1
|
Gilmer TM, Lai CH, Guo K, Deland K, Ashcraft KA, Stewart AE, Wang Y, Fu J, Wood KC, Kirsch DG, Kastan MB. A Novel Dual ATM/DNA-PK Inhibitor, XRD-0394, Potently Radiosensitizes and Potentiates PARP and Topoisomerase I Inhibitors. Mol Cancer Ther 2024; 23:751-765. [PMID: 38588408 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-23-0890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
A majority of patients with cancer receive radiotherapy as part of their treatment regimens whether using external beam therapy or locally-delivered radioisotopes. While often effective, some tumors are inadequately controlled with radiation and radiotherapy has significant short-term and long-term toxicities for cancer survivors. Insights into molecular mechanisms involved in cellular responses to DNA breaks introduced by radiation or other cancer therapies have been gained in recent years and approaches to manipulate these responses to enhance tumor cell killing or reduce normal tissue toxicity are of great interest. Here, we report the identification and initial characterization of XRD-0394, a potent and specific dual inhibitor of two DNA damage response kinases, ATM and DNA-PKcs. This orally bioavailable molecule demonstrates significantly enhanced tumor cell kill in the setting of therapeutic ionizing irradiation in vitro and in vivo. XRD-0394 also potentiates the effectiveness of topoisomerase I inhibitors in vitro. In addition, in cells lacking BRCA1/2 XRD-0394 shows single-agent activity and synergy in combination with PARP inhibitors. A phase Ia clinical trial (NCT05002140) with XRD-0394 in combination with radiotherapy has completed. These results provide a rationale for future clinical trials with XRD-0394 in combination with radiotherapy, PARP inhibitors, and targeted delivery of topoisomerase I inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chun-Hsiang Lai
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kexiao Guo
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Katherine Deland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kathleen A Ashcraft
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Amy E Stewart
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Kris C Wood
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - David G Kirsch
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michael B Kastan
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bentzen SM, Vogelius IR, Hodgson D, Howell R, Jackson A, Hua CH, Olch AJ, Ronckers C, Kremer L, Milano M, Marks LB, Constine LS. Radiation Dose-Volume-Response Relationships for Adverse Events in Childhood Cancer Survivors: Introduction to the Scientific Issues in PENTEC. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:338-353. [PMID: 38760115 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.11.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
At its very core, radiation oncology involves a trade-off between the benefits and risks of exposing tumors and normal tissue to relatively high doses of ionizing radiation. This trade-off is particularly critical in childhood cancer survivors (CCS), in whom both benefits and risks can be hugely consequential due to the long life expectancy if the primary cancer is controlled. Estimating the normal tissue-related risks of a specific radiation therapy plan in an individual patient relies on predictive mathematical modeling of empirical data on adverse events. The Pediatric Normal-Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) collaborative network was formed to summarize and, when possible, to synthesize dose-volume-response relationships for a range of adverse events incident in CCS based on the literature. Normal-tissue clinical radiation biology in children is particularly challenging for many reasons: (1) Childhood malignancies are relatively uncommon-constituting approximately 1% of new incident cancers in the United States-and biologically heterogeneous, leading to many small series in the literature and large variability within and between series. This creates challenges in synthesizing data across series. (2) CCS are at an elevated risk for a range of adverse health events that are not specific to radiation therapy. Thus, excess relative or absolute risk compared with a reference population becomes the appropriate metric. (3) Various study designs and quantities to express risk are found in the literature, and these are summarized. (4) Adverse effects in CCS often occur 30, 50, or more years after therapy. This limits the information content of series with even very extended follow-up, and lifetime risk estimates are typically extrapolations that become dependent on the mathematical model used. (5) The long latent period means that retrospective dosimetry is required, as individual computed tomography-based radiation therapy plans gradually became available after 1980. (6) Many individual patient-level factors affect outcomes, including age at exposure, attained age, lifestyle exposures, health behaviors, other treatment modalities, dose, fractionation, and dose distribution. (7) Prospective databases with individual patient-level data and radiation dosimetry are being built and will facilitate advances in dose-volume-response modeling. We discuss these challenges and attempts to overcome them in the setting of PENTEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Søren M Bentzen
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Ivan R Vogelius
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - David Hodgson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rebecca Howell
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chia-Ho Hua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Arthur J Olch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Cecile Ronckers
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Leontien Kremer
- Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Lawrence B Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Casey DL, Vogelius IR, Brodin NP, Roberts KB, Avanzo M, Moni J, Owens C, Ronckers CM, Constine LS, Bentzen SM, Olch A. Risk of Subsequent Neoplasms in Childhood Cancer Survivors After Radiation Therapy: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:640-654. [PMID: 37777927 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) analysis of published investigations of central nervous system (CNS) subsequent neoplasms (SNs), subsequent sarcomas, and subsequent lung cancers in childhood cancer survivors who received radiation therapy (RT) was performed to estimate the effect of RT dose on the risk of SNs and the modification of this risk by host and treatment factors. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic literature review was performed to identify data published from 1975 to 2022 on SNs after prior RT in childhood cancer survivors. After abstract review, usable quantitative and qualitative data were extracted from 83 studies for CNS SNs, 118 for subsequent sarcomas, and 10 for lung SNs with 4 additional studies (3 for CNS SNs and 1 for lung SNs) later added. The incidences of SNs, RT dose, age, sex, primary cancer diagnosis, chemotherapy exposure, and latent time from primary diagnosis to SNs were extracted to assess the factors influencing risk for SNs. The excess relative ratio (ERR) for developing SNs as a function of dose was analyzed using inverse-variance weighted linear regression, and the ERR/Gy was estimated. Excess absolute risks were also calculated. RESULTS The ERR/Gy for subsequent meningiomas was estimated at 0.44 (95% CI, 0.19-0.68); for malignant CNS neoplasms, 0.15 (95% CI, 0.11-0.18); for sarcomas, 0.045 (95% CI, 0.023-0.067); and for lung cancer, 0.068 (95% CI, 0.03-0.11). Younger age at time of primary diagnosis was associated with higher risk of subsequent meningioma and sarcoma, whereas no significant effect was observed for age at exposure for risk of malignant CNS neoplasm, and insufficient data were available regarding age for lung cancer. Females had a higher risk of subsequent meningioma (odds ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.22-1.76; P < .0001) relative to males, whereas no statistically significant sex difference was seen in risk of malignant CNS neoplasms, sarcoma SNs, or lung SNs. There was an association between chemotherapy receipt (specifically alkylating agents and anthracyclines) and subsequent sarcoma risk, whereas there was no clear association between specific chemotherapeutic agents and risk of CNS SNs and lung SNs. CONCLUSIONS This PENTEC systematic review shows a significant radiation dose-response relationship for CNS SNs, sarcomas, and lung SNs. Given the linear dose response, improved conformality around the target volume that limits the high dose volume might be a promising strategy for reducing the risk of SNs after RT. Other host- and treatment-related factors such as age and chemotherapy play a significant contributory role in the development of SNs and should be considered when estimating the risk of SNs after RT among childhood cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana L Casey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Ivan R Vogelius
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - N Patrik Brodin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Kenneth B Roberts
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Michele Avanzo
- Division of Medical Physics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico Aviano IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Janaki Moni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Constance Owens
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Cécile M Ronckers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Louis S Constine
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Soren M Bentzen
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Arthur Olch
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stokkevåg CH, Journy N, Vogelius IR, Howell RM, Hodgson D, Bentzen SM. Radiation Therapy Technology Advances and Mitigation of Subsequent Neoplasms in Childhood Cancer Survivors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:681-696. [PMID: 38430101 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.01.206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) vision paper, challenges and opportunities in the assessment of subsequent neoplasms (SNs) from radiation therapy (RT) are presented and discussed in the context of technology advancement. METHODS AND MATERIALS The paper discusses the current knowledge of SN risks associated with historic, contemporary, and future RT technologies. Opportunities for research and SN mitigation strategies in pediatric patients with cancer are reviewed. RESULTS Present experience with radiation carcinogenesis is from populations exposed during widely different scenarios. Knowledge gaps exist within clinical cohorts and follow-up; dose-response and volume effects; dose-rate and fractionation effects; radiation quality and proton/particle therapy; age considerations; susceptibility of specific tissues; and risks related to genetic predisposition. The biological mechanisms associated with local and patient-level risks are largely unknown. CONCLUSIONS Future cancer care is expected to involve several available RT technologies, necessitating evidence and strategies to assess the performance of competing treatments. It is essential to maximize the utilization of existing follow-up while planning for prospective data collection, including standardized registration of individual treatment information with linkage across patient databases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla H Stokkevåg
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
| | - Neige Journy
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit 1018, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris Saclay University, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Ivan R Vogelius
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rebecca M Howell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David Hodgson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hoeltgen L, Meixner E, Hoegen-Saßmannshausen P, Kim JY, Deng M, Seidensaal K, Held T, Herfarth K, Haberer T, Debus J, Mairani A, Harrabi S, Tessonnier T. Helium Ion Therapy for Advanced Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1993. [PMID: 38893114 PMCID: PMC11171253 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16111993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Helium ion therapy (HRT) is a promising modality for the treatment of pediatric tumors and those located close to critical structures due to the favorable biophysical properties of helium ions. This in silico study aimed to explore the potential benefits of HRT in advanced juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA) compared to proton therapy (PRT). We assessed 11 consecutive patients previously treated with PRT for JNA in a definitive or postoperative setting with a relative biological effectiveness (RBE) weighted dose of 45 Gy (RBE) in 25 fractions at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center. HRT plans were designed retrospectively for dosimetric comparisons and risk assessments of radiation-induced complications. HRT led to enhanced target coverage in all patients, along with sparing of critical organs at risk, including a reduction in the brain integral dose by approximately 27%. In terms of estimated risks of radiation-induced complications, HRT led to a reduction in ocular toxicity, cataract development, xerostomia, tinnitus, alopecia and delayed recall. Similarly, HRT led to reduced estimated risks of radiation-induced secondary neoplasms, with a mean excess absolute risk reduction of approximately 30% for secondary CNS malignancies. HRT is a promising modality for advanced JNA, with the potential for enhanced sparing of healthy tissue and thus reduced radiation-induced acute and long-term complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Line Hoeltgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ji-Young Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Seidensaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Partner Site, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO), Medical Physics Department, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Diallo I, Allodji RS, Veres C, Bolle S, Llanas D, Ezzouhri S, Zrafi W, Debiche G, Souchard V, Fauchery R, Haddy N, Journy N, Demoor-Goldschmidt C, Winter DL, Hjorth L, Wiebe T, Haupt R, Robert C, Kremer L, Bardi E, Sacerdote C, Terenziani M, Kuehni CE, Schindera C, Skinner R, Winther JF, Lähteenmäki P, Byrn J, Jakab Z, Cardis E, Pasqual E, Tapio S, Baatout S, Atkinson M, Benotmane MA, Sugden E, Zaletel LZ, Ronckers C, Reulen RC, Hawkins MM, de Vathaire F. Radiation Doses Received by Major Organs at Risk in Children and Young Adolescents Treated for Cancer with External Beam Radiation Therapy: A Large-scale Study from 12 European Countries. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00446-2. [PMID: 38582233 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.03.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Childhood cancer survivors, in particular those treated with radiation therapy, are at high risk of long-term iatrogenic events. The prediction of risk of such events is mainly based on the knowledge of the radiation dose received to healthy organs and tissues during treatment of childhood cancer diagnosed decades ago. We aimed to set up a standardized organ dose table to help former patients and clinicians in charge of long-term follow-up clinics. METHODS AND MATERIALS We performed whole body dosimetric reconstruction for 2646 patients from 12 European countries treated between 1941 and 2006 (median, 1976). Most plannings were 2- or 3-dimensional. A total of 46% of patients were treated using Cobalt 60, and 41%, using a linear accelerator. The median prescribed dose was 27.2 Gy (IQ1-IQ3, 17.6-40.0 Gy). A patient-specific voxel-based anthropomorphic phantom with more than 200 anatomic structures or substructures delineated as a surrogate of each subject's anatomy was used. The radiation therapy was simulated with a treatment planning system based on available treatment information. The radiation dose received by any organ of the body was estimated by extending the treatment planning system dose calculation to the whole body, by type and localization of childhood cancer. RESULTS The integral dose and normal tissue doses to most of the 23 considered organs increased between the 1950s and 1970s and decreased or plateaued thereafter. Whatever the organ considered, the type of childhood cancer explained most of the variability in organ dose. The country of treatment explained only a small part of the variability. CONCLUSIONS The detailed dose estimates provide very useful information for former patients or clinicians who have only limited knowledge about radiation therapy protocols or techniques, but who know the type and site of childhood cancer, sex, age, and year of treatment. This will allow better prediction of the long-term risk of iatrogenic events and better referral to long-term follow-up clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahima Diallo
- Inserm, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, France; Inserm, Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, Villejuif, France
| | - Rodrigue S Allodji
- Inserm, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, France
| | - Cristina Veres
- Inserm, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, France; Inserm, Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Damien Llanas
- Inserm, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, France
| | - Safaa Ezzouhri
- Inserm, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, France
| | - Wael Zrafi
- Inserm, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, France
| | - Ghazi Debiche
- Inserm, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, France
| | - Vincent Souchard
- Inserm, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, France
| | - Romain Fauchery
- Inserm, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France
| | - Nadia Haddy
- Inserm, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, France
| | - Neige Journy
- Inserm, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, France
| | - Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt
- Inserm, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France; Pediatric Oncology Department, University Hospital, Angers, France; Department of Radiotherapy and Protontherapy, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - David L Winter
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, Robert Aitken Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Lars Hjorth
- Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Paediatrics, Lund, Sweden
| | - Thomas Wiebe
- Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Paediatrics, Lund, Sweden
| | - Riccardo Haupt
- DOPO Clinic - Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Via Gerolamo Gaslini, Genova, Italy
| | - Charlotte Robert
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, France
| | - Leontien Kremer
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Edit Bardi
- St Anna Children's Hospital, Vienna, Austria, and Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria
| | - Carlotta Sacerdote
- Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Monica Terenziani
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Onco-Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia E Kuehni
- Childhood Cancer Research Group, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christina Schindera
- Childhood Cancer Research Group, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Division of Paediatric Oncology/Haematology, University Children's Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Roderick Skinner
- Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Päivi Lähteenmäki
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Fican-West, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | | | - Zsuzsanna Jakab
- Hungarian Childhood Cancer Registry, 2nd Department of Pediatrics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Elisabeth Cardis
- Barcelona Institute of Global Health (ISGlobal), University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisa Pasqual
- Barcelona Institute of Global Health (ISGlobal), University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Soile Tapio
- Institute of Radiation Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen-German Research Centre for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Baatout
- Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, SCK CEN, Mol, Belgium
| | - Mike Atkinson
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung, Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Elaine Sugden
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, Robert Aitken Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Raoul C Reulen
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, Robert Aitken Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Mike M Hawkins
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, Robert Aitken Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- Inserm, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Saenko V, Mitsutake N. Radiation-Related Thyroid Cancer. Endocr Rev 2024; 45:1-29. [PMID: 37450579 PMCID: PMC10765163 DOI: 10.1210/endrev/bnad022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
Radiation is an environmental factor that elevates the risk of developing thyroid cancer. Actual and possible scenarios of exposures to external and internal radiation are multiple and diverse. This article reviews radiation doses to the thyroid and corresponding cancer risks due to planned, existing, and emergency exposure situations, and medical, public, and occupational categories of exposures. Any exposure scenario may deliver a range of doses to the thyroid, and the risk for cancer is addressed along with modifying factors. The consequences of the Chornobyl and Fukushima nuclear power plant accidents are described, summarizing the information on thyroid cancer epidemiology, treatment, and prognosis, clinicopathological characteristics, and genetic alterations. The Chornobyl thyroid cancers have evolved in time: becoming less aggressive and driver shifting from fusions to point mutations. A comparison of thyroid cancers from the 2 areas reveals numerous differences that cumulatively suggest the low probability of the radiogenic nature of thyroid cancers in Fukushima. In view of continuing usage of different sources of radiation in various settings, the possible ways of reducing thyroid cancer risk from exposures are considered. For external exposures, reasonable measures are generally in line with the As Low As Reasonably Achievable principle, while for internal irradiation from radioactive iodine, thyroid blocking with stable iodine may be recommended in addition to other measures in case of anticipated exposures from a nuclear reactor accident. Finally, the perspectives of studies of radiation effects on the thyroid are discussed from the epidemiological, basic science, and clinical points of view.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir Saenko
- Department of Radiation Molecular Epidemiology, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan
| | - Norisato Mitsutake
- Department of Radiation Molecular Epidemiology, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan
- Department of Radiation Medical Sciences, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Journy N, Bolle S, Brualla L, Dumas A, Fresneau B, Haddy N, Haghdoost S, Haustermans K, Jackson A, Karabegovic S, Lassen-Ramshad Y, Thariat J, Wette MR, Botzenhardt S, De Wit I, Demoor-Goldschmidt C, Christiaens M, Høyer M, Isebaert S, Jacobs S, Henriksen LT, Maduro JH, Ronckers C, Steinmeier T, Uyttebroeck A, Van Beek K, Walsh L, Thierry-Chef I, Timmermann B. Assessing late outcomes of advances in radiotherapy for paediatric cancers: Study protocol of the "HARMONIC-RT" European registry (NCT 04746729). Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:109972. [PMID: 37922994 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Neige Journy
- National Institute for Medical Research (INSERM) U1018 Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Laboratory of "Radiation Epidemiology, Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Survivorship", Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
| | - Stéphanie Bolle
- Department of Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Hufelandstr. 55, Essen 45147, Germany
| | - Lorenzo Brualla
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Hufelandstr. 55, Essen 45147, Germany
| | - Agnès Dumas
- Inserm, Aix Marseille University, IRD, ISSPAM, SESSTIM (Economic and Social Sciences of Health and Medical Information Processing), Marseille, France
| | - Brice Fresneau
- National Institute for Medical Research (INSERM) U1018 Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Laboratory of "Radiation Epidemiology, Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Survivorship", Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Paediatric Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Nadia Haddy
- National Institute for Medical Research (INSERM) U1018 Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Laboratory of "Radiation Epidemiology, Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Survivorship", Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Siamak Haghdoost
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Caen Normandy, Advanced Resource Center for HADrontherapy in Europe (ARCHADE), 14000 Caen, France
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UZ Leuven & Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Angela Jackson
- National Institute for Medical Research (INSERM) U1018 Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France; National Institute for Medical Research (INSERM) U1018 Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Sanja Karabegovic
- Department of Neuroradiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Yasmin Lassen-Ramshad
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus 8200, Denmark
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Centre Régional Francois Baclesse, Avenue Du General Harris 3, Caen Cedex 5 14076, France; Université de Caen Normandie, ENSICAEN, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC Caen UMR6534, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - Martina Roxanne Wette
- Department of Particle Therapy - University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Hufelandstrasse 55, Essen 45147, Germany; West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Hufelandstr. 55, Essen 45147, Germany
| | - Suzan Botzenhardt
- Department of Particle Therapy - University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Hufelandstrasse 55, Essen 45147, Germany
| | - Inge De Wit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UZ Leuven & Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt
- National Institute for Medical Research (INSERM) U1018 Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Laboratory of "Radiation Epidemiology, Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Survivorship", Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Centre Régional Francois Baclesse, Avenue Du General Harris 3, Caen Cedex 5 14076, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Rue Larrey 4, Angers 49 000, France
| | - Melissa Christiaens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UZ Leuven & Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Morten Høyer
- Aarhus University (AU), Nordre Ringgade 1, Aarhus C 8000, Denmark
| | - Sofie Isebaert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UZ Leuven & Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Sandra Jacobs
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium; Department of Neuroradiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Louise Tram Henriksen
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus 8200, Denmark
| | - John H Maduro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Cecile Ronckers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Theresa Steinmeier
- Department of Particle Therapy - University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Hufelandstrasse 55, Essen 45147, Germany; West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Hufelandstr. 55, Essen 45147, Germany
| | - Anne Uyttebroeck
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Karen Van Beek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UZ Leuven & Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Linda Walsh
- Department of Physics, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Beate Timmermann
- University Hospital Essen (UK Essen), Hufelandstrasse 55, Essen 45147, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy - University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Hufelandstrasse 55, Essen 45147, Germany; West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Hufelandstr. 55, Essen 45147, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Scholz-Kreisel P, Becker C, Kaiser M, Mahmoudpour SH, Voigt M, Ressing M, Blettner M, Calaminus G, Baust K, Scholtes C, Zimmermann M, Zeissig SR, Schmidberger H, Karle H, Meyer-Oldenburg S, Kaatsch P, Spix C. Subsequent primary neoplasms after childhood cancer therapy - design and description of the German nested case-control study STATT-SCAR. Cancer Causes Control 2024; 35:33-41. [PMID: 37530985 PMCID: PMC10764383 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01760-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subsequent primary neoplasms (SPN) are among the most severe late effects and the second most frequent cause of death in childhood cancer patients. In this paper we introduce method and properties of the STATT-SCAR study (Second Tumor After Tumor Therapy, Second Cancer After Radiotherapy), which is a joint nested matched case-control study to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy (STATT) as well as radiotherapy (SCAR) on the risk of developing a SPN. METHODS Based on the cohort of the German childhood cancer registry (GCCR), we selected patients diagnosed with a first neoplasm before age 15 or younger between 1980 and 2014. We selected those with a SPN at least half a year after the first neoplasm, and matched up to four controls to each case. Therapy data were acquired from various sources, including clinical study centers and treating hospitals. To analyze the impact of radiotherapy, organ doses were estimated by using reconstructed treatment plans. The effect of chemotherapy was analyzed using substance groups summarized after isotoxic dose conversion. RESULTS 1244 cases with a SPN were identified and matched with 4976 controls. Treatment data were acquired for 83% of all match groups (one case and at least one control). Based on preliminary analyses, 98% of all patients received chemotherapy and 54% of all patients were treated with radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Based on our data, detailed analyses of dose response relationships and treatment element combinations are possible, leading to a deeper insight into SPN risks after cancer treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study is registered at the German clinical trial register (DRKS) under number DRKS00017847 [45].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Scholz-Kreisel
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
- Federal Offices for Radiation Protection, Neuherberg, Germany.
| | - Cornelia Becker
- German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR) Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology at the Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Melanie Kaiser
- German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR) Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology at the Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Seyed Hamidreza Mahmoudpour
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Mathias Voigt
- German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR) Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology at the Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Meike Ressing
- German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR) Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology at the Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Maria Blettner
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Gabriele Calaminus
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Katja Baust
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Cathy Scholtes
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Martin Zimmermann
- Department for Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Children's Hospital, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sylke Ruth Zeissig
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry (ICE-B), University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Regional Centre Würzburg, Bavarian Cancer Registry, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department for Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heiko Karle
- Department for Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sarah Meyer-Oldenburg
- Department for Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Kaatsch
- German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR) Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology at the Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Claudia Spix
- German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR) Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology at the Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Berrington de González A, Gibson TM, Lee C, Albert PS, Griffin KT, Kitahara CM, Liu D, Mille MM, Shin J, Bajaj BV, Flood TE, Gallotto SL, Paganetti H, Ahmed SK, Eaton BR, Indelicato DJ, Milgrom SA, Palmer JD, Baliga S, Poppe MM, Tsang DS, Wong K, Yock TI. The Pediatric Proton and Photon Therapy Comparison Cohort: Study Design for a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort to Investigate Subsequent Cancers After Pediatric Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101273. [PMID: 38047226 PMCID: PMC10692298 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The physical properties of protons lower doses to surrounding normal tissues compared with photons, potentially reducing acute and long-term adverse effects, including subsequent cancers. The magnitude of benefit is uncertain, however, and currently based largely on modeling studies. Despite the paucity of directly comparative data, the number of proton centers and patients are expanding exponentially. Direct studies of the potential risks and benefits are needed in children, who have the highest risk of radiation-related subsequent cancers. The Pediatric Proton and Photon Therapy Comparison Cohort aims to meet this need. Methods and Materials We are developing a record-linkage cohort of 10,000 proton and 10,000 photon therapy patients treated from 2007 to 2022 in the United States and Canada for pediatric central nervous system tumors, sarcomas, Hodgkin lymphoma, or neuroblastoma, the pediatric tumors most frequently treated with protons. Exposure assessment will be based on state-of-the-art dosimetry facilitated by collection of electronic radiation records for all eligible patients. Subsequent cancers and mortality will be ascertained by linkage to state and provincial cancer registries in the United States and Canada, respectively. The primary analysis will examine subsequent cancer risk after proton therapy compared with photon therapy, adjusting for potential confounders and accounting for competing risks. Results For the primary aim comparing overall subsequent cancer rates between proton and photon therapy, we estimated that with 10,000 patients in each treatment group there would be 80% power to detect a relative risk of 0.8 assuming a cumulative incidence of subsequent cancers of 2.5% by 15 years after diagnosis. To date, 9 institutions have joined the cohort and initiated data collection; additional centers will be added in the coming year(s). Conclusions Our findings will affect clinical practice for pediatric patients with cancer by providing the first large-scale systematic comparison of the risk of subsequent cancers from proton compared with photon therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Todd M. Gibson
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Choonsik Lee
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Paul S. Albert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Keith T. Griffin
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Cari Meinhold Kitahara
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Danping Liu
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Matthew M. Mille
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jungwook Shin
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Benjamin V.M. Bajaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tristin E. Flood
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara L. Gallotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Safia K. Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bree R. Eaton
- Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Daniel J. Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Sarah A. Milgrom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Joshua D. Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Matthew M. Poppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah–Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Derek S. Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kenneth Wong
- Radiation Oncology Program, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Torunn I. Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Multiple tools exist to assess a patient's breast cancer risk. The choice of risk model depends on the patient's risk factors and how the calculation will impact care. High-risk patients-those with a lifetime breast cancer risk of ≥20%-are, for instance, eligible for supplemental screening with breast magnetic resonance imaging. Those with an elevated short-term breast cancer risk (frequently defined as a 5-year risk ≥1.66%) should be offered endocrine prophylaxis. High-risk patients should also receive guidance on modification of lifestyle factors that affect breast cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy E Cyr
- Department of Medicine, Washington University, Box 8056, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| | - Kaitlyn Kennard
- Department of Surgery, Washington University, Box 8051, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Saint louis, MO 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ver Berne J, Politis C, Shaheen E, Jacobs R. Cumulative exposure and lifetime cancer risk from diagnostic radiation in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery: a cross-sectional analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023; 52:1064-1070. [PMID: 36804279 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2023.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Radiation doses in dentomaxillofacial imaging are typically very low. However, diagnostic and follow-up protocols in orthognathic surgery result in a patient-specific risk in effective dose. Estimating the cancer risks from these exposures remains abstract for many maxillofacial surgeons. In this study, 40 orthognathic patients were randomly sampled and their cumulative effective dose (ED) calculated. The lifetime attributable risk of cancer (LAR) was calculated based on the standard radiological protocol for orthognathic surgery follow-up using methods described in the BEIR VII report and RadRAT. The mean cumulative ED of the 40 sampled patients at the end of their 2-year follow-up period was 1.91 ± 0.58 mSv. The LAR at the end of follow-up was 17.65 (90% confidence interval 6.46-32.90) per 100,000 person-years for male orthognathic patients and 13.93 (90% confidence interval 6.27-25.24) per 100,000 person-years for female orthognathic patients. This represents 0.70% and 0.68%, respectively, of the baseline cancer risk for oral, thyroid, and brain cancer combined. Although theoretical, these results provide a framework for interpreting radiation doses and cancer risks in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. Considering the increased radiation sensitivity in children and adolescents, indication-oriented and patient-specific imaging protocols should be advised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Ver Berne
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - C Politis
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Shaheen
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - R Jacobs
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Dentistry, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Grzywacz VP, Arden JD, Mankuzhy NP, Gustafson GS, Sebastian EA, Abbott VL, Walters KJ, Puzzonia JA, Limbacher AS, Hafron JM, Krauss DJ. Normal Tissue Integral Dose as a Result of Prostate Radiation Therapy: A Quantitative Comparison Between High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Modern External Beam Radiation Therapy Techniques. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101160. [PMID: 36896212 PMCID: PMC9991537 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Quantification of integral radiation dose delivered during treatment for prostate cancer is lacking. We performed a comparative quantification of dose to nontarget body tissues delivered via 4 common radiation techniques: conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, pencil-beam scanning proton therapy, and high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Methods and Materials Plans for each radiation technique were generated for 10 patients with typical anatomy. For brachytherapy plans, virtual needles were placed to achieve standard dosimetry. Standard planning target volume margins or robustness margins were applied as appropriate. A "normal tissue" structure (entire computed tomography simulation volume minus planning target volume) was generated for integral dose computation. Dose-volume histogram parameters for targets and normal structures were tabulated. Normal tissue integral dose was calculated by multiplying normal tissue volume by mean dose. Results Normal tissue integral dose was lowest for brachytherapy. Pencil-beam scanning protons, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and brachytherapy resulted in 17%, 57%, and 91% absolute reductions compared with standard volumetric modulated arc therapy, respectively. Mean nontarget tissues receiving 25%, 50%, and 75% of the prescription dose were reduced by 85%, 76%, and 83% for brachytherapy relative to volumetric modulated arc therapy, by 79%, 64%, and 74% relative to stereotactic body radiation therapy, and 73%, 60%, and 81% relative to proton therapy. All reductions observed using brachytherapy were statistically significant. Conclusions High-dose-rate brachytherapy is an effective technique for reducing dose to nontarget body tissues relative to volumetric modulated arc therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and pencil-beam scanning proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jessica D Arden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Nikhil P Mankuzhy
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Joseph's Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Gary S Gustafson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | | | - Veronica L Abbott
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Kailee J Walters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Julie A Puzzonia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Amy S Limbacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Jason M Hafron
- Department of Urology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Daniel J Krauss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cholowsky NL, Chen MJ, Selouani G, Pett SC, Pearson DD, Danforth JM, Fenton S, Rydz E, Diteljan MJ, Peters CE, Goodarzi AA. Consequences of changing Canadian activity patterns since the COVID-19 pandemic include increased residential radon gas exposure for younger people. Sci Rep 2023; 13:5735. [PMID: 37029226 PMCID: PMC10081328 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32416-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has produced widespread behaviour changes that shifted how people split their time between different environments, altering health risks. Here, we report an update of North American activity patterns before and after pandemic onset, and implications to radioactive radon gas exposure, a leading cause of lung cancer. We surveyed 4009 Canadian households home to people of varied age, gender, employment, community, and income. Whilst overall time spent indoors remained unchanged, time in primary residence increased from 66.4 to 77% of life (+ 1062 h/y) after pandemic onset, increasing annual radiation doses from residential radon by 19.2% (0.97 mSv/y). Disproportionately greater changes were experienced by younger people in newer urban or suburban properties with more occupants, and/or those employed in managerial, administrative, or professional roles excluding medicine. Microinfluencer-based public health messaging stimulated health-seeking behaviour amongst highly impacted, younger groups by > 50%. This work supports re-evaluating environmental health risks modified by still-changing activity patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha L Cholowsky
- Robson DNA Science Centre, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Myra J Chen
- Robson DNA Science Centre, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ghozllane Selouani
- Robson DNA Science Centre, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Sophie C Pett
- Robson DNA Science Centre, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Dustin D Pearson
- Robson DNA Science Centre, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - John M Danforth
- Robson DNA Science Centre, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Shelby Fenton
- Department of Oncology, Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ela Rydz
- Department of Oncology, Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Cheryl E Peters
- Department of Oncology, Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, British Columbia Cancer, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Aaron A Goodarzi
- Robson DNA Science Centre, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
- Department of Oncology, Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Grandt CL, Brackmann LK, Foraita R, Schwarz H, Hummel-Bartenschlager W, Hankeln T, Kraemer C, Zahnreich S, Drees P, Mirsch J, Spix C, Blettner M, Schmidberger H, Binder H, Hess M, Galetzka D, Marini F, Poplawski A, Marron M. Gene expression variability in long-term survivors of childhood cancer and cancer-free controls in response to ionizing irradiation. Mol Med 2023; 29:41. [PMID: 36997855 PMCID: PMC10061869 DOI: 10.1186/s10020-023-00629-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Differential expression analysis is usually adjusted for variation. However, most studies that examined the expression variability (EV) have used computations affected by low expression levels and did not examine healthy tissue. This study aims to calculate and characterize an unbiased EV in primary fibroblasts of childhood cancer survivors and cancer-free controls (N0) in response to ionizing radiation. METHODS Human skin fibroblasts of 52 donors with a first primary neoplasm in childhood (N1), 52 donors with at least one second primary neoplasm (N2 +), as well as 52 N0 were obtained from the KiKme case-control study and exposed to a high (2 Gray) and a low dose (0.05 Gray) of X-rays and sham- irradiation (0 Gray). Genes were then classified as hypo-, non-, or hyper-variable per donor group and radiation treatment, and then examined for over-represented functional signatures. RESULTS We found 22 genes with considerable EV differences between donor groups, of which 11 genes were associated with response to ionizing radiation, stress, and DNA repair. The largest number of genes exclusive to one donor group and variability classification combination were all detected in N0: hypo-variable genes after 0 Gray (n = 49), 0.05 Gray (n = 41), and 2 Gray (n = 38), as well as hyper-variable genes after any dose (n = 43). While after 2 Gray positive regulation of cell cycle was hypo-variable in N0, (regulation of) fibroblast proliferation was over-represented in hyper-variable genes of N1 and N2+. In N2+, 30 genes were uniquely classified as hyper-variable after the low dose and were associated with the ERK1/ERK2 cascade. For N1, no exclusive gene sets with functions related to the radiation response were detected in our data. CONCLUSION N2+ showed high degrees of variability in pathways for the cell fate decision after genotoxic insults that may lead to the transfer and multiplication of DNA-damage via proliferation, where apoptosis and removal of the damaged genome would have been appropriate. Such a deficiency could potentially lead to a higher vulnerability towards side effects of exposure to high doses of ionizing radiation, but following low-dose applications employed in diagnostics, as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caine Lucas Grandt
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstr. 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
- Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
| | - Lara Kim Brackmann
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstr. 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Ronja Foraita
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstr. 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Heike Schwarz
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstr. 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Hankeln
- Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Molecular Genetics and Genome Analysis, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christiane Kraemer
- Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Molecular Genetics and Genome Analysis, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zahnreich
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Philipp Drees
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Johanna Mirsch
- Radiation Biology and DNA Repair, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Claudia Spix
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Maria Blettner
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), Center of the Johannes, University Medical, Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Harald Binder
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Hess
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Danuta Galetzka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Federico Marini
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), Center of the Johannes, University Medical, Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Alicia Poplawski
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), Center of the Johannes, University Medical, Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Manuela Marron
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstr. 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Colorectal Cancer Risk and Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Surveillance in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 57:431-439. [PMID: 36656074 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
While many organizations have published guidance on the approach to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in average-risk and certain high-risk groups, adult survivors of childhood cancer (ASCC) who have a heightened risk of CRC are rarely included as a target group for enhanced CRC surveillance. The population of ASCC continues to grow due to increasingly effective cancer therapies and improved survival. With this increased survival comes an increased risk for subsequent malignant neoplasms, including CRC. Since there is little published guidance for CRC surveillance in ASCC and limited awareness of increased CRC risk among both physicians and patients, the objectives of our paper are to review the incidence of and risk factors for colorectal neoplasia in ASCC, describe the clinical phenotypes of colorectal neoplasia in ASCC, review published surveillance strategies based on consensus-based survivorship guidelines, and outline areas for future research to optimize surveillance strategies.
Collapse
|
17
|
Secondary osteosarcoma: a challenge indeed. Int J Clin Oncol 2023; 28:184-190. [PMID: 36401730 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-022-02267-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk of survivors developing a secondary bone sarcoma after being treated for pediatric cancers is well established. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with secondary osteosarcoma (SOS). METHODS The study concerns survivors of childhood and adolescence primary neoplasms (PN) treated with chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy and surgery, subsequently diagnosed with SOS. RESULTS We identified 26 patients (13 females, 13 males) who developed SOS a median 7.3 years after being diagnosed with a PN (5/7 of these patients tested for Li-Fraumeni and found positive for the syndrome). The sample's median age was 8.0 and 15.0 years when their PN and SOS were diagnosed, respectively. To treat their PN, 24 out of 26 patients had been given radiotherapy, and 19 had received chemotherapy including doxorubicin. A considerable number of SOS occurred at unfavorable sites (nine hip bone, six skull). All but one patient received chemotherapy with tailored schedules, omitting doxorubicin in 19 cases. Eighteen of the 26 patients underwent surgery. The 5- and 10-year overall survival and probabilities after the diagnosis of SOS (95% confidence interval) were 50% (32.7-76.5%) and 38.9% (22.4-67.4%); 5- and 10-year progression-free survival was 47% (29.9-73.7%) and 35.2% (19.3-64.4%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The survival rates after SOS are lower than in patients with primary osteosarcoma, but not negligible. It is therefore mandatory to discuss the best choice of treatment for such patients at a referral center, in terms of their chances of cure and quality of life.
Collapse
|
18
|
Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Mutational Signatures Related to Radiation-Induced Sarcomas and DNA-Damage-Repair Pathways. Mod Pathol 2023; 36:100004. [PMID: 36788076 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2022.100004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Radiation-induced sarcoma (RIS) is a rare but serious late complication arising from radiotherapy. Despite unfavorable clinical outcomes, the genomic footprints of ionizing radiation in RIS development remain largely unknown. Hence, this study aimed to characterize RIS genomes and the genomic alterations in them. We analyzed whole-genome sequencing in 11 RIS genomes matched with normal genomes to identify somatic alterations potentially associated with RIS development. Furthermore, the abundance of mutations, mutation signatures, and structural variants in RIS were compared with those in radiation-naïve spontaneous sarcomas. The mutation abundance in RIS genomes, including one hypermutated genome, was variable. Cancer-related genes might show different types of genomic alterations. For instance, NF1, NF2, NOTCH1, NOTCH2, PIK3CA, RB1, and TP53 showed singleton somatic mutations; MYC, CDKN2A, RB1, and NF1 showed recurrent copy number alterations; and NF2, ARID1B, and RAD51B showed recurrent structural variations. The genomic footprints of nonhomologous end joining are prevalent at indels of RIS genomes compared with those in spontaneous sarcoma genomes, representing the genomic hallmark of RIS genomes. In addition, frequent chromothripsis was identified along with predisposing germline variants in the DNA-damage-repair pathways in RIS genomes. The characterization of RIS genomes on a whole-genome sequencing scale highlighted that the nonhomologous end joining pathway was associated with tumorigenesis, and it might pave the way for the development of advanced diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for RIS.
Collapse
|
19
|
Bhatia S. Germline risk factors for second malignant neoplasms after treatment for pediatric hematologic malignancies. HEMATOLOGY. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY. EDUCATION PROGRAM 2022; 2022:245-250. [PMID: 36485122 PMCID: PMC9820434 DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2022000399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Survivors of childhood hematologic malignancies are at a substantially higher risk of developing subsequent neoplasms (SNs) when compared with the general population. SNs commonly observed in this population include basal cell carcinoma, brain tumors, thyroid cancer, breast cancer, bone tumors, and sarcoma. Radiation is the primary therapeutic exposure associated with the development of these SNs. There is emerging evidence of an association between chemotherapeutic exposures (alkylating agents/anthracyclines) and the development of SNs. Despite a strong dose-dependent association between therapeutic exposures and SN risk, there is significant interindividual variability in the risk for SNs for any given dose of therapeutic exposure. This interindividual variability in risk suggests the role of genetic susceptibility. This article describes the clinical and molecular epidemiology of SNs commonly observed in survivors of childhood hematologic malignancies and also highlights some of the work focusing on the development of risk prediction models to facilitate targeted interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smita Bhatia
- Correspondence Smita Bhatia, Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1600 7th Ave S, Lowder 500, Birmingham, AL 35233; e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kinoshita Y, Yamasaki F, Taguchi A, Takayasu T, Yonezawa U, Tominaga A, Arita K, Okada S, Horie N, Sugiyama K. Influence of growth hormone therapy on germinoma survivors. Pituitary 2022; 25:854-860. [PMID: 35986827 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-022-01273-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Due to the effectiveness of growth hormone therapy (GHT), the number of cancer survivors receiving GHT has increased. Previous studies had indicated that GHT was not associated with the increasing risks of tumor recurrence and development with second neoplasm (SN) in cancer survivors. However, to date, research on those risks in germinoma survivors is still limited. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of GHT in relation to tumor recurrence and development with SN in pure germinoma survivors. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was approved by the Ethical Committee for Epidemiology of our institution. Seventy-three consecutive patients who underwent a biopsy of the lesion and were diagnosed with pure germinoma were retrospectively studied. They (median age, 15.0 years) were followed up more than 1 year after biopsy (median follow-up period, 14.3 years). The following data was obtained from the medical records of the patients: age, sex, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings, hormonal replacement, and events including tumor recurrence and/or SN. RESULTS In our patient series, 16 patients (21.9%) who were more likely to have neurohypophysial lesion and receive multiple hormonal therapies had received GHT. No significant differences in the rates of tumor recurrence and development with SN were observed between the patients who had and had not received GHT. Moreover, the recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates were not different between the patients who had and had not received GHT. CONCLUSIONS GHT did not increase the risks of tumor recurrence and development with SN in pure germinoma survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuyuki Kinoshita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 7348551, Japan.
| | - Fumiyuki Yamasaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 7348551, Japan
| | - Akira Taguchi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 7348551, Japan
| | - Takeshi Takayasu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 7348551, Japan
| | - Ushio Yonezawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 7348551, Japan
| | - Atsushi Tominaga
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Endovascular Therapy, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kazunori Arita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Satoshi Okada
- Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Nobutaka Horie
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 7348551, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Sugiyama
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Neuro-Oncology Program, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Karapinar E, Varkal M, Saka N. LONG-TERM THYROID DISORDERS IN CHILDREN RECEIVING ONCOLOGIC TREATMENT AND RADIOTHERAPY. ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA (BUCHAREST, ROMANIA : 2005) 2022; 18:429-435. [PMID: 37152881 PMCID: PMC10162817 DOI: 10.4183/aeb.2022.429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Context Childhood cancer survival has increased substantially over the past few decades. However, long-term side effects associated with cancer treatment have also risen. Especially thyroid gland disorders are common. Objective and Design The present retrospective cross-sectional study aimed to investigate risk factors of long-term TD in survivors of leukemia-lymphoma. Subjects and Methods The study included 44 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and 26 Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (HL). Abnormal laboratory and pathological ultrasonographic findings of the thyroid gland were accepted as a thyroid disorder. The possible causes of thyroid disorders were investigated. Results Long-term thyroid disorder was found in 40% of the patients. This rate was higher in HL patients than in ALL (65% vs. 25%). Thyroid disorder was significantly more common in patients who received radiotherapy to the neck (57% vs. 17%). Radiotherapy to the neck area was the only significant determinant for thyroid disorders in the regression models [OR 33.17, 95% CI (2.76-398.9) p = 0.006]. However, HL remained significantly associated with TD in the logistic model performed using cancer type [OR 19.25, 95% CI (2.39-155.3) p = 0.006]. Conclusions The study showed that radiotherapy applied to the neck was an essential risk factor for long-term TD in the average 6-year follow-up of cancer survivors. However, we recommend that childhood cancer survivors should be followed closely for a long time since long-term endocrine side effects were reported during longer than six years follow-up periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Karapinar
- Istanbul University, Faculty of Medicine − Pediatrics, Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey
| | - M.A. Varkal
- Istanbul University, Faculty of Medicine − Pediatrics, Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey
| | - N. Saka
- Istanbul University, Faculty of Medicine − Pediatrics, Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Grandt CL, Brackmann LK, Poplawski A, Schwarz H, Hummel-Bartenschlager W, Hankeln T, Kraemer C, Marini F, Zahnreich S, Schmitt I, Drees P, Mirsch J, Grabow D, Schmidberger H, Binder H, Hess M, Galetzka D, Marron M. Radiation-response in primary fibroblasts of long-term survivors of childhood cancer with and without second primary neoplasms: the KiKme study. Mol Med 2022; 28:105. [PMID: 36068491 PMCID: PMC9450413 DOI: 10.1186/s10020-022-00520-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The etiology and most risk factors for a sporadic first primary neoplasm in childhood or subsequent second primary neoplasms are still unknown. One established causal factor for therapy-associated second primary neoplasms is the exposure to ionizing radiation during radiation therapy as a mainstay of cancer treatment. Second primary neoplasms occur in 8% of all cancer survivors within 30 years after the first diagnosis in Germany, but the underlying factors for intrinsic susceptibilities have not yet been clarified. Thus, the purpose of this nested case–control study was the investigation and comparison of gene expression and affected pathways in primary fibroblasts of childhood cancer survivors with a first primary neoplasm only or with at least one subsequent second primary neoplasm, and controls without neoplasms after exposure to a low and a high dose of ionizing radiation. Methods Primary fibroblasts were obtained from skin biopsies from 52 adult donors with a first primary neoplasm in childhood (N1), 52 with at least one additional primary neoplasm (N2+), as well as 52 without cancer (N0) from the KiKme study. Cultured fibroblasts were exposed to a high [2 Gray (Gy)] and a low dose (0.05 Gy) of X-rays. Messenger ribonucleic acid was extracted 4 h after exposure and Illumina-sequenced. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were computed using limma for R, selected at a false discovery rate level of 0.05, and further analyzed for pathway enrichment (right-tailed Fisher’s Exact Test) and (in-) activation (z ≥|2|) using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Results After 0.05 Gy, least DEGs were found in N0 (n = 236), compared to N1 (n = 653) and N2+ (n = 694). The top DEGs with regard to the adjusted p-value were upregulated in fibroblasts across all donor groups (SESN1, MDM2, CDKN1A, TIGAR, BTG2, BLOC1S2, PPM1D, PHLDB3, FBXO22, AEN, TRIAP1, and POLH). Here, we observed activation of p53 Signaling in N0 and to a lesser extent in N1, but not in N2+. Only in N0, DNA (excision-) repair (involved genes: CDKN1A, PPM1D, and DDB2) was predicted to be a downstream function, while molecular networks in N2+ were associated with cancer, as well as injury and abnormalities (among others, downregulation of MSH6, CCNE2, and CHUK). After 2 Gy, the number of DEGs was similar in fibroblasts of all donor groups and genes with the highest absolute log2 fold-change were upregulated throughout (CDKN1A, TIGAR, HSPA4L, MDM2, BLOC1SD2, PPM1D, SESN1, BTG2, FBXO22, PCNA, and TRIAP1). Here, the p53 Signaling-Pathway was activated in fibroblasts of all donor groups. The Mitotic Roles of Polo Like Kinase-Pathway was inactivated in N1 and N2+. Molecular Mechanisms of Cancer were affected in fibroblasts of all donor groups. P53 was predicted to be an upstream regulator in fibroblasts of all donor groups and E2F1 in N1 and N2+. Results of the downstream analysis were senescence in N0 and N2+, transformation of cells in N0, and no significant effects in N1. Seven genes were differentially expressed in reaction to 2 Gy dependent on the donor group (LINC00601, COBLL1, SESN2, BIN3, TNFRSF10A, EEF1AKNMT, and BTG2). Conclusion Our results show dose-dependent differences in the radiation response between N1/N2+ and N0. While mechanisms against genotoxic stress were activated to the same extent after a high dose in all groups, the radiation response was impaired after a low dose in N1/N2+, suggesting an increased risk for adverse effects including carcinogenesis, particularly in N2+. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10020-022-00520-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caine Lucas Grandt
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology, BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.,Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Lara Kim Brackmann
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology, BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Alicia Poplawski
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heike Schwarz
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology, BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Hankeln
- Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Molecular Genetics and Genome Analysis, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christiane Kraemer
- Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Molecular Genetics and Genome Analysis, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Federico Marini
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zahnreich
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Iris Schmitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Philipp Drees
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Johanna Mirsch
- Radiation Biology and DNA Repair, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Desiree Grabow
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Harald Binder
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Hess
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Danuta Galetzka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Manuela Marron
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology, BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ohshima Y, Sasaki I, Watanabe S, Sakashita T, Higashi T, Ishioka NS. Organic cation transporter 3 mediates the non-norepinephrine transporter driven uptake of meta-[211At]astato-benzylguanidine. Nucl Med Biol 2022; 112-113:44-51. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2022.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
24
|
Wakeford R, Hauptmann M. The risk of cancer following high, and very high, doses of ionising radiation. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2022; 42:020518. [PMID: 35671754 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac767b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
It is established that moderate-to-high doses of ionising radiation increase the risk of subsequent cancer in the exposed individual, but the question arises as to the risk of cancer from higher doses, such as those delivered during radiotherapy, accidents, or deliberate acts of malice. In general, the cumulative dose received during a course of radiation treatment is sufficiently high that it would kill a person if delivered as a single dose to the whole body, but therapeutic doses are carefully fractionated and high/very high doses are generally limited to a small tissue volume under controlled conditions. The very high cumulative doses delivered as fractions during radiation treatment are designed to inactivate diseased cells, but inevitably some healthy cells will also receive high/very high doses. How the doses (ranging from <1 Gy to tens of Gy) received by healthy tissues during radiotherapy affect the risk of second primary cancer is an increasingly important issue to address as more cancer patients survive the disease. Studies show that, except for a turndown for thyroid cancer, a linear dose-response for second primary solid cancers seems to exist over a cumulative gamma radiation dose range of tens of gray, but with a gradient of excess relative risk per Gy that varies with the type of second cancer, and which is notably shallower than that found in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors receiving a single moderate-to-high acute dose. The risk of second primary cancer consequent to high/very high doses of radiation is likely to be due to repopulation of heavily irradiated tissues by surviving stem cells, some of which will have been malignantly transformed by radiation exposure, although the exact mechanism is not known, and various models have been proposed. It is important to understand the mechanisms that lead to the raised risk of second primary cancers consequent to the receipt of high/very high doses, in particular so that the risks associated with novel radiation treatment regimens-for example, intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy that deliver high doses to the target volume while exposing relatively large volumes of healthy tissue to low/moderate doses, and treatments using protons or heavy ions rather than photons-may be properly assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Wakeford
- Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School, Fehrbelliner Strasse 38, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nuyts S, Bollen H, Ng SP, Corry J, Eisbruch A, Mendenhall WM, Smee R, Strojan P, Ng WT, Ferlito A. Proton Therapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Early Clinical Experience and Current Challenges. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112587. [PMID: 35681568 PMCID: PMC9179360 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Proton therapy is a promising type of radiation therapy used to destroy tumor cells. It has the potential to further improve the outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer since it allows to minimize the radiation dose to vital structures around the tumor, leading to less toxicity. This paper describes the current experience worldwide with proton therapy in head and neck cancer. Abstract Proton therapy (PT) is a promising development in radiation oncology, with the potential to further improve outcomes for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). By utilizing the finite range of protons, healthy tissue can be spared from beam exit doses that would otherwise be irradiated with photon-based treatments. Current evidence on PT for HNSCC is limited to comparative dosimetric analyses and retrospective single-institution series. As a consequence, the recognized indications for the reimbursement of PT remain scarce in most countries. Nevertheless, approximately 100 PT centers are in operation worldwide, and initial experiences for HNSCC are being reported. This review aims to summarize the results of the early clinical experience with PT for HNSCC and the challenges that are currently faced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Nuyts
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Correspondence:
| | - Heleen Bollen
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - June Corry
- Division of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - Avraham Eisbruch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32209, USA;
| | - Robert Smee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Prince of Wales Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia;
| | - Primoz Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;
| | - Wai Tong Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China;
| | - Alfio Ferlito
- Coordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, 35125 Padua, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hochberg J, Basso J, Shi Q, Klejmont L, Flower A, Bortfeld K, Harrison L, van de Ven C, Moorthy C, Islam H, Gerard P, Voss S, Cairo MS. Risk-adapted chemoimmunotherapy using brentuximab vedotin and rituximab in children, adolescents, and young adults with newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma: a phase II, non-randomized controlled trial. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2021-004445. [PMID: 35584865 PMCID: PMC9119160 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cure rates for Hodgkin’s lymphoma are excellent, but excess short-term and long-term morbidities from treatment remain a concern. Immunotherapy targeting both tumor antigens and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in children, adolescents, and young adults with Hodgkin’s lymphoma may improve early response rates and eliminate toxic chemotherapy and radiation, thus minimizing toxicity. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the safety and overall response rate of brentuximab vedotin and rituximab in combination with risk-adapted chemotherapy in children, adolescents, and young adults with newly diagnosed classic Hodgkin’s lymphoma (cHL). Methods This is a prospective, phase II, non-randomized, risk-assigned study. Patients were treated and evaluated between 2012 and 2020. Eligible patients were aged ≥1 and ≤30 years old with advanced stage, intermediate-risk, and high-risk newly diagnosed cHL. Patients received four or six cycles of brentuximab vedotin (1.2 mg/kg), doxorubicin (25 mg/m2), vinblastine (6 mg/m2), dacarbazine (375 mg/m2), and rituximab (375 mg/m2). Early response was evaluated following two cycles of therapy. Involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) was restricted to high-risk patients with both bulky disease and slow response or those not in complete response at the end of chemoimmunotherapy. Results Thirty patients were enrolled, with a median age of 15 years (4–23). There were 18 intermediate-risk and 12 high-risk patients. Toxicities included grade III mucositis (3%), infusion reaction (3%), and peripheral neuropathy (6%). There was a 100% complete response rate on completion of chemoimmunotherapy. Eighteen patients (60%) achieved a rapid early response. Four patients (13%) required IFRT. The 5-year event-free and overall survival rates were 100%, with a median follow-up of 62 months (18–105). Conclusions Immunotherapy with brentuximab vedotin, rituximab, and risk-adapted chemotherapy is safe in children, adolescents, and young adults with newly diagnosed cHL. We have demonstrated 100% complete response and 100% event-free and overall survival rates at a median 5-year follow-up, with a significant reduction in use of more toxic chemotherapy and IFRT. A larger cohort is required to confirm these preliminary findings. Trial registration number NCT02398240.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jaclyn Basso
- Pediatrics, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - Qiuhu Shi
- Epidemiology and Community Health, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Liana Klejmont
- Pediatrics, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - Allyson Flower
- Pediatrics, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | | | - Lauren Harrison
- Pediatrics, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | | | - Chitti Moorthy
- Radiology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - Humayun Islam
- Pathology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - Perry Gerard
- Radiology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - Stephan Voss
- Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mitchell S Cairo
- Pediatrics, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA .,Pathology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.,Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.,Microbiology & Immunology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.,Cell Biology & Anatomy, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Modulation of Secondary Cancer Risks from Radiation Exposure by Sex, Age and Gonadal Hormone Status: Progress, Opportunities and Challenges. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12050725. [PMID: 35629147 PMCID: PMC9146871 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12050725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Available data on cancer secondary to ionizing radiation consistently show an excess (2-fold amount) of radiation-attributable solid tumors in women relative to men. This excess risk varies by organ and age, with the largest sex differences (6- to more than 10-fold) found in female thyroid and breasts exposed between birth until menopause (~50 years old) relative to age-matched males. Studies in humans and animals also show large changes in cell proliferation rates, radiotracer accumulation and target density in female reproductive organs, breast, thyroid and brain in conjunction with physiological changes in gonadal hormones during the menstrual cycle, puberty, lactation and menopause. These sex differences and hormonal effects present challenges as well as opportunities to personalize radiation-based treatment and diagnostic paradigms so as to optimize the risk/benefit ratios in radiation-based cancer therapy and diagnosis. Specifically, Targeted Radionuclide Therapy (TRT) is a fast-expanding cancer treatment modality utilizing radiopharmaceuticals with high avidity to specific molecular tumor markers, many of which are influenced by sex and gonadal hormone status. However, past and present dosimetry studies of TRT agents do not stratify results by sex and hormonal environment. We conclude that cancer management using ionizing radiation should be personalized and informed by the patient sex, age and hormonal status.
Collapse
|
28
|
Berger ND, Brownlee PM, Chen MJ, Morrison H, Osz K, Ploquin NP, Chan JA, Goodarzi AA. High replication stress and limited Rad51-mediated DNA repair capacity, but not oxidative stress, underlie oligodendrocyte precursor cell radiosensitivity. NAR Cancer 2022; 4:zcac012. [PMID: 35425901 PMCID: PMC9004414 DOI: 10.1093/narcan/zcac012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Cranial irradiation is part of the standard of care for treating pediatric brain tumors. However, ionizing radiation can trigger serious long-term neurologic sequelae, including oligodendrocyte and brain white matter loss enabling neurocognitive decline in children surviving brain cancer. Oxidative stress-mediated oligodendrocyte precursor cell (OPC) radiosensitivity has been proposed as a possible explanation for this. Here, however, we demonstrate that antioxidants fail to improve OPC viability after irradiation, despite suppressing oxidative stress, suggesting an alternative etiology for OPC radiosensitivity. Using systematic approaches, we find that OPCs have higher irradiation-induced and endogenous γH2AX foci compared to neural stem cells, neurons, astrocytes and mature oligodendrocytes, and these correlate with replication-associated DNA double strand breakage. Furthermore, OPCs are reliant upon ATR kinase and Mre11 nuclease-dependent processes for viability, are more sensitive to drugs increasing replication fork collapse, and display synthetic lethality with PARP inhibitors after irradiation. This suggests an insufficiency for homology-mediated DNA repair in OPCs—a model that is supported by evidence of normal RPA but reduced RAD51 filament formation at resected lesions in irradiated OPCs. We therefore propose a DNA repair-centric mechanism of OPC radiosensitivity, involving chronically-elevated replication stress combined with ‘bottlenecks’ in RAD51-dependent DNA repair that together reduce radiation resilience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Daniel Berger
- Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Peter M Brownlee
- Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Myra J Chen
- Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Hali Morrison
- Department of Oncology and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Katalin Osz
- Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nicolas P Ploquin
- Department of Oncology and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jennifer A Chan
- Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Aaron A Goodarzi
- Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dell'Oro M, Short M, Wilson P, Peukert D, Hua CH, Merchant TE, Bezak E. Lifetime attributable risk of radiation induced second primary cancer from scattering and scanning proton therapy - A model for out-of-field organs of paediatric patients with cranial cancer. Radiother Oncol 2022; 172:65-75. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
30
|
Pellerino A, Caccese M, Padovan M, Cerretti G, Lombardi G. Epidemiology, risk factors, and prognostic factors of gliomas. Clin Transl Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-022-00489-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
31
|
Jones DA, Candio P, Shakir R, Ntentas G, Ramroth J, Gray AM, Cutter DJ. Informing radiotherapy decisions in stage I/IIa Hodgkin lymphoma: modeling life expectancy using radiation dosimetry. Blood Adv 2022; 6:909-919. [PMID: 34872107 PMCID: PMC8945315 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent randomized trials, omitting consolidative radiotherapy (RT) in early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (ESHL) increased relapses. However, decades of follow-up are required to observe whether lower initial disease control is compensated by reduced risk of late effects. Extrapolation beyond trial follow-up is therefore necessary to inform current treatment decisions. To this end, we developed a microsimulation model to estimate lifetime quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) after combined modality treatment (CMT) or chemotherapy-alone for stage I/IIa ESHL. For CMT, the model included risks of breast and lung cancer, coronary heart disease, and ischemic stroke. Comparative outcomes were assessed for a clinically relevant range of example patients differing by age, sex, smoking status, and representative organs at risk (OAR) radiation doses informed by the RAPID trial. Analysis was performed with and without a 3.5% discount rate on future health. Smoking status had a large effect on optimal treatment choice. CMT was superior for nearly all never smoker example patients regardless of age, sex, and OAR doses. At a maximum, CMT produced a 1.095 (95% CI: 1.054-1.137) gain in undiscounted QALYs for a 20-year-old male never smoker with unilateral neck disease. In contrast, current smokers could substantially gain from chemotherapy-alone treatment. Again at a maximum, a 20-year-old male current smoker with bilateral neck and whole mediastinum involvement gained 3.500 (95% CI: 3.400 to 3.600) undiscounted QALYs with chemotherapy-alone treatment. Overall, CMT was more favorable the younger the patient, when future health discounting was included, and in never smokers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rebecca Shakir
- Clinical Trial Service Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Georgios Ntentas
- Clinical Trial Service Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Medical Physics, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Johanna Ramroth
- Clinical Trial Service Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - David J. Cutter
- Clinical Trial Service Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Francis SS, Ostrom QT, Cote DJ, Smith TR, Claus E, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. The Epidemiology of Central Nervous System Tumors. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2022; 36:23-42. [PMID: 34801162 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2021.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
This article reviews the current epidemiology of central nervous system tumors. Population-level basic epidemiology, nationally and internationally, and current understanding of germline genetic risk are discussed, with a focus on known and well-studied risk factors related to the etiology of central nervous system tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen S Francis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Division of Neuro and Molecular Epidemiology, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, 1450 3rd Street, HD442, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
| | - Quinn T Ostrom
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, 571 Research Drive, MSRB-1, Rm 442, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - David J Cote
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1200 N State Street, Suite 3300, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Timothy R Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Elizabeth Claus
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, Yale School of Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, Trans-Divisional Research Program, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), NCI Shady Grove, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Farber E, Kwiecien JM, Bojic D, Ngu M, Akohene-Mensah P, Vanhie JJ, Lloyd J, Larkin J, DE Lisio M. Exercise Improves Cancer-free Survival and Health Span in a Model of Radiation-induced Cancer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2021; 53:2254-2263. [PMID: 34081060 DOI: 10.1249/mss.0000000000002711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiation therapy increases the risk of secondary malignancy and morbidity in cancer survivors. The role of obesity and exercise training in modulating this risk is not well understood. As such, we used a preclinical model of radiation-induced malignancy to investigate whether diet-induced obesity and/or endurance exercise training altered lifelong survival, cancer incidence, and morbidity. METHODS Male CBA mice were randomly divided into control diet/sedentary group (CTRL/SED), high-fat diet (45% fat)/sedentary group (HFD/SED), control diet/exercise group (2-3 d·wk-1; CTRL/EX), or high-fat diet/exercise group (HFD/EX) groups then exposed to whole-body radiation (3 Gy). End point monitoring and pathology determined mortality and cancer incidence, respectively. Health span index, a measure of morbidity, was determined by a composite measure of 10 anthropometric, metabolic, performance, and behavioral measures. RESULTS Overall survival was higher in HFD/SED compared with CTRL/SED (P < 0.05). The risk of cancer-related mortality by 18 months postradiation was 1.99 and 1.63 in HFD/SED compared with CTRL/EX (RR = 1.99, 95% confidence interval = 1.20-3.31, P = 0.0081) and CTRL/SED (RR = 1.63, 95% confidence interval = 1.06-2.49, P = 0.0250), respectively. The number of mice at end point with cancer was higher in HFD/SED compared with CTRL/EX and CTRL/SED (P < 0.05). Health span index was highest in CTRL/EX (score = +2.5), followed by HFD/EX (score = +1), and HFD/SED (score = -1) relative to CTRL/SED. CONCLUSION This work provides the basis for future preclinical studies investigating the dose-response relationship between exercise training and late effects of radiation therapy as well as the mechanisms responsible for these effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eadan Farber
- School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CANADA
| | - Jacek M Kwiecien
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, CANADA
| | - Dejan Bojic
- School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CANADA
| | - Matthew Ngu
- School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CANADA
| | - Paul Akohene-Mensah
- School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CANADA
| | - James J Vanhie
- School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CANADA
| | - Jessica Lloyd
- School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CANADA
| | - Jillian Larkin
- School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CANADA
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Possible Mechanisms of Subsequent Neoplasia Development in Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13205064. [PMID: 34680213 PMCID: PMC8533890 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13205064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in medicine have improved outcomes in children diagnosed with cancer, with overall 5-year survival rates for these children now exceeding 80%. Two-thirds of childhood cancer survivors have at least one late effect of cancer therapy, with one-third having serious or even life-threatening effects. One of the most serious late effects is a development of subsequent malignant neoplasms (histologically different cancers, which appear after the treatment for primary cancer), which occur in about 3-10% of survivors and are associated with high mortality. In cancers with a very good prognosis, subsequent malignant neoplasms significantly affect long-term survival. Therefore, there is an effort to reduce particularly hazardous treatments. This review discusses the importance of individual factors (gender, genetic factors, cytostatic drugs, radiotherapy) in the development of subsequent malignant neoplasms and the possibilities of their prediction and prevention in the future.
Collapse
|
35
|
Węgierek-Ciuk A, Lankoff A, Lisowska H, Kędzierawski P, Akuwudike P, Lundholm L, Wojcik A. Cisplatin Reduces the Frequencies of Radiotherapy-Induced Micronuclei in Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes of Patients with Gynaecological Cancer: Possible Implications for the Risk of Second Malignant Neoplasms. Cells 2021; 10:2709. [PMID: 34685687 PMCID: PMC8534481 DOI: 10.3390/cells10102709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Gynaecologic cancers are common among women and treatment includes surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy, where the last two methods induce DNA damage in non-targeted cells like peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL). Damaged normal cells can transform leading to second malignant neoplasms (SMN) but the level of risk and impact of risk modifiers is not well defined. We investigated how radiotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy induce DNA damage in PBL of cervix and endometrial cancer patients during therapy. Blood samples were collected from nine endometrial cancer patients (treatment with radiotherapy + chemotherapy-RC) and nine cervical cancer patients (treatment with radiotherapy alone-R) before radiotherapy, 3 weeks after onset of radiotherapy and at the end of radiotherapy. Half of each blood sample was irradiated ex vivo with 2 Gy of gamma radiation in order to check how therapy influenced the sensitivity of PBL to radiation. Analysed endpoints were micronucleus (MN) frequencies, apoptosis frequencies and cell proliferation index. The results were characterised by strong individual variation, especially the MN frequencies and proliferation index. On average, despite higher total dose and larger fields, therapy alone induced the same level of MN in PBL of RC patients as compared to R. This result was accompanied by a higher level of apoptosis and stronger inhibition of cell proliferation in RC patients. The ex vivo dose induced fewer MN, more apoptosis and more strongly inhibited proliferation of PBL of RC as compared to R patients. These results are interpreted as evidence for a sensitizing effect of chemotherapy on radiation cytotoxicity. The possible implications for the risk of second malignant neoplasms are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aneta Węgierek-Ciuk
- Department of Medical Biology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Uniwersytecka 7, 25-406 Kielce, Poland; (A.L.); (H.L.); (A.W.)
| | - Anna Lankoff
- Department of Medical Biology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Uniwersytecka 7, 25-406 Kielce, Poland; (A.L.); (H.L.); (A.W.)
- Centre for Radiobiology and Biological Dosimetry, Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Dorodna 16, 03-195 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Halina Lisowska
- Department of Medical Biology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Uniwersytecka 7, 25-406 Kielce, Poland; (A.L.); (H.L.); (A.W.)
| | - Piotr Kędzierawski
- Department of Radiotherapy, Holy Cross Cancer Center, Artwinskiego 3, 25-734 Kielce, Poland;
| | - Pamela Akuwudike
- Centre for Radiation Protection Research, Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden; (P.A.); (L.L.)
| | - Lovisa Lundholm
- Centre for Radiation Protection Research, Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden; (P.A.); (L.L.)
| | - Andrzej Wojcik
- Department of Medical Biology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Uniwersytecka 7, 25-406 Kielce, Poland; (A.L.); (H.L.); (A.W.)
- Centre for Radiation Protection Research, Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden; (P.A.); (L.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Deng MY, Sturm D, Pfaff E, Sill M, Stichel D, Balasubramanian GP, Tippelt S, Kramm C, Donson AM, Green AL, Jones C, Schittenhelm J, Ebinger M, Schuhmann MU, Jones BC, van Tilburg CM, Wittmann A, Golanov A, Ryzhova M, Ecker J, Milde T, Witt O, Sahm F, Reuss D, Sumerauer D, Zamecnik J, Korshunov A, von Deimling A, Pfister SM, Jones DTW. Radiation-induced gliomas represent H3-/IDH-wild type pediatric gliomas with recurrent PDGFRA amplification and loss of CDKN2A/B. Nat Commun 2021; 12:5530. [PMID: 34545083 PMCID: PMC8452680 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25708-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Long-term complications such as radiation-induced second malignancies occur in a subset of patients following radiation-therapy, particularly relevant in pediatric patients due to the long follow-up period in case of survival. Radiation-induced gliomas (RIGs) have been reported in patients after treatment with cranial irradiation for various primary malignancies such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and medulloblastoma (MB). We perform comprehensive (epi-) genetic and expression profiling of RIGs arising after cranial irradiation for MB (n = 23) and ALL (n = 9). Our study reveals a unifying molecular signature for the majority of RIGs, with recurrent PDGFRA amplification and loss of CDKN2A/B and an absence of somatic hotspot mutations in genes encoding histone 3 variants or IDH1/2, uncovering diagnostic markers and potentially actionable targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Y Deng
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Glioma Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dominik Sturm
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Glioma Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elke Pfaff
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Glioma Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Sill
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Damian Stichel
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gnana Prakash Balasubramanian
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Tippelt
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | - Christof Kramm
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Andrew M Donson
- Morgan Adams Foundation Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Adam L Green
- Morgan Adams Foundation Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Chris Jones
- Division of Molecular Pathology and Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jens Schittenhelm
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology and Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Martin Ebinger
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Children's University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Martin U Schuhmann
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Barbara C Jones
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Glioma Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cornelis M van Tilburg
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Pediatric Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Wittmann
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Glioma Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrey Golanov
- Department of Neuropathology, NN Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marina Ryzhova
- Department of Neuropathology, NN Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - Jonas Ecker
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Pediatric Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Till Milde
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Pediatric Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Olaf Witt
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Pediatric Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Sahm
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Reuss
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Sumerauer
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Motol University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Josef Zamecnik
- Department of Pathology, Motol University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Andrey Korshunov
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas von Deimling
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan M Pfister
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David T W Jones
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Division of Pediatric Glioma Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cochrane T, Campbell BA, Gangatharan SA, Latimer M, Khor R, Christie DRH, Gilbertson M, Ratnasingam S, Palfreyman E, Lee HP, Trotman J, Hertzberg M, Dickinson M. Assessment and management of newly diagnosed classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a consensus practice statement from the Australasian Lymphoma Alliance. Intern Med J 2021; 51:2119-2128. [PMID: 34505342 DOI: 10.1111/imj.15503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The management of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has undergone significant changes in recent years. Due to the predilection of HL to affect younger patients, balancing cure and treatment-related morbidity is a constant source of concern for physicians and patients alike. Positron emission tomography adapted therapy has been developed for both early and advanced stage HL to try and improve the outcome of treatment, while minimising toxicities. The aim of this review is to digest the plethora of studies recently conducted and provide some clear, evidence-based practice statements to simplify the management of HL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Cochrane
- Department of Haematology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.,School of Medicine, Griffiths University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Belinda A Campbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shane A Gangatharan
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Maya Latimer
- ACT Pathology and Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | | | - David R H Christie
- Genesiscare, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.,Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael Gilbertson
- Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Haematology and Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sumita Ratnasingam
- Andrew Love Cancer Centre, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emma Palfreyman
- Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Hui-Peng Lee
- Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Judith Trotman
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark Hertzberg
- Department of Haematology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Dickinson
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Tinganelli W, Luoni F, Durante M. What can space radiation protection learn from radiation oncology? LIFE SCIENCES IN SPACE RESEARCH 2021; 30:82-95. [PMID: 34281668 DOI: 10.1016/j.lssr.2021.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Protection from cosmic radiation of crews of long-term space missions is now becoming an urgent requirement to allow a safe colonization of the moon and Mars. Epidemiology provides little help to quantify the risk, because the astronaut group is small and as yet mostly involved in low-Earth orbit mission, whilst the usual cohorts used for radiation protection on Earth (e.g. atomic bomb survivors) were exposed to a radiation quality substantially different from the energetic charged particle field found in space. However, there are over 260,000 patients treated with accelerated protons or heavier ions for different types of cancer, and this cohort may be useful for quantifying the effects of space-like radiation in humans. Space radiation protection and particle therapy research also share the same tools and devices, such as accelerators and detectors, as well as several research topics, from nuclear fragmentation cross sections to the radiobiology of densely ionizing radiation. The transfer of the information from the cancer radiotherapy field to space is manifestly complicated, yet the two field should strengthen their relationship and exchange methods and data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter Tinganelli
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Francesca Luoni
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Darmstadt, Germany; Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Physik Kondensierter Materie, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Marco Durante
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Darmstadt, Germany; Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Physik Kondensierter Materie, Darmstadt, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Boerma M, Davis CM, Jackson IL, Schaue D, Williams JP. All for one, though not one for all: team players in normal tissue radiobiology. Int J Radiat Biol 2021; 98:346-366. [PMID: 34129427 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1941383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE As part of the special issue on 'Women in Science', this review offers a perspective on past and ongoing work in the field of normal (non-cancer) tissue radiation biology, highlighting the work of many of the leading contributors to this field of research. We discuss some of the hypotheses that have guided investigations, with a focus on some of the critical organs considered dose-limiting with respect to radiation therapy, and speculate on where the field needs to go in the future. CONCLUSIONS The scope of work that makes up normal tissue radiation biology has and continues to play a pivotal role in the radiation sciences, ensuring the most effective application of radiation in imaging and therapy, as well as contributing to radiation protection efforts. However, despite the proven historical value of preclinical findings, recent decades have seen clinical practice move ahead with altered fractionation scheduling based on empirical observations, with little to no (or even negative) supporting scientific data. Given our current appreciation of the complexity of normal tissue radiation responses and their temporal variability, with tissue- and/or organ-specific mechanisms that include intra-, inter- and extracellular messaging, as well as contributions from systemic compartments, such as the immune system, the need to maintain a positive therapeutic ratio has never been more urgent. Importantly, mitigation and treatment strategies, whether for the clinic, emergency use following accidental or deliberate releases, or reducing occupational risk, will likely require multi-targeted approaches that involve both local and systemic intervention. From our personal perspective as five 'Women in Science', we would like to acknowledge and applaud the role that many female scientists have played in this field. We stand on the shoulders of those who have gone before, some of whom are fellow contributors to this special issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjan Boerma
- Division of Radiation Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Catherine M Davis
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Isabel L Jackson
- Division of Translational Radiation Sciences, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dörthe Schaue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jacqueline P Williams
- Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Indelicato DJ, Bates JE, Mailhot Vega RB, Rotondo RL, Hoppe BS, Morris CG, Looi WS, Sandler ES, Aldana PR, Bradley JA. Second tumor risk in children treated with proton therapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68:e28941. [PMID: 33565257 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Out-of-field neutron dissemination during double-scattered proton therapy has raised concerns of increased second malignancies, disproportionally affecting pediatric patients due to the proportion of body exposed to scatter dose and inherent radiosensitivity of developing tissue. We sought to provide empiric data on the incidence of early second tumors. METHODS Between 2006 and 2019, 1713 consecutive children underwent double-scattered proton therapy. Median age at treatment was 9.1 years; 371 were ≤3 years old. Thirty-seven patients (2.2%) had tumor predisposition syndromes. Median prescription dose was 54 Gy (range 15-75.6). Median follow-up was 3.3 years (range 0.1-12.8), including 6587 total person-years. Five hundred forty-nine patients had ≥5 years of follow-up. A second tumor was defined as any solid neoplasm throughout the body. RESULTS Eleven patients developed second tumors; the 5- and 10-year cumulative incidences were 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4-1.9%) and 3.1% (95% CI, 1.5-6.2%), respectively. Using age- and gender-specific data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, the standardized incidence ratio was 13.5; the absolute excess risk was 1.5/1000 person-years. All but one patient who developed second tumors were irradiated at ≤5 years old (p < .0005). There was also a statistically significant correlation between patients with tumor predisposition syndromes and second tumors (p < .0001). Excluding patients with tumor predisposition syndromes, 5- and 10-year rates were 0.6% (95% CI, 0.2-1.7%) and 1.7% (95% CI, 0.7-4.0%), respectively, with all five malignant second tumors occurring in the high-dose region. CONCLUSION Second tumors are rare within the decade following double-scattered proton therapy, particularly among children irradiated at >5 years old and those without tumor predisposition syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - James E Bates
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Raymond B Mailhot Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Ronny L Rotondo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Christopher G Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Wen S Looi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Eric S Sandler
- Department of Pediatrics, Nemours Children's Specialty Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Philipp R Aldana
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Julie A Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Selection of Mediastinal Lymphoma Patients for Proton Therapy Within the Proton Collaborative Group Registry: Concordance With the ILROG Guidelines. Am J Clin Oncol 2021; 44:269-274. [PMID: 33852456 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE As patients with mediastinal lymphoma are typically young with curable disease, advanced radiation techniques such as proton therapy are often considered to minimize subacute and late toxicity. However, it is unclear which mediastinal lymphoma patients are treated with proton therapy. Within a prospective, multi-institutional proton registry, we characterized mediastinal lymphoma patients treated with proton therapy and assessed concordance with consensus recommendations published in 2018 by the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG). METHODS Eligible patients included those with lymphoma of the mediastinum treated exclusively with proton therapy for whom digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) treatment data were available for review. Given the challenge with reliably visualizing the left mainstem coronary artery, the inferior-most aspect of the left pulmonary artery (PA) was used as a surrogate. Extent of disease was characterized as upper mediastinum (above level of left PA), middle mediastinum (below left PA but at or above level of T8), or low mediastinum (below T8). RESULTS Between November 2012 and April 2019, 56 patients were treated and met inclusion criteria. Patients treated with proton therapy were young (median, 24 y; range: 12 to 88), with over half being female (55%). Patients were most commonly treated at initial diagnosis (86%) and had Hodgkin lymphoma (79%). Most patients (96%) had mediastinal disease that extended down to the level of the heart: 48% had middle and 48% had low mediastinal involvement. Nearly all patients (96%) met the ILROG consensus recommendations: 95% had lower mediastinal disease, 46% were young females, and 9% were heavily pretreated. Heart (mean) and lung dose (mean, V5, V20) were significantly associated with lowest extent of mediastinal disease. CONCLUSIONS Mediastinal lymphoma patients treated with proton therapy are typically young with lower mediastinal involvement. Within a prospective, multi-institutional proton registry, nearly all treated patients fit the ILROG consensus recommendations regarding which mediastinal lymphoma patients may most benefit from proton therapy.
Collapse
|
42
|
Ho WL, Hung GY, Yen HJ, Yang YL, Chang HH, Lu MY, Lin KH, Chen JS, Cheng CN, Hung IJ, Yang CP, Chen SH, Liu HC, Yeh TC, Hou JY, Hsiao CC, Sheen JM, Chang TT, Wong TT, Miser JS, Liu YL, Chen RL, Chen BW, Peng CT, Chang TK, Wu KH, Chang YH, Wang JL, Wang SC, Lin MT, Hu FC, Jou ST, Lin DT. Characteristics and outcomes of second cancers in patients with childhood cancer: A report from the Taiwan Pediatric Oncology Group. J Formos Med Assoc 2021; 121:350-359. [PMID: 34154895 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with childhood cancer are at increased risk for the development of second cancers. METHODS A national multicenter survey of second cancers conducted by the Taiwan Pediatric Oncology Group retrieved retrospective data from the database at the Children Cancer Foundation in Taiwan beginning in 1995. The characteristics of second cancers and associations of patient demographic and clinical characteristics with time to death due to a second cancer were analyzed. RESULTS We examined the records of 8782 patients with a primary cancer diagnosed between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2013, and a total of 99 patients with a second cancer were identified. The most common type of second cancer was acute myeloid leukemia (n = 35), followed by acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 15), central nervous system (CNS) tumors (n = 15), and sarcomas (n = 10). Secondary hematological malignancies occurred earlier than other secondary cancers. The frequencies of second CNS tumors and second bone cancers and sarcomas were notably increased when prior radiation doses increased from zero, low dose to high dose. The overall 5-year survival of patients with a second cancer was poor (33.7%). Multivariate survival analysis revealed that the year of primary diagnosis ≤2002, secondary hematological malignancies, and age at second cancer diagnosis ≤9.3 years or >26.8 years increased the risk of death following second cancer. CONCLUSION Children who develop a second cancer have an unfavorable outcome. Early detection and improved treatment for second cancers are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wan-Ling Ho
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Pediatrics, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Taipei Cancer Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Pediatrics, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Giun-Yi Hung
- Department of Pediatrics, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Ju Yen
- Department of Pediatrics, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Li Yang
- Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Hao Chang
- Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Meng-Yao Lu
- Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kai-Hsin Lin
- Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jiann-Shiuh Chen
- Department of Pediatrics, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Neng Cheng
- Department of Pediatrics, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Iou-Jih Hung
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Chang Gung Children's Hospital-Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Ping Yang
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Chang Gung Children's Hospital-Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Hsiang Chen
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Chang Gung Children's Hospital-Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hsi-Che Liu
- Department of Pediatrics, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ting-Chi Yeh
- Department of Pediatrics, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Yin Hou
- Department of Pediatrics, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Cheng Hsiao
- Department of Pediatrics, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jiunn-Ming Sheen
- Department of Pediatrics, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Pediatrics, Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Tai-Tsung Chang
- Ditmanson Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan; Department of Pediatrics, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Tai-Tong Wong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan
| | - James S Miser
- Taipei Cancer Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; College of Medical Sciences and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Lin Liu
- Taipei Cancer Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Pediatrics, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Rong-Long Chen
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bow-Wen Chen
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Tien Peng
- Division of Pediatric Hematology & Oncology, Children's Hospital of China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Biotechnology, Asia University, Wufeng, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Te-Kau Chang
- Division of Pediatric Hematology & Oncology, Children's Hospital of China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Pediatrics, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Kang-Hsi Wu
- Division of Pediatric Hematology & Oncology, Children's Hospital of China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Pediatrics, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Hsiang Chang
- Department of Pediatrics, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jinn-Li Wang
- Department of Pediatrics, Taipei Medical University-Wanfang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Chung Wang
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Changhua Christian Children's Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Tsan Lin
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Changhua Christian Children's Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Fu-Chang Hu
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine and School of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; International-Harvard Statistical Consulting Company, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shiann-Tarng Jou
- Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Dong-Tsamn Lin
- Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rodrigues AJ, Jin MC, Wu A, Bhambhvani HP, Li G, Grant GA. Risk of secondary neoplasms after external-beam radiation therapy treatment of pediatric low-grade gliomas: a SEER analysis, 1973-2015. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2021; 28:306-314. [PMID: 34144522 DOI: 10.3171/2021.1.peds20859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although past studies have associated external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with higher incidences of secondary neoplasms (SNs), its effect on SN development from pediatric low-grade gliomas (LGGs), defined as WHO grade I and II gliomas of astrocytic or oligodendrocytic origin, is not well understood. Utilizing a national cancer registry, the authors sought to characterize the risk of SN development after EBRT treatment of pediatric LGG. METHODS A total of 1245 pediatric patient (aged 0-17 years) records from 1973 to 2015 were assembled from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariable and multivariable subdistribution hazard regression models were used to evaluate the prognostic impact of demographic, tumor, and treatment-related covariates. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline characteristics. Cumulative incidence analyses measured the time to, and rate of, SN development, stratified by receipt of EBRT and controlled for competing mortality risk. The Fine and Gray semiparametric model was used to estimate future SN risk in EBRT- and non-EBRT-treated pediatric patients. RESULTS In this study, 366 patients received EBRT and 879 did not. Forty-six patients developed SNs after an LGG diagnosis, and 27 of these patients received EBRT (OR 3.61, 95% CI 1.90-6.95; p < 0.001). For patients alive 30 years from the initial LGG diagnosis, the absolute risk of SN development in the EBRT-treated cohort was 12.61% (95% CI 8.31-13.00) compared with 4.99% (95% CI 4.38-12.23) in the non-EBRT-treated cohort (p = 0.013). Cumulative incidence curves that were adjusted for competing events still demonstrated higher rates of SN development in the EBRT-treated patients with LGGs. After matching across available covariates and again adjusting for the competing risk of mortality, a clear association between EBRT and SN development remained (subhazard ratio 2.26, 95% CI 1.21-4.20; p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS Radiation therapy was associated with an increased risk of future SNs for pediatric patients surviving LGGs. These data suggest that the long-term implications of EBRT should be considered when making treatment decisions for this patient population.
Collapse
|
44
|
Zidane M, Truong T, Lesueur F, Xhaard C, Cordina-Duverger E, Boland A, Blanché H, Ory C, Chevillard S, Deleuze JF, Souchard V, Ren Y, Zemmache MZ, Canale S, Borson-Chazot F, Schvartz C, Mariné Barjoan E, Guizard AV, Laurent-Puig P, Mulot C, Guibon J, Karimi M, Schlumberger M, Adjadj E, Rubino C, Guenel P, Cazier JB, de Vathaire F. Role of DNA Repair Variants and Diagnostic Radiology Exams in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Risk: A Pooled Analysis of Two Case-Control Studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:1208-1217. [PMID: 33827984 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-1142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the increased use and diversity of diagnostic procedures, it is important to understand genetic susceptibility to radiation-induced thyroid cancer. METHODS On the basis of self-declared diagnostic radiology examination records in addition to existing literature, we estimated the radiation dose delivered to the thyroid gland from diagnostic procedures during childhood and adulthood in two case-control studies conducted in France. A total of 1,071 differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) cases and 1,188 controls from the combined studies were genotyped using a custom-made Illumina OncoArray DNA chip. We focused our analysis on variants in genes involved in DNA damage response and repair pathways, representing a total of 5,817 SNPs in 571 genes. We estimated the OR per milli-Gray (OR/mGy) of the radiation dose delivered to the thyroid gland using conditional logistic regression. We then used an unconditional logistic regression model to assess the association between DNA repair gene variants and DTC risk. We performed a meta-analysis of the two studies. RESULTS The OR/mGy was 1.02 (95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.03). We found significant associations between DTC and rs7164173 in CHD2 (P = 5.79 × 10-5), rs6067822 in NFATc2 (P = 9.26 × 10-5), rs1059394 and rs699517 both in ENOSF1/THYS, rs12702628 in RPA3, and an interaction between rs7068306 in MGMT and thyroid radiation doses (P = 3.40 × 10-4). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest a role for variants in CDH2, NFATc2, ENOSF1/THYS, RPA3, and MGMT in DTC risk. IMPACT CDH2, NFATc2, ENOSF1/THYS, and RPA3 have not previously been shown to be associated with DTC risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monia Zidane
- INSERM, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), 94800 Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Sud Orsay, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Thérèse Truong
- INSERM, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), 94800 Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Sud Orsay, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Fabienne Lesueur
- Inserm, U900, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France
| | - Constance Xhaard
- INSERM Centre d'Investigation Clinique CIC-P 1433, CHRU Nancy, France
- INSERM U1116, FCRIN INI-CRCT, Lorraine Université, Nancy, France
| | - Emilie Cordina-Duverger
- INSERM, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), 94800 Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Sud Orsay, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Anne Boland
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, Evry, France
| | - Hélène Blanché
- Fondation Jean Dausset-CEPH (Centre Etude du Polymorphisme Humain), Paris, France
- Laboratory of Excellence GENMED (Medical Genomics)
| | - Catherine Ory
- CEA, Direction de la Recherche Fondamentale, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, iRCM, SREIT, Laboratoire de Cancérologie Expérimentale (LCE), Université Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Sylvie Chevillard
- CEA, Direction de la Recherche Fondamentale, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, iRCM, SREIT, Laboratoire de Cancérologie Expérimentale (LCE), Université Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Jean-François Deleuze
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, Evry, France
- Fondation Jean Dausset-CEPH (Centre Etude du Polymorphisme Humain), Paris, France
- Laboratory of Excellence GENMED (Medical Genomics)
| | - Vincent Souchard
- INSERM, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), 94800 Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Sud Orsay, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Yan Ren
- INSERM, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), 94800 Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Sud Orsay, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Mohammed Zakarya Zemmache
- INSERM, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), 94800 Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Sud Orsay, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Françoise Borson-Chazot
- Rhône-Alpes Thyroid Cancer Registry, Cancer Research Center of Lyon (UMR INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286), RTH Laennec Faculty of Medicine, University of Lyon, Lyon
| | - Claire Schvartz
- Thyroid Cancer Registry of Champagne-Ardennes, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, Cancer Registry of Isère, Meylan
| | | | - Anne-Valérie Guizard
- Registre Général des Tumeurs du Calvados, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
- U1086 INSERM-UCN "ANTICIPE," Caen, France
| | - Pierre Laurent-Puig
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, USPC, Université Paris Descartes, Université Paris Diderot, EPIGENETEC, Paris, France
| | - Claire Mulot
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, USPC, Université Paris Descartes, Université Paris Diderot, EPIGENETEC, Paris, France
| | - Julie Guibon
- INSERM, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), 94800 Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Sud Orsay, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Inserm, U900, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France
| | - Mojgan Karimi
- INSERM, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), 94800 Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Sud Orsay, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Martin Schlumberger
- Université Paris-Sud Orsay, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Elizabeth Adjadj
- INSERM, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - Carole Rubino
- INSERM, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), 94800 Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Sud Orsay, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Pascal Guenel
- INSERM, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), 94800 Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Sud Orsay, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Cazier
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- INSERM, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), 94800 Villejuif, France.
- Université Paris-Sud Orsay, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Mul J, Seravalli E, Bosman ME, van de Ven CP, Littooij AS, van Grotel M, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Janssens GO. Estimated clinical benefit of combining highly conformal target volumes with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) versus conventional flank irradiation in pediatric renal tumors. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 29:20-26. [PMID: 34027140 PMCID: PMC8134033 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently, flank target volumes adjusted for organ shift/motion have been defined. Highly conformal volumes with VMAT were compared to conventional volumes/beams. The new approach prevented a dose constraint violation of ≥ 1 OARs in 60% of cases. VMAT reduced the irradiated Total Body Volume receiving > 10% of the prescribed dose.
Background For decades, Anterior-Posterior/Posterior-Anterior (AP/PA) photon beams were standard-of-care for flank irradiation in children with renal cancer. Recently, highly conformal flank target volumes were defined correcting for postoperative organ shift and intra-fraction motion. By radiotherapy treatment plan comparison, this study aims to estimate the clinical benefits and potential risks of combining highly conformal target volumes with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) versus conventional target volumes with AP/PA beams for flank irradiation. Materials and Methods Twenty consecutive renal tumor cases (left/right-sided:10/10; median age:3.2 years) were selected. Highly conformal flank target volumes were generated for VMAT, while conventional target volumes were used for AP/PA. For each case, the dose to the organs at risk (OARs) and Total Body Volume (TBV) was calculated to compare VMAT with AP/PA treatment plans for a prescribed dose (PD) of 14.4/1.8 Gy. Dose constraint violation of the tail of the pancreas and spleen (Dmean < 10 Gy), heart (D50 < 5 Gy) or mammary buds (Dmean < 10 Gy) were prioritized as potentially beneficial for clinics. Results Highly conformal Planning Target Volumes (PTV) were smaller than conventional volumes (mean ΔPTVAP/PA-PTVVMAT: 555 mL, Δ60%, p=<0.01). A mean dose reduction favoring VMAT was observed for almost all OARs. Dose constraints to the tail of the pancreas, spleen, heart and mammary buds were fulfilled in 8/20, 12/20, 16/20 and 19/20 cases with AP/PA, versus 14/20, 17/20, 20/20 and 20/20 cases with VMAT, respectively. In 12/20 cases, VMAT prevented the dose constraint violation of one or more OARs otherwise exceeded by AP/PA. VMAT increased the TBV receiving 10% of the PD, but reduced the amount of irradiated TBV for all higher doses. Conclusion Compared to 14.4 Gy flank irradiation using conventional AP/PA photon beams, an estimated clinical benefit by dose reduction to the OARs can be expected in 60% of the pediatric renal tumor cases using highly conformal flank target volumes combined with VMAT.
Collapse
Key Words
- 95% CI, 95% Confidence Interval
- AP/PA, Anterior-Posterior/Posterior-Anterior
- CT, Computed Tomography
- CTV, Clinical Target Volume
- Conformal radiotherapy
- GTV, Gross Tumor Volume
- ID, integral dose
- IMRT, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
- ITV, Internal Target Volume
- MRI, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- OARs, organs at risk
- Organs at risk
- PD, Prescribed Dose
- PTV, Planning Target Volume
- Pediatric renal tumors
- RT, radiotherapy
- SIOP-RTSG, International Society of Pediatric Oncology – Renal Tumor Study Group
- Side-effects
- TBV, Total Body Volume
- VMAT
- VMAT, Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy
- Wilms tumor
- vs, versus
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joeri Mul
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Enrica Seravalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mirjam E Bosman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis P van de Ven
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Annemieke S Littooij
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Martine van Grotel
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Geert O Janssens
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Iorio GC, Salvestrini V, Borghetti P, De Felice F, Greco C, Nardone V, Fiorentino A, Gregucci F, Desideri I. The impact of modern radiotherapy on radiation-induced late sequelae: Focus on early-stage mediastinal classical Hodgkin Lymphoma. A critical review by the Young Group of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO). Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 161:103326. [PMID: 33862247 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Revised: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The historically feared radiation-induced secondary cancers and cardiac toxicities observed among mediastinal classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) patients may still negatively burden the benefit of radiotherapy among long-term survivors. Modern radiotherapy (RT) delivery techniques, including intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) solutions, are drastically changing this scenario. Results of a literature overview are reported and discussed in this paper. MATERIALS AND METHODS Key references were derived from a PubMed query. Hand searching and clinicaltrials.gov were also used. RESULTS This paper contains a narrative report and a critical discussion of organs-at-risk dose-volume metrics linked with radiation-induced toxicities in cHL patients. CONCLUSIONS The scenario of early-stage cHL presents long-life expectancies, thus the goal of treatment should aim at maintaining high cure rates and limiting the onset of late complications. Further evaluations of dosimetric measures and clinical outcomes are warranted to identify patients at higher risk to target treatment tailoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Paolo Borghetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio Nardone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale del Mare, Viale della Metamorfosi, Naples, Italy
| | - Alba Fiorentino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Fabiana Gregucci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bowers DC, Verbruggen LC, Kremer LCM, Hudson MM, Skinner R, Constine LS, Sabin ND, Bhangoo R, Haupt R, Hawkins MM, Jenkinson H, Khan RB, Klimo P, Pretorius P, Ng A, Reulen RC, Ronckers CM, Sadighi Z, Scheinemann K, Schouten-van Meeteren N, Sugden E, Teepen JC, Ullrich NJ, Walter A, Wallace WH, Oeffinger KC, Armstrong GT, van der Pal HJH, Mulder RL. Surveillance for subsequent neoplasms of the CNS for childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and recommendations from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e196-e206. [PMID: 33845037 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30688-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Exposure to cranial radiotherapy is associated with an increased risk of subsequent CNS neoplasms among childhood, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) cancer survivors. Surveillance for subsequent neoplasms can translate into early diagnoses and interventions that could improve cancer survivors' health and quality of life. The practice guideline presented here by the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group was developed with an evidence-based method that entailed the gathering and appraisal of published evidence associated with subsequent CNS neoplasms among CAYA cancer survivors. The preparation of these guidelines showed a paucity of high-quality evidence and highlighted the need for additional research to inform survivorship care. The recommendations are based on careful consideration of the evidence supporting the benefits, risks, and harms of the surveillance interventions, clinical judgment regarding individual patient circumstances, and the need to maintain flexibility of application across different health-care systems. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to establish whether early detection of subsequent CNS neoplasms reduces morbidity and mortality, and therefore no recommendation can be formulated for or against routine MRI surveillance. The decision to start surveillance should be made by the CAYA cancer survivor and health-care provider after careful consideration of the potential harms and benefits of surveillance for CNS neoplasms, including meningioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel C Bowers
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Harold C Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| | | | | | - Melissa M Hudson
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Roderick Skinner
- Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Haematology and Oncology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Noah D Sabin
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Ranjeev Bhangoo
- Neurosurgical Department, King's College Hospital Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Riccardo Haupt
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit and DOPO Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
| | - Mike M Hawkins
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Helen Jenkinson
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Raja B Khan
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neurology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Paul Klimo
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Pieter Pretorius
- Department of Neuroradiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Antony Ng
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK
| | - Raoul C Reulen
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Cécile M Ronckers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Institute for Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Zsila Sadighi
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katrin Scheinemann
- Division of Oncology-Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland; Division of Hematology & Oncology, University Children's Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Pediatrics, McMaster Children's Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Jop C Teepen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Nicole J Ullrich
- Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew Walter
- Department of Pediatrics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Wilmington, DE, USA; Department of Pediatrics, A I duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - W Hamish Wallace
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kevin C Oeffinger
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Gregory T Armstrong
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | - Renée L Mulder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hoppe BS, Advani R, Milgrom SA, Bakst RL, Ballas LK, Dabaja BS, Flowers CR, Ha CS, Mansur DB, Metzger ML, Pinnix CC, Plastaras JP, Roberts KB, Smith SM, Terezakis SA, Kirwan JM, Constine LS. Primary Mediastinal B Cell Lymphoma in the Positron-Emission Tomography Era Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:36-44. [PMID: 33774076 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.03.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a highly curable subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that is diagnosed predominantly in adolescents and young adults. Consequently, long-term treatment-related morbidity is critical to consider when devising treatment strategies that include different chemoimmunotherapy strategies with or without radiation therapy. Furthermore, adaptive approaches using the end-of-chemotherapy (EOC) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scanning may help to determine which patients may benefit from additional therapies. We aimed to develop evidence-based guidelines for treating these patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline using the PubMed database. The ARS expert committee, composed of radiation oncologists, hematologists, and pediatric oncologists, developed consensus guidelines using the modified Delphi framework. RESULTS Nine studies met the full criteria for inclusion based on reporting outcomes on patients with primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma with EOC PET/CT response scored with the 5-point Deauville scale. These studies formed the evidence for these guidelines in managing patients with PMBCL according to the EOC PET response, including after a 5-point Deauville scale of 1 to 3, 4, or 5, and for patients with relapsed and refractory disease. The expert group also developed guidance on radiation simulation, treatment planning, and plan evaluation based on expert opinion. CONCLUSIONS Various treatment approaches exist in the management of PMBCL, including different chemoimmunotherapy regimens, the use of consolidative radiation therapy, and adaptive approaches based on EOC PET/CT response. These guidelines can be used by practitioners to provide appropriate treatment according to different disease scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
| | - Ranjana Advani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Center, Palo Alto, California
| | - Sarah A Milgrom
- Department of Radiation Oncology,University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Richard L Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Leslie K Ballas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Bouthaina S Dabaja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christopher R Flowers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chul S Ha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - David B Mansur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Monika L Metzger
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital and University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Chelsea C Pinnix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - John P Plastaras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kenneth B Roberts
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Sonali M Smith
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Jessica M Kirwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida Department of Radiation Oncology, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Giulino-Roth L, Pei Q, Buxton A, Bush R, Wu Y, Wolden SL, Constine LS, Kelly KM, Schwartz CL, Friedman DL. Subsequent malignant neoplasms among children with Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Blood 2021; 137:1449-1456. [PMID: 33512412 PMCID: PMC7976513 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2020007225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) have an increased risk of subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs). Response-adapted treatment may decrease this risk by reducing exposure to therapy associated with SMN risk. The Children's Oncology Group study AHOD0031 evaluated response-adapted therapy for children and adolescents with intermediate-risk HL. We report the SMNs among 1711 patients enrolled in AHOD0031. Patients were treated with 4 cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, and cyclophosphamide with or without involved-field radiation therapy (RT). Patients with a slow early response to initial chemotherapy were randomized to 2 additional cycles of dexamethasone, etoposide, cisplatin and cytarabine or no additional chemotherapy, and all received RT. At a median follow-up of 7.3 years, an analysis of SMNs was performed. The 10-year cumulative incidence of SMN was 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-2.0). SMNs included 3 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 11 with solid tumors, and 3 with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Sixteen of 17 patients with an SMN had received combined modality therapy. The standardized incidence ratio for SMN was 9.5 (95% CI, 4.5-15.2) with an excess absolute risk of 1.2 per 1000 person-years. The cumulative incidence of SMNs was higher among patients who received RT (P = .037). In multivariate analysis, RT, B symptoms, and race were associated with SMN risk. Given the latency from exposure, we have likely captured all cases of secondary leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Longer follow-up is needed to determine the risk of solid tumors. Avoidance of RT without sacrificing disease control should remain a goal for future therapeutic approaches. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00025259.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Giulino-Roth
- Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Qinglin Pei
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
- Children's Oncology Group Statistics and Data Center, Gainesville, FL
| | - Allen Buxton
- Children's Oncology Group Statistics and Data Center, Monrovia, CA
| | - Rizvan Bush
- Children's Oncology Group Statistics and Data Center, Monrovia, CA
| | - Yue Wu
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Suzanne L Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology and
- Department of Pediatrics, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
| | - Kara M Kelly
- Department of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Cindy L Schwartz
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Debra L Friedman
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; and
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Swati, Chadha VD. Role of epigenetic mechanisms in propagating off-targeted effects following radiation based therapies - A review. MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH 2021; 787:108370. [PMID: 34083045 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2021.108370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Despite being an important diagnostic and treatment modality, ionizing radiation (IR) is also known to cause genotoxicity and multiple side effects leading to secondary carcinogenesis. While modern cancer radiation therapy has improved patient recovery and enhanced survival rates, the risk of radiation-related adverse effects has become a growing challenge. It is now well-accepted that IR-induced side effects are not exclusively restricted to exposed cells but also spread to distant 'bystander' cells and even to the unexposed progeny of the irradiated cells. These 'off-targeted' effects involve a plethora of molecular events depending on the type of radiation and tumor tissue background. While the mechanisms by which off-targeted effects arise remain obscure, emerging evidence based on the non-mendelian inheritance of various manifestations of them as well as their persistence for longer periods supports a contribution of epigenetic factors. This review focuses on the major epigenetic phenomena including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and small RNA mediated silencing and their versatile role in the manifestation of IR induced off-targeted effects. As short- and long-range communication vehicles respectively, the role of gap junctions and exosomes in spreading these epigenetic-alteration driven off-targeted effects is also discussed. Furthermore, this review emphasizes the possible therapeutic potentials of these epigenetic mechanisms and how beneficial outcomes could potentially be achieved by targeting various signaling molecules involved in these mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swati
- Centre for Nuclear Medicine (U.I.E.A.S.T), South Campus, Panjab University, Sector 25, Chandigarh, 160014, India.
| | - Vijayta D Chadha
- Centre for Nuclear Medicine (U.I.E.A.S.T), South Campus, Panjab University, Sector 25, Chandigarh, 160014, India.
| |
Collapse
|