1
|
Ersoy TF, Brainman D, Coras R, Berger B, Weissinger F, Grote A, Simon M. Defining the role of surgery for patients with multiple brain metastases. J Neurooncol 2024; 169:317-328. [PMID: 38916848 PMCID: PMC11341766 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04739-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To better define the role of surgery, we investigated survival and functional outcomes in patients with multiple brain metastases. METHODS Pertinent clinical and radiological data of 131 consecutive patients (156 surgeries) were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS Surgical indications included mass effect (84.6%) and need for tissue acquisition (44.9%, for molecularly informed treatment: 10 patients). Major (i.e. CTCAE grade 3-5) neurological, surgical and medical complication were observed in 6 (3.8%), 12 (7.7%), and 12 (7.7%) surgical cases. Median preoperative and discharge KPS were 80% (IQF: 60-90%). Median overall survival (mOS) was 7.4 months. However, estimated 1 and 2 year overall survival rates were 35.6% and 25.1%, respectively. Survival was dismal (i.e. mOS ≤ 2.5 months) in patients who had no postoperative radio- and systemic therapy, or who incurred major complications. Multivariate analysis with all parameters significantly correlated with survival as univariate parameters revealed female sex, oligometastases, no major new/worsened neurological deficits, and postoperative radio- and systemic therapy as independent positive prognostic parameters. Univariate positive prognostic parameters also included histology (best survival in breast cancer patients) and less than median (0.28 cm3) residual tumor load. CONCLUSIONS Surgery is a reasonable therapeutic option in many patients with multiple brain metastases. Operations should primarily aim at reducing mass effect thereby preserving the patients' functional health status which will allow for further local (radiation) and systemic therapy. Surgery for the acquisition of metastatic tissue (more recently for molecularly informed treatment) is another important surgical indication. Cytoreductive surgery may also carry a survival benefit by itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tunc Faik Ersoy
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital OWL, Campus Bielefeld-Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany.
| | - Daniel Brainman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital OWL, Campus Bielefeld-Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Roland Coras
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Björn Berger
- Department for Neuroradiology, University Hospital OWL, Campus Bielefeld-Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Florian Weissinger
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, University Hospital OWL, Campus Bielefeld-Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Alexander Grote
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital OWL, Campus Bielefeld-Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Simon
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital OWL, Campus Bielefeld-Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pellerino A, Davidson TM, Bellur SS, Ahluwalia MS, Tawbi H, Rudà R, Soffietti R. Prevention of Brain Metastases: A New Frontier. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2134. [PMID: 38893253 PMCID: PMC11171378 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
This review discusses the topic of prevention of brain metastases from the most frequent solid tumor types, i.e., lung cancer, breast cancer and melanoma. Within each tumor type, the risk of brain metastasis is related to disease status and molecular subtype (i.e., EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer, BRAF and NRAF-mutant melanoma). Prophylactic cranial irradiation is the standard of care in patients in small cell lung cancer responsive to chemotherapy but at the price of late neurocognitive decline. More recently, several molecular agents with the capability to target molecular alterations driving tumor growth have proven as effective in the prevention of secondary relapse into the brain in clinical trials. This is the case for EGFR-mutant or ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer inhibitors, tucatinib and trastuzumab-deruxtecan for HER2-positive breast cancer and BRAF inhibitors for melanoma. The need for screening with an MRI in asymptomatic patients at risk of brain metastases is emphasized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Pellerino
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience ‘Rita Levi Montalcini’, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy;
| | - Tara Marie Davidson
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (T.M.D.); (H.T.)
| | - Shreyas S. Bellur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL 33176, USA; (S.S.B.); (M.S.A.)
| | - Manmeet S. Ahluwalia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL 33176, USA; (S.S.B.); (M.S.A.)
| | - Hussein Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (T.M.D.); (H.T.)
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience ‘Rita Levi Montalcini’, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy;
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yu F, Qin L, Zhang H, Qin L, Fan H. A novel fluorescence-electrochemiluminescence dual-mode sensing platform for high-precision BRAF gene detection. Analyst 2024; 149:2114-2121. [PMID: 38426487 DOI: 10.1039/d3an02237d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
In this study, we innovatively synthesized bipyridine ruthenium cluster nanosheets (RuMOFNCs), a novel metal-organic framework material that exhibits both fluorescence and electrochemiluminescence. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) were anchored onto RuMOFNCs via bipyridine chelation, enhancing optical signals and creating sites for attaching biologically functional probes. We employed tetraferrocene-modified DNA probes, linked via gold-sulfur (Au-S) bonds, to construct a dual-mode fluorescence-electrochemiluminescence biosensor. This sensor, exploiting exonuclease III (Exo III)-mediated cyclic amplification, inhibits the electron transfer from RuMOFNC to tetraferrocene, resulting in amplified fluorescence and electrochemiluminescence signals. The sensor demonstrates exceptional sensitivity for detecting the BRAF gene, with fluorescence and electrochemiluminescence detection limits of 10.3 aM (range: 0.1 fM to 1 nM) and 3.1 aM (range: 1 aM to 10 pM), respectively. These capabilities are attributed to RuMOFNCs' luminescence properties, tetraferrocene's quenching effect, and the specificity of base pairing. This study's findings hold substantial promise for biomedical research and clinical diagnostics, particularly in precision medicine and early disease detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fengyao Yu
- Department of Pharmacy, JiangXi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, JiangXi 330004, China
| | - Longyue Qin
- School of Materials Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, YunNan 650031, China
| | - Hua Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, JiangXi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, JiangXi 330004, China
| | - Longshua Qin
- Department of Pharmacy, JiangXi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, JiangXi 330004, China
| | - Hao Fan
- Department of Pharmacy, JiangXi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, JiangXi 330004, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ottaviani MM, Fasinella MR, Di Rienzo A, Gladi M, di Somma LGM, Iacoangeli M, Dobran M. Analysis of prognostic factors and the role of epilepsy in neurosurgical patients with brain metastases. Surg Neurol Int 2024; 15:79. [PMID: 38628515 PMCID: PMC11021078 DOI: 10.25259/sni_735_2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Brain metastases (BMs) represent the most frequent brain tumors in adults. The identification of key prognostic factors is essential for choosing the therapeutic strategy tailored to each patient. Epilepsy can precede several months of other clinical presentations of BMs. This work aimed to study the impact of epilepsy and other prognostic factors on BMs patients' survival. Methods This retrospective study included 51 patients diagnosed with BMs and who underwent neurosurgery between 2010 and 2021. The impact of BM features and patient's clinical characteristics on the overall survival (OS) was analyzed through uni- and multivariate analysis. Results The average OS was 25.98 months and differed according to the histology of the primary tumor. The primary tumor localization and the presence of extracranial metastases had a statistically significant impact on the OS, and patients with single BM showed a superior OS to those with multifocal lesions. The localization of BMs in the temporal lobe correlated with the highest OS. The OS was significantly higher in patients who presented seizures in their clinical onset and in those who had better post-surgical Karnofsky performance status, no post-surgical complications, and who underwent post-surgical treatment. Conclusion Our study has highlighted prognostically favorable patient and tumor factors. Among those, a clinical onset with epileptic seizures can help identify brain metastasis hitherto silent. This could lead to immediate diagnostic-therapeutic interventions with more aggressive therapies after appropriate multidisciplinary evaluation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Samlowski W. The Effect of Non-Overlapping Somatic Mutations in BRAF, NRAS, NF1, or CKIT on the Incidence and Outcome of Brain Metastases during Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy of Metastatic Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:594. [PMID: 38339344 PMCID: PMC10854687 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Previous studies suggested that somatic BRAF and NRAS mutations in metastatic melanoma increase the risk for brain metastases. The risk related to other non-overlapping "driver" mutations is unknown. We performed a retrospective evaluation of the incidence, timing, and outcome of brain metastases in a population of melanoma patients that underwent uniform next-gen sequencing. All patients were treated with initial checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Seventeen of 88 patients (20.0%) developed brain metastases. Eleven patients had brain metastases at diagnosis (12.9%). These were all patients with BRAF V600 or NF1 mutations. Only six patients with NRAS, NF1, KIT, or BRAF mutations (including fusions/internal rearrangements experienced delayed CNS progression following immunotherapy (7.1%)). No "quadruple negative" patient developed brain metastases. Patients with brain metastases at diagnosis had a better outcome than those with delayed intracranial progression. Current predictive markers, (LDH, tumor mutation burden, and PDL1) were poorly correlated with the development of brain metastases. Treatment with immunotherapy appears to reduce the incidence of brain metastases. Next-gen molecular sequencing of tumors in metastatic melanoma patients was useful in identifying genetic subpopulations with an increased or reduced risk of brain metastases. This may allow eventual personalization of screening strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfram Samlowski
- Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89148, USA; ; Tel.: +1-702-321-3930
- Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV), Las Vegas, NV 89106, USA
- School of Medicine, University of Nevada (Reno), Reno, NV 89557, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
In GK, Ribeiro JR, Yin J, Xiu J, Bustos MA, Ito F, Chow F, Zada G, Hwang L, Salama AKS, Park SJ, Moser JC, Darabi S, Domingo-Musibay E, Ascierto ML, Margolin K, Lutzky J, Gibney GT, Atkins MB, Izar B, Hoon DSB, VanderWalde AM. Multi-omic profiling reveals discrepant immunogenic properties and a unique tumor microenvironment among melanoma brain metastases. NPJ Precis Oncol 2023; 7:120. [PMID: 37964004 PMCID: PMC10646102 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-023-00471-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Melanoma brain metastases (MBM) are clinically challenging to treat and exhibit variable responses to immune checkpoint therapies. Prior research suggests that MBM exhibit poor tumor immune responses and are enriched in oxidative phosphorylation. Here, we report results from a multi-omic analysis of a large, real-world melanoma cohort. MBM exhibited lower interferon-gamma (IFNγ) scores and T cell-inflamed scores compared to primary cutaneous melanoma (PCM) or extracranial metastases (ECM), which was independent of tumor mutational burden. Among MBM, there were fewer computationally inferred immune cell infiltrates, which correlated with lower TNF and IL12B mRNA levels. Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) revealed suppression of inflammatory responses and dendritic cell maturation pathways. MBM also demonstrated a higher frequency of pathogenic PTEN mutations and angiogenic signaling. Oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) was enriched in MBM and negatively correlated with NK cell and B cell-associated transcriptomic signatures. Modulating metabolic or angiogenic pathways in MBM may improve responses to immunotherapy in this difficult-to-treat patient subset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gino K In
- Division of Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | | | - Jun Yin
- Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Matias A Bustos
- Department of Translational Molecular Medicine, Saint John's Cancer Institute, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Fumito Ito
- Department of Surgery, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Frances Chow
- Department of Neurology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gabriel Zada
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lindsay Hwang
- LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - April K S Salama
- Division of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Soo J Park
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Justin C Moser
- HonorHealth Research and Innovation Institute, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Sourat Darabi
- Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Hoag Hospital, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | - Evidio Domingo-Musibay
- Department of Medicine, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Maria L Ascierto
- Rosalie and Harold Rae Brown Cancer Immunotherapy Research Program, Borstein Family Melanoma Program, Department of Translational Immunology, Saint John's Cancer Institute, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Kim Margolin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Saint John's Cancer Institute, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Jose Lutzky
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Geoffrey T Gibney
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Michael B Atkins
- Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Benjamin Izar
- Columbia University, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dave S B Hoon
- Department of Translational Molecular Medicine, Saint John's Cancer Institute, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Ari M VanderWalde
- Caris Life Sciences, Irving, TX, USA
- West Cancer Center and Research Institute, 514 Chickasawba St., Blytheville, Arkansas, 72315, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brozos-Vázquez EM, Rodríguez-López C, Cortegoso-Mosquera A, López-Landrove S, Muinelo-Romay L, García-González J, López-López R, León-Mateos L. Immunotherapy in patients with brain metastasis: advances and challenges for the treatment and the application of circulating biomarkers. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1221113. [PMID: 38022574 PMCID: PMC10654987 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1221113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The central nervous system (CNS) is one of the most frequent metastatic sites of various cancers, including lung cancer, breast cancer and melanoma. The development of brain metastases requires a specific therapeutic approach and is associated with high mortality and morbidity in cancer patients. Advances in precision medicine and the introduction in recent years of new drugs, such as immunotherapy, have made it possible to improve the prognosis of these patients by improving survival and quality of life. New diagnostic techniques such as liquid biopsy allow real-time monitoring of tumor evolution, providing molecular information on prognostic and predictive biomarkers of response to treatment in blood or other fluids. In this review, we perform an exhaustive update of the clinical trials that demonstrate the utility of immunotherapy in patients with brain metastases and the potential of circulating biomarkers to improving the results of efficacy and toxicity in this subgroup of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Brozos-Vázquez
- Medical Oncology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- ONCOMET, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Rodríguez-López
- Medical Oncology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- ONCOMET, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Cortegoso-Mosquera
- Medical Oncology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- ONCOMET, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - S López-Landrove
- ONCOMET, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - L Muinelo-Romay
- ONCOMET, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - J García-González
- Medical Oncology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- ONCOMET, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - R López-López
- Medical Oncology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- ONCOMET, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - L León-Mateos
- Medical Oncology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- ONCOMET, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vasudevan HN, Delley C, Chen WC, Mirchia K, Pan S, Shukla P, Aabedi AA, Nguyen MP, Morshed RA, Young JS, Boreta L, Fogh SE, Nakamura JL, Theodosopoulos PV, Phillips J, Hervey-Jumper SL, Daras M, Pike L, Aghi MK, Tsai K, Raleigh DR, Braunstein SE, Abate AR. Molecular Features of Resected Melanoma Brain Metastases, Clinical Outcomes, and Responses to Immunotherapy. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2329186. [PMID: 37589977 PMCID: PMC10436135 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Central nervous system (CNS)-penetrant systemic therapies have significantly advanced care for patients with melanoma brain metastases. However, improved understanding of the molecular landscape and microenvironment of these lesions is needed to both optimize patient selection and advance treatment approaches. Objective To evaluate how bulk and single-cell genomic features of melanoma brain metastases are associated with clinical outcome and treatment response. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study analyzed bulk DNA sequencing and single nuclear RNA-sequencing data from resected melanoma brain metastases and included 94 consecutive patients with a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of melanoma brain metastasis who underwent surgical resection at a single National Comprehensive Cancer Network cancer center in San Francisco, California, from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2022. Exposure A Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified targeted sequencing assay was used to analyze tumor resection specimens, with a focus on BRAF V600E alteration. For frozen pathologic specimens from CNS treatment-naive patients undergoing surgical resection, commercial single nuclear RNA sequencing approaches were used. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included CNS progression-free survival (PFS), microenvironmental composition with decreased T-cell and macrophage populations, and responses to immunotherapy. Results To correlate molecular status with clinical outcome, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of 94 consecutive patients (median age, 64 years [range, 24-82 years]; 70 men [74%]) with targeted BRAF alteration testing showed worse median intracranial PFS (BRAF variant: 3.6 months [IQR, 0.1-30.6 months]; BRAF wildtype: 11.0 months [IQR, 0.8-81.5 months]; P < .001) and OS (BRAF variant: 9.8 months [IQR, 2.5-69.4 months]; BRAF wildtype: 23.2 months [IQR, 1.1-102.5 months]; P = .005; log-rank test) in BRAF V600E variant tumors. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that BRAF V600E status was an independent variable significantly associated with both PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.65; 95% CI, 1.54-4.57; P < .001) and OS (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.08-3.55; P = .03). For the 45 patients with resected melanoma brain metastases undergoing targeted DNA sequencing, molecular classification recapitulated The Cancer Genome Atlas groups (NRAS variant, BRAF variant, NF1 variant, and triple wildtype) with no subtype enrichment within the brain metastasis cohort. On a molecular level, BRAF V600E variant lesions were found to have a significantly decreased tumor mutation burden. Moreover, single nuclear RNA sequencing of treatment-naive BRAF V600E variant (n = 3) brain metastases compared with BRAF wildtype (n = 3) brain metastases revealed increased immune cell populations in BRAF wildtype tumors (mean [SD], 11% [4.1%] vs 3% [1.6%] CD45-positive cells; P = .04). Survival analysis of postoperative immunotherapy responses by BRAF status revealed that BRAF wildtype lesions were associated with a response to checkpoint inhibition (median OS: with immunotherapy, undefined; without immunotherapy, 13.0 months [range, 1.1-61.7 months]; P = .001; log-rank test) while BRAF variant lesions (median OS: with immunotherapy, 9.8 months [range, 2.9-39.8 months]; without immunotherapy, 9.5 months [range, 2.5-67.2 months]; P = .81; log-rank test) were not. Conclusions and Relevance This molecular analysis of patients with resected melanoma brain metastases found that BRAF V600E alteration is an important translational biomarker associated with worse clinical outcomes, differential microenvironmental composition, and benefit from immunotherapy. Patients with BRAF V600E variant melanoma brain metastases may thus benefit from alternative CNS-penetrant systemic regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harish N. Vasudevan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Cyrille Delley
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Francisco
| | - William C. Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Kanish Mirchia
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Sixuan Pan
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Poojan Shukla
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Alex A. Aabedi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Minh P. Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Ramin A. Morshed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Jacob S. Young
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Lauren Boreta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Shannon E. Fogh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Jean L. Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - Joanna Phillips
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - Mariza Daras
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Luke Pike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Manish K. Aghi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Katy Tsai
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - David R. Raleigh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - Adam R. Abate
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sperduto PW, Salama AKS, Anders C. Progress for patients with melanoma brain metastases. Neuro Oncol 2023; 25:1321-1322. [PMID: 36883201 PMCID: PMC10326485 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Paul W Sperduto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical
Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - April K S Salama
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University
Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Carey Anders
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University
Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Derks SHAE, Jongen JLM, van der Meer EL, Ho LS, Slagter C, Joosse A, de Jonge MJA, Schouten JW, Oomen-de Hoop E, van den Bent MJ, van der Veldt AAM. Impact of Novel Treatments in Patients with Melanoma Brain Metastasis: Real-World Data. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051461. [PMID: 36900253 PMCID: PMC10000692 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) is associated with poor outcome, but targeted therapies (TTs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized treatment over the past decade. We assessed the impact of these treatments in a real-world setting. METHODS A single-center cohort study was performed at a large, tertiary referral center for melanoma (Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands). Overall survival (OS) was assessed before and after 2015, after which TTs and ICIs were increasingly prescribed. RESULTS There were 430 patients with MBM included; 152 pre-2015 and 278 post-2015. Median OS improved from 4.4 to 6.9 months (HR 0.67, p < 0.001) after 2015. TTs and ICIs prior to MBM diagnosis were associated with poorer median OS as compared to no prior systemic treatment (TTs: 2.0 vs. 10.9 and ICIs: 4.2 vs. 7.9 months, p < 0.001). ICIs directly after MBM diagnosis were associated with improved median OS as compared to no direct ICIs (21.5 vs. 4.2 months, p < 0.001). Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT; HR 0.49, p = 0.013) and ICIs (HR 0.32, p < 0.001) were independently associated with improved OS. CONCLUSION After 2015, OS significantly improved for patients with MBM, especially with SRT and ICIs. Demonstrating a large survival benefit, ICIs should be considered first after MBM diagnosis, if clinically feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie H. A. E. Derks
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost L. M. Jongen
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Edgar L. van der Meer
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Li Shen Ho
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cleo Slagter
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen Joosse
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maja J. A. de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost W. Schouten
- Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Oomen-de Hoop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin J. van den Bent
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid A. M. van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-10-704-02-52
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tabor JK, Onoichenco A, Narayan V, Wernicke AG, D’Amico RS, Vojnic M. Brain metastasis screening in the molecular age. Neurooncol Adv 2023; 5:vdad080. [PMID: 37484759 PMCID: PMC10358433 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of brain metastases (BM) amongst cancer patients has been increasing due to improvements in therapeutic options and an increase in overall survival. Molecular characterization of tumors has provided insights into the biology and oncogenic drivers of BM and molecular subtype-based screening. Though there are currently some screening and surveillance guidelines for BM, they remain limited. In this comprehensive review, we review and present epidemiological data on BM, their molecular characterization, and current screening guidelines. The molecular subtypes with the highest BM incidence are epithelial growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), BRCA1, triple-negative (TN), and HER2+ breast cancers, and BRAF-mutated melanoma. Furthermore, BMs are more likely to present asymptomatically at diagnosis in oncogene-addicted NSCLC and BRAF-mutated melanoma. European screening standards recommend more frequent screening for oncogene-addicted NSCLC patients, and clinical trials are investigating screening for BM in hormone receptor+, HER2+, and TN breast cancers. However, more work is needed to determine optimal screening guidelines for other primary cancer molecular subtypes. With the advent of personalized medicine, molecular characterization of tumors has revolutionized the landscape of cancer treatment and prognostication. Incorporating molecular characterization into BM screening guidelines may allow physicians to better identify patients at high risk for BM development and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Vinayak Narayan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY, USA
| | - A Gabriella Wernicke
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY, USA
| | - Randy S D’Amico
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY, USA
| | - Morana Vojnic
- Corresponding Author: Morana Vojnic, MD, MBA, 210 East 64th Street, Floor 4, New York, NY 10065, USA ()
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tan XL, Le A, Scherrer E, Tang H, Kiehl N, Han J, Jiang R, Diede SJ, Shui IM. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for melanoma brain metastases. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1025664. [PMID: 36568199 PMCID: PMC9773194 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1025664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background More than 60% of all stage IV melanoma patients develop brain metastases, while melanoma brain metastases (MBM) is historically difficult to treat with poor prognosis. Objectives To summarize clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in MBM patients. Methods A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted, and a literature search for relevant studies was performed on November 1, 2020. Weighted average of median overall survival (OS) was calculated by treatments. The random-effects model in conducting meta-analyses was applied. Results A total of 41 observational studies and 12 clinical trials with our clinical outcomes of interest, and 31 observational studies addressing prognostic factors were selected. The most common treatments for MBM were immunotherapy (IO), MAP kinase inhibitor (MAPKi), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), SRS+MAPKi, and SRS+IO, with median OS from treatment start of 7.2, 8.6, 7.3, 7.3, and 14.1 months, respectively. Improved OS was observed for IO and SRS with the addition of IO and/or MAPKi, compared to no IO and SRS alone, respectively. Several prognostic factors were found to be significantly associated with OS in MBM. Conclusion This study summarizes pertinent information regarding clinical outcomes and the association between patient characteristics and MBM prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang-Lin Tan
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States,*Correspondence: Xiang-Lin Tan,
| | - Amy Le
- Department of Epidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Emilie Scherrer
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States,Seagen Inc., Bothell, WA, United States
| | - Huilin Tang
- Integrative Precision Health, LLC, Carmel, IN, United States
| | - Nick Kiehl
- Department of Epidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Jiali Han
- Integrative Precision Health, LLC, Carmel, IN, United States
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Radiation therapy for melanoma brain metastases: a systematic review. Radiol Oncol 2022; 56:267-284. [PMID: 35962952 PMCID: PMC9400437 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2022-0032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation therapy (RT) for melanoma brain metastases, delivered either as whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) or as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), is an established component of treatment for this condition. However, evidence allowing comparison of the outcomes, advantages and disadvantages of the two RT modalities is scant, with very few randomised controlled trials having been conducted. This has led to considerable uncertainty and inconsistent guideline recommendations. The present systematic review identified 112 studies reporting outcomes for patients with melanoma brain metastases treated with RT. Three were randomised controlled trials but only one was of sufficient size to be considered informative. Most of the evidence was from non-randomised studies, either specific treatment series or disease cohorts. Criteria for determining treatment choice were reported in only 32 studies and the quality of these studies was variable. From the time of diagnosis of brain metastasis, the median survival after WBRT alone was 3.5 months (IQR 2.4-4.0 months) and for SRS alone it was 7.5 months (IQR 6.7-9.0 months). Overall patient survival increased over time (pre-1989 to 2015) but this was not apparent within specific treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS These survival estimates provide a baseline for determining the incremental benefits of recently introduced systemic treatments using targeted therapy or immunotherapy for melanoma brain metastases.
Collapse
|
14
|
ADC textural features in patients with single brain metastases improve clinical risk models. Clin Exp Metastasis 2022; 39:459-466. [PMID: 35394585 PMCID: PMC9117356 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-022-10160-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
AIMS In this retrospective study we performed a quantitative textural analysis of apparant diffusion coefficient (ADC) images derived from diffusion weighted MRI (DW-MRI) of single brain metastases (BM) patients from different primary tumors and tested whether these imaging parameters may improve established clinical risk models. METHODS We identified 87 patients with single BM who had a DW-MRI at initial diagnosis. Applying image segmentation, volumes of contrast-enhanced lesions in T1 sequences, hyperintense T2 lesions (peritumoral border zone (T2PZ)) and tumor-free gray and white matter compartment (GMWMC) were generated and registered to corresponding ADC maps. ADC textural parameters were generated and a linear backward regression model was applied selecting imaging features in association with survival. A cox proportional hazard model with backward regression was fitted for the clinical prognostic models (diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment score (DS-GPA) and the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA)) including these imaging features. RESULTS Thirty ADC textural parameters were generated and linear backward regression identified eight independent imaging parameters which in combination predicted survival. Five ADC texture features derived from T2PZ, the volume of the T2PZ, the normalized mean ADC of the GMWMC as well as the mean ADC slope of T2PZ. A cox backward regression including the DS-GPA, RPA and these eight parameters identified two MRI features which improved the two risk scores (HR = 1.14 [1.05;1.24] for normalized mean ADC GMWMC and HR = 0.87 [0.77;0.97]) for ADC 3D kurtosis of the T2PZ.) CONCLUSIONS: Textural analysis of ADC maps in patients with single brain metastases improved established clinical risk models. These findings may aid to better understand the pathogenesis of BM and may allow selection of patients for new treatment options.
Collapse
|
15
|
Eggen AC, Hospers GAP, Bosma I, Kramer MCA, Reyners AKL, Jalving M. Anti-tumor treatment and healthcare consumption near death in the era of novel treatment options for patients with melanoma brain metastases. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:247. [PMID: 35247992 PMCID: PMC8897874 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09316-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Effective systemic treatments have revolutionized the management of patients with metastatic melanoma, including those with brain metastases. The extent to which these treatments influence disease trajectories close to death is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to gain insight into provided treatments and healthcare consumption during the last 3 months of life in patients with melanoma brain metastases. Methods Retrospective, single-center study, including consecutive patients with melanoma brain metastases diagnosed between June-2015 and June-2018, referred to the medical oncologist, and died before November-2019. Patient and tumor characteristics, anti-tumor treatments, healthcare consumption, presence of neurological symptoms, and do-not-resuscitate status were extracted from medical charts. Results 100 patients were included. A BRAF-mutation was present in 66 patients. Systemic anti-tumor therapy was given to 72% of patients during the last 3 months of life, 34% in the last month, and 6% in the last week. Patients with a BRAF-mutation more frequently received systemic treatment during the last 3 (85% vs. 47%) and last month (42% vs. 18%) of life than patients without a BRAF-mutation. Furthermore, patients receiving systemic treatment were more likely to visit the emergency room (ER, 75% vs. 36%) and be hospitalized (75% vs. 36%) than those who did not. Conclusion The majority of patients with melanoma brain metastases received anti-tumor treatment during the last 3 months of life. ER visits and hospitalizations occurred more often in patients on anti-tumor treatment. Further research is warranted to examine the impact of anti-tumor treatments close to death on symptom burden and care satisfaction.
Collapse
|
16
|
Caulfield JI, Kluger HM. Emerging Studies of Melanoma Brain Metastasis. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:585-594. [PMID: 35212922 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01237-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Among solid tumors, melanoma has the highest propensity for brain dissemination. Although newer treatment approaches have resulted in excellent control or elimination of brain metastasis in many patients, they remain the cause of significant morbidity and mortality. Here, we review recent preclinical and clinical studies to detail current understanding of the incidence, prognosis, biological characteristics, and treatments for melanoma brain metastases. RECENT FINDINGS Clinical trials tailored to this patient population have demonstrated prolonged disease control with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Emerging clinical challenges include radiation necrosis and perilesional edema, phenomena that are rarely seen in other organs. Recent preclinical studies have resulted in improved understanding of the tumor microenvironment in the brain, providing insights into additional treatment approaches. The biological basis of brain tumor homing and survival within the central nervous system remain understudied. Additional preclinical and clinical studies will enhance our ability to prevent and treat brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine I Caulfield
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Saberian C, Sperduto P, Davies MA. Targeted therapy strategies for melanoma brain metastasis. Neurooncol Adv 2021; 3:v75-v85. [PMID: 34859235 PMCID: PMC8633745 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Melanoma is the most aggressive of the common forms of skin cancer. Metastasis to the central nervous system is one of the most common and deadly complications of this disease. Historically, melanoma patients with brain metastases had a median survival of less than 6 months. However, outcomes of melanoma patients have markedly improved over the last decade due to new therapeutic approaches, including immune and targeted therapies. Targeted therapies leverage the high rate of driver mutations in this disease, which result in the activation of multiple key signaling pathways. The RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway is activated in the majority of cutaneous melanomas, most commonly by point mutations in the Braf serine-threonine kinase. While most early targeted therapy studies excluded melanoma patients with brain metastases, subsequent studies have shown that BRAF inhibitors, now generally given concurrently with MEK inhibitors, achieve high rates of tumor response and disease control in Braf-mutant melanoma brain metastases (MBMs). Unfortunately, the duration of these responses is generally relatively short- and shorter than is observed in extracranial metastases. This review will summarize current data regarding the safety and efficacy of targeted therapies for MBMs and discuss rational combinatorial strategies that may improve outcomes further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal Saberian
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Paul Sperduto
- Minneapolis Radiation Oncology, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Samlowski W, Adajar C. Cautious addition of targeted therapy to PD-1 inhibitors after initial progression of BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma on checkpoint inhibitor therapy. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1187. [PMID: 34743688 PMCID: PMC8573907 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08906-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Virtually all metastatic patients with metastatic melanoma who progress after initial treatment with PD-1 or CTLA-4 directed antibodies will die of their disease. Salvage options are urgently needed. It is theoretically attractive to combine immunotherapy with targeted agents in progressing patients with BRAF mutation positive melanoma, but the toxicity of combined treatment has proven challenging. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of our patient database and identified 23 patients who progressed on initial checkpoint inhibitor treatment, who subsequently had cautious addition of BRAF±MEK inhibitor therapy to continued PD-1 antibody treatment. Results We found an objective response rate of 55% in second line therapy, with a median progression-free survival of 33.4 months and median overall survival of 34.1 months, with 40% of patients in unmaintained remission at over 3 years. Ten of 12 responding patients were able to discontinue all therapy and continue in unmaintained remission. Toxicity of this approach was generally manageable (21.7% grade 3–5 toxicity). There was 1 early sudden death for unknown reasons in a responding patient. Discussion Our results suggest that 2nd line therapy with PD-1 inhibitors plus BRAF±MEK inhibitors has substantial activity and manageable toxicity. This treatment can induce additional durable complete responses in patients who have progressed on initial immunotherapy. These results suggest further evaluation be performed of sequential PD-1 antibody treatment with cautious addition of targeted therapy in appropriate patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfram Samlowski
- Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, 9280 W. Sunset Rd., Suite 100, Las Vegas, NV, 89148, USA. .,University of Nevada Las Vegas, (UNLV) Kerkorian School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV, USA. .,University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, NV, USA.
| | - Camille Adajar
- University of Nevada Las Vegas, (UNLV) Kerkorian School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ge Y, Che X, Gao X, Zhao S, Su J. Combination of radiotherapy and targeted therapy for melanoma brain metastases: a systematic review. Melanoma Res 2021; 31:413-420. [PMID: 34406985 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is a mainstay of efficient treatment of brain metastases from solid tumors. Immunotherapy has improved the survival of metastatic cancer patients across many tumor types. However, targeted therapy is a feasible alternative for patients unable to continue immunotherapy or with poor outcomes of immunotherapy. The combination of radiotherapy and targeted therapy for the treatment of brain metastases has a strong theoretical underpinning, but data on the efficacy and safety of this combination is still limited. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane library database was conducted. Eleven studies were included for a total of 316 patients. Median OS was about 6.2-17.8 months from radiotherapy. Weighted survival and local control at 1 and 2 years were correlated (50.1 and 17.8%, 90.7 and 14.7% at 1 and 2 year, respectively). Radiotherapy given before or concurrently to targeted therapy provided the best effect on the outcome. For patients with brain metastases from cutaneous melanoma, the addition of concurrent targeted therapy to brain radiotherapy can increase survival and provide long-term control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Ge
- Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
- Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xuanlin Che
- Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
- Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xin Gao
- Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
- Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Shuang Zhao
- Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
- Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Juan Su
- Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
- Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Survival estimation of melanoma patients with brain metastasis using the Melanoma-molGPA score: external validation from a French cohort. Melanoma Res 2021; 30:472-476. [PMID: 32404732 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
While immunotherapies and targeted therapies such as BRAF inhibitors have improved the prognosis, BM is still associated with poor outcome and a short survival. Metastatic melanoma patients are a heterogeneous subgroup with variable prognosis. As several prospective clinical trials have addressed the question of optimal therapy for these patients, an accurate validated selection tool is needed. Melanoma molecular graded prognostic assessment (Melanoma-molGPA) is a new prognostic score for BM melanoma patients. We decided to perform an external validation of this score. All consecutive patients treated between May 2014 and December 2017 for a newly diagnosed locally advanced or metastatic melanoma with available status for BRAF mutation were identified. Melanoma mol-GPA was applied in each patient with BM and correlated to overall survival. One hundred patients were included. Median follow-up was 27.8 months. Distribution for the Melanoma-molGPA groups GPA 0-1, GPA 1.5-2, GPA 2.5-3 and GPA 3.5-4 were as follows: 23, 51, 24 and 2.0%, respectively. Subgroups GPA 2.5-3 and 3.5-4 were combined. Median overall survival for groups GPA 0-1, 1.5-2 and 2.5-4.0 was 4.2, 6.9 and 18.4 months, respectively, P = 0.0032. Our study is the most recent, and with the largest cohort, to validate the Melanoma-molGPA score as an accurate and reproducible score for estimating overall survival. As several prospective clinical trials are addressing the issue of optimal therapy including the impact of local treatment for these patients, the Melanoma-molGPA is a useful tool in BM melanoma patients.
Collapse
|
21
|
Proescholdt MA, Schödel P, Doenitz C, Pukrop T, Höhne J, Schmidt NO, Schebesch KM. The Management of Brain Metastases-Systematic Review of Neurosurgical Aspects. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1616. [PMID: 33807384 PMCID: PMC8036330 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The multidisciplinary management of patients with brain metastases (BM) consists of surgical resection, different radiation treatment modalities, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and targeted molecular treatment. This review presents the current state of neurosurgical technology applied to achieve maximal resection with minimal morbidity as a treatment paradigm in patients with BM. In addition, we discuss the contribution of neurosurgical resection on functional outcome, advanced systemic treatment strategies, and enhanced understanding of the tumor biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin A. Proescholdt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Petra Schödel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Christian Doenitz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Tobias Pukrop
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Julius Höhne
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Nils Ole Schmidt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Karl-Michael Schebesch
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jiang C, Kleber TJ, Switchenko JM, Khan MK. Single institutional outcomes of whole brain radiotherapy for metastatic melanoma brain metastases. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:31. [PMID: 33557890 PMCID: PMC7871629 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01754-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The management of melanoma with brain metastases (MBM) is increasingly complex, especially given recent improvements in targeted agents, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy. Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is a longstanding radiotherapy technique for which reported patient outcomes and experiences are limited. We sought to report our institutional outcomes for MBM patients receiving WBRT and assess whether other clinical factors impact prognosis. Methods A retrospective review of a single institution database was performed. Patients diagnosed with MBM from 2000 to 2018 treated with WBRT, with or without other systemic treatments, were included. Post-WBRT brain MRI scans were assessed at timed intervals for radiographic response. Clinical and treatment variables associated with overall survival (OS), distant failure-free survival (DFFS), local failure-free survival (LFFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed. Data on radiation-induced side effects, including radionecrosis, hemorrhage, and memory deficits, was also captured. Results 63 patients with MBM were ultimately included in our study. 69% of patients had 5 or more brain metastases at the time of WBRT, and 68% had extracranial disease. The median dose of WBRT was 30 Gy over 10 fractions. Median follow-up was 4.0 months. Patients receiving WBRT had a median OS of 7.0 months, median PFS of 2.2 months, median DFFS of 6.1 months, and median LFFS of 4.9 months. Performance status correlated with OS on both univariate and multivariable analysis. BRAF inhibitor was the only systemic therapy to significantly impact OS on univariate analysis (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07–0.79, p = 0.019), and this effect extended to multivariable analysis as well. Post-WBRT intralesional hemorrhage decreased DFFS on both univariate and multivariable analysis. Of patients with post-treatment brain scans available, there was a 16% rate of radionecrosis, 32% rate of hemorrhage, and 19% rate of memory deficits. Conclusions Outcomes for MBM patients receiving WBRT indicate that WBRT remains an effective treatment strategy to control intracranial disease. Treatment-related toxicities such as intralesional hemorrhage, necrosis, or neurocognitive side effects are limited. With continued innovations in WBRT technique and systemic therapy development, MBM outcomes may continue to improve. Further trials should evaluate the role of WBRT in the modern context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Jiang
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Troy J Kleber
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Switchenko
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mohammad K Khan
- Winship Cancer Institute, 1365 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30345, USA. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ahluwalia M, Ali MA, Joshi RS, Park ES, Taha B, McCutcheon I, Chiang V, Hong A, Sinclair G, Bartek J, Chen CC. An integrated disease-specific graded prognostic assessment scale for melanoma: contributions of KPS, CITV, number of metastases, and BRAF mutation status. Neurooncol Adv 2021; 3:vdaa152. [PMID: 33506199 PMCID: PMC7810198 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) remains a mainstay therapy in the treatment of melanoma brain metastases (BM). While prognostic scales have been developed for melanoma patients who underwent SRS treatment for BM, the pertinence of these scales in the context of molecularly targeted therapies remains unclear. Methods Through a multi-institutional collaboration, we collated the survival patterns of 331 melanoma BM patients with known BRAF mutation status treated with SRS. We established a prognostic scale that was validated in an independent cohort of 174 patients. All patients with BRAF mutations in this series were treated with BRAF inhibitors. Prognostic utility was assessed using Net Reclassification Index (NRI > 0) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) metrics. Results In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, BRAF mutation status, KPS, number of metastases, and cumulative intracranial tumor volume (CITV) independently contributed to survival prognostication for melanoma patients with SRS-treated BM (P < .05 for all variables). These variables were incorporated into a prognostic scale using the disease-specific graded prognostic assessment (ds-GPA) framework. This integrated melanoma ds-GPA scale was validated in 2 independent cohorts collated through a multi-institutional collaboration. In terms of order of prognostic importance, BRAF mutation status exerted the greatest influence on survival, while KPS, the number of metastases, and CITV exhibited comparable, lesser impacts. Conclusions Optimal survival prognostication for SRS-treated patients with melanoma BM requires an integrated assessment of patient characteristics (KPS), tumor characteristics (CITV and number of metastases), and the mutational profile of the melanoma (BRAF mutation status).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manmeet Ahluwalia
- Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Mir A Ali
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Rushikesh S Joshi
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Eun Suk Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Birra Taha
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ian McCutcheon
- Department of Neurosurgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Veronica Chiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Angela Hong
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Wollstonecraft, NSW, Australia
| | - Georges Sinclair
- Department of Oncology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.,Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jiri Bartek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Clark C Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sperduto PW, Mesko S, Li J, Cagney D, Aizer A, Lin NU, Nesbit E, Kruser TJ, Chan J, Braunstein S, Lee J, Kirkpatrick JP, Breen W, Brown PD, Shi D, Shih HA, Soliman H, Sahgal A, Shanley R, Sperduto WA, Lou E, Everett A, Boggs DH, Masucci L, Roberge D, Remick J, Plichta K, Buatti JM, Jain S, Gaspar LE, Wu CC, Wang TJ, Bryant J, Chuong M, An Y, Chiang V, Nakano T, Aoyama H, Mehta MP. Survival in Patients With Brain Metastases: Summary Report on the Updated Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment and Definition of the Eligibility Quotient. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:3773-3784. [PMID: 32931399 PMCID: PMC7655019 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.01255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 225] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Conventional wisdom has rendered patients with brain metastases ineligible for clinical trials for fear that poor survival could mask the benefit of otherwise promising treatments. Our group previously published the diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA). Updates with larger contemporary cohorts using molecular markers and newly identified prognostic factors have been published. The purposes of this work are to present all the updated indices in a single report to guide treatment choice, stratify research, and define an eligibility quotient to expand eligibility. METHODS A multi-institutional database of 6,984 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases underwent multivariable analyses of prognostic factors and treatments associated with survival for each primary site. Significant factors were used to define the updated GPA. GPAs of 4.0 and 0.0 correlate with the best and worst prognoses, respectively. RESULTS Significant prognostic factors varied by diagnosis and new prognostic factors were identified. Those factors were incorporated into the updated GPA with robust separation (P < .01) between subgroups. Survival has improved, but varies widely by GPA for patients with non-small-cell lung, breast, melanoma, GI, and renal cancer with brain metastases from 7-47 months, 3-36 months, 5-34 months, 3-17 months, and 4-35 months, respectively. CONCLUSION Median survival varies widely and our ability to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases has improved. The updated GPA (available free at brainmetgpa.com) provides an accurate tool with which to estimate survival, individualize treatment, and stratify clinical trials. Instead of excluding patients with brain metastases, enrollment should be encouraged and those trials should be stratified by the GPA to ensure those trials make appropriate comparisons. Furthermore, we recommend the expansion of eligibility to allow for the enrollment of patients with previously treated brain metastases who have a 50% or greater probability of an additional year of survival (eligibility quotient > 0.50).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul W. Sperduto
- Minneapolis Radiation Oncology and University of Minnesota Gamma Knife Center, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | - Jing Li
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Ayal Aizer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Jason Chan
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Diana Shi
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Hany Soliman
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Emil Lou
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | | | - Laura Masucci
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Roberge
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Yi An
- Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Brito C, Barral DC, Pojo M. Subversion of Ras Small GTPases in Cutaneous Melanoma Aggressiveness. Front Cell Dev Biol 2020; 8:575223. [PMID: 33072757 PMCID: PMC7538714 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.575223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The rising incidence and mortality rate associated with the metastatic ability of cutaneous melanoma represent a major public health concern. Cutaneous melanoma is one of the most invasive human cancers, but the molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. Moreover, currently available therapies are not efficient in avoiding melanoma lethality. In this context, new biomarkers of prognosis, metastasis, and response to therapy are necessary to better predict the disease outcome. Additionally, the knowledge about the molecular alterations and dysregulated pathways involved in melanoma metastasis may provide new therapeutic targets. Members of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases regulate various essential cellular activities, from signaling to membrane traffic and cytoskeleton dynamics. Therefore, it is not surprising that they are differentially expressed, and their functions subverted in several types of cancer, including melanoma. Indeed, Ras small GTPases were found to regulate melanoma progression and invasion. Hence, a better understanding of the mechanisms regulated by Ras small GTPases that are involved in melanoma tumorigenesis and progression may provide new therapeutic strategies to block these processes. Here, we review the current knowledge on the role of Ras small GTPases in melanoma aggressiveness and the molecular mechanisms involved. Furthermore, we summarize the known involvement of these proteins in melanoma metastasis and how these players influence the response to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheila Brito
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Duarte C Barral
- CEDOC, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Marta Pojo
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Melanoma is an aggressive form of skin cancer with a very high mortality rate. Early diagnosis of the disease, the utilization of more potent pharmacological agents, and more effective drug delivery systems are essential to achieve an optimal treatment plan. The applications of nanotechnology to improve therapeutic efficacy and early diagnosis for melanoma treatment have received great interest among researchers and clinicians. In this review, we summarize the recent progress of utilizing various nanomaterials for theranostics of melanoma. The key importance of using nanomaterials for theranostics of melanoma is to improve efficacy and reduce side effects, ensuring safe implementation in clinical use. As opposed to conventional in vitro diagnostic methods, in vivo medical imaging technologies have the advantages of being a type of non-invasive, real-time monitoring. Several common nanoparticles, including ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, silica nanoparticles, and carbon-based nanoparticles, have been applied to deliver chemotherapeutic agents for the theranostics of melanoma. The application of nanomaterials for theranostics in molecular imaging (MRI, PET, US, OI, etc.) plays an important role in targeting drug delivery of melanoma, by monitoring the distribution site of the molecular imaging probe and the therapeutic drug in the body in real-time. Hence, it is worthwhile to anticipate the approval of these nanomaterials for theranostics in molecular imaging by the US Food and Drug Administration in clinical trials.
Collapse
|
27
|
Keung EZ, Gershenwald JE. Clinicopathological Features, Staging, and Current Approaches to Treatment in High-Risk Resectable Melanoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 112:875-885. [PMID: 32061122 PMCID: PMC7492771 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of melanoma in the United States has been increasing over the past several decades. Prognosis largely depends on disease stage, with 5-year melanoma-specific survival ranging from as high as 99% in patients with stage I disease to less than 10% for some patients with stage IV (distant metastatic) disease. Fortunately, in the last 5-10 years, there have been remarkable treatment advances for patients with high-risk resectable melanoma, including approval of targeted and immune checkpoint blockade therapies. In addition, results of recent clinical trials have confirmed the importance of sentinel lymph node biopsy and continue to refine the approach to regional lymph node basin management. Lastly, the melanoma staging system was revised in the eighth edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, which was implemented on January 1, 2018. Here we discuss these changes and the clinicopathological features that confer high risk for locoregional and distant disease relapse and poor survival. Implications regarding the management of melanoma in the metastatic and adjuvant settings are discussed, as are future directions for neoadjuvant therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Melanoma and Skin Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
The development of brain metastases occurs in 10–20% of all patients with cancer. Brain metastases portend poor survival and contribute to increased cancer mortality and morbidity. Despite multimodal treatment options, which include surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, 5-year survival remains low. Besides, our current treatment modalities can have significant neurological comorbidities, which result in neurocognitive decline and a decrease in a patient’s quality of life. However, innovations in technology, improved understanding of tumor biology, and new therapeutic options have led to improved patient care. Novel approaches in radiotherapy are minimizing the neurocognitive decline while providing the same therapeutic benefit. In addition, advances in targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors are redefining the management of lung and melanoma brain metastases. Similar approaches to brain metastases from other primary tumors promise to lead to new and effective therapies. We are beginning to understand the appropriate combination of these novel approaches with our traditional treatment options. As advances in basic and translational science and innovative technologies enter clinical practice, the prognosis of patients with brain metastases will continue to improve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Lauko
- Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Yasmeen Rauf
- Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Blateau P, Coyaud E, Laurent E, Béganton B, Ducros V, Chauchard G, Vendrell JA, Solassol J. TERT Promoter Mutation as an Independent Prognostic Marker for Poor Prognosis MAPK Inhibitors-Treated Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E2224. [PMID: 32784823 PMCID: PMC7463448 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Although the development of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitors has greatly improved the prognosis of BRAFV600 cutaneous melanomas, the identification of molecular indicators for mutated patients at risk of early progression remains a major issue. Using an amplicon-based next-generation-sequencing (NGS) assay that targets cancer-related genes, we investigated co-occurring alterations in 89 melanoma samples. We analyzed both their association with clinicopathological variables and clinical significance in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to BRAF genotyping. Among co-occurring mutations, TERT promoter was the most frequently mutated gene. Although no significant difference in PFS was observed in the presence or absence of co-occurring alterations to BRAFV600, there was a trend of longer PFS for patients harboring TERT c.-124C>T mutation. Of most interest, this mutation is an independent marker of good prognosis in subgroups of patients with poor prognosis (presence of brain metastasis and elevated level of lactate dehydrogenase, LDH). Moreover, combination of elevated LDH level, presence of brain metastasis, and TERT c.-124C>T mutation was identified as the best fit model for predicting clinical outcome. Our work revealed the potential interest of c.-124C>T status determination in order to refine the prognosis of BRAFV600 melanoma under mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Blateau
- Laboratoire de Biologie des Tumeurs Solides, Département de Pathologie et Oncobiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France; (P.B.); (B.B.); (V.D.); (G.C.); (J.A.V.)
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France
| | - Etienne Coyaud
- Laboratoire Protéomique Réponse Inflammatoire Spectrométrie de Masse (PRISM), INSERM U1192, Université de Lille, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, F-59000 Lille, France; (E.C.); (E.L.)
| | - Estelle Laurent
- Laboratoire Protéomique Réponse Inflammatoire Spectrométrie de Masse (PRISM), INSERM U1192, Université de Lille, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, F-59000 Lille, France; (E.C.); (E.L.)
| | - Benoit Béganton
- Laboratoire de Biologie des Tumeurs Solides, Département de Pathologie et Oncobiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France; (P.B.); (B.B.); (V.D.); (G.C.); (J.A.V.)
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France
| | - Vincent Ducros
- Laboratoire de Biologie des Tumeurs Solides, Département de Pathologie et Oncobiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France; (P.B.); (B.B.); (V.D.); (G.C.); (J.A.V.)
| | - Géraldine Chauchard
- Laboratoire de Biologie des Tumeurs Solides, Département de Pathologie et Oncobiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France; (P.B.); (B.B.); (V.D.); (G.C.); (J.A.V.)
| | - Julie A. Vendrell
- Laboratoire de Biologie des Tumeurs Solides, Département de Pathologie et Oncobiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France; (P.B.); (B.B.); (V.D.); (G.C.); (J.A.V.)
| | - Jérôme Solassol
- Laboratoire de Biologie des Tumeurs Solides, Département de Pathologie et Oncobiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France; (P.B.); (B.B.); (V.D.); (G.C.); (J.A.V.)
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Salvati L, Mandalà M, Massi D. Melanoma brain metastases: review of histopathological features and immune-molecular aspects. Melanoma Manag 2020; 7:MMT44. [PMID: 32821376 PMCID: PMC7426753 DOI: 10.2217/mmt-2019-0021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) have a dismal prognosis, but the unprecedented advances in systemic therapy alone or in combination with local therapy have now extended the 1-year overall survival rate from 20–25% to nearing 80–85%, mainly in asymptomatic patients. The histopathological and molecular characterization of MBM and the understanding of the microenvironment are critical to more effectively manage patients with advanced melanoma and to design biologically driven clinical trials. This review aims to give an overview of the main histopathological features and the immune-molecular aspects of MBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Salvati
- Department of Experimental & Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Mario Mandalà
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology & Hematology, Pope John XXIII Cancer Center Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Daniela Massi
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Neuditschko B, Janker L, Niederstaetter L, Brunmair J, Krivanek K, Izraely S, Sagi-Assif O, Meshel T, Keppler BK, Del Favero G, Witz IP, Gerner C. The Challenge of Classifying Metastatic Cell Properties by Molecular Profiling Exemplified with Cutaneous Melanoma Cells and Their Cerebral Metastasis from Patient Derived Mouse Xenografts. Mol Cell Proteomics 2020; 19:478-489. [PMID: 31892524 PMCID: PMC7050108 DOI: 10.1074/mcp.ra119.001886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The prediction of metastatic properties from molecular analyses still poses a major challenge. Here we aimed at the classification of metastasis-related cell properties by proteome profiling making use of cutaneous and brain-metastasizing variants from single melanomas sharing the same genetic ancestry. Previous experiments demonstrated that cultured cells derived from these xenografted variants maintain a stable phenotype associated with a differential metastatic behavior: The brain metastasizing variants produce more spontaneous micro-metastases than the corresponding cutaneous variants. Four corresponding pairs of cutaneous and metastatic cells were obtained from four individual patients, resulting in eight cell-lines presently investigated. Label free proteome profiling revealed significant differences between corresponding pairs of cutaneous and cerebellar metastases from the same patient. Indeed, each brain metastasizing variant expressed several apparently metastasis-associated proteomic alterations as compared with the corresponding cutaneous variant. Among the differentially expressed proteins we identified cell adhesion molecules, immune regulators, epithelial to mesenchymal transition markers, stem cell markers, redox regulators and cytokines. Similar results were observed regarding eicosanoids, considered relevant for metastasis, such as PGE2 and 12-HETE. Multiparametric morphological analysis of cells also revealed no characteristic alterations associated with the cutaneous and brain metastasis variants. However, no correct classification regarding metastatic potential was yet possible with the present data. We thus concluded that molecular profiling is able to classify cells according to known functional categories but is not yet able to predict relevant cell properties emerging from networks consisting of many interconnected molecules. The presently observed broad diversity of molecular patterns, irrespective of restricting to one tumor type and two main classes of metastasis, highlights the important need to develop meta-analysis strategies to predict cell properties from molecular profiling data. Such base knowledge will greatly support future individualized precision medicine approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Neuditschko
- Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna; Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna
| | - Lukas Janker
- Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna
| | | | - Julia Brunmair
- Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna
| | - Katharina Krivanek
- Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna; Department of Food Chemistry and Toxicology, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna
| | - Sivan Izraely
- Department of Cell Research and Immunology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University
| | - Orit Sagi-Assif
- Department of Cell Research and Immunology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University
| | - Tsipi Meshel
- Department of Cell Research and Immunology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University
| | - Bernhard K Keppler
- Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna
| | - Giorgia Del Favero
- Department of Food Chemistry and Toxicology, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna; Core Facility Multimodal Imaging, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna
| | - Isaac P Witz
- Department of Cell Research and Immunology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University
| | - Christopher Gerner
- Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna; Joint Metabolome Facility, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Brain metastases are a very common manifestation of cancer that have historically been approached as a single disease entity given the uniform association with poor clinical outcomes. Fortunately, our understanding of the biology and molecular underpinnings of brain metastases has greatly improved, resulting in more sophisticated prognostic models and multiple patient-related and disease-specific treatment paradigms. In addition, the therapeutic armamentarium has expanded from whole-brain radiotherapy and surgery to include stereotactic radiosurgery, targeted therapies and immunotherapies, which are often used sequentially or in combination. Advances in neuroimaging have provided additional opportunities to accurately screen for intracranial disease at initial cancer diagnosis, target intracranial lesions with precision during treatment and help differentiate the effects of treatment from disease progression by incorporating functional imaging. Given the numerous available treatment options for patients with brain metastases, a multidisciplinary approach is strongly recommended to personalize the treatment of each patient in an effort to improve the therapeutic ratio. Given the ongoing controversies regarding the optimal sequencing of the available and expanding treatment options for patients with brain metastases, enrolment in clinical trials is essential to advance our understanding of this complex and common disease. In this Review, we describe the key features of diagnosis, risk stratification and modern paradigms in the treatment and management of patients with brain metastases and provide speculation on future research directions.
Collapse
|
33
|
Sperduto PW, Deegan BJ, Li J, Jethwa KR, Brown PD, Lockney N, Beal K, Rana NG, Attia A, Tseng CL, Sahgal A, Shanley R, Sperduto WA, Lou E, Zahra A, Buatti JM, Yu JB, Chiang V, Molitoris JK, Masucci L, Roberge D, Shi DD, Shih HA, Olson A, Kirkpatrick JP, Braunstein S, Sneed P, Mehta MP. Estimating survival for renal cell carcinoma patients with brain metastases: an update of the Renal Graded Prognostic Assessment tool. Neuro Oncol 2019; 20:1652-1660. [PMID: 30418657 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Brain metastases are a common complication of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Our group previously published the Renal Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) tool. In our prior RCC study (n = 286, 1985-2005), we found marked heterogeneity and variation in outcomes. In our recent update in a larger, more contemporary cohort, we identified additional significant prognostic factors. The purpose of this study is to update the original Renal-GPA based on the newly identified prognostic factors. Methods A multi-institutional retrospective institutional review board-approved database of 711 RCC patients with new brain metastases diagnosed from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2015 was created. Clinical parameters and treatment were correlated with survival. A revised Renal GPA index was designed by weighting the most significant factors in proportion to their hazard ratios and assigning scores such that the patients with the best and worst prognoses would have a GPA of 4.0 and 0.0, respectively. Results The 4 most significant factors were Karnofsky performance status, number of brain metastases, extracranial metastases, and hemoglobin. The overall median survival was 12 months. Median survival for GPA groups 0-1.0, 1.5-2.0, 2.5-3, and 3.5-4.0 (% n = 25, 27, 30 and 17) was 4, 12, 17, and 35 months, respectively. Conclusion The updated Renal GPA is a user-friendly tool that will help clinicians and patients better understand prognosis, individualize clinical decision making and treatment selection, provide a means to compare retrospective literature, and provide more robust stratification of future clinical trials in this heterogeneous population. To simplify use of this tool in daily practice, a free online application is available at brainmetgpa.com.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul W Sperduto
- Minneapolis Radiation Oncology and University of Minnesota Gamma Knife Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Brian J Deegan
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, Texas
| | - Jing Li
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, Texas
| | - Krishan R Jethwa
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Paul D Brown
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Natalie Lockney
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, New York
| | - Kathryn Beal
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, New York
| | - Nitesh G Rana
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Albert Attia
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Sunnybrook-University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Sunnybrook-University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ryan Shanley
- University of Minnesota Biostatistics, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - William A Sperduto
- University of Minnesota Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Emil Lou
- University of Minnesota Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Amir Zahra
- University of Iowa, Department of Radiation Oncology, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - John M Buatti
- University of Iowa, Department of Radiation Oncology, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - James B Yu
- Yale University, Department of Radiation Oncology, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Veronica Chiang
- Yale University, Department of Neurosurgery, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jason K Molitoris
- University of Maryland, Department of Radiation Oncology, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Laura Masucci
- Centre Hospitalier de l' Université de Montreal, Department of Radiation Oncology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Roberge
- Centre Hospitalier de l' Université de Montreal, Department of Radiation Oncology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Diana D Shi
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Helen A Shih
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Adam Olson
- Duke University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Durham, North Carolina
| | - John P Kirkpatrick
- Duke University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Steve Braunstein
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Radiation Oncology, San Francisco, California
| | - Penny Sneed
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Radiation Oncology, San Francisco, California
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Miami Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
McTyre ER, Soike MH, Farris M, Ayala-Peacock DN, Hepel JT, Page BR, Shen C, Kleinberg L, Contessa JN, Corso C, Chiang V, Henson-Masters A, Cramer CK, Ruiz J, Pasche B, Watabe K, D'Agostino R, Su J, Laxton AW, Tatter SB, Fiveash JB, Ahluwalia M, Kotecha R, Chao ST, Braunstein SE, Attia A, Chung C, Chan MD. Multi-institutional validation of brain metastasis velocity, a recently defined predictor of outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery. Radiother Oncol 2019; 142:168-174. [PMID: 31526671 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2019] [Revised: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Brain metastasis velocity (BMV) is a prognostic metric that describes the recurrence rate of new brain metastases after initial treatment with radiosurgery (SRS). We have previously risk stratified patients into high, intermediate, and low-risk BMV groups, which correlates with overall survival (OS). We sought to externally validate BMV in a multi-institutional setting. METHODS Patients from nine academic centers were treated with upfront SRS; the validation cohort consisted of data from eight institutions not previously used to define BMV. Patients were classified by BMV into low (<4 BMV), intermediate (4-13 BMV), and high-risk groups (>13 BMV). Time-to-event outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards methods were used to estimate the effect of BMV and salvage modality on OS. RESULTS Of 2829 patients, 2092 patients were included in the validation dataset. Of these, 921 (44.0%) experienced distant brain failure (DBF). Median OS from initial SRS was 11.2 mo. Median OS for BMV < 4, BMV 4-13, and BMV > 13 were 12.5 mo, 7.0 mo, and 4.6 mo (p < 0.0001). After multivariate regression modeling, melanoma histology (β: 10.10, SE: 1.89, p < 0.0001) and number of initial brain metastases (β: 1.52, SE: 0.34, p < 0.0001) remained predictive of BMV (adjusted R2 = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS This multi-institutional dataset validates BMV as a predictor of OS following initial SRS. BMV is being utilized in upcoming multi-institutional randomized controlled trials as a stratification variable for salvage whole brain radiation versus salvage SRS after DBF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emory R McTyre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Greenville Health System Cancer Institute, USA
| | - Michael H Soike
- Hazelrig-Salter Radiation Oncology Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
| | - Michael Farris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, USA
| | | | - Jaroslaw T Hepel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brown University Alpert Medical School, USA
| | - Brandi R Page
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, USA
| | - Colette Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jimmy Ruiz
- Department of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, USA
| | - Boris Pasche
- Department of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, USA
| | - Kounosuke Watabe
- Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, USA
| | - Ralph D'Agostino
- Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, USA
| | - Jing Su
- Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, USA
| | - Adrian W Laxton
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, USA
| | | | - John B Fiveash
- Hazelrig-Salter Radiation Oncology Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA
| | - Manmeet Ahluwalia
- Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, USA
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, USA
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, USA
| | - Steve E Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Albert Attia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, USA
| | - Michael D Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Șuteu P, Todor N, Ignat RM, Nagy V. Clinical prognostic factors associated with survival and a survival score for patients with brain metastases. Future Oncol 2019; 15:2619-2634. [PMID: 31290342 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2019-0119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To identify prognostic factors of survival in patients with brain metastases (BM) and to devise a prognostic score. Patients & methods: In this single-institution retrospective study, we analyzed potential clinical prognostic factors in 1363 patients with BM. Based on the Cox proportional hazard model, we devised a BM score with three classes (score <5, 5-6 and >6). Results: The 1-year overall survival (OS) was 26%. Independent prognostic factors of OS were: age, gender, Karnofski performance status, number of BM, control of primary, presence of extracerebral metastases and type of primary tumor. The 1-year OS was 56% for score <5; 21% for score 5-6 and 4% for score >6 (p < 0.01). Conclusion: The BM score we propose is effective in grouping patients according to their prognosis and can help decision making regarding treatment adjustments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Șuteu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine & Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,"Prof.Dr. I. Chiricuță" Oncology Institute, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Nicolae Todor
- "Prof.Dr. I. Chiricuță" Oncology Institute, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Radu-Mihai Ignat
- Department of Anatomy & Embriology, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine & Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Viorica Nagy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine & Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,"Prof.Dr. I. Chiricuță" Oncology Institute, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sperduto PW, Fang P, Li J, Breen W, Brown PD, Cagney D, Aizer A, Yu J, Chiang V, Jain S, Gaspar LE, Myrehaug S, Sahgal A, Braunstein S, Sneed P, Cameron B, Attia A, Molitoris J, Wu CC, Wang TJC, Lockney N, Beal K, Parkhurst J, Buatti JM, Shanley R, Lou E, Tandberg DD, Kirkpatrick JP, Shi D, Shih HA, Chuong M, Saito H, Aoyama H, Masucci L, Roberge D, Mehta MP. Survival and prognostic factors in patients with gastrointestinal cancers and brain metastases: have we made progress? Transl Res 2019; 208:63-72. [PMID: 30885538 PMCID: PMC6527460 DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2019.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2018] [Revised: 02/17/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The literature describing the prognosis of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers and brain metastases (BM) is sparse. Our group previously published a prognostic index, the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) for GI cancer patients with BM, based on 209 patients diagnosed from 1985-2005. The purpose of this analysis is to identify prognostic factors for GI cancer patients with newly diagnosed BM in a larger contemporary cohort. A multi-institutional retrospective IRB-approved database of 792 GI cancer patients with new BM diagnosed from 1/1/2006 to 12/31/2016 was created. Demographic data, clinical parameters, and treatment were correlated with survival and time from primary diagnosis to BM (TPDBM). Kaplan-Meier median survival (MS) estimates were calculated and compared with log-rank tests. The MS from time of first treatment for BM for the prior and current cohorts were 5 and 8 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Eight prognostic factors (age, stage, primary site, resection of primary tumor, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), extracranial metastases, number of BM and Hgb were found to be significant for survival, in contrast to only one (KPS) in the prior cohort. In this cohort, the most common primary sites were rectum (24%) and esophagus (23%). Median TPDBM was 22 months. Notably, 37% (267/716) presented with poor prognosis (GPA 0-1.0). Although little improvement in overall survival in this cohort has been achieved in recent decades, survival varies widely and multiple new prognostic factors were identified. Future work will translate these factors into a prognostic index to facilitate clinical decision-making and stratification of future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul W Sperduto
- Minneapolis Radiation Oncology and University of Minnesota Gamma Knife Center.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Survival and prognostic factors in surgically treated brain metastases. J Neurooncol 2019; 143:359-367. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03171-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
38
|
Rauschenberg R, Bruns J, Brütting J, Daubner D, Lohaus F, Zimmer L, Forschner A, Zips D, Hassel JC, Berking C, Kaehler KC, Utikal J, Gutzmer R, Terheyden P, Meiss F, Rafei-Shamsabadi D, Kiecker F, Debus D, Dabrowski E, Arnold A, Garzarolli M, Kuske M, Beissert S, Löck S, Linn J, Troost EGC, Meier F. Impact of radiation, systemic therapy and treatment sequencing on survival of patients with melanoma brain metastases. Eur J Cancer 2019; 110:11-20. [PMID: 30739835 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Revised: 12/01/2018] [Accepted: 12/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combining stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and active systemic therapies (STs) achieved favourable survival outcomes in patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) in retrospective analyses. However, several aspects of this treatment strategy remain poorly understood. We report on the overall survival (OS) of patients with MBM treated with a combination of radiotherapy (RT) and ST as well as the impact of the v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF)-V600 mutation (BRAFmut) status, types of RT and ST and their sequence. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data of 208 patients treated with SRS or whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and either immunotherapy (IT) or targeted therapy (TT) within a 6-week interval to RT were analysed retrospectively. OS was calculated from RT to death or last follow-up. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed to determine prognostic features associated with OS. RESULTS The median follow-up was 7.3 months. 139 patients received IT, 67 received TT and 2 received IT and TT within 6 weeks to RT (WBRT 45%; SRS 55%). One-year Kaplan-Meier OS rates were 69%, 65%, 33% and 18% (P < .001) for SRS with IT, SRS with TT, WBRT with IT and WBRT with TT, respectively. Patients with a BRAFmut receiving IT combined with RT experienced higher OS rates (88%, 65%, 50% and 18%). TT following RT or started before and continued thereafter was associated with improved median OS compared with TT solely before RT (12.2 [95% confidence interval {CI} 9.3-15.1]; 9.8 [95% CI 6.9-12.6] versus 5.1 [95% CI 2.7-7.5]; P = .03). CONCLUSION SRS and IT achieved the highest OS rates. A BRAFmut appears to be a favourable prognostic factor for OS. For the combination of RT and TT, the sequence appears to be crucial. Combinations of WBRT and ST achieved unprecedentedly high OS rates and warrant further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricarda Rauschenberg
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre, Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Bruns
- Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Julia Brütting
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre, Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Dirk Daubner
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Fabian Lohaus
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lisa Zimmer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Forschner
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Skin Cancer Center, CCC Tübingen-Stuttgart, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jessica C Hassel
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Katharina C Kaehler
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jochen Utikal
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Skin Cancer Center Hannover, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Patrik Terheyden
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Frank Meiss
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - David Rafei-Shamsabadi
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Felix Kiecker
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Debus
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology, Paracelsus Medical University, General Hospital Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Evelyn Dabrowski
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology, Ludwigshafen Medical Center, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Andreas Arnold
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Marlene Garzarolli
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre, Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marvin Kuske
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre, Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Beissert
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre, Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jennifer Linn
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre, Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
The Importance of the Right Framework: Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway and the Scaffolding Protein PTPIP51. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:ijms19103282. [PMID: 30360441 PMCID: PMC6213971 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19103282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2018] [Revised: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The protein tyrosine phosphatase interacting protein 51 (PTPIP51) regulates and interconnects signaling pathways, such as the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and an abundance of different others, e.g., Akt signaling, NF-κB signaling, and the communication between different cell organelles. PTPIP51 acts as a scaffold protein for signaling proteins, e.g., Raf-1, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2), as well as for other scaffold proteins, e.g., 14-3-3 proteins. These interactions are governed by the phosphorylation of serine and tyrosine residues of PTPIP51. The phosphorylation status is finely tuned by receptor tyrosine kinases (EGFR, Her2), non-receptor tyrosine kinases (c-Src) and the phosphatase protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B). This review addresses various diseases which display at least one alteration in these enzymes regulating PTPIP51-interactions. The objective of this review is to summarize the knowledge of the MAPK-related interactome of PTPIP51 for several tumor entities and metabolic disorders.
Collapse
|
40
|
Prognostic models for patients with brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery with or without whole brain radiotherapy: a validation study. J Neurooncol 2018; 140:341-349. [PMID: 30132164 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2958-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/24/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) To compare the performance of five prognostic models [RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), Score Index for Radiosurgery in Brain Metastases (SIR), Barnholtz-Sloan-Kattan nomogram (BSKN), diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (dsGPA), and Graded Prognostic Assessment for Lung Cancer Using Molecular Markers (Lung-molGPA)] against actual survival in patients with brain metastases treated with SRS +/- WBRT. MATERIALS/METHODS 100 consecutive patients treated with SRS +/- WBRT between January 2006 and July 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were binned according to 33 percentiles of the predicted survival distribution for the BSKN and dsGPA models to compare with LungmolGPA, RPA and SIR. Pearson's correlation coefficients between predicted and observed survival were estimated to quantify the proportion of variance in observed survival. RESULTS Median survival for the entire cohort was 13.5 months, with predicted vs actual MS by BSKN, SIR, dsGPA, RPA, adenocarcinoma Lung-molGPA, and nonadenocarcinoma Lung-molGPA was 3.8 vs 15.6 months, 7 vs 13.5 months, 9.4 vs 13.5 months, 10.3 vs 13.5 months, 13.7 vs 13.7 months, and 9.8 vs 9.7 months, respectively. The BSKN model and adenocarcinoma LungmolGPA created three groups with a statistically significantly different MS (p = 0.002 and p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION All models under-predicted MS and only the BSKN and Lung-molGPA model stratified patients into three risk groups with statistically significant actual MS. The prognostic groupings of the adenocarcinoma Lung-molGPA group was the best predictor of MS, and showed that we are making improvements in our prognostic ability by utilizing molecular information that is much more widely available in the current treatment era.
Collapse
|
41
|
Lauko A, Thapa B, Venur VA, Ahluwalia MS. Management of Brain Metastases in the New Era of Checkpoint Inhibition. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2018; 18:70. [PMID: 30121715 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-018-0877-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW Brain metastasis is a common complication of advanced malignancies, especially, lung cancer, breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and melanoma. Traditionally surgery, when indicated, and radiation therapy, either as whole-brain radiation therapy or stereotactic radiosurgery, constituted the major treatment options for brain metastases. Until recently, most of the systemic chemotherapy agents had limited activity for brain metastases. However, with the advent of small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy agents, there has been renewed interest in using these agents in the management of brain metastases. RECENT FINDINGS Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic melanoma, lung cancer, kidney cancer, and bladder cancer among others. They modulate the immune system to recognize tumor antigens as "non-self" antigens and mount an immune response against them. Initial studies of using immune checkpoint inhibitors in brain metastases have shown promising activity, and several clinical trials are currently underway. Studies are also assessing the combination of radiation therapy and immunotherapy in brain metastases. The results of these ongoing clinical trials have the potential to change the therapeutic paradigm in patients with brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Lauko
- Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, S73, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Bicky Thapa
- Fairview Hospital-Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, S73, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Redmer T. Deciphering mechanisms of brain metastasis in melanoma - the gist of the matter. Mol Cancer 2018; 17:106. [PMID: 30053879 PMCID: PMC6064184 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-018-0854-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 07/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastasis to distant organs and particularly the brain still represents the most serious obstacle in melanoma therapies. Melanoma cells acquire a phenotype to metastasize to the brain and successfully grow there through complex mechanisms determined by microenvironmental than rather genetic cues. There do appear to be some prerequisites, including the presence of oncogenic BRAF or NRAS mutations and a loss of PTEN. Further mediators of the brain metastatic phenotype appear to be the high activation of the PI3K/AKT or STAT3 pathway or high levels of PLEKHA5 and MMP2 in metastatic cells. A yet undefined subset of brain metastases exhibit a high level of expression of CD271 that is associated with stemness, migration and survival. Hence, CD271 expression may determine specific properties of brain metastatic melanoma cells. Environmental cues - in particular those provided by brain parenchymal cells such as astrocytes - seem to help specifically guide melanoma cells that express CCR4 or CD271, potential "homing receptors". Upon entering the brain, these cells interact with brain parenchyma cells and are thereby reprogrammed to adopt a neurological phenotype. Several lines of evidence suggest that current therapies may have a negative effect by activating a program that drives tumor cells toward stemness and metastasis. Yet significant improvements have expanded the therapeutic options for treating brain metastases from melanoma, by combining potent BRAF inhibitors such as dabrafenib with checkpoint inhibitors or stereotactic surgery. Further progress toward developing new therapeutic strategies will require a more profound understanding of the mechanisms that underlie brain metastasis in melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torben Redmer
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117, Berlin, Germany. .,Department of Medical Biochemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Roux A, Botella C, Still M, Zanello M, Dhermain F, Metellus P, Pallud J. Posterior Fossa Metastasis-Associated Obstructive Hydrocephalus in Adult Patients: Literature Review and Practical Considerations from the Neuro-Oncology Club of the French Society of Neurosurgery. World Neurosurg 2018; 117:271-279. [PMID: 29935321 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no consensus concerning the management of adult patients with posterior fossa metastasis-associated obstructive hydrocephalus, especially regarding surgical procedures. A literature review was performed to assess the surgical strategy in the management of patients with metastatic brain tumor. METHODS A literature search was conducted of PubMed in November 2017 to identify all studies concerning brain metastases and obstructive hydrocephalus in English. All studies (except case reports and pediatric studies) between December 1953 and November 2017 that were about posterior fossa metastasis-associated obstructive hydrocephalus in adult patients were eligible. Eligible studies were classified by level of evidence. We assessed epidemiology, clinical and imaging findings, neurosurgical management, and prognosis of adult patients with posterior fossa metastasis-associated obstructive hydrocephalus. We suggest some practical considerations and a management decision tree on behalf of the Neuro-oncology Club of the French Society of Neurosurgery, with evidence-based analysis. RESULTS Direct surgical resection could be considered for patients with asymptomatic obstructive hydrocephalus, and endoscopic third ventriculostomy seems to be a reasonable procedure for patients with symptomatic obstructive hydrocephalus. A ventriculoperitoneal or atrial shunt seems to be a valid alternative when patients have a history of central nervous system infection or ventricular hemorrhage, leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, or unfavorable anatomy for an endoscopic third ventriculostomy to be performed. CONCLUSIONS The Neuro-oncology Club of the French Society of Neurosurgery suggests a prospective assessment of these neurosurgical procedures to compare their safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Roux
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris, France; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; Inserm, U894, IMA-Brain, Centre de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Paris, France
| | - Céline Botella
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris, France; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; Department of Neurosurgery, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Megan Still
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris, France; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Marc Zanello
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris, France; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; Inserm, U894, IMA-Brain, Centre de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Paris, France
| | - Frédéric Dhermain
- Department of Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy University Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Philippe Metellus
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clairval Private Hospital, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Marseille, France
| | - Johan Pallud
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris, France; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; Inserm, U894, IMA-Brain, Centre de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiosurgery for newly diagnosed melanoma brain metastases. J Neurooncol 2018; 140:55-62. [PMID: 29909499 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2930-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Brain metastases are common in metastatic melanoma and radiosurgery is often utilized for local control. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) play a central role in contemporary melanoma management; however, there is limited data exploring outcomes and potential toxicities for patients treated with CPIs and radiosurgery. METHODS We retrospectively identified all consecutive cases of newly diagnosed melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery at a single institution between 2012 and 2017, and included only patients that initiated CPIs within 8 weeks before or after radiosurgery. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were included with a median follow-up of 31.6 months. Two-year local control was 92%. Median time to out-of-field CNS and extra-CNS progression were 8.4 and 7.9 months, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.4 months and median overall survival (OS) was not reached (NR). Twenty-five patients (66%) received anti-CTLA4 and 13 patients (34%) received anti-PD-1+/-anti-CTLA4. Compared with anti-CTLA4, patients that received anti-PD-1+/-anti-CTLA4 had significant improvements in time to out-of-field CNS progression (p = 0.049), extra-CNS progression (p = 0.015), and PFS (p = 0.043), with median time to out-of-field CNS progression of NR vs. 3.1 months, median time to extra-CNS progression of NR vs. 4.4 months, and median PFS of 20.3 vs. 2.4 months. Six patients (16%) developed grade ≥ 2 CNS toxicities (grade 2: 3, grade 3: 3, grade 4/5: 0). CONCLUSIONS Excellent outcomes were observed in patients that initiated CPIs within 8 weeks of undergoing radiosurgery for newly diagnosed MBM. There appears to be an advantage to anti-PD-1 or combination therapy compared to anti-CTLA4.
Collapse
|
45
|
Sperduto PW, Deegan BJ, Li J, Jethwa KR, Brown PD, Lockney N, Beal K, Rana NG, Attia A, Tseng CL, Sahgal A, Shanley R, Sperduto WA, Lou E, Zahra A, Buatti JM, Yu JB, Chiang V, Molitoris JK, Masucci L, Roberge D, Shi DD, Shih HA, Olson A, Kirkpatrick JP, Braunstein S, Sneed P, Mehta MP. Effect of Targeted Therapies on Prognostic Factors, Patterns of Care, and Survival in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma and Brain Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 101:845-853. [PMID: 29976497 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Revised: 03/06/2018] [Accepted: 04/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify prognostic factors, define evolving patterns of care, and the effect of targeted therapies in a larger contemporary cohort of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with new brain metastases (BM). METHODS AND MATERIALS A multi-institutional retrospective institutional review board-approved database of 711 RCC patients with new BM diagnosed from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2015, was created. Clinical parameters and treatment were correlated with median survival and time from primary diagnosis to BM. Multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS The median survival for the prior/present cohorts was 9.6/12 months, respectively (P < .01). Four prognostic factors (Karnofsky performance status, extracranial metastases, number of BM, and hemoglobin b) were significant for survival after the diagnosis of BM. Of the 6 drug types studied, only cytokine use after BM was associated with improved survival. The use of whole-brain radiation therapy declined from 50% to 22%, and the use of stereotactic radiosurgery alone increased from 46% to 58%. Nonneurologic causes of death were twice as common as neurologic causes. CONCLUSIONS Additional prognostic factors refine prognostication in this larger contemporary cohort. Patterns of care have changed, and survival of RCC patients with BM has improved over time. The reasons for this improvement in survival remain unknown but may relate to more aggressive use of local brain metastasis therapy and a wider array of systemic treatment options for those patients with progressive extracranial tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul W Sperduto
- Minneapolis Radiation Oncology and University of Minnesota Gamma Knife Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
| | | | - Jing Li
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | - Kathryn Beal
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nitesh G Rana
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Albert Attia
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Arjun Sahgal
- Sunnybrook-University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ryan Shanley
- University of Minnesota Biostatistics, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | - Emil Lou
- University of Minnesota Cancer Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Laura Masucci
- Centre Hospitalier de l' Université de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - David Roberge
- Centre Hospitalier de l' Université de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Diana D Shi
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Helen A Shih
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Steve Braunstein
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Penny Sneed
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Tolerance and outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery combined with anti-programmed cell death-1 (pembrolizumab) for melanoma brain metastases. Melanoma Res 2018; 28:111-119. [DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
47
|
Nieder C, Mehta MP, Geinitz H, Grosu AL. Prognostic and predictive factors in patients with brain metastases from solid tumors: A review of published nomograms. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018; 126:13-18. [PMID: 29759555 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2017] [Revised: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review published nomograms that predict endpoints such as overall survival (OS) or risk of intracranial relapse in patients with brain metastases from solid tumors. METHODS The methods and results of nomogram studies identified by a systematic search were extracted and compared, stratified by endpoint predicted by the respective nomograms. In particular, validation strategies (external/internal), concordance indices (cut-off 0.75) and comparisons to older models were analyzed. RESULTS Six publications reported on prediction of OS. Most of these analyses focused on one particular primary tumor site, e.g., breast cancer or hepatocellular carcinoma, while the largest study included different primary tumor sites. The median number of patients was 244. Three of six studies included external validation cohorts. With few exceptions, concordance indices <0.75 were reported. In all studies reporting this endpoint, the nomogram outperformed older prognostic scores. Two nomograms focused on development of new brain metastases after radiosurgery (one externally validated), one on survival free from salvage whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) after radiosurgery, and one on neurologic and non-neurologic death in patients receiving radiosurgery after WBRT failure. All concordance indices of these 4 nomograms were <0.70. CONCLUSION Taking into account concordance indices and comparisons to older prognostic models, the most promising, externally validated nomograms are the breast cancer and the non-small cell lung cancer nomogram predicting OS, and the distant brain failure after radiosurgery nomogram. Additional validation studies as well as continuous monitoring of the models' performance appear necessary to ensure their clinical applicability in the present era of rapidly changing treatment paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten Nieder
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital, 8092 Bodø, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Hans Geinitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Linz, Austria
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Badakhshi H, Engeling F, Budach V, Ghadjar P, Zschaeck S, Kaul D. Are prognostic indices for brain metastases of melanoma still valid in the stereotactic era? Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:3. [PMID: 29316943 PMCID: PMC5761199 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0951-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 12/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Malignant melanoma brain metastases (MBM) are the third most common cause for brain metastases (BM). Historically Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was considered the goldstandard of treatment even though melanoma cells are regarded as very radioresistant. Therapeutic possibilities have fundamentally changed since the availability of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), where it is possible to apply high ablative doses in a very precise manner. In this work we analyze prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) after SRT in patients with MBM and evaluate the applicability of popular prognostic indices that mainly stem from the WBRT-era. Materials and methods This work is a retrospective analysis of OS of 80 malignant melanoma (MM) patients who received SRT for intracranial melanoma metastases between 2004 and 2014 who had not received prior treatment for MBM in terms of surgery or WBRT. Potential prognostic factors were analyzed using univariable and multivariable analysis. Existing prognostic scores [Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA), Diagnosis-Specific-GPA (DS-GPA), Golden Grading System (GGS) and RADES] were calculated and tested using log-rank analysis. Results Eighty patients, respectively 177 brain metastases, were irradiated. The median survival time from radiation was 7.06 months. Overall, GGS, GPA and DS-GPA were significant predictors of survival. The MM-specific index DS-GPA showed the best p-value but did not show adequate division when looking at the two intermediate risk subgroups. RADES did not show any statistically significant prognostic value. In univariable as well as in multivariable analyses a higher Karnofsky-Index, a single BM, and non nodular melanoma (NM) histology were positive predictors of survival. Conclusion The existing prognostic scores do not seem to ideally fit for this special group of patients. Our results indicate that the histologic subtype of MM could add to the prognostic value of specialized future indices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harun Badakhshi
- Department of Clinical Radiation Oncology, Ernst von Bergman Medical Center, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 14467, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Fidelis Engeling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Radiation Therapy in Brain Metastasis of Solid Tumors: A Challenge for the Future. Radiat Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52619-5_12-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
50
|
Fang P, Boehling NS, Koay EJ, Bucheit AD, Jakob JA, Settle SH, Brown PD, Davies MA, Sulman EP. Melanoma brain metastases harboring BRAF
V600K
or NRAS mutations are associated with an increased local failure rate following conventional therapy. J Neurooncol 2017; 137:67-75. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2695-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|