1
|
Hon BYC, Chan J, Ng KS, Lam SC. Predicting herd immunity achievement: a time-series analysis of vaccination and fatality rates using 1,075 days of COVID-19 data. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1403163. [PMID: 39371208 PMCID: PMC11449892 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1403163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 08/29/2024] [Indexed: 10/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic, driven by SARS-CoV-2, has made vaccination a critical strategy for global control. However, vaccine hesitancy, particularly among certain age groups, remains a significant barrier to achieving herd immunity. Methods This study uses Poisson regression and ARIMA time-series modeling to identify factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy, understand age-specific vaccination preferences, and assess the impact of bivalent vaccines on reducing hesitancy and fatality rates. It also predicts the time required to achieve herd immunity by analyzing factors such as vaccine dosing intervals, age-specific preferences, and changes in fatality rates. Results The study finds that individuals recovering from COVID-19 often delay vaccination due to perceived immunity. There is a preference for combining BNT162b2 and CoronaVac vaccines. The BNT162b2 bivalent vaccine has significantly reduced vaccine hesitancy and is linked with lower fatality rates, particularly in those aged 80 and above. However, it tends to induce more severe side effects compared to Sinovac. Vaccine hesitancy is most prevalent among the youngest (0-11) and oldest (80+) age groups, posing a challenge to reaching 90% vaccination coverage. Conclusion Vaccine hesitancy is a major obstacle to herd immunity. Effective strategies include creating urgency, offering incentives, and prioritizing vulnerable age groups. Despite these challenges, the government should have continued to encourage vaccinations while gradually lifting COVID-19 control measures, balancing public health safety with the return to normal life, as was observed in the transition period during the latter stages of the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benny Yiu Chung Hon
- Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Department of Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Jeffrey Chan
- King George V School, Ho Man Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Kei Shing Ng
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Simon Ching Lam
- School of Nursing, Tung Wah College, Ho Man Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yeung NCY, Lau STY, Mak WWS, Cheng C, Chan EYY, Siu JYM, Cheung PSY. Applying the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology to Identify Factors Associated With Intention to Use Teledelivered Supportive Care Among Recently Diagnosed Breast Cancer Survivors During COVID-19 in Hong Kong: Cross-Sectional Survey. JMIR Cancer 2024; 10:e51072. [PMID: 38935942 PMCID: PMC11240077 DOI: 10.2196/51072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many supportive cancer care (SCC) services were teledelivered during COVID-19, but what facilitates patients' intentions to use teledelivered SCC is unknown. OBJECTIVE The study aimed to use the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology to investigate the factors associated with the intentions of breast cancer survivors (BCS) in Hong Kong to use various types of teledelivered SCC (including psychosocial care, medical consultation, complementary care, peer support groups). Favorable telehealth-related perceptions (higher performance expectancy, lower effort expectancy, more facilitating conditions, positive social influences), less technological anxiety, and greater fear of COVID-19 were hypothesized to be associated with higher intentions to use teledelivered SCC. Moreover, the associations between telehealth-related perceptions and intentions to use teledelivered SCC were hypothesized to be moderated by education level, such that associations between telehealth-related perceptions and intentions to use teledelivered SCC would be stronger among those with a higher education level. METHODS A sample of 209 (209/287, 72.8% completion rate) women diagnosed with breast cancer since the start of the COVID-19 outbreak in Hong Kong (ie, January 2020) were recruited from the Hong Kong Breast Cancer Registry to complete a cross-sectional survey between June 2022 and December 2022. Participants' intentions to use various types of teledelivered SCC (dependent variables), telehealth-related perceptions (independent variables), and sociodemographic variables (eg, education, as a moderator variable) were measured using self-reported, validated measures. RESULTS Hierarchical regression analysis results showed that greater confidence using telehealth, performance expectancy (believing telehealth helps with daily tasks), social influence (important others encouraging telehealth use), and facilitating conditions (having resources for telehealth use) were associated with higher intentions to use teledelivered SCC (range: β=0.16, P=.03 to β=0.34, P<.001). Moreover, 2-way interactions emerged between education level and 2 of the telehealth perception variables. Education level moderated the associations between (1) performance expectancy and intention to use teledelivered complementary care (β=0.34, P=.04) and (2) facilitating conditions and intention to use teledelivered peer support groups (β=0.36, P=.03). The positive associations between those telehealth perceptions and intentions were only significant among those with a higher education level. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study implied that enhancing BCS' skills at using telehealth, BCS' and their important others' perceived benefits of telehealth, and providing assistance for telehealth use could increase BCS' intentions to use teledelivered SCC. For intentions to use specific types of SCC, addressing relevant factors (performance expectancy, facilitating conditions) might be particularly beneficial for those with a higher education level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelson C Y Yeung
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong)
| | - Stephanie T Y Lau
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong)
| | - Winnie W S Mak
- Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong)
| | - Cecilia Cheng
- Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong)
| | - Emily Y Y Chan
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong)
| | - Judy Y M Siu
- Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong)
| | - Polly S Y Cheung
- Hong Kong Breast Cancer Foundation, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Youn HM, Zhang Y, Liu A, Ng CS, Liang J, Lau GKK, Lee SF, Lok J, Lam CLK, Wan EYF, Quan J. Decline in Cancer Diagnoses during the 'Zero COVID' Policy in Hong Kong: Indirect Spillover Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:157-164. [PMID: 38262779 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Despite a largely successful 'zero COVID' policy in 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted routine cancer services in the city of Hong Kong. The aims of this study were to examine the trends in cancer incidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and estimate missed cancer diagnoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used population-based data from the Hong Kong Cancer Registry 1983-2020 to examine the trends of age- and sex-standardised cancer incidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We applied: (i) the annual average percentage change (AAPC) calculated using the Joinpoint regression model and (ii) the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model to forecast cancer incidence rates in 2020. Missed cancer diagnoses in 2020 were estimated by comparing forecasted incidence rates to reported rates. A subgroup analysis was conducted by sex, age and cancer site. RESULTS The cancer incidence in Hong Kong declined by 4.4% from 2019 to 2020 (male 8.1%; female 1.1%) compared with the long-term AAPC of 0.5% from 2005 to 2019 (95% confidence interval 0.3, 0.7). The gap between the reported and forecasted incidence for 2020 ranged from 5.1 to 5.7% (male 8.5%, 9.8%; female 2.3%, 3.5%). We estimated 1525-1596 missed cancer diagnoses (ARIMA estimate -98, 3148; AAPC 514, 1729) in 2020. Most missed diagnoses were in males (ARIMA 1361 [327, 2394]; AAPC 1401 [1353, 1460]), with an estimated 479-557 missed cases of colorectal cancer (ARIMA 112, 837; AAPC 518, 597) and 256-352 missed cases of prostate cancer (AAPC 231, 280; ARIMA 110, 594). CONCLUSION The incidence of new cancer diagnoses declined in 2020 contrary to the long-term increase over the previous decades. Significantly lower diagnoses than expected were observed in males, particularly for colorectal and prostate cancers. Fewer reported cancer cases indicate missed diagnoses and could lead to delayed treatment that could impact future health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H M Youn
- Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Y Zhang
- School of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - A Liu
- School of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - C S Ng
- School of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - J Liang
- School of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - G K K Lau
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - S F Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - J Lok
- Department of Pathology, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - C L K Lam
- Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - E Y F Wan
- Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health (D(2)4H), Hong Kong Science and Technology Park, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - J Quan
- School of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; HKU Business School, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mostafavi Zadeh SM, Tajik F, Gheytanchi E, Kiani J, Ghods R, Madjd Z. COVID-19 pandemic impact on screening and diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023:spcare-2023-004310. [PMID: 37748857 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The healthcare level has been greatly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic compared with before the outbreak. This study aimed to review the impact of COVID-19 on the screening and diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). METHOD The current study was designed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020. The keywords used to perform the search strategy were COVID-19 and prostate neoplasms. The four primary electronic databases comprising PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus and Embase were searched until 1 September 2022. After screening and selecting studies through the EndNote software, data were extracted from each included study by two independent authors. All studies were evaluated according to Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality assessment tool. RESULTS As a result, 40 studies were included, categorised into two subjects. The majority of studies indicated a significant decrease in screening prostate-specific antibody tests during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with the pre-pandemic period, leading to delays in cancer diagnosis. The decrease in the number of diagnosed cases with low/intermediate stages to some extent was more than those with advanced stages. The PCa screening and diagnosis reduction ranged from nearly 0% to 78% and from 4.1% to 71.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION Our findings showed that during the COVID-19 lockdown, delays in PCa screening tests and diagnoses led to the negative health effects on patients with PCa. Thus, it is highly recommended performing regular cancer screening to reduce the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021291656.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed Mostafa Mostafavi Zadeh
- Oncopathology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Tajik
- Oncopathology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Elmira Gheytanchi
- Oncopathology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jafar Kiani
- Oncopathology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Roya Ghods
- Oncopathology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Zahra Madjd
- Oncopathology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lemanska A, Andrews C, Fisher L, Bacon S, Frampton AE, Mehrkar A, Inglesby P, Davy S, Roberts K, Patalay P, Goldacre B, MacKenna B, Walker AJ. Healthcare in England was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic across the pancreatic cancer pathway: A cohort study using OpenSAFELY-TPP. eLife 2023; 12:e85332. [PMID: 37561116 PMCID: PMC10414967 DOI: 10.7554/elife.85332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Healthcare across all sectors, in the UK and globally, was negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. We analysed healthcare services delivered to people with pancreatic cancer from January 2015 to March 2023 to investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods With the approval of NHS England, and drawing from a nationally representative OpenSAFELY-TPP dataset of 24 million patients (over 40% of the English population), we undertook a cohort study of people diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. We queried electronic healthcare records for information on the provision of healthcare services across the pancreatic cancer pathway. To estimate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, we predicted the rates of healthcare services if the pandemic had not happened. We used generalised linear models and the pre-pandemic data from January 2015 to February 2020 to predict rates in March 2020 to March 2023. The 95% confidence intervals of the predicted values were used to estimate the significance of the difference between the predicted and observed rates. Results The rate of pancreatic cancer and diabetes diagnoses in the cohort was not affected by the pandemic. There were 26,840 people diagnosed with pancreatic cancer from January 2015 to March 2023. The mean age at diagnosis was 72 (±11 SD), 48% of people were female, 95% were of White ethnicity, and 40% were diagnosed with diabetes. We found a reduction in surgical resections by 25-28% during the pandemic. In addition, 20%, 10%, and 4% fewer people received body mass index, glycated haemoglobin, and liver function tests, respectively, before they were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. There was no impact of the pandemic on the number of people making contact with primary care, but the number of contacts increased on average by 1-2 per person amongst those who made contact. Reporting of jaundice decreased by 28%, but recovered within 12 months into the pandemic. Emergency department visits, hospital admissions, and deaths were not affected. Conclusions The pandemic affected healthcare in England across the pancreatic cancer pathway. Positive lessons could be learnt from the services that were resilient and those that recovered quickly. The reductions in healthcare experienced by people with cancer have the potential to lead to worse outcomes. Current efforts should focus on addressing the unmet needs of people with cancer. Funding This work was jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust (222097/Z/20/Z); MRC (MR/V015757/1, MC_PC-20059, MR/W016729/1); NIHR (NIHR135559, COV-LT2-0073), and Health Data Research UK (HDRUK2021.000, 2021.0157). This work was funded by Medical Research Council (MRC) grant reference MR/W021390/1 as part of the postdoctoral fellowship awarded to AL and undertaken at the Bennett Institute, University of Oxford. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, NHS England, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), or the Department of Health and Social Care. Funders had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnieszka Lemanska
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of SurreyGuildfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Colm Andrews
- Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Louis Fisher
- Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Seb Bacon
- Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Adam E Frampton
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of SurreyGuildfordUnited Kingdom
- HPB Surgical Unit, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation TrustGuildfordUnited Kingdom
- Oncology Section, Surrey Cancer Research Institute, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of SurreyGuildfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Amir Mehrkar
- Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Peter Inglesby
- Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Simon Davy
- Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Keith Roberts
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of BirminghamBirminghamUnited Kingdom
| | - Praveetha Patalay
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing and Centre for Longitudinal Studies, University College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Ben Goldacre
- Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Brian MacKenna
- Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Alex J Walker
- Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Griewing S, Wagner U, Lingenfelder M, Fischer R, Kalder M. Chronological development of in-patient oncology in times of COVID-19: a retrospective analysis of hospitalized oncology and COVID-19 patients of a German University Hospital. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:2551-2558. [PMID: 35771262 PMCID: PMC9244885 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04044-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this study is to examine the chronological development of hospitalized oncology and COVID-19 patients, and compare effects on oncology sub-disciplines for pre-pandemic (2017-19) and pandemic (2020-21) years in the setting of a German university maximum care provider. METHODS Data were retrospectively retrieved from the hospital performance controlling system for patient collectives with oncological main (nOnco) and COVID-19 secondary diagnosis (nCOVID-19). Data analysis is based on descriptive statistical assessment. RESULTS The oncology patient collective (nOnco = 27,919) shows a decrease of hospitalized patients for the whole pandemic (- 4% for 2020 and - 2,5% for 2021 to 2019). The number of hospitalized COVID-19 patients increases from first to second pandemic year by + 106.71% (nCOVID-19 = 868). Maximum decline in monthly hospitalized oncology patients amounts to - 19% (May 2020) during the first and - 21% (December 2020) during the second lockdown. Relative monthly hospitalization levels of oncology patients reverted to pre-pandemic levels from February 2021 onwards. CONCLUSION The results confirm a decline in hospitalized oncology patients for the entire pandemic in the setting of a maximum care provider. Imposed lockdown and contact restrictions, rising COVID-19 case numbers, as well as discovery of new virus variants have a negative impact on hospitalized treated oncological patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Griewing
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
- Chair of General Business Administration, Institute for Health Care Management e.V., Philipps-University Marburg, Universitätsstraße 24, 35037, Marburg, Germany.
| | - Uwe Wagner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Michael Lingenfelder
- Chair of General Business Administration, Institute for Health Care Management e.V., Philipps-University Marburg, Universitätsstraße 24, 35037, Marburg, Germany
| | - Rebecca Fischer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Kalder
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wu D, Nam R, Leung KSK, Waraich H, Purnomo A, Chou OHI, Perone F, Pawar S, Faraz F, Liu H, Zhou J, Liu T, Chan JSK, Tse G. Population-Based Clinical Studies Using Routinely Collected Data in Hong Kong, China: A Systematic Review of Trends and Established Local Practices. CARDIOVASCULAR INNOVATIONS AND APPLICATIONS 2023; 8. [DOI: 10.15212/cvia.2023.0073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Routinely collected health data are increasingly used in clinical research. No study has systematically reviewed the temporal trends in the number of publications and analyzed different aspects of local research practices and their variations in Hong Kong, China, with a specific focus on research ethics governance and approval.
Methods: PubMed was systematically searched from its inception to March 28, 2023, for studies using routinely collected healthcare data from Hong Kong.
Results: A total of 454 studies were included. Between 2000 and 2009, 32 studies were identified. The number of publications increased from 5 to 120 between 2010 and 2022. Of the investigator-led studies using the Hospital Authority (HA)’s cross-cluster data (n = 393), 327 (83.2%) reported receiving ethics approval from a single cluster/university-based REC, whereas 50 studies (12.7%) did not report approval from a REC. For use of the HA Data Collaboration Lab, approval by a single hospital-based or University-based REC is accepted. Repeated submission of identical ethics applications to different RECs is estimated to cost HK$4.2 million yearly.
Conclusions: Most studies reported gaining approval from a single cluster REC before retrieval of cross-cluster HA data. Substantial cost savings would result if repeated review of identical ethics applications were not required.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ng JS, Hamilton DG. Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening and diagnosis rates: A rapid review and meta-analysis. J Med Screen 2022; 29:209-218. [PMID: 35593115 PMCID: PMC9127453 DOI: 10.1177/09691413221101807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has caused an indefinite delay to cancer screening programs worldwide. This study aims to explore the impact on breast cancer screening outcomes such as mammography and diagnosis rates. METHODS We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, medRxiv and bioRxiv between January 2020 to October 2021 to identify studies that reported on the rates of screening mammography and breast cancer diagnosis before and during the pandemic. The effects of 'lockdown' measures, age and ethnicity on outcomes were also examined. All studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Rate ratios were calculated for all outcomes and pooled using standard inverse-variance random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS We identified 994 articles, of which 7 registry-based and 24 non-registry-based retrospective cohort studies, including data on 4,860,786 and 629,823 patients respectively across 18 different countries, were identified. Overall, breast cancer screening and diagnosis rates dropped by an estimated 41-53% and 18-29% respectively between 2019 and 2020. No differences in mammogram screening rates depending on patient age or ethnicity were observed. However, countries that implemented lockdown measures were associated with a significantly greater reduction in mammogram and diagnosis rates between 2019 and 2020 in comparison to those that did not. CONCLUSION The pandemic has caused a substantial reduction in the screening and diagnosis of breast cancer, with reductions more pronounced in countries under lockdown restrictions. It is early yet to know if delayed screening during the pandemic translates into higher breast cancer mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay Shen Ng
- Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of
Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Malacca General
Hospital, Ministry of Health, Malaysia
| | - Daniel G. Hamilton
- Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of
Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- MetaMelb Research Group, School of
BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Griewing S, Lingenfelder M, Kalder M, Wagner U, Gremke N. Gesundheitsökonomischer Vergleich von onkologischen und
COVID-19-Patienten. GESUNDHEITSÖKONOMIE & QUALITÄTSMANAGEMENT 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1945-6672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Zusammenfassung
Zielsetzung Ziel der Studie ist es die Auswirkungen der COVID-19 Pandemie
auf die stationär behandelten Patienten eines universitären
Maximalversorgers mit einer Krebs- und/oder COVID-19-Erkrankung zu
untersuchen. Unterscheiden sich die Patientenkollektive
gesundheitsökonomisch und ergeben sich aus den Resultaten administrative
Konsequenzen für eine proaktive Steuerung der regionalen
Krebsversorgung.
Methodik Es wurde eine retrospektive, deskriptive Datenanalyse klinischer
und gesundheitsökonomischer Parameter aller am
Universitätsklinikum Marburg stationär aufgenommenen
onkologischen und COVID-19-postiven Patienten sowie der Kombination von
onkologischen Patienten mit einer COVID-19-Erkrankung innerhalb des
Beobachtungszeitraums von 2017 bis 2021 durchgeführt.
Ergebnisse Es wurde ein Rückgang onkologisch behandelter Patienten
über den gesamten Zeitraum der COVID-19-Pandemie beobachtet.
Onkologische Patienten mit einer COVID-19-Erkrankung stellen das
Patientenkollektiv mit dem höchsten Schweregrad der Erkrankung dar,
gefolgt von der COVID-19- und rein onkologischen Patienten. Dies spiegelt sich
gleichsam in den ökonomischen Leistungskennzahlen wider. Die
chronologischen Verläufe des DRG-Erlöses und Case Mix Index pro
COVID-19-Patienten weisen Unterschiede für Zeitabschnitte des
Pandemiegeschehens in Deutschland auf.
Schlussfolgerung Der Vergleich der Patientenkollektive bestätigt
das hohes Gefährdungspotential von onkologischen Patienten, welches sich
in einer gesundheitsökonomisch aufwendigen Behandlung widerspiegelt.
Nationale Maßnahmen, Kontaktbeschränkungen oder pandemische
Ereignisse lassen sich am chronologischen Verlauf der klinischen und
wirtschaftlichen Parameter nachvollziehen. Trotz des internationalen
Rückgangs an ambulanten und stationären onkologischen Patienten
ist die „state-of-the-art“ Krebsversorgung in pandemischen
Zeiten realisierbar. Aufgrund dessen besteht die Handlungsnotwendigkeit
für einen stationären Maximalversorger durch Kommunikation und
Versorgungsmodellierung die onkologische Versorgung proaktiver zu steuern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Griewing
- Institut für Health Care Management e.V., Lehrstuhl für
Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Philipps-Universität Marburg,
Marburg, Germany
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe,
Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg,
Marburg, Germany
| | - Michael Lingenfelder
- Institut für Health Care Management e.V., Lehrstuhl für
Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Philipps-Universität Marburg,
Marburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Kalder
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe,
Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg,
Marburg, Germany
| | - Uwe Wagner
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe,
Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg,
Marburg, Germany
| | - Niklas Gremke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe,
Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg,
Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jacob L, Kalder M, Kostev K. Decrease in the number of patients diagnosed with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022; 148:3117-3123. [PMID: 35041059 PMCID: PMC8764247 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-03922-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Little is known on how coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has impacted cancer diagnosis in Germany since the first lockdown in March 2020. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to compare the number of patients newly diagnosed with cancer in general and specialized practices in Germany between April 2020-March 2021 and April 2019-March 2020. METHODS Patients aged ≥ 18 years with at least 1 visit to 1 of 1403 general and specialized practices in Germany in April 2020-March 2021 (n = 3,804,596) and April 2019-March 2020 (n = 3,913,386) were included in this retrospective study. Specialized practices were composed of gynecology, dermatology and urology practices. Cancer diagnoses included all types of cancer documented using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10 codes: C00-C97). The number of patients newly diagnosed with cancer per practice was compared between April 2020-March 2021 and April 2019-March 2020 using Wilcoxon tests. RESULTS There were 126,379 and 138,996 patients diagnosed with cancer in April 2020-March 2021 and April 2019-March 2020, respectively. The number of patients diagnosed with cancer decreased in all types of practice, and this decrease was significant in general practices (- 7.1%, p value = 0.038). In terms of cancer type, this decrease was particularly pronounced for skin cancers (- 12.8%, p value = 0.025). CONCLUSION The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with a decrease in the number of patients newly diagnosed with cancer in general and specialized practices in Germany. Public health interventions are urgently warranted to mitigate the deleterious effects of this health crisis on cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Jacob
- Research and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu/CIBERSAM, Dr. Antoni Pujadas, 42, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78180, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Matthias Kalder
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Philipps University of Marburg, 35037, Marburg, Germany
| | - Karel Kostev
- Department of Epidemiology, IQVIA, Unterschweinstiege 2-14, 60549, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ribes J, Pareja L, Sanz X, Mosteiro S, Escribà JM, Esteban L, Gálvez J, Osca G, Rodenas P, Pérez-Sust P, Borràs JM. Cancer diagnosis in Catalonia (Spain) after two years of COVID-19 pandemic: an incomplete recovery. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100486. [PMID: 35714476 PMCID: PMC9197337 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J Ribes
- Catalan Pathology Registry, Catalan Cancer Plan, Department of Health of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Cancer Registry Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - L Pareja
- Hospital Cancer Registry Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - X Sanz
- Catalan Pathology Registry, Catalan Cancer Plan, Department of Health of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Mosteiro
- Hospital Cancer Registry Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J M Escribà
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Cancer Registry Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Esteban
- Catalan Pathology Registry, Catalan Cancer Plan, Department of Health of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Gálvez
- Hospital Cancer Registry Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - G Osca
- Hospital Cancer Registry Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Rodenas
- Catalan Electronic Health Record, EHealth Office, Health/Catalan Health Service, Department of Health of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Pérez-Sust
- CatSalut Information Systems and Health Department ICT Unit, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J M Borràs
- Catalan Pathology Registry, Catalan Cancer Plan, Department of Health of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Differences in the Impact of COVID-19 on Pathology Laboratories and Cancer Diagnosis in Girona. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph182413269. [PMID: 34948878 PMCID: PMC8701849 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182413269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The recent COVID-19 pandemic has compromised socio-health care, with consequences for the diagnosis and follow-up of other pathologies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on cancer diagnosis in Girona, Spain. Methodology: Observational study of samples received in two pathology laboratories during 2019–2020 (tertiary hospital in Girona and county hospital in Figueres). Date, sample type, and location and morphology were available. Samples were recoded to determine malignancy and grouped by location. Comparisons were made by calendar year and period of exposure to COVID-19. Results: 102,360 samples were included: 80,517 from Girona and 21,843 from Figueres. The reduction in activity in the pathology laboratories in 2020 compared to the previous year was 25.4% in Girona and 27.5% in Figueres. The reduction in cancer diagnoses in 2020 compared to 2019 was 6.8% in Girona and 21% in Figueres. In both laboratories, a decrease was observed in the diagnoses of neoplasms of the lip, oral cavity and pharynx, larynx, colon, rectum and anus, kidney and urinary system, melanoma, and central nervous system. A statistically significant higher probability of a sample received in the pathology laboratory displaying malignancy during COVID-19 was found (Girona: OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.23–1.34; Figueres: OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01–1.20) with respect to the COVID-19-free period. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a reduction in cancer diagnoses by pathology departments that varies according to tumor location and type of hospital. Despite this, the optimization of care resources and the recovery effort have partially reduced the impact of the pandemic in certain neoplasms.
Collapse
|
13
|
Ng KS, Vardhanabhuti V. Chest-Related Imaging Investigations During Multiple Waves of COVID-19 Infection in Hong Kong. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:704515. [PMID: 34869408 PMCID: PMC8635515 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.704515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruption to healthcare worldwide. In this study, we aim to quantify its impact of chest related radiological procedures over the different waves of local infection in Hong Kong across the territory's public hospitals. Methods: This was an observational study enrolling patients between January 2017 and December 2020. Consecutive population-based chest radiographs, CT, US, and interventional radiology (IR) procedures were obtained public hospitals across Hong Kong. Results: A significant reduction of 10.0% (p < 0.001) in the total number of chest radiographs was observed. Non-significant reduction of 2.5% (p = 0.0989), 39.1% (p = 0.2135), and 1.9% (p = 0.8446) was observed for Chest CT, Chest US, and Chest IR procedures, respectively, in 2020 compared to the projected values. Conclusion: Although, it was anticipated that there would be a significant impact to health services caused by the pandemic, for chest-related investigations in Hong Kong, the impact was not as severe. Quantitative analysis could help with future planning and public health decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kei Shing Ng
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Varut Vardhanabhuti
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|