Complicated Pericarditis: Understanding Risk Factors and Pathophysiology to Inform Imaging and Treatment

Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Treatment of Pericarditis: A Review

Importance

Pericarditis accounts for up to 5% of emergency department visits for nonischemic chest pain in North America and Western Europe. With appropriate treatment, 70% to 85% of these patients have a benign course. In acute pericarditis, the development of constrictive pericarditis (<0.5%) and pericardial tamponade (<3%) can be life-threatening.

Observations

Acute pericarditis is diagnosed with presence of 2 or more of the following: sharp, pleuritic chest pain that worsens when supine (≈90%); new widespread electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation and PR depression (≈25%-50%); a new or increased pericardial effusion that is most often small (≈60%); or a pericardial friction rub (<30%). In North America and Western Europe, the most common causes of acute pericarditis are idiopathic or viral, followed by pericarditis after cardiac procedures or operations. Tuberculosis is the most common cause in endemic areas and is treated with antituberculosis therapy, with corticosteroids considered for associated constrictive pericarditis. Treatment of acute idiopathic and pericarditis after cardiac procedures or operations involves use of high-dose nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), with doses tapered once chest pain has resolved and C-reactive protein level has normalized, typically over several weeks. These patients should receive a 3-month course of colchicine to relieve symptoms and reduce the risk of recurrence (37.5% vs 16.7%; absolute risk reduction, 20.8%). With a first recurrence of pericarditis, colchicine should be continued for at least 6 months. Corticosteroids are often used if pericarditis does not improve with NSAIDs and colchicine. In certain patients with multiple recurrences, which can occur for several years, interleukin 1 (IL-1) blockers have demonstrated efficacy and may be preferred to corticosteroids.

Conclusions

Acute pericarditis is a common cause of nonischemic chest pain. Tuberculosis is the leading cause of pericarditis in endemic areas and is treated with antitubercular therapy. In North America and Western Europe, pericarditis is typically idiopathic, develops after a viral infection, or develops following cardiac procedures or surgery. Treatment with NSAIDs and colchicine leads to a favorable prognosis in most patients, although 15% to 30% of patients develop recurrence. Patients with multiple recurrent pericarditis can have a disease duration of several years or more, are often treated with corticosteroids, and IL-1 blockers may be used for selected patients as steroid-sparing therapy.

Recurrent pericarditis and interleukin (IL)-1 inhibitors

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is defined by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) as an instance of acute pericarditis (AP) that occurs at least 4-6 weeks after the resolution of a previous episode of the same ailment. To mitigate the risk of RP, it is advised to administer accurate and prolonged pharmacological treatment for both the initial AP and subsequent RP. ESC guidelines recommend commencing treatment for any single episode of AP, including those that contribute to RP, with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in conjunction with colchicine for several months, often followed by gradual tapering. If there is an inadequate response, corticosteroids (CS) may be introduced cautiously. However, in a minority of cases, even when NSAIDs, colchicine, and CS are administered together at the highest recommended dosages, they may prove ineffective. In such instances, treatment with immunosuppressive drugs or biologics is advised. Among biologics, interleukin (IL)-1 inhibitors have been extensively studied, although certain gaps remain. This narrative review delves into the rationale for employing IL-1 inhibitors and presents findings from existing studies regarding their efficacy, tolerability, and safety. Analysis of the literature indicates that there is currently insufficient data to ascertain the true therapeutic role of IL-1 inhibitors in managing and preventing RP. However, theoretically, drugs targeting both IL-1α and IL-1β may offer superior efficacy compared to those solely targeting IL-1β due to the significant involvement of both cytokines in inflammation. Further research is warranted to determine the comparative effectiveness of IL-1α and IL-1β inhibitors.

Novel Treatments in Refractory Recurrent Pericarditis

Refractory recurrent pericarditis is a troublesome condition that severely impairs the quality of life of affected patients and significantly increases healthcare spending. Until recently, therapeutic options included only a few medications and most of the patients resorted to chronic glucocorticoid treatment with steroid dependence. In the most recent decade, the introduction of interleukin-1 blockers in clinical practice has revolutionized the treatment of glucocorticoid-dependent and colchicine-resistant recurrent pericarditis due to their excellent efficacy and good safety profile. The rationale for the introduction of this class of medications in clinical practice is the autoinflammatory nature of recurrent pericarditis in a substantial rate of cases, with interleukin-1 being the main pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in this context. This review aims to discuss the contemporary available evidence from original research and real-world data on interleukin-1 blocker use in refractory recurrent pericarditis, in terms of indications, mechanism of action, efficacy, side effects, and recommended treatment protocols. Moreover, novel treatment proposals, such as hydroxychloroquine, beta blockers, and cannabidiol, which showed encouraging preliminary results, are addressed. Finally, gaps in knowledge, unmet needs, and future perspectives related to recurrent pericarditis are thoroughly discussed.

Pericardial Diseases and Best Practices for Pericardiectomy: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Remarkable advances have occurred in the understanding of the pathophysiology of pericardial diseases and the role of multimodality imaging in this field. Medical therapy and surgical options for pericardial diseases have also evolved substantially. Pericardiectomy is indicated for chronic or irreversible constrictive pericarditis, refractory recurrent pericarditis despite optimal medical therapy, or partial agenesis of the pericardium with a complication (eg, herniation). A multidisciplinary evaluation before pericardiectomy is essential for optimal patient outcomes. Overall, given the good outcomes reported, radical pericardiectomy on cardiopulmonary bypass, if feasible, is the preferred approach. Due to patient complexity, as well as the technical aspects of the surgery, pericardiectomy should be performed at high-volume centers that have the required expertise. The current review highlights the essential features of this multidisciplinary approach from diagnosis to recovery in patients undergoing pericardiectomy.

Efficacy and Safety of Interleukin-1 Inhibitors in the Management of Patients with Recurrent Pericarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of interleukin-1 (IL-1) inhibitors in patients with recurrent pericarditis (RP) remain to be determined.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the impact of IL-1 inhibitors on patients suffering from RP.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched to identify articles investigating the effects of IL-1 inhibitors in patients with RP up until January 2024. Relevant data on study characteristics and results were selected based on predefined criteria. The results were combined using a random effects model.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 102 patients from three open-label randomized controlled trials. Overall, the use of IL-1 inhibitors, in comparison to placebo, demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of pericarditis recurrence [risk ratio (RR) 0.13; 95% confident interval (CI) 0.05-0.30; p < 0.05; I2 = 0%]. However, the administration of IL-1 inhibitors may lead to certain adverse events (AEs), including infections and injection-site reactions. The risk of AEs is significantly higher with IL-1 inhibitors compared with placebo (RR 1.88; 95% CI 1.30-2.72; p < 0.05; I2 = 0%). Nevertheless, the occurrence of serious AEs among patients was relatively rare, and no fatalities were reported.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that IL-1 inhibitors can effectively reduce the risk of recurrence in patients with RP and are relatively safe.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO identifier number CRD42023492904.

Interleukin-1 Blockers for the Treatment of Recurrent Pericarditis: Pathophysiology, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Perspectives

ABSTRACT

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is the most troublesome complication of acute pericarditis reflecting an unresolving inflammation of the pericardial sac around the heart and associated with significant morbidity. Recent studies have shown interleukin-1 (IL-1) signaling to be central to the pathophysiology of cases of RP with evidence of activation of systemic inflammation. We herein review the literature and clinical trials discussing the utility of IL-1 blockade for RP. The early experience of IL-1 blockade with anakinra (Kineret) and its favorable safety profile paved the way for the clinical development of rilonacept (Arcalyst) and subsequent approval by the US FDA for RP. In patients with RP who have become colchicine-resistant and glucocorticoid-dependent, IL-1 blockade with rilonacept or anakinra effectively treats recurrences and prevents future flares and significantly improves quality of life.

Novel Therapeutic Insights Into the Treatment of Pericarditis: Targeting the Innate Immune System

ABSTRACT

Acute pericarditis is characterized by pericardial inflammation that can be treated with anti-inflammatory drugs. A considerable percentage of patients develops recurrent pericarditis with several relapses. In developed countries, the idiopathic form is the most frequent and has a high risk of recurrences. Two pathophysiological mechanisms have been described for idiopathic recurrent pericarditis: autoimmune and autoinflammatory. The autoimmune mechanism is more frequently encountered in patients with rheumatologic disorders, especially systemic lupus erythematosus. The innate immune system plays a central role in the pathophysiology of pericarditis, especially in the autoinflammatory phenotype. Current evidence highlights the central role played by interleukin 1 and NLRP3 (NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) in idiopathic recurrent pericarditis. Accordingly, interleukin 1 blockers have been approved for the treatment of this condition. Neutrophils are likely to be important in such setting; however, their role has only been partially investigated. In the present review, we have collected the current knowledge on the role of innate immune system in pericarditis pathophysiology and how this can be used to provide targeted treatments for patients with recurrent pericarditis.

INFLA-score: A new diagnostic paradigm to identify pericarditis

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of pericarditis may be challenging because not all patients meet the conventional criteria. An overlooked diagnosis implies a longer course of symptoms and an increased risk of recurrences. C-reactive protein (CRP), widely used as an inflammation marker, has some limitations. This study aimed to assess the usefulness and prognostic value of INFLA-score, a validated index assessing low-grade inflammation, in the definite diagnosis of pericarditis.

METHODS

Patients with suspected pericarditis were included. The INFLA-score was computed based on white blood cells and platelet count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and CRP, ranging from -16 to +16. An INFLA-score > 0 was considered positive for the presence of pericardial inflammation. The primary end point was the association of INFLA-score with diagnosis of pericarditis according to conventional criteria. The recurrence of pericarditis at 6 months was the secondary end point.

RESULTS

A total of 202 patients were included, aged 47 ± 17 years, and 57% were females. Among 72 (36%) patients with a diagnosis of pericarditis, an INFLA-score > 0 was observed in 86% (vs. 36%, p < 0.001), abnormal CRP in 42% (vs. 10%, p < 0.001), pericardial effusion in 44% (vs. 19%, p < 0.001), abnormal electrocardiogram in 56% (vs. 24%, p < 0.001), and rubs in 5% (vs. 0.1%, p = 0.072). INFLA-score > 0 had the strongest predictive value for the diagnosis of pericarditis (hazard ratio 8.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.39-21.21), with 86% sensitivity and 64% specificity, as opposed to CRP (hazard ratio 1.72, non-significant 95% CI 0.69-4.29). Recurrent pericarditis at 6 months was more frequent in patients with a positive INFLA-score (37% vs. 8%, p < 0.001, rate ratio 4.15, 95% CI 2.81-6.12). In patients with normal CRP, INFLA-score-confirmed ongoing inflammation in 78% of the cases. Compared with the conventional criteria, the INFLA-score had the highest accuracy (area under the curve = 0.82). Different cutoffs were valuable to rule out (INFLA-score > 0, sensitivity 86%, and negative likelihood ratio 0.22) or rule in (INFLA-score ≥ 10, specificity 97%, and positive likelihood ratio 13) the diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The INFLA-score is a useful diagnostic tool to assess the probability of pericarditis, with a strong prognostic value for further recurrences, outperforming CRP.

Surgical Approaches for Pericardial Diseases: What Is New?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to discuss the evolving techniques and approaches for pericardiectomy, with a focus on the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and the extent of radical pericardial resection. The review aims to highlight the benefits and considerations associated with these modifications in radical pericardiectomy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have demonstrated that the use of CPB during pericardiectomy does not increase procedural risk or negatively impact survival. In fact, it has been shown to contribute to a more radical resection and improve postoperative outcomes, which is associated with less recurrence and better survival. The review emphasizes the importance of radical pericardiectomy and the use of CPB in achieving successful outcomes. Radical resection of the pericardium, facilitated by CPB, helps minimize the risk of recurrent constrictions and the need for reinterventions. The findings highlight the correlation between postoperative outcomes and survival, further supporting the use of CPB.

In-hospital adverse events and recurrence in hospitalized patients with acute pericarditis

BACKGROUND

Acute pericarditis occasionally requires invasive treatment, and may recur after discharge. However, there are no studies on acute pericarditis in Japan, and its clinical characteristics and prognosis are unknown.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of clinical characteristics, invasive procedures, mortality, and recurrence in patients with acute pericarditis hospitalized from 2010 to 2022. The primary in-hospital outcome was adverse events (AEs), a composite of all-cause mortality and cardiac tamponade. The primary outcome in the long-term analysis was hospitalization for recurrent pericarditis.

RESULTS

The median age of all 65 patients was 65.0 years [interquartile range (IQR), 48.0-76.0 years], and 49 (75.3 %) were male. The etiology of acute pericarditis was idiopathic in 55 patients (84.6 %), collagenous in 5 (7.6 %), bacterial in 1 (1.5 %), malignant in 3 (4.6 %), and related to previous open-heart surgery in 1 (1.5 %). Of the 8 patients (12.3 %) with in-hospital AE, 1 (1.5 %) died during hospitalization and 7 (10.8 %) developed cardiac tamponade. Patients with AE were less likely to have chest pain (p = 0.011) but were more likely to have symptoms lasting 72 h after treatment (p = 0.006), heart failure (p < 0.001), and higher levels of C-reactive protein (p = 0.040) and B-type natriuretic peptide (p = 0.032). All patients complicated with cardiac tamponade were treated with pericardial drainage or pericardiotomy. We analyzed 57 patients for recurrent pericarditis after excluding 8 patients: 1 with in-hospital death, 3 with malignant pericarditis, 1 with bacterial pericarditis, and 3 lost to follow-up. During a median follow-up of 2.5 years (IQR 1.3-3.0 years), 6 patients (10.5 %) had recurrences requiring hospitalization. The recurrence rate of pericarditis was not associated with colchicine treatment or aspirin dose or titration.

CONCLUSIONS

In acute pericarditis requiring hospitalization, in-hospital AE and recurrence were each observed in >10 % of patients. Further large studies on treatment are warranted.

D-dimer as a diagnostic and prognostic plasma biomarker in patients with a first episode of acute pericarditis

OBJECTIVES

The impact of plasma biomarkers on diagnosis and prognosis of patients with acute pericarditis (AP) has been poorly investigated. This study aims to assess the diagnostic and prognostic role of d-dimer (DD), an easily obtainable biomarker, in patients with AP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a prospective clinical study enrolling 265 consecutive patients hospitalized between September 2010 and May 2019 with a first episode of AP. At baseline, demographics, clinical features, laboratory and imaging findings were recorded. All patients were followed-up for a minimum of 18 months. Endpoints included cardiac tamponade, new-onset atrial fibrillation, pericardial drainage, recurrent/constrictive pericarditis and death.

RESULTS

DD was measured in 165 out of 265 patients (62.3%, median levels 1456 ng/mL) Among them, 121 patients (73.3%) presented with elevated age-adjusted DD levels. Patients with elevated DD depicted a higher rate of pleural (69.4%, vs 38.6%, p<0.001) and pericardial effusions (89.3% vs 72.7%, p = 0.009). Elevated DD correlated with admission (rho=0.37) and peak (rho=0.36) C-reactive protein values. Patients with elevated DD depicted a trend towards a greater prevalence of pericardial tamponade vs those without (14.9% vs 4.5% respectively, p = 0.07). In the 43.8% of patients with elevated DD who underwent computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), no case of pulmonary embolism or aortic syndrome was unveiled.

CONCLUSION

DD elevation is detected in the majority of AP cases at presentation and may herald cardiac tamponade. In patients with chest pain not attributable to alternative causes, elevated DD denotes an inflammatory condition and should not prompt unnecessary investigations, such as CTPA.

Pericardial Immune Cells and Their Evolving Role in Cardiovascular Pathophysiology

The pericardium plays several homeostatic roles to support and maintain everyday cardiac function. Recent advances in techniques and experimental models have allowed for further exploration into the cellular contents of the pericardium itself. Of particular interest are the various immune cell populations present in the space within the pericardial fluid and fat. In contrast to immune cells of the comparable pleura, peritoneum and heart, pericardial immune cells appear to be distinct in their function and phenotype. Specifically, recent work has suggested these cells play critical roles in an array of pathophysiological conditions including myocardial infarction, pericarditis, and post-cardiac surgery complications. In this review, we spotlight the pericardial immune cells currently identified in mice and humans, the pathophysiological role of these cells, and the clinical significance of the immunocardiology axis in cardiovascular health.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of pericardial diseases: a comprehensive guide

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has been established as a valuable diagnostic tool in the assessment of pericardial diseases by providing information on cardiac anatomy and function, surrounding extra-cardiac structures, pericardial thickening and effusion, characterization of pericardial effusion, and the presence of active pericardial inflammation from the same scan. In addition, CMR imaging has excellent diagnostic accuracy for the non-invasive detection of constrictive physiology evading the need for invasive catheterization in most instances. Growing evidence in the field suggests that pericardial enhancement on CMR is not only diagnostic of pericarditis but also has prognostic value for pericarditis recurrence, although such evidence is derived from small patient cohorts. CMR findings could also be used to guide treatment de-escalation or up-titration in recurrent pericarditis and selecting patients most likely to benefit from novel treatments such as anakinra and rilonacept. This article is an overview of the CMR applications in pericardial syndromes as a primer for reporting physicians. We sought to provide a summary of the clinical protocols used and an interpretation of the major CMR findings in the setting of pericardial diseases. We also discuss points that are less well clear and delineate the strengths and weak points of CMR in pericardial diseases.

Rilonacept and Other Interleukin-1 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Recurrent Pericarditis

Pericarditis is the commonest form of pericardial disease. Unfortunately, despite optimal treatment, approximately 15-30% of patients with acute pericarditis have recurrence. Many of these patients are refractory to colchicine, and become corticosteroid-dependent. Recurrent pericarditis severely impairs quality of life, and is associated with significant morbidity. Inflammasome formation and overproduction of interleukin (IL)-1 have been found to drive the systemic inflammatory response in recurrent autoinflammatory pericarditis. Several IL-1 inhibitors have been evaluated for their usefulness as therapeutic options. Rilonacept is a dimeric fusion protein that functions as a soluble decoy receptor that binds to both IL-1α and IL-1β, thereby inhibiting the IL-1 pathway. It is safe and efficacious in the treatment of recurrent pericarditis in the RHAPSODY II and III trials. Anakinra is a recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist that blocks the action of circulating IL-1α and IL-1β. It has also been shown to be safe and efficacious in the AIRTRIP and IRAP studies. Canakinumab is a selective human monoclonal antibody against IL-1β, and data on its use in recurrent pericarditis is scarce. Several questions regarding IL-1 inhibitor therapy, such as the duration of treatment and the recommended tapering protocols, as well as their use in special populations like pregnant or lactating women, remain unanswered and need to be addressed in future studies.

Management of acute pericarditis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Provide an update on current management and most recent evidence in the treatment of pediatric pericarditis.

RECENT FINDINGS

While treatment of acute pericarditis has not significantly changed over the last decade, management of recurrent acute pericarditis, with increased attention to autoinflammation as a causal mechanism, has evolved substantially. This includes clinical trial evidence that newer medications targeting interleukin-1 receptors are effective in recurrent forms of pericarditis. In addition, advanced imaging utilizing cardiac magnetic resonance has emerged as a particularly effective way to detect ongoing pericardial inflammation in support of more difficult-to-treat patients.

SUMMARY

Recent advances in acute and recurrent pericarditis management have allowed for a more tailored approach to the individual patient. Yet, unresolved questions require further research.

Autoimmune Pericarditis: Multimodality Imaging

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to understand the underlying mechanism that leads to pericarditis in systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases. The underlying mechanism plays a vital role in the appropriate management of patients. In addition, we will review the current landscape of available cardiac imaging modalities with emphasis on pericardial conditions as well as proposed treatment and management tailored toward pericardial autoimmune and autoinflammatory processes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Approximately 22% of all cases of pericarditis with a known etiology are caused by systemic autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, and vasculitis. In recent years, there have been advancements of imaging modalities including cardiac MRI, cardiac CT scan, and PET scan and their respective nuances in regard to contrast use, technique, and views which clinicians may utilize to better understand the extent of a patient's pericardial pathology and the trajectory of his or her disease process. In this review, we will discuss systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases that involve the pericardium. We will also review different imaging modalities that are currently used to further characterize such conditions. Having a deeper understanding of such techniques will improve patient outcomes by helping clinicians tailor treatment plans according to the unique underlying condition.

Advances in Imaging and Targeted Therapies for Recurrent Pericarditis: A Review

Importance

Pericarditis is the most common form of pericardial disease. Recurrence of pericarditis affects 15% to 30% of patients after the initial episode of pericarditis. Up to 50% of patients with the first recurrence have additional recurrences. These patients often progress to have colchicine-resistant and corticosteroid-dependent disease. Rapidly evolving cardiac magnetic resonance imaging techniques and novel targeted therapies have paved the way for imaging-guided therapy for recurrent pericarditis. However, the optimal application of these recent advances remains unclear.

Observations

A search was conducted using the PubMed and Cochrane databases for English-language studies, management guidelines, meta-analyses, and review articles published until April 2022 on recurrent pericarditis. Following the 2015 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases, new clinical trials and registry data have emerged that demonstrate the efficacy of interleukin-1 blockers in recurrent pericarditis. In addition, new observational data have come to light supporting the use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of such patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

Advances in imaging and targeted therapies have led to a paradigm shift in the management of recurrent pericarditis. This narrative review summarizes the established and emerging data on the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent pericarditis with special emphasis on the role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and interleukin-1 blockers in the current era of tailored therapy for recurrent pericarditis.

Diagnosis, treatment, and management of pericardial effusion- review

The hemodynamic stability of the heart and pericardium are maintained by the pericardial fluid of volume ∼10–50 ml. Pericardial effusion is associated with the abnormal accumulation of pericardial fluid in the pericardial cavity. Numerous imaging techniques are utilized to evaluate pericardial effusion including chest X-ray, electrocardiogram, transthoracic echocardiography, computed tomography scan, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and pericardiocentesis. Once diagnosed, there are numerous treatment options available for the management of patients with pericardial effusion. These include various invasive and non-invasive strategies such as pericardiocentesis, pericardial window, and sclerosing therapies. In recent times, few studies have been conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of each approach in routine clinical practice. In this review, we review the role of different modalities in the diagnosis of pericardial effusion while highlighting existing therapies aimed at the management and treatment of pericardial effusion.

•

Numerous imaging techniques are utilized to evaluate pericardial effusion (PE) including chest X-ray, electrocardiogram, transthoracic echocardiography, CT scan, cardiac MRI, and pericardiocentesis.

•

Multiple treatment options are available for the management of patients with PE including pericardiocentesis, pericardial window, and sclerosing therapies.

•

Recent studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of various diagnostic and management techniques in routine clinical practice.

•

Further research is needed to investigate the optimal diagnostic and treatment options for patients with PE.

Pericarditis and Autoinflammation: A Clinical and Genetic Analysis of Patients With Idiopathic Recurrent Pericarditis and Monogenic Autoinflammatory Diseases at a National Referral Center

Background Idiopathic recurrent pericarditis (IRP) is an orphan disease that carries significant morbidity, partly driven by corticosteroid dependence. Innate immune modulators, colchicine and anti-interleukin-1 agents, pioneered in monogenic autoinflammatory diseases, have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in trials, suggesting that autoinflammation may contribute to IRP. This study characterizes the phenotype of patients with IRP and monogenic autoinflammatory diseases, and establishes whether autoinflammatory disease genes are associated with IRP. Methods and Results We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients with IRP (n=136) and monogenic autoinflammatory diseases (n=1910) attending a national center (London, UK) between 2000 and 2021. We examined 4 genes (MEFV, MVK, NLRP3, TNFRSF1A) by next-generation sequencing in 128 patients with IRP and compared the frequency of rare deleterious variants to controls obtained from the Genome Aggregation Database. In this cohort of patients with IRP, corticosteroid dependence was common (39/136, 28.7%) and was associated with chronic pain (adjusted odds ratio 2.8 [95% CI, 1.3-6.5], P=0.012). IRP frequently manifested with systemic inflammation (raised C-reactive protein [121/136, 89.0%] and extrapericardial effusions [68/136, 50.0%]). Pericarditis was observed in all examined monogenic autoinflammatory diseases (0.4%-3.7% of cases). Rare deleterious MEFV variants were more frequent in IRP than in ancestry-matched controls (allele frequency 9/200 versus 2932/129 200, P=0.040). Conclusions Pericarditis is a feature of interleukin-1 driven monogenic autoinflammatory diseases and IRP is associated with variants in MEFV, a gene involved in interleukin-1β processing. We also found that corticosteroid dependence in IRP is associated with chronic noninflammatory pain. Together these data implicate autoinflammation in IRP and support reducing reliance on corticosteroids in its management.

Interleukin-1 Antagonists for the Treatment of Recurrent Pericarditis

Although most patients with acute pericarditis will recover, a minority will have recurrent, debilitating episodes. In these patients, refractory symptoms result in high morbidity, and typically require a prolonged duration of anti-inflammatory treatment. Initially, the efficacy of colchicine in both recurrent pericarditis and periodic fever syndromes suggested the central role of the inflammasome in pericarditis. Subsequently, the success of interleukin-1 antagonists in autoinflammatory diseases prompted further investigation in recurrent pericarditis. In current clinical practice, interleukin-1 antagonists include canakinumab, anakinra, and rilonacept. Both anakinra and rilonacept have demonstrated efficacy in randomized trials of patients with recurrent pericarditis. The aim of the current review is to explain the biological rationale for interleukin-1 antagonists in recurrent pericarditis, highlight supporting clinical evidence, and emphasizing future areas of investigation.

Recurrent Pericarditis: a Stubborn Opponent Meets New Treatments in 2022

Purpose of Review

Our goal in writing this review was to provide a comprehensive appraisal of current therapies for idiopathic recurrent pericarditis with a particular focus on the newest therapeutic agents. We sought to understand the role of the inflammasome in the pathophysiology of pericarditis and how it informs the use of interleukin-1 (IL-1)-directed therapies.

Recent Findings

The latest research on this topic has focused on the critical role of the NLRP3 (NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein) inflammasome. Very recently, components of the NLRP3 inflammasome were detected by immune staining in pericardial tissue from patients with recurrent idiopathic pericarditis. In a mouse model of pericarditis, anti-IL-1 agents anakinra and rilonacept reduced NLRP3 immunostaining. Subsequent study of these drugs in human subjects with idiopathic recurrent pericarditis demonstrated their efficacy.

Summary

Recurrent idiopathic pericarditis, while relatively rare, poses a continued treatment challenge and contributes to a diminished quality of life for those patients who are afflicted. Recent developments, including an animal model of the disease and the use of IL-1-directed therapies, represent an exciting leap forward in our understanding of treatment targets. These advances offer not only new tools in our fight against this disease, but also the promise of earlier intervention and attenuation of disease morbidity. As our experience with these new agents expands, we can address questions about the ideal timing of introduction of anti-IL-1 therapy and duration of therapy and better understand the potential side effect profile.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11886-022-01719-z.

Acute Pericarditis: Update

Purpose of Review

Since 2015, when ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases were published, ongoing research has enhanced the current state of knowledge on acute pericarditis. This review is an update on the latest developments in this field.

Recent Findings

In recurrent acute pericarditis, autoinflammation has been included among causative mechanisms restricting the vague diagnoses of “idiopathic” pericarditis. Cardiac magnetic resonance that detects ongoing pericardial inflammation may guide treatment in difficult-to-treat patients. Development of risk scores may assist identification of patients at high risk for complicated pericarditis, who should be closely monitored and aggressively treated. Treatment with IL-1 inhibitors has been proven efficacious in recurrent forms with a good safety profile. Finally, acute pericarditis has recently attracted great interest as it has been reported among side effects post COVID-19 vaccination and may also complicate SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Summary

Recent advancements in acute pericarditis have contributed to a better understanding of the disease allowing a tailored to the individual patient approach. However, there are still unsolved questions that require further research.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11886-022-01710-8.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Dyspnea-Suspected Cardiac Origin (Ischemia Already Excluded): 2021 Update

Dyspnea is the symptom of perceived breathing discomfort and is commonly encountered in a variety of clinical settings. Cardiac etiologies of dyspnea are an important consideration; among these, valvular heart disease (Variant 1), arrhythmia (Variant 2), and pericardial disease (Variant 3) are reviewed in this document. Imaging plays an important role in the clinical assessment of these suspected abnormalities, with usually appropriate procedures including resting transthoracic echocardiography in all three variants, radiography for Variants 1 and 3, MRI heart function and morphology in Variants 2 and 3, and CT heart function and morphology with intravenous contrast for Variant 3. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Chronic pericardial effusion: current concepts and emerging trends

INTRODUCTION

Pericardial effusion (PEF) is a common and challenging pericardial syndrome with a variety of clinical manifestations ranging from asymptomatic, incidentally uncovered small PEFs, to life-threatening cardiac tamponade.

AREAS COVERED

: This review focuses on the pathophysiology, epidemiology, etiology, classification, clinical findings, diagnostic work-up, management and outcome of PEFs. Particular emphasis has been given on the most recent evidence concerning the contribution of imaging for the detection, differential diagnosis and evaluation of the hemodynamic impact of PEFs on the diastolic filling of the heart. Moreover, simplified algorithms for PEF triage and management have been included.

EXPERT OPINION

The management of patients with PEFs is mainly based on four parameters namely hemodynamic impact on diastolic function, elevation of inflammatory markers, presence of a specific underlying condition known to be associated with PEF and finally size and duration of the effusion. Novel data have contributed to change our view towards large, asymptomatic, "idiopathic" PEFs and dictated a rather conservative approach in most cases. It is also stressed that there is a compelling need for additional research, which is essential for tailored treatments aiming at the improvement of quality of life and containment of health care costs.

Predisposing factors and uremic pericardial effusion among ESRD patients undergoing dialysis

Objective

Pericardial effusion and pericarditis are responsible for 3–5% of deaths due to tamponade, fatal arrhythmia and heart failure. Improvement in dialysis methods has allowed the initiation of the treatment at early stages. This study is designed to evaluate the prevalence of pericardial effusion and its predisposing factors among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing dialysis.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study that included patients from the two Medical Centers in (XXX). These patients were presented with ESRD with a GFR <10 cc/min and were under long-term dialysis, also called chronic hemodialysis. The echocardiography was performed and patients with pericarditis and/or pericardial effusion due to non-uremic causes or dialysis were excluded.

Results

Of 132 patients included, mild pericardial effusion was observed in 17(12.9%) patients, 8(6.1%) patients were presented with moderate and 1 (0.7%) had severe pericardial effusion. Among females, 9(15.8%) showed pericardial effusion whereas, it was reported in 8(10.7%) males, with no statistically significant difference. Furthermore, no significant difference was seen in the ages or etiologies of patients with or without pericardial effusion (50.5 ± 15.5 vs 52.8 ± 16.1, respectively).

Conclusion

Our study reports that echocardiography among dialysis patients is likely to determine the effectiveness of the dialysis procedure and can be a cost-effective approach. Futher studies regarding laboratory parameters are required in this area.

•

Improvement in dialysis methods has allowed the initiation of the treatment at early stages.

•

Echocardiography among dialysis patients is likely to determine the effectiveness of the dialysis procedure.

•

Furthermore, normal serum BUN and Cr concentrations are not reliable predictors of effective dialysis alone.

•

Normal serum BUN and Cr concentrations are not solely reliable predictors of effective hemodialysis.

A Case of Acute Pericarditis After COVID-19 Vaccination

A two-dose regimen of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination confers 95% protection against COronaVIrus Disease 19 (COVID-19) and the safety profile is adequate. To the submission date, there were no reports in literature of acute pericarditis after BNT162b2 vaccination. However, pericarditis has been reported as a rare event associated with COVID-19 infection, which could be due to the pro-inflammatory effects of the spike protein. Recent evidence of post-vaccine myocarditis has been published. Herein we describe the case of a middle-aged healthy women who developed symptoms and signs of acute pericarditis 7-10 days after the second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination. Although a direct effect cannot be stated, it is important to report a potential adverse vaccine reaction effect that could be associated with the expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induced from the mRNA of the vaccine.

Clinical Burden and Unmet Need in Recurrent Pericarditis: A Systematic Literature Review

Inflammation of the pericardium (pericarditis) is characterized by excruciating chest pain. This systematic literature review summarizes clinical, humanistic, and economic burdens in acute, especially recurrent, pericarditis, with a secondary aim of understanding United States treatment patterns and outcomes. Short-term clinical burden is well characterized, but long-term data are limited. Some studies report healthcare resource utilization and economic impact; none measure health-related quality-of-life. Pericarditis is associated with infrequent but potentially life-threatening complications, including cardiac tamponade (weighted average: 12.7% across 10 studies), constrictive pericarditis (1.84%; 9 studies), and pericardial effusion (54.7%; 16 studies). There are no approved pericarditis treatments; treatment guidelines, when available, are inconsistent on treatment course or duration. Most recommend first-line use of conventional treatments, for example, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs with or without colchicine; however, 15-30% of patients experience recurrence. Second-line therapy may involve conventional therapies plus long-term utilization of corticosteroids, despite safety issues and the difficulty of tapering or discontinuation. Other exploratory therapies (eg, azathioprine, immunoglobulin, methotrexate, anakinra) present steroid-sparing options, but none are supported by robust clinical evidence, and some present tolerability challenges that may impact adherence. Pericardiectomy is occasionally pursued in treatment-refractory patients, although data are limited. This lack of an evidence-based treatment pathway for patients with recurrent disease is reflected in readmission rates, for example, 12.2% at 30 days in 1 US study. Patients with continued recurrence and inadequate treatment response need approved, safe, accessible treatments to resolve pericarditis symptoms and reduce recurrence risk without excessive treatment burden.

Myocarditis and pericarditis: Case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data

Myocarditis and/or pericarditis (also known as myopericarditis) are inflammatory diseases involving the myocardium (with non-ischemic myocyte necrosis) and/or the pericardial sac. Myocarditis/pericarditis (MPC) may present with variable clinical signs, symptoms, etiologies and outcomes, including acute heart failure, sudden death, and chronic dilated cardiomyopathy. Possible undiagnosed and/or subclinical acute myocarditis, with undefined potential for delayed manifestations, presents further challenges for diagnosing an acute disease and may go undetected in the setting of infection as well as adverse drug/vaccine reactions. The most common causes of MPC are viral, with non-infectious, drug/vaccine associated hypersensitivity and/or autoimmune causes being less well defined and with potentially different inflammatory mechanisms and treatment responses. Potential cardiac adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) encompass a larger scope of diagnoses such as triggering or exacerbating ischemic cardiac events, cardiomyopathy with potential heart failure, arrhythmias and sudden death. The current published experience does not support a potential causal association with vaccines based on epidemiologic evidence of relative risk increases compared with background unvaccinated incidence. The only evidence supporting a possible causal association of MPC with a vaccine comes from case reports. Hypersensitivity MPC as a drug/vaccine induced cardiac adverse event has long been a concern for post-licensure safety surveillance, as well as safety data submission for licensure. Other cardiac adverse events, such as dilated cardiomyopathy, were also defined in the CDC definitions for adverse events after smallpox vaccination in 2006. In addition, several groups have attempted to develop and improve the definition and adjudication of post-vaccination cardiovascular events. We developed the current case definitions for myocarditis and pericarditis as an AEFI building on experience and lessons learnt, as well as a comprehensive literature review. Considerations of other etiologies and causal relationships are outside the scope of this document.

A Case of Acute Viral Pericarditis Complicated With Pericardial Effusion Induced by Third Dose of COVID Vaccination

COVID-19 vaccines were safe and efficacious in clinical trials. A two-dose regimen of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine confers no less than 95% protection against COVID-19 with an adequate safety profile. To date, no reports have been made in the literature regarding the onset of acute viral pericarditis after vaccination with the Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine. But on the other hand, pericarditis is reported to occur in rare instances of COVID-19 infection, and this may be attributed to the pro-inflammatory effects of the spike protein. In this article, we describe the case of an elderly male patient with a known case of hypothyroidism who presented to our emergency department with fever, chills, and dry cough for ten days after the third dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Although we cannot mention a direct effect, it is essential to note a potential adverse reaction to vaccine administration following the expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-induced from the vaccine’s mRNA.

Rilonacept (Interleukin-1 Inhibition) for the Treatment of Pericarditis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We reviewed the contemporary literature and clinical trials to discuss the applications of the interleukin-1 (IL-1) inhibitor rilonacept to treat pericarditis, with regards to pathophysiology, pharmacology, efficacy, and safety.

RECENT FINDINGS

Rilonacept is an emerging novel agent for treating recurrent pericarditis, with phase II and III clinical trials recently published. Rilonacept rapidly resolved pericarditis pain and inflammation, markedly reduced recurrent pericarditis episodes, and had few adverse events indicating a high safety profile. Recurrent pericarditis is associated with significant morbidity and unmet need for novel therapies. Inflammasomes and the IL-1 pathways were found to be critical in its pathophysiology, leading to IL-1 inhibitors being developed. The high efficacy and safety of rilonacept for recurrent pericarditis means it could potentially be considered as a second-line therapy ahead of or as an alternative to corticosteroids, and highlight the great promise of targeted immunomodulatory therapy in this field.

Pericarditis Recurrence After Initial Uncomplicated Clinical Course

Acute pericarditis is an inflammatory disease associated with a non-negligible risk of acute complications and future recurrence. However, the exact incidence of pericarditis recurrence in patients with a first uncomplicated clinical course is unknown. We sought to evaluate the incidence and clinical predictors of recurrence after a first episode of acute uncomplicated pericarditis in a large urban hospital in the United States. We conducted a retrospective review, through electronic health records, to complete a database that includes patients admitted with a first episode of acute pericarditis and selected only those with an uncomplicated course (without in-hospital death, large pericardial effusion [>20 mm] or tamponade, constriction, or incessant pericarditis) at the VCU Medical Center (Richmond, Virginia) from 2009 to 2018. A total of 240 patients met acute pericarditis criteria: of the 240 patients, 164 patients (68%) had an uncomplicated course (median age [interquartile range] in years: 50 [32 to 62], 43% females). The median follow-up time was 186 (19 to 467) days. Pericarditis was idiopathic in 84 patients (51%). Fifteen patients (9%) had at least 1 episode of recurrent pericarditis. Compared with those without recurrence, patients with recurrent pericarditis were younger (37 [25 to 59] vs 51 [34 to 62] years, p = 0.034), had a higher prevalence of subacute/delayed presentation (2 [13%] vs 1 [1%], p = 0.023), and less frequently received colchicine (6 [40%] vs 100 [67%], p = 0.036). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, subacute presentation and younger age remained predictors of recurrence at follow-up. In conclusion, 9% of patients with acute pericarditis experienced a recurrence over a 6-month median follow-up despite an initial uncomplicated course. Younger age and subacute presentation were associated with a significantly increased risk of recurrence.

Cardiovascular Characteristics and Outcomes of Young Patients with COVID-19

Although 18-45-year-old (y-o) patients represent a significant proportion of patients hospitalized for COVID-19, data concerning the young population remain scarce. The Critical COVID France (CCF) study was an observational study including consecutive patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in 24 centers between 26 February and 20 April 2020. The primary composite outcome included transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) or in-hospital death. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular (CV) complications. Among 2868 patients, 321 (11.2%) patients were in the 18-45-y-o range. In comparison with older patients, young patients were more likely to have class 2 obesity and less likely to have hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia. The primary outcome occurred less frequently in 18-45-y-o patients in comparison with patients > 45 years old (y/o) (16.8% vs. 30.7%, p < 0.001). The 18-45-y-o patients presented with pericarditis (2.2% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.003) and myocarditis (2.5% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.002) more frequently than patients >45 y/o. Acute heart failure occurred less frequently in 18-45-y-o patients (0.9% vs. 7.2%, p < 0.001), while thrombotic complications were similar in young and older patients. Whereas both transfer to the ICU and in-hospital death occurred less frequently in young patients, COVID-19 seemed to have a particular CV impact in this population.

Rilonacept for the treatment of recurrent pericarditis

INTRODUCTION

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is a debilitating disease that has an underlying autoinflammatory pathophysiology mediated by cytokine interleukin (IL)-1. Rilonacept, a recombinant dimeric fusion protein that blocks IL-1α and IL-1β signaling has emerged as a valuable therapeutic option of RP. Rilonacept has been evaluated in Phase 2 and 3 clinic trials and was recently approved for RP treatment.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews available clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of rilonacept for the treatment of RP.

EXPERT OPINION

Findings from Rhapsody (Rilonacept inHibition of interleukin-1 Alpha and beta for recurrent Pericarditis: a pivotal Symptomatology and Outcomes stuDY) phase 2 and 3 trials suggest that rilonacept represents a promising new therapy for those patients with colchicine resistant or glucocorticoid-dependence disease. Treatment leads to rapid clinical response, with a median resolution of symptoms in 5 days, normalization of C-reactive protein (CRP) in a median of 7 days, and successful weaning from glucocorticoids. This novel therapy also reduces recurrence rates compared with placebo. Rilonacept has also demonstrated a good safety profile, with the most common adverse events including injection-site reactions and upper respiratory tract infections. This anti-IL 1 agent has emerged as an efficacious treatment for RP, with potential use for glucocorticoid-free regimens and as monotherapy. Future trials are needed to explore these treatment options and to clarify the appropriate therapy duration.

A risk score for pericarditis recurrence

BACKGROUND

Currently, we remain uncertain about which patients are at increased risk for recurrent pericarditis. We developed a risk score for pericarditis recurrence in patients with acute pericarditis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively recruited 262 patients with a first episode of acute pericarditis. Baseline patients' demographics, clinical, imaging and laboratory data were collected. Patients were followed up for a median of 51 months (interquartile range 21-71) for recurrence. Variables with <10% missingness were entered into multivariable logistic regression models with stepwise elimination to explore independent predictors of recurrence. The final model performance was assessed by the c-index whereas model's calibration and optimism-corrected c-index were evaluated after 10-fold cross-validation.

RESULTS

We identified six independent predictors for pericarditis recurrence, that is age, effusion size, platelet count (negative predictors) and reduced inferior vena cava collapse, in-hospital use of corticosteroids and heart rate (positive predictors). The final model had good performance for recurrence, c-index 0.783 (95% CI 0.725-0.842), while the optimism-corrected c-index after cross-validation was 0.752. Based on these variables, we developed a risk score point system for recurrence (0-22 points) with equally good performance (c-index 0.740, 95% CI 0.677-0.803). Patients with a low score (0-7 points) had 21.3% risk for recurrence, while those with high score (≥12 points) had a 69.8% risk for recurrence. The score was predictive of recurrence among most patient subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple risk score point system based on 6 variables can be used to predict the individualized risk for pericarditis recurrence among patients with a first episode of acute pericarditis.

Role of non-invasive multimodality imaging in autoimmune pericarditis

Systemic autoimmune diseases are an important cause of pericardial involvement and contribute to up to ∼22% cases of pericarditis with a known aetiology. The underlying mechanism for pericardial involvement varies with each systemic disease and leads to a poor understanding of its management. Multimodality imaging establishes the diagnosis and determines the type and extent of pericardial involvement. In this review, we elaborate upon various pericardial syndromes associated with different systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases and the multitude of imaging modalities that can be used to further characterize autoimmune pericardial involvement. Lastly, these forms of pericarditis have a greater likelihood of recurrence, and clinicians need to understand their unique treatment approaches to improve patient outcomes.

Emerging Therapies for Recurrent Pericarditis: Interleukin-1 inhibitors

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is a complex inflammatory disorder associated with adverse outcomes and poor quality of life. After the first episode of acute pericarditis, a non‐negligible group of patients will fail to achieve complete remission despite treatment and will be challenged by side effects from the chronic use of medications like corticosteroids. The cause of RP remains unknown in the majority of cases, mainly due to a gap in knowledge of its complex pathophysiology. Over the past 2 decades, the interleukin‐1 (IL‐1) pathway has been uncovered as a key element in the inflammatory cascade, allowing the development of pharmacological targets known as IL‐1 inhibitors. This group of medications has emerged as a treatment option for patients with RP colchicine‐resistance and steroid dependents. Currently, anakinra and rilonacept, have demonstrated beneficial impact in clinical outcomes with a reasonable safety profile in randomized clinical trials. There is still paucity of data regarding the use of canakinumab in the treatment of patients with RP. Although further studies are needed to refine therapeutic protocols and taper of concomitant therapies, IL‐1 inhibitors, continue to consolidate as part of the pharmacological armamentarium to manage this complex condition with potential use as monotherapy. The aim of this review is to highlight the role of IL‐1 pathway in RP and discuss the efficacy, safety, and clinical applicability of IL‐1 inhibitors in the treatment of RP based on current evidence.

Disease and Economic Burden Associated with Recurrent Pericarditis in a Privately Insured United States Population

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 30% of patients with a first acute pericarditis episode experience a recurrence ≤ 18 months; ~ 15% experience multiple recurrences. This study assessed the recurrence and economic burden among patients with multiple recurrences.

METHODS

Adults with idiopathic pericarditis were identified in the OptumHealth Care Solutions, Inc., database (2007-2017). Recurrent pericarditis (RP) was defined as ≥ 2 episodes of care separated by > 28 days; multiple recurrences were defined as ≥ 2 recurrences.

RESULTS

Among 944 patients with RP, 375 (39.7%) experienced multiple recurrences and were propensity score-matched 1:1 to 375 patients without recurrence. Among patients with multiple recurrences, median disease duration (time from first episode to end of last recurrence, confirmed by a 1.5-year recurrence-free period) was 2.84 years. The multiple recurrences cohort had higher rates of hospitalizations per-patient-per-month (PPPM) than the no recurrence cohort (rate ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 2.22 [1.35-3.65]). Mean total healthcare costs were significantly higher in the multiple recurrences versus no recurrence cohort ($2728 vs. $1568 PPPM, cost ratio [95% CI] = 1.74 [1.29-2.32]), mainly driven by higher hospitalization costs in the multiple recurrences cohort (mean: $1180 vs. $420 PPPM, cost ratio [95% CI] = 2.81 [1.80-4.66]). Mean work loss costs were higher in the multiple recurrences versus no recurrence cohort ($696 vs. $169 PPPM, cost ratio [95% CI] = 4.12 [1.64-9.61]). In patients with multiple recurrences, mean cost of the first episode was $19,189; subsequent recurrences ranged from $2089 to $7366 (second recurrence = $6222).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, among patients with multiple pericarditis recurrences, disease symptoms persisted several years, and healthcare and work loss costs were further compounded in this subset of patients.

The Impact of Physical Activity on Pericarditis

Purpose of Review

To discuss the possible harmful effects and pathophysiology of exercise in cases of pericarditis, explore the role of multi-modality imaging to help guide exercise recommendations, and compare U.S. with European guideline recommendations on the safe resumption of physical activity following resolution of pericarditis.

Recent Findings

Despite multiple postulated mechanisms by which exercise may be harmful during active inflammation of the myocardium or pericardium, the exact pathophysiology remains largely unknown. The inclusion of multi-modality cardiac imaging may play a role in further elucidating the relationship of exercise with outcomes in pericarditis. More recently, the prevalence of COVID-19 cardiac involvement in athletes prior to returning to play appears lower than previously reported; however, current recommendations are consistent with those for other etiologies of pericarditis.

Summary

Further research is certainly needed to better understand the relationship between physical activity and pericarditis, the pathophysiology, and the prognostic role of multimodality imaging.

Inflamed Colon and Pericardium: A Rare Combination of Colitis and Recurrent Pericarditis

A 29-year-old woman with severe ulcerative colitis presented with complicated recurrent pericarditis. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed improvement in pericardial inflammation with a prolonged course of anti-inflammatory therapy, but she developed several relapses on biologics. Rilonacept (newer interleukin-1 antagonist), disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and pericardiectomy may be considered in such patients. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)

Pericarditis and pericardial effusion: one or two distinct diseases?

The main pericardial syndromes include acute and recurrent pericarditis, constrictive pericarditis and chronic pericardial effusion in the absence of overt inflammation. Despite recent advances in pericardial syndromes, certain clinical scenarios depict remarkable peculiarities and their management is often challenging for the clinician. Acute pericarditis is the most common pericardial disease and in most instances is accompanied by pericardial effusion. On the other hand, pericardial effusion may appear as a separate clinical entity occasionally characterized by absence of inflammatory markers elevation. In cases that effusions are accompanied by C-reactive protein (CRP) elevation, the administration of empiric anti-inflammatory treatment as in acute pericarditis, is the guidelines recommended approach. Conversely, the optimal management of patients with pericardial effusions in the absence of clinical or subclinical inflammation (as depicted by CRP levels and cardiac magnetic resonance findings), is not supported by solid evidence. Patients with chronic pericardial effusions should be followed in specialized centers according to tailored timelines, based on the specific clinical scenarios which should take into account etiology, effusion size, disease duration and stability as regards symptoms and effusion volume. Patients should also be advised to seek medical care at any time if symptoms like chest pain, dyspnea and fatigue should appear.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in 2954 COVID-19 Adult Survivors: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Background

Recent studies have utilized MRI to determine the extent to which COVID‐19 survivors may experience cardiac sequels after recovery.

Purpose

To systematically review the main cardiac MRI findings in COVID‐19 adult survivors.

Study type

Systematic review.

Subjects

A total of 2954 COVID‐19 adult survivors from 16 studies.

Field Strength/sequence

Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), parametric mapping (T1‐native, T2, T1‐post (extracellular volume fraction [ECV]), T2‐weighted sequences (myocardium/pericardium), at 1.5 T and 3  T.

Assessment

A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Google scholar databases using Boolean operators and the relevant key terms covering COVID‐19, cardiac injury, CMR, and follow‐up. MRI data, including (if available) T1, T2, extra cellular volume, presence of myocardial or pericardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and left and right ventricular ejection fraction were extracted.

Statistical Tests

The main results of the included studies are summarized. No additional statistical analysis was performed.

Results

Of 1601 articles retrieved from the initial search, 12 cohorts and 10 case series met our eligibility criteria. The rate of raised T1 in COVID‐19 adult survivors varied across studies from 0% to 73%. Raised T2 was detected in none of patients in 4 out of 15 studies, and in the remaining studies, its rate ranged from 2% to 60%. In most studies, LGE (myocardial or pericardial) was observed in COVID‐19 survivors, the rate ranging from 4% to 100%. Myocardial LGE mainly had nonischemic patterns. None of the cohort studies observed myocardial LGE in “healthy” controls. Most studies found that patients who recovered from COVID‐19 had a significantly greater T1 and T2 compared to participants in the corresponding control group.

Data Conclusion

Findings of MRI studies suggest the presence of myocardial and pericardial involvement in a notable number of patients recovered from COVID‐19.

Level of Evidence

3

Technical Efficacy Stage

3

US Database Study of Clinical Burden and Unmet Need in Recurrent Pericarditis

Background

Patients with recurrent pericarditis (RP) may develop complications, multiple recurrences, or inadequate treatment response. This study aimed to characterize disease burden and unmet needs in RP.

Methods and Results

This retrospective US database analysis included newly diagnosed patients with RP with ≥24 months of continuous history following their first pericarditis episode. RP was defined as ≥2 pericarditis episodes ≥28 days apart. Some patients had ≥2 recurrences, while others had a single recurrence with a serious complication, ie, constrictive pericarditis, cardiac tamponade, or a large pericardial effusion with pericardiocentesis/pericardial window. Among these patients with multiple recurrences and/or complications, some had features relating to treatment history, including long‐term corticosteroid use (corticosteroids started within 30 days of flare, continuing ≥90 consecutive days) or inadequate treatment response (pericarditis recurring despite corticosteroids and/or colchicine, or other drugs [excluding NSAIDs] within 30 days of flare, or prior pericardiectomy). Patients (N=2096) had hypertension (60%), cardiomegaly (9%), congestive heart failure (17%), atrial fibrillation (16%), autoimmune diseases (18%), diabetes mellitus (21%), renal disease (20%), anxiety (21%), and depression (14%). Complications included pericardial effusion (50%), cardiac tamponade (9%), and constrictive pericarditis (4%). Pharmacotherapy included colchicine (51%), NSAIDs (40%), and corticosteroids (30%), often in combination. This study estimates 37 000 US patients with RP; incidence was 6.0/100 000/year (95% CI, 5.6‒6.3), and prevalence was 11.2/100 000 (95% CI, 10.6‒11.7).

Conclusions

Patients with RP may have multiple recurrences and/or complications, often because of inadequate treatment response and persistent underlying disease. Corticosteroid use is frequent despite known side‐effect risks, potentially exacerbated by prevalent comorbidities. Substantial clinical burden and lack of effective treatments underscore the high unmet need.

The Role of Rilonacept in Recurrent Pericarditis

Recurrent pericarditis is associated with significant morbidity and adverse impact on quality of life. Contemporary studies have emphasized the key role of autoinflammatory pathways in its pathophysiology, mainly through the activation of inflammasomes and the production of interleukin (IL)-1α and IL-1β. The IL-1 pathway has emerged as a promising target for the treatment of these patients. A novel IL-1 inhibitor, rilonacept, functions as an IL-1 trap binding to the circulating IL-1α and IL-1β mitigating their inflammatory response. Recently, the RHAPSODY phase III clinical trial evaluated the use of rilonacept in patients with recurrent pericarditis, who were refractory to colchicine, or steroid-dependent. Rilonacept significantly reduced symptoms, inflammatory markers and recurrent episodes, and increased successful withdrawal of steroids. The safety profile of the medication is favourable and well tolerated by patients, with local injection site reaction being the most common side effect described. These results have shifted the paradigm of the understanding of the disease and promise to become part of the armamentarium of medications for the standard of care of these patients, with potential use as monotherapy. The changing landscape of therapeutics and pathophysiology warrants increased recognition and understanding from the international cardiology community about this novel drug and its implication in managing these complex patients.The objective of this review is to describe the bio-action of rilonacept in the treatment of recurrent pericarditis.