1
|
Nelson HS. The Art of Immunotherapy. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2024; 12:1-10. [PMID: 37898175 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.10.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
Selection of a patient with rhinitis/conjunctivitis or asthma for allergy immunotherapy (AIT) requires several decisions. First, does the patient's sensitization, pattern of exposure to an allergen, and degree of exposure to that allergen reasonably suggest a causal relationship? Does the level and duration of symptoms warrant the cost and inconvenience of immunotherapy, or is the patient motivated by the disease-modifying potential of AIT? If AIT is selected, is the choice to be greater safety and convenience with sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablets, but with treatment probably limited to 2 or 3 allergens, or for subcutaneous immunotherapy where multiple allergen therapy is the rule and efficacy may be somewhat greater, at least initially, or does the physician go off-label into the unknowns of liquid SLIT? Are there extracts of sufficient potency to achieve likely effective doses? How does the physician deal with large local or systemic reactions, with gaps in treatment, with pollen seasons, and the use of premedication or cautionary prescription of epinephrine autoinjectors? How can adherence to AIT be improved? These and other questions are addressed in this paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harold S Nelson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy/Immunology, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee HY, Lee SM, Kang SY, Kim K, Kim JH, Ryu G, Min JY, Park KH, Park SY, Sung M, Lee Y, Yang EA, Jee HM, Ha EK, Shin YS, Chung EH, Choi SH, Koh YI, Kim ST, Nahm DH, Park JW, Shim JY, An YM, Han DH, Han MY, Lee YW, Choi JH. KAAACI Guidelines for Allergen Immunotherapy. ALLERGY, ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH 2023; 15:725-756. [PMID: 37957792 PMCID: PMC10643862 DOI: 10.4168/aair.2023.15.6.725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a causative treatment for various allergic diseases such as allergic rhinitis, allergic asthma, and bee venom allergy that induces tolerance to offending allergens. The need for uniform practice guidelines in AIT is continuously growing because of the increasing discovery of potential candidates for AIT and evolving interest in new therapeutic approaches. This guideline is an updated version of the Korean Academy of Asthma Allergy and Clinical Immunology recommendations for AIT published in 2010. This updated guideline proposes an expert opinion by allergy, pediatrics, and otorhinolaryngology specialists with an extensive literature review. The guideline deals with basic knowledge and methodological aspects of AIT, including mechanisms, clinical efficacy, patient selection, allergens extract selection, schedule and doses, management of adverse reactions, efficacy measurements, and special consideration in pediatrics. The guidelines for sublingual immunotherapy will be covered in detail in a separate article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hwa Young Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Min Lee
- Division of Pulmonology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Sung-Yoon Kang
- Division of Pulmonology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Kyunghoon Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ju Hee Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gwanghui Ryu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Young Min
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Hee Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - So-Young Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Gwangmyeong, Korea
| | - Myongsoon Sung
- Department of Pediatrics, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital, Gumi, Korea
| | - Youngsoo Lee
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Eun-Ae Yang
- Department of Pediatrics, Daejeon St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Hye Mi Jee
- Department of Pediatrics, CHA University School of Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Eun Kyo Ha
- Department of Pediatrics, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoo Seob Shin
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Eun Hee Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Sun Hee Choi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young-Il Koh
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Seon Tae Kim
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Dong-Ho Nahm
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Jung Won Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Yeon Shim
- Department of Pediatrics, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Doo Hee Han
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Man Yong Han
- Department of Pediatrics, CHA University School of Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Yong Won Lee
- Division of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Health Policy Research, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
| | - Jeong-Hee Choi
- Department of Pulmonology and Allergy, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Feng X, Liu J. A novel dose-adjustment protocol for interrupted subcutaneous immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis. Immunotherapy 2023; 15:1171-1181. [PMID: 37585664 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2023-0051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to develop a novel dose strategy for subcutaneous immunotherapy to reduce medical waste and financial burdens for patients who are required to restart subcutaneous immunotherapy. Patients & methods: A prospective, nonrandomized concurrent controlled trial was performed to assess the safety and advantages of the novel dose-adjustment protocol compared with the conventional one. 76 subjects were grouped to receive novel or conventional dose-adjustment protocols. Results: The injections, visits and time needed to reach the pre-established dose with the novel regimen were decreased. Furthermore, there were no differences in side reactions between the two groups. Conclusion: The novel protocol seemed safe and well tolerated, offering the advantages of time efficiency and reduced healthcare costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xian Feng
- Department of Otolaryngology, Affiliated Eye Ear Nose & Throat Hospital, Fudan University, No. 83, Fenyang Road, Shanghai, 200031, PR China
| | - Juan Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology, Affiliated Eye Ear Nose & Throat Hospital, Fudan University, No. 83, Fenyang Road, Shanghai, 200031, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Kam PJ, Zielen S, Bernstein JA, Berger U, Berger M, Cuevas M, Cypcar D, Fuhr-Horst A, Greisner WA, Jandl M, Laßmann S, Worm M, Matz J, Sher E, Smith C, Steven GC, Mösges R, Shamji MH, DuBuske L, Borghese F, Oluwayi K, Zwingers T, Seybold M, Armfield O, Heath MD, Hewings SJ, Kramer MF, Skinner MA. Short-course subcutaneous treatment with PQ Grass strongly improves symptom and medication scores in grass allergy. Allergy 2023; 78:2756-2766. [PMID: 37366581 DOI: 10.1111/all.15788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A modified grass allergen subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) product with MicroCrystalline Tyrosine and monophosphoryl lipid-A as an adjuvant system (Grass MATA MPL [PQ Grass]) is being developed as short-course treatment of grass-pollen allergic rhinitis (SAR) and/or rhinoconjunctivitis. We sought to evaluate the combined symptom and medication score (CSMS) of the optimized cumulative dose of 27,600 standardized units (SU) PQ Grass in a field setting prior to embarking on a pivotal Phase III trial. METHODS In this exploratory, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial subjects were enrolled across 14 sites (Germany and the United States of America). Six pre-seasonal subcutaneous injections of PQ Grass (using conventional or extended regimens) or placebo were administered to 119 subjects (aged 18-65 years) with moderate-to-severe SAR with or without asthma that was well-controlled. The primary efficacy endpoint was CSMS during peak grass pollen season (GPS). Secondary endpoints included Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire standardized (RQLQ-S) and allergen-specific IgG4 response. RESULTS The mean CSMS compared to placebo was 33.1% (p = .0325) and 39.5% (p = .0112) for the conventional and extended regimens, respectively. An increase in IgG4 was shown for both regimens (p < .01) as well as an improvement in total RQLQ-S for the extended regimen (mean change -0.72, p = .02). Both regimens were well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS This trial demonstrated a clinically relevant and statistically significant efficacy response to PQ Grass. Unprecedented effect sizes were reached for grass allergy of up to ≈40% compared to placebo for CSMS after only six PQ Grass injections. Both PQ Grass regimens were considered equally safe and well-tolerated. Based on enhanced efficacy profile extended regime will be progressed to the pivotal Phase III trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - S Zielen
- Children and Adolescents Department, Allergology, Pulmonology & Cystic Fibrosis, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - J A Bernstein
- Bernstein Clinical Research Center, LLC, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - U Berger
- Aerobiology and Pollen Research Unit, Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Berger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Wiener Gesundheitsverbund, Hospital Hietzing, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Cuevas
- Clinic and Polyclinic of Otorhinolaryngology, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - D Cypcar
- Allergy Partners of Western North Carolina, Asheville, North Carolina, USA
| | - A Fuhr-Horst
- ENT Research- Institut für klinische Studien, Essen, Germany
| | - W A Greisner
- Bluegrass Allergy Research, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - M Jandl
- Hamburger Institut für Therapieforschung GmbH, Hamburg, Germany
| | - S Laßmann
- Studienzentrum Dr. Sabine Laßmann, Saalfeld, Germany
| | - M Worm
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy-Charite Campus Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - J Matz
- Chesapeake Clinical Research, Inc, White Marsh, Maryland, USA
| | - E Sher
- Allergy Partners of New Jersey, Ocean Township, New Jersey, USA
| | - C Smith
- Certified Research Associates, Cortland, New York, USA
| | - G C Steven
- Allergy Asthma & Sinus Center, S.C., Greenfield, Wisconsin, USA
| | - R Mösges
- IMSB (Institute of Computational Biology and Medical Statistics), University at Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- ClinCompetence, Cologne, Germany
| | - M H Shamji
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - L DuBuske
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - K Oluwayi
- Allergy Therapeutics PLC, Worthing, UK
| | | | - M Seybold
- Allergy Therapeutics PLC, Worthing, UK
| | | | - M D Heath
- Allergy Therapeutics PLC, Worthing, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
De Carli M, Capezzali E, Tonon S, Frossi B. Mechanism and clinical evidence of immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis. FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2023; 4:1217388. [PMID: 37601646 PMCID: PMC10434251 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2023.1217388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Allergic rhinitis is a common upper airway disease caused by hypersensitivity to various aeroallergens. It causes increased inflammation throughout the body and may be complicated by other otolaryngological pathologies such as chronic hyperplastic eosinophilic sinusitis, nasal polyposis, and serous otitis media. Allergic rhinitis is an IgE-mediated disease and immunotherapy can be a possible approach for patients to limit the use of antihistamines and corticosteroids. There is evidence that allergen immunotherapy can prevent the development of new sensitizations and reduce the risk of later development of asthma in patients with allergic rhinitis. However, some patients do not benefit from this approach and the efficacy of immunotherapy in reducing the severity and relapse of symptoms is still a matter of debate. This review highlights new aspects of allergic rhinitis with a particular focus on the impact of sexual dimorphism on the disease manifestation and efficacy to the allergen specific immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco De Carli
- Second Unit of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Silvia Tonon
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Barbara Frossi
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Spriggs K, Pfaar O, Pawankar R, Durham S. Is "Maintenance" a Misnomer? A Narrative Framework Setting the Right Expectations of Allergen Immunotherapy. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:2051-2053. [PMID: 37422324 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kymble Spriggs
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Philipps-Universität, Marburg, Germany
| | - Ruby Pawankar
- Division of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Stephen Durham
- Allergy and Immunology, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, United Kingdom; Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wise SK, Damask C, Roland LT, Ebert C, Levy JM, Lin S, Luong A, Rodriguez K, Sedaghat AR, Toskala E, Villwock J, Abdullah B, Akdis C, Alt JA, Ansotegui IJ, Azar A, Baroody F, Benninger MS, Bernstein J, Brook C, Campbell R, Casale T, Chaaban MR, Chew FT, Chambliss J, Cianferoni A, Custovic A, Davis EM, DelGaudio JM, Ellis AK, Flanagan C, Fokkens WJ, Franzese C, Greenhawt M, Gill A, Halderman A, Hohlfeld JM, Incorvaia C, Joe SA, Joshi S, Kuruvilla ME, Kim J, Klein AM, Krouse HJ, Kuan EC, Lang D, Larenas-Linnemann D, Laury AM, Lechner M, Lee SE, Lee VS, Loftus P, Marcus S, Marzouk H, Mattos J, McCoul E, Melen E, Mims JW, Mullol J, Nayak JV, Oppenheimer J, Orlandi RR, Phillips K, Platt M, Ramanathan M, Raymond M, Rhee CS, Reitsma S, Ryan M, Sastre J, Schlosser RJ, Schuman TA, Shaker MS, Sheikh A, Smith KA, Soyka MB, Takashima M, Tang M, Tantilipikorn P, Taw MB, Tversky J, Tyler MA, Veling MC, Wallace D, Wang DY, White A, Zhang L. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Allergic rhinitis - 2023. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023; 13:293-859. [PMID: 36878860 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 79.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the 5 years that have passed since the publication of the 2018 International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2018), the literature has expanded substantially. The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update presents 144 individual topics on allergic rhinitis (AR), expanded by over 40 topics from the 2018 document. Originally presented topics from 2018 have also been reviewed and updated. The executive summary highlights key evidence-based findings and recommendation from the full document. METHODS ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 employed established evidence-based review with recommendation (EBRR) methodology to individually evaluate each topic. Stepwise iterative peer review and consensus was performed for each topic. The final document was then collated and includes the results of this work. RESULTS ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 includes 10 major content areas and 144 individual topics related to AR. For a substantial proportion of topics included, an aggregate grade of evidence is presented, which is determined by collating the levels of evidence for each available study identified in the literature. For topics in which a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention is considered, a recommendation summary is presented, which considers the aggregate grade of evidence, benefit, harm, and cost. CONCLUSION The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update provides a comprehensive evaluation of AR and the currently available evidence. It is this evidence that contributes to our current knowledge base and recommendations for patient evaluation and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah K Wise
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Cecelia Damask
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Private Practice, University of Central Florida, Lake Mary, Florida, USA
| | - Lauren T Roland
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Charles Ebert
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joshua M Levy
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sandra Lin
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Amber Luong
- Otolaryngology-HNS, McGovern Medical School of the University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kenneth Rodriguez
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ahmad R Sedaghat
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Elina Toskala
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Baharudin Abdullah
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang, Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Cezmi Akdis
- Immunology, Infectious Diseases, Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Jeremiah A Alt
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Antoine Azar
- Allergy/Immunology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Fuad Baroody
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | | | - Christopher Brook
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Harvard University, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Raewyn Campbell
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Thomas Casale
- Allergy/Immunology, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Mohamad R Chaaban
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Cleveland Clinic, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Fook Tim Chew
- Allergy/Immunology, Genetics, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jeffrey Chambliss
- Allergy/Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Antonella Cianferoni
- Allergy/Immunology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | - Anne K Ellis
- Allergy/Immunology, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - Wytske J Fokkens
- Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Matthew Greenhawt
- Allergy/Immunology, Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Amarbir Gill
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Ashleigh Halderman
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Jens M Hohlfeld
- Respiratory Medicine, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine ITEM, Hannover Medical School, German Center for Lung Research, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Stephanie A Joe
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Shyam Joshi
- Allergy/Immunology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Jean Kim
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Adam M Klein
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Helene J Krouse
- Otorhinolaryngology Nursing, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, Texas, USA
| | - Edward C Kuan
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - David Lang
- Allergy/Immunology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | - Matt Lechner
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University College London, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Stella E Lee
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Victoria S Lee
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Patricia Loftus
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sonya Marcus
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Haidy Marzouk
- Otolaryngology-HNS, State University of New York Upstate, Syracuse, New York, USA
| | - Jose Mattos
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Edward McCoul
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Ochsner Clinic, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Erik Melen
- Pediatric Allergy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - James W Mims
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joaquim Mullol
- Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jayakar V Nayak
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - John Oppenheimer
- Allergy/Immunology, Rutgers, State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | | | - Katie Phillips
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Michael Platt
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | - Chae-Seo Rhee
- Rhinology/Allergy, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sietze Reitsma
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Matthew Ryan
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Joaquin Sastre
- Allergy, Fundacion Jiminez Diaz, University Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Theodore A Schuman
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Marcus S Shaker
- Allergy/Immunology, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Primary Care, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Kristine A Smith
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Michael B Soyka
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Zurich, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Masayoshi Takashima
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Houston Methodist Academic Institute, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Monica Tang
- Allergy/Immunology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Malcolm B Taw
- Integrative East-West Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Westlake Village, California, USA
| | - Jody Tversky
- Allergy/Immunology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Matthew A Tyler
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Maria C Veling
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Dana Wallace
- Allergy/Immunology, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA
| | - De Yun Wang
- Otolaryngology-HNS, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Andrew White
- Allergy/Immunology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Luo Zhang
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Accelerated allergy shot schedules for inhalant and venom allergens provide individuals with allergy symptom relief but in a shorter time frame than conventional therapy. Accelerated immunotherapy (IT) protocols allow patients to reach therapeutic doses in a shorter time frame while improving adherence and reducing direct costs (e.g., fewer office visits and medications) and indirect costs (e.g., less travel time, missed work or school). Rush IT and cluster IT are believed to work through mechanisms similar to conventional subcutaneous IT (SCIT). The risk for severe systemic reactions during accelerated IT is low when appropriately administered; however, life-threatening and fatal reactions do occur. To reduce the incidence of systemic allergic reactions during cluster and rush IT protocols, premedication is recommended. It is important to exclude individuals at high risk such as those with poorly controlled asthma or those who are on β-blockers to mitigate the risk for developing systemic allergic reactions. However, accelerated SCIT regimens offer increased convenience, faster improvement in allergy symptoms, and the potential to reduce health-care costs while providing equivalent safety outcomes compared with conventional IT protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Greiwe
- From the Bernstein Allergy Group Inc, Cincinnati, Ohio; and
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hossenbaccus L, Linton S, Ramchandani R, Burrows AG, Ellis AK. Study of Cat Allergy Using Controlled Methodology-A Review of the Literature and a Call to Action. FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2022; 3:828091. [PMID: 35386639 PMCID: PMC8974834 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2022.828091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of cat allergen-induced AR is increasing worldwide, prompting its study using controlled methodology. Three general categories of allergen exposure models currently exist for the study of cat allergen-induced AR: natural exposure cat rooms, allergen exposure chambers (AEC), and nasal allergen challenges (NAC). We evaluated existing literature surrounding the use of these models to study cat allergen induced AR using online research databases, including OVID Medline, Embase, and Web of Science. We report that natural exposure cat rooms have been important in establishing the foundation for our understanding of cat allergen-induced AR. Major limitations, including variable allergen ranges and differing study designs highlight the need for a more standardized protocol. In comparison, AECs are an exceptional model to mimic real-world allergen exposure and study long-term implications of AR with large sample sizes. Existing AECs are limited by heterogeneous facility designs, differing methods of cat allergen distribution, and issues surrounding cost and accessibility. Conversely, NACs allow for smaller participant cohorts for easier biological sampling and are ideal for phase I, phase 2 or proof-of-concept studies. NACs generally have a standardized protocol and are less expensive compared to AECs. Nevertheless, NACs solely capture acute allergen exposure and have the further limitation of using allergen extracts rather than natural allergen. As the use of combined controlled methodologies is sparse, we recommend concurrent use of AECs and NACs to study short- and long-term effects of AR, thereby providing a more holistic representation of cat allergen-induced AR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lubnaa Hossenbaccus
- Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston Health Sciences Centre – KGH Site, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Sophia Linton
- Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston Health Sciences Centre – KGH Site, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Rashi Ramchandani
- Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston Health Sciences Centre – KGH Site, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Alyssa G. Burrows
- Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston Health Sciences Centre – KGH Site, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Anne K. Ellis
- Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston Health Sciences Centre – KGH Site, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Barber D, Diaz‐Perales A, Escribese MM, Kleine‐Tebbe J, Matricardi PM, Ollert M, Santos AF, Sastre J. Molecular allergology and its impact in specific allergy diagnosis and therapy. Allergy 2021; 76:3642-3658. [PMID: 34057744 DOI: 10.1111/all.14969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Progressive knowledge of allergenic structures resulted in a broad availability of allergenic molecules for diagnosis. Component-resolved diagnosis allowed a better understanding of patient sensitization patterns, facilitating allergen immunotherapy decisions. In parallel to the discovery of allergenic molecules, there was a progressive development of a regulation framework that affected both in vitro diagnostics and Allergen Immunotherapy products. With a progressive understanding of underlying mechanisms associated to Allergen immunotherapy and an increasing experience of application of molecular diagnosis in daily life, we focus in analyzing the evidences of the value provided by molecular allergology in daily clinical practice, with a focus on Allergen Immunotherapy decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domingo Barber
- Departamento de Ciencias Médicas Básicas Facultad de Medicina IMMA, Universidad San Pablo CEU, CEU Universities Madrid Spain
- ARADyAL‐RD16/0006/0015 RD16/0006/0003 Thematic Network and Cooperative Research Centers ISCIII Madrid Spain
| | - Araceli Diaz‐Perales
- ARADyAL‐RD16/0006/0015 RD16/0006/0003 Thematic Network and Cooperative Research Centers ISCIII Madrid Spain
- Center for Plant Biotechnology and Genomic Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Pozuelo de Alarcon Spain
| | - Maria M. Escribese
- Departamento de Ciencias Médicas Básicas Facultad de Medicina IMMA, Universidad San Pablo CEU, CEU Universities Madrid Spain
- ARADyAL‐RD16/0006/0015 RD16/0006/0003 Thematic Network and Cooperative Research Centers ISCIII Madrid Spain
| | | | - Paolo M. Matricardi
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology Charitè Medical University of Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Markus Ollert
- Department of Infection and Immunity Luxembourg Institute of Health Esch‐sur‐Alzette Luxembourg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
| | - Alexandra F. Santos
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy School of Life Course Sciences Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine King's College London London UK
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences King's College London London UK
- Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma London UK
- Children's Allergy Service Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital London UK
| | - Joaquin Sastre
- Fundación Jiménez Diaz AllergyDepartment Universidad Autonomade Madrid, CIBERES, Instituto de Salud Carlos III Madrid Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wambre ER, Farrington M, Bajzik V, DeBerg HA, Ruddy M, DeVeaux M, Meier P, Robinson D, Cantor M, Huang C, Orengo JM, Wang CQ, Radin A. Clinical and immunological evaluation of cat-allergic asthmatics living with or without a cat. Clin Exp Allergy 2021; 51:1624-1633. [PMID: 34599624 PMCID: PMC9293312 DOI: 10.1111/cea.14024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Characterising the clinical and immunological impact of daily cat exposure in cat-allergic subjects with asthma who live with cats (WC) and those who do not (WoC) may provide understanding of the drivers of the allergic response. METHODS Clinical and immunological characteristics (skin prick test, spirometry, symptom assessments, immunological markers) were compared between asthmatic subjects WC (n = 10) and WoC (n = 9). RESULTS WC subjects had greater use of long-acting beta agonists (p < .05) and high-potency corticosteroids. No differences were observed in lung function, nasal and ocular symptoms, or asthma control between the groups. Cat dander- and Fel d 1-specific IgG4 concentrations were higher in WC than WoC subjects (both p < .05). Total IgE and cat dander-, Fel d 1- and Fel d 7-specific IgE concentrations were similar, but Fel d 4-sIgE was higher in WC subjects (p < .05) versus WoC. Basophil sensitivity to cat dander extract and Fel d 1 was lower in WC versus WoC subjects (p < .05) and correlated with higher IgG4 concentrations (r = 0.63; p = .009). Fel d 1-specific CD4+ T-cell responses polarised toward Th2A responses in WC versus WoC subjects; Fel d 1-specific IgE correlated with surface expression of CRTH2 and CD200R (both p ≤ .05). CONCLUSION Immunological differences observed in WC versus WoC did not reflect clinical tolerance with natural cat exposure. The ability to live with a cat despite allergy could be driven by higher preventative medication use. This study may support design of novel therapeutics for allergy management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik R. Wambre
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason Medical CenterSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Mary Farrington
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason Medical CenterSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Virginia Mason Medical CenterSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Veronique Bajzik
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason Medical CenterSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Hannah A. DeBerg
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason Medical CenterSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Allen Radin
- Regeneron PharmaceuticalsTarrytownNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Boonpiyathad T, Lao-Araya M, Chiewchalermsri C, Sangkanjanavanich S, Morita H. Allergic Rhinitis: What Do We Know About Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy? FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2021; 2:747323. [PMID: 35387059 PMCID: PMC8974870 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2021.747323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an IgE-mediated disease that is characterized by Th2 joint inflammation. Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is indicated for AR when symptoms remain uncontrolled despite medication and allergen avoidance. AIT is considered to have been effective if it alleviated allergic symptoms, decreased medication use, improved the quality of life even after treatment cessation, and prevented the progression of AR to asthma and the onset of new sensitization. AIT can be administered subcutaneously or sublingually, and novel routes are still being developed, such as intra-lymphatically and epicutaneously. AIT aims at inducing allergen tolerance through modification of innate and adaptive immunologic responses. The main mechanism of AIT is control of type 2 inflammatory cells through induction of various functional regulatory cells such as regulatory T cells (Tregs), follicular T cells (Tfr), B cells (Bregs), dendritic cells (DCregs), innate lymphoid cells (IL-10+ ILCs), and natural killer cells (NKregs). However, AIT has a number of disadvantages: the long treatment period required to achieve greater efficacy, high cost, systemic allergic reactions, and the absence of a biomarker for predicting treatment responders. Currently, adjunctive therapies, vaccine adjuvants, and novel vaccine technologies are being studied to overcome the problems associated with AIT. This review presents an updated overview of AIT, with a special focus on AR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadech Boonpiyathad
- Department of Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
- *Correspondence: Tadech Boonpiyathad
| | - Mongkol Lao-Araya
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Chirawat Chiewchalermsri
- Department of Medicine, Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center, Srinakharinwirot University, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Sasipa Sangkanjanavanich
- Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Department of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Hideaki Morita
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
- Allergy Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nelson HS. How important is proper dosing for subcutaneous and sublingual allergy immunotherapy? Allergy Asthma Proc 2021; 42:368-377. [PMID: 34474706 DOI: 10.2500/aap.2021.42.210061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Background: Results of surveys report that allergists use a wide range of doses for allergy immunotherapy; however, results of randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled studies suggest that the range of the optimum effective dosing is relatively narrow. Objective: To review studies that established effective or less than fully effective doses for allergy immunotherapy. Methods: Studies were reviewed that established effective and ineffective subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy doses. Only those studies that expressed dosing in terms of the content of a major allergen in the maintenance doses were included in defining effective and ineffective doses. Results: Studies were identified that showed effective doses for subcutaneous injection, established in randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trials, for short ragweed, timothy grass, house-dust mites, cat and dog dander, birch, and Alternaria. For short ragweed, timothy grass, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, and cat and dog dander, less-effective doses were determined, along with effective doses; the less-effective doses were only one-fifth to one-tenth less in allergen content than were the effective doses. Effective doses of cockroach and all fungal extracts except Alternaria have not been established. Information is available on the mean major allergen content of U.S. standardized and a few nonstandardized extracts, which allows the information on effective and ineffective dosing to be used in prescribing subcutaneous allergy immunotherapy. With sublingual allergy immunotherapy, all the approved tablets had multidose studies that determined the optimal dose. For the U.S. liquid extracts, to my knowledge, there are no studies to define effective doses except for ragweed. Conclusions: Although a wide range of doses are prescribed by U.S. allergists, analysis of available data suggests that effective doses fall within a narrow range and that use of doses one-fifth or one-tenth of the effective doses may sacrifice most or all of the potential efficacy of the treatment.
Collapse
|
14
|
Shamji MH, Singh I, Layhadi JA, Ito C, Karamani A, Kouser L, Sharif H, Tang J, Handijiev S, Parkin RV, Durham SR, Kostic A, Orengo JM, DeVeaux M, Kamal M, Stahl N, Yancopoulos GD, Wang CQ, Radin AR. Passive Prophylactic Administration with a Single Dose of Anti-Fel d 1 Monoclonal Antibodies REGN1908-1909 in Cat Allergen-induced Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 204:23-33. [PMID: 33651675 PMCID: PMC8437124 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202011-4107oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Sensitization to Fel d 1 (Felis domesticus allergen 1) contributes to persistent allergic rhinitis and asthma. Existing treatment options for cat allergy, including allergen immunotherapy, are only moderately effective, and allergen immunotherapy has limited use because of safety concerns. Objectives: To explore the relationship among the pharmacokinetic, clinical, and immunological effects of anti–Fel d 1 monoclonal antibodies (REGN1908–1909) in patients after treatment. Methods: Patients received REGN1908–1909 (n = 36) or a placebo (n = 37) in a phase 1b study. Fel d 1–induced basophil and IgE-facilitated allergen binding responses were evaluated at baseline and Days 8, 29, and 85. Cytokine and chemokine concentrations in nasal fluids were measured, and REGN1908–1909 inhibition of allergen–IgE binding in patient serum was evaluated. Measurements and Main Results: Peak serum drug concentrations were concordant with maximal observed clinical response. The anti–Fel d 1 IgE/cat dander IgE ratio in pretreatment serum correlated with Total Nasal Symptom Score improvement. The allergen-neutralizing capacity of REGN1908–1909 was observed in serum and nasal fluid and was detected in an inhibition assay. Type 2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13) and chemokines (CCL17/TARC, CCL5/RANTES [regulated upon activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted]) in nasal fluid were inhibited in REGN1908–1909–treated patients compared with placebo (P < 0.05 for all); IL-13 and IL-5 concentrations correlated with Total Nasal Symptom Score improvement. Ex vivo assays demonstrated that REGN1908 and REGN1909 combined were more potent than each alone for inhibiting FcεRI- and FcεRII (CD23)–mediated allergic responses and subsequent T-cell activation. Conclusions: A single, passive-dose administration of Fel d 1–neutralizing IgG antibodies improved nasal symptoms in cat-allergic patients and was underscored by suppression of FcεRI-, FcεRII-, and T-helper cell type 2–mediated allergic responses. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02127801)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed H Shamji
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, Medical Research Center-Asthma United Kingdom Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Iesha Singh
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, Medical Research Center-Asthma United Kingdom Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Janice A Layhadi
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, Medical Research Center-Asthma United Kingdom Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Constance Ito
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, Medical Research Center-Asthma United Kingdom Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Angeliki Karamani
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, Medical Research Center-Asthma United Kingdom Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Lubna Kouser
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, Medical Research Center-Asthma United Kingdom Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Hanisah Sharif
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, Medical Research Center-Asthma United Kingdom Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Jiaqian Tang
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, Medical Research Center-Asthma United Kingdom Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Sava Handijiev
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, Medical Research Center-Asthma United Kingdom Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Rebecca V Parkin
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, Medical Research Center-Asthma United Kingdom Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Stephen R Durham
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, Medical Research Center-Asthma United Kingdom Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Ana Kostic
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York
| | | | | | - Mohamed Kamal
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York
| | - Neil Stahl
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York
| | | | - Claire Q Wang
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York
| | - Allen R Radin
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Caimmi D, Demoly P. Recommandations pour la prescription de l’immunothérapie allergénique et le suivi du patient — Questions développées et revue de la littérature. REVUE FRANÇAISE D'ALLERGOLOGIE 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.reval.2020.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
|
16
|
|
17
|
González JPS, Hernández EB, Abellán AC, Peñalver-Mellado M. Immunogenicity of a new allergoid from Felis domesticus. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2020; 48:612-618. [PMID: 32446784 DOI: 10.1016/j.aller.2020.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Revised: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The chemical modification of allergens with glutaraldehyde improves safety while maintaining clinical efficacy, which permits the administration of higher doses of immunotherapy, reducing the risk of adverse reactions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the immunogenic capacity of a new cat dander polymer by immunizing mice and quantifying immunoglobulins in serum, in comparison with the non-modified allergen. METHODS The study consists of the immunization of three mice groups with the polymerized and the native extract, together with a negative control group. The immunoglobulin levels in serum have been measured by indirect ELISA. By means of the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test, it was determined if there were significant differences in the values of specific antibodies between groups. RESULTS The group immunized with the allergoid showed significantly higher specific IgG and IgG1 values to dander allergens and specific IgG to the major allergen Fel d 1, while there were no significant changes in IgG2a and IgE values. These results could be due to a higher immunization dose. The vaccine formulation was based on the optimal defined dose for clinical efficacy of allergen immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS This preclinical study carried out with the present assay has established that the allergoid of cat dander extract, as designed for its optimal use in allergen immunotherapy, produces a higher specific IgG than the native extract, in addition to showing significantly higher specific IgG1 levels, evidencing a greater effectiveness in immunization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Sola González
- Probelte Pharma S.L.U., S/Antonio Belmonte Abellán, 3-7, 30100 Murcia, Spain
| | - E Bravo Hernández
- Probelte Pharma S.L.U., S/Antonio Belmonte Abellán, 3-7, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
| | - A Cerezo Abellán
- Probelte Pharma S.L.U., S/Antonio Belmonte Abellán, 3-7, 30100 Murcia, Spain
| | - M Peñalver-Mellado
- Probelte Pharma S.L.U., S/Antonio Belmonte Abellán, 3-7, 30100 Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Calderon MA, Waserman S, Bernstein DI, Demoly P, Douglass J, Gagnon R, Katelaris CH, Kim H, Nelson HS, Okamoto Y, Okubo K, Virchow JC, DuBuske L, Casale TB, Canonica GW, Nolte H. Clinical Practice of Allergen Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis and Asthma: An Expert Panel Report. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2020; 8:2920-2936.e1. [PMID: 32422372 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.04.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) reduces symptoms and medication use associated with allergic rhinitis with or without conjunctivitis and allergic asthma. Although several AIT guidelines exist, there remain unanswered questions about AIT that are relevant to everyday practice. Our objective was to prepare an evidence-based overview addressing the practical aspects of AIT in clinical practice based on published evidence and the experience of international experts in the field. Topics covered include interpretation and translation of clinical trial data into everyday clinical practice (eg, allergen doses and treatment duration), assessment of risk and treatment of local and systemic allergic reactions, recommendations for improvement of AIT guidelines, and identification of appropriate data for seeking regulatory approval, to name a few. Many informational gaps in AIT practice need further evaluation as products and practices evolve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moisés A Calderon
- Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College London-NHLI, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Susan Waserman
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - David I Bernstein
- Division of Allergy, Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Pascal Demoly
- Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Montpellier, & IPLESP, Sorbonne Université - Inserm, Paris, France
| | - Jo Douglass
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital & The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Remi Gagnon
- Clinique Spécialisée en Allergie de la Capitale, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Constance H Katelaris
- Campbelltown Hospital and the School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Harold Kim
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Division of Clinical Immunology & Allergy, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Harold S Nelson
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo
| | - Yoshitaka Okamoto
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kimihiro Okubo
- Department of Otolaryngology, Nippon Medical School, Nippon, Japan
| | - J Christian Virchow
- Department of Pneumology/Intensive Care Medicine, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Lawrence DuBuske
- Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
| | - Thomas B Casale
- Division of Allergy/Immunology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla
| | - G Walter Canonica
- Personalized Medicine Clinic Asthma & Allergy, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Alvaro-Lozano M, Akdis CA, Akdis M, Alviani C, Angier E, Arasi S, Arzt-Gradwohl L, Barber D, Bazire R, Cavkaytar O, Comberiati P, Dramburg S, Durham SR, Eifan AO, Forchert L, Halken S, Kirtland M, Kucuksezer UC, Layhadi JA, Matricardi PM, Muraro A, Ozdemir C, Pajno GB, Pfaar O, Potapova E, Riggioni C, Roberts G, Rodríguez Del Río P, Shamji MH, Sturm GJ, Vazquez-Ortiz M. EAACI Allergen Immunotherapy User's Guide. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2020; 31 Suppl 25:1-101. [PMID: 32436290 PMCID: PMC7317851 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy is a cornerstone in the treatment of allergic children. The clinical efficiency relies on a well-defined immunologic mechanism promoting regulatory T cells and downplaying the immune response induced by allergens. Clinical indications have been well documented for respiratory allergy in the presence of rhinitis and/or allergic asthma, to pollens and dust mites. Patients who have had an anaphylactic reaction to hymenoptera venom are also good candidates for allergen immunotherapy. Administration of allergen is currently mostly either by subcutaneous injections or by sublingual administration. Both methods have been extensively studied and have pros and cons. Specifically in children, the choice of the method of administration according to the patient's profile is important. Although allergen immunotherapy is widely used, there is a need for improvement. More particularly, biomarkers for prediction of the success of the treatments are needed. The strength and efficiency of the immune response may also be boosted by the use of better adjuvants. Finally, novel formulations might be more efficient and might improve the patient's adherence to the treatment. This user's guide reviews current knowledge and aims to provide clinical guidance to healthcare professionals taking care of children undergoing allergen immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cezmi A Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University of Zurich, Davos, Switzerland.,Christine Kühne-Center for Allergy Research and Education, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Mubeccel Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University of Zurich, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Cherry Alviani
- The David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Newport, Isle of Wight, UK.,Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Elisabeth Angier
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Stefania Arasi
- Pediatric Allergology Unit, Department of Pediatric Medicine, Bambino Gesù Children's research Hospital (IRCCS), Rome, Italy
| | - Lisa Arzt-Gradwohl
- Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Domingo Barber
- School of Medicine, Institute for Applied Molecular Medicine (IMMA), Universidad CEU San Pablo, Madrid, Spain.,RETIC ARADYAL RD16/0006/0015, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raphaëlle Bazire
- Allergy Department, Hospital Infantil Niño Jesús, ARADyAL RD16/0006/0026, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ozlem Cavkaytar
- Department of Paediatric Allergy and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Pasquale Comberiati
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Paediatrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Stephanie Dramburg
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephen R Durham
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group; Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Section of Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.,the MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK
| | - Aarif O Eifan
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Leandra Forchert
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne Halken
- Hans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Max Kirtland
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Umut C Kucuksezer
- Aziz Sancar Institute of Experimental Medicine, Department of Immunology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Janice A Layhadi
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group; Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Section of Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.,the MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK.,Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paolo Maria Matricardi
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Antonella Muraro
- The Referral Centre for Food Allergy Diagnosis and Treatment Veneto Region, Department of Women and Child Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Cevdet Ozdemir
- Institute of Child Health, Department of Pediatric Basic Sciences, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.,Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Ekaterina Potapova
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Riggioni
- Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology Service, Institut de Reserca Sant Joan de Deú, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Graham Roberts
- The David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Newport, Isle of Wight, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.,Paediatric Allergy and Respiratory Medicine (MP803), Clinical & Experimental Sciences & Human Development in Health Academic Units University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine & University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Mohamed H Shamji
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group; Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Section of Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.,the MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK
| | - Gunter J Sturm
- Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wheatley LM, Wood R, Nadeau K, Liu A, Zoratti E, Bacharier L, Brittain E, Calderon M, Casale T, Chipps B, Cox L, Creticos PS, Desai M, Dreborg S, Durham S, Gergen PJ, Gruchalla R, Nelson H, O'Hehir RE, Plaut M, Schwaninger JM, Tilles S, Vickery B, Wittenberg KM, Togias A. Mind the gaps: Clinical trial concepts to address unanswered questions in aeroallergen immunotherapy-An NIAID/AHRQ Workshop. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2019; 143:1711-1726. [PMID: 30731123 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2018] [Revised: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases organized a workshop to develop trial concepts that could improve the use and effectiveness of aeroallergen immunotherapy (AAIT). Expert groups were formed to accomplish the following tasks: (1) propose a study design to compare the effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous versus sublingual AAIT; (2) propose a study design to compare the effectiveness and safety of AAIT by using 1 or a few allergens versus all or most allergens to which a patient is sensitized; (3) propose a study design to determine whether AAIT can alter the progression of childhood allergic airways disease; and (4) propose a study design to determine the optimal dose and duration of AAIT to achieve maximal effectiveness with acceptable safety. Study designs were presented by the workgroups, extensively discussed at the workshop, and revised for this report. The proposed trials would be of long duration and require large highly characterized patient populations. Scientific caveats and feasibility matters are discussed. These concepts are intended to help the development of clinical trials that can address some of the major questions related to the practice of AAIT for the management and prevention of allergic airways disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M Wheatley
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Md.
| | | | | | - Andrew Liu
- Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo
| | | | | | - Erica Brittain
- Biostatistics Research Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Md
| | | | | | - Bradley Chipps
- Capital Allergy and Respiratory Disease Center, Sacramento, Calif
| | - Linda Cox
- Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Fla
| | | | - Manisha Desai
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
| | | | | | - Peter J Gergen
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Md
| | | | | | - Robyn E O'Hehir
- Alfred Hospital and Monash University Medical School, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Marshall Plaut
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Md
| | - Julie M Schwaninger
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Md
| | | | - Brian Vickery
- North Carolina Children's Hospital, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kim M Wittenberg
- Center for Evidence and Practice Improvement, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Md
| | - Alkis Togias
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Md
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Worm M, Higenbottam T, Pfaar O, Mösges R, Aberer W, Gunawardena K, Wessiepe D, Lee D, Kramer MF, Skinner M, Lees B, Zielen S. Randomized controlled trials define shape of dose response for Pollinex Quattro Birch allergoid immunotherapy. Allergy 2018; 73:1812-1822. [PMID: 29779247 PMCID: PMC6175210 DOI: 10.1111/all.13478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Birch Allergoid, Tyrosine Adsorbate, Monophosphoryl Lipid A (POLLINEX® Quattro Plus 1.0 ml Birch 100%) is an effective, well-tolerated short course subcutaneous immunotherapy. We performed 2 phase II studies to determine its optimal cumulative dose. METHODS The studies were conducted in Germany, Austria and Poland (EudraCT numbers: 2012-004336-28 PQBirch203 and 2015-000984-15 PQBirch204) using a wide range of cumulative doses. In both studies, subjects were administered 6 therapy injections weekly outside the pollen season. Conjunctival Provocation Tests were performed at screening, baseline and 3-4 weeks after completing treatment, to quantify the reduction in Total Symptom Scores (as the primary endpoint) with each cumulative dose. Multiple Comparison Procedure and Modeling analysis was used to test for the dose response, shape of the curve and estimation of the median effective dose (ED50 ), a measure of potency. RESULTS Statistically significant dose responses (P < .01 & .001) were seen, respectively. The highest cumulative dose in PQBirch204 (27 300 standardized units [SU]) approached a plateau. Potency of the PQBirch was demonstrated by an ED50 2723 SU, just over half the current dose. Prevalence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar for active doses, most being short-lived and mild. Compliance was over 85% in all groups. CONCLUSION Increasing the cumulative dose of PQBirch 5.5-fold from 5100 to 27 300 SU achieved an absolute point difference from placebo of 1.91, a relative difference 32.3% and an increase in efficacy of 50%, without compromising safety. The cumulative dose response was confirmed to be curvilinear in shape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Worm
- Department Campus Charité Mitte; Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Berlin Germany
| | | | - O. Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery; University of Medicine, Mannheim, Germany; Medical Faculty Mannheim; Heidelberg University; Mannheim Germany
- Centre for Rhinology and Allergology; Wiesbaden Germany
| | - R. Mösges
- Hospital of the University of Cologne; Cologne Germany
| | - W. Aberer
- University Hospital Clinic; Graz Austria
| | | | - D. Wessiepe
- Metronomia Clinical Research GmbH; Muenchen Germany
| | - D. Lee
- Bencard Allergie; München Germany
| | | | | | - B. Lees
- Allergy Therapeutics; Worthing UK
| | - S. Zielen
- Clinic for Child and Adolescent Medicine, Allergology, Pneumonology and Cystic Fibrosis; Goethe University Frankfurt am Main; Frankfurt Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sola J, Pedreño Y, Cerezo A, Peñalver-Mellado M. Development and characterization of an allergoid of cat dander for immunotherapy. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2018; 46:491-498. [PMID: 29342409 DOI: 10.1016/j.aller.2017.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2017] [Revised: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergy to cats is a frequent cause of sensitization to indoor allergens and currently there are few alternatives to specific immunotherapy with cat native extracts. The objective is to develop and characterize a new allergoid to increase the tools available for use in clinical practice. METHODS The allergoid cat dander extract (ACD) was developed from a native cat dander extract (NCD) by modification with glutaraldehyde, and the optimal process control was determined by SDS-PAGE, DOT BLOT and determination of free amine groups. The ACD was characterized in protein profile by SDS-PAGE, size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and peptide footprint. The allergenic profile of ACD was determined by immunoblot, IgE CAP inhibition and IgG competition ELISA. The major allergen content in NCD was obtained by the ELISA sandwich protocol and was extrapolated to ACD. RESULTS The control process determined the optimal development of the allergoid. The ACD obtained contains 182.28μg/mg of protein and 11.90μg/mg of Fel d 1. SDS-PAGE and SEC confirmed the presence of high molecular weight proteins in ACD, and the peptide footprint showed the presence of Fel d 1 and Fel d 7. The high degree of polymerization was evidenced with the determination of the reduction of lysine residues in the allergoid, resulting 91.96%. The ACD showed a significant loss of allergenicity respect to NCD, while the IgG-binding capacity was maintained. CONCLUSIONS The ACD obtained presents a good safety profile, so would be a good alternative for treatment of cat allergy.
Collapse
|
23
|
Dávila I, Domínguez‐Ortega J, Navarro‐Pulido A, Alonso A, Antolín‐Amerigo D, González‐Mancebo E, Martín‐García C, Núñez‐Acevedo B, Prior N, Reche M, Rosado A, Ruiz‐Hornillos J, Sánchez MC, Torrecillas M. Consensus document on dog and cat allergy. Allergy 2018; 73:1206-1222. [PMID: 29318625 DOI: 10.1111/all.13391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The prevalence of sensitization to dogs and cats varies by country, exposure time and predisposition to atopy. It is estimated that 26% of European adults coming to the clinic for suspected allergy to inhalant allergens are sensitized to cats and 27% to dogs. This document is intended to be a useful tool for clinicians involved in the management of people with dog or cat allergy. It was prepared from a consensus process based on the RAND/UCLA method. Following a literature review, it proposes various recommendations concerning the diagnosis and treatment of these patients, grounded in evidence and clinical experience. The diagnosis of dog and cat allergy is based on a medical history and physical examination that are consistent with each other and is confirmed with positive results on specific IgE skin tests. Sometimes, especially in polysensitized patients, molecular diagnosis is strongly recommended. Although the most advisable measure would be to avoid the animal, this is often impossible and associated with a major emotional impact. Furthermore, indirect exposure to allergens occurs in environments in which animals are not present. Immunotherapy is emerging as a potential solution to this problem, although further supporting studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I. Dávila
- Allergy Department University Hospital of Salamanca Salamanca Spain
- Institute for Biomedical Research IBSAL Salamanca Spain
- Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences University of Salamanca Salamanca Spain
| | - J. Domínguez‐Ortega
- Allergy Department Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ) Madrid Spain
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES) Madrid Spain
| | - A. Navarro‐Pulido
- Allergology Clinical Management Unit (UGC) El Tomillar Hospital Sevilla Spain
| | - A. Alonso
- Allergy Department Valladolid Medical Alliance Valladolid Spain
| | - D. Antolín‐Amerigo
- Immune System Diseases Department‐Allergy Unit Príncipe de Asturias University Hospital Madrid Spain
- Department of Medicine and medical specialties (IRYCIS) University of Alcalá Madrid Spain
| | | | | | | | - N. Prior
- Allergy Department Severo Ochoa University Hospital Madrid Spain
| | - M. Reche
- Allergy Department Infanta Sofía Hospital Madrid Spain
| | - A. Rosado
- Allergy Unit Alcorcón Foundation University Hospital Madrid Spain
| | | | - M. C. Sánchez
- Allergy Unit Juan Ramón Jiménez Hospital Huelva Spain
| | - M. Torrecillas
- Allergy Department Albacete University General Hospital Complex Albacete Spain
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Orengo JM, Radin AR, Kamat V, Badithe A, Ben LH, Bennett BL, Zhong S, Birchard D, Limnander A, Rafique A, Bautista J, Kostic A, Newell D, Duan X, Franklin MC, Olson W, Huang T, Gandhi NA, Lipsich L, Stahl N, Papadopoulos NJ, Murphy AJ, Yancopoulos GD. Treating cat allergy with monoclonal IgG antibodies that bind allergen and prevent IgE engagement. Nat Commun 2018. [PMID: 29650949 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03636-8.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute allergic symptoms are caused by allergen-induced crosslinking of allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) bound to Fc-epsilon receptors on effector cells. Desensitization with allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) has been used for over a century, but the dominant protective mechanism remains unclear. One consistent observation is increased allergen-specific IgG, thought to competitively block allergen binding to IgE. Here we show that the blocking potency of the IgG response to Cat-SIT is heterogeneous. Next, using two potent, pre-selected allergen-blocking monoclonal IgG antibodies against the immunodominant cat allergen Fel d 1, we demonstrate that increasing the IgG/IgE ratio reduces the allergic response in mice and in cat-allergic patients: a single dose of blocking IgG reduces clinical symptoms in response to nasal provocation (ANCOVA, p = 0.0003), with a magnitude observed at day 8 similar to that reported with years of conventional SIT. This study suggests that simply augmenting the blocking IgG/IgE ratio may reverse allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Orengo
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA.
| | - A R Radin
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - V Kamat
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - A Badithe
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - L H Ben
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - B L Bennett
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - S Zhong
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - D Birchard
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - A Limnander
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - A Rafique
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - J Bautista
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - A Kostic
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - D Newell
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - X Duan
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - M C Franklin
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - W Olson
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - T Huang
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - N A Gandhi
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - L Lipsich
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - N Stahl
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - N J Papadopoulos
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - A J Murphy
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - G D Yancopoulos
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Treating cat allergy with monoclonal IgG antibodies that bind allergen and prevent IgE engagement. Nat Commun 2018; 9:1421. [PMID: 29650949 PMCID: PMC5897525 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03636-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 152] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2017] [Accepted: 02/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute allergic symptoms are caused by allergen-induced crosslinking of allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) bound to Fc-epsilon receptors on effector cells. Desensitization with allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) has been used for over a century, but the dominant protective mechanism remains unclear. One consistent observation is increased allergen-specific IgG, thought to competitively block allergen binding to IgE. Here we show that the blocking potency of the IgG response to Cat-SIT is heterogeneous. Next, using two potent, pre-selected allergen-blocking monoclonal IgG antibodies against the immunodominant cat allergen Fel d 1, we demonstrate that increasing the IgG/IgE ratio reduces the allergic response in mice and in cat-allergic patients: a single dose of blocking IgG reduces clinical symptoms in response to nasal provocation (ANCOVA, p = 0.0003), with a magnitude observed at day 8 similar to that reported with years of conventional SIT. This study suggests that simply augmenting the blocking IgG/IgE ratio may reverse allergy. Allergen-specific immunotherapy is used to treat patients affected by acute immunoglobulin E (IgE) responses, but the function mechanism is unclear. Here the authors show that the administration of two cat allergen-specific IgGs reduces allergic responses in mouse models and helps ameliorate clinical symptoms in a phase 1b clinical trial.
Collapse
|
26
|
Hoover H, Leatherman B, Ryan M, McMains K, Veling M. Evidence-based dosing of maintenance subcutaneous immunotherapy: a contemporary review of state-of-the-art practice. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2018; 8:806-816. [PMID: 29631326 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2017] [Revised: 01/31/2018] [Accepted: 02/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subcutaneous immunotherapy is an effective allergy treatment only if properly dosed. In this article we review the data on the probable effective dose range for subcutaneous immunotherapy and convert the recommended doses into a clinically relevant format. METHODS A comprehensive literature search of dose-response subcutaneous immunotherapy studies was done of EBM databases, Medline database, PreMedline, and the National Guideline Clearinghouse for the period 1980-2016. Recommended doses were converted to the volume of allergen extract that should be added to a 5-mL maintenance vial. RESULTS A safe and effective dose for subcutaneous immunotherapy is likely 5-20 μg of major allergen per injection. A 0.5-mL injection from a 5-mL maintenance vial containing 0.2 mL of manufacturer's extract of each allergen should reach the lower end of the probable effective dose range for most allergens. A larger volume of extract is required to reach that range when treatment includes cat, dog, or only 1 dust mite. Increasing beyond the commonly prescribed 0.2 mL of manufacturer's extract added to a 5-mL treatment vial is reasonable for nearly all allergens to achieve a maintenance dose higher in the probable effective dose range. CONCLUSION Current otolaryngic allergy practice usually escalates patients to 0.5-mL injections from 5-mL maintenance vials containing 0.2 mL of manufacturer's extract of each allergen. With the main exceptions of cat and dog, those injections administered 1 or 2 times per month likely provide an efficacious dose of allergen and are consistent with published guidelines. A larger volume of extract should be considered in certain clinical situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hunter Hoover
- Charlotte Eye Ear Nose and Throat Associates, Charlotte, NC
| | | | - Matthew Ryan
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Kevin McMains
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
| | - Maria Veling
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Virtanen T. Immunotherapy for pet allergies. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2018; 14:807-814. [PMID: 29182437 PMCID: PMC5893203 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1409315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2017] [Revised: 10/27/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Allergic diseases compose a serious challenge for modern societies. Their individual, medical and economical burden is large. As humans spend most of their time indoors, exposure to indoor allergens is a significant contributor to the development of allergic sensitization and respiratory allergies, such as allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma. One important source of indoor allergens are pets, in particular cats and dogs. Allergens from these and other mammals spread effectively and they are encountered widely in public places. If patient education, allergen avoidance and pharmacotherapy do not suffice for controlling the symptoms of pet allergy, allergen immunotherapy can be a treatment option. Current information on allergen immunotherapy in pet allergy suggests that it can be effective in reducing allergic symptoms. However, the low number of high-quality randomized controlled trials of allergen immunotherapy in pet allergy warrants for further investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuomas Virtanen
- University of Eastern Finland, School of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chan SK, Leung DYM. Dog and Cat Allergies: Current State of Diagnostic Approaches and Challenges. ALLERGY, ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH 2018; 10:97-105. [PMID: 29411550 PMCID: PMC5809771 DOI: 10.4168/aair.2018.10.2.97] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2017] [Accepted: 10/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Allergies to dogs and cats affect 10%-20% of the population worldwide and is a growing public health concern as these rates increase. Given the prevalence of detectable dog and cat allergens even in households without pets, there is a critical need to accurately diagnose and treat patients to reduce morbidity and mortality from exposure. The ability to diagnose cat sensitization is good, in contrast to dogs. Component resolved diagnostics of sensitization to individual allergenic proteins will dramatically improve diagnosis. This review focuses on the current state of knowledge regarding allergies to dogs and cats, recent advances, therapies such as subcutaneous immunotherapy, and discusses important areas to improve diagnosis and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanny K Chan
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. USA
| | - Donald Y M Leung
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. USA
- Division of Pediatric Allergy-Immunology, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wise SK, Lin SY, Toskala E, Orlandi RR, Akdis CA, Alt JA, Azar A, Baroody FM, Bachert C, Canonica GW, Chacko T, Cingi C, Ciprandi G, Corey J, Cox LS, Creticos PS, Custovic A, Damask C, DeConde A, DelGaudio JM, Ebert CS, Eloy JA, Flanagan CE, Fokkens WJ, Franzese C, Gosepath J, Halderman A, Hamilton RG, Hoffman HJ, Hohlfeld JM, Houser SM, Hwang PH, Incorvaia C, Jarvis D, Khalid AN, Kilpeläinen M, Kingdom TT, Krouse H, Larenas-Linnemann D, Laury AM, Lee SE, Levy JM, Luong AU, Marple BF, McCoul ED, McMains KC, Melén E, Mims JW, Moscato G, Mullol J, Nelson HS, Patadia M, Pawankar R, Pfaar O, Platt MP, Reisacher W, Rondón C, Rudmik L, Ryan M, Sastre J, Schlosser RJ, Settipane RA, Sharma HP, Sheikh A, Smith TL, Tantilipikorn P, Tversky JR, Veling MC, Wang DY, Westman M, Wickman M, Zacharek M. International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2018; 8:108-352. [PMID: 29438602 PMCID: PMC7286723 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 218] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2017] [Revised: 12/01/2017] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Critical examination of the quality and validity of available allergic rhinitis (AR) literature is necessary to improve understanding and to appropriately translate this knowledge to clinical care of the AR patient. To evaluate the existing AR literature, international multidisciplinary experts with an interest in AR have produced the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR). METHODS Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to AR. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) format as dictated by available evidence and purpose within the ICAR:AR document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:AR document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus. RESULTS The ICAR:AR document addresses over 100 individual topics related to AR, including diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk factors for the development of AR, allergy testing modalities, treatment, and other conditions/comorbidities associated with AR. CONCLUSION This critical review of the AR literature has identified several strengths; providers can be confident that treatment decisions are supported by rigorous studies. However, there are also substantial gaps in the AR literature. These knowledge gaps should be viewed as opportunities for improvement, as often the things that we teach and the medicine that we practice are not based on the best quality evidence. This document aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the AR literature to identify areas for future AR research and improved understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Cezmi A. Akdis
- Allergy/Asthma, Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research, Switzerland
| | | | - Antoine Azar
- Allergy/Immunology, Johns Hopkins University, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Cemal Cingi
- Otolaryngology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Adam DeConde
- Otolaryngology, University of California San Diego, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jan Gosepath
- Otorhinolaryngology, Helios Kliniken Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Jens M. Hohlfeld
- Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Airway Research Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, German Center for Lung Research, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amber U. Luong
- Otolaryngology, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, USA
| | | | | | | | - Erik Melén
- Pediatric Allergy, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
| | | | | | - Joaquim Mullol
- Otolaryngology, Universitat de Barcelona, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Oliver Pfaar
- Rhinology/Allergy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | | | - Carmen Rondón
- Allergy, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, Spain
| | - Luke Rudmik
- Otolaryngology, University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Matthew Ryan
- Otolaryngology, University of Texas Southwestern, USA
| | - Joaquin Sastre
- Allergology, Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jiminez Diaz, Spain
| | | | | | - Hemant P. Sharma
- Allergy/Immunology, Children's National Health System, George Washington University School of Medicine, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - De Yun Wang
- Otolaryngology, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nelson HS, Durham SR. Allergen Immunotherapy for a Teenager with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Due to Grass Pollen: Subcutaneous or Sublingual Route? THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2017; 5:52-57. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2016] [Revised: 10/25/2016] [Accepted: 10/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
31
|
Son JY, Jung MH, Koh KW, Park EK, Heo JH, Choi GS, Kim HK. Changes in skin reactivity and associated factors in patients sensitized to house dust mites after 1 year of allergen-specific immunotherapy. Asia Pac Allergy 2017; 7:82-91. [PMID: 28487839 PMCID: PMC5410415 DOI: 10.5415/apallergy.2017.7.2.82] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2017] [Accepted: 04/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) can significantly improve symptoms and reduce the need for symptomatic medication. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate changes in skin reactivity to house dust mites (HDMs) as an immunologic response and associated factors after 1 year of immunotherapy. Methods A total of 80 patients with allergic airway diseases who received subcutaneous SIT with HDMs from 2009 to 2014 were evaluated. The investigated parameters were basic demographic characteristics, skin reactivity and specific IgE for HDM, serum total IgE level, blood eosinophil counts, and medication score. Results The mean levels of skin reactivity to HDMs, blood eosinophil counts, and medication scores after 1 year were significantly reduced from baseline. In univariate comparison of the changes in skin reactivity to HDMs, age ≤30 years, HDMs only as target of immunotherapy, and high initial skin reactivity (≥2) to HDMs were significantly associated with the reduction in skin test reactivity. In multivariate analysis, high initial skin reactivity and HDMs only as target allergens were significantly associated with changes in skin reactivity to HDMs. In the receiver operating characteristic curve of the initial mean skin reactivity to HDMs for more than 50% reduction, the optimal cutoff value was 2.14. Conclusion This study showed significant reductions in allergen skin reactivity to HDMs after 1 year of immunotherapy in patients sensitized to HDMs. The extent of initial allergen skin reactivity and only HDMs as target allergen were important predictive factors for changes in skin reactivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong-Yeop Son
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan 49267, Korea
| | - Mann-Hong Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan 49267, Korea
| | - Kwang-Wook Koh
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan 49267, Korea
| | - Eun-Kee Park
- Department of Medical Humanities and Social Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan 49267, Korea
| | - Jeong-Hoon Heo
- Department of Molecular Biology & Immunology, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan 49267, Korea
| | - Gil-Soon Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan 49267, Korea
| | - Hee-Kyoo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan 49267, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kappen JH, Durham SR, Veen HI', Shamji MH. Applications and mechanisms of immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis and asthma. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2016; 11:73-86. [PMID: 27678500 DOI: 10.1177/1753465816669662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical and immunologic tolerance are hallmarks of successful allergen immunotherapy (AIT). Clinical benefits such as reduced symptoms, pharmacotherapy intake and improvement of quality of life persist following cessation of treatment. Successful AIT is associated with suppression of allergic inflammatory cells such as mast cells, eosinophils and basophils in target organs. Furthermore, AIT down-regulates type 2 innate lymphoid cells and allergen-specific type 2 T-helper (Th2) cells. The immunologic tolerant state following AIT is associated with the induction of distinct phenotypes of regulatory T-cells (T-regs) including interleukin (IL)-10-, IL-35- and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β- producing T-regs and FoxP3+ T-regs. B-cell responses, including the induction of IL-10+ regulatory B-cells (B-regs) and the production of IgG4-associated blocking antibodies are also induced following successful AIT. These events are associated with the suppression of antigen-specific Th2 responses and delayed immune deviation in favour of Th1 type responses. Insight into the mechanisms of AIT has allowed identification of novel biomarkers with potential to predict the clinical response to AIT and also novel therapeutic strategies for more effective and safer AIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper H Kappen
- Department of Pulmonology, STZ centre of excellence for Asthma & COPD, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Kleiweg 500, 3045 PM, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stephen R Durham
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Hans In 't Veen
- Department of Pulmonology, STZ centre of excellence for Asthma & COPD, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Kleiweg 500, 3045 PM, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mohamed H Shamji
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Chen H, Zhang K, Wang S, Xu C, Zou Z, Tao A. Generation and purification of monoclonal antibodies against Der f 2, a major allergen from Dermatophagoides farinae. Drug Discov Ther 2016; 10:103-8. [PMID: 27210892 DOI: 10.5582/ddt.2016.01029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are needed for the quantitation of environmental allergens for precise diagnosis and immunotherapy. In this study, we produced and purified monoclonal antibodies against Der f 2, one of the major allergens of the house dust mite Dermatophagoides farina, in order to develop an assay for the detection of this allergen. BALB/c mice were immunized four times with the protein Der f 2 together with an adjuvant after which splenocytes were collected and fused with SP2/0 (myeloma cells) in the presence of polyethylene glycol (PEG). The fused cells were selected in the presence of Hypoxanthine-Aminopterin-Thymidine (HAT) and then Hypoxanthine-Thymidine (HT) medium. Positive cells were screened with ELISA and subcloned by limited dilution at least three times to achieve stable mAb-producing clones. Four stable mAb-producing clones were obtained. One clone with IgG1 isotype and another with IgG2b isotype were chosen to produce large amounts of mAb by inoculation of the cells into the abdominal cavity of mice. Ascites were collected and the mAbs were purified using protein A affinity chromatography. Testing of the ascites by ELISA showed the titration of IgG1 and IgG2b to be higher than 1/10(6) dilution. The specificity of both antibodies was confirmed by immunoblotting. Thus, we produced two mAb clones against Der f 2 that can be used to create a precise quantitative method to identify allergen components in dust samples and facilitate further study in Der f 2 component-resolved diagnosis (CRD).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huifang Chen
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, The State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Allergy & Clinical Immunology
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Krouse JH, Krouse HJ. Modulation of Immune Mediators with MQT-based Immunotherapy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 134:746-50. [PMID: 16647528 DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2005] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Assess immune and clinical changes with immunotherapy based on modified quantitative testing (MQT). BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy promotes immunomodulation that occurs over several years. Quantitative testing offers the advantage of initiating immunotherapy with robust antigen concentrations. This study assessed whether changes in immune mediators and allergy symptoms occur rapidly using quantitative techniques. METHODS: Sixteen allergic adults were tested using MQT. Subjects had serum drawn for immunoglobulins E and G4 (IgE, IgG4) to 3 antigens, Der p1, Der f1, and Fel d1, and for interleukins IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-12, and IL-13, and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA). Subjects also completed the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 (SNOT-20), the Allergy Outcome Scale (AOS), and the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI). They underwent MQT-based immunotherapy and completed outcome measures again at 6 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Nine subjects completed the study. Analysis demonstrated significant increases in IgG4 levels to all antigens, significant decreases in serum levels of IL-1β and IL-5, and significant increases in levels of IL-1RA. Improvement was also noted in AOS and RSDI subscales. CONCLUSION: Immunotherapy based on MQT demonstrates significant changes in immunoglobulin and cytokine levels by 12 weeks following initiation. In addition, improvement in symptom and quality-of-life measures occurs by 12 weeks. These findings support the rapid onset of clinical effects with MQT-based treatment of inhalant allergy. EBM rating: C-4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John H Krouse
- School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Epstein TG, Liss GM, Murphy-Berendts K, Bernstein DI. Risk factors for fatal and nonfatal reactions to subcutaneous immunotherapy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2016; 116:354-359.e2. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2015] [Revised: 01/26/2016] [Accepted: 02/02/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
36
|
Orphan immunotherapies for allergic diseases. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2016; 116:194-8. [PMID: 26837608 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.12.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2015] [Revised: 12/28/2015] [Accepted: 12/30/2015] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As confirmed by systematic reviews and meta-analyses, allergen immunotherapy is clinically effective in the treatment of allergic diseases. In particular, subcutaneous immunotherapy is a pivotal treatment in patients with severe reactions to Hymenoptera venom, whereas subcutaneous immunotherapy and sublingual immunotherapy are indicated in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma by inhalant allergens. Other allergies related to animal dander (other than cat, which is the most studied), such as dog, molds, occupational allergens, and insects, have also been recognized. For these allergens, immunotherapy is poorly studied and often unavailable. Thus, use of the term orphan immunotherapies is appropriate. DATA SOURCES We used MEDLINE to search the medical literature for English-language articles. STUDY SELECTION Randomized, controlled, masked studies for orphan immunotherapies were selected. In the remaining cases, the available reports were described. RESULTS The literature on food desensitization is abundant, but for other orphan allergens, such as mosquito, Argas reflexus, dog, or occupational allergens, there are only a few studies, and most are small studies or case reports. CONCLUSION Orphan immunotherapy is associated with insufficient evidence of efficacy from controlled trials, an erroneous belief of the limited importance of some allergen sources, and the unlikelihood for producers to have a profit in making commercially available extracts (with an expensive process for registration) to be used in few patients. It should be taken into consideration that adequate preparations should be available also for orphan allergens.
Collapse
|
37
|
Scadding GW, Eifan A, Penagos M, Dumitru A, Switzer A, McMahon O, Phippard D, Togias A, Durham SR, Shamji MH. Local and systemic effects of cat allergen nasal provocation. Clin Exp Allergy 2015; 45:613-23. [PMID: 25303516 PMCID: PMC4778413 DOI: 10.1111/cea.12434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2014] [Revised: 08/29/2014] [Accepted: 09/01/2014] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Cat allergen is widely distributed in homes and schools; allergic sensitization is common. Objective To develop a model of cat allergen nasal challenge to establish dose–response and time–course characteristics and investigate local and systemic biomarkers of allergic inflammation. Methods Nineteen cat‐allergic individuals underwent titrated nasal challenge, range 0.243 to 14.6 μg/mL Fel d1, and matched diluent‐only provocation. Clinical response to 8 h was assessed by symptom scores and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF). Nasal fluid was collected using polyurethane sponges and analysed by ImmunoCAP and multiplex assays. Whole blood flow cytometry for basophil surface CD63, CD107a, and CD203c was carried out at baseline and 6 h post‐challenge. Results A dose–response to allergen was seen in symptom scores and PNIF, maximal at 10 000 BU/mL (4.87 μg/mL Fel d1), P < 0.0001 vs. diluent. Nasal fluid tryptase was elevated at 5 min after challenge (P < 0.05 vs. diluent); eotaxin, IL‐4, ‐5, ‐9, and ‐13 were increased at 8 h (P < 0.05 to P < 0.0001 vs. diluent); TSLP was undetectable; IL‐10, IL‐17A, and IL‐33 were unchanged compared to diluent challenge. Nasal fluid IL‐5 and IL‐13 correlated inversely with PNIF after challenge (IL‐5, r = −0.79, P < 0.0001; IL‐13, r = −0.60, P = 0.006). Surface expression of CD63 and CD107a was greater at 6 h than at baseline, both in the presence (both P < 0.05) and absence (CD63, P < 0.01; CD107a, P < 0.05) of in vitro allergen stimulation; no changes were seen on diluent challenge day. Conclusions Cat allergen nasal challenge produces local and systemic Th2‐driven inflammatory responses and has potential as a surrogate outcome measure in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G W Scadding
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Larenas Linnemann DES, Blaiss MS. Selection of patients for sublingual versus subcutaneous immunotherapy. Immunotherapy 2015; 6:871-84. [PMID: 25290418 DOI: 10.2217/imt.14.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy is the sole treatment for IgE-mediated allergic diseases directed at the underlying mechanism. The two widely accepted administration routes are sublingual (SLIT) and subcutaneous (SCIT). We reviewed how patients should best be selected for immunotherapy and how the optimal administration route can be defined. Before deciding SCIT or SLIT, appropriate selection of patients for allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is mandatory. To be eligible for AIT, subjects must have a clear medical history of allergic disease, with exacerbation of symptoms on exposure to one or more allergens and a corresponding positive skin or in vitro test. Then the route of administration should be based on: published evidence of clinical and immunologic efficacy (which varies per allergic disease and per allergen); mono- or multi-allergen immunotherapy, for SLIT multi-allergen immunotherapy was not effective; safety: adverse events with SLIT are more frequent, but less severe; and, costs and patient preferences, closely related to adherence issues. All these are discussed in the article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Désirée E S Larenas Linnemann
- Hospital Médica Sur, Torre 2, cons.602, Puente de Piedra 150, Colonia Toriello Guerra, Delegación Tlalpan, 14050 México D.F., México
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Islam AD, Selmi C, Datta-Mitra A, Sonu R, Chen M, Gershwin ME, Raychaudhuri SP. The changing faces of IgG4-related disease: Clinical manifestations and pathogenesis. Autoimmun Rev 2015; 14:914-22. [PMID: 26112170 DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2015] [Accepted: 06/09/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Since the earliest reports in 2001, immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related disease has been defined as an autoimmune systemic disease characterized by the lymphoplasmacytic infiltration of affected tissues leading to fibrosis and obliterative phlebitis along with elevated serum IgG4 levels. Prior to this unifying hypothesis, a plethora of clinical manifestations were considered as separate entities despite the similar laboratory profile. The pathology can be observed in virtually all organs and may thus be a challenging diagnosis, especially when the adequate clinical suspicion is not present or when obtaining a tissue biopsy is not feasible. Nonetheless, the most frequently involved organs are the pancreas and exocrine glands but these may be spared. Immunosuppressants lead to a prompt clinical response in virtually all cases and prevent histological sequelae and, as a consequence, an early differential diagnosis from other conditions, particularly infections and cancer, as well as an early treatment should be pursued. We describe herein two cases in which atypical disease manifestations were observed, i.e., one with recurrent neck lymph node enlargement and proptosis, and one with jaundice. Our understanding of the pathogenesis of IgG4-related disease is largely incomplete but data support a significant role for Th2 cytokines with the contribution of innate immunity factors such as Toll-like receptors, macrophages and basophils. Further, macrophages activated by IL4 overexpress B cell activating factors and contribute to chronic inflammation and the development of fibrosis. We cannot rule out the possibility that the largely variable disease phenotypes reflect different pathogenetic mechanisms and the tissue microenvironment may then contribute to the organ involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arshia Duza Islam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of California Davis, School of Medicine, Davis, CA, USA; VA Medical Center Sacramento, Mather, CA, USA
| | - Carlo Selmi
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy; BIOMETRA Department, University of Milan, Italy
| | | | - Rebecca Sonu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, School of Medicine, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Mingyi Chen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, School of Medicine, Davis, CA, USA
| | - M Eric Gershwin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of California Davis, School of Medicine, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Siba P Raychaudhuri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of California Davis, School of Medicine, Davis, CA, USA; VA Medical Center Sacramento, Mather, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Scadding GW, Eifan AO, Lao‐Araya M, Penagos M, Poon SY, Steveling E, Yan R, Switzer A, Phippard D, Togias A, Shamji MH, Durham SR. Effect of grass pollen immunotherapy on clinical and local immune response to nasal allergen challenge. Allergy 2015; 70:689-96. [PMID: 25773990 PMCID: PMC4826905 DOI: 10.1111/all.12608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/08/2015] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Rationale Nasal allergen provocations may be useful in investigating the pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis and effects of treatments. Objective To use grass pollen nasal allergen challenge (NAC) to investigate the effects of allergen immunotherapy in a cross‐sectional study. Methods We studied nasal and cutaneous responses in untreated subjects with seasonal grass‐pollen allergic rhinitis (n = 14) compared with immunotherapy‐treated allergics (n = 14), plus a nonatopic control group (n = 14). Volunteers underwent a standardized NAC with 2000 biological units of timothy grass allergen (equivalent to 1.3 μg major allergen, Phl p5). Nasal fluid was collected and analysed by ImmunoCAP and multiplex assays. Clinical response was assessed by symptom scores and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF). Cutaneous response was measured by intradermal allergen injection. Retrospective seasonal symptom questionnaires were also completed. Results Immunotherapy‐treated patients had lower symptom scores (P = 0.04) and higher PNIF (P = 0.02) after challenge than untreated allergics. They had reduced early (P = 0.0007) and late (P < 0.0001) skin responses, and lower retrospective seasonal symptom scores (P < 0.0001). Compared to untreated allergics, immunotherapy‐treated patients had reduced nasal fluid concentrations of IL‐4, IL‐9 and eotaxin (all P < 0.05, 8 h level and/or area under the curve comparison), and trends for reduced IL‐13 (P = 0.07, area under the curve) and early‐phase tryptase levels (P = 0.06). Conclusions Nasal allergen challenge is sensitive in the detection of clinical and biological effects of allergen immunotherapy and may be a useful surrogate marker of treatment efficacy in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G. W. Scadding
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
| | - A. O. Eifan
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
| | - M. Lao‐Araya
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
| | - M. Penagos
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
| | - S. Y. Poon
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
| | - E. Steveling
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
| | - R. Yan
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
| | - A. Switzer
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
| | | | - A. Togias
- The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Bethesda MDUSA
| | - M. H. Shamji
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
| | - S. R. Durham
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Curin M, Weber M, Thalhamer T, Swoboda I, Focke-Tejkl M, Blatt K, Valent P, Marth K, Garmatiuk T, Grönlund H, Thalhamer J, Spitzauer S, Valenta R. Hypoallergenic derivatives of Fel d 1 obtained by rational reassembly for allergy vaccination and tolerance induction. Clin Exp Allergy 2015; 44:882-94. [PMID: 24552249 DOI: 10.1111/cea.12294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2013] [Revised: 10/30/2013] [Accepted: 02/05/2014] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The major cat allergen Fel d 1 represents one of the most important respiratory allergens. Aim of this study was to engineer recombinant Fel d 1 derivatives with reduced IgE reactivity and preserved T cell epitopes for vaccination and tolerance induction. METHODS Seven recombinant mosaic proteins were generated by reassembly of non-IgE-reactive peptides of Fel d 1 which contained the sequence elements for induction of allergen-specific blocking IgG antibodies and T cell epitopes. Mosaic proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli using codon-optimized synthetic genes and compared with Fel d 1 regarding structural fold by circular dichroism, IgE-binding capacity, activation of allergic patients' basophils and ability to induce allergen-specific blocking IgG antibodies upon immunization. RESULTS Although each of the mosaic proteins had lost the alpha-helical fold typical for Fel d 1, a strong reduction in IgE reactivity as well as allergenic activity in basophil activation assays was only obtained for three constructs, two reassembled fragments (Fel d 1 MB, Fel d 1 MC) and a fusion of the latter two (Fel d 1 MF) in which the cysteines of Fel d 1 MC were replaced by serines. Immunization of rabbits with Fel d 1 MB, MC and MF induced high levels of IgG antibodies that inhibited IgE reactivity of cat-allergic patients to Fel d 1 in a comparable manner as IgG induced with the wild-type allergen. CONCLUSIONS We report the development of hypoallergenic reassembled Fel d 1 proteins suitable for vaccination and tolerance induction in cat-allergic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Curin
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Allergy Research, Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Leitlinie zur (allergen-)spezifischen Immuntherapie bei IgE-vermittelten allergischen Erkrankungen. ALLERGO JOURNAL 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s15007-014-0707-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
43
|
Umehara H, Nakajima A, Nakamura T, Kawanami T, Tanaka M, Dong L, Kawano M. IgG4-related disease and its pathogenesis-cross-talk between innate and acquired immunity. Int Immunol 2014; 26:585-95. [PMID: 25024397 PMCID: PMC4201844 DOI: 10.1093/intimm/dxu074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
IgG4-RD, a novel disease involving many immune-system components IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a novel clinical entity proposed in Japan in the 21th century and is attracting strong attention over the world. The characteristic manifestations of IgG4-RD are increased serum IgG4 concentration and tumefaction by IgG4+ plasma cells. Although the clinical manifestations in various organs have been established, the pathogenesis of IgG4-RD is still unknown. Recently, many reports of aberrant acquired immunity such as Th2-diminated immune responses have been published. However, many questions still remain, including questions about the pathogenesis of IgG4-RD and the roles of IgG4. In this review, we discuss the pathogenesis of IgG4-RD by focusing on the cross-talk between innate and acquired immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hisanori Umehara
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Immunology, Kanazawa Medical University, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinada-machi, Kahoku-gun, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan Department of Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan Present address: Department of Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Akio Nakajima
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Immunology, Kanazawa Medical University, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinada-machi, Kahoku-gun, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan
| | - Takuji Nakamura
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Immunology, Kanazawa Medical University, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinada-machi, Kahoku-gun, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan
| | - Takafumi Kawanami
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Immunology, Kanazawa Medical University, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinada-machi, Kahoku-gun, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan
| | - Masao Tanaka
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Immunology, Kanazawa Medical University, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinada-machi, Kahoku-gun, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan
| | - Lingli Dong
- Department of Hematology and Immunology, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, China
| | - Mitsuhiro Kawano
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8641, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Holland CL, Samuels KM, Baldwin JL, Greenhawt MJ. Systemic reactions to inhalant immunotherapy using 1:1 target dosing. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2014; 112:453-8. [PMID: 24631183 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2013] [Revised: 02/17/2014] [Accepted: 02/17/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 2007 immunotherapy practice parameters advocate maintenance dosing at 1:1 (1:20 maintenance concentrate). There is limited literature exploring the effect of 1:1 dosing on the rate of systemic reactions to subcutaneous immunotherapy (SRITs). OBJECTIVE To investigate the effects of 1:1 dosing on SRITs in a large, academic practice. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all nonvenom and noncluster SRITs that occurred between 2005 and 2011. SRITs that occurred from August 2008 through December 2011, postparameter dosing (post-PD) was initiated, were compared to SRITs that occurred from January 2005 to July 2008 with preparameter dosing (pre-PD) using 1:50 as a maintenance concentrate. RESULTS A total of 269 SRITs occurred in a 7-year period. Significantly more post-PD SRITs (131 of 38,548 injections) occurred than pre-PD SRITs (132 of 52,833 injections) (0.34% vs 0.25%, P = .01). However, when excluding 44 SRITs that occurred in established pre-PD patients transitioned to post-PD, there was no significant difference in SRIT rate (0.25% vs 0.22%), World Allergy Organization (WAO) grade, or SRIT time to onset. Nonred (non-1:1) vials accounted for a significantly larger proportion of all post-PD SRITs compared with all pre-PD SRITs (50.7% vs 31.1%, adjusted P = .009). Prior SRITs were reported less frequently among persons with post-PD SRITs (29.2% vs 70.8%, adjusted P = .009). In an adjusted logistic regression model, male sex (odds ratio, 7.9; 95% CI, 2.4-26) and longer time to reaction onset (odds ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.89-0.99) were associated with higher WAO severity grade reactions. CONCLUSION Pre-PD vs post-PD SRIT rates were not significantly different, adjusting for patients transitioned from established pre-PD to post-PD. This finding suggests that post-PD is as safe as pre-PD. Male sex and faster time to reaction onset were associated with higher WAO grade reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine L Holland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, The University of Michigan Medical School and the University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Kiela M Samuels
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, The University of Michigan Medical School and the University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; School of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - James L Baldwin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, The University of Michigan Medical School and the University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Matthew J Greenhawt
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, The University of Michigan Medical School and the University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Okamoto Y, Ohta N, Okano M, Kamijo A, Gotoh M, Suzuki M, Takeno S, Terada T, Hanazawa T, Horiguchi S, Honda K, Matsune S, Yamada T, Yuta A, Nakayama T, Fujieda S. Guiding principles of subcutaneous immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis in Japan. Auris Nasus Larynx 2014; 41:1-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2013.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2013] [Revised: 06/11/2013] [Accepted: 09/27/2013] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
46
|
Feng S, Xu Y, Ma R, Sun Y, Luo X, Li H. Cluster subcutaneous allergen specific immunotherapy for the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9:e86529. [PMID: 24489740 PMCID: PMC3904879 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2013] [Accepted: 12/10/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although allergen specific immunotherapy (SIT) represents the only immune- modifying and curative option available for patients with allergic rhinitis (AR), the optimal schedule for specific subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is still unknown. The objective of this study is to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of cluster SCIT for patients with AR. Methods By searching PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane clinical trials database from 1980 through May 10th, 2013, we collected and analyzed the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cluster SCIT to assess its efficacy and safety. Results Eight trials involving 567 participants were included in this systematic review. Our meta-analysis showed that cluster SCIT have similar effect in reduction of both rhinitis symptoms and the requirement for anti-allergic medication compared with conventional SCIT, but when comparing cluster SCIT with placebo, no statistic significance were found in reduction of symptom scores or medication scores. Some caution is required in this interpretation as there was significant heterogeneity between studies. Data relating to Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) in 3 included studies were analyzed, which consistently point to the efficacy of cluster SCIT in improving quality of life compared to placebo. To assess the safety of cluster SCIT, meta-analysis showed that no differences existed in the incidence of either local adverse reaction or systemic adverse reaction between the cluster group and control group. Conclusion Based on the current limited evidence, we still could not conclude affirmatively that cluster SCIT was a safe and efficacious option for the treatment of AR patients. Further large-scale, well-designed RCTs on this topic are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaoyan Feng
- Allergy and Cancer Center, Otorhinolarygology Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Otolaryngology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China
| | - Ying Xu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Renqiang Ma
- Allergy and Cancer Center, Otorhinolarygology Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yueqi Sun
- Allergy and Cancer Center, Otorhinolarygology Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xi Luo
- Allergy and Cancer Center, Otorhinolarygology Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huabin Li
- Allergy and Cancer Center, Otorhinolarygology Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Pfaar O, Bachert C, Bufe A, Buhl R, Ebner C, Eng P, Friedrichs F, Fuchs T, Hamelmann E, Hartwig-Bade D, Hering T, Huttegger I, Jung K, Klimek L, Kopp MV, Merk H, Rabe U, Saloga J, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Schuster A, Schwerk N, Sitter H, Umpfenbach U, Wedi B, Wöhrl S, Worm M, Kleine-Tebbe J, Kaul S, Schwalfenberg A. Guideline on allergen-specific immunotherapy in IgE-mediated allergic diseases: S2k Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the Society for Pediatric Allergy and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the Austrian Society for Allergy and Immunology (ÖGAI), the Swiss Society for Allergy and Immunology (SGAI), the German Society of Dermatology (DDG), the German Society of Oto- Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), the German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), the Society for Pediatric Pneumology (GPP), the German Respiratory Society (DGP), the German Association of ENT Surgeons (BV-HNO), the Professional Federation of Paediatricians and Youth Doctors (BVKJ), the Federal Association of Pulmonologists (BDP) and the German Dermatologists Association (BVDD). ALLERGO JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL 2014; 23:282-319. [PMID: 26120539 PMCID: PMC4479478 DOI: 10.1007/s40629-014-0032-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 245] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The present guideline (S2k) on allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) was established by the German, Austrian and Swiss professional associations for allergy in consensus with the scientific specialist societies and professional associations in the fields of otolaryngology, dermatology and venereology, pediatric and adolescent medicine, pneumology as well as a German patient organization (German Allergy and Asthma Association; Deutscher Allergie- und Asthmabund, DAAB) according to the criteria of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, AWMF). AIT is a therapy with disease-modifying effects. By administering allergen extracts, specific blocking antibodies, toler-ance-inducing cells and mediators are activated. These prevent further exacerbation of the allergen-triggered immune response, block the specific immune response and attenuate the inflammatory response in tissue. Products for SCIT or SLIT cannot be compared at present due to their heterogeneous composition, nor can allergen concentrations given by different manufacturers be compared meaningfully due to the varying methods used to measure their active ingredients. Non-modified allergens are used for SCIT in the form of aqueous or physically adsorbed (depot) extracts, as well as chemically modified allergens (allergoids) as depot extracts. Allergen extracts for SLIT are used in the form of aqueous solutions or tablets. The clinical efficacy of AIT is measured using various scores as primary and secondary study endpoints. The EMA stipulates combined symptom and medication scores as primary endpoint. A harmonization of clinical endpoints, e. g., by using the combined symptom and medication scores (CSMS) recommended by the EAACI, is desirable in the future in order to permit the comparison of results from different studies. The current CONSORT recommendations from the ARIA/GA2LEN group specify standards for the evaluation, presentation and publication of study results. According to the Therapy allergen ordinance (TAV), preparations containing common allergen sources (pollen from grasses, birch, alder, hazel, house dust mites, as well as bee and wasp venom) need a marketing authorization in Germany. During the marketing authorization process, these preparations are examined regarding quality, safety and efficacy. In the opinion of the authors, authorized allergen preparations with documented efficacy and safety, or preparations tradeable under the TAV for which efficacy and safety have already been documented in clinical trials meeting WAO or EMA standards, should be preferentially used. Individual formulations (NPP) enable the prescription of rare allergen sources (e.g., pollen from ash, mugwort or ambrosia, mold Alternaria, animal allergens) for specific immunotherapy. Mixing these allergens with TAV allergens is not permitted. Allergic rhinitis and its associated co-morbidities (e. g., bronchial asthma) generate substantial direct and indirect costs. Treatment options, in particular AIT, are therefore evaluated using cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses. From a long-term perspective, AIT is considered to be significantly more cost effective in allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma than pharmacotherapy, but is heavily dependent on patient compliance. Meta-analyses provide unequivocal evidence of the efficacy of SCIT and SLIT for certain allergen sources and age groups. Data from controlled studies differ in terms of scope, quality and dosing regimens and require product-specific evaluation. Therefore, evaluating individual preparations according to clearly defined criteria is recommended. A broad transfer of the efficacy of certain preparations to all preparations administered in the same way is not endorsed. The website of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (www.dgaki.de/leitlinien/s2k-leitlinie-sit; DGAKI: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allergologie und klinische Immunologie) provides tables with specific information on available products for AIT in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. The tables contain the number of clinical studies per product in adults and children, the year of market authorization, underlying scoring systems, number of randomized and analyzed subjects and the method of evaluation (ITT, FAS, PP), separately given for grass pollen, birch pollen and house dust mite allergens, and the status of approval for the conduct of clinical studies with these products. Strong evidence of the efficacy of SCIT in pollen allergy-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in adulthood is well-documented in numerous trials and, in childhood and adolescence, in a few trials. Efficacy in house dust mite allergy is documented by a number of controlled trials in adults and few controlled trials in children. Only a few controlled trials, independent of age, are available for mold allergy (in particular Alternaria). With regard to animal dander allergies (primarily to cat allergens), only small studies, some with methodological deficiencies are available. Only a moderate and inconsistent therapeutic effect in atopic dermatitis has been observed in the quite heterogeneous studies conducted to date. SCIT has been well investigated for individual preparations in controlled bronchial asthma as defined by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2007 and intermittent and mild persistent asthma (GINA 2005) and it is recommended as a treatment option, in addition to allergen avoidance and pharmacotherapy, provided there is a clear causal link between respiratory symptoms and the relevant allergen. The efficacy of SLIT in grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis is extensively documented in adults and children, whilst its efficacy in tree pollen allergy has only been shown in adults. New controlled trials (some with high patient numbers) on house dust mite allergy provide evidence of efficacy of SLIT in adults. Compared with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, there are only few studies on the efficacy of SLIT in allergic asthma. In this context, newer studies show an efficacy for SLIT on asthma symptoms in the subgroup of grass pollen allergic children, adolescents and adults with asthma and efficacy in primary house dust mite allergy-induced asthma in adolescents aged from 14 years and in adults. Aspects of secondary prevention, in particular the reduction of new sensitizations and reduced asthma risk, are important rationales for choosing to initiate treatment early in childhood and adolescence. In this context, those products for which the appropriate effects have been demonstrated should be considered. SCIT or SLIT with pollen or mite allergens can be performed in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis using allergen extracts that have been proven to be effective in at least one double-blind placebo-controlled (DBPC) study. At present, clinical trials are underway for the indication in asthma due to house dust mite allergy, some of the results of which have already been published, whilst others are still awaited (see the DGAKI table "Approved/potentially completed studies" via www.dgaki.de/Leitlinien/s2k-Leitlinie-sit (according to www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu)). When establishing the indication for AIT, factors that favour clinical efficacy should be taken into consideration. Differences between SCIT and SLIT are to be considered primarily in terms of contraindications. In individual cases, AIT may be justifiably indicated despite the presence of contraindications. SCIT injections and the initiation of SLIT are performed by a physician experienced in this type of treatment and who is able to administer emergency treatment in the case of an allergic reaction. Patients must be fully informed about the procedure and risks of possible adverse events, and the details of this process must be documented (see "Treatment information sheet"; available as a handout via www.dgaki.de/Leitlinien/s2k-Leitlinie-sit). Treatment should be performed according to the manufacturer's product information leaflet. In cases where AIT is to be performed or continued by a different physician to the one who established the indication, close cooperation is required in order to ensure that treatment is implemented consistently and at low risk. In general, it is recommended that SCIT and SLIT should only be performed using preparations for which adequate proof of efficacy is available from clinical trials. Treatment adherence among AIT patients is lower than assumed by physicians, irrespective of the form of administration. Clearly, adherence is of vital importance for treatment success. Improving AIT adherence is one of the most important future goals, in order to ensure efficacy of the therapy. Severe, potentially life-threatening systemic reactions during SCIT are possible, but - providing all safety measures are adhered to - these events are very rare. Most adverse events are mild to moderate and can be treated well. Dose-dependent adverse local reactions occur frequently in the mouth and throat in SLIT. Systemic reactions have been described in SLIT, but are seen far less often than with SCIT. In terms of anaphylaxis and other severe systemic reactions, SLIT has a better safety profile than SCIT. The risk and effects of adverse systemic reactions in the setting of AIT can be effectively reduced by training of personnel, adhering to safety standards and prompt use of emergency measures, including early administration of i. m. epinephrine. Details on the acute management of anaphylactic reactions can be found in the current S2 guideline on anaphylaxis issued by the AWMF (S2-AWMF-LL Registry Number 061-025). AIT is undergoing some innovative developments in many areas (e. g., allergen characterization, new administration routes, adjuvants, faster and safer dose escalation protocols), some of which are already being investigated in clinical trials. Cite this as Pfaar O, Bachert C, Bufe A, Buhl R, Ebner C, Eng P, Friedrichs F, Fuchs T, Hamelmann E, Hartwig-Bade D, Hering T, Huttegger I, Jung K, Klimek L, Kopp MV, Merk H, Rabe U, Saloga J, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Schuster A, Schwerk N, Sitter H, Umpfenbach U, Wedi B, Wöhrl S, Worm M, Kleine-Tebbe J. Guideline on allergen-specific immunotherapy in IgE-mediated allergic diseases - S2k Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the Society for Pediatric Allergy and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the Austrian Society for Allergy and Immunology (ÖGAI), the Swiss Society for Allergy and Immunology (SGAI), the German Society of Dermatology (DDG), the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), the German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), the Society for Pediatric Pneumology (GPP), the German Respiratory Society (DGP), the German Association of ENT Surgeons (BV-HNO), the Professional Federation of Paediatricians and Youth Doctors (BVKJ), the Federal Association of Pulmonologists (BDP) and the German Dermatologists Association (BVDD). Allergo J Int 2014;23:282-319.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Pfaar
- />Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
- />Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- />Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, An den Quellen 10, 65189 Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Claus Bachert
- />Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Albrecht Bufe
- />Department of Experimental Pneumology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Roland Buhl
- />Pulmonary Department, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christof Ebner
- />Outpatient Clinic for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Eng
- />Department of Children and Adolescent Medicine, Aarau and Children‘s Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Frank Friedrichs
- />Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine Practice, Laurensberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Fuchs
- />Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Eckard Hamelmann
- />Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Pediatric Center Bethel, Evangelical Hospital, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Hering
- />Pulmonary Outpatient Practice, Tegel, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isidor Huttegger
- />Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Salzburg Regional Hospitals, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - Ludger Klimek
- />Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Matthias Volkmar Kopp
- />Clinic of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Lübeck University, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Lung Center (DZL), Lübeck, Germany
| | - Hans Merk
- />Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Uta Rabe
- />Department of Allergology, Johanniter-Krankenhaus im Fläming Treuenbrietzen GmbH, Treuenbrietzen Germany, Treuenbrietzen, Germany
| | - Joachim Saloga
- />Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Antje Schuster
- />Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Nicolaus Schwerk
- />University Children’s hospital, Department of Pediatric Pneumology, Allergology and Neonatology, Hanover Medical University, Hannover, Germany
| | - Helmut Sitter
- />Institute for Theoretical Surgery, Marburg University, Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Bettina Wedi
- />Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venereology, Hannover Medical University, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Margitta Worm
- />Allergy-Centre-Charité, Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Susanne Kaul
- />Division of Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Langen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Nanda A, Wasan AN. Clinical assessment of allergen immunotherapy with differing doses of horse extract. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2013; 112:76. [PMID: 24331400 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2013] [Revised: 09/24/2013] [Accepted: 10/14/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anil Nanda
- Asthma and Allergy Center, Lewisville, Texas; Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Esch RE, Plunkett GA. Immunotherapy preparation guidelines, rules, and regulation. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2013; 13:406-13. [PMID: 23722699 DOI: 10.1007/s11882-013-0358-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy has been used to treat allergic diseases for more than 100 years. In the U.S., the preparation of diagnostic and therapeutic extracts requires the cooperation of the extract manufacturer, who provides the individual allergen concentrates, and the practicing physician who formulates, dilutes, and administers the final patient-specific treatment extract. The guidelines, rules, and regulations for these activities have been established and continue to be developed as progress is made. The molecular characterization and standardization of allergenic extracts has allowed for improvements in defining the potency of these products. In turn, these advances have led to improved dosing regimens and formulation practices. This review will describe in detail some of these interactions and will identify issues that require more attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert E Esch
- Greer Laboratories, 639 Nuway Circle, Lenoir, NC 28645, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
Rush and cluster immunotherapy schedules are accelerated immunotherapy build-up schedules. A cluster immunotherapy schedule involves the patient receiving several allergen injections (generally 2-4) sequentially in a single day of treatment on nonconsecutive days. The maintenance dose is generally reached in 4-8 weeks. In rush immunotherapy protocols, higher doses are administered at 15- to 60-min intervals over a 1- to 3-day period until the maintenance dose is achieved. This review will serve as an update for accelerated immunotherapy schedules. The review will include recent investigations demonstrating the safety of cluster schedules in atopic dermatitis, pediatric patients, and inhalant allergen mixtures and an accelerated protocol utilizing an infusion pump for allergen delivery. There has also been further elucidation on the immunological changes which occur during accelerated immunotherapy. Finally, new studies analyzing systemic reaction risk factors are discussed.
Collapse
|