Epidemiology and outcomes of pregnancy and obstetric complications in trauma in the United Kingdom

CETARS/CAR Practice Guideline on Imaging the Pregnant Trauma Patient

Imaging of pregnant patients who sustained trauma often causes fear and confusion among patients, their families, and health care professionals regarding the potential for detrimental effects from radiation exposure to the fetus. Unnecessary delays or potentially harmful avoidance of the justified imaging studies may result from this understandable anxiety. This guideline was developed by the Canadian Emergency, Trauma and Acute Care Radiology Society (CETARS) and the Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Working Group on Imaging the Pregnant Trauma Patient, informed by a literature review as well as multidisciplinary expert panel opinions and discussions. The working group included academic subspecialty radiologists, a trauma team leader, an emergency physician, and an obstetriciangynaecologist/maternal fetal medicine specialist, who were brought together to provide updated, evidence-based recommendations for the imaging of pregnant trauma patients, including patient safety aspects (eg, radiation and contrast concerns) and counselling, initial imaging in maternal trauma, specific considerations for the use of fluoroscopy, angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging. The guideline strives to achieve clarity and prevent added anxiety in an already stressful situation of injury to a pregnant patient, who should not be imaged differently.

Emergency cesarean section in pregnant trauma patients presenting after motor vehicle collision

Background

Most pregnant trauma patients (PTPs) present after motor vehicle collision (MVC). The national rate and risk factors for emergency cesarean section (ECS) during the index hospitalization for pregnant trauma patients (PTPs) are unknown. We sought to investigate the national rate of ECS in PTPs presenting after MVC, hypothesizing a higher risk of ECS among those with severe injuries or elevated shock index (SI).

Methods

The 2020-2021 TQIP was queried for PTPs presenting after MVC. PTPs that underwent ECS were compared to patients that did not undergo ECS. Elevated SI was defined as ≥1. Severe injury was defined by abbreviated injury scale grade ≥3. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.

Results

From 1183 PTPs, 95 (8.0 %) underwent ECS. The median time to ECS was 115 min. The ECS group had higher rates of lung (27.4 % vs. 12.2 %, p < 0.001) injury, spleen (18.9 % vs. 5.5 %, p < 0.001) injury, and elevated SI (22.1 % vs. 9.8 %, p < 0.001). ECS patients had higher rates of complication (9.5 % vs. 2.1 %, p < 0.001) and death (4.2 % vs. 1.1 %, p = 0.012). Independently associated risk factors for ECS included severe head (OR 2.65, CI 1.14-6.17, p = 0.023) or abdominal (OR 2.07, CI 1.08-3.97, p = 0.028) injuries and elevated SI (OR 2.17 CI 1.25-3.79, p = 0.006).

Conclusion

The national rate of ECS among PTPs presenting after MVC is 8 % with most occurring within the first 2 hours of arrival. Severe head and abdominal injuries as well as elevated SI are risk factors for ECS.

Trauma in pregnancy: A narrative review of the current literature

INTRODUCTION

Trauma accounts for nearly half of all deaths of pregnant women. Pregnant women have distinct physiologic and anatomic characteristics which complicate their management following major trauma.

OBJECTIVE

This paper comprises a narrative review of the most recent literature informing the management of pregnant trauma patients.

DISCUSSION

The incidence of trauma during pregnancy is 6-8%. The focus of clinical assessment must be on the mother, starting with the primary survey. During airway management, clinicians should consider early intubation if necessary and utilize gastric tubes to minimize the risk of aspiration. Pregnant women experience progesterone-mediated hyperventilation, and normal PaCO2 levels may portend imminent respiratory failure. Clinicians should utilize left lateral tilt in hypotensive pregnant women to displace the uterus off the inferior vena cava. Ultrasonography is an attractive imaging modality for pregnant women which is specific for ruling in intraabdominal hemorrhage but not sufficiently sensitive to exclude this diagnosis. Clinicians should not hesitate to order computed tomography imaging in unstable patients if there is diagnostic ambiguity. Cardiotocographic monitoring simultaneously assesses uterine contractions and fetal heart rate and should last at least 4 h for pregnant women following even minor abdominal trauma if their fetus has achieved viable gestational age (approximately 24 weeks). In the event of cardiac arrest, peri-mortem cesarean section may improve outcomes for the mother and fetus alike. Unique specific complications include uterine rupture and placental abruption, which require emergent resuscitation and obstetrics consultation for definitive management. Emergency clinicians should maintain a low threshold for transfer to a tertiary care center given correlations between even isolated and relatively minor traumatic injuries with adverse fetal and maternal outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in pregnant women. Emergency clinicians must understand the evaluation and management of pregnant trauma patients.

National variation in guidance for the management of pregnant women presenting with major trauma

INTRODUCTION

The initial assessment of pregnant women presenting with significant injuries is more complicated than that of non-pregnant women because of physiological and anatomical changes, and the presence of the fetus. The aim of this study was to determine whether guidelines for the early management of severely injured pregnant women exist, which aspects of assessment/management they cover and to what extent there is national consistency.

METHODS

A freedom of information request was submitted to 125 acute National Health Service trusts in England and six in Wales. The trusts were asked to confirm whether they have a guideline for the management of major trauma in pregnant women presenting to the emergency department and what the guidelines were.

RESULTS

In total, 96.2% of trusts responded, of which 19% have a specific guideline and 7.9% have a generic guideline for assessing pregnant women in the emergency department, irrespective of injury severity. Of the responding trusts, 19.8% have a protocol that specifies when an obstetric trauma call should be put out by the emergency department and when a pregnant woman should be transferred to a major trauma centre for definitive management. Our results found that 69.8% routinely call obstetrics or gynaecology to the trauma call compared with 36.5% calling paediatrics.

CONCLUSIONS

The heterogeneity evident across trusts necessitates the establishment of national guidelines for the assessment of pregnant women with major trauma to standardise communication and delivery of care.

A pregnant woman with long-standing, retained intraabdominal glass shards who gave birth to a live infant with no complications: a case report

BACKGROUND

Most cases of traumatic injury during pregnancy involve blunt trauma, with penetrating trauma being uncommonly rare. In glass shard injuries, fragments often penetrate deeply, and multiple injuries may occur simultaneously; attention must be paid to the possibility of organ injury from the residual fragments. However, no case of this occurring during pregnancy has been reported yet.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 34-year-old pregnant Cameroonian woman who retained intraabdominal glass shards following a penetrating injury at 13 weeks gestation and not diagnosed until 22 weeks gestation. Notably, this patient continued the pregnancy without complications and gave birth via cesarean section at 36 weeks gestation.

CONCLUSION

In pregnant women sustaining a penetrating glass trauma during pregnancy, careful attention should be paid to the fragments; in that case, computed tomography is a useful modality for accurately visualizing any remaining fragments in the body. Essentially, the foreign bodies in glass shard injuries during pregnancy should be removed immediately, but conservative management for term delivery is an important choice for patients at risk for preterm delivery.

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Gunshot Wounds in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Case Reports

A systematic review was performed to compare adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes among pregnant patients with gunshot wounds (GSW) to the abdominopelvic vs other region(s) at > 20 weeks gestation. A search of Medline Ovid, Elsevier Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, and Cochrane Library in July 2022 and reference searches resulted in 1742 studies, which were screened. The 41 included studies reported outcomes for 59 pregnant patients with GSW, of which 31 (52.5%) had an isolated abdominopelvic GSW and 28 (47.5%) had an extremity, thorax, head/neck, back/spine, poly-site, or other/unknown GSW. Stillbirth occurred in 26.7% of abdominopelvic GSW and 26% of non-abdominopelvic GSW. Maternal death occurred in 3.7% of abdominopelvic GSW and 10.7% of non-abdominopelvic GSW. Neonatal death occurred in 9.1% of abdominopelvic GSW and 5.3% of non-abdominopelvic GSW. Further research is needed to standardize the approach for the evaluation and management of patients with GSW in pregnancy.

Maternal outcomes of pregnant patients after trauma: a retrospective study of the Trauma Registry of England and Wales

INTRODUCTION

Trauma accounts for 20% of deaths in pregnant women. Injury characterisation and outcome in pregnant women following trauma is poorly described. To understand and inform optimum care of this key injury population, a study was conducted using the Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) database.

METHODS

In total, 341 pregnant and 26,774 non-pregnant female patients aged 15 to 46 years were identified for comparison from the TARN database. Mortality, cross-sectional imaging, blood product administration and EQ-5D scores were compared between the two groups. Mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS) and mortality rate before and after the creation of regional trauma networks were reported for pregnant patients.

RESULTS

Pregnancy was recorded in 1.3% (341/27,115) of included patients, with the most common cause of injury being road traffic collisions. A reduction in crude maternal mortality was observed over the course of the study period (7.3% to 2.9%). Baseline mean EQ-5D (0.47) and EQ-VAS (54.08) improved to 0.81 (p < 0.001) and 85.75 (p = 0.001), respectively, at 6 months following injury.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of trauma in pregnancy is small and mortality in injured pregnant women decreased over the study period. Pregnant patients have significantly improved patient-reported outcome measures 6 months after injury although this is limited in impact because of poor response rates and outcome reporting. Construction and validation of tools aiding in outcome reporting will help considerably in understanding further gains in the care of pregnant women.

Predictors of fetal delivery in pregnant trauma patients: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Pregnant trauma patients (PTPs) undergo observation and fetal monitoring following trauma due to possible fetal delivery (FD) or adverse outcome. There is a paucity of data on PTP outcomes, especially related to risk factors for FD. We aimed to identify predictors of posttraumatic FD in potentially viable pregnancies.

METHODS

All PTPs (≥18 years) with ≥24-weeks gestational age were included in this multicenter retrospective study at 12 Level-I and II trauma centers between 2016 and 2021. Pregnant trauma patients who underwent FD ((+) FD) were compared to those who did not deliver ((-) FD) during the index hospitalization. Univariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify predictors of FD.

RESULTS

Of 591 PTPs, 63 (10.7%) underwent FD, with 4 (6.3%) maternal deaths. The (+) FD group was similar in maternal age (27 vs. 28 years, p = 0.310) but had older gestational age (37 vs. 30 weeks, p < 0.001) and higher mean injury severity score (7.0 vs. 1.5, p < 0.001) compared with the (-) FD group. The (+) FD group had higher rates of vaginal bleeding (6.3% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.002), uterine contractions (46% vs. 23.5%, p < 0.001), and abnormal fetal heart tracing (54.7% vs. 14.6%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors for (+) FD included abdominal injury (odds ratio [OR], 4.07; confidence interval [CI], 1.11-15.02; p = 0.035), gestational age (OR, 1.68 per week ≥24 weeks; CI, 1.44-1.95; p < 0.001), abnormal FHT (OR, 12.72; CI, 5.19-31.17; p < 0.001), and premature rupture of membranes (OR, 35.97; CI, 7.28-177.74; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The FD rate was approximately 10% for PTPs with viable fetal gestational age. Independent risk factors for (+) FD included maternal and fetal factors, many of which are available on initial trauma bay evaluation. These risk factors may help predict FD in the trauma setting and shape future guidelines regarding the recommended observation of PTPs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Major trauma in pregnancy: prediction of maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes

BACKGROUND

Trauma, largely the consequence of motor vehicle crashes, is the leading cause of pregnancy-associated maternal mortality. Prediction of adverse outcomes has been difficult in pregnancy given the infrequent occurrence of traumatic events and anatomic considerations unique to pregnancy. The injury severity score, an anatomic scoring system with weighting dependent on severity and anatomic region of injury, is used in the prediction of adverse outcomes in the nonpregnant population but has yet to be validated in pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate the associations between risk factors and adverse pregnancy outcomes after major trauma in pregnancy and to develop a clinical prediction model for adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective analysis of a cohort of pregnant patients who sustained major trauma and who were admitted to 1 of 2 level 1 trauma centers. Three composite adverse pregnancy outcomes were evaluated, namely adverse maternal outcomes and short- and long-term adverse perinatal outcomes, defined as outcomes occurring within the first 72 hours of the traumatic event or encompassing the entire pregnancy. Bivariate analyses were performed to estimate the associations between clinical or trauma-related variables and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to predict each adverse pregnancy outcome. The predictive performance of each model was estimated using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 119 pregnant trauma patients were included, 26.1% of whom met the severe adverse maternal pregnancy outcome criteria, 29.4% of whom met the severe short-term adverse perinatal pregnancy outcome definition, and 51.3% of whom met the severe long-term adverse perinatal pregnancy outcome definition. Injury severity score and gestational age were associated with the composite short-term adverse perinatal pregnancy outcome with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.20 (95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.30). The injury severity score was solely predictive of the adverse maternal and long-term adverse perinatal pregnancy outcomes with odds ratios of 1.65 (95% confidence interval, 1.31-2.09) and 1.14 (95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.23), respectively. An injury severity score ≥8 was the best cutoff for predicting adverse maternal outcomes with 96.8% sensitivity and 92.0% specificity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.990±0.006). An injury severity score ≥3 was the best cutoff for the short-term adverse perinatal outcomes, which correlates with a 68.6% sensitivity and 65.1% specificity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.755±0.055). An injury severity score ≥2 was the best cutoff for the long-term adverse perinatal outcomes, yielding a 68.3% sensitivity and 72.4% specificity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.763±0.042).

CONCLUSION

For pregnant trauma patients, an injury severity score of ≥8 was predictive of severe adverse maternal outcomes. Minor trauma in pregnancy, defined in this study as an injury severity score <2, was not associated with maternal or perinatal morbidity or mortality. These data can guide management decisions for pregnant patients who present after trauma.

Maternal outcomes in association with motor vehicle crashes during pregnancy: a nationwide population-based retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Limited studies have assessed the association of motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) during pregnancy with adverse maternal outcomes using a population-based nationwide dataset that covers all MVCs.

METHODS

A total of 20 844 births from women who had been involved in MVCs during pregnancy were obtained from the National Birth Notification (BN) Database in Taiwan. We randomly selected 83 274 control births from women in the BN matched on age, gestational age and crash date. All study subjects were linked to medical claims and the Death Registry to identify the maternal outcomes after crashes. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% CI of adverse outcomes associated with MVCs during pregnancy.

RESULTS

Pregnant women involved in MVCs had significantly higher risks of placental abruption (aOR=1.51, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.74), prolonged uterine contractions (aOR=1.31, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.53), antepartum haemorrhage (aOR=1.19, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.26) and caesarean delivery (aOR=1.05, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.09) than the controls. Such elevated risks tended to be higher in the MVCs with greater severity. Scooter riders had higher ORs of various adverse maternal outcomes than car drivers.

CONCLUSIONS

Women involved in MVCs during pregnancy were at increased risk of various adverse maternal outcomes, especially in those with severe MVCs and riding scooters at MVCs. These findings suggest that clinicians should be aware of these effects, and educational materials that include the above information should be provided as part of prenatal care.

Ten Rules for the Management of Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury During Pregnancy: An Expert Viewpoint

Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) are major causes of disability and death. In addition, when TBI occurs during pregnancy, it can lead to miscarriage, premature birth, and maternal/fetal death, engendering clinical and ethical issues. Several recommendations have been proposed for the management of TBI patients; however, none of these have been specifically applied to pregnant women, which often have been excluded from major trials. Therefore, at present, evidence on TBI management in pregnant women is limited and mostly based on clinical experience. The aim of this manuscript is to provide the clinicians with practical suggestions, based on 10 rules, for the management of moderate to severe TBI during pregnancy. In particular, we firstly describe the pathophysiological changes occurring during pregnancy; then we explore the main strategies for the diagnosis of TBI taking in consideration the risks related to mother and fetus, and finally we discuss the most appropriate approaches for the management in this particular condition. Based on the available evidence, we suggest a stepwise approach consisting of different tiers of treatment and we describe the specific risks according to the severity of the neurological and systemic conditions of both fetus and mother in relation to each trimester of pregnancy. The innovative feature of this approach is the fact that it focuses on the vulnerability and specificity of this population, without forgetting the current knowledge on adult non-pregnant patients, which has to be applied to improve the quality of the care process.

Risk of Mortality in Association with Pregnancy in Women Following Motor Vehicle Crashes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The aim of the study was to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the association between mortality risk and motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) in pregnant women compared with nonpregnant women. We used relevant MeSH terms to identify epidemiological studies of mortality risk in relation to MVCs from PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used for quality assessment. For comparison of mortality from MVCs between pregnant and nonpregnant women, the pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. The eight studies selected met all inclusion criteria. These studies included 14,120 injured victims who were pregnant at the time of the incident and 207,935 victims who were not pregnant. Compared with nonpregnant women, pregnant women had a moderate but insignificant decrease in mortality risk (pooled OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.38–1.22, I² = 88.71%). Subgroup analysis revealed that the pooled OR significantly increased at 1.64 (95% CI = 1.16–2.33, I² < 0.01%) for two studies with a similar difference in the mean injury severity score (ISS) between pregnant and nonpregnant women. Future studies should further explore the risk factors associated with MVCs in pregnant women to reduce maternal mortality.

Epidemiology of pregnant patients with major trauma in Victoria

OBJECTIVE

Trauma is one of the most common contributors to maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality. The aim of the present study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of major trauma in pregnant patients using a population-based registry.

METHODS

Registry-based study using data from the Victorian State Trauma Registry (VSTR), a population-based database of all hospitalised major trauma (death due to injury, Injury Severity Score [ISS] ≥12, admission to an intensive care unit [ICU] for more than 24 h and requiring mechanical ventilation for at least part of their ICU stay or urgent surgery) in Victoria, Australia, from 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2019. Pregnant patients with major trauma were identified on the VSTR. We summarised patient data using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Over the 12-year study period, there were 63 pregnant major trauma patients. Fifty-two (82.5%) patients sustained injuries resulting from road transport collisions. The maternal survival rate was 98.4% and the foetal survival rate was 88.9%. Thoracic injury was the most common injury (25/63), followed by abdominal injury (23/63). Eighty-six percent of the third trimester patients (19/22) were transported directly to a major trauma service with capacity for definitive care of the pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated road transport injury was the most common mechanism of injury and both maternal survival rates and foetal survival rates were high. This information is essential for trauma care system planning and public health initiatives to improve the clinical management and outcomes of pregnant women with major trauma.

Association of Traumatic Injury With Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Taiwan, 2004 to 2014

IMPORTANCE

Literature has suggested that trauma among pregnant women is associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, limited research has investigated the association of trauma with adverse pregnancy outcomes by using a national data set.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between traumatic injury and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This population-based cohort study of pregnant women in Taiwan linked 3 data sets, the Taiwan Birth Registry, Household Registration Information, and National Health Insurance Research Database, from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2014. Data, including the characteristics of pregnant women and infants, were extracted from the Taiwan Birth Registry data set; to obtain trauma data, this data set and the Household Registration Information data set were collectively linked to National Health Insurance Research Database data. The combined data set was analyzed from January to July 2019. Adverse pregnancy outcomes and premature delivery were defined using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes.

EXPOSURES

The primary exposures of this study were 2 clinical variables related to injury during pregnancy: medical treatment in the emergency department (yes or no) and hospitalization (yes or no).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome variable was adverse pregnancy outcomes, and the secondary outcome variable was premature delivery. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to investigate the association of injuries with adverse pregnancy outcomes after controlling for demographic characteristics and other pregnancy-related variables.

RESULTS

A total of 2 973 831 pregnant women (2 475 805 [83.3%] aged 20-34 years) were enrolled between 2004 and 2014, of whom 59 681 (2.0%) sought medical treatments due to injuries. Results of multivariate logistic regression models showed that women receiving emergency treatments more than once were 1.08 times as likely (adjusted odds ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.05-1.10) to have adverse pregnancy outcomes than women who received no emergency treatment. Women with injury-related hospitalization were 1.53 times more likely (adjusted odds ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.41-1.65) to have adverse pregnancy outcomes than women who did not sustain injuries. Furthermore, recurrent injuries were associated with a 572% increase in odds of premature delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 6.72; 95% CI, 2.86-15.80).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, trauma among pregnant women was associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, as were hospitalization and emergency department visits due to injury.

Predictors of obstetric complications following traumatic injuries in pregnancy

BACKGROUND

After a traumatic injury, the provision of appropriate, timely care to pregnant women jury is crucial for the health of both the mother and fetus. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors predicting post-traumatic obstetric complications in pregnant women who presented to the emergency department (ED) with traumatic injuries.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women aged 18 y and older who were admitted to the trauma unit of our ED between 2017 and 2020. The data collected included maternal demographics, trauma mechanism, and pregnancy outcome. The patients were divided into two subgroups according to the presence or absence of trauma-related complications, and clinical features were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In total, 241 pregnant trauma patients were included in the study. The mean maternal age was 26.1 ± 4.4 y, and the mean gestational age the time of the trauma was 28.4 ± 6.8 wk. In the study, 17.8% (43/241) of patients experienced obstetric-related complications within the first 24 h post-trauma. The risk factors associated with obstetric complications were aged older than 35 y (odds ratio [OR] = 5.31,95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.77-15.96, p = 0.003), third trimester trauma (OR = 2.41,95% CI:1.14-5.12, p = 0.021), and abnormal obstetric ultrasonography (OR = 6.25,95% CI:2.03-19.22, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Among pregnant patients who present to the ED after a traumatic injury, advanced maternal age, trauma in the third trimester, and abnormal obstetric ultrasonography findings should alert physicians to the possibility of post-traumatic complications (within the first 24 h after trauma) and the need for close monitoring.

[The (severely) injured pregnant patient from the perspective of trauma surgery]

BACKGROUND

Trauma is the leading cause for nonpregnancy-linked maternal mortality in pregnant women, even though the exact incidence for accidents in pregnancy is unknown. Trauma management concepts applied for nonpregnant adult patients are just as valid for injured and severely injured pregnant women but in addition trauma management has to consider the unique physiological and pathophysiological conditions for a favorable maternal and fetal outcome.

OBJECTIVE

Overview of current data about the epidemiology, injury mechanisms, maternal and fetal outcome and recommendations on the management of injured pregnant women based on a systematic literature search.

RESULTS

Currently, there is no evidence indicating an association between maternal injury severity, the physiological condition and the fetal outcome. Practice guidelines for trauma management in pregnancy recommend prioritization of maternal treatment and resuscitation for optimal initial treatment of the fetus. The current recommendations for trauma room management in pregnancy, surgical treatment, including damage control surgery, are based on weak evidence.

CONCLUSION

The examination, stabilization and treatment of injured pregnant women has priority for fetal survival and outcome. The management of severe trauma in pregnancy requires a multidisciplinary expertise and team approach consisting of surgeons, anesthetists, radiologists, obstetricians and neonatologists, so that for a severely injured gravida, the decision for admission to designated trauma centers is already preclinically made. The principles of management and treatment of severely injured pregnant women should adhere to the treatment principles of nonpregnant trauma victims.

[Development of a new module for the TraumaRegister DGU® : Better collation of the sequelae of severe injuries during pregnancy]

BACKGROUND

Life-threatening injuries during pregnancy are a rare occurrence. The TraumaRegister DGU^® (TR-DGU) has been recording whether seriously injured women were pregnant since 2016. This information is not sufficient to enable a differentiated assessment of the quality of care because parameters, such as gestational age, state of pregnancy at discharge and survival of the child are missing. The TraumaRegister working group of the committee on emergency medicine, intensive care and severe trauma management (section NIS) of the German Trauma Society (DGU) therefore came to the conclusion that the fetal outcome or the intactness of the pregnancy after acute treatment is an important measure of the quality of care of pregnant women. They commissioned a task force to work out a suitable data set for a better analysis of such cases. This article presents the so-called fetus module in detail.

METHODS

The data set was developed in an interdisciplinary process together with accredited experts from the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the German Society for Perinatal Medicine (DGPM) and the Society for Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine (GNPI).

RESULTS

The fetus module comprises 20 parameters describing the pregnancy, the condition of the mother and child on admission and discharge.

CONCLUSION

The fetus module will provide important data to make the process and outcome quality of care of severely injured pregnant women measurable and to develop prognostic instruments with which predictions about high-risk constellations for the outcome of mother and child can be made.

[Acute treatment of pregnant women after severe trauma-a retrospective multicenter analysis]

BACKGROUND

For the medical team, the management of pregnant trauma patients is a particular challenge. The aim of this study is to compile this data and to determine differences between pregnant and not pregnant trauma patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We carried out a retrospective data analysis from the TraumaRegister DGU® with a comparison of 102 pregnant and 3135 not pregnant women of child-bearing age (16-45 years) from 2016-2018 who were treated in a trauma center. All patients were delivered to the resuscitation room and received intensive care treatment.

RESULTS

In Germany, Austria and Switzerland 3.2% of all trauma patients (102 women) were pregnant. Women with an average age of 29 years suffered most often trauma as a result of a road traffic accident. Major trauma (Injury Severity Score [ISS] ≥16 points) was seen in 24.5% of the pregnant women and 37.4% of the nonpregnant women. A computer tomography (whole body computer tomography) was carried out in 32.7% of all pregnant women but in 79.8% of the nonpregnant women. As a result of the trauma, 2.9% of the pregnant and 3.5% of the not pregnant women died. The standardised mortality rate (SMR) was 0.42 in pregnant women and 0.63 in nonpregnant women.

CONCLUSION

For the first time there is data regarding incidence, trauma mechanism, prehospital and in-hospital care as well as intensive care of pregnant trauma patients in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Further research regarding foetal outcome and trauma-related injuries in pregnant women is needed to develop an adjusted management for these patients ready to implement in trauma centres. Gynaecologists and obstetricians should be implemented in the trauma room team when needed.

Maternal trauma due to motor vehicle crashes and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review and quantify the effect of motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) in pregnancy on maternal and offspring outcomes.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational data searched from inception until 1 July 2018. Searching was from June to August 2018 in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Latin-American and Caribbean System on Health Sciences Information, Scientific Electronic Library Online, TRANSPORT, International Road Research Documentation, European Conference of Ministers of Transportation Databases, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register.

PARTICIPANTS

Studies were selected if they focused on the effects of exposure MVC during pregnancy versus non-exposure, with follow-up to verify outcomes in various settings, including secondary care, collision and emergency, and inpatient care.

DATA SYNTHESIS

For incidence data, we calculated a pooled estimate per 1000 women. For comparison of outcomes between women involved and those not involved in MVC, we calculated ORs with 95% CIs. Where possible, we statistically pooled the data using the random-effects model. The quality of studies used in the comparative analysis was assessed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

We included 19 studies (3 222 066 women) of which the majority was carried out in high-income countries (18/19). In population-level studies of women involved in MVC, maternal death occurred in 3.6 per 1000 (95% CI 0.25-10.42; 3 studies, 12 000 women; Tau=1.77), and fetal death or stillbirth in 6.6 per 1000 (95% CI 3.81-10.12; 8 studies, 47 992 women; I2=92.6%). Pooled incidence of complications per 1000 women involved in MVC was labour induction (276.43), preterm delivery (191.90) and caesarean section (166.65). Compared with women not involved in MVC, those involved had increased odds of placental abruption (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.27-1.63; 3 studies, 1 500 825 women) and maternal death (OR 202.27; 95% CI 110.60-369.95; 1 study, 1 094 559 women).

CONCLUSION

Pregnant women involved in MVC were at higher risk of maternal death and complications than those not involved.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018100788.

Pregnant trauma patients may be at increased risk of mortality compared to nonpregnant women of reproductive age: trends and outcomes over 10 years at a level I trauma center

Background:

Pregnancy has been identified as a risk factor for poor outcomes after traumatic injury, but prior outcome analyses are conflicting and dated. We sought to examine outcomes in a contemporary cohort.

Methods:

Retrospective cohort analysis at a level I trauma center’s institutional registry from 2009 to 2018, with comparison to population-level demographic trends in women of reproductive age and pregnancy prevalence. Unadjusted cohorts of pregnant versus nonpregnant trauma patients were compared. Pregnant patients then were matched on age, mechanism of injury, year, and injury severity score with nonpregnant controls for adjusted analysis with a primary outcome of maternal mortality.

Results:

Despite declining birth and pregnancy rates in the population, pregnant women comprised a stable 5.3% of female trauma patients of reproductive age without decline over the study period (p = 0.53). Compared with nonpregnant women, pregnant trauma patients had a lower injury severity score (1 [1–5] vs 5 [1–10] p < 0.0001) and a shorter length of stay (1 [1–2] vs 1 [1–4] p = 0.04), were less likely to have CT imaging (48.8% vs 67.4%, p < 0.0001) and more likely to be admitted (89.3% vs 79.2%, p = 0.003). Positive toxicology screens were less prevalent in pregnant women, but only for ethanol (5.4% vs 31.4%, p < 0.0001); there was no difference in rates of cannabis, opiates, or cocaine. After matching to adjust for age, year, mechanism of injury, and injury severity score, mortality occurred significantly more frequently in the pregnant cohort (2.1% vs 0.2%, OR = 13.5 [1.39–130.9], p = 0.02).

Conclusion:

Pregnant trauma patients have not declined in our population despite population-level declines in pregnancy. After adjusting for lower injury severity, pregnant women were at substantially greater risk of mortality. This supports ongoing concern for pregnant trauma patients as a vulnerable population. Further efforts should optimize systems of care to maximize the chances of rescue for both mother and fetus.

The unborn fetus: The unrecognized victim of trauma during pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Trauma is the leading cause of non-obstetric death in pregnancy. While maternal management is defined, few studies have examined the effects on the fetus.

METHODS

Following IRB approval, all pregnant females (2010-2017) at a level-1 trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. Maternal and fetal demographics, interventions, and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 188 pregnancies in 5654 females. Maternal demographics were 26 ± 7 years old, gestational age at trauma 21 ± 12 weeks, 81% blunt mechanism, and maternal mortality 6%. Forty-one (22%) fetuses were immediately affected by the trauma including 20 (11%) born alive, 12 (7%) fetal demise, and 9 (5%) stillbirths. Of those that initially survived (n = 20), 5 (25%) expired during neonatal hospitalization. Two mothers returned immediately after trauma discharge with stillbirths for an overall infant mortality of 14% (n = 26). There were 84 patients with complete data to delivery including the 41 born at trauma and 43 born on a subsequent hospitalization. Those born at the time of trauma had significantly more delivery/neonatal complications and worse outcomes. Overall trauma burden to the fetus (preterm delivery, stillbirth, delivery/neonatal complication, or long-term disability) was 66% (56/84).

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma during pregnancy has significant immediate mortality and delayed effects on the unborn fetus. This study has uncovered a previously hidden burden and mortality of trauma during pregnancy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Prehospital education in triage for pediatric and pregnant patients in a regional trauma system without collocated pediatric and adult trauma centers

PURPOSE

Patient triage to the appropriate destination is critical to prehospital trauma care. Triage decisions are challenging in a region without collocated pediatric and adult trauma centers.

METHODS

A regional survey was administered to emergency medical response units identifying variability and confusion regarding factors influencing patient disposition. A course was developed to guide the triage of pediatric and pregnant trauma patients. Pre- and posttests were administered to address course principles, including decision making and triage.

RESULTS

A total of 445 participants completed the course at 22 sites representing 88 different prehospital provider agencies. Pre- and posttests were administered to 62% of participants with an average score improvement of 53.4% (pretest range 30% to 56.6%; posttest range 85% to 100%). Improvements were seen in all categories including major and minor trauma in pregnancy, major trauma in adolescence, and knowledge of age limits and triage protocols.

CONCLUSION

Education on triage guidelines and principles of pediatric resuscitation is essential for appropriate prehospital trauma management. Pre- and posttests may be used to demonstrate short term efficacy, while ongoing evaluations of practice patterns and follow-up surveys are needed to demonstrate longevity of acquired knowledge and identify areas of persistent confusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Case Series without Standardized.

The prediction of fetal death with a simple maternal blood test at 20-24 weeks: a role for angiogenic index-1 (PlGF/sVEGFR-1 ratio)

BACKGROUND

Fetal death is an obstetrical syndrome that annually affects 2.4 to 3 million pregnancies worldwide, including more than 20,000 in the United States each year. Currently, there is no test available to identify patients at risk for this pregnancy complication.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine if maternal plasma concentrations of angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors measured at 24-28 weeks of gestation can predict subsequent fetal death.

STUDY DESIGN

A case-cohort study was designed to include 1000 randomly selected subjects and all remaining fetal deaths (cases) from a cohort of 4006 women with a singleton pregnancy, enrolled at 6-22 weeks of gestation, in a pregnancy biomarker cohort study. The placentas of all fetal deaths were histologically examined by pathologists who used a standardized protocol and were blinded to patient outcomes. Placental growth factor, soluble endoglin, and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Quantiles of the analyte concentrations (or concentration ratios) were estimated as a function of gestational age among women who delivered a live neonate but did not develop preeclampsia or deliver a small-for-gestational-age newborn. A positive test was defined as analyte concentrations (or ratios) <2.5th and 10th centiles (placental growth factor, placental growth factor/soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 [angiogenic index-1] and placental growth factor/soluble endoglin) or >90th and 97.5th centiles (soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 and soluble endoglin). Inverse probability weighting was used to reflect the parent cohort when estimating the relative risk.

RESULTS

There were 11 fetal deaths and 829 controls with samples available for analysis between 24-28 weeks of gestation. Three fetal deaths occurred <28 weeks and 8 occurred ≥28 weeks of gestation. The rate of placental lesions consistent with maternal vascular underperfusion was 33.3% (1/3) among those who had a fetal death <28 weeks and 87.5% (7/8) of those who had this complication ≥28 weeks of gestation. The maternal plasma angiogenic index-1 value was <10th centile in 63.6% (7/11) of the fetal death group and in 11.1% (92/829) of the controls. The angiogenic index-1 value was <2.5th centile in 54.5% (6/11) of the fetal death group and in 3.7% (31/829) of the controls. An angiogenic index-1 value <2.5th centile had the largest positive likelihood ratio for predicting fetal death >24 weeks (14.6; 95% confidence interval, 7.7-27.7) and a relative risk of 29.1 (95% confidence interval, 8.8-97.1), followed by soluble endoglin >97.5th centile and placental growth factor/soluble endoglin <2.5th, both with a positive likelihood ratio of 13.7 (95% confidence interval, 7.3-25.8) and a relative risk of 27.4 (95% confidence interval, 8.2-91.2). Among women without a fetal death whose plasma angiogenic index-1 concentration ratio was <2.5th centile, 61% (19/31) developed preeclampsia or delivered a small-for-gestational-age neonate; when the 10th centile was used as the cut-off, 37% (34/92) of women had these adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

(1) A maternal plasma angiogenic index-1 value <2.5th centile (0.126) at 24-28 weeks of gestation carries a 29-fold increase in the risk of subsequent fetal death and identifies 55% of subsequent fetal deaths with a false-positive rate of 3.5%; and (2) 61% of women who have a false-positive test result will subsequently experience adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Management of pregnancy and obstetric complications in prehospital trauma care: prehospital resuscitative hysterotomy/perimortem caesarean section

The need for prehospital resuscitative hysterotomy/perimortem caesarean section is rare. The procedures can be daunting and clinically challenging for practitioners. Maternal death can be averted by swift and decisive action. This guideline serves to inform prehospital practitioners about conducting maternal resuscitation following cardiac arrest, provides an evidence-based framework to support decision making and highlights areas for improvement in prehospital care.

Management of pregnancy and obstetric complications in prehospital trauma care: faculty of prehospital care consensus guidelines

This consensus statement seeks to provide clear guidance for the management of pregnant trauma patients in the prehospital setting. Pregnant patients sustaining trauma injuries have certain clinical management priorities beyond that of the non-pregnant trauma patients and that if overlooked may be detrimental to maternal and fetal outcomes.