National Cancer Data Base Analysis of Radiation Therapy Consolidation Modality for Cervical Cancer: The Impact of New Technological Advancements

Brachytherapy Seed Placement by Robotic Bronchoscopy with Cone Beam Computed Tomography Guidance for Peripheral Lung Cancer: A Human Cadaveric Feasibility Pilot

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the feasibility of using robotic-assisted bronchoscopy with cone beam computed tomography (RB-CBCT) platform to perform low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) implants in a mechanically ventilated human cadaveric model. Postimplant dosimetry was compared with standard stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The RB-CBCT platform was used to place inert LDR-BT seeds into mechanically ventilated human cadavers with percutaneously injected pseudotumors. LDR-BT dosimetry plans were created a priori with a prescription dose of 100 Gy to the pseudotumor plus a 3-mm margin to define a planning target volume. Implant quality was assessed by postimplant dosimetry and seed placement accuracy. BT dosimetry was compared with standard SBRT treatment plans for the same cadaveric tumor volumes.

RESULTS

Eight pseudotumors were planned with a total of 41 LDR-BT seeds, with a median of 5 seeds to achieve appropriate target coverage. All 41 LDR-BT seeds were successfully implanted in the 8 pseudotumors using RB-CBCT. On postimplant analysis, the average (± SD) dosimetry to the pseudotumor was a V95% of 99.4% ± 3.3% and D90% of 128 ± 23 Gy. The average distance between the planned and delivered seed location was 3.8 ± 1.1 mm. In comparison with SBRT plans, LDR-BT dose conformity was superior for the ratio of the V50% to the volume of the planning target volume (2.3-4.0, P < .001) and V25% (5.0 vs 17.5, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

RB-CBCT may be a feasible technology for implantation of LDR-BT seeds in peripheral lung tumors and can achieve preplanned dosimetry goals with better dose conformity than SBRT. Further clinical studies are indicated to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of LDR-BT delivered by RB-CBCT for treating early-stage lung cancer.

Anticoagulation management in gynecologic brachytherapy patients with perioperative or chronic thromboembolic disease: A retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

Women on chronic anticoagulation (AC) who require operative brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies represent a clinical challenge, but no guidelines exist regarding patient selection for brachytherapy or their perioperative management. We aimed to understand the incidence of hemorrhagic and embolic events in our patients on chronic AC and suggest management strategies for this patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective, single institutional study of patients treated with operative, gynecologic brachytherapy from 2013 to 2023 was performed to identify patients on chronic AC. We determined indications for AC use, oncologic therapy characteristics, duration of AC interruption, and therapy outcomes. The primary aim was to determine perioperative embolic or hemorrhagic complications as measured by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

RESULTS

Of 304 patients treated with operative implants, 32 (10%) were on chronic AC for venous thromboembolism (n = 25), or atrial fibrillation/flutter (n = 13). The most common malignancies were cervical (n = 15) and inoperable uterine (n = 11). Implants were intracavitary (n = 14), interstitial (n = 6), or hybrid (n = 12) with a median (range) of 2 (1-3) implants, 4 (2-5) fractions, and 2 (1-3) days of bedrest per implant. 63% (n = 20) had an epidural for analgesia. AC was held for a median 3 days in 94% (n = 30) prior to the operative implant, and pharmacologic DVT prophylaxis was used in 78% (n = 25). There were two grade ≥ 2 hemorrhagic events and no new embolic events.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of bleeding and embolic events was acceptable, and women on chronic AC should not be excluded from potentially lifesaving operative brachytherapy, including complex cases that require spinal analgesia and interstitial applicators.

Potential to reduce margins and Shrink targets in patients with intact cervical cancer treated on An MRI guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) system

INTRODUCTION

Consensus contouring guidelines for intensity-modulated-radiation-therapy (IMRT) of patients with locally advanced cervix cancer (LACC) advise including the whole uterus in the target volume and adding generous planning-target-volumes (PTVs) to account for motion uncertainties of the gross-tumor-volume (GTV). The primary objective of this analysis was to assess the interfractional GTV motions using a magnetic-resonance-image (MRI) guided-Radiation-Therapy (MRgRT) system to investigate the margins required for MRgRT treatments.

METHODS

125 daily set-up MRIs from five patients with LACC who received MRgRT were analyzed. The GTV, bladder, uterus, and rectum were contoured on all 125 MRIs. Tumor volume changes were calculated in cubic-centimeters (cc). The positional and volume changes of organs-at-risk (OARs) were calculated to assess their effect on GTV interfractional motion, these data were used to calculate adequate PTV margins.

RESULTS

The tumor volume decreased in size during the course of MRgRT for all patients, from 34.0 % to 85.2 %. The interfractional average GTV displacement ranged from 0.46 cm to 0.94 cm. The PTV margins required were: 0.78 cm Left-Right, 1.31 cm Anterior-Posterior and 1.38 cm for the Superior-Inferior directions. The proposed PTV margins, compared to those recommended by consensus guidelines, reduce the PTV by 38 % sparing both the sigmoid and bowel OARs.

CONCLUSIONS

By utilizing daily onboard MRI guidance, the GTV becomes readily visualized, allowing for margin reduction and potentially excluding a portion of the uterine fundus from the PTV. The amount of interfractional motion demonstrated in this study is considerable and clinically significant with the goal of decreasing treatment toxicity while maintaining tumor control.

SUMMARY

Daily pretreatment magnetic resonance images (MRIs) from patients with locally advanced cervix cancer (LACC) treated with on-board MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) were analyzed to quantify the range of interfractional motion and develop target volume guidelines for adaptive MRgRT. MRI-guidance leads to better tumor visualization in comparison to cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and online adaptive planning can account for the interfraction motion of the tumor and surrounding tissue. MRI's ability to better visualize the disease and pelvic anatomy along with adaptive on-board MRgRT could allow for a reduction in the required setup margins as well as potentially excluding non-diseased portions of the uterus from the target volumes. These changes will lead to reduced treatment volumes and may lead to decreased treatment toxicities and allow for dose escalation in certain circumstances.

The current status of brachytherapy in Europe - A GEC-ESTRO Brachy-HERO survey

A survey regarding utilisation of brachytherapy was distributed to European brachytherapy professionals. Eighty replies from 26 countries were received, two of which were outside Europe. The replies showed that brachytherapy is still widely used. The main indications for brachytherapy are gynaecological and prostate cancer, with >80 % of the responding countries performing brachytherapy for these indications. There is on average one brachytherapy centre per 0.8 million inhabitants, ranging from 0.4 per million to 2.3 per million inhabitants. The organisation of brachytherapy on national levels also varies from country to country, with less than half of the countries having a central brachytherapy registry. All in all, the survey shows that brachytherapy still plays a role on modern radiotherapy, but the field could benefit from a stronger collaboration both nationally and internationally.

Clinical and dosimetric outcomes of a 3-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a safety net hospital

PURPOSE

To report outcomes of a 3-fraction HDR brachytherapy boost for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) at a large safety net hospital.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective review of 93 patients with FIGO 2018 Stage IA2 to IVB cervical cancer treated with HDR brachytherapy boost in 3 fractions between 2017 and 2022 was conducted. The 2-year local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimators. Hazard ratios of covariates for local failure (LF) were determined using univariate Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 31 months. Mean cumulative EQD2 of HR-CTV D90 was 85.3 Gy (95% CI 84.2, 86.4). Mean cumulative EQD2 of the D2cc for bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and small bowel was 74.7 Gy (95% CI 72.4, 77.0), 58.2 Gy (95% CI 56.7, 59.6), 60.9 Gy (95% CI 59.4, 62.3), and 58.9 Gy (95% CI 56.7, 61.1) respectively. Two-year LC, PFS, and OS were 80.9% (95% CI 73.1%, 89.5%), 63.2% (95% CI 54.0%, 74.1%), and 85.2% (95% CI 78.1%, 93.0%) respectively. The hazard ratio for LF for incomplete concurrent chemotherapy regimen was 3.07 (95% CI 1.17, 8.09; p = 0.02). Three percent of patients experienced late grade 3+ toxicities after radiation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-fraction HDR brachytherapy boost was generally well-tolerated by patients and may be a viable alternative in the treatment of LACC.

What is the future of uterovaginal brachytherapy in private practice in France?

Private radiotherapy centres treat almost one in two patients in France. However, very few of these centres perform uterovaginal brachytherapy. In this short communication, we look at the reasons for the underdevelopment of uterovaginal brachytherapy in private practice. In our opinion, there are three factors limiting its development: the lack of doctors trained in brachytherapy, the complex and human resource-heavy organisation, and the inadequate and insufficient reimbursement of uterovaginal brachytherapy. This last point seems to be shared by the entire community of radiation oncologist in France, and it is vital that brachytherapy is given its due value, otherwise it will continue to decline.

A guide to large data sets for population-based cancer research: Strengths, limitations, and pitfalls

With the proliferation of cancer research based on large databases, misalignment of research questions and data set capabilities is inevitable. Nationally maintained databases are appealing to cancer researchers because of the ease of access to large amounts of patient data available for analysis and risk estimation. Data sets that are commonly used in cancer research include the National Cancer Database, the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) program of the National Cancer Institute, the SEER-Medicare database, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, and the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project databases, among others. Each data set has pros and cons with respect to variable availability and the ability to analyze cancer-specific outcomes. It is critical for researchers to understand the strengths and limitations of each database. Changing variable definitions, the length of postoperative data collection, and the availability of patient-reported outcomes or social determinants of health data are examples of factors that researchers must consider when selecting a data set for research purposes. For the current review, the authors summarized the advantages and disadvantages of various national data sets for cohort studies in cancer populations.

Clinical Outcomes of 3 Versus 4 Fractions of Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Brachytherapy in Cervical Cancer

PURPOSE

Magnetic resonance image-guided brachytherapy is essential in the management of locally advanced cervical cancer. This study compares disease and toxicity outcomes in cervical cancer patients treated with 24 Gy/3 fractions (Fr) versus the conventional 28 Gy/4 Fr.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective study included 241 consecutive patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 stage IB to IVA cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation between April 2014 and March 2021. Disease-free survival (DFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Cumulative incidence of local failure (LF), distant failure (DF), and G2+ gastrointestinal (GI), urinary and vaginal toxicity were estimated using the cumulative incidence function with death as a competing risk and compared using Gray's test.

RESULTS

Of the 241 patients, 42% received 24 Gy/3 Fr and 58% received 28 Gy/4 Fr. With a median follow-up of 3.2 (range, 0.2-9.2) years, there were 14 local, 41 regional nodal, and 51 distant failures in 63 (26%) patients. No significant differences were found between the 24 Gy/3 Fr and 28 Gy/4 Fr groups in 3-year DFS (77% vs 68%, P = .21), the 3-year cumulative incidence of LF (5% vs 7%, P = .57), DF (22% vs 25%, P = .86), G2+ GI toxicity (11% vs 20%, P = .13), or G2+ vaginal toxicity (14% vs 17%, P = .48), respectively. The 3-year cumulative G2+ urinary toxicity rate was lower in the 24 Gy/3 Fr group (9% vs 23%, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cervical cancer treated with 24 Gy/3 Fr had similar DFS, LF, DF, GI, and vaginal toxicity rates and a trend toward a lower G2+ urinary toxicity rate compared with those treated with 28 Gy/4 Fr. A less resource-intensive brachytherapy fractionation schedule of 24 Gy/3 Fr is a safe alternative to 28 Gy/4 Fr for definitive treatment of cervical cancer.

Prognostic nomograms for locally advanced cervical cancer based on the SEER database: Integrating Cox regression and competing risk analysis

Locally advanced cervical carcinoma (LACC) remains a significant global health challenge owing to its high recurrence rates and poor outcomes, despite current treatments. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive risk stratification model for LACC by integrating Cox regression and competing risk analyses. This was done to improve clinical decision making. We analyzed data from 3428 patients with LACC registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and diagnosed them between 2010 and 2015. Cox regression and competing risk analyses were used to identify the prognostic factors. We constructed and validated nomograms for overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Multivariate Cox regression identified key prognostic factors for OS, including advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, age, marital status, ethnicity, and tumor size. Notably, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IIIA, IIIB, and IVA had hazard ratios of 2.227, 2.451, and 4.852, respectively, significantly increasing the mortality risk compared to stage IB2. Ethnic disparities were evident, with African Americans facing a 39.8% higher risk than Caucasians did. Competing risk analyses confirmed the significance of these factors in DSS, particularly tumor size. Our nomogram demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with area under the curve values ranging from 0.706 to 0.784 for DSS and 0.717 to 0.781 for OS. Calibration plots and decision curve analyses further validated the clinical utility of this nomogram. We present effective nomograms for LACC risk stratification that incorporate multiple prognostic factors. These models provide a refined approach for individualized patient management and have the potential to significantly enhance therapeutic strategies for LACC.

AAPM BTSC Report 377.B: Physicist brachytherapy training in 2022 - A survey of therapeutic medical physics residents

BACKGROUND

A survey of medical physics residency program directors was conducted in Spring 2021 to examine the current state of brachytherapy (BT) training during residency. In this related work, a subsequent survey of therapeutic medical physics residents in 2022 was conducted to assess the confidence and experience of the trainees. Concerns for access to high-quality and diverse training in BT have escalated in importance due to recent declines in BT utilization.

METHODS

A survey consisting of 26 questions was designed by a working unit of the Brachytherapy Subcommittee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) and approved for distribution by the Executive Committee of the AAPM. The survey was distributed to current trainees and recent graduates of the Commission on Accreditation of Medical Physics Education Programs accredited therapeutic medical physics residency programs by the AAPM. The participant response was anonymously recorded in an online platform and subsequently analyzed using spreadsheet software.

RESULTS

The survey was distributed to 796 current medical physics residents or recent graduates over the course of 6 weeks in February and March of 2022. The survey received 736 views and a total of 182 responses were collected, with 165 respondents completing the survey in full. Among those responses, 110 had completed their residency training, with program start dates ranging from calendar years 2015 to 2021. Individual responses from the survey takers (including partial survey submissions) were evaluated and analyzed to compile results.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical physics residents reported the highest levels of confidence and caseload for gynecological BT procedures when compared with other surveyed treatment techniques. This indicates opportunities to improve training and increase access to clinical caseload are needed in order to improve competency and confidence. Time constraints (clinical and rotation-based) were indicated as impediments to BT proficiency. Medical physics residents reported enthusiasm for additional training opportunities in BT, and it is evident that additional structure and programs are required to ensure adequate access to BT training during residency.

Personalized strategies for brachytherapy of cervix cancer

Among most tailored approaches in radiation oncology, the development of brachytherapy for the treatment of cervical cancer patients has benefited from various technological innovations. The development of 3D image-guided treatments was the first step for treatment personalization. This breakthrough preceded practice homogenization and validation of predictive dose and volume parameters and prognostic factors. We review some of the most significant strategies that emerged from the ongoing research in order to increase personalization in uterovaginal brachytherapy. A better stratification based on patients and tumors characteristics may lead to better discriminate candidates for intensification or de-escalation strategies, in order to still improve patient outcome while minimizing the risk of treatment-related side effects.

National Cancer Database analysis of radiation therapy consolidation modality and dose for inoperable endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

We utilized the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to evaluate trends and assess outcomes in radiation therapy (RT) boost modality and total dose among medically inoperable endometrial cancer (EC) patients with locoregional disease.

METHODS

Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I - IIIC2 inoperable EC treated with RT ± chemotherapy were analyzed. Practice patterns compared external beam RT (EBRT) versus high-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT) boost and total RT dose (palliative: ≤3000 cGy, definitive low dose [DLD]: 4500 - 6249 cGy, definitive high dose [DHD]: ≥6250 cGy) over time. Kaplan-Meier method evaluated overall survival (OS) and Cox proportional hazard modeling assessed variables associated with OS.

RESULTS

NCDB included 1755 total cases, of which 1209 received a radiotherapy boost. From 2004 to 2019, boost modality rates differed with increasing utilization of BT consolidation and a decreasing rate of palliation. Predictors of a palliative dose were stage III disease, Black race, N2 disease, and poorly or undifferentiated grade. Multivariable analysis found BT boost was associated with lower mortality compared to EBRT (HR: 0.81, CI: 0.68-0.97; p = 0.019). Mortality rates were higher for palliation versus DHD. Additional factors associated with inferior survival were increasing age, worse Charlson-Deyo score, higher T stage, higher N stage, and moderately, poorly, or undifferentiated grade.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of BT boost for locoregionally confined, medically inoperable EC has increased since 2004. Brachytherapy consolidation remains an effective RT modality for medically inoperable EC, associated with lower mortality compared to EBRT consolidation.

[Effect of Brachytherapy Source Dwell Position on Dose Distribution in Cervical Cancer Therapy]

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of different source dwell positions on dose distribution in the treatment of cervical cancer with brachytherapy.

METHODS

Treatment planning data for cervical cancer patients were used. Treatment plans were created at 1 mm intervals, varying up to 5 mm. For intracavitary brachytherapy and intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy, the following dose parameters were evaluated: 90% high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV D90%), rectum 2 cm3 dose (Rectum D2 cc), small intestine 2 cm3 dose (Small D2 cc), sigmoid colon 2 cm3 dose (Sigmoid D2 cc), bladder 2 cm3 dose (Bladder D2 cc), point A dose.

RESULTS

In intracavitary brachytherapy, the HR-CTV D90%, Rectum D2 cc, Small D2 cc, and Sigmoid D2 cc doses increased as the source dwell position changed in the direction. On the other hand, the dose of Bladder D2 cc increased when the source position changed in the outward direction. The same trend was observed in the case of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy.

CONCLUSION

It was shown that a 1 mm change in the source dwell position can affect the dose by up to 2% or more. The accuracy of the source dwell position is very important and should be checked before using the device.

Dose escalation with stereotactic body radiotherapy for cervical cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

Dose escalation with brachytherapy after pelvic irradiation is standard for treating cervical cancer. Its application can be impossible for some patients. Dose escalation with SBRT is widely used with high local control and acceptable toxicity rates in different body parts. The study enrolled patients who underwent SBRT treatment for dose escalation in the cervix.

METHODS

Patients who were pathologically diagnosed and treated with cervical SBRT after definitive CRT were included in the study. A total of 30 Gy in 5 fractions for the high-risk volume was prescribed. The first response evaluation was performed three months after the completion of treatment. Treatment toxicity was documented according to the RTOG-EORTC scale. Oncological outcomes and toxicity were assessed.

RESULTS

Between 02.2019 and 05.2023, 40 patients were treated with an SBRT boost after pelvic irradiation. The median follow-up time was 16 months (7-44 months). The median HR CTV was 47 cc (8,3-168,2 cc). There were 39 patients who achieved a complete response and one who achieved a partial response in the third month after treatment. There were two local or two regional recurrences. The 1-year metastasis-free survival was 88%, and the 1-year progression-free survival was 88%. During the follow-up period, one grade 3 gastrointestinal side effect was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT which has low toxicity and reasonable locoregional control rates in a short follow-up period, may be an option for dose escalation in brachytherapy-ineligible cervical cancer patients.

The current state and future perspectives of radiotherapy for cervical cancer

Radiotherapy is an effective treatment method for cervical cancer and is typically administered as external beam radiotherapy followed by intracavitary brachytherapy. In Japan, center shielding is used in external beam radiotherapy to shorten treatment time and reduce the doses delivered to the rectum or bladder. However, it has several challenges, such as uncertainties in calculating the cumulative dose. Recently, external beam radiotherapy has been increasingly performed with intensity-modulated radiotherapy, which reduces doses to the rectum or bladder without center shielding. In highly conformal radiotherapy, uncertainties in treatment delivery, such as inter-fractional anatomical structure movements, affect treatment outcomes; therefore, image-guided radiotherapy is essential for appropriate and safe performance. Regarding intracavitary brachytherapy, the use of magnetic resonance imaging-based image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is becoming increasingly widespread because it allows dose escalation to the tumor and accurately evaluates the dose delivered to the surrounding normal organs. According to current evidence, a minimal dose of D90% of the high-risk clinical target volume is significantly relevant to local control. Further improvements in target coverage have been achieved with combined interstitial and intracavity brachytherapy for massive tumors with extensive parametrical involvement. Introducing artificial intelligence will enable faster and more accurate generation of brachytherapy plans. Charged-particle therapies have biological and dosimetric advantages, and current evidence has proven their effectiveness and safety in cervical cancer treatment. Recently, radiotherapy-related technologies have advanced dramatically. This review provides an overview of technological innovations and future perspectives in radiotherapy for cervical cancer.

Long term clinical outcomes of cervical cancer patients who were recommended surgery but did not undergo it: A SEER database study

BACKGROUND

This study analyzed the long-term clinical outcomes of cervical cancer patients recommended surgery but who did not undergo it using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The aim was to identify the subgroups with comparable overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) through stratified analysis.

METHODS

Cases of cervical cancer were retrieved from SEER database using SEER*Stat software. This included patients in the non-surgery group (recommended surgery but did not undergo it), and a reference surgery group. Propensity score matching balanced differences between the non-surgery and surgery groups. Stratified analysis and log-rank tests were used to identify subgroups within the non-surgery group with comparable OS and CSS to the surgery group.

RESULTS

A total of 30,807 cervical cancer patients were included in the OS and CSS analysis. In the matched cohort (n = 1278), patients in the non-surgery group had significantly lower 5-year CSS (63.2 % vs. 80.1 %, P < 0.001) and 5-year OS (59.0 % vs. 78.0 %, P < 0.001). However, within the matched cohort, there was no statistically significant difference in OS and CSS between the non-surgery and surgery groups in subgroups diagnosed during 2010-2014 (P = 0.064, P = 0.182), 2015-2020 (P = 0.122, P = 0.518), T2 stage (P = 0.139, P = 0.052), T3 stage (P = 0.502, P = 0.317), or with distant metastasis (M1) (P = 0.411, P = 0.520).

CONCLUSION

Patients in the non-surgery group generally exhibited lower long-term clinical outcomes compared to those in the surgery group. However, with advancements in non-surgical treatment techniques, particularly notable in patients with T2, T3, and M1 stages, these differences are gradually diminishing.

169Yb-based high dose rate intensity modulated brachytherapy for focal treatment of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

This study compares conventional 192Ir-based high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with 169Yb-based HDR intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) for focal prostate cancer treatment. Additionally, the study explores the potential to generate less invasive treatment plans with IMBT by reducing the number of catheters needed to achieve acceptable outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective dosimetric study of ten prostate cancer patients initially treated with conventional 192Ir-based HDR-BT and 5-14 catheters was employed. RapidBrachyMCTPS, a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning system was used to calculate and optimize dose distributions. For 169Yb-based HDR IMBT, a custom 169Yb source combined with 0.8 mm thick platinum shields placed inside 6F catheters was used. Furthermore, dose distributions were investigated when iteratively removing catheters for less invasive treatments.

RESULTS

With IMBT, the urethra D10 and D0.1cc decreased on average by 15.89 and 15.65 percentage points (pp) and the rectum V75 and D2cc by 1.53 and 11.54 pp, respectively, compared to the conventional clinical plans. Similar trends were observed when the number of catheters decreased. On average, there was an observed increase in PTV V150 from 2.84 pp with IMBT when utilizing all catheters to 8.83 pp when four catheters were removed. PTV V200 increased from 0.42 to 2.96 pp on average. Hotspots in the body were however lower with IMBT compared to conventional clinical plans.

CONCLUSIONS

169Yb-based HDR IMBT for focal treatment of prostate cancer has the potential to successfully deliver clinically acceptable, less invasive treatment with reduced dose to organs at risk.

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)-Guided Adaptive Boost Radiotherapy for a Patient With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Ineligible for Brachytherapy

Brachytherapy is a critical component of locally advanced cervical cancer treatment, and patients ineligible for brachytherapy historically have poor outcomes. Delivery of boost with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been studied, though toxicity is a concern. Recent case reports have explored adaptive radiation boost, which can adjust plans for inter-fraction motion using magnetic resonance guidance. Herein, we report the first patient with locally advanced cervical cancer ineligible for brachytherapy who was treated with a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided adaptive boost following completion of chemoradiation. A 71-year-old female with locally advanced cervical cancer was treated with chemoradiation and was deemed ineligible for a brachytherapy boost due to tumor size, geometry, and a fistula with a tumor in the bladder. She was prescribed a boost to the primary tumor of 25 Gy in five fractions using CBCT-guided adaptive radiation following the completion of chemoradiation. A simulation was performed using a non-contrast CT fused with a mid-chemoradiation magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan to create an initial plan. For each treatment fraction, kilovoltage CBCTs were acquired, contours of organs at risk (OARs) were adjusted to reflect anatomy-of-the-day, and an adapted plan was generated. The initial and adapted plans were compared using dose-volume histogram objectives, and the adapted plan was used if it resolved OAR constraint violations or improved target coverage. The use of the initial treatment plan would have resulted in constraint violations for the rectum, sigmoid, and bladder in all fractions. The adapted plans achieved hard constraints in all fractions for all four critical OARs. The mean total treatment time across all five fractions was 58 minutes. This case demonstrates the feasibility of a CBCT-guided adaptive boost approach and the dosimetric benefits of plan adaptation in this setting. Though larger-scale and longer-term data are needed, CBCT-guided adaptive radiation may present a feasible alternative modality to deliver boost doses for brachytherapy-ineligible patients.

Generalizability of deep learning in organ-at-risk segmentation: A transfer learning study in cervical brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Deep learning can automate delineation in radiation therapy, reducing time and variability. Yet, its efficacy varies across different institutions, scanners, or settings, emphasizing the need for adaptable and robust models in clinical environments. Our study demonstrates the effectiveness of the transfer learning (TL) approach in enhancing the generalizability of deep learning models for auto-segmentation of organs-at-risk (OARs) in cervical brachytherapy.

METHODS

A pre-trained model was developed using 120 scans with ring and tandem applicator on a 3T magnetic resonance (MR) scanner (RT3). Four OARs were segmented and evaluated. Segmentation performance was evaluated by Volumetric Dice Similarity Coefficient (vDSC), 95 % Hausdorff Distance (HD95), surface DSC, and Added Path Length (APL). The model was fine-tuned on three out-of-distribution target groups. Pre- and post-TL outcomes, and influence of number of fine-tuning scans, were compared. A model trained with one group (Single) and a model trained with all four groups (Mixed) were evaluated on both seen and unseen data distributions.

RESULTS

TL enhanced segmentation accuracy across target groups, matching the pre-trained model's performance. The first five fine-tuning scans led to the most noticeable improvements, with performance plateauing with more data. TL outperformed training-from-scratch given the same training data. The Mixed model performed similarly to the Single model on RT3 scans but demonstrated superior performance on unseen data.

CONCLUSIONS

TL can improve a model's generalizability for OAR segmentation in MR-guided cervical brachytherapy, requiring less fine-tuning data and reduced training time. These results provide a foundation for developing adaptable models to accommodate clinical settings.

Role of simulation-based training and assessment to improve brachytherapy competency among radiation oncology residents

Simulation is a technique used in healthcare to replicate clinical scenarios and improve patient safety, efficacy, and efficiency. Simulation-based medical education facilitates training and assessment in healthcare without increasing risk to patients, supported by ample evidence from surgical/procedural specialties. Simulation in radiation oncology has been leveraged to an extent, with successful examples of both screen-based and hands-on simulators that have improved confidence and performance in trainees. In the current era, evidence substantiates a significant deficit in brachytherapy procedure education, with radiation oncology residents reporting low confidence in this procedural skill, largely attributable to insufficient caseloads at some centers. Simulation-based medical education can facilitate structured training and competency-based assessment in brachytherapy skills. This review discusses existing advances and future directions in brachytherapy simulation, using examples from simulation in surgical specialties.

Radiation Proctitis in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Treated by Chemoradiation: Analysis and Predictive Factors From a Retrospective Cohort

OBJECTIVES

Radiation proctitis is a misunderstanding complication of chemoradiation in locally advanced cervical cancer. The objective of our study is to provide a detailed description and analysis of predictive factors associated with radiation proctitis in a retrospective cohort of patients treated by chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer.

METHODS

All patients treated by exclusive chemoradiation or chemoradiation followed by brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer from 2011 to 2017 were included in the study. A bivariate analysis was conducted to establish correlations between the occurrence of radiation proctitis and various clinical and technical variables.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients were included in the study. The mean dose (SD) to the planning target volume was 47.1 Gy (6.2). Fifty-nine (46.1%) patients underwent brachytherapy. Sixteen patients (12.5%) developed radiation proctitis, grade 2 or higher in 12 patients (9.3%). In univariate analysis, anticoagulant or antiplatelet treatments ( P =0.039), older age ( P =0.049), rectal volume irradiated at 40 Gy ( P =0.01) and 30 Gy ( P =0.037) were significantly associated with the occurrence of a grade ≥2 radiation proctitis. The delivered dose to 2 cm 3 of rectum (D2cm 3 ) showed a potential association with the occurrence of radiation proctitis of all grades ( P =0.064).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights clinical and technical factors that should be considered in assessing the risk of radiation proctitis. These results contribute to a better understanding of this complication.

Dramatic Radiographic Response of Pelvis-Filling Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Treated With Radiation and Chemotherapy

Locally advanced cervical cancers are often treated with palliative intent due to concerns that the tumor is too far advanced or too large to be treated curatively. Also, patients greater than 65 years of age with cervical cancer are sometimes regarded as being too old or too frail to be cured with combined radiation and chemotherapy. These patients are often treated with radiation alone or with palliative therapy. Understanding the treatment modalities for cervical cancer is essential, as they can be complex and unique to each patient's specific diagnosis. This case report aims to describe the dramatic response to treatment with combined radiation and chemotherapy for a patient greater than 65 years of age with pelvis-filling cervical cancer with right-sided hydronephrosis. After a five-week course of concurrent chemoradiation, the cervical mass radiographically completely disappeared, with no evidence of disease noted on pelvic MRI.

Effective timing of hyaluronate gel injection in image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer: a proposal of the 'adjusted dose score'

Hyaluronate gel injection (HGI) in the rectovaginal septum and vesicovaginal septum is effective in the setting of high-dose-rate image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) for cervical cancer. We aimed to retrospectively investigate optimal conditions for HGI to achieve optimal dose distribution with a minimum number of HGI. We classified 50 IGABT plans of 13 patients with cervical cancer who received IGABT both with and without HGI in the rectovaginal septum and vesicovaginal septum into the following two groups: plan with (number of plans = 32) and plan without (number of plans = 18) HGI. The irradiation dose parameters of high-risk clinical target volume (CTVHR) and organs at risk per fraction were compared between these groups. We also developed the adjusted dose score (ADS), reflecting the overall irradiation dose status for four organs at risk and CTVHR in one IGABT plan and investigated its utility in determining the application of HGI. HGI reduced the maximum dose to the most exposed 2.0 cm3 (D2.0 cm3) of the bladder while increasing the minimum dose covering 90% of CTVHR and the percentage of CTVHR receiving 100% of the prescription dose in one IGABT plan without causing any associated complications. An ADS of ≥2.60 was the optimum cut-off value to decide whether to perform HGI. In conclusion, HGI is a useful procedure for improving target dose distribution while reducing D2.0 cm3 in the bladder in a single IGABT plan. The ADS can serve as a useful indicator for the implementation of HGI.

A survey on brachytherapy training of gynecological cancer focusing on the competence of residents in China

BACKGROUND

The brachytherapy is an indispensable treatment for gynecological tumors, but the quality and efficiency of brachytherapy training for residents is still unclear.

METHODS

An anonymous questionnaire was designed to collect information on gynecological brachytherapy (GBT) training for radiation oncology residents from 28 training bases in China. The questionnaire content was designed based on the principle of competency based medical education (CBME). The Likert scale was employed to evaluate self-reported competence and comprehension regarding GBT. A total of 132 senior residents were included in the final analysis.

RESULTS

53.79% (71/132) of senior residents had experience in performing image-guided GBT, whereas 76.52% (101/132) had observed the procedure during their standardized residency training. The proportion of senior residents who reported having the self-reported competence to independently complete the GBT was 78.03% for intracavity GBT, 75.00% for vaginal stump GBT, and 50.03% for interstitial GBT, respectively. The number of successful completion of Interstitial, intracavity and vaginal GBT was correlated with the self- confidence of trainees after standardized training. In particular, the independent completion of interstitial GBT for more than 20 cases was an independent factor for the self-reported competence of senior residents. During the training period, 50.76% and 56.82% of the residents had not participated in the specialized examinations and professional GBT courses.

CONCLUSIONS

The study revealed that the self-confidence of residents to independently complete brachytherapy was relatively high, and the specialized curriculum setting and training process assessment for brachytherapy training still need to be strengthened in the future.

Multibody dynamic modeling of the behavior of flexible instruments used in cervical cancer brachytherapy

BACKGROUND

The steep radiation dose gradients in cervical cancer brachytherapy (BT) necessitate a thorough understanding of the behavior of afterloader source cables or needles in the curved channels of (patient-tailored) applicators.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to develop and validate computer models to simulate: (1) BT source positions, and (2) insertion forces of needles in curved applicator channels. The methodology presented can be used to improve the knowledge of instrument behavior in current applicators and aid the development of novel (3D-printed) BT applicators.

METHODS

For the computer models, BT instruments were discretized in finite elements. Simulations were performed in SPACAR by formulating nodal contact force and motion input models and specifying the instruments' kinematic and dynamic properties. To evaluate the source cable model, simulated source paths in ring applicators were compared with manufacturer-measured source paths. The impact of discrepancies on the dosimetry was estimated for standard plans. To validate needle models, simulated needle insertion forces in curved channels with varying curvature, torsion, and clearance, were compared with force measurements in dedicated 3D-printed templates.

RESULTS

Comparison of simulated with manufacturer-measured source positions showed 0.5-1.2 mm median and <2.0 mm maximum differences, in all but one applicator geometry. The resulting maximum relative dose differences at the lateral surface and at 5 mm depth were 5.5% and 4.7%, respectively. Simulated insertion forces for BT needles in curved channels accurately resembled the forces experimentally obtained by including experimental uncertainties in the simulation.

CONCLUSION

The models developed can accurately predict source positions and insertion forces in BT applicators. Insights from these models can aid novel applicator design with improved motion and force transmission of BT instruments, and contribute to the estimation of overall treatment precision. The methodology presented can be extended to study other applicator geometries, flexible instruments, and afterloading systems.

Explainable artificial intelligence analysis of brachytherapy boost receipt in cervical cancer during the COVID-19 era

PURPOSE

Brachytherapy is a critical component of the standard-of-care curative radiotherapy regimen for women with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). However, existing literature suggests that many patients will not receive the brachytherapy boost. We used machine learning (ML) and explainable artificial intelligence to characterize this disparity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with LACC diagnosed from 2004 to 2020 who received definitive radiation were identified in the National Cancer Database. Five ML models were trained to predict if a patient received a brachytherapy boost. The best-performing model was explained using SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values. To identify trends that may be attributable to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the previous analysis was repeated and limited to 2019 to 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 37,564 patients with LACC were identified; 5799 were diagnosed from 2019 to 2020 (COVID cohort). Of these patients, 59.3% received a brachytherapy boost, with 76.4% of patients diagnosed in 2019 to 2020 receiving a boost. The random forest model achieved the best performance for both the overall and COVID cohorts. In the overall cohort, the most important predictive features were the year of diagnosis, stage, age, and insurance status. In the COVID cohort, the most important predictive features were FIGO stage, age, insurance status, and hospital type. Of the 26 patients who tested positive for COVID-19 during their course of radiotherapy, 19 (73.1%) received a brachytherapy boost.

CONCLUSIONS

A gradual increase in brachytherapy boost utilization has been noted, which did not seem to be significantly impacted by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. ML could be considered to identify patient populations where brachytherapy is underutilized, which can provide actionable feedback for improving access.

Updated Trends in Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy Utilization and Disparities in the United States From 2004 to 2020

PURPOSE

Lower brachytherapy utilization for cervical cancer patients is associated with decreased survival. This study examines more recent trends in brachytherapy utilization from 2004 to 2020 to assess any trend reversal after awareness increased regarding the importance of brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study analyzed data from the National Cancer Database of patients with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IB to IVA cervical cancer treated with radiation therapy between 2004 and 2020. To compare brachytherapy utilization over time, 2- to 3-year categories were created to account for potential variation seen in individual years. A multivariate log binomial regression with robust variance was used to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of brachytherapy utilization in each year category in reference to the 2004-2006 category. Additionally, risk factors for brachytherapy utilization were identified.

RESULTS

Overall brachytherapy utilization for cervical cancer increased from 54.9% in 2004 to 75.7% in 2020. Compared with 2004 to 2006 when rates of utilization totaled 55.2%, brachytherapy utilization significantly increased to 63.4% in 2011 to 2014 (IRR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.11-1.19), 66.0% in 2015 to 2017 (1.20 [1.16-1.23]), and 76.0% in 2018 to 2020 (1.38 [1.34-1.42]). Sociodemographic factors associated with lower brachytherapy utilization included Black race (0.94 [0.92-0.97]), Hispanic ethnicity (0.92 [0.90-0.95]), and age >59 years (age ≥60-69: 0.96 [0.94-0.98]; age ≥70-79: 0.89 [0.87-0.92]; age ≥80: 0.73 [0.69-0.77]). Positive predictors of brachytherapy utilization included having insurance (IRR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.14).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with FIGO IB-IVA cervical cancer treated with radiation therapy from 2004 to 2020, brachytherapy utilization has increased during the past decade. These results are encouraging given the known benefit to cause-specific survival and overall survival provided by brachytherapy treatment and indicate a reversal in the trend of declining brachytherapy noted previously. Concerns related to disparities by race, ethnicity, and insurance status require further interventions.

Design approach and benefits of the 3D-printed vaginal individualized applicator (VIA)

PURPOSE

Interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy necessitates precise needle placement, requiring time and expertise. We aimed to simplify interstitial procedures and facilitate optimal needle distribution with individualized vaginal templates to guide interstitial needles.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We developed the 3D-printed vaginal individualized applicator (VIA), a cylindrical template containing individualized internal channels that guide interstitial needles to cover the tumor extent. Eight patients underwent VIA only interstitial implants (VIA only), and five intact cervical cases were treated using tandem and customized VIA (VIA + T). Procedure length, number of needles utilized and dosimetric measures were evaluated.

RESULTS

VIA was successfully designed and used clinically for 24 procedures (8 VIA only, 16 VIA + T). Average procedure needle insertion time reduced from 80.9 min for traditional interstitial to 42.9 min for VIA only, approximately 47% shorter with a similar mean high risk CTV volume (28.3 cc VIA only vs. 32.4 cc) and excellent dosimetry with average CTV V100% (94.3% and 94.4%). VIA + T was particularly useful in patients with small vaginal canals and large tumor size. For the five VIA + T patients average tumor size was 68.0cc (range 26.6-143.5 cc). VIA + T procedures were approximately 20% shorter than hybrid procedures with other applicators with mean length of 20.1 min and an average of 6.8 needles (range 3-12).

CONCLUSION

Our novel 3D-printed VIA facilitates gynecologic interstitial brachytherapy by simplifying needle placement, reducing procedure time, and maintaining excellent dosimetry. VIA can be customized for various clinical scenarios, particularly beneficial for large tumors or small vaginal canals.

Can an in-person hands-on applicator-based teaching session improve trainee knowledge and comfort with complex gynecologic brachytherapy?

INTRODUCTION

With the emergence of imaged-based planning and hybrid applicators the complexity of gynecologic brachytherapy has dramatically increased. Despite the known advantages of brachytherapy, notable national declines in utilization of brachytherapy have been documented. Clearly improved education in the sphere of gynecologic brachytherapy is needed. We hypothesize that a hands-on applicator-based training session would improve trainee comfort with gynecologic brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An in-person, applicator-based, hands-on training session was held with trainees from both radiation and gynecologic oncology programs. Trainees practiced assembling and handling applicators while receiving instruction on clinical scenarios in which various applicators are used in gynecologic cancer brachytherapy. Pre- and post-session, participants were administered an objective test of 10 pictorial-based case vignettes to quantify ability to select the correct applicator based on the interpretation of T2-weighted MR images. Participants additionally received a subjective survey to quantify comfort and experience with gynecologic brachytherapy using Likert-type question formatting.

RESULTS

A total of 14 trainees participated. Most common case volume experience was 0-10 intracavitary (57%), 0-10 hybrid (71%), and 0-10 interstitial (71%). Pre-session, the most common answer to comfort level was "not comfortable still learning" for all brachytherapy types, and most common answer to largest gap in knowledge was all facets of brachytherapy. Average case-based test score was 3.5/10 pre-session versus 5.3/10 post-session (p = 0.028). Post-session, all respondents reported improved comfort level with brachytherapy. Post-session, most common answer to largest gap in knowledge was applicator/patient selection, and applicator/patient selection was also the largest area of identified improvement. 100% of participants felt repeating the session in the future would be helpful.

CONCLUSIONS

Hands-on training with applicators improves both subjective and objective comfort with gynecologic brachytherapy. With 100% of participants requesting to implement this session into resident training, we suggest national opportunities might exist to expand educational processes and improve utilization of complex gynecologic brachytherapy in practice.

Updated Trends in the Utilization of Brachytherapy in Cervical Cancer in the United States: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results Study

PURPOSE

Our previous Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) study revealed a concerning decline in brachytherapy utilization in the United States between 1988 and 2009. This study evaluates recent trends in brachytherapy utilization in cervical cancer and identifies factors and survival benefit associated with the use of brachytherapy treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Using SEER data, 8500 patients with International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians 2009 stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) between 2000 and 2020 were identified. Logistic regression analysis was performed on potential factors associated with brachytherapy use: age, marital status, race, ethnicity, income, metropolitan status, year of diagnosis, SEER region, histology, grade, and stage. To adjust for differences between patients who received brachytherapy and those who did not, propensity-score matching was used. Multivariable Cox regression analysis assessed the association of brachytherapy use with cervical cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and all-cause mortality (ACM) in the matched cohort.

RESULTS

Sixty-four percent of the 8500 women received brachytherapy in combination with EBRT; 36% received EBRT alone. The brachytherapy utilization rate declined sharply in 2003/2004 (lowest rate 44% in 2003) and then gradually improved especially in 2018 to 2020 (76%). Factors associated with higher odds of brachytherapy use included younger age, married (vs single), later years of diagnosis, certain SEER regions, and earlier stage. In the propensity-score matched cohort, brachytherapy treatment was associated with lower 4-year cumulative incidence of cancer death (32.1% vs 43.4%; P < .001) and better overall survival (64.0% vs 51.4%; P < .001). Brachytherapy treatment was independently associated with lower CSM (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.64-0.76; P < .001) and ACM (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.67-0.78; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Brachytherapy utilization among SEER regions has improved since 2004 in patients with stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer. Brachytherapy use remains independently associated with significantly lower CSM and ACM and is an essential component of treatment for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Evaluating outcomes and toxicities for a newly implemented MRI-based brachytherapy program for cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

We report an updated analysis of the outcomes and toxicities of MRI-based brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer from a U.S. academic center.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on patients treated with MRI-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer. EBRT was standardly 45 Gy in 25 fractions with weekly cisplatin. MRI was performed with the brachytherapy applicator in situ. Dose specification was most commonly 7 Gy for 4 fractions with optimization aim of D90 HR-CTV EQD2 of 85-95 Gyα/β=10 Gy in 2 implants each delivering 2 fractions.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients were included with median follow up of 24.5 months (IQR 11.9-39.8). Stage IIIA-IVB accounted for 31.6% of cases. Dosimetry results include median GTV D98 of 101.0 Gy (IQR 93.3-118.8) and HR-CTV D90 of 89 Gy (IQR 86.1-90.6). Median D2cc bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and bowel doses were 82.1 Gy (IQR 75.9-88.0), 65.9 Gy (IQR 59.6-71.2), 65.1 Gy (IQR 57.7-69.6), and 55 Gy (IQR 48.9-60.9). Chronic grade 3+ toxicities were seen in the bladder (8.2%), rectosigmoid (4.1%), and vagina (1.0%). Three-year LC, PFS, and OS were estimated to be 84%, 61.7%, and 76.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MRI-based brachytherapy demonstrates excellent local control and acceptable rates of high-grade morbidity. These results are possible in our population with relatively large volume primary tumors and extensive local disease.

Immuno-Molecular Targeted Therapy Use and Survival Benefit in Patients with Stage IVB Cervical Carcinoma in Commission on Cancer®-Accredited Facilities in the United States

PURPOSE

To investigate IMT use and survival in real-world stage IVB cervical cancer patients outside randomized clinical trials.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with stage IVB cervical cancer during 2013-2019 in the National Cancer Database and treated with chemotherapy (CT) ± external beam radiation (EBRT) ± intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) ± IMT were studied. The adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for risk of death were estimated in patients treated with vs. without IMT after applying propensity score analysis to balance the clinical covariates.

RESULTS

There were 3164 evaluable patients, including 969 (31%) who were treated with IMT. The use of IMT increased from 11% in 2013 to 46% in 2019. Age, insurance, facility type, sites of distant metastasis, and type of first-line treatment were independently associated with using IMT. In propensity-score-balanced patients, the median survival was 18.6 vs. 13.1 months for with vs. without IMT (p < 0.001). The AHR was 0.72 (95% CI = 0.64-0.80) for adding IMT overall, 0.72 for IMT + CT, 0.66 for IMT + CT + EBRT, and 0.69 for IMT + CT + EBRT + ICBT. IMT-associated survival improvements were suggested in all subgroups by age, race/ethnicity, comorbidity score, facility type, tumor grade, tumor size, and site of metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

IMT was associated with a consistent survival benefit in real-world patients with stage IVB cervical cancer.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on brachytherapy and cancer patient outcomes: A systematic review

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of brachytherapy in patients with gynecologic and prostate cancers including treatment delays, increased burden of mortality, and associated clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases were searched for studies published through September 2023 using MeSH terms and keywords related to "COVID and brachytherapy." Inclusion criteria included all studies reporting on the impact of COVID-19 on treatment delay, treatment omission, recurrence rates, and clinical outcomes in patients requiring brachytherapy for prostate or gynecologic cancers from December 2019 to September 2023. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers (LH, IV).

RESULTS

Of the 292 screened records, 10 studies (9 retrospective, 1 prospective single-arm exploratory noninferiority) were included. Hypofractioned regimens were the preferred approach in radiation treatment (RT) centers, with 6 of 10 studies noting shift towards hypofractionation. For cervical cancer, intracavitary brachytherapy was limited to 3-4 fractions, reducing personnel and patient exposure. Treatment delays influenced by COVID-19 ranged between 19% and 53% and treatment omissions ranged between 2% and 28%. These disruptions arose from factors such as patient fear of contracting COVID-19, COVID-19 infection, barriers to accessing care, and operating room closures. Three studies reported on a single-application (SA) rather than a multiple application (MA) approach for cervical cancer. They reported excellent local control, shorter overall treatment time at the expense of higher grade ≥2 vaginal, genitourinary, and gastrointestinal events. For cervical cancer patients, overall treatment time (OTT) was significantly impacted by COVID-19 as reported by 2 studies from India. OTT > 60 days occurred in 40-53% of patients.

CONCLUSION

This is the first systematic review to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on brachytherapy in patients with gynecologic and prostate cancers. Although many expert consensus recommendations have been published during the pandemic regarding radiation therapy, few studies evaluated its clinical impact on brachytherapy delivery and patient outcomes. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in treatment delays, omissions in brachytherapy, and further adoption of hypofractionated regimens. Early results demonstrate that despite increased toxicities, local control rates with hypofractionated treatment are similar to standard fractionation. The impact of the pandemic on gynecologic and prostate cancers is yet to be determined as well as the long-term outcomes on patients treated during the lockdown period.

Brachytherapy Workflow Practices: Analysis of Different Workflow Scenarios in Patients With Cervical Cancer and Impact on IGBT Implementation-An IAEA Study

PURPOSE

The workflow of brachytherapy (BT) is an essential aspect of treatment to consider in image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT). It has an overarching effect influencing patient throughput and the number of cancer treatments that can be performed as it occupies equipment, space, and personnel. There is limited research addressing this issue. Under the International Atomic Energy Agency's Coordinated Research Activity titled IGBT for cervix cancer: An implementation study, our study analyzes various scenarios in the clinical workflow of BT delivery for cervical cancer. It aims to determine the extent to which these scenarios allow the routine implementation of IGBT. With this information, current barriers and individualized adaptations to efficient workflows can be identified to enhance the global application of IGBT, leading to better cervical cancer treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A web-based poll of questions regarding practices in BT workflow was presented to 62 participants from low-, lower middle-, upper middle-, and high-income countries (19 countries).

RESULTS

This study highlighted diversity in BT practices across countries, income levels, and regions. It identified variations in workflow, patient throughput, and resource availability, which can have implications for the efficiency and quality of BT treatments. Scenario A, utilizing multiple locations for the steps of the BT procedure, was the most commonly used. The availability of resources, such as imaging devices and trained personnel, varied among the participating centers and remained challenging for IGBT implementation and sustainability.

CONCLUSION

The design of the BT facility plays a vital role in improving efficiency, with a dedicated BT suite contributing to an efficient workflow but limiting patient throughput, especially for high-volume centers. Although IGBT is effective, its implementation requires consideration of various logistical challenges and should be individualized.

Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Uterine Cervical Cancer to Reduce Toxicity and Enhance Efficacy - an Option or a Must?: A Narrative Review

Radiotherapy (RT) is a fundamental modality in treatment of cervical cancer. With advancement of technology, conventional RT used for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for over half a century has been rapidly replaced with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) especially during the last decade. This newer technique is able to differentiate the intensity of radiation within the same field, thus reduces the inevitable exposure of radiation to normal organs and enables better dose delivery to tumors. Recently, the American Society for Radiation Oncology has released a guideline for RT in cervical cancer. Although a section of the guideline recommends IMRT for the purpose of toxicity reduction, a thorough review of the literature is necessary to understand the current status of IMRT in cervical cancer. This narrative review updates the recent high-level evidences regarding the efficacy and toxicity of IMRT and provides a better understanding of the most innovative techniques currently available for EBRT enabled by IMRT.

Online Adaptive Magnetic Resonance-guided Radiation Therapy for Gynaecological Cancers: Preliminary Results of Feasibility and Outcome

AIMS

To present the preliminary results on the clinical utilisation of an online daily adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) for various gynaecological cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve patients treated between September 2018 and June 2022 were included. Six patients (50%) were treated with pelvic radiation therapy followed by MRgRT boost as brachytherapy boost was ineligible or unavailable, three patients (25%) were treated with pelvic MRgRT followed by high dose rate brachytherapy, two patients (16.7%) were treated with only MRgRT, one patient (8.3%) was treated with linear accelerator-based radiation therapy followed by MRgRT boost for bulky iliac lymph nodes.

RESULTS

The median age was 56.5 years (range 31-86 years). Eight patients (66.7%) had a complete response, three patients (25%) had a partial response and one patient (8.3%) died due to acute renal failure. The mean follow-up time was 11.2 months (range 3.1-42.6 months). The estimated 1-year overall survival was 88.9%. The median treatment time was 47 days (range 10-87 days). During external beam radiation therapy, 10 (83.3%) patients had concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Pelvic external beam radiation therapy doses for all cohorts were 45-50.4 Gy with a fraction dose of 1.8 Gy. The median magnetic resonance-guided boost dose was 32 Gy (range 20-50 Gy) and fraction doses ranged between 4 and 10 Gy. Three patients were treated with intracavitary high dose rate brachytherapy (26-28 Gy in four to five fractions). None of the patients had grade >3 late genitourinary toxicities.

CONCLUSION

MRgRT is reliable and clinically feasible for treating patients with gynaecological cancers alone or in combination with brachytherapy with an acceptable toxicity and outcome. MRgRT boost could be an option when brachytherapy is not available or ineligible.

Dosimetric comparison of stereotactic MR-guided radiation therapy (SMART) and HDR brachytherapy boost in cervical cancer

PURPOSE

The standard of care in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). Although previous studies compared HDR-BT with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), there is scarce data regarding the dosimetric outcomes of stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) boost in lieu of HDR-BT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this single-institutional in-silico comparative study, LACC patients who were definitively treated with external beam radiotherapy followed by HDR-BT were selected. Target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were delineated in MRI and HDR-planning CT. An HDR-BT and a SMART boost plan were generated with a prescribed dose of 28 Gy in four fractions for all patients. The HDR-BT and SMART boost plans were compared in regard to target coverage as well OARs doses.

RESULTS

Mean EQD2 D90 to HR-CTV and IR-CTV for HDR-BT plans were 89.7 and 70.5 Gy, respectively. For SMART, the mean EQD2 D90 to HR-PTV, HR-CTV, and IR-CTV were 82.9, 95.4, and 70.2 Gy, respectively. The mean D2cc EQD2 of bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon for HDR-BT plans were 86.4, 70.7, and 65.7 Gy, respectively. The mean D2cc EQD2 of bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon for SMART plans were 81.4, 70.8, and 73.6 Gy, respectively. All dose constraints in terms of target coverage and OARs constraints were met for both HDR-BT and SMART plans.

CONCLUSIONS

This dosimetric study demonstrates that SMART can be applied in cases where HDR-BT is not available or ineligible with acceptable target coverage and OAR sparing. However, prospective clinical studies are needed to validate these results.

Dose and fractionation regimen for brachytherapy boost in cervical cancer in the US

PURPOSE

Curative-intent radiotherapy for locally advanced and select early stage cervical cancer in the US includes external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with brachytherapy. Although there are guidelines for brachytherapy dose and fractionation regimens, there are limited data on practice patterns. This study aims to evaluate the contemporary utilization of cervical cancer brachytherapy in the US and its association with patient demographics and facility characteristics.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical covariates of cervical cancer patients diagnosed and treated in 2018-2020 with curative-intent radiotherapy from the 2020 National Cancer Database. Associations between patient and institutional factors with the number of brachytherapy fractions were identified with logistic regression. Factors with association (p < 0.10) were then included in a multivariable logistic regression model. All tests were two-sided with significance <0.05 unless specified otherwise.

RESULTS

Among the eligible 2517 patients, 97.3% received HDR or LDR and is further analyzed. More patients received HDR than LDR brachytherapy (98.9% vs 1.1%) and intracavitary than interstitial brachytherapy (86.4% vs 13.6%). The most common number of HDR fractions prescribed were 5 (51.0%), 4 (32.9%), and 3 (8.6%). After adjusting for the other variables in the model, ethnicity, private insurance status, overall insurance status, and facility type were the only factors that were significantly associated with the number of brachytherapy factions (p < 0.0001, p = 0.028, p = 0.001, and p < 0.0001, respectively, n = 2184).

CONCLUSIONS

In the US, various HDR brachytherapy regimens are utilized depending on patient and institutional factors. Future research may optimize cervical cancer brachytherapy by correlating specific dose and fractionation regimens with patient outcomes.

Disparities in brachytherapy utilization in cervical cancer in the United States: A comprehensive literature review

Brachytherapy (BT) is an integral component of treatment for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, significantly improving local control and overall survival. There is an overall trend of decreased utilization of BT in United States (US) in the last few decades with around 50% of patients being treated without BT. The cause of decreased utilization is multifactorial including physician comfort, facility volume, low reimbursements rates and costs of starting and maintaining a brachytherapy program. This decrease coincides with an increase in the use of newer advanced techniques like intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) boost resulting in inferior oncological outcomes and increased toxicity. Moreover, racial and socioeconomic disparities in BT utilization have been widely reported in the US. Various factors including age, race, socio-economic status, location, facility type, facility volume and insurance status result in limited access to brachytherapy, which jeopardizes oncologic outcomes. This comprehensive review discusses the BT utilization in the US, examines the impact of race and socioeconomic factors on BT utilization, and highlights its impact on outcomes.

Developing Next-Generation 3-Dimensional Printing for Cervical Cancer Hybrid Brachytherapy: A Guided Interstitial Technique Enabling Improved Flexibility, Dosimetry, and Efficiency

PURPOSE

We developed a 3-dimensionally (3D) printed tandem anchored radially guiding interstitial template (TARGIT) to increase the simplicity of intracavitary/interstitial technique for tandem-and-ovoid (T&O) procedures in cervical cancer brachytherapy. This study compared dosimetry and procedure logistics between T&O implants using the original TARGIT versus the next-generation TARGIT-Flexible-eXtended (TARGIT-FX) 3D-printed template designed for practice-changing ease-of-use with further simplified needle insertion and increased flexibility in needle placement.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This single-institution retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing T&O brachytherapy as part of definitive cervical cancer treatment. Procedures used the original TARGIT from November 2019 through February 2022 and the TARGIT-FX from March 2022 through November 2022. The FX design features full extension to the vaginal introitus with 9 needle channels and allows for needle additions or depth adjustments intraprocedure and after computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

A total of 148 implants were performed, 68 (46%) with TARGIT and 80 (54%) with TARGIT-FX, across 41 patients. Across implants, the TARGIT-FX achieved higher mean V100% (+2.8%, P = .0019), and across patients, the TARGIT-FX achieved higher D90 (+2.0 Gy, P = .037) and higher D98 (+2.7 Gy, P = .016) compared with the original TARGIT. Doses to organs at risk were overall similar between templates. Procedure times for TARGIT-FX implants were 30% shorter on average than for those using the original TARGIT (P < .0001), and 28% shorter on average for the subset of implants with high-risk clinical target volume ≥30 cc (P = .013). All residents (100%, N = 6) surveyed regarding the TARGIT-FX indicated ease-of-use for needle insertion and interest in applying the technique in future practice.

CONCLUSIONS

The TARGIT-FX achieved shorter procedure times with increased tumor coverage and similar normal tissue sparing compared with the previously applied TARGIT and illustrates the potential of 3D printing to enhance efficiency and shorten the learning curve for intracavitary/interstitial procedure technique in cervical cancer brachytherapy.

Improvement in radiation techniques for locally advanced cervical cancer during the last two decades

Since the National Cancer Institute (NCI) alert of concurrent chemoradiotherapy, radiotherapy has been changed from external beam radiotherapy plus brachytherapy to platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Therefore, concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus brachytherapy has become a standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. Simultaneously, definitive radiotherapy has been changed gradually from external beam radiotherapy plus low-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy to external beam radiotherapy plus high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy. Cervix cancer is uncommon in developed countries; hence, international collaborations have been critical in large-scale clinical trials. The Cervical Cancer Research Network (CCRN), created from the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG), has investigated various concurrent chemotherapy regimens and sequential methods of radiation and chemotherapy. Most recently, many clinical trials of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with radiotherapy have been ongoing for sequential or concurrent settings. During the last decade, the method of standard radiation therapy has changed from three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy to intensity-modulated radiation therapy for external beam radiotherapy and from two-dimensional to three-dimensional image-guided approaches for brachytherapy. Recent improvements include stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy and MRI-guided linear accelerator (MRI-LINAC) using adaptive radiotherapy. Here we review the current progress of radiation therapy during the last two decades.

Health Services Research in Brachytherapy: Current Understanding and Future Challenges

Brachytherapy is an integral component of cancer care. Widespread concerns have been expressed though about the need for greater brachytherapy availability across many jurisdictions. Yet, health services research in brachytherapy has lagged behind that in external beam radiotherapy. Optimal brachytherapy utilisation, to help inform expected demand, have not been defined beyond the New South Wales region in Australia, with few studies having reported observed brachytherapy utilisation. There is also a relative lack of robust cost and cost-effectiveness studies, making investment decisions in brachytherapy even more uncertain and challenging to justify, despite its key role in cancer control. As the range of indications for brachytherapy expands, providing organ/function preservation for a wider range of diagnoses, there is an urgent need to redress this balance. By outlining the work undertaken in this area to date, we highlight its importance and explore where further study is required.

Retrospective analysis of local recurrence pattern by computed tomography image-guided intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer in a single Japanese institution

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the treatment results with focus on local control (LC) by computed tomography (CT)-guided intracavity brachytherapy and interstitial brachytherapy (ICBT/ISBT) for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with LACC undergoing ICBT/ISBT at least once in our institution between January 2017 and June 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was local control (LC), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and late toxicities. Differences between patient subgroups for prognostic factors in LC, PFS, and OS were analyzed using the log-rank test. The recurrence patterns of LC were also investigated.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were included in the present study. The median high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) at the initial brachytherapy was 48.2 cc. The median total dose of HR-CTV D90 (EQD2) was 70.7 Gy. The median followup period was 39.4 months. The 3-year LC, PFS and OS rates in all patients were 88.2%, 56.6%, and 65.4% (95% CI 50.3-78.0%), respectively. Corpus invasion and large HR-CTV (70 cc or more) were significant prognostic factors in LC, PFS, and OS. Marginal recurrences at the fundus of the uterus were detected in 3 of 5 patients in whom local recurrence was observed. Late toxicities of Grade 3 or higher were detected in 3 patients (6.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Favorable LC was achieved by performing CT-guided ICBT/ISBT for LACC. The brachytherapy strategy for patients with corpus invasion or large HR-CTV may need to be reconsidered.

Brachytherapy training in India: Results from the GEC-ESTRO-India survey

INTRODUCTION

Brachytherapy (BT) is integral in treatment of gynecological malignancies and is also an option for many other cancers. Data on training and proficiency levels of early career oncologists is limited. Like other continents a survey was conducted for early career oncologists in India.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An online survey was conducted from November 2019 to February 2020, through Association of Radiation Oncologists of India (AROI) for early career radiation oncologists expected to be within 6 years of training. The survey used a 22 item questionnaire that was also used for European survey. Responses to individual statements were recorded on a 1-5 Likert-type scale. Descriptive statistics were used to describe proportions.

RESULTS

One-hundred twenty-four (17%) of 700 recipients responded to the survey. Majority of the respondents (88%) stated that being able to perform BT at the end of their training was important. Two-thirds of the respondents (81/124) had performed >10 intracavitary procedure and 22.5% had performed >10 intracavitary-interstitial implants. Many respondents had not performed nongynecological procedure- breast (64%), prostate(82%), gastro-intestinal (47%). Respondents predicted that in next 10 years, the role of BT is likely to increase. Lack of dedicated curriculum and training was perceived as the greatest barriers to achieving independence in BT (58%). Respondents suggested that BT training should be prioritized during conferences (73%) and online teaching modules (56%), along with development of BT skills labs (65%).

CONCLUSION

This survey identified a lack of proficiency in gynecological intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy and non-gynecological brachytherapy, despite BT training being regarded as highly important. Dedicated programs, including standardized curriculum and assessment need to be developed for training early- career radiation oncologists in BT.

Identifying disparities in brachytherapy delivery for locally advanced cervical cancer

INTRODUCTION

The standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer is concurrent chemotherapy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by a brachytherapy boost. Some studies show a decreased usage of brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients despite the standard of care and known survival advantage. This study aims to characterize the utilization of brachytherapy in Oregon and identify where disparities in treatment may exist.

METHODS

The Oregon State Cancer Registry database was used to identify patients diagnosed with FIGO Stage IB2-IVB cervical cancer between 2007 and 2016. Patients who received initial EBRT were categorized by whether they received brachytherapy boost or not. Age at diagnosis, county of patient residence, rural-urban status of the county, race/ethnicity, and insurance payer were studied using multivariable logistic regression to identify possible underserved populations. Survival data was compared using a Cox proportional hazard survival model.

RESULTS

401 patients who received primary EBRT for FIGO stage IB2-IVB cervical cancer were identified in the 10-year span. Breakdown by stage is: 16% stage IB2, 23.9% stage II, 37.4% stage III, and 22.7% stage IV. Of those, 154 (38.4%) received brachytherapy boost treatment, 75 (18.7%) received a different boost modality, and 42.9% received no boost. Stage IV (p = 0.001) and uninsured patients (p = 0.04) were significantly less likely to receive brachytherapy. Older age was also associated with decreased brachytherapy usage, as each additional year of life decreased brachytherapy receipt by 1.8% (p = 0.04). Native American and Pacific Islander patients were the only group significantly more likely to receive brachytherapy (p=0.003). There was no significant difference in the rate of brachytherapy boost identified based on urban/rural status of the county (p = 0.63 to 0.69), other racial/ethnic categories (p = 0.66 to 0.80), or among the other stages (p=0.45 to 0.63). In Cox proportional hazard survival analysis, patients that received brachytherapy showed a 42% reduction in risk of cancer specific mortality, though this did not reach the predetermined level of statistical significance (p = 0.057).

CONCLUSIONS

The brachytherapy boost rate among locally advanced cervical cancer patients was 38.4%. The data also indicated a likely reduction in cancer specific mortality in patients receiving brachytherapy. Older patients, stage IV patients, and uninsured patients were less likely to receive brachytherapy. Given the low overall brachytherapy usage, these data indicate access and delivery of brachytherapy care needs to be improved across the state. The increased brachytherapy use in the American Indian and Pacific Islander patient population should be further studied to identify facilitators to treatment completion and potentially extrapolate to other groups.

Boost modalities in cervical cancer: dosimetric comparison between intracavitary BT vs. intracavitary + interstitial BT vs. SBRT

PURPOSE / OBJECTIVE

This study compares the dosimetric plans of three distinct boost modalities in cervical cancer (CC): intracavitary (IC) with tandem/ovoids brachytherapy (BT), IC + interstitial (IS) BT, and Stereotactic-Body-Radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim is to determine the dosimetric impact in terms of target coverage and organ at risk (OAR) doses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

24 consecutive IC + IS BT boost treatment plans were retrospectively identified. For each plan included, two additional plans were created: IC-BT and SBRT. Importantly, no planning target volume (PTV) or planning (organ at) risk volume (PRV) margins were generated, therefore all structures were identical for any boost modality. Two different normalizations were performed: (1) Normalization to the target: prescription of 7.1 Gy to the D90% (defined as the minimum dose covering 90%) of the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV); (2) Normalization to the OARs. HR-CTV coverage and OARs sparing were compared. The equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) of EBRT and BT for CTV-HR and OARs were calculated using the linear-quadratic model with α/β of 10 (EQD2₁₀) and 3 (EQD2₃), respectively RESULTS: A total of 72 plans were investigated. In the first normalization, the mean EQD2_3-D2cc (defined as the minimal dose of the 2 cc) of OAR was significantly higher in the IC-BT plans, and the bladder D2cc hard constraint could not be reached. IC + IS BT leads to a 1 Gy mean absolute decrease of bladder EQD2₃-D2cc (relative dose: -19%), allowing to reach the hard constraint. SBRT (without PTV) delivers the lowest EQD2₃-D2cc to the OAR. In the second normalization, IC-BT provides a significantly lower dose to the EQD2₁₀-D90% (6.62 Gy) and cannot achieve the coverage goal. SBRT (without PTV) yields the highest dose to the D90% of HR-CTV and a significantly lower EQD2₁₀-D50% and D30%.

CONCLUSION

The key dosimetric benefit of BT over SBRT without PTV is a significantly higher D50% and D30% in the HR-CTV, which increases the local and conformal dose to the target. IC + IS BT vs. IC-BT provides significantly better target coverage and a lower dose to the OARs, making it the preferred boost modality in CC.

ESGO/ESTRO quality indicators for radiation therapy of cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) has previously defined and established a list of quality indicators for the surgical treatment of cervical cancer. As a continuation of this effort to improve overall quality of care for cervical cancer patients across all aspects, ESGO and the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) initiated the development of quality indicators for radiation therapy of cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a list of quality indicators for radiation therapy of cervical cancer that can be used to audit and improve clinical practice by giving to practitioners and administrators a quantitative basis to improve care and organizational processes, notably for recognition of the increased complexity of modern external radiotherapy and brachytherapy techniques.

METHODS

Quality indicators were based on scientific evidence and/or expert consensus. The development process included a systematic literature search for identification of potential quality indicators and documentation of scientific evidence, consensus meetings of a group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large international panel of clinicians (n=99).

RESULTS

Using a structured format, each quality indicator has a description specifying what the indicator is measuring. Measurability specifications are detailed to define how the quality indicators will be measured in practice. Targets were also defined for specifying the level which each unit or center should be aiming to achieve. Nineteen structural, process, and outcome indicators were defined. Quality indicators 1-6 are general requirements related to pretreatment workup, time to treatment, upfront radiation therapy, and overall management, including active participation in clinical research and the decision making process within a structured multidisciplinary team. Quality indicators 7-17 are related to treatment indicators. Quality indicators 18 and 19 are related to patient outcomes.

DISCUSSION

This set of quality indicators is a major instrument to standardize the quality of radiation therapy in cervical cancer. A scoring system combining surgical and radiotherapeutic quality indicators will be developed within an envisaged future ESGO accreditation process for the overall management of cervical cancer, in an effort to support institutional and governmental quality assurance programs.

ESGO/ESTRO quality indicators for radiation therapy of cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) has previously defined and established a list of quality indicators for the surgical treatment of cervical cancer. As a continuation of this effort to improve overall quality of care for cervical cancer patients across all aspects, ESGO and the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) initiated the development of quality indicators for radiation therapy of cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a list of quality indicators for radiation therapy of cervical cancer that can be used to audit and improve clinical practice by giving to practitioners and administrators a quantitative basis to improve care and organizational processes, notably for recognition of the increased complexity of modern external radiotherapy and brachytherapy techniques.

METHODS

Quality indicators were based on scientific evidence and/or expert consensus. The development process included a systematic literature search for identification of potential quality indicators and documentation of scientific evidence, consensus meetings of a group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large international panel of clinicians (n = 99).

RESULTS

Using a structured format, each quality indicator has a description specifying what the indicator is measuring. Measurability specifications are detailed to define how the quality indicators will be measured in practice. Targets were also defined for specifying the level which each unit or center should be aiming to achieve. Nineteen structural, process, and outcome indicators were defined. Quality indicators 1-6 are general requirements related to pretreatment workup, time to treatment, upfront radiation therapy, and overall management, including active participation in clinical research and the decision making process within a structured multidisciplinary team. Quality indicators 7-17 are related to treatment indicators. Quality indicators 18 and 19 are related to patient outcomes.

DISCUSSION

This set of quality indicators is a major instrument to standardize the quality of radiation therapy in cervical cancer. A scoring system combining surgical and radiotherapeutic quality indicators will be developed within an envisaged future ESGO accreditation process for the overall management of cervical cancer, in an effort to support institutional and governmental quality assurance programs.

Challenges in the Sustainability of Brachytherapy Service in Contemporary Radiotherapy

Brachytherapy has a long history of delivering a highly conformal radiation dose to the target volume with sparing of adjacent normal tissue and has an irreplaceable role in certain cancers, such as cervical and prostate cancers. There have been futile attempts to replace brachytherapy with other radiation techniques. Despite that there are multifaceted challenges in preserving this dying art, from establishment, to a trained workforce, to maintenance of the equipment and source replacement costs. Here we focus on the challenges to access brachytherapy, the availability and distribution of care across the globe and appropriate training leading to proper implementation of the procedure. Brachytherapy holds a significant place in the treatment armamentarium of most common cancers, such as cervical, prostate, head and neck and skin cancers. However, there is an uneven distribution of brachytherapy facilities, not only across the globe, but also at a national level, with a larger proportion of facilities concentrated in certain regions, more so in low and low-middle income countries. The regions with the highest incidence of cervical cancer have the least access to brachytherapy facilities. Attempts to bridge the gap are essential and should be focused on uniform distribution and access to care, improving training of the workforce through specialised training programmes, reducing the cost of care, planning to reduce the recurring cost, generating evidence and research guidelines, renewing interest in brachytherapy through rebranding, use of social media and building an attainable long-term roadmap.