American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Peter Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thomas F DeLaney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew Folpe
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - John M Kane
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - X Allen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Ivy Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - John Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Michael Stolten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Steven Thorpe
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Jonathan C Trent
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida
| | - Maria Voermans
- Froedtert & Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kruckeberg BM, Lee DR, Barlow JD, Morrey ME, Rose PS, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Houdek MT. Total elbow arthroplasty for tumors of the distal humerus and elbow. J Surg Oncol 2021; 124:1508-1514. [PMID: 34424539 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The elbow is a rare location for primary and metastatic tumors in the upper extremity. The goal of reconstruction is to provide painless motion and stability for hand function. Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is commonly utilized, with either off-the-self components, modular segmental endoprosthesis, or allograft-prosthesis composites (APC). The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare commonly utilized elbow reconstructions and report outcomes of (1) patient function and (2) implant survival and complications. METHODS We reviewed 33 patients (18 females and 15 males) undergoing elbow arthroplasty for reconstruction of an underlying oncologic process including linked TEA (n = 22, 67%), APC (n = 9, 27%), and endoprosthesis (n = 2, 6%). The most common indication was metastatic disease (n = 17, 52%), with 24 patients (73%) presenting with a pathologic fracture. RESULTS Five-year implant survival was following elbow reconstruction was 88%. The mean most recent Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score were 84 ± 18 and 78 ± 15%. Postoperative complications occurred in 15 elbows (45%), most commonly periprosthetic fracture (n = 5, 15%), leading to reoperation in six elbows (18%). CONCLUSION Although elbow arthroplasty is associated with a high incidence of complications, it provides a stable platform for upper extremity function in patients with oncologic processes of the elbow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dustin R Lee
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jonathan D Barlow
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mark E Morrey
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Peter S Rose
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Matthew T Houdek
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sabharwal S, Alcorn SR, Morris CD. Treatment of Radiation-Associated Fractures: A Critical Analysis Review. JBJS Rev 2021; 9:01874474-202108000-00007. [PMID: 34415860 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.20.00275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
» Fractures that result from radiation-induced bone damage are a recognized adverse effect of radiation therapy (RT). » The mechanisms of damage from RT are thought to be related to impaired vascularity, aberrations in osteoclast and osteoblast-mediated bone turnover, and compromise of cortical and trabecular microarchitecture. » Treatment of radiation-associated fractures is challenging, with rates of delayed union and nonunion of >50%. » Fracture management strategies, each with its own profile of risks and benefits, include prophylactic intramedullary nailing of long bones, open reduction and internal fixation with adjunctive iliac crest or vascularized fibular grafting, and endoprosthetic reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir Sabharwal
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sara R Alcorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Carol D Morris
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bourdais R, Achkar S, Honoré C, Faron M, Cavalcanti A, Auzac G, Ngo C, Haddag-Miliani L, Verret B, Dumont S, Deutsch E, Le Cesne A, Mir O, Le Péchoux C, Levy A. Prospective evaluation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy toxicity in extremity soft tissue sarcomas patients: A role for irradiated healthy soft tissue volume? Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 29:79-84. [PMID: 34179521 PMCID: PMC8213831 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Toxicity assessment in ESTS patients who received IMRT in real-life practice. Prospective evaluation by confidential mailed survey. Healthy soft tissue segment volume (median: 3911 cm3) associated with decreased toxicities. This should be confirmed as a possible dosimetric constraint.
Aim To prospectively assess toxicities of curative-intent intensity-modulated conformal radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcomas (ESTS). Methods Data from 59 consecutive patients with ESTS between 2014 and 2019 were both retrospectively and prospectively analysed. Toxicity data were collected both by confidential mailed survey (39% completed) and medical charts, and graded according to CTCAE v5.0. Normal tissues dosimetric data (healthy soft tissue segment, joint and bone) were included. The healthy soft tissue segment was created by adding 5 cm on either side of the PTV on CT axial slices, the PTV and bone (and articulation if present) were then removed from the generated volume. Results IMRT was delivered post-operatively for nearly half of patients (n = 24, 41%), preoperatively for 18 (31%) and exclusively for 17 (28%; salvage: 13% or immediately inoperable: 15%). The median total dose delivered to the planned target volume (PTV) was 50.4 Gy (36–68 Gy) and 13 patients (22%) received a boost. With a median follow-up of 27 months (6–94 months), a total of 87 late effects were identified in 44/59 (75%) patients: 89% G1–2, and 11% G3–4. The main G1-2 toxicities were: functional limitation (36%), oedema (29%), gait disorders (20%), neurological disorders (20%) and chronic pain (32%). G3-4 toxicities were pain (n = 2), arterial stricture (n = 1) and a chronic wound requiring skin graft (n = 2). No bone fracture was observed. Quality of life was rated as good or very good in 70% patients who completed the survey. Larger (>3500 cm3) healthy soft tissue segment volume was associated with decreased late toxicities (p = 0.02). No other predictive factor of toxicity was identified. The 2-year rates of local control, overall survival and recurrence-free survival were 90%, 90% and 64%, respectively. Conclusion Healthy soft tissue segment volume influenced toxicity. Long-term prospective monitoring in a homogeneous population remains critical to assess the impact of IMRT induced chronic toxicity in ESTS patients. This should ideally lead to a validated normal tissue dose constraint (e.g.: healthy soft tissue segment volume > 3500 cm3) to recommend for practitioners to help reduce the late toxicity risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rémi Bourdais
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Samir Achkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Charles Honoré
- Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Matthieu Faron
- Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | | | - Guillaume Auzac
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Carine Ngo
- Department of Pathology, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | | | - Benjamin Verret
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Sarah Dumont
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, F-94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Axel Le Cesne
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Olivier Mir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Cécile Le Péchoux
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Antonin Levy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, F-94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bartlow CM, Mann KA, Damron TA, Oest ME. Altered mechanical behavior of demineralized bone following therapeutic radiation. J Orthop Res 2021; 39:750-760. [PMID: 32965711 PMCID: PMC8212945 DOI: 10.1002/jor.24868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Post-radiotherapy (RTx) bone fragility fractures are a late-onset complication occurring in bone within or underlying the radiation field. These fractures are difficult to predict, as patients do not present with local osteopenia. Using a murine hindlimb RTx model, we previously documented decreased mineralized bone strength and fracture toughness, but alterations in material properties of the organic bone matrix are largely unknown. In this study, 4 days of fractionated hindlimb irradiation (4 × 5 Gy) or Sham irradiation was administered in a mouse model (BALB/cJ, end points: 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks, n = 15/group/end point). Following demineralization, the viscoelastic stress relaxation, and monotonic tensile mechanical properties of tibiae were determined. Irradiated tibiae demonstrated an immediate (day after last radiation fraction) and sustained (4, 8, 12 weeks) increase in stress relaxation compared to the Sham group, with a 4.4% decrease in equilibrium stress (p < .017). While tensile strength was not different between groups, irradiated tibiae had a lower elastic modulus (-5%, p = .027) and energy to failure (-12.2%, p = .012) with monotonic loading. Gel electrophoresis showed that therapeutic irradiation (4 × 5 Gy) does not result in collagen fragmentation, while irradiation at a common sterilization dose (25 kGy) extensively fragmented collagen. These results suggest that altered collagen mechanical behavior has a role in postirradiation bone fragility, but this can occur without detectable collagen fragmentation. Statement of Clinical Significance: Therapeutic irradiation alters bone organic matrix mechanics and which contribute to diminished fatigue strength, but this does not occur via collagen fragmentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher M. Bartlow
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery State University of New York Upstate Medical University Syracuse New York USA
| | - Kenneth A. Mann
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery State University of New York Upstate Medical University Syracuse New York USA
| | - Timothy A. Damron
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery State University of New York Upstate Medical University Syracuse New York USA
| | - Megan E. Oest
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery State University of New York Upstate Medical University Syracuse New York USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Postradiation Fractures after Combined Modality Treatment in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Sarcoma 2021; 2021:8877567. [PMID: 33790687 PMCID: PMC7984930 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8877567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities is typically treated with limb-sparing surgery and radiation therapy; with this treatment approach, high local control rates can be achieved. However, postradiation bone fractures, fractures occurring in the prior radiation field with minimal or no trauma, are a serious late complication that occurs in 2–22% of patients who receive surgery and radiation for STS. Multiple risk factors for sustaining a postradiation fracture exist, including high radiation dose, female sex, periosteal stripping, older age, femur location, and chemotherapy administration. The treatment of these pathological fractures can be difficult, with complications including delayed union, nonunion, and infection posing particular challenges. Here, we review the mechanisms, risk factors, and treatment challenges associated with postradiation fractures in STS patients.
Collapse
|
22
|
Hall KS, Bruland ØS, Bjerkehagen B, Lidbrink E, Jebsen N, Hagberg H, Papworth K, Hagberg O, Trovik C, Bauer H, Eriksson M. Preoperative accelerated radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy in a defined cohort of patients with high risk soft tissue sarcoma: a Scandinavian Sarcoma Group study. Clin Sarcoma Res 2020; 10:22. [PMID: 33292545 PMCID: PMC7672981 DOI: 10.1186/s13569-020-00145-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We recently reported outcomes from a Scandinavian Sarcoma Group adjuvant study (SSG XX group A) conducted on localized and operable high risk soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities and trunk wall. SSG XX, group B, comprised of patients in a defined cohort with locally advanced STS considered at high risk for intralesional surgery. These patients received preoperative accelerated radiotherapy, together with neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Herein we report the results of this group B. Methods Twenty patients with high-grade, locally advanced and deep STS located in lower extremities (n = 12), upper extremities (5) or trunk wall (3) were included. The median age was 59 years and 14 patients were males. The treatment regimen consisted of 6 cycles of doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and ifosfamide (6 g/m2), with three cycles given neoadjuvantly, and preoperative radiotherapy (1, 8 Gyx2/daily to 36 Gy) between cycles 2 and 3. After a repeated MRI surgery was then conducted, and the remaining 3 chemotherapy cycles were given postoperatively at 3 weeks intervals. Survival data, local control, toxicity of chemotherapy and postoperative complications are presented. Results Median follow-up time for metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 2.8 years (range 0.3–10.4). The 5-year MFS was 49.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 31.7–77.4). The median follow-up time was 5.4 years (range 0.3–10.4) for overall survival (OS). The 5-year OS was 64.0% (95% CI 45.8–89.4). The median tumour size was 13 cm, with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 10) and synovial sarcoma (n = 6) diagnosed most frequently. All patients completed surgery. Resection margins were R0 in 19 patients and R1 in 1 patient. No patients had evidence of disease progression preoperatively. Three patients experienced a local recurrence, in 2 after lung metastases had already been diagnosed. Eleven patients (55%) had postoperative wound problems (temporary in 8 and persistent in 3). Conclusions Preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy were associated with temporary wound-healing problems. Survival outcomes, local control and toxicities were deemed satisfactory when considering the locally advanced sarcoma disease status at primary diagnosis. Trial registration This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00790244 and with European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials No. EUDRACT 2007-001152-39
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten Sundby Hall
- Department of Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Øyvind S Bruland
- Department of Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bodil Bjerkehagen
- Department of Pathology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elisabet Lidbrink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nina Jebsen
- Departments of Oncology and Orthopedics, Haukeland University Hospital and Centre for Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hans Hagberg
- Department of Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Karin Papworth
- Department of Oncology, Norrlands University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Oskar Hagberg
- Institution of Translation Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Clement Trovik
- Department Musculo-Skeletal Tumor Service/Orthopedics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Henrik Bauer
- Musculo-Skeletal Tumor Service, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Casey DL, Berry SL, Crago A, Fabbri N, Singer S, Alektiar KM. Femoral Fracture in Primary Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy with and Without Dose Constraints. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:2700-2704. [PMID: 33073343 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09213-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We previously reported that the cumulative risk of femoral fracture in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for thigh and groin soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is low. In the current study, we sought to evaluate the effect of radiation dose constraints on the rate of femoral fracture in a more contemporary cohort. METHODS All patients treated with IMRT for STS of the thigh or groin from 2004 to 2016 were included (n = 145). Beginning in 2011, radiation dose was constrained to a mean dose of < 37 Gy, volume of bone receiving ≥ 40 Gy (V40Gy) < 64%, and maximum dose < 59 Gy to limit the dose to the femur. RESULTS Sixty-one patients were treated before dose constraints were implemented, and 84 patients were treated after. Median follow-up for patients treated before and after constraints were implemented was 6.1 and 5.7 years, respectively, and the two groups were demographically and clinically similar. On univariate analysis, the 5-year cumulative incidence of femoral fracture among patients treated with and without dose constraints was 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-12.2%) versus 7.4% (95% CI 3.1-17.6%) [p = 0.11, p = non-significant, respectively]. On multivariable analysis, only age ≥ 60 years was significantly associated with increased risk of fracture. CONCLUSIONS The risk of femoral fracture after IMRT for STS of the thigh/groin is low, and with the implementation of radiation dose constraints, the risk is < 2%. Although longer follow-up is needed, our results support the utilization of extremity sarcoma IMRT-specific dose constraints for fracture prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana L Casey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sean L Berry
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aimee Crago
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicola Fabbri
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samuel Singer
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kaled M Alektiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy-Related Wound Morbidity in Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Perspectives for Radioprotective Agents. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12082258. [PMID: 32806601 PMCID: PMC7465163 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Historically, patients with localized soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities would undergo limb amputation. It was subsequently determined that the addition of radiation therapy (RT) delivered prior to (neoadjuvant) or after (adjuvant) a limb-sparing surgical resection yielded equivalent survival outcomes to amputation in appropriate patients. Generally, neoadjuvant radiation offers decreased volume and dose of high-intensity radiation to normal tissue and increased chance of achieving negative surgical margins-but also increases wound healing complications when compared to adjuvant radiotherapy. This review elaborates on the current neoadjuvant/adjuvant RT approaches, wound healing complications in STS, and the potential application of novel radioprotective agents to minimize radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity.
Collapse
|
25
|
Spałek MJ, Rutkowski P. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak: Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Soft Tissue Sarcomas as a Valuable Option in the Environment of Limited Medical Resources and Demands for Increased Protection of Patients. Front Oncol 2020; 10:993. [PMID: 32582558 PMCID: PMC7292147 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mateusz Jacek Spałek
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mandair GS, Oest ME, Mann KA, Morris MD, Damron TA, Kohn DH. Radiation-induced changes to bone composition extend beyond periosteal bone. Bone Rep 2020; 12:100262. [PMID: 32258252 PMCID: PMC7125315 DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2019] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas are often at risk of post-irradiation (post-RTx) bone fragility fractures, but our understanding of factors controlling radiation-induced bone injury is limited. Previous studies have evaluated post-RTx changes to cortical bone composition in the periosteum of irradiated tibiae, but have not evaluated effects of irradiation in deeper tissues, such as endosteal or mid-cortical bone, and whether there are differential spatial effects of irradiation. In this study, we hypothesize that post-RTx changes to cortical bone composition are greater in endosteal compared to mid-cortical or periosteal bone. METHODS A pre-clinical mouse model of limited field hindlimb irradiation was used to evaluate spatial and temporal post-RTx changes to the metaphyseal cortex of irradiated tibiae. Irradiation was delivered unilaterally to the hindlimbs of 12-wk old female BALB/cJ mice as 4 consecutive daily doses of 5 Gy each. RTx and non-RTx tibiae were obtained at 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12 wks post-RTx (n = 9 mice/group/time). Raman spectroscopy was used to evaluate spatial and temporal post-RTx changes to cortical bone composition in age-matched RTx and non-RTx groups. RESULTS Significant early spatial differences in mineral/matrix and collagen crosslink ratios were found between endosteal and periosteal or mid-cortical bone at 2-wks post-RTx. Although spatial differences were transient, mineral/matrix ratios significantly decreased and collagen crosslink ratios significantly increased with post-RTx time throughout the entire tibial metaphyseal cortex. CONCLUSIONS Irradiation negatively impacts the composition of cortical bone in a spatially-dependent manner starting as early as 2-wks post-RTx. Long-term progressive post-RTx changes across all cortical bone sites may eventually contribute to the increased risk of post-RTx bone fragility fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Megan E. Oest
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth A. Mann
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | | | - Timothy A. Damron
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - David H. Kohn
- School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gómez J, Tsagozis P. Multidisciplinary treatment of soft tissue sarcomas: An update. World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11:180-189. [PMID: 32355640 PMCID: PMC7186235 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i4.180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Standard treatment for soft tissue sarcoma, based on complete surgical resection with or without adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy, has not substantially changed during the last several decades. Nevertheless, recent advances have contributed to considerable improvement in the management of these patients; for example, new magnetic resonance imaging sequences such as diffusion-weighted imaging and magnetic resonance imaging radiomics can better assess tumor extension and even estimate its grade. Detection of circulating genetic material (liquid biopsy) and next-generation sequencing are powerful techniques for genetic analysis, which will increase our understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms and may reveal potential therapeutic targets. The role of chemotherapy in non-metastatic disease is still controversial, and there is a need to identify patients who really benefit from this treatment. Novel chemotherapeutic regimens have entered clinical praxis and can change the outcome of patients with metastatic disease. Advances in radiotherapy have helped decrease local adverse effects and sustain good local control of the disease. The following report provides an updated view of the diagnosis, treatment, and future perspectives on the management of patients with soft tissue sarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Gómez
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona 31008, Spain
| | - Panagiotis Tsagozis
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm 17176, Sweden
- Muskuloskeletal Tumour Service, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm 17176, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Brinkmann EJ, Ahmed SK, Houdek MT. Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Role of Local Control. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2020; 21:13. [PMID: 32025823 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-020-0703-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT For localized extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS), treatment is individualized and each patient needs to be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team at a referral sarcoma center specialized in the care of sarcoma. For a majority of patients, treatment for eSTS involves limb-salvage surgery, with or without the addition of radiation therapy. Surgery should only be performed by surgeons specifically fellowship trained in the resection of eSTS. Surgery alone may be considered for small, low-grade, and superficial tumors as long a wide (≥ 2 cm) margin can be achieved. In cases where a less than wide negative margin can be achieved, radiation therapy should be utilized to facilitate a planned close margin resection to preserve critical structures (such as nerves, blood vessels, and bone) without a significant impact on oncologic outcomes. Soft tissue sarcomas are rare, and as such patients often present following an inadvertent excision. In these situations, we recommend preoperative radiation and wide tumor bed re-excision, as rates of residual tumor can be high in this scenario. While there is large amount of evidence to support the use of radiotherapy to enhance local tumor control, the evidence to support the use of chemotherapy to enhance local tumor control is lacking, and as such cannot be recommended for all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elyse J Brinkmann
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Safia K Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew T Houdek
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Iizumi T, Shimizu S, Numajiri H, Takei H, Yamada N, Mizumoto M, Ishikawa H, Okumura T, Sakurai H. Large Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma Treated with Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy and Local Hyperthermia. Int J Part Ther 2019; 6:35-41. [PMID: 31773047 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-18-00046.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) is one of the most common soft tissue sarcomas. The standard treatment is adequate surgical resection; in addition, radiation therapy plays a major role in perioperative treatment in most cases. Herein, we report the case of a patient with a large MFH who was successfully treated with combined proton beam therapy (PBT) and local hyperthermia (LH). Case Presentation A 60-year-old man presented with a 6×4-cm mass on his left thigh. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry indicated MFH, and he refused limb amputation. He received treatment with PBT at a dose at 72 GyE in 18 fractions. To cover the entire large target lesion, we used a patch-field protocol. He also concurrently received 7 courses of LH. The combination therapy achieved long-term local control without severe acute or late toxicity during the 7-year follow-up period. Conclusions This case suggests that the combination of PBT and LH may be an option as a limb-preserving treatment for large inoperable MFH in the extremities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Iizumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Shosei Shimizu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Haruko Numajiri
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Takei
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Noboru Yamada
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Fukushima Rosai Hospital, Iwaki, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Okumura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Di Brina L, Fogliata A, Navarria P, D'Agostino G, Franzese C, Franceschini D, De Rose F, Comito T, Bertuzzi A, Marrari A, Colombo P, Quagliuolo V, Santoro A, Scorsetti M. Adjuvant volumetric modulated arc therapy compared to 3D conformal radiation therapy for newly diagnosed soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: outcome and toxicity evaluation. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20190252. [PMID: 31322910 PMCID: PMC6774597 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Revised: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of adjuvant volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in terms of toxicity and local control (LC) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities. METHODS From 2004 to 2016, 109 patients were treated, initially using 3DCRT and subsequently with VMAT. Clinical outcome was evaluated by contrast-enhanced MRI, thoracic and abdominal CT 3 months after treatments and then every 6 months. Toxicity was evaluated with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scale v. 4.3. RESULTS Patients presented Stage III soft tissue sarcoma disease (77%), localized tumor (95%) at the lower extremity (87%), adipocytic histotype (46%). Surgical resection was performed in all patients, followed by adjuvant 3DCRT in 38, and VMAT in 71. The median total dose was 66 Gy/33 fractions (range 60-70 Gy;25-35 fractions). More successful bone sparing was recorded using VMAT (p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 61 months, 93 and 58 months for 3DCRT and VMAT group, respectively. The 2- and 5 year LC were 95.3±2.1%, and 87.4±3.4% for the whole cohort, 92.0±4.5%, 82.9±6.4% for 3DCRT, 97.1±2.0%, 89.6±4.1% for VMAT (p = 0.150). On univariate and multivariate analysis the factors recorded as conditioning LC were the status of the surgical resection margins (p = 0.028) and the total dose delivered (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION The availability of modern radiotherapy technique permit a better conformity on the target with maximum sparing of normal tissue and acceptable side-effects. VMAT is a safe and feasible treatment with limited rate of toxicity, compared to 3DCRT. Results on LC of VMAT are encouraging. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities can benefit from the use of VMAT, with a reduction of the high dose to bones to avoid radiation osteonecrosis. An adequate total dose of at least 66 Gy and a radical surgical margin allow a good local control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Di Brina
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Antonella Fogliata
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Giuseppe D'Agostino
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Davide Franceschini
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Fiorenza De Rose
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Tiziana Comito
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Alexia Bertuzzi
- Medical Oncology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Andrea Marrari
- Medical Oncology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Piergiuseppe Colombo
- Pahtology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS-, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wang J, Song Y, Liu X, Jin J, Wang W, Yu Z, Liu Y, Li N, Fang H, Ren H, Tang Y, Tang Y, Chen B, Lu N, Qi S, Wang S, Li Y. Comparison of outcome and toxicity of postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy with two-dimensional radiotherapy in patients with soft tissue sarcoma of extremities and trunk. Cancer Med 2019; 8:902-909. [PMID: 30740916 PMCID: PMC6434203 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Revised: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the survival outcomes and late toxicities of postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with two-dimensional radiotherapy (2D-RT) for patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of extremities and trunk. METHODS 274 consecutive patients with nonmetastatic STS of extremities and trunk treated with postoperative IMRT (n = 187) and 2D-RT (n = 87) were analyzed. Survival was calculated by using Kaplan-Meier method. Independent prognostic factors were identified using Cox stepwise regression analysis for variables with a P-value <0.1 in univariate analysis. RESULTS With a median follow-up time of 58.1 months, 30 local recurrences, 66 distant metastases, and 40 deaths occurred. Compared to 2D-RT group, the IMRT group had higher 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (91.1% vs 80.8%; P = 0.029), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (80.0% vs 69.7%; P = 0.048), disease-free survival (DFS) (75.2% vs 59.2%; P = 0.021), and overall survival (OS) (90.2% vs 81.0%; P = 0.029). Multivariate analysis showed IMRT was an independent favorable factor for LRFS, DMFS, DFS, and OS. For late toxicities, the patients in IMRT group enjoyed lower incidences of ≥Grade 2 joint stiffness (3.9% vs 12.3%; P = 0.041) and ≥Grade 3 fractures (0.0% vs 3.4%; P = 0.25) than those in 2D-RT group. ≥Grade 2 Edema was similar between these two groups (4.8% vs 9.2%; P = 0.183). CONCLUSIONS When compared with conventional techniques, postoperative IMRT seems to provide better LRFS, DMFS, DFS, and OS and less late toxicities in patients with STS of extremities and trunk, which should be offered as a preferred treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianyang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yongwen Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xinfan Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weihu Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zihao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yueping Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ning Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hua Ren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ningning Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shunan Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shulian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yexiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Guadagnolo BA. IMRT Should Be Considered a Standard-of-Care Approach for Radiation Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:1186-1187. [PMID: 30706228 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07192-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- B Ashleigh Guadagnolo
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Health Services Research, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Folkert MR, Casey DL, Berry SL, Crago A, Fabbri N, Singer S, Alektiar KM. Femoral Fracture in Primary Soft-Tissue Sarcoma of the Thigh and Groin Treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: Observed versus Expected Risk. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:1326-1331. [PMID: 30706225 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07182-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study was designed to compare the observed risk of femoral fracture in primary soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) of the thigh/groin treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to expected risk calculated using the Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH) nomogram. METHODS Expected femoral fracture risk was calculated by using the PMH nomogram. Cumulative risk of fracture was estimated by using Kaplan-Meier statistics. Prognostic factors were assessed with univariate and multivariate analysis using Cox's stepwise regression. RESULTS Between February 2002 and December 2010, 92 consecutive eligible patients were assessed. Median follow-up was 73 months (106 months in surviving patients). IMRT was delivered preoperatively (50 Gy) in 13 (14%) patients and postoperatively in 79 (86%) patients (median dose, 63 Gy; range, 59.4-66.6 Gy). The observed crude risk of fractures was 6.5% compared with 25.6% expected risk from the nomogram; the cumulative risk of fracture using IMRT at 5 years was 6.7% (95% CI 2.8-16.0%). The median time to fracture was 23 months (range, 6.9-88.6). Significant predictors of fracture on univariate analysis were age ≥ 60 years (p = 0.03), tumor location in the anterior thigh (p = 0.008), and periosteal stripping to > 20 cm (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, age ≥ 60 years and periosteal stripping > 20 cm retained significance (p = 0.04 and p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In this study, the cumulative risk of femur fracture in patients treated with IMRT (6.7%) is less than the expected risk using the PMH nomogram (25.6%). Established predictors of femur fracture, such as gender, tumor size, and dose of RT, seem to have less impact on fracture risk when using IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Folkert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Dana L Casey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sean L Berry
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Aimee Crago
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Nicola Fabbri
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Samuel Singer
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Kaled M Alektiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bartlow CM, Mann KA, Damron TA, Oest ME. Limited field radiation therapy results in decreased bone fracture toughness in a murine model. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0204928. [PMID: 30281657 PMCID: PMC6169919 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Fragility fractures are a well-known complication following oncologic radiotherapy, and it is suspected that radiation-induced embrittlement of bone within the treatment field may contribute to fracture risk. To explore this phenomenon, a mouse model (BALB/cJ) of fractionated, limited field, bilateral hindlimb irradiation (4x5 Gy) was used. The effects of radiation on femoral (cortical) bone fracture toughness, morphology, and biochemistry-including advanced glycation end products (AGEs)-were quantified and compared to Sham group samples prior to irradiation and at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-irradiation. Additionally, alterations to bone fracture toughness mediated directly by radiation (independent of cellular mechanisms) were determined using devitalized mouse cadaver femurs. Finally, the contribution of AGEs to reduced fracture toughness was examined by artificially ribosylating mouse femurs ex vivo. These data demonstrate that in vivo irradiation results in an immediate (-42% at 0 weeks, p < 0.001) and sustained (-28% at 12 weeks, p < 0.001) decrease in fracture toughness with small changes in morphology (-5% in cortical area at 12 weeks), and minimal changes in bone composition (tissue mineral density, mineral:matrix ratio, and AGE content). Irradiation of devitalized femurs also reduced fracture toughness (-29%, p < 0.001), but to a lesser extent than was seen in vivo. While artificial ribosylation decreased fracture toughness with time, the extent of glycation needed to induce this effect exceeded the AGE accumulation that occurred in vivo. Overall, hindlimb irradiation induced a substantial and sustained decrease in bone fracture toughness. Approximately half of this decrease in fracture toughness is due to direct radiation damage, independent of cellular remodeling. Collagen glycation in vivo was not substantially altered, suggesting other matrix changes may contribute to post-radiotherapy bone embrittlement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher M. Bartlow
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America
| | - Kenneth A. Mann
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America
| | - Timothy A. Damron
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America
| | - Megan E. Oest
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Tang Z, Zeng Q, Li Y, Zhang X, Ma J, Suto MJ, Xu B, Yi N. Development of a radiosensitivity gene signature for patients with soft tissue sarcoma. Oncotarget 2018; 8:27428-27439. [PMID: 28404969 PMCID: PMC5432346 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2016] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant radiotherapy is an important clinical treatment option for the majority of sarcomas. The motivation of current study is to identify a gene signature and to predict radiosensitive patients who are most likely to benefit from radiotherapy. Using the public available data of soft tissue sarcoma from The Cancer Genome Atlas, we developed a cross-validation procedure for identifying a gene signature and predicting radiosensitive patients through. The result showed that the predicted radiosensitive patients who received radiotherapy had a significantly better survival with a reduced rate of new tumor event and disease progression. Strata analysis showed that the predicted radiosensitive patients had significantly better survival under radiotherapy independent of histologic types. A hierarchical cluster analysis was used to validate the gene signature, and the results showed the predicted sensitivity for each patient well matched the results from cluster analysis. Together, we demonstrate a radiosensitive molecular signature that can be potentially used for identifying radiosensitive patients with sarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaixiang Tang
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China.,Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Preventive and Translational Medicine for Geriatric Diseases, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China.,Center for Genetic Epidemiology and Genomics, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China.,Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Qinghua Zeng
- Drug Discovery Division, Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Xinyan Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Jinlu Ma
- Drug Discovery Division, Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shanxi, 710061, China
| | - Mark J Suto
- Drug Discovery Division, Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Bo Xu
- Drug Discovery Division, Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Nengjun Yi
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Li W, Appiah S, Hill C, Becker N, Catton C, Chung P, Shultz D, Ferguson P, O'Sullivan B, Dickie C. Evidence-based region of interest matching guidelines for sarcoma volumetric image-guided radiation therapy. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2018; 5:3-8. [PMID: 32095568 PMCID: PMC7033805 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2018.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2017] [Revised: 12/20/2017] [Accepted: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Region-of-interest (ROI) guidelines for soft tissue sarcoma CBCT-guidance were developed. ROI guidelines were developed for four anatomic sites using the PDSA cycle. ROI guidelines are intended to increase image registration reproducibility. Results include improved image guidance decision making and workflow efficiencies.
Purpose Region-of-interest (ROI) guidelines for online cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) radiotherapy may improve matching reproducibility and reduce inter-user variability of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) image guidance. The purpose of this work is to standardize ROI STS CBCT image registration guidelines using the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycle for the lower extremity, retroperitoneal, pelvis, and thorax. Methods Based on anatomic bony surrogates, initial ROI matching guidelines for STS were developed by a team of radiation therapists, physicists and oncologists (Plan). Retrospective, qualitative evaluation of the guidelines was completed by the designated sarcoma lead therapist to determine clinical feasibility (Do). Validation of the ROI guidelines was performed through independent evaluation by radiation therapy CBCT imaging experts on a cohort of 10 patients per anatomic region (Study). Results Draft ROI guidelines were evaluated by 2 independent observers who registered weekly CBCT images to test their validity. Each observer assessed 5 patients per anatomic site, testing ROI options for accuracy of image registration and feasibility, while some ROI borders were adjusted based on algorithm matching performance. Validated ROI guidelines were presented to the sarcoma multidisciplinary site group, and an inter-professional committee of imaging experts for approval prior to clinical implementation (Act). Conclusion ROI matching guidelines for STS IGRT were standardized for 4 anatomic sites using the PDSA cycle for change testing and implementation. IGRT guidelines are intended to improve STS image registration reproducibility, and in turn, are expected to improve the confidence of IGRT decision making and workflow efficiencies for a rare disease with diverse presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winnie Li
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Samuel Appiah
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Christine Hill
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nathan Becker
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Charles Catton
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Chung
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Shultz
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Ferguson
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Musculoskeletal Oncology Unit, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brian O'Sullivan
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Colleen Dickie
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Haas RL, Gronchi A, van de Sande MA, Baldini EH, Gelderblom H, Messiou C, Wardelmann E, Le Cesne A. Perioperative Management of Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:118-124. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.74.7527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgery is potentially curative for primary nonmetastatic extremity soft tissue sarcomas. After surgery alone, patients may remain at risk for local recurrences and/or metastatic disease. To reduce the likelihood of a local relapse, the addition of radiotherapy (RT) to limb-sparing surgery may result in higher local control rates of at least 85%. Generally, it can be stated that local control after both preoperative and postoperative RT is comparable, but that preoperative RT comes with a more favorable toxicity profile after prolonged follow-up, albeit at the cost of a higher wound complication rate. Furthermore, recent data suggest that preoperative RT is more cost effective. To reduce the risk of subsequent metastatic disease, systemic chemotherapy can be introduced early during the primary management of these patients. These systemic chemotherapy regimens can also be applied both preoperatively and postoperatively. Finally, with the aim of increasing the antitumor response of perioperative RT, these agents may even be combined with RT, concurrently and sequentially. While designing new preoperative combination regimens, responses should be carefully monitored by both sophisticated radiologic and pathologic evaluations. This article reviews all these aspects, in addition to limb-sparing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rick L. Haas
- Rick L. Haas, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Rick L. Haas, Michiel A.J. van de Sande, and Hans Gelderblom, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Alessandro Gronchi, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Elizabeth H. Baldini, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Christina Messiou, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Eva Wardelmann, University Hospital
| | - Alessandro Gronchi
- Rick L. Haas, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Rick L. Haas, Michiel A.J. van de Sande, and Hans Gelderblom, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Alessandro Gronchi, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Elizabeth H. Baldini, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Christina Messiou, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Eva Wardelmann, University Hospital
| | - Michiel A.J. van de Sande
- Rick L. Haas, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Rick L. Haas, Michiel A.J. van de Sande, and Hans Gelderblom, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Alessandro Gronchi, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Elizabeth H. Baldini, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Christina Messiou, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Eva Wardelmann, University Hospital
| | - Elizabeth H. Baldini
- Rick L. Haas, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Rick L. Haas, Michiel A.J. van de Sande, and Hans Gelderblom, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Alessandro Gronchi, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Elizabeth H. Baldini, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Christina Messiou, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Eva Wardelmann, University Hospital
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Rick L. Haas, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Rick L. Haas, Michiel A.J. van de Sande, and Hans Gelderblom, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Alessandro Gronchi, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Elizabeth H. Baldini, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Christina Messiou, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Eva Wardelmann, University Hospital
| | - Christina Messiou
- Rick L. Haas, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Rick L. Haas, Michiel A.J. van de Sande, and Hans Gelderblom, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Alessandro Gronchi, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Elizabeth H. Baldini, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Christina Messiou, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Eva Wardelmann, University Hospital
| | - Eva Wardelmann
- Rick L. Haas, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Rick L. Haas, Michiel A.J. van de Sande, and Hans Gelderblom, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Alessandro Gronchi, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Elizabeth H. Baldini, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Christina Messiou, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Eva Wardelmann, University Hospital
| | - Axel Le Cesne
- Rick L. Haas, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Rick L. Haas, Michiel A.J. van de Sande, and Hans Gelderblom, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Alessandro Gronchi, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Elizabeth H. Baldini, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Christina Messiou, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Eva Wardelmann, University Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Oest ME, Policastro CG, Mann KA, Zimmerman ND, Damron TA. Longitudinal Effects of Single Hindlimb Radiation Therapy on Bone Strength and Morphology at Local and Contralateral Sites. J Bone Miner Res 2018; 33:99-112. [PMID: 28902435 PMCID: PMC5776033 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2016] [Revised: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 09/12/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RTx) is associated with increased risk for late-onset fragility fractures in bone tissue underlying the radiation field. Bone tissue outside the RTx field is often selected as a "normal" comparator tissue in clinical assessment of fragility fracture risk, but the robustness of this comparison is limited by an incomplete understanding of the systemic effects of local radiotherapy. In this study, a mouse model of limited field irradiation was used to quantify longitudinal changes in local (irradiated) and systemic (non-irradiated) femurs with respect to bone density, morphology, and strength. BALB/cJ mice aged 12 weeks underwent unilateral hindlimb irradiation (4 × 5 Gy) or a sham procedure. Femurs were collected at endpoints of 4 days before treatment and at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks post-treatment. Irradiated (RTx), Contralateral (non-RTx), and Sham (non-RTx) femurs were imaged by micro-computed tomography and mechanically tested in three-point bending. In both the RTx and Contralateral non-RTx groups, the longer-term (12- to 26-week) outcomes included trabecular resorption, loss of diaphyseal cortical bone, and decreased bending strength. Contralateral femurs generally followed an intermediate response compared with RTx femurs. Change also varied by anatomic compartment; post-RTx loss of trabecular bone was more profound in the metaphyseal than the epiphyseal compartment, and cortical bone thickness decreased at the mid-diaphysis but increased at the metaphysis. These data demonstrate that changes in bone quantity, density, and architecture occur both locally and systemically after limited field irradiation and vary by anatomic compartment. Furthermore, the severity and persistence of systemic bone damage after limited field irradiation suggest selection of control tissues for assessment of fracture risk or changes in bone density after radiotherapy may be challenging. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan E Oest
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Connor G Policastro
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth A Mann
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Nicholas D Zimmerman
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Timothy A Damron
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
De La Hoz Polo M, Dick E, Bhumbra R, Pollock R, Sandhu R, Saifuddin A. Surgical considerations when reporting MRI studies of soft tissue sarcoma of the limbs. Skeletal Radiol 2017; 46:1667-1678. [PMID: 28884363 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2745-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2017] [Revised: 07/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/01/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours that require prompt diagnosis and treatment at a specialist centre. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the modality of choice for identification, characterisation, biopsy planning and staging of soft tissue masses. MRI enables both the operating surgeon and patient to be optimally prepared prior to surgery for the likelihood of margin-negative resection and to anticipate possible sacrifice of adjacent structures and consequent loss of function. The aim of this review is to aid the radiologist in performing and reporting MRI studies of soft tissue sarcomas, with particular reference to the requirements of the surgical oncologist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcela De La Hoz Polo
- Radiology Department, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, Brixton, SE5 9RS, UK.
| | - Elizabeth Dick
- Radiology Department, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | - Rej Bhumbra
- Trauma & Orthopaedic Department, Barts Health Orthopaedic Centre, Newham & The Royal London Hospitals, Whitechapel Rd, London, Whitechapel, E1 1BB, UK
| | - Rob Pollock
- Trauma & Orthopaedic Department, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, UK
| | - Ranbir Sandhu
- Radiology Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Asif Saifuddin
- Radiology Department, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tang Z, Zeng Q, Li Y, Zhang X, Suto MJ, Xu B, Yi N. Predicting radiotherapy response for patients with soft tissue sarcoma by developing a molecular signature. Oncol Rep 2017; 38:2814-2824. [PMID: 29048650 PMCID: PMC5780036 DOI: 10.3892/or.2017.5999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2017] [Accepted: 08/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas are rare and aggressive tumors arising from connective tissues. Adjuvant radiotherapy is a commonly used treatment approach for the majority of sarcomas. We attempted to identify a gene signature that can predict radiosensitive patients who are most likely to have a better treatment response from radiotherapy, compared with disease progression. Using the publicly available data of soft tissue sarcoma from The Cancer Genome Atlas, we developed a cross-validation procedure to identify a predictive gene signature for radiosensitivity. The results showed that the predicted radiosensitive patients who received radiotherapy had significantly improved treatment response. We further provide supportive evidence to validate our sensitivity prediction. Results showed that the predicted radiosensitive patients who received radiotherapy had significantly improved survival than patients who did not. ROC analysis showed that the developed gene signature had a powerful prediction on treatment response. We further found that predicted radiosensitive patients who received radiotherapy had a significantly reduced rate of new tumor events. Finally, we validated our gene signature using a hierarchical cluster analysis, and found that the predicted sensitivities were well-matched with results from the cluster analysis. These results are consistent with our expectation, suggesting that the identified gene signature and radiosensitivity prediction are effective. The genes involved in the signature may provide a molecular basis for prognostic studies and radiotherapy target discovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaixiang Tang
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123, P.R. China
| | - Qinghua Zeng
- Drug Discovery Division, Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Xinyan Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Mark J Suto
- Drug Discovery Division, Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Bo Xu
- Drug Discovery Division, Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Nengjun Yi
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gupta S, Kafchinski LA, Gundle KR, Saidi K, Griffin AM, Wunder JS, Ferguson PC. Intercalary allograft augmented with intramedullary cement and plate fixation is a reliable solution after resection of a diaphyseal tumour. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B:973-978. [PMID: 28663406 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b7.bjj-2016-0996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2016] [Accepted: 12/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Intercalary allografts following resection of a primary diaphyseal tumour have high rates of complications and failures. At our institution intercalary allografts are augmented with intramedullary cement and fixed using compression plating. Our aim was to evaluate their long-term outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 46 patients underwent reconstruction with an intercalary allograft between 1989 and 2014. The patients had a mean age of 32.8 years (14 to 77). The most common diagnoses were osteosarcoma (n = 16) and chondrosarcoma (n = 9). The location of the tumours was in the femur in 21, the tibia in 16 and the humerus in nine. Function was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS). The survival of the graft and the overall survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The median follow-up was 92 months (4 to 288). The mean MSTS 87 score was 29.1 (19 to 35), the mean MSTS 93 score was 82.2 (50 to 100) and the mean TESS score was 81.2 (43 to 100). Overall survival of the allograft was 84.8%. A total of 15 patients (33%) had a complication. Five allografts were revised for complications and one for local recurrence. CONCLUSION Intercalary allografts augmented with intramedullary cement and compression plate fixation provide a reliable and durable method of reconstruction after the excision of a primary diaphyseal bone tumour, with high levels of function and satisfaction. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:973-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Gupta
- Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle St, Glasgow G4 0SF, UK
| | - L A Kafchinski
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, 4801 Alberta Avenue El Paso, TX 79905, USA
| | - K R Gundle
- Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - K Saidi
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine, 2120 Regent Street South, Unit 2, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E3Z9, Canada
| | - A M Griffin
- Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - J S Wunder
- Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - P C Ferguson
- Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, M5G 1X5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Schernberg A, Hennequin C. [Normal tissue tolerance to external beam radiation therapy: Bone marrow and cortical bone structures]. Cancer Radiother 2017; 21:619-625. [PMID: 28774489 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2017] [Accepted: 06/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
In patients undergoing external radiation therapy, bone marrow and cortical bone structures are all often neglected as organs at risk. Still, from increased febrile neutropenia risk in patients undergoing chemoradiation for a pelvic tumour to increased risk of vertebral fracture when undergoing hypofractioned stereotactic radiotherapy of a spinal metastasis, adverse effects are frequent and sometimes serious. This literature review first defines the rules for contouring these structures, then the dose constraints currently recommended. This article focuses first on conventional irradiation or intensity modulation radiotherapy considering classical fractionation. Secondly, it focuses on stereotactic radiotherapy. The considered organs will be haematopoietic structures, and bone cortical structures. Current recommendations are summarised in a table.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Schernberg
- Service de radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, hôpitaux universitaires Est parisien, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France.
| | - C Hennequin
- Service de cancérologie-radiothérapie, hôpital Saint-Louis, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75475 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ramu EM, Houdek MT, Isaac CE, Dickie CI, Ferguson PC, Wunder JS. Management of soft-tissue sarcomas; treatment strategies, staging, and outcomes. SICOT J 2017; 3:20. [PMID: 28287387 PMCID: PMC5347369 DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2017010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2016] [Accepted: 01/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare group of malignant tumors which can affect any age group. For the majority of patients who present with a localized STS, treatment involves a multidisciplinary team decision-making approach ultimately relying on surgical resection with or without adjuvant radiation for successful limb salvage. The goals of treatment are to provide the patient with a functional extremity without local tumor relapse. The purpose of this article is to review the treatment of extremity STS, with a focus on staging, treatment options, and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eyal M Ramu
- University of Toronto Musculoskeletal Oncology Unit, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, M5G 1X5 Ontario, Canada - Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5G 2C4 Ontario, Canada - Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5G 2C4 Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew T Houdek
- University of Toronto Musculoskeletal Oncology Unit, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, M5G 1X5 Ontario, Canada - Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5G 2C4 Ontario, Canada - Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5G 2C4 Ontario, Canada
| | - Christian E Isaac
- University of Toronto Musculoskeletal Oncology Unit, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, M5G 1X5 Ontario, Canada - Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5G 2C4 Ontario, Canada - Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5G 2C4 Ontario, Canada
| | - Colleen I Dickie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5G 2C4 Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter C Ferguson
- University of Toronto Musculoskeletal Oncology Unit, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, M5G 1X5 Ontario, Canada - Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5G 2C4 Ontario, Canada - Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5G 2C4 Ontario, Canada
| | - Jay S Wunder
- University of Toronto Musculoskeletal Oncology Unit, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, M5G 1X5 Ontario, Canada - Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5G 2C4 Ontario, Canada - Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5G 2C4 Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
The value of adaptive preoperative radiotherapy in management of soft tissue sarcoma. Radiother Oncol 2017; 122:458-463. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Revised: 10/28/2016] [Accepted: 12/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
45
|
Wortman JR, Tirumani SH, Jagannathan JP, Rosenthal MH, Shinagare AB, Hornick JL, Baldini EH, Ramaiya NH. Radiation Therapy for Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: A Primer for Radiologists. Radiographics 2017; 36:554-72. [PMID: 26963462 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2016150083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) plays an important role in multimodality therapy for soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). RT treatment paradigms have evolved significantly in recent years, and many different complex RT modalities are commonly used in STS. These include external-beam RT, intensity-modulated RT, stereotactic body RT, and brachytherapy. Imaging is essential throughout the treatment process. Plain radiographs, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and positron emission tomography/CT all play potential roles in the management of STS. Before RT, high-quality imaging is needed to direct management decisions, both by global tumor staging and detailed assessment of the extent of local disease. At the time of RT, precise planning imaging is required to delineate tumor volumes, including gross tumor volume, clinical target volume, and planning target volume, which are used to direct therapy. In addition, imaging at the time of RT must outline the location of adjacent vital organs, to optimize treatment efficacy and minimize toxicity. After RT, imaging is needed to assess the patient for tumor response to therapy. In addition, imaging at regular intervals is often required to monitor for recurrence of disease and potential complications of therapy. The purpose of this review is to familiarize radiologists with the indications for RT in STS, common therapeutic modalities used, roles of imaging throughout the treatment process, and complications of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy R Wortman
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.R.W., S.H.T., J.P.J., M.H.R., A.B.S., N.H.R.), Pathology (J.L.H.), and Radiation Oncology (E.H.B.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115; and Department of Imaging (S.H.T., J.P.J., M.H.R., A.B.S., N.H.R.) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology (E.H.B.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Sree Harsha Tirumani
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.R.W., S.H.T., J.P.J., M.H.R., A.B.S., N.H.R.), Pathology (J.L.H.), and Radiation Oncology (E.H.B.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115; and Department of Imaging (S.H.T., J.P.J., M.H.R., A.B.S., N.H.R.) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology (E.H.B.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Jyothi P Jagannathan
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.R.W., S.H.T., J.P.J., M.H.R., A.B.S., N.H.R.), Pathology (J.L.H.), and Radiation Oncology (E.H.B.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115; and Department of Imaging (S.H.T., J.P.J., M.H.R., A.B.S., N.H.R.) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology (E.H.B.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Michael H Rosenthal
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.R.W., S.H.T., J.P.J., M.H.R., A.B.S., N.H.R.), Pathology (J.L.H.), and Radiation Oncology (E.H.B.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115; and Department of Imaging (S.H.T., J.P.J., M.H.R., A.B.S., N.H.R.) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology (E.H.B.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Atul B Shinagare
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.R.W., S.H.T., J.P.J., M.H.R., A.B.S., N.H.R.), Pathology (J.L.H.), and Radiation Oncology (E.H.B.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115; and Department of Imaging (S.H.T., J.P.J., M.H.R., A.B.S., N.H.R.) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology (E.H.B.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Jason L Hornick
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.R.W., S.H.T., J.P.J., M.H.R., A.B.S., N.H.R.), Pathology (J.L.H.), and Radiation Oncology (E.H.B.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115; and Department of Imaging (S.H.T., J.P.J., M.H.R., A.B.S., N.H.R.) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology (E.H.B.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Elizabeth H Baldini
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.R.W., S.H.T., J.P.J., M.H.R., A.B.S., N.H.R.), Pathology (J.L.H.), and Radiation Oncology (E.H.B.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115; and Department of Imaging (S.H.T., J.P.J., M.H.R., A.B.S., N.H.R.) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology (E.H.B.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Nikhil H Ramaiya
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.R.W., S.H.T., J.P.J., M.H.R., A.B.S., N.H.R.), Pathology (J.L.H.), and Radiation Oncology (E.H.B.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115; and Department of Imaging (S.H.T., J.P.J., M.H.R., A.B.S., N.H.R.) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology (E.H.B.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
Although there is no consensus regarding the optimal sequencing of external beam radiotherapy and surgery for extremity soft tissue sarcoma, radiation therapy delivered before or after limb-sparing surgery significantly improves local control, particularly for high-grade tumors. Large database analyses suggest that improved local control may translate into an overall survival benefit. Best practices require ample communication between the radiation and surgical teams to ensure appropriate tissues are targeted, unnecessary radiation is avoided, and patients are afforded the best opportunity for cure while maintaining function. Modern experiences with intensity-modulated radiotherapy/image-guided radiation therapy suggest toxicity is reduced through field size reduction and precise targeting, improving the therapeutic ratio.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke K Leachman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| | - Thomas J Galloway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Okoukoni C, Randolph DM, McTyre ER, Kwok A, Weaver AA, Blackstock AW, Munley MT, Willey JS. Early dose-dependent cortical thinning of the femoral neck in anal cancer patients treated with pelvic radiation therapy. Bone 2017; 94:84-89. [PMID: 27780791 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2016] [Revised: 10/13/2016] [Accepted: 10/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Anal cancer patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) have an increased risk of hip fractures after treatment. The mechanism of these fractures is unknown; however, femoral fractures have been correlated with cortical bone thinning. The objective of this study was to assess early changes in cortical bone thickness at common sites of femoral fracture in anal cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS RT treatment plans and computed tomography (CT) scans from 23 anal cancer patients who underwent IMRT between November 2012 and December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Cortical thickness (Ct.Th) was mapped at homologous vertices within the proximal femur using pre-RT and post-RT (≤4months) CT scans. The bone attenuation measurements were collected at homologous locations within the trabecular bone of the right femoral neck (FN). The percent change in Ct.Th and trabecular bone mineral density (trBMD) were assessed. FN cortical thinning was correlated to RT dose using linear regression. A logistic model for dose dependent cortical thinning was constructed. RESULTS Twenty-two patients were analyzed. Significant post-treatment cortical thinning was observed in the intertrochanteric crest, subcapital and inferior FN (p<0.05). FN volume receiving ≥40Gy (V40Gy) was a significant predictor of focal cortical thinning ≥30% (p=0.03). A significant decrease in FN trBMD was observed (-6.4% [range -34.4 to 3.3%]; p=0.01). CONCLUSION Significant early decrease in Ct.Th and trBMD occurs at the FN in patients treated with RT for anal cancer. FN V40Gy was predictive of clinically significant focal FN cortical thinning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Okoukoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - David M Randolph
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Emory R McTyre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Andy Kwok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Ashley A Weaver
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University Center for Injury Biomechanics, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - A William Blackstock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Michael T Munley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Willey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Radiation Therapy for Sarcomas. Sarcoma 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-43121-5_10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
49
|
[Radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas: Technical evolution and impact on clinical benefit]. Cancer Radiother 2016; 20:666-76. [PMID: 27614501 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.07.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2016] [Revised: 07/11/2016] [Accepted: 07/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The standard treatment for extremity soft tissue sarcomas is based on the association of surgery and radiotherapy. This strategy allows local control improvement with the risk of increased toxicity. There is therefore a growing interest to identify those patients who will benefit from radiotherapy and those who will have the same local control with surgery alone. Furthermore, the development of toxicity has been correlated with the extension of the irradiated volume and the volume receiving high doses. Technological development as intensity modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy allows limited irradiated volume improving the protection of the organs at risk leading to clinical benefit improvement. Moreover, efforts are being done to improve local control for the patients at high risk of local relapse. In this paper, we discuss all these mentioned aspects.
Collapse
|
50
|
Larrier NA, Czito BG, Kirsch DG. Radiation Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Indications and Controversies for Neoadjuvant Therapy, Adjuvant Therapy, Intraoperative Radiation Therapy, and Brachytherapy. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2016; 25:841-60. [PMID: 27591502 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2016.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas are rare mesenchymal cancers that pose a treatment challenge. Although small superficial soft tissue sarcomas can be managed by surgery alone, adjuvant radiotherapy in addition to limb-sparing surgery substantially increases local control of extremity sarcomas. Compared with postoperative radiotherapy, preoperative radiotherapy doubles the risk of a wound complication, but decreases the risk for late effects, which are generally irreversible. For retroperitoneal sarcomas, intraoperative radiotherapy can be used to safely escalate the radiation dose to the tumor bed. Patients with newly diagnosed sarcoma should be evaluated before surgery by a multidisciplinary team that includes a radiation oncologist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole A Larrier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, 450 Research Drive, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Brian G Czito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, 450 Research Drive, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - David G Kirsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, 450 Research Drive, Durham, NC 27708, USA; Department of Pharmacology & Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, 450 Research Drive, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
| |
Collapse
|